baths?row:bookshelves falsity,adjures?confounding …

1) Game works because it taps into fundamental circuitry in a woman’s brain, and

2) Most guys are too lazy to do what it takes to become good at game.

Reason #2 is most important. I mean, EVERYONE knows how to be trim and fit (eat less and exercise more). But few have the self-discipline to do it. The reality is, getting good at game requires discipline and commitment, which are in short supply with a large chunk of humanity.

Australia needs us.

T. AKA Ricky Raw’s last blog post: Reader Email – Book Suggestions.

“The only thing you can’t fake is supreme confidence…”

Sure you can fake it…you have to start somewhere. But eventually it’ll become real. And I view it not so much as “confidence” as there’s really nothing to be scared of anyway.

in a superfeminized culture like sweden’s it doesn’t surprise me at all that the game would be a big deal. the connection between the neutering of a culture’s males via feminist orthodoxy and their embrace of game should be obvious.

roissy’s last blog post: The Worst Bars In DC For Pickup.

T. AKA Ricky Raw’s last blog post: Reader Email – Book Suggestions.

You must also consider that, every year, the population of new women to the bars refreshes itself with new fish, and the old ones leave the herd. The game ends when the PU-world focuses its attention on girls under 21 that, by the time they hit the bars, they are all desensitized.

I’m glad I’m not doing the seduction stuff anymore. Once you realize that when all of your efforts to game women is nothing more than a drawn-out form of supplication to women, that is to say, learning how to get them to like you in ways not natural to your person, you begin to look at other Pick-up artists differently. And then, you realize this holds true for yourself. I won’t dis pickiing up chicks in this manner, but I do dislike the idea that beta-males who put on all of that cocky-funny armor can talk trash about other beta males who just haven’t read a few mass e-mails from DeAngelo.

The “conversational threads” is my favorite part of your book because that is where things naturally stall. He establishes contact and conversation, they find each other physically mutually attractive and wham……………..uncomfortable silence too early in early game because his mind’s hazy and he temporarily runs out of good things to say. Having three or four personal stories that portray alphaness in the bank that one can always pull out, or four or five converstational starters that he can thread off of, can string together the converstation long enough for the player to keep building vibe without resorting to asking trite things that are so overused.

Women would have been clueless to game, but by going on television and talk shows he (and Strauss in his TV appearances) told the whole world that guys are using a sophisticated psychologically calibrated “sales pitch” delivered as a converstatino that has been tested over and over as an effective way to “mood scam” women into bed with men they wouldn’t ordinarily sleep with, especially on the first date.

Now, so many women no doubt know “of” game, they probably are suspicious that every guy out there is running it on them. Some will no doubt be a little wary.

I think the “neg” and some of the psychological tests could be instruments in game where a guy might stand a chance of getting caught. The strawberry test (which sounded terrific in your book BTW), if its the second time she has heard it, is going to alert her that at the least that its (TST) is something that guys talk about in frats as a way to mindfuck a girl into her panties. The cube and the marryfuckkill might also become clichesque if even one major womens magazine that girls read at the hairdressers publishes a story and mentions it. Through the girlnetwork many of the women will find out about the psychological tests that guys can run in game and anything like that that you pull out and run might make her very suspicious that your entire enteraction could have been somewhat scripted.

I suppose it depends on the girl, and if she minds feeling that she has been mood scammed vs. how much she has enjoyed your company.

For ROOSH, THE BIGGEST AND BEST ATTRIBUTE OF YOUR BOOK IS THAT CONCEPT OF “CONVERSTATIONAL THREADS” AND HAVING STORIES AND MATERIAL BASED ON YOUR REAL EXPERIENCE,

as long as they don’t find out about the new hidden gem with the unbeatable ratio in adams morgan.

roissy’s last blog post: There Is No Such Thing As A Bar Girl.

namaste’s last blog post: Dilly Man.

I’ve been seeing a chic for most the year so I’m not “out there” right now. But if I were, I think I’d use the angle of interesting+funny+confident+non-needy”. In fact I think just fun + confident will do at core because “funny” when it comes down to it is just a quick way to indicate to a girl that you a fun and entertaining person to be around, that you would bring some value to her life.

There has to be better places to meet girls though than bars and clubs. Maybe it’s time to focus on day game. Girls are probably way less defensive.

I guess the size, multiple floors and solid collection of 6’s make it a great practice place.

Jackgoesforth’s last blog post: Foreigners Put JGF On Tilt.

Dick Goodnuts’s last blog post: Good Morning – Kanye West & Takashi Murakami.