I thought of this question after reading Schopenhauer’s essay On Women. Is their main purpose in life to push papers in an office? To become fans of pop music? Addicts of smartphones? Mindless consumers of corporate brands?

No, it’s simply to reproduce.

Quick—name a female scientist besides Marie Curie. Name a female artist during the Renaissance. Name a famous female architect or Nobel Prize winner. Women have been quiet in the history of the world not because of male privilege, but because they’re not designed to achieve. The advantage that nature has given them concerns solely their appearance.

[Nature] has provided her with superabundant beauty and charm for a few years at the expense of the whole remainder of her life, so that during these years she may so capture the imagination of a man that he is carried away into undertaking to support her honorably in some form or another for the rest of her life, a step he would seem hardly likely to take for purely rational considerations.

A woman loses her beauty during motherhood because it’s superfluous to her existence. For every MILF you encounter there are 100 mothers whose drab appearance would not even breach your consciousness. Western women, through their stupidity and lack of self-control, have rebuked nature’s call of taking advantage of those few years of beauty by staying fat and masculine for their entire lives. It’s too little, too late when she’s unable to attract decent men in her mid 30s or silence the call of her genes telling her to become a mother. She will remain barren, a failure in life.

I’ve always said that even shy and young girls have a competence of game that would rival that of experienced men who are much older. Female game, in the form of cunning, manipulation, lying, and charm, is hard-wired into their genetics. While some men are also born with such skills, most have to learn it through trial and error. Men of the past have found it much easier at becoming skilled at a specific trade and earning money in order to land a wife than to compete with women in the game arena. But when having a good job is no longer sufficient, like it is today, the arduous process of becoming competent at game must be undertaken. The demand for game advice has become so great that it has spawned its own industry in several countries, the first time that has happened in world history.

[Women] are sexus sequior, the inferior second sex in everything respect: one should be indulgent towards their weaknesses, but to pay them honour is ridiculous beyond measure and demeans us even in their eyes.

This is a fact that white knights will never understand. As any game practitioner knows, a woman does not respect you if you respect her. Call this sad or unfortunate but that’s the reality of human nature. Women do not like you if you attribute value to them that is not actually there. Complimenting a woman beyond her appearance, such as on her personality, courage, intelligence, or what have you, is a sure-fire way to not sleep with her. Even complimenting her beauty has become dangerous. Do so at your own peril and be hated by your penis for all eternity.

That the property which has cost men long years of toil and effort, and been won with so much difficulty, should afterwards come into the hands of women, who then, in their lack of reason, squander it in a short time, or otherwise fool it away, is a grievance and a wrong as serious as it common, which should be prevented by limiting the right of women to inherit.

There is a reason why a woman’s vagina was locked up and guarded in ancient times until marriage: she could not be trusted with her sexual choices. Look at a modern woman’s sexual behavior and ask yourself who is gaining from her promiscuity. Alpha men are gaining. She’s wasting the few years of beauty she has to fuck them with absolutely no commitment or strings, and soon will be left alone, without a provider, and nothing to show for her prime years of beauty besides HPV and a bitter attitude. Ancient practices were followed to specifically avoid this outcome, no matter how “misogynist” they are to the modern feminist cunt.

There is no point in wasting any more energy worrying about their plight. They made their bed and will now lie in it while sucking off the alpha she just met in the bar. Having game, being alpha, and understanding the true nature of women allow today’s man to be harem masters of the past. I’m enjoying this party to no end, but one day the music will stop. And then I’ll adapt again.

Related Posts You May Like: Rubber Ducks I Bought A New Desk Not That Important The Sweet Spot Real Man Travel Guides

Game Tips Newsletter: I send out a biweekly email newsletter with subjects such as How To Handle Flakey Girls, 7 Tips For Incredible First Dates, How To Pick Up Girls In Coffee Shops, The Reason Why She Isn't Calling You Back, and much more. Learn how to subscribe.

Truth..

As for the Madame Curie comment, one anecdote I read about her was that she refused to have a wedding dress, unless it was practical enough to be worn in the lab after the wedding. Forget how smart or hard working she was to achieve what she did — that anti-bridezilla attitude would put her at 1 in a million women on its own.

People will laugh at this post, but it is so damn true. I can’t get over how women have no fear and no sense of urgency when it comes to finding a husband. Trolling the dating scene in your mid-30′s is like gambling in a casino on a line of credit….stupid….bad management and highly risky. I hope your number comes up on that roulette table.

I mean why would women wait? The beauty and gift they are given to this world is the ability to have children and to create a family. But, nope, they will only do that with a dude who doesn’t give a shit about them.

It’s pretty comical if you see it for face value.

A scary and real look at women in the 21st century. Good post.

Bingo on all counts.

“Complimenting a woman beyond her appearance, such as on her personality, courage, intelligence, or what have you, is a sure-fire way to not sleep with her. Even complimenting her beauty has become dangerous. ”

do you mean this in everyday life or even during a pickup? because in the latter there comes a point where you do have to hit on girls, where you do have to make them pass through hoops to impress you. you never talk about qualification in your works yet it’s probably the important thing in pickup

To simply state a woman’s only merit is that they can reproduce would be a bit cold hearted on any person who has ever felt the embrace of a quality woman.

Yes, your time of having the comfort may not exist for long without game, but there is much wonder in the nature, or rather, the true nature of woman. Woman was created to aid man, to nurture the species and to supplement the man. What would the world be like without the lure of our favorite plaything? When women were proper, they would take care of all the things man didn’t have time for so he could focus on progressing the world forward.

The entire human timeline has not been like it is now. People haven’t always been conditioned their entire lives. People are more than just conditions. In a natural society without the constant fear mongering, constantly competition for mind conditioning(this includes feminists), woman would be a wonderful companion, lover, partner to life.

When a woman can understand her true ways, and wants to take up life as a side to her alpha male, she will be happier than ever, he will be happy, and he will be successful.

A good example is a scientist I am very fond of by the name of Dr. Alexander Shulgin. He is a living legend, a pharmacologist, an organic chemist and his wife is his personal research partner and also a well known psychologist (which is, in fact, a very good job for a professional woman.)

I understand the need to bend mens will to snap them out of their programming for the pedastalization of women, but when you lose sight of the prize and focus only on the journey, it makes people wonder why you are doing it in the first place.

Wow, this post goes to the core of this whole website and the modern man’s dilemma when it comes to the opposite sex.

Good post, Roosh.

What if you compliment a woman on her ability to perform at a feminine hobby, such as sewing or playing a musical instrument?

Women’s terrible aging process is one of the greatest gifts of nature. Whenever I approah a very sexy woman, I always tell myself, she’s going to look like shit in 7-10 years. Thanks to “pedo” hysteria against men, the de facto age of female consent around the world is now 18, so an 18 year old girl has at the very most, 7-10 more years of beauty left in her. If you dare to date any girl younger than 18, they (the feminazis and police thugs) can fuck up your life for doing something as harmless as taking a sexy photo of your girlfriend or having her send one to you. So the age of consent in your state might be 16 years old, but is it worth the risk of being charged with “child” porn and being a pedophile or child molester because your 16 year old ex-girlfriend decides to report you for that nude photo she sent you when you were still together? Stand up and change the laws, men. Stand. Up. And. Fight. Back. Against these draconian feminist laws.

“Quick—name a female scientist besides Marie Curie. ”

Her father was her first teacher, her husband helped her immensely and was instrumental in her getting the physics Nobel. She reproduced, more than once. This was much much before the grrrl power feminism.

“As any game practitioner knows, a woman does not respect you if you respect her. ”

Respect the men who made her so.

“You need only look at the way in which she is formed, to see that woman is not meant to undergo great labor, whether of the mind or of the body.”

The thing being that today women can use men’s inventions to look like men, copy their behavior in assertiveness seminars, and read up on Newton’s theory of gravity and yet don’t think of his ‘shoulders of giants’ quote, even though they aren’t looking any farther.

Let there be light
….and there was light

Roosh…if you definitely come down on one side of the nature vs. nurture debate in your quest against feminism, you will unleash a pandora’s box.

Race relations will dramatically change as a result of “music stopping,” on feminism. Be careful what you wish for.

I’m reading a book about female artists during the Renaissance. Just because you can’t name them and are ignorant of art history, doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Many of them had their names painted over with credit taken by famous male artists of that time.

I hope you never have a daughter. And I’m so sorry for your mother. This kind of warped, bitter, anti-social view must make her cry at night.

Artemisia Gentileschi

Very well written.

This blog does to women, everything you hate done to men.
I’m sure I can dig up a few underground man-hater sites that match your views word for word.

Question, if you hate women so much, why do you spend your life trying to win them? Your entire career is based on it.

You are right, when you aren’t 30 anymore, you WILL have to adapt. And PRAY that she can’t google your name.

I don’t think the “name a female painter/scientist/etc” from ancient times is a fair measure. You probably can’t name many minority men from those times, due to fewer opportunities and openness then.

The big change I see in society is that men are losing in a big way. Look at numbers like unemployment (2/3 male), university graduation rates (2/3 female), or prisoners (92% male). Men are falling behind when it comes to achievement. I suppose you can say they’re all beta and blame the feminists, but that doesn’t really solve the problem.

@ Justin

If men are losing big time, women will lose big time eventually. After all, who are society’s electricians, plumbers, captains of industry, construction workers, soldiers in combat, innovators, etc….

If men don’t give a shit about society more and more, society will eventually go to shit. Name a single major civilization in history that did not have strong men leading it? Name one that did not have its roots in patriarchy? Name one which women lead?

Ancient Rome? Ancient China? Napoleonic France? The Byzantine Empire? Ancient India? Pre-feminist America?

ALL of them have been lead by men in patriarchal setups. The only matriarchies in this world are small, village-sized societies. I bet you can’t even name a rich, strong country that has its roots in matriarchal rule.

Please, men have run the world for all of history and make civilization go. Without men working hard, we’re all fucked, including the women.

If things don’t change in the US and men have little to no interest in contributing to society, I guarantee you our society will fall in 20-30 years max. The deficits, financial problems, economics problems and obesity are just symptoms and the tip of the iceberg, buddy.

I’ll be enjoying decline from Asia.

Name a female scientist besides Marie Curie? That’s easy– Nancy Hopkins (if she’s recovered by now from swooning over Larry Summers’s talk.)
There was also a friend of mine’s ex-girlfriend. She could do physics and math better than most guys, but what was interesting was that the other girls gave her a wide berth. They didn’t seem to hate her, it just seemed that they saw her as being different and didn’t have much to do with her.

This is the money quote: “Women have been quiet in the history of the world not because of male privilege, but because they’re not designed to achieve.”

Women are capable of hard work. They are capable of achievement that comes through hard work.

Where women pale in comparison to men is their ability to take risks, start businesses, explore oceans, conquer nature, innovate and create. They simply aren’t wired that way.

Sure, some women can — and do — achieve and innovate great things. But they are few and far between and the exception proves the rule.

It is men that propel civilization forward through industry, innovation, invention. Men are willing to die to explore and achieve. Men are willing to risk poverty and failure to start businesses. Women by nature are conservative and risk averse.

This is just the role nature gave men and women. Men, who are expendable, take risks and move society forward. Women, far less expendable, guard the population of the race.

After all, 1 man and 100 women can have over 500 babies. 100 men and 1 woman can have at most 10 babies. Do the math.

Schopenhauer on love:

It’s nothing personal.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeFQsF-umH0

@moses
Talking about how expendable men are…..that’s a great point.

“After all, 1 man and 100 women can have over 500 babies. 100 men and 1 woman can have at most 10 babies. Do the math.”

@Boheme

I agree — men are the risk-takers and are vital to the economy. However, the % of risk-takers versus worker bees needed is relatively low. Men seem to be losing the worker bee part of the race.

Men are NOT expendable:

I’d rather see 10 QUALITY children be raised in a village with lots of men versus a 500 ghetto trash babies being raised in a village of single mothers with very few men around. Anyone who thinks a healthy society is all about the numbers is clearly retarded. Human beings aren’t furry little rabbits. A society of single mothers = chaotic violent trash

roosh, sometimes you just knock it out of the park.

A fucking plus.

“Having game, being alpha, and understanding the true nature of women…”

BEING alpha or BECOMING alpha?

Wow, Im gettin a littl philosophical here….to BE or not to BE, lol…

great post by the way. This is the Mature Roosh I was looking for. Approaching Sade

@19
“After all, 1 man and 100 women can have over 500 babies. 100 men and 1 woman can have at most 10 babies. Do the math.”

That would make sense if the human species was worrying about being extinct. There are over 7 billion people on earth now. If a few women end up not having any babies it won’t be a big deal.

Thanks SID for the Shopenhauer video. Part 2 is even better. Following his ideas, Night game would only have one single purpose: making a baby!

We should be grateful to Roosh for helping our species, but going raw should become the rule :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZRivYwt17Y&feature=related

16 Justin
2 hours, 4 minutes ago
I don’t think the “name a female painter/scientist/etc” from ancient times is a fair measure.

1) Statement of fact:
You probably can’t name many minority men from those times,

2) Alleged Cause of facet:
due to fewer opportunities and openness then.

Statement #1 seems factual to me; vaccines, the integrated circuit, calculus, the transistor, discovery of sanitation ( Semmelweiss), light bulb, telephone,–all were White or Asian men.

Your alleged cause– I think that these White guys were, while inventing all this shit, also oppressing an equal amount of Black geniuses and preventing them from equal inventiveness, may or may not be true. I don’t there’s any way to prove the case.

All we have are the inventions that exist, and the facts that White men created almost all the most important inventions of civilization ( Also the lovely atom bomb and Spanish Inquisition too!)

That’s cool, we still have Jon Coltrane and jimi Hendrix, the foremost geniuses of American Music; and the great Martin Luther King, the advanced proponent of non-violence and human harmony.

It’s not like we don’t all get something from each other.

This is a verbatim intro to a profile on a major online dating website that I copied and pasted – welcome to the world of American women. The chick is about a 6 on a 1-10 scale. Good luck sweet pea. Wish I could upload her photo.

—

I have focused on my career for many years, assuming I would naturally meet someone along the way. Since that has not happened, I am trying to take a proactive approach to meeting people, while continuing to get out more and focusing on hobbies and interests in my limited free time.

My favorite people are funny, caring, have integrity, are hard-working, and are what I consider good-hearted. Those are traits I deem important because I’m proud of them in me.

While I’ve been very narrow in my ‘type’ in the past, I’m learning that there are a lot of great people I’ve missed that I shouldn’t have passed up. I can be hesitant about making the first move and reaching out to someone, but I do think that it’s important to get out there as much as possible and meet new people.

The chick above is 35 by the way. 35 and probably weight in at 150 lbs.

Schopenhauer on Love:

http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/essays/chapter10.html

wow, 35, i’m surprised her profile doesn’t sound more desperate.

To 28 deepcov3r

We have a ton of Chinese and Indian men creating new breakthroughs and advancing cutting edge industry today. They’re doing this both in Western labs and back in their home country. So the white man doesn’t have a monopoly on high-tech innovation anymore, it’s just that women, all white, yellow, brown and black of them, still aren’t creating shit except babies. A formal education never stopped all colors of men from inventing, in the past, and in the present. China was the most technologically advaned country in the middle ages before Rennaisances. So for you to say only white men invent shit, is dishonest, but for you to say women don’t invent shit, is true.

The history is full of female rulers. Cleopatra, Nefertiti, Queen Victoria, Catherine the Great, Queen Isabel to name a few. As for the modern times, the legendary Golda Meir, Benazir Butto, Corason Aquino, Margaret Thatcher, Queen Elizabeth II, Queen Beatrice are a few to name.

There are a load of female scientists who won the Nobel, they are just not famous as Madame Curie, but there is a considerable number. Here is a list of female scientists who won the Nobel prize:

The Nobel Prize in Physics
1963 Maria Goeppert Mayer
1903 Marie Curie

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry
2009 Ada E. Yonath
1964 Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin
1935 Irène Joliot-Curie
1911 Marie Curie

The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
2009 Elizabeth H. Blackburn
2009 Carol W. Greider
2008 Françoise Barré-Sinoussi
2004 Linda B. Buck
1995 Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard
1988 Gertrude B. Elion
1986 Rita Levi-Montalcini
1983 Barbara McClintock
1977 Rosalyn Yalow
1947 Gerty Cori

Check this link for the full list of other Nobel winners, including literature:

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/women.html

I am not saying all women should be scientists or engineers and compete with men. A lot of women are definitely cut to be housewives, some are awesome school teachers (studies show women are better suited than men for teaching preschool and elementary) and a few are cut to be scientists, researchers and engineers. The nobel laurate list above is not small by any means.

I guess reducing women to housewives and breeding vessels has to do with culture. Some European cultures had shield maidens and female warriors. Spartans put their daughters through vigorous physical training and taught them how to fight, cause they believed a true Spartan warrior could only be born to a Spartan mother. They did not raise their women to be submissive house slaves.

Ancient Norse culture had Valkyries and war maidens, one of their main deities was a goddess of war. Same goes for the ancient Greeks whose hunting deity was a goddess. There are hunting and war goddesses in heathen religions (including Hinduism).

Some Caucasian (meaning the people from Caucasia region west of Caspian Sea) and Black Sea tribes teach their daughters how to ride horses and wield weapons (even in this day and age), their women cook and clean and raise children of course, but they are not reduced to subservient slaves by any means. My mother was a working mother, she cooked us fresh meals from scratch every day and kept a career, she also made most of our childhood clothes from scratch, made fruit preserves and home canned food, crocheted pillowcases and tableclothes, all of that while working full time until retirement age. I have Scandinavian, German, American girlfriends who have full time jobs and feminine hobbies such as sewing and crocheting. Lazy TV culture and consumerism is the main reason urban American women don’t pursue anything other than their job. having a full time job is no excuse for being a lazy ass. There are lots of women around the world who can keep a job and run a household.

You folks are judging all women based on a bunch of cutthroat feminazis and drunken bar sluts in urban concrete jungles. Have any of you ever been to places like Iowa, Wisconsin, rural Texas?

I personally know quite a few American girls who stay chaste until marriage, in this day and age. My American girlfriends all know how to cook, knit, sew, crochet, make home canned fruit preserves, and all of them have a college degree or working on getting one. And no, they aren’t all fatties, most of them have normal BMI.

Using the testosterone ridden cutthroat bitches of urban jungles who are brainwashed by Cosmopolitan and retarded HBO shows as an example to stereotype 150 million+ women is just plain illogical.

Maybe it’s time y’all take off those blinders and go on road trip through the corn fields… Just sayin’!

SIF, right on the money. MIdwestern women are far more feminine than east coast bitches.

Yes, there are highly accomplished women in the field of mathematics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_mathematicians

Wikipedia is a good resource on this. Search for female scientists, inventors, pioneers, etc.

you will see a boatload.

@ Sif

I hope you realize that those “good girls” have the same feminist brainwashing that our culture spews out on a daily basis. There’s a high probability those girls will get fat after marriage and change for the worse. Besides, why bother when the divorce laws will screw men over so badly?

Our country is in decline. It’s best to hasten the process and rebuild afterwards. Getting hitched because you think it’s still relevant in this day and age is retarded.

There are very few marriageable women left.

WORLD CLASS ACCOMPLISHED WOMEN

1. Hypatia of Alexandria
(355 or 370 – 415) – Greek – philosopher, astronomer, mathematician – She was the salaried head of the Neoplatonic School in Alexandria, Egypt, from the year 400. Her students were pagan and Christian young men from around the empire. She was killed by a mob of Christians in 415, probably inflamed by the bishop of Alexandria,

2. Elena Cornaro Piscopia
(1646-1684) – Italian (Venice) – mathematician, theologian – She was a child prodigy who studied many languages, composed music, sang and played many instruments, and learned philosophy, mathematics and theology. Her doctorate, a first, was from the University of Padua, where she studied theology. She became a lecturer there in mathematics.

3. Maria Agnesi
(1718-1799) – Italian (Milan) – mathematician – Oldest of 21 children and a child prodigy who studied languages and math, she wrote a textbook to explain math to her brothers which became a noted textbook on mathematics. She was the first woman appointed a university professor of mathematics, though there’s doubt she took up the chair.

4. Sophie Germain
(1776-1830) – French – mathematician – She studied geometry to escape boredom during the French Revolution when she was confined to her family’s home, and went on to do important work in mathematics, especially her work on Fermat’s Last Theorem.

5. Mary Fairfax Somerville
(1780-1872) – Scottish and British – mathematician – known as the “Queen of Nineteenth Century Science,” she fought family opposition to her study of math, and not only produced her own writings on theoretical and mathematical science, she produced the first geography text in England.

6. Ada Lovelace (Augusta Byron, Countess of Lovelace)
(1815-1852) – British – mathematician – The only legitimate daughter of Byron, the poet, her translation of an article on Charles Babbage’s Analytical Engine includes notations (three-fourths of the translation!) that describe what later became known as a computer and as software. In 1980, the Ada computer language was named for her.

7. Charlotte Angas Scott
(1848-1931) – English, American – mathematician, educator – Raised in a supportive family that encouraged her education, Charlotte Angas Scott became the first head of the math department at Bryn Mawr College. Her work to standardize testing for college entrance resulted in the formation of the College Entrance Examination Board.

8. Sofia Kovalevskaya
(1850-1891) – Russian – mathematician – She escaped her parents’ opposition to her advanced study by a marriage of convenience, moving from Russia to Germany and, eventually, to Sweden, where her research in mathematics included the Koalevskaya Top and the Cauchy-Kovalevskaya Theorem.

9. Alicia Stott
(1860-1940) – English – mathematician – She translated Platonic and Archimedean solids into higher dimensions, taking years at a time away from her career to be a homemaker.

10. Amalie Emmy Noether
(1882-1935) – German, Jewish, American – mathematician – Called by Albert Einstein “the most significant creative mathematical genius thus far produced since the higher education of women began,” Noether escaped Germany when the Nazis took over, and taught in America for several years before her unexpected death.

[Roosh: Was it hard to research this list since Wikipedia is down?]

I usually dig your posts Roosh, but this one is a fail.

What happens if we follow these ideas to their logical conclusion? Won’t be long before we’re talking about the “master race” and doing cartwheels because our father’s father was a great man.

The best part – those same German philosophers catalyzing these posts built the ideological framework that lead to National Socializm. And we all know how that went. So, like The Rationalist mentioned above… do we really want to open up that Pandora’s box?

props for the open discussion in the comments today.

your last comment though strikes me a little off….you say : “I’m enjoying this party to no end, but one day the music will stop.”

me thinks the host doth protest too much. are you really enjoying this “party” to no end?

as a game practitioner, i enjoyed the services of many females riding the carousel. but ultimately i was dismayed at the current state of affairs, depressed at the outcomes and really hopeless about the future.

there really truly is more to life than just banging bitches.

and roosh, really? are you that happy where you are doing what you’re doing right now?

We are not “inferior” to you. We need eachother.

Not every invention man has created has been good anyway, it would have been better for the planet if we had stayed in the trees and still hunted with bows.

Lol at sif and GENTLEMEN

Compare those lists to an equivalent list about men. You may as well be weighing a feather against an anvil. Honestly, you are really scrapping the barrel. How many of those women have you actually heard of before you scrambled to wikipedia to try and hold up your weak argument? Could you name their contributions without having to look it up first? I doubt it.

Look up the list of inventions by women. It is embarrassingly short.

Sure, some women have made some contributions to civilisation. But considering that women make up 50% of the population, they haven’t really done squat. Roosh’s point still stands.

Roosh, I like the way you advocate mens rights but some of your posts are starting to get as blatantly biased as the feminist nonsense from the other side.

Not all women are dimwitted sluts.Plenty of women contribute meaningful work to society and help fill the tax coffers.Some are low lifes for sure but the same goes for men.

I dont see a big problem with some women not having children.The world is overpopulated as it is.As long as the geneticly blessed ones are having kids and the ugly ones miss out who cares?

Why so cranky lately? And you have always confused respecting women with being a beta faggot. You were a beta faggot when you were younger and women wouldn’t even fart on you. Now you are convinced that women didn’t like you because you were too nice to them. Newsflash dickfag, women want to be respected and they also want to feel protected from danger. The sooner you realize that, the sooner you will be able to spend more than 3 weeks with a woman from a non 3rd world country. Suck it, tits.

margaret thatcher was a badass…i’m pretty sure she and reagan single-handedly defeated communism with ninja karate and free market capitalism

chicks can do awesome shit too. i don’t feel like less of a man for saying that

Getting better with women is something I’ve been attempting for a while now and Roosh has been a good influence on me in that pursuit…

…but it’s sad to have to dig through the sexist material to get to the worthwhile reads. I’m beginning to feel sorry for him. He sounds like he’s trying to constantly paper-over a whole lot of hurt underneath. These hate pieces are evidence of that.

What will he be left with when this “party” is over? It’s a question I find myself asking more and more.

Women have a dual purpose ..pushing men too is their thing. What about ambitious men throughout history? They have always been self motivated but married to “pushy women”.Eleanor Roosevelt, Hilary Clinton, Michelle Obama, Maria Shriver,etc. in our culture. Have any of these men settled with women who were not highly ambitious themselves? Look at CEO’s, Athletes, Entertainers..most have un-attractive pushy wives.

As a long time fan of the casanova exploits of our handsome narrator, I can’t help but agree with people who are put off by the lines of thinking recently. It’s just… sad.

But, I’m still naive enough to hope this is just a build up to the real revelation, when Roosh meets a woman he respects and loves. One who understands and nurtures him like no other, bolsters his best qualities and improves his worst, births his offspring and suffers his follies with grace.

Good luck in love, no matter what form it finally takes.

Nikola Tesla inherited his inventor genes from his mother, who was well known for inventing tools in their village. He was greatly influenced by his mother. If she wasn’t an illiterate village housewife, I’m sure she’d be like her son. The only reason women didn’t contribute as much to science and and technology is cause they were oppressed by the male dominated Judeo-Christian religions. Healers were predominantly female in heathen Europe until Christianity came along and restricted practicing medicine to men for centuries.

@Boheme Chinois: not all women get fat after marfiage and childbirth. Rural women do gardening, and cook healthy homemade foods. They don’t have drive thru fast food joints in rural towns of the Midwest. Excessive driving culture and lack of physical activity, combined with the widely available cheap junk food is what makes people (not just women) fat. Male obesity rate is higher than or equal to female obesity in most states. Where there are fat women, there are fat men. Blame the poor/nonexistent mass transit system, suburban drive-thru lifestyle, the fast food joints and the high fructose corn syrup for the rampant obesity.

If you find a gal who has hobbies like hiking, backyard gardening or rock climbing, you won’t have to worry about her gaining weight. Upper middle class and health nut types don’t get fat. When I go to whole foods, I don’t see any morbidly obese whales. Most women shopping there (a lot of them with children in tow) are pretty thin. And this is in one of the fattest cities in the continental US.

@ ‘All women are feminists’ pessimists: Let me help you get a grip on reality. Homemaking and cooking magazines sell far more than Cosmopolitan and celebrity gossip magazines.

Here is the 2011 magazine circulation figures for the USA:

Better Homes and Gardens(#3 national best seller) 7,648,900
Good Housekeeping 4,336,711
Woman’s Day(cooking&homemaking): 3,895,814
Family Circle 3,816,958
Ladies’ Home Journal: 3,267,239
Taste of Home: 3,235,718
Cosmopolitan: 3,032,211
Southern Living (cooking&homemaking magazine): 2,830,178
Parenting: 2,227,351

If most American women are dumb bar sluts, masculine feminiazis, sex&the city wannabes and career freak spinsters, who is buying these millions of good housewife magazines?

The circulation of Better Homes and Gardens is a whopping 7,648,900. More than twice the circulation of Cosmopolitan.

Solid evidence says most American women are not feminists or sex&the city wannabes, in fact most American women are good homemakers or aspiring to be so.

Like I said, take a road trip and get to know your own country before making assumptions based on the small environment you’re exposed to. It’s a HUGE country.

Want a traditional lifestyle with a traditional homemaker wife? Get out of NYC, Chicago, DC. You really don’t have to go to 3rd world countries, but you can’t expect your good tratitional wife to not get corrupted in an urban sprawl environment. Even if you bring a 3rd world woman over, she’ll become just as corrupted by the feminazi programming. Don’t want ltr or marriage and just bang away? Go right ahead, who’s stopping you? But if you are a true PUA, why all the bitching about American women? Just go to whatever foreign country and bang away.

@43

great posting Dan

@45

You think women should be respected for any genetic beauty they are given? Lmao what a dope gtfo

You probably worship athletes too

This post kills. Dark, despairing Roosh is great. This is where playing the chicks’ game takes you and I for one am interested in seeing what happens in your grand experiment my brother…

I think you spend too much time in bars. I see women everywhere taking care of their kids, cooking, pursuing hobbies that have nothing to do with Sex and the City, volunteering, taking care of aging parents. And they are American. And not all are fat.

“WORLD CLASS ACCOMPLISHED WOMEN”

how many of them helped by men to get these accomplishments? That they were born in high-society and of being associated with these men?
And how many of them had these accomplishments wildly exaggerated by the stupid feminists in their zeal for ‘female role models’? If they were men, you’d never heard of many of them.

Like

“Ada Lovelace”

“her translation of an article on Charles Babbage’s Analytical Engine includes notations (three-fourths of the translation!) ”

Read up on it, it’s embarrassing to include her in that list. To be fair, she died young.

(If it’s hard to find it in the multitude of pages celebrating her as the first programmer, here it is

http://www.true-equality.net/archive/2010/07/08/ada-lovelace-was-not-the-first-computer-programmer.aspx)

Or how many men you don’t get to hear about in the name of gender equality of popularity?

“Maxwell is considered by many physicists to be the 19th-century scientist who had the greatest influence on 20th-century physics. His contributions to the science are considered by many to be of the same magnitude as those of Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein.”

Or Pierre Curie who was undoubtedly a much better scientist than his wife.

Roosh, its pretty much just to have children otherwise there really isn’t any purpose in nature.

http://thecaptainpower.blogspot.com/2012/01/listening-to-your-parents-can-ruin-your.html

It saddens me to think we have around the world an education system that produces people that think like this. This is why democracy struggles, not because of the informed, but because of the uninformed. I do not know how many of you have come to your conclusions as rational, intelligent adults.

Firstly, this post is not a hate post, other than feminists. This post does not hate women…

@42 Cocoon – “We are not “inferior” to you. We need eachother.”

He doesn’t say women are an inferior gender. He says women are inferior scientists, mathematicians and engineers.

He does says men need women, we need them as mothers and wives. Your strengths are in nuturing and kindness, exploit optimal value out of that, rather than aspiring to be inferior scientisis to men.

@44 Magnum – “Plenty of women contribute meaningful work to society and help fill the tax coffers”

Raising children to be happy and enhancing their development is meaningful work. tax cofferss… hmm not so much. Adding to the quarterly profit for Apple, l’Oreal or Encorpera (thanks Elmer) is pretty meaningless.

This is what feminists have stated. That raising children and being a wife that makes husbands happy has no value.

I agree there is no pay cheque, but I value it more than any number of additional TV’s, a second car in the drive way and a vast number of material crap that a wife’s income pays for.

I, and probably a lot of men here, want women to add maximum value, and that is as good wives and mothers.

@45 Anonymous – “Newsflash dickfag, women want to be respected and they also want to feel protected from danger.”

Do you want to be taken serious? Are you blind to real world actions?

If women wanted to be respected and protected, then compliment and cuddle would have sold exponentially moe than Bang. Soldiers would be the most sought after spouses, not Wall St exces and male celebrities.

Not a single man in the world who attracts and seduces large numbers of women is someone who announces loudly respect for women, or offers to protect them.

And this is where a lesson needs to be drawn. as a cognitive function, it makes sense that such a man is a good mating partner. Your brain can deduce that, but it is NOT an element of attraction, which is an emotion drawn from a more primal source.

A protecting man who respects you _IS A GOOD MAN_, but by itself is not something that is attractive to women.

Roosh displays anger towards the fact we have lost this piece of knowledge when he says…

‘she could not be trusted with her sexual choices. Look at a modern woman’s sexual behavior and ask yourself who is gaining from her promiscuity’

Women are increasingly pursuing their primal triggers of attraction, rather than good men.

It is not hate on women, just the feminist ideal.

Came to see the short storm in the comments section. Was not disappointed. Seriously tho, this MRA stuff is basically Jezabel for dudes.

@57, Really.What about nurses,child care workers,dental assistants,secretaries,school teachers,vetenary assistants,aged care workers,waitresses,retail workers ect.ect.

What do you want them all to do? hide in the cupboard untill they have children.There are some jobs that are best suited to woman.Big deal.Their tax dollars help.

I’m getting sick of hearing about men blaming women for turning into pussies.Men have no one to blame but themselves.

There would be no Steve Jobs without Wozniak.

That is one overlooked reason why there are not as many famous women—-Women can’t work with other women in business because we would prefer to work with our husbands (like Madame Curie)

Very few famous people do it alone. Men are more cooperative than women.

Also you are missing the contributions women have made to Womanly Subjects. Though Thomas Edison and Henry Ford are the defacto ultimate Heros…there are great women that contributed to our society in their own ways..Agatha Christie is the one on my lips currently.

Also…raising children takes a lot of time and a lot of focus.

Posts like these actually strengthen the feminist mindset because you Devalue the Contribution of Women as badly as they do.

“The only thing they are good for is raising children”

*Sneer Contempt Snicker*

Yeah…that attitude among men is going to help marriage and increase the birthrate.

I wonder how many successful men there would be if their mothers had ignored them. There wouldn’t even be language development if women didn’t spend all day doting over their children pointing out objects.

And because women spend all day pointing out objects, that leaves less time to be in a lab going over DNA sequences.

Roosh this is an awful post!!! You just handed it all to the feminists on a silver platter!

From an evolutionary perspective males are motivated to mate with females who provide a higher likelihood of a larger patrilineage.

Historically there has not been a high level of differentiation of skills or assets that females bring to the table that impact this.

Think about it: if your wife is a great cook you’ll enjoy your meals more, but will it increase the chances of your children living a long life and multiplying?

Now, if your wife is attractive, then your female children are likely to be attractive. Therefore you sons’ peers will want to reproduce with your female children.

As a thought experiment, imagine a world where the concept of female attractiveness does not exist. Then imagine that in the next iteration of that world 1% of the male population comes to a general consensus on female attractiveness and its desirability as a result of random mutation. All other factors being equal, males in the 99% who are are not part of this consenus are genetically inventivised to mate with the females that the 1% of men find attractive simply because these women’s children will have a higher likelihood of being taken care of by a male due to the 1% of men who are biased towards those female qualities.

The sum total is that the reason you care about the physical attractiveness of women is that this is a factor that influences the mating decisions of other men. But this is no cultural delusion. You are not a follower. You are simply maximizing for your female offspring’s ability to reproduce.

You may call your female children the player’s curse, but they carry your DNA the same as as your male children.

I’m not arguinig they shouldn’t work, that they should be locked up in cupboards until they are prepared to conceive. It is a strawman argument.

But the assertion was “Is their main purpose in life to push papers in an office?” or any degree of unfulfilling task.

No species that doesn’t view reproduction as a main purpose is successful. A biological truth is that women are the ones designated this role, so despite feminist rhetoric, I can’t see how this isn’t there main purpose, or it isn’t the MOST valuable thing a woman can do.

It is cultural conditioning that says cluttering up a closet full of shoes and handbags you won’t use more than 10 times is ‘success’.

Now, with the aspects that go with child rearing, obviously this has evolved traits such as kindness and nuturing upon women. Thus it makes them well suited to tasks such as nursing, school teachers and aged care workers, but I can’t agree they are tasks of equal value to raising her own children. They should definately be subordinate to raising her own children.

Your second iteration regarding tax shows little understanding of economics and this forum really isn’t the place to expand on it.

And lastly, your charge of inadequacy towards ‘men blaming women for turning them into pussies’. Again, more than anything, I am saddened about education, your comprehension is severely.

How have you read everything above and concluded that this is the common theme here? It can’t be a rational conclusion.

Who the fuck is Marie Curie?

March is women’s history month, and I’m always fascinated at how lame women’s contributions to history have been. Take away the “first woman to do [activity x that men have been doing for decades] and there’s nothing left. Well behaved women rarely make history, nor do poorly behaved ones.

Keep spitting that truth, Roosh.

@60 Tits – “The only thing they are good for is raising children”

Does it not bother you that you can read a body of text, ignore what it says and come to a totally different conclusion about what the author stated?

He says women are optimal for raising children, biology dictates that. Just as I am a mammal and I break gaseous oxygen, I do not think “I am only good for breathing oxygen” because I can’t breathe through water like a fish.

It then seems absurd for a woman to deny her optimal traits so she can push paper and consume the latest iCrap from apple.

@61 Tits – “There wouldn’t even be language development if women didn’t spend all day doting over their children pointing out objects.”

Can I ask you, do you feel any cognitive dissonance here?

Would that statement not suggest that women who nuture children, in such a way you just described, are doing the greatest service? Achieving the greatest success? markedly more meaningful and successful that consuming Gucci and Benneton?

Or do you suggest that a woman who throws away a pair of shoes she bought in 2005 for $700 ‘cuz like, it’s totally…so out of style!’, and worn 8 times thinks to herself “I’m glad I conditioned myself to pursue a career so I can afford fashion, more than being a mother!”

Roosh, when are you going to write the bang for girls book?

@ T@ A man,You are saddened about my lack of education?

Boo Hoo.

Let me guess…you’re a billionaire brain surgeon while simutaneously holding down part time jobs in nuclear physics and aeronautical engineering.

All the while banging supermodels on the side.Your word is gospel.I wont ever question you again.

Some of the fruitcakes on here are becoming as delusional as the femnazis on the other team.

“@ T@ A man,You are saddened about my lack of education?

Boo Hoo.

Let me guess…you’re a billionaire brain surgeon while simutaneously holding down part time jobs in nuclear physics and aeronautical engineering.

All the while banging supermodels on the side.”

I never alluded to anything remotely close to that so why delve into a world of histronics?

It saddens me because, by the example you have set here in this thread’ lack any critical thought or comprehension.

You’ve laid charges that people here espouse denying women the right to work. That hasn’t occured.

Then to have your argument devolve into comparisons with feminazis shows you find it difficult to maintain a rational frame.

“Your word is gospel.I wont ever question you again.”

The purpose of debate is to challenge and be challenged. You’re challenging themses that don’t exist and now act petulant and throw your toys out of the cot because you are challenged.

If those are your responses, then what are trying to accomplish here?

My man Roosh, this has nothing to do with this post, but it’s important. It has to do with the boner test. I would post on the boner test page, but it’s old and I want you to KNOW that I am thankful for that article.

I met a girl who is maybe a 6. I’m not going to lie, I think I’m like a 9 in terms of male attractiveness (which includes things like $ and career and game). She gives me raging boners, more so than the “hot” girls. I had a great day with her and went home, and my friends were kind of like “WTF.” I thought about ending it with her, but she was so sweet, nice, feminine, kind, uncunty, and as I said, boner-inspiring. This weekend I’m going to take her out for an awesome time, and get to know her better, because she passes my boner test with flying colors. In these days, a woman like her is ultra rare, especially in the U.S., and I’ll take her and my ego and everyone else can go fuck themselves, because my boners will be fulfilled and so will I. Thanks again Roosh. Your message on boners is what I needed.

She’s not a fat chick though. Just want to clear that up least anyone think I succumbed to that. Think a 9 body with a meh face – she’s an athlete.

It’s impossible for us to hate women. Just because, in the past, one was rejected by a couple of nonsensical women who didn’t even know what a great guy one is, is not a reason for hate towards the entire genre. To state a misogynist tendency for expressing the cruel reality of female nature is just ridiculous. Don’t they realise how huge the pain inside us is for realising how wrong we’ve been raised by our mothers and society? This is really sad and painful, and the pain is very REAL. The pain of going against our own feelings and behaviours because they’re not reciprocated in the same way/magnitude by women. How can we possibly hate women! In which universe such an idea can be conceived! Sad is, also, women’s inability to realise this. And despite this, we still think about them… most of the time :)

“Healers were predominantly female in heathen Europe until Christianity came along and restricted practicing medicine to men for centuries.”

Let’s compare and contrast the advance of the medical arts in “heathen Europe” vs. that seen when they were restricted to men, shall we?

You can start by naming 5 great medical advances developed by the heathen quackettes.

This is a case of ‘sour grapes” where Roosh hates on what he can’t have – a high status female.

He might get a bang in here and there – but no one who would stick around with Roosh to raise little Roosh’s to have every advantage possible. So your stuck with non-thriving offspring, if any. That’s assuming that they haven’t got a death sentence in the womb with HIV. And Chlamydia. And HPV.

I shared a meal with Jocelyn Bell Burnell last year. I don’t think she – or her younger versions, would bother with the likes of Roosh.

So I’ll call it like it is, sour grapes.

And good luck Roosh on your journey, as you head inexorably towards reproductive failure.

[Roosh: So this woman won't bother with me.. http://www.optcorp.com/edu/articleDetailEDU.aspx?aid=1002 ? Why do you troll? ]

Shared a meal with a woman hey?

Good livin’

@66

http://www.worldsbestbars.com

@Dave that’s what they call chemistry. Her pheromones give you the boners, not necessarily her looks. Looks aren’t everything (I’m not talking about hideous trolls or the morbid obese of course). A hot blonde model wouldn’t give you the boners if there’s no chemistry. Besides she’s an athlete, she has the discipline, she will never be a fat ass and women with well toned muscles don’t get fat after having children, they don’t get mushy and saggy when they age. She won’t get pregnancy stretch marks, either. If her face isn’t so great, there’s surgery to fix that.

Men on Italian cruise ship push past women to get to lifeboats, women unhappy about lack of deference.

“Women and children were not getting priority at all.”

Fuck you, cunt!

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/2012/01/16/costa-concordia-disaster-retired-british-cop-tells-how-men-pushed-past-women-and-children-to-reach-lifeboats-86908-23701859/

@40 : Have we reached the Godwin point there ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

[Roosh: Was it hard to research this list since Wikipedia is down?]

Are you butthurt?

Speaking of wikipedia. It has an exhaustive list of highly accomplished women in the area of HARD SCIENCES, engineering and math. May the butthurt seeps through your spine all the way to your brain and cause brain freeze.

That’s kinda the point, the list can only be exhaustive in case of women. The physics nobel list got exhausted even before the 2nd-wave feminism seriously started the “we need to ape men more” theme. Yet, the stupidity of feminists regarding STEM fields continues to be taken seriously.

Not that the first-wavers were anything about equality either, that which is termed these days as ‘married women had no property’, or ‘women were property’, and other shit like that:

“The wife has absolute and unfettered control over her own property, man-earned though it be, and her person. This is the new style. But the gaoler and the broad arrow [government mark of ownership] make the husband, her earning slave, to be insulted and jeered with impunity. This is the old style with a difference. “All yours is mine, and all mine’s my own.” Mere man is not worth considering when the material aggrandizement of women is concerned !”

From The Legal Subjection of Men, by Belfort Bax 1908. (named after JS Mill’s seminal feminist work, The Subjection of Women)

and here is the aforementioned female equality in action by a suffragete in 1912:

“Under the married women property act a husband has no jurisdiction over his wife’s property and income. Under the income tax he is responsible for her taxes. If the taxes are not paid, the husband, not the wife, is imprisoned. Mrs. Wilks refused to pay her income taxes–$185–and her husband was locked up. He will spend the rest of his life in prison unless the wife pays or the laws are changed.”

http://fullofgraceseasonedwithsalt.blogspot.com/2011/01/sends-husband-to-jail-to-aid-suffrage.html

“This ignores the historical dynamics between women and men. In the past, to be eligible for marriage, men often had to prove themselves able to provide a wife with food and shelter. In a sense, a woman didn’t marry a man, but his livelihood. In every essential respect, he was as much her property as she was his.

It also demeans modern men. Historically, rape may have been about property. But that does not dictate what is presently true. Do most mothers consider their children chattel? Are kids no more than property to moms? Would torturing a woman’s children be, to her, nothing more than vandalizing her property?”

http://www.backlash.com/book/rape1.html

Quoting again from the Legal Subjection of Men:

“As a successful lady litigant (May, 1896) remarked to her husband, “There is no law which compels me to obey or honour you, but there is a law that you must keep me.” This woman tersely sums up the position. In the case of a man of property the Courts will expropriate him for the benefit of his wife. In the case of a wage-earner the Courts from police magistrates to Supreme Court will decree him to be her earning slave, bound to work for her or go to prison.

A wife, no matter if rolling in wealth, is not obliged to contribute a penny to her husband’s support, even if he be incapacitated from work through disease or accident.”

@ 66, Sif:
“Roosh, when are you going to write the bang for girls book?”

Moron.

Amazing how all those years ago Schopenhauer knew and yet still, today, we’ve learnt nothing from him. Things will probably have to get a lot worse before we start paying any attention to truths like these.

@Anon:
“And good luck Roosh on your journey, as you head inexorably towards reproductive failure.”

Squid ink. Squid ink moron.

[Roosh: So this woman won’t bother with me.. http://www.optcorp.com/edu/articleDetailEDU.aspx?aid=1002

AHHHH!!!! Jeepers creepers. That leaves a bad taste in your mouth.

Roosh once again is correct but the catalyst is wrong.

Modern women became this way because of MODERN MEN!

Do you have any idea how strong, virile, masculine, and badass ancient man was?

I cant remember who said this quote but it’s true…

“in every society, the men get the women they deserve”

What modern society has done is stripped everything from our TRUE ancient lifestyles. The alphas keep the betas in check a number of ways.

1. Lack of sunlight

Everything considered “successful” must be accomplished indoors.

- school
- university
- work
- childcare
- gym
etc

The sun is life. Did you know that exposing your back to sunlight DOUBLES Testosterone levels?

Only direct sunlight. If you are indoors being successful, then your Testosterone DECREASE!!!!

Ancient man was outdoors. Modern man is indoors.

2. Crappy Corporate Diet

The corporate Alphas keep the betas in check with their chemically enhanced food.

3. Porn

Our bodies never evolved to deal with porn. If you are struggling with it, please visit…

http://www.yourbrainonporn.com

Porn lowers Testosterone and turns you into a pussy AKA a woman.

==================================
CONCLUSION – Modern Man is to blame
==================================

The only group of people Roosh can blame is MEN!

You cannot sit inside a classroom or workdesk all day and expect women to respond to you the same way.

Stop blaming women for their nature.

WOMEN ARE FOLLOWERS!!!!!!!!

WOMEN ARE FOLLOWERS!!!!!!!!

WOMEN ARE FOLLOWERS!!!!!!!!

WOMEN ARE FOLLOWERS!!!!!!!!

WOMEN ARE FOLLOWERS!!!!!!!!

=========================
MEN MUST LEAD
==========================

If modern man wants a feminine, sexy mate, then stop being an indoor cat and turn into a Lion.

Here’s a few tips I use to gt in touch with my ancient DNA

1. Plenty of Sleep
2. No alcohol
3. No smoking
4. No porn
5. Masterbation 1 time per week (sex is better :))
6. Lift Weights
7. Relax
8. At least 1 hour of Sunlight per day (take your shirt off if you can…..naked sun exposure is the best)

People think Roosh is whining, but really Roosh is a wise sage.

He tells it like it is. He lives in a foreign country, thus no direct exposure to American women.

He is a brilliant writer, an antropologist, always commenting on his environments.

IF AMERICAN MEN WANT DECENT WOMEN, YOU MUST BE THE SAME MAN YOUR GRANDFATHER WAS.

What’s the purpose of women beyond bitching, lying and consistent drama?

- Cooking
- Cleaning
- Sucking
- Bending over and assuming the position.

Beyond that, they’re of no use to society

“She’s wasting the few years of beauty she has to fuck them with absolutely no commitment or strings, and soon will be left alone, without a provider, and nothing to show for her prime years of beauty besides HPV and a bitter attitude.”

Absolutely false in America, where every fattie has a husband and kids, or child support and kids.

Prediction: Roosh will never have children. He’s unfit, so that’s probably a good thing. How the hell would he support them?

@ The Rationalist “Be careful what you wish for…”

Yeah, because race relations are sooooooooo great right now.

Helter Skelter!

@69 Dave

Glad to see the Boner Test helped you past your ego.

Can the internet and gaming community agree on a definitive definition of what it is to be an “Alpha”? I consider an Alpha male to be a dude who has climbed the corporate ladder or owns his own business, has plenty of free time, has plenty of disposable income, and gets tons of free, hot puss. I do not consider an Alpha to be a jobless, mongrel, traveling wastoid who pulls the drunk sluts at the bar an hour before last call.

@78 – Haha. Godwin and Murphy. Both geniuses.

Fine, you got me. But remove any reference to Schopenhauer… completely disregard my last sentence… and my point is still valid.

Womens primary purpose is to reproduce.

I thought this was common knowledge!

Why else would they look their best when they are the most fertile!?

Nature has all this figured out for us. We don’t have to figure anything out, we just have to follow natures design.

Be a pack leader, get the fertile females, been like this for ages..

@31 Tampa…

“I have focused on my career for many years, assuming I would naturally meet someone along the way. Since that has not happened, I am trying to take a proactive approach to meeting people, while continuing to get out more and focusing on hobbies and interests in my limited free time.

My favorite people are funny, caring, have integrity, are hard-working, and are what I consider good-hearted. Those are traits I deem important because I’m proud of them in me.

While I’ve been very narrow in my ‘type’ in the past, I’m learning that there are a lot of great people I’ve missed that I shouldn’t have passed up. I can be hesitant about making the first move and reaching out to someone, but I do think that it’s important to get out there as much as possible and meet new people”

I actually find this to be a mature approach by this woman, even if she’s mediocre-looking to busted. She’s actually being honest, owning up and taking responsibility for her current state. Most chicks are bitter, blaming men or just about anyone other than themselves for why they haven’t met someone.

Women….
….Fuck em

What do you mean by adapt,again?
Surely this is the definitive existence.
You seemed to have the key to the secrets of the universe. What more is left? See,I am not as smart as you,or the rest of the fellows here. I am quite shocked at the fact that there are not many choglodytes(my spell check sucks) in this forum. Everybody seems quite intelligent,even in their silliness.
But you are right Sir. It does seem that the so called fairer sex is not owning up to their obligations,and as has been evidenced in the last 10 years,seem to mainly care about tabloidish TV, and reality shows,”Titanic”(the 1997 film),and justin Beiber.
There seems to be a lot of them in important corporate positions though. It seems to me that it’s definitely mostly to fill quotas,but a lot of these positions are NOT the Token positions one would think one would get just to be “diverse”. They seem to be in legitimately powerful positions,WTF?
Why would ANY corporation take the chance on the best WOMAN on the job as opposed to The 2000 MEN who are better than her? Do they WANT to go Bankrupt on purpose,for tax reasons???

Roosh is a pornstar:
http://www.jizzhut.com/videos/official-bounty-hunter-parody-carolyn-reese–2259565.html

First things first.
We have to first unite as men,and make some headway,and THEN and only THEN do we PARTIALLY focus on what race of men have the biggest cocks or brains.
There is too much racial chest pounding,and that defeats the purpose/cause. Women,for the most part,are united in spite of racial/religious,or ethnic differences….to a point. But,non the less they are more in tune,and united in their quest of COMPLETE GLOBAL DOMINANCE.
They,at least when it comes to the grater good,will unite and tear us a new one without the tiniest bit of hesitation. It is up to us, and this underground community,to level the playing field and rectify things.
Now,it may not happen in our lifetimes,but I do believe it CAN happen. Just give up on the petty racial, “White dudes are sexier”,”Black dudes have the biggest cocks and are more alpha and agg
ressive”,Asians are smarter,and “Latinos are more virile(it’s true BTW(JK))”,and focus on what is TRULY important,and advance and propagate the species by, in the words of Malcolm X… “any Means necessary.” Pantalones!!!!

the only purpose of women is to keep their mouths shut as their three holes take my dick. nothing more. PERIOD

Women have two uses to a smart man. A good lay and to bear kids (if he wants them).

Women have two uses to society. To do the drudgery work that men are dropping out of the workforce to avoid. To domesticate men.

The end.

I applaud some of this. But man, you act like this attitude is waaaaaaay more all encompassing than it actually is. IMO.

Sure you meet a lot of bitches out there…but was that ever not the case? And why would you want them anyway? Why care so much about them?

You seem bitter they don’t pray at the alter of your cock as you seem to think they should. Why? I on the other hand say fuck ‘em and move on to the next.

Roosh,

Please, please write a post about how Polish men are very Beta and have no game. Here is why :

A lot of white racists in America are from Eastern Europe and Poland. They are the ones slamming you for stealing ‘their’ women. They are the ones acting as MRAs only to say that Game is ‘pussy worship’.

In reality, Polish women are easy because Polish men are so Beta that the women are desperate.

Please do a skewering of the lame Game of Polish men.

didn’t read this ludicrously long thread, but wanted to say i found this quite wierd:

” Complimenting a woman beyond her appearance, such as on her personality, courage, intelligence, or what have you, is a sure-fire way to not sleep with her. Even complimenting her beauty has become dangerous. ”

obviously complimenting of any kind should more or less be avoided at all costs, but it was always my impression that the absolute LAST thing you want to compliment is her beauty, whereas saying she was “interesting” or “smart” or whatever can actually be effective towards your goals because it implies that you are so sated with respect to the consistent beauty you acquire, that you have the insurance to vet for less typical attributes.

Is it me or has anyone else seen the influence of roissy/heartiste slipping into roosh’s writing style?

For every accomplished woman there are dozens of more accomplished men. For every leading woman in a field, there are hundreds of men who are more accomplished than her who don’t even make the top one hundred most accomplished men in that field.

The reason these women are known is not because they held their own with men but because they were women. It’s very hard to be well known if you’re the 100th best at something as a man but if you’re the best female at something but not even as good as the 100th best man at it then you will be known. That’s why we have female sports, female chess, female awards. If we didn’t, we’d never hear of any women in any field save the extremely rare outlier like Marie Curie and Judit Polgár.

For any girl who recites the following quote –

“Behind every great man is a great woman”

The logic is simple – After a hard days graft making stuff happen and bringing food home to the table. At some point, he will want to kick back and get his dick sucked and get pampered by a privileged woman of equal greatness.

It’s a man’s world. Women are simply here for men to enjoy after a hard day’s work.

If the above comment is insulting to women, then it’s likely you’re either a feminazi, or you’ve completely lost touch of your female nature.

All I have to say to you haters of Roosh’s message today, is that you are a bunch of morons who would rather kill the messanger because it’s a message you don’t like. He’s telling you the truth.

You really don’t understand him, do you? He was once and omega who then pushed through being beta without settling for being beta and became Alpha with the ladies. In today’s 2012 world he should be respected and lauded for changing his life around and not trying futile attempts to live in 1912 world. He has figured out how to relate as successfully as most any man can to women in today’s environment in the USA. You can’t tell an Alpha who was once an omega anything because he’s lived at both extremes and he knows how things work. He’s a man who would have been married happily supporting his family in 1912 USA. It has become excessively difficult to do in 2012 USA so he does the smart thing which is BANG as many women preferably good looking that he can. He, like most Omegas who became Alphas, knows and understands more than men who have been Betas who have become Alphas. He, like most Omegas who became Alphas, knows and understands more than men who have been Alphas all their lives.

You fools really don’t understand the situation on the ground, do you? Marriage is the man signing up to about the closest thing to slavery whether he stays married or worse gets divorced as exists in 2012 USA. He has listed the reasons on this website as have others online at different websites. To paraphrase a statement Roosh made, the emergence of Men’s Right’s Activists and GAME Advocates is the manifestation of a sick and dying civilization.

Correction
I meant to state in the 2nd paragraph and last sentence in Comment 107 above:

He, like most Omegas who became Alphas, knows and understands A LOT more than men who have been Alphas all their lives

Here’s a stupid question. What exactly is an Omega,and what is the difference between an omega,and a beta? I thought that a man is either An Alpha,or a Beta. Also what would a bulldyke lesbo be considered as? Is the overwhelming presence of lesbianism,particularly in black,and other communities the result of an alpha shortage,or TOO many alphas,since the Bravado and the quasi Alpha like behavior is pretty rampant in those communities. Then it becomes increasingly difficult for women to identify the real thing. So, rather than date a “fake” Alpha,they’ll just have their needs met by a hideous boulder shaped bulldyke until then. So that’s another problem with learning to be alpha,some women will just know,since they are aware of movements like this. They’re keeping their eyes wide open,and their legs closed(to men)AND their tongues(for women) ready.

i ‘ve been a big fan of Roosh but, boy, this time he’s trying to fuck with me. i mean the way western women are doing their thing is good for me as a non western dude, cause i got laid easy with out no strings attached and when it comes to marriage then i will go back to where i came from where women behave and act like a women. i feel bad for my fellow western males though. but hey you can come over middle east or africa where the feminist sun does NOT and will never ever rise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFh5F8cFb3g&feature=youtu.be

Disagree with this video

@ Pantalones
The hierarchy of men and placing them into Alpha, Beta and Omega categories is simply are 1)the percentage or number of women attracted enough to have sex with him and 2)the quality of women’s personalities and especially their physical beauty to have sex with him. Alpha men are at minimum in the top quartile and are anywhere from 5% to 25% of the men. Omega men are in the bottom quartile and are anywhere between 5% to 25% of the men. Beta men are in the middle and are anywhere from 50% to 90% of the men and as a result are the majority of men. Alpha men do very well with women. Beta men do ok or average with women. Omega men do very poorly with women.

Omega men are involuntary virgins at the very worst. If the Omega men are doing better they have long periods of involuntary celibacy if they don’t pay whores money for sex. They are also unable to have sex with physically attractive women without typically paying whores for sex. They seldom are able to bang average looking women. They are most typically having sex with physically ugly women and women with poor personalities when they are having sex which is seldom. Omegas typically have extraordinary difficulty even getting physically ugly women with horrible personalities to be their long term relationship girlfriend or wife. It gets harder for them to accomplish if the woman is physically ugly but has a decent or better yet great personality.

Beta men can get sex from women, but not nearly as often as they like. They do better than omegas. Beta men can have sex with ugly women and women with bad personalities with more ease, but often don’t want to do so. They are usually stuck having girlfriends or wives who are often harridans, cheating sluts and golddiggers who have ridden the Alpha male cock carrousol hard, often and frequently before settling down later and begrudgingly in life. Not all of their girlfriends and wives have ridden on the Alpha cock carrousol but many if not most have. Sometimes these men have a good day and have sex with physically beautiful women. Usually if these men want sexual variety and sex with physically beautiful women they have to pay whores. Sometimes these men get women who are average looking but have good personalities for girlfriends and wives. They get physically attractive women with poor personalities less often. They seldom if ever get physically beautiful with good personalities women for girfriends and wives. They make up most of your married American men.

Alphas don’t need girlfriends and wives for steady sex unlike betas. Typically, the only reason they would pay for whores is to be like Charlie Sheen said,” I don’t pay whores for sex, but I do pay them to walk away.” These men are swimming in vagina, even to the point swimming in more vagina than they know what to do with. They often have sex with pretty women. They also are able to get rid of women who have poor personalities more easily than Betas and Omegas either before sex or after it. They can easily have sex with average looking women, not all of them but many if not most.

I suppose a homosexual woman could be an Alpha, Beta and Omega too in the same way a heterosexual man can. You could say the same of bisexual men and women when they are engaging in heterosexual tendencies for men and homosexual tendencies for women. I don’t know if pure female homosexuality has increased or not. I do know that open female bisexuality is occuring more often. Female homosexuality hurts all men as it reduces the number of females available for sex to all men.

Female bisexuality helps the Alpha men tremendously, but hurts beta men and omega men on average. The reasons should be clear. Beta men and even more so omega men have difficulty attracting and keeping women for sex and relationships. Why would they want more competition coming from bisexual and homosexual women? They don’t. It’s easier for a homosexual woman or a bisexual woman to talk a bisexual woman into sleeping with her than most men who are beta or worse yet omega because male sexuality is more frightening because of its inherent predatory nature(which is not evil by the way), and women usually listen to other women more than men even when they shouldn’t. Women especially in the ist world care more about what most women think than what most men think. Therefore the only man who has a chance to compete and possibly win a woman’s ear and her vagina against another woman is an Alpha man.

Beta men seldom will get women to volunteer for reverse gangbang sex without paying whores for it. It virtually never happens for Omega men without paying whores for it. Alphas can have harems and reverse gangbang sex more easily and not have to pay money to whores for it. It is usually easier to let a woman talk another women into doing reverse gangbang sex than you the man doing so whether you are Alpha, Beta or Omega.

It is often easier for a man to have a harem or reverse gangbangs with bisexual women than heterosexual women. The reason is bisexual women are more likely to say yes to servicing and being serviced by two people. Heterosexual women don’t want to service nor be serviced by women. A man usually doesn’t have enough energy and skill to service both women if one or more of the women is heterosexual. All heterosexual and bisexual women compete against eachother to get the attention and desire of a man they want. The wanted man is usually an Alpha and sometimes a Beta while almost never an Omega. It’s just that bisexual women are less likely to turn on eachother or the man in a harem or especially a reverse gangbang than heterosexual women are. The reason is bisexual women will give eachother attention and desire too as well as keep eachother in line for the wanted man’s desire, attention and wants. Jealousy is more likely to rear it’s ugly head with heterosexual women than bisexual women. Hell hath no fury of a woman scorned. I’ve seldom known any man who got a reverse gangbang from heterosexual women while I’ve known plenty of men who’ve gotten a reverse gangbang from bisexual women. Harems without reverse gangbangs are more common for men with heterosexual women, but men must more carefully manage them as bisexual women police eachother better for men in harems than heterosexual women do. Bisexual women make it easier for men especially Alpha men to create the kinds of love triangles, harems and reverse gangbangs they want.

I loved imparting what I feel to be good game advice while feeding you the TROLL!!! LOL and LMAO!!

No, it’s because for many years people believed as you do, and there were not many opportunities for women to succeed.

About respect – it’s more like no one respects a person who doesn’t respect him or herself.

women need to shut their mouths unless they are having my cock rammed down it so far they are gagging. i dont need to hear them talk

Why women have sex

According to a new book, there are 237 reasons why women have sex. And most of them have little to do with romance or pleasure

Wow, your writing and voice sounds as good as or even better than Roissy (especially now that Le Chateau is full of ghost writers who pale in comparison to Roissy In DC). Keep up the good work.

@roosh – “What is the real purpose of women? [I]t’s simply to reproduce.”

that’s the real purpose of men, too, btw. (~_^)

Dude, good old Schop. is like, passé. You need to start reading Otto Weininger… St. Otto Weininger that is. Now there was a man who really understood women; he knew their secrets so well that women even today, shudder violently at the mention of this hero’s most holy name.

@doclove. Thanks for the Info. Wow you answered my inquiry and then some. But why call me a troll? If I was a troll,then why did you not only answer my question,but devoted a lot of thought and time to answer it?

Purpose of women is simple:
Please man period.

Female doctors are generally preferable to male ones.

I’d reckon most guys could not name more than one male scientist, besides Einstein, so maybe not a great example.

@The Glee Manifesto…Why do you believe female doctors are preferable to male ones? The demands of medicine vary greatly by specialty, but training in modern medicine (especially the life-or-death surgical/emergency/hospital-based specialties), rewards physical and mental endurance (and time away from the family), which gives men an advantage. While medical schools are over half women, it’s rare to see a chief surgeon or chief ER Physician that is female.

Preferable for me at least.
Women are better listeners and more compassionate.

Roosh has never had a girlfriend.

If you’re fucking a woman right, plus playing the “Charming Asshole” role, she is only too happy to do these submissive things like cook, giving you a massage, deferring to your opinion.

I am scrawny and short. Average looking but nothing special. I regularly get women to do these things for me in relationships. Actually they like it because they recognize my energy and that makes them want to be more feminine.

To be honest, I think we know that we are deep down inferior to men in strength and intelligence. We are designed to carry babies for men and we are better at household tasks. It is just the way we are made.

In the past, even knowing this I have struggled with accepting this role nature has dealt me. But as I become older (I’m 25) I now understand that the feminism concepts taught to us were wrong, and it is important as a woman to accept our role. I am now in a stable relationship, my boy friend is an alpha, he brings in the bread and provides for me, in return he demands that I cook for him, clean our house and serve his sexual needs every day. I think men and women are supposed to complement each other. I’m finally starting to see why men are said to be the head of women, we are born to follow men and made for men, of course we can still have our own opinion, but we must respect our man when he tells us we are wrong. He is the provider and the head of the household, he has every right to lay down his rules and we simply have to obey and follow his lead. Our job is much easier than a man’s job after all.

All these Roissy followers who equate game with some sort of anachronistic contempt for women…mah, I’m not even getting why any of you would ever want to be near a female, let alone inside one.

@ Pantalones
My fault. You’re not a troll. I took your comment #109 the wrong way. I withdraw the troll comment and apoligize.

The confusing part as a woman, is yes, I feel it all through my bones and my heart and spirit that my purpose is to make babies with a man I love. To take care of that man the same way I would our children. And I Intend to.

But we were taken from the bone of man. And you must know that it isn’t always easy pushing aside feelings of wanting to dominate. Especially when it is clear that we’re emotionally and morally superior, generally speaking. I feel blessed and lucky to be a woman. I always think of Alexander the Great’s mother; how she told him Zeus was his real father. She was responsible for his greatness. But she doesn’t get credit for it and she didn’t write a book revealing her genius plan.

Benjamin Franklin said

“The present little Sacrifice of your Vanity will afterwards be amply repaid.”

I believe that’s true, although I can’t say yet with credibility. It’s a little sacrifice when the reward is a family that loves you and seeing your husband and children become the absolute best they can be. We are creating little worlds within a world.

But when we come together to talk in a setting like this where we can be honest, can we also recognize why some women have turned to technology, tv, and meaningless work? A man wants a girl worth fighting for but can’t you see we want men who will fight for us?

Please, fight for us. We have a lot of love for you.

I’d like to add that I don’t agree with listening to everything a man says. Sometimes they’re wrong. If Alex the Great had a wife, he would’ve been even greater. As much as children hate discipline, they crave structure, boundaries and rules. Reverting from a culture of extreme feminism doesn’t mean going completely backwards. Shouldn’t we be evolving? What can we take from all of this to make into something new and better?

This blog is a joke, right? Okay, maybe not. But I find it very amusing. It is so absurd, I had to laugh.

The real purpose of women is to reproduce? Now that’s funny. Well, all you neanderthals… the year is 2012. As I look around, there seems to be no shortage of the human species. As a matter of fact, this planet has an over abundance of morons… so it makes perfect sense to reproduce less nowadays. This may help other species thrive, ones that have been slaughtered and destroyed thanks to “men”. It may also help the planet recover and rebound from all the destruction caused by “men”.

One could actually ACCURATELY state that men have no purpose whatsoever. Since women are much better at communicating and negotiating than men, there would be no war; hence, no need for “warriors”. Women are perfectly capable of working in any field. Hell, without men, there would hardly be any crime. Murder, rape, child molestation, physical and sexual assaults, domestic violence, drug dealing, gang violence, car theft, vandalism, etc. would be almost nonexistant. The world would be so peaceful. We wouldn’t need many police officers! And today, women can have babies without men. Freakin’ unbelievable. Women actually do not need men for survival. Oh how the tables have turned…

Men, however, need women. To be created and to survive, they need women. I think some of the ugly bitterness from you dick heads stem from the fact that this is indeed the reality of today, and that burns your asses. But confident men, real men… the ones I respect, do not feel this way. But you pieces of shit, have built up hate from your own failures and inadequacies. And perhaps bad experiences have only made things worse for your pathetic lives.

As far as women not being scientists… wtf? Really? Well,
shit-for-brains… when I was in college 18 years ago, more than half of my biology professors were female and close to half of my chemistry professors were female. I was a Bio major/Chem minor. Last time I checked, there are more women veterinarians than male vets today. Over 30% of doctors are women, a huge surge over the last 30 yrs. At this trend, in another 20-30 yrs, nearly half of medical docors will be women. There are more female dentists too. More and more women are entering the scientific community. Go into a science dept. in college or a research lab or an ER and feast your eyes! You’ll see women everywhere. They will have more skill, talent, knowledge and intelligence in their little pinky fingers than you rejects have in your entire bodies.

As a woman, I have gone to college, graduated with honors, purchased 3 properties completely on my own, started a business, married later in life (@ 36, now 41), had one baby, adopted 1 toddler. My purpose is so complex, so much more than reproduction. How dare you fuck-heads make such ludicrous comments. Thank god, that there are plenty of wonderful men out there. Thank god for my amazing husbands.

If you ever can hit by a car while crossing the street due to stupidity of checking out a girl half your age… just think, there is a good possibilty the ER surgeon. Tell her how you feel. Good luck with that!

Oooops, my bad. I meant to say “thank god for my amazing husband”. I had said “husbands”. Not my style, one great man is all I desire. I also meant to say that after you get hit by a car… the ER doc may very well be a woman! If you’re ever in a similar situation, hopefully, you will be euthanized. I wish I could round up all you hateful men, and practice shooting my gun. This would be fun and entertaining Any volunteers?

Where are all these horrible women? Most American women are fat. Most are sluts. Ones that pursue certain careers or have non- traditional interests are feminists/dikes? Women are inferior and stupid. Where are these awful American women? They’re hiding somewhere! Because as I look around, I see amazing women everywhere. Right here, in the good ole U.S. of A.

My mother raised 3 children on her own. My Dad passed away when I was 5 yrs old. My mother was devoted and dedicated to my Dad, being his caregiver for 2 yrs while he was sick. She is a strong woman. She did not date for 5 yrs after her love past away. She met a great man 6 yrs after my Dad died and remarried. It’s 18 years later and she is still happily married.

My sister is amazing. Her fiance came back from Iraq injured, a couple years ago. He lost both legs. She is now married to him, expecting a child and is faithful and dedicated. He is a hero. She is his hero.

My grandmother, aunts, great aunts, female cousins, female friends and female co-workers are amazing, all of them. Different ages, mixed races, diverse backgrounds. Some are traditional homemakers. Some are successful professionals. All are monogomous. All are loving, caring, hard working devoted women. Most are heterosexual. Few are gay. But none of them are feminist male haters. Some are married. Some are not. But none are sluts. I am surrounded by beautiful women. So where the hell are you meeting all these losers? You know the saying… “birds of a feather, flock together”.

I’m almost 30. I was engaged when I was 27. One month before the wedding, I found out I was pregnant but also found out my husband-to-be had cheated on me. Wedding was off. My twins hardly see their dead beat Dad. I ask him to spend time with his kids but he chooses not to. I also do not pursue getting more money from him. He makes a good income but has hardly contributed financially. I could have his ass in court and surely get more money. But I choose not to. I make good money too and I’ll manage on my own. Thank goodness my children have wonderful uncles and male cousins to grow up with. Though it’s a shame my ex couldn’t keep his dick in his pants!

I am a great woman. I am surrounded by great women. Their lives are complex. Their roles are diverse and varied. They are mothers, sisters, friends, companions, role models, neighbors. They contribute in so many unique ways. My neighbor rescues abused animals and finds homes for them. My cousin works with autistic children. Another cousin is a primary care physician. My best friend beat breast cancer and is a volunteer at a hospital. Thank goodness, these women have amazing men in their lives.

All of you men here, however, are indeed losers. Oh yeah, what is up with all this talk of fatties? American men aren’t plump? Please. Look around, there’s heavy men and women everywhere. But who the hell cares?!??!! I am thin but I know big women, and honestly they aren’t big eaters and exercise frequently. I can eat a lot, and I do not gain. So genetics play a bigger role than you morons think! Besides, the bigger gals are just as wonderful as the slim ones. And they all actually have hot boyfriends/hubbies. Yes!!! They all have good looking guys in their lives. They are slightly plump but still very attractive. No problems getting interest from the opposite sex. Oh well… I am sure the same cannot be said for you. Besides, it is likely you’re ugly (fat) fucks!

All you need is LOVE! Love is all you need! :)

I think women like missy are what have convinced me to stay single. To come home to a cunt like that every night would make me want to hurl my lifeless body out a window. God bless her beta husband.

And to the chick above me…”i know big women, honestly they’re not big eaters”. haha, I’ve been in fitness my whole life. Thats what we call fat, lazy and full of excuses

To #129 A.T. Great _did_ have a wife (in fact three of them – wife #1 murdered wives #2&3 after he died), although he was (like every other bloke in his culture at the time) primarily a raving poofter.

Anyway, you sound like a nice girl, from your posts, so good luck to you!

Hey Anon… Please date a woman like Missy! Hurling your lifeless body out a window sounds brilliant (I’d love to be a spectator for such a thrilling “event”).

Regarding weight… JD is correct. Two of my female friends are overweight, one moderately and the other significantly. Neither are lazy, far from it. A few of my thinner friends are lazy. My thinnest friend has never exercised a day in her life. Funny thing is, guys don’t seems to check her out although she has a decent face. She is just a walking toothpick! She has the hardest time dating out of all my friends. The one that is moderately overweight doesn’t seem to have problems at all. Her face is insanely gorgeous and although heavy, she has an hour glass shape and her weight is mostly in her chest, hips and thighs. I know for sure she is at the gym 4 times a week and she is not a big eater. So Anon… you’re wrong.

Go open a window, please, and fling yourself out. Just think of all the fatties out there. And the c’s running around. Those horrid thoughts should enable you to commit suicide. Free yourself from the pain! Do it, do it, do it…

why are the girls here so aggressive towards the men? i’m a girl and i honestly feel that i am most happy and content when there is a strong man in my life. i want to become a feminine woman who is able to satisfy her man completely. we girls are born to serve men and take care of them and our children. these are important jobs too. we have no right to boss men around as they are like our masters. when my man comes home, i am happy to see him and i focus all my energies to make him happy. i also disagree with girls who use sex as a means to get what they want from their man. God created woman to serve men, and that i believe includes sexually.

we may not be as physically strong as men or have their intelligence to become great scientists, but we have something that men don’t, and that is the ability to carry babies. so Roosh is right in asking why shouldn’t we embrace this unique ability? i want to serve my man, obey him and one day be given the privilege to carry his seeds and bear his children. i believe that this is the ultimate achievement for us girls.

Doesn’t the (global) government want a lower worldwide population? If so, then maybe a good way to keep women from reproducing is to keep them in schools and in their careers (on their rears) and on contraception during their fertile years. From a government point of view, the purpose of men and women is to pay taxes to support the aristocracy living in luxury and to support the socialist welfare state. Millions of women begin the repoduction process yearly, but they end it so they can continue their careers. The real purpose of women might be to be singers, or my employees, their choice.

For those who posted all that stuff from Wiki or whatever as a counterpoint to Roosh forgot to note his off-the-top of the head requirement that went with his question.

That fact that you had to Wiki a bunch of women you mostly didn’t know about before, or the scant few you forgot about and only reminded of during this search, only serves to prove his point.