I’ve been posting pictures of different women on my Twitter with the question “Would you bang?” A few days after sharing a picture, I tallied up on the yes and no responses to calculate a rating on the 1-10 scale.

My methodology was simple: I took the number of yes answers and divided it by the number of total responses. I then added 0.5 points to every score because a lot of men on the internet act like they only bang supermodels (e.g. “2/10, pointy elbows”). We also have to account for the fact that many men confuse “Would you bang?” with “Would you put in a lot of work to bang?” The WYB metric only asks if you would fornicate without having to work for it. Let’s review the women from ugliest to hottest…

1. Rating: 2.3

I see pierced nipples

It’s no surprise that most men would not bang a woman with so much plastic surgery and tattoos that she looks like a man, but this specimen is thin enough that I suspect most men would bang her if they received a doctor’s note confirming she’s AIDS-free.

2. Rating: 5.0

I prefer dark chocolate when it comes to chocolate (75% cacao to be exact), but not when it comes to women. This black woman is objectively attractive for her race, but that’s still not enough to push her out of an average rating.

3. Rating: 5.2

I see granny panties

The gigantic butt on this Asian girl could not take away from a Skeletor face. A lot of men also thought her butt was fake, which is generally a boner killer, unlike the case with fake breasts.

4. Rating: 5.6

This full-figured woman lost many points for her hair, but the men who did want to bang her showed a high enthusiasm for taking a wild ride on her voluptuous body.

5. Rating: 6.2

Sag city!

Even thought this newscaster is a bit long on years, with a marshmallow body to match, many men would bang her because of her generally attractive appearance.

6. Rating: 7.1

This is a picture of Bill Gates daughter, who happens to love Muslim cock. Personally, I think her face is ugly, but for many men who follow me, white is right and the fact that she’s thin and young pushes her to a favorable rating.

7. Rating: 7.2

A lesbian haircut and advanced age did not stop this German politician from blitzkreiging to a solid 7.2 score. I do suspect that her breasts played a sizable part in the surprisingly high rating.

8. Rating: 7.4

There were no surprises for this handsome woman. I believe that she would be an ideal girl for a normal man who wants a thin female to reproduce with.

9. Rating: 8.4

Big breasts strike again. This girl is not especially attractive, but she has no major flaw that pushes her into WNB territory. A genuine smile also goes a long way for men who are tired of girls with attitude.

10. Rating: 8.7

I’m not attracted to Asian girls, but I would bang this one in a vigorous manner. Most other men agree with me.

11. Rating: 9.4

I see pierced nipples

The hottest girl in my sample happens to be a race amalgamation, though with heavy European admixture. Objectively, I believe she does have a superior facial structure and body compared to the other girls and so deserves her rating, which suggests that raw beauty can edge out racial preferences when it comes to solely banging.

Don’t be ashamed if you would bang every single girl on this list. The men who judge you most for your bangs are the ones who feel most ashamed of their own. If you get a boner for a girl, your dick obviously craves her body and you should proceed as long as it does not harm you emotionally or physically. All I can tell you is that my boner has never lied to me. I trust its judgement.

Read Next: My Boner Is My Master

118 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kish
Kish
2 years ago

I think a better experiment would be to give each of these girls an online profile in the US and see how many Chad’s message them for sex. You would see even the ugliest girls in America have tons of options.

Roosh
2 years ago
Reply to  Kish

We already know that though.

David
David
2 years ago
Reply to  Kish

There is difference between SMV and level of physical attractiveness/beauty.

She can be 4 in physical beauty department with 8 SMV(extremely desirable)

B.A.
B.A.
2 years ago
Reply to  David

Not quite sure how you figure that.

Scott
Scott
2 years ago

The 7.2 and the 9.4 are the only ones I find to be pretty hot. 7.2 I

edsdfddsf
edsdfddsf
2 years ago

These ratings don’t make sense to me. Probably because the men responding were not anonymous. They would all bang the first one but don’t want to admit that in public.

jeremy
jeremy
2 years ago
Reply to  edsdfddsf

I would bang the first one drunk

Crom
Crom
2 years ago

The one with with the big tits and the dog seems nice and feminine. Would rather bang her than the others.

Proud_Nimby
Proud_Nimby
2 years ago

I generally agree with the analysis presented above, but I think 5 (Trish Regan), 7 and 8 rate higher than 9 and 10, in my humble opinion. I like average sized breasts — girl 9’s breasts are too big for me. Trish Regan and Girl 7 have perfectly sized breasts in my book.

anon1
anon1
2 years ago

6, 10 and 11 for me.

issue with 10 is the outfit

alex
alex
2 years ago

my expectations are sadly high and that’s why I get no sex 🙁

Cagdas Akdemir
Cagdas Akdemir
2 years ago
Reply to  alex

Goddamn dude. That is exactly what i thought. I would only be interested in 9.4 and 2.3.

fr
fr
2 years ago

I’m something of a racist, meaning I’m white and dislike blacks, but that number 2 Negress is a smoking HB10 if ever there was one. Maybe sneak her into my apartment as hired help so nobody sees us together in public.

Jack Redrum
Jack Redrum
2 years ago
Reply to  fr

As a white guy who bangs a lot of hot black chicks, I find that the reactions from my white guy friends are usually thus follows:
1. Oh wow Jack you bang black girls? Ha okay.
2. [3 days later from same guys] Hey dude how do you bang black chicks? I’d really like to do it someday!
Me: LOL.

Elvis Gilberto
Elvis Gilberto
2 years ago
Reply to  fr

Hello Racist,
I bet ur mama used to be a hired d**k pleaser

jason42175
jason42175
2 years ago
Reply to  fr

Either A, You surround yourself around ignorant black people too feel like your’re the smartest Superior person in the room.

Or B, You surround yourself with education blacks, and you are the least educated/stupidest person in the room.

I’m guessing A, you have never been around a single educated black person, because racist especially the ones who admitted they are, like you are always 100% of the time, are poor and uneducated.

JPSC
JPSC
2 years ago
Reply to  jason42175

Is English your first language? If not, I’ll give you a pass on using shitty grammar while calling someone else uneducated.

JPSC
JPSC
2 years ago
Reply to  fr

I enjoy seeing people admit that they are racists. I think it’s the beginning of a trend we will be seeing more and more of. People are sick of being called “racist” for everything they say and think, and are just now beginning to start to own it and say, “OK, fine, I’m a racist. Now what?”

Jack is back
Jack is back
2 years ago
Reply to  JPSC

Racists are idiots

Jack is back
Jack is back
2 years ago
Reply to  fr

Disqus will ban racists. Flagged

Brutus Maximus
Brutus Maximus
2 years ago

A wise man said :To bang or not to bang, that’s the question.

Hubert Cumberdale
Hubert Cumberdale
2 years ago
Reply to  Brutus Maximus

If she’s a 9 or 10, stick it in.

Kevin Bastardboy
Kevin Bastardboy
2 years ago

or jack off to her photo..

Hubert Cumberdale
Hubert Cumberdale
2 years ago

Roosh I’ve always been curious why you have minimal attraction to Asian women, even the top 10% ones from Taiwan, Japan, Korea, Vietnam etc. who really can go toe-to-toe with the best White chicks.

While South American and Eastern European women are quickly jumping on the obesity, blue hair, and tattoos train, East Asia is still largely resisting all that junk.

shitlord9000
shitlord9000
2 years ago

No they can’t go toe-to-toe with white chicks. That’s why so many of them have plastic surgery to look more like white chicks.

Brutus Maximus
Brutus Maximus
2 years ago
Reply to  shitlord9000

the tightness though

William Adams
William Adams
2 years ago
Reply to  shitlord9000

Very misguided assertion. Asians are ambiguous in regard to white women. The ideal facial proportions and white skin have long roots and very little to do with European features: it’s more like the ideal face in a universal sense. Essentially Asians want to look like a mix between a European and an Asian, but their Asian features most be present. If you have been to Korea and Japan you know that they have ethnic pride.

Veni Vidi Vici
Veni Vidi Vici
2 years ago
Reply to  shitlord9000

Agreed, I rarely see an Asian 9-10. And few who are, like Miss? Mocha above are usually mixed with heavy Caucasian features.
I found the blond at 8 to be the most attractive of the bunch and agree with the general consensus she is an 8.

Kevin Bastardboy
Kevin Bastardboy
2 years ago
Reply to  shitlord9000

many Asians actually have whiter/lighter skin than most “white” Europeans..
you see super-pale Japanese & some Chinese, they are not all “yellow”

Roosh
2 years ago

Who you’re attracted to is not your choice.

Anon
Anon
2 years ago
Reply to  Roosh

Irony

Anti-Gnostic
Anti-Gnostic
2 years ago
Reply to  Roosh

Who you’re attracted to is a combination of biology and environment. You should know better.

ND52
2 years ago
Reply to  Anti-Gnostic

And neither of those things you have any control of while growing up, ergo it’s not your choice.

Kevin Bastardboy
Kevin Bastardboy
2 years ago

so many Asian girls have the body of a 12 year old boy, virtually no curves, no ass, no tits. t i that turns you on, cool.
to me, a little padding is nice on tits & ass

Bavieca
Bavieca
2 years ago

Superb writing and a masterful delivery.

Gammelsvensk
Gammelsvensk
2 years ago

Nr 7 and 4 would not bang. 3 and 1 maybe if they came easy in difficult times. 10, 11 and possibly 8 would actually try to bang. Nr9 if she was the girl next door and was showing me lots of interest.

William Adams
William Adams
2 years ago

Very good post.

I think that the rating of the black girl was way too low, although you explained why that is the case. I would give her a 7. Although I like attractive Asian girls, sometimes to the same degree as white girls and pretty mixed girls, that one is too short without having considerably high heels to counter this fact. She is a 7, not more. I have banged hotter Asian girls than that. There are many tall Asian girls these days, between 5.6-5.9, but the ones who are shorter are wise to wear 3-4 inch heels, which will make them very pretty with their slim legs and feminine appearance. Short legs look kind of weird, and the only appropriate counter-measure is this.

I agree that number 11 is the hottest – she’s very attractive. Also the one with purple-pink hair was hot.

MCGOO
MCGOO
2 years ago

Nice article but I think the sampling is prejudiced towards the ‘head of the snail’ part of the HB bell graph. Beauty vs ugliness of our genome can be crunched onto a bell graph I believe. But the sampling is way high ignoring the hump and tail of the graph. For all the majority ‘humper’ graph dwellers walking around, realize that SOMEONE had to screw to produce them. If you see a 1 or 2 with a wedding ring on, then you know someone out there is sticking their dick in that. For example, the tatted chick in #1 would be a must bang for 100% of similarly tatted Harley Davidson enthusiasts. So for them, she’d be a 10. It depends who you are. The sampling doesn’t really show what is a zero or what is a 10 though, and there are zeros believe me and 10s too. A cursory tour of your local Walmart would represent a truer sampling of the genome from end to end. The sample is actually a little lower at Walmart since they provide electric buggies to attract the cows with fatty liver disease. You’d have to go next door to Kohl’s to get the upper end sample. Notice no buggy cows go there because they don’t stock the 4XL and above.

So the question is not so much would you bang, but WHAT do you actually bang. If you had a pair of X-ray glasses that actually worked and you went around your neighborhood, you’d see house after house with Roseanne being clocked by a schlub. Or you’d see the old lady with the scarf from the bus stop and you’d see the face of the wincing schlub that settles for that pokey. Then you’d see one of the buggy cows from walmart and some buckwheat in action. But shit man, if I had X-ray glasses for real, I’d ride my bike fast through all that scrough barely even looking. Then the 9s and 10s would stand out and I’d put on my brakes to catch any intel.

Truth is I think most women are getting sexed about the same. Zeros are getting trashed by the scrapings and 9s are getting it by the same frequency because the female bio clock is the same. A HB 1 female who’s horny will put out the honey trap for the first piece of shit from the soup kitchen with AIDS sores and she’ll get it. The 9+ female also has her pick of orbiters.

But the sex action for the males is inverse with incels excluded and alphas, even promiscous soup kitchen alphas filling the incel gap. I don’t know if it’s really 80/20% or 90/10% because women lie so much.

Still it holds that it’s WHAT you actually bang, not WOULD you bang. Your own mother or even your buddies mother – think about it – or their grandmother – NO ONE would bang right??? WRONG. Your dear own daddy and your buddy’s dear dad, they gladly pegged those old gals regularly to produce you and your buddy.

fr
fr
2 years ago
Reply to  MCGOO

As usual, not sure I understand what the hell McGoo is saying, maybe he himself doesn’t always know, but I definitely enjoy reading him.

JPSC
JPSC
2 years ago
Reply to  MCGOO

this is one of the greatest comments ever written on disqus

Taint Tostada
Taint Tostada
2 years ago

Meat is for men. Bones are for dogs. Number four has way better sex appeal than that old frump and the emaciated ginger. I’d bang em all though, except for number one.

fr
fr
2 years ago
Reply to  Taint Tostada

First two sentences I agree with, but that number four has SJW written all over her with that purple hair. I am willing (very willing) to cross the race line with number two but I will not cross the politics/culture/attitude/sanity lines. Agree also with you about number one.

WayTooFresh
2 years ago

They all look M2F transgendered

positron1
positron1
2 years ago
Reply to  WayTooFresh

Pointy elbows too.

Dhillon
Dhillon
2 years ago

Y’all r crazy! #2 has a better body/more attractive than 3-7, 9 and 10. # 2, # 8, and # 11 are top 3.

G Wiz
G Wiz
2 years ago
Reply to  Dhillon

No “Top 3”. There’s #11. And then there’s 10 transsexuals.

Noah brandini
Noah brandini
2 years ago

The last woman presents herself as a low-value woman so she is good for pump and dump but not for being the one and only.
Also, this woman feels that she is not good enough, so she is always going to be blaming you for her problems and that’s a clear red flag for dating.

Anti-Gnostic
Anti-Gnostic
2 years ago
Reply to  Noah brandini

Actually. the last woman is of high value.

Noah brandini
Noah brandini
2 years ago
Reply to  Anti-Gnostic

Then you don’t know what high-value actually means. Unfortunately I think in today’s world, we as a society put way too much
emphasis on how we look externally, and way too little emphasis on how
we show up to the world.

G Wiz
G Wiz
2 years ago

#11 = BANGABLE

All others: GROSS. Would NOT touch

Kevin Bastardboy
Kevin Bastardboy
2 years ago
Reply to  G Wiz

sure, incel..thanks for coming out

Mary Jane Rottenkrotch
Mary Jane Rottenkrotch
2 years ago

#1- if she passes medical exam…hey now…

K-man
K-man
2 years ago

I’d bang them all… #1 with a triple-layer condom

Abaria
Abaria
2 years ago

How i would rate them:

1. Rating: 3
2. Rating: 7+
3. Rating: 5+
4. Rating: 6
5. Rating: 4
6. Rating: 7
7. Rating: 2
8. Rating: 8
9. Rating: 3
10. Rating: 7
11. Rating: 9+

Homine
Homine
2 years ago

Ignoring personal preference:
1, 11 porn, anything allowed, and disposable
6,8,10 neoteny, Contradicts but also contrasts sex = intensified stimulation, and also correlated with virginity(human evolution)

“taste” is redistributed depending on quality. Average males would bang better than average looking females(genetically ugly). Very low quality males would bang average or less than average looking females. But in reality choice is redistributed too, and with it variation, with men at the top having more variety, more choice.

The appearance of most women is a lie, thus is that MOST men are banging women that are genetically uglier. e.g. all girls in the photos are artificially enhanced

Anti-Gnostic
Anti-Gnostic
2 years ago
Reply to  Homine

“The appearance of most women is a lie…”

In a photograph, perhaps one’s flawed features are covered up or are not as revealing. But that is not necessarily “a lie”.

Homine
Homine
2 years ago
Reply to  Anti-Gnostic

Clothes specially designed, make up, depilation, fat redistribution(waist, hips, legs,ass, etc.), surgery, hair grooming, personality, dental enhancement, etc., entire industries dedicated to change and enhance women’s appearance and public image(innocence, IQ, education, etc.)

Oh yes, “a lie” Females change their appearance to imitate men’s preference, “male choice”, to compete, to be the idealization, the woman that man creates, that man has created in each historical period

Men choose stimuli, so women being fakes do not cause rejection in men, but the opposite, this is related to “male denial”, blindness, pleasure, lots of pleasure.

Most men will trust that stimulation as if it was real(instinctively), which also allows prostitution and manipulation of his sexuality and empathy.

Most men would be surprised how “unmodified” females really look
And many women too…

Kevin Bastardboy
Kevin Bastardboy
2 years ago
Reply to  Homine

in that sense most mens’ appearance is a “lie” too, minus (usually, not always) the makeup. but clothes, grooming, dental (unless super-poor)

Homine
Homine
2 years ago

That is a wrong comparison. Or false equivalence
Men don’t have sexual organs to stimulate the female. Nothing equivalent to breasts, buttocks, neoteny, etc. And you are also ignoring the amount of modifications

Men invent that technology, women do not. Those modifications are possible because of men, not women themselves, that technology describes masculinity NOT femininity. Those modifications represent male preference, not female preference. They represent the desire of women to stimulate a man by being what men prefer. In other words, stimulation is unidirectional

The males that lie/imitate a supposed female sexual preference are ultimately imitating not what women desire, but what dominant males defined already as attractive to women, they are imitating status, manhood, better or real men. Because that fools women psychologically. That act of imitation by certain males is feminization, a lie indeed

So a man cannot lie by enhancing and multiplying the effect of non existent sexual organs, or neoteny. Because even if he could there would NOT be a female receptive to that. Men’s clothes are NOT sexual. Most women do not marry “hot” men. Men’s clothes are not designed to be sexually stimulating, or fantastical, the average male is not dressing in any special way. Dental care matters more for women, in men status matters more. Grooming matters incomparably more to women. Etc.

The males that lie are for example the so called PUAs, but they lie by pretending to be “men” How ? By imitating what they consider to be an “alpha male”, which obviously they are not. They are feminized

We have then several factors: Sexual organs or biology that stimulates men, culture or man’s idealization of ‘woman’, technology to materialize that fantasy, that lie. And all of them come from men alone. Women did not define male sexual organs through evolution = men don’t have sexual organs to stimulate females, otherwise men would be using them all the time for obvious reasons. Women did not design or define the appearance of men, in fact it is evident how bad most men dress today. Women do not dress like they want, but as men want, exactly as men describe their sexual preferences. Women are constantly concerned about what is it that men want or what is it that causes a bigger effect, even lesbians, and they learn it all from men or by seeing other women

The lies of “most” men are not explicitly related to mating, are lesser and general, therefore they do not have the same impact in women like the lies of most women have in men. Prostitutes are example of that.

Homine
Homine
2 years ago

That is a wrong comparison. Or false equivalence
Men don’t have sexual organs to stimulate the female. Nothing equivalent to breasts, buttocks, neoteny, etc. And you are also ignoring the amount of modifications

Men invent that technology, women do not. Those modifications are possible because of men, not women themselves, that technology describes masculinity NOT femininity. Those modifications represent male preference, not female preference. They represent the desire of women to stimulate a man by being what men prefer. In other words, stimulation is unidirectional

The males that lie/imitate a supposed female sexual preference are ultimately imitating not what women desire, but what dominant males defined already as attractive to women, they are imitating status, manhood, better or real men. Because that fools women psychologically. That act of imitation by certain males is feminization, a lie indeed

So a man cannot lie by enhancing and multiplying the effect of non existent sexual organs, or neoteny. Because even if he could there would NOT be a female receptive to that. Men’s clothes are NOT sexual. Most women do not marry “hot” men. Men’s clothes are not designed to be sexually stimulating, or fantastical, the average male is not dressing in any special way. Dental care matters more for women, in men status matters more. Grooming matters incomparably more to women. Etc.

The males that lie are for example the so called PUAs, but they lie by pretending to be “men” How ? By imitating what they consider to be an “alpha male”, which obviously they are not. They are feminized

We have then several factors: Sexual organs or biology that stimulates men, culture or man’s idealization of ‘woman’, technology to materialize that fantasy, that lie. And all of them come from men alone. Women did not define male sexual organs through evolution = men don’t have sexual organs to stimulate females, otherwise men would be using them all the time for obvious reasons. Women did not design or define the appearance of men, in fact it is evident how bad most men dress today. Women do not dress like they want, but as men want, exactly as men describe their sexual preferences. Women are constantly concerned about what is it that men want or what is it that causes a bigger effect, even lesbians, and they learn it all from men or by seeing other women

The lies of “most” men are not explicitly related to mating, are lesser and general, therefore they do not have the same impact in women like the lies of most women have in men. Prostitutes are example of that.

(reposted, antispam censorship)

Homine
Homine
2 years ago

That is a wrong comparison. Or false equivalence
Men don’t have sexual organs to stimulate the female. Nothing equivalent to breasts, buttocks, neoteny, etc. And you are also ignoring the amount of modifications

Men invent that technology, women do not. Those modifications are possible because of men, not women themselves, that technology describes masculinity NOT femininity. Those modifications represent male preference, not female preference. They represent the desire of women to stimulate a man by being what men prefer. In other words, stimulation is unidirectional

The males that lie/imitate a supposed female sexual preference are ultimately imitating not what women desire, but what dominant males defined already as attractive to women, they are imitating status, manhood, better or real men. Because that fools women psychologically. That act of imitation by certain males is feminization, a lie indeed

So a man cannot lie by enhancing and multiplying the effect of non existent sexual organs, or neoteny. Because even if he could there would NOT be a female receptive to that. Men’s clothes are NOT sexual. Most women do not marry “hot” men. Men’s clothes are not designed to be sexually stimulating, or fantastical, the average male is not dressing in any special way. Dental care matters more for women, in men status matters more. Grooming matters incomparably more to women. Etc.

The males that lie are for example the so called PUAs, but they lie by pretending to be “men” How ? By imitating what they consider to be an “alpha male”, which obviously they are not. They are feminized

We have then several factors: Sexual organs or biology that stimulates men, culture or man’s idealization of ‘woman’, technology to materialize that fantasy, that lie. And all of them come from men alone. Women did not define male sexual organs through evolution = men don’t have sexual organs to stimulate females, otherwise men would be using them all the time for obvious reasons. Women did not design or define the appearance of men, in fact it is evident how bad most men dress today. Women do not dress like they want, but as men want, exactly as men describe their sexual preferences. Women are constantly concerned about what is it that men want or what is it that causes a bigger effect, even lesbians, and they learn it all from men or by seeing other women

The lies of “most” men are not explicitly related to mating, are lesser and general, therefore they do not have the same impact in women like the lies of most women have in men. Prostitutes are example of that.

(reposted, antispam censorship)

Anti-Gnostic
Anti-Gnostic
2 years ago
Reply to  Homine

“Clothes specially designed, make up, depilation, fat redistribution(waist, hips, legs,ass, etc.), surgery, hair grooming, personality, dental enhancement, etc., entire industries dedicated to change and enhance women’s appearance and public image(innocence, IQ, education, etc.)”

Change and enhance being the key operative words here. No “lying”.

“”Oh yes, “a lie” Females change their appearance to imitate men’s preference, “male choice”, to compete, to be the idealization, the woman that man creates, that man has created in each historical period'”

Sure, in some cases women change their appearance because out of man’s preference, but in other cases, they wear what makes them feel desirable.

‘Most men would be surprised how “unmodified” females really look…

Actually, most men are not surprised, especially if they are married or had a one night stand and neglected to leave the scene of the crime.

Homine
Homine
2 years ago
Reply to  Anti-Gnostic

Not some cases, meaning is defined by culture directly or indirectly. This aspect of culture is derived from male receptive nature. “feeling desirable” is basically the same, you are not desired if there is no one receptive.

Stimulation refers to its genetic correlation. The stimulation itself is a “normal” lie from nature, but the correlation is NOT a lie. Changes that affect that correlation are intentional lies that also affect sexual selection

The surprise thing mentioned in the previous comment is about the impact on culture it’d had if most of the complexity of body modifications was revealed, not just mere present changes of appearance that women do, but also those they do through time, conscious and unconsciously.

Kevin Bastardboy
Kevin Bastardboy
2 years ago
Reply to  Homine

yes all men are 100% honest and all women lie, I forgot the redpill/MGToW/incel “code”

Homine
Homine
2 years ago

Right now there is some coward or disqus censoring comments…

Homine
Homine
2 years ago
Reply to  Homine

Censored comment(June 4), reposted:

That is a wrong comparison. Or false equivalence
Men don’t have sexual organs to stimulate the female. Nothing equivalent to breasts, buttocks, neoteny, etc. And you are also ignoring the amount of modifications

Men invent that technology, women do not. Those modifications are possible because of men, not women themselves, that technology describes masculinity NOT femininity. Those modifications represent male preference, not female preference. They represent the desire of women to stimulate a man by being what men prefer. In other words, stimulation is unidirectional

The males that lie/imitate a supposed female sexual preference are ultimately imitating not what women desire, but what dominant males defined already as attractive to women, they are imitating status, manhood, better or real men. Because that fools women psychologically. That act of imitation by certain males is feminization, a lie indeed

So a man cannot lie by enhancing and multiplying the effect of non existent sexual organs, or neoteny. Because even if he could there would NOT be a female receptive to that. Men’s clothes are NOT sexual. Most women do not marry “hot” men. Men’s clothes are not designed to be sexually stimulating, or fantastical, the average male is not dressing in any special way. Dental care matters more for women, in men status matters more. Grooming matters incomparably more to women. Etc.

The males that lie are for example the so called PUAs, but they lie by pretending to be “men” How ? By imitating what they consider to be an “alpha male”, which obviously they are not. They are feminized

We have then several factors: Sexual organs or biology that stimulates men, culture or man’s idealization of ‘woman’, technology to materialize that fantasy, that lie. And all of them come from men alone. Women did not define male sexual organs through evolution = men don’t have sexual organs to stimulate females, otherwise men would be using them all the time for obvious reasons. Women did not design or define the appearance of men, in fact it is evident how bad most men dress today. Women do not dress like they want, but as men want, exactly as men describe their sexual preferences. Women are constantly concerned about what is it that men want or what is it that causes a bigger effect, even lesbians, and they learn it all from men or by seeing other women

The lies of “most” men are not explicitly related to mating, are lesser and general, therefore they do not have the same impact in women like the lies of most women have in men. Prostitutes are example of that.

Kevin Bastardboy
Kevin Bastardboy
2 years ago
Reply to  Homine

and how to explain gigolos that service wealthy women?

Homine
Homine
2 years ago

What do you mean?

Homine
Homine
2 years ago
Reply to  Homine

Censored reply(June 4), reposted:
——————-
kevin quote: “in that sense most mens’ appearance is a “lie” too, minus (usually, not always) the makeup. but clothes, grooming, dental (unless super-poor)”
——————-
playing with disqus censorship: [w0.m3n] = tits
———-
That is a wrong comparison. Or false equivalence
Men don’t have sexual organs to stimulate the female. Nothing equivalent to breasts, buttocks, neoteny, etc. And you are also ignoring the amount of modifications

Men invent that technology, [w0.m3n] do not. Those modifications are possible because of men, not [w0.m3n] themselves, that technology describes masculinity NOT femininity. Those modifications represent male preference, not female preference. They represent the desire of [w0.m3n] to stimulate a man by being what men prefer. In other words, stimulation is unidirectional

The males that lie/imitate a supposed female sexual preference are ultimately imitating not what [w0.m3n] desire, but what dominant males defined already as attractive to [w0.m3n], they are imitating status, manhood, better or real men. Because that fools [w0.m3n] psychologically. That act of imitation by certain males is feminization, a lie indeed

So a man cannot lie by enhancing and multiplying the effect of non existent sexual organs, or neoteny. Because even if he could there would NOT be a female receptive to that. Men’s clothes are NOT sexual. Most [w0.m3n] do not marry “hot” men. Men’s clothes are not designed to be sexually stimulating, or fantastical, the average male is not dressing in any special way. Dental care matters more for [w0.m3n], in men status matters more. Grooming matters incomparably more to [w0.m3n]. Etc.

The males that lie are for example the so called PUAs, but they lie by pretending to be “men” How ? By imitating what they consider to be an “alpha male”, which obviously they are not. They are feminized

We have then several factors: Sexual organs or biology that stimulates men, culture or man’s idealization of ‘[w0.m3n]’, technology to materialize that fantasy, that lie. And all of them come from men alone. [w0.m3n] did not define male sexual organs through evolution = men don’t have sexual organs to stimulate females, otherwise men would be using them all the time for obvious reasons. [w0.m3n] did not design or define the appearance of men, in fact it is evident how bad most men dress today. [w0.m3n] do not dress like they want, but as men want, exactly as men describe their sexual preferences. [w0.m3n] are constantly concerned about what is it that men want or what is it that causes a bigger effect, even lesbians, and they learn it all from men or by seeing other [w0.m3n]

The lies of “most” men are not explicitly related to mating, are lesser and general, therefore they do not have the same impact in [w0.m3n] like the lies of most [w0.m3n] have in men. Prostitutes are example of that.

/censorship: google-disqus/

TyKo Steamboat
TyKo Steamboat
2 years ago

There are about 193 countries in the world. But the USA, for some reason, loves tits. I just don’t get it… I like tits, don’t get me wrong. But I would rather she be completely flat-chested, have a petite thin body, long hair & a killer ass.
Am I the only guy that doesn’t like boobs in USA? I typically associate big-boobs with fat chicks I guess. Tough to get the full package, but big boobs is one of the first physical features I compromise. Boobs just aren’t important
Physical deal breakers: short hair, stinky breath, fat body, shitty tattoos

Itanimulli
Itanimulli
2 years ago
Reply to  TyKo Steamboat

We’re in the time of the big butt fad and you’re asking if you’re the only person out of 300+ million people to not like boobs that much? You sound absolutely stupid.

TyKo Steamboat
TyKo Steamboat
2 years ago
Reply to  Itanimulli

“Big Butt Fad?” Who are you? Sir Mix-A lot?

MCGOO
MCGOO
2 years ago
Reply to  TyKo Steamboat

Tyko have you ever tried to tittie fuck a flat chested girl? It’s equally embarrassing for both parties. It’s an exercize in futility trying to streeetch her estrogen lacking adolescent buds together forming somewhat of a cavern like a mad baker who’s short on dough trying to make a skin crepé – and then torpedoing it with your tool – and FLAP it’s gone. Fuck it. Geez. Flip over bitch or gimmee a DUCKY UNDERARM!!

https://youtu.be/ynWhozyOoZQ

Really HOW flat chested is the question. I don’t like seeing ribs where there should be tits. Western men having an optical occlusion for boobs is a result of upbringing and possibly brainwashing I believe. You don’t see boobs for what they are like the ‘natural man’ sees boobs. They’re for BREEDING and TIT FEEDING offspring.

I’ll admit that I myself wasn’t a boob man after being raised with sterility education by the pre-skrillex crop of 2nd wave feminist public school teachers. They taught that boys and girls were all the same in class. In my advanced placement classes, the females were pretty much the same bean pole build as the geeks and the girls projected their intellect in class making their flat chests invisible. They had minimal or non existant sexual mojo. You had to go to the pep rallies to witness tits in action.

It wasn’t until maybe half a decade later that I would understand the importance of tits. A flat chested woman is also a difficult breeder. A flatty may be good for an only child and then she’ll nag and neg how hard the pregnancy was on her body and hormones. Blah! But if you buy into the scheme that women are for communicating with in depth and talking to, then one of the flat chested educated girls could coffee talk you to sleep every night and make you forget about the ensuing western demographic armageddon.

SERIAL BREEDERS are where the tit genes dwell. They have ample mammary buds that fill out generously when her baby machine is activated. It works on a clock and all you have to do is keep dumping load after load into her – and make bank or hustle somehow to keep the castle rolling.

TyKo Steamboat
TyKo Steamboat
2 years ago
Reply to  MCGOO

“Titty fucking” is a thing after you turn 20? I thought it was just something we do in high school. I didn’t realize a grown man would try to fuck a grown woman in her breasts with his penis

As I type this, I’m in Odessa Ukraine. My girlfriend is 21. She is a small A-cup. Her tits look good from all angles I’ve seen. I prefer A & B cups, it tells me she’ll stay thin later in life. Her legs look strong like a horse yet they’re as thin as tooth picks. I’ve been with chicks with big boobs. They turn 30 & they sag, stretch & look sad. I could care less about them. They’re cool, but they do nothing for me. To each his own, I suppose.

You bring up a good point with big boobs & fertility but it still does nothing for me in terms of attraction. Yes, I also realize you may get negged by the woman after a difficult pregnancy, but do you really think all men want to have children? Or make a small army? I’d be ok with 2, 1 or 0 kids.
I see big boobs going hand-&-glove with fat chicks.

John Woods
John Woods
2 years ago
Reply to  TyKo Steamboat

Just curious: If you could care less, why don’t you?

TyKo Steamboat
TyKo Steamboat
2 years ago
Reply to  John Woods

I’m just trying to find some logic behind the big boob/fat chick infatuation in the USA. Is it fat acceptance that has been released into our culture? I don’t get it

I mean, I understand dudes naturally like large tits because they offer comfort & a sense of safety. They promote fertility. But I don’t understand the complete obsession in the USA for knockers

positron1
positron1
2 years ago
Reply to  TyKo Steamboat

I’m an American who likes them slender and can remember when thin women weren’t rare as hens teeth in the US. Some of it is fat acceptance, some of it is the Africanization of US culture in the last few decades. Black dudes sincerely love big asses, but lately white guys have been apeing them big time. Would have boggled my mind back in the 1980s to think that a big ass on a woman would ever be considered a good thing by the general public, but here we are.

The Asian doll girl and Bill Gate’s spawn for me, by the way.

Lisa
Lisa
2 years ago
Reply to  TyKo Steamboat

Are you sure the men who like a “nice, petite, small, athletic ass” are attracted to women?

Kevin Bastardboy
Kevin Bastardboy
2 years ago
Reply to  TyKo Steamboat

not “every” guy in USA, plus I think it’s common in some other places, UK, etc

Gg
Gg
2 years ago

What’s your relation to Heartiste?