An Avalanche Of Feminist Hate

On Return Of Kings yesterday I posted the The 9 Ugliest Feminists In America. I wanted to make an objective statement about the physical appearance of America’s dimmest feminist minds. I didn’t challenge their views, talk about rape, or say that women should be denied suffrage. No matter, because the feminists went apeshit and melted the server down. I’ve never experienced anything like it.

The who’s who of the Jezebel junta took a break from being oppressed by the patriarchy to share their thoughts..

Amanda seemed to have been especially wounded at my jab that she was injected with testosterone in the womb. There was also a tweet from Feministing to it’s 64,000 followers, “congratulating” their leader Jessica Valenti for making the list, but it has since been deleted. I also mustn’t forget the tweet from—I kid you not—a “fat studies scholar.” I believe it involves studying feminism while simultaneously eating cupcakes.

Wonkette, which I don’t believe is still operational, had an extensive post published soon after the initial tweet…

Roosh is a cool dude. He is a pickup artist Mens’ Rights Activist who will take a break from boning all the world’s hottest women to teach you how to rape Ukrainian girls or something.

But Roosh is sad we guess, maybe his pageviews are not everything he would like them to be, but he has come up with a surefire way to get all the sweet honey clicks, and that is by ranking all the ugliest feminazis, obvs. So Sandra Fluke is obviously a grotesque monster (just look at her!) plus she makes you pay for her birth control.

I’m a PUAMRA now.

On the blog of Rebecca Watson (the feminist who tried to bring down great man Richard Dawkins after a nerd hit on her in an elevator), one of her writer’s tried to make an insult…

Basically, a dude who is so handsome he can only be depicted as a cartoon lest everyone die from orgasm should his actual photo ever be published, took a list of outspoken feminists and declared them ugly and the world was like ‘WHOA! THAT’S SO ORIGINAL AND DEEP! NO ONE HAS EVER CALLED FEMINISTS UGLY BEFORE! You, faceless cartoon man whose legal name is totally definitely Roosh IRL because why would you hide behind a pseudonym, are a true hero!”

A simple Google image search on “roosh” would have quickly led her to my true identity:

No feminist outrage is complete without the house male feminist defending his masters. Here is a man, a word I use with great reluctance, whining that he didn’t make the list

..there is not a single feminist man in the entire list. I feel so very left out — not to mention offended on behalf of my gender.

He outdoes himself, however:

Yep, every single woman listed is in fact beautiful.

Every single woman listed is in fact not. How deep does your balls have to be buried in your blubber folds to find this woman beautiful:

Mangina par excellence Hugo Schwyzer also whined about not being put on, no doubt in order to maintain his supply of stretched feminist vagina.

Someone asked me why I would resort to such childish name calling. It’s the same reason I call out cockblockers. The cockblocker already cost me the girl so there is no real physical gain in confronting her, but my words hurt her and ruin her night. Bitching her out means she will probably suffer the same fate as me: having her night disturbed. That satisfies me.

Thanks to the feminist movement, America is lost for me and a lot of other men. Nothing positive will come from America’s contaminated womb in the next couple of decades, but like confronting a rude cockblocker, I want to offend them. I want them to know that there is a man ape somewhere in Eastern Europe whose words can cause the feminist sphere on Twitter to lose their shit. That’s all. I don’t want to talk to them or argue with them, and I don’t want to debate them. Many men smarter than me have provided reasonable and logical arguments that unfortunately are like planet kryptonite to a feminist. They cannot be convinced and they cannot see reality. They don’t even possess enough math skills to read a chart with basic statistics. The only two ways to annoy them is to mock rape or call them ugly. Anything else and you’re wasting your time.

I wanted to send a message that I consider them unattractive women. They received that message and were wounded by it, enough to get their followers to throw hate at me all day. Happiness for me as a man and as an American is helping men get what they want out of life while pissing off the very women who are contributing to America’s horrendous cultural and female decline. Judging by that standard, I gotta say that yesterday was a good day.

Read Next: The Decline Of American Women


  1. Anonymous January 16, 2013 at 9:06 am

    They’re trying so hard to play it off with sarcasm, but it burns them deep inside.

  2. Anonymous January 16, 2013 at 9:12 am

    And, it doesn’t just burn them that they are personally being called ugly (because on some level they have all accepted the truth of their own horrible appearance) but it also burns them up on general principle that men actually care about physical attractiveness. They’ve accepted that they are ugly, but they still hold out hope that it doesn’t matter. Clue: it does.

    But there is a whole wide world of men out there and not all of them are good looking enough or confident enough to be choosy on a girl’s looks.

    Advice to physically revolting feminists: drop your snark and idealogy like a bad habit. It actually lowers your value even further. Become a sweet, submissive, caring and actually -feminine- girl, and you have a good shot at happiness with a loyal man who’s about as unfortunate looking as you are.

  3. playmuc January 16, 2013 at 9:23 am

    Fair enough.

  4. memcpy January 16, 2013 at 9:28 am

    Their not beautiful and neither is their attitude. Being here in Japan is an amazing difference, it’s almost laughable if a Japanese woman were to speak like this. You never hear it. Japanese women know their place. I’ve been spoiled here, they’re nice, pretty, and feminine.

  5. Solo Aka Marty Mcfly January 16, 2013 at 9:32 am

    I got a serious question has anybody ever seen a “hot” feminist?

  6. dumasworld January 16, 2013 at 9:36 am

    Solo, the answer is no, Krauser did a recent post on this too.

    Hot women don’t need feminism, their looks are their power. Ugly fat cunts like this need feminism because they would get fuck all in a world because they are worthless

  7. Brandon 2.0 January 16, 2013 at 9:38 am

    Seriously though, that thing holding a bag of chips with the kid on christmas look was setting itself up for sarcasm.

  8. skeet_game January 16, 2013 at 9:42 am

    you sir are a true american hero! the blogs have not made me laugh as much as i did yesterday. for all that those women (heh!) may say I guarantee that ALL of them spent an extra minute compared to usual checking themselves out in front of the mirror heh.

    thermonuclear tuesday ftw!

  9. Gavin Madden January 16, 2013 at 9:42 am

    …what about handsome feminist men? bahahahaha never!

  10. Anonymous January 16, 2013 at 9:49 am

    It takes a special kind of repulsiveness to be a feminist.

    It’s almost as if they know that they are unable to be phsyically desired, and instead choose to lash out at those whose desire they want so badly to feel.

  11. Days of Broken Arrows January 16, 2013 at 10:31 am

    Wonkette wrote: “But Roosh is sad we guess, maybe his pageviews are not everything he would like them to be, but he has come up with a surefire way to get all the sweet honey clicks…”

    WTF? The whole reason Wonkette wrote this piece up is so they could get some of the clicks Roosh was getting by association. Doesn’t anyone see the irony in this?

    That said, I am so goddamned tired of the way hipster internet types write. “Sweet honey clicks.” Fuck this writer.

  12. Raul Felix January 16, 2013 at 10:32 am

    “I’m offending for my gender”… what a fucking little bitch. God, some guys do deserve to be beta males.

  13. Todd January 16, 2013 at 10:32 am

    Eh, I don’t see any need to pay attention to negative people. I think at some point they will look back and wonder why they didn’t go a different route in life. I believe women become feminists because they do not accept the man reflected of their own smv. If a woman is a 3 and won’t accept a male 1-3 feminism is her go to strategy. If she accepted the male reflective of her own smv a point or two less than hers she’d probably be happy. The problem is women have been raised thinking they’re all 10’s and deserve a 10 and nothing less. Men are aware of their smv and seem to accept it whereas women irrationally reject their smv and instead get angry. Accept your smv ladies and settle for the male relative to yours. It’s really that simple.

  14. The Renegade January 16, 2013 at 10:34 am

    But Roosh,

    we don’t wanna just stop there. I hope I’m not just speaking for myself when I say I also want to see income redistributed to persecuted males, be them divorcees or drop outs from school as a consequence of affirmative action the American police state dictated on them. I would go to extreme lengths to accomplish this. There must be an underground network, that makes it a principal activity to steal from western women and their enablers, including the US Government, which has become the most corrupt and contaminated state in the world, as is usually the case with ultimate power, BUT NOT ALWAYS. The Turkish Empires would be among the exceptions for example.

    All the Best

  15. Phinn January 16, 2013 at 10:56 am

    “I’m a PUAMRA now.”

    I love it.

    I’m posting here primarily to record my name (or my pseudonym, at least) on the Internet for posterity — this is a great moment in history, alongside the signing of the Magna Carta, the first shot of the Revolutionary War, and Armstrong’s walk on the moon.

    I will be able to say that I was there when it all began — the end of feminism.

    Let this be remembered as the day when men decided to behave like men again, when we learned that we can call a hagbeast a hagbeast, and yet the firmament would not crumble.

  16. 24601 January 16, 2013 at 11:04 am

    way to lead the attack, Roosh. I enjoyed the show all day.

  17. rgl January 16, 2013 at 11:22 am

    it must be so weird to not understand that all these women are laughing at you. you are a nerd with a butt cut whose only friends are men on the internet who don’t know how to get laid and are still mad that they never got laid in high school. you thinking women is ugly is the same as like, gollum or paul giamatti calling us ugly.

  18. Thursday January 16, 2013 at 11:22 am

    I think there is a legitmate question here about why feminists do tend to be so damn ugly.

    A couple theories (not mutually exclusive).

    1. Masculinization. Feminists simply tend to be physiologically more like men, so they naturally want to be able to do the things men do (sometimes).

    2. Self selection for women who are bad at the traditional female way of getting resources (i.e. through men). This includes ugly chicks (self explanatory), lesbians (self explanatory), sluts (who can’t control their sexuality and choose sex partners only on the basis of attraction, not how good a provider they are), and semi-autistics and other social retards (who don’t know how to read men).

  19. Thursday January 16, 2013 at 11:25 am

    It is really funny to hear people insult you, say you can’t get laid, you’re a loser etc. when in fact you are tearing it up. If Roosh is so damn awful, ugly, whatever why do so many women anxious to get on his nuts, including a couple well known DC feminists.

  20. Anonymous January 16, 2013 at 11:25 am

    Jessica Valenti isn’t ugly.

    I’d hit it.

  21. Anonymous January 16, 2013 at 11:26 am

    Angelina Jolie is a beautiful feminist.

    But I think she’s the only one.

  22. P January 16, 2013 at 11:27 am

    Keep making these posts and you’ll be rolling in cash real quick.

  23. Thursday January 16, 2013 at 11:36 am

    Interesting that they put so much hate on a post that Roosh probably put close to zero effort into. I mean really it’s kind of a casual toss off.

    But the feminists treated it like it was the most serious thing in the world.

  24. David January 16, 2013 at 11:37 am

    the simple mindedness also decreased the attractive level. Add unattractive together with illogical screeching and that’s as attractive as banging a goat.

  25. dumasworld January 16, 2013 at 11:39 am

    @number 18 – blah blah blha *shaming* blah blah blah

    typical feminist, hypocrite

  26. Thursday January 16, 2013 at 11:41 am

    Jessica Valenti and Sandra Fluke though aren’t really that ugly. They’re in the 5-6 range. Bangable. The rest are hideous she-beasts. Shudder.

  27. Thursday January 16, 2013 at 11:46 am

    I got a serious question has anybody ever seen a “hot” feminist?

    The best you can do are Gloria Steinem and the young Naomi Wolf.

  28. Steve January 16, 2013 at 11:48 am

    Love it – keep fighting the good fight Rooshie-boy

  29. Thursday January 16, 2013 at 11:51 am

    Note how Roosh has a genuine sense of humour about his own looks, calling himself a hairy beast all the time.

  30. Anonymous January 16, 2013 at 11:55 am

    It is like in Braveheart, when he said “I’m going to pick a fight.”


  31. Alex January 16, 2013 at 11:56 am

    I heart you Roosh

  32. Aaron January 16, 2013 at 11:56 am

    I once knew an attractive feminist, except she was batshit insane (no father figure in her life) and a huge slut.

    The irony is that if you were to somehow put together a list of Top 10 Feminists to Fuck, you’d receive the same backlash (that’s “sexual objectification!”). Feminists want men to have boners over a woman’s personalities, accomplishments, and intrinsic qualities. The hard-on must be a social construct, just like gender!

    It’s entertaining how easy it is to offend feminists. Just find a general worldview that doesn’t match their beliefs: People judge others by their looks, men get turned on by attractive women, these women are ugly, accept it bitches.

  33. Adam January 16, 2013 at 12:00 pm

    And the manosphere continues to grow. All hail Roosh! King troll of the manosphere!

  34. Teedub January 16, 2013 at 12:09 pm

    “Yep, every single woman listed is in fact beautiful.”

    Had to burst out laughing at that one. How pathetic!

  35. Teedub January 16, 2013 at 12:10 pm

    @33 Aaron

    Haha, perfect!

  36. Sombro January 16, 2013 at 12:14 pm

    Their hideousness is easily ignorable. What’s sadder is when these harpies open their mouths, you realise their souls are just as ugly.

  37. Solo Aka Marty Mcfly January 16, 2013 at 12:21 pm

    Roosh loving you integrating more picture post, shows versatility.
    What I find pathetic is that these feminist call men misogynistic and shame us
    But than instead of fighting in civility they call you names such as a skin head, wishing for your death, and other despicable things
    Kate Harding could get it though after a 5th of vodka..
    Just saying….

  38. Captain Courageous January 16, 2013 at 12:48 pm

    Hey Roosh, I’m a big fan but no matter how much I might want to, I can’t come along with you on this one.

    These women are not particularly ugly. They are just unattractive nonentities, that are not worth a second look from any Man. Calling these femnazis out on their looks, is like calling Hitler out on his table manners.

    Think about it… They have gone through their whole lives without any Man paying them the slightest attention. And now, for the first time ever, a Man has finally noticed them. Sure it might have been their unattractiveness that finally caught his eye but in their “rationalizing monkey’s” head, that wont matter, it’s still male attention and that’s something they’ve probably craved all their lives.

    I can fully understand the need for you to vent your spleen from time to time but as Kipling said in your post the other week… “when being hated, don’t give way to hating” .

    Roosh, I think that your valuable talents would be much better used, ridiculing the repugnant views of these sad women, rather than their lack of pleasant features.

    Respect Bro

  39. KO January 16, 2013 at 12:51 pm

    U need to upgrade ur hosting plan server is getting killed.

    [Roosh: Yes the site theme doesn’t scale to high traffic. The programming is currently being optimized.]

  40. JP January 16, 2013 at 12:58 pm

    Man, those feminists you listed are disgusting cunts now, imagine what they will be like in 20-30 years when they are post-menopausal wheelchair-bound shoggoths who had to get their legs amputated because of diabetic foot-rot. *shudder*

  41. Krauser January 16, 2013 at 1:00 pm

    haha, what a bunch of stupid ugly cunts. Their behaviour is transparent and you worked them so easily. It’s sad that feminists don’t even get a functioning brain to make up for their boot-faced absence of sexual value.

  42. john January 16, 2013 at 1:05 pm

    there is a certain satisfying irony that this was a twitter explosion of outrage.

    twitter, the piece of shit shallow american celeb monster that contributes nothing to the world. These vapid feminists and their white knighters probbably noticed and posted all this from their new macbooks while sitting at starbucks.

    fuck I am glad I don’t live there.

  43. Jordan January 16, 2013 at 1:19 pm

    best comment on the original post:

    anonymous: The ugliest thing about this post is that you think it’s okay to insult these women.

    russian guy: no, i’d say there are 9 things much uglier than that.

    spit out my drink after reading that one!

  44. Rael January 16, 2013 at 1:20 pm

    “Someone asked me why I would resort to such childish name calling.”

    Because there’s a new book & a new website that could both use some extra publicity.

    If the feminist web presence had collectively learned anything from the past (Tosh’s rape joke flapple, for example) they’d have just ignored you.

    Congrats on another big free promo score.

  45. anonymouse January 16, 2013 at 1:23 pm

    Whatever, other than the old ones have any of them managed to actually reproduce?

  46. Jonathan January 16, 2013 at 1:26 pm

    That feminists are mostly ugly isn’t rocket science. It’s pretty self-explanatory.

    Feminists who actually are really beautiful aren’t really feminists of the third wave/Jezebel type. They are women who think feminism stands for voting rights and legal abortion.

    The feminist of the third wave/Jezebel school on the other hand aren’t satisfied with that. They want to change culture so that women are no longer “only valued because of their looks”. On other words, they don’t want men to prefer hot young women over fat ugly bitches. Naomi Wolf’s canonical feminist bestseller “The Beauty Myth” is full of quotes designed to get the self-rationalization hamster wheel spinning in the ugly rejected woman who reads them.

    “Sadly, the signals that allow men and women to find the partners who most please them are scrambled by the sexual insecurity initiated by beauty thinking. A woman who is self-conscious can’t relax to let her sensuality come into play. If she is hungry she will be tense. If she is “done up” she will be on the alert for her reflection in his eyes. If she is ashamed of her body, its movement will be stilled. If she does not feel entitled to claim attention, she will not demand that airspace to shine in. If his field of vision has been boxed in by “beauty”–a box continually shrinking–he simply will not see her, his real love, standing right before him.”

    “Men are visually aroused by women’s bodies and less sensitive to their arousal by women’s personalities because they are trained early into that response, while women are less visually aroused and more emotionally aroused because that is their training. This asymmetry in sexual education maintains men’s power in the myth: They look at women’s bodies, evaluate, move on; their own bodies are not looked at, evaluated, and taken or passed over. But there is no “rock called gender” responsible for that; it can change so that real mutuality–an equal gaze, equal vulnerability, equal desire–brings heterosexual men and women together.”

    “What becomes of a man who acquires a beautiful woman, with her “beauty” his sole target? He sabotages himself. He has gained no friend, no ally, no mutual trust: She knows quite well why she has been chosen. He has succeeded in buying something: the esteem of other men who find such an acquisition impressive.”

    All of the above are quotes from The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used Against Women by Naomi Wolf

    What type of woman do you think actually wants to believe this? The super hot chick or the fat, ugly, manjawed woman’s studies major?

    This is what third wave feminism is all about. And this is why ugly women flock to feminism as flies to rotten corpse.

  47. Rael January 16, 2013 at 1:32 pm

    Of course a few tweets isn’t the same as being called out in articles on any of the larger feminist websites … maybe they are learning something.

    We’ll see … maybe Jezebel will yet post an article denouncing you. Good luck.

  48. La mouette January 16, 2013 at 2:13 pm


  49. Anonymous January 16, 2013 at 2:53 pm

    All feminists are winners in this competition – you go grillaz

  50. Amanjaw Marcuntte January 16, 2013 at 2:59 pm

    The most mystifying reaction to all this was by the white knights who called these things “beautiful women.”

    Seriously, what the ever-loving fuck? Are they lying or deluded? It’s especially ironic when it comes from ‘skeptics’ like PZ Myers. Don’t these Atheism+ manginas realise that they sound just as irrationally dogmatic as the creationists they deride?

  51. Cunty McCunterson January 16, 2013 at 3:20 pm

    Now please put up some more babes, my ballsack all but retracted.

  52. Guy Incognito January 16, 2013 at 3:43 pm

    Could the response to that post be any more perfect?

  53. anonymouse January 16, 2013 at 4:03 pm

    PZ myers the the male equivalent to the hideous lindy west. too ugly to get sex on his terms, too weak for a woman to find him attractive on her terms. all he has is trying vainly to appeal to their secondary process (comfort) and hope the timing is right to get lucky.

    If he were a PUA he’d be hoping for what they call fool’s mate, but we just call it pussy begging.

  54. Leap of a Beta January 16, 2013 at 4:05 pm

    Thanks for taking the feminist hate for a day, and giving us in the US a breather. I took the opportunity to face the world free of hate for a day. To drink and be merry in a world of beautiful young women while all the unattractive feminists’ heads exploded on twitter before they ate a tub of ice cream in one sitting. It was beautiful.

    Now I have to go back out into the world filled with feminists once again.

  55. Dannyfrom504 January 16, 2013 at 4:21 pm

    Privateman told me to read this.

    Keep strong and fighting the good fight. My blog is WAAAY different from yours and I don’t get near the traffic you do, but fuck feminists.

    They don’t mind a man being financially raped in a divorce so I can’t take them seriously. They MADE the current generation of slits and now are pissed that guys with game are knocking the back.

    Sorry feminists, you made the playing field, I’m just winning the game. Thanks.

    Stay up Roosh.

  56. Mike 2 January 16, 2013 at 4:33 pm


    they reproduce the same tired old lies all the time.

  57. greenlander January 16, 2013 at 4:33 pm

    Roosh, just remember this: all publicity is good publicity!

    Keep on doin’ what you’re doin’ and don’t let the warpigs wear you down!

  58. Hipstersstink January 16, 2013 at 4:34 pm

    Too funny. I was wondering why I couldn’t access the site yesterday.

  59. Derrick January 16, 2013 at 4:35 pm

    @47: Most young women ARE feminists, they just aren’t aware enough to realize it, so they do not identify it. There are attractive girls who aren’t feminists, but they must be rare as shit.

  60. lulz January 16, 2013 at 5:28 pm

    rgl “you thinking women is ugly is the same as like, gollum or paul giamatti calling us ugly.”

    I love the smell of napalmed feminists in the morning.

  61. truth January 16, 2013 at 5:36 pm

    The Meta Data of Roosh’s post: Become a feminist, join the ranks of fuglys and losers. THAT is what is scaring these bitches, realizing they are a losers club, and if anyone else finds out, their whole message is fucked. What better way than to post their pictures, and let their internal hatred speak for themselves.

  62. Anonymous January 16, 2013 at 5:54 pm

    It’s pretty immature to bully people about their looks. Are you five?

  63. Ra January 16, 2013 at 5:58 pm

    “I want them to know that there is a man ape somewhere in Eastern Europe whose words can cause the feminist sphere on Twitter to lose their shit.”

    Fucking glorious. 

  64. SuckPoppet January 16, 2013 at 6:58 pm


    You make me ashamed of my gender you repulsive toad.

  65. Thursday January 16, 2013 at 7:08 pm

    Can’t be bothered with the rest.

  66. skeet_game January 16, 2013 at 8:26 pm

    beta boy white knight inexperienced in what to say and what not to say to a chick tries to ingratiate himself with horse-faced chick….gets bitched out.

    roosh’s post on feminists from yesterday is the gift that keeps on giving

  67. AssNeck January 16, 2013 at 8:31 pm

    The feminists I knew in college were hideous. They really are bitter since they cannot attract men.

    The best thing I ever did to a feminist – besides banging a few of them when I was too drunk to care – was when a right plonker of a bird asked me to help shovel her condo area (a very small area like mine).

    I told her to hold on and when I came back I told her she could borrow my shovel. The look on her pinched face was priceless.

    A feminist needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle. Until it comes to getting laid or shoveling her own path.

  68. Pedro Cristiano January 16, 2013 at 9:07 pm

    Very funny, great link baiting. I have started confronting cockblockers too!

  69. Not-Pele January 16, 2013 at 9:28 pm

    As football players are told, play the ball and not the man, otherwise you get put on the bench by the ref. Even if you’ve got issues with the man, beat the man by your skills and drive, not with targeted abuse (sledging or a kick to the head…)

    This style of public attack gives people a much easier option by which to damage your profile and business efforts. It is much harder and takes more effort to argue against your views, than it does to criticize your comments on their appearance.

    Id suggest reconsidering the approach, and make their views look silly, based on the success of your books and business, not by targeting their personal attributes.

    Assneck’s approach is a good example of a win that didnt rely on personal criticism for it’s strength. It wouldn’t matter how ugly/beaut the other person was, the win would hold solid. The shovel exposed the use of a feminist argument as a convenient cloak, by exposing their personal hypocrisy, and inherently sexist underlying beliefs. Classic Socratic method there :-).

  70. DLV Master January 16, 2013 at 9:37 pm

    STFU ugly skanks!

  71. Alex Hill January 16, 2013 at 9:53 pm

    With feminism comes many important and interesting branching points worthy of discussion. The schism between sex-positive and sex-negative feminism. The skirmishes that pop up between them and men’s rights advocates. The effect these things have on modern culture.

    When it came time to articulate your own thoughts on these critically-important aspects of our daily life, you… made fun of people for their physical appearances.

    I don’t think it’s fair for a pile of afterbirth mistakenly raised as a human being to be making fun of how other people look.

  72. Armenian January 16, 2013 at 10:00 pm

    The Feminist movement is like the Israeli government. Because they have power, influence over political policies, are well funded and backed by the mainstream media, they are perceived as legit. They can justify bombing the Palestinians and build settlements but if the Palestinians fight back for their own survival, they are the ones seen as the barbaric terrorists.

  73. American Man January 16, 2013 at 10:02 pm

    Alex Hill, you have obviously never been in a relationship with an attractive woman. Real women want to be treated like a child, to be led by a dominant man, to be valued for their feminine qualities and their beauty. Feminism has not important topics worthy of discussion. Get your head out of your ass.

  74. Shamrock January 16, 2013 at 10:09 pm

    Can we make this a monthly event? I’m certain there’s more than enough ugly feminists to go around.

  75. James A January 16, 2013 at 10:34 pm

    Thank you Roosh, for saying what needs to be said.

  76. Derrick January 17, 2013 at 12:57 am


    Au contraire, my “Not a famous Footballer” friend.

    Ad hominem attacks are the most effective anti-feminist tool I can think of. How many posts either here or at RoK got that much feminist whining associated with it? None. That’s just the way it is.

  77. Anonymous January 17, 2013 at 1:19 am

    In other news, cupcake and donut sales are skyrocketing…..

  78. monster221 January 17, 2013 at 1:45 am

    haha its the troglodyte again.

  79. M January 17, 2013 at 1:55 am

    Lol @ the person who said personal attacks aren’t effective, have you failed to pay attention to every election ever?

  80. Anonymous January 17, 2013 at 2:06 am

    This is ridiculous, you as an writer are ridiculous and I am so sick of men trying to control women by calling them ugly.

    Take a good look in the mirror, because you are the ugliest son of a bitch out there, asshole.

    Stop making feminism a joke. You expect a certain body type in women while every body is built differently. You see so much less hate for fat guys, so how is it fair that women get hate for it? Why can men indulge themselves but women need to starve themselves.

    Eating disorders and self hate are real things, and you are just triggering it for all the girls who think they aren’t attractive. Congratulations. I hope you choke.

  81. Matt H. January 17, 2013 at 2:25 am

    Hahaha! Keep stirring the pot Roosh.

    People attack you because they see you as a threat. That’s a very, very good thing. It means you’re on to something.

  82. JP January 17, 2013 at 2:31 am

    @ 87

    Judging by your comment, I’m guessing you are a moron incapable of seeing the contradictions in your own post.

    First “This is ridiculous, you as an writer are ridiculous and I am so sick of men trying to control women by calling them ugly.”

    Then “Take a good look in the mirror, because you are the ugliest son of a bitch out there, asshole.”

    So its wrong for Roosh to make an observation about how ugly feminists are but its OK for you to try to shame him into silence by calling him an ugly SOB? And why are all these feminists getting pissed off about being called ugly if beauty norms are supposedly artificial cultural constructs?

    Women don’t get hate for being fat, they get hate for being self entitled heartless harridans who constantly have to remind us how ok they are with being morbidly obese.

    Every fat bitch in the world could easily solve 80% of her problems if they would staple their mouthes shut for 3 months.

    “Eating disorders and self hate are real things”. Yeah, too bad those eating disorders aren’t anorexia or bulimia. At least chicks with those disorders would be able to give men boners and be able to walk through a door without having to grease the sides first.

    You may think healthy at any size is true, but see if you feel the same way when they are lifting your lardass onto an MRI designed for buffalo so they can figure out which one of your organs are failing.

    Also, I’m guessing your fat. In which case, no one will love you until you make shoving your finger down your throat a habit. So start worshipping the porcelain god, FATASS!!

  83. Adam January 17, 2013 at 6:06 am

    Re #5 – “I got a serious question has anybody ever seen a “hot” feminist?”

    Susan Faludi wasn’t too bad looking in her younger days.

    Going back a couple of generations, Gloria Steinem was actually once a Playboy Bunny!

    so, they don’t (or at least didn’t) all look like Germaine Greer or Andrea Dworkin

  84. John January 17, 2013 at 6:12 am

    What I like about the “manosphere” is that it shines a light on stuff that you don’t see anywhere else. Theres nothing like this on mainstream tv and media.

    One of the things that hits home to me is being logical is pointless. Its literally a game, it doesn’t matter what the truth is or what the reality is. You can’t reason with the unreasonable.

    I like it when the PUA’s have a go at feminists, its like I’m watching the star manjaw fembot QB get dumped/sacked repeatedly.

    Good on ya Roosh.

  85. JJ Roberts January 17, 2013 at 6:13 am

    It’s not hard to see why ugly women gravitate to feminism.

    If you have sexual marketplace value, you can get what you want from men by using it.

    If you have zero sexual marketplace value, your hypergamous nature can only be indulged by insiting that nature is ‘wrong’ and that special rules should be passed to compensate you for your lack of attractiveness.

    And if that does not happen? Waaaaaaaaaa WAaaaaaaaaa! Not fair !! Waaaaaaaaa!!! Tar and feather everyone that stands our way !!! Waaaaaaa!

  86. maciano January 17, 2013 at 6:24 am

    personal attacks don’t work? ask nietzsche. he said socrates’ invention/ concept of the soul and its supposed beauty was only intended to hide his ugly physical appearance.

    what would the guy say about feminists’ fury for male’s natural preferences: beautiful, young feminine women?

  87. BANG ROMANIA January 17, 2013 at 7:58 am

    Roosh I like very much your work.

    Keep on doing great stuff !!!

    BANG ROMANIA !!!;)

  88. John Rambo January 17, 2013 at 8:56 am

    Hell yea Roosh. THIS is the way to attack them. Feminists and women are too stupid to understand philosophy and intelligent comments. Just attack them on a personal level, using the exact same shaming language they use against men, and we will DEFEAT them.

  89. Ben January 17, 2013 at 9:04 am

    Haha you knew perfectly well what you were doing when you began to write the ugly feminists post. Worked a treat, hey Rooshy?

  90. Todd January 17, 2013 at 9:47 am

    I work with an old feminists that divorced her husband and turned to Buddhism and she’s now in her mid 50’s. She’s one of the most unpleasant people I have ever met in my entire life and is a complete and total nasty person to other people but especially men. She hates the fact that i’m dating 4-5 women at any given time and it only makes her nastier towards me. I know deep down she is lonely and have empathy towards her situation, so I am nice to hear because of that. I even suggested to her to get back in the game and online date.

  91. Psychonaut January 17, 2013 at 12:12 pm

    This is very good (Applause)

  92. Chicago REd January 17, 2013 at 12:14 pm

    I eat secular feminist manbeast cunts for breakfast!

    If I meet a girl online or while prowling the scene and she’s doable, worth a bang, not a fat Troll, she passes the Boner Test, but I discover she’s a secular feminist manbeast cunt. There are only three outcomes in which I win:

    She pays for everything I dominate her verbally and intellectually she eventually leaves an angry confused bundle of broken delusions.

    She pays for everything at the second venue I dominate her verbally and intellectually she eventually is heard muttering as she storms out of the building, red faced while holding back her crocodile tears “Men are pigs!”

    She screams while on her back in her bed “Give it to me hard Daddy! Yes! It’s your pussy baby! It’s all yours! Take it! Take it!” to my query as I hate fuck her through the night. Of course she’s been pumped and dumped. I eat secular feminist manbeast cunts for breakfast.

    What women don’t understand is that after the age of thirty they’re no longer buyers but sellers and that’s a completely different attitude and set of marketing strategies.

  93. Jonathan January 17, 2013 at 1:20 pm


    Problem with feminists is that they shame and hate on men for preferring slender beautiful feminine women over ugly abrasive fat bitches like themselves.

    Make no mistake, third wave feminism isn’t about equal rights and abortion anymore, if it was, there would be nothing left to fight for since abortion is legal and women have the same legal rights as men. The reason they keep saying that their version of feminism is about equal rights is cause if they were being honest no attractive beautiful women call herself a feminist.

    Third wave feminism is basically a war against men’s preferences when it comes to sex and relationships. Feminists are women who simply aren’t able to live up to those preferences so instead they try to shame men for having them and blame patriarchy for creating these fake standards that are oppressive to women and therefore every man who actually chose women based on these standards are oppressors.

    If you as a man won’t fuck or commit to an ugly feminist woman you are oppressing her according to third wave feminism. They think and act like they are entitled to sex, love and relationships with the men they desire, while at the same time mocking and shaming the omega losers with horrible game who try to hit on them.

    There is nothing wrong with calling these women out for what they are, ugly and unattractive.

  94. Dillon January 17, 2013 at 1:25 pm

    Feminism is not women against men.

    Feminism is rejected women’s war against attractive women. Bad effects to men is just collateral damage.

  95. Jonathan January 17, 2013 at 1:34 pm


    I’ts both actually, it’s war against us men for having the preferences we have, and a war against attractive women for actually living up to those preferences.

    Ever wondered why feminists always try to convince other women to not make themselves attractive to men? The war against attractive women is a bit more subtle and is more akin to attempts to brainwash them from a young age.

  96. Johnny Salami January 17, 2013 at 1:49 pm

    I’ve seen uglier.

  97. Cross January 17, 2013 at 1:54 pm

    Where I live, Jezebel is the name of strip club.

  98. Jonathan January 17, 2013 at 2:16 pm


    Me too, enter any women’s studies course in any university and you’ll be risking lifelong impotence.

    The sad thing is that third wave feminists use the hottest ones as front figures.

    Roosh’s list is actually more like the 9 sexiest third wave feminists rather than the ugliest. They can’t even be shown in pictures.

  99. Anonymous January 17, 2013 at 4:18 pm

    Someone said Amanda is a 4 because she is not fat. No she isn’t. I turned down more attractive than her not long ago, and I considered that chick a 3. Amanda is a 2 tops.

  100. Holy shit January 17, 2013 at 9:11 pm

    375 comments and it’s still going up. Most major newspapers can’t even muster that kind of activity. You really struck a chord.

  101. anon January 17, 2013 at 9:12 pm

    I overheard 2 feminists on the train in torpnto talking about the ugliest feminist posti

  102. Anonymous January 17, 2013 at 9:57 pm

    “Eating disorders and self hate are real things”. Yeah, too bad those eating disorders aren’t anorexia or bulimia. At least chicks with those disorders would be able to give men boners and be able to walk through a door without having to grease the sides first”

    Is that a joke? You’re glorifying two of the worse mental disorders out there? Have you seen the average anorexia sufferer? lol

  103. j January 17, 2013 at 11:00 pm

    getting yr rocks off trolling feminists and is a dead end.

    your blog is stagnating. its no doubt selling books and making you money from all the new 22 year old guys getting into Game and MRA shit, but for guys who’ve been around a few years its the same ole shit.

    who the fuck cares about these fat feminist cunts?

    you’re not moving ahead, bro.

  104. Anonymous January 17, 2013 at 11:47 pm

    The sad thing is that most of these ‘ugly’ feminists have more of a chance of getting laid than most of the readers of this blog. Women don’t need to ‘prove’ themselves to men. Men need to prove themselves. That’s how nature intended it. If you want women acting according to their ‘sweet, feminine’ natures (childish and stupid), then men need to act according to their natures (brutish and primitive). After all, sperm is cheap and abundant and doesn’t lead to life on its very own. It’s in very plentiful supply, and therefore not worth too much payment.

  105. Anonymous January 17, 2013 at 11:50 pm

    Don’t treat your sperm like it’s some fine wine. It’s not made of such fine ingredients, doesn’t taste as interesting, and isn’t that rare. As long as men are the ones reading every same PUA blog out there, we can all see that women don’t really need to be that interesting as long as men are driven by their dicks.

  106. Anonymous January 18, 2013 at 1:13 am

    Never heard of taking the higher road, I guess?

  107. An-on-ymous January 18, 2013 at 6:15 am

    This post really isn’t complete without Delicious Taco’s comments on Amanda Marcotte from the last time you called her ugly.

    ” Ugh… I thought it was cruel to call this girl ugly. I stayed out of this thread; didn’t want to be part of disparaging another human being’s physical appearance.

    But a “4?” People are calling her a “4?” I’ve known 4’s. I’ve fucked 4’s, many times. Senator, this is no 4.

    This girl looks like Andre the Giant raped Fred Gwynne and somehow created a butt baby. This girl looks like the guy who reconstructs the faces of early man from skulls for National Geographic got hammered one night in his workshop and decided to play a joke. “If she lost weight and got her teeth fixed, she’d be OK…” NO. NO. That bone structure would NEVER be OK. And those teeth can’t be fixed. They’re the size of fucking pizza plates, splayed out like a bridge hand. The technology does not exist to fix this abomination and won’t for another hundred years. Every single thing that could be wrong with a human face is wrong with this person. No amount of weight loss is going to do shit, except drain her titties into flappy elderly Orang-Utan pancakes. Because this is a person who has lost the genetic lottery so hard that you just KNOW that that’s the first place she loses weight.

    This is a hideous mutant sewer creature who should have been mercifully put to death as soon as it crawled from the womb. This is violently ugly. Chromosome damage ugly. Chernobyl ugly. Ugly like the holocaust. Ugly like man’s inhumanity to man.

    A “4?” You would “let her suck your dick?” Let’s be serious here, people: if ever there was a “1,” this is a fucking 1. This is in case of ugly emergency, break glass. I would rather fuck a Portuguese Man-O-War. I would rather have the Budweiser Clydesdales run a parade over my balls than have this creation of H.P. Lovecraft within 1,000 yards of my penis.

    Those of you who call this a “4:” God help you. Let me show you what a “4” really is: a thick chick with bad skin who sucks a mean dick. This woman is something that folks from the Old Country bring up to scare their kids.”

  108. 3rd Millenium Men January 18, 2013 at 9:00 am

    Lindy West is utterly intellectually dishonest. I wrote a long, well-considered comment to her post about why men don’t need dating coaches. It was there for a while, then deleted without warning. Can’t even have anyone challenge her disgracefully wrong views. Pathetic.

  109. Phinn January 18, 2013 at 9:03 am

    #115 Anonymous — You win the thread.

    Well done, sir. Well done.

  110. Anonymous January 18, 2013 at 9:03 am

    It’s just funny that these ‘ugly’ feminists are probably having multiple orgasms with their neckbeard boyfriends tonight while the guys reading this blog all pretend that they’re holding out for a ’10’ while they sit here typing their pathetic comments, no woman in sight – not even a 1 or a 0 to reject (like they would reject a 1 or 0). The truth is that most of them probably got boners after a 6 rejected them and walked away. But then they realized they felt rejected and had to come on this blog to insult the ‘feminazis’ in order to feel better. Losers.

  111. Hawkeye January 18, 2013 at 9:49 am

    I suspect you guys already know about PeeZee Myers’ reaction to the so-called ‘elevator incident’ involving Rebecca Watson. I remember Dawkins writing an ironic piece about this.
    It goes once again to show you that no matter how smart/educated a man can be, he can be a complete and utter moron at the same time.

  112. Anonymous January 18, 2013 at 11:31 am


    “Roosh’s list is actually more like the 9 sexiest third wave feminists rather than the ugliest.”

    Exactly. It gets WAAAAAY worse than that list.

  113. По реке January 18, 2013 at 11:59 am

    @118, well, if telling yourself that makes you feel better hahahahaha

    This post was great from start to finish. I thought the article was funny when I first read it but I had no idea the storm it was going to kick up, which of course made it all the funnier. Roosh said out loud what every man already thinks and feminists lost their marbles. Good stuff.

    Also, I think feminists have gotten used to forcing apologies out of people when they throw a big enough temper tantrum (ie Tosh), when they finally run into someone who stands behind their opinions and refuses to yield it only makes them angrier. Well done, and on a more general note RoK has had some stellar articles over the past week or so.

  114. Anonymous January 18, 2013 at 5:31 pm

    I don’t get the impression that these women really care. All you really did was manage to make yourself look infantile and silly, and people that already stood behind you are…still standing behind you. This accomplishes nothing, except making you look incredibly immature. You will never win any argument by resorting to such a childish approach.

    You also have to remember that this plays into the persecution complex that EVERYONE has (including you, Roosh). The whole “If I am persecuted, that must mean I am right” type of thing. It just helps their cause, it doesn’t hinder it. Just like getting negative feedback and being banned, or whatever happened, made your resolve stronger, Roosh. They like the fact that they are upsetting the enemy so much that the enemy is resorting to something as sad as calling them ugly. I imagine it feels very righteous. People usually resort to physical appearance insults when they feel defeated…so that’s how you look. Like you give up, and they win.

    So good job on making them even more dedicated, dude.

  115. Anonymous January 18, 2013 at 6:38 pm

    So far, no one has pointed out Marcotte’s twitter comment. The only thing she had to say was an attack on Hymowitz. Ah, feminists, it’s important to remember that besides themselves, who they really hate are other women.

  116. Anonymous January 18, 2013 at 7:15 pm

    They are no uglier than Roosh V

  117. Yep January 18, 2013 at 7:16 pm


    I guess that explains the 500+ comments for that article. I don’t know what your definition of “care” is, but to me it looks like they cared plenty.


    link to said twitter comment?

  118. Glengarry January 18, 2013 at 8:22 pm

    Trolling the trolls. Chuckle.

    Truth is, they’re uglier on the inside.

  119. James L January 18, 2013 at 9:51 pm

    Women are low-IQ, subhuman wastes of space who deserve nothing but being ridiculed, oppressed and raped every single minute of the day. Be proud to be a woman-hater; be proud to be a Man. Men have made every brick of civilization and that’s what’s eating them inside – that Men are simply better.

    Sincerely, James L

    Male Supremacist & Mathematician.

  120. Anonymous January 19, 2013 at 9:18 am

    Lizards really figured it out with the asexual reproduction gambit. Personally, if it weren’t for lust, why would women even want men? Men want women way more than women want men. If there really was a God, this stupid construct of men and women wouldn’t exist. Basically, lust fools you into reproducing because no one in their right mind finds the opposite sex *that* fascinating, not enough to want to have sex with them on a constant basis (well, men do). Especially women. You get fucked, you get pregnant which makes you even more fucked for life. Then you have to sit around with your fucking kid, pretending it’s all awesome to be a mom and follow your ‘feminine’ nature while the guy who did this to you forces you to have orgasmless sex (the guy has an orgasm, always, of course) on a semi-regular basis and then throws you out when someone better comes (younger and hotter) comes along while you have to scrape together a life. Relationships between men and women are just like the relationships between corporate America and its employees – no loyalty, no fun, just kick you out when they feel like it. Anyway, males can’t asexually reproduce, so basically they will become extinct one day, anyway. Problem solved.

  121. Anonymous January 19, 2013 at 9:19 am

    @127 My guess is if it wasn’t for date rape you’d never get laid.

  122. anonymous January 19, 2013 at 11:23 am

    I actually had to cover her face with my thumb when I read this article due to me being at lunch trying to eat. Most of them are their own best form of birth control.On a high note a feminist I know (more like ex feminist) recently went from167 lbs down to about 112 lbs or so over the last semester. She grew her hair out to shoulder length and started caring more about what men thought about her and now she is actually in a relationship with a guy who isn’t a vagina worshipping beta. This all happened after we hung out for about 5 months togther at school and the ideas I got from rooshv rubbed off on her. So even though she would never admit it she thanks you rooshv everytime she’s with him.

  123. Nox January 19, 2013 at 6:43 pm

    Roosh, How do we end Feminism?

  124. Anonymous January 19, 2013 at 7:34 pm

    @125, most of the commenters were dudes licking Roosh’s butthole.

  125. Yep January 19, 2013 at 9:02 pm


    Most? lol. Get your eyes checked. There were plenty of feminists chest thumping and shit-flinging in the comment section.

    A lot of the articles posted on ROK don’t touch 100 comments. Hell, not even 50. So, you mean to tell me the massive increase in comments for one article was caused by increased activity by his readers? Get outta here. You can try and convince yourself into thinking the feminists don’t care, but the numbers bear it out. Feathers were ruffled, and feminists cared enough to put finger to keyboard and type out vitriol.

  126. Anonymous January 19, 2013 at 11:29 pm


    Alright, if you want to base whether the women criticized in the article were offended or not on the number of comments, that is fine. But if you look at their twitters, they obviously don’t care very much. They are not suddenly going “OMG, he’s right, I am ugly, I must quit being a feminist.” If they did care, it probably just fueled their fire. Things tend to work that way. His supporters tried to act like he was doing some great service (“It WORKS to call them ugly”) but he hasn’t done anything, except cause some lulz.

  127. American Dude January 20, 2013 at 11:00 pm

    @ 135
    Your missing the point. Women care A LOT about their looks. Roosh’s list was effective because it hurt them AND they claim beauty is a social construct. It’s not…and they know it and his post makes it clear. Believe me, it hurt the chick with the manjaw to read the truth just as it hurt #2 that she’s married to a subpar man because a quality guy doesn’t marry a feminist. I read Roosh because I date foreign girls exclusively, others read him for game, others because they are sick of feminism being rammed down western school goers throats, but one thing we all have in common is disgust with the lies feminists spout off.

    Women care about their looks. They want to be mothers.
    They don’t want to be spinsters. That’s why feminism is so ugly. It is causing real harm to both men and women. It’s hurt men a lot, but you’ll see, it’s going to hurt women even more, and it’s going to lose a lot of ground the next generation. I am successful and all my resources and production is going oversees. Lots of other guys will stay single. It might fuel their fire…but Roosh’s point is they are LYING. They DO CARE about being quality women, that’s why feminists are ugly…

  128. Anonymous January 21, 2013 at 7:28 am


    I really think you’re giving Roosh more credit than he deserves. I doubt he thought it through that much. He just wanted to hurt their feelings because he hates feminism.

  129. Anonymous January 21, 2013 at 7:29 am

    Also, dailymail as a source? Come ON.

  130. CaptainScarlet January 21, 2013 at 12:12 pm

    I think you need to write a blog article connecting the dots more firmly, that is, which investigates/proves the proposition that not only are feminists ugly, but its converse (contrapositive?) proposition, that is, that there is no feminist who is really beautiful.

    In fact are there even any broad-daylight 7’s that are feminists?

  131. Numbersixxx January 24, 2013 at 4:12 am

    Roosh, your list is faulty. You forgot Melissa McEwan from Shakesville. Check out her Encyclopedia Dramatica page (NSFW).

  132. Alpha Mind January 26, 2013 at 1:04 am

    I saw this and thought of you and this post.

    [Roosh: He’s a hero of our times.]

  133. Anonymous February 2, 2013 at 10:12 pm

    Omg that girl is atrocious.

  134. Roy February 24, 2013 at 3:34 am

    These are not merely “unattractive women” – they are so downright vile and disgusting the earth would spit them right back out were you to bury them, hell would reject them and no rude words could ever do them justice.
    It also goes to show that after decades of man-shaming and cocking it up, they have no defense when someone else takes a shot at them.
    You go Roosh! I support you too!

  135. Anonymous April 3, 2013 at 11:29 pm

    You fucking rule.

  136. RobotWisdom April 8, 2013 at 4:01 pm

    Roosh, you look like a Google “Caveman” reject whose brain is so confused and bewildered by such basic human concepts as dignity, decency, respect and sympathy that your brow furrowed to the point that your forehead slopes over your eyes, rendering them dim caves where the reflected light of your fantasies of raping and lobotomizing women that have the audacity to be turned off by your insipid, vile and hateful charms obviously flicker. Seriously, you resemble the actor portraying a serial killer on this low-budget slasher flick I saw recently; the killer buried an axe into the brains of beautiful (usually topless) women because apparently he couldn’t stand that they were smarter than him–or maybe he just couldn’t get it up. You look like what Cat Stevens would look like if, instead of becoming a muslim, he got hit by a car, suffered severe brain damage, and became a gun crazy fundamentalist Christian. Your penis must be microscopic. You and most of the people that comment on this site obviously don’t hate women; you are in fact so utterly afraid of them that you have all resorted to vindictive and near criminally-stupid conspiracy theories in order to explain why women that resemble Agelina Jolie and Kate Upton don’t want to have your babies. Of course, it’s pointless to post this because none of you momma’s teet-suckling George Clooney wannabes will understand it–too many big words. I weep for the future of humanity. America, however one chooses to define it, is already in its final death throes–with fuckwits like you numbering any serious number at all. It seems to me that the population of America–men and women alike–is being overrun by emotional cripples, mental midgets, and sociopaths. Honestly, I have a difficult time believing any of this is real; it all seems like some complex bad joke meant to make me despair over the condition of the human race. But that is probably just wishful thinking. What stops me from moving to the snowy northern watses of Canada or contemplating suicide is that I want to enjoy watching this society destroy itself. God speed. Good night and good luck.

  137. asian_dude April 19, 2013 at 8:38 am

    @146 ^

    Personal attacks? check
    Appeal to emotion? check
    Strawman arguments? check

    Reason or logic? Nope

  138. CC August 26, 2013 at 6:40 am

    I don’t understand how you can get anywhere by attacking anyone. Attacking someone, well, the root cause is because you feel attacked and victimized in your own way. When you take care of that and confidently brush off attacks, you don’t need to attack others to make a point, and you start to be more reasonable than the type of feminists you so despise for their irrational ideals.

    In the article, you made a great example of that. You stated how you get mad and attack someone that cockblocks or rejects sex with you ruins your night. It goes back to that whole victim thing and getting angry at perceived attacks: if rejecting sex is something that you don’t like, why attack anyone to make a point? If you are truly confident and focused on what you genuinely want, you brush it off: in getting pissed at someone for not doing something you wanted (besides the fact that simply expecting something from someone regardless of what you think you ‘did for them’ beyond considering their own needs/wants is not right either), it simply exposes your own insecurity and wastes your own time and energy along with throwing an inconvenient boulder in someone’s path only because they didn’t do something you wanted them to do.

    You would be better off being genuine, cool, and open about casual sex, rather than resorting to cheaper and more difficult manipulative ploys that you get angry about not working like you wanted them to. There are women out there who would like casual sex just like you. If someone tries to stop you or the person you are engaging with decides that maybe they don’t want casual sex for the night, then you have to shrug it off and look for it somewhere else. It’s more about belief in yourself, being frank, and being genuine than it is this game you speak of. You’ll draw to you exactly what you are looking for if you work this way: otherwise it’s always this fight, this struggle, where you or other people are always getting cut down. And you know what?

    It doesn’t have to be that way.

  139. PaulMorphy November 5, 2013 at 4:33 pm

    This is some great shit. Hot chicks are never feminists and feminists are never hot chicks.

  140. pyronite February 3, 2014 at 2:28 pm

    Man, this blog and the people who post here are really terrible.

    1. GetItGoing July 30, 2014 at 5:31 pm

      Please pull your slip down a bit. Your mangina is showing.

  141. MissTexas June 20, 2014 at 6:52 pm

    Ha! I’m gorgeous and I am a feminist! 🙂 half tempted to show you my perfection, but I don’t think you could help from fantasizing about me and it would kill me if I knew you found me attractive! One of the feminist ideas that has not been understood once, not even once anywhere on here: We’re not mad that you don’t find us attractive. We WANT you to find us unattractive. If you find us unattractive, maybe we will get left alone! (lol) people want vagina more than girls want dick so I don’t have to put up with this pick up artist shit to get laid. We just have to put up with you doing this pick up artist shit so you can get laid… Only we really don’t put up with it anymore. Many of these posts make it seem like it’s been getting really, really hard to sleep with American women. Because many of us are so tired of this lame ass game, of all these ‘PUA’ lol, nothing more than being continually pestered by guys who can ONLY have a good time if a woman sleeps with them. Lol so fragile!! Is it hard knowing that if a woman doesn’t sleep with you,you had a bad night? that your happiness is dependent on a random girl? So silly. I wish that you could be happy like us feminists and not be dependent on receiving attention from other people 🙂

  142. cthulhu April 6, 2015 at 10:22 pm

    Amanda marcote might be a man. Notice her hair style covers her brow, a usual tranny tactic to hide the brow bone.

  143. Pingback: Transformations Real Social Dynamics Torrent | Stylelife Blog

  144. Odile Lee May 1, 2015 at 2:35 pm

    “he can only be depicted as a cartoon lest everyone die from orgasm.” ( sarcasm as she poison penned.)
    I beg to negate. I finally stumbled upon a picture of of Mr Roosh- and was quite pleasantly surprised to see how masculinely beautiful he was.( I did also realise he looks like a boy I once loved, so Im biased, of course. )
    I would rather say, he is modest and not corrupted by celebrity culture. A good writer should rely on the passion of his heart, the truth of his convictions – not his looks. However they may serve his personal life.
    It would appear to me, that Mr Roosh, being sensible, embodies this. I can respect this in a writer.