Are You Serious?

1. No good deed goes unpunished. Yesterday I posted a picture of a seemingly happy couple, complimenting the guy on his game and the girl on her looks. Turns out the guy is gay (he fooled me) and his friends are getting uppity, all because I complimented his pussy-getting ability. Whatever. They are obviously new to the internet with their “you have no life” arguments. Next thing they will tell me that are “it” people in DC or something. Sorry my life is isn’t going to Fly every fucking weekend to party with the same fucking people. Please teach me how to be cool.

2. A girl who I refused to go down on publicly reacted to my post on Tuesday by basically saying I have mommy issues. I wrote something spiked with venom that was ready to crush her but I decided to put it aside. I have no choice but to defend my honor if she continues the psychobabble.

3. Both Kathryn and V shut down their blogs today. The DC blog community as I know it is over, and I fear the brain drain has just begun.

Related Posts For You

newest oldest most voted
Jinxy
Guest
Jinxy
Offline

Maybe Adam will make a guest appearance so that we can kick him around for old time’s sake.

Jinxy
Guest
Jinxy
Offline

P.S. How can you take anybody who writes like this seriously?

“it just shows how big of a dork u are. These are actually the ?it? people in DC?your just jealous…”

LOLZ.

PWNT.

Roissy
Guest
Roissy
Offline

The “you have no life/living in mommy’s basement” argument was a staple of hedonistic’s tired repertoire.

so is the “we want each other’s sex” hypothesis. 😉

for the record, i think i was the second commenter to out this dude. the phallic hair wasn’t the tipoff. it’s something in the eyes. gay dudes’ eyes sparkle like women’s.

not that there’s anything wrong with that. there doesn’t need to be. there’s plenty else wrong with these douches.

SugarDraws
Guest
SugarDraws
Offline

I didn’t even know DC had a “it” scence. Must be Californian or NY transplants

Mark Foley
Guest
Mark Foley
Offline

Hey DCB you got this guys name,phone number or Instant messenger screen name???????

Phil
Guest
Phil
Offline

I am just as stunned as when I heard George Michael was gay.

George Michael
Guest
George Michael
Offline

I tried to bang this homo latin lover but his anus was so loose from being ganged banged. I love it when he cuts my pubic hair. I know some people said he was a hairstylist. But they didnt specify which one. He is a pubic hairstylist. He made my nappy hairs straight.

jg
Guest
jg
Offline

Maybe some of these comments are so negative because you posted a picture of two people you don’t know and subjected them to public comment on the internet without their permission. This is a perfect example of one of the greatest downsides of the internet– the damage it can inflict on the individual’s right to privacy. While one may argue that because this picture was posted on the club promoter’s website, these people consented to being posted on the internet, they never consented to being posted on your blog and subjected to public redicule. Furthermore, the photo you posted the other day on your new tee-shirt of you and the two young women is even more offensive. Your tee-shirt insinuated that (a) you slept with either or both of those women; and (b) you find them highly unattractive. FYI: there are civil causes of action that could potentially be brought against you for this. (False light, defamation, slander, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, just to name a few). While your blog is entertaining, it would probably be wise to lay off posting pictures of people who haven’t given you permission to use their photo.

B
Guest
B
Offline

While I moron the death of Circle V and Kathryn’s blogs,…If you weren’t such a dick (online at least) then you might not get the gay community up your ass (ha! I didn’t get the pun til it was done)

Meanwhile, yea. I see the RIP section =(

Greg
Guest
Greg
Offline

The points jg makes are a perfect example of how convoluted and archaic laws dealing with these subjects are in light of modern-day technology. “Privacy” is a joke these days and our laws should reflect that reality rather than create an entire industry for lawyers and the pathetic fools who hire them.

Phil
Guest
Phil
Offline

Maybe they shouldn’t have posed for a photo that was posted on “clubchair.com” if they were so concerned about “privacy”.

Euro_girl
Guest
Euro_girl
Offline

Should have known! Just look at the guys eyebrow’s!

Tampa
Guest
Tampa
Offline

JG you are a total moron. There is no legal basis for anything you are saying. They posted a picture from a club website of two annymous individuals. They did not use the person to sell a product, advance a cause, or endorse a position.

It is not illegal to post a picture of someone. Do you think the Washington Post ask an accused criminal if they can have permission to post his mug shot?

He can post 225 pictures of you and shout to the world that he personally thinks you look like a flaming homo. They have this thing called the United States Consitution… you should think about reading it.

I bet Jessica Simpson asks “US Magazine” (i am sure you are your bros read it in the bathrooms of Cobalt) to seek permission for all the photos they post of her.

Spare us the threats and retarded comments.

Actually Roosh talked highly of you in his analysis… .it was the commenters that thought you looked like a tool box.

You are going to file a law suit… give me a freakin break. And for your information… it would be “Clubchair.com” that would have, if any, a legal course of action for copying and pasting a photo from their site.. that is if they notified all on lookers that the photos and mug shots were property of theirs and were only allowed to be re-published with thier expressed written permission.

You sould like a total retard.

Schwa
Guest
Schwa
Offline

You can’t sue for slander unless it has somehow caused them to lose money. Just because someone insults your ass on the internet doesn’t mean you can sue and win. Of course nobody’s stopping you from trying to serve someone.

In any case he wasn’t hating on them anyway.

Jinxy
Guest
Jinxy
Offline

“redicule”

JG,

Again, it’s hard to get weak in the knees over the threat of a lawsuit when you can’t even fucking spell properly.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Seems to me jg’s a first year law student or something. (Tampa may very well be a practicing attorney.) None of these enumerated claims would survive pretrial, let alone the answer. (come on, seriously, intentional infliction of emotional distress? Negligence?). Bottom line — real world practice disallows these claims in this instance.

Johnny Cochran
Guest
Johnny Cochran
Offline

Yeah bitch your wrong. If the description don’t fit, you must acquit. Dam I’m watching Oregon vs BYU and Oregon Band just played Lord of the rings theme song…WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MIke
Guest
MIke
Offline

I don’t care what the DC blog scene is turning into, don’t you quit on us

W
Guest
W
Offline

That “it” people comment is hysterical, since I personally know Roosh has a very good idea who the real “it” people are and those two are definitely not “it”. Sorry I have been away so long Roosh, I def miss your posts.

angrybarista (aka seenster...)
Guest

i kind of miss the cpmc…

last time I visit your site
Guest
last time I visit your site
Offline

How is this comment you made about them.. a nice one? ……..

“Other than an awkward claw position for her left arm, the girl attempts to get as close as possible to him, as if she wants everyone on the internet to know they are an item. The thing that seals the fact that this man is a player is that her crotch is almost against his crotch, something that is uncommon when posing for pictures with lady friends”

I dont know who you are but I think your a jerk.. You seem like you have way to much time on your hands….Everytime someone takes a picture I doubt if they think about how someone is going to make fun of it.. These people are just out having a good time.. Why are you such a hater????… last time I visit your site..

jg
Guest
jg
Offline

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16366256/

I thought this may interest some of the people who slammed me in these comments…

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

jg, just read that story you posted the link for, that’s going to be a difficult call for the lawyers involved, but I think you do have some very valid points and I agree with some, but not all of them.

If folks don’t want their photo posted on the internet, then whenever they “pose” or “whatever” for the camera they’d better make damn sure they have signed a contract or waiver that retains their rights to the photo as well as (C)opyright info placed somewhere on the photo with any restrictions for its usage, otherwise if there are no disclaimers and it gets posted, the US Constitution DOES give ANYONE the right to state an opinion on it, bad, good or indifferent.

That’s why we have FREE SPEECH in the US!

schadenfreude
Guest
schadenfreude
Offline

if i was that guy (just realized this posting is from TWO YEARS AGO but ill blame the heineken mini-keg) and i got posted on the web, well, theres two things to do, IF im so pissed about it, one, laugh it off, as much as i can…sorta play it down. (oh im not sure that was me….hehehe)
or, go to see the poster personally and make them see the error of their ways.

Candy Dillard
Guest

hi
xht6t4d4nea9qtyz
good luck