At the height of my casual sex phase, when I was sleeping with numerous women per year, I was also attacking feminists and “sluts” with a level of hostility that I wouldn’t use today. Why was I so heated and angry while receiving bountiful sexual pleasure? Shouldn’t I have been praising the type of woman who gave me commitment-free sex? It took me a long time to realize that attacking those women was a way of relieving my guilt from sleeping with other women. I learned that guilt is the worldly debt you must pay when you sleep with strangers, along with many other activities you perform that are normalized in modern society. That guilt is then projected outwardly onto others as anger, distrust, frustration, and hatred.
You are already familiar with a form of guilt that is felt immediately and directly. Your friend is sick in the hospital but you are too busy to visit him. He dies and now you feel guilty. You date a girl for many years who is madly in love with you, but you decide she is not the girl for you. You break up with her and feel guilty. Your pug is ill with cancer and needs expensive treatment that you can barely afford. You forgo treatment, the pug dies, and now you feel guilty. Most people consciously experience guilt in these scenarios. They know the source of their guilt and tear their hair out wondering if they made the right choice, often for the rest of their lives.
But there is another kind of guilt that you don’t become consciously aware of. It happens when you engage in behavior that goes against the natural order or moral law but which is encouraged, promoted, or enabled by your culture. Sleeping around is the most common example. Outside the confines of love and family, sex is perverse and immoral, because it denies the reproductive aspect of humanity to treat others as masturbatory tools that are used and discarded. Exposing and rubbing your genitals with another person is the most physically intimate act you can perform, but doing so with a stranger creates subconscious guilt, no matter what your belief system or religion. When you consider that people place more care in not touching public door handles than vetting a person they fornicate with, it’s no surprise that societies which have promoted casual sex are awash in massive guilt that must be resolved within or projected without, but since most people are not aware of this specific form of guilt, it is almost always projected.
Subconscious guilt is a form of negative internal pressure that the soul can neither handle nor endure. As if in a game of tag, you must pass on the guilt to someone else, or find a method to dissipate it. This can occur by attacking other people, engaging in combative politics, abusing substances, or seeking a soothing form of ego gratification, often the exact same behavior that is causing the guilt in the first place. It turns out that men who have received sexual pleasure from sluts will then attack sluts for being… sluts. And then to relieve that angst he seeks pleasure with even more sluts, perpetuating the cycle. The type of woman that a man attacks is often one who has given him pleasure (his most accurate insults are reserved for who he knows best).
This phenomenon also happens to women who engage in casual sex. The women who cry most about “toxic masculinity” or “rape culture,” and who believe that sex is a source of empowerment and confidence, are promiscuous or “polyamorous” women who are relieving their guilt. This guilt is especially potent in women because, unlike with men, their scarcity of eggs, shortened window of fertility, and higher bodily investment during pregnancy dictate that they must be more choosy when selecting partners. Most people in the social justice movement are therefore composed of highly promiscuous women living a “liberated” lifestyle and then attacking men for also wanting to live the same lifestyle, just like how I was attacking sluts and feminists while simultaneously sleeping with them. I like to think of myself as an intelligent man, but the fact that I missed this massive blind spot for so many years means that many others are likely missing it as well.
Another example comes from interracial relationships. When a person seeks a partner outside of their race, guilt is created, and that gets projected against the very race they have amorous feelings for. You see this in black, Asian, and Indian women who attack “white privilege” and “white supremacy” while simultaneously dating white men or being attracted to them. Black women who advocate for Black Lives Matter or other racial concerns are almost certainly fornicating with a man who possesses white blood. The same happens to white men. If you want to identify a subset of white men who are disproportionately attracted to Asian women, try an alt-right event. I have to conclude that we are wired to reproduce with a similar race as ourselves, and when we choose not to do that, guilt is created and then projected as race activism.
One form of guilt that I have noticed growing within myself concerns my aging parents. Even though my parents can currently take care of themselves, I realize that they would be happier and more comfortable if I lived closer to them. Unless I permanently move back to the United States, this guilt will grow and then need to be projected. I suspect that the latest trend of attacking boomers is a way for Generation X’ers and millennials to relieve the guilt that is created from not being close to their family. Other behaviors that create guilt are masturbation, especially with the aid of hardcore pornography, and sodomy, which are both direct forms of self-abuse.
Unless you cut off guilt at its source, you will need to vent the pressure through constant projection and creative forms of deviance. Hence the ease at which those riddled by guilt become natural activists. If I didn’t stop having casual sex, I would find new and ingenious ways to insult women. If I soon don’t resolve the guilt of not being close to my parents, I will attack boomerism. Unless a woman becomes more modest and monogamous, she will rail against the “patriarchy” while bragging about her latest abortion. Unless a mixed-race individual makes peace with their identity, they will be the racist they claim to be against. Unfortunately, people continue to perform the behavior that creates the initial feelings of guilt because they are receiving messages in the culture that doing so is acceptable or healthy, but if that was the case, the guilt wouldn’t be there.
For the longest time, I thought I was just an animal that could “do what thou wilt.” I wanted to sleep around, be “free,” spread my “wings,” experience all I could, and design my own lifestyle in a faraway land, but there are built-in limitations to my existence that have blocked those attempts. If I chose to ignore those limitations and continue transgressing moral law, the subconscious guilt would start controlling me like a parasite controls its host, and I would soon find that my resulting “self” is merely a manifestation of behavior that is not compatible with life as it was created for me.
I believe God has established boundaries for humans that prevent men like myself from eternally sleeping with females like a dog, or doing other behaviors that are so common in the animal world, and it has “only” taken me four decades to understand that. I’m sure I will continue to make mistakes when it comes to sex, relationships, and being the best son to my parents that I can, but at least now I understand the consequence of those mistakes. Every time I look to attack someone or commit an immoral act with the hopes of receiving pleasure, I will have to think long and hard about what guilt I’m trying to relieve.
Read Next: Men Are Wasting Their Time
There’s a lotta logos in this article. The only thing I’ll add is to the miscegenation portion. I’m very happily married to a coloured (South African term for ‘mulatto’) woman. I’m an Alaskan white guy, have been in Cape Town, South Africa for a while and know in my bones I made the right decision. What I wanted in a woman I’ve got. She’s traditional, very attractive, married me as a virgin, very family oriented, has strong ties to her parents, sister & extended family, and most importantly is a serious, life long christian who wants children. Ultimately the buck stops with me in the marriage & she’ll follow my lead on the big decisions but there’s mutual respect. I’m spiritual and familial leader of my household. I didn’t come here because I had some hankering for exotic women but rather she checked all the right boxes.
However, I know this is not usual and you can’t give general advice based on exceptions. There are definitely few coloured women who fit this category. A shockingly high amount of them become single moms, they’re increasingly coming from broken homes and a lot of the urban ones often live in communities rife with gangsterism, violent crime and drug abuse. It’s a very similar phenomenon to what you see with urban blacks in the U.S., only the coloureds down here eat a lot more curry, tend to have Malay admixture and speak Afrikaans. There just aren’t that many of them who are quality women. This is where you’re absolutely right and the normies will get into a tizzy.
Even though I’m in a very happy marriage I don’t council men or women to purposefully seek people from different cultures. I’m a statistical outlier, I know that. My wife and I both aren’t at all normal in our respective groups which is why we work well together. I also know, statistically speaking, I wouldn’t do nearly as well among Zulu or Chinese women as I would with a good ‘ol white chick from fly over country U.S. If you make a fetish out of women from different cultures and ethnic groups (the 2 go hand in hand) and try to get into a relationship with them you’re setting yourself up for trouble. Zulu chicks aren’t white women with smooth ebony skin and big bums, and it’s dumb and an insult to them to think of them as such. They’re different and because of that a progressive, soy drinking urbanite male who feels guilty about being white will absolutely not get on well with them in the long run.
People are usually attracted to others who look like themselves and that’s a good thing because it means you’re more likely to have stuff in common. On the other hand, if you meet a girl from a different group who you really like and has the same values, beliefs and goals as you, and you’ve done your homework and scoped out her family, you may be doing yourself a disservice if you write her off automatically. In general though, statistically speaking, miscegenation isn’t a hot idea. Too many differences on average.
That’s nice and all, but your children will hate you for that. Your children won’t look like you nor your wife. To every hafu and mulatto I talked to, there was always identity and sometimes genetic health problems. I am in a similar situation in which I could have a perfectly virtuous woman, yet she is half Asian and half European. She looks like either and neither – nobody can tell what she is exactly unless she tells you herself. She does not like to be mixed, but she cannot change that. She is a stunning beauty, yet, yet in the back of my mind is the race-question in which I know that it is wrong. I’d rather become a monk/hermit instead of wifing up a different race than mine or a white slut.
Grace trumps race in regards to salvation, but not in the material world. Miscegenation is forbidden by the moral law, yet unless you don’t know some biblical Greek you’ll never know.
I am not a friend of the CI movement, but they have some interesting truth nukes you cannot argue with (scroll down to “The Sixth Commandment”): http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl720.htm
Actually the bible doesnt forbid miscegenation here is good arguments why:
designofprovidence.blogspot.com
From the same bible and with good knowlege of greek.
See arguments about kinism here.
I skimmed through his article and, summarized, he says that
miscegenation is forbidden because of different gods, i. e. culture. Which is one truth. The Law of Moses doesn’t explain most of the time why the laws exist, e. g. Leviticus 20:13 says that sodomites must be burned, but it doesn’t tell you why. Now, you see that the sodomite can do whatever he wants in today’s Western world and you see the consequences at first hand: rampant pedophilia, rapid spread of STDs, rape, obsession with torture and death and animals etc. Conclusion: in order to suppress malfunction in society you have to burn sodomites.
Same with race-mixing. Because each race and ethnicity has a different genetic code, hence a different bio-chemistry in their brain, they have a different god, i. e. culture. It makes total sense. Now you can argue that we all came from the three sons of Noah, but this is also wrong. All Caucasoid (mostly white) races come from Noah’s three sons. But thanks to history magic we believe what is genetically impossible and not even biblical. Even Ethiopians are Caucasoid because they mixed with the Hamites and Semites thousands of years ago; you can see in their facial bone structure that they look typically “white”, even though their skin is black. 150 years ago nobody would make the insane claim that we all descend from one man. Rather, it was commonly known that all “whites” descend from one man, and that is Adam. The other races (Negroids and Mongoloids) have been created way earlier than the Caucasoids, which is archaelogically and genetically proven. The blue-eyed-gene for example goes back to exactly one common ancestor. Then how comes no Asian or African has colored eyes?
With the meshing of two completely different cultures and genetic codes, you increase the likelihood of creating evil in the world hundredfold. Like the spread of the barbaric culture of Islam in the Middle East, the complete chaos with creating millions of gods in India and an idolatrous and sexually completely degenerate society like in South America.
You can read in different historical accounts about the decay that (only) mulatto societies have upon morals and environment. In the Travels of Marco Polo you have an account (Book I, Chapter 14) in which fair-skinned Tartars took black Indian wifes. The mixed race offspring ravaged the city of Camandu, and even acquired magical and diabolical knowledge they used for their raids.
You may have good intentions but misinformation and lacking in knowledge creates more evil than good. As it is written in Hosea 4:6:
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.
God is NO respector of person, nationality, ethnicity or color. It’s humans with their racist hang-ups.
“That’s nice and all, but your children will hate you for that.”
You have no idea what you are talking about.
As far as Roosh is concerned, he was so heated and angry when receiving sex because he understood that he could not curb his rutting instinct. Rather than say no to the young lass, and try to guide her, he submitted to his base urges…and then proceeded to blame her for his own decision.
“Miscegenation is forbidden by the moral law.”
Sources?
Rather than say no to the young lass
I don’t think you’ve read/understood any of Roosh’s game books.
There was no situation in which Roosh could “say no” to any young lass, because when you run game you are actively leading the interaction, and moving it forward, because you want the sex to happen. “Saying no” is something the girl does if she wants you to stop escalating.
If there ever was a situation where the woman was leading and escalating the interaction, and Roosh was in a situation to “say no to the lass” it would probably account for less than 1% of his bangs.
Some men have few opportunities to “say no” to sex, but the more desirable men do have such opportunities. The man to be is the man who could easily sleep around but does not.
In EVERY situation Roosh could have said no. You want matters to escalate to get that second date, then progress in the relationship towards marriage and children. It’s white knightish of you to defend Roosh, but you are dead wrong here. Roosh chose to soil women. If they wanted sex, he simply says “No”. Instead, he bangs them and then refuses to take part ownership in his own degeneracy.
Sources or retract.
It’s only fair that you live up to the same standards you impose on others.
@guest_183814
How many sources must I mention until you believe me? If you don’t already with what I have provided, then nothing will convince you.
That’s a given to do as I say – there have been plenty opportunities to fornicate with Asian and Latin American girls and I denied all of them.
@guest_183680 I was directing my comment to Anti-Gnostic, not you.
Genesis 11:6-8 KJV
And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have e imagined to do. [7] Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech. [8] So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon g the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
LOL, that verse has absolutely nothing to do with the mixing of races. Try again.
Anti-Gnostic:
You’re right, he doesn’t know what he’s talking about and almost as importantly ‘where’ he’s talking about. Cape Coloureds are the Mexicans of Africa: Dutchmen bangin Khoisan African women and Malays over centuries. They’ve forged an identity that’s unique to them, they like it that way, they came up with a language (Afrikaans) and they’re more aware than just about anybody that racial groups, while they exist in a sense, aren’t exactly the hard and fast sort of things the progressive race pimps or stormfags would have you believe.
Also, they don’t hate their dads or granddads for being white because they had a group they fit right into, ‘coloured’. In the U.S. a lot of hapas have identity crisis, it’s true, because they don’t fit in anywhere. That’s not the case here in South Africa. Here, if you’re mixed, you’re not an ‘other category’ like you are in Europe or the U.S. You’re coloured, you speak Afrikaans, you eat the hell out of curry and are most likely Christian.
Our kids will look like us (wife’s real fair skinned and doesn’t exactly have an afro) and even if they didn’t that’s not a big deal here in the Cape. One of the cousins is coloured, his mom is coloured, and his dad was Italian (died), and they’re all Christian. He worships the memory of his dad, doesn’t hate his parents at all, and nobody’s weird about it because coloureds don’t have the identity problem hapas in the U.S. do. The problems of being ‘identity challenged’ aren’t the same in all places nor for the same reasons.
I’ll leave the Biblical aspect out of it other than to say intermarriage is clearly not prohibited in the scripture. Marrying outside the faith is. The Israelites were prohibited from marrying Canaanites and the like because they were horrendous, child sacrificing heathens and the line of David had to be maintained till the Messiah. Keep in mind too they were talking about ethnic groups, not races, but the same rules fundamentally apply to each. Interfaith marriage is always bad, miscegenation is usually UNWISE (not evil) but not in all times or places and it’s not prohibited in scripture.
There are trade-offs to marrying outside your own culture, at the very least. It’s not a matter of indifference but not forbidden or sinful. As our culture becomes more and more anti-Christian, these trade-offs will probably matter less and less. There is definitely an effect on the children: are they Westerners or Easterners? How will others perceive them: too white to be black? Too black to be white? The mulattoes were all murdered in Haiti after the colonial period. Regardless of your attitude toward inter-cultural marriage, be aware of how others view it and the effect on your kids.
Your race and your religion often go together, thus you often can’t really marry outside your race and keep your religion. The Chronicler is alluding to this when he writes, “Now Solomon loved many foreign women, and when he was older they turned him away from God….”
“I’d rather become a monk/hermit instead of wifing up a different race than mine or a white slut.”
If those are your beliefs, maybe it’s best that you don’t marry or reproduce.
Go MGTOW!
How do you know what his children will do you racist idiot?
If you were blind what would color mean to you then?
Wait until R00$h barks that you’re a race traitor and that you should have wifed up some used up petri dish Anglo-Saxon $kanky h0r3 in the USA or Leafistan.
Folks, R00$h is promoting a hidden agenda that benefits the shoes in the end. S3x is natural for men. Being a forced incel is not.
Do you think R00$h is telling this to the African tribes or the Moe Slims to stop having s3x? He is only telling the higher IQ Red Pill men this!
While I’m not disagreeing with you, I don’t hear him saying anything about having to wife-up a former slut. He could preach to africans or mozzies but I doubt they would understand him, or they would bait him with false understanding and nod their heads and then turn around and go rape a bunch of little girls because its in their blood to do so. Its not in our blood to be animals, but thats what the shoes want you to believe.
You just have to catch them young and impressionable. The route he would have us go would have us ditch all the city whores and find one young nubile girl in the countryside who actually has God in her life before humans, rare, but still possible. I’ve almost had one, but it didn’t work out with the courting process… a strange thing to experience if you’re used to pump-n-dump and Americunts.
The truth is if you have a young wife who checks all the boxes you will not be left wanting, IF you have a strong connection with God, and IF you are not so easily swayed to cheat. I still believe having multiple wives is possible for a Christian, but nobody wants to hear me out on that.
“People are usually attracted to those who look like themselves”. I must be the exception to the rule then. Part of it could be because I live in the Pacific Northwest (I am a relatively new transplant) but most of the white women here are very unattractive to me. I often feel repulsed. It’s not just their looks (over the top plain) but personality too…they are devoid of any feminine charm. They have loads of masculine energy.
I have mentioned it before on this site. The town I live in is heavily Hispanic and the Latinas are extremely attractive to me…by any objective measure they (as a group) have far more beauty than the local white girls. They are a joy to talk to as well. Yet I am supposed to be attracted to the ones that look like me? The thing is you can’t negotiate what you find attractive…you can’t choose based on logic. It is something you either have for someone or you don’t.
If I was in a different region (a different state or better yet much of Europe) I would be attracted to more white women, like I was before. Right here and right now I’m not.
leeping around is the most common example.
Go tell that to Chad who is having the time of his life with bit_chez, while you act like a femenist prude.
You’re just young and brainwashed by poz culture. Don’t learn the hard way by looking back and realising it was a mistake (as you will do eventually).
So we must become involuntary celibates while everyone else is breeding like rabbits?
R00$h has an agenda. MGTOW and Incels are anti-s3x agenda to stop whites from mating and reproducing.
That’s the thing, nobody is breeding. They’re having pozzed sterile sex and it drains their souls.
That’s the thing, nobody is breeding. They’re having pozzed sterile sex and it drains their souls.
Casual sex is fun until it’s not fun. And it can become not fun very fast.
And then it’s too late.
Which is the point of feminism, SJW’ing, and MGTOW.
And we become rather self-righteous in condemning those who do what we used to do.
This adversarial mode is not the best way to lead others to enlightenment.
I don’t really see roosh being self-righteous here.
At this point the emotion I feel most when reviewing my many encounters is grief. Most or all of them I entered with good cheer, hope, and general gratefulness for at least a potential for life and love. Now my facebook feed is littered with their stories, and they nearly all seem sad to me.
There is some comfort in the fact that my 50 year old self may have more chances remaining to get something right, (where their 32 or 38 year old selves are apparently resigned to a long life of spinsterhood…)
I think that the guilt wave crested and fell a while back and the sadness wave is more of a long slow roller.
Any guilt in being a manwhore is fake pseudoreligious postering and really nothing more than general subconscious negativity masquerading as ‘guilt’.
Why ? Men are built to do one thing and one thing only. Spread seed….as far and as wide as possible. So any guilt u feel can’t possibly be organic but is rather misplaced religious nonsense or general mental negativity emanating from the subconscious.
The guilt I refer to is not ‘fake pseudoreligious postering.’ What I am referring to is an emotion that comes with the recognition that a considerable amount of time and energy was wasted. Guilt is the feeling that one has made a significant error. As it happens I have made a few.
The consequence of fucking women who carry an iud is not exactly what nature intended. I’m thinking that your statement is, well, not even wrong.
The feeling of ‘error’ is based on religious nonsense……..why ? As a man u were built to bust as many nuts as possible.
But not necessarily inside a female every time. Unlike other animals, we have standards and values.
No reasoning. No attempt at understanding. Just a tape on loop in your head.
“THAT’S JUST RELIGIOUS NONSENSE”
hello Alchemist.
Back in my 20’s when I was struggling to reconcile the culture and accept women as “equals” and even hold them to it (I know, this sounds amazingly naive), I wanted to have adult relationships with them. Game is many things, but the most important one is the realization that women at the beginning of a relationship are about as conscious as a 3 year old child in a Chuck E Cheese’s. Due in part to biology and also to the culture and sexual market value they have, they act like spoiled brats. I feel bad for them but even now I also hold them accountable.
A 38 year old woman need not be a spinster. I have many women friends who are widows or got divorced but are otherwise normal and they put up personal ads with a pleasant smile and had hundreds of responses including from decent men. No sane woman in that age need be lonely. They just have to do some of the work here that men do in learning “game”.
Before Roosh, I did some self-study and read a few books including the crude but useful Ross Jeffries and learned “frame”. The concept that I deserved decent treatment from women and this was a core requirement for me to be attractive to women. Men respecting themselves commands respect from women. It’s strange, but true. To preserve this frame, I did what my father did fishing and occasionally “threw one back”. Perfectly decent women who were stuck up (due to the mental diseases that society had given them I refer to above) just to show them, and myself, I didn’t NEED them. I didn’t have to beg from them.
So of course there’s always a wonder for me in “what could have been”. If I had just exercised some discretion and kept my mouth shut and just done game a little better, who knows? But then again, life is random as well. I don’t have too strong regrets about it and most importantly, I got frame and self-respect out of it. I never begged for sex. Ever.
“but the most important one is the realization that women at the beginning of a relationship are about as conscious as a 3 year old child in a Chuck E Cheese’s.”
Thanks for the laugh. Of course, you do know that your statement is not even true, right?
You do realize that our statement is even MORE untrue, right?
I argued like you again. BOOMED!
“You do realize that our statement is even MORE untrue, right?”
I would suggest you put the keyboard down before you embarrass yourself further.
I would suggest you look up the definition of “irony” (especially of the unintentional variety), since your like to dislike ratio of your comments would indicate that your comment history is cancer, and overwhelmingly embarrassing. LOL
It’s against the law to take advantage of a “3 year old child in a Chuck E Cheese’s”—and for good reason. It’s best to bypass those types and keep looking.
I have a three year old and the stores are full of shiny things to grab her attention and sometimes I just give in. She’s just too darn cute.
And that’s ok. She’s 3. I am guiding her to be more disciplined and set better expectations. Sort of like I did with her mother (who was a lot more mature than typical American women.)
“Take advantage?” More like guide. I’m not a clown. But I knew I had to walk on eggs for the first few weeks of courtship. That’s what game, even healthy game, is. If we could “just be ourselves” and have adult, honest discussions then game wouldn’t be necessary.
Here’s where we can have an honest discussion. Tell me how it’s “not even true?” Of course I don’t mean this “literally”. I mean it in the sense that they are emotionally self-centered, fragile, easily spooked, and even bratty. Someone whose not conscious of their own childishness naturally would deny this is true even as they’re displaying those very behaviors (which I’ve seen which I did get a “laugh” out of.)
I’m not saying that to be cruel or condescending but rather it’s life. Celebrities are the same way. It’s just their life situation.
“There is some comfort in the fact that my 50 year old self may have more chances remaining to get something right, (where their 32 or 38 year old selves are apparently resigned to a long life of spinsterhood…)“
Those who indulge in schadenfreude may not have learned as much as they think they have.
IF you’re truly ready to open yourself to love, there may be a woman for you—if you want to try for kids, a woman no older than her late 30s, or if you don’t want kids a woman of any age. Unless you’re very well preserved and/or rich, you may not have as many options as you think you have. A little humility will make a genuine human connection more likely.
Roosh,
Generally agree with you, am the same age as you with similar experiences. Regardless of all that, it has to be reiterated that men need you to be a voice for them more than ever. Maybe you don’t feel anger or hatred toward feminists/SJWs/etc. anymore and maybe that is good for your (and our?) mental and physical health, but regardless the situation that men and little boys are born into today is frankly intolerable. If and when you have son’s you will, being the good man that you are,think of nothing but what their adult lives will be like in our rotten #MeToo culture with rotten girls and rotted out lack of good moral and spiritual influences. Our boys (the real future of the human race) are in bad shape and they need men to bring our reason/altruism/civilization building oriented minds to the table to make sure they don’t have to grow up in degenerate clown world like we had to.
Keep in mind that the reason why many men decided to engage in hedonistic lifestyles is due to traditional marriage becoming increasingly expensive for men. Wages pay less due to competition with women (even as men are still expected to be the breadwinner) and a culture and legal system that eats young, naive men who engage in “traditional” marriage alive.
Sl*ts aren’t the only problem. It’s the prudishness and genuine hostility towards men that makes feminism so toxic. Western women are often unsuitable for relationships of any kind and this is intentional. This makes them miserable in the long run, but this is a product of feminism and feminists are NOT his allies. They never will be. Feminists want to make men into serfs for their lesbian matriarchy. That’s at least the feminists with half a brain. The rest are just dumb selfish materialists.
Actually, the reason why some men engage in hedonism is because they lack the ability to curb their rutting instinct. It’s inborn. They are defective. As a result, they blame everyone else but themselves.
Western women? No, it’s women from America or from Europe. They are not what you say they are.
Sources or retract.
It’s only fair that you live up to the same standards you impose on others.
Actually, I have many western women friends and I’d say that about a good half of them are quality. They generally marry young (because quality women are grabbed fast) and become invisible. Nobody is going to meet them on clubs or dating sites. The “leftover” women are just like those rejected produce on the last day of the week before the stores restock: The groped or ignored merchandise that’s going bad. It gave me, and I think men here, a disproportionate view of women.
Now granted, I was in the same boat but as a “produce”, I was more like one of those dented cans of food: Still good, but not prime. Most beta males are ok and not out to “rut”. They want a pleasant relationship/girlfriend with the track going towards marriage and kids. They’re realistic enough to know they can’t afford a lifestyle like Hugh Hefner or Roosh.
Then again, this is my view based upon how women were back in the 90’s. After 2 decades of (more) feminism since then, the percentage of quality young women (marriageable) may be even lower.
The far majority of men — maybe 95% (and women) are and have always been (and always will be) betas. The sexual revolution ( which we are now seeing was really a gay, transgender and lesbian sexual revolution) created havoc for the betas.
Beta men are mostly traditionalists — and if they have good parents are loyal to them and their family. They want to get to work and settle down and have kids.
However when feminists, gays and lesbians in the west brain washed beta women to seek their so called women liberation, beta men were at a loss. They were forced into the hedonist life style — mostly by visiting prostitutes — and trying to fake being alphas. The situation is still the same today in 2019.
Game became popular trying to give help and direction to the lost generation of betas. In reality it did not do that much. Because once a beta, always a beta. Prostitution business however did and still does quite well.
However, traditional betas are the most important foundation of a society and its inner workings. Without them society cannot function and will collapse.
Hence society must revolve around the betas and their needs.
But Capitalism started to become corrupt — as profits are always first. Hence corporations supported feminism, gays and lesbians as it greatly increased the labor market and paying less wages –and the need for beta men greatly was reduced.
Hence beta men from the 1070s and onward were forced into the single, lonely hedonist life.
Until the work force starts to employ betas again as a priority there is no hope for recovery and a collapse is inevitable.
In the end, it was not really beta women or beta men who are at fault. It was corrupt Capitalism which still exists today and who continue to pursue profit with no moral compass or conscious. The irony is they make their money but in the end also starve to death. Like being stranded on a boat in the ocean. Water is every where but you cannot drink it and die of thirst.
I wasn’t “forced into the hedonist life style”; I chose it freely. (Maybe I’m not a beta.) And given a choice, I’d do it again, at least for a while. This may be natural; and now that starting a family in one’s early 20s isn’t financially feasible for most men (as it hasn’t been for many decades), a period of exploration is more or less a necessity. (However, I respect those who abstain until marriage. You may be better men than I.)
“The far majority of men — maybe 95% (and women) are and have always been (and always will be) betas.”
You are completely making up a percentage.
“Beta men are mostly traditionalists — and if they have good parents are loyal to them and their family. They want to get to work and settle down and have kids.”
No.
“They were forced into the hedonist life style — mostly by visiting prostitutes — and trying to fake being alphas. The situation is still the same today in 2019.”
Son, escaping one’s responsibility for their own actions is juvenile. Grow up.
“Hence beta men from the 1070s and onward were forced into the single, lonely hedonist life.”
Really, since the 1070’s?
“It was corrupt Capitalism which still exists today and who continue to pursue profit with no moral compass or conscious.”
I thought we’re suppose to blame everything bad on the Jews. What gives?
No, you are. Also, YOU grow up. No… you.
Actually it’s generous to call your response an “argument” since you never provide reasons for your conclusions. You only make assertions.
YOU ARE DEFEATED AGAIN!
Listen, White Knight, I called out a person who neglected to offer a source. She has to offer evidence or retract. Do you enjoy being a secret king?
@guest_183805 Listen, person with the reading comprehension of a mentally challenged bonobo: You did not offer evidence nor retract. I am not defending anyone, I am merely pointing out this glaring inconsistency.
I guess, me noticing this hypocrisy makes me a so-called “white knight” in your world. Please go back to high school to learn what words mean.
DEFEATED AGAIN.
Capitalists actually funded the feminist/”suffragette” movements because they wanted women to go to work, provide cheap labor, and buy more stuff as well. Win-win-win all around for them. But certainly didn’t help improve living standards. Same with immigration: Transform the USA into a third world country and make a quick profit. They don’t think about where they’re going to go next after they foul their own nest.
We’re the same: You go to the store and see an item for 10 bucks and a similar item for 5 bucks. It’s not greed but ignorance. I may not know whether that 10 buck item was made responsibly, by local labor not in a sweatshop and dumping pollutants into a local river OR just marked up for some reason. A LOT of stuff is overpriced junk such as “designer” brands. Eyeglasses for example: I get 70 buck glasses online that are just as good as marked up store junk.
Anyhoo, it’s difficult to make responsible market decisions particular in a high stress environment. Young women are born into this toxic environment and like crabs: If you grow up in a tank being pinched by other crabs, you’ll become “crabby”.
Men in the states largely cannot go to prostitutes because it’s illegal and for many middle class betas, getting busted can have a detrimental effect on their career. It’s highly risky.
As a woman of colour who dates a white man and most of my exes were white as well, I think you get the causation wrong. It’s not guilt that causes some black, Asian and Indian women to attack white privilege when they date white men. It’s at least partially bitterness because we are the beta females. We are acutely aware that the white guys we always wanted didn’t always want us. They settled for us after the blonde, thin, all-American women they pedestalized but couldn’t get settled down with taller and richer men. So we challenge and subvert the system that makes them the most privileged segment of society in the western world and possibly the whole planet. Guilt has nothing to do with it.
What about growing up, and stopping minding skin colour and the other socio-cultural fantasies tied with that?
Would that be too much?
If you are a 6, he’s with you because the 7-10 blonde rebuffed him, but there are also 7-10 black, yellow, pink, purple, sea green, females who rebuffed him as well. It’s about sexual market value, not complexion.
I mean, I don’t disagree. It’s not really about skin colour for me either. Ultimately, I like good-looking men period. And it’s easier as a woman of color to get a good-looking man who is white than one who is not white. Both because they are more numerous, and because good-looking nonwhite men use their looks to get themselves a white woman (who would never look at them if they were not in some way above average). This is the nature of white privilege. Even a basic white woman gets her pick of the litter first. So the decent-looking white guys eventually figure out that they are not only competing with their own race but the best of all the other races of men as well for a good-looking white woman, and then they eventually would rather settle for a 7 or 8 Asian/Indian/black woman rather than an overweight or a five white woman. I’m actually surprised Roosh would offer such an incomplete or inaccurate explanation here when he was the one (or one of his writers) who explained the whole racial dynamic on ROK and it went exactly like this and basically explained white privilege in the dating market exactly like this more or less. It was something about white female obesity causing white men to date other races, or something to that effect.
Basically, white men are the only men who DON’T worship skin color but BMI and other things more, and that’s one reason why they become a preference. I think there are more black guys who would date and obese white woman than there are white guys.
Dang, I’m an Asian dude who dates mostly white women and this is pretty spot on. Thanks for telling it how it is.
Yeah, well I’ve seen the sort of white women that non-white men consort with; overwhelmingly overwhelmingly land whales and cigstaches.
That’s not really accurate.
@guest_183671 LOL, that’s actually a far less flattering explanation than Roosh’s guilt theory. But I actually agree with you.
In my experience, ethnic minority women who date white men, have a strong resentment/dislike of white women. When SJW leftist women talk about “white-splaining” or “white privilege”, very often they’re referring not necessarily to white men, but to white women. Hence the idea of “toxic white feminism” in which they critique other feminists for focusing on white wahmen struggles, while ignoring those of ethnic minorities.
What it boils down to, is women competing against each other in the victim olympics to cry about who is the most oppressed. I believe this is a big reason why Obama became president, but Hilary Clinton did not; ethnic minority women came together to vote for Obama, but would not vote for a white woman because of the tendency towards intrasexual competition (i.e., viewing white women as competitors). There is no “women’s solidarity” – they are relentlessly competing for the few alphas of the world (which is a scarce resource).
Feminist infighting shows that women’s passive-aggressiveness never truly stops. There was a study recently, showing that women who experience “bullying” at work are overwhelmingly more likely to experience it from another woman than a man.
I can’t speak for every other woman but I know for me I don’t personally hate white women or blonde women at all, I simply would like to see other women represented as the sweet and vulnerable love interests, in leadership positions sometimes, etc. Not just white women all the time. These things do get into people’s subconsciousness and affect the opportunities, both romantic and professional, that are extended to women who don’t look like ‘the ideal’ so it’s about levelling the playing field really, nothing against them at all and at the end of the day if a woman represents my interests I’m not going to vote against her just because she is white. I really don’t consider myself to be a racist I just have an unfortunate and seemingly irreversible preference.
I can’t speak for every other woman but I know for me I don’t personally hate white women or blonde women at all
No one said anything about hate. What I said was there is a strong resentment towards white women, which seems consistent with your “acute awareness” and honest admission that there’s “bitterness” that the men you ended up with really wanted white wahmen but, in your words, settled for the ethnic woman.
Your comment here also seems to underscore how this all boils down to intrasexual competition with white women for the small handful of alpha males out there: “And it’s easier as a woman of color to get a good-looking man who is white than one who is not white. Both because they are more numerous, and because good-looking nonwhite men use their looks to get themselves a white woman.”
I simply would like to see other women represented as the sweet and vulnerable love interests, in leadership positions sometimes
This underscores another interesting difference between men and women. When men want something, they are forced to go out and create the results they want for themselves. Asian and East-Indian doctors for example don’t wait for the world to give them more representation in the medical field. They study long hours and sacrifice their social lives in their youth to work hard for years in order to become doctors. America is by and large, much more of a meritocracy than most other countries in the world (and in pretty much every case, more of one than whatever country they immigrated from). At the hospital where I once worked at, there were a ton of Asian and East-Indian doctors. Many of them could also speak Spanish in order to communicate with hispanic patients.
By contrast, when women want something, they protest to try to “subvert the system” as you put it, to get more “representation” and cry about how things are unfair and woe is me. If women want leadership positions, perhaps women should look to their ethnic male counterparts as an example, and cultivate those skills that would make them a good leader; showing a track record of successful leading in the past. I’ve yet to meet a western born feminist woman appreciate how lucky she really is to be living in the most coddled generation and country in the world. Mostly they complain about the horrifying scourge of “man-spreading” on public transit, and trying find invisible instances of “mansplaining” to fuel their need for drama and angst.
“Your comment here also seems to underscore how this all boils down to intrasexual competition with white women…”
That is not even remotely accurate.
“for the small handful of alpha males out there.”
Actually, there are TONS of alpha males.
No, YOUR comment is not even remotely accurate. YOU GOT BOOMED AGAIN.
Again, do you enjoy being a secret king?
Again, do you enjoy having the reading comprehension of a mentally challenged toddler?
Women are not leaders, they are dumb mindless herd animals and birthing vessels.
Okay, but then why complain that you are single? You should be happy to be single and not tied down to a dumb mindless woman. I understand the misogyny as many men have always been misogynists. What I don’t understand is why misogynist complain about marriage rates going down. They should be happy about that.
Where you raised by your biological father?
*were
Not really. I was raised by my stepdad mostly. We are still very close today. Why?
“Leveling the playing field” is commie babble that essentially means dragging down any good standards to appease the garbage of society, which inadvertently makes women like you even less desirable. The closer non-white women veer towards the modern “white woman” archetype, the even less objectively desirable they are. At that point the cost far exceeds the risk, especially when it comes to having children, who without special attention will grow up to become the same rootless communists who support the current corrupt system. The only reason White men even consider dating foreign women is because there is/was a much high probability of finding wholesome, feminine, good wife material then the masculized whorish trash that the Jew-infected West produces. Women who are not submissive to their men are the ones who are left behind. Unwife-able discarded whores who have noone to rely on but an increasingly Bolshevik-esque government.
This is true for white men, especially white men in Asia who date Asian women. They look down upon Asian men and bash Asian men in front of their Asian girlfriends. That’s why white men and Asian women couples end up with toxic offspring like Elliot Rodger.
Challenge and subvert it to replace it with a bunch of asshurt ugly communists with an inferiority complex? Jesus H. Christ. So in reality you are guilty that not only are you undesirable to your own race, but to a man of a race that gave you a change you take a giant shit on what remains of their culture? You’re absolute garbage that needs to go back.
Nope!
Yes, it is true and I also don’t see evidence of what he’s saying with white men who are interracially coupled being alt-right. Most white men who date outside of their race are liberals. Yes, there is hard data for this, check out Audacious Epigone for it. And a white guy with an Asian woman once made a blogspot site called ‘whitewomensuck.’ Does that sound like guilt to you?
“It’s not guilt that causes some black, Asian and Indian women to attack white privilege when they date white men. It’s at least partially “bitterness because we are the beta females. We are acutely aware that the white guys we always wanted didn’t always want us.”
And for feeling such a way, for having such low self esteem, for wanting to be loved by a group who has much blood on their hands (blood of your ancestors and perhaps current relatives), you feel GUILTY.
The violence and hate u project at white men are merely projections of your own violence and hate of yourself. …..u practically admit it.
There is a lot of projection here. The violence and hate you project? Says who? Pointing out that white privilege exists and has measurable effects on people in society is in no way a manifestation of violence. It is just a statement of fact. And frankly, it’s like saying I would know because I’m clearly part of the problem. How is that violent or hateful? It’s just honest. Unless of course you mean to say that being denied privilege you feel entitled to or think white women should be entitled to is violent in and of itself.
Here’s an unpopular opinion: any advantage afforded by so called “white privilege” is extremely overblown, especially when compared to female privilege over men – and yes, women are a privileged class in society. Why do I say so?
1. Men suffer about 93% of all workplace fatalities in America.
2. About 77% to 84% of all homeless people are men.
3. In the criminal system, men receive 63% longer sentences for the same crime, and women are twice as likely to avoid incarceration compared to men when they are convicted of a crime. Note: This is all controlling for prior factors, and this gender gap is about six times as large as the racial disparity found.
These are all clearly gendered issues affecting men that no one really cares about, because men are naturally the more disposable sex. Which is fine, I understand that men will always be considered less valuable “biologically” than women, but at least acknowledge and understand the ways in which women are privileged.
A feminist once told me: “privilege is invisible to all those who have it.” She had no idea how accurate she was, and how oblivious she was to her own privilege.
The idea of White Privilege is absurd to the point that only retards could be duped into believing it. Guess what, dummy? Whites DESERVE privilege and preference in THEIR OWN NATIONS. If you move your ungrateful ass back to Liberia, you can have all the Black Privilege that you can handle! How is this hard to understand?! Furthermore, Whites are the only people in the history of mankind that are so compassionate toward other races (competitors) that they would give foreigners and non-Whites all sorts of unearned privileges in White nations. The most privileged people on earth today are non-Whites living in White nations. They get all the benefits of White society, without having to do any of the work to build and maintain such a society. The reason you feel inadequate and underrepresented is because your people haven’t done a damn thing except act as ungrateful and hate-filled parasites against the very people who have bent over backward to elevate you above your natural station in life. Deep down on a subconscious level, you KNOW that you aren’t worthy of all this unearned praise, adulation, and benefit heaped upon you by guilty White liberals, and so you instinctively lack respect for our society because you know it’s based on the lie that you are an equal!
“Pointing out that white privilege exists and has measurable effects on people in society is in no way a manifestation of violence. It is just a statement of fact”. There is nothing factual about Jewish lies. “White Privilege” does not exist and is merely a Judeo-Bolshevik construct aimed at and created for blaming White Europeans for the actions/crimes of Jews. Jewish Privilege, however; does exist and is easily identifiable if one knows how to look for an identify Jews impersonating Whites. This is what they have always done for millennia; blame their enemies for the crimes they themselves commit and rouse up hatred in the mindless, useful idiots who gobble up their media. But I see as a woman you cannot think outside of what some indoctrination center masquerading as “university” has filled your feeble mind with. Yours, and others like you, who posses your type of ignorant, spoon-fed, clueless thinking is what will lead to the coming war. Your baseless entitlement, demands, and expectations of special privileges at the expense of the host population (Whites) will continue to create tension until an inevitable breaking point. You will lose in the end, even if the remaining moral White Europeans are wiped out. Jews are the best slavers on this planet, but also the best liars and deceivers.
“Pointing out that white privilege exists and has measurable effects on people in society is in no way a manifestation of violence. It is just a statement of fact”. There is nothing factual about Je*wish lies. “White Privilege” does not exist and is merely a Jud*eo-Bolshevik construct aimed at and created for blaming White Europeans for the actions/crimes of Je*ws. Jew*ish Privilege, however; does exist and is easily identifiable if one knows how to look for an identify Jews impersonating Whites. This is what they have always done for millennia; blame their enemies for the crimes they themselves commit and rouse up hatred in the mindless, useful idiots who gobble up their media. But I see as a woman you cannot think outside of what some indoctrination center masquerading as “university” has filled your feeble mind with. Yours, and others like you, who posses your type of ignorant, spoon-fed, clueless thinking is what will lead to the coming war. Your baseless entitlement, demands, and expectations of special privileges at the expense of the host population (Whites) will continue to create tension until an inevitable breaking point. You will lose in the end, even if the remaining moral White Europeans are wiped out. Je*w*s are the best slavers on this planet, but also the best liars and deceivers.
I was going to ask if you were black based on your idiotic comments upthread about men being nothing more than animals with the sole purpose of screwing everything that moves (standard black male outlook on life). This comment here proves I was right and I don’t even need to ask now. Only a moronic black man would say something so obviously false and hypocritical as accusing Whites of having blood on their hands, while leaving out the MILLIONS of incidents of black-0n-white savagery and senseless violence just in the past 20 years alone. If anyone has blood on their hands, it’s the negro, who victimizes every community he’s ever lived in with horrific everyday violence perpetrated against young, old, men, women, and children.
I’m actually a woman, but given your obvious rage issues, not being able to accept that a woman may share an opinion you don’t like is probably lower down on the list of reasons you should seek therapy.
“And a white guy with an Asian woman once made a blogspot site called ‘whitewomensuck.’ Does that sound like guilt to you?”
Yes. It does.
This behavior used to be visible on Rooshv forum. All kinds of alt right sympathizing types who had no problem going around he world banging women of other races and yet would go beserk at the idea of of men of other races doing the same to ‘their’ women…..especially when said perpetrator was black. A lot of antiblack racism can be explained by this. Projected GUILT. Why ?
Because no matter how u slice it, blacks have been the victim for the last few hundred years of white depradation…intentional or otherwise and all whites ..especially..in racially charged America know it.
So I guess what you are saying is that guilt can manifest in different ways and not just in the ways Roosh has described here. Fair enough, although from having seen the site before it got taken down I really felt that his motive was to dispel the idea that a white man dates nonwhite women because he “can’t get” a white woman. He seemed to be implying it’s the easiest thing to do in the world given their numeric abundance in his country and their (he claimed) proclivity to looseness, which I don’t necessarily agree with. So even for him it was a status-protecting thing, I didn’t see it as guilt.
The White woman is a filthy w.h.o.r.e. who uses every hole as a safe deposit box.
The white woman is a cum guzzling and canine f.u.c.k.i.n.g. w-h-o-r-e-!
“This behavior used to be visible on Rooshv forum. All kinds of alt right sympathizing types who had no problem going around he world banging women of other races and yet would go beserk at the idea of of men of other races doing the same to ‘their’ women…..especially when said perpetrator was black. A lot of antiblack racism can be explained by this. Projected GUILT. Why ?”
The exact same can be said about Asian men, Black men etc. Kindly take your hypocrisy and show it.. All the Asian boys who bitch about “muh yellow fever” have no problem building a fetish around White women. Same for Black men etc.
Very insightful article, Roosh. Though, I think you’re a bit with the part on interracial
marriage. I might agree with you that it can be better for kids when they have two parents of the same racial background, though, I don’t think the guilt in that situation could be compared to guilt received from fornicating with multiple women. Neither the Orthodox or Catholic Church condemn interracial marriage and it is still in line with the natural law.
It is not. Read the book of Ezra and read this article (scroll down to “The Sixth Commandment”): http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl720.htm
Man has an inherent apprehension in his gut that ought to restrain him from miscegenation. Ever wondered why no country nor empire build on miscegenation (South America, India and the Middle East) was as powerful as racially homogenous countries?
We need to get you laid and keep you in Eastern Europe then. The new Roosh is a beta shell of the man he used to be.
Who’s a good goy? You are!
I concur. He is promoting incelism to his fans, and even forcing PC speech on his forum by banning members who “objectify” women using locker room phrases and slang.
Back when RoK was active, I said a similar thing but for different reasons. Roosh is struggling to figure out his feelings of regret by going from poon-tang hunter to religious zealot. I have a more simple explanation from my youthful days.
I wasn’t tempted to become a one-night stand club goer because the price of entry was too high for me (literally). Being short and without significant social status, that lifestyle was like banging my head into a brick wall. Heck, I even found the traditional dating standard of BSing women into the sack to be demeaning. I strove for authentic relationships even as society told me that I was a loser if I couldn’t get laid. Modern western dating customs are amazing inauthentic and similar to peacock displays but even the peacocks are at least honest about what they’re doing.
Roosh feels bad because he “paid” for sex in the most expensive way possible: Most of his adult life clown gaming women and running his life around them. During the same period, I learned new languages, developed lifetime friendships, watched DVD’s I enjoyed, and even literally smelled the roses. Being “alpha” for me meant transcending the doggy-chase-bone game that both betas and gamers engaged in.
That’s not to say I was a monk. Roosh even during his hedonistic days frowned upon paying for sex via cash even as this option was available in most countries he visited. I found this amusing in that chasing after sl*ts was, IMO, just as decadent as going to a clean brothel and far far cheaper. Everything in moderation of course. And that’s Roosh’s problem: Whatever he’s into for the moment, he jumps in without checking to see how deep it is. Roosh, hit a brothel. St Thomas Aquinas says it’s ok. You don’t have to game women at a brothel. The experience is mindblowing.
His conjecture about feminism is way off. I have debated them for years and they’re simply spoiled man-hating brats who are angry that they’re not the prettiest and most important people on earth simply for being born female. Rush Limbaugh’s summation of them is quite accurate. Note that they hate him no matter what he does either being religious or sleeping around simply because he’s an unapologetic male. The challenge is that even as there are men who want to settle down and have a family (I certainly did), the toxic culture of feminine entitlement is what is scaring many men off.
Roosh may not realize it, but he may have dodged a bullet. If he had stayed in DC and been a “good boy”, he may have gone beta and married some DC leftist **** or even a church going materialist princess the region is FULL of and worked his butt off to pay for an overpriced home and wound up divorced by now visiting his kids every other weekend. Getting married and having kids (which I’ve done) requires a whole different level of game. He won’t find it searching for Satan under his couch.
I enjoy Roosh and his observations but I didn’t take them as the meaning of life but he apparently did and still does. He doesn’t have a way to know if what he currently believes is The Holy Truth so God seems like a great way to get that certainty.
The fact of life is, for men, that life is uncertain. We try our best and roll the dice the best we can. You can’t win at blackjack in Vegas but you can narrow the odds of losing.
“Roosh, hit a brothel. St Thomas Aquinas says it’s ok.”
That is patently false.
“I have debated them for years and they’re simply spoiled man-hating brats”
You are projecting.
No you are.
See? Anybody can argue like you. ARGUMENT DEFEATED.
https://mises.org/wire/catholic-theologians-prostitution-should-be-legal-0
it would seem obvious that Aquinas would want to engage every force against them, especially civil law. Oddly enough he does not. Instead he notes that the state should allow fornication and prostitution to exist for the sake of the common good. Relying on the well-known passage from Augustine’s De ordine, Aquinas advocates tolerance of prostitution by noting: “Accordingly in human government also, those who are in authority rightly tolerate certain evils, lest certain goods be lost, or certain evils be incurred: thus Augustine says [De ordine 2.4]: ‘If you do away with harlots, the world will be convulsed with lust.'” If these social practices were to be suppressed, the public reaction might be such as to threaten the peace of society.
There is a line that can be walked, a very fine line you have to be very cautious with and have great balance to walk. You date and engage in casual sex, but never one night stands, never with someone you don’t connect with, and never without a dose of romance. This until you find one you can’t move on from.
If you act morally there is no guilt.
Exactly. Whether we pursue casual sex, plates, friends-with-benefits, mini relationships, LTR, or marriage, the key is to do so without deception. What causes guilt is the “seduction technique” of pretending to be open to something more exclusive or lasting than we really intend. And that guilt is legitimate.
casual sex by definition is immoral.
Yes, but a man must learn by experience. For women it’s different, God’s grace either reaches them early or it never does.
“For women it’s different, God’s grace either reaches them early or it never does.”
Source or retract.
You date and engage in casual sex, but never one night stands
What? That is a direct contradiction, and you can’t explain it away with pilpul. Casual sex is wrong, in fact fornication is wrong. It will only have negative consequence.
You sound like someone thoroughly baked in the sexual ethnic of the 90’s. Growing up watching ‘Seinfeld’ I took this ethic for a very long time. But it’s false, and should be rejected outright. There is no balance, no ‘fine line.’ If you engage in this life-style when you are lucky enough to find one “you can’t move on from” you will have to be VERY lucky that she won’t move on from you.
The modern courtship style is a complete farce. I think your approach can only work if you’re operating cynically. Otherwise you’re just eating your cake and hoping to have it.
If you act morally there is no guilt.
Dude. Casual sex is not and cannot be moral. Morality is concrete and objective. We may not agree on what is and is not is immoral, but actual morality isn’t flexible. No sane, moral person can say casual sex is moral.
Rooshv.com is a Christian website and if you think casual sex is moral you shouldn’t be here.
I consider casual sex any sex outside marriage, and it’s moral if you acknowledge God daily through your piety and humbleness and ask for forgiveness. We are all full of sin, that is the natural of man.
As long as you’re not prideful you’re in God’s grace.
LOL, it doesn’t work that way. If you are knowingly and purposely sinning then asking for forgiveness, it is under false pretenses.
Then we can conclude that all the people here hating on homosexuals feel guilty beacuse they have conflicts with their own sexuality
um no, sodomy is just plain old disgusting. The rectum is for shitting. Anyone who puts their face or dick in a cavern full of rotting food, bile, stomach acid, bacteria and fungus is makes me want to puke, not feel “guilty”. End of story.
One thing is to disagree with a certain behavoiur or to find it disgusting so you simply don’t do it and you go on with your life minding your own business like you should.
Another complete different thing is to be hating on something/someone for that certain behavior or whatever and being nearly obsessed about the subject. You have to seek in yourself why that moves so many things in you?
We have to separate the fact that there’s an agenda, a demonic one in the way the controllers want to sexually pervert our society with the media & porn etc and gender bending chemicals. These are the people your critique should be referred to. Not the victims of this social manipulation.
Ibet you have more than enough to watch out about where your own pipi and if your general behavior is in complete integrity before starting pointing fingers at others. The one wirhout sin should throw the fist stone. The one that judges will be judged
Guilt/regret is created by knowingly/unknowingly choosing the worse option.
No. Guilt is mostly manifestation of the negative side of the subconscious…..as is regret.
Most of it is not real as applied to the alleged uilt producing event.
Roosh should start writing a new book “Advanced Game- How to expose rape fantasizers” for the sake of the modern man facing the elitist agenda.
The subsequent outrage of daddy govt’s feminists being rejected by an entire upcoming generation of men would be quite something to behold.
Sluts are like fast food; the minute you mention it no one will shut up about how shit it tastes and how bad it is for you, yet on every block there’s a McDonalds, KFC or Burger King.
Boss analogy. Have a cigar my friend.
That one came out of (((Monica Lewinsky’s))) sweaty boxxx.
The white woman is a goddamn filthy w.h.o.r.e who would have $ex with anything.
> filthy whore
Has sex with everyone, except you.
One night stands are a massive mistake.
I fucked the wrong woman one night.
4 years later her problems are my problems.
I cannot leave; the situation is far too critical.
I deserve it for taking advantage of such a desperate woman. At least her life is a little better than it was 4 years ago.
But I will be happy when I can get out.
Please expand in what way?
He only leaves clues to his situation. She must be a baby rabies inflicted sex fiend with herpes. She fears abandonment and has a basement with whips and leg chains anchored about. I pray for the dude.
I don’t wanna dox myself.
I screwed some woman who was in a real bad place in life. I did it because it was easy. I did it because I didn’t wanna be an incel beta. But when I was done I realized that using and losing her would devastate her and make her terrible situation much worse. It’s like breaking another leg on an already limping dog. The guilt consumed me. I had to at least make things better for her before I let her go. Well, I have been trying that for the last 4 years, but her situation is terrible and very difficult. I am exhausted. I never wanted this, but the guilt holds me hostage and the burden is my penance. I really resent my father and the culture for not teaching me how to form healthy relationships with women.
I have had to look past so many other women who could have made me much happier. But my circumstances force me into this. I do not wish this predicament on anyone. Having to be with someone you do not love is a very unique type of hell. But this is what happens when you stick your dick in the wrong place.
Historically, many marriages began on such a basis. You’re probably doing the right thing by not abandoning her (especially if you were less than up front about wanting only a one-night stand). Should you “have to” marry her? Of course not. But in the “olden days” you would have been expected to. (A lesson for those who think they’d like to bring back the “good old days”—and for young men contemplating an unwise liaison.)
So in a nutshell Mr Truth, she’s not a whole woman. She’s somewhat damaged and broken and she’s high maintenance. She doesn’t bring a lot to the table and she falls short of what a full package woman would bring to the table. She’s maybe a 70% woman or lower, perhaps 50% right? Maybe it’s lower than that like a real non functional dependent/codependent approaching invalid level 30%. If it’s mental with her, then she’s only a comfort woman at best.
Simple arithmetic dictates that 30% plus 70% = 100%. It is your duty to yourself to open her to the advantages of a sister wife. Voila problem fixed. And why throw away a perfectly good 30%’er anyway? What’s wrong with collecting women that can’t function independently. We all collect car parts in our back yards, or at least I do. No one car part will operate on it’s own, but at least you have back up parts lying here and there in case your primary machine breaks.
So with your one broken partial woman cojoined with an additional full woman [90% or greater is an A- in school], you’re looking at 120% womanpower pulling the horses of the domestic home front. No it’s no Ferrari, but it’s better than kicking the pavement or kicking yourself for believing that you are obligated to remain bound to one broken woman regardless of the cost or handicap to yourself. Besides, with a whole and functioning mother goose woman at your armside, the other broken woman appears more whole and fixed on your other arm. Sometimes this actually fixes a broken woman to be in the nucleus of a polygynous union when it was only mental or trauma based originally with her.
Think higher than yourself. Think about your clan. Your clan awaits you and your clan is only one sisterwife away once you top the 90%+ bar or threshold. You are 30% there, only 70 points away from entering for the first time the doorway to your clan. Yoor clan awaits you. It’s yours. Your clan has always been there waiting. Ye be blinded no more. Amen.
Sorry man, didn’t have the patience for that blog post. But I guess you’re making an analogy between women and cars. My advice; pick another analogy.
I don’t blame you. My thought train for writing that wasn’t formed in a day, more like decades. So reading it at the common 75 wpm speed won’t internalize much of it. There’s so much other noise and pulp reading out there like the fishwrap newspaper, but I try to lay gold nuggets when I write the best I can. Good luck with your clan sir.
Are you not married? No kids?
Then LEAVE. Hell, even if you are married. LEAVE.
Leave YESTERDAY.
The situation smells like she has a personality disorder, or is at least fucked in the head. Four years? For years and she’s still in bad straits. Dude, you can’t fix her or even help her. You’ve given her FOUR YEARS. You can’t fix her. YOU CAN’T FIX HER!!!
You have to leave. Do it suddenly. Do it by surprise. Move all your stuff out and disappear completely. No contact. It’s a thing, look it up.
This just reeks of co-dependency. Look it up. You have to get out. Your life depends on it. You can’t do her any good and she can only do you bad. Deal with the guilt later.
“Co-dependency” sounds like another one of those made-up jew terms to misdirect our volition. It is perfectly natural and desirable for a woman to develop dependancy on a man. Stigmatizing such bonding is just a cynical feminist (((manipulation))) of language.
But you are right about her not doing me any good. Sad but true. I will leave her very soon when I am ready.
Yes, anything you personally disagree with also happens to be a made up “jew term” as you put it.
It is possible to be overly dependent on someone to an unhealthy degree. There is an abundant amount of academic literature on this. I’m gonna go out on a limb and take the word of medical professionals over some asshat on the internet who calls himself “the truth.”
Aww the atheist is butthurt I challenged his sacred “sources” lmfao.
Yeah it’s not like I didn’t explain how female dependence is a healthy and natural thing. That’s my “source”. It’s called common sense–and I can tell you struggle with it as your authority fallacy believing pseudo-intellectualism shows. It’s ok though, I’ve doubt you’ve ever been out on a limb, that would be too much to ask of your small mind. Stick to Richard Dawkins instead, it’s safer that way.
@guest_183748
LOL. So which of the following is the reason you lashed out here:
(a) You didn’t like how I correctly pointed out that you’re an asshat who calls himself “the truth”
(b) You are, by your own admission, a profoundly sad and miserable person who is too much of a coward to end a relationship he never wanted to be in, and instead continues to live a lie that’s being going on for 4 years, and will likely continue indefinitely
The irony here is that understanding codependency and unhealthy attachment patterns would actually help you get out of your situation. Based on what you’ve said so far, YOU are quite possibly the dependent person in your relationship (and not necessarily your partner). It’s not uncommon for codependent betas to play the role of “rescuer”, which seems to fit the situation you described for yourself. Rescuers often rely on their partner’s poor functioning to satisfy their own emotional needs (or “savior complexes”). They often have very poor communication and poor boundaries as well well as high reactivity (all things you demonstrated in the way you responded to me and others).
Anyways, you might want to get that looked at.
I’m gonna ignore all that other angry stuff in your post, since you are obviously in pain and lashing out.
May whatever imaginary god you believe in bless you and help you during this dire time. LOL.
You’re right a woman in her natural healthy state is codependent/complementary to the man. The man leads and the woman serves and works under his wing. What I was referring to previously was severe broken woman handicap level co/dependency like where she can barely boil water or prepare a package dinner. Like where the noodles are crunchy and uncooked and she says “woops I forgot again”. Or like where every day at least you exclaim “Geez you’re too stupid to live. You’d be dead without me.” Or where she calls you to stop work and come running home because she saw a spider and now she’s trapped in the closet hiding and the door is stuck and she thinks she’s suffocating. Or like when she compulsively starts drama and wars with neighbors to where they want to blame and kill you the man and vandalize your property when she started it all in the first place. Like as in she severely suffers from clinical schizo- quackto- frackazoiditis. She crosses the line when your freedom and safety is jeapordized because of her.
I learned long ago that your community and neighbors in general judge you as a man on the female company you keep. If you have a crazy bat for a spouse but you yourself are a great guy, your community still derides and judges you for harboring a piece of sh¡t woman. Even with tyrannical levels of feminist (((enforcement))) laws on the local lawbooks, the citizenry still retains their core natural common sense and instinct on the true natural order of the sexes and the natural expectations for the man to ultimately guide, lead and control the shebeast.
So if your woman startes trouble and sh¡t talk with people in your surrounlings and you can’t quell or control her discreetly and quietly, it’s because feminism has taught her to scream like a banshee and flag you to be swatted and for mangina white knights and women’s advocates to come running to her aid.
I tell you when the time comes to reclaim dominion over our women, we’ll see all shades of screaming and wailing from women who appeared fine in their sterile whoring lives. As soon as you challenge the legitimacy of the feminist order, a good 80% of the vain sterile liberated working whores will go totally batsh!t.
You have to hand pick a woman for a spouse young who is pure in mind and you have to possess the true patriarchal spirit and mojo. True patriarchal spirit is powerful and once a woman answers to her true natural calling to give herself mind body and soul onto her patriarchal master, then her destiny is true, glorious and ironclad. She’s set for life. There’s no way to peel her away from her honorable seat as a sister in her beloved clan.
Hail the Patriarchy!!
Why would any dude break up with a girl who is madly in love with him? That example made no sense. Your lucky to find one that’s halfway decent.
The question is, would you marry her? If not, break up.
You were just releasing anger of the humiliation of being a clown in pick up. That´s why you have to be yourself. “Be yourself” means you will not feel any repressed anger/resentment for putting up with shit you don´t want to. Anger will always be released sometimes against the wrong person. Which is unfair to that person. This is why you can´t put up anything for your woman or anyone else. It will crawl back up and release in the most strange ways. I use to do that. Release anger sometimes against the wrong person. Now I try to do it immediately against the right person. Sometimes it´s bad. And I lose money because of it.
My wife I was me. No excessive romantic bullshit. You think when I asked her to marry me I´ve put on my knees and all that hollywood bullshit? Fuck off. And do I love her? Yes. I love her. By love meaning giving my life for hers. Being the mother of my childs also helps in this decision.
You cannot set the bar too much up. Because women will expect you to mantain it. And as time passes you don´t feel like doing it. And it creates resentment.
Set the bar low. Low. There will be days you will just like seat in front of the couch all day.
In other important news. I believe all this solar/renewable energy is just like the Rothschilds did with Napoleon in the war. We are being set up for energies which will not work if the solar activity goes to minimum. And people will be completely helpless and dependent of the solution created. And they will profit. Nowadays through taxation. Because they own the state. Not only jewish elite but all elite. Common people will get slaughtered in food prices.
You are against interracial relationships, Roosh? You are Hitler.
I believe you are pandering towards all those frustrated angry white men who are lacking in their ability towards mating with “their” women, hencethis slight against men of colour — whom you and your followers see as subhuman — from ruining the gene pool.
Now do you also wanna justify your bigotry by quoting something from Scripture that abhors miscegenation, Adolf Rooshler?
………….Nazi
> thinking nazis are evil in 2019
Gtfo the internet boomer
We must wife up these used up Stacy wh0r3s who fucked every Tyrone on tha block, instead of having a stable marriage with an Oriental bride or a Hispanic woman.
R00$h is promoting his agenda to keep men on the plantation. His current post-shroom teachings will lead men into incelism.
Impregnating a white whore with white seed is far more preferable than impregnating a non-white virgin waifu princess with anything.
No it’s not right to put your seed in a whore, you’ve spoken a lie though you call yourself as the truth, which is itself delusional. Your white offspring will end up just like the white whore you fertilized, skanky and whorish if she’s a girl, and a beta cuck who’ll wife up the town bike if he’s a boy.
Read microchimerism, telegony and about the whore gene, if you’re really so into genetics. A woman’s womb and brain retains DNA from her previous partners, and she also passed on her own behavioural characterises to her off spring.
Another reason why the adage “you can’t turn a ho into a wife” holds true. Hoes usually produce and raise more hoes and cucks. And most of the white cuckboys and whores of today had whore foremothers in their lineage.
Half casts are always twisted. To promote miscegenation is unbelievably moronic. You are really a huge part of the problem (and should ideally be first on the list as a traitor).
The sixth commandment bans adultery. If you look at the etymology of the Latin word, miscegenation is included in adultery.
The 10 Commandments were written in Hebrew, dummy.
Roosh, As the Word says , You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. You had guilt because you were committing sin, You perhaps did not know that God does not forbid a man to marry several women. Mainstream Christianity preaches monogamy but the Bible teaches otherwise. The reason why men have resorted to casual sex to satisfy their instinctive urges is because modern society ,has established monogamy as the only acceptable and respectable marriage. Polygyny has been systematically attacked and made unpopular. When you speak of polygamy one immediately points you to Warren Jeffs raping and marrying 14 year olds therefore it must be bad because of some cult somewhere. Nobody runs away from monogamy even though divorce rates are at all time highs, and abuse still happens in monogamy. The main reason however that polygyny is hated is because it is incompatible with equal rights. Polygyny is hated because it puts women in their place . . . , but is it necessarily a bad place? No its not, It’s the place that God ordained for them and if they get a loving caring responsible husband they can be very happy in that place . God never ordained equal rights in marriage and He never condemned polygyny. Because western society has made polygyny taboo men have to resort to sin, (fornication and adultery) to satisfy their natural instinct which they could have done in a polygynous marriage. The western race is dwindling and immigrants are filling the space , polygamy could solve this problem in less that 200years. Sadly it is too late as most western women would consider the suggestion of being a second wife an insult. You are not shamed for being gay, lesbian , even polyamory is considered ok simply because it also allows the woman multiple partners, but polygyny ..No. Herein lies the curse.
Well said Patriarch. The nanny state has more power over a monogamous household too. This is a state power issue. The household with the lone female spouse is only one signature or petition at the courthouse away from the state getting their foot into your door and decimating your hard earned estate and stripping you of contact with your seedline offspring like war captives.
The nanny bitchstate has no mercy for the trad patriarchal clan because it is a self governing and self supporting power structure. The state wants broken or incomplete segments of families or individuals that must ‘plug in’ to the system’s services to survive – – just like the electric power utility monopolies prefer customers without backup power generation and whose survival depends on being plugged into their grid. They all want you plugged in and dependent.
In a polygynous household, one single fickle confused wife is not as pivotal to the functioning of the household as a whole, and she alone cannot pull the plug and wreck the place. Family disputes are settled at the table with the sisters and the nanny state keeps their foot out of your door. The sister wives all watch each other’s backs. The polygynous family arrangerent is like a tetrahedron, the strongest structure next to a synthetic diamond. You can’t bust a polygynous family apart with a sledge hammer and the nanny state knows that. So basically the man isn’t likely to return home from work and find the place gutted with a note that reads “gone to my mother’s to get some space”. Or the real doozey of a note that reads “gone (somewhere in the world) to find myself”.
Heh, there’s a story of a really flaky woman that comes to mind who left such a note “gone to find myself”. It was in upstate Michigan in the late 70s when this one stupid ding bat mom abandoned her nest. Steinem was all the rampage and this poor ding a ling mom drank the feminist liberation theology kool aid to the fullest – and then she bolted from her home one day after putting her 6 yr old daughter and 10 yr old son on the bus to school.
The kids came home from school that day and NO MORE MOMMY! The dad never remarried, raised the kids on his own and it was very trying for him at the least. If only that family had a sister wife, things would be so different. The house was beautiful with a huge green front lawn and prominent American flagpole. Dad worked hard in the union and the 10 yr old boy got good grades and went on into the military. His 6 yo sister went on to graduate too. Maybe the boy hated his mother for abandoning him or maybe he had to compensate by making the selfish indifference of his feminized mother mutual, internalized within himself . . . we’ll never know. But what we do know is that the mom sent a letter from Morocco several years later to her estranged family that pretty much explained things. She had to ‘find’ herself. She’d gotten a job with some travel agency and was seeing the world. Well so much for self propelled female incongruity.
And that 10 yr old boy back in 1979 . . . . his name was Timothy Mcveigh.
Under polygyny, some men get multiple women and other men get none. The men who get none get angry and are easily recruited into violence. It’s not the best system.
@ Ananymous – Under polygyny, men don’t ‘get’ women handed to them like they were army rations and this is a misconception of polygamy, or specifically patriarchal polygyny. Men have to work, game, barter and hustle for a female mate or mates as anywhere else.
The SMV marketplace isn’t disrupted a bit when one man takes two virgin wives because virgins are born every day. It’s the used whores that are avoided, but a virtuous polygynous man sticks with his sister wives and he doesn’t go out popping virgins indiscriminately and polluting the waters for everyone else. There are many used whores out there and some blind betas will marry them. The used whores will do coitis with multiple men who don’t care about purity and virtue, so the hapless of the betas get serviced by the p for p whores and the rogue and renegade alphas wantonly use the remaining married and unmarried whores.
A married virgin is for all accounts untouchable other than by the patriarch sire, whether he be alpha or beta. It’s a big leap for a married beta with a loyal virgin wife to seek a sister wife. If he’s downsized and not in a position to expand his clan, then one wife works fine for him, just like the Prius compact economy car is the only choice for some depending on their needs and outlay.
Now say you have a big man with big balls and big ambitons. A tiny gas saving Prius would cramp his style and his life plans. He wants and needs a big Suburban or a tank or even a whole wagon train pulling the clan front. Maybe he has a family business or large farm that needs many clan hands on deck to make the place work. If his balls are up to it, then give him the blessing and a cigar to go ahead and obtain an extra wife or two. He needs them like they need not only him, but the companionship/cooperation of the other loyal sisters.
If you stumble upon a sister wife material lady or girl that’s virgin, just remember that in this corrupt world, she’s only one foolish decision away from being just another whore out in the world unless she wife’s up a beta provider or enters a poly clan. Either way, we western men need to shore up our women soon because they’re being used up, tarnished and tainted and are being turned into used whores with unattached families at like a mile a munite. And with feminism, it’s mostly all her ‘choice’ when she throws her life and her virginity into the garbage can and renders herself unfit to marry anything other than a blind fool.
The first man to take a second wife was Lameh, if you read the story in the OT you will see nothing good came out of that. Nowhere in the Bible polygamy is promoted. It was allowed back then but made clear it is wrong in the NT.
I really don’t blame you for how you think. This is what is preached in almost all “Christian” churches to the extent that people almost have no choice but to parrot the same lame arguments. e.g. “Lamech was the first polygamous man”. Really? Is that an argument ?? Ok I’ll follow your logic. Adam was also the first monogamous man wasn’t he , how did that turn out, not too great huh , one of his sons murders the other, they get evicted from Eden and mankind gets cursed in the process, What about Isaac and Rebekah’s monogamy , it ended up with Jacob stealing the birthright and Esau chasing him for many years trying to kill him, What about Job’s monogamy, God put him to the test and his own wife instead of being loving and supportive advises him to curse God and die (possibly so that she would have the inheritance). Yet noone blames monogamy for all these sad stories i’ve mentioned. But If one thing goes wrong in a polygamous family people blame polygamy itself.
Polygamy was encouraged both in Old and New Testament. e.g. When David commited adultery God rebuked and said he should not have taken another man’s wife and reminds David that he had already given him his master (Saul)’s wives and if he wanted more he should have asked for more and God would have given him. If that’s not encouraging I dont what is
We are no longer under OT rules, back then it was allowed but nowhere it is said that God commanded it. For NT see 1 Cor 7:2 “But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband”. Can you point to the NT verse which encourages polygamy?
This hits too close to home.
I realized at a very young age that I was attractive, and I lost my virginity at 14. I’m very close to my parents, but they were not strict with me when I was growing up because I was such a good kid. I grew up in the Britney/Christina era and it was a competition to see who could be most like them. I realized I can easily get anything I wanted because I was attractive, and I became a master manipulator.
When I started using tumblr in my early 20’s, I discovered radical feminism. I started thinking that every issue I had was because of men. I was a free, liberated woman, and the goal was to have as many notches under my belt as I could, because I was equal (aka better) than men. I felt like men were the cause of all things bad, and used them as much as possible so they would feel my pain.
I continued to have casual sex. I felt dead inside when the guys lost interest in me, so I would continue the cycle. Because if the last guy didn’t think I was hot enough, the next one surely will.
I became a web cam model. Enough said. Luckily I ended this cycle of self exploitation years ago. Became sober, gave up all social media platforms etc. My number is not that high, but I wish it was lower. I did not want to be the girl with the “1000 cock stare” 😂
Casual sex is disgusting. Like you mentioned, sex is the most intimate thing you can do with someone, and to do this with a stranger is an act of self loathing. Getting sex is easy, but to save yourself and be intimate with someone you love is the best thing ever.
I practise celibacy now, thanks to understanding the yogic limb of Brahmacharya. Sexual energy is incredibly powerful, and giving it away casually is such a waste.
I wasted my 20’s because I wanted to get my kicks. Here I am, 31 and single. At this point if I never have sex again, I would be okay with that.
Guilt is born when we let Satan take control and give in to temptation. We feel guilty when we eat too much junk, spend too much money on material goods, drink too much, when we are lazy etc. It might feel good in the moment, but self control is strength and an act of self love.
In the red pill, you have reached what we call the “epiphany phase.”
What happens in this phase? And what comes after?
Bullshit.
I assure you that if Brad Pitt showed up in fron of you right now you would drop your drawers and fuck the life out of him.
You fake guilt is just a manifestation of your normal subconscious negativity AND your realization that u failed to stick ur Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks landing.
That’s a ridiculous thing to say. I have no desire to sleep with someone I’ve never had a conversation with.
It’s important to feel a sense of safety and security when you’re intimate with someone. Just because Brad Pitt showed up at my door and wanted to sleep with me doesn’t mean I would feel the same way.
Hahahahah. Right.
Believe it or not, fool, some people believe in things that are more important that immediate gratification.
Well said. I’m where you are but a man.
I don’t feel guilty very often, even about things that people look down upon. Maybe because I have my justifications, as we all do. However, I don’t have a justification for having wronged someone who I know was good to me – in which case, I immediately apologize. Any form of repentance is really good enough and will relieve you.
One of the most important things in life is to have a clear conscience because it is directly tied to your self respect. If you have done something that in your eyes decreases the respect you have for yourself, you will grow bitter and destructive. Self hatred never pans out well.
Dark triad cures beta… You’re welcome
Nice thought provoking essay. I think in a lot of cases it may also be the other way around. People maybe look to sex or intimacy to alleviate feelings of guilt and self loathing that were already there that developed as a result of childhood traumas and from being “broken” to fall inline with whatever social conventions of the day.
Because of the trauma to the psyche and unwillingness to face it, the casual sex or whatever just becomes another thing to feel guilty about, driving the cycle on, whether there is legit reason to feel shame or not. The more messed up folk will feel guilty about anything and everything. Some react by getting mad and aggressive towards others, some will just get down on themselves.
Crazy realization though that so much of the nonsense in the world is due to projection eh.. all the outward inversion manifesting from inward inversion. Kind of forces you to have compassion towards even the vilest scum. You see some clown desperately insisting how strong and proud they are, and all you see is a child huddled in the corner that feels unloved. But it doesn’t always explain everything. Taking this too far is like saying a guy who hates spiders secretly loves them. It may be the case, but unless you can read minds, who knows.
I don’t think cutting the guilt at the source is merely changing your habits. I think Jesse Lee Peterson said guilt is caused by judging yourself, which is playing god. When you stop judging yourself all the time, then the guilt begins to subside, and the self destructive activities you were engrossing yourself in to numb the pain become less interesting over time. To stop judging we have to question the way we see ourselves and continually deny our ego and pride.. clearing out the cobwebs of opinions that masquerade as personhood. I think that is when the npc programming begins to fade. Not after simply just adopting a new set of views. Some may drastically change their habits through willpower, but they may just be setting themselves up again in another egocentric trap. Without real insight we’re liable to fall hard at some point or continue serving the same old master just in different ways. I can’t read your mind or intentions and this is a rhetorical question, but for example, you can see how it might seem you have legitimized your disdain for this globohomo system with Christian dogma and now have a higher horse from which to continue calling out degenerates, but has the internal mental process changed?
Anyway, I think the sticking point is confronting the illusions we have about who we think we are and the personality that was in large part created as a reaction to pain and humiliation. Getting to the root of guilt can unravel our whole identity. Negative feelings are actually useful and point the way, but we have to listen to them and not try to drown them out or run away. Unless our parents are saints, we all get traumatized to some degree, not to mention what the system inflicts on us. It doesn’t really matter if we’re functional in the world or not, every spiritual seeker has these facades and vulnerabilities to face. I don’t know how or why facing the truth makes everything better, but it does. There is always hope for even the most depraved.
“Without real insight we’re liable to fall hard at some point or continue serving the same old master just in different ways. I can’t read your mind or intentions and this is a rhetorical question, but for example, you can see how it might seem you have legitimized your disdain for this globohomo system with Christian dogma and now have a higher horse from which to continue calling out degenerates, but has the internal mental process changed?”
Wise words we would all do well to consider.
Guilt is a product of religious indoctrination.
Change my mind.
Roosh when you speak of the intense focus and concentration of the monks and their pure living habits, I compare that to married home life and keeping your woman proper and straight. A man should be whole like Adam and uncircumcised to have full command of his reproductive equipment and further he should live pure to achieve the mental clarity to fully see and grasp the reigns on his shebeast breederwoman. She is a mighty ornery and divergently driven thing if you release the reigns on her.
So that brings me to the topic of domestic order and relations. A man who lives impure, say for example he constantly drinks recreationally at home – what you find is the female begins to have immense power and control over him in the same way a voodoo priest has control over his subject by administering his potions. The same effect is seen when the husband habitually uses pain medications. The drug or substance of choice is her pipeline to control and the man finds it impossible to master the kind of control and mentorship that a sage monk has over his pure body and surroundings.
But I find the ‘reproducing’ or ‘birthing’ offspring being equated to death as a falsehood. Our seedline is life and we uphold life most worshipfully. Our ongoing progenesis is why we are here. I’ve heard statements like “you die when you give birth” which is pure jewish clap trap. The monks are servicemen without full command of their genetalia so they never get virtue tested on that aspect of their being. They take a short cut in life you might say but sadly they remain genetic dead ends. Aborting and post wall sjw’s too take the same shortcut, being in service to cultural marxism, monks to it if you will and they too are genetic dead ends.
So as a man sips his booze at home, the wifey nips and panders and henpecks unchallenged and soon she sets the agenda secretly. And she is quick to pour him another drink to keep him oblivious. In the long term she enjoys immense control over most situations. But the woman is never the master architect or planner or designer of civilization – – so in the long run ye house beeth a domicile of PUSSYWHIPPERY!!!
The Monarch Programming has been strong lately.
America has a gender ratio problem, so the plan is to try & turn all straight men into modern day monks to quell any potential uprising.
Roo$h!
Are you okay. dude?
GUILT and SHAME and MISCEGENATION are TOOLs of the ‘New Society’..
Such notions represent PERMANENT BLAME-(placing) and IMMOBILIZATION of your future life by your past missteps.
—-Notice how things are becoming more paralyzing by the day ….
example. — Your digital U.N., Chinese style “Social Credit Score” records that you whored around Brasilia and combined with your NON-left-wing politics will now determine that you can no longer travel or have gainful employment!
Do you want to be a part of that?
CHRIST said to CONFESS your sins and strive to -reject- them!
HE DIED for YOUR sins.. YOUR ‘errors’.. !
HE showed the WAY OUT!~
HE NEVER SAID to wallow in regret and waste time moping over your pathetic mistakes.
In fact the NWO SYSTEM (as the FALSE GLOBAL SURVEILLANCE RELIGION) -WANTS- you to feel all guilty and depressed… —and in many cases thereby RESTRICT YOUR GOD-GIVEN FREEDOMS whilst FINANCIALLY PENALIZING you for NONSENSE like slavery (reparations), LGBTQ+2-XYZ (censorship fines/ immoral laws), economic inequality (communism tax), climate damage (carbon tax for foreign factory pollution), ad infinitum … the list is literally ENDLESS.
Are you going to ruin the rest of your life by being such a “guilt victim”?
Do you even realize how by guilt based anti-sex campaigning you become a de-facto MeToo supporter.. all because you are chagrined over some mediocre Czech pussy you had in 1995?
CHRIST NEVER SAID to be an INCEL A-Political-Tard Cuck-Loser!
CHRIST NEVER SAID he would condemn you for having sex with a hot chick!
CHRIST NEVER SAID you had to save the evil world from itself!
CHRIST said be RIGHT with GOD and be MASTER of your own house.
HE SAID to speak the GOOD NEWS to those who can HEAR it.
HE SAID to always make your best effort to “walk the narrow path”
HE SAID it is not easy but HE is there for you when you falter! 🙂
THIS is why Christianity is under fire these days.. it is the OPPOSITE of untenable guilt!
Lastly–
I get you’re going thru a mid-life crisis and it’s not been easy for ya Roo$h–
It’s awful and we are all sympathetic..
But did you ever stop to think that YOUR bohemian life was DESIGNED by GOD to be that way? That HE in fact was sending you thru very specific experiences to specifically enlighten -YOU-?
THINK
Would you still be Roo$h if you immediately married some pig at 16 and lived in some Kosovoan farming village with children who hate you for raising them in poverty???
Would you still feel ‘guilt’ for being more turned on by your milking cow than your bloated wife?
Would you feel ‘guilt’ about your pets when you served them for your only winter meal?
Would you still, thru ‘guilt’, worship in your old world religion when you realized your patriarch sold your village to moneylenders and he is one of them?
How much ‘guilt’ would you feel for your aging parents when they were sleeping the same bedroom with you and your smegma-ed wife?
What level of ‘guilt’ would you feel when you were made homeless by the U.N. illegals given tax free rights to your farm property?
How about the ‘guilt’ you feel for your “combative politics” when 260 pound Ivan the Lumberjack shows up in a dress and declares himself the Communist candidate for Mayor, no one in the village votes for him, and yet he (she) is sworn in anyway?
HINT-
If you going to now impart “guiding wisdom packed with guilt” could you at least AVOID the CLICKBAIT extreme titles and similar thinking thereof….
The Less Dramatic but more Truthful Title of this Article should read
” Casual Sex Is Not Really Casual ”
Lesson for the Day; ReCAP-
GUILT is SHIT
🙂
PS; Your parents would most likely want you to be safe and living where you are happy. I can tell you from experience that overlooking your own needs for elder relatives can leave you DEVASTATED when they pass. There has to be a reasonable balance between family and self.
PPS; Pets are NOT people. “Putting to sleep” is a weird notion but sometimes it is the truly merciful thing for the pet’s suffering.
PPS; Miscegenation DOES carry consequences. There is an ABSOLUTE increase in the potential of birth defects within interracial marriage.
This is awesome. I hope Roosh reads.
“Miscegenation DOES carry consequences. There is an ABSOLUTE increase in the potential of birth defects within interracial marriage.”
Sources or retract.
His sources come from the same place that yours do: from the inside of his own butt.
There is no God. The only natural law is that of biology.
A man fucks a slut while simultaneously resenting her because he knows she will go on to fuck countless other men. What every man wants is a loyal slut. Harems are the most natural biological construct of all.
In most species of mammal, very few males have the opportunity to pass on their genes through reproduction. Only the alpha males reproduce and typically do so through impregnating multiple females.
That is the Law.
If you feel guilt over spreading your seed, it is of your own making.
> there is no God
> thinks he can prove an existential negative
> by invoking muh biology
> ???
> therefore, existential negative!
Go back to college, and get a refund…
Troll harder dumbass.
Instead of answering for your failed arguments I must be a troll.
Lol, go back to silicone valley with your snowflake sensibilities.
Isn’t it funny how Darwinists always presume to be the smart ones in the room, yet when put to scrutiny they bitch out like the effeminate pseudointellectuals they really are.
Imagine my shock.
Do you believe in the Hindu god Vishnu? How about the Nordic god Thor? How about the Greek god Zeus? How about all the gods of ancient Egypt? Are all of these gods real or not?
“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.” – Stephen Roberts
And what if they are all the same God?
> atheism BTFO.
It’s funny how atheists claim to believe in no gods, but if you point how how evolution fails or how their dating techniques are very retroactively selective, they lose their minds like fanatics who had their precious theology blasphemed.
And what if they are all the same God?
LOL, this question suggests to me that your beliefs are actually more hilarious and retarded than I originally thought.
You committed one of the classic beta bitch blunders: answering a question with another question: do you genuinely believe all religions are the same god? If yes, are all religions equally valid in your view? Or did you simply say that in a disingenuous attempt avoid the cognitive dissonance that would result from admitting that you have no rational basis of your imaginary fairytale belief system, and that’s no more rational than say, believing in Scientology god of Xenu?
It’s funny how atheists claim to believe in no gods, but if you point how how evolution fails
Okay I’ll bite.
How does “evolution” fail?
or how their dating techniques are very retroactively selectively
LOL, you seem really confused about what atheism is. Do you think part of the definition of atheist has anything to do with “dating techniques”? Wow, whatever school you went to failed you badly.
You might want to have some semblance of scientific literacy before engaging in discussions such as this.
This quote sounds nice but doesn’t make sense. The idea of a higher power is not rejected by anybody- put another way, all the warriors have different weapons but everyone is armed, unlike Roberts whose hands are empty. They may argue among themselves whether a katana is better than a Saracen sword for the upcoming battle, yet they all understand the need to be armed in this fight. There is a common denominator. Can you see the difference… You have two separate sets of people, atheists and believers- all of whom started from the logical point that the world is God’s creation. When they look around, everyone agrees that God exists, there is no disagreement about that, the ways part only after this fact has been established, they may see others as erring, but not fundamentally wrong, there’s no denying God here. I don’t reject God, just your way of understanding him, like when there are/were different, competing explanations for natural phenomena, when the question revolved around their nature, not their existence.
People have been searching for the truth since day one, so you have all those imaginary Nordic and Greek gods, and eventually those very pagans have accepted Jesus, who is not a product of someone’s fantasy, voluntarily, As for Hindu gods, as a Catholic I believe those might actually be real demon manifestations, whie Christianity springs from the revealed truth- God’s will to show people the way. And just like today, even when Jesus roamed the earth, and performed miracles, many Jews were accusing him (and later also his apostles), of being a fraud and a charlatan, out to deceive and lead the populace astray.
“Only the alpha males reproduce and typically do so through impregnating multiple females.”
Not tru exactly. Betas reproduce as well….just not as prolifically. Why ? 1 alpha cant possibly monitor the females 24/7/365. Being an alpha is also risky business. Health and Life always at risk from other alphas and ascendant betas. KWomen can and do cheat and cuckold where they perceive a chance to get away with it.
“A man fucks a slut while simultaneously resenting her because he knows she will go on to fuck countless other men. What every man wants is a loyal slut”
Tru. hahah. But this also proves how men suffer from their own solipsism and irrationality…….Madonna whore complex.
EAT SLEEP FUCK GOY!! THERE IS NO TOMORROW. NOTHING HIGHER.
EAT SLEEP FUCK GOY.
You weren’t feeling guilty furking thousands of $kanks in Europe. A man is biologically wired to spread his seed to more than one woman.
Only a woman would feel guilt for sleeping around because it’s not in her nature to take five different dick at one time, one from a shoe, one from Chad, one from Chaddam, one from Tyrone and one from her pet dog.
Shame on you for promoting incelism to men!
It’s funny how neither the 14 nor the 88 makes any sense outside of monogamy.
Good luck setting up a Reich on African sexual selection strategies.
African sexual selection strategies is what created humanity itself………
Civilizations rise and fall, but human survival always marches on ! It is predicted that by 2050, 1/3rd of all people on the planet will be African……
This issue has already been figured out and decided by natural selection.
> believes in evolution
Lmfao, go back to 2008.
I’m so sick of this boomer-tier notion that it’s women’s nature to be monogamous. It’s their nature to breed with successful and/or dominant men. Hence the need for patriarchy.
Who ever argured that monogamy was natural?
It’s actually human nature to be monogamous in a civilization. There is no need for patriarchy, that is dead.
Sources or retract.
It’s only fair that you live up to the same standards you impose on others.
> thinks demanding sources constitutes an argument.
Let me guess, you just finished the god delusion?
@guest_183748
LOL, let me guess, you never learned what unintentional irony is.
We are a naturally monogamous under certain circumstances and it really depends on the value the person. High value females are monogamous, lower value ones are promiscuous. In men it’s the opposite, when a high value man gets old only then does he stop spreading the seed. The low value men raise their own children and the high value man’s ones, while the latter only raises his own.
When siblings don’t look alike, you know why that is.
Incel = involuntarily celebate.
Volcel = voluntarily celebate.
Why is worth tied to the amount of whores you’ve slept with (if you got her easy, so did all the others)?
This was good except for the racial part. Do you believe that it is immoral or somehow sinful to date other races? It’s a sin to lust after someone because they might look a certain way; but to not date someone just because they are another race is creating divisions in the human species that are not really there. The devil is the source of arbitrary division. We are all cousins: one human race descended from original parents created by God. [I’m not saying it’s OK to date or marry your first, second or even third cousin. That’s not healthy. You need some genetic distance.]
Wake up, dummy. You sound like a blue-pilled beta fag. And a race traitor to boot.
So someone who isn’t racist is a blue-pilled beta fag? I’m just learning the jargon.
The shorr answer is yes, cuck.
I’ll pray for you.
Pray for youself, it’s the least you can do.
What a prideful and self righteous response. The problem is miscegenation. Birth defects, twisted mentality, mental health. Promoting half casts is awfully cruel and stupid.
The only group of people can rebuild are whites.
The problem with racism is there is no end to it. “Whites” are not a single group: Germans feel superior to Slavs, for example. North Germans feel superior to Bavarians. Saxons feel superior to Pommeranians. Nordics feel superior to the “half-breed” Teutons (a mix of Celtic and “pure” Germanic). Where does all this bullshit end? The logic of miscegenation leads to fucking incest. The divisions are endless in any group that defines itself by division. Tribalism will bring us right back to the damn dark ages if you keep following it. Christianity united cultures and races and overcame tribal divisions otherwise Europe would have diminished into an absolute mess after the Roman Empire fell. The “caucasian” race is a made up conglomeration of people united by Christianity (and it also includes “Brown” Indians, who are the original Aryans).
It probably would not bring the dark ages,but this part
>>>>Brown Indians (who are original aryans)<<<<
Guess you have been watching too much (((blacked.com))) my dear christcuck.
Why are you still here? Roosh converted to Christianity. What the hell is a “christcuck” you blasphemous swine. Take some more of your nihilism pills till you choke on them, if that’s what you want.
there is a lot in here brother roosh. the guilt and shame produced within is unbearable indeed, and further fuels masturbation to hardcore porn, and fornication. may you find truth in the days to come.
Great article Roosh. Never thought about it this way.
Good to see you mature, Roosh. Our parents are not perfect, but in the end they are the only one who care about us and have made a lot of sacrifices to make us an independent adult. Glad to see your are paying heed to your familial duties.
Hey Roosh and all, as a 24 year old male with a notch count of only 3, I need some advice. I’ve had 3 long term relationships with girls I met through my social circle. My last one is my oneitis who dumped ME, which a year later still distracts me. I recently came upon the forum here and the website and game in general. As a man who eventually wants a Christian wife, am I still expected to get a few casual sex encounters to have better skills? (Obviously I’ve had premarital sex, but never outside of a committed monogamous relationship). Am I understanding this right: I have to do lots of approaches/significantly increase my notch count so as to know how to keep a woman in the future? This website is a treasure trove. Thank you.
Finding a good wife and increasing your notch count are, for the most part, mutually exclusive. Focus on one or the other.
Then I’ll continue to use game to find a woman who is marriage material instead of birddogging 6/10 bar sloots. God bless and thanks!
Roosh they are aware of that.
Feeling Guilty after sex.
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/casual-sex-why-do-we-feel-so-guilty-about-hooking-up
How to “control” your guilty emotions after sex.
https://www.bustle.com/articles/41655-how-to-hook-up-with-someone-without-guilt-by-staying-satisfied-safe-and-sane
One Night Stand creates “sex guilt”
https://culturacolectiva.com/lifestyle/one-night-stand-casual-sex-guilt
People are full of guilt due to excessive sex ( different partners)
https://www.quora.com/I%E2%80%99m-wrapt-with-guilt-for-having-casual-sexual-partners-in-my-twenties-now-that-I%E2%80%99m-older-and-in-my-thirties-How-can-I-let-go-of-this-guilt-when-it%E2%80%99s-eating-me-up-inside
And so so so many other articles, paperwork and research.
It’s so funny that there are articles about that and still our society promotes non-marriage sex.
This is a great article to clarify the nature of natural human sexuality; showing me why the hell I feel so messed up after pump and dump experiences. I always feel for the girl after….. how they just ditch so easily>??? last girl was all messed up and drrunkish we had some ncie sex and then I got up and she ditched me… wtf??? the girls actually conditioned to discard the emotions easier.
I always felt casual sex was trash based on my feelings this is exactly correct though. TY ROOSH. The Bible is wise and right as usual.
“HE who commits sexual Immorality sins against his own flesh”
“Every other sin is outside the body but sexual sin is inside the body”
When people have sex… They join spiritually. I MEAN WHAT THE HELL WE MISSED OUR NOSE IN OUR FACE HERE?!?!?!
GENITALS = GENISIS = CREATE
We put our creative force together and expect this only physical. ASD A SASDA SDASD AASD
Oh the irony – so Roosh and all of his pals have staunchly supported Trump – a known fornicator and proven pathological liar NOW WHAT CHRISTIAN SOLDIERS?
Flummoxed and Confused as you march backward.
Regardless of your political orientation these are 2 known facts – trump is a liar and a womanizer.
Further irony being that Roosh is now touting abstinence and the evils of “interracial love” after being “born again”
Get a grip ROOSH your trite new found dogma is akin to wahhabism.
Next week let’s all watch ROOSH join the Westboro Baptist Church for his next stunt.
I like to follow my own path and enjoy not being a sheeple and following some moronic dogma encased in the word “religion” with an invisible guy in the sky with a clipboard who is keeping tabs on everyone.
Religion is for the lost and lone, handicapped and poor, the lost desperate people who need faith because they have nothing else to help them thru the day.
All man made religions are the scourge of mankind so I will take a hard pass thanks!
Watching ROOSH go from extreme manosphere playboy guru/ right wing trump supporter to Born again pious Christian is like watching a guy in a custom tailored brooks brothers suit slipping on a huge pile of dog shit on the street and rolling around in it for hours , eating it and offering it to others as a healthy nutritious meal.
Maybe one day you will come out of this phase and find moderation, peace of mind ,balance, tolerance and non judgement of how other people live – you know mind your own fucking business and LIVE AND LET LIVE.
I am a fan of Roosh, but I fail to understand this kind of logic. Maybe, because I’m free of that guilt. I don’t understand it.
To be frank, the idea of “guilt” is too far fetched and misplaced (both in the times we live in and in the article to apply it to the general population), after analysing it from a red pill unemotional perspective. There’s no guilt among Chads and Tyrones for fucking multiple women, and there’s even no more remorse among women for spreading their holes for them.
The type of porn you see today (brutal anal, spitting and multiple insertions) is often the fantasy of many women today. And that’s the (casual) sex they seek these days. Casual sex has created guilt specifically for you (or for guys like you) but don’t expect them out there to feel the same like you do. With all due respect.
Roosh, I recommend you to watch a movie “Shame” starring Micheal Fassbender and a documentary “Rocco” featuring the life of male pornstar Rocco Sifreddi (who himself laments that these days porn is just about straight bestial mechanical sex with “no romance”). Both explore the theme of male guilt over promiscuity and hypersexuality. Rocco feels guilty for banging young actresses in their 20s (Abella Danger and Verruca James) and remarks that they are in the same age as his sons, who instead should be fucking them. But the actresses don’t care and have no guilt.
Mind you, porn consumption is 30 to 40% among women today who idolize pornstars like Rocco and Manuel Ferrara, and have absolute no guilt about casual sex. That’s true red pill wisdom.
And to be frank, the most honest answer comes in the Rocco documentary from a female pornstar right now well in her late 40s, Kelly Stafford.
“I just like to fuck with hot blooded males and I have a high sex drive. What’s normal for me is too much for others.”
Rocco’s cousin, who shoots his movies, at one point, verbally abuses her and her life choices, but she has no guilt. And trust me, there are hordes of women like her out there.
Watch the entire documentary here.
https://youtu.be/ZKxAdQQ9NXc
And that’s how modern women are today, emulating the lives of female pornstars and hoes of the yesteryears who continue to live their lives unashamedly and without guilt.
You could have a few outliers like Shelly Lubben who fights against porn after having starred in it before, but the majority will end up like Nina Hartley who’s still fucking young dudes after menopause. And that’s how most women (and the top 20% of men slaying pussy regularly) are.
The question of sex is always gonna be there: when is it right and when it’s not. And the question is most of the time people regret for passing up on sex than actually fucking and then regretting. And you see it commonly more in women – the ones who actually provide you with the sex. Because a woman would rather fuck and get validated about her appeal and sexuality than feel guilty about not fucking or being validated. What you see on social media and in real life with young teens posting booty pics or walking in tiny shorts with their asses hanging out is all that. This is 2019.
Your guilt is more about supposedly abusing women more than actual sex itself or having influenced thousands of your followers to pursue sex with women, now that you’ve had a spiritual/moral awakening . You probably feel that by using game or indulging in casual meaningless sex, you have somehow abused them, not to mention the tons of hate you recieved from feminists all over the years. The truth is you didn’t abuse those women. They made a choice and they slept with you, some repeatedly. And they would do it again with someone else. Same to the women who will sleep with the men who learnt game from you.
Unless if you really raped them, consensual sex (even if it’s casual or meaningless) is between two adults who know why they’re doing it.
Or your guilt is induced by the thought that you chased your desires and you somehow let down your family or dear ones. Or your guilt is that you could’ve started a family earlier and had kids and a wife to return to, instead of ratching up notches with beautiful women.
You probably feel your time has passed by for you didn’t pair bond as you should’ve earlier and fulfilled your biological imperative of procreating – considering female degeneracy worsens with every passing year and looks like no signs of improving.
This is just a mid life crisis – this feeling too shall pass. Your life has just begun at 40.
You did not fail. It was your destiny to learn the red pill through casual sex, and your present level of higher wisdom and maturity is the result of your experiences, no matter how difficult your situation is now. You could’ve alternately been living in blue pill LaLa land and still working a job which was nothing but indentured servitude, to probably come home to a millennial wife and kids who would ungratefully push you deeper into the plantation till you burned out, like thousands of men out there. And there’s no honor in that.
Women, in their natural state, experience no guil for they’re typically sensory and feeling creatures. They only feel guilty when someone actually invalidates them through shaming them, so your argument that casual sex creates guilt in feminists is way off the market.
Regarding miscegenation, women feel no guilt in that too. I’ve seen plenty of young traditional Russian girls indulging in the worst debauchery in their vacations abroad, with foreign men, especially in places like India or the middle East. And many of them claim to be traditional while taking a curry cock up their rosy buttholes. It’s forgotten conveniently. The irony is however when such women try to shame you for your promiscuity, but the real truth is that they shame others out of envy, not guilt. The same applies to men who bang a lot of women yet call them sluts, it’s not always out of guilt, but rather rage and envy.
Envy and rage for not being able to control the other person’s sexuality. Envy and rage for not being to rely on the other person. Envy and rage for not being able to experience as much sexual abundance or appeal as the other person.
That is what an environment and lifestyle of casual sex often actually creates. And thus you have the incels, and Elliot Rodgers as a byproduct of that.
If casual sex actually created guilt, we wouldn’t be seeing the levels of hedonism, degeneracy and female entitlement as today. Men and especially woomen would be tapping out of chick carousel as soon as they hit one or two partners out of guilt from casual sex, but that’s not happening, is it?
I think this is Roosh’s most hypocritical article ever.
You chased ass for the past 20 years.
You wrote a dozen of books to teach men how to slay pussy which you were addicted to (or maybe still are but have now to contend with younger men who are and will slay the coochie both at home and abroad, some of whom who so follow your own game tips).
You made a living of it and used it to fund your sex travels.
You taught men that feminists are the scum.
Now you’ve nuked your own followers and damned them for the lifestyle that you yourself helped create for them with your writings.
You want to justify your previous avatar of chas ing sex as to saying you felt guilty or you were rejected by thots at home.
You’re preaching incelism to your followers because probably you are one now because of your age and social reputation. Incels love company and are often the worst cockblockers to their friends. This is very sad to see.
You can’t get a virtous wife because game is everywhere (which you helped promote), virgins are losing it to men with game (just like how you deflowered many virgins yourself), thots abound yet you can’t find a virgin who attracts you or is attracted to you. And now you’re telling men who are gaming women that it’s evil and creates guilt. What a way to turn back on your followers.
There are thousands of red pill men in this world who are having casual sex (even in their 50s and beyond) and not feeling guilt at that.
You’re angry at the degeneracy because you can’t partake in it or because you have low T now.
You lament at white women sleeping with other races because you wish you found your own virginal sexy beautiful white wife to have kids with. Yet you are not white yourself but you exclusively fucked white girls across 20+ countries. Do you feel guilty for that too?
You preach bigotry against other races simply because you don’t get laid as a non white man with white women as they do. That’s hypocrisy. Do you feel guilty for that too? And low IQ Forrest Gump like white radicals who follow you don’t see that.
You supposedly preach the red pill but state that sexual intercourse with white women is exclusively for whites but sex with other races is permissible for white men. Basically you’ve created your own Talmudic law for your followers yet claim to hate the Jews and the Talmud.
Basically white women are only for you, Persians, Armenians (including Dan Bilzerian and yourself), a few select black men and your white followers. Other humans don’t deserve sex with them and white women who date interracially deserve to be pumped and dumped. So do you feel guilty for that?
You created a monster and now you can’t disown it in the name of guilt.
Okay, let’s not forget that feminists and sluts are degenerate assholes
Feminism as an IDEOLOGY is the enemy. Women are just women.
As I said earlier, for you Roosh it is time to have children, to become a real life patriarch, to continue the genetic legacy of your ancestors.
Well this may be one of the most sensible (and sad) articles I’ve read by this dude. Finally he’s realised how daft it is to put down women for having sex with you when that is what you want.
Mate, there is nothing wrong with casual sex, but as with anything; if you’re doing it to fulfill some kind of void or to ‘prove’ something then that isn’t good. People who have nothing to prove are way more discreet about their personal sex lives, because it’s personal and doesn’t need to be shared with anyone else. It’s your private life.
It’s kind of sad how so much needless guilt and shame is detailed in this article. Everyone should be free to be themselves without putting down other people for being themselves. Casual sex should neither be promoted nor discouraged; it’s something people do if they want to but shouting about how all women should be promiscuous and that all men are pigs doesn’t make for a very harmonious society (and is hypocritical on all sides). Maybe Roosh is starting to reflect on things now that he’s getting older.
There can actually be a lot of benefits to casual sex if all parties involved are happy; if people are busy and don’t want a relationship but want to fulfill their physical needs, then it can be mutually beneficial. If people are doing it so they can brag about being liberated or how many women they’ve banged, it misses the point and becomes a numbers game rather than a fun past-time.
Apologies; this is the saddest article I’ve read by him (not sensible); the ‘guilt’ part is pretty ridiculous and hypocritical.
Buy FULL GRAM Cartridges online Award winning cartridge!
Huge selection of many amazing, powerful flavors.
Testing 90%+ THC (on average), these cartridges can satisfy even the most veteran smoker.
Available THC CARTS
MARIO CARTS
EXOTIC CARTS
STIIIZY CARTS
710KINGPEN
DANK VAPES:
http://simpsondispensary.com
I think a more precise word here would be ‘remorse’ than ‘guilt’.
Guilty in some contexts, yes, but only in some contexts! But most of the times, past some age a more precise feeling for both men and women is remorse, that they have made suboptimal choices previously in their lives.
I have had some hot Insta thots (some I’ve banged some I refused to bang out of meaningless feelings to bang yet another thot) hear them say the magic – keyword(s) – “BAD DECISIONS”. This is BIG, they admit it, but it has to be the right moment and you be there to hear and pay attention to their regret and their subtle sorrow really feeling this. They are desolated.
Of course, out of habit (as we all are creatures of habits), they still indulge in Insta posts and other similar shit because this is what works for now, but less and less in their case, as the years pass by.
One of these girls I’ve been with started her own psychanalysis cabinet ‘to help out other people’ /sigh… When in reality she desperately wants to cure herself.
I asked her upfront since I’ve been with her a few years ago so we still chat from time to time. Do you regret having cheated and leaving your husband and raising your daughter alone? She said yes! Would you reverse back and undo all this? Yes! That’s why I want my cabinet to help out people (she went full college degree, then master in Psychology in her late 30’s to accomplish this).
But in the end, we’re all hypocritical beings and we would go long way with mental gymnastics to rationalize or cure our bad decisions (men too, not only women!). And it’s always a cocktail of feelings – remorse, guilt, envy, rage, etc, tuned a bit differently similar to a music mixer (and those will continuously vary depending on the time of your life stage you’re at a precise point in time).
Cheers and onward to a more meaningful path and life for all of us, as humanity!
(excuse if my points didn’t make through very well as I’m not a native English speaker, but I hope you got the idea)
Cheers,
Sarm
I don’t feel guilt when I have sex even with strangers. We both get off. Our ‘reset’ buttons have been pushed. No babies made. When I am in a relationship, I honor the commitment to the extent we mutually expressed it. No more than that.