A lot of men like to believe that the promiscuous or degenerate impulses of women today had to be programmed into them, but most of those impulses were there all along. All women needed was a more permissible environment. One song that hinted at this truth was Cyndi Lauper’s nearly forty-year-old single “Girls Just Want To Have Fun.”
On a casual listen, the song seems to portray a girl’s innocent need to party, but decoding the lyrics reveal that “have fun” really means “to fornicate.” The song then makes perfect sense and accurately portrays the female behavior we see today.
I come home in the morning light
My mother says when you gonna live your life right
Oh mother dear we’re not the fortunate ones
And girls they want to have fun
Oh girls just want to have fun
Cyndi went out, partied, and had sex with a man. After coming home, she received token resistance from her mother, but not enough to change her behavior, perhaps because mother also wanted to live out her own youth in the same manner.
The phone rings in the middle of the night
My father yells what you gonna do with your life
Oh daddy dear you know you’re still number one
But girls they want to have fun
Oh girls just want to have
The father is portrayed as a disgusting, idiot slob who is out of touch when compared to his empowered daughter. It’s a surprise that he even lived in the house. Today, 23% of children are raised by single parents. Removing the father figure is especially dangerous to a female because she then attempts to simulate his love through shallow sexual encounters or attention-seeking. Even with a father in the home, there is no sign that Cyndi was punished for her late-night party lifestyle.
Some boys take a beautiful girl
And hide her away from the rest of the world
I want to be the one to walk in the sun
Oh girls they want to have fun
Oh girls just want to have
Cyndi wants to display her beauty to everyone, even if she already has the love of one man. It’s important for her to always be in the position of upgrading her current man if she happens to find something better. She wants to have the option of sleeping with other guys on the side, because relationships are too boring for a young girl who has her entire life ahead of her.
That’s all they really want
Some fun
When the working day is done
Oh girls, they want to have fun
Oh girls just want to have fun
Before feminism really dug its heels into the culture, Cyndi already assumed a “working day” for women. Even she knew that work would be so dull that it would have to be counter-balanced with fun and casual sex. Girls spend the day working to be independent from men to spend their nights getting used by attractive men at night.
The song was originally released in 1979, but does it not perfectly describe the mentality of an average woman in 2018? Today’s woman spends her prime having fun and only considers settling down when her career is “established” or her options for attractive men begin to dwindle. It then becomes a game of musical chairs to lock down any reasonable man, but even in that case, she will still be open to having fun on the side if a new man excites her.
I used to believe that men and women had to be somewhat brainwashed to participate in degenerate behaviors, but I no longer think that is the case. The problem with the modern era is not that it programs people to be bad, but it allows and encourages people to be bad by simply acting on their human impulses. The wives you think were so traditional fifty or one-hundred years ago could have been just as promiscuous today if they had the choice. Societies of the past did a reasonable job of constraining the flaws of our species, but those constraints are now gone, and what you see today may actually be more “human” than ever.
Read Next: Women Who Don’t Have Babies Go Crazy
Okay but this is the same problem with promiscuous men. Why single out women?
Woman spotted.
One thing Roosh;
When the boomers came into the world, say from 1945 to 1955, the number of childless men and women where basically on par in the US (and elsewhere) at about 10 percent. So most people got to breed. If you look to nature and our past however you find a completely different story. I won`t go on a long rant about the evolutionary reasons for this, but it`s quite obvious that sexual selection is real. We are descendants of app. 80 percent women to 40 percent men, as revealed by our genome. In some species only about 1 in 10 males succeed in breeding.
So the gender dynamic in the post war years was in other words completely unnatural, and hence many “weak” organisms came into existence, and the result was what we saw with the hippie generation, and dependence on Government etc. It may sound cynical, but that is what happens when all men get to breed. So the solution simply can`t be monogamy and most men finding a woman to reproduce with. In fact we are returning to what is more natural for humans, unfortunately via the evil of Feminism, but still.
Add to this the statistical probability of intelligent working single career women who abort fetuses after being impregnated by the few alphas that can ‘pick the lock’ of their gates. At their prime the female’s value is high and the choicest eggs inadvertantly fertilized are in grave peril of being removed from the pool. It is a repeated skimming off the top of the crop that can ‘monkify’ or REDUCE TO MONKEYS any otherwise foreleaning bellcurve group. THINK SPRING BREAK where intelligent hot college females are coralled onto an island or resort and then fed alcohol and innundated with jungle mating music until a reproductive frenzy occurs with the most select physically fit and intelligent males. Then regret pregnancies are aborted by the career bound females.
Repeatedly skimming off and removing the top tier genetic combinations quickly reduces the entire group to MONKEYS in no time I tell you! White nations become 100% retarded hillbillies and black nations become complete APES. Severe extreme patriarchy would fix the situation now like instant fix a flat. It would arrest the bleed out of the choicest eggs/fittest sperm combinations. Turn the patriarchal control knob up to ’10’ on male authority. It has to be the hardest hard core patriarchy in the west now or it’s a no-fix. Sometimes like now is when it is crucial.
This is one of the reasons I see biological immortality as the solution for whites. As opposed to actually breeding. You definitely notice a trend in that people are getting dumber in general as you said, it`s backed up by evidence/statistics also. Part of the reason is of course that smart people don`t reproduce very much.
I just have no faith in the return of any patriarchy with Europeans. (Meaning Anglo and Germanic whites, Slavs might be different story.) It`s just not happening, in fact it will probably get much worse.
I’ll have to disagree on becoming cyborg. We must remain organic and fertile to control the technology. To become complete cyborg we surrender. Cyborg vs human is like comparing female vs male – one is controlled by the other who creates. Women procreate but THE MEN create and shape civilization. To go from human to cyborg is a surrender and a forefeiture – like a man voluntarily having his genetalia lopped off to become a facsimilie of a woo-man.
Again we must remain organic and fertile to control the tech that the MEN of our great human species devised. Tech is a tool that can make us fly, calculate faster and so on. Becoming cyborg would pull the plug on our humanity. The globohomo elites lost their humanity long ago so their opinion doesn’t count. Our next housecleaning extermination of pesky termites and cockroaches will sweep the denatured globohomos into the shop vac along with the rest. Then MAN will return to the throne and sit back aloft and in command breathing the clean fresh air of a spotless house. Aaaaaaah!
I`m talking about biological immortality. As for immortality in the broader sense, I`m sceptical of that ever coming to fruition. (brain uploading, nanobots that keep us healthy etc.) But biological immortality is not unprecedented in nature, in fact it`s the norm throughout most of the history of life on the planet, as I`ve mentioned, and I have good reason to believe it will come soon. (I`m a biologist, and have worked on telomere biology for some time.)
So, should we remain organic, yes, and I don`t think there will be an option. But life/youth extension and age reversal, via medical-biological technology would give whites some time, since this would preferentially be available to Westerners for the foreseeable future.
PS: I`m not totally on board with using the term humanity with a positive connotation. Shouldn`t we strive for something greater eventually?
it’ll get worse before it gets better …. if it gets better.
Add to this the statistical probability of intelligent working single career women who abort fetuses after being impregnated by the few alphas that can ‘pick the lock’ of their gates. At their prime the female’s value is high and the choicest eggs inadvertantly fertilized are in grave peril of being removed from the pool. It is a repeated skimming off the top of the crop that can ‘monkify’ or REDUCE TO MONKEYS any otherwise foreleaning bellcurve group. THINK SPRING BREAK where intelligent hot college females are coralled onto an island or resort and then fed alcohol and innundated with jungle mating music until a reproductive frenzy occurs with the most select physically fit and intelligent males. Then regret pregnancies are aborted by the career bound females.
Repeatedly skimming off and removing the top tier genetic combinations quickly reduces the entire group to MONKEYS in no time I tell you! White nations become 100% retarded hillbillies and black nations become complete APES. Severe extreme patriarchy would fix the situation now like instant fix a flat. It would arrest the bleed out of the choicest eggs/fittest sperm combinations. Turn the patriarchal control knob up to ’10’ on male authority. It has to be the hardest hard core patriarchy in the west now or it’s a no-fix. Sometimes like now is when it is crucial.
Muslims breed with more than one.
So do I my friend:)
You mean sex or reproduce?
Brutal muslim law cause that every man got wife or wives and females are males property, father then husband, so every male breed.
We are descendants of app. 80 percent women to 40 percent men, as revealed by our genome.
I’m not calling bullshit but I highly doubt it. At least a cursory examination into my own family tree reveals that to be decidedly not the case.
We`re talking mostly about the pre-civilization gender dynamics here. So the 100`s of thousands of years that we lived as hominid hunter-gatherer`s, and even prior to that.
OK. Thanks for the clarification.
I’m afraid monogamy and most men finding a woman to reproduce with” is the only way you get a somewhat decent and technologically advanced society. Otherwise you get the Middle East and/or the ancient world, BEFORE the Romans (even the ancient Greeks and Romans were mostly monogamous). And don’t come with the crap of the noble savage. History and experience have proven Hobbes right on that regard.
And you are wrong. War, Disease and violence WERE the main reasons behind the “40% of men reproduce” rule, not women rejecting “betas” (Damn, most healthy and non starving “betas” of the 19th hundreds would have beaten to a pulp most modern men, let alone in previous eras). .
The problem (and in this you are right) is that an affluent and technologically advanced society lets everyone or almost everyone including women afford a lot of fantasies. I guess our success had the seeds of its own destruction…
Sheesh… I hope you don’t think you were being original.
A key that opens many locks is a valuable key.
A lock that opens to many keys is a shitty and useless lock.
Women are the gatekeepers to sex. Otherwise its called rape. Hence, promiscuity in a society is determined by women’s choices.
But women fantasized about sex.
Also 🙂 but I mean women fantasized about rape.
‘Rape’ is a proprietary term of women in a matriarchy or gynocracy. A woman cannot sexually ‘rape’ a man. Therefore we must drop the term altogether until women are once again coralled under the dominion of MAN. If a woman is property of a man, he cannot rape her. He owns her. If another man forcibly achieves coitus with her then it is adjudged rape. If she partakes in the coitus voluntarily, then the owner of the female may adjudicate both parties.
What if she dies because of violent sex in marriage? How can law punish someone for his property?
The worldwide number of casualties where married women die by violent sex with their hubby is very low, like I could count on my fingers. A hundred times more people die from choking on goldfish and from blender mishaps in the kitchen. Still it’s statistically very miniscule. Don’t have nightmares about blenders now, but realize how feminist propaganda has so many women freaked out and terrified of men. BoogeyBLENDERS exist only in your ID and you should no more fear your patriarchal master either. Stop it already.
What if “she” cheats Him by sleeping with other MEN? What if she makes His life a nightmare? What if she outright spends/wastes ALL of His hard-earned money? What if He dies because she poisoned Him?
How can law punish a entitled, arrogant, bitchy, slutty, whorish, shameless and ungrateful “her” !!??
PS: weak, pathetic, inferior and ungrateful bitches of your kind always try to deviate the topic and argue pointlessly !!
Do we have any documented cases that show penetration by a penis can kill a woman?
Because it only takes one man to fuck a hundred sluts. Shaming the men is therefore useless. If you impose draconian meausres on the men, even if you managed to break and beat down 99 of them, there will always be that one guy who is sociopathic enough to ignore the rules and fuck the sluts, and because there is only one player left, all the sluts will be fighting over him
On the other hand if you shame the sluts, then the first year you might get on 10 sluts to act like human women. This means instead of your typical slut having 99 other sluts cheering her on, she will only have 89 sluts backing her up, and ten women married to socially powerful men letting her know they intend to use their influence to fuck up her standing in society (thats what shaming actually is).
Which means the next year that society continues shaming the sluts, there will be another ten women who will decide to join the winning team and betray the slutsterhood. So now you have 20 married socially connected women, and 80 sluts, meaning that if a girl wants to slut around she will only have 79 sloghtly worried sluts cheering her on instead of 89.
This process continues and eventually you have women getting married young to good guys, who arent jaded and used up… basically normal human women instead of the ego obsessed sex addicts we have today.
Also, the way to deal with the men is much simpler. If a man and a woman are found to have been fucking outside of marriage, you beat the living shit out of BOTH OF THEM. You do this publicly, in front of all their family and friends.
If it tirns out the slut was a virgin before she met her One True Love (forever and ever! Because feelings NEVER lie!!!!! Squeee!), then you force her One True No Kidding This Time Love to pay a hefty fine up to a full years salary to her father, and force the male to marry her.
See its the “force the male to marry her” part that a lot of PUAs will have a nervous breakdown over. But it only works if you publicly beat the living shit out fo the girl in front of her father, mother, brothers, sosters, coisins, and friends.
Otherwise, youll be back to sluts fucking players and then waylaying stupid beta who dont know any better to “seduce them” and then force those betas to wife them up while they side fuck their One True Love
“Also, the way to deal with the men is much simpler. If a man and a woman are found to have been fucking outside of marriage, you beat the living shit out of BOTH OF THEM. You do this publicly, in front of all their family and friends.”
OK, so why don’t you indulge and perform this noble action?
I’m referring to having this done via the courts, in public with the approval of society.
Right now the West has a serious problem. They’ve decided that the only kind of sex that is bad is “non-consensual” sex. Anything else is good. You’re problem is that when it comes to women, “consensual” is a gray area.
Many women decide the next morning that the sex was not consensual. If she was drunk the night before and the next morning she feels good about what she did, then it was consensual. If two months later her friends put her down for being a slut, or mock her for being with a loser, then she will “suddenly realize” that she was lying to herself the entire time and it wasn’t consensual after all.
On the other hand, if she was actually brutalized and told acid will be thrown into her face if she complains to anyone, her mind may rationalize her terror and actually decide the sex was consensual.
This is a recipe for total chaos, which is where we are currently well in the middle of, and it is only going to get worse.
At some point, someone is going to have to decide that the most important function of society, the funciton of reproduction, is going to have to be taken seriously and given controls that neither stifle society nor encourage chaos, or you are going to simply lose your society and be replaced by someone who does have some kind of control over their reproduction method.
Right now, that’s the Muslims.
“Many women decide the next morning that the sex was not consensual.”
It’s not as many as you think.
“If two months later her friends put her down for being a slut, or mock her for being with a loser, then she will “suddenly realize” that she was lying to herself the entire time and it wasn’t consensual after all.”
No, it’s still consensual, and depending upon how much pressure is exerted and how she views herself, it is more than likely nothing will come out of this “revelation”.
“This is a recipe for total chaos, which is where we are currently well in the middle of, and it is only going to get worse.”
Nothing is as good as it seems, and nothing is as bad as it seems.
“At some point, someone is going to have to decide that the most important function of society, the funciton of reproduction, is going to have to be taken seriously and given controls that neither stifle society nor encourage chaos, or you are going to simply lose your society and be replaced by someone who does have some kind of control over their reproduction method.”
Well, if the most important function of society is reproduction, one need not look to the Manosphere for any advice on the matter. Moreover, what specific controls do you envision?
You know, you have totally convinced me. I have to agree, contrary to what I thought, everything is actually fine. There are zero problems in the way things are going.
And any problems that might exist are either totally the fault of men who just aren’t manly enough, or feminine enough or who don’t properly appreciate how good they really have it.
So there is absolutely no need whatsoever to change anything at all, unless that change involves cracking down on deadbeat dads/ unmotivated young males who spend 99% of their time watching porn and playing computer games/ ungrateful men who run from marriage like the plague when really they should just man up and put a ring on that finger, etc etc.
Or alternatively, maybe we need more feminism, because the real problem is that women have not been empowered enough. I recommend castrating all the males who aren’t you.
Thank you so much for clearing everything up. And I wish you the best of luck with this, whatever it is you call a society.
Cheers.
Not to worry, such men are being gangraped by #metoo degenerates.
You point something out, instead of thinking about it, her automatic reflex kicks in: oh yeah, but what about men??? The most predictable thing in the world
A muslim version of your brilliant response to the article would be “but whuddabout the crusade?”
Did you cum here for the creampie party?
Hey no talkin’ to da womenz on deze treads!
Out, damn spot! Out!
Big difference. The more sexual partners a woman has, the more unlikely she will ever be able to bond with and be loyal to a particular man. From this comes cat ladyhood, blowing up families, frivorce and divorce rape. Men are different. A man can have many sexual partners and still bond with and be loyal to a specific woman.
Her father in the video was a world famous WWF wrestler named Lou Albano. It was probably the coolest thing ever back then to see him in an MTV music video.
I don”™t understand your astounding hypocrisy. You go around promoting slut culture then you write shit like this? You pearl-clutching puritans are always the same talking out of both sides of your arse.
Liberal detected. To the diseased liberal mind everything is about The Narrative, so he gets confused when someone pushes two different things that don’t belong in the same narrative in his mind.
You”™re quite the bellend aren”™t you? Yeah it”™s real damn “conservative” promoting slut-banging culture. Especially when you and the rest of the thirsty Rooshv incels pretend to be outraged by it.
I’m not a conservative but thanks for decisively confirming p much everything I said.
What you wrote is sick beyond belief. It is the equivalent of a Nazi screaming at Jews caught for stealing moldy bread in a concentration camp.
At the very least he promotes slut test/identify culture. Good enough I would say, compared to the liberal stance.
Fat ain’t in here. Even an agile and popular fat guy like wrestler Lou Albano once was. Lou Albano had quite the interesting life. He was born in Italy to a doctor father and a mother who was both a nurse and concert pianist. Both parents were American born but Lou was born in Bari Italy where his father was studying medicine. Lou grew up in White Plains, New York where he starred on his high school track and football teams. He eventually became a professional wrestler and was part to two tag team champions. Injuries suffered wrestling and in his high school football days lead him into managing. With his dramatic character and charismatic style he became highly successful managing wrestlers, after all professional wrestling is entertainment first and second with actual wrestling a distant third. He began collaborating with Cyndi Lauper, doing videos with her making her part of dramatic story lines he promoted. Lou was quite the character and lead the life of a man’s man. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1EvISFOzdA
It’s sad that our modern times have become a theme park of sexual exploration for women. I don’t see any end to this in the near future as feminism begins its infection into newer territories globally.
Don”™t worry, you wouldn”™t have been any more content living in a different era. Life is by its very inner workings destined to be an affair of near constant discomfort, only patched along the way when said discomforts are occasionally relieved, which doesn”™t really happen all that often. “It”™s always something,” as they say.
Sometimes I’ve said that women these days could learn a lot from their grandmothers in terms of understanding how to act with class, femininity etc.
But maybe its that men these days could learn a lot from their grandfathers about how to maintain patriarchy, nationalism, masculinty etc.
Everything you write about – maybe men are actually to blame for allowing feminism to get out of control.
There are still good girls around, from good families with good, traditional, family-orientated values etc but you’ve got to get them while they are young, eg 17 to 21…They get into relationships young.
Problem is, with a lot of guys on this forum, myself included – we didnt get girls in high school, and overcompensate when we get a bit older by becoming players and spending years fucking around. We end up missing opportunites to lock down the good girls while they are young. Other guys end up getting them instead. And then we are stuck with the girls who are 25, 27, 28…damaged goods who aren’t relationship quality.
You”™re making the mistake of thinking that you can actually find what you”™re looking for. It”™s impossible, given the way sentient life works. If you had the good girl you”™d eventually get bored/something else would happen and there would be another problem staring at you. Life is all about trying to solve problems. Just read any history book and you”™ll see this.
Yes! He eventually find out.
This article argues that women are essentially sluts at heart. I actually argue that outside a hardcore group of sluts, most women have to be ‘programmed’ by society in order to become sluts. Whichever is true doesn’t matter at this point, but a society that restrains sluttitude will succeed whereas one that promotes it will fail. Before the collapse of other societies, it was commonly noted that the men and women both became more promiscuous and other invaders eventually colonised those areas. Conservative cultures like Islam may have the moniker of backwards invaders (brought in by the banker), but they will outlast the western post-white culture. At least the muslims know ‘who’ is behind white race-replacement and they hate that group. The muslims also have much more conservative ideals that we may not agree with, but these ideals have maintained islamic society for over a millennium and perhaps for much longer. A ‘white sharia’ wouldn’t be a bad idea for white peoples. Heck, white people just have to adopt the morals and attitudes of their ancestors 100-150 years ago… is it really that hard?? I guess many would rather die out than swallow the distasteful medicine that it takes to re-establish the dwindling white society.
There will be no race war, and the few racial groups that go to war will be tugged on by the banker tribe. The biggest way to destroy the white man is to own his resources(done) and offshore his manufacturing and food supply(done). The mass abortion/slut society/mass immigration is merely the icing on the cake of a defeated peoples who are soon to become extinct. And the worst thing is that whilst the banker may have ‘yanked the chain’ as the puppet master, the people doing the hard legwork of destroying white society were white people themselves.
this.
Then there are those who don’t get out much…
“A ‘white sharia’ wouldn’t be a bad idea for white peoples.”
What would it all consist of? Who would enforce it? How?
You really need to think before you speak.
“I guess many would rather die out than swallow the distasteful medicine that it takes to re-establish the dwindling white society.”
So are you married? How many white children? How are YOU trying to perpetuate “white society”?
“white sharia” = communism. worked out well didn’t it.
“white sharia” = communism. worked out well didn’t it.
There’s a surplus of men and the women know it.
Will there ever be a market correction?
Massive war of virus that only targets men. Maybe Bill Gates is working on the latter.
Massive war would turn nuclear which would affect a few more things than just men. The atmosphere not allowing enough sunlight in anymore which would in turn starve and freeze us all to death, and other fun stuff like that
this interview of Musk had me questioning if he’s red pilled.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ns2A-NMYOQ
Yes. After economic collapse
There is a surplus of clients, not men.
There is also a surplus of prostitutes, not women.
A cure for obesity would help. Ha!
Manosphere is about 25% red pilled. That”™s all. There is so much more red pill knowledge out there but the manosphere won”™t swallow it. Roosh himself is about 75% of the way there but he holds out hope and doesn”™t want to walk all the way down into the red pill forest. It”™s not pretty there. Best to praise a God that no one has ever seen (or praise the universe, for the atheist types) than to dig any deeper for more red pills.
Yeah, I want to throw up my Red pills.
Three problems with modern women:
(1) Girls don’t want to stop having ‘fun’. Serial monogamous partners, one after another, has become the new promiscuity. So even if they don’t have as many one night stands, their partner count is still high
(2) Modern women aren’t having nearly enough babies and so give the ‘elite’ class more excuses to do mass immigration. More babies in the past and future means more security during your old age, as pensions will not be there.
(3) Modern western women have no loyalty to their men and even worse, will divorce rape any simp. This just furthers family breakdown and the fragmentation of society.
Yes the banker tribe is to blame, but next up on the line are western populations who also share a lot of the blame, especially women and their choices. There’s no point ‘shaming’ them as society does not and its too late anyways. After whatever form the upcoming collapse takes (slow over decades or fast over a decade), it will only be the few traditionalist women who remain. The rest will fade out and also be outbred. Its important to note that most traditionalist women are nonwhite. Modern western white women have sown their own racial demise and an unhappy end to their current ‘haaaaapy’ lifestyle.
There are not enough alpha males, the ones which females want to be faithful, loyal and have babies.
Read Juvenal, women have always been like this.
Unless you’re one of the ‘elitists’ (and even they will eventually go down), even saving up an FU fund will not work miracles 10 years out from now. The whole point of monogamous marriage was to have children who would take care of you in your old age. Our generation cannot rely on pensions/401ks/etc etc. Whilst it is true that your children may not take care of you, in general, your choice is limited to:
-have no children and die unhappily in squalor in your old age
-have some children and hope that you bring them up well in this PC climate so that at least one or more of them will look after you when you get old.
Those are your two choices. You won’t be able to ‘run’ as western modernised society burns because it has become a global phenomenon with Chinese and Indian middle classes etc modelling themselves on the westernised modernised model. They will similarly go down with Western Society, just not as badly.
Crazy why manosphere types don”™t even consider suicide as a viable option. I would never rot away, even with a family member by my side. I”™m not falling down the stairs like my grandmother and not going to rot away in pain like my grandfather. It”™s either an assisted suicide clinic in Switzerland or I”™ll take care of it myself faster.
Surely you are some dumb troll…
See, exactly. You”™d rather rot away and complain all along the way that no one is taking care of you blah blah blah. What are you trying to accomplish anyway by hanging on as long as possible while you deteriorate? Don”™t try to answer that, you have no reason.
I suggest you kill yourself, j3w troll
Are you slow? I already said that was the plan in order to avoid rotting away like most do. I get it, you”™ve bought into the socially-acceptable ”˜life at whatever cost”™ model that”™s been poured down your throat. Just don”™t take it too hard when you”™re rotting away in a home all alone. There are other ways.
Naught but enlightened brilliance to be found around here…
I”™ve followed much of what has been written here and while I can agree with some of the view points, everyone has missed the important point; The feminization of men. Men are getting re-trained and men are folding like a bad card table. Almost all the guys I know that are in a relationship cave to all his mates rules and desires. How many times I”™ve heard my friends say “I have to ask the Boss” before he can commit to anything. Who”™s fault is this? It”™s your fault for allowing it to happen in your weak-ass life. The idea of being a man it appears is to keep your wife happy as in “happy wife is a happy life “ and you bought it line and sinker. Men you have yourselves to blame if you do t like that women have it on you. This has been slowly evolving over the last 100 years because you let the vagina rule you. Too many weak men and it”™s getting worse. Btw. I do believe in equal pay for equal work, let them put in the same time and effort as men do. But what we are building is selective equality. Have your cake and eat it too. YEt men are still expected to open doors and follow a myriad of rules all designed to keep you working your ass off for that little piece of tail. If men just acted like men you”™d stop complaining.
This would self-correct at least a bit if woman didn’t have the power of the State behind them. The threat of financial and social ruin is real, as all masculine cultural concepts like “honour” and “honesty” have dissolved.
It’s called ‘state husbandry’. It’s an arranged marriage where women are FORCED against their will to marry the state. In the west we see females being forcibly ushered into a marriage with the state. It is similar to compulsive arranged marriage in trad patriarchal countries, but in the west, the state is the groom by proxy and by default. Even liberated professional working career women whom you would think were ‘free’ to pursue their ‘dreams’ are locked into the contract marriage with the state. Western professional women could not pursue their ‘ambitions and dreams’ without the state wielding punitive force constantly against the WALL of tribesmen genetically driven to claim their choice female bloodline matches. The state WIELDS HELL upon our human genome and upon our every step. LOOK at all the professional women prancing about – sterile – arrogant – EMPOWERED – and their every activity safeguarded and sentried by the state who provides safe spaces and venues for frivolous female enetrpreneurship.
The state expends enormous resources keeping the male populus dammed from unleashing like a spillway and overcoming the crop of propped up and working professional shebeasts. The males are forcibly deterred from exercizing their natural dominion over the females.
If you live in Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan then yeah you sure can exercise your alpha superman machismo to the max on your wife.
But if you’re in über gynocentric Murica…….you’d better behave yourself or be bullet-proof in order to deal with those half a dozen state-funded white knights (read: cops) whom she summoned on your alpha superman ass.
#theduluthmodel #falseaccusations
Alpha males are wanted and respected everywhere, feminism and all this harassment bullshit only applies to weak betas.
Yeah, weak betas like Dicaprio, Brad Pitt and Johnny Depp who can’t bench press a car and bounce bullets off their eyeballs.
As for 6’3″ alphas with chiseled jaws plus washboard abs who somehow can’t bed Harvey Weinstein’s sloppy seconds, and have to settle for women 3-4 points beneath their own SMV instead? Some respect they’ve got there from “desirable” women.
40 years ago no woman wanted to be the boss. I can remember times when I was young and my girlfriend and I were trying to decide what to do, and she would say to me “You be the man,” i.e. tell me what we’re going to do. And that’s what I would do.
Promiscuity is prostitution, not sex itself.
All prostitutes are promiscuous. Men are not, as it is NOT about quantity.
If it had been in them, then nothing had been able to stop it. For being instinct.
Nobody can’t stop or inhibit instinct, it prevails.
Once a woman loses her virginity, her vagina becomes cheaper, therefore for some girls promiscuity becomes an easy way to get attention. It is an easy way to obtain validation. Dressing like whores is the same = easy = prostitution.
Promiscuity = promiscuus = indiscriminate = not sex itself.
She was probably abused. I don´t need to google it. All woman artists are fucked in the head. Something happened. This type of girls are abused and become enemies of man. May the abuse be physical, sexual or just psychological. I´m not being beta. It´s the truth. It´s not like they weren´t whores already. But the abuse exarcebates it. For some reason (which to me is obvious) they are being promoted as healthy models. When regardless of the motive. They should be burned in the stack.
Persians chicks are so hot Roosh. Why don´t you fuck them?
I’m very much in favor of Roosh finally marrying into his roots somewhere in his 40s. Iranian / Persian women ARE very attractive, polite, feminine, and graceful.
You’re so right:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQkC_J5LEyQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPWHOu131IU
et. al.
They just need to wax. There’s usually alot of fur on a Persian chick
Men are partly to blame for inventing alcohol.
Getting women drunk might just have been the impetus for settling down and hence civilization itself.
The alternative is more Soda Pop(insky)
This was released in 1984, not 1979 if memory serves.
Robert Hazard composed and recorded it in 1979.
Cyndi Lauper’s recording was released in 1983.The song was originally written and recorded by American musician and song writer Robert Hazard in 1979. The historical and technical errors on this site leave me frustrated beyond words. Nobody edits or fact checks anymore. Not the MSM, not the Manosphere, not anybody.
“Today”™s woman spends her prime having fun and only considers settling
down when her career is “established” or her options for attractive men
begin to dwindle. It then becomes a game of musical chairs to lock down
any reasonable man, but even in that case, she will still be open to
having fun on the side if a new man excites her vagina.”
Insane but oh soooo true….and sad!
Humans at the fundamental level are polygamists. Our impulses and urges never change, only the environment. All women will resume being whores if the given environment allows it.
Women are compulsively driven to spread their legs for alphas. If you’re an alpha, they will brazenly hump your leg, sometimes in public and even if a competitor female is humping the other leg. Men can define the phenomenon as ‘natural’ polygamous nature but we’re humans here and humans need civilized structure to thrive as humans. We simply need rules. PATRIARCHY is the rule and the cornerstone of what we know to be civilization. Alphas experience first hand and thus understand sexual nature and historically alphas set the rules for patriarchy.
Whoever thinks women have no natural loyalty must consider the card held by the alpha male group. Women DO have loyalty – TO ALPHA SEED. It is an intense compulsive and driven loyalty. The obtaining of alpha seed is the strongest natural compulsion of the human female next to the ‘nesting’ tendency where the female finds a small closed living quarters, a ‘cat box’ if you will where the female cleanses, eats and sleeps. Nursing weaning mothers often loop in a small radius area, a comfort zone area unless driven (or permitted) to forage or unless called to engage with other cohort breeder women. Ergo nursing (tit feeding) women in large mcmansions often ‘nest’ and occupy only a small corner of the structure, seldomly venturig out of their loop.
You can’t simply say humans because a key difference: women are not polygamous: they are hypergamous.
Male instinct is to keep multiple women at the same time, treating all of them more or less the same as in harem. Women constantly look for the best, abandoning the current one (or keeping him in case alpha relationship doesn’t work out, which I think is defined by social requirements and not biology).
No, people at their core are monogamist.
Male instinct is to procreate and raise a family with one woman.
Patriarchy is dead.
Amazing how we can look back through a red-pilled lens and see the pernicious influence on wholesome white culture by the chosen ones. It only took a few clicks to find the Jew producer behind this degenerate art, Rick Chertoff.
You guys are really trying to complicate a simple thought. Women were unhappy with themselves and their lives. They noticed men were more confident and happier. They blamed men for their own unhappiness and thought being like a man would solve their problems. To get their wish required they act more like men, assertive, pushy and strong willed. This new attitude worked perfectly and got them exactly what they wanted. Only, once they got it they realized their was a price to pay. Becoming like a man meant they would need to suffer the consequences of a man. Men don’t get a pass when they screw up. Men don’t get sympathy when they have a bad day or feel sad. Men cant show emotion without being taken advantage of. Men don’t get treated special just because they look good. Men don’t get to be the focus of the universe just because they’re a man.
See the problem is, they thought they could get the perks of being a man without having to pay the consequences. Fast forward to 2018. Women are now unhappier then ever before. The only difference now is men don’t feel bad for them. Men don’t sympathize with them. Men don’t give them a pass. Even how good they look no longer gets them special treatment.
I guess mission accomplished. Girls just wanna have fun.
“Women were unhappy with themselves and their lives. They noticed men were more confident and happier. They blamed men for their own unhappiness and thought being like a man would solve their problems.
Here is the reality. Men and women were unhappy how they treated one another. They made changes, some that are decidedly better and some that observably have made things worse.
“To get their wish required they act more like men, assertive, pushy and strong willed. This new attitude worked perfectly and got them exactly what they wanted”
No, that is how PEOPLE act.
“Men don’t get a pass when they screw up. Men don’t get sympathy when they have a bad day or feel sad. Men cant show emotion without being taken advantage of. Men don’t get treated special just because they look good.”
Of course they do! What planet are you from?
“Women are now unhappier then ever before.”
Some women, absolutely.
“The only difference now is men don’t feel bad for them. Men don’t sympathize with them. Men don’t give them a pass. Even how good they look no longer gets them special treatment.”
No, you are generalizing here.
I agree with the conclusion. I know even the stories about generations of our mothers anfd grandmothers, proving that. Croatia is in the game, also Poland, or Hungary, same thing. So it is human behaviour.
This makes so much sense, I the doctors sometimes & Dr Travis Storks female co hosts are always flirting with him, because that it what you do when the male very attractive…
I once found a hundred years old poem, written by a famous FEMALE poet of my nation. It is about slutty behavior and wild nature of an young girl who don’t listen to her father.Very similar to that song, but even more straight forward and natural. So- it reveals that it always was there. Roosh is right – that’s how people really are.
Your article reminded me of Juvenal’s satires. It’s quite clear women have been like this since before ancient Roman times, unfortunately.
I don’t see how the conclusions follow from the text. It’s like reading a Bible commentary; these are at best tendentious. I don’t doubt the truths that are offered by the author here, but I don’t see any connection to the text.