Kanye West, Men’s Rights, And Betrayal

Is Kanye West a closet men’s rights activist? His song “All Of The Lights” comes pretty close to summing up the entire movement. Here’s the song:

Allow me to translate Kanye’s two verses for the white guys who wear khakis.

Something wrong
I hold my head
MJ gone…our nigga dead!
I slapped my girl, she called the feds
I did that time and spent that bread
I’m heading home, I’m almost there
I’m on my way, heading up the stairs
To my surprise, a nigga replacing me
I had to take him to that ghetto university

“I was in a horrible place when Michael Jackson died, which contributed to me slapping the mother of my child. Instead of understanding my emotional state, she called the police, and I was convicted in a court of law. I served time in prison. I was excited to be released so that I could reunite with my family. Unfortunately, another man was in my house. I got so angry that I beat his ass up.”

Restraining order
Can’t see my daughter
Her mother, brother, grandmother hate me in that order
Public visitation
We met at Borders
Told her she take me back
I’ll be more supportive
I made mistakes
I bump my head
Courts suck me dry
I spent that bread
She need a daddy
Baby please, can’t let her grow up in that ghetto university

“The authorities were called again, and a restraining order was filed. In addition to my girlfriend’s entire family hating me, particularly her mother, I could only see my daughter in public locations such as the Borders bookstore. I promised my girlfriend that I’d tame my anger, that I made mistakes and was punished for them by the government (due to the incareration, my finances were completely wiped out). I pledged to remain commited to raising our daughter, because I knew that without a father she would wind up on drugs or pregnant.”

Men’s rights guys can adopt this as their anthem (I’m not being sarcastic). In the meantime, I recommend The Spearhead if you want to stay current on how pussified Western culture is becoming.

Next thing I want to share is an excerpt from a book I just read called Man Is Wolf To Man, a memoir about time spent in a Russian Gulag during Stalin’s rule. If you understand women, and see them as how they should be seen, the following should not shock you…

She used to be my wife. She was also the first person to denounce me when I was arrested. In front of the staff of the Institute of Endocrinology, she got up and said that she had sensed for a long time that I had been involved in counterrevolutionary activity, and she called for my expulsion from the [Communist] Party and the institute. She used to be my assistant. I had helped her with her doctorate—I wrote it for her. I promoted her. We’d been married for seven years. Everyone in my family liked her except for my mother, who said before we married, “Don’t cuddle a snake to your chest.” To this day I haven’t gotten over the shock.

We confided in each other about everything. She was my refuge from the terror of arrests that surrounded us. I don’t understand how from one day to the next, a person whom you thought—whom you knew loved you more than anything else could turn against you just to preserve her position and good standing in the Party. I never sensed a false note in our relationship. She was so warm and loving.

The investigator showed me the written statement in which she denounced me and asked for a divorce. I didn’t want to live after that. It hurt me more than the nightlife interrogations and beatings.

In Stalinist Russia it was common to falsely denounce others as a way to minimize the chance you’ll be denounced yourself. It was also used to show support to the party (setting yourself up for promotion) or to simply take over someone’s bigger apartment. The man above was sent to the Gulag for a ten year term.

I’m sure men who have been through a divorce are least surprised by the excerpt. Thankfully most women are not capable of such an act, but don’t underestimate their ability to destroy everything they come into contact with.

Related Posts For You

newest oldest most voted
Sam
Guest
Sam
Offline

“In Stalinist Russia it was common to falsely denounce others as a way to minimize the chance you’ll be denounced yourself.”

It was also common to beat and torture people until they would agree to anything, including signing a denouncement of themselves or anyone else.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Hitting a woman because you are too weak minded to overcome a bad day is for punks. And to do it because a petterass is dead? That’s just lame.

Now that second passage is some cold, cold sh#t. To bad there’s no god and no hell.

Steve
Guest
Steve
Offline

Men’s rights guys = no-action guys.

Might as well have a big “L” tattooed on your forehead.

outlaw josey wales
Guest
outlaw josey wales
Offline

Like most men, I didn’t see my divorce coming. It was out of the blue so to speak. If it wasn’t for game, and sites like this and roissy’s, where the true nature of women is revealed, I think I’d be a basket case.

I agree with 95% of Spearhead, but I don’t read it much because I find it to be a downer. The smell, touch, and taste of a woman who is into you is one of life’s (ONE OF) great pleasures, and I refuse to deny it to myself out of spite or bitterness.

There is beauty in women much like there is beauty in sharks, tigers, scorpions, and other dangerous creatures. When handled property, they can all give you pleasure, but you must never forget their true nature.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

When they stick a blow torch up your ass, you’ll denounce pussy and men’s rights too.

mr t
Guest
mr t
Offline

“Men’s rights guys = no-action guys.

Might as well have a big “L” tattooed on your forehead.”

If these guys really wanted to get back at women, they would learn game and do to women what happens in the movie “In the Company of Men” to targets.

Evan
Guest
Evan
Offline

Whelp, ya lost me.

hydrogonian
Guest
hydrogonian
Offline

I believe is self interest, and therefore I believe in men’s rights. Because I’m a man.

I would define anyone who doesn’t believe in their self interest as either insane or so weak minded so as to be open to being brainwashed to fighting for someone else’s self interest at the cost of their own. Men like this, in the context of any issue, are burdens on society as a whole. They gum up the political process that sets the laws that are beneficial for most of society.

If you don’t think that your rights are an issue, then you haven’t been forced into exercising them. Its a simple lack of experience. Go knock up or marry a low quality woman (or really any woman as its very hard to tell if you are getting “good” quality most of the time). I could argue that this lack of experience is “no action”. Usually men’s rights guys have plenty of experience. Their experience is what convinces them as to the importance of fighting for their rights.

Its usually the beta/low experience guy who is convinced that the sun rises and sets over his girls beat up poon that will denounce the importance of fighting for his own rights. Meanwhile, that same girl will eventually cheat on him, force him to raise children that aren’t his own, marry and divorce him as easy as she takes a shit in the morning, and generally own him psychologically and financially.

There is no misplaced emotion with the men’s rights guys. It’s just the guys who have been convinced to fight for their self interest. Simple and sane enough.

Begby
Guest
Begby
Offline

There’s nothing wrong with men’s rights – somebody’s gotta fight through other channels than pickup bars ya douches.

That is some goddawful lyricism by Kanye. I mean, you can really get famous writing complete horseshit like that? It’s just terrible word choices, rhymes, and overall theme. No wonder the kids I see around the city look like a bunch of fucking retards if this is the shit they have to listen to.

The Truth
Guest
The Truth
Offline

Buddy sounds like he was a beta from the get go. I mean who in their right mind would right a woman’s thesis? Fuckin white knight. I again say, it’s men(betas) who are to blame for our own problems. Women are just living by their nature.

Jimmy
Guest
Jimmy
Offline

It’s spooky how Roissy manages to get so many comments in such a short period of time on a blog post, and after writing a few brief paragraphs to boot.

I like Roissy. I like his evolutionary psychological approach to women, but I dislike his misogyny. Roissy is a sombre, dark character (but a talented writer with an excellent command of the English language nevertheless, despite his penchant for excessive literary and semi-pornographic vulgarity) and the Roissysphere is the dark, even sinister underbelly of the world of pick up artists. Let me confess: I was once a misogynist, but after having met a few really awesome women, I think I’ve changed my mind. It is true that women can be frustrating at times, and many times female emotional complexity is often incomprehensible, but it is the way of the lesser man to be offended by them. This means that misogyny is a sign of weakness, a mind virus that must be overcome. The guiding animus of one’s existence should never be hatred (although hatred is a beautiful emotion which does have its rightful place), but this shouldn’t exclude a sex realist (and race realist) way of viewing the world, which is why the superior man, understanding her nature, mercifully forgives the woman for her frequent gaffes.

As a result, I fear that Roissy is much too guided by hatred and misogyny to be of any practical use. However, the core principles of game remain substantially correct, unsullied by Roissy’s venom.

That said, “game” theory (the name is obviously unfortunate), founded on the principles of classical sociobiology via Charles Darwin, works and good PUAs are worthy of emulation. The actual art of game itself is really just common sense to all but the most socially challenged: ask large numbers of women, get turned down by many, but manage to attract the less than 5% who will say yes. In fact, one doesn’t even need game to attract women, because attracting women is just a numbers game, as any dummy knows. But game sure speeds things up a bit.

The G Manifesto
Guest
The G Manifesto
Offline

Anonymous 5
“When they stick a blow torch up your ass, you’ll denounce pussy and men’s rights too.”

I’ll post this msg from my duplicate account so you guys won;t be 100% sure it’s really me due to the highly sensitive nature of the document I’m about to disclose. G’s like mystery.

As you know, I’m a product of severe beatings and failures. Anyway, my last trip to E.Europe culminated in me signing the following:

“I, [The G Manifesto], forever denounce Roosh, game, and I will permanently desist from being a fake ass Internet wanksta who pretends being a baller.

signed: [The G Manifesto] MOSCOW, RUSSIA”

Still gives me goosebumps on my anus.

Yams
Guest
Yams
Offline

The Men’s Rights movement is the natural result of guys who have married and had kids with a western woman. If you don’t plan on ever getting to that stage with a woman then don’t bother yourself with it.

Gmac
Guest
Gmac
Offline

“It’s spooky how Roissy manages to get so many comments in such a short period of time on a blog post, and after writing a few brief paragraphs to boot.”

@Jimmy

Who cares? Everybody is different. Besides, Roosh is selling mad books and living it up traveling abroad. I’m sure the last thing he’s worried about is whether or not Roissy got more hits/comments on his page. Besides, don’t they hang out together sometimes in DC?

Gmac

Begby
Guest
Begby
Offline

“The Men’s Rights movement is the natural result of guys who have married and had kids with a western woman. If you don’t plan on ever getting to that stage with a woman then don’t bother yourself with it.”

Couldn’t agree more. The best way to assert men’s rights is to never get married. Just don’t see the need to slam guys who are in that situation, long past hope of becoming a nightclub PUA, and doing what they can to draw attention to the fallacies of institutionalized feminism.

Carl Sagan
Guest
Carl Sagan
Offline

As much as I hate whining from a man, the men’s rights dudes certainly opened up my eyes to a few things.

So has Roosh, Roissy, and others.

A lot of you guys need to put the haterade down for a second. Both men and women have bad qualities, it’s just that nobody ever talks about women’s bad qualities. They just don’t.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

the reason Men’s Rights guys are so bitter is that the only pussy they saw was the fat cow that they knocked up.

Roosh will get there ‘coz he likes no rubber action and is bitter by nature

Aaron
Guest
Aaron
Offline

Saw a men’s right’s protest a few days ago; protesting that their children had been taken from them or whatever. All of them 45 year old guys in AC/DC t-shirts with mullets or ponytails.

Aaron
Guest
Aaron
Offline

sorry – GRAY mullets or ponytails.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

No. Sorry dude, but you really do seem to hate women. The preoccupation is painfully obvious. Try reading some other blogs (I’m talking NON-community) and then look at how much you dwell on this shit

Firepower
Guest
Firepower
Offline

like obsidie says: nigs GOT to write…and whatnot.

Kanye has “been” mra since Golddigger.
many years ago.

I come here to get my fix of current muzik; i need a gorillaz update

hydrogonian
Guest
hydrogonian
Offline

“The Men’s Rights movement is the natural result of guys who have married and had kids with a western woman. If you don’t plan on ever getting to that stage with a woman then don’t bother yourself with it.”

This is typical of the myopic view that defines so many social issues.

First, the guys who get married and have kids are the ones that create the environment for you to play in. Their family life breeds the girls and guys who give you a social life, whether you choose to participate in the creation of society or not. They create your environment. Not caring about the social environment in which that society is created is against your self interest.

I may never have kids, but that makes me an outlier. That makes you an outlier. A non-participant to a large degree. We sponge off of the fruit of participants (we fuck their daughters).

But don’t think that just because you don’t participate that you don’t have an interest in the legal and emotional context of societies continued creation.

Also, you could easily get caught by getting a girl pregnant. Easily. Unless you are celibate. Its dumb not to care until you are entangled in the system, especially when an accident is so easy to have.

Thinking only one step ahead is no way to live life. As in: “Where’s my next meal and my next fuck?” That’s how animals live. You have to care about society so as not to be a burden on it. Caring about the legal effects on the social environment is as paramount as it gets in that regard.

Cacete
Guest
Cacete
Offline

Yip yip!
“While we’re at it, we need to start a White Man’s Rights as well.
Heck, why not?!!! We’re constantly beeing accused of every little bad thing on the planet and having to apologyse all the time for everthing. That really hit our huge white supremacist egoed dicks big time. We need to take a stand and demand our Rights to hate, anything we want, it’s a free country God Dammit!
We have the right to get our self respect back!
Slavery?…Pfffff…women?…Pffffff…blacks?…Pfffff…latinos?….PffffPfffffffff….oh please, who the fuck cares about them.

Bottom line (keeping it local USA, who the fuck cares about the rest of the world anyways):

– I want the right to smack my bitch all I want without being harrassed by a cop, I’m a man, fuck you! The bitch is a bitch, need to be taught to shut the fuck down. They are not really real people. No harm done.

– I want the right to also smack some black asses around and call them, you know, that banned word. So yeah! Down with this stupid ban, I can call demeaning names to whomever I choose to. Bringing slavery back can also help economy and job employment rates back to it’s feet, so that’s a go go on my book. They are not really real people. No harm done.

– I also know we have the right to smack around latinos, even the ones that think they are americans just cause their poor sorry excuse for a whore mother poped him out here. At least I can call them wetbacks, no bans for this sorry kind, not yet. They are not really real people. No harm done.

– Oh yeah, I’m demmanding the right to shoot any illegal immigrant I see at sight. This is a big service for this great country, getting rid of all this filth. They are not really real people. No harm done.

– I’m not even going to start with muslim people, they are really not worth it. Just shoot them down already! Why have atomic bombs if we’re not getting it’s action? They are not really real people. No harm done.”

Shocker!!!!!!
People truly believed at some point some or all of the above at the same time. And sadly still do, and you know it.
Too much hatred can make you a very very pitiful person.
When men brag about Men’s Rights, this is exaclty how you look, INSANE! Well, maybe not insane like the crazy mother fuckers above are but more of self centered shallow me, me, me, the world is mine, mine, mine sort of insane. Like a little boy that has his toys taken away by his mommy cause he won’t share them with the other kids and throws a fit. Such fontrum.
Suck it up! And go get some more pussy.

hydrogonian
Guest
hydrogonian
Offline

Two more points:

1. To all of you guys who don’t care, I will guarantee one day something will happen and then you will. And then you will wonder “why don’t all of these hordes of younger guys care. Its so obvious”. But by then, you’ll be the older guy that the younger guys can’t understand.

2. Who do you think has more insight? You, with your one girlfriend every two years and your ten approaches a year, or Roissy and Roosh who have much greater incidence of deep interaction with women than 99% of you? Is it the experienced guy or the inexperienced guy whose emotion is misplaced?

@cacete:

“When men brag about Men’s Rights, this is exaclty how you look, INSANE! Well, maybe not insane like the crazy mother fuckers above are but more of self centered shallow me, me, me, the world is mine, mine, mine sort of insane. Like a little boy that has his toys taken away by his mommy cause he won’t share them with the other kids and throws a fit. Such fontrum.”

you mean a self centered fit like women have been having for the past 50 years, and continue to have? Whose self centered fits make the news? Your angry and your thoughts are as shallow as they come.

That’s the last feeding of the troll, I promise.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Hey Roosh, long time reader here. Sorry man, but these kinds of posts make a lot of readers lose respect for you, over time.

The pissed off guys will gravitate to your blog for primal scream therapy, but for the rest of us it’s irrelevant and whining.

These are problems that wusses and beta males have. If they want to reclaim more power, they’ll find the community – it’s not hard to so if they bother doing a simple Google search. It’s not your job to rescue them and it won’t work.

You’re also coming across as a deeply wounded loner who can’t catch a half-decent girlfriend. I know that’s not the case, but damn you are doing your best to convince me otherwise.

You’re in Iceland now… for TWO WEEKS. Perfect! How about you stop undermining your reputation and respect among your readers and post something at the level we know you’re really capable of.

Yams
Guest
Yams
Offline

So just curious, are betas the only ones getting married and having children?? Serious question because if not then its stupid to say its a beta issue.

Seriously if you have children with a women in the US then you are automatically giving up alot of your power.

mr t
Guest
mr t
Offline

OT:

women = filthy dickholes

Sorry, had to say it.

Dipwad
Guest
Dipwad
Offline

Manhood101 . com teaches you all you need to know about being a dipshit who doesn’t care about your own rights and what can happen to you in a feminist cultural and legal system where having a penis automatically exposes you to the biases and hatred of feminism that controls our society today. And just because you say NO to marriage or children is no guarantee the tentacles of anti-male law or cultural pressures won’t affect you.

Calling these men losers and sexless virgins who can’t get women is avoidance of the actual discussion and a well-known shaming tactic used by feminists and weak-minded/short-sighted “men” who’ve been brainwashed by feminism’s hypocrisy and hatred.

Get yourselves a fuucking pair you spineless wimps who resort to the “can’t get laid” “bitter towards women” shaming tactics ie. mindless cowards.

hydrogonian
Guest
hydrogonian
Offline

Oh, and look at the difference between the average male comment and Cacete’s comment, who is obviously a woman. Men don’t use terms like yip! yip! pffff and !!!!!! repeatedly or at all. All overly emotional marks of a woman’s writing.

Now look at her content. Nothing but disjointed hyperbole; meaningless connections that have nothing to do with the topic; hypocrisy in that she believes that all of these other groups have a right to fight for their rights but then she shames men, specifically white men, when they do it; overly emotional rhetoric that branches off into claiming that some words are banned (what??); and just overall the writing of a crazed moron with no ability to argue or even think straight. I know some very smart, well spoken women, just like I know some smart well spoken men, but she gives women a bad name by being the one to come in and defend them with such, well, noise.

Subutai
Guest
Subutai
Offline

I’m disappointed at the lame attacks on this post, which I thought was on-point and ringing with truth.

It almost makes me think posting on the forum is a waste of time, if this is what the majority of the audience is made up of.

Tyler Durden Hipster Fag
Guest
Tyler Durden Hipster Fag
Offline

Most of these hipster fags are too dumbed down by our pathetic education system and their single mothers to understand cause and effect. Roosh, your time is wasted on these feminist – brainwashed hipster fags who think walking around like a fuzzy-hat wearing mystery who couldn’t care less about other men and acts like a sarcastic emo moron is manly. Like I said, these single mother raised dudes are even bigger emotional basket cases than the chicks who won’t fuck them except in their imaginary pua circle jerk stories.

anon
Guest
anon
Offline

Actually, the interpretation of the Kanye lyrics are completely wrong. His “daughter” is his music career, which he fucked up with the whole Taylor Swift fiasco. He “did that time” away from the music biz, and “spent that bread” (Kanye went to Europe and spend shitloads of money). When he returned to the music biz, other artists had taken his place, and now he has to show them who’s boss again (take em to that ghetto university).

Dopilsya
Guest
Dopilsya
Offline

Subutai

“I’m disappointed at the lame attacks on this post, which I thought was on-point and ringing with truth.

It almost makes me think posting on the forum is a waste of time, if this is what the majority of the audience is made up of.”

Dont be like that. Roosh and Roissy’s posts are red pills. They’re and they are’nt for everyone. Besides, by time i read all the comments on both sites, someone will already posted what i was thinking so no point in repeating. That’s what the blue pillers @ Jizzbel and Femfisting’s do.

nathan
Guest
nathan
Offline

I don’t know how he fit so many guests into one song; you can only really hear about half of them. Awesome song though, and an incredible album.

turk112
Guest
turk112
Offline

I think the main thing is to avoid situations where the girl has an incentive to denounce you, so to speak.

Roissy had a good post about this a few weeks ago entitled “Why You Shouldn’t Support Your Girlfriend’s Goals.”

Probably that was Mr. Gulag’s mistake — helping to raise his wife’s status to the point where she lost interest in him.

But more fundamentally the problem is that girls don’t really understand their own sexual impulses. So if they lose interest in their boyfriend or husband, they will invent some rationalization which justifies harming him.

samseau
Guest
samseau
Offline

Honestly, women who pull that kind of betrayal shit occur as commonly as a men who beat women.

In other words, it’s pretty uncommon but not unusual. Both sexes have reasons to be careful.

turk112
Guest
turk112
Offline

“Both sexes have reasons to be careful.”

That’s true, but there is a difference which is that girls have much worse insight into their sexual desires than do men.

So for example, if a man loses interest in his wife because she starts getting old and saggy, he will be aware of it. He may leave her or start banging some young hottie on the side, but he will usually not invent reasons to hate his wife. He will usually feel guilty about the cheating and will usually still feel a sense of obligation towards his wife.

By contrast if a girl starts losing interest in her husband, for example because his status declines relative to hers, she will normally not be aware of the reason. So she will start inventing reasons to hate, loath and despise him. She will feel completely justified in cheating on him and damaging him in other ways.

At the same time, if the girl is attracted to the man, she will invent reasons to love him even if he is seriously mistreating her.

Timothy
Guest
Timothy
Offline

Actually samseau…that kind of betrayal shit IS very common. The fact that women file for divorce in over 70% of the time. That women will poison your children against you, and make it as difficult as possible to see and communicate with them. That women will make up accusations of child abuse/molestation against fathers to sway custody in their favor. That women are quicker to bail on marriages when things are difficult (loss of man’s job, etc.). All of those things are forms of betrayal also. These things are far more common than men slapping women around.

trackback

[…] – “What is Your Project?“, “Women Who Say I Hate Women“, “Kanye West, Men’s Rights, and Betrayal”Steve Sailer – “Guys Create Wikipedia for Free: That’s a Problem“, […]

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

“Anonymous 5
“When they stick a blow torch up your ass, you’ll denounce pussy and men’s rights too.”

I’ll post this msg from my duplicate account so you guys won;t be 100% sure it’s really me due to the highly sensitive nature of the document I’m about to disclose. G’s like mystery.

As you know, I’m a product of severe beatings and failures. Anyway, my last trip to E.Europe culminated in me signing the following:

“I, [The G Manifesto], forever denounce Roosh, game, and I will permanently desist from being a fake ass Internet wanksta who pretends being a baller.

signed: [The G Manifesto] MOSCOW, RUSSIA”

Still gives me goosebumps on my anus.”

LOL I was on his blog and he was talking about going to Australia and getting dressed up to go into a drug dealers home and rob him with a British hardman. The first thought that came to my mind was that he spent the day watching the movies “Chopper” and Snatch”, went to take a shit, listened to some gangsta rap on his ipod and read an Australia travel guide while he was on the can, got an idea, went on the internet to do some supplementary research, then wrote his little fairy tale.

Greg
Guest
Greg
Offline

History is full of women who bravely stood by their men and full of male friends who were snakelike betrayers – I really don’t think either sex has a monopoly or even a majority stake on inhuman betrayal.

I simply don’t understand what point you are trying to make with that snippet. That women are capable of betrayal? Ok, who would have denied that? Do you really belive there are people who would deny that? Who are these people? That women are MORE likely to betray than men? That snippet surely doesn’t lead to any such conclusion – it’s not even an “illustration” of that, so that can’t be your point.

What then, is your point? OK, some women will betray their men. Got it. Thanks for letting me know that. I’ll kep that in mind.

Timothy
Guest
Timothy
Offline

Obviously one of the major problems on the internet is the inability to stick to the subject and context of the discussion. Sure, men have betrayed other men. Men have betrayed women. But if you stick to the context of relationships between men and women, I believe women are MUCH quicker to betray men for any number of reasons. I come to this conclusion from my own personal observations and experience, with a little of what I read in the media with regards to women’s behavior towards men.

The latest example would be the Halle Berry/Gabriel Aubrey custody battle. We all know Halle’s romantic history – the marriages ending in abuse, and/or infidelity. She’s the darling of the media and Hollywood, and perpetual victim. We know her feeling with regard to marriage – she’s sworn off the institution (I can’t be critical of her for that – we’ve discussed openly on this forum and others how men should do the same, so it would be hypocritical of me to rip her for that). We also know she desperately wanted a baby, so she found a nice looking, half decent guy who would be willing to father a child with her. I think we can also assume that she sees that child as HERS, and not theirs. I can’t recall seeing a pic of Aubrey with his daughter – she always seems to be with Halle. We can assume she largely dictates who gets to see the child and when. Aubrey did what COUNTLESS women have done with regards to custody – he ran to court to have his rights as a parent established, and to fight for joint custody. And he’s getting HAMMERED for it. Berry saw this as something of a Michael Jackson/Debbie Rowe situation, where the child was a gift to her from him (except of course she didn’t pay Aubrey and have him legally sign away his rights to the child). He’s doing what so many women complain that men DON’T do – he’s trying to be a father to his child, and is fighting to be more than an occasional weekend dad as dictated by a vindictive bitch. Berry saw him as a glorified sperm donor, but he’s fighting for more. I hope he gets what he wants. In the past she’s publicly praised him as a father, but now all of a sudden there are reports of him hurling racial slurs and other verbal abuse her way (there goes that betrayal thing, using the child as a wedge and espressing “concern” about the safety of the child). So typical.

turk112
Guest
turk112
Offline

“History is full of women who bravely stood by their men and full of male friends who were snakelike betrayers – I really don’t think either sex has a monopoly or even a majority stake on inhuman betrayal.”

I would say that if the universe is limited to (1) relationships; and (2) in the last 50 years or so, then women definitely do the majority of inhuman betraying.

See, the situation is not symmetrical. For one thing, as I noted above, men generally have a much better understanding of their own sexual desires than do girls.

For another, feminist brainwashing has been going on for quite a while. A big percentage of girls have been convinced that sex disparity which goes in their favor is normal and natural, but any which goes against them is terrible and evil.

Last, the feminists keep pushing to change laws to be more and more tilted against men in the areas of sexual assault; domestic violence; and child custody and support.

The upshot is that girls have more and more motives, means, and opportunties to stab men in the back. To see themselves as the victims and to have the legal tools to harm the men in their lives. So it only makes sense that they do the majority of inhuman betraying.

Jack
Guest
Jack
Offline

Um…this song sucks, but Golddigger was a classic and equally about men’s interests and rights.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

43 Roosh

“I don’t remember purging so many IP addresses in such a short amount of time. Countless others have been put under surveillance.”

Sounds like you;re running Gulag here too :))))
Posted via http://www.vastbrowser.com

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

41 Anonymous
“LOL I was on his blog and he was talking about going to Australia and getting dressed up to go into a drug dealers home and rob him with a British hardman. The first thought that came to my mind was that he spent the day watching the movies “Chopper” and Snatch”, went to take a shit, listened to some gangsta rap on his ipod and read an Australia travel guide while he was on the can, got an idea, went on the internet to do some supplementary research, then wrote his little fairy tale.”

Shit, now you got me imagining how G Manifesto posts here while sitting on a crapper in his Mom’s house, listening to gangsta rap and wiping his ass with Lonely Planet Australia :))

Fuck, he must be checking this website every second, to be among the first to post, even while making major deposits at the john. What a clown!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

43 Roosh
6 hours, 7 minutes ago
“The past two posts have been like honeypots in drawing out haters guilty of “anti-Roosh conversation.” I don’t remember purging so many IP addresses in such a short amount of time. Countless others have been put under surveillance.”

Shit, too bad you don;t believe in freedom of speech on your website that promotes “rights.”

Greg2
Guest
Greg2
Offline

Roosh, that’s really absurd – I did not use any insulting or coarse language. I all I did was write a sharply worded post. And my point was perfectly legitimate. I perfectly understand not letting pointlessly coarse or insulting language that makes no point but merely degrades the conversation, but if you feel challenged by every sharply worded dissent to your views to the point of having to ban IP addresses, this is not “strength” – this is an extremely fragile ego.

turj112 – OK, that’s a reasonable point. In the past 50 years women have developed pathologies, because of social conditions, that make them more likely to betray. Fair enough, but this has nothing to do with “female nature” as such. The snippet cited by Roosh takes place in a society and a part of the world where the social pathology of feminism does not exist (The Soviet Union), so I doubt that Roosh was trying to make a point about how modern feminism has created a situation where more women are likely to betray than men. It seems more likely he was trying to make a larger point about the essentially “fallen” nature of women, which seems to me absurd. I despise feminism, but these ideas that women are shittier than men “naturally” seems just as ridiculous – you may not realize it, and neither may Roosh, but these notions have a their roots in Christian dogma and the story of Adam and Eve, and are not rational.

The answer to the lopsidedness of feminism is not to claim women are worse than men, but to admit that both sexes are pretty damn awful for the most part. The way to combat one perniciously irrational ideology – feminism – is not to counter it with it’s opposite. It is to point out the stupidity of this way of thinking and make a move back to rationality.

Cracker ass Cracker
Guest
Cracker ass Cracker
Offline

Kanye west is a little bitch…Ghetto University? You mean his middle class Chicago suburd living ass? All his friends were white boys with skateboards and skinny jeans yet he cries about oppression and wrong doing of the “brothas” in the hood…fuck him. He is about as ghetto as Justin Beiber.

Roosh, much respect your forum/site has got some cool info but this is a reaching man. If I didnt know you better I would say this sounds borderline beta..trying to identify with a bitch like Kanye doesn’t do any justice to anyone.

Cracker ass Cracker
Guest
Cracker ass Cracker
Offline

PS – Greg stop bieng a bitch.