In order to be with a woman, there is no sacrifice a modern man is not willing to make. He will pretend to be a feminist, travel around the world, and even feign allegiance to abortion or homosexual marriage. If a man wants a woman, and the woman professes to like something, the man will profess to like it as well, all for a chance of intimacy, sex, or just a bit of companionship, but like Adam following Eve, his actions lead directly to spiritual death.
I originally got into the game because I wanted one idealized sexual relationship, not many. I imagined that the lust and sex from one woman would fulfill me and give my life meaning, so I learned some tricks and techniques on the internet and applied them to random women. My newfound game knowledge led instead to sex with multiple women, fueling my pride and lust to such an extent that I rewrote my personal history. Instead of admitting that the relationship fantasy I desired in my mind didn’t exist in the real world or was unattainable in my current immature state, I convinced myself that I wanted sex with a lot of women all along. I always wanted to be a player.
For nearly twenty years, I provided women with whatever they wanted—entertainment, fun, alcohol, emotional attraction, anonymous sex in European Airbnbs—so that I could feel pleasure from them, a paltry simulation of the love that exists within a devoted Christian marriage. If I didn’t apply my game skills and “social technology,” I feared that I would end up alone and miserable, yet how different was I from Adam?
Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?”
And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden; but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat it, nor shall you touch it, lest you die.’ ”
Then the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die. For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate. Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves coverings. —Genesis 3:1-7
Adam’s woman was tempted by Satan first and lost eternal life. When she came to him after eating from the tree, I imagine he noticed that her countenance had changed. She was no longer innocent with a saintly glow, and must have appeared worried and tense. The birds were not singing in the Garden like before. He was faced with a difficult choice: turn away from her and reorient himself to God, counting on Him to create another helpmate to make his life worthy, or fall with the woman in a moment of panic and fear of being alone to serve the will of Satan.
To Adam’s credit, he fell with the only woman in the world, yet today, men are begging to fall not for women who love them, not for women who could give them children (they would be immediately aborted), and not even for women they know, but for the potential to meet a godless woman. A man will spend hundreds of hours training to be more interesting or wealthy, to be more attractive in the hope of garnering the momentary interest of a woman, and he will stock his home with all the things that she wants, such as exciting travel photos, bottles of alcohol, playlists of sexy music, and “For Her Pleasure” condoms to satisfy her physically after spending hours straining to satisfy her emotionally. Some men even learn new languages, and the hundreds of hours that entails, to satisfy such a woman. Pathetic! In effect, the modern man pre-eats the apple from the Tree just for a chance of making a good impression on an Eve who has already gorged herself on the fruit. He falls for a woman who is busy serving her true master, Satan, a master she will always serve first.
I can’t help but laugh at my foolishness at the handful of times I tried to transform a girl I had met randomly, often in a bar, into a devoted housewife. When a woman is serving the evil one, she doesn’t want a human master. Why would she follow you anyway, a desperate, weak man who has re-arranged his entire life to make a false god out of a fallen woman?
Any woman who made the decision not to follow me into my perverted idea of marital bliss without God made the wise decision, because while I could puff my muscles up in the gym, strain to be more interesting than a smartphone, or pretend to be some type of dominant gorilla in the bedroom when all I really wanted was love, I was still the servant of the woman, and only deserved one who treated me like the fool that I was by playing games with me, lying to me, and treating me as a disposable toy.
Don’t make the same mistake as Adam. Don’t act as if you were made from the woman’s rib instead of the other way around. Don’t attempt to satisfy a woman with worldly trivialities and pleasures, because I assure you that it is far better to go it this life alone, walking with Christ under his love and protection, than to follow a woman into hell.
Read Next: Do You Deserve A Good Woman?
WOW! Truth can hurt, but healing can’t happen without truth!
Today’s modern women, who are largely feminist even in conservative churches now, know how to be independent and pride themselves on it. Many men have fallen behind with the ability to be independent and successful in an independent state. Many are still susceptible to a myriad of manipulations from family, social circles, co-workers, etc. which get them into all kinds of trouble – sometimes with profound consequences, especially if they get into a marriage they never should have or brought children into this world. Men need to learn how to develop thick skin again — body armor — to be able to withstand a world that seeks to tear them down for it’s own gain.
TBH, most women only turn CONVENIENTLY to God once they realize the players don’t find them hot anymore, or their own appeal is fading. Finding a “good” woman (especially in Western society) is often like trying to find a tiny piece of glass in a gigantic pile of steaming dinosaur crap these days. “conservative” women? You’ll be surprised to find so many of them send nude pics or have made amateur pornos of themselves, before “turning to God.”
I seriously think this is an exaggeration. I hardly doubt devout Christian women are sending nude pictures. There are ones that are Christian just by name, but I hardly see devout women doing that. I still see many 30+ women boasting how they can get any man they want etc. Not sure about that though.
Borgon is right. I see it in my own environment as well. Women will turn to God after their party years are over. It is often a genuine want for change – similar to what Roosh did. The problem is that as a man it is hard to ignore a woman’s past because of our biological nature.
Did Roosh do the same, then? He got older, and turned to God. I think women and men in marriage should have a simailr sexual past.
Men and women are different. Simply because male and female biological natures are different. Men are biologically programmed to spread their seed, while women aren’t biologically programmed to spread their ovaries. The whole concept of modern women trying to sexually compete with men is the reason why marriages are failing, and modern men today often see sexually liberated women as nothing but screw toys with self interest.
Grace
Your makin us look bad
He literally just said “the same as Roosh†pretty much Verbatum
And Boys aren’t girls
A key that opens many locks still functions, a master key. A lock with many keys is useless
We’re the locks. It’s not fair. It’s life and I’m going to tell you I don’t care what aaaaanyone tells you, no man will EVER be ok with you having a double digit notch count
Ever
Women are natural liars, you can’t distinguish if they have truly repented or just pretending because they are 30+ and desperately need a beta-provider. That’s why finding a 20-25 yo virgin is the safest bet. Or hell just stay alone, why not. Better than get cucked and divorce-raped in your 40s.
I would not marry any woman who spends more than 30 minutes per day on social media. That eliminates 90-96% of Western women. As for the virgin question, it’s not always the solution. Some virgins become corrupted because of their exposure to social media and ridiculous reality shows. They get convinced that they’re missing out on something. As for “repentant” church women, I think only 5% of those repentances are genuine. That type of woman is a needle in a haystack. I would offer the following combinaton of conditions for selecting a wife: (1) belongs to a devoutly Christian family, (2) eagerly attends church regularly, (3) has little to no sexual history, (4) severely restricts her own access to social media (no more than 30 minutes per day) and (5) cooks, cleans and raises kids without complaining. Only 4% of Western women meet these requirements, at best. Anyone else is not worth pursuing.
In this case, she is not turning to God. She is looking for a “good man” (a simp) who will put up with all her bull**it as she pretends to be a devout woman. But the masks come off very soon after the ceremony. I saw it with the whorish women I’ve met. Their thirsty husbands soon realize they were duped. Very, very few women are genuinely repentant of their party years. They feel they were entitled to them.
The greater problem is that when a woman wants to genuinely turn to God later after her party years, the effects of past promiscuity on her physiology and mentality are often long lasting or even irreversible. Some even become bat shit crazy frigid lunatic zealots who swear off sex completely with their partners to compensate for the guilt on the cock carousel. And hate others for having sex even in monogamous marriages.
Men on the other hand often have a smoother transition to religion from a promiscous past because promiscuity has lesser effects on a man’s mind as compared to a woman, unless if he ends up with a long lasting STD already.
This is why the ancients curbed female promiscuity because it would eventually lead to the collapse of society, due to the difference in effects of promiscuity on both men and women.
Devout Christian women? That’s an oxymoron these days. You’d be surprised at how many of them are taking it up their backdoors and blowing random men off to preserve their virginities while boasting about their physical purity. You may find a “devout” but jaded woman only after she’s had her share of men but again entitles herself to you forgiving her for her party years.
Never let your guard down, even with Christian women. Test the waters.
What distinguishes a Christian woman from a secular woman? Both are sinners. Both are deeply ingrained with Social Justice/feminist indoctrination, even on an unconscious level. Both believe they deserve Prine Charming. What distinguishes a Christian woman (and what makes her worth marrying) is (1) she belongs to a social grouping (the church) that applies pressure for her to uphold Christian values and behavioral norms, (2) she belongs to a family that applies the same pressure, and (3) is physically and spiritually prepared for marriage as a result of this pressure. I don’t believe women are devout Christians out of abstact convictions. They are devout Christians after upholding social norms and behaviors throughout their lives, and can’t imagine living differently.
There are different types of Christians; the feel good Christians who think their sins are already taken away and thus have a “sin blank check†through grace should be thoroughly avoided. These “ladies†may have notched up triple digit counts on the carousel and still be going strong with the power of “graceâ€.
If a woman is genuinely repentant, all her sins are forgiven and she is burdened with the guilt of having various men use and abuse her body instead of preserving it for marriage and childbearing. But my experience with women is that the vast majority don’t ever come to that genuine level of repentance. My experience is the vast majority don’t think much about anything beyond day-to-day concerns. That is what God designed them for. . Most women are not capable of abstract thinking, which is why they should never be in leadership positions. So I agree that they believe they have a blank check without truly contemplating what damage they have allowed to be done to themselves. And when the marriage is inevitably plagued by constant arguments, her constant stirring of scandals, her social media addictions, maintaining contacts with past flings (or searching for new ones) out of habit, she has no consciousness of the destructiveness of her behavior. The reality is that a woman needs to be prepared and groomed for marriage by her family and the church. Society no longer serves that function.
You’re right, unlike men, the average woman has a brain which is very prone to deceit and indoctrination hence the need of a logical male mind or a society structured around the principles of logical male leaders to guide her. However man has gradually relinquished his grasp of the wheel of societal control to the female gender thus emotionalism becomes the order of the day. Rational thought processes which are compatible to the natural order are thrown out the window to accommodate self glorifying edification which thoroughly goes against the natural order and thus leads to the ultimate destruction of mankind.
The Social Justice/feminist indoctrination is so deep in the unconscious that even so-called traditional women are not conscious of it. I would say that 96% of Western women are not marriable, including those in the church. The definition of marriable is (1) cooks without complaining, (2) cleans without complaining, (3) raises children without complaining and (4) does not spend at least two hours per day on social media. Just those four criteria alone eliminate 96% of Western women.
Hmmm… You’re making a lot of sense. But how sure are you of your statistics? 96% seems too much (for now).
I’d say 98% of women in America today are unmarriageable, as that figure involves women who’ve lost their virginities in premarital sex before they’ve hit 25 – across all age groups, ethnicities, or cultural backgrounds.
No society in the world today glorifies and condones blatant sluttiness, cheating, promiscuity, sex and whoredom as much as American society does – in the name of free speech. True, some women in other parts of the world may be more promiscous, but American society takes the top spot in glorifying and absolving all of it. And the pornification of America starts right in adolescence. Porn is destroying the west today, yet America produces 73% of it to hook on almost 50% of women across all demographic groups. It would be stupid to think that there’s ever gonna be a reversion to morality because the present generation of young women in their teens and 20s are already corrupted and are being corrupted on a daily basis.
To get married in America, is to sign a contract where a man willfully agrees to get cuckolded later, if not by his wife, then by the society and the government.
It is a sad reality regarding (supposedly) conservative churches. I attend the Holy Mass in an FSSPX chapel and there is one girl I get along with. We have a nice chat and then she mentions she won’t come for the next six weeks because she is VOLUNTEERING FOR THE ARMY! Granted, it is as paramedic but still the boot camp is the same for everybody. Why didn’t her family, friends, or the priest tell her not to go? After knowing that I threw all my hope out the window.
What’s wrong with serving your country?
ESPECIALLY as a paramedic?
Women have ZERO business in the armed forces
Moreover, she will be surrounding by horny men desperate for female attention. She will either get quickly married or quickly “familiar” with many of them.
Ture that, I saw that many times on deployments while overseas, even married women who were separated from their husbands were sharing favors with the men.Of course it was usually 10-15 horny guys to one women so the women could be choosy. not saying all of them were like that but many were.
You have the entire State machineries plotting against you- the family courts, the welfare State, the discriminative workplace laws etc. Your odds are insurmountable but it will be much more worth it than going down the path of spiritual death.
As a husband and a father, I definitely feel this pressure every day. It would get overwhelming, if not for my faith in God and my devout wife (who has her own failings, as I do). And resisting this pressure with a non-devout Christian wife is almost impossible. Raising a Christian family in this wicked day and age is only possible with a devout Christian wife, which are needles in haystacks unfortunately.
You’ve come a long way baby!
Great article, Roosh. I could feel your pain and grudge you hold from your sentences. There are things I regret as well and wish I did better or not at all in the past. Truly, women are miserable because of weak men, and men are therefore miserable as well.
A couple months ago I moved to new city and experienced a culture shock by how effeminate the men and how masculine the women are. When you go through the streets you can observe how most couples look inverted, meaning the woman is the aggressive (and dissatisfied) lead and the “man” the small boy following his surrogate mommy providing sex. A stark contrast to the previous cities I lived in, where the amount of foreigners was extremely high, hence more masculine.
Now don’t get me wrong, the women who live here are stunning beauties, but what they have on the outside they usually don’t have in the inside, and you can already tell by their facial expressions and body language – these subtle giveaways tell you A LOT about someone’s character. Because of that I consider to become a hermit for the next couple of years, finish my studies and leave the country and never look back.
Because of the dysfunction and inversion of the sexes I believe many have mental health issues; they may enjoy the moment, but not enjoy their lives.
The majority of Western women are masculine to disturbing levels. It’s utterly repulsive. And many Western white men have no choice but to resort to east Asian women. The only hope for the white race surviving is eastern Europe.
The whole thing about east Asian women being traditional is a myth. As Roosh famously said, water takes the shape of the container it fills. Women are no different. You’d be surprised at the number of women of Asian descent in North America who are both promiscuous and adulterous. It’s because western society glorifies promiscuity not only to them, but every woman.
So is moving to Asia to keep her traditional a better option? That’s an ambiguous proposition for a man who’s raised in western society. It takes a lot of sacrifice and adjustment for him. And other questions then come up – is she dating him in the hope of a green card to begin with? And will she continue to be with him if he relocates to where she is?
Darlock’s writings on chivalry really opened my eyes to the root of much of this behavior. Believe it or not this particular strain actually traces back to islamic love poetry which gave us the romanticized adultery and the elevation of women-defined romance as an ennobling and moral force. Which in turn laid the grounds for no fault divorce and a permissive if not defensive attitude towards women’s sins as a natural result of the ‘exultation of the beloved lady’.
Naturally I don’t agree with Dalrock on everything but those articles at least were really eye opening to me.
It is a disservice to men and women both and the root is sadly deeply embedded in western culture. So be it, the faithful will fight regardless.
The tracing of modern chivalry back to islamic love poetry is possibly correct, since there was a lot of intellectual and cultural exchange between Europe and the Middle East during the Crusades and the Arab rule in Spain before the Reconquista. Unfortunately that concept of chivalry is outdated in today’s liberal world where conservative values are often trashed upon by both men and women. It also possibly explains why a lot of Middle Eastern men tend to exhibit beta behavior when it comes to women, even if the Middle East is gradually turning westernised now, and so are the women there. Chivalry only works when a society still retains truly conservative women.
The ‘chivalrous’ teachings regarding women are the teachings of courtly love and were anti-christian parodies from the beginning. That conservatives seek to preserve that poison is a mark against them.
Poison cannot ‘work’ in society. The puritans tried to tame courtly love by bringing it marriage thus cutting out the adultery, the result was the groundwork of no fault divorce and feminism.
Dalrock has a satirical commentary on Chrétien de Troyes’s Knight of the Cart called ‘Fifty Shades of Lancelot’ that illustrated how thoroughly unchristian and ahead of their time in the worst way those ideals are.
His best post on the subject is ‘Call me Unchivalrous’
And yes it isn’t surprising it began is muslim lands due to large number of unmarried men v married women. Islam is not good for civilization nor are any the perversions it preaches.
Nor are the ‘chivalrous’ teachings, which even some academics admit are a type of paganism opposed to Christianity.
We need to follow biblical teachings regarding men, women, society, and everything else, nothing else will do for nothing else will bear good fruit.
Polygamy always means too many unmarried men chasing too few available women.
Not true.
ofc , woman says it .
Yeah, I didn’t like the title, and also many women shun away the idea of worship (towards them). It is however a good text and can only encourage and congratulate brother RooshV in his Faith walk.
Catholics must understand that women are weaker than men. Read the words of the saints:
Woman is a misbegotten man and has a faulty and defective nature in
comparison to his. Therefore she is unsure in herself. What she cannot
get, she seeks to obtain through lying and diabolical deceptions. And
so, to put it briefly, one must be on one’s guard with every woman, as
if she were a poisonous snake and the horned devil. … Thus in evil and
perverse doings woman is cleverer, that is, slyer, than man. Her
feelings drive woman toward every evil, just as reason impels man toward
all good. – St Albertus Magnus
We must return to the Natural Moral Order. https://jamescwijck.substack.com/p/a-traditional-catholics-manifesto
That seems to me to be a slur against the Blessed Virgin.
The Blessed Virgin is without Original Sin, and lacks the rebellious nature of Eve.
The Blessed Virgin is just as much as Eve the archetypic woman, and though without taint of sin still free. She in her obedience undoes Eve’s sin (note that Eve was also free of sin before she fell) just as Christ undoes Adam’s in his obedience to the Father’s will, even unto Crucifixtion.
Man comes from the earth, but woman from the side of man.
I’ll see your Albertus Magnus, and raise you Peter Lombard:
She [Eve] was formed not from just any part of his [Adam’s] body, but from his side, so that it should be shown that she was created for the partnership of love, lest, if perhaps she had been made from his head, she should be perceived as set over man in domination; or if from his feet, as if subject to him in servitude. Therefore, since she was made neither to dominate, nor to serve the man, but as his partner, she had to be produced neither from his head, nor from his feet, but from his side, so that he would know that she was to be placed beside himself
Non de qualibet parte corporis viri, sed de latere eius formata est, ut ostenderetur quia in consortium creabatur dilectionis: ne forte si fuisset de capite facta, viro ad dominationem videretur praeferenda; aut si de pedibus, ad servitutem subicienda. Quia igitur viro nec domina nec ancilla parabatur, sed socia, nec de capite nec de pedibus, sed de latere fuerat producenda, ut iuxta se ponendam cognosceret.
Peter Lombard, Libri Quatuor Sententiarum {Sentences}, Bk. 2, Distinction 18, Ch. 2, from Latin trans. Silano (2007) Bk. 2, p. 77.
Saying women are weaker than men is no more a slur against the Blessed Virgin that saying man is sinful is a slur against Christ.
Mary was not mentioned in the post you are addressing and Lombard does not contradict Magnus’ opinion in your cited passage.
Woman came from the lower rib of man which contains T cells. Man’s lower rib is the only part of a man’s body that can be broken off or severed and will grow back like a chameleon’s tail. Woman came from the curved rib segment and thusly she shifts from side to side. Her trajectory meanders in eternal loops and circles – – until she gives herself unto the straight edge rule of her patriarch.
Correction: Man’s lower rib contains stem cells.
If you think you will find a partner in life by marrying a devout Christian woman, I think you most of you will be disappointed. They are so deeply indoctrinated with Social Justice/feminist ideology that you will nonetheless end up marrying an independent entity constantly demanding concessions and capitulations from you on a daily basis. The modern woman, both Christian and secular, does not have the slightest idea to be a partner in marriage, in consistent and daily deference and respectfulness to her husband. It’s largely not their fault. They were never taught by their socialized parents, and the media and academia complete their corruption.
No. Then she had no reason to accept her son as Christ; for only those who are sinners need Christ.
His grace is the grace that preserved her from sin. She is both the first fruit and the catalyst of his salvation.
blasphemy of apostate church teachings…only JESUS CHRIST was sinless
MARY went on to have sex and children with Joseph. Read Gods’ Word and stop listening to lying priests and popes.
She did NOT rise into heaven and is NO queen of anything. Even Jesus placed no more importance to her than anyone else.
If you think you will avoid frequent arguments by marrying a devout Christian woman, you’re highly mistaken. I tell you that from a decade of marriage. Devout Christian women are just as prone to engaging in deception and manipulation as secular women. It’s the social pressure from the church and family that is supposed to keep them in line.That’s what the church was created for. Even a strong man will have episodes of capitulating to his wife’s manipulations out of interest of keeping peace in the house and having at least one evening without a shouting match. Regardless if they’re secular or Christian, women thrive on arguments as a means constant testing of their husbands to relieve their own deep insecurities. And they don’t care if their children are traumatized in the process.
Women can’t really love you in the way you love them. Just because her parents made her go to church doesn’t mean shes anything more than attracted to you
What do you mean?
I think he’s pointing out that men and women often fall in love for different reasons, and then love in a different way. Men fall in love with this “perfect creature†they expect to be with forever and assume she’ll feel the same way. She may feel much the same at first, though maybe for different reasons (sexual vs security/stability) but if his performance slips in her eyes, she’ll try to fix him while keeping her options open for an upgrade. While men keep up the starry-eyed idealism (pedestal-ism) for a long time, women are more pragmatic when it comes to love. Makes sense biologically… she has to be concerned for the survival of herself and her offspring. If you’re the starry-eyed male suitor, it sucks to find out your buy-in and hers are possibly based on different goals.
Yes, I would agree. Very well put. I have seen this play out many times exactly as your described. Are men, then, more honourable and graceful when it comes to love? It women are like this biologically, is it even their fault? I guess they have to have a rational and intelligent mind, otherwise they’d just go out looking for the perfect suitor forever.
If men only “fall in love with†(and therefore only commit to) a woman they see as “perfect that may be the start of the problem.
This is quite accurate except the upgrade part. Divorce was rare in the World War Two generation because of the social restrictions and the authority of the church in society. Now that these restrictions have been removed, and the church’s authority collapsed, women are free to indulge their most hypergamous desires, with catastrophic social consequences. The reason that Antifa even exists is female hypergamy and sexual freedom. I am confident that at least two-thirds of Antifa members come from broken households, in which they lacked a strong, moral father figure.
It seems like most of the men in this comment section think that they will find the prototype Christian woman who will wait for them at home with a warm dinner on the table, listen in awe and admiration to his deepest thoughts and feelings, and help him pursue his dreams in life. These women are unicorns, even in the church. The best you can hope for in a modern Christian woman is one who fulfills her household duties without complaining and strives to maintain some measure of peace and order in the household. In all likelihood, you won’t find your soulmate or partner in life since even on an unconscious level, she is indoctrinated to be independent.
Much of the problem also lies in the extreme weight given to “finding” that right partner. That puts too much hope on coincidences of expectations
i think a better approach is to look forward to growing together into better partners once fundamental parities are there to start with
I agree with this 100%. Any marriage should be based on a few essential foundational principles: (1) tradtional roles (male as provider and female as nurturer/helper), (2) common faith, (3) common backgrounds and (4) common ethnicity/language. The rest can evolve. There will be incompatibilities on the other smaller things in any marriage. You will never find someone fully compatible.
Years ago you wrote a post in which you articulated that no woman can hurt a man with “options”. Unfortunately, that is the sad truth of social life these days. Women in general to be honest are repulsed by men who “worship” them. The corollary to that is that no man can “tame” a “fallen” woman with “options”, to follow him. Unless if he’s “fallen” himself, or chooses to be one of her “options”. Like attracts like in the real world.
With the sexual revolution and advent of social media (which makes promiscuity even more easier, especially for women), there’s no turning back the clock now. We live in times where fathers and moms see their daughters and sons naked on the internet and making money out of it, if they aren’t already fornicating in amateur porn and uploading that online for everyone to behold. Satan is already winning because he’s glorified and normalised sin to everyone, to fit in contemporary times. He made Adam and Eve shed their innocence in the Garden and now their offspring on earth are doing it willingly and even boasting about it.
In today’s times of sexual permissivity, women are more attracted than ever to men who, let’s put it in religious terms, “worship Satan.” Meaning a man with no sexual morals and will be bedding as many women as possible, without giving a damn to what society thinks of him. They might hate him for his inflated self worth, but will often not give up the thought of sleeping with him, or cheating with him. This possibly explains how divorced or single moms especially in America or Western societies, often claim their exes were narcissists and abusive, without taking any responsibility for their own choice of choosing to be or sleep with him in their prime in the first place.
Modern female nature in its prime essentially looks for excitement and thrill in a man when it comes to sexual interest, not security, religiousity, stability or loyalty (these qualities only matter when she wants a safety cushion to land back on after she’s temporarily satiated herself).
The archetypes here are of Abel and Cain. Modern women may marry “Abel” but first choose to have fun with the Cains out there. And even if they married Abel, they would not mind cheating around with Cain. And if Cain offered them a semblance of hope that he would provide for them like Abel did, they wouldn’t mind assist Cain in killing Abel and starting anew with him. Because society today celebrates the Cains for “acquisition” – whether it’s women, fame, wealth etc (even if it may be by dubious means) but shuns or even mocks Abel for being a dork who believes in morals. At the most, society may throw a pity party for him to show that Abel still matters, but only to clean up Cain’s “leftovers.”
So Abel has to become or atleast try to copy Cain in such a society to keep women (or society) hooked onto him. Which probably explains what propels many good men today to learn game and become “immoral playboys” like Cain. Societies today glorify the 7 deadly sins to the masses – either subtly or blatantly – you even wrote a post about that earlier, before you turned to God.
What brought about these times in which men and women have become “fallen” or “damaged”? The answer lies in your own words: Water takes the shape of the container it’s poured in. Here men and women are both water, and thus act in the way society expects them to be. You either fit in the society, or you become an outcast for your contrarian beliefs. The Matrix is all consuming and is so far undefeated.
The other take is that you’ll find a lot of Cains who’ll act as Conservatives (for their own agenda) but inevitably with time their masks fall off. And when that happens, it only leads to further alienation of true conservatives, a bad name to Conservatism in general and a general distrustful apathy among the masses in society towards religion. Which only creates more men and women in society without a moral or spiritual compass, leading to more “fallen” men and women.
My last relationship that crashed and burned makes total sense now. Thanks brother
When you are coming back to Roosh Hour ?
Whenever he’s back from his roadtrip
Excellent article, Roosh. Women are inherently evil.
True. Women, even if they aren’t “evil”, are inherently attracted to evil. They only turn to God when all their material or sensual interests are exhausted.
I agree that it’s extremely rare for a woman not raised in the church, or without positive life experiences of the church, to genuinely seek God in repentance. The vast majority of women believe they have nothing to repent, no matter what sin they engaged in. But women raised in a positively devout Christian family, with genuine love, are highly likely to replicate their positive Christian experience when seeking their husband. That’s why in seeking a wife, I recommend selecting a woman from a devout family who is devout herself. That’s your best chance for a successful marriage.
Sorry to break it to you brother, but women are more influenced by generic social norms than individualized religious beliefs. Roosh was 100% right in an earlier post before he turned completely to God, that even “conservative women from a village” will want to sleep around in a loose cosmopolitan peenissive environment. In fact, they will try hard to sleep around anonymously as much as possible to gain much sexual experience as possible. The brutal bottom line is that the most sexually experienced women tend to make the best fucks but the worst wives, simply because their brains have been rewired for male sexual variety, just like how porn rewires the male brain.
I agree with you, and that is a consistent theme in my postings here. Most women are not capable of abstract thinking that determines standards of morality. The vast majority will adjust to the social norms of their surroundings, whatever they may be. But because society no longer supports healthy social norms, a decent woman for marriage can only be groomed by her immediate family, with the help of their particular church community. And the family and church have to exert social pressure to keep her in line. Christianity has no value without the social pressure exerted by the church. It is irrelevant without the active church.
I married what should be the ideal woman for marriage in this onlinecommunity, which is a devoted Orthodox Christian woman from a rural Ukrainian village. She even managed to emerge from living in a university residence hall undamaged (which I attribute to the mind-boggling passivity of Ukrainian men in general). She has admitted that she has been tempted. And I am convinced that she resists the temptation, when other women fail, because she is afraid of the social scorn that will be heaped upon her for failing to uphold her virtue in marriage (and not because I am such a wonderful husband). Social pressure from her family and from her church keeps her in line. And while most women don’t care what their church community thinks of them (or don’t go to church at all), she cares because she was raised to care. She was groomed to care, having attended Liturgies every Sunday all her life (and having family members as priests). The church is embedded in her unconscious, which is what we are doing with our children.
Very true, and even if they do the porn-star performance, so what? It’s hardly rocket science, nor is it anything that can’t be learned. …Indeed they learn it themselves to ensnare and manipulate men.
Plus, women’s performance in the bedroom is generally overrated, for the simple reason that anything a woman does is overrated: like children, females are praised to the skies for doing things which males do routinely. And a wife’s role during sex is trivial — she doesn’t have to perform anything that could be called difficult. Yet most can’t even manage that.
But a good Christian wife (i.e. one who will obey her husband) can be trained to please him. Her performance is not a matter of skill; it’s a matter of will — the will to please her husband. But sadly most women — even so-called Christian ones — lack even this.
Nice text Roosh! When there will be a Roosh hour again? We are eager to see you again. I hope everything is alright. God bless you!
It all comes down to three words – “GROW A PAIR”. Trump’s coronavirus task force head Dr Scott Atlas announced that “The only way this [covid] stops [in Michigan] is if people ‘rise up'” [against Whitmer’s new restrictions]. Continuing he echos Thomas Jefferson “you get what [tyranny] you accept”. Well, it’s not possible to RISE UP without firstly ‘growing a pair’. And man falls low, becoming the floor mat walked upon, trampled not only by child but by woman’s heavy spiritually naked foot when he’s GROWN NO PAIR. No all ye good people, there fosters no pair bonding when there be no PAIR by which ye female be embonded. And a man with a face mask signals that he hides in shame like Eve from the sight of the Lord – with a literal underwear sack with side straps obscuring the best side of his head, surely he hasn’t grown anything worthy of protective garment below. THROW THE MASK down to the ground ye and stomp on it. Commence o creation MAN to “GROW A PAIR”
Jefferson was about as atheistic and anti-Christian as they come (for his time).
I think you have written about this before but would love it If you could make a post about this topic again. Society has most men scared that they will die alone. “I assure you that it is far better to go it this life alone, walking with Christ under his love and protection, than to follow a woman into hell.”
The truth is that the future generations are going to be super screwed because modern women with their glorified whoredom will only produce dysfunctional offspring with dubious morals. Children inherently do not listen to parental advice, but rather follow parental example. Hoes and playboys only will reproduce in today’s modern social setting, and the future generations will thus have no morality just like their parents did.
We see this in most societies now. Sin is rampant and easily accessible on SmartPhones. Who can doubt that we are approaching the end times?
You need to shop around. Even a foreign woman ought to have a plan for life for the whole family, not just for herself when she views you literally, and figuratively, as just the passport to a soft life.
If you want to take your country back from president-elect George S., if no civil war breaks out now (there were excellent articles on this on ROK in its final months), you’ll need to have 5 kids each, withdraw to a Republican state- where the people are Republicans, build up a military when you just use their training without being loyal to the Democrat leadership (80% of the military’s rank and file are white and most of them are conservatives), create your own scouting and militia movement with people you know from childhood and your close neighbors so there is no infiltration (keep in mind the feds could try to set up a whole fake neighbourhood, and try to join up), and move to take America back in 25 to 30 years.
There will always be married and unmarried people around, whichever you are, try to help and support the cause, be a real godfather, be active in your nephews and nieces lives, be close to your relatives, host them in your house when they travel, lend them money (prudently of course), become your own underground, deep state, etc. Raising a Christian family is how you fight back against evil now. You’re doing it for your kids. Don’t worry about divorce (but choose your wives carefully), you’ll have to live everything behind anyway, the hearse has no baggage compartment. Your ancestors, from when the world was created, have fought through thick and thin, they’ve seen far worse and made it through because you’re here, they have achieved great things and brought you where you are, you owe them a good fight.
If the Court rules against America, from then on, all federal elections will be stolen. When Democrats flood the country with aliens, you’ll lose control over local elections, there will be fraud just as it is in all the Democrat run places. You need to start infiltrating the government, over 90% of it is Democrat- every bureaucrat, security guard, even building cleaners- the enemy owns the government, McCarthy told you about it, Bezmenov confirmed it. Voters have been enabling them since at least FDR if not earlier, “From ‘32 to ‘64, Democrats won seven elections, with the GOP prevailing but twice, with Eisenhower. And from 1930 to 1980, Democrats controlled both houses of Congress for 46 of the 50 years.”- Pat Buchanan.
Fighting evil doesn’t stop on the personal level, in one’s private life; you must do it publicly especially in times like these. God wills it. While Christianity is growing in China, people must keep on fighting for the souls in the west.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKrLr4jW0Eo
There is a problem, most women today have been raised by feminist mothers. My mother must have repeated the mantra “never rely on a man” to me over and over throughout my life. So, was I to save my virginity for marriage while also being deeply frightened of that union? It is a confusing state and can lead women down a road of promiscuity and pursuit of career not realizing it is a dead-end direction.
It took many years of occupational dissatisfaction and a strong, masculine loving man to wake me from that illusion. I wished I had been give the motherly guidance to protect me throughout my youth. Thankfully, I didn’t scar myself too much by loving many men, taking drugs, or other forms of self-abuse. My first sexual experience was with my husband. However, he desired more conquests so we didn’t marry until much later in life.
There is an art between the communication of men and women that needs to be passed down. There is a respect for self and for the man you hope to marry that must be present and taught also. Mothers are busy working for their idols not realizing their greatest role is that of a mother. The loss of a strong mother has far reaching effects on all areas of our society. It can alter how we understand ourselves and the foundational role of marriage.
Every word you wrote was spot on!
Feminism is to women today as Satan’s promise to Eve in Eden. Women have been falsely propagandized that they will be fulfilled by emulating men; having a career, exerting authority, being independent, conquering the world, etc. For thousands of years women have attained satisfaction subjugating herself to one man, having many children, nurturing her family. Grandmothers used to be the happiest, most pleasant people I ever knew.
Social pressure is powerful. Where there used to be expectation for young women to marry young and start a family, even in my lifetime, that notion has been replaced by going to college and having a career, gaining glory by becoming a CEO, lawyer, or something really prominent. But like you mentioned, it is unfulfilling for a woman to have a career.
Women today are depressed, even more than men, at least we men are fulfilled working in a career. Men are lonely. Most of us were ruined by ex wives who destroyed our life dreams of raising children. Many men are virtuous and have been steamrolled by women seeking social approval, while Satan’s children set the tone of society.
Roosh was right in this article, women are chasing after the goalposts Satan set. Men are seen as obstacles to reaching the end, or we are seen as a stepping stone to get there.
The very few decent women are harder to find than looking for a particular grain of sand at the beach. It’s tiresome to find a woman with any Christian virtue.
The Social Justice/feminist indoctrination is so deep in the unconscious that even so-called traditional women are not conscious of it. I would say that 96% of Western women are not marriable, including those in the church. The definition of marriable is (1) cooks without complaining, (2) cleans without complaining, (3) raises children without complaining and (4) does not spend at least two hours per day on social media. Just those four criteria alone eliminate 96% of Western women.
Yes, Feminism was a horrific mistake, and Patriarchy returning as the natural order would be most ideal, as it is literally God’s order. Nevertheless, if what you gleaned from the above article was “Women are a special super duper greater evil than men!!!!!!!” you’ve still got some bitter ex-player/MGTOW/incel to work out of your system.
To paraphrase that old idiom: “In every society, men and women get the men and women that they deserve.” Whether you like it or not, men and women are equally fallen in different ways, and Romans 3:10-18 isn’t just about women.
Not only that, but by trying to solely pass the buck off to women, you’re all ironically making the same fatal mistake Adam made in the aftermath of his partaking of the forbidden fruit:
“The man said, “The woman whom You gave to be with me, she gave me from the tree, and I ate.â€Â Then the Lord God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?†And the woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.— – Genesis 3:12-13
Did you catch that? The woman trying to blame the serpent was bad enough. But what Adam did was much MUCH worse. Read what he said again: “The woman whom YOU gave to be with me, she gave me from the tree and I ate.” Adam did not merely blame Eve: he blamed God Himself for the woman HE gave him. There’s a reason why verses throughout the Bible like Romans 5:12-14 cite Adam as the source of sin in the world:
“Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned— for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.”
The ultimate point you should glean from the article is the opposite of continuing to whine about women like someone still resentful about not getting a prom date in high school. Rather, it’s that you have two basic choices regarding women in this world, depending on the gifts that God has given you: either wear the pants and be the MAN in the relationship and fully accept your responsibility as head of the household, or commit to a life of celibacy if you have been blessed with that ability.
Whatever you do, don’t keep being a simp for fallen women, nor perpetually whining about them and blaming them for all your problems or the world’s problems like a pathetic victim. The only reason why Feminism was allowed to take off in the first place is because of the power that men themselves foolishly handed over to women. The Fall was the beginning of the Battle of the Sexes, and it continues to this day.
Feminism wasn’t a “mistake,” it was a deliberate Marxist-style class warfare against White men. look up and find who actually perpetuated 2nd wave (modern) Feminism.
Rollo Tomassi is now, non ironically, saying you have gone insane. It’s true that even the most mild of devotion to God appears as insanity to those in the world.
Nobody has cared what Tomassi has said for the last 5 years or so.
The whole thrust of Tomassi’s teachings is that men should learn how to think like women and in gaining this knowledge, use it to their full advantage to give women what they want and to get as much poon as possible. And this man claims to be a Christian! This is the opposite of Christianity. He is teaching an embrace of godlessness. He might help you get laid, but he will help you on the path to hell in the process. It’s worth noting that he is highly tramautized by the suicide of his brother-in-law, who killed himself after he was abandoned by Tomassi’s sister. But rather that regretting his brother-in-law’s suicide as a sinful act, Tomassi is encouraging men to avoid being put in that position by catering to the sinful ways of hypergamous women.
Yes. You nailed it right about Tomassi. I stopped watching his podcasts long back coz I thought he was heading in that direction.
Thanks Roosh, This came exactly at the right time!
Great article. Just live your life and work hard on improving spiritually, intellectually and physically and if God sends you a good woman, don’t ignore it, but don’t waste your time chasing sex and attention from women in order to fill the void in your soul that only God can fill.
Well put!
Women are not the reason for today’s problems. Every woman who is not a virgin today got that way because a man desired her and got his way. When I was young men did not expect sex and did not demand it either. They wanted marriage and a home and they married young, and by their thirties they had young children in school. Men don’t want that today. They are immature and not fit to marry. So stop blaming women. It is the men who have changed. I am old and I see what men are like today, and I know what men were like when I was young. I feel for my daughters. Men think dating is about sex, while most women want love. I can give you examples of the way men behave today. One guy said to one of my daughters he had ten girlfriends but he would not marry some of them because they were not very good in bed and more than once a guy would say they can’t go without sex in a relationship because they are an affectionate person, that was a polite way of saying they wanted sex so they were not interested in dating her. Eventually, either a girl will give in to their ways or they will think all men are like that and give up hope. These 30 year old women without husbands, they just might be a nice girl who did not want to be someone’s tossed aside bed partner, because they knew better than give their heart to a man in today’s world.
Bullshit, by “men” you mean 6’3 Chads of course, other men are effectively not men for you https://i.imgur.com/GTChhRq.jpg
Teach, no, ORDER your daughters to date someone who is NOT swimming in pussy and they will be married very soon. Otherwise they ‘ll end up wrecked STD-ridden cat-ladies if they keep ignoring normal guys. Show them these comics https://imgur.com/a/odxAV
@Audrey You misspelled “incels.co†in the search bar.
“One guy said to one of my daughters he had ten girlfriends …” ©
Now tell me who could have that much girlfriends? Most average guys have zero, some have one but 5% Chads have dozens, it’s the truth whether you accept it or not. Somehow every single girl thinks she has a chance to marry Chad and keep him faithful all while ignoring the propositions from normal men every day.
Birds of a feather flock together. If you think that “somehow every single girl†is that way, then what that means is that you’re doing something wrong where those are the only people you’ve been exposed to (aka the availability heuristic). It’s like Roosh said: Good men attract good women, and good women attract good men.
> Good men attract good women, and good women attract good men.
You can repeat this little mantra when you get cucked and divorce-raped by a supposedly good woman.
Rich and/or handsome men attract ALL women and take what they want, average men take what they can get and hope it works somehow (usually it doesn’t).
@Audrey I’m sorry that you feel that way, and I’m sorry that you’ve had that experience (or at least, believe that’ll be your fate based upon what you’ve seen). However, quite honestly, I’m sure you and I would have a good laugh if you knew who I was.
I know no one likes to listen to strangers on the Internet, but if you’d like to change your circumstances, I promise you there is a way. Google “external/internal locus of control†and read on from there. Hope that helps.
Andrey is right. Statistics have shown while promiscuity has remained at fairly the same level among men over the past decade, while promiscuity levels among women have steadily risen to around 8 to 10%. And these are just “official numbers”.
The truth now is that only 10% of men gain sexual access to over 80% of women (in their prime youth) while the rest of the men are often later saddled with “leftovers” of the 10%. Even Dan Bilzerian, mentioned it in an interview, though it’s now known that he actually pays for the hot women who in turn use him for fame and benefits. Nevertheless, the Pareto principle of 20 by 80 has steadily skewed even more in the past five years in the dating market. And with a collapsing economy and as the wealth gap widens in society, only the “elite” or “richer” men will have access to the majority of women even further. Even if it may simply be for mere “provider potential” (depending on the level of her wants and needs) as the costs of living go higher and relationship forming will become even more difficult for average Joes. It’s only going be random hookups for sexual gratification for both men and women, as “relationships” become further unaffordable when the dollars shrink, but the price of living and needs and desires goes up. Which is already happening. You see a lot of (young) women already indulging themselves for cash and fame on social media, webcamming or even porn and discreet escorting. Gold digging is actually being thrust upon women today, even if some of them already had an activated gold digging trait. And that will get even worse when an economic crisis occurs. You see it already with women wanting to hookup with exes or random men simply for economic benefits during the pandemic.
The damaging effects of this promiscuity on women are well known (apart from microchimerism where male DNA can stay in their systems for the rest of their lives). Roosh had posted this a few years back but studies were inconclusive then as microchimerism due to intercourse was only noted among insects and animals . It’s now however been said by doctors too when it comes to humans, and I can post some links too about it if you want to see them.
It’s no surprise many modern women have to rely on antidepressants and other drugs to combat the side effects of promiscuity later on in life. They’re struggling with multiple personal disorders (possibly a side effect of the retained absorbed male DNA from various men), a reluctance to work in relationships (with normal men) and damaged pair bonding ability.
The only thing promiscuity does is that it pair bonds women to sexual variety for oxytocin release, instead of the normal release of oxytocin in monogamous non promiscous women during sex. Science is now backing up what religion and morals have said long ago, albeit it’s not yet been advertised yet.
The whole “Good men attract good women” sounds like a parody of the (f)Law of Attraction. If that were true, why are so many young “good men” not getting good women in their prime? The whole meaning of “Good men” has become perverted by women these days, because more often than not, the definition of what makes a man “good” in her eyes depends on her whims, fantasies or circumstances. Which is already happening in the feminist west.
Birds of a feather do flock together – but women often change their “flocks” in their teens, prime 20s and later on with the social acceptance of permissivity. At the end many men today only are often faced with the option of getting a hybrid bird whose already accumulated different feathers from different “flocks”.
I guess I should have said he had ten girlfriends in his past. None of the women were good enough for him to marry. He was not a chad either. He was a farmer/mechanic and average looking. One of my daughters has met a nice Catholic Asian man and he is very respectful and his intentions are good. I hope it works out for them. He prays the rosary everyday like she does. You have a foul mouth. today’s western culture in is sick.
There is no limit to men’s desperation and veneration of women.
Eva Lovia, after 10 years of being a prostitute on screen and off screen, married an upper middle class handsome white man who is raising her child (supposedly the child is his, but we can’t be sure because she was still taking creampies on screen and off screen all throughout 2019 when the child was conceived). She also has 2.3 million followers on Instagram, a podcast and is still whoring herself out on OnlyFans.
Strap your boots for the new normal, boyos. Proud whore mothers — who have become role models and figures of authority in society — and proud cuck husbands and fathers.
Eva Lovia: Wife, mom, philosopher whore
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flxX4gZypRU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu2u6Eka8Lc this experiment is golden! “Tinder effect” is real! 300 kg 35 yo landwhale single mother can choose between thousands of good looking young men in a single city. If Roosh would have been born 20 years later, his PUA career wouldn’t have lasted long.
Can’t wait for Jesus to come back and burn this world down.
Hoes gonna hoe, and a ho with a wedding ring is still a hoe, not a wife.
btw, while average men worship women, women worship scumbags:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/thirteen-correctional-officers-indicted-in-maryland/2013/04/23/6d2cbc14-ac23-11e2-a8b9-2a63d75b5459_story.html
>Thirteen female corrections officers essentially handed over control of a Baltimore jail to gang leaders, prosecutors said. The officers were charged Tuesday in a federal racketeering indictment.
>The indictment described a jailhouse seemingly out of control. Four corrections officers became pregnant by one inmate. Two of them got tattoos of the inmate’s first name, Tavon — one on her neck, the other on a wrist.
If women do not have their social interactions and sexuality restricted by society (which used to be influenced by the church), there is no limit to the threachery, hedonism and social disorder they are capable of pursuing. Of course, this article clearly refers to Afro-American women, who are especially lacking any social constraints. Instead, the Social Justice ideology places Afro-Americans in sacred status, capable of doing nothing wrong and demand constant worship. Nothing could have been more destructive for this nation. At least a few Afro-American men have common sense are speaking out against the insanity their people have indulged (Jesse Lee Peterson, Tommy Sotomayor, David Carroll).
Honestly I felt Roosh actually was talking about all women in general in the West. When it comes to hedonism, adultery or promiscuity – morally liberated or promiscuous women of all races, ages and shapes will unite together and defend each other from criticism. Hoes will always defend other ones when whoredom is criticized.
Women worship scumbags because scumbags are agents of Satan with unlimited supply of booze, drugs, fame, thrill and of course debauchery – who won’t “judge” them for indulging themselves. Bottom line – women often chase men who will indulge their worst desires with no judgment. Men often love women who love scumbags who either knowingly or unknowingly worship Satan.
LOL.
When I first read the Bible, and realised that under the Law God gave Israel, women were essentially the property of men — sold by fathers to husbands, and stoned to death if they ever “played the whore” — I was shocked.
…But Clown World has helped me to understand why God’s Law is as it is. God knew what He was doing.
Amazing piece Roosh as usual , this one hits really close to home.
Wow, this article was spot on! Roosh must have been surveilling me the past 2 years! When a woman tells you on your second date that she had two abortions and shows no sign of remorse, don’t do what I did. I never agreed abortion was OK but I somehow thought a relationship with her would be a good idea anyway. Instead, run! Run, don’t look back, and whatever Christ has planned for you is better than what you would arrange for yourself.
More than 90% of women, including those in the church, don’t believe they have to repent of anything. That is my personal experience of interacting with them. They have no shame, they are damaged as a result, and they expect you to foot the bill.
Crystal Bassett, Brittni de la Mora and Jenna Presley are just few examples of pornstars conveniently turning to God. And all are now “preachers” after having married pastors. Christianity in the West has become a joke thanks to these false preachers and pastors, while Christianity still thrives in Orthodox eastern Europe. And to certain extent in Catholic countries.
And Christ will deal with them exactly as He deals with the church of Thyatira in Revelation.
the hardest lesson to learn with modern women, is that no matter how much good or at least potential good you might see in her, is that the damage that brought her to where she is wil never let her escape. They are in the position where society told them that they will be happiest and that position is one of casual sex, alcohol and free living. Don’t swim in the ocean to save them, just leave it alone.
I agree that 96% of them are tainted and damaged beyond rescue, whether it’s owing to the indoctrination in schools and academia, the indoctrination from social media and reality TV, or from the abuse that many experience in their lives. Enjoy being single, fellows! It’s not the worst thing in the world. Or book your flights to some semi-normal countries to find your bride, if there are any left. Finding a needle in a haystack costs a lot of money though.
I still agree to what Roosh had to say in one of his earlier articles before he turned to God, that “always assume she’s a slut”. It’s an golden adage to follow in today’s times. It doesn’t always matter how refined or feminine or Godly she might seem, you see feminine and “refined” escorts too in real life. But at the end of the day, she’s still sleeping around.
Wow. This one hit me hard. Great article.
Keep in the back of your mind, though she be really nice looking, she’s just a girl. If you run into each other in your older years, you’ll wonder- what did ‘this woman’ have to have been the focus of so much energy and effort?
Interesting. I’ve come to the same conclusions that my pursuit of women was idolatry. When you reject your heavenly father you become a slave to lust and try to get that religious experience sexually with a woman. I had a very beautiful ex who models and seemed nice, but she was a godless woman and rejected her Catholic upbringing and became an atheist and a nihilist. It shouldn’t have come as a big surprise that she started cheating and lying to me at the three year mark. It was very painful, but I thank God for getting me out of that relationship and finally He opened my eyes that I don’t need a woman, and I’m better off alone with God than pursuing ungodly women. Like Roosh I spent years desperately trying to win the love and approval of a woman and entertained that fantasy of the perfect life with the “one,” but it’s delusion. A godless woman will stab you in the back the moment she thinks a better deal comes along and you aren’t making her happy anymore. Just remember Eve forsook her perfect heavenly Father. What chance you do think you have making a godless woman happy?
I agree with you. And my experience is that the only women of God are those who were raised that way from childhood, which are very few. Unless a love of God, and at the same time a fear of his wrath, is embedded in a woman’s unconscious from a young age, it isa very rare for a woman to turn to God for genuine reasons. I have seen many women come to a church in their late 20s looking for a simp husband to start a family with, after a life of sin. And they are rarely genuinely repentant. They are strictly pragmatic because they were not raised with the love of God and fear of his judgment.
I treat women the way they treat me if they treat me with love and respect I do the same if not I treat them like the way they deserve to treated like dirt.
god bless you. I hope you find a good wife.
This is in my opinion, a healthier perspective of a man going his own way. Not to spite women out of resentment but to avoid committing sin and falling into Hell. A place that most people will unfortunately end up in.
Being chosen by God to be a believer in todays society is a huge responsibility as well as a massive trial.
But our creator would not have chosen us if he didn’t think we were capable and knows us far better than we know ourselves.
The dialog I think of when i read this article. So can I buy you a drink fair lady? Excellent. Let’s go back to my place. Now that the alcohol has worn off, what was your name? Well then (fill in the blank name)…here’s your pedestal. You’ll need this to satisfy the saintly projections in intend to put on you now. Well shit, that didn’t work. Next.