Related Posts For You

8
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
  
smilegrinwinkmrgreenneutraltwistedshockunamusedcooleviloopsrazzrollcryeeklolmadsadexclamationquestionideahmmbegwhewchucklesillyenvyshutmouth
4 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
anthonyJacktheonceandfuturekingJed E MaskRoosh Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Clark Kent
Guest
Clark Kent
Offline

No one’s nonsense or lies have gotten under my skin to the same extent as Judas Peterson.
He embodies basically everything I hate about the current age we live in.

A smarmy wimpy moralist who abandons his principles in exchange for money.

He espouses great Western thinkers like Nietzsche, for example, while proposing the exact kind of atheistic liberal Christianity that Nietzsche warned against and accused of leading to spiritual and biological nihilism. He rails against nationalism for Westerners while supporting nationalism for PC-approved nations (e.g., native Americans, Jews, etc.). He never lives up to the principles he suggests his followers should live up to (e.g., freedom of speech, full honesty, not submitting to the Left, etc.). And he takes himself so fucking seriously for enlightening us plebs with the brilliant discovery that “boys have a penis and girls have a vagina”. I could go on and on. I respect his broad knowledge in research psychology but he is making a complete mockery of Western philosophy and history.

He basically just took some basic red-pill ideas, i.e., the common sense of the not-too-distant past, and presented them in the least threatening and most ineffectual way possible. I didn’t mind him when he was a small-scale pundit, but seeing him rise to become some kind of Jesus figure has been very disturbing. That his “open- and scientific-minded” audience can barely handle any criticism of him or his ideas only makes it even worse.

Is he not just the epitome and conclusion of post-Enlightenment Anglo bourgeois individualism?

Jack
Guest
Jack
Offline

Then there’s the unique ideological parallels with people like Ben Shapiro and the entirety of the National Review staff (current and former).

Its basically the same formula that this Neocon contingent has always used:

Approve of one or two positions of the serious Right

(like gender roles or something else relatively non-threatening to the over-all progressive plan, but that will certainly be eliminated anyway due to the overall featured weakness of the neutered conservative politics),

and package them with reminders to stay true to the more central progressive goals.

You can literally trace this formula back decades. Start reading the early Neocon articles meant for the public.

That they feel the need to desperately hold onto their specific influence, by repackaging themselves in people like Jordan Peterson, communicates a lot about their distress over being discredited, ignored, and refuted in the prior election.

Arnold V
Guest
Arnold V
Offline

Roosh’s room is actually cleaner than Jordan’s…

anthony
Guest
anthony
Offline

These Butt Pirates are everywhere. ESPECIALLY up here in the “Six.” A complete and total nightmare. Northern American Society is crumbling everywhere. Need to clean house here first. If this market can be corrected, any can. Like I asked before: What is the plan?!

Jed E Mask
Guest
Jed E Mask
Offline

“What is the plan?!”

JESUS CHRIST…

anthony
Guest
anthony
Offline

In response to: Jed E mask…………your hideous bruv.

Typically I would give a dignified response, but your notch count is obviously below triple digits, and most likely under 10. You’ve definitely lived a below average life.

Any other worthless, feminized, emasculated chimps with more hubris?

theonceandfutureking
Guest
theonceandfutureking
Offline