Social Welfare Creates A Society Of Sluts

The countries I’ve visited with the most feminine women have also had the least helpful social welfare programs. If you know how much a country spends on their welfare in relation to GDP, you can come close to predicting how feminine, compliant, and nurturing their women are.

If a woman knows that she can be impulsive, a bitch, a slut, or get knocked up by any man, yet still receive free food, shelter, and a mobile phone from the government, what incentive is there for her to settle with a good man and keep him happy? Why would she pick any man who works in a “boring” job like engineering or computer programming instead of having exciting hookups with the indie guitarist who plays every Tuesday night at the dive bar?

When a girl thinks she can play the game for fifteen years, she simply won’t give a provider a chance until her womb is polluted, until her body is twenty pounds beyond its optimum carriage, and until she’s so entitled that the poor sap who marries her can’t possibly give her satisfaction. His life will turn upside down when she gets bored, divorces him, and takes his money.

In countries where welfare doesn’t exist, picking the guitarist over the engineer will actually decrease a girl’s survival chances. She may end up homeless and have to depend on the church for beetroot soup. She will definitely not have a car, a good home, or an iPhone, not even an older model. She will not have reliable access to health care. Therefore she must be extremely careful about who she sleeps with, and only when she’s still very young can she slip once or twice and fuck the bad boy without a condom. But if she’s still fucking a bohemian who smokes weed every day after she’s 25, her future will be bleak as the odds she enters poverty becomes 100%.

Ukraine doesn’t have welfare for women. Women there must find a husband or else they are in big trouble. While Ukrainian women can be tough, extractive, and transactional, especially for naive men raised in Western suburbia, they ultimately make for excellent partners. I got into a great relationship just one month after I landed in the industrial shithole of Kharkiv, and it ended up being more satisfying than all the relationships I’ve had with American women. The amount of pleasure she gave me based on the little work I had to put in was not surprising considering that she wanted to show her worth so I would deem her a good wife. Even upon marriage, she would not taper her womanly duties because a divorce would put her on the street.

There are three ways a woman can survive in this world:

1. Working
2. Government (welfare)
3. Husband

If you want an opportunity to meet the best women in the world, simply pick a country with low wages and no welfare. Those women will run, not walk, to the boring provider who has zero game, a 100 pound bench press, and clothing from Old Navy. I’m not saying you’ll bang a lot of hot party girls in those countries, but I am saying that you will find a caring wife one-hundred times easier than in America.

You must go to a country where a man of modest means, who is making GDP level income, is a far better bet for a woman than the government. This is not the case in many Western countries, especially Scandinavia, where the government provides a much better deal than any man. The irony of Scandinavia is that their taxes are so high to provide those gold-plated benefits that it’s almost impossible for a man to compete with the government as a provider. The government cockblocks its own male citizens, who have the indignity of having to pay for the cockblocking. Is it any surprise that the biggest sluts in the world exist in Scandinavia? Why be a good woman when the government will bail your slutty behavior out? Their governments are too beta for sluts to fail.

It’s much easier to choose a bi-annual visit to a welfare office to get monies directly deposited in a bank account while succumbing to whorish tendencies than to serve one man and ensure that his marital investment is paying off. If there is no potential for the woman to endure financial hardship after getting kicked to the curb for being lazy, foul, or unattractive, then the institution of marriage will collapse. There would be no incentive for it.

Government welfare is a woman’s backup plan, letting her know that if she fails with pleasing a man, with internet dating, with a strategy of one-night stand empowerment units, she will not be on the street. In addition to its soft form of government paper-pushing jobs, welfare provides incentive for the worst part of female nature to be released, subsidizing alphas with the right attitude but wrong job while reducing betas—who contribute most to society through their slavish labor—to masturbation and sex dolls. Note that welfare for men, in the form of unemployment benefits, doesn’t have the same perverse effect as welfare for women, because a man does not marry to be provided for. Therefore if you want a society of good wives, and not just good sluts, welfare for all women must be abolished.

Once the abolishment takes place, women who already made bad decisions with men will suffer and wind up on the street, begging private charities for food while turning to prostitution. Their children will be admitted to foster homes to be trained as future criminals of the state. But this suffering will provide a much needed example to young women, still motherless and in the prime of their fertility, of what type of future is in store for them if their slut stage goes beyond one or two bad boy cocks. If anything, school trips in fortified yellow buses can be taken through bad neighborhoods where it’s easy to see how yesterday’s party slut is today’s dazed streetwalker.

As men we have to ask ourselves what type of women we ultimately want. If it’s good sluts, the Western world will more than provide (as long as you can provide tight game). If it’s good women, we must change the state’s policies or—more simply—relocate to countries where the state does not compete with us and encourage women through generous welfare programs to live a life of fucking around instead of maintaining a good family. I hope you choose wisely, because your future as a father and husband will depend on it.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out my book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain my operation.

Don’t Miss: American Feminism Wants All Girls To Be Fat Sluts

Related Posts For You

newest oldest most voted
Ninja man
Guest
Ninja man
Offline

Roosh, just saw this and thought I’ve got to put this on, made me think what your alter ego looks like.

http://youtu.be/7hFMwQOfcUk

[Roosh: Roosh W is blowing up this year. He’s pretty good: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyDAHqDhwpQ ]

Ninja man
Guest
Ninja man
Offline

Ok jokes aside, another great post here Roosh. Without a shadow of a doubt my desire to have a serious LTR here in the UK with the idea of having kids is almost non existent compared to a year or so ago where I had pretty much accepted it as the norm. Thanks for keeping on providing the window of what’s out there on ground level man. I’m glad the hiatus was short lived!

a person
Guest
a person
Offline

why woman can’t be slut but man can be players?
why do you judge sluts but you yourself is a big player?
why woman need to wish a husband and be faithful, if man don’t want to sttle with a wife?

Reason
Guest
Reason
Offline

It’s like this. It takes a lot of effort for a man to be a player. Nice clothes, tight game, nice haircut, smell good, solid frame, self-confidence, resilience (because of all the rejections he’ll endure), nice car and big house (if don’t have, could have in the future), good (if living in the US, excellent) posture, a good (excellent) body, and most importantly, time.

All a woman needs to do is say ‘yes’. It’s a whole different ballgame; sluts and studs are not comparable. In mathematics, we say that the state of being a stud is incommensurable o the state of being a slut.

Dane
Guest
Dane
Offline

As a Dane, I agree with you completely. Also about what you have written in the past about Danish girls. I ended up marrying a Danish citizen but with African roots to get the best of both worlds smile

Jim
Guest
Jim
Offline

To a person,

A key that opens many locks is valuable. A lock that is opened by many keys is worthless.

Women don’t have to have skills at getting sex and for the most part, their value is in their ability to discern and choose. Bad choices or many partners don’t indicate strength or intelligence. The exact opposite especially if they repeat the same continually and end up in worse shape than before.

K-Man
Guest
K-Man
Offline

This is all good, but once you find the dream wife, do you bring her to the West, where she would quickly be spoiled by her spiteful sisters? This was even observed by Eddie Murphy in the 1980s:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq8nUyO-0SY

Or do you settle with her in her shithole? If so – how do you maintain your income which is perhaps 90% of the reason she chose you. If you lose that, she’d be gone with a quickness.

asdf
Guest
asdf
Offline

Since women have the vote, you can’t have male welfare without female welfare.

However, as technology improves labor itself, especially middle and lower on the bell curve labor, is becomming obsolete.

So the only way to distribute the gains of technology, since lower end labor is no longer competitive, is some kind of redistribution mechanism.

In the absence of such a mechanism men of average or lessor natural ability are still screwed, since their labor is not worth anything.

And yet we can’t seperate this mechanism from female welfare because they vote.

Cad and Bounder
Guest
Cad and Bounder
Offline

It’s worse than Roosh is portraying it!

It is not a coincidence that in the US and the UK the two parties that are losing support from single women are the Republicans and Conservatives. In other words the parties more committed to reducing public spending.

As the dependency culture expands it will become harder to reverse this tide of voting in favour of those that give you other people’s money of which you can then claim is your ‘entitlement’.

The only good news on this front is that, in the internet age, there are increasing opportunities to work remotely and just walk away from the tax and cultural burden of this culture by just going to live in countries without these problems.

It is small beer but corporations should be encouraged to do more on this front. Where I think the PUA forums and blogs can come in useful is in -somehow- finding a way to coordinate and discuss these activities. If more companies offered the opportunity for young Western men to go and work remotely (or rather in a satellite office) in other parts of the World than they would be astonished by the take-up and reduction in head office costs.

A Random Man
Guest
A Random Man
Offline

As a 34 year old man that abandoned the idea of having a wife and kids because I failed in finding a woman worthy enough of mothering my children, I like the way things are now. Learning game and applying it ruthlessly has opened up a world of scoring notches week in and week out when and where I want on my terms. Once the woman I enjoy at any given time crosses my silent boundaries, I simply move on to the next. The USA is a players paradise gentlemen.

Chester
Guest
Chester
Offline

In other words, you practice the three F’s, and to the devil with the byblow. Wonder how many kids you have wandering around behind you now. Oh, in case you are totally clueless, the good old 3 F’s: Find ’em, f*ck ’em, forget ’em. Too many idiots practicing that already, and those same idiots very carefully do NOT practice “safer sex.”

asmd
Guest
asmd
Offline

Moot point. No idiot is punished for unsafe sex unless it turns into a child support payment from a government you can’t escape. No women is punished for notching the 1000th stick in her hole. If she is attractive, the std must be very noticeable and very disastrous for a guy to actually sexually deny her, and with thirst for attractive women at an all time high, that is not going to happen. She will just call the next in line if by some miracle the guy rejects her. And the alphas are to alpha to be scared of anything, nothing short of a child support payment and even that doesn’t stop half of them.
The losers here are the betas and the guys who want a commitment with now deranged women who are incapable of sustaining a relationship. If you like the concept of love or commitment in perilous times, now is the time to stop or start fighting for it.
There should be punishment for heedlessly helping the devil enforce its national shameless slut policy. There should be justice for being beta, carrying the weight of others on your back until it breaks, and not even getting a few mandatory bangs with the finest local teenage sluts for all your constant sacrifice while the elites and attractive types effortlessly float on your blood and sweat. Unfortunately as of now and the past 50 years, there has not been.

Chester
Guest
Chester
Offline

Sounds much like you are a HUGE loser. Do hope you don’t dip your wick in a contaminated hole, and catch one of the never get overs.

Berria
Guest
Berria
Offline

I don’t think it’s so much countries with welfare vs ones without. I think it is more of a question of wealthy countries, ones with high GDP per Capita versus poor countries. In wealthy countries, many women can fall back on their families even if they don’t take welfare, while in poor countries their families can’t support them past a certain age or the only way to climb the ladder is through marriage.

Is there an example of a wealthy country without welfare and feminine women?

2 cents
Guest
2 cents
Offline

#7 is correct – as technology improves, most of the mid/lower class male jobs will become more and more obsolete. It is simply easier to buy robots and computers to do things for you, and use fuzzy AI to do simple low level executive decisions. All you have to do is feed them power – they won’t go on strikes, ask for raises, threaten to form unions, or steal your employees/customers to form their own companies.

So how do the masses of average/below average male get money? The government would either have to 1) give them welfare or 2) more police/jails.

However, those masses of welfare males can’t really support females, so government must 1) hand out welfare to females or 2) legalize polygamy.

That, or entirely rethink the concept of money. What do you do when human labor/low level management can simply be replaced with machines?

Beidas
Guest
Beidas
Offline

Welfare does not enable sluts. It enables mothers. Who are looking to be only 50% of western women at this point. The desire for motherhood far from universal among women. Until you can wrap your head around that fact you won’t understand the problem civilization now faces or how to fix it.

Cheese Louis
Guest
Cheese Louis
Offline

It’s both, imo. If a woman has no incentive to find a good husband, she’ll give into her desires and become a slut – then eventually she becomes a mom. By then, she wouldn’t have to seek out a beta man stepdad because the state provides for her.

asmd
Guest
asmd
Offline

And the beta STILL has NO CHANCE with said whore. The whores get whore’er and the betas get ignore’ered

Uri Katsav
Guest
Uri Katsav
Offline

More than Social Welfare, I guess the most corruptive force is entitlement programs for women. In former Soviet countries Ukraine, Russia, Bielorussia, etc., many communist institutions are alive, that is, public eductaion, public health, public housing, etc. Yet, these public services are not directed to women, but to population in general. Aside from that, women in those countries know that life is not easy and that there is a real shortage of worthy men who have the will and the means to stand up for a family. That’s why they do their best to catch Western men to marry them.

ofc
Guest
ofc
Offline

Japan?

Andrew S
Guest
Andrew S
Offline

No doubt the worst thing about welfare whether they’re handouts, ridiculous government jobs or cool laws all for women, is dealing with mediocre and below average looking women that act like they are high value.

beta_plus
Guest
beta_plus
Offline

As a half Dane, thank you for posting what I have felt for decades.

C
Guest
C
Offline

Exactly.

I’ve come to this conclusion myself: There should be an interest among (beta) men to reduce the state

Feminists and women’s interest groups on the other hand will try to make the state larger, increase taxes and expand the welfare programs.

Beta men are essentially tax paying slaves to women and the alpha elite.

They are giving up their own money to make themselves redundant, worthless and unnecessary.

Tools.

Paper
Guest
Paper
Offline

I live in NYC. I knew a graduate school educated asian girl in a long term relationship, who also signed up to be on a waiting list for NYCHA (govt. subsidized low-income housing). Once she was guaranteed housing, she kicked her beta boyfriend (white guy) to the curb so fast, his head never stopped spinning. Now that she could keep her (low wage) nonprofit job and have her rent subsidized, he was no longer needed. Cock Carousel for Life, baby!

Truth
Guest
Truth
Offline

spot on post roosh … Applies ten fold to the U.K were these idiot girls are literally cradled by the government after shitting out a child aged 17 because its the ‘ cool thing too do ‘ . having dated a single mum i couldn’t agree more.. im not saying its a easy ride having a kid and being on your own BUT the attitude and self entitlement that comes with knowing you’ll get a free house and money etc. is incredible. further more , it detaches them from reality of normal life.. i work , i own a property i have too pay for all my own shit etc. and i clearly remember having full blown arguments with my ex about mortgages , tax , price of fuel etc.. they just don’t have a fucking clue and as a result cannot relate to the day to day problems than 90% of ( mainly ) men have to go through just to exist nowadays and be independent. fuck them . The only possible bonus is …if you catch a single mum out on a night ‘off’ a chance of a fuck is quite good..but be warned … there will be issues.

asmd
Guest
asmd
Offline

Women do not have a clue. Some women do. Most do not.

It’s not necessarily their fault, their limited rather useless brains are really only geared for looking attractive, fucking, and cooking – although in todays world its just the first two. They never really evolved beyond self interest because that was all they needed to lead them to the best “provider” alphas – IE most dangerous and therefore physically capable.

The primary difference is that men evolved the ability to emphasize as a co-reaction to evolving critical thinking. Not all people are capable of it but majority of women are most certainly not. This is why a guy doesn’t give a homeless bum all of his money on an emotional whim – he may feel bad for the bum but he knows it won’t go anywhere productive or positive. But a welfare slut can’t stop giving herself away to takers – homeless or otherwise. She is so responsive to looks and physical interactions that make her feelz that there is no logic or reasoning behind her accounts other than “she felt like it” or “it made her feel better”. This of course translates into the bedroom where she becomes “suddenly and unexplainably” wet when a homeless guy she let spend the night out of sudden pity from the moment she laid eyes on him starts teasing her with game and stories about how he’s evaded police, the law, and tells her to feel his muscles.

Women were never wired to give a shit. The only exception is if you are alpha, because in their mind you are “that” stud who will always stay with them no matter how bad it gets. Which is ironic because you are emotionally incapable of giving a shit about them. It’s also a bunch of bullshit, they are literally wired to believe a complete lie that any sane person with just a little bit of thinking can see past.
Women, just lack any and all critical thinking in general. They never needed it and as long as they are attractive never will.

Lou
Guest
Lou
Offline

12 and 9 have a point. I think you have the causation backwards. Hence, liberated women help create social welfare. Social welfare did not just fall out of the sky.

Therapsid
Guest
Therapsid
Offline

Yet it’s interesting that communism maintained feminine women better than post-war Western society. You could ascribe this to poverty but then we’re seeing still poor countries in Latin America today become more feminist. I think Uri Katsav is correct that it’s because of the prevalence of specifically women-targeted social welfare programs, equal opportunity gender employment, and so on. And these were the products of Western feminism.

Cad and Bounder
Guest
Cad and Bounder
Offline

#9,#13 and #15 touch on another aspect of these issues.

The UK and US have a share of wealth and income much more skewed towards the upper quartile than in countries like France, Germany, Sweden or Japan.

This doesn’t affect divorce rates (US & Sweden ‘lead’ the way together there) but I would argue it does affect hypergamy virulence.

Hypergamy does seem to be much more of an issue in the UK and US. And guess where the fatattitude problem is the strongest? Guess whose lower than median income women are becoming obese?

Obesity in Europe here

http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/3-24112011-BP/EN/3-24112011-BP-EN.PDF

(see page 2). Yep UK women right at the ‘top’ of the 24-44year old group with 20.7% being obese.

Interestingly here are some of the countries in Europe where the women are less obese (by at least 2% points) than the men (18-25 and 25-44)…

Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Spain, Italy, Cypus, Latvia, Malta, Rumania, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia

Countries in Europe where women are 2% points more obese…

UK. France almost makes it in there and the Belgian sub group (18-25) make it in.

Of particular note are England’s (the data is from England only, if Scotland and Wales were included the rates would be even higher) 18-25 year old group. Only 5.6% of men are obese against 16.6% of women. If you strip out Malta the next highest would be Belgium at just 5.4%. And shockingly the English data is for 16-24 year olds. My guess is the rates would be higher if it was from 18-24 years.

You want a whale on welfare? Come to the UK.

Case closed.

gaoxiaen
Guest
gaoxiaen
Offline

Why would you want a future as a husband and father? That’s not a future, it’s a sentence.

Ravi Macho
Guest
Ravi Macho
Offline

Amen !

DENMARK IS THE PLACE
Guest
DENMARK IS THE PLACE
Offline

Because danish women are so ugly and MASCULINE, a larger procent of danish men and women are paying to have sex with dogs, and other animals.

True and serious, the government welcomes sex between danish and animals:

http://preciousjules1985.wordpress.com/2012/07/12/animal-brothels-legal-in-denmark/

Wilson
Guest
Wilson
Offline

There is no reversing a decline. Future elections will focus on which candidate is offering the most handouts to women. Men can only try to slow these new entitlements before their standard of living is completely gutted.

'Reality' Doug
Guest

This is gold: “If you want an opportunity to meet the best women in the world, simply pick a country with low wages and no welfare.” However, there is the corruption factor, as comment #16 indicates. It seems that tight Game is essential regardless if I want any success with women.

I’m one of those disconnected-from-the-economy types. So I don’t think I can be tight enough. Men are expendable: it’s evolutions way. Women are expendable only in civilization. Pruning (correctly) removes poverty of character and ability. Men are logical because the pruning was harsh. Women will change only after harsh pruning over 100,000 years of civilization.

#3 is not a person but a woman in love with her feeeelings.

From other comments, if a rich nation without welfare exists (#9), which came first between feminism and welfare (#18). We are the duck that makes foie gras, force feed. The calories are wealth and the gavage is fiat money. The new money from nothing, and its credit more removed forms, force economic activity that kills for a quick harvest with heavy collateral damage. We are NOT being conserved by conservatism, nor are we ever on offense with conservatism.

Which came first? Fiat money.

Big Ern
Guest
Big Ern
Offline

Instant classic.

windmills
Guest
windmills
Offline
Matt
Guest
Matt
Offline

If women don’t marry a man, they’ll marry the government.

Your post could easily have been titled, “Social Welfare Creates a Society of Fatties” for many of the same reasons.

Look at how the government messes with the male/female dynamic by getting involved in divorce.

Roosh, I’ve heard your previously say the government should provide health care for its citizens. I’m wondering if you’re rethinking that belief.

Once you start down this rabbit hole, you see how far it all goes.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Excellent post Roosh. Respect.

RickyBurt
Guest
RickyBurt
Offline

@12 Beidas
“Mothers” is your attempt to imbue motherly virtue when in fact you despise and denigrate it, put plainly its newspeak.

Firstly being a mother doesn’t preclude a woman from being a slut.

So uncompromising are these “mothers” that the greatest handout in history (Obamacare)almost failed on the single issue of subsidized abortions and contraception.

What is worth is how you are exporting these “issues” onto 3rd world countries under the guise of “non violence against women” etc

Stuki
Guest
Stuki
Offline

Social welfare creates a society of sluts, for sure. But also, governments inevitably create social welfare, as that is the only means they have available to buy votes. Expanding the share of the population that are dependent on you, is how you solidify your grip on power. Allowing you to expand more and more.

The only way out, is if those you plunder to pay for your “largesse”, fully recognize the absolute incontrovertible inevitability of this dynamic; and quit naively believing that there is some mythical “we” that include both them and those plundering them. Then they will start making efforts to withhold resources; as well as possibly actively diverting resources to directly fight the plunderers.

Eastern Europe may be better than America as of now, but as there exist some mechanism by which government there can make more people dependent on handouts fro them, they will do it. It’s only a matter of time. It has happened in every historical society, from Rome and onwards (and even prior, for sure.)

The only place I’m aware of that never succumbed, is tribal Central Asia, like Afghanistan. Where the default action to take when encountering someone unknown, is to shot him, unless he specifically and individually indicates he is bringing more benefit to you, than the risk he poses. Not a fertile place for tax collectors, that’s for sure.

Ravi Macho
Guest
Ravi Macho
Offline

Should be “is to shot him or her” !!!

Introverted Playboy
Guest

And yet Scandinavia has extremely low rates of teen pregnancy and teen birth, compared to the UK and certainly compared to the US (despite the US’ stingier welfare system). Women are not making their sexual calculus based on recent legislation that has been proposed by the Prime Minister. They’re making it based on the same old stuff: primal instincts, desire, emotional stimulation.

In any case, I don’t consider an uneducated woman with no skills to be a “high quality woman” but that’s just me. If I wanted an LTR, she would surely have to be my intellectual equal, or close to it, otherwise I would be bored to tears and pull my hair out. But for a casual fuck, sure, bring on the bimbos.

Sombro
Guest
Sombro
Offline

“The government cockblocks its own male citizens, who have the indignity of having to pay for the cockblocking.”

Truth.

Beidas
Guest
Beidas
Offline

@31 rickyburt

You misunderstand me. My point is childless female sluts get no more advantage from welfare than males. Were it not for welfare our birth rate would be like Japan’s.

Subotai
Guest
Subotai
Offline

“The government cockblocks its own male citizens”

Ain’t that the truth?!

Quote of the month!

Bill
Guest
Bill
Offline

Whereever the majority rules(Majority being the betas and omegas) eventually you get this type of society. The majority has to socially engineer the women of society to go for those things that they can provide (beta males strategies).

Ruxman
Guest
Ruxman
Offline

You won’t be able to rack up the same amount of notches in a state with less welfare, provided this idea is realised. Would someone in the game community be happy with girls stopping after 2 one night stands? Sounds like sex would come at long intervals.

Gannicus
Guest
Gannicus
Offline

This is one of your best posts Roosh. Great analysis.

RickyBurt
Guest
RickyBurt
Offline

@35 Beidas

You have a point. Whenever the liberal media says a politician doesn’t connect with women its a euphemism for him not bowing to women who want the state to pay for kindergarten and extend after school bullshit so they can make more money whilst neglecting their kids.

But to say childless sluts don’t get subsidised is misleading. You missed my point abound state subsidised Obamacare now forcing us to subsidize contraceptives and abortions.
You miss the fact state supported Planned parenthood rarely attends to mothers but rather helps women avoid motherhood.

The needless expansion of Big government is in part aimed at creating needless Federal jobs for sluts who vote for Obama when in actual fact the social fabric of society would be better preserved if we used that money to pay men to dig a big pointless hole in the ground.

Any ex-porn star can get a job teaching our kids despite the absence of male teachers being to the clear detriment of our kids.

However would it be a bad thing if our birth rate were more like Japan’s ? For a start we’d have less bastards to enable our militarist leaders to start wars of aggression. Hopefully it would put an end to the spreading of slut empowering liberal democracy we seek to spread through the barrel of a gun.

DAP
Guest
DAP
Offline

No man is a bigger pimp than the U.S. Government.

RickyBurt
Guest
RickyBurt
Offline

@35 Beidas
It also stands to reason that if the end destination for sluts is state funded motherhood then the entire journey in getting there has also been subsidized since the state was always a safety net / guarantor regardless of what bad decisions she took in reaching her destination.

doulos2game
Guest
doulos2game
Offline

This is very true in the case of finding a good girlfriend and potentially a wife. In countries where women are competing for the best possible mate, it will be detrimental to be even 15 pounds over weight. In the Dominican Republic the most beautiful women most of the times are accompanied by a successful man. In these types of countries, there is a different type of game needed to be run. You must run “Value Game”. I am not saying you have to actually have value, but come across like you do.

I never thought of it that way but Roosh is absolutely correct. This is the number-one reason for the fuglys(fat ugly girls) running around acting like they are a 10. It amazes me also that most of these girls are actually able to find someone to fuck them on the regular. They demand a whole list of qualities that they are looking for in a man. These ridiculous qualities that the only reason they demand such a thing is because in their minds, they think that they can actually have it all.

After living in New York for two years, I have noticed that America is not the place for me. When I was in my country, even though my level of game was “chubby chaser” I was able to keep myself satisfied not just sexually but emotionally. I didn’t have to put a lot of effort into getting laid. After I discovered this site and pick up valuable techniques, I could plow through pussy, but the amount of work I am putting in is just unbearable compared to the potential quality my hard work can generate. I haven’t game in another country, but I am excited to go back to my motherland and see what my skills will bring me. I can just imaging that if I could get laid here bi-weekly, then in a place where women have to compete for “MY” attention, I will catch AIDS.

JayMan
Guest
JayMan
Offline

What fascinates me about these posts in the game/HBD blogosphere is that sentiment like these are pretty much American Applachian/Deep Southern thinking (or in some cases Irish, Eastern European, or someone outside Germanic Europe). The Western World and the American North/West Coast is an egalitarian, “commonweal”-centric society. The welfare of all its citizens is of prime concern and always will be. “Gender equality” will be the norm, as seen in the extremes on Sweden. You will NEVER get these ideas across in this society. It is not in their nature.

This is in contrast from the American South, which descends from the Celtic fringes of Britain. There, tradionational gender roles are embraced, people are not viewed as equals, and notions of commonweal are weaker or nonexistent. The sentiments you express here are a combination of the Scotch-Irish and Deep Southern view: the natural wickedness/flawed nature of man and the need for a strict social hierarchy to keep things in order. As HBD Chick would tell you, the difference is outbreeding vs inbreeding. The liberal elements are more outbred and commonweal centric. The conservative elements are more inbred and more individual/kin centric. You guys exercise these views without knowing it’s as reflexive for you than it is for women to be women.

Days of Broken Arrows
Guest
Days of Broken Arrows
Offline

Keep in mind “gender equality” is in itself a sort of welfare, as is Title IX and the like. These concepts and programs remove qualified men from the workforce or colleges, and replace them with unqualified or underqualified women.

In doing this, the state is making Betas as obsolete as if it were handing out welfare. Things that would have worked for men in the 1950s, like job security, are now not even there and if they are, women can often best them. Hence men becoming obsolete as fathers and husbands.

Beyond that, this is an insightful write-up — and exactly what I bet the mainstream press knows but won’t print.

RickyBurt
Guest
RickyBurt
Offline

@44 JayMan

“The welfare of all its citizens is of prime concern and always will be.”

You’ve been drinking the liberal cool-aid Sir. Try selling that to the Occupy Movement. Besides if we are all citizens of the same country (regardless if we are North / West Coast or Appalachian why do we feel our welfare is not of their concern ?

Truth is government works for the privileged and powerful. “Liberals” , even those who spout egalitarian ideals are simply those who have been accommodated / absorbed into the existing power structure, either through plum jobs or welfare handouts.
Note they don’t tolerate anyone with opinions outside a certain tolerance (when did you last see or hear an honest leftwing firebrand in the US who was given the time of day by our liberal media?).

I think you need more depth to your theory.

jurko
Guest
jurko
Offline

Sounds like you’ve gone full Roissy. You never go full Roissy.

DANISH people end up having SEX with DOGS only
Guest
DANISH people end up having SEX with DOGS only
Offline

Because danish women are so ugly and MASCULINE, a larger procent of danish men and women are paying to have sex with dogs, and other animals.

True and serious, the government welcomes sex between danish and animals:

http://preciousjules1985.wordpress.com/2012/07/12/animal-brothels-legal-in-denmark/

DANISH people end up having SEX with DOGS only
Guest
DANISH people end up having SEX with DOGS only
Offline

According to the Danish newspaper 24timer, this interesting gap in the law has led to a flourishing business in which people pay in order to have sex with animals.

On the internet, several Danish animal owners openly advertise their services. The newspaper contacted several such individuals and was told that many of the animals have been engaged in this kind of activity for several years and that the animals crave the sexual stimulation. The newspaper found that the cost charged by the animal owners varied from DKK 500 to 1,000 (USD$85 to $170).

Cheese Louis
Guest
Cheese Louis
Offline

I wanna get in on this, am I too late? I want some dinero for nothing. xD

DANISH people end up having SEX with DOGS only
Guest
DANISH people end up having SEX with DOGS only
Offline

Best country to live in: Denmark. Women behave like men, and the majority of SEX happens between people and ANIMALS:

http://www.icenews.is/2008/05/20/animal-brothels-legal-in-denmark