As you’ve probably noticed, there are constant efforts among my haters to falsely paint me as a rapist. I’ve no doubt made that job easier for them by writing the article How To Stop Rape, where through an obvious thought experiment I state how rape would be decreased if we legalize it. Not only have I been called a rapist, but also a “rape advocate,” a term that appears to have been invented only for me.

The excerpt that is often used to falsely portray me as a rapist is the following, which I wrote in Bang Iceland (2011):

While walking to my place, I realized how drunk she was. In America, having sex with her would have been rape, since she couldn’t legally give her consent. It didn’t help matters that I was relatively sober, but I can’t say I cared or even hesitated.

I won’t rationalize my actions, but having sex is what I do. If a girl is willing to walk home with me, she’s going to get the dick no matter how much she has drunk. I’ll protect myself by using a condom (most of the time), but I know that when it comes to sex, one ounce of hesitation or a feeling of morality will get me nothing.

In this quote, which was taken out of context, I admit to sleeping with a girl who appeared more inebriated than me, and nothing more. My exaggerated “I’m a nonstop sex machine” bravado, which I always incorporate into my sex writing, is irrelevant. Now let’s put the quote in full context and see how the story continued:

I woke up first in the morning and looked over at her. I fully expected to be greeted by a beast, but I was pleasantly surprised that she actually looked better. I studied her face in the morning light and concluded that it was magnificent. She was the hottest Icelandic girl I had gotten with, and definitely in the top 10% of my all-time bangs. I pulled the covers down and examined her flawless creamy skin and her perfectly proportioned body with big tits and round ass. My dick was getting hard again and I gently poked her with it, fully expecting the typical awkward after-sex Icelandic vibe, but instead I was greeted with, “So you want to fuck again?”

Yes please!

Two more times we went, and by the end of it I had no semen left. Then we started to get to know each other. First we exchanged names, then ages, then professions. I’m pretty sure that guys know more about the prostitutes they fuck than I do about the Icelandic women I got with.

The morning after this girl was “raped,” and when she was completely sober, she asked me to have sex again. We did it two additional times and began to develop a connection that was deeper than my other Icelandic bangs (i.e. we knew each other’s first names).

There is no court of law in the world that would consider what happened that night rape, or see her as a rape victim, even if she was slightly inebriated the night before. She woke up the next day, remembered the good sex I gave her the night before, and eagerly wanted to have sex with me again. With every sex story I have written, if you take away writing devices I use to portray myself as an unstoppable sex god, and my trollish statements meant to microaggress feminists, what you’re left with are sexual encounters that are 100% consensual. And I can back that up with the fact that I’ve never been accused of rape by any woman in my life, online or off.

If you buy Bang Iceland and read it, you’ll also notice that Icelandic culture is one where heavy drinking is part of the mating dance. This feature has been encouraged by feminists to allow women to sleep with strangers in a twisted attempt to be “empowered.” When using an immoral feminist definition of consent, which unfortunately is being used today in the West, every single man including myself and even most women are the hook for “rape.” This is exactly what feminists want, to have men living in fear by allowing women to retroactively change their minds about all their sex encounters. The end goal is to allow women to have the power to point to a man and imprison him at her will, but even when using their dystopian definition, the story in Iceland that they use to paint me as a rapist clearly fails to do so.

Therefore, anyone who calls me a rapist is defaming my character to scare away men who need my advice the most. By falsely painting me as a rapist, they prevent men from accessing the very information that will drastically improve their lives.

I’m writing this article not to convince haters or even moderates, but to give context to readers who didn’t get a chance to read Bang Iceland in its entirety. The false accusations against me, no matter how persistent, will not stop me from sharing advice that helps men, and I will continue to do my part to reverse the attempts by feminists and social justice warriors to criminalize legal masculine behavior.

Read Next: Men Should Start Recording Sex With A Hidden Camera


  1. Etc November 11, 2015 at 9:35 am

    I read that article. It was good. The problem is not really what you think it is. You see Roosh, men and women speak different languages. Much is left for perception.

    The way i explain your thinking when talking to women is this way:

    We teach our kids stranger danger. Don’t go with strangers even if they have candy or puppies. Why does stranger danger stop when we are barely older?

    Men or women who go with some one they barely met is placing themselves in danger. They don’t know what is waiting for them. They could be robbed or jumped if they are men or beaten and left for dead. Maybe worse for women.

    Yes, the offenders may get caught and may get charged. But that does not stop bruises from forming. The bones from breaking or your belongings returned.

    You still got very badly hurt… And you placed yourself there knowing stranger danger.

    — alternativly I say, if I leave my house wide open and go out and get robbed the fault is mine and the robbers – not solely the robbers like it would be if they had to break in.

  2. theantifeminist November 11, 2015 at 9:57 am

    The individual who first accused you of being a rapist on the basis of the Bang Iceland extract is David Futrelle. This is a man who once argued that a film containing nothing but images of children being anally raped, forced to eat the excrement of their abusers, mutilated, and then murdered, was suitable material for gay sex shops. He actually mocked police officers for thinking otherwise and has never aplogized for this.

    Perhaps even more disturbingly, for a year he allowed a perverted transvestite reader of his (one of many) to continue commenting at his site AFTER I revealed that the reader moderated a forum dedicated to the fetish of crucifying, raping, torturing, and murdering women and schoolgirls.

    Futrelle has a long sad history of defending the abuse of women and children. For a period in the 90’s he was very active in claiming that child abuse was exaggerated and even went as far as claiming that female victims of abuse were rarely ‘innocent’ :

    1. Wes November 11, 2015 at 10:12 am

      I looked him up. He is barely human, he is such a soft slimy looking guy. I have stepped on better looking slugs. Add to that his perversions and my breakfast has been ruined.

      1. StarD November 12, 2015 at 11:55 am

        they are after you man . . . .you should remain aware of the staff you post on blogs looks like you are under the microscopic eye of the feminists and government in general . . . . but you are still my hero Roosh iv learnt a great deal from your writings its becoming clearer now more then ever . . . !!!

      2. Davis M.J. Aurini February 3, 2016 at 3:29 pm

        Her arm looks like a tumorous sea cucumber.

      3. lili August 5, 2016 at 7:32 am

        They are feminine.

      4. Innominatum Bellator February 7, 2016 at 7:15 pm

        You should bed her.

      5. lili August 5, 2016 at 7:32 am

        I don’t think you are a rapist, and I’m with you on this one. I know feminazis are really excessive. I’m a woman who respect men.
        But your moral is very weird. In your book, you pretend it’s not raping to take advantage of a drunken girl (I don’t know if you make her drunk on purpose or not)
        I’m antifeminist, but it’s called a rape everywhere but in some islamic countries, where it is called to do what the whore is expecting by foolish acts.

    2. lili August 5, 2016 at 7:24 am

      I clearly prefer Roosh to Futrelle. Yurk

  3. spicynujac November 11, 2015 at 10:07 am

    Your thought experiment on how to prevent rape by legalizing it is no different than those who claim (and are backed up with real world evidence like in Portugal) that decriminalizing drug use actually reduces drug use, not to mention all the violent crimes that go along with the illegal drug industry.

    Those who attack you care not for the victims of rape, and whether or not such a solution would decrease rapes. They simply relentlessly attack anyone who doesn’t fully support their insane agenda. You can see this with even second world feminist leaders like Naomi Wolf and Germaine Greer being attacked by millennial third wave feminists because they don’t fully go along with the tranny movement.

    1. Reason And Believing November 13, 2015 at 12:06 am

      Decriminalizing drugs did not reduce VIOLENT crime. It just reduced crimes by getting rid of drugs being a crime.
      Nonetheless, by “decriminalizing” private use, they became more like America, not less.

      1. spicynujac November 13, 2015 at 10:40 am

        I don’t follow. How is Portugal more like America? America has some of the harshest drug laws in the world, by the way. Even in countries where it is nominally illegal, often doing something like smoking weed will be met by police with a demand that you throw it out. In America, you’re likely going to jail.

        The example was that Portugal wanted to lower drug use by legalizing it, the same way it could be proposed that the prevelance of rape could be lowered by legalizing it. In Portugal, drug use did decline after legalization.

      2. lili August 5, 2016 at 7:37 am

        See how it is in the netherlands now. All the crimilnals and dealer of my country go there, take their shit, and go back in their country. Netherlands was a very calm country, and now it is the place to meet for gangs.
        Also, there is no frontier between “sweet” herbal drugs, and hard chemical ones. As soon as herbal drugs would be legal, other would be too. In my country, children in their teens smoke (most of them), no doubt they’ll want their own paradise place when it’ll be legal.

    2. Negentropic February 21, 2016 at 6:51 am

      How DARE you advocate rape of millions of minds with hard trucks? And potential flying out of windows instead of flapping their wings from the ground up? You eee-vil irresponsible man! lol

      How about a woman who admits to having had rape fantasies? There are many who have . Does that mean she wants to be raped? Of course not! It’s a goddamn fantasy in her head! They’re probably most often not even real “rape” fantasies, but fantasies of being extremely desired which get confused with rape in their minds. Even if someone was screwed-up enough to have real rape fantasies where some total stranger forces himself in, the non-consensual forced part, is still only in her head, just like a murder fantasy.

      Ever said in your own head: “I want to kill that bastard” and then fantasized gory scenarios like blowing the guy away with a shotgun or hitting a home run with his skull? Or “If someone ran that s.o.b. over with a truck tomorrow, I would throw a party and celebrate?” Considering the very high levels of stress in most societies, violent and sadistic fantasies are common. It doesn’t mean they act on it. It’s not a crime to talk about their crazy thoughts and emotional impulses because many of them are based on screwed-up core values and have to be changed at the root, something few are capable of without psychological or some kind of expert help.

      P.S. Sopranos was as popular as it was because people fantasize about being “untouchable” or able to “whack” people and get away with it, like their hero Tony. They actually look up to him as a role model, subconsciously, of course, and then repress these borderline psychotic aspects of themselves from the conscious mind so they can still think highly of themselves as “morally upright” people. It’s all done automatically from the roots of core values that are the opposite of what they THINK they hold. They don’t have to think about it. And unless they are able to examine the t-root or un-t-root of their values at the root, they will continue to be manipulated from the shadows by them for the rest of their lives.

      1. lili August 5, 2016 at 7:38 am

        Rape fantasies is cool, with your boyfriend for instance, being raped, with no consent, is not sooo cool.

  4. Slashfund November 11, 2015 at 10:09 am

    “There is no court of law in the world that would consider what happened that night rape”
    Not so sure about that since legally rape depends almost entirely on the woman’s testimony, and there are guys in US prisons even though they dated the victim for months.

    Since women are virtual children the passage needs to be translated:
    While walking to my place, I realized how YOUNG she was. In America,
    having sex with her would have been RAPE OF A CHILD WITHOUT FORCE, since she couldn’t legally give her consent. It didn’t help matters that I was relatively OLD, but I can’t say I cared or even hesitated.

    1. Jim Trompe November 18, 2015 at 8:39 am

      By the University of California law standards, I must be one of the most successful serial rapist ever, as I’ve never asked for permission.

      1. lili August 5, 2016 at 7:38 am

        So, how do you fuck. You are like an animals who leaps on the prey?

      2. Jim Jones Koolaid August 5, 2016 at 7:49 pm

        Lili, is that you? I’m sorry I didnt call after that night. I got busy at work.

      3. lili August 5, 2016 at 9:40 pm

        Give me your number, and you’ll be forgiven. Last night was so hot. I want more.

  5. Finlandude November 11, 2015 at 10:38 am

    Bang Iceland sales sky rocketing in 3…2…1…

  6. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 12:30 pm

    False accusations, lies, double standards, hypocrisy are trade marks of modern feminism and modern western society in general.
    Feminazis never answer any questions, never give facts and valid arguments, never bother to care about the truth being spoken! Instead they throw empty and false accusations around and lie about everything and everyone hoping that mainstream media will back them up with tons of brainwashing articles and propaganda!

    1. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 2:48 pm

      Toronto feministes have been telling a lot of people about Roosh in a defamatory context. It appears that merely reading articles from Roosh V is considered “hate speech” in Canada.

      However, when parents complain against female teachers in Toronto, the Toronto District School Board sometimes try to frame the parents with crimes they didn’t commit or to claim that the teacher was “harassed” and she “feared her life” over a phone call.

      1. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 3:48 pm

        Again, if Toronto males, Toronto parents etc weren’t soo damn pussifed then NO goddamn feminists or School Boards would ever dare to badmouth Roosh or impose any regulations or SexEd on parents. DO NOT blame women only, blame those who allow them to behave the way they do.

      2. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 5:45 pm

        Parents who stand up for their children against the feminazis are not “pussified”. There are many cases where parents who try to set things straight with crooked teachers end up being framed for criminal acts they didn’t do. The Toronto District School Board, CBC, CityNews, etc have millions of dollars in backing to spread smear campaigns and false flag attacks to deter parents from complaining. Which parent would want to end up in jail over a false flag created by the SJWs in order to deflect attention from feminists, etc?

        You are delusional to expect men and women in Toronto to risk being harassed by police, smeared on the media and sent to prison as scapegoats, while female teachers and feminazis here continue to stomp their Communist boot onto people here. It is not that simple as to confront feminists in Toronto. I know of parents who were given cease and desist orders from contacting the staff and administrators of their child’s own school in Toronto, all because the TDSB views complaints as “harassment”.

      3. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 5:50 pm

        Could I please see at least 1 link to the horror stories you are telling above?;)
        I still say that people in Toronto are sheeple unable to organize any meaningful protest or stand up for their right.
        All normal males should leave Toronto and Canada ASAP if they do not want to get sucked into Canadian reality.

      4. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 7:05 pm

        If Ontarians were stupid enough to vote Wynne in and to give her party a MAJORITY then they have NO damn rights to complain! NO DAMN RIGHTS! They should look in the mirror instead if they really want to find someone who’s really responsible for all the bad things happening.

      5. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 7:15 pm

        What about the 20% who didn’t vote for the freak? And as a matter of fact…Those who voted for Wynne would be in support of her ideas, not against her ideas. Most immigrants vote Conservative, while the freeloaders and refugees vote Lieberal for more free handouts.

      6. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 6:49 pm

        Not all parents in Toronto are “pussies”, they just don’t want the TDSB or government feminazis interfering with their lives through trumped-up accusations & threats of legal action from the school boards:

        Azeem Mohammed has four children under the age of 10 at Thorncliffe and believes the sex-ed classes will damage students.

        “I’m sick of hearing about sex. This shouldn’t be taught to children
        no matter what race or religion they are because it’s not good for
        people. This is invading a person’s privacy,” Mohammed said.

        “People who say this is OK haven’t read the curriculum. It’s ruining
        kids. If they (the government) don’t listen to us, we won’t send our
        kids to school.”

      7. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 7:03 pm

        Well, he IS a pussy since he does not understand that giving endless interviews ain’t gonna change nothing.
        He could at least stop his kids from going to SexEd classes? But did he do that? I guess not.

      8. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 7:13 pm

        Yes, they are taking their children out from schools, and some teachers got laid off due to the student shortage. However, these are immigrant classes of parents.

      9. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 6:55 pm

        You’re all talk, saying that people can suddenly “stand up” against these feminazi fuckers and gain respect..

        LifeSite News has been threatened with a LAWSUIT from the Peel District School Board (near Toronto of course) over publishing content from accurate sources about two lesbian teachers. Do you know how much money LifeSite News will have to pay to defend themselves from such trivial lawsuits which were intended to chill free speech? Probably in the hundreds of thousands of dollars! Do you think that parents who want to move so badly from this feminist shithole of Toronto will want to have their life savings drained to defend themselves in court from these Sex Ed fuckers? Hell fucking NO!

      10. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 7:01 pm

        Threatening with a lawsuit and actual arrest are two completely different things. Get YOUR shit straight and learn how to back up YOUR words with facts BEFORE you dare to call others “all talk”.

      11. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 7:12 pm

        Who says that they can’t get arrested too for some trumped-up charge? Frivolous lawsuits are just as annoying as false arrests. It is the same idea that the school boards and feminazis depend on the state to censor dissents, whether through the threat of arrest or court action!

      12. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 6:58 pm

        I do agree with you that people should stand up against this feminist crap in Toronto, but the manginas, feminazis and social justice warriors have more backing from the CBC, TDSB, Ontario Premier, etc…while those who criticize feminism are at risk of being framed for crimes they didn’t commit or end up in court over trivial lawsuits. The best option is to leave Toronto, and criticize the feminist bullcrap in a jurisdiction where Toronto cops have no fucking authority to impose their feminist white knighting on others.

      13. Barwin November 12, 2015 at 8:57 am

        I agree, an accusation is the same as a conviction. I’ve seen the same reaction in nurses at the hospital. Once I was waiting in the emergency because I was sick; I had been there for 9 hours, and an old man had been there for 11 hours (no joke, that’s Canadian health care for you – yes, the same “health care” that Canadians are known to constantly praise), and the old man started saying something to the nurse. He was annoyed but not belligerent or anything near it, and pretty calm, considering he’d been sitting in a chair, while ill, without food for 11 hours. He talked quietly, just because of his advanced age – his voice just physically wasn’t loud, but the nurse immediately raised her voice and started snapping “CALM DOWN SIR” at him, but he was calm. She then called security and he was promptly removed. It swear it was like the Gestapo. I actually found it so shocking that I went up to the two security guards and said “Are you guys in a Hitler cult? This man has been here for 11 hours, don’t you think he has a point? It’s a bit Nazi-like how you’re treating him…” but they also started snapping at me “SIR THIS DOES NOT CONCERN YOU etc etc”. The other people in the waiting room did nothing. In Canada I sure saw the ugliness that is humanity, and it wasn’t until I lived in Canada that I understood how people like Mao, Stalin, Hitler could thrive. They thrive because in the population they target, cowardice is socially accepted.

      14. Jim Trompe November 18, 2015 at 8:42 am

        Hate speech is just their way of violating basic human rights. Who decides what is or isn’t hate speech? Those in power.

    2. The Spooky Ghost November 11, 2015 at 9:33 pm

      The double standards are pretty ludicrous.

      For example, when AVFM takes a Jezebel article, copies it verbatim, and simply reverses the genders; feminists and the MSM use it to argue that AVFM is full of hate speech.

  7. Michael Sebastian November 11, 2015 at 12:34 pm

    If you get drunk and piss in the street, saying you were intoxicated will not be considered a defense. You are still responsible for your actions.

    What feminists are asking for is the ability to get drunk, have consensual sex, and then decide at some point later on whether it was consensual or not. Ridiculous.

  8. NightRider101 November 11, 2015 at 12:40 pm

    I watched your video (The State of Man). The media was promoting it as if it was hate video. To me, it was just regular video of a man talking about issues that modern day man face in today’s world and how they can maximize their role to get the best out of it. I didn’t see any hate at all. SJWS and retarded mob mentality liberals are the ones that are full of hate NOT Roosh and his manosphere websites. SJWs, feminists, and wacked media lost all their credibility at that moment.

    I think Roosh should place lawsuit (if possible) on every defamation rumors he gets both online and offline and just these SJW idiots that tables can be turned on them using their own page. These idiots will think twice before spreading blatant lies. It’s character assassination at best.

    1. me November 11, 2015 at 2:10 pm

      You assume that the judges aren’t SJW themselves. A pretty shaky assumption these days.

    2. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 5:49 pm

      Roosh might have a hard time suing the mainstream media and public figure feminazis because the Judges are SJWs and in Canada, if Roosh loses his case, he ends up paying some of the defendant’s court fees. I am not a lawyer, but the best way for Roosh to proverbially clog up the toilet with liquid cement is for him to lodge Human Rights complaint to the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal. It might not guarantee a win, but it will waste a lot of time for the feminist CBC, City News, SJW groups, etc who will have to spend time with lawyers to try and protect themselves from being sanctioned for human rights infringements.

      1. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 5:53 pm

        How about a call for all normal males to leave Canada instead of an endless court battle and attempts to change the unchangeable??
        Canada and Canadians will never change but it’s still possible to leave hell called Canada behind and to live a normal and fulfilling life elsewhere.

      2. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 7:02 pm

        The Human Rights Commission is a Tribunal, not a civil court, so they deal with complaints and they have their own measures.

        You might think that escaping from Canada will be a relief, but ever since the feminist Canadian media in Toronto & Anglo-Montreal started to make Roosh V famous, a lot of people are becoming feminists over the propaganda. I do agree that it’s more easier to combat Canadian feminism from another country than in Canada. Toronto feminism still has the risk to infect other cities and countries!

      3. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 7:08 pm

        Well,leaving Canada behind for good IS indeed a huge relief! One doesn’t have to deal with Canadian laws, stupidity , brainwashing and political correctness as soon as one boards a plane out of Canada and new life starts!
        I do not want to combat anything in Canada, be it feminism, affirmative action or political correctness. I’ll just let Canadians enjoy their own shit. That’s all, they fully deserve it.

      4. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 7:18 pm

        Yes. Leaving Canada is a relief for smart people who can see through the bullshit of feminazi Canada.

        I wish that Toronto feminazis and SJWs keep their shit in the same pen rather than spreading it to other countries, and this is why sometimes people have to warn others about Canadian feminism and political correctness before it’s too late!

      5. NightRider101 November 11, 2015 at 7:26 pm

        Bestgore owner Mark Marek also got Canadian court and media all over him after he posted a video and whereabouts of Luke Magnotta, the dude who dismembered his Chinese male lover. Bestgore was instrumental in locating the killer but the media frenzy was making it seem like Mark Marek was evil. He also wrote on his bestgore website many unfair insanity going on in western society especially his own country Canada.

  9. CaptainObvious November 11, 2015 at 1:13 pm

    Roosh that really sucks to be demonized by people who are truly perverted and in no way normal. However I guess we can accept that when dealing with sjw’s.

    On a slightly related but off topic note, I just got perma banned fro RVF for posting in the no fap thread and talking about my experience.

    The reason? Apparently I’m a mgtow troll that encourages violence. Anyone who looks over my post history can see I’m no fucking mgtow troll. Also is my giving an opinion that i’d like to punch someone in the face encouraging violence? If so there are some serious pussies holding the power of the ban hammer on your forum and I’d like to meet them to spit in their fucking faces.

    I would not worry about sjw’s but I’d worry about the people in your own forum moderating it because my perma ban was exactly something an sjw faggot would do.

    I’ve posted for a long time on ROK and am well received there. How is it I make two posts on RVF and get perma banned? LOL. What a joke.

    1. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 1:28 pm

      Nope, a real male shouldn’t accept anything politically correct and mainstream!!

      You’ve made a very good point about bans on here. I’m NOT a registered user but a well known one with a lot of messages on this board.
      I periodically get banned by my regular IP for no clear reason. And after 4-5 days I can post again but have to enter a modified nickname.
      Seems very odd to me since freedom of speech and thought is kinda promoted and supported here.

      1. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 2:54 pm

        Toronto feministes always causing problems whereever they go! Right now
        in Toronto, Roosh V posters are telling clubs to avoid conducting
        business with Roosh & his followers, as if that can help the dying
        nightlife scene in Toronto where Torontoized women would prefer to walk
        naked in front of kids during Gay Pride * Slut Walk than to behave like
        real women in a club. The club scene in Toronto is dying a slow death, while female teachers are getting naughty inside the classrooms. Dammit!

      2. John Galt November 11, 2015 at 6:22 pm

        Haven’t been in TO since 2007. How did the club scene spiral down? Is the economy actually worse?

      3. Toronto Guest November 11, 2015 at 7:07 pm

        Read Roosh’s article “15 Reasons why Toronto is the worst city…” and you will get a general idea.

        The club scene in Toronto is mainly paranoid, where feminazis and manginas view men who aren’t part of their group as potential rapists. The cost of living is so high in Toronto, that guys are taking on 10,000$ credit card debt to finance their lifestyle just to impress a chick.

        An insider in the financial field declared a few months ago that the average debt to income ratio for the entire Canada is hovering at 165-170%, and I do suspect that the city of Toronto will have their debt to income ration as high as 200%.

        Club life in Toronto is a waste of time.. The chicks at most time don’t wanna party, and with universities and colleges in the GTA enforcing YES MEANS YES and CONSENT IS CHANGING…It makes it way worse for men to get laid in Toronto.

    2. pinetree November 11, 2015 at 1:46 pm

      The problem is that with Roosh’s recent tour, he got more in the public eye and became a target. His forum has been attacked by trolls. It is difficult to monitor trolls as monitoring takes significant time and resources. I have been banned myself two times for something rather minor. No need to get offended but trying to understand the difficult task of monitoring can only be helpful. Simply register again with another name – and do not stir the pot so to say.

      1. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 2:10 pm

        Yes, there are trolls coming here who are indeed easy to spot.

        But I always use one IP address for my messaging and still get banned.

        It’s not about stirring the pot, it’s about a fair and honest treatment of long term readers and posters.

      2. Roosh November 11, 2015 at 3:22 pm

        You’ve been banned because you flood the comments with hysterics. You talk a lot about what men should do, but I don’t advise any man to behave with such emotion on the internet like you do.

      3. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 3:38 pm

        This is how I see it: it’s impossible to win any battle without giving 110% effort in everything.
        I often give very harsh comment but they ain’t hysterical.
        Unfortunately drastic measure are often needed to overcome or withstand the pressure coming from the mainstream society and propaganda machine.
        Softness ain’t gonna win nothing.
        I’m THIS emotional because I can see, feel and even smell the decline of the western society and anticipate possible impact of this decline on Eastern Europe/Russia.
        I do behave with emotion cause I simply can’t stand/tolerate how things are going all over the world these days.
        Ain’t nothing bad in being emotional instead of being indifferent or afraid to express own thoughts.

      4. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 5:53 pm

        “Softness ain’t gonna win nothing”

        I’m telling you again. In Toronto, if a parent, male, female, transexual, transanimal, etc what ever calls a school administrator to complain about her, the TDSB views anything as “harassment”, and the parents end up getting arrested by Toronto Police.

        Many people want to get the hell out from Toronto; not end up wasting 4 to 10 years in prison for trumped up charges by the feminists.

      5. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 5:56 pm

        Could you please give me at least 1 link to the story when parents got arrested for mere phone call to TDSB?

        Oh, and when I wanted to get out of Toronto, I packed my stuff and got out without hesitation;) What’s stopping others then?;)

      6. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 7:24 pm

        Did you even read the article??? How does THAT shit she did correlate with SexEd and feminazis?

      7. FrmrCanadian November 11, 2015 at 7:24 pm

        Oh, and I’d report ANYONE for THAT kind of baloney to police as well.

      8. Barwin November 12, 2015 at 8:51 am

        You’re not wrong FrmrCanadian, but you also have to heed the expression: when you yell, nobody hears you.

        Think about the people in society who’s opinions are respected. The talking heads (“experts”) on tv, the President, the Prime Minister, and so on. These people are never emotional. Therefore, if you want your opinion to be respected by others, never be emotional.

      9. CaptainObvious November 11, 2015 at 2:35 pm

        Perhaps I can understand in light of recent events but I’ll just refrain from any efforts at my own input on RVF.

        Stirring the pot is what I like to do and I do a great fuckin job of it.

        Btw roosh what do you think of an article on ROK titled “The value of hatred as a motivator”? Too risqué?

      10. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 3:00 pm

        If you wanna stir the pot, ask the Toronto District School Board why do they apparently allow female teachers to strip naked in front of their students, because the Toronto Police are barred from investigating such complaints if they ever happen. I hope you’re not in Toronto, though. I heard that parents who complain against the feminist teachers end up getting arrested for “harassment” or framed for crimes they were incapable of doing, such as directly sending a harassing letter inside a locked office of the Principal evading cameras and managing to get inside a locked building!

      11. Toronto Sucks November 11, 2015 at 2:57 pm

        The Canadian feministes are the ones who encouraged mob mentality against Roosh. In Toronto, there are flyers which instruct clubs and bars to boycott Roosh & his supporters. Seriously, as if that is going to help the dying club scene in Toronto? Many Toronto women prefer to walk naked in front of kids during Gay Pride and SlutWalk than to be approached by a man in a club in Toronto. I’ve heard that a growing number of female teachers are getting naughty inside the classrooms too, though investigating these complaints are very hard to do in Toronto because of cronyism and feminist unions.

    3. Toronto sucks November 11, 2015 at 2:51 pm

      Roosh V is afraid that the SJWs in North America, mainly from Toronto & Anglo-Montreal, will use the forum against him, and he has enough reason to be afraid. The Canadian media was smearing Roosh’s name everywhere this summer, that the sheeple are labelling anyone who is a fan of Roosh as a potential criminal.

    4. Shortest Straw November 11, 2015 at 3:16 pm

      I dunno – I think it’s kind of a badge of honor to get RVF banned. The phenomenon raises a couple of interesting questions, however:
      – Why do people care about being banned? When you post on the forum, you are creating content. Roosh and the mods create the culture, and the decisions are theirs to make. But the posters are getting out of it a sense of community, of belonging. It shows you how powerful that sense of community is that you care about being excluded, of not being allowed to contribute.
      – A weakness in the manosphere / neomasculinity / alt-right is the infighting. I’m surprised that the various factions haven’t worked more to identify common beliefs and common goals that can unite. Labeling dissenting opinions as “trolling” is symptomatic of this dissent. Is there an opportunity for a leader to draw together these factions united by beliefs but separated by contempt?

      1. Puccalove69 November 13, 2015 at 4:05 pm

        I wonder where the solidarity is. You wanna focus on fighting real enemies like feminism not each other.

      2. Shortest Straw November 14, 2015 at 2:42 am

        Yes. I think thus far the problem has been that we have not been clear on the enemy. This is a task that many have been struggling with. A few have made the most progress, but it’s still not clear. Before long I hope the enemy is articulated and agreed upon. Until then, we will continue to be divisive. I’m not worried, though; this is the way understanding works. In a subtle way, the infighting is just arguing. It’s ugly, but this is how the process has to work.

    5. Roosh November 11, 2015 at 3:20 pm

      RVF has strict moderation standards, and your post could easily be seen as a false flag troll meant to get men agreeing to “punch” girls, as you described. Talking about imaginary violence before you had 10 posts is not prudent for men who want to stay on RVF.

      ROK and RVF are very different communities. Depending on your personality, you’ll fit on one more than the other.

      1. Shortest Straw November 11, 2015 at 3:56 pm

        May I suggest you and the mods work more on grooming the posters than outright banning. People learn and grow and change, and effective leaders help guide that process. One glaring weakness of the Left, composed of women and weak men, is its intolerance; incompatibility with a team doesn’t have to be tolerated but it can be groomed out. One strength of any group of men is the members’ willingness to conform – but they have to be guided.

      2. Puccalove69 November 13, 2015 at 4:03 pm


      3. Barwin November 11, 2015 at 9:19 pm

        Fair enough. I also just got banned from RVF. I don’t mind. I made objective observations and only told the truth, but it didn’t meet the RVF narrative. The mud-spewing-bandwagon that immediately followed was a surprise to me, and was something I didn’t expect from this community.

        Anyway, I still like it here, your writing is in line with my experience in life.

  10. D Beguiled November 11, 2015 at 3:02 pm

    As tedious and annoying as it must be, it is important for well known figures in the masculine corner of the internet to post clear and definite refutations of SJW slander and defamation.

    Because the internet breeds and rewards pointless drama and herd behavior, the days of making your point by not dignifying something with a response are over.

    Roosh is smart to write this post, and if you have a section in your bookmarks where you keep clear refutations of bullshit in case you need them to shut idiots up, this post deserves a place there.

    As mentioned in the article, the point is not to convince the haters. They are a lost cause. The point is to give anyone sitting on the fence, or people who are inclined to be amenable to Roosh’s message, but have not read “Bang Iceland,” easy access to an antidote to lies.

    This post is strategic as much as it is anything else, and that is a good move, and should be emulated by anyone who is being slandered.

    The lucky thing about being a man today, is that you can be strategic by simply and clearly telling the truth. You don’t have to keep track of any lies like the SJWs do.

  11. KL November 11, 2015 at 4:23 pm

    How about holding a Ukrainian girlfriend down when she tried to “call an audible”?

    1. Roosh November 11, 2015 at 4:38 pm

      No girl has ever withdrawn consent for me during sex. Rough sex is not rape, either.

      So Steve, has it been a slow day in Van Munching? I may come down some day… what is your office number? It doesn’t say on your bio page:

      Thanks for paying to hear my DC lecture. I appreciate the money. By the way, this photo of you is not flattering: Lots of shadows.

      1. skillet November 11, 2015 at 6:23 pm

        I am amazed you have avoided a well organized and plausible set-up accusation. Like Angela Marcotte would love to write about-Roosh on the chain gang.

        Be careful dude.

      2. Puccalove69 November 13, 2015 at 3:57 pm

        Defensive much?

        “She tried to squirm away while I was laying down my strokes so I had to use some muscle to prevent her from escaping.”

        You must appreciate how this sounds. It sounds like she said stop, physically tried to get you off her and you used your force against her to continue. No matter how frustrating it is for a woman to ask you to stop during sex it doesn’t give you the right to ever use your force against her.

        How are we as the reader supposed to interpret where the persona ends and the reality begins?

  12. Shortest Straw November 11, 2015 at 4:27 pm

    “While walking to my place, I realized how drunk she was. In America, having sex with her would have been rape, since she couldn’t legally give her consent.”

    Really? You’re familiar with U.S. case law regarding rape by intoxication? Aren’t you presuming a lot of expertise?

    It’s human nature to assume one’s own guilt, but it is very often simply mistaken. If you had gone to an attorney with your confession of guilt, the first thing he would have done is established the facts, ignoring your confession. The question in his mind would be, would a jury convict you of rape? If not, your admission of guilt is wrong, a mistake.

    I think your first comment should be that you felt guilty about her inebriation, thanks to a society that programmed you to assume guilt on the part of a man who has sex with an inebriated woman, and you realized later that sense of guilt was mistaken.

  13. Davis M.J. Aurini November 11, 2015 at 5:55 pm

    Accusing you of rape requires an effeminate mind-frame; one where they ‘intuit’ what you ‘actually mean’ – that is to say, one where they get emotionally triggered, and ignore the facts to project their emotions on reality.

    I say ‘effeminate’ and not ‘feminine’ because the feminine frame is to pay close attention to minor details, and ‘intuit’ whether somebody is (for instance) upset and hiding it; it is different from the masculine, but it also adheres to reality.

    Your accusers are merely low-quality women and low-quality men, in rebellion against their own natures and God, who are seeking out a monster to blame for their problems rather than admitting to their own monstrosity.

    I use ‘monster’ in the original Greek sense.

  14. Terry "Death to Equality" Xu November 11, 2015 at 7:07 pm

    It’s simpler than that really

    I’ve been called a rapist by total strangers for just disagreeing with equality. People whom I just met and don’t even know my name. It’s kind of like the word “sociopath” and accusations of bigotry in general. The left throws these things out because they can’t defend their emotionally based positions and tries to get their way by playing moral high ground

    Don’t let it get to you

  15. codemonkey November 11, 2015 at 7:12 pm

    “This is exactly what feminists want, to have men living in fear by allowing women to retroactively change their minds about all their sex encounters. ”

    Alternatively, they would like to weed out all men who aren’t sociopathic politically connected criminals.

    1. November 11, 2015 at 7:21 pm

      In Toronto, there are so many flyers on many campuses about YES MEANS YES, CONSENT, STOP RAPE,REPORT RAPE, PREVENT RAPE, FIGHT RAPE, etc, that it’s getting pathetic. One would assume that Torono has a rape epidemic where women are raped every second or something like that. NOT. When a Toronto women feels “uncomfortable” when a man looks at her cleavage a mile away, the Toronto Police and security forces are more than happy to taze the guy if they want.

  16. Hejsssaa November 11, 2015 at 7:32 pm

    I dont get men who listen to you. Its just sad.

  17. Michael Kirney November 11, 2015 at 7:36 pm

    Whatever, dude. You make a point of being controversial and somebody has taken it way too far. How can you even be surprised about stuff like this? You need to chill, maybe go downtown for a rub’n’tug or a few beers and a show.

  18. Elmer T. Jones November 11, 2015 at 7:58 pm

    “My exaggerated “I’m a nonstop sex machine” bravado, which I always incorporate into my sex writing, is irrelevant.”

    What normal fella doesn’t do this? It’s how we bond with other men, and invites scathing rebukes.

  19. Before Christ November 11, 2015 at 9:13 pm

    Roosh you can thank me for reporting abuse on Amazon for two book “reviewers” who said you were a rapist. One included a petition link. They removed one comment (who explicitly said you were a rapist), and removed the petition link on the other (who says the books are an example of “rape culture” – an indirect indictment). My reason for reporting was just that, “false rape accusation”.
    You’re welcome.

    1. Roosh November 11, 2015 at 11:10 pm


  20. tavusaham November 12, 2015 at 1:10 am

    Not Easy rooshv If you wana get a reasonable income through laptop and if you have a reliable internet connection then you should be able to know how you make your income by laptop.this is very simple to know just vist my website
    and sign up there for more details

  21. StarD November 12, 2015 at 11:50 am

    ROOSH YOU LEGEND . . . .!!!!!!!! FUCK OUTTA HERE !!!! i know more about my prostitutes then the icelandic girl yu fucked !!!!! lol killin me

  22. DarthHideous November 12, 2015 at 1:59 pm

    Vox Day was right. SJWs do always lie.

  23. Lunastrelki November 12, 2015 at 5:41 pm

    In China I hear they don’t consider sex in a marriage to be an eligible form of rape.

  24. 66Scorpio November 13, 2015 at 3:25 am

    Roosh, you really should have considered your lawfare options while in Canada, a jurisdiction known for its lax defamation laws.

  25. כשכשכשכשכלוילוילוילו November 13, 2015 at 5:39 am

    Roosh I wish you would have posted an article like this sooner. While I, as a traditionalist reactionary, still do not condone the hookup culture that you engage in and promote, I still feel better knowing that when I read your blog and twitter, I’m reading the words of a man whose hookups have always been mutually enjoyable ones. (Well, actually, I’m not sure about THAT, but you get what I mean.) Your dozens of leftist haters can’t even use Bang Iceland against you; they now have nothing substantial, since you and any other guy who has casual sex are just beating third-wave feminists at the unsustainable game which they came up with.

  26. Puccalove69 November 13, 2015 at 3:30 pm

    I don’t think your a rapist or a misogynist or any of the objectively awful things people say about you. My only issue is the judgey tone. I don’t like people that get on their moral high horse but yours is a Shetland pony. Good people are people that do good things. Your behavior is immoral by most people’s standards; promiscuity, cheating, disease spreading, to name a few.

    Maybe you could have been good if you were born in another time. But you are dealt the cards that you are dealt and choose how to play them. If your attitude was ‘Hey I’m Roosh I’m a Mother Fucker that doesn’t give a shit.’ then I could at least respect you. But that’s not what I hear when I read you. Instead I hear;

    ‘I’m a ‘nice guy’ (patent pending) that blames women for my sexual failures. I do bad things but only to get laid so it’s women’s fault I behave this way. Thus I expect women to take responsibility not just for their bad behavior but for mine as well.’

    Adam sins but it’s always Eve’s fault.

  27. Christhinksyoureanidiot November 15, 2015 at 4:04 pm

    Personally I am a 30+, good looking guy currently in a long time relationship with a beautiful (both sexy and very pretty), feminist babe, who does wonderful things to my body every time she gets the chance, and she is also both funny as hell, and an intellectually stimulating conversationist. Honest to God. Yes, it actually IS possible to have an interesting relationship with a girl who gives a fuck if you die.

    Anyhow, nice to make your acquaintance guys. Enjoy your sordid, shallow view on the world, and I hope you grow back whatever withered inside of you (after you decided you would never dare to love again). Tallyho.

  28. Jim Trompe November 18, 2015 at 8:35 am

    You write 10,000 blog posts and they will be able to find something somewhere that can be taken out of context. And if it didn’t exist they would make it up anyways. I mean they just completely fabricate rape and abuse statistics at this point because reality doesn’t suit them. Your golden bullet is what you did in canada..Im a poor downtrodden muslim(and thus blameless for anything in their eyes).

  29. Anonymous November 21, 2015 at 1:34 pm

    A lot of SJW public figures will condemn Roosh for being a rapist. They judged him and decided. But how many men will risk defending Roosh in public, even when they think he is unfairly accused? A few, yes, but certainly not that many.

  30. Caligula Rex December 9, 2015 at 1:08 pm

    If you are a rapist and you get away with it, you should be proud. You can make millions teaching your tricks to beta male wet pussies.

    1. jarvo February 9, 2016 at 7:48 am

      I’m sorry mate, but you say ‘if you are a rapist and you get away with it you should be proud’? So if you are taking someones dignity, humiliating them, forcing them to do something they do not want to do, violently taking away their choices, entering them and destroying any piece of humanity they feel its totally fine if you never get caught. How would you feel if a huge strong man raped you, held you down and had sex with you against your will? Would it be fine? Should he be proud?

  31. Tronmartin January 12, 2016 at 1:33 am

    It is interesting that feminists think women can not consent to sex if they are drunk but they can consent to treatment in the crisis unit that I work in no matter how intoxicated or under the influence of drugs or alcohol they are. If a woman can change her mind in the morning about wanting to have sex then all of our patients can change their mind in the morning about wanting to be treated.

  32. NightRaven January 15, 2016 at 12:31 pm

    I would guess the troublesome sentence here is this one:
    “If a girl is willing to walk home with me, she’s going to get the dick no matter how much she has drunk. ”
    The rest of the paragraph makes it clear that you didn’t rape her, but the sentence I quoted makes it seem like you WOULD have raped her, if she had said no after walking home with you.
    I doubt that’s what you meant, but that’s what the sentence says, she will get laid because she went home with you, as in you will not allow any woman to leave to your place without sleeping with her.

  33. Sarah L Antal February 4, 2016 at 6:11 am

    I saw a post on fb about you being called a pro-rape advocate and all sorts of things and couldn’t believe things like that were even allowed but now that I read your page, I can see that is absolutely false. I actually enjoy reading your page and what you have to say. I honestly can’t believe people even go that far and say that. So more power to ya for everything you do and accomplish in helping men. I see nothing wrong with what you are trying to do. I’m a 36 yr old, mother of two and I think it’s great. Definitely gonna keep up with what you are doing and reading what your have to say. It’s always good to know the facts before you start pointing fingers and making false accusations. It gets so annoying when people make stuff into something it’s not. Judgemental assholes. Keep on keeping on. Fuckin A!

  34. L February 5, 2016 at 7:35 am

    Do you really belive that “rape would be decreased if we legalize it”, or was it just something you said? Was that a joke?

  35. tracelle February 6, 2016 at 5:38 pm

    “It didn’t help matters that I was relatively sober, but I can’t say I cared or even hesitated…If a girl is willing to walk home with me, she’s going to get the dick no
    matter how much she has drunk.”

    You write like you wanted it to sound rape-ish.

    1. aQ February 8, 2016 at 1:05 pm

      Thats to troll the feminists because in their world a woman has one sip of drink she cant consent

  36. jarvo February 8, 2016 at 9:01 pm

    all crimes would decrease if we leagalised them because they wouldnt be crimes anymore??

  37. jarvo February 8, 2016 at 9:03 pm

    That could’ve very easily not turned out so rosy. If she can’t give consent she can’t give consent. Irrelevant that the next day she could give consent.

  38. Anonymous October 17, 2016 at 2:52 am

    Ah okay, so you’re not a rapist, you just condone it. Nice to know… You aggrandize the problem, dumbass. Condoning rape is just as bad as doing the raping, because you’re just letting it happen. Rape should be legal? Lol I can’t wait to hear about the repercussions…

  39. pattern finder November 10, 2017 at 3:29 am

    looks like a lot of women are accusing famous people of multiple ‘harassment’ cases. I wonder why it’s only famous actors and film makers who seem to get accused, and not someone who ISN’T famous? What a strange ‘pattern’.