The American Cold Civil War

The left has decided that they no longer want to live among people who share different views than them. They are plugging their fingers in their ears while yelling racist, fascist, Nazi, and Hitler. They are refusing to yield, compromise, debate, or even accept that their political positions are starting to lose in democratic elections despite suspected cheating that aids them. This has put us squarely in the middle of a cold civil war where both sides of the political spectrum are warming to the idea of killing each other.

A confirmation of the left’s defeat is apparent when you see how their maniacal behavior converts more people, especially moderates, against them. The biggest recruiting tool against the left has become the left. Every time they protest, riot, screech against white people, or show their vulgarity, the remaining mentally sane of America realize that the left’s platform has become so out-of-touch that it no longer represents the basic ideals of the country. The non-cucked right needs to merely show up after temper tantrums and say “Look how crazy they are” for the converts to come pouring in.

The left is out of options

Many people are wondering why the left has become a recruiting agent for the right by promoting or engaging in violence. First, they simply don’t know what else to do. When a parent tells a child that he can’t eat candy for every meal, and the child doesn’t have a logical argument about the merits of eating that candy, what does he do? He cries, stomps his feet, threatens to run away, throws out insults like “meanie” and “jerk,” and may even hit his parent to get his way. Donald Trump and his supporters are the parents who won’t yield to an emotional child.

The second reason why the left is hurting their cause with violence is because its billionaire controllers, particularly George Soros, want to divide America to such an irreparable extent that a hot Civil War is forced, giving them an opportunity to increase their power. Soros wants to create so much hate, animosity, and chaos that any resulting conflict has a chance of him holding absolute power, compared to the current situation where he has “only” a moderate amount. In other words, he rather take the chance of war to solidify his grip further.

The leftists that Soros sponsors in the Woman’s Marches and the antifa outbursts may also want a Civil War, but a quick look at their physiognomy shows they would struggle to even go one day without electricity, and that they possess the same psychological directive as the child who is angry that he can’t have candy. Soros is the creepy old neighbor who promises them the candy they crave because he wants to build their trust and get them alone. The child, naive about the extreme danger that lurks behind the likes of Soros, decides to follow him into a van parked in the alley to spite its own parents and their righteous authority.

The reason the right has been reluctant to respond with violence is because they’re winning. Violence comes not from a position of strength, but desperation, when every other option has been extinguished, and should serve as a signal to you of what the real score between the left and right really is. Without violence, the left currently has a 100% chance of losing, continuously and humiliatingly, for at least the next eight years. All the gains that took them decades to achieve will be lost if we ravage and rape their power structures.

With a hot civil war, the left has a 25% chance to win, a bet they are willing to take even though there is a high chance they will be among the first to die in the conflict. A logical person would ask why they would push for a conflict that is sure to destroy the infrastructure of the urban centers they live in, and one where food, water, and other basic necessities would be lacking. The answer comes upon realizing that a child does not realize that eating candy every day will make him sick. The child must therefore be commanded for its own good, because it does not have the capability to take care of itself or understand the consequences of its actions.

We all lose in a hot war

Before the warrior in you gets excited at the prospect of crushing the left in a hot war and killing antifa members with high-powered weapons as they wield sharpened mop handles at you, understand that any war in the United States would quickly become a proxy war involving all major military powers, particularly China and Russia, who would rush to spend billions of dollars to have ultimate control of the country. It would be protracted and match the first civil war in terms of brutality, where 2% of the population died.

With the current population, a 2% death rate would result in over 6 million deaths. Compared to the 3,000 that died on 9/11, which was seen as the greatest national tragedy of modern times, a hot war would effect every single American in a profoundly negative way. No sane person with a family would wish for this outcome, which further highlights the insanity of much of the left in pushing for this very result. They rather see millions of people dead and the country ruined than accept a democratic process where their crazy ideas lost.

Even if we avoid a hot war, the underlying problems are not solved. The left will constantly subvert against the country in hopes of achieving a hot war, use both economic and physical violence against those on the right whom they disagree with, and inevitably descend into terroristic violence that rivals ISIS. It’s intolerable for things to proceed as they are, but if we remove a hot war from the table, what option is left?

1-800-DIVORCE

I recommend the long divorce option, which has three components. The first is extreme law and order. Starting with the Federal government, every single instance of leftist threats, intimidation, and violence must be investigated, prosecuted to the maximize allowable by law, and publicized. The left have been getting away with their illegal acts for too long, to the point where violent protesters don’t even fear arrest, thanks to Democratic mayors and police chiefs who allow it. The FBI must uphold the law and punish those who break it, and municipalities or universities that allow illegal acts must be punished through withholding of Federal funds. This will immediately shrink the number of violent agitators on the left and limit the power of their institutions.

The second component of the long divorce option is to excise the left from all centers of cultural power so that they cannot actively convert the youth. The fake news, already on its last legs, must be replaced by organizations that are not so vehemently anti-American, academia must be purged, and all globalist traitors working in government, both on the Federal and state level, must be removed from positions of power.

The media is hemorrhaging money and viewers, millions of citizens are getting red pilled to the subversiveness of the academic system (particularly its anti-male and anti-white agenda), and Trump has begun to right the ship in the Federal government, which will certainly trickle down to the local levels. Because the leftist establishment is losing control over their narrative, the younger Generation Z is already showing signs of rightward thinking thanks to being raised on 4chan memes more than TV programming. This means that we simply need to remove millennials from power and wait for them to die of old age or AIDS while preventing them from causing further damage to American institutions.

Halting immigration is the third component of the long divorce option. The left has not been able to show how immigrants benefit American citizens besides more diverse restaurant options, and emotional pleas of “human rights” and “compassion” is not sufficient enough to turn the United States into a big welfare office. Open-borders immigration is hurting existing citizens, serving as a cynical means for leftists to gain more votes in elections while browbeating their enemies with “hate speech” codes that demand you love non-Americans more than Americans.

We must also advocate for a white population that increases from where it currently stands, because America is no longer America if that number dips below 50%, and will instead look something like an international airport. Once immigration is stopped, and illegal citizens are deported, it will become monumentally more difficult for open-borders politicians to win nationally again. This can be absolutely ensured if woman’s suffrage is repealed, a proposition that I know many find unpalatable, but one that would usher in an era of permanent winning.

For us to win without a hot civil war, we have to retake the reins of power and peacefully co-exist with bitter leftists over the next fifty years while the culture slowly heals itself. Once institutions are purged of anti-American leftists, the new left will exist in more of a classical liberal form and believe in nominally nationalist ideas while accepting cultural values that are shy of traditional. The long divorce option will not excite you because of the length it takes to see a resolution, but it’s one that will preserve life and the existing infrastructure of the United States.

Four future outcomes

There are four outcomes that can proceed from the juncture of which we stand. The first is a globalist resurgence at the polls thanks to demographic changes that push the vote far to the left, starting in 2024. If this happens, we will have a president that is more authoritarian than Hillary Clinton. The boot will come down on all facets of American life, especially speech, and we will essentially be living in an open-air prison.

The second outcome is a hot war where we win. The country will be ravaged and millions will die, but at least most of the deaths will be leftists.

The third option is a hot war where we lose because of foreign involvement. Not only are we much more likely to die in this engagement, but the globalist boot will come down with such a viciousness that those on the right who survive may hope that they had died in the war.

And the fourth option is the long divorce, one that we will easily win if the recommendations I made above are taken. Very few people die and life can proceed with high stability and prosperity for the majority of the country.

The globalist left has so damaged the country from the decades they’ve been in power that there is no quick fix, and those of us who are alive today will likely not see a resolution that can be argued as “complete victory” during our lifetimes. I understand the frustration that many on the right have, and the desire they have to be immediately cured of poisons that the left has unleashed, but we must carefully analyze any outcome that results in the deaths of our loved ones and even ourselves. There is a time and place to die for what you believe in, but I hope I have convinced you that we have not yet reached that critical moment and that we can avoid the downsides of a hot civil war and the globalist boot by taking on the option of the long divorce to still win in the end.

The laws we have on the books are enough—let’s enforce those and allow the country to focus on itself instead of empire building and policing while the media and universities collapse upon the weight of their own lies and degeneracy. Besides, the entertainment value in watching the left screech and yell for the next several decades is sure to bring us reams of pleasure. That’s a better outcome than outright war.

Read Next: How To Save Western Civilization

Related Posts For You

100
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
  
smilegrinwinkmrgreenneutraltwistedshockunamusedcooleviloopsrazzrollcryeeklolmadsadexclamationquestionideahmmbegwhewchucklesillyenvyshutmouth
Photo and Image Files
 
 
 
45 Comment threads
55 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
60 Comment authors
Emily WeantTSKChrisSarah SagePoeTentiate Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
muzhchina
Guest
muzhchina
Offline

It’s time to get back to basics Roosh. All men must be encouraged to marry and have 3+ children before age 32.

Make family not government/politics your priority.

The left is anti family because it sees family as an obstacle to big government. The left can only win by using big daddy government power, but if the family unit is strong people are less reliant on government for help which fatally weakens leftism. Hence 50+ years of anti family policy.

Petruccio
Guest
Petruccio
Offline

Look at the Amish. Very traditional society, although I prefer a seemingly higher modern standard of living. They have at least three children and they are one of the very few segments of white America that is increasing in population.

Roosh
Guest
Roosh
Online

The left has damaged marriage and women to such an extent that your “back to basics” would ruin most men.

Jesse James
Guest
Jesse James
Offline

True. Look at the Janet Jackson case. Pre-nups are merely a trap. The more you have, the more the derange raised by the left view you as a target of opportunity.

Marriage, even to a foreigner like I am married to, comes with much uncertainty and risk. Fortunately, I get the great feeling that my wife is ride or die. I have several instances fo crap we have been through. One being a potential son dropped on me from out of no where years before my other kids I knew about. She still stayed!

Yet we both know, without a moments notice, at least 30 states will equip her to ruin me without warning.

Fortunately, 25 states and counting have adopted, or are, shared custody agreements. It is precisely because of what is talked about here.

Men are waking up, and their anger will at best turn into apathy. Not pretty. But better than anarchy!

Hound_Of_Zeus
Guest
Hound_Of_Zeus
Offline

An interesting question would be what have women turned into?
They are female biologically but mentally are they actually women any longer or just a creature with a female hormonal disposition that is only capable of repsonding to the dictates of their penis envy.

Per Desteen
Guest
Per Desteen
Offline

This is the “Do not marry” principle.

Yet good game practice gives the risk management tools required to manage marriage risk.

The above scenarios are short to medium term. Even divorce and partition will not work unless demographics are the primary focus. Even as de-programming takes time, so does repopulating white western civ demographics.

Wife hunting in blue cities is going to be non-optimal. Wife hunting in red counties will be a better prospect. That’s a business idea there.

If you are redpill, Caucasian, and married, your goal should be 4+ children with a SAHM that homeschools with a technical education focus.

Yes, many of you will say this is unattainable or idealistic. So is the 4th outcome of long divorce. Either get out of the way or get in and just start doing it. If you fall, pick yourself back up. Fear is the only thing that is stopping you, and the only true weapon leftists have. Let me clarify:

YOUR FEAR IS THE ONLY WEAPON LEFTISTS HAVE AGAINST YOU.

muzhchina
Guest
muzhchina
Offline

Then you should be using your influence to restore marriage as an institution.

Women should be married by 25 preferably 18-21. At age 18 even most American girls will still be on less than 5 cocks.

The left hasn’t destroyed biology, most young women will still yield to a strong man who wants kids.

The question is how many men want that? Most men want to just bang sluts. Very much the opposite of our forefathers

Watchful Sentry
Guest
Watchful Sentry
Offline

America’s forefather’s law was the only true law that exists: Biblical law. They understood that and followed it outright, or were influenced by it.

People conveniently leave that crucial truth out of discussions or comments about our forefathers when it has utmost primacy. When men turn to God, study His law, begin to implement it in their own lives, then demand it of their government slave masters, things will improve. As long as we continue to lobby for a return to some ambiguous point in our history where Biblical principles were not the law of the land, but the moral restraint shown by our people still embodied some semblance of our Christian beginnings, we will never win a real victory in any area we fight.

The Constitution and democracy never worked. It is directly responsible for where we are today. At any point it appeared to work, it was only because the people of America conducted themselves by Christian principles passed down from their forefathers and Biblical law. It had zero to do with democracy or the Constitution.

For the institution of marriage is to be restored, it must be actually restored to what the Author says it is. It is not a contract or a ceremony with the state and their priests in government. You do not need a paper from the state to be married and it is better to avoid covenanting with the state here (and anywhere else) you possibly can. Marriage is a contract between a man and a woman’s father for the property rights over the woman. The ceremony itself is a human institution. There’s nothing in Yahweh’s (God’s) law about having a ceremony.

When a prospective husband and a father agree over the transfer of headship of the woman, from the father to the eventual groom, it became cause for celebration. There would be a ceremony/celebration added to the lawful observation of the woman’s change in status from father, to husband, that required the father giving away his daughter in front of witnesses to validate the transfer. The only part that matters lawfully is the witnessing of the covenant and the giving of the woman from father to husband. That’s all that’s needed. The new husband then had exclusive rights to become “one flesh” with his new woman.

Fast forward to today. Men and women become “one flesh”, live together, and allegedly “get married” all the time without the father even being a thought. Maybe he’ll get some stupid gesture from a man who’s been screwing his daughter asking if he approves they “get married” at some point. I’ve got news for guys like that: As far as the true institution of marriage is concerned you two are already married! Becoming one flesh with a woman seals the deal. People today just put the cart before the horse and have no idea what real marriage is, let alone all the different aspects of its place as a pillar in a civilized society.

The right to be one flesh with the woman, and the father’s authority over that right, are at the center of the institution of marriage. The one flesh principle matters so much that if a father is negligent in protecting his daughter from potential scoundrels, and a man who forces sex from an un-betrothed woman, that man has to keep her forever regardless if the father disapproves. He can never divorce her. The man also has to fork over 50 shekels of silver to the father, which in today’s money can be as much as 1/3 of a man’s yearly wages (Deu 22).

If a man seduces and lays with a man’s daughter, he has to fess up, pay up, then properly covenant with the father to take headship of the woman he “sealed the deal” with. In this case, the father can annul the union and take back his daughter but he still gets the 50 silver for her virginity (Exo 20).

Just a few man made perversions of the marriage union that are not marriage, but considered marriage today, and are instead forms of adultery: same sex, interracial, and a woman “leaving her husband for another husband”. A man who lies with another man’s woman and homosexuality are capital crimes as is a man who would lay with another man’s fiance. A prudent father betrothing his daughter early to a suitable man also puts her out of danger for the Deu 22 rape outcome. Interracial unions carry the penalty of exile, or repentance and sending away the different race spouse with any mixed children who were product of the union.

What a pill to swallow for most people today! Talk about being “red pilled”. Christian principles, and Christian Kingdoms they build, are the pinnacle of righteous morality, justice, prosperity, human freedom, and will pave man’s path to the stars by sorting out the ungodly mess here on earth. Every current dilemma faced by the West is perfectly countered and solved by going back to the relevant Biblical law corresponding to it, including marriage. You want to see the white population increase dramatically (among a multitude of other benefits)? Return to a Christian government including true marriage laws!

“Pray, then, in this way:

“‘Our Father who is in heaven, Hallowed be Your name. ‘Your kingdom come. Your will be done, On earth as it is in heaven.”

Stadtaffe
Guest
Stadtaffe
Offline

I feel intuitively that a maternal drive in women needs to be the leading force more than a wish for children in men. Careerism in the west has just brainwashed women to such an extent that this drive is dormant and then their fertile years just pass by.. Men mainly want to bang but are responsive to ideas of honour and responsibility which would otherwise harmonise with the female wish for children but western governments and influencers have shafted men and broken the social contract to such an extent that this just doesn’t work anymore.

Emily Weant
Guest
Emily Weant
Offline

I agree. Men don’t want good women anymore, nor do they want to grow up and settle down. Roosh is constantly whining about how damaged American women are due to feminism but doesn’t address how this has affected men. The truth is that feminism and resulting promiscuity has opened the door for men to treat women as objects, demand sex on the first date, have children out of wedlock and expect women to work and raise the kids. In addition men are no longer men. They don’t treat women with respect, don’t act like gentlemen, etc. They don’t act like the type of men who would be good providers and make heads of households. Many live off their wives and act like limp wristed Bernie Bros. Many have no “game” and don’t know how to seduce a woman let alone carry on a conversation. Many men expect a woman to be college educated, have a car, and a good job by age 23. Yet is is all the fault of the women?? Men these days expect (and some want) women to be feminist sluts and act accordingly.

magus
Guest
magus
Offline

Thank you. And thanks for bringing up the part about white births. I wish there was a way to encourage-even via tax incentive or another program…to encourage white births without sounding “racist.” I think our country is best served if the predominate population continues to be white. It looks like welfare over the years became a defacto program to encourage non-white births but how do we get whites to reproduce more? Unfortunately the more educated our more intelligent women are-the less children (if any) they tend to have. Maybe we can encourage sound, European women for young men here. Agree about the “hot” civil war…yes our enemies will rush into that scenario in a second. Something to think about before any big time warfare begins.. I’ve been reading The Bell Curve -a lot to digest-but the big picture is clear-without encouraging births among the more intelligent parts of our society we’re ….

kdou
Guest
kdou
Offline

We have become a nation of greed and jealousy in many ways to covet as we are not good enough without all this stuff, much of what we neither need, want or even desire. Growing up in the 50’s most American’s had smaller homes, one bathroom, kids bunked several to a room and the home was intimate. This was the norm. We were not jealous that some had nice big houses because this was home. So greed and the fake women movement wanted you in debt to buy that big house and that new car and moms go to work to pay for this. Children raised by daycare not families even Aunts, Grandparents but strangers. Divorce now came easy so now the mom has to work to support the kids from the deadbeat dads who never even get to see their children. All progressives plan to wipe out the family. Next abortion, the wonderful world of Disney gay lifestyle that everyone needs to have now change your sex as if that will make you a happier person
I grew up a little poor but not poverty and still 50 years later still about the same. I just try to be happy with what I do have not what I don’t have. growing up on the West coast I really have never seen real poverty until this past war on drugs. Now addicts are homeless in the streets along with Veterans. Now this is poverty. where the children are now victims in every way possible.
The lunatic left things socialism is the way to go yet what part of their brain doesn’t understand the rich and powerful Elites (globalist’s) will still be in power same as always just now you will be striped of your land, homes, money to be a free person instead of a slave once again like kings ruling over the peasants once again.

meistergedanken
Guest
meistergedanken
Offline

I thought of this often as well, and it needs to be articulated more than it has. Growing up where I did in the 70’s and 80’s, everyone had a two-car garage, but a lot of people didn’t have AC, had only one television, didn’t have a computer, and only a 50/50 chance of having a VCR or cable. The cell phone/internet bill is now a major monthly expense that people didn’t have 20 years ago. And credit card use was much less than it is today. People tried repairing appliances rather than simply buying new ones. Mothers often made their own dresses and outfits for small children. People cooked their own food more often instead of takeout, and so on.

miseshayekrothbard
Guest
miseshayekrothbard
Offline

You can encourage white births by not encouraging nonwhite births, something natsoc tards need to understand. You cant have a welfare state. You also encourage white births by keeping women out of school and jobs. Women should be educated up to 14 and then find a husband by 18 or 20. There is a reason women are obsessed with having a boyfriend in their mid teens.

GRock
Guest
GRock
Offline

White men are simultaneously bearing the brunt of lion’s share of divorce law rape (slave to women, a gender ‘minority’ as it’s taught in college sociology classes) and, funding entitlement programs through majority tax burden (programs heavily skewed to help minorities). Socioeconomics can’t shed the ‘socio’ affect, without addressing the “economics” first. Did you ever think it’s also ironic as hell to see obvious increase in interracial couples, esp. white women with minority men? They’re both majority benefactors of the rigged system, and have the easiest, best chance in this environment. That shit is by design no doubt.

Remove those burdens through any method, and watch the whole damn thing start to relatively fix itself. But alas, this would be disjoining the perceptibly perfected wheel.

Stadtaffe
Guest
Stadtaffe
Offline

Agree fully, this welfare thing might have been a good idea at the start but it has now warped the natural order of things, encouraging non-white births etc

Jonathan Roseland
Guest

Tax incentives for net tax payers that have children…
No tax incentives for those on welfare assistance that have children…

And you’d get maternity wards full of beautiful little white babies.

Stadtaffe
Guest
Stadtaffe
Offline

I was noticing on a German government website yesterday the exact opposite! Encouraging non-white births. Well just the pictures of all different races and emphasis of government handouts. Am tempted but a bit reluctant to post a link.. The powers that be have definitely conspired to breed an underclass. We absolutely have to move past fear of being a bit racist, or being called racist, there are racial differences which should not be denied and we need to work to somehow bury this PC mindset permanently. That in itself should not create a “hot” war, rather the PC-mindset is slowly making a hot war inevitable.

Laguna Beach Fogey
Guest
Laguna Beach Fogey
Offline

Interesting.

Why would you *not* advocate a hot civil war at the very point where the Right enjoys an overwhelming advantage over our adversaries and could wipe them out completely if we put our mind to it?

Why wait a few more decades for the Left to import more non-white shock troops? It’s just going to get harder.

George Strong
Guest
George Strong
Offline

Agreed. It would take the left to do something outrageous to get the war started, though.

GRock
Guest
GRock
Offline

Most on the right won’t be able to shed the image of adult-sized children throwing a fit. They’d have to do something physically violent and organized that goes far beyond Berklee Protests. It boils down to guns coming out at these “rallies” and cops continuing to turn away. 3-4 incidents like that could be the like the pistol shot that started WWI.

George Strong
Guest
George Strong
Offline

I hope you are correct and I hope it happens soon. It is unjust that we must live among progs, wogs and nogs.

Stadtaffe
Guest
Stadtaffe
Offline

I also agree, and also in Europe, that there will be some kind of Franz Ferdinand kind of event, possibly at one of the national borders.

Jonathan Roseland
Guest

If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918-1956

Anti-Gnostic
Guest
Anti-Gnostic
Offline

I always have to laugh when Laguna Beach Phony chimes in about getting his grubby bankster hands on vibrants. We all know when push comes to shove for you and the fine gentlemen here, there are no Breiviks in the crowd.

Scotcho Rouleau
Guest
Scotcho Rouleau
Offline

You’re a faggot.

Stadtaffe
Guest
Stadtaffe
Offline

Don’t really wish for a hot war but we definitely don’t have decades left to turn this around something must visibly change much sooner even if there is some civil unrest.

Chris
Guest
Chris
Offline

You people seem to think only far right people have guns. Go drive around South Central L.A., Detoit or Chicago and then get back to me.

Edu
Guest
Edu
Offline

In case of a hot confrontation, you should not look down on foreign powers. Not only those political ones which could make that confrontation a proxy war, but because of sympathy and advocacy to SJW from foreign nations. I’m afraid to tell you that Trump’s camp and alt-right could have scarce support outside the US.

Crow_T_Robot65
Guest
Crow_T_Robot65
Offline

I disagree…Vlad would probably support us. He recognizes the importance of nationalism, and an SJW ruled USA wed to the UN (which it would be) would be a serious danger to Russia.

redpillyogi
Guest

plus half of europe would be on our side

PoeTentiate
Guest
PoeTentiate
Offline

Vlad would not be on “our” side. He would do whatever is needed to do maximum damage to America which stands in the way of his ambitions – to be “great” in his third world country with Nuclear Weapons. If you haven’t noticed Trump has stepped on his toes quite a bit lately, because Trump recognizes this truth.

Petruccio
Guest
Petruccio
Offline

Excellent analogy of Soros by using ‘creepy’ to describe him.

miseshayekrothbard
Guest
miseshayekrothbard
Offline

nigga looks like a sith lord

Lunostrelki
Guest
Lunostrelki
Offline

A hot civil war would do more than kill millions of Americans. Assuming it happened as a result of right-wing outrage under a Clinton presidency, it would have given the incumbent left the perfect excuse to institute Red Terror.

In my view, civil war was averted when Trump won the election. The grassroots left is angry as hell but they can’t amount to anything because they can’t fight a real war and don’t have official support. Look what happened at Berkeley. They couldn’t defend their own territory.

Imagine if Clinton had won and upheld the nation-killing policies of the left, by hook or crook. Liberals would be overjoyed, but the right wing would be livid. They’re the ones with the guns and the knowledge to use them and organize militias.

Remember that in 1918, the Russian Bolsheviks didn’t have rural support. They took over from the moderate leftist Provisional Government, and organized the workers and soldiers (forcibly, in most cases).

The Russian Cossacks were every bit as tough as the conservative American gun-owner. They still lost, because the Bolsheviks had taken over the cities and military industry, and had no compunctions at all about shooting or starving millions of people to death. The sheer firepower that a leftist government would have available would make the fight against American Whites (in both the political and racial senses of the term) even more lopsided.

Bernie’s “Our Revolution” sounds like a bad joke under a Trump victory, but here it would be very real. Carpet-bombing or nuking (if it came to that) conservatives states, lynching middle-class landowning whites and anyone suspected to have voted Republican, and pretty much any other atrocity would be on the table if the Left seized control of the government in 2016.

miseshayekrothbard
Guest
miseshayekrothbard
Offline

Except the police and military are on our side here. You can see their frustration in the videos when they are asked why they are just sitting back. “Ask the chief of police (a political appointment)” They would love to light the leftscum up with a hail of bullets and are just waiting for the word.

odalvarado
Guest
odalvarado
Offline

Roosh is this parody or are you headed a meltdown?

meistergedanken
Guest
meistergedanken
Offline

Are you attempting to be clever or are you really just obtuse?

jose
Guest
jose
Offline

Let them fight….

bdog57
Guest
bdog57
Offline

“If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child[ren] may have peace.” – Thomas Paine

Roosh
Guest
Roosh
Online

And then your children, not used to struggle or challenge, become SJWs and antifa members.

bdog57
Guest
bdog57
Offline

A bit of a cheap shot there.
All I can do is teach them: “Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.” –Proverbs 22:6. If they go astray after being taught correct principles, that will be on their heads.

The problems of today are not problems of their making, though. I generally assume that they’ll have problems of their own to solve- which I expect them to take full responsibility for. “Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.” –Matthew 6:34

In terms of OUR problems – this only ends in violence and/or divine intervention. Violence -even of the justifiable sort- leaves an imprint on the soul. I have yet to read of any civilization coming back from the brink in the manner you’ve described here (though that would be far preferable). If it must be violence, I’d prefer to have that on my head than the heads of my children- and I’d prefer it while I still have the capacity to wage it effectively. If it is to be divine intervention, I can only pray that my children will be spared having to wage it themselves until the Second Coming. War is Hell.

These sentiments are not unique to myself and Mr. Paine. “I must study politics and war, that our sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy. Our sons ought to study mathematics and philosophy, geography, natural history and naval architecture, navigation, commerce and agriculture in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary, tapestry and porcelain.”–John Adams

miseshayekrothbard
Guest
miseshayekrothbard
Offline

Peace is a delusion

hi
Guest
hi
Offline

Who cares, I’ll be dead or too old to attract fertile women by then.

Roosh V is just trying to expand and preserve his brand as always — this time by playing demagogue.

Jamar Reaves
Guest
Jamar Reaves
Offline

It feels so fucking great to watch these left wing assholes and their cancerous narratives crumble piece by piece. This was a long time coming considering the damage these sons of bitches have done throughout the years but to now see them tremble over the fact that people, who want to preserve Western civilization for future generations and create a nation they can be proud of, will not put up with their bullshit anymore is the best gift God ever gave us.

YosarriansRight
Guest
YosarriansRight
Offline

That IS their goal. The elimination of more than 90% of the population worldwide to 500 million for their Marxist utopia (this also includes your hardcore “Climate Change” Nazis, who hate mankind).

RK
Guest
RK
Offline

WHY IS SOROS FREE AND NOT IN JAIL?

miseshayekrothbard
Guest
miseshayekrothbard
Offline

You could probably walk up to him on the street and say boo and he would die. Then again, he is a sith lord, so hell probably just shoot you with force lightning.

No one important
Guest
No one important
Offline

This is the kind of analysis of the situation you come to read in this site. No other site offers such an unique insight that sounds so pausible.

Clark Kent
Guest
Clark Kent
Offline

Agreed. This is a thought-provoking article.

Maximus Decimus Meridius
Guest

Thought provoking because it is stripped bare fucking naked. It is a clear eyed view of a man staring at reality… a reality no one wants to acknowledge. The long divorce is underway, but I have my doubts it will pan out. Civil war must be the absolute final and last option, but because we are so close to it, this article provokes thought. We are no longer talking about hypothetheticals anymore. These are our options, and they are our only ones.

miseshayekrothbard
Guest
miseshayekrothbard
Offline

We arent averse to fighting because we are winning. We are averse because we have a lot more to lose. A bunch of antifa rats with nothing going for them can do lots of damage because they dont care and have NOTHING TO LOSE. They arent thinking about their future; we are. There was a quote in the Interpreter about this when they were looking for terrorist suspects, it had to be somebody who had nothing to lose. A terminal patient makes a perfect suicide bomber. Meanwhile, we dont want to spend a day in jail for anything. That could hurt job prospects, family and social relations, and so much more. Antifa are predicated on the fact that they are willing to go to jail as long as the job gets done. They obviously aim to avoid it, but they accept the possibility.

We arent winning, we won a single battle in a lengthy war. We must keep fighting again and again and extricate this cancer from our society.

redpillyogi
Guest

true, however, there are actually quite a few on the left that have quite a bit to lose. my guess is that they will gravitate to our side. its the only possible outcome on that front.

Poundings
Guest
Poundings
Offline

The answer is BANG BUS!

fangface
Guest
fangface
Offline

roosh, i understand you have to continually put out writing and media in order to make money, but this was some half-baked half-assed shit.

Jesse James
Guest
Jesse James
Offline

GREAT POST!

I have long thought the same. Civil War is never the answer. And I think your 2% estimate will actually be far too conservative. I think it will be at least 5%. Especially once the cities run out of power, food, and water. Pray you’re not too close to a city center. Say ten miles. If you think it is coming still, arming yourself smartly is best. Too many guns is not a great thing when it comes to ammo. You can only fire two guns at a time max. And likely only one with accuracy. Besides, when people are starving, good luck saving your garden. It will get taken. If you collect like I do, rain water included. Those who know you, are coming to your place. Have a plan on how to implement them instead of fight them. You see where this is going right? Far too much is assumed. There is no guarantee that you will survive. It’s a pipe dream. Don’t care how big you are, how many guns, how many vets you have in your house at the time. When assaulted by large groups of angry, and desperate, people searching for food……..it’s total anarchy.

Your fourth option is the best. Sadly.

L' Estasi dell' Oro
Guest
L' Estasi dell' Oro
Offline

agree with what you said there, a dawn of the dead/28 days later esk survivalist situation would be hard to manage, especially if you have women, children & elderly to protect.

Jesse James
Guest
Jesse James
Offline

Also, the “Survive in my doomsday prepper fortress” mentality is a no go too. Especially if you are within ten miles of a major city center. Also, don’t think your friendly country boys out in town will be cool when they know the law man ain’t coming either. Especially if you got a hot wife.

Human beings are really cruel to each other when they know a free opportunity, likely with zero consequences are attached, presents itself. Survival does not care about your morals.

Drago
Guest
Drago
Offline

I have heard stories from those who escaped the fall of Yugoslavia testament to this.

Stadtaffe
Guest
Stadtaffe
Offline

Was just reading about the siege of Sarajevo had no idea there was a tunnel dug and that the Serbs sealed it off for several years in the 90s..

subotaibahadur
Guest
subotaibahadur
Offline

The long divorce is the ideal. But it has as its predicate a governmental structure; Federal, State, and Local, that will as you say enforce the law evenly against both sides.

If Leftist law enforcement would do their job, arresting those who commit crimes regardless of PC standing, we would not be where they are. Right now, Democrat controlled governments order their law enforcement to stand down against any Leftists.

Currently, the Federal law enforcement community is still run by Obama and those farther Left. The only Trump appointee in the Justice Department is Sessions. EVERYBODY else is working for the Democrat Party to subvert the rule of law and the Constitution.

In the absence of that, violence is all but unavoidable. It does not mean it is desirable, but when one side attacks the options are submit or resist. The GOPe is doing its best to make sure that the government does not stand against the Democrats in anything legislatively, and so they are making violence more likely.

Subotai Bahadur

Reality slinger
Guest
Reality slinger
Offline

White males make up most of the forbes 400, yet the majority of frustrated people on this site are white males. Those in power fucking over their own? Blame the Joos!!!! Losers.

redpillyogi
Guest

nah those guys are complete psychopaths, for real. not one of our own.

South Texas
Guest
South Texas
Offline
Leon DeHierro
Guest
Leon DeHierro
Offline

The left and right hand wash each other. I find it less than human to classify oneself as one or the other. Just like someone would be proud to be black because their social construct made them feel empowered due to their personal strife stifled by discrimination or social injustice. It is sad and self limited. Liberalism or conservatism are the same coin flipped with equal chances. Why subject yourself to either/or. Why combat polar opposites? Why not fill the terrain with your own seeds of personal glory? To me everything else is deception of the will.

Al Als
Guest
Al Als
Offline

You are on the right track but still veering to the “right”.

JamesinUSA
Guest
JamesinUSA
Offline

The best possible scenario is to eventually have a Nationalist Revolution that will cleanse our nation of the radical left and it’s detrimental influence on our society. Especially the influence we see today in our Public Education system that is churning out brainwashed young adults who are taught to hate Democracy, Capitalism, America itself and it’s flag, and if they’re White, to even hate themselves and their own race. And not sure leave out a need to eradicate the Gangs, Child Molesters, and Drug Dealers who prey on our citizens. The radical
Left had almost taken over our nation, and if Hillary had been elected, it would have been a done deal that future generations would have cursed for many years to come. But, let there be no doubt, that this country isn’t ‘out of woods’ yet. They seem hell bent on destroying Trump by any means necessary.

Anti-Gnostic
Guest
Anti-Gnostic
Offline

So, are you willing to immediately and personally jackboot men, women, and their children whom you oppose politically? If not, then you are part of the problem.

Stadtaffe
Guest
Stadtaffe
Offline

yes, just that it would be better if “cleanse” did not mean “purge”, rather incarceration, corporal punishment etc.

wraith67
Guest
wraith67
Offline

No more chance of that slow divorce thing than there was of Paul Ryan’s 50 year budget.

Jonathan Roseland
Guest

My faith that the pen is mightier than the sword dangles by a fraying thread but these are stirring words…

MCGOO
Guest
MCGOO
Offline

Your pen vs sword analogy today works like this: Today in the age of universal web access, writers like musicians have a harder time making money because their works are displayed for free. So the writers remaining, unless they’re emyloyed or savvily hustling their works aren’t in it so much for the money and a lot more ’cause’ motivated genre gets written and basically just posted, like a big bulletin board. If it’s for a cause, then the author of course welcomes any viewing for free. But who anymore can demand a subscription fee just to read their stuff? Also with the proliferation of the web, we see a heightening of literacy especially with the red pill mentality. On the flipside, the genetically and terminally stupid reach their literary plateaus too with their “omg” social media drivel. Everyone now has a platform to write to their heart’s desire.

But for the true cultural renaissance writers, how will they suppliment their income at present? Well it’s with practical side work. Alas your ‘pen/sword’ quote comes into play. The ‘pen’ is diametrically opposed to the ‘blade’ and also the practicing trades of the two draw from diametrically opposed hemispheres of the brain. So to be ‘balanced’, a writer must exercize both so he doesn’t end up looking like this:

http://storey-lines.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/exhausted-writer.jpg

When is the last time this guy sharpened a blade?

So to be a writer, it is advisable to also part time:

drumroll

BLADE SHARPENER!

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-iIBznW_6uAI/ViDiOQGGZ0I/AAAAAAAAXZk/dIu7POCUFCA/s1600/MowerSharpener1.jpg

I remember the blade sharpeners – or the ‘blade men’ of my youth being depicted as low I.Q. simpletons, too stupid for any job requiring a keyboard. But what a useful skill – sharpening lawnmower and knife blades! Most writers have never sorted through a pile of spring steel and felt out a good piece of carbon metal that will take an edge and handcraft a improvised lawnmower blade ‘bushwhacker’ like this one with a honed razor’s edge:
comment image

The true razor’s edge is the trademark of the ‘BLADEMAN’ and takes a knack and skill to shave and carefully temper. During the Civil War, a seasoned ‘blade man’ could put a razor’s edge on a rough piece of metal in munites. Every kid should learn to shave and shape metal. It’s manly.

A large razor sharpened blade is not a rimfire weapon, no, but if primers and powder are depleted, an otherwise thumb twiddling writer could meanwhile be making useful blades. And during peacetime, I guaron-teee your push mower will slice through the tall scruff and weeds in your yard like it was butter. I once put a perfect razor edge on a small push mower and gave it a shove through the grass and let the mower go and roll by itself. It rolled for a good 20 feet. I mean that thing kept rolling through 8″ grass with no resistance.

With proficiency with metalworking, there’s no limit to what you can create. The sky is the limit. Keeping the full mind and faculties sharp is better than sliced bread and this writer won’t have to worry about the ‘writers slump’.

http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/DIY-Wolverine-Claws1.jpg

Maximus Decimus Meridius
Guest

Good Lord almighty! Can you imagine an Antifag’s reaction to his noodle punch being a MAGA supporter hitting the “snikt” button and releasing the claws????? Fuck me… shit is going to get real when it goes down.

Anti-Gnostic
Guest
Anti-Gnostic
Offline

There is a fifth option–none of the above. There will be no repatriations, there will be no race war, there will be partition of the United States.

TSK
Guest
TSK
Offline

What I don’t understand is why do Americans like to argue, protest and fight over nothing?

I’m talking to both you liberals and Trump supporters.

Why are you guys constantly at each other’s throat? Does identifying so much into politics help pay your rent or mortgage? Do any of you guys have billion dollars to even impact any worldly event?

What difference does it make in your personal lives? … If any of you guys died from a protest rally, do you think Trump or Hillary family is going to weep and cry over your dead body?

Instead of getting mad at something that you cannot control, why not use that time productively to create something valuable to the society and make money at the same time.

Like what Roosh is doing… Be a producer not just a consumer.

Crow_T_Robot65
Guest
Crow_T_Robot65
Offline

Profoundly short-sighted outlook. If the left keeps doing what’s it’s been doing whatever thing you create is going to be over-regulated, taxed and eventually confiscated. Wake up.

Maximus Decimus Meridius
Guest

This goes to the the white people not seeing the writing on the wall comment above. I have to even remind myself that ignoring this is not going to make things better.

spro23
Guest
spro23
Offline

A lot of normal white people still don’t comprehend the danger they and their children are in if leftists get in power again. We’re talking ethnic extermination, confiscation of private property, etc…. I think most white Christians can’t comprehend the level of evil directed towards them

Maximus Decimus Meridius
Guest

This. They just can’t see it. Some are just barely stirring with the rising immigration in Canada (where I hail from) but for the most part… to suggest that white/Europeans are being culturally and genetically genocided is the best way to get “the look”. I.e. Who let the fucking nutbar clown out of his straight jacket?

Sam Valley
Guest
Sam Valley
Offline

Surely one of the four predicted outcomes will absolutely occur, there are no other possibilities which are currently unforeseen.

end_marxism
Guest
end_marxism
Offline

I thought toxic, anti-male feminism would die down with President Trump, but it doesn’t seem so. There’s a cold war in the White House between leftists Ivanka & Kushner, and Bannon. I wonder what anti-male rhetoric and/or laws will surface after Ivanka’s trip to Berlin’s W20 Summit, to discuss “women’s economic empowerment”? All leftists (like Ivanka and Jared to start) shouldn’t even be in the White House.

MCGOO
Guest
MCGOO
Offline

It’s that bitch Ivanka. I knew it. She threw her own sister Tiffany under the bus long ago. Everyone knows how cuthroat sisters can be competing for dad’s attention.

SO LET’S GIVE TIFFANY the seat next to daddy and give the boot to Ivanka. Fathers can sometimes be unaware of the diabolical shit that their own daughters do to each other. Ivanka squashed poor Tiff. I’m sure Tiffany has a more traditional congruence with her father’s thinking than she’s allowed to present thanks to her BITCH SISTER! And Ivanka drags some big whoopdie jew into the national house. She brings that dog in there like he does her bidding. Of course he does. What a self centered fool she is with her popular trendy hollywood politics. Typical female dingbat and Jared is too weak to stand up to her dingbat female empowerment politics. Bring Tiffany around and see the catfight. With the spotlight on Ivanka, she’ll sulk back down in shame.

end_marxism
Guest
end_marxism
Offline

Glad someone else sees Ivanka for what she is. That’s an interesting idea. Although I’m against women in politics and nepotism, I’ll support anything to help get Ivanka and Soros-funded Kushner out (Don Jr. would be better imo). Wouldn’t doubt Melania can’t stand Ivanka either, we’ll see when she moves in. I don’t think Mr. Trump likes Tiffany very much, even her brothers openly admit Ivanka’s the favorite. Trump needs to get a spine and stop cucking to Ivanka. Such a resourceful upbringing and Ivanka turns into a man-hating leftist…sad! As for their sister relationship, Ivanka’s book portrayed herself as the “big sister that Tiffany can rely on” – apparently Tiffany wanted a credit card allowance but their dad wouldn’t let her have one, so Ivanka stepped in and convinced him to get her one; so even Tiffany may be dependent on controller Ivanka. Although there’s no doubt internal tension, that’s the external story (Ivanka conveniently glorifies herself). Ivanka has another book “Women who work” (what about women who are stay-at-home-housewives?) coming out in May, it would be a shame if it received negative reviews lol. Trump has a rally next Sat in Pennsylvania, his base needs to send a message that we’re not happy with his cucking/Ivanka. I wonder what Wikileaks would find if they investigated Ivanka and Kushner’s connections/correspondences…

MCGOO
Guest
MCGOO
Offline

That’s right. The Trump rally is next Sat 4/29 at the Farm Show Complex and Expo Ctr in New Holland (H’burg).
The event will be held at the PA Farm Show Complex and Expo Center in the New Holland Arena in Harrisburg.

April 29 is also the annual White House Correspondents’ Association dinner in Washington. Previous presidents attended the dinner but Trump and his staff are boycotting the MSM ‘dinner’ fiasco! He’s having a rally instead. I wonder if the MSM will even cover the rally? They’ll be covering the empty ‘dinner’. The line in the sand is becoming a trench.

TSK
Guest
TSK
Offline

If you want to return to the basics, go back to the jungles literally. Make it impossible for women to leave you and have no other option.

Sorry to say this but this is the truth.

Wanna know why shows like Walking Dead are popular?

When humans are forced into corners of survival mode, men and women’s role will be clearly defined automatically.

Scrumptiouis
Guest
Scrumptiouis
Offline

How many years has it taken us to catch up with Mel Gibson – the juice are behind ALL wars.

Goebbels proclaimed that peace, prosperity and sanity weren’t restored until the joos were completely removed from public life in Germany.

Bill
Guest
Bill
Offline

I like your article, but I have a different outcome that is likely to happen. War will come, but unlike any other. This war will not be contained, but it will move through the entire global body politic like cancer, metastasizing from places like Juarez, Syria and Afghanistan, to urban centers across all of the globe, including here in the US (It is already showing up in Berkeley). No one will ever be able to agree even what the fighting is exactly over–just as now we cannot agree on what is racism and what is fascism. So it will continue for decades, forming and reforming. The world will be engulfed in these small but ruthless battle fields–fires really–until a stable series of clans develop, all locally based. Just as we will not know exactly when ‘the warring’ started, we will not know exactly when it ended–life will just slowly start to become more stable in ten, twenty, thirty, maybe a hundred years, as customs and institutions develop to maintain it in this new era. Though even this ‘stable’ time will look little like what we know today–more like Scotland in the 15th century–perhaps minus the kilts, plus vestiges of modern technology.

Maximus Decimus Meridius
Guest

I can see you are truly trying to figure a way out of this mess. Lots of piss & vinegar out there for war, but when shit gets real, it’s a whole different ball game. No one wants a civil war, including me.

That said… here is my take.

Trump’s election was the divorce. The 8 years of Obama was the guy trying to make up his mind to pull the pin and blow himself up (i.e. start the divorce, knowing the laws and courts are against him). On Nov 8th, the sane people of America served divorce papers to the feminists/LGBT/globalist left.

We can see now the reaction to not being wanted or loved anymore by our betters.

The Berkeley skirmish… the punch heard round the world… I called the start of civil war in America. Why? Not because I want to see one, but it seems it is now inevitable (and I hate using that word). My reasoning is simple… we can’t talk to the left anymore.

In a divorce, both parties sit down to hammer out a deal. Yes, it can get ugly, but you are FORCED to talk and work out a deal. MOST IMPORTANTLY… you are both FORCED to ABIDE by the deal and GO YOUR SEPARATE WAYS… in peace.

Antifa… is the wife hiring a thug to kill her husband and NOT have to negotiate or concede anything. She (feminists/LGBTQ/globalists)… wants it all… UNLIMITED POWER!!!

We are going to have to fight. We will not initiate. We will not want to. But we will have no choice because they are not going to stop until we norms/conservatives/Europeans are dead. How many times do (((they))) have to say it for us to wake up?

I took a project management course in my younger days, thinking some training would get me a plum desk job (my person being wholly incompatible to it, but I digress and I was young). The teacher was a retired Canadian Air Force General. Most interesting class I have ever taken on the nature of power dynamics in getting change (i.e. a project) to actually happen within a corporate power structure.

The lesson that really stuck out for me was when he was talking about how the people you need to get on board the change/project respect power and authority. Specifically… how do THEY assert power and authority. If you can figure that out and MIRROR it, you will get them on board.

“The power used is the power respected.”

This was his exact quote. This… is why civil war in America is unavoidable. This is… the end game. The tribes final grab for the one ring to rule us all.

I don’t want violence… but Berkeley proved we are going to have it because they want it. We either stand up and defend ourselves, then go on the offensive to finish the job, or whites/Europeans go extinct. It is that simple.

Stephen Crane
Guest
Stephen Crane
Offline

Well, they got Bill O’Reilly.

kelley
Guest
kelley
Offline

the leftists couldn’t whip their way out of a wet paper sack……if it weren’t for free food, free education, free health care, they would wither away and die…..choke off their money pipeline, and they will be gone…..easy as that

kelley
Guest
kelley
Offline

this one’s easy……leftists couldn’t whip their way out of a wet paper sack……take away their government checks, food stamps, free education and health care, and they’re finished…..offer them a job and they will beat feet in retreat……..simple

Mike
Guest
Mike
Offline

I appreciate some of the posts related to gender dynamics on this blog. These are insightful even if I don’t always agree with every word. This article, on the other hand, is scary as hell. Part of the reason it’s scary is because it’s painting a scenario that’s basically armageddon. Is that the only way out? Maybe, but even if it is, thinking the left is to blame for everything is just a mistake. The manosphere often seems associates conservatives with patriarchy (=good) and liberals with feminism (=crazy and destructive). I agree that at their worst, liberals do some stupid, harmful things in pursuit of social justice. But liberal excesses and conservative excesses are intertwined like yin and yang. In fact, one criticism of feminism is that it’s basically an appropriation by women of patriarchal tools (such as politics and logic) that reduces women to units of economic production that happen to have different genitalia. And about this bizarre idea of Republicans/conservatives being seen as the good guys – really? Take a look at what happened throughout history in societies that started scapegoating immigrants and pushing images of cultural/ethnic purity. Is that where we want to go? The alt-right folks are correct that the system is broken and the elites couldn’t care less. But that goes for the elites on both sides. With Republicans trying to strip the poor of their health care and push tax breaks that overwhelmingly benefit the rich, it boggles my mind that any blue collar citizen could view them as saviors. But we have a population that is desperate for authority and direction and and will even listen to conmen. That’s both sad and dangerous. Don’t think you’ve really taken the red pill unless you can see how your saviors are holding the broomstick and you’re on your knees.

Al Als
Guest
Al Als
Offline

You display a balanced perspective among otherwise unbalanced individual views on this board. And while I don’t agree most all that your wrote, thanks for writing.

Al Als
Guest
Al Als
Offline

Wow… such a convoluted article with phrases of “The globalist left..” etc. etc. You understand that the so called “globalist left” is but a strategy that the capitalist ruling classes pursued to maximize capitalist profits for themselves: the capitalist ruling class during an epoch in which it made sense.

Now however, the capitalist world must be redivided, competitors must be eliminated, or at least subjugated, in order to, once again, maximize profits, with the current gobal hegemon, the USA ruling class, either successfully defending its hegemonic privileges or replaced by a new hegemon that will lead humanity into a new era or its extinction: NUCLEAR World War III.

As the Cylons said during the epic TV series “Battlestar Galactica”, this has happened before, and it will happen again… Indeed, once has only to look at the start of the 20th century when the British Empire, the global hegemon for the last 200 years at that time, was challenged, twice, by the new and vigorous German ruling class which sought, during the course of two world wars, to redivide the planet in its own interests to maximize profits, etc. etc.

Yes, I am a “genuine left”, more on this later…

I do however, agree with the articles on this site that promote the dominance of man over woman. And while I am a minority view among my comrades of the “genuine left”, it is consistent with evolution, biology, and social history and makes as much sense as the economic values of the “genuine left”. More on this later.

Bilgeman
Guest
Bilgeman
Offline

Convention of The States and amend the Constitution. Here are some starting points:

1) Congress shall make no laws recognizing Marriage as anything other than between one Man and one Woman. No State shall be empowered to modify or alter the definition of Man or Woman, nor institute any status equivalent to a Marriage in any other instance.

2) The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall not be infringed unless upon conviction by a Federal court or adjudicated and Federally reviewed finding of mental incapacity.

3) The Seventeenth amendment is hereby rescinded. US Senators shall be once again be elected by the legislatures of their respective State.

4) Congress shall make no laws, nor shall the States, afford to foreign aliens
the same Rights enjoyed by Citizens of the Republic.

5) The Currency of the United States shall be backed by gold, silver, platinum or other precious metals, and also by uranium or plutonium or other fissile materials.

6) No Alien nor group of Aliens may own property or equity in the United States to exceed 15% of that property’s or equity’s total market value.

7) The Sixteenth Amendment, authorizing the Federal taxation upon incomes, is hereby rescinded. Taxes shall be levied by the Federal government via a National Retail Sales tax. Congress shall make no laws exempting any transaction from this tax for any purpose.

8) The Power of any State to secede from this Union is hereby recognized, and such Secession will be respected upon a Citizen plebiscite of the State so desiring.

9) At intervals not to exceed 50 calendar years, a Convention of the States shall take place with full authority to undertake such Acts and Measures as it may deem necessary for reform of the Governemnt and preservation of the Union and its People. In no circumstance will Federal officeholders be seated or admitted to this Convention.

10) No Citizen shall be eligible for Federal office without certification of Honorable Service in the Military or Naval Services of the United States.

This should set the foundation for a more sane and conservative nation that is less vulnerable to foreign interests and of sounder fiscal responsibility.

Dirk Diggler
Guest
Dirk Diggler
Offline

Occam’s Razor favors the hot war option. The other is too complicated and is spread over too long a timeframe. Prepare accordingly.

Maple Curtain
Guest
Maple Curtain
Offline

“All the gains that took them decades to achieve will be lost if we ravage and rape their power structures.”

The left ain’t losing, Roosh. They might fear the loss of some of their gains, but the violence is a psychological reaction to reality (many of them are seriously disturbed and increasingly triggered by reality, so they are rioting to shut reality, and contrary opinions out of the public arena and out, they hope, of their consciousness) fueled by Soros’ money, not a fear of losing control of the levers of power.

But losing. No. Barring repeal of the 17th Amendment, at a barre minimum for starters, the right/nationalists have no chance at effecting political change – all 100 senators are owned by AIPAC/the Saudis (no that is not a contradiction), and the House is little better. That can’t change without constitutional change.

The globalists own the out-of-control federal government, and their increasingly ludicrous attempts at rallying middle-America for WWIII against Russia show how little democratic accountability that there is in the U.S. political system.

The right/nationalists haven’t even begun to figure out how to ravage/rape the power structures. Unfortunately.

Sarah Sage
Guest
Sarah Sage
Offline

Excellent article.

Chris
Guest
Chris
Offline

The blue cities/states pay the majority of taxes, the red states/countryside are net receivers of federal welfare. Go ahead and start a war, the red part of the country will soon look like rural Appalachia when all that coastal tax money dries up. I’d love nothing more than to give you right wing fucks your own country to run into the ground. It would look like one giant trailer park full of Trump-loving opiod addicts.

TSK
Guest
TSK
Offline

Or just dip out of the states and move to a country that has no American nor Jewish influence. Is there one like that, that even exists?