Over the summer I agreed to let the BBC and their host Reggie Yates attend one of my lectures for their “masculinity in Britain” documentary. Knowing how leftist the BBC is, we can’t be surprised that they ignored the bulk of my most relevant work to paint me as a rapist and rape instructor, using out-of-context quotes that they found on social justice websites. One-third of the documentary focused entirely on me and the wildest things I’ve written in the past ten years. Here’s the full documentary:

Here’s a cut of the documentary that contains just the parts I’m in:

At one part in the documentary, I ask Reggie if he’s gay, because he evaded my question on how fame has allowed him to have groupies. He claimed to be straight, but I don’t know a single straight man who would pose for this sort of photo:

reggie

Here’s my video response to the documentary:

Even though we shouldn’t be surprised that the BBC hired a non-masculine man to report on masculinity, their underlying social justice agenda should be called out and the conclusions made in the documentary should be ignored. What the BBC did with the above documentary is essentially hire a carpenter to review an Italian opera. Besides a handful of exaggerated facial expressions made for the camera, the carpenter will not be able to analyze the opera on a level above that of even a grade-school trumpet player.

Many men have asked me what I expected from the BBC. I didn’t expect anything, and as you can see in my response video, I can’t say I’m angry at their coverage. The reason is that there is nothing the media can do anymore to hurt me, and even if they paint me as a baby murderer, I will still gain readers because of it. When you are in an anti-fragile position, you’re immune to all manner of attacks, and so it’s the coverage alone that helps me because it gets my ideas across to those who have yet to see it. Even if 0.1% of people who watched the BBC documentary become readers of mine, it’s still a huge win, since doing it only cost me a couple hours of time.

fan-1 fan-2

On the other hand, people who are fragile are dependent on a constant stream of positive coverage from the media. They cannot have whispers and rumors that paint them as less pure than their public image. My image has already been dragged through the mud, so the only direction for me is up, regardless of what is said about me from this point on. I can be accused of torturing women in dungeons on live television and I wouldn’t lose a single reader, but if the same happened to Reggie, he would lose his job and his BBC-sponsored fame.

I did a Twitter poll the other week that asked men what would happen to their lives if they were falsely accused of rape. It shows that most men are still in a fragile position.

rape-poll

As the narrative loses steam and we enter a chaotic period where the mentally ill run the asylum, you must make the attempt to be as anti-fragile as possible so that when a false accusation is thrown your way, or a BBC host of questionable sexuality announces to its audience that you must be a rapist after reading an out-of-context quote, you don’t lose a single minute of sleep. The BBC program tried to paint me as a criminal, but instead I gained more fans and sold more books. As long as my name exits the mouth of my enemies, I win, and I will continue to win. I hope a growing percentage of my readers can find themselves in this position as well.[culturewar]

Read Next: Review Of Antifragile By Nassim Taleb

193 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Apollyon
Apollyon
4 years ago

They are getting desperate. Word is getting out and the more they try to stamp out Wrong Think(tm) the more it appeals to the truly disenfranchised.
Labelling is losing its power. Once you no longer fear being called homophobic, transphobic, racist, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, etc. there is little They can do to you socially.
However, be mindful of potential attacks to your livelihood. SJWs have no shame and no compassion. As Vox Day says, target them wherever you find them. Flush them out. Expose them. Mock them.
People are (slowly) waking up. Keep up the good work.

Modern Life Dating
Modern Life Dating
4 years ago
Reply to  Apollyon

That’s right! Don’t lose hope men and KNOW, we are fighting the good fight. We are bringing back balance. AND we will keep it that way.

Quintus Curtius
4 years ago
Reply to  Apollyon

Yes, this is very true.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  Apollyon

Most people’s livelihood is bound up with their social standing. Anyone in any position of influence is either jewish or a politically correct person. This state of affairs is damaging and the evil zionist overlords will themselves destroy the jewish people, each other; and also be ended in other ways is what i can see.

Most independent mined people have problems living in this society, especially because we don’t buy the kool aid as we see it is ending due to a bunch of evil racists and the people brainwashed by them, being used by them. The people are also at fault for being wantonly ignorant slaves…

I think we will see more disenfranchised people (hello mass immigration?) as elites clearly don’t care about western populations. We reached peak feminism as even minority men don’t get as preferential treatment as jews and females – soon we’ll be at peak judaism (when they run every single thing) when the unstable mess will collapse. They’re trying to collapse things on purpose, but they are not their ancestors and will no longer be able to rule a new society as they are too feeble-minded, self-serving as individuals and destructive to do so; traits which arguably were not as prominent in their ancestors. It is not hard for jews to own the world at this point considering their position and the dumbed down masses, and yet, they will not own it for long as their best stock has long been destroyed and replaced with barely capable miscreants.

The white race may or may not go out with a whimper. They’ll protest for another couple of years before the economy crashes and this will end most western and also white folk who are dependent on a banker-run economy to get the necessities of life to survive. By the time any alternate system is set up, most western populations will have died. Caucasian people need to be more independent of the economy and the women need to become more feminine and have more children. Children are the future and they aborted all of theirs or had them with some thug who was a poor dad to their children. Most of all, people need to acknowledge God and stop chasing money which is destroying their societies.

Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley
4 years ago
Reply to  jared thompson

I hope they overreach as much as they did in Germany, stealing 50% of the country’s hard assets through engineered inflation and then bragging about it. Russia remembers them ransacking them in the 90’s, and China is xenophobic; if America wakes up, sees their children’s future in the hands of jewish elites with a smug smile on their face and decides to make an issue of it, they will have no where to run, no super power to put down the shoah for them.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  Aldous Huxley

I’d have thought, sadly, that the situation is so bad that the western world is finished soon and the white race will be on the brink, as well as the palestinians. Others will suffer too. I hope it ends in a better fashion.

Inevitably the jews are so destructive they will destroy themselves and others will seek to avenge those of the human race who have been murdered by this band of racist God hating cut-throats.

Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley
4 years ago
Reply to  jared thompson

In the weimar republic, no one could have imagined that the jews, with as much power as they had, would fall victim to roaming whites in Germany as well (SS) within 10 years. Though they have done a good job of demonizing the greatest uprising against them in history, people will retaliate. White people are serial procrastinators, and this is no different.

On another note, I think it is terrible that they whine about the holocaust, but jewish bolsheviks killed 66 million white people in Russia. Just more ammunition if you need it for the coming debates.

roxtoto
roxtoto
4 years ago
Reply to  Aldous Huxley

Wars are waged by excesses of young men. Dont count on a white uprising.

Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley
4 years ago
Reply to  roxtoto

Already given up have we? This country became free from Britain with twice its number in population either indifferent or opposed. Victory belongs to those who refuse to quit.

roxtoto
roxtoto
4 years ago
Reply to  Aldous Huxley

That’s right. They quit their country of origin because it was hopeless to try and live free there. Same deal. Don’t count of western countries uprising.

Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley
4 years ago
Reply to  Apollyon

I get the racist one a lot. I just ask them why I am a villain for putting my own family first. They room turns on them when they fail to produce a coherent response.

Nevsky
Nevsky
4 years ago
Reply to  Apollyon

I agree, however dont forget that having one of those Leftist lables might cost you a job or even your freedom. I pissed off/mocked many SJWs in their faces when I was doing menial jobs, now I really have to watch what I say.

Ewan "TheUnpaidPiper" MacBain
Reply to  Apollyon

Bang on, and well said. Absolutely agree: once words, or insults, lose their potency, expect real nasty attacks of various sorts, including, but not limited to, the physical. We are in a dangerous transition state going toward a uncertain future. However, one thing is for sure across the spectrum: labelling in a derogatory fashion is losing steam, and losing it fast.

Conrad Stonebanks
Conrad Stonebanks
4 years ago

Apparently, Milo’s writing a piece on Reggie Yates. I can’t wait.

Quintus Curtius
4 years ago

Reggie Yates is terrified of saying the wrong thing, or even be seen as thinking the wrong thing. We should pity him, for the life of quiet torment he has to lead. Not only that, but I’m sure his fiance keeps him on a tight leash.

john malonoy
john malonoy
4 years ago

BBC is leftist and will play to that role. I sometimes wonder if Roosh is for real (as even in a third-rate blog they will use controlled opposition) or if he is unknowingly manipulated by the establishment to give disaffected men the illusion of choice/freedom where none exists. Either way, whether he is rewarded financially for his work or not by these elitists and their companies – one thing is for sure; they eventually get rid of the competition and even turn on those who ‘serve’ them at the lower levels of the organisation. Those folk are made an example of and new people are found.

I believe in opposing the establishment/elite juden, but they own all the mainstream and pretty much all the alternative media too. I mean like 100% barring some very obscure blogs which the new US/European internet acts will end up finishing off as well. This blog is too popular for them to ignore whether it is ‘controlled opposition’ or not and they will eventually push for its removal or do it by underhanded means. Considering the rate of pick up of pace in mass immigration, conflicts in the middle east (all of which most of the population didn’t want) – I don’t think there is much time left, a year or two perhaps, before the internet is just pure propaganda for rich evil elitist racists of the babylonian jewish kind. And they will rule the roost for a short time before their self-destructiveness overtakes them and other means too.

Bottom line – people are not bracing themselves when they should and as for Roosh, whether he is a genuine person or an agent of these people – I would have thought he needs to sideline himself into another line of work or he’ll become a target. I mean, he is the biggest manosphere person out there (seen on TV shows, UK newspapers etc) and if they need to make an example of men, they’ll just successfully send him down with false rape charges (wouldn’t even matter if he works for these guys, as they often send down their own from lower ranks and replace them). I hate to say things like this because I would rather Roosh continue his work even if he is jailed/whatever; but this will be the likely outcome considering his exposure and the fact that he has attracted lots of negative publicity from feminists. We are all expendable to them and sending him down as the most public male figure would send a strong message to a lot of men – yet these men would accept the implications as they’ve become weak.

I say we should form our own communities and focus less on money and more on what a tribal and local society would look like. Get off the internet – we just voice our concerns and often our comments are removed and nothing gets done anyways. The internet, TV, video games – it’s all zionist brainwashing propaganda. And Roosh needs an exit strategy, whatever his affiliation, or else one day soon these evil slavemasters will sacrifice him to make a political statement. I’d like Roosh to continue his work, but I’d understand if he disappeared from this particular scene as I believe he is in danger and is too exposed; so sadly, I would understand if he said that he’d done all he can do from this angle. I’m all for going out with a fight, but not everyone is – also, many of the people in this society aren’t worth saving – and going out with a fight has consequences… In this case I believe Roosh can continue his work in other ways without being used for someone else’s agenda.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  john malonoy

This society forgot God and renounced marriage and brotherly love. That’s what enabled parasitic elites to get us to run this dog-eat-dog race of self-destruction as we serve money and not God through brotherly love.

Now we’re not just overrun with parasitic zionists and other ‘leaders’, sluts, feminists, homos, and all sorts of madness and filth. The future looks very grim because all these people along with many others will inevitably die soon – and they’re going to drag us down with them.

Epoche
Epoche
4 years ago

I dont think that dressing up like that would worth the money and fame.

CanadianSamurai
CanadianSamurai
4 years ago

@ Quintus Curtius. Its true. I would even wager that he doesn’t even know his own fear in his conscious mind. Very sad. That boy needs his left queeRing out of his head. And a read pill in his mouth.

CanadianSamurai
CanadianSamurai
4 years ago

@Quintus Curtius. Thats true hes definitely scared. I would wager heavily that he isn’t even aware of his own fear in his conscious mind. He needs to get his QUeering out of his left ear, and a red pill in his mouth. That’d bea sight

guest
guest
4 years ago

It’s not just Reggie Yates that’s afraid of saying the wrong thing. The majority of men and women in America are terrified

One chance comment that transgresses the constantly contracting borders of political correctness in the US and you are out. Out of your job and out of polite society. You are a pariah if you dare to step outside the mass-media-maintained socialist borders of right thinking marxism-socialism.

The good news is that while they’ve succeeded in controlling everyones’ behavior, a rapidly growing plurality of people are waking up and pushing back.

That’s why Donald Trump is taking off in the polls. Everyday he says something new that drives the controlled mass media to new heights of screaming epipleptic paroxysms of hate and outrage.

And every day his poll numbers go up because people love it. They don’t really care what he says, they love seeing him push back and rattle the establishment’s cage.

A Thornton
A Thornton
4 years ago

I saw this programme and this is coming from a woman’s point of view. In some points I agree with what you say. The media has made it seem like its bad to look after your man and cook for etc. But there is a lot I don’t agree with the way you talk about woman.
There’s nothing wrong with being submissive to a man but on the other hand there is nothing wrong with a man being submissive to a women.
Grow up and join the 21st Century where relationships are EQUAL!
People can do what they please (within reason obviously) If a woman wants to be a stay at home mum that’s okay! If the dad wants to be a stay at home dad then there’s no wrong in that either!
Open your eyes and stop being so small minded! It’s people like you who turn people into feminists!

CoffeeCrazed
CoffeeCrazed
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

It is The Current Year™ after all.

Steve
Steve
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

Women aren’t attracted to weak men who submit to them.

Here is feminist Emma Watson, who only dates strong, masculine, physically superior men. Guess the meek, nice guy feminists get to watch her fuck alpha males while they follow her instructions.

This is why nobody takes feminism (or women) seriously. You can’t even stay congruent with what you preach.

NonCanadien
NonCanadien
4 years ago
Reply to  Steve

If I were the guy on the photo I’d avoid the female in question by all means possible and stay away from her as far as I only could!!!!

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  NonCanadien

Exactly. Is he really an alpha?

No.

Steve
Steve
4 years ago
Reply to  jared thompson

I’m saying, compared to male feminists who are ‘nice’, that guy has superior game and size.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  Steve

Maybe he has better game but I don’t rate Emma Thompson highly. I do know of guys with good game and good looks – yet they are heavily dependent on social standing more than anything else. Most modern alphas are social alphas and could not exist outside of the socially engineered western environment. Let’s see what the next decade holds and then compare notes…

NonCanadien
NonCanadien
4 years ago
Reply to  jared thompson

The girl on the photo is plain UGLY, both inside and outside.
The beauty comes from within and she ain’t got nothing there.

GRock
GRock
4 years ago
Reply to  jared thompson

Interesting point, as I’ve noted a few “social” alphas as you state, and seen their downfall make for a rocky road.

GRock
GRock
4 years ago
Reply to  jared thompson

Look. 90%+ of society now is imitating alphaness in look, but NOT in mind, body, or spirit. Isn’t the tatts and beard trend a dead giveaway? Even many jacked guys I know are blue-pill conditioned pussies, except they have 1-2 masculine qualities on the surface. (the guy in the pic isn’t jacked at all, he’s just toned).

Are they physically strong? Yes. Do they appear strong and masculine? Yes. But since the history of man on Earth, men are judged by only being as good as their lowest common denominator… which in most guys case, is their blue pill pussification, which is service to society, and not to their own commendable adventure of life.

Women however are judged and valued by their greatest achievement in just ONE category, and elevated as if the rest of their existence is all as great as the one single shining moment in their life. <<< And I'd like to pretend that in itself is accurate, but the truth is most women have been elevated in value FAR beyond their worth by the collective of pussified Blue-pill autobots.

Ewan "TheUnpaidPiper" MacBain
Reply to  GRock

Well said. The true and real measure of “alphaness”, or just plain manhood is … “Deeds. Not Words.” Deeds. Not Words.

The other attributes of masculinity help, but ultimately they’re not the principal core of the matter. It all comes to deeds; virtuous deeds, and high character.

66Scorpio
66Scorpio
4 years ago
Reply to  jared thompson

Being a fuck toy to a woman who is famous and out-earns you and can dispose of you at will does not make you alpha.

CanadianSamurai
CanadianSamurai
4 years ago
Reply to  66Scorpio

WEll said

Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley
4 years ago
Reply to  66Scorpio

I think he was trying to say Watson chose muscle or percieved strength over what she said she wanted in a guy, even going so far as to invoke her father as if she had any idea what being a man is like.

Of course any man who puts up with a woman so deluded with feminism she thinks she has the right to lecture the entire planet is beta. Let’s not mince other peoples’ words.

66Scorpio
66Scorpio
4 years ago
Reply to  Aldous Huxley

I agree. For all his marvelous pectoral muscles this guys is neither alpha nor beta.

MajorStyles
MajorStyles
4 years ago
Reply to  Steve

Exactly.

Another good example of this is the front page of Tinder. It shows around five couples, all of who allegedly met on Tinder. Each one of the guys has a cocky, Alpha, bad boy look.

Tinder is supposed to be something different: a new technology to bring people together easier, etc. But in the end, it’s the same old thing – Alpha fux/beta bux.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  MajorStyles

Again, that is a ‘look’ it is not real. That is mere social engineering propaganda – very few western men are bad boys, even the criminals. They are either ‘social alphas’ or degenerates. This social reality is like the matrix – its not real and its dangerous to accept it as reality. People will get sent down for accepting lies as truth in the near future.

Fuck tinder. These western sluts exist to be used as dogmeat/fuckmeat in some future conflict. They’re useless. The alpha fux beta but paradigm will last only for the few years modern society has left (and the alphas are social alphas, not the real deal in this society where all have gone insane and live in a hive mind of a shared mass delusion).

MajorStyles
MajorStyles
4 years ago
Reply to  jared thompson

Well, I agree that there is a bit of affectation to many of these Alphas. Society has done a good job of squeezing their masculinity out of them with a 24/7 barrage of feminist talking points.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  Steve

They’re both sellouts. English men are finished as a species in England. Alpha males are not people who suck zionist cock – in that case the alpha males are the zionist bigwigs (also not true as they run as a wolfpack, as well as the reasons). I’m not sure she is that much of a catch, so you cannot argue he is alpha in terms of getting tons of hot quality women either.

A Thornton
A Thornton
4 years ago
Reply to  Steve

You simply cannot say that without knowing all women, I can grantee there are women in this world that like to be the dominate one. I can definitely grantee that there are men that like to be dominated by women!
So you don’t women seriously?… good luck ever getting a girlfriend.
How do you know anything about her life? I guess from the media, right? But according the article above how can you ever trust media??

splooge
splooge
4 years ago
Reply to  Steve

why is he dating her, he could do so much better shes like a 5 or 6. His looks and fame can get him so much more

Tom Dane
Tom Dane
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

Sorry, the year means nothing. Men are men and women are women just the same now as thousands of years ago. We are not equal, we are not the same. Women are not attracted to losers just like men are not attracted to ugly girls. We can never think and be the same. Biology cannot be fooled.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  Tom Dane

Women wil marry losers or stay with them longer term as no one else will have them. This promotes weaker children from such pairings and the weaker society we have today.

A Thornton
A Thornton
4 years ago
Reply to  Tom Dane

Why aren’t we equal?
Agreed we are not the same but doesn’t mean we should be treated differently? There we go you guys categorizing men and women like thy are the same and you know what they all want and what they like.

Tom Dane
Tom Dane
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

Equal rights yea. But a man cannot be submissive to a woman and expect her to be attracted to him. It seems that now that feminist has worn every right a man has (exept the “right” of working shitty, dirty, dangerous and low paid jobs, it seems) they take it to the next level, claiming gender is a social construct and we should all treat each other completely the same. We cant. Women have abilities that men dont and will never have..she can use her sexuality to make men pay for her and support her.
Should they use it ? absolutely, why not ? But dont claim that there is no difference between us.

redpillyogi
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

For instance, men are attracted to women with certain features, waist to hip ratio being one of them. When we admit to this, we are not objectifying women, we are stating a biological reality. So in this sense, ugly and fat women will not receive the same amount of attention from men a.k.a they are not “equal” because you cannot bend the laws of nature.

Travis
Travis
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

“but on the other hand there is nothing wrong with a man being submissive to a women.”

Wrong. Completely and utterly wrong. This is the lesson we’ve been taught by feminism. And what has been the result? Female happiness has been in a steady decline for decades (as society has gotten more feminist). Marriage rates are in decline. The birth rate is in decline. The relationship between men and women has never been more antagonistic. Men are dropping out of society all together and retreating into porn and video games. Infidelity is rampant. Stable two parent families (with both biological parents) are a rarity.

The truth is, women are completely repulsed by submissive men. And telling men that it’s okay to act that way is doing a disservice to men, women, AND their children. It simply isn’t working. The social contract is falling apart, and with it, western societies.
Sending the message to men that it’s okay to be submissive to a woman, and that he can behave that way and still find a partner is the equivalent of telling a teenager that it’s okay to drop out of school, and that he’ll still be able to find an employer who will value him and pay him well. It might make you feel good, but it’s simply not true in 99.9 percent of all cases.

GRock
GRock
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis

“The social contract is falling apart” – really most concise way I’ve heard it described, in the fewest words.

A Thornton
A Thornton
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis

I agree that a stable two parent families are a rarity however I do not believe this is because women have been given too much freedom. BUT taking away a woman’s freedom and forcing her to be stay married to man and submit to him is wrong. Why does one have to submit to the other. I believe relationships should be equal, sometimes the woman will make dinner sometimes its the man etc. There’s no the woman must do this, the man must do that. That’s utterly wrong! Again I write… you cannot speak like you know every woman in the world “women are completely repulsed by submissive men” you do not know that. You are categorizing women as a whole and that is wrong!

Travis
Travis
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

“I agree that a stable two parent families are a rarity however I do not believe this is because women have been given too much freedom.”

Then what is it due to? They weren’t a rarity thirty years ago. What’s changed?

“BUT taking away a woman’s freedom and forcing her to be stay married to man and submit to him is wrong.”

First of all, how is it “taking away a woman’s freedom” by expecting her to stay married to her husband? Isn’t that what she vowed to do when she got married to him? Secondly, it goes both ways. I don’t think men should be divorcing their wives, either. I’m not saying it should be impossible. In circumstances of abuse or infidelity, for instance, it’s completely warranted. But right now it’s no longer, “Till death due us part.” It’s “Till someone better comes along.” Given that something like 75-80 percent of divorces are initiated by women, and the idea (which you just expressed) that expecting a woman to actually stay married to her husband is somehow “taking away her freedom”, the blame for the breakdown of marriage largely (although not completely, I’ll admit) falls on women.

“I believe relationships should be equal, sometimes the woman will make dinner sometimes its the man etc.”

That’s a nice thought, but it just isn’t reality. There is no such thing as an “equal” relationship. In EVERY relationship, be it between a man and his wife, a parent and their child, co-workers, same sex friends, family members, etc there is a more dominant personality, and a more submissive personality who follows the other’s lead in most cases. I believe that when the woman is the more dominant personality in a relationship with a man, usually both the woman and the man are going to be less happy. Not long ago there was a big controversy when it was discovered that marriages in which the female is the primary breadwinner fell apart at a MUCH higher rate than those in which the opposite were true. It was framed as sexism on the part of men. They were castigated for not “getting with the times”, and believing in “outdated gender roles”. But then the researchers dug a little deeper. You know what they found? It was the WOMEN who weren’t happy, and who were divorcing their husbands. After interviewing a bunch of those couples in the failed marriages, it was discovered that the WOMEN had lost respect for their husbands. There were a whole lot of comments like “I just got to the point where I didn’t see him as a man anymore”.

“Again I write… you cannot speak like you know every woman in the world “women are completely repulsed by submissive men” you do not know that. You are categorizing women as a whole and that is wrong!”

First of all, you keep saying “that is wrong!”. How about telling me WHY that is wrong? Human beings take note of behavior and notice patterns. It’s what we do. It’s not a bad thing. On the contrary. It’s a HUGE evolutionary advantage. Of COURSE, I’m not saying that every woman in the world thinks exactly the same way. Don’t be ridiculous. But to anyone not completely blinded by ideology, it’s incredibly apparent that there’s a pattern to the type of man most women find attractive. Just as there’s an observable pattern to the type of women MEN usually find attractive. Have you EVER seen a romance novel in which the object of the female protagonist desire was a submissive, stay at home dad? How do you explain the popularity of 50 Shades of Grey, for instance? Can you think of anything even REMOTELY equivalent in popularity with women in which the man is submissive and/or feminine?
Just as an addendum to that point, I’ll offer up some completely anecdotal evidence of my own. My mom is a librarian. She’s mentioned on more than one occasion that all of the books coming out in the last decade or so written by men feature strong, empowered, butt kicking feminist women, with men as their sidekicks. According to her, women DO NOT read those books. They avoid them like the plague. Instead, most of her female patrons read female authors. Because female authors are the only one’s who still write male characters as strong, masculine, and dominant.

guest
guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis

Who care what she thinks?

She’s a woman. She’s not supposed to think, and if she does she needs to keep her silly opinions to herself.

Case closed.

Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

That’s cute, never mind the fact that communist defectors admitted that feminism is a tool for getting women to divorce men and marry the state instead, or that government spending only started rising faster than inflation when women were given the vote. Every submissive man I know is a slave and 50/50 contemplating suicide.

How am I supposed to trust a group of people who flippantly break vows to an omnipotent being?

guest
guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis

“but on the other hand there is nothing wrong with a man being submissive to a women.”

There’ve always been a few losers like this. Maybe 5 %~ 10% of the male population. Truth be told a lot of guys go through a stage of allowing women to push them around, especially when they are young and still in schools, with minds that have been turned to mush with feminist-socialist garbage.

But anybody with normal testosterone levels wakes up before he’s 18 and laughs at that sensitive, compliant male shit they feed you.

Or maybe they don’t these days.

The propaganda effort is much more complete and all encompassing these days. They start screwing up young men’s minds from the day they walk into preschool or look at one of those kids shows on television.

Ewan "TheUnpaidPiper" MacBain
Reply to  Travis

Well said.

hv
hv
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

Stop repeating banal drivel, you stupid dumb bint. Try and actually read and comprehend some of what the manosphere writes and says about the nature of women before making dumb comments and repeating the same banal drivel and feminist and liberal talking points we’ve already encountered and rebutted many times on here.

There is EVERYTHING wrong with the a man being submissive to a woman, not the least of which is that women find submissive men and man of lower status/income to be repulsive and sexually undesirable. Women and feminists are complete and utter hypocrites.. or just too invested in their ideology to realize how destructive it is, and how it is creating conditions in society that are discouraging men and women from mating and marrying. It’s no coincidence that wherever women are given freedom, the birthrates and marriage rates decline. Feminism leads to societal, cultural and demographic suicide. These are not opinions that require any debate.. but rather are empirical facts.

Tom Dane
Tom Dane
4 years ago
Reply to  hv

” is that women find submissive men and man of lower status/income to them repulsive”

Right on. Sometimes I think women hate these men so much that they wouldn’t mind kill them or have someone kill them, if they could get away with it.
So always be strong with women, never give in, never apologize.

A Thornton
A Thornton
4 years ago
Reply to  hv

Haha there is no need to start calling names now is there? How can you talk like you know every woman out there? “women find this and that” … news flash!! not every woman thinks the same! Not all women find submissive men “sexually undesirable” Stop categorising men and women like they are all the same! There are women out there that like to dominate men and I bet they like it too. Sorry but you are a minority things have changed, time to accept it.

Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

It’s called descriptive statistics. Single divorced mothers are the unhappiest demographic of people on the planet, despite having more government priveleges than anyone on the planet.

This must be why most nursing programs only require trigonometry in terms of math.

hv
hv
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

There is a definitely a need to start calling names when some idiot female wanders in here for the first time and starts with her “wow, just wow” spiel followed by standard liberal and feminist talking points as if we haven’t encountered and rebutted those stupid, banal points again and again already here. It just gets annoying.. read some of what has been written already and then comment.

As far as your saying every woman wants the same thing or that men and women are all the same.. that’s not what I said, and not what even the manosphere or this site says. You can find some exceptions in every rule.. but for the most part, females have a certain nature ingrained in biology and which is the result of a millions years of evolution.. Gender differences are not simply a social construct. You bring up as your rebuttal an example of a very fringe and small fetish group of dominant women and then pretend that has anything to do with how most women feel about submissive males.. that is just faulty and stupid reasoning. I know quite a bit about BDSM culture, btw.. and I know dominant women are such a small minority it’s impossible for males with submissive fetishes to find them. Most women in the BDSM lifestyle are submissives and not dominants. And even those dominant women have very little actual respect for submissive men. They enjoy the power they feel and the attention they get from those men.. but that’s about it. Women want men their equals.. or even better, higher status and income, more successful, dominant alpha males. It’s part of their biological and evolutionary makeup.

You say “things have changed, blah blah”.. but female nature hasn’t changed.. nor has their mating choices. When I see female doctors or other high achieving women actually marrying down, like so many men used to do, and continue to do, then I”ll believe things have changed. Women are still incredibly shallow, picky and status conscious creatures. High achieving women only want high achieving men, and men who are just as successful or more so than they are. This is fundamentally different from what high achieving men want in women. Nothing really fundamentally about female or male nature has changed.. What has changed is that women have a lot more power and freedom now.. and your average woman now thinks she’s way too good for your average man.. and any reasonably attractive, slender female is so much more at an advantage in the sexual market place than your corresponding average male that she finds no reason to settle down and get married early.. instead opting to slut it up with a small percentage of high alpha men.. and waiting to get married, if even that, way past in her 30s. As Roosh put it, feminism and sexual freedom for women leads to a sterile dead end for them. Because the status of women has been so elavated, and the status of men correspondingly lowered, most women are not able to satisfy their hypergamous female instincts, i.e, to find a male at the top of a dominance hierarchy to mate with. Most men aren’t of sufficient high status.. high income.. or good looks for even the average female and she’s never satisfied.. and ends up getting pumped and dumped by the 5% of alphas who are the only ones she’s interested in.

And don’t let anyone fool you: feminism is very much a zero sum game.. in that for women to gain power and status, men have to lose those things.

P.S. We may or may not be in the minority. There isn’t sufficient data for you to make that assessment, really. Maybe most men are just too cowed to speak their mind and reveal how they really feel. But even if you’re right that we are the minority.. what has that got to do with the validity of what we’re saying and pointing out?

guest
guest
4 years ago
Reply to  hv

Exactly. 90% of all women are recording machines.

They “think” in the same way that a parrot thinks. It hears things, and tends to repeat the things it hears the most.

The veracity or the utility of what they say is irrelevant. It’s what they were told the most by the person who feed them that counts, just like with the parrot.

Nowadays that person is the state, which bestows favors on them in the form of giveaways and set asides.

CanadianSamurai
CanadianSamurai
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

@ Thornton. The natural male female energy works as such: Male appeals to female/female attracts male. Male gets woman, woman submit to masculine energy> then male submit to feminine energy; and alas they become yin and yang.

The wording of equality is not so simple. There is a natural dynamic to this harmonious relationship. Find this in nature 99% of creatures. FUck 21 century fat head idiocy. Its very ignorant of an idea to snobbishly say our 5 decades of procreation can immediately supercede how many generations? 0 BCE its at least 200 decades, which is utterly tiny considering our evolution. Generously now. Since 0 BCE Where we have a good amount of recorded history. that is 2.5% of that time.

Only capitalistic, state sponsored usery, dumbed down fat heat educated foolery; evil conniving, coward weakling faggots. would boast such a tiny percent is what it is to be human. What it is is called social engineering. People are just fucking cows to be herded. In a pod being “grown” like the fucking matrix. This 21 century equality is a lie, sorry.

Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley
4 years ago
Reply to  A Thornton

Simply saying it’s 2015 and then telling people to grow up as if it follows is a blatant ad hoc fallacy. More evidence that women stop developing intellectually around 18 years of age, as if the 8:1 ratio of male to female geniuses didn’t illustrate that enough already.

evilwhitemalempire
evilwhitemalempire
4 years ago

“Strongly offensive” statements coming from the “meekest of the meek”
————————————–
Is this code for men not knowing their place?
Sure sounds like it.

GRock
GRock
4 years ago

Ask yourself what is a women’s #1 go to way to argue against a man when she’s dead wrong? This phrase which was blurted out when I was a kid on the elementary school ground.

“I know you are but what am I?”

NightRider101
NightRider101
4 years ago

I watched that BBC documentary and it was pretty biased. They specifically focused on your words and that one satire article (which should have been obvious to them) about “how to stop rape”. Contrast to Reggie’s interview with the Russian Nationalists where he was very nervous; in here, he seem to be more be in more ‘confident’ version of himself and even throwing some mocking gestures. Maybe because he is in his territory and nothing can go wrong for him. His brother is gay and there is a high chance that he is secretly a homosexual too also judging by that picture; no sane man would pose like that unless a lot of money was given but his face would be forever plastered all over internet and no amount of money can cover the shame. If they want to do a documentary, it should be impartial and unbiased. They shouldn’t go with an agenda. The BBC lost their credibility here trying to paint masculinity as some sort of extreme movement. At one point after getting out of lecture, Reggie says the young men have extreme views so we live in a day and age where talking about masculinity is extreme. WOW

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  NightRider101

Britain is the most leftist country in the world. British jews helped create Israel with the Balfour declaration and they also own the banks a la House of Rothschilds and company. Britain is arguably more zionist than the US and israel. British jews helped send down the tsar of Russia in the 1900s; helped take down Napoleon in the 1800s(?date) etc… Brits were the first ones to create the concentration camp in 1899 when white Boer people were put in one.

Britain is basically the home for scumbags, especially the City of London and certain associated organisations like the Scottish Freemasons etc.. They do own the world as a fact. I just dispute their management of it and their plans. This society has no future with the sheer illegal immigration and the blindness of the masses (e.g. mass abortion) and the evil of the leaders. Its the ultimate God-less sou-less society as a mix between orwell’s 1984 and alders huxley’s hedonist brave new world. We’re just zoo animals who one day will be killed off, hence my need to leave here as this may be the only one place in the world along with Israel that is not realistically salvageable.

NightRider101
NightRider101
4 years ago
Reply to  jared thompson

The same Jewish (I believe the dude was Persian Jew) who orchestrated and controlled the drug trade at that time in SouthEast Asia and the Jew world owned British Empire that introduced and drugged the Chinese in Opium War.

evilwhitemalempire
evilwhitemalempire
4 years ago

What do Trump, Roosh, and Clarey all have in common besides similar political views?
They are all immune to the system.
Either because they’re too rich for it to hurt them.
Or because their lifestyles are too unconventional for it to hurt them.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago

Trump has a jewish wife and daughter. Aaron Clarey is a jew who wants whites to enjoy a decline (which they can’t enjoy due to immigration etc) so his jewish tribe can turn them more easily into dogmeat.

Davis M.J. Aurini
4 years ago

I feel bad for this mixed-racial mutt. He’s been taught his entire life to feel opressed by British racism, while at the same time all of his accomplishments are subtly undermined by the affirmative action he can’t ignore. He’s a slave to the politically correct system; the moment he calls it out, he stops receiving its benefits.

He certainly has the aspect of the gay narcissist, mincing and flirting with the camera. I’m sure he’s experimented just to prove his open-midedness… probably with older, predatory producers and the like.

EDIT: You acquitted yourself well, and you’ve got a swinging pad.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago

Mixed race people are a product of elite negative social engineering. I have to truly wonder how many of them would represent the future once this society ends? I have no issues with them, but a lot of groups supported by our current society are used by bankers for their ends. Once the society ends, those people end. So feminists, homos obviously will go. But I do wonder about certain mixed race people who may have a future in a world with a different social orientation;its possible some would thrive.

digra
digra
4 years ago

I also saw this program. Yates didn’t surprise me one bit (true beta albeit famous) in his reactions to Roosh, however he was a bit more tentative and thoughtful when talking to Milo Yannopoulos, and to the young guy at the speaker’s corner.

Of course, in my opinion Roosh was aware on how he and his views would be edited and adopted ZFG – personally, I think he could have potentially benefited more if he framed his views in the wider picture (encompassing societal issues, marriage/divorce, men’s custody rights, etc) as incentives or disincentives for men.

At the end, Yates said something to the extent of ‘men need male role models, the manosphere fills this gap but its views are toxic’ – is it beside the point that (I suspect) he didn’t grow up with his father?

GRock
GRock
4 years ago
Reply to  digra

Just like arguing with a westernized modern female, they “edit” it to fit their argument, and change context of your words, using them often out of context intentionally, to fit their motive. Hearing him interview Roosh reminded me of a tamed down version of fighting my last LTR which I rightfully dumped based on moral constructs.

guest
guest
4 years ago
Reply to  digra

I liked how Yates was worried about the effect that reading a sentence out of Roosh’s book would have on his younger brother.

Yes, all media which transgresses the social orthodoxy received from the political and media elites who control our societies should be destroyed, because all people are idiots who instantly adopt and conform to whatever they read

Morrison
Morrison
4 years ago

Meanwhile all of this translates to more book sales for Roosh; what the heck, more power to him for going through all that crap and putting himself out there.

Same thing applies to gun shops and the current Traitor-in-Chief: they absolutely love it when he gets up on a speech to the nation about gun control. Because the next day the shops sell out of guns and ammo.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  Morrison

The zionists are a transnational group, so whilst people perhaps shouldn’t give up guns, they are not effective any more in changing the outcome. Even if you could theoretically overthrow them, they’ll just nuke you from elsewhere or something similar.

redpillyogi
4 years ago
Reply to  Morrison

Exactly, the mainstream would be better off ignoring people like Roosh, but they really have no clue.

The Night Porter
4 years ago

The very acceptance of this ugly Wog/Orc as a standard-bearer of masculinity in the West is a symptom of civilization decline. Prior to 1990, a Wog like this would have been beaten and mildly tortured by skinheads in London for attempting to date white girls. Today, Western man has fallen so low that losers attend his NLP rehashed seminars.

This Orc’s “career” is made possible by the very decay and decline he decries.

Roosh
4 years ago

Correct, you and your brethren have neglected your duties as men so it takes a barbarian savage to show you how to be men again. Either follow me or go back to posting memes on Twitter.

Travis
Travis
4 years ago
Reply to  Roosh

I’m really starting to get the impression that all of these people are just clever trolls trying to keep the different factions of the manosphere/alt-right from banding together by sowing discord and distrust.

Roosh
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis

It’s people with no skin in the game, just trying to breed discontent because it makes them feel a bit of power. No one who has built a following would forgo basic strategy and the use of alliances. Well, except Paul Elam lol.

Travis
Travis
4 years ago
Reply to  Roosh

Well I’d tell you to ignore them, but you’re obviously intelligent enough to do that on your own. Keep up the good work, Roosh. If there’s one thing the alt-right/manosphere is lacking, it’s leadership and people willing to actually put their asses on the line for something they believe in. You’re doing that. And I think I speak for a whole lot of guys when I say I respect the hell out of you for it. What you’re doing is greatly appreciated.

GRock
GRock
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis

The greatest moments to be had by manosphere advocates is when SJWs devicively turn on one another, like the bloods and crips exterminating each other. Unfortunately, even then, there’s always collateral damage.

NonCanadien
NonCanadien
4 years ago
Reply to  GRock

Do not wait for someone to do the job for you.
Do it yourself!

GRock
GRock
4 years ago
Reply to  NonCanadien

Sshhh. I am. Just not online.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago

There are many PUAs out there who deserve to be on the receiving end of what you said. Consider that perhaps Roosh is not one of them.

Also Known As
Also Known As
4 years ago

To this day I don’t understand how anyone can read Roosh’s piece on legalizing rape and not understand that it is clearly satire, and classic satire, to boot: exaggerating a concept in a fictional realm to expose real-life absurdity. How is that so hard to understand?

spicynujac
spicynujac
4 years ago
Reply to  Also Known As

They don’t read it.

Anyway, I’m not sure I’d call it advocating legalizing rape. I could make the factual statement that eliminating drug laws would reduce drug use. That is a different statement that calling for elimination of drug laws. Sure, one could logically lead to the other, but I honestly don’t know if I’d want to eliminate all drug laws tomorrow. That requires a value judgement. Either way, if one is unclear, one only has to ask the question “Are you calling for the legalization of rape?” But of course no one does that.

NonCanadien
NonCanadien
4 years ago

The problem is that BBC is very mainstream and 95% of sheeple will always believe what it says/promotes/advertises whereas Roosh’s impact is very limited.
Guess how many people listen/watch BBC and how many of them even know about this site?
An overwhelming majority of western sheeple will blindly believe what BBC, CBC, CNN etc are telling them. Sheeple do not read Roosh nor they think about what Roosh is writing. Thinking takes time, effort and brains. These 3 aspects are severely lacking in 95% of modern population be it males or females.
Don’t be so hard on Reggie, he’s a liar who’s afraid to lose his jobs and numerous perks connected with it. He’s a product of the system, created to manipulate, indoctrinate and steer the sheeple who watch his BS on TV.
Be hard on a system which creates “Reggies” to stupidify sheeple more and more with every passing day.

Tom Dane
Tom Dane
4 years ago
Reply to  NonCanadien

ur right, reggie is nothing but a puppet. It’s not really him speaking, it’s his masters.

NonCanadien
NonCanadien
4 years ago
Reply to  Tom Dane

Right on! Reggie ain’t nothing! He’s just a puppet, a parrot who’s opening his mouth to spit out the ideas his Masters tell him to!
But he has a SYSTEM behind his back thus he feels “secure” in his own shell and will never dare to leave it and wander around the open sea of thoughts and visions.

Tom Dane
Tom Dane
4 years ago
Reply to  NonCanadien

I dont think he is even allowed to, even if he wanted to. They, literally, tell him what to say. For example, of all the thousans of Roosh articles, his first choice was the “rape” stories. What’s the chance of him finding that after a few minutes of browsing ? Of course it’s heavy scripted.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  Tom Dane

He’s just a slave to evil people. He is still somewhat responsible though, either through being soulless and ignorant or simply wanting an easier life by not challenging injustice.

NonCanadien
NonCanadien
4 years ago
Reply to  Tom Dane

Of course he’s being told what to say in his shows.
The problem is that he does not even want to tell what he really thinks! Or may be he’s just so indoctrinated that he DOES in fact BELIEVE in what he says on TV!?
There is no democracy in the West, no democracy but political correctness, affirmative action, quota hiring and multiculturalism. People ain’t supposed to say what they really think or mean, everybody has to follow other rats in an endless rat race.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  NonCanadien

I don’t believe that most people here are going to be alive soon. At the G8 financial meeting in 2009, they said the dollar would stop being the reserve currency in 2018. This is when all white people become third world poor. After this, they will cull the population with a staged war and other means.

NonCanadien
NonCanadien
4 years ago
Reply to  jared thompson

Well.. if all this happens, then white people will not have anyone to blame but themselves for accepting all the values of political correctness, mass immigration, affirmative action, tolerance and multiculturalism.

Tom Dane
Tom Dane
4 years ago
Reply to  NonCanadien

I would say that it surprises me how far it has gone on the Anglossphere..I live in Denmark and though it’s heavily influenced by feminism, you still don’t find biased programs like this, not without at least trying to give all parts a fair shake. This Yates show reminds me completely of Soviet og Nazi propaganda. There is no difference at all.

guest
guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Tom Dane

Nobody tells him anything.

He knows what he is supposed to say, and he’s quite happy to do it. That’s why he was hired.

He also knows, underneath it all, that he’s pushing a load of crap. He doesn’t care.

That’s why many homosexuals are media personalities. They have the sort of fundamental constitution that is completely unconcerned with, or outright hostile to the continuation of the species by normal biological propagation.

I say many, but not all. And homosexuals certainly don’t have a corner on the market for propagating society destroying tripe. Regular old heterosexual sociopaths and narcissists are perfect modern day media personalities as well for the same reason.

Look back at some of the news and media personalities of the past and you’ll see a marked difference in demeanor and fundamental viewpoint, and it wasn’t just because they were reflecting the views of the social matrix of the past.

They WERE the progenitors of that social matrix.

We have something quite different these days, something spun by people like Reggie Yates and his ilk.

But still, Yates wouldn’t be anywhere without the blessing of the people who pay him.

As the Greeks say, A fish rots from the head.

redpillyogi
4 years ago
Reply to  NonCanadien

Reggie is the problem AND the system is the problem. They are co-dependant.

AngweRebootIRL
AngweRebootIRL
4 years ago

You and MILO both are paving a way that scares the shit out of these progressive SJWs

Angela
Angela
4 years ago

It is evident that you are a terribly insecure, ignorant man who has probably at one time in his life suffered rejection by a woman and as a consequence of this feels that women are there for the purpose of men to use as they wish. If you feel that women who cut their hair short do so because they can’t be bothered to make an effort to make themselves pretty would you be ok with women saying that you have a beard because you can’t be bothered to shave? What about women who have lost their hair to chemotherapy, would you automatically assume that they are feminists? Do you even care? It’s no wonder that you like to brag about shagging your way around the world, no woman in their right mind would have a long term relationship with such a masogonist, that is why you are single. You would probably like to argue that you are not a masogonist as you love women, no, you don’t love them, you like to use, shag and abuse them, if this is love to you then you really do need help. Your perspective on free speach is warped. When you eventually get arrested and sentenced for rape, which will happen as you will slip up, individuals who are so arrogant always do slip up, women will rejoice.

NonCanadien
NonCanadien
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

1. And why am I not surprised at your choice of words??:)) “Insecure, mAsogonist, abuse women, arrogant”.
2. It’s spelled “misogynist”;) Funny how you pretend to be smart, but make TWO mistakes in one word which is a holy one for all feminazis;)
3. I sure feel for North American pussified males who have to deal with a crap like YOU on a dating market.

Angela
Angela
4 years ago
Reply to  NonCanadien

This is just too funny and has given me a great laugh this morning! You think I’m trying to be smart by having an opinion?! For all you know I could be a man using a woman’s name? As for misspelling I was relying on autocorrect (I like to be honest about my mistakes – do you?), you also make an assumption that I reside in North America and that I’m single and a feminist, I’m actually a married mother of two whose husband is not a woman abusing husband nor is he a ‘pussified’ male but has respect for woman and a shared dislike for individuals who feel that women are put on this planet for their own gratification and purpose. I pity you and all men like you and your children if you have them for having their growth as individuals shaped by the views of the ignorant.

Did you have to number the points you wished to make to let everyone know you can count?!

NonCanadien
NonCanadien
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

Too bad that truth is a funny thing for western feminazis.
I do not care if you are a man using a woman’s name or some intersexual, but I do care about your opinions.
And I also do not care where you live.
And why do you pity me? Cause I dare to have an own opinion, to differ from the crowd of sheeple, dare to stand up and be counted and to lead by example?
Again, too bad that having those qualities equals being ignorant in modern Western world.
And trust me, I can count a lot better than you, Western feminazi.

Boy Wonder
Boy Wonder
4 years ago
Reply to  NonCanadien

PMSL! ‘Trust me’, seriously? PMSL 😂😂😂😂

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

His views have changed over the years – he wants more from women than just sex. He isn’t a mysoginist for wanting that.

GRock
GRock
4 years ago
Reply to  jared thompson

Even if all he wanted was sex, that still isn’t a crime, especially since women hold the keys to it, and mutually give it up and obtain pleasure from sex.

GRock
GRock
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

Your victimhood caused this movement, not ours. The world pandered to your victimhood so long now it’s completely fucked up. Get it yet? We’re not the victims. Guys just like us created the safe society you’ve enjoyed so much thus far in life. Allowing you to crush it is what your type of men do.

Angela
Angela
4 years ago
Reply to  GRock

So women are now victims? Of what and whom?

GRock
GRock
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

Themselves

Angela
Angela
4 years ago
Reply to  GRock

Erm forgive me but I’m ever so slightly confused, at what point have I stated I feel a victim and what would I be a victim of? Are you able to possibly communicate in an intelligent manner without using expletives? Thank you.

.
.

Andy
Andy
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

This is what a cock carosel rider looks like.

guest
guest
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

She’s like all of them.

They remind me of those dolls they used to have with a cord you pulled in the back of their neck.

That would make them repeat one of maybe 10 or 12 short sentences recorded on a machine encased in sawdust within their little heads.

Angela
Angela
4 years ago
Reply to  Andy

Would you be referring to the women that participate in forums on Mumsnet as ‘sluts’ if one was your mother, daughter or sister?

lol
lol
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

No, I usually prefer “reeking harpy jezebel” or “obstreperous gutter snipe.”

GRock
GRock
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

Interfamilial relation status doesn’t erase slutdome. So yes, it’s a high probability.

Angela
Angela
4 years ago
Reply to  GRock

Define ‘slutdome’?

Andy
Andy
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

Most of the Woman on mumsnet are sluts, low class, bottom dwelling slutty slut, slut, sluts. My female relatives would agree and would not be seen dead there. I would disown any Dauughter of mine who mixed with such dross.

The Mumsnet feminist pages are full of sluts, mentally unstable, emotionally fragile whore beasts whose only function is to act like bearded ladies in a fun fair, that is, they are there to laugh at.

Angela
Angela
4 years ago
Reply to  Andy

Go on, let some of that anger out, does it make you feel better? Lol 😘

andy
andy
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

Ain’t no anger there doll. Try harder with the replies.

Angela
Angela
4 years ago
Reply to  andy

Hatred? 😡😡😡

GRock
GRock
4 years ago

One of the most telling parts is when Reggie states that manosphere men see themselves as “victims.” Come on here, the irony that the entire progressivism agenda is about pandering to victimhood makes that statement a blatant hypocrisy. You know they’re scrambling when their best retort is “I know you are but what am I?”

lol
lol
4 years ago
Reply to  GRock

Exactly. If the eternal villain, the heterosexual white man, becomes a sympathetic character– transcending the creepy, violent Goldsteinesque “dudebro” caricature, the irredeemable moron, or the dumb, henpecked eunuch “ally”– their ideology collapses. This cannot be permitted.

skillet
skillet
4 years ago

Nice piece. Way to play the mainstream media

Wes
Wes
4 years ago

Reading what is written about you, after actually reading what you wrote. That is just confirmation of the fact that social justice warriors are unworthy of any respect at all. Remember they always lie.

TomP
TomP
4 years ago

Comments & dislikes on the YT video are telling. Let everyone know BBC & Reggie is SCUM

Rick
Rick
4 years ago

I dont know who the MGTOW guy was that called him a BBC Poodle, and then the other adding ‘bigblackcock’ to it but these guys should get back into PUA game with laconic wit like that. Bravo.

splooge
splooge
4 years ago

think he does the pc gay thing because he has to. Otherwise hell lose his cushy job and fame….kinda of a golden prision.

otherwise why would a young good looking black male take the feminazi side

Wittgenstein
Wittgenstein
4 years ago

Look guys, here’s a man – Reggie Yates – who’s more successful in his professional and personal life than most (if not all) of you. He’s got the kind of model girlfriend all of you would brag about. He’s got options, and yet, he treats women well, he’s not an asshole, he’s in tune with his masculinity to such a degree that he’s not afraid of posing for a flamboyant picture. And all you can do is hate, calling him “beta” and whatever. Roosh, how sad that the only way you have to respond to criticism is by undermining another man’s masculinity. It’s redundant to repeat this but I can’t help seeing you as an increasingly bitter and pathetic sociopath whose narcissism is becoming greater as you age. No wonder you don’t understand that other people without your level of jadedness can’t recognize your writing as “satire.” I’m convinced that you truly care neither about women nor men. You care about yourself. Your intelligence and leadership would allow you to live life differently, and show men how to be more sexually confident, yet what you do is cultivating hatred and destruction, and leading very young men down a very dark path from which they may never recover.

Angela
Angela
4 years ago
Reply to  Wittgenstein

Bravo! Well said. I’m all for freedom of speach but if the only way some individuals can freely express themselves is to put down others then that is more bullying. Perhaps by putting down others and trying to get a ‘following’ individuals are hiding their true sexuality. Next thing they’ll be out shooting or fishing to bring home the evening meal slung over their shoulders beating their chest. It strikes me that it isn’t women, Jews, blacks or otherwise that are the shouting about being the victims but ‘masculine’ males who somehow feel betrayed by men who class themselves as metrosexual and are therefore submitting themselves to being ‘pussifield’, these men are merely moving with the times.

Krum aka Крум Безстрашни
Krum aka Крум Безстрашни
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

It strikes me that it isn’t women, Jews, blacks or otherwise that are the shouting about being the victims but ‘masculine’ males

The Jews have ADL, Hollywood, the universities and strong financial backing as they control the money creation and yet they play the victims card. Women have second wave of feminism now and still play the victims card. All mainstream media and politics are orientated solely towards protection of minorities, Jews and women. The Blacks haven’t figured out yet how to exploit the victimhood.

There isn’t a single mainstream media or a political party that is pro-male, not even one.

Prove me wrong.

Angela
Angela
4 years ago

I have absolutely no desire to prove you wrong. I do not live in a world where I have to convince a male chauvinist, xenophobic, narrow minded person who believes that the whole world revolves solely around the country in which they reside and refers to matters in a generic form. Widen your world, there is a world, politics and media outside of the USA perhaps exploring it would widen your knowledge and educate you about different cultures so you can gain a better insight into how men and women of all ethnic backgrounds can live in harmony equally – what is it you are so afraid of?

Wittgenstein
Wittgenstein
4 years ago
Reply to  Angela

Sexuality and dating have become a brutal marketplace with fierce competition, potentially unlimited options for a successful few, and endless frustration and depression for others. Everyone’s looking for the grand prize and nobody’s happy with what they can get. It’s basic economics. In my view, the “manosphere” is a platform for those men who are losing out in that sexual marketplace, and who think they might fare better in a traditional system where choices (especially for women) are less. Of course it is an impossibility to ever return to that system, and hence their anger and rage is growing, and it’s directed against all those they think are complicit in their sexual disenfranchisement: politics, liberated women, homosexuals, metrosexual men, you name it. It’s very Freudian. They hate liberated women (“feminists”) particularly because those women have the liberty to reject them. But anyway. The BBC documentary clearly shows that many of these men would profit simply from doing something meaningful in their lives, from growing up and working on themselves and facing the challenge to become better and more confident men. Where Roosh could actually help them a lot, if he could get over his own rabid misogyny and bottomless nihilism.

jared thompson
jared thompson
4 years ago
Reply to  Wittgenstein

This is the most ridiculous post I have read. I have an MD. You are a pseudo-psychiatrist, closet narcissist and sociopath commenting.

Goodbye.

Boy Wonder
Boy Wonder
4 years ago
Reply to  jared thompson

Hello 😬 what a fantastic statement! ‘I have an MD’! 😘 Excuse me whilst I run and hide at the fear this statement has put in me – do excuse the sarcasm, it’s an affliction I have.

splooge
splooge
4 years ago

to proove your innocenence,why not put your british talk for free online

splooge
splooge
4 years ago

dont worry about the bbc being misandirst. Hell they are also called racist and islamaphobic. Shouldn’t be a shock since foreigners are more conservatives an believe in traditional family values.