Over the summer I agreed to let the BBC and their host Reggie Yates attend one of my lectures for their “masculinity in Britain” documentary. Knowing how leftist the BBC is, we can’t be surprised that they ignored the bulk of my most relevant work to paint me as a rapist and rape instructor, using out-of-context quotes that they found on social justice websites. One-third of the documentary focused entirely on me and the wildest things I’ve written in the past ten years. Here’s the full documentary:

Here’s a cut of the documentary that contains just the parts I’m in:

At one part in the documentary, I ask Reggie if he’s gay, because he evaded my question on how fame has allowed him to have groupies. He claimed to be straight, but I don’t know a single straight man who would pose for this sort of photo:


Here’s my video response to the documentary:

Even though we shouldn’t be surprised that the BBC hired a non-masculine man to report on masculinity, their underlying social justice agenda should be called out and the conclusions made in the documentary should be ignored. What the BBC did with the above documentary is essentially hire a carpenter to review an Italian opera. Besides a handful of exaggerated facial expressions made for the camera, the carpenter will not be able to analyze the opera on a level above that of even a grade-school trumpet player.

Many men have asked me what I expected from the BBC. I didn’t expect anything, and as you can see in my response video, I can’t say I’m angry at their coverage. The reason is that there is nothing the media can do anymore to hurt me, and even if they paint me as a baby murderer, I will still gain readers because of it. When you are in an anti-fragile position, you’re immune to all manner of attacks, and so it’s the coverage alone that helps me because it gets my ideas across to those who have yet to see it. Even if 0.1% of people who watched the BBC documentary become readers of mine, it’s still a huge win, since doing it only cost me a couple hours of time.

fan-1 fan-2

On the other hand, people who are fragile are dependent on a constant stream of positive coverage from the media. They cannot have whispers and rumors that paint them as less pure than their public image. My image has already been dragged through the mud, so the only direction for me is up, regardless of what is said about me from this point on. I can be accused of torturing women in dungeons on live television and I wouldn’t lose a single reader, but if the same happened to Reggie, he would lose his job and his BBC-sponsored fame.

I did a Twitter poll the other week that asked men what would happen to their lives if they were falsely accused of rape. It shows that most men are still in a fragile position.


As the narrative loses steam and we enter a chaotic period where the mentally ill run the asylum, you must make the attempt to be as anti-fragile as possible so that when a false accusation is thrown your way, or a BBC host of questionable sexuality announces to its audience that you must be a rapist after reading an out-of-context quote, you don’t lose a single minute of sleep. The BBC program tried to paint me as a criminal, but instead I gained more fans and sold more books. As long as my name exits the mouth of my enemies, I win, and I will continue to win. I hope a growing percentage of my readers can find themselves in this position as well.[culturewar]

Read Next: Review Of Antifragile By Nassim Taleb


  1. Apollyon December 21, 2015 at 9:36 am

    They are getting desperate. Word is getting out and the more they try to stamp out Wrong Think(tm) the more it appeals to the truly disenfranchised.
    Labelling is losing its power. Once you no longer fear being called homophobic, transphobic, racist, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, etc. there is little They can do to you socially.
    However, be mindful of potential attacks to your livelihood. SJWs have no shame and no compassion. As Vox Day says, target them wherever you find them. Flush them out. Expose them. Mock them.
    People are (slowly) waking up. Keep up the good work.

    1. Modern Life Dating December 21, 2015 at 9:51 am

      That’s right! Don’t lose hope men and KNOW, we are fighting the good fight. We are bringing back balance. AND we will keep it that way.

    2. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:02 pm

      Most people’s livelihood is bound up with their social standing. Anyone in any position of influence is either jewish or a politically correct person. This state of affairs is damaging and the evil zionist overlords will themselves destroy the jewish people, each other; and also be ended in other ways is what i can see.

      Most independent mined people have problems living in this society, especially because we don’t buy the kool aid as we see it is ending due to a bunch of evil racists and the people brainwashed by them, being used by them. The people are also at fault for being wantonly ignorant slaves…

      I think we will see more disenfranchised people (hello mass immigration?) as elites clearly don’t care about western populations. We reached peak feminism as even minority men don’t get as preferential treatment as jews and females – soon we’ll be at peak judaism (when they run every single thing) when the unstable mess will collapse. They’re trying to collapse things on purpose, but they are not their ancestors and will no longer be able to rule a new society as they are too feeble-minded, self-serving as individuals and destructive to do so; traits which arguably were not as prominent in their ancestors. It is not hard for jews to own the world at this point considering their position and the dumbed down masses, and yet, they will not own it for long as their best stock has long been destroyed and replaced with barely capable miscreants.

      The white race may or may not go out with a whimper. They’ll protest for another couple of years before the economy crashes and this will end most western and also white folk who are dependent on a banker-run economy to get the necessities of life to survive. By the time any alternate system is set up, most western populations will have died. Caucasian people need to be more independent of the economy and the women need to become more feminine and have more children. Children are the future and they aborted all of theirs or had them with some thug who was a poor dad to their children. Most of all, people need to acknowledge God and stop chasing money which is destroying their societies.

      1. Aldous Huxley December 23, 2015 at 12:36 am

        I hope they overreach as much as they did in Germany, stealing 50% of the country’s hard assets through engineered inflation and then bragging about it. Russia remembers them ransacking them in the 90’s, and China is xenophobic; if America wakes up, sees their children’s future in the hands of jewish elites with a smug smile on their face and decides to make an issue of it, they will have no where to run, no super power to put down the shoah for them.

      2. jared thompson December 23, 2015 at 4:56 am

        I’d have thought, sadly, that the situation is so bad that the western world is finished soon and the white race will be on the brink, as well as the palestinians. Others will suffer too. I hope it ends in a better fashion.

        Inevitably the jews are so destructive they will destroy themselves and others will seek to avenge those of the human race who have been murdered by this band of racist God hating cut-throats.

      3. Aldous Huxley December 23, 2015 at 2:52 pm

        In the weimar republic, no one could have imagined that the jews, with as much power as they had, would fall victim to roaming whites in Germany as well (SS) within 10 years. Though they have done a good job of demonizing the greatest uprising against them in history, people will retaliate. White people are serial procrastinators, and this is no different.

        On another note, I think it is terrible that they whine about the holocaust, but jewish bolsheviks killed 66 million white people in Russia. Just more ammunition if you need it for the coming debates.

      4. roxtoto December 24, 2015 at 7:27 pm

        Wars are waged by excesses of young men. Dont count on a white uprising.

      5. Aldous Huxley December 24, 2015 at 10:09 pm

        Already given up have we? This country became free from Britain with twice its number in population either indifferent or opposed. Victory belongs to those who refuse to quit.

      6. roxtoto January 26, 2016 at 8:49 pm

        That’s right. They quit their country of origin because it was hopeless to try and live free there. Same deal. Don’t count of western countries uprising.

    3. Aldous Huxley December 23, 2015 at 12:33 am

      I get the racist one a lot. I just ask them why I am a villain for putting my own family first. They room turns on them when they fail to produce a coherent response.

    4. Nevsky December 23, 2015 at 2:30 am

      I agree, however dont forget that having one of those Leftist lables might cost you a job or even your freedom. I pissed off/mocked many SJWs in their faces when I was doing menial jobs, now I really have to watch what I say.

    5. Ewan "TheUnpaidPiper" MacBain January 20, 2016 at 4:18 am

      Bang on, and well said. Absolutely agree: once words, or insults, lose their potency, expect real nasty attacks of various sorts, including, but not limited to, the physical. We are in a dangerous transition state going toward a uncertain future. However, one thing is for sure across the spectrum: labelling in a derogatory fashion is losing steam, and losing it fast.

  2. Conrad Stonebanks December 21, 2015 at 10:01 am

    Apparently, Milo’s writing a piece on Reggie Yates. I can’t wait.

  3. Quintus Curtius December 21, 2015 at 11:20 am

    Reggie Yates is terrified of saying the wrong thing, or even be seen as thinking the wrong thing. We should pity him, for the life of quiet torment he has to lead. Not only that, but I’m sure his fiance keeps him on a tight leash.

    1. john malonoy December 21, 2015 at 4:50 pm

      BBC is leftist and will play to that role. I sometimes wonder if Roosh is for real (as even in a third-rate blog they will use controlled opposition) or if he is unknowingly manipulated by the establishment to give disaffected men the illusion of choice/freedom where none exists. Either way, whether he is rewarded financially for his work or not by these elitists and their companies – one thing is for sure; they eventually get rid of the competition and even turn on those who ‘serve’ them at the lower levels of the organisation. Those folk are made an example of and new people are found.

      I believe in opposing the establishment/elite juden, but they own all the mainstream and pretty much all the alternative media too. I mean like 100% barring some very obscure blogs which the new US/European internet acts will end up finishing off as well. This blog is too popular for them to ignore whether it is ‘controlled opposition’ or not and they will eventually push for its removal or do it by underhanded means. Considering the rate of pick up of pace in mass immigration, conflicts in the middle east (all of which most of the population didn’t want) – I don’t think there is much time left, a year or two perhaps, before the internet is just pure propaganda for rich evil elitist racists of the babylonian jewish kind. And they will rule the roost for a short time before their self-destructiveness overtakes them and other means too.

      Bottom line – people are not bracing themselves when they should and as for Roosh, whether he is a genuine person or an agent of these people – I would have thought he needs to sideline himself into another line of work or he’ll become a target. I mean, he is the biggest manosphere person out there (seen on TV shows, UK newspapers etc) and if they need to make an example of men, they’ll just successfully send him down with false rape charges (wouldn’t even matter if he works for these guys, as they often send down their own from lower ranks and replace them). I hate to say things like this because I would rather Roosh continue his work even if he is jailed/whatever; but this will be the likely outcome considering his exposure and the fact that he has attracted lots of negative publicity from feminists. We are all expendable to them and sending him down as the most public male figure would send a strong message to a lot of men – yet these men would accept the implications as they’ve become weak.

      I say we should form our own communities and focus less on money and more on what a tribal and local society would look like. Get off the internet – we just voice our concerns and often our comments are removed and nothing gets done anyways. The internet, TV, video games – it’s all zionist brainwashing propaganda. And Roosh needs an exit strategy, whatever his affiliation, or else one day soon these evil slavemasters will sacrifice him to make a political statement. I’d like Roosh to continue his work, but I’d understand if he disappeared from this particular scene as I believe he is in danger and is too exposed; so sadly, I would understand if he said that he’d done all he can do from this angle. I’m all for going out with a fight, but not everyone is – also, many of the people in this society aren’t worth saving – and going out with a fight has consequences… In this case I believe Roosh can continue his work in other ways without being used for someone else’s agenda.

      1. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:32 pm

        This society forgot God and renounced marriage and brotherly love. That’s what enabled parasitic elites to get us to run this dog-eat-dog race of self-destruction as we serve money and not God through brotherly love.

        Now we’re not just overrun with parasitic zionists and other ‘leaders’, sluts, feminists, homos, and all sorts of madness and filth. The future looks very grim because all these people along with many others will inevitably die soon – and they’re going to drag us down with them.

    2. Epoche December 22, 2015 at 12:47 pm

      I dont think that dressing up like that would worth the money and fame.

    3. CanadianSamurai December 22, 2015 at 2:39 pm

      @ Quintus Curtius. Its true. I would even wager that he doesn’t even know his own fear in his conscious mind. Very sad. That boy needs his left queeRing out of his head. And a read pill in his mouth.

    4. CanadianSamurai December 22, 2015 at 2:41 pm

      @Quintus Curtius. Thats true hes definitely scared. I would wager heavily that he isn’t even aware of his own fear in his conscious mind. He needs to get his QUeering out of his left ear, and a red pill in his mouth. That’d bea sight

    5. guest December 29, 2015 at 7:15 am

      It’s not just Reggie Yates that’s afraid of saying the wrong thing. The majority of men and women in America are terrified

      One chance comment that transgresses the constantly contracting borders of political correctness in the US and you are out. Out of your job and out of polite society. You are a pariah if you dare to step outside the mass-media-maintained socialist borders of right thinking marxism-socialism.

      The good news is that while they’ve succeeded in controlling everyones’ behavior, a rapidly growing plurality of people are waking up and pushing back.

      That’s why Donald Trump is taking off in the polls. Everyday he says something new that drives the controlled mass media to new heights of screaming epipleptic paroxysms of hate and outrage.

      And every day his poll numbers go up because people love it. They don’t really care what he says, they love seeing him push back and rattle the establishment’s cage.

  4. A Thornton December 21, 2015 at 11:58 am

    I saw this programme and this is coming from a woman’s point of view. In some points I agree with what you say. The media has made it seem like its bad to look after your man and cook for etc. But there is a lot I don’t agree with the way you talk about woman.
    There’s nothing wrong with being submissive to a man but on the other hand there is nothing wrong with a man being submissive to a women.
    Grow up and join the 21st Century where relationships are EQUAL!
    People can do what they please (within reason obviously) If a woman wants to be a stay at home mum that’s okay! If the dad wants to be a stay at home dad then there’s no wrong in that either!
    Open your eyes and stop being so small minded! It’s people like you who turn people into feminists!

    1. CoffeeCrazed December 21, 2015 at 1:56 pm

      It is The Current Year™ after all.

    2. Steve December 21, 2015 at 3:17 pm

      Women aren’t attracted to weak men who submit to them.

      Here is feminist Emma Watson, who only dates strong, masculine, physically superior men. Guess the meek, nice guy feminists get to watch her fuck alpha males while they follow her instructions.

      This is why nobody takes feminism (or women) seriously. You can’t even stay congruent with what you preach.

      1. NonCanadien December 21, 2015 at 3:36 pm

        If I were the guy on the photo I’d avoid the female in question by all means possible and stay away from her as far as I only could!!!!

      2. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:20 pm

        Exactly. Is he really an alpha?


      3. Steve December 21, 2015 at 5:25 pm

        I’m saying, compared to male feminists who are ‘nice’, that guy has superior game and size.

      4. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:37 pm

        Maybe he has better game but I don’t rate Emma Thompson highly. I do know of guys with good game and good looks – yet they are heavily dependent on social standing more than anything else. Most modern alphas are social alphas and could not exist outside of the socially engineered western environment. Let’s see what the next decade holds and then compare notes…

      5. NonCanadien December 21, 2015 at 5:43 pm

        The girl on the photo is plain UGLY, both inside and outside.
        The beauty comes from within and she ain’t got nothing there.

      6. GRock December 21, 2015 at 7:24 pm

        Interesting point, as I’ve noted a few “social” alphas as you state, and seen their downfall make for a rocky road.

      7. GRock December 21, 2015 at 6:39 pm

        Look. 90%+ of society now is imitating alphaness in look, but NOT in mind, body, or spirit. Isn’t the tatts and beard trend a dead giveaway? Even many jacked guys I know are blue-pill conditioned pussies, except they have 1-2 masculine qualities on the surface. (the guy in the pic isn’t jacked at all, he’s just toned).

        Are they physically strong? Yes. Do they appear strong and masculine? Yes. But since the history of man on Earth, men are judged by only being as good as their lowest common denominator… which in most guys case, is their blue pill pussification, which is service to society, and not to their own commendable adventure of life.

        Women however are judged and valued by their greatest achievement in just ONE category, and elevated as if the rest of their existence is all as great as the one single shining moment in their life. <<< And I'd like to pretend that in itself is accurate, but the truth is most women have been elevated in value FAR beyond their worth by the collective of pussified Blue-pill autobots.

      8. Ewan "TheUnpaidPiper" MacBain January 20, 2016 at 4:25 am

        Well said. The true and real measure of “alphaness”, or just plain manhood is … “Deeds. Not Words.” Deeds. Not Words.

        The other attributes of masculinity help, but ultimately they’re not the principal core of the matter. It all comes to deeds; virtuous deeds, and high character.

      9. 66Scorpio December 21, 2015 at 6:54 pm

        Being a fuck toy to a woman who is famous and out-earns you and can dispose of you at will does not make you alpha.

      10. CanadianSamurai December 22, 2015 at 2:52 pm

        WEll said

      11. Aldous Huxley December 23, 2015 at 12:45 am

        I think he was trying to say Watson chose muscle or percieved strength over what she said she wanted in a guy, even going so far as to invoke her father as if she had any idea what being a man is like.

        Of course any man who puts up with a woman so deluded with feminism she thinks she has the right to lecture the entire planet is beta. Let’s not mince other peoples’ words.

      12. 66Scorpio December 23, 2015 at 7:43 am

        I agree. For all his marvelous pectoral muscles this guys is neither alpha nor beta.

      13. MajorStyles December 21, 2015 at 3:42 pm


        Another good example of this is the front page of Tinder. It shows around five couples, all of who allegedly met on Tinder. Each one of the guys has a cocky, Alpha, bad boy look.

        Tinder is supposed to be something different: a new technology to bring people together easier, etc. But in the end, it’s the same old thing – Alpha fux/beta bux.

      14. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:19 pm

        Again, that is a ‘look’ it is not real. That is mere social engineering propaganda – very few western men are bad boys, even the criminals. They are either ‘social alphas’ or degenerates. This social reality is like the matrix – its not real and its dangerous to accept it as reality. People will get sent down for accepting lies as truth in the near future.

        Fuck tinder. These western sluts exist to be used as dogmeat/fuckmeat in some future conflict. They’re useless. The alpha fux beta but paradigm will last only for the few years modern society has left (and the alphas are social alphas, not the real deal in this society where all have gone insane and live in a hive mind of a shared mass delusion).

      15. MajorStyles December 21, 2015 at 6:54 pm

        Well, I agree that there is a bit of affectation to many of these Alphas. Society has done a good job of squeezing their masculinity out of them with a 24/7 barrage of feminist talking points.

      16. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:17 pm

        They’re both sellouts. English men are finished as a species in England. Alpha males are not people who suck zionist cock – in that case the alpha males are the zionist bigwigs (also not true as they run as a wolfpack, as well as the reasons). I’m not sure she is that much of a catch, so you cannot argue he is alpha in terms of getting tons of hot quality women either.

      17. A Thornton December 22, 2015 at 4:47 am

        You simply cannot say that without knowing all women, I can grantee there are women in this world that like to be the dominate one. I can definitely grantee that there are men that like to be dominated by women!
        So you don’t women seriously?… good luck ever getting a girlfriend.
        How do you know anything about her life? I guess from the media, right? But according the article above how can you ever trust media??

      18. splooge December 22, 2015 at 9:23 pm

        why is he dating her, he could do so much better shes like a 5 or 6. His looks and fame can get him so much more

    3. Tom Dane December 21, 2015 at 4:35 pm

      Sorry, the year means nothing. Men are men and women are women just the same now as thousands of years ago. We are not equal, we are not the same. Women are not attracted to losers just like men are not attracted to ugly girls. We can never think and be the same. Biology cannot be fooled.

      1. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:15 pm

        Women wil marry losers or stay with them longer term as no one else will have them. This promotes weaker children from such pairings and the weaker society we have today.

      2. A Thornton December 22, 2015 at 6:21 am

        Why aren’t we equal?
        Agreed we are not the same but doesn’t mean we should be treated differently? There we go you guys categorizing men and women like thy are the same and you know what they all want and what they like.

      3. Tom Dane December 22, 2015 at 9:49 am

        Equal rights yea. But a man cannot be submissive to a woman and expect her to be attracted to him. It seems that now that feminist has worn every right a man has (exept the “right” of working shitty, dirty, dangerous and low paid jobs, it seems) they take it to the next level, claiming gender is a social construct and we should all treat each other completely the same. We cant. Women have abilities that men dont and will never have..she can use her sexuality to make men pay for her and support her.
        Should they use it ? absolutely, why not ? But dont claim that there is no difference between us.

      4. redpillyogi December 22, 2015 at 6:42 pm

        For instance, men are attracted to women with certain features, waist to hip ratio being one of them. When we admit to this, we are not objectifying women, we are stating a biological reality. So in this sense, ugly and fat women will not receive the same amount of attention from men a.k.a they are not “equal” because you cannot bend the laws of nature.

    4. Travis December 21, 2015 at 5:29 pm

      “but on the other hand there is nothing wrong with a man being submissive to a women.”

      Wrong. Completely and utterly wrong. This is the lesson we’ve been taught by feminism. And what has been the result? Female happiness has been in a steady decline for decades (as society has gotten more feminist). Marriage rates are in decline. The birth rate is in decline. The relationship between men and women has never been more antagonistic. Men are dropping out of society all together and retreating into porn and video games. Infidelity is rampant. Stable two parent families (with both biological parents) are a rarity.

      The truth is, women are completely repulsed by submissive men. And telling men that it’s okay to act that way is doing a disservice to men, women, AND their children. It simply isn’t working. The social contract is falling apart, and with it, western societies.
      Sending the message to men that it’s okay to be submissive to a woman, and that he can behave that way and still find a partner is the equivalent of telling a teenager that it’s okay to drop out of school, and that he’ll still be able to find an employer who will value him and pay him well. It might make you feel good, but it’s simply not true in 99.9 percent of all cases.

      1. GRock December 21, 2015 at 6:50 pm

        “The social contract is falling apart” – really most concise way I’ve heard it described, in the fewest words.

      2. A Thornton December 22, 2015 at 6:17 am

        I agree that a stable two parent families are a rarity however I do not believe this is because women have been given too much freedom. BUT taking away a woman’s freedom and forcing her to be stay married to man and submit to him is wrong. Why does one have to submit to the other. I believe relationships should be equal, sometimes the woman will make dinner sometimes its the man etc. There’s no the woman must do this, the man must do that. That’s utterly wrong! Again I write… you cannot speak like you know every woman in the world “women are completely repulsed by submissive men” you do not know that. You are categorizing women as a whole and that is wrong!

      3. Travis December 22, 2015 at 8:30 am

        “I agree that a stable two parent families are a rarity however I do not believe this is because women have been given too much freedom.”

        Then what is it due to? They weren’t a rarity thirty years ago. What’s changed?

        “BUT taking away a woman’s freedom and forcing her to be stay married to man and submit to him is wrong.”

        First of all, how is it “taking away a woman’s freedom” by expecting her to stay married to her husband? Isn’t that what she vowed to do when she got married to him? Secondly, it goes both ways. I don’t think men should be divorcing their wives, either. I’m not saying it should be impossible. In circumstances of abuse or infidelity, for instance, it’s completely warranted. But right now it’s no longer, “Till death due us part.” It’s “Till someone better comes along.” Given that something like 75-80 percent of divorces are initiated by women, and the idea (which you just expressed) that expecting a woman to actually stay married to her husband is somehow “taking away her freedom”, the blame for the breakdown of marriage largely (although not completely, I’ll admit) falls on women.

        “I believe relationships should be equal, sometimes the woman will make dinner sometimes its the man etc.”

        That’s a nice thought, but it just isn’t reality. There is no such thing as an “equal” relationship. In EVERY relationship, be it between a man and his wife, a parent and their child, co-workers, same sex friends, family members, etc there is a more dominant personality, and a more submissive personality who follows the other’s lead in most cases. I believe that when the woman is the more dominant personality in a relationship with a man, usually both the woman and the man are going to be less happy. Not long ago there was a big controversy when it was discovered that marriages in which the female is the primary breadwinner fell apart at a MUCH higher rate than those in which the opposite were true. It was framed as sexism on the part of men. They were castigated for not “getting with the times”, and believing in “outdated gender roles”. But then the researchers dug a little deeper. You know what they found? It was the WOMEN who weren’t happy, and who were divorcing their husbands. After interviewing a bunch of those couples in the failed marriages, it was discovered that the WOMEN had lost respect for their husbands. There were a whole lot of comments like “I just got to the point where I didn’t see him as a man anymore”.

        “Again I write… you cannot speak like you know every woman in the world “women are completely repulsed by submissive men” you do not know that. You are categorizing women as a whole and that is wrong!”

        First of all, you keep saying “that is wrong!”. How about telling me WHY that is wrong? Human beings take note of behavior and notice patterns. It’s what we do. It’s not a bad thing. On the contrary. It’s a HUGE evolutionary advantage. Of COURSE, I’m not saying that every woman in the world thinks exactly the same way. Don’t be ridiculous. But to anyone not completely blinded by ideology, it’s incredibly apparent that there’s a pattern to the type of man most women find attractive. Just as there’s an observable pattern to the type of women MEN usually find attractive. Have you EVER seen a romance novel in which the object of the female protagonist desire was a submissive, stay at home dad? How do you explain the popularity of 50 Shades of Grey, for instance? Can you think of anything even REMOTELY equivalent in popularity with women in which the man is submissive and/or feminine?
        Just as an addendum to that point, I’ll offer up some completely anecdotal evidence of my own. My mom is a librarian. She’s mentioned on more than one occasion that all of the books coming out in the last decade or so written by men feature strong, empowered, butt kicking feminist women, with men as their sidekicks. According to her, women DO NOT read those books. They avoid them like the plague. Instead, most of her female patrons read female authors. Because female authors are the only one’s who still write male characters as strong, masculine, and dominant.

      4. guest December 29, 2015 at 7:27 am

        Who care what she thinks?

        She’s a woman. She’s not supposed to think, and if she does she needs to keep her silly opinions to herself.

        Case closed.

      5. Aldous Huxley December 23, 2015 at 12:58 am

        That’s cute, never mind the fact that communist defectors admitted that feminism is a tool for getting women to divorce men and marry the state instead, or that government spending only started rising faster than inflation when women were given the vote. Every submissive man I know is a slave and 50/50 contemplating suicide.

        How am I supposed to trust a group of people who flippantly break vows to an omnipotent being?

      6. guest December 29, 2015 at 7:24 am

        “but on the other hand there is nothing wrong with a man being submissive to a women.”

        There’ve always been a few losers like this. Maybe 5 %~ 10% of the male population. Truth be told a lot of guys go through a stage of allowing women to push them around, especially when they are young and still in schools, with minds that have been turned to mush with feminist-socialist garbage.

        But anybody with normal testosterone levels wakes up before he’s 18 and laughs at that sensitive, compliant male shit they feed you.

        Or maybe they don’t these days.

        The propaganda effort is much more complete and all encompassing these days. They start screwing up young men’s minds from the day they walk into preschool or look at one of those kids shows on television.

    5. hv December 22, 2015 at 1:28 am

      Stop repeating banal drivel, you stupid dumb bint. Try and actually read and comprehend some of what the manosphere writes and says about the nature of women before making dumb comments and repeating the same banal drivel and feminist and liberal talking points we’ve already encountered and rebutted many times on here.

      There is EVERYTHING wrong with the a man being submissive to a woman, not the least of which is that women find submissive men and man of lower status/income to be repulsive and sexually undesirable. Women and feminists are complete and utter hypocrites.. or just too invested in their ideology to realize how destructive it is, and how it is creating conditions in society that are discouraging men and women from mating and marrying. It’s no coincidence that wherever women are given freedom, the birthrates and marriage rates decline. Feminism leads to societal, cultural and demographic suicide. These are not opinions that require any debate.. but rather are empirical facts.

      1. Tom Dane December 22, 2015 at 5:26 am

        ” is that women find submissive men and man of lower status/income to them repulsive”

        Right on. Sometimes I think women hate these men so much that they wouldn’t mind kill them or have someone kill them, if they could get away with it.
        So always be strong with women, never give in, never apologize.

      2. A Thornton December 22, 2015 at 6:09 am

        Haha there is no need to start calling names now is there? How can you talk like you know every woman out there? “women find this and that” … news flash!! not every woman thinks the same! Not all women find submissive men “sexually undesirable” Stop categorising men and women like they are all the same! There are women out there that like to dominate men and I bet they like it too. Sorry but you are a minority things have changed, time to accept it.

      3. Aldous Huxley December 23, 2015 at 1:01 am

        It’s called descriptive statistics. Single divorced mothers are the unhappiest demographic of people on the planet, despite having more government priveleges than anyone on the planet.

        This must be why most nursing programs only require trigonometry in terms of math.

      4. hv December 23, 2015 at 2:30 am

        There is a definitely a need to start calling names when some idiot female wanders in here for the first time and starts with her “wow, just wow” spiel followed by standard liberal and feminist talking points as if we haven’t encountered and rebutted those stupid, banal points again and again already here. It just gets annoying.. read some of what has been written already and then comment.

        As far as your saying every woman wants the same thing or that men and women are all the same.. that’s not what I said, and not what even the manosphere or this site says. You can find some exceptions in every rule.. but for the most part, females have a certain nature ingrained in biology and which is the result of a millions years of evolution.. Gender differences are not simply a social construct. You bring up as your rebuttal an example of a very fringe and small fetish group of dominant women and then pretend that has anything to do with how most women feel about submissive males.. that is just faulty and stupid reasoning. I know quite a bit about BDSM culture, btw.. and I know dominant women are such a small minority it’s impossible for males with submissive fetishes to find them. Most women in the BDSM lifestyle are submissives and not dominants. And even those dominant women have very little actual respect for submissive men. They enjoy the power they feel and the attention they get from those men.. but that’s about it. Women want men their equals.. or even better, higher status and income, more successful, dominant alpha males. It’s part of their biological and evolutionary makeup.

        You say “things have changed, blah blah”.. but female nature hasn’t changed.. nor has their mating choices. When I see female doctors or other high achieving women actually marrying down, like so many men used to do, and continue to do, then I”ll believe things have changed. Women are still incredibly shallow, picky and status conscious creatures. High achieving women only want high achieving men, and men who are just as successful or more so than they are. This is fundamentally different from what high achieving men want in women. Nothing really fundamentally about female or male nature has changed.. What has changed is that women have a lot more power and freedom now.. and your average woman now thinks she’s way too good for your average man.. and any reasonably attractive, slender female is so much more at an advantage in the sexual market place than your corresponding average male that she finds no reason to settle down and get married early.. instead opting to slut it up with a small percentage of high alpha men.. and waiting to get married, if even that, way past in her 30s. As Roosh put it, feminism and sexual freedom for women leads to a sterile dead end for them. Because the status of women has been so elavated, and the status of men correspondingly lowered, most women are not able to satisfy their hypergamous female instincts, i.e, to find a male at the top of a dominance hierarchy to mate with. Most men aren’t of sufficient high status.. high income.. or good looks for even the average female and she’s never satisfied.. and ends up getting pumped and dumped by the 5% of alphas who are the only ones she’s interested in.

        And don’t let anyone fool you: feminism is very much a zero sum game.. in that for women to gain power and status, men have to lose those things.

        P.S. We may or may not be in the minority. There isn’t sufficient data for you to make that assessment, really. Maybe most men are just too cowed to speak their mind and reveal how they really feel. But even if you’re right that we are the minority.. what has that got to do with the validity of what we’re saying and pointing out?

      5. guest December 29, 2015 at 7:32 am

        Exactly. 90% of all women are recording machines.

        They “think” in the same way that a parrot thinks. It hears things, and tends to repeat the things it hears the most.

        The veracity or the utility of what they say is irrelevant. It’s what they were told the most by the person who feed them that counts, just like with the parrot.

        Nowadays that person is the state, which bestows favors on them in the form of giveaways and set asides.

    6. CanadianSamurai December 22, 2015 at 2:49 pm

      @ Thornton. The natural male female energy works as such: Male appeals to female/female attracts male. Male gets woman, woman submit to masculine energy> then male submit to feminine energy; and alas they become yin and yang.

      The wording of equality is not so simple. There is a natural dynamic to this harmonious relationship. Find this in nature 99% of creatures. FUck 21 century fat head idiocy. Its very ignorant of an idea to snobbishly say our 5 decades of procreation can immediately supercede how many generations? 0 BCE its at least 200 decades, which is utterly tiny considering our evolution. Generously now. Since 0 BCE Where we have a good amount of recorded history. that is 2.5% of that time.

      Only capitalistic, state sponsored usery, dumbed down fat heat educated foolery; evil conniving, coward weakling faggots. would boast such a tiny percent is what it is to be human. What it is is called social engineering. People are just fucking cows to be herded. In a pod being “grown” like the fucking matrix. This 21 century equality is a lie, sorry.

    7. Aldous Huxley December 23, 2015 at 12:48 am

      Simply saying it’s 2015 and then telling people to grow up as if it follows is a blatant ad hoc fallacy. More evidence that women stop developing intellectually around 18 years of age, as if the 8:1 ratio of male to female geniuses didn’t illustrate that enough already.

  5. evilwhitemalempire December 21, 2015 at 11:59 am

    “Strongly offensive” statements coming from the “meekest of the meek”
    Is this code for men not knowing their place?
    Sure sounds like it.

    1. GRock December 21, 2015 at 6:52 pm

      Ask yourself what is a women’s #1 go to way to argue against a man when she’s dead wrong? This phrase which was blurted out when I was a kid on the elementary school ground.

      “I know you are but what am I?”

  6. NightRider101 December 21, 2015 at 12:00 pm

    I watched that BBC documentary and it was pretty biased. They specifically focused on your words and that one satire article (which should have been obvious to them) about “how to stop rape”. Contrast to Reggie’s interview with the Russian Nationalists where he was very nervous; in here, he seem to be more be in more ‘confident’ version of himself and even throwing some mocking gestures. Maybe because he is in his territory and nothing can go wrong for him. His brother is gay and there is a high chance that he is secretly a homosexual too also judging by that picture; no sane man would pose like that unless a lot of money was given but his face would be forever plastered all over internet and no amount of money can cover the shame. If they want to do a documentary, it should be impartial and unbiased. They shouldn’t go with an agenda. The BBC lost their credibility here trying to paint masculinity as some sort of extreme movement. At one point after getting out of lecture, Reggie says the young men have extreme views so we live in a day and age where talking about masculinity is extreme. WOW

    1. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:10 pm

      Britain is the most leftist country in the world. British jews helped create Israel with the Balfour declaration and they also own the banks a la House of Rothschilds and company. Britain is arguably more zionist than the US and israel. British jews helped send down the tsar of Russia in the 1900s; helped take down Napoleon in the 1800s(?date) etc… Brits were the first ones to create the concentration camp in 1899 when white Boer people were put in one.

      Britain is basically the home for scumbags, especially the City of London and certain associated organisations like the Scottish Freemasons etc.. They do own the world as a fact. I just dispute their management of it and their plans. This society has no future with the sheer illegal immigration and the blindness of the masses (e.g. mass abortion) and the evil of the leaders. Its the ultimate God-less sou-less society as a mix between orwell’s 1984 and alders huxley’s hedonist brave new world. We’re just zoo animals who one day will be killed off, hence my need to leave here as this may be the only one place in the world along with Israel that is not realistically salvageable.

      1. NightRider101 December 21, 2015 at 8:05 pm

        The same Jewish (I believe the dude was Persian Jew) who orchestrated and controlled the drug trade at that time in SouthEast Asia and the Jew world owned British Empire that introduced and drugged the Chinese in Opium War.

  7. evilwhitemalempire December 21, 2015 at 12:11 pm

    What do Trump, Roosh, and Clarey all have in common besides similar political views?
    They are all immune to the system.
    Either because they’re too rich for it to hurt them.
    Or because their lifestyles are too unconventional for it to hurt them.

    1. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:11 pm

      Trump has a jewish wife and daughter. Aaron Clarey is a jew who wants whites to enjoy a decline (which they can’t enjoy due to immigration etc) so his jewish tribe can turn them more easily into dogmeat.

  8. Davis M.J. Aurini December 21, 2015 at 12:40 pm

    I feel bad for this mixed-racial mutt. He’s been taught his entire life to feel opressed by British racism, while at the same time all of his accomplishments are subtly undermined by the affirmative action he can’t ignore. He’s a slave to the politically correct system; the moment he calls it out, he stops receiving its benefits.

    He certainly has the aspect of the gay narcissist, mincing and flirting with the camera. I’m sure he’s experimented just to prove his open-midedness… probably with older, predatory producers and the like.

    EDIT: You acquitted yourself well, and you’ve got a swinging pad.

    1. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:05 pm

      Mixed race people are a product of elite negative social engineering. I have to truly wonder how many of them would represent the future once this society ends? I have no issues with them, but a lot of groups supported by our current society are used by bankers for their ends. Once the society ends, those people end. So feminists, homos obviously will go. But I do wonder about certain mixed race people who may have a future in a world with a different social orientation;its possible some would thrive.

  9. digra December 21, 2015 at 12:59 pm

    I also saw this program. Yates didn’t surprise me one bit (true beta albeit famous) in his reactions to Roosh, however he was a bit more tentative and thoughtful when talking to Milo Yannopoulos, and to the young guy at the speaker’s corner.

    Of course, in my opinion Roosh was aware on how he and his views would be edited and adopted ZFG – personally, I think he could have potentially benefited more if he framed his views in the wider picture (encompassing societal issues, marriage/divorce, men’s custody rights, etc) as incentives or disincentives for men.

    At the end, Yates said something to the extent of ‘men need male role models, the manosphere fills this gap but its views are toxic’ – is it beside the point that (I suspect) he didn’t grow up with his father?

    1. GRock December 21, 2015 at 6:57 pm

      Just like arguing with a westernized modern female, they “edit” it to fit their argument, and change context of your words, using them often out of context intentionally, to fit their motive. Hearing him interview Roosh reminded me of a tamed down version of fighting my last LTR which I rightfully dumped based on moral constructs.

    2. guest December 29, 2015 at 7:40 am

      I liked how Yates was worried about the effect that reading a sentence out of Roosh’s book would have on his younger brother.

      Yes, all media which transgresses the social orthodoxy received from the political and media elites who control our societies should be destroyed, because all people are idiots who instantly adopt and conform to whatever they read

  10. Morrison December 21, 2015 at 1:57 pm

    Meanwhile all of this translates to more book sales for Roosh; what the heck, more power to him for going through all that crap and putting himself out there.

    Same thing applies to gun shops and the current Traitor-in-Chief: they absolutely love it when he gets up on a speech to the nation about gun control. Because the next day the shops sell out of guns and ammo.

    1. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:34 pm

      The zionists are a transnational group, so whilst people perhaps shouldn’t give up guns, they are not effective any more in changing the outcome. Even if you could theoretically overthrow them, they’ll just nuke you from elsewhere or something similar.

    2. redpillyogi December 22, 2015 at 5:34 pm

      Exactly, the mainstream would be better off ignoring people like Roosh, but they really have no clue.

  11. The Night Porter December 21, 2015 at 2:15 pm

    The very acceptance of this ugly Wog/Orc as a standard-bearer of masculinity in the West is a symptom of civilization decline. Prior to 1990, a Wog like this would have been beaten and mildly tortured by skinheads in London for attempting to date white girls. Today, Western man has fallen so low that losers attend his NLP rehashed seminars.

    This Orc’s “career” is made possible by the very decay and decline he decries.

    1. Roosh December 21, 2015 at 4:55 pm

      Correct, you and your brethren have neglected your duties as men so it takes a barbarian savage to show you how to be men again. Either follow me or go back to posting memes on Twitter.

      1. Travis December 21, 2015 at 5:42 pm

        I’m really starting to get the impression that all of these people are just clever trolls trying to keep the different factions of the manosphere/alt-right from banding together by sowing discord and distrust.

      2. Roosh December 21, 2015 at 6:11 pm

        It’s people with no skin in the game, just trying to breed discontent because it makes them feel a bit of power. No one who has built a following would forgo basic strategy and the use of alliances. Well, except Paul Elam lol.

      3. Travis December 21, 2015 at 6:49 pm

        Well I’d tell you to ignore them, but you’re obviously intelligent enough to do that on your own. Keep up the good work, Roosh. If there’s one thing the alt-right/manosphere is lacking, it’s leadership and people willing to actually put their asses on the line for something they believe in. You’re doing that. And I think I speak for a whole lot of guys when I say I respect the hell out of you for it. What you’re doing is greatly appreciated.

      4. GRock December 21, 2015 at 7:01 pm

        The greatest moments to be had by manosphere advocates is when SJWs devicively turn on one another, like the bloods and crips exterminating each other. Unfortunately, even then, there’s always collateral damage.

      5. NonCanadien December 21, 2015 at 7:04 pm

        Do not wait for someone to do the job for you.
        Do it yourself!

      6. GRock December 21, 2015 at 7:17 pm

        Sshhh. I am. Just not online.

    2. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:27 pm

      There are many PUAs out there who deserve to be on the receiving end of what you said. Consider that perhaps Roosh is not one of them.

  12. Also Known As December 21, 2015 at 3:43 pm

    To this day I don’t understand how anyone can read Roosh’s piece on legalizing rape and not understand that it is clearly satire, and classic satire, to boot: exaggerating a concept in a fictional realm to expose real-life absurdity. How is that so hard to understand?

    1. spicynujac December 21, 2015 at 3:45 pm

      They don’t read it.

      Anyway, I’m not sure I’d call it advocating legalizing rape. I could make the factual statement that eliminating drug laws would reduce drug use. That is a different statement that calling for elimination of drug laws. Sure, one could logically lead to the other, but I honestly don’t know if I’d want to eliminate all drug laws tomorrow. That requires a value judgement. Either way, if one is unclear, one only has to ask the question “Are you calling for the legalization of rape?” But of course no one does that.

  13. NonCanadien December 21, 2015 at 4:07 pm

    The problem is that BBC is very mainstream and 95% of sheeple will always believe what it says/promotes/advertises whereas Roosh’s impact is very limited.
    Guess how many people listen/watch BBC and how many of them even know about this site?
    An overwhelming majority of western sheeple will blindly believe what BBC, CBC, CNN etc are telling them. Sheeple do not read Roosh nor they think about what Roosh is writing. Thinking takes time, effort and brains. These 3 aspects are severely lacking in 95% of modern population be it males or females.
    Don’t be so hard on Reggie, he’s a liar who’s afraid to lose his jobs and numerous perks connected with it. He’s a product of the system, created to manipulate, indoctrinate and steer the sheeple who watch his BS on TV.
    Be hard on a system which creates “Reggies” to stupidify sheeple more and more with every passing day.

    1. Tom Dane December 21, 2015 at 4:42 pm

      ur right, reggie is nothing but a puppet. It’s not really him speaking, it’s his masters.

      1. NonCanadien December 21, 2015 at 4:50 pm

        Right on! Reggie ain’t nothing! He’s just a puppet, a parrot who’s opening his mouth to spit out the ideas his Masters tell him to!
        But he has a SYSTEM behind his back thus he feels “secure” in his own shell and will never dare to leave it and wander around the open sea of thoughts and visions.

      2. Tom Dane December 21, 2015 at 5:03 pm

        I dont think he is even allowed to, even if he wanted to. They, literally, tell him what to say. For example, of all the thousans of Roosh articles, his first choice was the “rape” stories. What’s the chance of him finding that after a few minutes of browsing ? Of course it’s heavy scripted.

      3. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:13 pm

        He’s just a slave to evil people. He is still somewhat responsible though, either through being soulless and ignorant or simply wanting an easier life by not challenging injustice.

      4. NonCanadien December 21, 2015 at 5:14 pm

        Of course he’s being told what to say in his shows.
        The problem is that he does not even want to tell what he really thinks! Or may be he’s just so indoctrinated that he DOES in fact BELIEVE in what he says on TV!?
        There is no democracy in the West, no democracy but political correctness, affirmative action, quota hiring and multiculturalism. People ain’t supposed to say what they really think or mean, everybody has to follow other rats in an endless rat race.

      5. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:25 pm

        I don’t believe that most people here are going to be alive soon. At the G8 financial meeting in 2009, they said the dollar would stop being the reserve currency in 2018. This is when all white people become third world poor. After this, they will cull the population with a staged war and other means.

      6. NonCanadien December 21, 2015 at 5:45 pm

        Well.. if all this happens, then white people will not have anyone to blame but themselves for accepting all the values of political correctness, mass immigration, affirmative action, tolerance and multiculturalism.

      7. Tom Dane December 22, 2015 at 4:42 am

        I would say that it surprises me how far it has gone on the Anglossphere..I live in Denmark and though it’s heavily influenced by feminism, you still don’t find biased programs like this, not without at least trying to give all parts a fair shake. This Yates show reminds me completely of Soviet og Nazi propaganda. There is no difference at all.

      8. guest December 29, 2015 at 7:51 am

        Nobody tells him anything.

        He knows what he is supposed to say, and he’s quite happy to do it. That’s why he was hired.

        He also knows, underneath it all, that he’s pushing a load of crap. He doesn’t care.

        That’s why many homosexuals are media personalities. They have the sort of fundamental constitution that is completely unconcerned with, or outright hostile to the continuation of the species by normal biological propagation.

        I say many, but not all. And homosexuals certainly don’t have a corner on the market for propagating society destroying tripe. Regular old heterosexual sociopaths and narcissists are perfect modern day media personalities as well for the same reason.

        Look back at some of the news and media personalities of the past and you’ll see a marked difference in demeanor and fundamental viewpoint, and it wasn’t just because they were reflecting the views of the social matrix of the past.

        They WERE the progenitors of that social matrix.

        We have something quite different these days, something spun by people like Reggie Yates and his ilk.

        But still, Yates wouldn’t be anywhere without the blessing of the people who pay him.

        As the Greeks say, A fish rots from the head.

      9. redpillyogi December 22, 2015 at 5:27 pm

        Reggie is the problem AND the system is the problem. They are co-dependant.

  14. AngweRebootIRL December 21, 2015 at 4:16 pm

    You and MILO both are paving a way that scares the shit out of these progressive SJWs

  15. Angela December 21, 2015 at 4:54 pm

    It is evident that you are a terribly insecure, ignorant man who has probably at one time in his life suffered rejection by a woman and as a consequence of this feels that women are there for the purpose of men to use as they wish. If you feel that women who cut their hair short do so because they can’t be bothered to make an effort to make themselves pretty would you be ok with women saying that you have a beard because you can’t be bothered to shave? What about women who have lost their hair to chemotherapy, would you automatically assume that they are feminists? Do you even care? It’s no wonder that you like to brag about shagging your way around the world, no woman in their right mind would have a long term relationship with such a masogonist, that is why you are single. You would probably like to argue that you are not a masogonist as you love women, no, you don’t love them, you like to use, shag and abuse them, if this is love to you then you really do need help. Your perspective on free speach is warped. When you eventually get arrested and sentenced for rape, which will happen as you will slip up, individuals who are so arrogant always do slip up, women will rejoice.

    1. NonCanadien December 21, 2015 at 5:06 pm

      1. And why am I not surprised at your choice of words??:)) “Insecure, mAsogonist, abuse women, arrogant”.
      2. It’s spelled “misogynist”;) Funny how you pretend to be smart, but make TWO mistakes in one word which is a holy one for all feminazis;)
      3. I sure feel for North American pussified males who have to deal with a crap like YOU on a dating market.

      1. Angela December 22, 2015 at 2:29 am

        This is just too funny and has given me a great laugh this morning! You think I’m trying to be smart by having an opinion?! For all you know I could be a man using a woman’s name? As for misspelling I was relying on autocorrect (I like to be honest about my mistakes – do you?), you also make an assumption that I reside in North America and that I’m single and a feminist, I’m actually a married mother of two whose husband is not a woman abusing husband nor is he a ‘pussified’ male but has respect for woman and a shared dislike for individuals who feel that women are put on this planet for their own gratification and purpose. I pity you and all men like you and your children if you have them for having their growth as individuals shaped by the views of the ignorant.

        Did you have to number the points you wished to make to let everyone know you can count?!

      2. NonCanadien December 22, 2015 at 2:02 pm

        Too bad that truth is a funny thing for western feminazis.
        I do not care if you are a man using a woman’s name or some intersexual, but I do care about your opinions.
        And I also do not care where you live.
        And why do you pity me? Cause I dare to have an own opinion, to differ from the crowd of sheeple, dare to stand up and be counted and to lead by example?
        Again, too bad that having those qualities equals being ignorant in modern Western world.
        And trust me, I can count a lot better than you, Western feminazi.

      3. Boy Wonder December 24, 2015 at 2:10 am

        PMSL! ‘Trust me’, seriously? PMSL 😂😂😂😂

    2. jared thompson December 21, 2015 at 5:25 pm

      His views have changed over the years – he wants more from women than just sex. He isn’t a mysoginist for wanting that.

      1. GRock December 21, 2015 at 7:09 pm

        Even if all he wanted was sex, that still isn’t a crime, especially since women hold the keys to it, and mutually give it up and obtain pleasure from sex.

    3. GRock December 21, 2015 at 7:15 pm

      Your victimhood caused this movement, not ours. The world pandered to your victimhood so long now it’s completely fucked up. Get it yet? We’re not the victims. Guys just like us created the safe society you’ve enjoyed so much thus far in life. Allowing you to crush it is what your type of men do.

      1. Angela December 22, 2015 at 2:30 am

        So women are now victims? Of what and whom?

      2. GRock December 22, 2015 at 1:13 pm


      3. Angela December 22, 2015 at 8:56 am

        Erm forgive me but I’m ever so slightly confused, at what point have I stated I feel a victim and what would I be a victim of? Are you able to possibly communicate in an intelligent manner without using expletives? Thank you.


    4. Andy December 24, 2015 at 2:02 pm

      This is what a cock carosel rider looks like.

    5. guest December 29, 2015 at 7:57 am

      She’s like all of them.

      They remind me of those dolls they used to have with a cord you pulled in the back of their neck.

      That would make them repeat one of maybe 10 or 12 short sentences recorded on a machine encased in sawdust within their little heads.

    1. Angela December 22, 2015 at 8:40 am

      Would you be referring to the women that participate in forums on Mumsnet as ‘sluts’ if one was your mother, daughter or sister?

      1. lol December 22, 2015 at 9:52 am

        No, I usually prefer “reeking harpy jezebel” or “obstreperous gutter snipe.”

      2. GRock December 22, 2015 at 1:12 pm

        Interfamilial relation status doesn’t erase slutdome. So yes, it’s a high probability.

      3. Angela December 22, 2015 at 5:00 pm

        Define ‘slutdome’?

      4. Andy December 23, 2015 at 1:27 pm

        Most of the Woman on mumsnet are sluts, low class, bottom dwelling slutty slut, slut, sluts. My female relatives would agree and would not be seen dead there. I would disown any Dauughter of mine who mixed with such dross.

        The Mumsnet feminist pages are full of sluts, mentally unstable, emotionally fragile whore beasts whose only function is to act like bearded ladies in a fun fair, that is, they are there to laugh at.

      5. Angela December 23, 2015 at 4:12 pm

        Go on, let some of that anger out, does it make you feel better? Lol 😘

      6. andy December 24, 2015 at 2:01 pm

        Ain’t no anger there doll. Try harder with the replies.

      7. Angela December 25, 2015 at 10:03 am

        Hatred? 😡😡😡

  16. GRock December 21, 2015 at 7:08 pm

    One of the most telling parts is when Reggie states that manosphere men see themselves as “victims.” Come on here, the irony that the entire progressivism agenda is about pandering to victimhood makes that statement a blatant hypocrisy. You know they’re scrambling when their best retort is “I know you are but what am I?”

    1. lol December 22, 2015 at 10:15 am

      Exactly. If the eternal villain, the heterosexual white man, becomes a sympathetic character– transcending the creepy, violent Goldsteinesque “dudebro” caricature, the irredeemable moron, or the dumb, henpecked eunuch “ally”– their ideology collapses. This cannot be permitted.

  17. skillet December 21, 2015 at 7:29 pm

    Nice piece. Way to play the mainstream media

  18. Wes December 21, 2015 at 9:35 pm

    Reading what is written about you, after actually reading what you wrote. That is just confirmation of the fact that social justice warriors are unworthy of any respect at all. Remember they always lie.

  19. TomP December 21, 2015 at 10:01 pm

    Comments & dislikes on the YT video are telling. Let everyone know BBC & Reggie is SCUM

  20. Rick December 22, 2015 at 3:40 am

    I dont know who the MGTOW guy was that called him a BBC Poodle, and then the other adding ‘bigblackcock’ to it but these guys should get back into PUA game with laconic wit like that. Bravo.

  21. splooge December 22, 2015 at 5:44 am

    think he does the pc gay thing because he has to. Otherwise hell lose his cushy job and fame….kinda of a golden prision.

    otherwise why would a young good looking black male take the feminazi side

  22. Wittgenstein December 22, 2015 at 5:55 am

    Look guys, here’s a man – Reggie Yates – who’s more successful in his professional and personal life than most (if not all) of you. He’s got the kind of model girlfriend all of you would brag about. He’s got options, and yet, he treats women well, he’s not an asshole, he’s in tune with his masculinity to such a degree that he’s not afraid of posing for a flamboyant picture. And all you can do is hate, calling him “beta” and whatever. Roosh, how sad that the only way you have to respond to criticism is by undermining another man’s masculinity. It’s redundant to repeat this but I can’t help seeing you as an increasingly bitter and pathetic sociopath whose narcissism is becoming greater as you age. No wonder you don’t understand that other people without your level of jadedness can’t recognize your writing as “satire.” I’m convinced that you truly care neither about women nor men. You care about yourself. Your intelligence and leadership would allow you to live life differently, and show men how to be more sexually confident, yet what you do is cultivating hatred and destruction, and leading very young men down a very dark path from which they may never recover.

    1. Angela December 22, 2015 at 8:52 am

      Bravo! Well said. I’m all for freedom of speach but if the only way some individuals can freely express themselves is to put down others then that is more bullying. Perhaps by putting down others and trying to get a ‘following’ individuals are hiding their true sexuality. Next thing they’ll be out shooting or fishing to bring home the evening meal slung over their shoulders beating their chest. It strikes me that it isn’t women, Jews, blacks or otherwise that are the shouting about being the victims but ‘masculine’ males who somehow feel betrayed by men who class themselves as metrosexual and are therefore submitting themselves to being ‘pussifield’, these men are merely moving with the times.

      1. Krum aka Крум Безстрашни December 22, 2015 at 11:01 am

        It strikes me that it isn’t women, Jews, blacks or otherwise that are the shouting about being the victims but ‘masculine’ males

        The Jews have ADL, Hollywood, the universities and strong financial backing as they control the money creation and yet they play the victims card. Women have second wave of feminism now and still play the victims card. All mainstream media and politics are orientated solely towards protection of minorities, Jews and women. The Blacks haven’t figured out yet how to exploit the victimhood.

        There isn’t a single mainstream media or a political party that is pro-male, not even one.

        Prove me wrong.

      2. Angela December 22, 2015 at 2:08 pm

        I have absolutely no desire to prove you wrong. I do not live in a world where I have to convince a male chauvinist, xenophobic, narrow minded person who believes that the whole world revolves solely around the country in which they reside and refers to matters in a generic form. Widen your world, there is a world, politics and media outside of the USA perhaps exploring it would widen your knowledge and educate you about different cultures so you can gain a better insight into how men and women of all ethnic backgrounds can live in harmony equally – what is it you are so afraid of?

      3. Wittgenstein December 22, 2015 at 3:02 pm

        Sexuality and dating have become a brutal marketplace with fierce competition, potentially unlimited options for a successful few, and endless frustration and depression for others. Everyone’s looking for the grand prize and nobody’s happy with what they can get. It’s basic economics. In my view, the “manosphere” is a platform for those men who are losing out in that sexual marketplace, and who think they might fare better in a traditional system where choices (especially for women) are less. Of course it is an impossibility to ever return to that system, and hence their anger and rage is growing, and it’s directed against all those they think are complicit in their sexual disenfranchisement: politics, liberated women, homosexuals, metrosexual men, you name it. It’s very Freudian. They hate liberated women (“feminists”) particularly because those women have the liberty to reject them. But anyway. The BBC documentary clearly shows that many of these men would profit simply from doing something meaningful in their lives, from growing up and working on themselves and facing the challenge to become better and more confident men. Where Roosh could actually help them a lot, if he could get over his own rabid misogyny and bottomless nihilism.

      4. jared thompson December 23, 2015 at 4:33 am

        This is the most ridiculous post I have read. I have an MD. You are a pseudo-psychiatrist, closet narcissist and sociopath commenting.


      5. Boy Wonder December 24, 2015 at 1:46 am

        Hello 😬 what a fantastic statement! ‘I have an MD’! 😘 Excuse me whilst I run and hide at the fear this statement has put in me – do excuse the sarcasm, it’s an affliction I have.

  23. splooge December 22, 2015 at 5:57 am

    to proove your innocenence,why not put your british talk for free online

  24. splooge December 22, 2015 at 6:02 am

    dont worry about the bbc being misandirst. Hell they are also called racist and islamaphobic. Shouldn’t be a shock since foreigners are more conservatives an believe in traditional family values.

  25. BernieGoetzFan December 22, 2015 at 9:21 am

    Glad to see Roosh getting more readers/followers. I am sure Reggie Yates likes having lots of male groupies. Imagine if the camera were turned on him!

  26. Krum aka Крум Безстрашни December 22, 2015 at 9:22 am

    He is definitely gay and you let him in during your lecture but whats worse you let him in your own apartment and you showed him the bed with the sign.

    Roosh, I respect your work to a degree but I’ll be brutally honest with you, you were just whoring for fame with the BBC.

    p.s. And in your video you’re wearing a tshirt with Trump. The manosphere’s endorsement of Trump is so ironic and plain stupid because it will be Trump exactly who will help Hillary Clinton to get elected.

    1. spicynujac December 22, 2015 at 12:34 pm

      I don’t give a shit about elections and voting. I don’t even endorse Trump and dislike strongly some things he says, and like others. But I will say this. If you can’t stand up for someone who is speaking truth, who is being a leader, who you agree with, because you are afraid it will cause Marco Rubio or Jeb Bush to lose the white house then fuck you because those two are every bit as bad as the Clinton alternative.

      1. Krum aka Крум Безстрашни December 22, 2015 at 12:42 pm

        Trump’s non-PC narrative is his screen role play. He is allowed to say these thing and he gets all the media attention so it reaches the target audience – you. Who controls the media?

        He is the same Trump who changed his political affiliations like he changes his underwear and the same Trump who has donated to the Clintons and to all democrats “because it is good for business and they are all democrats in government”.

        The wolf changes his coat, but not his disposition.

      2. Roosh December 22, 2015 at 1:34 pm

        Krum is my (and ROK’s) pet troll. He has been banned countless times but can’t resist coming back. I can only imagine how he takes it when a girl dumps him.

      3. Krum II December 22, 2015 at 2:15 pm

        Girls can not dump me as I’m totally happy with my beautiful wife and four children.

        Something you can only dream of!

        p.s. Care to explain to the readers here on what grounds exactly did you decide to ban me?

      4. Boy Wonder December 24, 2015 at 2:05 am

        Yes Roosh, do explain why you ban Krum. Considering this is your blog you don’t participate much.

  27. Chris Brony December 22, 2015 at 10:45 am

    All publicity is good publicity.

    We are in an age where the Main Stream Media is losing its power over the narrative.

    You can see this in the way that non establishment politicians are starting to do better and better across the Western World – Trump, Corbyn, Left wing political parties in Spain and Greece, Right Wing parties in Sweden, France, UK and Austria.

    Because of Facebook, you Tube, Blogs and other media once people get your message directly they can then decide for themselves what to believe. They can get your whole message without it being cut into sound bites by the MSM.

    As for Reggie, he is an entertainer. Entertainers dress up and pose for pictures and wear makeup, that’s what they do sometimes. There is no need to try and disparage his sexual orientation one way or another.

    As for Feminism, I think the readers of these pages should support Feminism, as long as it stands for equal rights and equal treatment. It’s only when it strays to special treatment, positive discrimination, quotas, laws that favour women in divorce and other areas that we should complain. In fact, the vast majority of women just ask for this. They don’t actually support the Feminists that shout the loudest and make the most noise. So don’t target women in general, target the vocal Feminists – who do not even represent the majority of women anyway.

    1. NonCanadien December 22, 2015 at 1:51 pm

      What do you base this observation on: ” You can see this in the way that non establishment politicians are starting to do better and better across the Western World – Trump, Corbyn, Left wing political parties in Spain and Greece, Right Wing parties in Sweden, France, UK and Austria.”
      I fail to notice anything even remotely resembling the above mentioned.

      1. Chris Brony December 22, 2015 at 2:59 pm

        Trump leading the Republican Nomination despite being an outsider
        Corbin (left wing)won the Labour election in the UK despite being 200/1 at the start of the campaign
        Far Left won the Greek elections
        Far left made dramatic gains in Spanish elections this week to become the second largest party in Parliament
        Wilders Freedom party is the biggest party in Holland 19% ahead of second place
        Austrian Far Right have led the polls in Austria for 6 months
        Le Pen’s Front Nationale were the largest party in France’s regional elections in the first round and are the largest in the European Parliament elections
        In Sweden the Far Right party is now polling the most
        In the UK UKIP are the largest EU Parliamentary party and polled 14% in the national elections

      2. NonCanadien December 22, 2015 at 3:43 pm

        1. Trump leading the Republican Nomination despite being an outsider —– But will he become the president of the United States?? I really doubt it.

        2. Corbin won the Labour election in the UK despite being 200/1 at the start of the campaign—– So what? Did the general direction of British politics change? NO.
        3. Far Left won the Greek elections—-See above about the changes in politics.

        4.Far left made dramatic gains in Spanish elections this week to become the second largest party in Parliament
        Wilders Freedom party is the biggest party in Holland 19% ahead of second place——same about changes in politics.
        5. Austrian Far Right have led the polls in Austria for 6 months—-again, where are the changes?

        6. Le Pen’s Front Nationale were the largest party in France’s regional elections in the first round and are the largest in the European Parliament elections—– yeah right, and then lost it all in the 2nd round. WHERE is the victory??

        7.In Sweden the Far Right party is now polling the most—–WHAT??? Where did you get THIS from???

        8. In the UK UKIP are the largest EU Parliamentary party and polled 14% in the national elections.—–And where are the changes?
        To sum it up-take your rosy glasses off and stop reading propaganda. Better yet-get out and see it all yourself.
        Sheeple are still sheeple and mainstream is still a mainstream, with absolutely NO changes on the horizon.

    2. redpillyogi December 24, 2015 at 10:34 pm

      Why would you call it “feminism” then? There’s no need for that. I think everyone here is all for equal opportunity. The unfortunate thing is that even with equal opportunity, some people will advance farther because that is the basic nature of humanity. We are all different yet feminism and cultural marxism cannot accept this fundamental law.

  28. CanadianSamurai December 22, 2015 at 2:36 pm

    I just lost 5 points of manliness after listening to that BBC mangina Reporter. Hes like a woman in a mans body. Lawl.

  29. Angela December 22, 2015 at 3:10 pm

    I’ve rather enjoyed trying to understand the world in which men participate in ‘manosphere’. Ive been called a feminazi, which is a new one on me, I’ve been called a lot of things in my time but never a feminazis, if you actually knew me I very much doubt you would call me a feminazi! One of your followers asked why I pity him (of course I am assuming the sexuality of this individual)’ I actually pity all of you who follow these principals and I hope that one day you will find yourself in a loving, equal relationship and look back on the days when you used words like ‘feminazi’ and laugh as you say ‘I’m so pleased that I grew up and widened my world and understanding of the individuals in it’, by doing this you will hopefully one day understand that at this point in your life the only person who is the victim is you and you have put yourselves in this position, no one else has done it. I wish you well and hope that you find peace in the world you live in.

    1. NonCanadien December 22, 2015 at 3:32 pm

      I’m the one who called you a feminazi and I stay by my words. You are one.
      You make an assumption that I’m an unhappy individual who ain’t got no life, no family, no kids and is an uneducated evil creature.
      And at the same time I’ve been happily married with kids for almost 8 years now and have a strong and evolving family where both I and my wife know that it takes TWO to build a strong and respectful family based on equality, respect, mutual understanding and support! But it still takes TWO and a JOINT daily effort to build it!
      And now take a look at most western families where a female wants a male to give her EVERYTHING on a silver platter without ever giving anything back! Sounds familiar, eh?;)
      Joint effort? WHAT joint effort? It’s unheard of in the west!

      1. Boy Wonder December 24, 2015 at 2:03 am

        Why are you so angry? What is it exactly that women have done that you find so unacceptable?

      2. NonCanadien December 24, 2015 at 12:40 pm

        Too bad that telling the truth equals being angry in the western world..

      3. Boy Wonder December 24, 2015 at 2:10 pm

        Not sure that actually answers my question! 😜

    2. redpillyogi December 24, 2015 at 10:29 pm

      My guess is you are, on your best day, a 5.5. Am I right?

      1. Angela December 25, 2015 at 3:56 am

        If I had the first idea of what you are wittering on about I might actually be able to respond appropriately but as it’s all a ‘game’ to you I’ve clearly got to gem up on the rules. This is fun though!

      2. redpillyogi December 25, 2015 at 8:20 pm

        You just solidified my point, namely, that you are completely ignorant to the zeitgeist of the day. You should really educate yourself because after all, its that very ignorance which is bringing about the destruction of your world. Good luck to you and God speed, I’ll be enjoying life just outside the matrix.

      3. Angela December 27, 2015 at 4:02 pm


  30. redpillyogi December 22, 2015 at 6:31 pm

    LOL I watched the entire documentary and the BBC did the Manosphere a massive solid. In less than one hour, the mainstream media put the Manosphere on the radar for hundreds of thousands of men across the globe. There is no such thing as bad publicity, doesn’t George Soros know this basic concept?

  31. Djay December 22, 2015 at 8:10 pm

    Media are leftists. They are a tool to propagate leftists’s agenda. Honest medias are unemployed.

    Never trust medias.

    According to what you said in your speech, things are going to get worse. This civilisation will probably need to collapse before it can rise again.

  32. splooge December 22, 2015 at 9:22 pm

    check it out, woman marries famous legless dancer, cheatts on him and charges him with domestic violence…..How the fuck can a dude with no legs whoop your ass.
    the woman very shameless. theyll talk about oppression,patriachy and privledge and when comes to someone lower on that totem pole she dont give a fuck.

  33. Davidish December 23, 2015 at 1:29 pm

    So am I the only one guessing ‘Angela’ is not what we would regard as a classical beauty?

    1. Angela December 23, 2015 at 3:06 pm

      The ‘men’ conversing here are really just too funny. How you have managed to assume that I am not a classical beauty is beyond me! I guess that to you any women that is capable of having a brain cell in her that enables an opinion to be formed must be a spinster, overweight, ugly, barren, have an army of cats to keep her company. I do feel incredible pity for you as it would seem that if this is indeed your viewpoint then you truely are very narrow minded, if the only way you can ‘win’ points as a man is to throw derogatory comments about them I’m not suprised that there are feminists or as you prefer to call them ‘feminazis’. It’s men such as you that women actually despise and would mean that they would rather have a relationship with someone of their own sex who can provide them with more intellectual stimulation than look twice as a bigoted excuse of a man.

      1. Davidish December 24, 2015 at 1:48 pm

        Yep, Angela is a ham beast.

      2. Angela December 24, 2015 at 2:08 pm

        Do you have the capability of conversing without using insults? It’s not really an educated way of communicating.

      3. Davidish December 24, 2015 at 5:38 pm

        Angie babes, if you cannot stand the heat………..

      4. Angela December 25, 2015 at 3:53 am

        I can certainly stand the heat but I prefer to converse in an educated intelligent manner that does not involve hurling insults, it seems that you cannot communicate in that manner. Back to school for you I feel!

      5. Davidish December 25, 2015 at 7:25 pm

        Angela, you are not intelligent.

      6. Angela December 27, 2015 at 4:33 pm

        Again with the insults! This is getting boring as you really can’t converse without insulting. Adios.

      7. Davidish December 28, 2015 at 9:16 am

        This is a statement of fact, not an insult.
        Your false pride in your supposed education and ‘intelligence’ is showing.

    2. Wonder Boy December 24, 2015 at 2:01 am

      Am I the only one guessing that Davidish has issues. Go see a shrink sweetie, make sure it’s a women, she’ll soon sort you out so that you are ‘pussywhipped’. Gotta love the ludicrous statements the ‘men’ make on this forum. 😜😜😜

      1. Davidish December 24, 2015 at 1:52 pm

        Should there not be a ? at the end of the first sentence?

      2. Boy Wonder December 24, 2015 at 2:05 pm

        Are you a teacher? It wasn’t actually a question but a statement.

      3. Davidish December 24, 2015 at 5:36 pm

        No, it is clearly a question.

      4. Boy Wonder December 25, 2015 at 3:51 am

        The sarcasm is clearly lost on you. 😘

      5. Davidish December 25, 2015 at 7:23 pm

        You have not asked a question.

        There is no sarcasm in your post.

      6. Boy Wonder December 27, 2015 at 4:01 pm

        Are you a teacher? Could have sworn that was a question! And the second question was ‘why don’t you ever answer questions? Angela also asked you a question, which again you didn’t answer. Yes, there was sarcasm, which as stated you clearly missed. I’m guessing you are American. Why do you feel the need to insult people so much, is it to mask your own inadequancies? That’s a question in case you didn’t realise. Generally when a ? appears at the end of a sentence it is asking a question, sometimes it’s rhetorical other not. In the instances of the above questions are to elicit a response. Do you get pleasure insulting others? Does it make you feel better about yourself? Why can’t you be honest? Men such as you give men like me who are honest and respectful to others a bad name, it’s the minority that spoil it for the majority and yes, you are a minority.

      7. Davidish December 28, 2015 at 9:13 am

        No not American and no there is no sarcasm.
        You are not ‘honest or respectful’, as your posts show. You are a faggot. A pathetic gamma male, worthless in your own eyes and in the eyes of the world.

      8. Boy Wonder December 28, 2015 at 1:59 pm

        Again, no questions answered just insults. Yawn

      9. Boy Wonder December 28, 2015 at 2:04 pm

        Apologies, you did clarify that you aren’t American and have officially answered a question. Congratulations! What do you define as ‘faggot’? What do you define as worthy in your eyes? What are your attributes that rate you so highly in your eyes? I’m genuinely interested.

      10. Davidish December 28, 2015 at 4:19 pm

        Nip over to Vox Popoli, read his posts about arguing with gamma males. Think about yourself. Get better.

      11. Boy Wonder December 25, 2015 at 12:51 pm

        Why don’t you ever answer any questions posed to you? You probably won’t actually answer this one either.

  34. James Donaghy December 23, 2015 at 4:47 pm

    As a heterosexual man I find your explainations of why you do what you do and how you do it fascinating. Not in an admirable way, but more in that you clearly have a deep psychological disorder or compulsion that drives you to look at women as things to be collected as sexual conquests. The fact that you don’t seem to be in any long term relationship suggests you are spectacularly bad at them (more of a short game than a long game guy) and so have decided to make money off your many failings which has empowered you. This in turn has gained the interest of others who believe that their own relationship failings can be corrected by the same methods you employ. There is a problem with this fallacy though, you haven’t corrected anything, you have merely monetised your sexual appetites and are going against Feminism as it doesn’t accept you’re compulsions as some sort of God given right. Society and laws are designed with middle class white men in mind afterall, so if you’re anything else you’re pretty fucked from yhe start. You talk about masculinity in sexual terms, yet I wonder how many of your followers / benefactors would be worthy of your definition of masculinity? The world you want to create seems to be one full of subserviant women, with low self-esteem, low iq’s, low ambitions and low morals…. basically a world full of prostitutes. How dire would that be? Anyway, its just a thought, I doubt your egoism will let you take in anything I say anyway.

    1. Wonder Boy December 24, 2015 at 1:57 am

      Maybe, just maybe the reason these men feel they have to price their masculinity is because they are actually closet homosexuals to fearful of coming out. I guess their retort would be that I’m just using a text book response. Oops feeling sleeping at the predictiveness of the response.😴😴😴

      1. Wonder Boy December 24, 2015 at 2:39 am

        Proove, not Price! Lol

    2. redpillyogi December 24, 2015 at 10:16 pm

      “…look at women as things to be collected”
      Roosh (and really representing the entire manosphere) hopes of and envisions a world in which women are strong/smart in their individual roles as caretakers thus fulfilling their natural duties.

      “…decided to make money”
      Everyone needs to make money. It appears that Roosh has decided to make money in the only morally acceptable way in the world as he sees it.

  35. Red December 27, 2015 at 2:23 pm

    You disgust me.
    Just thought I’d let you know, seeing as you’re all for freedom of speech and stuff.

  36. Tdogg December 31, 2015 at 9:56 am

    I’m a British guy and feel i must aplogise for this sorry excuse for a man. Reggae Yates is a children’s presenter trying to do grown up material now and evolve into something more serious than a joke. He’s not exactly an intellectual heavyweight put it that way. I too was dismayed such a biased documentary was funded by tax payers money and the presenter and pc bbc in effect attempted to throw masculinity under a bus. It makes me even more sure the bbc should be a private concern, not funded by the public and run by manginas.
    Apologies again.

  37. pot of smoke December 31, 2015 at 2:06 pm

    where can i watch the full documentary?? has it been taken down?

    1. GeorgeoSix January 5, 2016 at 5:56 am

      It’s still on BBC iplayer – I watched it last night.

  38. Moth-e January 12, 2016 at 10:15 pm

    The BBC didn’t paint you as a rapist based on an out of context quote!! You are a rapist.

    It doesn’t matter what context you state that you think the ‘violent taking of women’ should be legalised on private property. That statement shows that you condone rape and see women only as a commodity for your sexual gratification.

    In the show I’ve just seen you asked Reggie if he had ever had sex with a girl when she was still asleep…obviously the response was an emphatic no. Do you know why? BECAUSE THAT’S RAPE!!!

    Seems to me you have concluded that Reggie is not masculine because he doesn’t share your rapey views. Being a rapist doesn’t make you masculine, it does make you quite clearly sick though – seriously get help.

  39. Rainer Scott January 18, 2016 at 12:21 pm

    Well, this all goes to show that treating the old platitude “all publicity is good publicity” as a truism is a little niaive.

    I have to question the wisdom of ever allowing the BBC to frame a discussion or commentary about the “manosphere” by taking part in a ‘documentary’ over which they have complete editorial control, and which was sure to contain lengthy monologues by the ‘presenter’.

    In other words, giving them a gift-wrapped opportunity for a hatchet job

    As a Brit, I found it utterly predictable – the BBC has always been authoritarian, and for the last generation or so this has entailed abject political correctness.

    If you are ever invited by the Bolshevik Broadcast Corporation again (or any other British lie-factory, for that matter), make sure it’s on an open, non-edited discussion program, hosted by an actual journalist (not an airhead “personality” like ReggieYates – a little research on this fool would surely have given you pause) such as ‘Hard Talk’.

    Edit > a couple of people have observed that they really needed a sharper hatchet-man than Yates, and that quite a few eye-brows were raised, in a good way.

  40. 3rdEye January 28, 2016 at 3:25 pm

    Seems to me that Roosh is purposefully controversial in his writing. Controversy attracts attention, and attention is Roosh’s business model. Whilst I agree with some of what Roosh says, it’s easy for the media to demonise extreme views, or views that are presented extremely (as in the case of Roosh)