The End Goal Of Western Progressivism Is Depopulation

Not long ago I proposed that decreasing birth rates in the Western world is happening due to some cosmic force that is seeking balance upon the universe. I missed the mark. The force is not something cosmic or metaphysical, but human. After studying the evidence, it’s clear that there is a conscious scheme to control the human population through both cultural and biological means, which allows the elite to sustain or elevate their power and wealth.

The first piece of evidence showing you have been primed to favor depopulation is that you most likely agree to at least two of the following three statements, even if you consider yourself “red pill”:

  • “Agendas or schemes by the global elite should be first considered a ‘conspiracy theory.'”
  • “There are too many people on planet Earth.”
  • “Needs of the environment must come before plans to increase human fertility.”

It’s not a coincidence that you are already on board with depopulation agenda, and if you live in a Westernized nation, you came to that conclusion “naturally” because since you were in grade school, you have been bombarded with messages about the dangers of over-population and the fragility of the environment. It turns out that all the progressive ideas being spread in the West have one thing in common: they all limit human reproduction.

Here is a short list of progressive causes that have percolated from intellectuals and later sponsored or hijacked by billionaire activists and major government institutions of the West.

1. Abortion is a bodily “choice,” not human murder. Result: it decreases population.

2. Birth control is a “choice” that allows women to better practice consumer lifestyles. Result: it decreases population.

3. Female empowerment in the form of feminism and egalitarianism pushes women into corporate work with the goal of delaying motherhood (or eliminating it outright). Result: it decreases reproduction and family formation.

4. Promotion of sterile human relationships in the form of homosexuality and transsexuality can’t possibly result in the creation of life. Result: it decreases population, reproduction, and traditional family formation.

5. Promotion of atheism, nihilism, individualism, and consumerism as suitable alternatives to traditional living via nuclear family units. Result: it decreases reproduction and traditional family formation.

6. The needs of the “environment” must be served before that of living humans. Result: it makes human guilty of family formation.

7. Massive waves of foreign immigrants are encouraged entry into Western nations to break bonds between tribe and neighbor that decrease notions of nationalism and patriotism while transferring fertility and economic resources from native people to foreigers. Result: it decreases relative population of native citizens.

All of the above decreases the reproductive rate, either directly through the killing of life, or indirectly by promoting guilt and alternative lifestyles that are incompatible with the creation of life. At the same time, immigrant populations are allowed to grow at a faster rate that the natives’ ability to reproduce.

Those who rule over us don’t need more Americans or European-derived people to cement their power and wealth within nations they control through government institutions and transnational organizations and corporations. How would it benefit them if a baby boom takes place among those from American conservative states that believe in the first and second amendments? If you were king of the land, and you regularly met with those who helped you rule, would you really want the type of people who are most likely to overthrow you to reproduce up to their biological maximum, or would you want to hurt their reproductive potential while pushing every degenerate cause under the sun in an effort to limit their numbers?

I wrote Cultural Collapse Theory a year ago, where I detail the specific mechanism that progressivism destroys a host culture, but I could easily re-title it to Population Collapse Theory without having to make many changes to the text. I must admit that I feel a bit foolish for taking so long to realize the agenda all along is depopulation, especially when the elite have openly shared and discussed their plans. All you need to do when watching their interviews is to replace the buzzwords “population control” and “sustainable development” for “depopulation of Western natives.” This is often done under the guise of curing third-world poverty or making the Earth “more livable” for Western children that will never be born.

Here are a few public statements that show how depopulation agenda is important to those who dictate government and corporate policy:

Prince Charles commenting on population control:

I could have chosen Mumbai, Cairo or Mexico City; wherever you look, the world’s population is increasing fast. It goes up by the equivalent of the entire population of the United Kingdom every year. Which means that this poor planet of ours, which already struggles to sustain 6.8 billion people, will somehow have to support over 9 billion people within 50 years.

John P. Holdren, Barack Obama’s top science advisor:

A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men. The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control.

David Rockefeller, gloablist who refuses to die:

rockefeller

Ted Turner, founder of CNN and one of the largest landowners in the United States:

Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, which successfully used abortion to decimate the black population in the United States:

The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.

Thomas Ferguson, former official of U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs:

There is a single theme behind all our work—we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it….

Bill Gates talked about using one of his foundations to play god in Africa and limit the population using biological means. It’s quite interesting to see a dorky looking geek so interested in population control, but then again his father served as head of Planned Parenthood.

Gates’ friend, Warren Buffet, is also on board with depopulation. He gave $3 billion to his wife’s Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation. Take a guess as to where that foundation donates most of its money? Planned Parenthood.

The tax records also show that most of the foundation’s spending goes to abortion and contraception advocacy and research. According to Access Philanthropy, a research institute that focuses on the giving preferences of foundations and corporate donors, family planning is one of the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation’s main purposes. The foundation’s nonprofit 990 tax form shows that in 2008, Planned Parenthood and its affiliates in the U.S. received about $45 million; the international arm of the organization got about $8 million. There is no line item for the Ryan program [pro-abortion organization] or the Family Planning Fellowship [pro-abortion organization]. But the foundation paid out around $50 million to universities with one or both of the programs.

By now you should note that the more sinister the individual, the more they are portrayed by the media as harmless, awkwardly geeky, and folksy (e.g. Mark Zuckerberg, the Google founders, and the CEO of Starbucks).

There’s the 1974 document titled National Security Study Memorandum 200 (full PDF text), commissioned by Henry Kissinger, whose obsession with international order led him to the conclusion that rising population of some countries would threaten US interests, and that contraception must be promoted within them to limit their population. Kissinger, another zombie globalist who won’t die, is still instrumental in dictating policies around the world through his consulting firm Kissinger Associates.

The United Nations has an action plan called Agenda 21 that advocates for “sustainable development.” One way it does that is through worldwide promotion of feminism, which has the effect of removing women from the family home and into corporate workplaces that are under control by the same gloabalists in the UN club. As any Western nation’s population chart can tell you, feminism goes hand-in-hand with depopulation. The UN offers confirmation that feminism is a great form of birth control since they consider it essential for “sustainable development,” globalist code for reducing the birth rate.

[Human settlement improvements] should be based on technical cooperation activities, partnerships among the public, private and community sectors and participation in the decision-making process by community groups and special interest groups such as women, indigenous people, the elderly and the disabled. These approaches should form the core principles of national settlement strategies. In developing these strategies, countries will need to set priorities among the eight programme areas in this chapter in accordance with their national plans and objectives, taking fully into account their social and cultural capabilities. Furthermore, countries should make appropriate provision to monitor the impact of their strategies on marginalized and disenfranchised groups, with particular reference to the needs of women.

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) is led by Christiana Figueres, the daughter of Costa Rica’s former president, ensuring her admission to the globalist club. She states in the following video that the UN should “make every effort” to decrease population from its current trajectory (start at 4:30).

The former Chief Of Bioethics to the National Institute Of Health (NIH) is Israeli Ezekiel Emanual, who is brother to former Obama advisor and Chicago mayor Rahm Emmanuel. In an Atlantic article, he claimed that we should all consider dropping dead at 75 because it would save the government trillions of dollars. The most anti-ethical and chaotic arguments will come under the guise of ethics and world order.

I am talking about how long I want to live and the kind and amount of health care I will consent to after 75. Americans seem to be obsessed with exercising, doing mental puzzles, consuming various juice and protein concoctions, sticking to strict diets, and popping vitamins and supplements, all in a valiant effort to cheat death and prolong life as long as possible. This has become so pervasive that it now defines a cultural type: what I call the American immortal.

I reject this aspiration. I think this manic desperation to endlessly extend life is misguided and potentially destructive. For many reasons, 75 is a pretty good age to aim to stop.

The quotes, videos, and articles above barely scratch the surface of what you can research yourself on Youtube and Google. While there is an unhinged element on many of the sites that talk about depopulation, I trust you can use your own judgement in separating fact from emotion.

Most corporations, whose sole motivation is profit for shareholders, have for some odd reason pathological soft spots for women and the environment. It’s no coincidence that empowerment of women into becoming corporate workers and mindless consumers shatters their reproduction while promotion of environmental concerns makes you not only guilty to have a family of your own, but inclined to give unwavering support and authority to globalist agendas that limit population in the “privileged” Western world while at the same time supporting the breeding of third-world immigrants to displace them.

Men who have come to the conclusion of depopulation arrive at it from different paths. I saw it not through politics but through sex. I saw firsthand how the government, media, and universities are deliberately trying to promote mistrust between man and woman through feminism, the myth of rape culture, and social justice ideas that allow a divide and conquer strategy to pit the sexes against each other, making every woman see a man as a potential rapist and every man see a woman as someone who could ruin his life.

The fact that men are scared to death of a false rape accusation or are fearful of being taken to the cleaners in divorce is a feature of depopulation-driven progressivism, not a bug. A wedge has been driven between men and women so that you see each other as threats to your happiness and livelihood. It is by design that you are not capable or willing of doing anything more with a woman than mutual masturbation under the influence of alcohol that will not result in family creation. Just in case you do want to make babies, a backup plan has been enacted so that reproduction will still not result: essentially all fertile young women are on birth control, encouraged to go on it after puberty. Even if she does become pregnant, the means to abort it will be so easy, especially with you convincing her to do so since coincidentally there are state and federal laws that enslave any middle class man who thinks having children could somehow serve his interests.

It’s important to understand that birth control doesn’t have to be only biological in the form of pills or abortion, but in the form of ideas and beliefs that instill fear and dread about reproducing by associating having a child with a loss of individual or consumer freedom. I wouldn’t be surprised if “men going their own way” groups are indirectly supported by the state to increase a man’s fear of reproducing with women.

In case you still have doubts that depopulation is the overreaching agenda of Western elites, I ask you to take a look at charts of fertility birth rates from World Bank data and ask yourself why isn’t there any concerted effort to reverse the declines? Why aren’t governments supporting natalist policies like in Russia that aim to seed future generations of natives to create a stronger nation that will endure the ages, instead of importing criminals and democratically challenged Mexicans or radical Islamists?

population-chart

What’s amazing is that the US birth rate is below replacement rate even accounting for its fecund immigrants, showing that fertile peoples become effectively sterile once inserted into an environment that has been slated for depopulation. Currently there is not one European nation west of Russia, even when including Eastern Europe, that has a fertility rate above that of the replacement rate. By comparison, the fertility rate of Niger is 7.56, four times that of the United States, but don’t worry, Bill Gates’ humanitarian “vaccine” program will take care of that problem when the time is right through his pet project, a birth control microchip that can be turned on and off by wireless remote.

The three main cultural mechanisms of reducing native populations is to program people to be concerned for women’s rights, third world immigration, and the environment. This is why nearly everyone on the left, including SJW’s, are fanatically supportive of all three. Leftists have been soundly convinced of issues that lead to the destruction of the family unit, the breakdown of their society’s social fabric, and their own voluntary sterilization. When you combine biological efforts that include birth control and abortion, you can see how Westerners have absolutely no chance of recovering their population compared to African, Middle Eastern, and Asian populations that do not currently face both cultural and biological bombs to reduce their birth rates, but will soon enough be targeted once the Westerners are sufficiently weakened and depopulation goals are met.

You probably now understand why when Brussels accepts a new country into the European Union, the first thing they do is mandate a gay pride parade on the capital streets, and why they immediately start screeching about the need for more women’s rights. This is the cultural attack that aims to limit the reproduction of that country so that their sovereignty can be easily dismantled within only two generations, an attack that begins even before they join the EU in order to “prove” they are ready to destroy themselves for the short term gain of big loans and free trade for that nation’s local elite.

Even the form of game that I taught early in my career, of one-night stands, was compatible with the depopulation agenda since reproduction would often not result from it. This meant that I was a useful idiot for many years. I can’t help but notice that attacks against me have increased in intensity as I move away from teaching sterile sex and anti-family ideas to promoting more traditional values that are far likelier to result in reproduction.

While I would certainly agree with you that there are plenty of people currently inhabiting the Earth, I disagree that a small group of globalists at the top should be able to play Dr. Eugenicist and determine who reproduces or not without limiting their own reproduction, especially since their hypocrisy about caring for the environment is on full display as they fly around the world in their private jets to their numerous mansions. They do not want you to impregnate a fertile 19 year old and have many home-schooled and ritalin-free children with her. Instead, you’re bombarded with messages to marry an aging spinster whose womb is likely already sterile and who can’t give you more than two children, which is not nearly enough to sustain the population.

Perhaps in the 1950’s you were told that having a big family is the masculine thing to do, but it’s almost impossible these days to see images of large nuclear families represented positively in television or commercials, especially with women under 25 who are not already slaves to corporations and government propaganda.

I’m coming to the conclusion that the only way to defeat the evils of liberalism, feminism, social justice, and progressivism is to have huge families and create tribes that are free-thinking, self-reliant, and, most importantly, armed. The men of the future who can resist totalitarianism and unjust government authority come from the wombs of the women living today, and those women must at some point be convinced that being stay-at-home mothers who raise strong men is superior to becoming zombie consumers who poison and sterilize their own bodies.

The last thing that those in power want is for women to pair-bond with independent, masculine men who do not need the state and who place more importance and loyalty in their blood relatives and nation than to leftist ideas, iPhones, and sports teams. In the past, my fantasies were about sleeping with as many women as possible so I can be the playboy that I saw in the Hollywood movies, but now they are about creating the sons who will one day lead their people and their nation. It’s squarely up to us to create the men who can eliminate the parasites that are successfully controlling modern humanity.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out my book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain my operation.

Read Next: Western Men Are Becoming Evolutionary Dead-Ends

Related Posts For You

newest oldest most voted
Chronic Reducer
Guest

AKA White Genocide.

Myra Esoteric
Guest
Myra Esoteric
Offline

Yeah, we’re also pushing African Americans out… nobody really wants us Chinese / Indians having too many kids and looking for Lebensraum in the West lol. It’s all about intergroup competition.

One quote, I believe often attributed to Lee Kuan Yew, is that every heterogeneous society will have a political dialogue based upon tribal loyalties, rather than a free flow of ideas.

Even as late as 1980, white Americans were divided upon the quasi-racial political lines of Catholic, Protestant and Jew. Catholic = Italian / white minorities, Protestant = what used to be called “white”, Jew is self explanatory.

Look at the dislike of black Republicans, for example, or even Asian Republicans like Bobby Jindal. Ayn Rand’s warnings about collectivism are coming true.

Ragnar Blåskägg
Guest
Ragnar Blåskägg
Offline

Even all the different jews of israel ashkenazi, mizrahim, ethiopian, and vietnamese seem to be having the same kind of conflict.
Ideas of oneness and universalism is a recipy for disaster.

Myra Esoteric
Guest
Myra Esoteric
Offline

Yeah, I agree. How do we balance people being at peace with folks actually exchanging ideas. It seems that there’s some sort of trade off with diversity.

On one hand, when you have too much of it it causes stagnation, when you have too little of it you also have a different kind of stagnation. There’s got to be a good formula somewhere.

nicho12
Guest
nicho12
Offline

Diversity has never been successful anywhere. You have to have an authoritarian government for it work, it’s like putting hyenas, lions, tigers, sheep and pythons in the same cage and make them live in peace and harmony

Myra Esoteric
Guest
Myra Esoteric
Offline

Except when you get too un-diverse and then you stymie creativity and free trade

James Solbakken
Guest
James Solbakken
Offline

Don’t confuse global international diversity with intra-national diversity. It takes all kinds to make a world, but too many kinds in one country screw up the cohesion.

Myra Esoteric
Guest
Myra Esoteric
Offline

Yeah, I agree. Even in the US which is known for its diversity, it took many years after the European exclusion act of 1924 to get the diverse crowds to simmer down and for people to form a cohesive whole.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

Diversity does not require a mixing of foreign cultures. It merely needs someone who took the left road to work and someone who took the right. A common base set of values is needed in order to create a successful community and society.

James
Guest
James
Offline

That’s why governments are becoming more authoritarian all over the western world.

Clanton Wood
Guest
Clanton Wood
Offline

https://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.103.1.1

A very interesting article on the correlation between genetic diversity and a countries economic power.

Myra Esoteric
Guest
Myra Esoteric
Offline

Yeah, if you have too much dissimilarity then people are all over the place in terms of their culture and the like.

Also consider this. A lot of times this genetic diversity is actually the result of people separating off into little groups and causing stuff like inbreeding depression – rather than having lots of different source streams into the population.

Baby Shoes
Guest
Baby Shoes
Offline

Tikkun Olam and Talmudic commentary will be the death of us.

Ragnar Blåskägg
Guest
Ragnar Blåskägg
Offline

We’re still here though, im not saying the situation is not bad but they havent succeeded yet, if racial awareness and nationalism will continue to grow more, they will have a hard time continuing shoving their sickness down our throat.

benvad
Guest
benvad
Offline

We’ve got to either return to ancestor worshipping or return to the Structure of the Church and focus on the LOGOS (order of the universe and reason). With regards to the Pharisees they are detrimental to our culture and a complete destruction.

curenado
Guest
curenado
Offline

The holywood boys? Many of us actually think “its just an easy acting job” and believers or those with vocation don’t really want the ire and jealousy of the “oh they like him better!” so you go around like belief in the god and authentic works are a rosicrucian secret. I was a church physician in a 3rd world place. The talks-too-much club of “people motivator” christian preachers did thier best to set mobs on us. Poor bucket fish and us stuck in the bucket with them. Now that fema is paying clergy to monitor and report on thier congregations, any sort of kindness or virtue towards them that has an actual calorie in it feels really scary.

curenado
Guest
curenado
Offline

Not until every nickel that could be rendered out you any way possible, from cradle until you aren’t up to it anymore. I may have missed it in the article, but depopulation “at optimal maximum profits!” is the trend. Otherwise they would just “do it”. A live screaming pile of coin bleeding tank fish provides cash and more than it takes to inhume the rest. (Win/win!)

OrthodoxChristian
Guest
OrthodoxChristian
Offline

“Even as late as 1980, white Americans were divided upon the quasi-racial political lines of Catholic, Protestant and Jew. Catholic = Italian / white minorities, Protestant = what used to be called “white”, Jew is self explanatory.”

White was Caucasian. Germans were and still are split about 50/50 between Protestant and Roman Catholic, and Germans are largest white ethnicity in the USA (for example: 2000 census). The Jews are the Jews regardless of skin color, they’ll collectively always be in favor of policies in host countries that they wouldn’t support for Israel.

Myra Esoteric
Guest
Myra Esoteric
Offline

How do you retcon that into old sociological studies that classify people as “White”, “Black”, “Italian”, “Puerto Rican” and “Other”. I didn’t know that about Germans, TIL.

Baby Shoes
Guest
Baby Shoes
Offline

That’s a little white TRUTH.

curenado
Guest
curenado
Offline

Thats why eventually every country sends them packing, sometimes lit up. I was born nobility. There is a VAST difference between benevolent rule and the great prehistoric slavers of the middle east. The species they created raping thier slaves is the most bothersome bunch on the rock and a lot like them. The magicians and thier accomplices

Baby Shoes
Guest
Baby Shoes
Offline

Even more by ethnicity.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

It’s not just whites, but they are the race most likely to disappear along with the Palestinians.

curenado
Guest
curenado
Offline

Mideast peoples do not have a genetic identity anymore. If all you see is an unidentifiable genetic septic tank, thats how you know “mideast”. They have ran this scam so many times for so long on everyone they could, god finally gave them the reward of thier ways and its a billboard of warning to everybody else.

splooge
Guest
splooge
Offline

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2127rank.html

ethnic lands are feeling it too, north east asia, iran,uzbekistan,lebanon,brazil,etc.
Isreal is the only first world land above it while some developing lands dont.
2.11 and below is below replacement value.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

israel has an autism rate of 0.2%; in most other countries it has risen over the last twenty years to over 2% of the population in the US.

Tainted vaccines to make the goyim sick, dumb and dead???

Paul
Guest
Paul
Offline

It’s more to do with food. We basically getting no nutrition in our food today. 80% of health problems can be cured by real (organic) food.

90% of health problems are due to poor lifestyle (bad food, no exercise, not enough sleep).

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

I still don’t see how one country can have such a huge difference from EVERY OTHER COUNTRY whose autism rate is increasing ! It has long been speculated that our vaccines are tainted.

Paul
Guest
Paul
Offline

We let the corporations poison our food, the video below is a must watch!
https://youtu.be/uMVdrEo5130

splooge
Guest
splooge
Offline

better then third world, we are overnourished and consume only junk food then organic

johannes scotus eriugena
Guest
johannes scotus eriugena
Offline

10And he called the multitude, and said unto them, Hear, and understand: 11Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.

12Then came his disciples, and said unto him, Knowest thou that the Pharisees were offended, after they heard this saying? 13But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up. 14Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

15Then answered Peter and said unto him, Declare unto us this parable. 16And Jesus said, Are ye also yet without understanding? 17Do not ye yet understand, that whatsoever entereth in at the mouth goeth into the belly, and is cast out into the draught? 18But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.19For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies:20These are the things which defile a man: but to eat with unwashen hands defileth not a man.

curenado
Guest
curenado
Offline

So then all the added poisons, pathogens and gmo frankenfood is not that big a factor? It is

Lexie
Guest
Lexie
Offline

Older parents (especially dads) are much more likely to have autistic children, so i’d guess it’s the delayed parenthood aspect causing the rise

Myra Esoteric
Guest
Myra Esoteric
Offline

North East Asia can theoretically repopulate with Chinese immigrants but we would probably bring too much clannishness there and create a low-trust society, according to the latest HBD theories, and transform Japan into a 3rd world society lol.

splooge
Guest
splooge
Offline

its kinda already happening witht he hans and manchus of the east moving into tibet,mongol and hui land in tibet,inner mongolia province and xianjing. ITs part of china but they arent chinese if that makes sense like chechnians,tartars and dagestanis are native to certain part of russia but not slavic russian.

Myra Esoteric
Guest
Myra Esoteric
Offline

Eh it might cancel out cuz Mongols and Muslims aren’t subject to birth control laws there

NightRider101
Guest
NightRider101
Offline

Ask the Koreans and Japanese if they want Chinese to replace and repopulate into their land. I’m sure you will get surprising answer. These groups do not like each other.

Myra Esoteric
Guest
Myra Esoteric
Offline

Yeah I was being facetious.

Rachael Lefler
Guest
Rachael Lefler
Offline

Yeah but the Japanese won’t be able to fight off other groups who want to take over their land soon. Lack of population. Technology and US aid helps them now, will it when their population dwindles to nothing?

Shortest Straw
Guest
Shortest Straw
Offline

The emergent term for it is genosuicide.
Sigh.

Baby Shoes
Guest
Baby Shoes
Offline

Certain group wants to replace the white majority because they’re worried about being attacked. They are paranoid and wish to eliminate any perceived threat even though America has allowed to to prosper in complete “freedom”.

That wasn’t sufficient for them instead they chose to destabilize it even though they’ll be the the recipient of massive suffering. They are the scorpion on the proverbial frogs back.

Duuuude
Guest
Duuuude
Offline

MAX IGAN (watch Deprogramming the Collective: The Rediscovery of The Self) does the numbers and shows that ALL OF THE GLOBAL POPULATION, each man, woman and child could have 1/4 of an acre of land, and this would not even fill up Australia.

In other words, every single man, woman and child on earth right now could have a 1/4 acre plot of land and fit into Australia with one whole state still empty, PLUS the entire rest of the world.

Now before you say, ok, sure, but not all that land is arable, some of it is mountainous, etc. etc.

But just think about that. It’s simple math.

THE WORLD IS NOT OVERPOPULATED.

IT’S A PROBLEM OF EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION.

benvad
Guest
benvad
Offline

That is so true.

George Strong
Guest
George Strong
Offline

The various gov’ts penalize whites for having children thru taxation and desegregation, but subsidize inferior groups to have more useless eater children.

James
Guest
James
Offline

So why wasn’t the term used? I find it odd that it was evaded when this is precisely what’s being described.

curenado
Guest
curenado
Offline

They’re after everybody. The retarded ones just do thier invasion, demolition and murder for them, and are much easier to skunk off when they fulfilled the only purpose they had.

George Nada
Guest
George Nada
Offline

Sounds like Roosh found out about Agenda 21.
Oh, by the way, the Rockefellers and the other oligarchical clans are in no way effected by this scheme which they have foisted off on the masses; the oligarchal clans which own and control the media, the politicians, the education system, the medical system, the money system, and the corporations, THEY still make sure that THEY live their own elite lives in what basically amounts to an old-school PATRIARCHY. They’re not stupid; they know what works.
See the suppressed, out-of-print works of Emmanuel Josephson for more on that.

Clark Kent
Guest
Clark Kent
Offline

Multiculturalism for everyone else, Identity for us.
Feminism for everyone else, Patriarchy for us.
Consumerism for everyone else, Wealth for us.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

Don’t you mean:
‘death and serfdom for everyone else (esp. whites), wealth for us.

jzak95
Guest
jzak95
Offline

Roosh, by far this has to be the best article you have ever written. But as I’ve said before, what do you propose we do? Do we abandon America for dead and expatriate and reproduce with foreign women? Do we pray Donald Trump wins and try to make our stand here in the States? Do we hope Bernie Sanders or Hilary Clinton win and facilitate the implosion of the States, and rebuild from the ashes? It’s clear that you have identified the problem. Now we need solid solutions. There are plenty of younger men who are looking for leadership to lead us through the darkness, and right now you are that leader.

Morrison
Guest
Morrison
Offline

“, what do you propose we do? Do we abandon America for dead and expatriate and reproduce with foreign women? ”

Damned good question.

jbird669
Guest
jbird669
Offline

Damned good indeed. Can’t forget about us who didn’t have access to red pill in their 20s and had kids and now have to wait until they turn 18 to expatriate.

jzak95
Guest
jzak95
Offline

Actually, I was referring to those of us under 30 who will likely never have the opportunity to have kids under the current conditions. But what the hell, men of all ages can and must band together against the cancer that is the left!

66Scorpio
Guest
66Scorpio
Offline

If you are a man under 30 and not getting any quality pussy in North American, then get your ass on a plane to Asia or South America or the FSU.

jz95
Guest
jz95
Offline

I don’t think that option is going to be available to me or other men my age by the time we are financially secure. The world will probably be completely westernized within the next 10-15 years.

66Scorpio
Guest
66Scorpio
Offline

Don’t wait to be financially secure. Get your TESL or get your company to post you. Join the army or the foreign service or something. But GTFO and bag your unicorn before it is too late.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

How to fix things- LOVE AND DIVERSITY WILL CONQUER ALL!

(1) promote mass immigration for israel, because its racist that they are the only white person country not to have mass immigration
(2) make sure only jews marry and have babies with non-jews, especially nonwhite races – because diversity is strength and because its racist to not have enough race mixing going on with jews/israel. It’s about love – loving others not like us and making beautiful babies with them, not hating them.

and possibly…
(3) have masses of people become ‘honorary jews’ to change the racial death cult from within, so the new normal becomes something other than what the talmudists want

Roosh
Guest
Roosh
Offline

I’m thinking hard about these questions. I’ll have answers in the future.

Epoche
Guest
Epoche
Offline

We need to fight for the right of exclusion. we need to have the ability to form communities and organizations that exclude others based upon self defining criteria.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

There is no solution. Even if you managed to recruit all of your followers and people with equal ideas, get your hands on guns and think about shooting the place up, you will be persecuted and killed before you get a chance to make a difference. Even if you managed to find clear evidence supportive of your ideas, theories, thought experiments and put them on Wikileaks or wherever you think the most people will hear about it, you will be slided, ignored and fall victim to the apathetic nature of the common denominator.

These people have more power, money and reach than you can ever dream off. You will always be “that guy” who rambles and even if you write a book about it with hundreds of citations – or even a research paper – you will be outed/persecuted due to something in your past, background or what ever fits to demoralize and devalue you.

I am not saying you should give up, it is just that even if you ever find an all entailing “answer” it will never find the masses. This battle was lost before you were born.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

I’m pretty sure that whenever the economy crashes, 95% of western society would be wiped out within a year of no food, no healthcare, and everyone killing each other for supplies. The only problem is, the ‘elite’ are so destructive, that they will prey on each other afterwards with no one else to parasitise – they are that far insane. Having said that, I believe that God would put an end to this before it destroys the entire human race.

Edomite jewry do persecute – they have money, power but I dispute the fact they are brainy. They are just connected and sociopathic in a way others cannot be and run as a wolf pack. It is true the battle is ‘lost’ and the apathetic masses will be killed real real soon; but these people in their hatred for their fellow man will destroy themselves in their short-sightedness and rage, removing themselves from the human race, as well as being put down by various other modalities. They ‘succeed’ only as a temporary state of affairs in a world that is between two eras.

iBooB
Guest
iBooB
Offline

Through their own vanity they fail to realize that Nature will always balance itself out.

Snowden
Guest
Snowden
Offline

Look at the iron legion. Here in the states the mikraetes are trying to form a similar group.

Maybe all we can do is to find what we can, make babies, and teach them the truth. To preserve it as hell burns everything around us.

bruguel
Guest
bruguel
Offline

Roosh, allow me suggest a thorough reading of Schopenhauer. I am sure you will see that the reason for the depopulation of the west, is METAPHYSICAL…due to the fact that it is the most “advanced”, it has lost the “will to live”!

oldfashionedfellow
Guest
oldfashionedfellow
Offline
Evolutionary1
Guest
Evolutionary1
Offline

Your writings have changed my life. On my end I’m working on my career, which will be taking off in mid 2016. I’m also with a traditional girl and we’re trying to make a kid, who I intend to home school later on.

I’m very happy to see the direction your writings have taken.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

As if Trump, Sanders or Clinton would help. When you see the borders being over-run with immigrants against the local population’s wishes, its because voting is a joke. The ‘scam’ is to get people to believe they have a choice until society is locked down tight to be collapsed and controlled.

Europe is the future of the white man.
All westernised countries will see much of their populations culled.
There is no escape, just easing of the pain, in certain non-western countries, if you can afford it and can make the transition.

You should get good with God. Get some preps in, no matter if its just a bag with essential supplies. Then if possible, find a good living situation in a less populated part of your country/the world. Become self-sufficient and get rid of the tech. This sucker is going down in 3-10 years. They even had the IMF say in 2009 that the dollar would be replaced as the global reserve currency by 2018. The whole point is to disempower western nations and whites. Well, the ‘manufactured chaos’ we see in our media every day as well as migration madness etc is testament to the fact that the elite are in the endgame and are playing chess whilst the masses are playing chequers, thinking they can lynch the elite. The masses are just going to be used to fight each other and get dead, just like always. Humanity never learns. They elite will only get dead after killing off much of the western world and less so of the world at large, proportionately speaking.

jzak95
Guest
jzak95
Offline

Want me to make you real mad? I’m only half white.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

Why would that make me mad? People are who they are – I just hate evil and that’s the sick edomites who run this joint. I don’t really have much of an opinion against everyone else, except that humanity needs to wake the fuck up and improve as a whole.

jz95
Guest
jz95
Offline

Sorry, brother. From the looks of one of your previous comments it looked as though you were one of those white supremacists that tend to hang around this neck of the woods. Not that I have anything against whites having pride for themselves and their heritage. They have as much of a right to feel proud of themselves as do other races. Nonetheless, a lot of comments I’ve read these days seem to be denigrating minorities or “mongrels” such as myself, when all of us need to band together- at least for a little while- against a common enemy: leftism.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

No need for supremacism – people just want to preserve their race. Other people and races are also very valuable too. I sometimes wonder if all that hate is being typed by paid agitators who want to promote divisions between peoples as they steal all the cash and resources.

The only exception is evil bankers and their brainwashed brethren whom unfortunately we cannot save or coexist with – they need to get wiped out because they are aching to enslave us and destroy us all.

jz95
Guest
jz95
Offline

Agreed. All races, including white people, have the right to preserve themselves. But it is difficult when so many of their own people, or perhaps at least an extremely vocal minority, are preventing them from doing so.

Grizzles
Guest
Grizzles
Offline

Looking at the possible time frame for when SHTF, I’ve found William Strauss/Neil Howe’s book- The Fourth Turning to be an interesting hypothesis, and one personally I believe to be worth entertaining the possibility of.

In the book they predict that our current ‘cycle’ will reach its end between the years 2020-2025, which fits within your estimated time period so I figured it was worth sharing.
Also worth mentioning is that every cycle that has been noted has ended with war, and I agree with everything you posted above.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

Sadly, strauss, mystery and most original PUA leaders were jews or zionists who spearheaded the PUA movement to further help create a society of disconnected people, as a complement to feminism. He is controlled opposition who has benefitted from his position. Whilst life is a series of cycles, it is the timeframe the leaders have set that is more revealing – they have laid out their plans with many bigwigs predicting a global war by 2022 at the latest.

When they talk about ’50 years in the future’ and show us all this great stuff we are going to have in the media, it is a mere pacifier for the masses who swallow the cool-aid without looking at the current reality of a poor economy with over-run borders. They are just acting like dumb scared sheep who are being herded for the slaughter.

Stadtaffe
Guest
Stadtaffe
Offline

Man that was a funny read, I’m thinking of stocking up the pantry for when the SHTF..

armenia4ever
Guest

“Do we hope Bernie Sanders or Hilary Clinton win and facilitate the implosion of the States, and rebuild from the ashes?”

Probably this.

Also start a big family, preferably in a more rural area where people are friendly, the cost of living is cheap, and you can by acres of land for 2-4k an acre.

If the Amish can do it, why can’t we?

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

No leader will save you. At least not from the ones on offer at the current time.

The Amish have become used to a low tech life and also have an experienced community. We have neither and not everyone can join up to the same lifestyle. Besides, they may also not make it.

A relationship with God, preparation and luck will see us through. But you are right that making steps to move to the edges of a society, like moving to a rural area, do increase your chances and will make for a better life in future – but don’t tell most city dwellers that; they are stuck in their delusions.

iBooB
Guest
iBooB
Offline

That’s the next step. Tackling the question of what do we do now and how do we get there. In my opinion the wrong thing to do would be to run away OR fight. Don’t look to politics or religions to save you as only we can save ourselves at this point. The problem is the entire Western World is enslaved by their egos, jobs and material possessions. How to make the time to raise our own children correctly? To build communities on new foundations based on ancient immutable laws and nature?

The answer I believe lies in the twisted world of LAW. If you REGISTER (although adherence to COMMON LAW would be the best bet and I think that falls under TRUSTS, don’t quote me) a non-profit charity or religion, corporated or unincorporated, and place yourself as Director/CEO, or MESSIAH, you relieve yourself from many burdens that the government places on you as a competitor (bonded slave/employee) in the world of commerce- like taxation. You will then have all the free time in the world spreading your gospel and building your society all while getting paid for it too (funneled through the trust?). But even I still get confused because every single combination of classification like Religion vs charity vs trust vs ceo vs priest makes a huge impact on how you will be viewed as an entity before our lord and majesty at court. I haven’t tried any of this but its got to be there somewhere. Maybe a friendly, non-disinformative Jew can chime in because I know LOTS if not ALL of them are all up in this bitch. Yeah that’s a fact. I heard it’s taught in like grade 4 in private tribal Judaic summer camps while public school kids of same age get to learn about gay sex and masturbation. Shiiieeeeetttt.

If game took up to now to solve and it was a 10,000 piece puzzle, nigga this be a 10 million piece puzzle right hurr. It’s like thinking you finally beat the last boss of the game but then the fucker grows 50x bigger and uglier and meaner and starts hitting you with crazy shit… yeah it’s big boss time. But if anybody can do it it’s Roosh. Look how far he’s come. He defeated mayors of cities, petitions, SJW’s, angry violent mobs and the list goes on. The sad thing is- Heaven forbid- it’s only going to get worse for him the deeper he gets. Let’s pray his confidence, courage, resolve, strength, intelligence and all that good shit grows even bigger.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

His problem of finding a ‘quality’ woman has no solution. It requires a naivety on his part which he doesn’t have. The only quality women that exist will be the ones in the next era of humanity. The few’ quality’ girls that currently exist are still ones that are helping to perpetuate a sick system and are almost always dating weak men – even many red pill men are white knights and cannot see how fucked up our current society is, to the point where most of the kinds of people that exist now, even ‘quality’ ones, would not exist in a properly functioning society with a future. They are just wedded to their wicked leaders and will fall with them.

The social environment makes or breaks a society and patriarchy along with the Christian religion kept women in check decades ago. Now the social environment has been altered and the net goal of destroying the white western family has been realised, along with most western Christians practising a form of Christianity that is more akin to luciferianism.

Titan000
Guest
Titan000
Offline

The Christian religion commands patriarchal family structure. So patriarchy in a sense comes with Christianity as well as other functional religions.

League of Shadows
Guest
League of Shadows
Offline

Christianity was the blueprint for Western civilization. We flourish under its tenants, or at least we used to. Much like all things in the West, Christianity was perverted and subverted for Globalist’s agendas. If we are to resurge post collapse or make a turn in direction now we must reclaim Christianity as it was originally intended.

I am not speaking of deity worship or praying and dogmatic practices as much as I am speaking about the parables and morals that Christianity taught us: How we arrange our families, How we arrange our societies, How we wage war and build nations.

Old testimate Christian god was not to be fucked with. He was fire and brimstone, which is to say Mankind following the Christian beliefs were not to be fucked with…we were fire and brimstone. Then came the “turn the other cheek nonsense”.

Our enemies have a faith, something to believe that emboldens their hearts in combat, in all its forms. We too must also have a faith to believe in, something that will unite all Western men under a banner to repel the hordes once again. Christianity served that purpose for 1000+ years..its time to return to it as a rallying cry once more.

League of Shadows
Guest
League of Shadows
Offline

If I may?: You plan for all contingencies and prepare to initiate action towards those ends as opportunities present themselves. To have one plan is to have one path that can be destroyed by an opponent whose global reach and resources are almost infinite.

No, you must have various plans and angles. You can have various allies moving in various directions towards one ultimate goal. Thus spreading out your opposition’s resources and attention, perhaps thin enough where your allies may have a chance. Or creating misdirection so that other allies and their plans go undetected.

Trump is an angle, preparing for post collapse resurgence is another angle, guerrilla viral marketing is yet another. But I suggest, in my humble opinion, that expatriating will not solve our issues at home. America is our home, it is stocked with our resources, to expatriate is to leave your castle. We cannot run from issues that are global in reach, we must stay on home turf where we have some semblance of advantage.

Leaders will rise in the coming decades, be able to identify them, be prepared to support them. Think creatively, be brave. Turn off the TV and video games. Put down the cigarettes and weed. Go to the gym, learn real world skills, reconnect with nature. I have faith in the youth while most dismiss them. Convert your brothers to redpill and Western masculinity, be ashamed of nothing.

Rachael Lefler
Guest
Rachael Lefler
Offline

Yeah I know, I don’t like the way things are any more than Roosh but the reality is I can’t afford to abandon a career track to have 7 kids, and most women can’t either. Movements we were told would give us choices just made us slaves.

John Yossarian
Guest
John Yossarian
Offline

You can afford it if you land a dude with a solid career – OR – You can take a month off for every kid and he can be the stay-at-home dad. Either way, it makes for great kids and a happy home.

Morrison
Guest
Morrison
Offline

Those embedded videos showing a couple of the elites putting their foot in their mouths by admitting the bigger agenda are not appearing on your page. Coincidence? Or perhaps you are being followed by them.

That said, if you want to have kids thats great, but unless you can determine which sex your future baby will be, you run the risk of having a daughter, i.e. a future table dancer who will become a conplete whore and hate her father by the time she reaches age 15.

Ragnar Blåskägg
Guest
Ragnar Blåskägg
Offline

I have a hard time seeing roosh raising a daughter to be a table dancer though. I think the manosphere in general have the potential to create fathers that would in turn create once again a healthy generation of women.

Morrison
Guest
Morrison
Offline

I hear that – Roosh would be in a different situation. But in wastelands like the USA where fathers have ZERO rights and say to raise his children, the government instead, raises the children. And girls are being brought up under the feminist way.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

Will most western daughters being born now reach the age of 15? This society doesn’t have that long left…

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

The rich rabbis will have lots of goyim table dancers.

Funny how it works out that a certain group proportionately get rich whilst the others get made into slaves.

KermitTheeFrog777
Guest
KermitTheeFrog777
Offline

Well, today is the day my reversion to the political right is complete. The more fit and better at game I have gotten, the more I have sympathized and understood these mechanisms, and Nietzche’ “Master” mentality. I now feel the clear motivation for sex and family. Time to go full Dark Enlightenment and reinvigorate the ranks. My main challenge is figuring out how to square my current agnosticism with the fact that my practical goals align with Master-minded Christians; only way to raise a family imo. My best answer at the moment is to realize there are both Master and Slave veins in both religious and non-religious movements. E.g.Jesus was slave but Paul was Master.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

In what way do you mean Jesus was a slave?
And Paul a master?

Wes
Guest
Wes
Offline

Yes deep down inside progressives hate humanity. It is that simple

Kisse Ellis
Guest
Kisse Ellis
Offline

Yes. They hate themselves. It is a mental illness. Self loathing.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

They haven’t learned to ‘be their brother’s keeper’.
To constantly be selfish means to destroy our own selves.

The Bible and Christianity, whilst flawed, have much wisdom (I feel a bit moreso than other religions – although all religions are half-truths and lies).
Christ did exist however as God’s representative/son. In the future, I believe all religion will be cast aside in favour of spirituality and a personal connection with God manifest by brotherly love. No, its not a pipe dream, its just that humanity is being manipulated without its knowledge or consent. 70% of western society is on pills of some sort – many religions also foretell about how these drugs supposedly helping us are used to warp our minds before the fall of a civilisation. Big Pharma is smiling.

GoingSane
Guest
GoingSane
Offline

It’s good to see you making the connection between totalitarian control and population reduction, they are limited in number and resources and therefore need fewer individuals to maintain it all. One of those things I couldn’t ignore any longer and considered myself afterward to finally be going sane.
The subtle, insidious indoctrination we undergo from early development to adolescence and even in adulthood is well-crafted, and the interesting thing is that it doesn’t even have to be what would traditionally be termed as “conspiracy” just like-minded individuals/groups loosely working doggedly toward the same objective(s).
But I too have to ask, without a change in culture and values back toward the traditional, raising children in the modern West seems self-defeating (damned if you do, damned if you don’t), for they will be even easier prey to ever more vicious undermining, and how do we raise the young properly with all government authority fixed upon us to prevent it? (Especially when there is an obvious intent to limit Men’s presence in child-rearing specifically and have them raised by the mentally deranged).

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

Totalitarian control will be pumped to the max with the new terrorism reforms. Don’t forget that they will continue the abusive staged wars, the importation of immigrants especially from ‘terrorist’ countries and loss of liberties of local populations. Why so much ‘terrorism’ now and who is benefiting from this ‘divide-and-conquer’?

Titan000
Guest
Titan000
Offline

Cradle to grave. Although I also think the adolescence as a social phenomenon (existing since the 18th century)is also harmful to young adults and preventing them from realizing their potential.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

In the UK in England, after white woman whoring/divorce/abortion and mass immigration after this/and staged wars; the current population (including illegals which the government doesn’t count) are this:

49% white English
10% mostly white other
41% non-whites (mostly in cities)

Considering it is a small country whose main sources of income after offspring industries is banking fraud and illegal drug smuggling, I would say Britain is finished. Especially since we have to import 60% of our food at a minimum. When the economy crashes, the people will turn on each other. In fact, due to the social structure of every westernised (mostly white) countries, they are all vulnerable to economic shocks (which will be masked by ww3).

The bigwigs running the show in banking and hollywood release stuff like ‘the walking dead’ because that’s how they see us – and they’re not completely wrong.

Ragnar Blåskägg
Guest
Ragnar Blåskägg
Offline

Everything you just mentioned is the reasons why i think the most crucial component for white people is to start repopulating the countryside, forming communities and optimally becoming self sufficient.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

They needed to do that 30 years ago – the masses, especially in the west, have corralled themselves into cities dependent on a fragile supply line of food and other commodities essential for life. If I wanted to wipe out the white race (which I know is the goal) I would do the same:
(1) put all whites in cities
(2) make them dependent on a falsified economy
(3) weaken the role of males
(4) make women have less children and attack the men

The problem is that much of the population is morally complicit as we can’t expect feminists en masse to stop aborting babies en masse etc.. The men are guilty too. So you have a corrupted elite with a corrupted society where even the immigrants learn the same behaviours.

The elite planned it this way to have an ideal situation where everyone kills each other whilst they sit back and watch. The triptych of economic collapse, a staged war and lack of resources with infighting will do the trick. On the other hand, if you want a ‘righteous’ society or to fix the situation, you have to kill both the elite and many of the masses who have become depraved, many of whom are professionals with jobs who blindly do all sorts of society destroying shit all day long etc… Don’t forget that whatever rules are coming in due to ‘terrorism’ will be used to oppress the masses. I just read on the financial site zero hedge that white males are considered to be the number one threat – ha ha ha.

So sitting in the country with a cool beer whilst everyone else wipes each other out is a good plan. Of course, people in the country won’t be left alone either, but they have a much better chance at making it with less zombified ‘walkers’ about and especially if they are a little more self-sufficient with regards to food and water.

Ragnar Blåskägg
Guest
Ragnar Blåskägg
Offline

here in sweden as an example the social democrats has worked very hard since the sixties to depopulate the countryside and thus diminish the amount of domestic food production, the results: sweden a once self sufficient country foodwise would have food for three days in the case of an economic collapse were import would halt.

But as you say there will be only a minority that will be able to prepare themselves for whats to come, best not to have to high hopes for the masses unless you want to drive yourself crazy.

And to your last point: an obvious thing that a potential rural community would need is some form of militia of course, something to protect from the hordes of lowlifes.

redpillyogi
Guest

I agree wholeheartedly. I’m learning permaculture and earth building here in Thailand.

Ragnar Blåskägg
Guest
Ragnar Blåskägg
Offline

Earth building is very fascinating, i saw a documentary about it a couple of years ago, its incredible to watch people build those amazing houses with their bare hands. Earth building definetely has a lot of potential in our coming future to help the exodus from the current crap society we live in.

redpillyogi
Guest

Yes, and you can actually design some very aesthetic structures from earth. I was quite surprised to see all of the amazing designs.

sam1
Guest
sam1
Offline

Gross lie. Non whites are 9% of the UK population. Check Census data.

Screw_Globalism
Guest
Screw_Globalism
Offline

Greater London for one example is 80% non white at least now

Clark Kent
Guest
Clark Kent
Offline

I applaud you Roosh for once again outdoing yourself.
This is another article that ties together years of observation and research.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

‘the end goal of western progressivism is depopulation’
MEANS
the end goal of western progressivism is genocide !!! (especially whites)

Skoll
Guest
Skoll
Offline

You are wrong on so many levels. I’m not sure why you think it’s a good idea to continue the population growth that we (as a world) are facing when:

-The migrants (minus Syrians) flooding into Europe is the result of Africa’s exploding population.

-Without abortion, most of those unwanted babies will grow up sucking off tax-payers money, commit crime, and end up in jail.

-It may be difficult for us with constant Wi-fi access to understand, but there are many parts of the world where people lack basic needs like clean water, food, and even toilets. In fact, the only way the current level of population is even being maintained is due to GMOs and meat from CAFOs. So how the hell does having an extra 2 billion on top of our current 7 billion going to help that situation?

So unless you’re willing to support all the extra billions of impoverished people, why wouldn’t you want population to decrease?

I think you’re generalizing too much here. You have to separate the first world population problem (mainly Europe and Japan) with the third world’s. West has a problem with population decline due to everything you correctly identified while the third world is exploding due to lack of control. But to lump them together and say that there is a global depopulation conspiracy is ridiculous.

The solution is simple: Europe needs to secure its borders and increase fertility by destroying feminism and instilling traditional family values, while the third world needs their population controlled and even reduced.

If there is any population conspiracy, it’s that the elites are flooding the first world with third world immigrants to dilute the population pool, destroy cultural unity, and keep the wages low.

It’s hard to even talk about the environment without being labeled a lefty, but is it really crazy to ask for a stable environment to exist in? How do you plan to support billions of extra people without a sustainable environment? It’s not some progressive conspiracy to want to have decent living conditions. Try living in Beijing with their air pollution. Try living in Nigeria or India for a year and try saying that population doesn’t need to be controlled.comment image

zbyszek
Guest
zbyszek
Offline

This is a great reply! I wouldn’t have put it better.
While Roosh’s post merely touches a more fundamental problem, overall it sounds just ridiculous.

Slashfund
Guest
Slashfund
Offline

-They’d be stopped at the border if Western nations weren’t desperate to increase the population
-If welfare spending is too high, the solution is to cut welfare, not the population
-Overpopulation in the 3rd world will correct itself

spicynujac
Guest
spicynujac
Offline

This is what few will talk about. The reason immigration will continue, at least in America, is because financially, it has to, to sustain our financial system. The choices are balance the budget or increase the taxpayer rolls. Which do you think the politicians will choose?

Skoll
Guest
Skoll
Offline

-They’d be stopped if Western nations weren’t pussified.
-I don’t think cutting welfare is mutually exclusive to reducing population. And welfare or not, what do you think is going to happen when all those unwanted babies from their useless mothers grow up?

-It will correct itself eventually, but why wait with all the looming consequences?

Stadtaffe
Guest
Stadtaffe
Offline

…if western nations weren’t so pussified, politically correct and guilt ridden they would be stopped at the border. Thankfully there are a few cracks at the edges, a few politicians doing a few politically incorrect things, I can’t wait to see that trend increase, especially as it relates to building of border fences.. Man, there would be riots in certain European countries if they cut welfare payments, cars burning in the streets etc, would need to have the forces of order to keep that in check before they cut welfare.

spicynujac
Guest
spicynujac
Offline

Agreed, with the caveat that I wouldn’t call Europe’s peak in population a “problem with population decline”. I wouldn’t ascribe a negative connotation to it. I think EU hit peak population, and it’s not going any higher. They naturally reached a saturation point. EU is already a much more densely populated area than almost all of the USA. You know at some point, Paris population 100 million stops being Paris at all.

redpillyogi
Guest

WTF did you even read the article. His ENTIRE argument was centered around the fact that the global elite are seeking to destroy the freedom loving western populations. Please don’t make me go back up to the article to capture all of his points. Take 5 minutes and actually read it.

Skoll
Guest
Skoll
Offline

What are you babbling about? You’re the one who obviously didn’t read my comment.

The population of the West is declining mainly due to feminism and the destruction of traditional family values. Countries like France already have incentives for parents to have more children, so there goes your depopulation conspiracy.

What the elites are doing is bringing in excess population from third world into the western countries while trying to control the population growth of in places like sub-Saharan Africa, not the “freedom loving” (lol) West.

Give me one counter-argument against my original comment instead of just repeating this bullshit conspiracy theory like it’s the truth.

redpillyogi
Guest

You open with this:
“I’m not sure why you think it’s a good idea to continue the population growth that we (as a world) are facing when…”

Roosh isn’t advocating for global population growth. What he is saying that strong nuclear western families should increase their populations while 3rd world populations should naturally decrease. So, yes, simple maths can insinuate western populations on the increase, 3rd world on the decrease, and also an overall decrease of global population growth. SJW and liberals blindly parrot that EVERYONE should stop having babies, but their true target of this message is the freedom loving individuals of the west, because the liberals are useful idiots for Soros and Co.

Stadtaffe
Guest
Stadtaffe
Offline

“Europe needs to secure its borders and increase fertility by destroying feminism and instilling traditional family values” is a wonderful sentence. They also need to destigmatise nationalism and allow a healthy sense of tribe and nation to re-establish itself. The European union probably needs to dissolve so as to allow these healthy things to happen and end the poisonous forced multiculturalism. Maybe if it were run by conservative politicians instead of leftards it could stay but that’s probably unlikely..

Inigo
Guest
Inigo
Offline

This is depopulation of the goyim.

-Ted Turner financed the Georgia Guidestones which states to keep the population under 500,000,000

– QUOTE FROM THE JEWISH TALMUD: Sanhedrin 59a: “Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal.”

The goal of the synagog of Satan is to reduce the population enough so that there is only the elite and their slaves.

advancedatheist
Guest
advancedatheist
Offline

-Ted Turner financed the Georgia Guidestones which states to keep the population under 500,000,000

Stop it with this “guidestones” nonsense. If you don’t like the number inscribed on a rock, set up another rock with a number on it you approve of.

Seriously, this obsession with the Guidestones shows primitive, magical thinking, like you think these rocks act like voodoo dolls or something.

Inigo
Guest
Inigo
Offline

No, it doesn’t matter if it’s on a rock, a building or tattooed on your mom’s ass.

What matters is the people and idealism behind it. In which you missed the entire point.

Laguna Beach Fogey
Guest
Laguna Beach Fogey
Offline

White Genocide.

They really do want to exterminate us.

I wish we would return the favor.

Marshallaw
Guest
Marshallaw
Offline

I have a feeling the time might be close……

Kisse Ellis
Guest
Kisse Ellis
Offline

Who is ‘they’ ?

The architects of the plan are ‘white’ too…

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

Sadly, I have found in person that when a ‘white person’ says they want ‘mass immigration’, it inevitably turns out that white person was a jew. Jews are not pro non-whites though – they use their banks to keep the third world in perpetual debt. They just hate the human race, and it is far worse than I have described.

Owen Gilmore
Guest
Owen Gilmore
Offline

Ridiculous. Jews are 2-3% tops. My globalist brother is FINE with immigration; we’re as waspy as they come. Means he gets cheap ethnic food and nannies for his kids which he can easily pay for from his corporate job.

Conrad Stonebanks
Guest
Conrad Stonebanks
Offline

The globalist elites are rubbing their hands with glee:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=m3sxDlDxzac

Marshallaw
Guest
Marshallaw
Offline

Ezekiel Emmanuels quote about the immortal Americans? Does he really believe that the country with the highest rates of obesity on the planet are obsessed with exercise and protein shakes?
As there are many in every country that look after their health the majority are more into eating a junk food diet and then let the doctor and big pharma sort it out when they get sick rather than preventative medicine.
Factory farming and convenience food will kill you slowly. I have been involved in the agriculture industry and believe me the vast majority of producers are thinking of the bottom line not their customers health. When prices of feed go up producers will look for other cheaper alternatives to keep their margins, most of these alternatives are not good for health.
I am weaning myself off sugar and booze. Trying to eat clean. There is a lot to be said for growing much of your own food if you live in the country side. When the zombie apocalypse hits you might just last a little longer……

redpillyogi
Guest

Exactly. I’m pretty sure his message is “eat whatever you want. Spend your 40/50/60s in the hospital handing over whatever money you made during your prime earning years to us. Retire at 68, die at 70. Enjoy”.

Libertas
Guest
Libertas
Offline

This doesn’t seem entirely accurate because what is happening now is the third world being imported into the West for the purposes of cheap labor and destroying nations.

By controlling the population in this way, they limit their own pool of cheap labor and their options to impose a global order because less people will mean more heterogeneity and less pressure on it. I do see how this is compatible with reducing population in homogenous states.

Maybe this is all true of a certain environmentalist segment, but to say it’s true of all “the elite” is mistaken.

Hordes from the third world do need to be controlled.

Titan000
Guest
Titan000
Offline

As consequence of depopulation. They are short of human labour to fuel growth. Part of the reason why they iInstitute immigration or at least thats their stated reason.

Bugger
Guest
Bugger
Offline

Elites want power. Power ultimately means military power, which is based on a combination of labor, technology, resources, social organization, etc. The trend over the past 150 years is for technology to be more important and labor less important and that trend is accelerating. Given military power, you can buy or steal resources, provided the states controlling those resources are kept weak, as is the case of all the Arab and other African countries, so that is a minor factor.

The interesting factor is social organization. The primary goal of the elites in developed countries has been to break the power of the lower classes so as to recreate aristocracy and that is why they are bringing in immigrants. Once aristocracy is reintroduced and democracy eliminated, a series of flu pandemics and other “natural” disasters will be unleashed to cull the lower classes in the developed countries, both the natives and the immigrants.

Nobody cares about population in Africa, whether it grows or shrinks. What matters is that Africa be kept weak so it can be exploited. If these Africans overpopulate, they’ll suffer a famine at some point. Doesn’t matter, since it takes very few people to extract their resources. If the starving Africans, etc try to immigrate to Europe AFTER the aristocracy has been reintroduced, and hence no more need for immigrants to break the power of the lower classes, they’ll be gunned down like rats by helicopter gunship drones.

ffds
Guest
ffds
Offline

Exactly, this isn’t some Oligarch purge-the-poor scheme; it’s a scheme to destroy Western cultures and Caucasian racial identity. If it were the former, there would be population control in the third world. Instead, the third world is just imported in as fast as possible to eliminate Whitey and destroy our standard of living with reduced wages/benefits…

French-Canadian
Guest
French-Canadian
Offline

There’s one issue that I want to adress here and that unfortunately I think Roosh has never talked about in this blog. One of the things that make it really hard on men and women to really connect is the way women often treat strangers that approach them in public places (whether it’s bars, clubs, at the grocery store, etc.) in North America.

As a man, especially in a bar for example, you really feel like the woman feels it is totally legitimate for here to be mean, hostile and even violent towards a man that approaches her, and even if that approach was done with class. And if she does so, not only will she not be looked upon as a bitch, but her friends will probably look at the guy and laugh. “Probably an ass-hole”, will they think. You would think that in places like bars and so on, it would be easy to meet women, if you’re an honest single man, but it’s really not, because of that type of behavior by women, which makes the whole experience very unpleasant. And a lot of them often form circles purposely designed to block men for talking to men. Why do you go to a bar then??

At the end of the day, if you look at the situation from a man’s perspective, there are more negatives than positives for a man to go in such places and the end result is that honest men often don’t go there or when they do, don’t approach women.

If you try to talk to them at the grocery store, or waiting in line at the bank, then you have good chances of being looked at with dreadful eyes as if you were a rapist or a psycho. “I don’t know you! How do i know you’re not a serial killer?”
As Roosh said, women are thought to look at all men as potential rapists, but not only that: they are taught to disrespect men, especially in places like bars, that are normally made for men and women to meet. We’re all assholes, bastards, manipulators, cheators. How can these women commit in healthy and lasting relationships, and how can they even in the first place MEET an honest guy, if this is the opinion they have of them in general and if they treat them like shit when they approach them?

Aryan Jesuite
Guest
Aryan Jesuite
Offline

…the articles and comments over at The Rational Male will be of interest to you in answering these concerns. To start with be ‘outcome independent’ when approaching women. Don’t be concerned with the outcome of the approach. Focus on the approach itself. Maybe you are basing your well being on the validation of women. This is a painful way to go. Instead try approaching with humorous insults, then if you get rejected, so what? You didn’t really put yourself out there anyway and besides she might just respond with good natured bantering back at you. You are then open to escalate: agree and amplify ~ just a couple red pill ideas that might work for you.

NightRider101
Guest
NightRider101
Offline

This is probably why hardcore left wing liberals always usually support concepts of depopulation and abortion.

greyghost1
Guest
greyghost1
Offline

The depopulation is the depopulation of independent thinking types. Just a different for of Stalinist purge. The population is being replaced with third worlders that are used to living under centralized restricted rule with a ruling class free to enjoy life above the piss ants.
For those waiting for some brave men to cause the collapse unless you do it yourself it can get plenty bad. Look at north Korea and Cambodia and Burma at the end of the Vietnam thing.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

‘The depopulation is the depopulation of independent thinking types. Just a different for of Stalinist purge’

Exactly. But the western populations en masse will soon get killed too. The whole point is to get rid of high consuming people and more feisty populations (whites).

MCGOO
Guest
MCGOO
Offline

The globalists want masses of dumb raceless mongrel zombie wage slaves with no tribal affiliation. Racially semitic Jews are also less likely to be rejected from a society with no clear racial lines, no surviving forms of tradition or culture other than their own. They often run the sweat shops.

I once tried to talk some red pill power points in a church group of ‘sheeple’. I brought up the Illuminati just for sake of argument and the parishoners had never heard of it. The pastor got reeeeel mad at me and acted like some zionist Jews do when you reveal that you have a degree in redspeak. Not all jews flip out, but the bad ones, the tribe hatchetmen go berserk. They realize you’re dangerous to their game of running cult marx control, but the way they get homicidal on you is insane. Like they have a licence to take you out.

But this supposedly milk toast Judeo Christian pastor was soo used to having nothing but a bunch of cherry picked cabbage patch nodding zombies for a congregation that he freaked out like I was the devil. You’d think HE himself might privately be interested in redspeak, but noo he would have none of it, not speaking to me anymore and then insinuating behind my back that my kids were not in good hands. I got my clan out of there and got my firewall ready in case we had any trouble with the punk ass preacher. Two faced fed clergy response team goddamn traitor. People like this pasor are dangerous, manipulative sheep hearders, and this pastor went on my growing shit list after that.

EVERY WESTERNER needs to keep and honor their own shitlist. It would be a tragedy if the shitsters ever weaseled away when the shit hits the fan. They’ll slip free to go on and poison society and innocent lives down the road if they aren’t stopped. Every divorce raped western man should remember names and faces of those that actively persecuted his family or profitted off of its dismemberment. Enough names to exceed the number of fingers and toes they have. The fam court rats, the child support witches, the whole hit squad of them. There will come a time when there will be a lot of NAMING FINGERS and POINTING NAMES . . heh . . almost forgot, the people with autistic sons. The villians here may or may not be the doctors, but you can salt out the hard line enemy when you buck the system and refuse shots. Then see what prosecutor comes with zero tolerance for your ‘non compliance’. The hard line enforcers are definately enemy of western civ. I can’t remember who the judge was who expelled the validictorian kid for accidentally having a butter knife in his backpack under extreme ‘zero tolerance’ mania enforcement. But that’s the kind of folk that western civ could do without. The epitome of useless eater bureaucrat. If I were in charge, there would definately be a ‘slave for life’ class of the former traitors. I’d put them on treadwheels generating power for the citizens and have them beaten with monkey bats and whips if they resisted.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

Its true the tribesmen flip out, become violent, or mention the holocaust like 20 times (even forgetting jews holocaust 15 times that number in their purge in the USSR, and that the holocaust is questionable at best). Jews don’t like their dirty laundry being pointed out and try and say we’re all just as bad – erm, no, no we are not all like you sick guys…

I doubt jews would be able to keep control of a future society, for they are too destructive and self-destructive now. Logically speaking, any future society run by them will destroy itself, them along with it, in less than 50 years from now and most likely a whole lot sooner. I believe that God will end this some day, but if he doesn’t, its not like jews will inherit the planet. No matter what preparations they have made, they cannot survive without other members of humanity who HAVE A REAL MEANINGFUL SAY in how our world is run.

redpillyogi
Guest

Pol Pot wanted to get rid of the educated thinking class. The elites are just the Khmer Rouge in disguise, executed on a global scale.

Zarg Buell
Guest
Zarg Buell
Offline

“By now you should note that the more sinister the individual, the more they are portrayed by the media as harmless, awkwardly geeky, and folksy (e.g. Mark Zuckerberg, the Google founders, and the CEO of Starbucks).”
Jew, Jew/Jew, and Jew.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

“By now you should note that the more sinister the individual, the more they are portrayed by the media as harmless, awkwardly geeky, and folksy”

I’m stealing this from you for my quotes to reflect on.

Obviously jews are behind it all – though the brainwashed goyim slaves don’t do much to help by aborting their own children and being blinded/indifferent/ignorant as to the real agenda.

Giorgi
Guest
Giorgi
Offline

“Why aren’t governments supporting natalist policies like in Russia that aim to seed future generations of natives to create a stronger nation..”

Your obsession with Russia as some kind of paradise on earth is honestly becoming a tad bit disturbing. Also please check the facts: many European nations have social policies nominally encouraging more children. Germany and France, for example, have very lucrative financial subsidies enticing child birth, far more than whatever pittance Putin and his cronies bestow to impoverished Russian middle class.

“there is not one European nation west of Russia, even when including Eastern Europe, that has a fertility rate above that of the replacement rate.”

Why exclude Russia? Fertillity rate there is actually LOWER than UK and Sweden, countries considered as SJW strongholds here. And please no “it is all immigrants in Europe and all natives Russians in Russia”. Most replacement level fertility rate in Russia is actually in Muslim regions. Western Russia is pretty bare even after a modest surge in birth rates.

Untergang07
Guest
Untergang07
Offline

Also please check the facts: many European nations have social policies
nominally encouraging more children. Germany and France, for example,
have very lucrative financial subsidies enticing child birth, far more
than whatever pittance Putin and his cronies bestow to impoverished
Russian middle class.

And those schemes have been an utter failure, a fiasco, except in the inmigrant communities. Swedish, English, French and German populations ALL have sub-replacement fertility rates. Russia is no paradise by most standards, but the disease is mental and, may I say, spiritual hence no subsidy has boosted fertility to the replacement rate. In this case, the Russian efforts at trying to resucitate the Christian faith are smarter than just giving money to sluts so they can have children. And even in Russia, morality cannot be legislated.

Deebos
Guest
Deebos
Offline

I may get on a “what does this have to do with game” kick every now and then but this is a very detailed and informative article. Sadly, I agreed with two of the three statements (the last two). Quite eye opening.

Zelcorpion
Guest
Zelcorpion
Offline

Excellent article.

While Earth has some end limits, the current over population is a myth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WT_CxJfFgh0
If you give every 4 individuals 400m2/4300sqf of land, you could squeeze in 7 billion people on the territory of Texas. That would leave the rest of the Earth completely free.
Currently some regions are densely populated while others are utterly empty. We even produce enough food for 9 billion people already, but are throwing it away in the West. UNESCO has admitted repeatedly that we could easily produce enough food for 12 billion just in Africa alone! – And even that would not be at the productive limit of that continent.

Elite driven depopulation is a fact. In reality if the elite did not meddle, then most couples when being wealthy would opt to have 2-3 children. Poverty is the biggest driver of population growth. Even wealthy Muslim countries like Saud-Arabia are having barely 2.5 children. There is very likely a natural reproduction rate even when you have a traditional healthy family.

But of course the current agendas serve not only to depopulate earth, but also take control of Western rebellious individualistic countries. There are many reasons why the globalist powers don’t want you to reproduce.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

It is a myth and we have more resources than ‘official’ lying sources claim, compared to the past when official sources told the truth about these things.

But they will peddle the limited resources lie so the ‘elite’ (haha) can have an excuse to ‘depopulate’ (i.e. kill) all of us.

Zelcorpion
Guest
Zelcorpion
Offline

Go read your Huffingtonpost and New York Beta Times like a good mainstream citizen. Shoo shooo – be gone from here before you are triggered!

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

Are you an adult? You sound like the one who is triggered – you’ve become hysterical when I was pointing out a logical point. And you call yourself a man. Coward.

You’re pathetic.

Zelcorpion
Guest
Zelcorpion
Offline

Doubting my manhood. This gets better. You are busted woman – or you are a neutered male.

Those are not arguments. You just stated that official sources always tell the truth.

NO – they tell half-truths at best.
Limits in our times are self-appointed and temporary at best. If you look at agricultural policies, then you find out that entire areas at sizes of states or countries in the West are paid to do nothing, milk or even meat output is massively restricted to keep products more expensive. The AGenda 21 with it’s zoning restrictions directly mend into that.

Also Africa is a special case, because around 1900 during full colonial rule the output was likely x-times higher than you have now. You have massive farms now laid bare.

I won’t even care to post links to even UNESCO sources or a bit more credible ones, because women are forbidden here.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

Your comments do not befit an adult male – you try to shame me with feminist shaming tactics suggesting you are a really weak male, its truly pathetic.

My arguments are true and stand on their stated merits.

I won’t respond to you until you grow a pair of balls.

NightRider101
Guest
NightRider101
Offline

People who usually complain about overpopulation are liberals with poor social skills.

dk
Guest
dk
Offline

Excellent article Roosh, thanks for the wisdom shared! Just my 2c on the bit calling yourself a “useful idiot”. Teaching the Word of Game is by no means assisting the Hivemind’s goals. Opening men’s eyes to Red Pill truth is never the wrong thing to do. What every individual does with this truth though, is the litmus test. Whether you use Game to sleep with dozens of cheap floozies or to game your wife or to find and marry and impregnate that hot 19yo seven times is entirely up to you. We men, choose to be the elite’s useful idiots, or not.

JB
Guest
JB
Offline

There’ll be a word, but it won’t be found within my generation. There’ll be a more pertinent word to describe what we’re living through, what we’ve lived through; there was a word to describe what modernity was, and there’ll be a word to describe whatever it was after modernity; as the ‘Middle Ages’ was an expression found to describe what came after the Roman Empire. – Michel Maffesoli

Nathan
Guest
Nathan
Offline

I am grateful for you, Roosh. Thanks for taking the red pill and sharing it freely.

spicynujac
Guest
spicynujac
Offline

There is some cognitive dissonance on the population issue.

Yes, Planned Parenthood was founded with a goal of reducing the number of poor black kids on welfare. The vast numbers of abortions are people who are least able to handle motherhood–ie those too dumb to pre-plan by taking a pill or using a condom, the poor, teen moms, etc.

If these people are part of the “inferior” classes the same way “immigrant populations” are considered inferior, then why is it good to have more of them? You can’t argue for more indigenous white births and at the same time attack Planned Parenthood for basically agreeing with your ideology.

Is there no size population that would get people questioning that we have too many people? Let’s say we get up to 25 billion, gas costs $50 a gallon, all food is genetically modified and full of hormones and chemicals, everyone lives in high rise apartments, social interactions and governments are even more impersonal than today, police state intensifies, you are constantly tracked everywhere you go, food and air quality are approaching danger levels, pathogens and disease epidemics increase, infrastructure is overloaded, taxation levels rise, women have even less responsibility as they can be virtually anonymous in their social circles with CC riding, and let’s not even get into the fact that I don’t know what jobs 20 billion of those are going to find to do.

Yes, it’s an extreme case, but these are all issues which suffer a decrease in quality of life as population increases. I’m asking the question, is there no point at which one could argue the population is too big? Also, keep in mind western governments still subsidize and encourage larger families, and punish the single.

Kisse Ellis
Guest
Kisse Ellis
Offline

You wrong.” Planned Parenthood was founded with a goal of reducing the number of poor black kids on welfare”

Welfare didnt exist when Planned Parenthood was created.

Its Eugenics pure and simple

spicynujac
Guest
spicynujac
Offline

The USA has a multitude of social programs. “Welfare” does not refer to a single program. There were certainly social support programs available at the time Margaret Sanger ran Planned Parenthood. Eugenics is the belief that inferior classes should be reduced or eliminated, and this is what Sanger believed, particularly about poor blacks.

Kisse Ellis
Guest
Kisse Ellis
Offline

‘There were certainly social support programs available at the time Margaret Sanger ran Planned Parenthood.’

Not really. Back then most ‘assistance’ was charity – church driven…..not government.

We are talking about the early 1900s.

Eugenics pure and simple.

armenia4ever
Guest

Eliminate all those social programs. Get rid of any subsidy or help for single mothers.

Watch what will happen.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

The earth could sustain 33 billion people with the US living standard at that time (which was high) based on the 1980s UN study; they reduced it to 9 billion so the bankers have less people to kill so they can control it all.

Planned parenthood and its/western sponsoring of the single child rule in China, the forced sterilisations in India and Africa – its an outrage. Ironically, it would seem the US/UK corporations/governments use the white race, but hate them the most, especially US/UK white people, who the governments’ plan on killing off. A traitor is the worst kind of enemy – insidious and striking you when you least are able to defend yourselves.

spicynujac
Guest
spicynujac
Offline

You can’t say there could be more people “at the same living standard.” Just as ONE mere example. If there were 33 billion cars on the road, gas would cost exponentially more than it does today. How would all these people have the same living standard if it costs 5x as much to fill up their gas tanks?
And the air would be far more toxic due to that many tailpipes spewing exhaust every day, every city would look like L.A. smog. And auto usage is but a tiny fraction of the impact 33 billion people would have on the planet. We’re talking food, water, sewage, scarce resources, etc.

Untergang07
Guest
Untergang07
Offline

Malthus was refuted more than a century ago. You are a bit outdated my friend.

Granted, the Earth has it limits, but those limits haven’t been reached yet and as someone mentioned already, prosperous people are prone to have less children, 3 or 4 or even 2 instead of 7 or 8, This has been proven around the world. The population would never reach 25 Billion unless we are able to leave this planet. Second, technologies are changing, despite the cronies attempts at blocking inconvenient discoveries, hybrid cars and other emission reducing devices are breaking into the market, even fusion reactors, once a fantasy, are being seriously considered http://www.physics-astronomy.com/2015/02/lockheed-martins-new-compact-fusion.html.

Even now we have the means to seriously reduce the human footprint, /(the real one that includes chemical pollution, land use and habitat destruction, not only emissions that supposedly contribute to warming) but those changes, needed in most industries are being blocked because it would cause a dent in profits.

spicynujac
Guest
Skoll
Guest
Skoll
Offline

“But, but… we can easily support 10+ billion if we just wipe out all the other lifeforms on earth and replace them with factory farms and genetically mutated chickens. Sure it’s going to suck living in giant apartments and crowded cities, but at least we’re not performing abortions of unwanted babies from poor single mothers.”

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

We can support way more than 10 billion – this is way to low as the carrying capacity of the earth and is proven to be a lie. It is only that the current debauched economy is not meant to support that many people as you, I and the rest of the world are ‘useless eaters’ to the elite who want the world’s resources to themselves. This low figure of 10 billion is merely an excuse for them to wipe out the planet’s population and is a lie.

redpillyogi
Guest

We are not just “useless eaters” to the elite. If so, the elite would basically be indifferent to us. The fact is that we are indeed a THREAT to the elite, which is why they want to isolate and depopulate us in a methodical manner. SJWs are part and parcel with the NWO in a full on attack to freedom loving Americans. This is the infowar.

Skoll
Guest
Skoll
Offline

But why would you want to live in a world with ‘way more’ than 10 billion people? I live in a moderate sized city that is relatively clean and quiet, but I still hate how crowded and polluted it is. Why would anyone want the population to increase and live like rats? Any increase in population automatically means scarcer resources, why would I want to live in scarcity?

And even if the elites manage to decrease the population to 1 billion (which was what the world population was not long ago) who cares? No one in the West is stopping you from having as many children as you want. How does depopulation even harm me except giving me more breathing space?

cheeseburgercheeseburger
Guest
cheeseburgercheeseburger
Offline

Glad you posted this spicy, some people cant wrap their heads around the fact the earth cannot sustain so many folks

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

It can support more than that – just not with the current falsified and manipulated economy. The ‘elites’ have repeated this lie so many times as to make it the truth. Next they’ll say you’ll be saving the world if you kill yourself – will you comply with that too? They are full of BS and hate humanity.

spicynujac
Guest
spicynujac
Offline

What blows my mind is, ok, if you have an opinion that Earth with 20 billion people would still be a fun place, that’s one thing. Crazy, but ok whatever. But there are people who actually think depopulation is a serious issue. Throughout human history, at every point on that X axis, depopulation was never an issue, and now that we hit the hockey stick straight up, some raise this delusional problem. I really can’t fathom it. Even if the graphs took a nose dive straight down, I would not be worried about human extinction. Life always finds a way. But they are pointed straight up. If this was on any other site, I would think they were trolling, but I believe some people honestly think depopulation is a real problem. I guess chalk it up to our shitty educational system…

cheeseburgercheeseburger
Guest
cheeseburgercheeseburger
Offline

Imagine we did get to 33 billion on earth? Oil extraction hit a wall almost ten years ago(I dont read energy sites anymore, but I think global daily consumption still hovers around 80 mil/barrels per day). If only half of that 33 bil were part of the global modern economy, we would need 160 mil barrels available every day! I dont understand why peeps dont get there are limits to everything, resources are finite

redpillyogi
Guest

Meanwhile we are driving oversized SUVs, watering our unproductive lawns, driving god-knows-how-many miles to work each day, and the list goes on. Grow your own food, build your own house, work from home. There, just cut your resource consumption by about 90%. And its actually a fulfilling lifestyle because you have the knowledge/skillset to create the means necessary for your own survival (i.e. self-sufficiency).

redpillyogi
Guest

This is really missing the point entirely. The article isn’t about net population/depopulation growth/destruction. The author’s point is that the destruction of the population of FREEDOM LOVING WESTERNERS is a scientific takeover by the global elite. You’re essentially creating a straw man argument in an attempt to take people’s attention away from the overriding issue at hand.

Untergang07
Guest
Untergang07
Offline

If you were more diligent (and intellectually honest) you would have posted the graph showing the growth rates of World population. Your malthusian fantasies will not come to fruition, sorry to disappoint you. Btw those are the optimistic rates.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=imgres&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAkQjRwwAGoVChMIg_GWlt2cyQIViismCh3rSw99&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPopulation_growth&psig=AFQjCNFWU0ANaUmyXwHjA1giLhyJRtBwmQ&ust=1448030785963292

spicynujac
Guest
spicynujac
Offline

I have no opinion or dog in this fight. The facts stand for themselves. If one stranger on the internet wants to believe another stranger is a dishonest scumbag because he only looked at the raw numbers on the planet, not the actual growth rates, so be it. The graph above is population *growth rates*. Of course population growth rates cannot continue to increase. That would mean every generation would have to have at least one more child than the prior, So 50 generations down the road a mom would have 50 kids which is not even biologically possible.

No, the population can increase as long as people have a positive growth rate at all. So having 3 kids per family for example. It doesn’t have to rise to 50, but if every family had a steady 3 kids per family, there would be an enormous increase in population, while the “growth rate” would be unchanged.

The rate of change of increase is different from the rate of increase. Of course, declining population is still a fantasy at this point… And so what if it did decline? What if the long term stable population of the earth was “only” 5 billion, and we are now on our way to reaching that equilibrium. Would that be so terrible? Why is there this moral imperative that we must produce greater numbers of bodies? There *is* some number of stabilized population on the earth, right? Are we going to be having this same fearmongering discussion when we are at 29 billion approach 30? Fear of depopulation? Come on, fight some real battles. The human race is not going to die out. Period.

Untergang07
Guest
Untergang07
Offline

The facts stand for themselves. As I said before those are the optimistic rates. I have no doubt the growth rates will reach well beyond the 0 en x axis. Feminism is spreading quickly around the world as well as the dissolution of values, hence Latinamerica will have at most ten years before all of it experiences sub-replacement rates (right now only certain coutries of South America including Brazil are in this level). Before 2030 all South Asia will be in Sub-replacement rates.

Whether you want to accept it or not, the reality is that before the end of this century there will be less people alive than today, whether it’s war or the simple fact that birthrates worldwide cannot sustain it and we enter in an economic death spiral. By the way as I said before your hysteric scenarios are completely unrealistic (20 billion). I am sure you believed all those outdated projections that forecast 10 or more billion people by 2030 and that have been revised and debunked ad nauseam.

spicynujac
Guest
spicynujac
Offline

I’m not making any scenarios, other than observing that currently population is exponentially increasing, so that appears to be the most likely trend. But it’s also true that perhaps we have overshot and are reverting back to the mean. I don’t care what peak population is. It could be 5 billion, 15, or 50. But answer me this. If there are fewer people at the end of this century, (or even if there were more) why does that fact have a positive or negative connotation attached to it? In other words why is an increasing population good, or a decreasing one bad, or vice versa? Why attach a morality to it? That’s my biggest beef. Why ascribe good or bad qualities to natural population levels?

Untergang07
Guest
Untergang07
Offline

Is one thing if a real equilibrium is reached due to natural processes and a more or less conscious decision. It is a totally different thing if degenerate fucks decide to play God and decree the extinction of my bloodline “for the sake of the planet”while they enjoy luxurious life fly around the world and have 4 children per mistress.

Untergang07
Guest
Untergang07
Offline

But answer me this. If there are fewer people at the end of this century, (or even if there were more)

I never said it was something bad. I stated that (lower population by the end of the century) to show how hysterical, the overpopulation scare was.

why does that fact have a positive or negative connotation attached to it?

Maybe positive, maybe if most of the population is young and oldster are the ones dying off. It means rough economic times for certain sectores nothing worrisome.
Negative if oldsters are way more than babies and teenagers, it means demographic death spiral (and economic one) from which there might be no recovery in a very long time, if ever…

In other words why is an increasing population good, or a decreasing
one bad, or vice versa? Why attach a morality to it? That’s my biggest
beef. Why ascribe good or bad qualities to natural population levels?

If you are disconnected individual, with no more aspirations beyond your next meal or dump, well, good for you, the end of your bloodline and culture would be ok for you. However if you have some stake in the future, things would look grim indeed (I am not talking as a White Nationalist, just a man that would like to see a better world for his descendants). Specially since there is nothing natural about the social developments of the last decades and their impact on the population growth. This is specially true since the overpopulation theme is based on half truths and outright lies.

redpillyogi
Guest

Again, there is no moral imperative surrounding the issue of population growth/de-growth. The issue is whether or not the population curve is being controlled by a ruling elite class.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

We can support 33 billion with a good living standard as I said in another comment on this page. Its just that the ‘elite’ would have too much opposition. Besides, we may not even get to 8 billion, as the elite plan a ‘depopulation’ purge with ww3 within the next 10 years or less.

spicynujac
Guest
spicynujac
Offline

OK, I disagree, but let’s suspend disbelief and the laws of economics, and say that’s true. Why would one *want* to live on a planet with 33 billion people? I can think of a whole host of reasons not to, but I’d like to hear why in any way that would be good or enjoyable or beneficial.

redpillyogi
Guest

Right on. Essentially the population will drop naturally with the amount of resources the world has to offer. Which of course is fine. The big problem here is there are a set of people that are actively trying to control the population and its demonic.

Girl in the World
Guest
Girl in the World
Offline

Roosh, I’ve been reading your material for a couple of years, and I’m glad to see that you’re maturing and starting to look at the big picture, the ways in which we’ve all been brainwashed and duped. I always saw the truth in your ideas, but I appreciate that you’re moving away from a Men vs. Women ideology, and toward 99.999% vs. 0.001%. I think you’re starting to understand that the Western women you’ve spent years disparaging are the products of a sick culture, just as the men are. Now more than ever, the women of your time need your understanding and support, not judgment and scorn.

Try to imagine what it’s been like to grow up as a woman during these twisted times. Sure, we’ve had certain “privileges”. But are those privileges ultimately doing us any good? I’ve been pulled along on the girl power bandwagon as much as anyone in my time. But I’ve always been more interested in human power than girl power.

For many years, I’ve heard comments from my peers about how it’s “better for the planet” to avoid having a lot of kids, staunch judgment of the “breeders” who do, a superiority in their decadent, self-serving American lifestyles. Though I could see this was the mainstream line of thought, it never sat well with me. I thought about all these old people without the support of their children and grandchildren, settling into corporate retirement homes to be fleeced by the system till their final lonely days.

Of course, I’m not immune to the programming. While “the carousel” never enticed me, I have been given the message that men are unreliable and my well-being depends on being self-sufficient, earning my own income, not relying on a man for anything. Now I see the programming for what it is, and I’m sad that I fell prey to it. It might be too late for me to create a big, healthy, free-thinking family. But it’s not too late for me to speak up about what I see and encourage others to step outside the elaborately constructed matrix.

For most of human history, the richest 0.001% (or so) have controlled and exploited the other 99.999%, in the past through abject slavery, and these days through corporate cubicle slavery. The sociopath energy of Mark Zuckerberg, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, Bill Gates, the “elite” has always existed and probably will always exist. It is a dark and demonic energy that rules this world.

As long as people lie down and accept the exploitation and abuse, it will continue and intensify, as we see now. The only defense is refusal to submit. If enough people refuse to submit, the result is usually a bloody reset. And the cycle starts again. I hope we can work together to figure out less destructive ways to be free.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

2-4% of women are thinkers who have the courage to back up their opinions, same as 2-4% of men. The rest of men and women don’t think. But having said that, the rest of women need to have more children in the western world, as replacing children/marriage with working as a corporate slave where the corporations do evil has been a massive scam that will destroy western societies.

Feminism is a temporary state of affairs soon to end and the next era will be a different one. I’m sure women will also have a place to make decisions in the coming era, its just that almost ALL of those women will be coming from non-western societies. The western ones have gone full retard on the corruption where abortion is done en masse etc – so the next potential leader of the west could’ve been aborted etc. Children are needed – otherwise other people from distant lands will take the place of the originals. Feminism is a banker ploy – its not real female empowerment.

Girl in the World
Guest
Girl in the World
Offline

Western culture tells women that the short-term rewards of self-sufficiency are far greater than those of motherhood. Our culture celebrates “high-achieving” career women who display all the shiny trappings of ego, not mothers who sacrifice all that to prioritize caring for a family.

I’m no one to throw stones, as I’m as much a product of this toxic environment as anyone. But ask yourselves as young men which women you reward with your time and attention. Is it the genuine, humble girls of substance, or the self-promoting, boastful girls projecting an illusion to lure you in? Are you more attracted to the mother or the whore? Angel or the devil?

Image search “best women”. You’ll find near-naked and naked women, cosmetically manipulated celebrities, women in power suits, bikini models, comic book heroines, runway models. I scrolled for pages and don’t see a single mother, and maybe 1 out of 100 look like “nice girls”.

Amy Wilson
Guest
Amy Wilson
Offline

Totally agree with Girl of the World.
When we see the guys in our peer group giving more attention to the narcissistic girls in short skirts it’s really easy to be frustrated.

I look at the girls I know….and keenly appreciate the difficulties faced by my brothers in finding a good girl. The pretty ones are immodest and the modest ones are masculine or overweight.

redpillyogi
Guest

It works both ways. If you agree that banker/politician type men are destroying the world, yet the most fertile women are attracted and marry these types. Therefore men are rewarded for immoral and narcissistic behaviour.

ex-convict
Guest
ex-convict
Offline

“But ask yourselves as young men which women you reward with your time and attention. Is it the genuine, humble girls of substance, or the self-promoting, boastful girls projecting an illusion to lure you in?”

Sure, men jerk off to pictures and videos of models occasionally after a rough day in the office, but those girls are physically out of reach for at least 90% of men. Let’s unplug from the internet/pornography matrix and bring this discussion to the real world…

In reality, a woman need not be in model shape to weaken the knees of her man and gain his loyalty; she only needs to be in *decent* shape, smile every now and then, be nurturing, gentle, supportive, and sexually loyal. That’s it. It’s easy. It’s natural. You do those things between the ages of 18-30ish and you’ve got excellent odds of locking down a stable and loyal lover and provider.

Our sick and twisted society has tried to convince us otherwise, but even so millions of women couldn’t resist their biological urge to rush to the store upon the release of 50 Shades of Grey – a book that *quite literally* exemplifies the natural polarity between the sexes. (sales now easily over 100 million – https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=50+shades+of+grey+100+million)

armenia4ever
Guest

Yea, I think you make a very good point here.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

You make some decent points – however I contest that most people in western culture are self-sufficient; that is a social manipulation. Most western women benefit from an economy that involves enslaving others from poorer nations who make our clothes, food and everything else. Western women are the least self-sufficient people in the world. They don’t in general make their own food, mend their own clothes, make things in general etc. Feminism is only there to separate them from men and family; so they become a whore to corporate bigwigs whose goal it is to end the white race – a goal which will come much sooner than expected, as the mass migration shows, for the immigrants have more traditional values and will inherit the future. Yet the real way the depopulation will occur will be through economic collapse and war, which will happen soon as whites are no longer able to defend their own interests and are deluded when they think as a group they can – they lost this ability en masse a long time ago.

Untergang07
Guest
Untergang07
Offline

2-4% of women are thinkers who have the courage to back up their
opinions, same as 2-4% of men. The rest of men and women don’t think.

Based on personal experience (and the facts throughout history) I would put that number 1-3% for women and 5-8% for men my friend.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

That may well be true; still, it shows you how low those numbers are. It makes for sobering thinking – most people are not capable of democracy as they do not think, and cannot make long-term good decisions that benefit their group. So 90% of people are deluded when they think they can make a good decision. Even rich people are oftentimes not thinkers – they just inherit the money or they get rich by going along with the wolf pack; they are destructive to others and self-destructive, rather than being thinkers.

Worse, this line of thought also brings into question how many human beings really have free will (and what that means), which is to say very few.

redpillyogi
Guest

I was thinking the same thing. I have come across very very few women that are truly awake.

CrzyMoFo
Guest
CrzyMoFo
Offline

Of course depopulation in the end-game for progressive globalists. Anyone with a basic understanding of exponential growth (which our dumbded-down education system does a poor job of teching) leads the rational thinker to the conclusion that there is no other sustainable option for the human race but to halt population growth and pursue depopulation through natural attrition and possibly other means.

This idea of controlling population growth and depopulating the planet to sustainable levels is so repulsive and outside the realm of compassionate humanist comprehension that most people will not even examine the problem much less work on solutions to avoid the inevitable Yet as simple pragmatic matter, there ultimately is no other choice but to accomplish goal. Call it by whatever conspiracy monger term you like. There is no other solution but to curtail and reduce human population for a sustainable human race. The mathematics are quite simple. And I, for one, support such a movement. Movements such as Earth Day, which began as a population control movement, have morphed into a global ecological save-the-planet agendas. Global climate change has been shoved down our consciousnesses for so long that it can be used to alter human behavior to achieve it’s real goal of population control and profit for global elites through taxation.

The ultimate moral dilemma is who lives, who dies, what’s the criteria for deciding, and who judges such things. Humans will not accept any such process for determining such things and would rebel at the overt signs that such a process is being implement.

So, the powers to be simply use covert methods to achieve their goals. Food, I believe, is the ultimate human depopulation weapon available to the progressive globalist elites to limit, control and reduce the populations across the globe. Birth control, abortion, war and engineered disease has not done the job. However, starting a people and/or robbing them of their health through poisonous food that robs them of longevity is and has been underway for decades. Why else do we have declining indicators of health and longevity in the west as our food science and technology have evolved to such a sophisticated level? It’s engineered to keep us unhealthy, sick, diseased, and ultimately dead at an earlier mean age than in generations past. Sick food makes sick people! It also provides big health care and pharma with great profits centers as more people rely on the system to fix the problems created by the weaponized food.

So, unless all nations of all humans could implement radical population control policies leading to a sustainable global population based on the sustainable resources, I must, by reasonable conclusion, support movements that aim to control and reduce the global population. I must divorce my emotion from my reason and start solving the problem at hand, rather than lash you emotionally based on my feelings on the value of human life. Of course, such a movement is impossible given the fact that all nations have operated on a model of perpetual growth and have no other model of continuous existence of the economies, populations and political and social systems. This is easily observed in countries such as Japan that provide incentives to young citizens to grow the population in an effort to continue ponzi scheme of economic growth to support their aging and unproductive citizens. It’s a mad solution to a problem that only compounds in the severity of it’s ultimate resolution as the numbers grow exponentially.

i’ve been preaching for years that depopulation is the end-game of our planet, and there is no amount of science, engineering and technology that can prevent the final solution. At best, our science and technology merely delay the inevitable.

spicynujac
Guest
spicynujac
Offline

If depopulation is the goal then they are failing horribly.

advancedatheist
Guest
advancedatheist
Offline

Yeah, they need to chisel a lower world population figure on the Georgia Guidestones to try to make their magic rocks’ depopulation mojo stronger.

Kisse Ellis
Guest
Kisse Ellis
Offline

U are wrong. The West is below replacement level……only immigration and their children keep it above replacement.

Japan is below replacement as is China.

Latin America is above replacement, but slowing. Africa is the only place where population is growing…..and that Is because people feel the pressure to have a big family because of early mortality and no social safety nets.

spicynujac
Guest
spicynujac
Offline

One can have opinions on population levels, but there are clear facts, and human population is not only increasing, it is increasing *exponentially*. If one does not understand this, I’m afraid there’s nothing else to be said.
Even if population level graphs didn’t look like hockey sticks, and in some imaginary world, population levels topped off, why would that be a bad thing? I mean at our current rates, maybe it happens when we hit 50 billion, so if population finally levels off at 50 billion, will there be Chicken Littles proclaiming that it’s the end of the world because population peaked? Can society not exist under a stable population the way it did for the first 98% of history?

iBooB
Guest
iBooB
Offline

The Earth is alive. Just like a plant it has cycles of life, death and rebirth. And if a plant can adapt and branch out and literally stretch itself out of shade to reach direct sunlight, can the earth not adapt to natural fluctuations of human population living on it?

If you cut the stem of that plant, tear a leaf, snap a twig off it – doe it not have the ability to heal and regenerate? But if it gets too damaged it will die. Population control is not the main issue. It’s earth damage control.

Owen Gilmore
Guest
Owen Gilmore
Offline

And also foreign aid and NGOs prop up the population and corrupt governments.

Shortest Straw
Guest
Shortest Straw
Offline

Completely wrong. The only parts of the world that have growing population (fertility rates above replacement) are Africa and pockets of India.

CrzyMoFo
Guest
CrzyMoFo
Offline

I think they are succeeding. Keep in mind this project is on the time scale of a century, maybe two. Just because there’s not a sudden radical reduction in population doesn’t mean they are failing. Inflection points such as reduction in new births and mean lifespan show that some efforts are headed in teh right direciton.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Roosh, you are completely looking at the wrong angle. All of this is only done to support the petrodollar and increase the power of Zionism. Depopulation is an – in their eyes – positive side-effect, by no means the ultimate goal. Just look at all the events occurring in the West, the Middle East and ask yourself “Who benefits from this?”. The only answer is Zionism, Greater Israel and the petrodollar.

Who benefits from the Middle East being in turmoil with itself and countries being on the edge of inner destruction? Only those who fear the power of these countries. Who benefits from setting up an atmosphere in which an exemption of mass killing Muslims is not only allowed but encouraged? Zionists, who have ever since outed their desire for a homeland of their people. Massacre of the entire region Israel needs to expand, will only be a drop in a bucket when Muslims are persecuted in Europe.

The reason Saddam his regime was hijacked is because he was planning to replace the dollar with the euro. Not a single line of official evidence to legalize boots on the ground in Iraq is justified. The United Stated knew very well that Saddam, though oppressive, was a stabilizing factor in Iraq but they couldn’t allow to shift the value of oil to the euro instead of the dollar, which Saddam planned to do. If he would, lots of other oil states would surely follow resulting decline of the dollar and influence and capital of the United States.

Gadaffi (Libya) had the same plan with a different accent and wanted to replace the dollar with a new gold standard (the Gold Dinar). Libya, which only recently amassed its wealth in oil, wanted to put it on the market en masse in trade for the Gold Dinar. Because Libya has/had an immense amount of gold reserves, they could easily outplay Western nations in terms of setting the value of oil with their new currency. Gadaffi his plan was thusly evolved that he already had most of Africa behind him and if it would be put in action, the other oil states would immediately recognize the ability to exponentially increase their wealth – because the West doesn’t have that much gold per capita compared to some countries in the Middle East (especially Libya at that time). So they toppled his regime with outside help and constant media exposure as in no way the opposition would have been able to win from Gadaffi on their own.

All of this IS/ISIL/Daeash is created due to very specific funding of the West to “freedom fighters”. They enabled them. They wanted to have Assad out of place from within, without putting boots on the ground, as this is highly frowned upon by the common denominator due to what happened in the past with such actions (Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan). IS currently controlling the oil fields of Iraq, is enabled. The oil and capital of Iraq and Syria in the quantities they sell _far_ under market value, is only encouraged by certain groups. Why loot a place and be blamed when you can just indirectly support people without being the offender pur sang?

Of course, all of this sounds like conspiracy nutjob rambling shit but it’s evident it is the truth. I just wish you and the red pill brigade would look further than “muh feminism” and “muh immigrants” and take a closer look at the root cause of all of this and call the beast by its name; Zionism.

iBooB
Guest
iBooB
Offline

Nope. It’s ourselves. We were always given a choice no matter how tasty that apple seemed.

Nice try though buddy. It was like seeing through a glass of water that big wall of truths you spewed there.

Danny
Guest
Danny
Offline

I always wonder if all this seeing your kids as your legacy or as people who “one day lead their people and their nation” isn’t just some modern form of narcissism disguised as traditionalism.
I’m sure more than 99,9% of the people in history who procreated didn’t do that out of “noble” reasons such as sacrifice or legacy. No, they just created families because that’s what people did or because the woman became pregnant.
I’m just not buying the whole “selfish and superficial” modern humans vs the “noble” ancient humans.

John
Guest
John
Offline

“my fantasies…now they are about creating the sons who will one day lead their people
and their nation.”

Can’t help but I wonder what would happen if you end up having daughters.

Kisse Ellis
Guest
Kisse Ellis
Offline

If u have daughter, then raise them to be the kind of wives that a real leaders would want and cherish…….to be the kind of women who will become great mothers.

Danny
Guest
Danny
Offline

Yeah, I though Roosh was a man of facts and logic!

But I’m dissappointed to see he is still harboring fantasies.

Bugger
Guest
Bugger
Offline

She’ll rebel against her upbringing, same as all kids do. Which means if Roosh brings up her to be a modest maiden, she’ll probably turn out the biggest slut in town, sucking off whole rooms full of blacks and immigrants maybe. Meanwhile, I’ll be LMFAO

Beatem
Guest
Beatem
Offline

This summer I was in NYC with a bunch of rich kids whose fathers work at Wall Street. They told me that their number one goal was to reduce the population since that would mean not sharing the resources with others. They were all hardcore left wingers.

Kisse Ellis
Guest
Kisse Ellis
Offline

Yup. At root. It is a form of self loathing and selfishness…….

And i bet all those rich kids you worked with were White.

splooge
Guest
splooge
Offline

its happening in ethnic countries too. Iran’s family planning was so effective during the shah, the government is having a hard time getting the women out of university(which they outnumber men) and get them to be mothers. They are below the 2.11 mark like Lebanon and Uzbekistan whom are secretly sterilizing their women. And these nations arent rich. They need the people. Whose gonna immigrate there.

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-17612550

not even the west do this.

I like looking at demographics for fun since 2007, global fertility rates have gone down except Israel’s. I dont know why. Because they force urbanize the arabs and their rates have dropped but secular and orthodox has raised. its easy to kill the rate but bringing it up is hard.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2127rank.html

overpopulation was a fear of china, until the 1 child policy bit them in the ass now that there are too few people to care for the elderly. India is following suit because they have a strong feminist influence.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

Israel is the only one with an increase as the jewish bankers and most of their brethren want jews to survive and control the world, sadly.

Amy Wilson
Guest
Amy Wilson
Offline

I don’t think that’s true. Most Jewish Israelis don’t have more than a couple of children, it’s the Orthodox and the Israeli Arabs breeding like mad things.

jared thompson
Guest
jared thompson
Offline

I am going on official statistics I have perused at various sites. The orthodox perhaps are contributing more, but it was the jewish birth rate (not including arabs) that is at 5-6 per family at a minimum.

We don’t have to worry about it. The various jews in charge of things will kill of much of the goyim and then destroy themselves as well as being killed by various other modalities. We are just forced to watch and even perhaps be forcibly involved as this era of humanity ends. And a new one free of our leaders and their evil plans will begin. It’s inevitable.

splooge
Guest
splooge
Offline

comment image

below 2.11 is aging, so blue is bad. Green is bare minimum. best to be in 3-5 range.
without migrants many western lands will be like japan where 1 in 4 is over 65, huge burden for young people. Which can be a problem for other lands and a major one for poor countries.
adult diapers should not oversell baby diapers
populations should be green not grey.

Titan000
Guest
Titan000
Offline

They seem to be failing at curbing the African birthrate.

Roosh
Guest
Roosh
Offline

I think they’re just getting started. They’ll do the whole feminist package like usual and let Gates inject the people with whatever he wants.

Grizzles
Guest
Grizzles
Offline

Excellent article, as many people have said. Keep fighting the good fight, looking forward to the solutions you and your commentators provide.

ReallyBra?
Guest
ReallyBra?
Offline

“It is by design that you are not capable or willing of doing anything more with a woman than mutual masturbation under the influence of alcohol that will not result in family creation.”

Brilliant summation.

We’re done Gents. End goal now is to redoubt and watch it burn. After that, we regroup and rebuild our way. From the looks of it, it won’t be that long.

http://nypost.com/2015/11/18/student-i-was-suspended-for-having-a-consensual-threesome/

”“Jane Doe told Plaintiff she . . . wanted to have a ‘three-some,’ ” court papers say. So John, Jane and Richard Doe did the deed.

The female student later complained to the college, which opened an investigation that found both men had violated the school’s sexual-misconduct policy. They were kicked out of the school for two semesters and must complete sex-violence training and write an essay, the suit says.”

Amy Wilson
Guest
Amy Wilson
Offline

Excellent work, Roosh. I’m going to save and reread this article.

I must say that it’s only in the last little while that I’ve begun to see your blog as part of the cultural revolution occurring in the manosphere, rather than a curious look into the mind of a (from my POV) immoral PUA.

I wish you all the best.

Robert
Guest
Robert
Offline

One way to regenerate First World populations is to shrink taxation and government expenditures so that responsible people can afford to have children. Right now much of their income is being sopped up by taxation.
Stop subsidizing the reproduction of the feral and the feckless here and abroad. Stop encouraging immigration that amounts to race-replacement.
Responsible people will practice intelligent family planning anyway, but they shouldn’t be made to keep their birthrate below replacement rate.
There is no point in adding any more billions to the world’s population, no matter who thinks it’s a good idea. Make the world crowded enough and there will be wars that make Verdun look like a skirmish.
The global elite that is setting policy now doubtless includes some super-rich bastards like Soros, but the real “global elite” is the “kids” of the 1960’s and ’70’s – and their spawn – who are in key positions in government, education, the great foundations, and the media. They are the enemy, not the average rich person.

ex-convict
Guest
ex-convict
Offline

I’d like to add another point to your already well thought out 7 point list.

8.) Economic ruin through tactics of the Jewish-led Federal Reserve Bank.

The American government has borrowed so much money that we will never be able to pay back the interest on the debt. By “we”, I mean “we the people” through our tax dollars. A very large portion of our tax dollars goes to pay interest on the national debt (not the original debt itself), which is ever increasing by design of the elites. Taxes will continue to rise in the future while wages remain relatively stagnant; while at the same time prices of everything we require to survive such as rent, food, electricity, and water will continue to increase.

I’ve heard it costs a lot of money to successfully raise a large family nowadays – unlike in the past where poor farmers in the Midwest could easily have 5 kids and still be successful (like my family, basically came up poor but healthy). Even if I wanted to, at this point in my life I just don’t have the required resources or required wholesome woman to do it – and I’m not the type to mooch off of the already raped taxpayers.

Shortest Straw
Guest
Shortest Straw
Offline

Bravo, Roosh, very good article.
It would be good to dig deeper into the intrinsic motivations. Sub replacement fertility rates are too pervasive to be a mere societal influence. There’s something intrinsic here. Species die out all on their own, or with relatively minor perturbations to the environment. The decline of the passenger pigeon, for example, was foreseen long in advance of the last birthless pigeon dying in a zoo. The environment shifted, and you just couldn’t get the ugly little bastards to mate.

Shortest Straw
Guest
Shortest Straw
Offline

One thing progressivism contributes is the thinking that all humans are equivalent. Thus one can look at the total population figures, which are zooming in the undeveloped world, and conclude that populations in the developed world need to fall to compensate.
The result, of course, is mass migration and extinction of the developed world.

MajorStyles
Guest
MajorStyles
Offline

Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t Japan and Germany have the two lowest reproduction rates? If so, that’s one hell of a coincidence.

fuckglobalism
Guest
fuckglobalism
Offline

Awesome article Roosh. I came up with this conclusion as well after watching this video a couple weeks ago:

https://youtu.be/Pb3JI8F9LQQ?t=5m30s

I highly recommend watching this entire series to understand the simple concept of exponential growth. The only problem I have is that the elites have already worked to make it incredibly expensive to raise children these days. I am married and want children but the old plan of buying a home and raising 2-3 kids is really difficult now. I am considering leaving the states but I am in my mid 30’s and don’t know what kind of job I could get.

anon1
Guest
anon1
Offline

Extremely relevant 1930s song https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JvH1r45iipg

armenia4ever
Guest

Welcome to the club. I actually made a post exactly about this on the Deep Forum section and more then a few thought I was nuts. https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-50925.html

“I’m coming to the conclusion that the only way to defeat the evils of liberalism, feminism, social justice, and progressivism is to have huge families and create tribes that are free-thinking, self-reliant, and, most importantly, armed.”

Look into the Quiverfull movement and notice the barrage of withering criticism they receive from angry progressives who are mad that not only are they having kids – which their critics aren’t – but they are homeschooling them as well so progressives can’t grab them at young ages and indoctrinate them via the public schools.

This of course, terrifies them.

The solution has been right in front of us for a long time, but its a tough and dangerous one. You somehow have to find the right girl in order to create that big family. (Luckily, I already have.)

These SJW freaks can be outbred, as can most on the left, because they simply DONT have kids. In fact, we should be encouraging their types and most on the left to always have abortions. It will make outbreeding them that much easier.

Look at Europe already and notice who is having kids and who isn’t. Give it 50 years and Muslims will have outbred the natives there. What the Turks couldn’t accomplish at the gates of Vienna will be accomplished via having large families.

iBooB
Guest
iBooB
Offline

It takes more than finding a girl and having babies. Hundreds of years of precise planning has gotten us to where we are today. Our vested rights and freedoms need to be reclaimed and exercised. Our voluntary indebted servitude to our masters needs to be rescinded in order to start to flip the script back to where we are the masters of our domain. It can be done without running away or killing. It will take men of great courage, intelligence, fortitude, compassion, empathy, morality, faith, wisdom and all that good shit

66Scorpio
Guest
66Scorpio
Offline

A lot of the people calling for population limits are either feminists (male or female) who nobody would fuck anyways, or wealthy oligarchs with 4 or more kids of their own.
.
There was an article in Wired Magazine back several years titled “The Doomslayer”. They featured a guy who offered a list of arguments against all the doomsayers at the time. One thing he pointed out is that humans naturally produce more than they consume. Think about it: why does the population keep increasing? Malthus was largely wrong, although you will get lower life expectancies in regions where people are prevented from using technological means that are available.
.
So DDT gets banned from Africa and millions die of malaria. They are trying to keep GM rice out of Asia because it might be “dangerous” even if it does prevent childhood blindness and starvation. There is the push to limit African energy development to “green” sources, despite the fact the Africans can’t afford it and would be quite happy with a growing, carbon-based economy like the west has enjoyed for the last few centuries.

anon1
Guest
anon1
Offline

Also worth checking out is the podcast with Kevin kelly and Tim ferris where Kevin kelly talks about the fears of depopulation at length, and some interesting stuff about how the amish use selective introduction of technology to see what is societally beneficial or not.

For any one not too inclined to research the crib notes are that: almost entirely across the board people are having less kids and it’s a depopulation time bomb. The only places that have a rising birth rate are in saharan Africa and it’s not certain why that is. The amish Also are the best prepared for dealing with technology In a community harmonious way (bare in mind Kevin kelly was wired editor for a long time, he’s no luddite)

Also no doubt due to the introduction of synthetic foods, plastics in our water supply, and synthetic chemical contraceptions, women, in particular white women are having all sorts of fertility problems even if they do want to have kids. Because of porn most young western men can’t even get their dick hard, and anti masculine pursuits has let to weak low motility sperm.

A good rule of thumb is, whatever the majority do, be sure that is wrong. So if everyone’s saying too many people, the truth is opposite. That birth rates are on the decline and that the population though high now will fall very quickly. Our entire distribution industry and globalised economy relies on two things: people and oil.

If you’re not breeding you are self selecting for ejection from the human race. I can understand why men go their own way when choices are limited and most women are shitty but your genes will die if you don’t have kids.

I can appreciate rugged individualism as much as anyone else but just know that you’re fucking up your tribe (whichever one that may be) for the expense of yourself.

I predict that people will out of necessity have to become more comfortable with fucking outside their cultural background.

You already see this with a number of men going to find eastern European or Russian girls to form quasi slavic couplings in order to maintain an air of traditionality in the midst of their own dying civilisations.

Here’s the solution but most people won’t take it because they are weaned to the metropolitan ‘stay in the cities and urbanised areas’ lifestyle. They spent so long in office chairs and various first world accoutrements they lack the spine necessary to truly go off reservation so to speak. I even struggle with this issue myself.

The solution:

1) find a woman that’s not just hot but someone who you could mate with, sire, and raise good children with. I don’t care what faith you are but probably best to pick a woman of that same faith as it makes things easier. If you are an atheist well good luck, I don’t want you to take the religious woman because they are obedient and loyal, and you taking them means the religious guys can’t have them. Many religious girls are naive and can be turned out too easily, they require some level of protection if you’re a man and this woman is to sire and raise your kids.

2) independent income via the net is good and useful (keep cash and gold in a safe or whatever) but your best bet is moving somewhere that has a God fearing community and arable farmland.

3) get used to living off the grid mostly. Even with solar panels or whatever, you have to embrace self sufficiency. Most men are not able to do this, atleast not immediately. Even I would find it difficult or hard.

4) learn a trade, grow and raise crops and cattle for what you eat. Make yourself valuable to your community and defend your property if needed.

5) put lots of babies in your woman. Men are resistant to do this, yes she won’t be like a brand new car, no amount of yoga and natural exercise will make her like the botox lipped, fake breast having, hrt treating, pussy dry as a bone, phoney women you’ll get in the urban centers. But by God she’ll be a woman. One thing I like from the Arab and mormon tradition is the concept of more than one wife, but you have to be a real man to maintain discipline with more than one woman, and it’s very stressful as well.

6) your family is your primary tribe, your religion your second, your local community your third, anyone else doesn’t come into it.

Do you think most people will do this? It’s fucking hard because modernity is so tempting.

It’s easier for a man to pump and dump a few good looking girls than it is to sift through the shit to find a lady.

It’s easier to fuck about in youth (heck I wish I was fucking more) than to put down roots.

nicho12
Guest
nicho12
Offline

Until you destroy the current system, forget it, you can whine all you want but what your suggesting will come out of hard and bloody struggle. Civilizations don’t rise out of comfortable conditions, they rise out of bloody struggle

anon1
Guest
anon1
Offline

who said anything of comfort? societies fucked. save yourselves and your own.

Bugger
Guest
Bugger
Offline

Are you actually doing any of the things you advise, or just talking out your ass while sitting in your mom’s basement?

anon1
Guest
anon1
Offline

doing some of the things, working on the others. but if you’re this butthurt about it i can only imagine what pathetically little you get upto in your life

redpillyogi
Guest

I’m finding that taking care of your own body is extremely liberating and in fact necessary for off-grid living. If you wind up reliant on the medical industrial complex, you will never have freedom full stop. Also, maintaining your body allows you to work the land into old age.

MCGOO
Guest
MCGOO
Offline

Keep it real clowns, KEEP IT RAW!! All you swingin’ dicks grab your sticks. The west is RIIISING UUUP!!