The Girl Score (A System For Rating Individual Girls)

The 1-10 system is a pretty reliable way to rate the attractiveness of women. It does have its flaws (one man’s 9 can be another man’s 6), but it gets the job done more often than not. What we don’t have is a way to measure the overall quality of an individual girl that accounts for additional things besides her appearance. I’ve constructed something that accounts for all the parts of a woman that is most likely to bring happiness to man.

One problem players experience with dating women besides getting actual sex is deciding which ones they should invest time into for more serious relationships. The girl score is a tool to help you determine if a girl is worthy of fuck buddy status, casual dating, something more, or nothing at all. It is calculated not only after you’ve had sex with a girl but have also gone on at least three dates with her, a long-enough time length where you can reliably rate her merits. By the third date you should have a very clear idea of who the girl is, where it’s unlikely she’ll still be hiding any of her strengths (girls show their best traits first, as probably you do, too).

So what qualities make the best women? I’ve narrowed it down to five things, each of which is rated on a scale of 1-10:

Attractiveness. A universal desire of men everywhere is beauty. While you can become desensitized to it, you cannot become desensitized to ugliness—you merely tolerate it because you have no other option. You can put a beautiful but brain-dead girl who speaks a foreign language in front of me right now and being with her will be much more pleasurable than an ugly girl who can talk about the creation of the universe. I save philosophical life discussions for my guy friends because having one with a woman would be like asking a plumber how to install a ceiling fan. Since attractiveness is so important, the 1-10 score here is multiplied by 5.

Sexual Performance. Sex is a big part of why we exist, and if a girl is unable to satisfy you sexually at any time you want to bust a nut then she has failed in her duty as a woman. It doesn’t matter whether she uses her pussy, mouth, or anus, but she must use it with vigor and enthusiasm to give you maximum pleasure. Women have to understand that they’ve evolved for millions of years for the main purpose of carefully selecting a man and then pleasing him. A woman should consider suicide if she cannot strongly fulfill this most basic feature of life.

Nurturing. Does she cook for you? Does she want to take care of you? Does she have a good living space that suggests she knows how to maintain a home? Does she give as much as she takes? This quality is more important for long-term relationships, and basically comes down to the following question: does she have heart? Otherwise, she will destroy your soul in a drawn-out process that leaves you nothing but an shadow of your former self. Your friends won’t even be able to recognize you.

Woman Quality. Is she feminine and sexy? Do you feel proud with her when out in public? Does she make you feel like a strong man? Is she compliant, keeping talk-back at a minimum, while sacrificing her needs for yours? If a girl is pretty, but masculine in appearance or attitude, you won’t be able to forge a strong emotional connection with her. It would be like dating a lifeless doll instead of a living, breathing creature of the Earth.

Personality. Is she pleasing to spend time with? Is she capable of light but enjoyable conversation? Does she keep drama and jealousy to a minimum? Does she get along with your friends? With personality it’s not so much that you need a hyper-intelligent or well-traveled girl, but someone who is cool and easy to pass long amounts of time with. It’s better she say nothing then nag, whine, or torture you with her geo-political views that she is in no way qualified to talk about.

Now I want to give you general scoring guidelines so you know how to rate each factor.

Attractiveness

10: This score doesn’t exist besides retouched magazines photos. Therefore any guy who says he has fucked a 10 is exaggerating at best, lying at worst.
9: Models or actresses like Scarlett Johansen, Mila Kunis, and so on.
8: Beautiful.
7: Cute and pleasing to look at.
6: Needs help from makeup or lighting.
3: Beast.

Sexual Performance

10: You get a raging hard-on just thinking of what she can do to your cock. She’s better than the porn stars you watch on PornHub. Your nickname for her is “deep-throating cock gobbler.”
9: Stupendous in bed.
8: Horny girl who bows down to your cock like it’s her medieval dungeon master.
7: Solid bedroom performance.
5: Average.
3: She offers you a handjob because she can’t make you cum with her dry pussy or mouth.

Nurturing

10: Future mother of your child.
9: Her happiness seems like it’s entirely dependent on yours.
8: Goes out of her way to make sure you’re content.
7: You see some potential for her to be a good wife or mother, but she needs to work on consistency.
6: She’d reluctantly go to the drug store to buy you medicine if you were sick.
5: She’d warm up a can of soup in the microwave.
1: It would take her a while to notice you died in your sleep.

Woman Quality

10: What a woman! She makes you feel like a pimp.
9: You feel blessed to have found such a sexy bitch.
8: She makes you slightly more jealous than you normally would thanks to her irresistible feminine allure.
7: Definitely girly, but nothing extraordinary.
5: Studying her movements wouldn’t get your dick hard. You’d have to at least make eye contact with her taint to get the penis blood flowing.
3: She seems to get more looks from lesbians than heterosexual men.
1: Some people confuse her for a man.

Personality

10: The most interesting girl in the world.
9: Extremely fun and infectious to be around. Everyone loves her.
8: Great charm.
7: Pretty cool.
6: Pleasant.
5: Jane Doe off the street. Her personality is not going to win any awards.
3: Getting a teeth pulled doesn’t seem so bad.
1: Well, at least she has a pussy.

Now I want you think of all the girls you went on at least three dates with. To calculate a score, simply multiply the attractiveness score by five and add to it the other values (sample chart), for a possible maximum score of 90. While I don’t think a girl should score a 10 in attractiveness, I do think it’s possible with the rest of the categories. A 10 is perfection, so you shouldn’t be tossing it out like candy.

The point of coming up with the girl score isn’t to compare with other guys, but to compare with other girls you’ve dated. It’s an objective metric that tells you two things: (1) who you should spend your time with and, more importantly, (2) if you should proceed with a girl when she hits you with relationship talk.

I calculated the scores of about 25 girls I remember going on at least three dates with and then ranked them from top score to lowest. From that list I was able to construct cut-off values that happened to be true for me:

  • With a score of 60 I’d turn her into a fuck buddy
  • At 65 I’d consider an open relationship with her where I give part-time pursuit to other girls
  • At 70 I’d consider a relationship
  • A score of at least 73 means deep emotional involvement is a dangerous possibility

Now that I have determined my cut-off points, all I have to do after going on three dates with a girl is plug-and-chug to tell me the best way I should proceed. This saves me time, my most important resource, and allows me to make correct decisions even if I’m in a vulnerable emotional state. (Note that my cut-offs will be different from yours since our scoring will be different.)

I used the girl score recently when deciding whether to make an investment of sorts on a specific girl. I felt strongly for her, but was very hesitant to do what was required to take the relationship to the next level. The reason, as I found out, was because she scored a 66, which is just above the cut-off for a mere open relationship. There is no doubt in my mind that a month of dating with her would bore me, since it has in the past with girls in her score range. I therefore did not make the investment, and can sleep well knowing it was the best decision. If she scored a 70 though, I may have tried.

The girl score doesn’t care if you’re lonely, coming off a bad sexless streak, or exceptionally horny—it will objectively tell you what you need to do. It prevents you from slipping back to an ex that can’t possibly provide you with the happiness you desire, while simultaneously giving you evidence to pursue something deeper with girls who are worthy.

Understand that a girl’s score will change with time. An American girl I dated in 2002 scored a 73.5. It seemed impossible for me to get over her, and of course I tried various pathetic means to get her back, like sending her an e-card with animated bunnies on her birthday. None worked. Two years after we dated, I randomly saw her in a local mall. I noticed that something wretched happened to her face—drug use, perhaps—where she dropped a full point on the attractiveness scale. I got over her quickly after that. It makes sense to me 9 years later: since attractiveness has a weight of five, her overall score dropped to 68.5, which while high, is out of my relationship range. Hindsight allows me to make sense of old scores, and old scores will now allow me to make sense of future girls I get involved with.

Word of warning: just because a girl scores high (>70 in my case), doesn’t mean you should treat her “well.” Quite the opposite. I have to be much more methodical in my game because the past has shown me that relaxing with high-value girls will cause them to dump me. On the flip side, it’s comical how girls in the 50s range are almost pathetic with how they throw themselves at me, probably because they’ve unconsciously given me a high “guy score.”

Every man has a ceiling of what he can get. At this current stage of my life, I doubt I can get higher than a 75. This is fine for me since a 73 or higher will absolutely give me happiness, but it does cut it quite close. Note that a guy’s score can increase in time, since girl’s rate us on categories such as stability and interestingness, but unfortunately a girl’s score can only go down. If you want to get married with a girl, ask yourself if you still want to be with after she sustains a hit of 5-10 points that is sure to come from aging.

You may be wondering why we don’t account for a girl’s job. Truth is girls who are highly educated score very low in the Woman Factor and Nurturing qualities. If I were to add a work category, I’d actually have to allow negative scores to account for the fact that professional women are impossible to please, which is a consistent source of unhappiness for men. If I take out a middle-class Colombian girl to a place like TGIF, she’d be appreciative and thank me for the meal with a blowjob even though she doesn’t like giving blowjobs, but if I did that to a middle class girl from D.C. she’d text her friends during the meal saying how lame I am and later post an anonymous rant on Craigslist about how men are idiots who don’t know how to treat a strong woman.

I hate to get too mathematical when it comes to seduction, but this scoring method takes away the emotional factor that, truth be told, causes men to make serious mistakes. This objective measurement makes it less likely you’ll make an error by diving into a relationship with a girl who isn’t worthy, while simultaneously pushing you to invest in a girl who is.

Read Next: 7 Things You Can Do To Improve Your Game Right Now

Related Posts For You

newest oldest most voted
Peter Phoenix
Guest
Peter Phoenix
Offline

you’re on my level.

Bro_kyle
Guest
Bro_kyle
Offline

You’re disgusting. all of you are nasty. and no real woman would ever want to be with somebody that mysoginistic.

Observer365
Guest
Observer365
Offline

Amen. I cannot believe that this is the mindset of men in general. It’s ugly in all possible ways and even though I’d probably merit a pretty decent “score” (so that argument is out), I could not get away from that mentality fast enough.

Fuckboy
Guest
Fuckboy
Offline

You’re both probably fat ugly chicks 😂 only ugly girls hate this scale just saying…

Bree
Guest
Bree
Offline

Did you miss the part where it says that a girl can be pretty, but GOD FORBID she be smart or succesful? Oh wait…Your name’s ‘Fuckboy’… Please, save the world – never breed.

Rudedudesonhere
Guest
Rudedudesonhere
Offline

Fuckboy, you think you sound smart but you don’t. This article is the exact reason I dated only 2 men in my life and the second one, I married. My husband was this type of pig, that’s why I had him on his knees just to ask me out. He only got 7 dates out of me, no sex and we got engaged in 1 month after dating and now he is happily married to an educated and gorgeous hard to please woman who he says is the best he’s ever had and he happens to be that guy I hated who spent 20 years of his life playing women and scoring them. We have a child together, he will do anything I ask of him and as he has put it ” I will die for you.” So yeah, unlike you, there are strong men out there who are not afraid of strong gorgeous women who they will love and protect with every beat of their heart. The problem is that women need to stop giving men like you the opportunity to think you are God’s gift to life when all you are is useless. Women are made to suck up the hardships of life, we do everything for men, from staying beautiful to cleaning up after you and feeding you so why should you think you are so worthy of scoring us? Every time a dude looked at me or asked me out, I rolled my eyes and said I don’t think so, because respectful men don’t disrespect you and ask you out like dogs who wrote this article. I never fell for their tricks, I watched too many of my friends get played for months and some for years, their experiences taught me lots. The little boy who wrote this article is clearly lacking his mommy’s love and is so bitter with his 2 inch dick that he has to find ways to belittle women in order to feel superior, its psychology so I don’t know why he thinks he is fooling anyone. Fuckboy, I know you sit behind your computer screen while holding your tiny dick and stroking it to nonexistent pornographic women because you are ugly and I mean like less than a 1 and you have no qualities a woman cares for therefore no woman wants to even touch your dick with an ugly stick so you speak behind the screen. Try saying your shit a strong woman’s face, see if she does punch you in your tiny balls. Ugly prick!

Marcianus Valerius
Guest
Marcianus Valerius
Offline

Ladies and gentleman, let me give you some insight into the mind of this person with the nickname ‘Rudedudesonhere’.

This is the epitome of narcissism and mental instability – the kind of woman every centered man must avoid like the plague. She starts off by saying she only dated two (2!) men in her life because supposedly, ‘most men are pigs’. Her grandiosity is of course above all these ‘unworthy pigs’. What do you think is the likely scenario here? A) This ‘obviously rational, virtuous woman’ has indeed dated only 2 men in her life or B) she has slept around and each time she got rejected by those men in the end because they couldn’t handle putting up with a narcissistic psychopath long-term? Ask yourselves when you read her entire post, what do you think is probably the case? I think it’s blatantly obvious. As for the so-called “man” she married, she claims that he used to be ‘this type of pig’. Wait, I thought she didn’t date these kinds of guys? Didn’t she tell us before that the whole reason she only dated 2 men was because of the rest of the men were ‘those same pigs’? But somehow one of the two men she was dating was ‘this type of pig’ too? The logic of a highly irrational, illogical and unstable woman, ladies and gentlemen. So, right off the bat, she loses credibility. Let’s continue. She married this guy only one month after dating – meaning, according to her post, she had 7 dates with this guy and one month after the seventh date she married him already. So, she married a guy who was supposedly ‘this type of pig’ who was playing women for 20 years that quickly. Speaks volumes about her sense of responsibility and judgement.

Anyway, she goes on like a textbook narcissist calling herself ‘georgeous’ multiple times. Who the hell feels the need to call themselves georgeous over and over again? LOL. She takes pride that her man was ‘on his knees begging’ her for a date, that supposedly he does everything for her and ‘would die’ for her. I think we have a good picture of what kind of “man” we’re dealing with here. She calls him “strong”, meaning if he’s ready to fully submit to a woman and supplicate to her to the point he would actually sacrifice his OWN life (!), he is somehow “strong”. But of course, she is deserving of such treatment because she is obviously the center of the universe. All sarcasm aside, I must mention this again – this is the hallmark of a true narcissist. The type of behavior her man exhibits is in no way, shape or form congruent with the demeanor of a masculine, confident and centered man. On the other hand, her own behavior is anything BUT feminine too.

She then says:
“The problem is that women need to stop giving men like you the opportunity to think you are God’s gift to life when all you are is useless.”
..but doesn’t realize she is 100% guilty of this just as she doesn’t realize that it is her who keeps acting like she is God’s gift to life. Her choice of word of “useless” reveals how she views the opposite gender. She must have a certain “use” of a man – but the needs of the man in question are entirely irrelevant, of course. Did I mention this is how narcissists view people? Let’s keep going.

“Women are made to suck up the hardships of life, we do everything for men, from staying beautiful to cleaning up after you and feeding you so why should you think you are so worthy of scoring us?”
Typical gynocentric worldview of your run-of-the-mill modern feminist. It’s all about her – the woman. The man is only here to serve this infallible creature. Women do all this and that and they are infallible according to them. All the positive generalities one can ascribe to men she doesn’t mention. Why? Because it doesn’t even graze her consciousness. It doesn’t even exist in her mind. The man is only a means to an end. It’s all about her – the woman. This idea fits perfectly with how she described the relationship dynamic between her and her husband.

And of course, she tops her comment off using typical female shaming/manipulation tacics and hurls childish insults like “haha you have a tiny penis and you’re ugly” and “no woman wants to be with you anyway”. But God forbid a man would engage in body shaming her. That kind of hypocrisy is as natural to a modern feminist as flying is to a bird. I will conclude with a question: Is this woman posting a hysterical rant full of verbal attacks, narcissistic rage, illogical statements, contradictions and hypocrisy really the “strong, georgous” woman she portrays herself as?

To all people reading this, male or female, as I wrote in the beginning: This is the kind of person you want to avoid at all costs.

JACK WILLIAMS
Guest
JACK WILLIAMS
Offline

No. He is actually right

Poltergeist
Guest
Poltergeist
Offline

this is wrong. it is absolutely terrible to rate women like this. i hope all pigs that like this system don’t have sisters and never have daughters. this is completely immature behavior and i sincerely pity your mothers
“You can put a beautiful but brain-dead girl who speaks a foreign
language in front of me right now and being with her will be much more
pleasurable than an ugly girl who can talk about the creation of the
universe.” that is just terrible, if you sick pigs want a brain dead person just do yourself in a corner of a room.
I am very pleased that there are women here that wont stand for this, and i am very happy that some men agree that this is disgusting primitive behavior.
To have a sixteen year old high school SENIOR tell all you pigs that, its really sad.
to all those women, you do not need men like that:

Adil
Guest
Adil
Offline

Womens’ love is conditional, so they rate us in a similar manner (looks, leadership, status, possessions). Relationship in a nutshel is an exchange of goods and services (new Iphone for a blowjob, or stable husband for a supporting mother), no matter how much ethical component you try to add. Personally, I would prefer the brain-dead beauty, not solely because of her looks, but also because I don’t really give a shit about the creation of the universe.

WhoAmI123
Guest
WhoAmI123
Offline

‘…but also because I don’t really give a shit about the creation of the universe.’ Wuuuut.

Teni Hakobjanyan
Guest
Teni Hakobjanyan
Offline

And why isn’t there a corresponding scale for males ? Oh I’d put quite an interesting content haha

AA
Guest
AA
Offline
Brian
Guest
Brian
Offline

FYI, if you multiply attractiveness by 5, and add the four others, the highest you can get is a 90.

Good post though. I like a system that helps me quantitatively push aside the chemical buzz of things being new with someone to really evaluate if they’re worth more of your time.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Solid idea, but its not out of 100..

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Well I mean, you can tell the author isn’t very intelligent…

Riker
Guest
Riker
Offline

I really like this post… I{m way too emotional to make good decisions about girls at this point in my life (24) and my current level of game. Reading this really helps to reflect on girls and past decisions. Cool.

Gmac
Guest
Gmac
Offline

Win.

Basil Ransom
Guest
Basil Ransom
Offline

Quality and personality can overlap a lot, as can nurturing. For scoring, I’d just combine those last three into one, and multiply it 3 times.

You have different preferences for a fling and a long term girlfriend. Weighting the factors the same doesn’t reflect that. Hell, attractiveness for a f-buddy wouldn’t matter if she’s a 10 at Sex.

Somewhat OT: It seems like plenty of relationships survive only through sex. It’s a bond of comfort and convenience, not chemistry and passion. It’s like a pot friend – without the pot i.e. sex and jewelry, you guys would never hang out. Another reason why girls today are shittier – when you started giving it up way before commitments were made, we stopped caring about your personality.

Mackroyal44
Guest
Mackroyal44
Offline

Great post Roosh. I see taking that week off from posting has renewed your vigor. Now being as though Im a guy from the P.G County and D.C area I’ve noticed the three years I’ve been in the game that finding a women that is Nurturing with a personality is next to impossible.

“like sending her an e-card with animated bunnies on her birthday” Now you know you was wrong for that.

Bob
Guest
Bob
Offline

Why not make an attractiveness 10 equal “the highest that is humanly possible” instead of intentionally making 10 equal something that exists only in a fantasy world? Some kind of tribute to Spinal Tap?

Dongthrust
Guest
Dongthrust
Offline

Heh. Great post. Except I never get to a third date in most cases. Just the bang and a smaller bank account. Relaxing around 8s without putting in much effort is a balance I haven’t quite perfected yet. The 7s in DC seem to think they’re dimes so I can’t win either way. At least RedTube will always be there for me in a nurturing way.

Teni Hakobjanyan
Guest
Teni Hakobjanyan
Offline

Sad

Workshy Joe
Guest

Personally, I’m a big proponent of binary ratings.

1 = You would fuck her if you were unattached and she was DTF with you.
0 = No thanks.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

This is kind of nuts. I read this with a smirk on my face, thinking it was ridiculous.
But I just ran the numbers on my last 6 girls and everything (that happened between me and them) suddenly makes sense.
This is an invaluable tool/metric.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

I do think that the weight for attractiveness is a bit too high though. I think 3x or 4x … would be better.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Roosh: With all the time you’ve been spending on game why do you think your limit is a 73? What is keeping you from getting higher than that?

cupojohan
Guest
cupojohan
Offline

@14 73 is actually pretty high up there. Given that the highest level of physical attractiveness is 9, that is -5 points right off the bat.

For each of the other categories, it is also unlikely the that a very attractive girl will score very highly because she has been trained to think/act a certain way by our feminist society and she believes very little is expected of her in a relationship because of constant ego stroking by betas throwing C&C game at her.

It’s not that a guy with skills like Roosh couldn’t land an ~80 GS (girl score), it’s the rarity of these women that actually comes into play.

DJD
Guest
DJD
Offline

Will a Columbian girl in the US also trade BJs for crap food?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Excellent post

speakeasy
Guest
speakeasy
Offline

“Women have to understand that they’ve evolved for millions of years for the main purpose of carefully selecting a man and then pleasing him. A woman should consider suicide if she cannot strongly fulfill this most basic feature of life.”

The feminist bloggers have just switched to DEFCON 1.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

You should make the last 10 points logistical / lifestyle considerations (with 10 being maximum compatibility/convenience) then you would end up with 100 points total.

mguy
Guest
mguy
Offline

i agree with the logistics comment. you have to factor the convenience.

Jordan
Guest
Jordan
Offline

Gold…Pure Gold….Another great post!

gringoed
Guest
gringoed
Offline

Nice attempt but this can’t be objectified so easily. I like the boner test better, even for LTR’s.

Brian
Guest
Brian
Offline

I could have 2 extra buttons on a checklist. 1. She’s got a high number based on her looks, but her attitude causes too much stress, so press the “I Eject Button.” 2. She’s got a high number, but she wants to get married and I do not, so press the “I’m not going to get married RESET the game with a new woman button.”

Ubermind
Guest
Ubermind
Offline

I would reccomend to add another 1-10 scale that can be added to this and result in a 100 total.

Her friend/family evaluation. Extremely important if you have a relationship with a woman and not just sex.

A girl gets high score here if her parents are stil married to each other, she has no male friends and her girlfriends are also cute and feminine, whom you would like to bang and who are attracted to you and would provide a side fling or an easy social proof, her social circle has traditional patriarchal values.

A girl gets low score if her parents are divorced, she has daddy issues, her friends are liberals and include many jealous mangina orbiters and man-hating liberal feminist women.

In America most girls would score low here so maybe you can overlook this scale by giving most girls a default of 0, bet in countries where liberal values still are combating natural values this scale comes in factor. If a woman scores 8 or 10 here, plus 70 or higher from the rest, she actually becomes a worthly LTR prospect

French Connection
Guest
French Connection
Offline

Great post, and +1 for the addition by Ubermind. While family background doesnt necessarily dictate the future of a relationship, it sure serves as a good indicator.

I also think the sexual performance needs a multiplier (x2?). Personally I could forgive shortcomings in the cooking department if she scores 8+ in the bedroom, but if she’s only somewhat boring sexually I’ll be bored with her regardless of the looks or cooking skills.

That said, finding a girl who scores high on the nurturing scale is near to impossible. All my exes which did well on that (bar one Dutch girl), were Eastern European. Just saying…

Ubermind
Guest
Ubermind
Offline

@French Connection

I believe sexual performance could use a multiplier to evaluate a one night stand, but in a relationship it definately is the most insignificant starer value, that could even be divided by 2. The reason for this is that virginal or relatively inexperienced women score higher in other factors, but know not how to please a man initially, but you can show them and teach them to do whatever you want. More inexperienced and blank women will be even more easy to accept anything you teach them. I take great delight in teaching a girl how to suck it, introduce her to spanking, masochism and other stuff she is unaware of. If she knows any of this before me than I have a discomfort that she is remembering another man who showed her these moves, while repeating those moves on me.

While Roosh correctly said that women’s value will decrease over time – sexual performance is the exceptional one where she may improve if you teach her how to.

I believe nurturing factor is the one Roosh actually underestimates and that could use a multiplier of 1.5 or 2. This has a little significance in ONS but in a relationship – well is there anything better than a girl who goes to buy a medicine for you when you are sick, prepares all meals and then role-plays the naughty nurse? I have had the pleasure.

French Connection
Guest
French Connection
Offline

@ Ubermind

Personally, while I don’t mind teaching girls new things, working with a blank canvas is something I don’t always have the patience for. I know from experience that if a girl is invested in and committed to the relationship, she will go to new measures to please her man (and this goes for both the nurturing and sexual department).

I guess it comes down to what you want in a woman/relationship, which is very much dictated by the stage of life you’re in. I’m 25, I’m guessing you’re >30? (not trolling) Many of my older friends (>30) have said to look for different qualities in girls than they did 5-10 years ago. While looks remain the factor with the biggest multiplier, I do find myself putting more weight on other factors than I did a few years ago.

Ubermind
Guest
Ubermind
Offline

@French Connection

I also happen to be 25. These differences between our preferences come from different worldviews. While you probably have a more consumerist approach to sex and life in general (as dictated by your culture and surrounding paradigm that also produces feminism), I really enjoy the artistic aspect of folding a girl as a white canvas and writing on her soul with my pen… ehm, personality.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

“her duty as a woman to satisfy you with… her pussy, mouth, or anus,”

Roosh, that is SO objectifying, chauvinistic, and limited. You totally forgot handjobs, tit-fucking and footjobs.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

can this be any more mechanical?

ped24
Guest
ped24
Offline

@roosh, need to do a post of some sort on guys, in light of how girls actually perceive us. Notice I said actually, and not what they would tell you. I think your philosophy on it would be a fun read.

trackback

[…] Now, why does this happen? For men it is the immeasurable testosterone soaked power of the manly drive. It’s this drive, this passion to get shit done that attracts women, more so than the inevitable results of that action. Sure, you might be a fat broke slob right now, but given some time and dedication, you could drastically change your situation – you can work on your appearance, your wealth, your “game” and swagger, and you will see drastic improvements in your ability to attract the opposite sex, even with those goals nowhere near complete. For example, while I am in way better shape then when i was at my fattest, I still have the furthest thing from sweet abs, yet I went on a macking tear recently that ended with me finding an amazing girlfriend (and yes, she scores incredibly high on Roosh’s “Girl Score“) […]

ShawnHasATony Penis
Guest
ShawnHasATony Penis
Offline

When someone says so and so’s a “10” I think that not even he believes that she is a “10,” but he’s just saying that that woman, in his opinion, is as hot as they come.

I support the dime ranking because it seems almost defeatist not to, while acknowledging the sad sad fact that “perfection,” even airbrushed “perfection,” does not exist in the female form.

VI
Guest
VI
Offline

If a girl is pretty, but masculine in appearance or attitude, you won’t be able to forge a strong emotional connection with her. It would be like dating a lifeless doll instead of a living, breathing creature of the Earth.

I dated a girl like this for a long time. I never enjoyed the sex with her as much I do with girls who are less attractive but more feminine.

Jonny
Guest
Jonny
Offline

OMFG. First, this is brilliant. Second, my results were horrendous.

Of the 2 girlfriends I’ve ever had, the first is a 35, while the second a 49.

The next girl I’m with better be at least a 70, preferably 90. Nowhere to move but up!

NoName
Guest
NoName
Offline

and there goes another idiot

Johnny
Guest
Johnny
Offline

“@roosh, need to do a post of some sort on guys, in light of how girls actually perceive us.”

Exactly. I’d be very interestd in that too.

As for girls who are masculine in looks and/or demeanor… that kills it for me. Instant turn off, impossible to feel attracted to. Experience told me that this type is mainly found among western/white women.

samseau
Guest
samseau
Offline

whereas the boner test was for casual sex, the girl score is for long term relationships. these are the tools for the everyday player.

the one problem with the girl score is that it needs lots of prior experience to determine what scores you should want/have, while the boner test carries a simplicity that could work for a teenage boy.

I remember the girl who crushed me, she was a 73.

Laughingdog
Guest
Laughingdog
Offline

Honestly, if some of you are that attached to a 100 point score, just take one of the other categories that matters to you more than the others and double it.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

I’d throw the Boltzmann constant in there somewhere. Then we can use a spectrograph to measure these “women” of which you speak.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

I think this is actually a brilliant idea. Although, I think that each man should create his own actual guidelines. But the concept of a 0-100 score for each woman is genius.

The last two relationships I had were in the low to mid 50s using Roosh’s scale. My main target at the moment is a 65, although I can’t rate sexual performance yet… so I just have to give her a 5 on that as a guess. Even at a 65, I have a pretty bad crush on her. yikes I need to harden up!

K-Man
Guest
K-Man
Offline

On this scale, I have yet to see a girl score above 70-75 out of max 85 (since you say 10’s don’t exist).
In my 15+ years of experience in the dating field, if a girl is a 8-9 in beauty, she is VERY unlikely to rate high on nurturing or personality. She could perhaps rate high on woman quality and sexual performance, but not the other two.
That would make a 75-80 woman on this scale even rarer than a 10 on the beauty scale.

By the way, why isn’t 5 the mean of the scale? Assuming a 0 does not exist just like a 10 doesn’t, then 5 is exactly mid-way of the scale between 1 and 9. And since you say a 6 already “needs help” then I guess 5 would be way below average, which skews the scale.

Allen
Guest
Allen
Offline

How about a 5 point deduction for any random red flags or complaints that you have about her? This isn’t small stuff, these are just the random MAJOR things that somehow ruin the package.

This seems about right to take care of a majority of concerns: she’s a liar (blatant), her mom is especially busted, etc. It would drop a girl who is otherwise long term material right down into harem range, and harem girls down into the fuckable range. This has worked well for the several girls I’ve rated so so far.

JAFO
Guest
JAFO
Offline

Kudos.

Gnashing of teeth in progress at Jizzabel.

StrikeforceMorituri
Guest
StrikeforceMorituri
Offline

I love that you added nurturing to the scale, I once dated a girl that was so smoking hot my pants had a permanent fade in the crotch area, I loved banging this chick and the social proof that she gave me was unbelievable. Her only negative that I couldn’t get over though was the fact that she was Zero in the nurturing department. She was definitely a 1 on your nurture scale.

(1:It would take her a while to notice you died in your sleep)

I felt crazy dropping her but in the end all of her hotness couldn’t shake that one little need.

Enlightened
Guest
Enlightened
Offline

This has been incredibly enlightening for me. I’ve been dating an Asian woman off and on for a couple years. When I ran the numbers, she is a solid 75.

At minimum, I have to recognize she is the best woman I have ever been with according to these standards. The risk is that I commit to something long term, which I have resisted thus far.

Roosh and all, thoughts on this? What do you do when you find someone reasonably close to perfect?

InterestedParty
Guest
InterestedParty
Offline

Legit 10s do exist in the real world. I can easily see why someone in DC might say it’s impossible though.

Cassie
Guest
Cassie
Offline

You’re an asshole.

Jose pasada
Guest

yep you he is asshole.

trackback

[…] – “The Girl Score (A System for Rating Individual Girls)“, “One Night Can Change Everything“, “Do American Women Have Looser […]

Lance
Guest
Lance
Offline

Roosh, interesting article. The system I use is much simpler, I score in two categories: Sexual Compatibility and Companionship. For me, everything falls into those two areas. Notice I have nothing for attractiveness…that’s because attractiveness comes from a combination of the two.

Right now I’m interested in women that are 9+ in sexual compatibility and 6+ in companionship. I feel that the sex is far more important and, to be honest, I don’t really need a perfect female companionship to have a fulfilling relationship.