If you think of what happens to our community as a microcosm of larger forces, a lot of what we see occurring in Europe and the United States makes enough sense that you can start to predict the future. A reviewer of my new book notices this:

I thought [Free Speech Isn’t Free] would be somewhat boring and a mere recollection of what had happened in Canada, but there is far more of the story told and Roosh is surprisingly good at generating an almost suspenseful mood even though you probably know what happened. This is a behind the scenes, VIP access account.

It’s in Free Speech Isn’t Free that we see the inside details of what went down and how the media is far more sinister than I ever realized. We hear alot about how biased the media is – almost to the point of pseudo conspiracy theory – but when you see how the line between advocate/activist and journalist has been obliterated, you’ll be shocked as to just how much the media was out to get Roosh.

What Roosh does here is connect the dots. Why would any media publication sacrifice their reputation? Why would they lie about the February 6th meetups? Why the hell would they care about Roosh giving speeches to what was seemingly just a small group of men in each city? What Roosh has done is uncover that there is more sinister forces at work – to the point that you almost think you are reading a work of fiction. The war isn’t just cultural, its an ideological one and once you realize the etiology of the worldview of the people who went after Roosh, you realize that the cost of speaking out and being a figurehead isn’t cheap.

There is a war. It’s up to you to find your role – something Roosh goes over in this book as he explains the tactics and overall strategy that went into letting his speaking tour actually occur. Of key importance was finding people he could trust – a lesson as old as time itself.

These are only four rules you need to understand:

1. There is a group of very rich men who control the levers of power.
2. Those men own the media.
3. Those men sponsor political candidates on all sides to do their bidding.
4. Those men have a simple agenda of increasing their wealth and power, to be gods among men.

It’s really that simple. Anything else is a red herring, such as the differences between political parties, whether there is an “Illuminati” that does blood sacrifices, or if those at the top are Jews or lizard people.

From these rules, explaining what happened to me in Canada last year and the meetup outrage this past February is quite easy to explain:

1. I have an agenda that is traditional and patriarchal.
2. Those in power have an agenda that is non-traditional and matriarchal.
3. I began to physically organize into a proto-political movement.

Which institution can be instantly weaponized to attack a man who is physically organizing a movement that stands against the ruling agenda? The media. I don’t know exactly how they coordinate, but the exact same type of coordination you saw against Gamergate and now with Donald Trump confirms that the media works as a single organism that can spring to heel within hours.

Media coordination against Trump
Media coordination against Trump

Media coordination against gamers
Media coordination against gamers

I was recently told by an insider that the dividing line is physical organization. If you decide to have meetings that are politically subversive in nature, you will either be attacked like I have or be infiltrated by the FBI. We’re allowed to stew angrily in our internet ghettos, but the second we coordinate in person, the machine will attack again. I’m left with the decision on what to do from this point on.

To see the whole story of how the media attacked me, along with a breakdown of their master plan, check out my new book Free Speech Isn’t Free. It has a balanced mix of narrative and ideology that will also give you actionable advice to help defend yourself against establishment attacks. Click here to learn more about the book or order it now on Amazon.


  1. Conrad Stonebanks August 10, 2016 at 9:43 am

    “I don’t know exactly how they coordinate”

    I’ve always wondered about this. Presumably, orders are distributed from the top down. But who is giving the orders/instructions and how? Do they all use a secret mailing list to coordinate?

    It’s not just the media, but also local politicians and heads of state in the West. They all parrot the same globalist talking points and adhere to the same globalist narrative. There is some massive collusion going on behind the scenes. They must have a secure channel that enables them to do so.

    1. Zelcorpion August 10, 2016 at 11:04 am

      Media is infiltrated with secret service agents and people at the top who know what the agenda is.
      Also most outlets get their info from 2 news distribution sources. The elite certainly controls that – they only need to point out to editors at the top what to focus on. It’s really a solid design.

      1. Roosh August 10, 2016 at 11:30 am

        I’m sure top editors meet often to make sure their messaging is consistent.

      2. Zelcorpion August 10, 2016 at 11:37 am

        Aside from the big and frankly red-herring meeting of Bilderberg there are countless meetings and seminars where top professionals of various industries meet and coordinate. All you need is to have a few wine-and-dine seminars with hookers in luxury resorts to go through the next points on the agenda.
        Even I know enough of the current agenda to know what to push and what to attack or be silent about. In addition every outlet can easily have a person or two sifting through all news sources and pouncing on anything interesting or worthwhile.

      3. Roosh August 10, 2016 at 2:01 pm

        I don’t know if it was you or someone else, but Bilderberg is not even for the top guys. It’s maybe one step above the CFR.

      4. A.W.E.S.O.M.-O August 11, 2016 at 7:37 pm

        Absolutely. They visit each other’s sites as well to make sure all of their nonsense is at least consistent

      5. Epoche August 12, 2016 at 11:30 am

        You asked what should you do aka meeting in person. We should meet in person. As long as no one is advocating anything illegal then you should be fine. Do the meetup with the assumption that you will be infiltrated.

      6. Matt Steffens August 15, 2016 at 12:36 pm

        Buy and hand out Nokia 8210s like the Barksdales and roll so deep incognito not even the Feds would be able to find anybody. This is why I tend to do my serious meetups discussing various (100% legal) business ventures such as construction deep in the woods or in some variety of bunker with Faraday cages mounted on the walls.

      7. Matt Steffens August 15, 2016 at 12:37 pm

        KEEP IN MIND THOUGH : most of the refurbs (tear them apart and look) have chips in them so the fucking Feds can crack big drug cases. Use coded text messages anyway. Fuck them.

    2. Roosh August 10, 2016 at 11:30 am

      There are multiple mailing lists that are used to give orders to the peon journalists, but the leaders of those lists get orders from above. There must be multiple levels, but not so many that it takes too long to spread messages per news cycle.

      1. A.W.E.S.O.M.-O August 11, 2016 at 7:37 pm

        Just enough to create a few layers of distance between those handing out orders and those writing pieces.

    3. Blinko23 August 10, 2016 at 1:48 pm

      Google Operation Mockingbird for a start.

    4. Nick August 10, 2016 at 4:22 pm

      At least as far as the Mass Media is concerned, it’s an organic entity that essentially embodies the communist revolution (destruction of private property rights, ending freedom of speech, destroying the family/religion/tradition etc.) There’s surely coordination at the top, but I think it’s much less than we think.

      Two excellent books on this are “Addicted to Distraction: The Consequences of Mass Media Addiction” and “Thought Prison: The Fundamental Nature of Political Correctness”, both by Professor Bruce Charlton, they are free online and on Amazon.

      In the end we have to realize that there is a supernatural cause to all of this. Good and evil exists, God and Satan exist, and their struggle for the souls of men manifests itself in what happens on earth. We can’t let the injustices that we see let us get depressed and despair. Instead we should focus on what we can control, our behavior, values, supporting our friends and family, being honorable and courageous men.

    5. God August 10, 2016 at 9:03 pm

      “they” dont need to coordinate. Anything that goes against the narrative that has been pummeled into us since we were kids creates un-ease.

      Say to someone how the ghost busters film is about feminism, and most people don’t see it that way and will argue it, and brush it off as if its nothing is going on..

      Personally, i just dont see the point to all the control, mind games, etc. Theyre really just a bunch of dickheads.

      1. GRock August 12, 2016 at 7:28 pm

        “and most people don’t see it that way and will argue it, and brush it off as if its nothing is going on..” << and the reason most people don't see it? Its not something as monumental as "swallowing the red pill" per se, but the effectiveness of incrementalism.

        When you change something – or paint in broad brush strokes changing everything, all rights, all freedoms, but make those changes over 5-10-20 years, people don't see the change occur. Especially with short attention span addiction. Instantaneous-isms is all people can process anymore.

        Better yet, say sure, legalize their weed, let the gays marry, import un-checked immigrants and amnesty for illegals, "that'll pacify them as we take what's left of their future, kids and great grand kids future away." THAT is precisely how its being done.

      2. Matt Steffens August 15, 2016 at 12:38 pm

        You might want to change your handle unless you are, in fact, God.

    6. Rick Moser August 11, 2016 at 10:30 am

      I noticed the meetup attacks began on the Socialist subredit. They were the sentinels who noticed the plans and delivered a few lines of narrative that the media initially copied.

    7. prepz August 11, 2016 at 1:02 pm

      Mainstream media merely plagiarize and regurgitate wire service stories from services such as the AP, and when they’re not so lazy as to actually go interview news makers, they generally talk to the same professional spokespeople who spout the same agenda-driven talking points.

      It’s not really so much that they organize, but simply appear to be organized because they’re drinking tainted water from the same wells. So it’s no surprise that they display symptoms of the same disease of media bias.

    8. GRock August 12, 2016 at 7:18 pm

      I agree that there are more or less “passed down” orders. However, I don’t believe those happen as frequent as you might think. – just a hunch -. But rather, they planted the seeds within media channels, esp during early smart phone era (past 6 years or so) and tend to those seeds so they’re growing as they’ve chosen, just let the cancer do its work.

      Re. Roosh, I think he may have flared-up just enough to the point where a direct order(s) could have been passed down from the major media outlets, to the smaller less credible ones to do most of the dirty work. The system. It’s all about supporting the system. Just like how the economy is now built entirely around the system. If it’s not in direct support, it’s a rocky living for those individuals going it alone. UNLESS, its in support of a leftist SJW agenda which keeps the sheeple in line for the elitists. I.e. A faggy band with a hipster message. Props.

      Consider what “jobs” or “careers” do people you know have with the most stability? They’re ALL institutionally tied to the “system.” Healthcare, education, criminal justice and law enforcement, military, government, or massive businesses (media included) that operate more like governments than free market start-ups… all in line with elitists and directly tied.
      Every single person I know in one of the above industries are swimmingly financially stable. Maybe not rich, but very solid. The rest are either very rich (the noble few), teetering on upper middle class – OR – practically destitute because they see what’s really occurring and refuse to become part of it.

      So many have joined the “dark side” and honestly believe they’re not a cog in the wheel of the problem, but the rationalization hamster and justification monkey whispering shit in their ignorant ears operates the exact same way a slutty westernized woman’s do. The machine is so effective with the virility of social media on the gorilla front, that the equation is this simple:
      1) Project propaganda, 2) deny falsehoods in investigative reporting (more so deny ANY reporting requires provable investigation), 3) Write follow up clincher stories (vids, tweets, etc.) 4) DONE – success. 5) Onto the next subversion.

  2. Zelcorpion August 10, 2016 at 11:10 am

    Usually there are 2 ways of dealing with potentially dangerous organisations:
    1) Infiltration or buying up of them – Greenpeace, most alternative radio and media, almost all political parties etc
    2) Shutting them up or eliminating them

    Martin Luther King was such an example. They did not mind when he raised some racial issues. But when he started becoming aware of the elite pulling him by the strings and when he attempted to rally also whites behind him on issues that mattered to everyone – that was his death warrant. They could not let him focus all races on the real enemy – the globalist elite.

    Likely the best way is to start physical meetings as Secret Masculine Societies that run under the radar of the media. The growth of such a society may be slower, but at least not met with attacks of their rabid ideological bulldogs.

    1. Roosh August 10, 2016 at 11:31 am

      Secret meetings can harder to organize but really the only way going forward.

      1. Apollyon August 10, 2016 at 1:28 pm

        You’ll have to have a way to vet potential participants long before the meetups occur.

    2. Blinko23 August 10, 2016 at 1:50 pm

      Yup. MLK was assassinated as soon as he started to speak out aggressively against the Vietnam war.

  3. Straightalpha August 10, 2016 at 11:48 am

    Hey Roosh, I read your book Free Speech Isn’t Free and I am currently writing a summary of the most important parts. Is it possible that I translate some passages of the book into german and use them once I start my german redpill-blog ( straightalpha.com ) ?
    I think your book is a must read for every man – especially the appendix parts (for beginners) and Jeff’s explanations in Chapter 4 and therefore I would like to present some snippets on my blog – of course with a link to your book on amazon at the top and at the bottom.
    The german men need to know about what is going on in the west. There is no more time to waste. There is no german redpill community hence I need to built something up myself. I tried to educate them on the biggest german board for PUAs but while the users liked my content the moderators and administrators gave me penalties for hate speech, sexism and misogynie and then deleted my account.
    I really appreciate your books and q&a videos.
    Thanks for everything you’ve done, Roosh!

    1. Roosh August 10, 2016 at 2:00 pm

      Sure, you’re free to translate parts.

      1. refusenik August 11, 2016 at 9:05 am

        “there’s a real ENMITY between liberal Jews and evangelicals”
        Liberal Jews have real enmity for evangelicals. It is not reciprocated, at most there is mild dislike, maybe some distrust, normal in group preference, but nothing remotely approaching ENMITY. Many if not most evangelicals love to virtue signal by being Zionist.

      2. Oyy August 12, 2016 at 12:21 am

        Right. What most jews don’t seem to understand is that their disdain for white christianish folk is not only not reciprocated; it is, in fact, more-or-less understood, accepted and, in the most bizarre, head-scratchin’est, non-nonsensical manner possible, wholly embraced.

        A latter-day churchian’s love for jews is analogous to a cuckold’s love for his bull.

        “Ahh… Praise the Lawrd, that wuz good! [Rubs his ass.] Now, really get in there and Bernakify my buttox!!! lzolozlololololol”

        It’s total self-abnegating, self-annihilating behavior. Oyyy! Such meshugganeh shotzkim!

        It’s hard to even begin to do justice to it. If you aren’t familiar with modern American “Christian” culture, you just won’t get it.

        What American jewry also apparently doesn’t get is the threat posed by their own newly-formed corps of divisivictim “agents of change.” Young, pissed off, mass media/educational system-indoctrinated cis-het-whitey-hating Yolandas and Marcuses are ascendant; as old whites slowly die off, their “woke” successors are being churned out by the tens of thousands with every graduating class.

        These people hate whitey, true; but they also have no love for the jew. And precisely zero reverence, or even affinity, for erstwhile out-group “allies.” Why would they? It’s not in their programming.

        “Shuddafuk up, bitch. Hilter was a muthafuggin cracka.”

  4. Jeff - BestToolsForMen.com August 10, 2016 at 12:26 pm

    They probably use compartmentalization in their distribution lists. The same tactic is available to us.

  5. JackBlack23 August 10, 2016 at 4:04 pm

    You have a pretty big platform and are already on (((their))) radar so I expect at some point that you will either be shut down entirely or get co-opted and become a shill like your friend Cernovich …

  6. Scuttlebuttin' August 10, 2016 at 5:02 pm

    Why would “men in power” have a “matriarchal” agenda? Their orientation is self-interest, so their support of “feminism” is only its utility in undermining current opposition, heavily male and, perhaps more important to this discussion, anti-statist. They have no more attachment to Motherhood than the Pharoahs did.

    1. zphyer6 August 10, 2016 at 5:47 pm

      A Matriarchy will eventually concentrate more power into their hands. Women like being lead by Big Daddy Government. This way they can use women as useful idiots and a buffer against more dangerous males that would try to rise up.

    2. MajorStyles August 11, 2016 at 5:24 pm

      “Why would “men in power” have a “matriarchal” agenda?”

      Tell that to the guys who own Dillard’s.

  7. splooge August 10, 2016 at 6:06 pm


    thought this would be interesting, this must really resonate with you roosh. Motherland wont accept you and neither do the local nationalists whom are xenophobic and the liberals that undermine, so you are in a hopeless box. but least you came out as an exception then goinig crazy like the rest of the alienated 2nd gen kids.

    1. Conservative Muslim Guy August 10, 2016 at 8:22 pm

      2nd generation Muslim here (from North America though, not Europe)..Still, what this guy says is not true on so many levels. He takes a grain of truth and exaggerates it to the Nth degree. Most Muslims do not “hate” Westerners, although we may have different cultural values. People are people, “westerners” are people we go to school with, have professional relationships with, etc.

      Furthermore, Arabs, Persians and Turks do not hate each other. There may be some cultural differences, but they are not more than the difference between the different races of Europe; if anything Muslims are closer to one another since they still have the conception of Dar al-Islam (whereas the concept of Christendom, which united various races across Europe was lost.)

      Also, Muslims “from the home country” don’t hate Muslims who live in the West, they usually look up to us with some kind of celebrity status because of the superior status the West gained over the Islamic world during the colonial period, as well as the fact that Islamic civilization is still at one of its lowest points in all of history. Muslims in the Islamic world have a kind of love and obsession with Western culture, many of them try to be more Western than people in the West themselves. This causes tension with religious elements because it is seen as capitulating to foreign values. There are two kinds of reactions to this: the traditional approach whcih attempts to take the good stuff that agrees with Islam and reject the bad stuff that disagrees – these people are thinkers and philosophers. Then there are the people who are unsophisticated and double down in a kind of mindless, hard-core Salafism (which is really a kind of modernism itself), and reject everything Western and attempt to go back to a kind of “true Islam” (which is actually a mutilation of the tradition.)

      Hope this helps.

  8. Conservative Muslim Guy August 10, 2016 at 9:13 pm


    What is the balance between organized conspiracy, incidental ideological collusion and incompetent journalism/view-grabbing?

    What I mean by this is as follows. You organize a meet up and hundreds of news sites are writing articles calling you a rapist. There are three explanations for this:

    1. Organized conspiracy: There is a top-down conspiracy against you, such that these various news stations are given orders to malign you and froth up a mob against you. They are trying to inoculate the masses against you by lying about who you are/what you believe.

    2. Incidental ideological collusion: The vast majority of people who work in the media are already selected for their liberal, SJW bias. Hence, whenever any of them read your work, you get similar reactions and hence all of these articles which are a) against you and b) have similar criticisms/talking points.

    3. Incompetent Journalism/View-Grabbing: There are a few people who pick up your work and make certain exaggerations against you for several reasons: a) they hate you/your ideas and b) to get an outrage reactions because outrage = more views = more revenue. Subsequently, mass shares are produced, because people are outraged, which creates a minor trend that other journalists now want to get a piece of the pie of, so they must now produce an article (within the timeline of an hour) about the same subject so that they can get a piece of the viral pie. Subsequently, more mass shares are produced until “Roosh” becomes a huge trending topic and every media outlet is forced to speak about it in order to try to get views, and must do so within a very short period of time. For this reason, each of the news outlets basically copies one another without fact checking, and sometimes making increasingly more exaggerated claims in order to get more of the viral pie. I think you noticed this when you did your press conference where it was entirely evident that most of the people who wrote about you did not even do basic research into your work and just copied from one another. You even called them out on it.

    Any one of these three theories (or any kind of combination of these three theories) can account for the perceived collusion between various organizations. How do you know to what extent, if any, each of these three theories is playing in frothing up the mob? Perhaps there is no conspiracy from the top down and theories 2 (incidental collusion) and 3 (incompetent journalism/view-grabbing) completely explain everything. Perhaps it is a combination of factors, or perhaps it is theory 1 (organized conspiracy) exclusively. How do we know?

    The fact that politicians joined in on the hate can be explained by two theories:

    1. They received top-down orders.
    2. They were opportunists taking advantage of a media-frothed mob to win brownie points with the public, make the news, get their name out there, increase their support, etc.

    My point is that either of these two theories, or a combination of both, are plausible. How do we know which factors are playing a role here and to what degree?

    1. Better Dead Than Red August 10, 2016 at 11:29 pm

      Excellent and comprehensive analysis. I am tired of being accused of conspiracist by people who actually do not provide me with an answer.

  9. VoodooEconomics August 10, 2016 at 11:02 pm

    “The media. I don’t know exactly how they coordinate, but the exact same type of coordination you saw against Gamergate and now with Donald Trump confirms that the media works as a single organism that can spring to heel within hours.”

    Something like Journalist. It was tougher 30 years ago outside of the internet era to collaborate. Nowadays one just needs to privately coordinate Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc. to all have the same false narrative and communication is instant. The phone you hold is how they are able to handcuff us. Its possible to do this with a tilted algorithm with specific stop words and that would not require human intervention. Trump, GOP, taxes, 2nd amendment, etc. One could coordinate even with local government (such as Twin Falls, Idaho and their shit mayor) and local media outlets.

    Its that easy. Stories write themselves. No one needs foreign bureaus nor send reporters to far flung places. You just need to have the right narrative and the proper medium. Your phone and a twitter or facebook app is all that is needed.

    The red pill is not just physical but also mental and that is the hardest part to deal with. Once you see it I would compare it to the movie “They Live”. The red pill also includes how you see the world and once you can see the media and our politics exists to get the public pissed at a false narrative you can’t undo that.

    The internet and our communication makes us dumber. I used to believe 20 years ago communication would enable us to learn a lot more. Now it just dumbs us down. I have seen the smartest people I have ever known say the dumbest things pulled off of the internet.

    Free your mind. Smash your smartphone and delete your apps.

  10. jcoors August 10, 2016 at 11:04 pm

    Roosh, if you want to know how the media coordinates on talking points so quickly, read about JournoList and its successor CabaList:


    It’s confirmed as a real list where the leftwing media collude on talking points. See if you can find a way to gain access 🙂

    1. Roosh August 11, 2016 at 7:42 am

      We would need a journalist infiltrator who fakes being a liberal.

  11. Charliedelto August 11, 2016 at 12:06 am

    They can try and stop ‘us’ once we’ve started but they can’t stop ‘us’ from starting in the first place. If what ‘us’ is is the mind of every 14 year old boy who sees something not quite right and stops to ask a question until he gets an adequate response, they will need to stop a great many people, maybe too many.

    I have an African professor at University and he always tells me that the defining characteristic of European people is to be self critical, it is our greatest strength. So I’m not sure that the focus should be on men who are already awake forming outlaw gangs (which is how they’ll be portrayed), but rather the provision of online materials for when the 14 year old boy asks the question, even if it takes him 20 years to find the answer.

  12. kevm3 August 11, 2016 at 1:25 am

    This is more than to merely make a few rich guys even more rich, for these guys have way more money than they know what to do with. This is more about these guys bringing forth the kingdom of their master, who is Satan. In the Bible, when Jesus fasted for 40 days and 40 nights, he was met by Satan who told Jesus that he would give Jesus all the kingdoms of the world if Jesus would bow down before him. Obviously Jesus refused. However, the Bible tells us Satan is currently the ruler of this world. This is why you often see these strange rituals during things like the Grammys. If you’ve noticed, television has taken a decidedly darker and strange turn over the past decade and a half. Obviously, you hear of the ‘new world order’, but there is also the religious component, which is their ‘new age’ religion, which will cause the Antichrist to be worshipped. This is also why we are increasingly moving towards a digital/credit based society and away from cash. This will allow for the bringing forth of the mark of the beast, which you will have to accept in order to buy and sell. The Bible is accurate in explaining it all, given you take the time to decipher it.

    1. ConservativeAtheistRedPiller August 14, 2016 at 9:03 am

      Satan doesn’t exist. I’ve repeatedly offered to bow to him if I can become a billionaire but I’m still waiting for my checking account to get that +$1,000,000,000 credit. It doesn’t budge.

  13. just a human August 11, 2016 at 8:16 am

    The best thing to do is to organize a legal,conservative political party. When you organize secret meetups-they can be easy defined as dangerous for state and society. No doubt – there will be infiltrated agents,but as long as you follow law-nobody can shut down a legal organisation.

  14. Whitney August 11, 2016 at 8:22 am

    That was a good review. It made me look at it on Amazon but it was the 1 star reviews that prompted my purchase.

    1. Roosh August 12, 2016 at 1:32 pm


  15. MajorStyles August 11, 2016 at 10:08 am

    According to Nielsen, “women will control two-thirds of the consumer wealth in the U.S. over the next decade.”

    Source: http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2013/u-s–women-control-the-purse-strings.html

    So the desire to make things matriarchal can largely be seen as a financial one. The Dillards, Macy’s, Luis Vutton, etc. Think of all the stores that line the malls of not only America, but the world. These stores depend on female patronage, and female income is state influenced (via the creation of soft skill jobs, such as Human Resource departments, non-profit organizations, etc.). The owners of these stores no doubt see patriarchy as a direct threat to their economic livlihood.

    The customer is always right, and the customer is a fat, tattooed, feminist woman.

    1. chris007 August 12, 2016 at 6:20 pm

      Why would patriarchy be a threat to companies like Luis Vuitton or Macys?

  16. Scotcho Rouleau August 11, 2016 at 12:30 pm

    what about the physical meet-ups of white nationalists like Richard Spencer and his “Become Who We Are” events in Washington, DC? Those are against the official American ideology of racial equality. Why hasn’t the machine stopped those meet-ups?

    1. fatherofthree August 11, 2016 at 2:41 pm

      Because the machine like a bit of opposition to hide behind, so much so that very often it generates it.

      1. Scotcho Rouleau August 12, 2016 at 9:24 am

        in other words, roosh is wrong?

    2. Roosh August 12, 2016 at 1:32 pm

      How do you know that he hasn’t already been infiltrated by the FBI? Many rumors float around.

  17. fatherofthree August 11, 2016 at 2:38 pm

    1. There is a group of very rich men who control the levers of power.
    2. Those men own the media.
    3. Those men sponsor political candidates on all sides to do their bidding.
    4. Those men have a simple agenda of increasing their wealth and power, to be gods among men.

    And yet, Roosh still buys into the Trump con. Go figure!

    1. KZOO August 11, 2016 at 7:01 pm

      Roosh is pragmatic and understands that politics is the art of the possible (i.e. Trump is our best bet and at the very least, will buy us time).

  18. skillet August 14, 2016 at 6:04 pm

    I think you should try again, Roosh. But find a title or some ruse that will make it harder for the feminazis to cry rape.

    Maybe there is no way, but it is worth pondering