It’s probably obvious to you that our enemy had a bad 2014. Feminists, SJW’s, and their totalitarian liberal buddies were on the ropes for much of the year and for the first time had to play defense to their delusional and incorrect beliefs. One of the reasons they’ve been successful up to now is that they pretended to be moderate. They simply preached the idea of “equality” and the cessation of violence against women. What monster would be against that?

But now many moderates are finding out that they wanted much more than equality. They have pursued censorship and hate while advocating for the removal of due process for men and their marginalization in order to make them second-class citizens. As they’ve made rapid gains over the past few years, their cry for equality has been rightly outed as a anti-man movement.

Since moderates tend to be reasonable—perhaps foolishingly so—in that they want to hear both sides of the story before making a decision, I believe they can be convinced of our correct views if we pursue the following two tactics:

1. Label the enemy mentally insane

Once a moderate finds out that they are being pressured by someone who has a host of psychiatric disorders, they are less inclined to believe them. This will be easy to do since the enemy has adopted transsexuality as their pet cause.

Let’s be clear that transsexuality is not being biologically born with mutated sex parts from two sexes like a hermaphrodite. A transsexual is someone who was biologically born with one sex but feels they are another. This is a legitimate psychiatric disorder, one of the most severe you can have, because it increases your rate for drug addiction and suicide while leading to irreversible surgical changes to your body that leave you as neither man nor woman.

The American Psychiatric Association, however, has stopped calling it a disorder for the sole reason to “reduce stigma,” a political decision that does not change the fact that transsexuals are grossly ill, exhibiting a behavioral pattern that you simply don’t see in non-humans. The fact that narcissism is labeled a disorder while transsexualism is not should clue you in to how science is no longer being used in the APA.

You can make the argument that some homosexual behavior is found in the wild, especially in primates, but have you ever heard of an animal biting off its penis because it wanted a vagina instead? Yet they are letting transsexuals and those who support them dictate policy that affects sane men while trying to normalize their deranged behavior. You must call it out for what it is.

The video I did on Laci Green, a prominent Youtube feminist who suffered from suicidal ideation and had to be given medication so she wouldn’t end her life, shows that most of these people are mentally sick in some way, with a host of serious personal demons that preclude them from coming up with public policies or mandates when they can’t even take care of themselves without popping pharmaceuticals or mutilating themselves. Take your pick from this list—they likely have more than one conditon:

People with mental disorders should get the treatment and medication they need (at their own expense) instead of trying to change the world into their image by legitimizing and normalizing their frightful psychoses.

2. Show how women are consistent liars who can’t be trusted

We’ve long known that women are essentially overgrown children who are unable to take care of themselves or act in moral and virtuous manner when not properly influenced by a male figure. Even a dog, when let loose from its master, does not begin to go on a rampage of destruction like women do when released from their traditional role.

When left to their own devices, their true nature implores them to pursue base behaviors of narcissism, attention whoring, deceit, backstabbing, cheating, manipulation, status-seeking, golddigging, and violence against men. These qualities prevent her from being a loyal wife, fit mother, or even a barely informed citizen who knows more about geopolitical issues of the day than which celebrity is fucking who.

Give a girl the “empowerment” and “independence” to go to university and she’ll pop out four years later with a million selfies on her smartphone and a notch count of at least 20 while being unable to come up with one good idea to advance civilization in a way that men have been doing for centuries. Without male guidance, a woman becomes useless in her natural motherly role.

This fact is important when dealing with today’s rape hysteria. We must make it clear to moderates that women are liars who have been proven to lie in the past and who will continue to use lies against men for their own personal gain. Once the legitimacy of a woman’s word is undermined, moderates will no longer stand by while their preach their myths of rape culture, patriarchy, and the unequal wage gap. They will be skeptical and treat women as they ought to be treated.

Whenever a woman alleges rape, tell your confused friend the following: “Women have lied in the past about rape, such as with Brian Banks, the Duke Lacrosse team, and also with the recent UVA hoax. Without clear evidence that can be used in a court of law, we must remain skeptical.” Clearly show how women behave in a way to maximize their attention and validation for personal benefit while shaming, disparaging, and denouncing innocent men that have done no wrong. Call out bogus “1 in 4 women have been sexually assaulted” studies whenever you see them by highlighting methodology so flawed that it would offend even a Haitian voodoo priest.

The key word is “skepticism.” Once you get people in the habit of being skeptical of any claim by a woman, their hysterics and rantings will then be ignored except in cases where true harm against them was performed (i.e. real rape, something that has been declining in America for decades).

Red pill ideas against the enemy is spreading rapidly, and you can now commonly see them in the comments section of mainstream publications (the ones that haven’t removed them, anyway). I believe the two tactics above will quicken the pace in getting more people over to our side.

While we should not dilute our message or moderate ourselves to win these people over, we should help spread doubt that those who are trying to influence them are either mentally insane or flat out liars (commonly both). Hammer that into their brains over the next year or two and they will properly disregard the latest rantings and accusations that attempt to further escalate the war against men. While I don’t want to declare that victory may be within sight, I can say we’re inching ever so closer.[culturewar]

Read Next: Culture War Predictions For 2015


  1. Seth Rose January 26, 2015 at 10:18 am

    The fact that the APA changed it to “dysphoria” from “disorder is HUGE. As you stated, because of this, people with this problem will not be able to get the help they require. In fact, they will be enabled and encouraged by SJW’s on sites like Tumblr who are so delusional as to think this is natural and healthy.

    1. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 8:24 am

      The APA is a disreputable organisation owned by vested financial interests, who are more interested in psychopathologising the US population for purposes of social control, just like the old Soviet Union, and I say that as an MD. Psychiatrists get paid whilst most of america goes on some type of drug, so only drug companies and the elite gain from categorising behaviours that are normal, or miscategorising people who get the wrong sort of help designd to keep them ane society weak.

    2. Ray Wolfson January 27, 2015 at 6:29 pm

      100+ years ago, women declared a clandestine war on men, that they thought they had won….. god help them when they lose….. it’s going to be back to the kitchen and the bedroom…………

      1. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 6:35 pm

        Ive seen too many female med students witj 200k debt to believe that women will ever wake up in time. A new generation must be born who have never underone feminist brainwashing, and such changes will take time, 20 years at least, assuming that the wealthybackers of feminmsm have disappeared.

      2. BigN_Tasty March 9, 2016 at 12:59 am

        Or fending for themselves in the wild while men enjoy ultra realistic sexbots.

        I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Women are the Great Filter. If we tear this parasite off our backs we will become Gods.

  2. ATC January 26, 2015 at 11:10 am

    Hell, a lot of us natural omegas have Anxiety Disorder. The difference is – instead of making a victim spectacle out of our pathologies we try to self-improve.

    This is also why SJWs despise Mormons…another non-mainstream group that just works hard instead of demanding gibsmedats.

    1. Shortest Straw January 26, 2015 at 1:11 pm

      Women and omega males have a lot in common.

      1. Natty Kadifa January 30, 2015 at 7:23 pm

        *some* women – not sure why it’s ‘beta/alpha/omega males and WOMEN – and yes im an anti feminist – not sure why you feel the need to go to the same level as the feminazis with your generalisations

      2. Shortest Straw January 30, 2015 at 8:14 pm

        Because I get tired of qualifying my generalizations. I realize there is a distribution and not all women are the same, just like how not all men, omega and otherwise, are the same.

        Omega males don’t function – or function minimally – within the male hierarchy. They resent the hierarchy, as it has generally done them more harm than good, at least from their perspective, and tend to passively resist its functioning. They also actively compete with one another, as one’s loss is another’s gain. The most vicious behavior is encountered among the lower status omegas.

        Women do not function within a command hierarchy. Rather, they are in a flat social group, but with some members having a higher value than others. The higher value members get more rewards than the lower. They actively compete with one another; one’s loss is another’s gain. The most vicious behavior is encountered among the lower status women.

        You are right. I shouldn’t have said “women”. I meant “low status women”.

      3. SVB October 7, 2015 at 4:39 am

        So, basically anyone who believes this nonsense can be described as an omega male. Thanks for your clarification!

    2. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 8:31 am

      Real anxiety disorder is rare – what you are describing as a disorder is a normal reaction you can somewhat overcome using mental tricks and other techniques. Let’s not get into the habit the elite want of turning society into people who need mental help, when the ones running it are the ones most in need of mental help.

  3. Conrad Stonebanks January 26, 2015 at 12:23 pm

    The manosphere continues to evolve into a full-blown resistance movement. The elites probably see the influencing of moderates as their prerogative, and may only allow influences by other parties (even if it’s the truth) up to a certain degree.

    1. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 8:09 am

      LThe internet is a strange thing – it is more heavily policed than admitted, as there are many paid shillls protecting a certain national interest/sect. There is a lot of disinfo sites and real info is often suppressed. Yet, despite this, some resistance movements do gain traction, such as ‘free palestine’. I do wonder, though, that seeing as a dissident purge is in the works, what the future may be for those blinded ones who think it won’t happen to them was the world becomes palestine.

      Q: Why are FEMA camps only in the US and Canada?

      A: Because they had the history of fighting for their independence and these are the only two Anglo nations where guns are widely available. You don’t need FEMA or its like in Britain/South Africa/Australia, where they are all disarmed.

      1. Ray Wolfson January 27, 2015 at 6:31 pm

        yeah…. latest false flag in France is certainly designed to undermine revolutionary forces there…. the French farmers and fisherman are famous for their blockages… as were the British working class, until they turned the country into a giant version of Big Brother TV show with CCTV on every corner….

      2. seth datta January 28, 2015 at 8:26 am

        The upper class who traditionally looked out for the working class had intermarried with the bankster tribe a long time ago.

  4. Martin Woo January 26, 2015 at 12:40 pm

    Great article but homosexuality is not the same thing as “same-sex interactions”
    In the “wild”, same-sex interactions refer to interspecies familiarity, parenthood and pack/flock dominance
    It does not refer to homosexuality.
    Homosexuality is the SEXUAL attraction to the same gender. Not friendship, fatherhood or competition.
    The gay activists changed homosexuality to “same-sex” labeling to confuse and distract from reality.

    1. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 8:22 am

      Considering the unfeminised women due to cultural upbringing, and the higher male to female ratio with male-heavy immigration, the elites are now further seeding the ideamof homosexuality to further break up the family unit, whilst more men may actively choose being gay or bi to meet their urges. I see a future for PUA teaching men to pick up hot men. Unfortunately, the elite are pedos as can be seen in the various UK scandals, so it will become more acceptable to have MANBLA, the notorious Man-boy love association, and other organisations having their practices becoming mainstream.

  5. EdwardJi January 26, 2015 at 1:07 pm

    While there is no doubt that many transsexuals are mentally ill, I’d be extremely wary of bringing the “it’s not natural” argument into it. Gender switching is uncommon, but not exactly rare either, in the animal kingdom. Conclusive proof may remain elusive, but it is certainly a safe bet, with plenty of tangential evidence, that modern vertebrates (yes, including humans) are descended from transsexual aquatic and amphibious ancestors. Ask any large scale chicken farmer and they’ll tell you that the occasional hen will stop laying eggs, grow a male’s comb and plumage and start behaving exactly like a male, although they won’t change their sex organs. These tranny hens were prized back in the days when cock-fighting was a common British sport (note that this was also back when all agriculture was “organic”), because their cock opponent would often be confused long enough to get eviscerated without really fighting back.

    A transsexual may have underlying biological causes for their condition that are not possible to detect by looking at their genitals. For example, in a city the size of London, you could expect there to be 500-600 people who are genetically male, but express a totally female phenotype. The only way to tell is by a DNA test, or surgically examining their ovaries, which are actually undeveloped testes, lacking eggs. This can also happen in reverse (female genotype, male phenotype).

    Which brings us to a tricky question, without much data to answer it: are many transsexuals simply mentally ill, or is their mental illness typically a symptom of underlying genetic and hormonal abnormalities (invisible to you and me), often combined with growing up around people who mistreated them?

    1. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 7:59 am

      The elite had apparently allowed many female estrogen hormone compounds into the water in order to mqake men less aggressive towards their so called rulers. This, amongst many other things, may explain some of the sexual issues in moden society being more prevalent, as a simp, google search willl reveal more estrogens are indeed in the water.

      1. EdwardJi January 27, 2015 at 11:25 am

        I’m not down with conspiracy theories about “ruling elites” and their dastardly master plans that people seem to know so much about from watching youtube.
        The reason why you know about estrogens in water is primarily because
        government agencies test it and release public reports. Humans have always looked upon the chaos of the world and imputed a human mind onto it, something that we can understand and interact with. It’s an illusion. There is no elite puppet master, pulling the strings from behind the scenes, any more than there is a god in the sky with a plan for us.

      2. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 6:30 pm

        The views you hold about God and the views you hold about an elite, which are sperate points themselves, are both true. However, I do accept that a certain percentage of the population will claim otherwise, although your views are aligned with the views of the moneyed interests who own the west. In this current era, money and brainwashing beats truth, though this was not the case in the past, nor shall it be in the future after the human race undergoes much suffering and is forced to reevaluate the beliefs being imprinted upon it by conditioning of society. Religion may be false, but God is real. Moneyed intertests against certain population groups is also real.

      3. Sean Detente February 12, 2015 at 3:20 am

        That some people are wealthier than others has been around forever, dude. It’s no nebulous conspiracy of illumanati drinking schnapps and manipulating the diamond market from Bavaria, just plain old human greed.m

        Though that is one of the few more creative interpretations I’ve seen of the whole 1% vs 99% class warfare malarkey the occupiers pushed.

    2. Ray Wolfson January 27, 2015 at 6:35 pm

      river trout are known to become all female due to estrogen mimicking chemical contamination in the rivers…..

      1. EdwardJi January 27, 2015 at 7:22 pm

        Not exactly. Some male trout are “feminised”, not female, with “gonads containing male and female tissue, and/or feminized reproductive ducts”.
        These fish are literally swimming all day in pretty polluted waters that no first world person would ever have to drink. Also, natural gender switching is most common in fish. I’m sure you know that a number of reef fish can even flip back and forth several times during their lives.

        However, your basic concern is valid and there is ongoing research into how all this is affecting humans, especially the link between these estrogen-type chemicals and male fertility.
        If you are concerned, you can consider investing in a reverse-osmosis water filter for your home.

  6. Zelcorpion January 26, 2015 at 2:27 pm

    The problem is that Red Pill wisdom is seeping in and even Hollywood partly begins to acknowledge it when looking at the new TV series “Togetherness” They essentially present all the tells of a sexless marriage to a timid Beta, carousel riding sluts, hypergamy etc. –
    But they offer no solutions whatsoever – it seems like Hollywood writers are reading the ‘sphere, but probably cannot ever mention concepts like Game or healthy male domination and female submission. I don’t think that they ever will yield in that regard. We can discredit certain people on some more extreme campaigns, but that’s about it – next year millions more will leave the colleges indoctrinated.

    1. Andrea January 26, 2015 at 2:42 pm

      It would be great to read and learn more about “healthy male domination and female submission.” Any good books or cites? I cannot help but to think about lions.

      1. Andrea January 26, 2015 at 3:16 pm


      2. EdwardJi January 26, 2015 at 6:41 pm

        Interesting question. In the world of fiction, the movie Straw Dogs is a gripping study of this topic from all angles.

      3. Andrea January 26, 2015 at 7:11 pm

        Can’t wait to check it out. Thanks.

      4. Nelli P January 27, 2015 at 6:24 am

        dont fall into that trap honey. we Russian women have been submissive for years and look where it got us

    2. theakinet January 26, 2015 at 9:35 pm

      Sunday’s episode (“Insanity”), was the most obviously red-pill. The beta husbands beta friend (who was an alpha in the 90s) started to fall in love with amanda peet. But she friend-zoned him to hook up with an older alpha.

      Peet’s character gets pumped-and-dumped in episode 1, and the wife is clearly looking to cheat. 100% chance the show’s writers know about the manosphere.

    3. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 7:55 am

      The people who own hollywood are the same caste as the banksters screwing us, hence they bombard us and our parents with the culture at birth so it becomes the norm. Seeing the TV and movies niw gives you an idea where they are taking things and what the grown up children will be like fifteen to twenty years from now.

  7. Olly January 26, 2015 at 3:26 pm

    You write the following:

    “We’ve long known that women are essentially overgrown children who are unable to take care of themselves or act in moral and virtuous manner when not properly influenced by a male figure. Even a dog, when let loose from its master, does not begin to go on a rampage of destruction like women do when released from their traditional role.”

    And then wonder why women find you repulsive…

    1. Tom January 26, 2015 at 9:43 pm

      Roosh is right, I have 20 years experience dealing with women and they can be dangerous mad liars.

      1. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 6:38 pm

        I think western brainwashing teaches men that women are sweet, but woman can be just as socially manipulative and destructive as men, if not worse. The older generations partly responsible for it did not have as many oppressive laws to deal with and they had more jobs and disposable income for divorce and alimoney.

      2. shinypichu January 31, 2015 at 2:50 am

        We, women are as great as men, if you have seen bad women is because you can see bad men, but you see bad wome because you are a man if you was a woman you would be seen bad men. This is because bad people try to hurt other people, exist bad women and bad men.

      3. Eric Lauder January 31, 2015 at 6:52 pm

        “Without clear evidence that can be used in a court of law, we must remain skeptical” -this is the main point of the article. Do you support the right to due process? Do you support “innocent until proven guilty”? About every crime, including rape, I mean.
        The survey which putted out 20% women are abused in campuses is a lie: nor even in war zones it happens at such rate. Department of Justice confirmed it’s 0.61%.
        0.61% is NOT good: I have a daughter, and I want to protect her. Rape is a crime and MUST be deal by criminal justice, not by ridicolous universities “feminist courts” with unworkable laws like yes-means-yes. Real rapists deserve jail, not just only expulsion from university. And false accusers deserve jail too.

      4. shinypichu February 1, 2015 at 5:41 am

        I think that all cases must be investigated before to send somebody to the jail. But your enemy isnt the girls, your enemy are the prejudgement. In a world where prejudgement dont exist men dont would have this problem but men wouldt say that girls are evil either. I dont like this site and others roosh sites because they expand the predjudgements against women.

      5. Eric Lauder February 1, 2015 at 11:07 am

        Do you like radical feminists sites, like the ones where Marcotte or Valenti write? These sites are full of prejudgements: they depict girls as victims, always, and weak and shy creatures, and they depict boys as powerful and abusive, they think there’s a widespread “rape culture” (that’s not true, since rapes are performed by less than 1% of men, and other men respect women), that men should be “reprogrammed” by women because women are wiser and know better. At the same time, there’s an enormous educational gender gap: 66% degrees earned by females, 33% by males, and men are treated like shit in universities (especially in UK).
        Radical feminism is nowadays the main source of prejudices and gender stereotypes. Roosh is just a reaction, and not the more extreme one: he’s just a man who likes to have a lot of women, not against their sexual freedom or education. I’m reading “Submission” by Michel Houellebecq – try to read it if you want to have some hint about what can be the future. Western men, raised up with equality in mind, could be the best allies of their mothers, sisters and lovers, but only if women would reject radical feminism. Otherwise, our sons will be the best allies of islamists. In Sweden feminism is basically radical feminism: they blame and bash polite and shy Swedish men and cheers to muslims – that’s blindness…

      6. shinypichu February 2, 2015 at 9:31 am

        I didnt know this sites i will try to see a bit when i dont hqve studies. I dint know about this girls but i am reading about marrcotte in wikipedia and i dont agree with some of thinghs that she said.

      7. Eric Lauder February 2, 2015 at 10:06 am

        Amanda Marcotte is a man-hater in disguise. Yes-means-yes law, strongly supported by her, is a tool for false accusations: it doesn’t hurts rapists at all, and it introduces an unrealistic “affirmative ongoing consent”. Personally, I would prefer to not have sex than to ask for consent every minute during the intercourse: that’s humiliating, I’m not the subject of the woman. If the woman wish to stop, she have just only to say: “stop, please”.

      8. shinypichu February 2, 2015 at 2:27 pm

        Im dont know who is i olnly have found her twitter i need inform more.

      9. Eric Lauder February 2, 2015 at 2:47 pm
        It seems she likes misandry, and she dislikes men. But she’s heterosexual, that should be very frustrating, I suppose. Her problem is not that she’s quite ugly, her problem is that she is a self-centered, narcissistic and whiny man-hater.
        In another article she writed that women who have childs are stupids.

      10. shinypichu February 3, 2015 at 9:27 am

        I dont want to have kids, get married or having sex. But i think that is is bad that this girl try to do that other people dont have kids. I think that give a life to a kid is a great thingh (but it is painful).
        My reason for dont want it dont have relation with feminism, it is only that i dont feel with the capacity of do it for some reasons.

        Ideologies should exist for serve humanity and humanity shouldnt exist for serve ideologuies. But when a ideology grow their activist usually forget this.

      11. Eric Lauder February 3, 2015 at 12:13 pm

        Your idea about ideologies is very exact. I guess you’re from Japan, there’s no need to confirm it of course, nor to explain your reasons. Everyone deserve her/his privacy. For me kids are the most important thing in life, even there’s a very high price to pay in order to have them. Marriage is no good anymore for a man: apart from kids and the first 2-3 years, marriage is just a pain for a man. I have see a really well working marriage in my life:my parents. My father had a low-level education and he was a blue collar, but very specialized, high income. My mother had a degree but she freely choosed to be an housewife. She managed all the money and she decided investments. My father never did a chore: he did just only his work (10 hours per day, often even more due overtime) and his hobbies. My family did some major social advancements with that system: they started in a little apartment and now they live in a three-stories luxury villa – she was great doing investments, she had her car, and she also had time to perform her hobby: amateur painter. That was her “patriarchal oppression”. They still love each other, and even now they’re old often she call him “my prince” (before my father’s retirement, when he returned from overtime at job, often she called him “my warrior”). I had more than 100 women in my life, sadly, no one, never, was like her.

      12. shinypichu February 3, 2015 at 2:27 pm

        It can be bad for a woman too, people usually is egoist, women and men are egoist we are equal for good and for bad.
        I am not japanese i cant understand why you think it.
        I love manga and japanese videogames like pokemon but i m not japanese.
        Im sorry but you are wrong i am from europe.

      13. Eric Lauder February 3, 2015 at 3:24 pm

        Egoism it’s just as nowadays way of life works. Third wave feminism is exploiting the sufferences of women, but 90% of these sufferences are totally unrelated with their boyfriends or husbands, are related with the current self-centered and consumerist way of life. Even women treated as objects is a consumerist matter, a new issue, unrelated with old patriarchy: in old patriarchal societies (ancient Greece, i.e.) women were strictly controlled for life by their husbands, not used and then throwed away. And it’s the same for men: men are used like objects by their wifes (or even worse by their cohabitee) then divorce-raped. Even the American issue about rapes in campuses: most aren’t “rapes”, I mean: it isn’t real violence. It’s an empty sad intercourse between two drunk persons. Consumerism. The thing that is most amazing for me is: both in feminist and anti-feminist sites there’s an harsh criticism against the actual turbo-capitalistic society. But both think most issues they have are caused by the opposite gender. It’s not true. My ex-wife becomed a compulsory shoppist, egoistical, self-centered and career-obsessed mainly due actual way of life, and feminism just only reinforced that. And almost the same problems afflict even conservative women, anti-feminists – just only a little less because they are a little more ready to accept sacrifices in order to save their families. But often it’s still not enough.

      14. shinypichu February 4, 2015 at 9:46 am

        Usually in a battle all sides have a lot of things equal with the other side but they cant see it.
        I dont know what you are triying to say about consumism, consumism is good for economy of a country (if people buy thighs created in their country).
        It is right that some people buy thinghs that they dont wanted to buy but consumism is needed for economy. I love buy videogames, i dont buy a lot of it because i dont have a job and i need more money for buying it. I usully have to renunce a some of this for buy other than i want more. I cant live without some consumism videogames are something that i love since i was child, when i get the game that i was waiting for years im become happy.
        Im sure that you need some consumism, ¿do you like book or films?.
        All us need some consumismm because we like things that arent unneded for life but needed for happiness.
        It is right that some people waste too money and they should have a plan.
        But some consumism is needed.

      15. Eric Lauder February 4, 2015 at 11:42 am

        Men and women should stand together, not to be against each other: the idea of a perpetual battle between sexes is feminism’s venomous fruit.
        Consumism is good when it’s about buying things. But it’s evil when it’s about to let your family in order to pursuit a career in order to get more money. I guess you don’t know piracy…when I was young videogames piracy was legal in Italy: basically you could went in a newspaper stand and buy pirated videogames: a musicassette with 20 videogames that was priced half than a single original videogame. When I was 12-13 yo, a boy usually had more than 500 videogames for his home computer…I never played some of the videogames I buyed when I was 12 yo…

      16. shinypichu February 5, 2015 at 10:20 am

        Yes people dont need war.

        ¿what are you triying to say when you say that have a job for make more money is bad?
        I dont understant, make more money is good for all the family.

      17. Eric Lauder February 5, 2015 at 1:45 pm

        Make more money for all the family is good, as long as your job is not your main goal: if you want a family, priorities should be: first your partner, second your childs, third your job. My ex-wife priorities were: first her job, second her childs, third I’m not sure. And now we’re divorced.
        Also, usually women control at least 80% of family in come: there’s nothing bad in that, it’s biological. When humans were primitive women controlled almost all the food: the fruit collected by the woman and the preys captured by the man. Human species is hardwired to let control of family resources to the woman.
        In my parents’ family it worked very well: my housewife mother save money and did investments.
        In my family it didn’t work: my ex-wife, college professor, developed compulsory shopping syndrome…

      18. shinypichu February 6, 2015 at 9:40 am

        I cant judge about your problems with your ex wife because i cant know what happening in your family. I m need to listen the two sides for it.
        But i think that you feel that she dont love you enough.
        Some people is better doing some thinghs that other, it isnt impprtant if this person is a man or a woman.
        I dont think that women or men are good in some thingh because they are women/men.

      19. shinypichu January 31, 2015 at 2:47 am

        You, roosh and others roosh followers are the liars.

    2. Marcus Aurelius January 27, 2015 at 2:43 am

      S/he who behaves badly hates the light, and hates even more the torchbearer.

      1. Olly January 27, 2015 at 5:01 am

        Or it could be that Roosh has written a load of evidence-free old cobblers.

      2. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 8:33 am

        Most men and women these days behave like animals, but more women need direction than men.

  8. Gabe January 26, 2015 at 4:07 pm

    Do the Slavs have familiarity with The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion?

    The Protocols set forth the Elites long term plans.

    1. Darius January 26, 2015 at 5:12 pm

      That’s some anti-semetic nonsense. The Protocols were faked.

      1. Dogbert II January 28, 2015 at 2:28 pm

        Actually not. Get hold of the expert opinion on the matter by Ulrich Fleischhauer from 1938.

    2. EdwardJi January 26, 2015 at 5:13 pm

      Either you’re trolling, or you don’t know shit. That tired old piece of propaganda was written, as far as anyone knows, by either a Ukrainian or a Russian and was first published in Russia.

    3. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 8:42 am

      People call this fake, but it was written by a jewish person in its alleged original form, and it does somewhat accurately describe the world we live in today. I think people should read the Talmud and google the racist verses from it- I read the entire book which is the most racist and hateful holy book ive read, and i read of 7 religions including the koran and bible. I have met some of the lower class elite who are jewish, as are the owners of institutions running the UK. It would seem to me that jews have historically used their banking power as canaanites to undermine white society and other races whilst they benefit, as attested to by Christ, Muhammed, the FoundingFathers. The jewish final solution seems to be to enslave and genocide the entire human race.

      1. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 8:45 am

        Ps they are genetically not semites, so the word antisemite has no meaning. The word antigentile, actually needs to be recognised as a truism in the world today. Jews are never persecuted, they are malevolent and manipulative persecutors.

        I’m sure Mossad has upvoted many comments attacking you, as they have manu paid trolls to suppress the truth and try and discredit others by underhanded means, as they are cowards.

      2. chenelope January 28, 2015 at 8:07 pm

        Seth, I’m regularly impressed by your knowledge of this topic, and would appreciate if you could direct me towards some accurate literature that chronicles or explains the Masonic/Elite/Zionist/Illuminati (whatever and whomever they are) modus operandi. I’ve been considering getting Henry Makow’s book, but with all these ‘truthers’ there’s always a suspicion they’re simply cashing in on a the paranoia of the ‘sheeple’ and spinning tall tales. All said and done, it’s merely a passing interest I’d like to get a greater understanding of, and though it does affect our societies in subtle ways [less subtle when it comes to wars or terrorist strikes, of course], history has shown us that reigns of tyranny are short-lived. I can recommend all the books and lectures on this page to read. They relate to a different topic, but have nevertheless allowed me to get a grasp of some of the histories mankind has progressed through, and have provided insight into the various predicaments we face today.

  9. ATC January 26, 2015 at 5:56 pm

    Take your pick from this list—they likely have more than one condition

    Don’t forget Autogynephilia, which University of Toronto psychiatry professor Ray Blanchard has noted in his research. Essentially a man attracted to the idea of himself as a hot girl.

    Note that SJWs are so shit-scared of Blanchard’s research, and have marginalized it so effectively, that apparently not even Roosh was familiar with it.

    Blanchard’s work is highly deserving of an ROK article.

    1. Eric Lauder January 27, 2015 at 9:30 am

      “Autogynephilia” is real. I’m a alpha man, but my secret forbidden dream is to be an hot woman, then go in Australia, then have lesbian sex with Sheila Jeffreys including a lot of extreme BDSM practices (electricity, anal sex with giant strapons, and so on). 🙂

  10. Andrea January 26, 2015 at 7:24 pm

    If we become useless without a man’s guidance, are men responsible for our epidemic degeneration? What type of men are raising these lying, neurotic, gold digging, cheating, backstabbing, whores? I’m not a feminist and I love your blog so I’m really curious to hear your answer.

    1. ATC January 26, 2015 at 8:22 pm

      Of all the girls who’ve slipped through my hammy omega fingers, the one who I can say has gone on to be the coolest wife (concerned about her appearance, SAHM and obviously devoted to her husband and kids) grew up in an intact 2-parent family, married at age 23 (to a 21 y/o dude), and had an alpha small-businessman dad who involved her in his activities as she was growing up.

      Of the 3 most recent sluts that come to mind, 2 of them had dads who had passed away, and the other one’s dad was an alley cat who left a passel of half-siblings all over town.

      1. Mark Kimmel January 26, 2015 at 10:26 pm

        Expect more feral women as strong masculine men and 2 parent households continue to decline.

      2. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 8:48 am

        Society has collapsed and we live in the last decade or decades of the west.

    2. Marcus Aurelius January 27, 2015 at 2:46 am

      “What type of men are raising these lying, neurotic, gold digging, cheating, backstabbing, whores?”

      Short answer: none. When the divorce rate is 50% and bastardry by birth is statistically on track to become the norm rather than the exception, women have only one source of knowledge on men: their mothers and how they behave towards men. This is the truth lying behind all the bullshit of single mothers who supposedly did no damage to their children by choosing a life of slutdom over committed marriage.

      1. Andrea January 27, 2015 at 3:11 am

        Everyone needs strong, loving fathers. We urgently need to fix our broken legal system and empower men who are told in many ways that they are not really needed when it comes to raising kids, especially young girls.

      2. Eric Lauder January 27, 2015 at 12:31 pm

        In Europe we are going on the opposite way: Convention of Istanbul, meant to protect women (women! Not ALL spouses, just only women!) from domestic violence, basically is generating new and evil laws: women have the right to send their husbands in jail at will, simply claiming “emotional abuse”. That will be the end of marriage and cohabitation, at least the heterosexual kind, in a matter of ten years.
        Harriet Harma, important UK feminist politician
        She declared “it cannot be assumed that men are bound to be an asset to family life or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means to social cohesion”.

      3. shinypichu January 31, 2015 at 2:55 am

        I think that kids need their father and their mother but if his father is a roosh follower i think that is better for kids dont see he.

      4. Eric Lauder January 31, 2015 at 7:03 pm

        My kids prefer me than their mother, both my son and my daughter. She’s a very bad mix of extreme permissivism and punishments that make no sense. My kids behave much better when they’re with me, even if with me they receive more gestures of affection and less punishment: the authority of a father doesn’t needs to give punishments, usually, it’s more than enough to just change the tone of voice to correct the kids. Screams and hysterical punishments are things their mother performs, not me. Sadly, since shared parenting was saboted by feminists here in Italy, I have my kids with me just only 6 days per month.

      5. shinypichu February 1, 2015 at 5:53 am

        ¿dont can the children go where they want?

      6. Eric Lauder February 1, 2015 at 11:32 am

        No, kids cannot choose until they reach 14 years. My son is 10 yo, my daughter is 9 yo.
        Shared parenting was saboted in Italy, by feminists. I have my kids 6 days per month instead of the usual 4, and I don’t’pay alimonies to my wife, just only money for kids. That was a great victory, quite unusual, achieved just be because I had two great female lawyers (I have a relationship with one of them now: she said to me that more than 70% of stalking accusations against ex-husband are false here in Italy, used by wifes to get more money from their husbands and to take away the childs from them). Most men are far less lucky than me.

      7. shinypichu February 2, 2015 at 9:43 am

        Who hurt a person for make money dont have my respet but this is a problem that can dissaparear if prejudgements dissaparear. Dissaparetion of prejudgements is good for feminism too, it is good for the true feminism.

        Pd: i cant reply in some days, i have to study sorry, if you reply me again i will try to reply you in week end.

      8. Eric Lauder February 2, 2015 at 11:38 am

        What do you study? Just a curiosity.

      9. shinypichu February 2, 2015 at 2:35 pm

        I dont know how it is called in english. Im not in university, im dont have the capacity for go to the university because i am lazy.

      10. Eric Lauder February 2, 2015 at 2:41 pm

        Try in your language, then.

      11. shinypichu February 3, 2015 at 9:08 am

        ¿why?This isnt a important thingh.

      12. shinypichu February 2, 2015 at 2:36 pm

        I am too lazy for university.

      13. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 8:51 am

        Even many two parent households have a weak mangina father, and the predominant culture of atomisation against the familky unit doesn’t help even the best of fathers. We need a huge cultural change and the bankster elite don’t want that, they want things that promote their own power.

      14. Eric Lauder January 27, 2015 at 1:23 pm

        Also the whole system tends to turn men in manginas. I admit it happened even to me: I had more than 100 women in my life, then I suppose I’m quite alpha, and I married a quite traditional woman. The problem is: her family (we lived near them) and the whole environment surrounding us – basically her extended family was an old-style matriarchy ruled by three sisters with their mangina husbands – two out of three of these sisters were also very unfaithful. The coworkers of my ex-wife, college professor, were mostly feminists. It was just a matter of time. She didn’t cheated on me, but she started to try to silence me with screams, on every single matter. And at every time her entire extended family was on her side. I don’t think I’m weak, but I’m human, and humans have some limits. Now I have two unserious relationships, and I have no intention to marry nor cohabitee.

      15. spicynujac January 27, 2015 at 2:58 pm

        No matter how strong or masculine one is, it is virtually impossible to live a happy, successful life in the west. The society simply does not allow for it.

      16. Eric Lauder January 27, 2015 at 4:49 pm

        Even in the past a marriage required a lot of efforts, due care of childs, a myriad of matters and little compromises, also because women have a far lesser sex drive than men and men have to deal with it for life when they live with a woman. But, on the whole, marriage it worked. Now it’s even unhealthy for a man: I was fatter and depressed during last months of my marriage. Now I lift again and I have 13.4% fat mass (just checked, an hour ago) and I have also quitted smoking – it’s not good as when I was 20, but for a 42 yo man is not bad…and I have unserious but quite satisfying relationships with two different women: 3-4 nights for each per month, no more (I have even my childs to take care of, 6 days per month). And chores are not heavy at all: I have a robot vacuum cleaner, dishwasher, and so on…

      17. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 6:44 pm

        Our society rewards the compliant, the mediocre, and the degenrate. Made in the image of what the banksters are.

      18. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 6:43 pm

        I feel your disappointment – yeh, it doesn’t matter how alpha you are for LTRs, the predominant culture against men will always waste relationships. I just wish women wanted to be more than demanding cum receptacles, as a society like that is doomed, and IMHO western society brainwashing is geared towards destroying men, families and atomising society.

      19. Eric Lauder January 28, 2015 at 2:54 am

        Atomising society is the final goal: people in power is using feminism – among other movements – as a tool to create a society of singles: more easy to control and more consumerist. It cannot work: since men are more rational than women they will be always less consumerists, but also, since women are mothers women will ask for more and more economical help from the State – a society cannot work if the part of society that consume more is also the same part that need more social aid – a similar society would require laws for men (providers of taxation, less consumerists) and different laws for women (consumer of tax revenues, but also primary consumers of goods) and that cannot be misleaded under the flag of “equality”.

    3. Eric Lauder January 27, 2015 at 9:39 am

      Yes. I think men are responsible too, even more than women.
      I think that weak men drugged by political correctness raise lying, neurotic, gold digging, childish and unaccountable daughters.
      “Whores” is not a problem for me: theorically a worthy woman should have all the men she wants BEFORE the marriage, because an eventual worthy woman would be really equal to men. The problem is: current generation of women and feminists are making very clear that “worthy” (aka “sincere, courageous, fair and accountable”) is a word that is not bindable with “woman”, in fact the terms are quite the opposite.

      1. Andrea January 27, 2015 at 10:51 am

        Thanks for owning up to that. As women, we must also be accountable for our failure in raising “worthy” daughters and also in raising strong, self-sufficient, loving men who respect women. It feels like we need an entirely different movement for men and women who are seeking to find and create solutions and are tired of the blaming wars between the manosphere and the feminists. Anyone who’s serious about change begins looking at the “self” and works to understand how they have been part of the problem.

      2. Eric Lauder January 27, 2015 at 12:15 pm

        Most men already respect women, and I guess next generation of men will respect women LESS than the current one. That will be the obiouvs reaction to feminist propaganda: the problem are not equal rights or sexual freedom or empowerment of women – these are good things – the problems are: male-bashing, and women depicted as victims in order to get special rights. Sexual discrimination against men – all men treated as paedophiles, supported by feminists:
        When a man is discriminated and insulted in such way, just due his sex, derespect of feminists is RIGHT, just an human reaction, and, since feminists say they talk for ALL women and many women are silent about it, it can even happen that the discriminated and insulted men start to derespect ALL women.

      3. Andrea January 27, 2015 at 12:26 pm

        Exactly, we are all reacting instead of acting. That’s why I’m on this blog. To show that not all women agree with the feminists’ approach to claim the victim role and “fight” for “equality.” The manosphere is a backlash to the male bashing agenda feminists opted for. So where do we go from here?

      4. Eric Lauder January 27, 2015 at 1:07 pm

        Sadly, I think pick-up artists are the lesser problem for women. PUA, with some differences, ever existed. I was a PUA ante-litteram in my twenties, but that didn’t prevented me from getting married, and remain faithful for 13.5 years. Feminism destroyed my marriage. My idea is that the marriage was created by women, since our female ancestors developed permanent sex drive (all other female mammals have non-permanent but seasonal sexuality). That’s why is mainly a task of women to save what other women are destroying, the marriage. Men can support, but they cannot be the driving force. I guess that, if a woman a day will led a similar movement, she’ll be extremely surprised, positively, when she’ll see how much support she’s gaining even from men currently labeled as “misogynists”.

      5. Andrea January 27, 2015 at 1:27 pm

        Exciting idea! To start a movement led by women but informed and guided by men to revitalize the relationship between the sexes. It would offer an alternative to feminism by addressing some of the red pill’s ideals while empowering women on a more spiritual and emotional level. It seems that feminism is doing to women what communism did to humanists.

      6. Eric Lauder January 27, 2015 at 1:45 pm

        It can work only by that way. There’s not only WAF, but even some feminists, the very few honest ones, like Christina Hoff Sommers and Wendy McElroy – I suggest to you to join their discussions. In Italy we have Glenda Mancini, who’s trying to deconstruct the myth of “femicide” that is the main feminist fake in Italy (48 men killed by their women, 55 women killed by their men – but according feminists “femicides” are 179: they inflated the number taking in account EVEN 28 WOMEN KILLED BY OTHER WOMEN!!!).
        The very good thing for a woman is that that kind of women are viewed as very worthy by men: as far I know Glenda Mancini in Italy receive DAILY marriage proposals from all Italy…

      7. Andrea January 27, 2015 at 1:51 pm

        Daily marriage proposals sounds like a great bonus. I just Googled this and you’re right…it seems that this “new” movement is already underway globally. It just needs a name.

      8. Eric Lauder January 27, 2015 at 2:17 pm

        No, man-haters are immensely more powerful. They manage the “global gender gap report” – the system is meant in a way that is impossible to reach the theoretical equality, because “Information about gender imbalances to the advantage of women is explicitly prevented from affecting the score.” – I lived in Sweden for 3.5 years, and women are more-than-equal with men, but still there isn’t equality according the fake “global gender gap report” and there’s a rampant feminist party demanding: 75% quotas for women, tax on men, tax on every newborn male, re-education camps (about “consuming habits” they said) for men. They taked 5.3% votes on spring 2014 and they have a seat in European Parliament and that is their hymn:,00.shtml
        Women must protest against that. That can only spread misogyny, with some good reasons. These Swedish man-haters blame current generation of Swedish men for wars: Sweden is neutral since more than 150 years and didn’t fight wars in the last 200+ years…

      9. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 7:09 pm

        Feminism is sponsored by the same group behind communism, and social movements are almost always based on the ideas of rich people.

      10. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 7:04 pm

        In ancient rome, as with many other societies, feminism was a major driving force towards societal collapse and its effects could not be undone. It took until the next society until normal sustainable gender roles could be established. The implications for western and white society are not good.

      11. shinypichu January 31, 2015 at 3:02 am

        Equality is important, but im not think that the thinh that you say “victim role” can be good because it is against equality and do that people like roosh can extend their ideology to other people.

      12. Edward Easterling September 9, 2017 at 5:06 pm

        “Anyone who’s serious about change begins looking at the “self” and works to understand how they have been part of the problem.”


    4. Free&Libre February 11, 2015 at 4:56 pm

      Are you aware of the fact that there are just as many lying, neurotic, cheating, backstabbing man-whores? Why is morality expected of women, but not men? Don’t fool yourself. Men like Roosh see you as an object. They label all women as evil and amoral to justify how they treat them. Agreeing with them won’t make you special. They would still treat you like a piece of trash. If Roosh was really looking for one special, moral woman, why hasn’t he found one yet? He’s traveled the world and supposedly gets tons of girls. He hasn’t really tried. He just wants to fuck as many women as possible. It’s him. His problem is himself. I see tons of happy guys with girlfriends and wives. He isn’t one of them because he doesn’t want to be.

      1. Andrea February 11, 2015 at 6:38 pm

        I’m very aware of men with no integrity and I’m not writing my opinion to get positive attention. However, I do see a trend with American women. We thought feminism was our solution and now we are faced with unhealthy and meaningless relationships with men, playing the victim role and failing to look at our role in these cycles. Men like Roosh are men with integrity, strong, intelligent men who are sick of weak mediocre women who keep blaming everyone for their shortcomings. They are promiscuous and they are slowly realizing that sex without intimacy is meaningless. We should have known that before jumping on the hypergamy bandwagon.

      2. Free&Libre February 11, 2015 at 7:40 pm

        That makes sense. It makes me angry though that so many men portray women as being completely at fault. I agree that women play the victim too often, but I feel that men like Roosh are using the shortcomings of women as an excuse to be hateful. I also don’t understand how Roosh feels comfortable generalizing to all women in the Western hemisphere. I would never generalize to all men. Calling all women backstabbing whores is like calling all black people dumb criminals. Its not right or rational to stereotype. Lastly, I think its sick how so many of the articles and comments on this site describe women as objects that can only be measured by attractiveness. That sort of treatment of any human being is a sign of psychopathy and it undermines every tenet of a civilized society.

      3. Andrea February 11, 2015 at 8:11 pm

        I completely agree, to generalize any group is to make an ass of your self and yes, a lot of men here group all American women in the “americunt” category. But there are a lot of men here that are not as cynical. The key is not to take anything personal and to try to keep a dialogue open. Roosh does an excellent job at being provocative while being real enough to have people relate to his experiences. Can we do the same?

  11. Nelli P January 27, 2015 at 6:21 am

    okay just to make clear… does all this apply to US only? because in places like Russia, Nigeria, Vietnam, Philippines etc rape apologism has existed for years. they may have some women who put false rape accusations on men but those cases are greatly outnumbered by men who rape girls and get away with it. if women do not feel protected by the legislator they will simply fight back. while living and working and Russia I have been harrassed at work multiple times and this was considered the norm. and now see in what state Russia is now. a feminist America is much better off I believe. If men refuse to protect women who have been raped, humiliated etc then we will simply start killing the rapists to finally teach you a lesson. I earnestly wish every rape apolgist to be raped himself and see what its like.

    1. Eric Lauder January 27, 2015 at 1:32 pm

      Question: drunk sex with both persons happy during sex, is rape? An attempted kiss without physical coercion is sexual harassment? Catcall should be punished?
      I cannot rape a woman, I’m biologically programmed to take pleasure from their pleasure. But I did A LOT of drunk sex. Once me and a friend, in Ibiza, catched five drunk girls from Netherlands, and we had sex with all. Next morning they were a little embarassed but still happy: they saluted us with kisses (it was their last day in Ibiza) and one of them even forget her underwears in the hotel room!!!
      I should be considered a rapist?

      1. Nelli P January 28, 2015 at 3:44 am

        Question: drunk sex with both persons happy during sex, is rape?

        No, but if one partner doesnt want the sex and is forced – yes it is rape. even without physical harm

        An attempted kiss without physical coercion is sexual harassment?

        yes, and if a woman does this to a man its the same. not smth to go to police but if the person persists with his sexual advances after being told to fuck off, he deserves to be punished

        Catcall should be punished?

        catcall is humiliating. not punished but critisized. how would you feel if a bunch of gay men would openly catcall you on the street?

      2. Eric Lauder January 28, 2015 at 4:13 am

        I agree with all your answers. I’m also an harsh critic of catcall: it’s embarassing for the woman, and humiliating for the childish man who do it.
        Never catcalled by a bunch of gay men, nor by a bunch of women: in the latter case I would be very glad, probably it’s also because it doesn’t happen to me, but, frankly, I think the real difference is biological: men are almost always in the mood and sex-positive, because sperm production is permanent. Women have sex drive just only in some days – due their cycle – and other days they’re almost asexuated and even disturbed by the presence of men (apart from when a man, acting wisely, manage to turn around that, with a light and polite seduction, overcoming the biological limit of the woman and stimulating her body through her brain) – we should accept these biological differences, and deal with it – feminism is doing the opposite, pretending women have a sexuality similar to men.
        However in a night club with phones on the table (to comunicate between tables) once I received calls from a bunch of gay men from another table, even with very explicit sexual proposals: I found it quite funny, also because when I answered to them: “you’re funny, but this line should be not occupied all time, I have to talk with girls” they understood and they immediatly stopped.

      3. Nelli P January 28, 2015 at 3:47 am

        plus on that night I wasnt drunk. I wanted to go home and I caught a cap and te edriver (plus two of his friends) planned to take us girls to their house and rape. yes its rape. and dont you compare it to your sexual adventures in ibiza.

      4. Eric Lauder January 28, 2015 at 4:31 am

        Your attitudes are positive, you complains are rights, men whom harassed you should be harshly punished. But you should understand that in the west we are dealing with the opposite problem: here the definition of rape and sexual harassment is inflated and there are laws especially meant against men – basically a woman can send a man in jail without proofs. You’re just seeing the reaction of men against that.

  12. Nelli P January 27, 2015 at 6:39 am

    I have been sexually harrassed at work. imagine the humiliation when you sit there on your desk and your collegues openly discuss your boobs. then you walk by and they slap your ass. and if I didnt like smth they could fire me and that was during the earlier wave of the crisis so I had to keep my job.

    I worked in moscow in a building next to a night club. once me and my girlfriend left a work at 21.00 PM and got into a cab. then suddenly two more men get into it and they drive us off. they were both drunk and the driver had been waiting for some cute girls to get in. he wanted to kidnap us and gang rape at his house (he didnt quite say that all he said was “shut up bitches ist not your business where we are going” and the shitheads said smth like “dont worry it wont hurt too much unless you fight”. only our pleading helped us to get out of that cab alive plus my friend lied that her dad works at the police. but the asshole who sat next to me in the cab still did pull up my shirt, sqeezed my boobs and forced to give him a hand job. if that is not rape or sexual advances or whatever then what is it? and how much pain does a woman have to go through in order to classify the violent act as rape and “real harm”? does she have to have her uterus ripped apart? I couldnt even file a case against that man because if you are raped in Russia, you as a woman will be the object of shame.God only knows what those bastards may have done towards other women but I knew if I went to the police station i would be laughed at. that is the reason we have so much violence in Russia – they always blame the victim. is this a country roosh would like to live in? only you need to know one thing – lack of legal protection i patriarch countires also applies to men. if you get abused nobody will give a fuck.

    1. Eric Lauder January 27, 2015 at 2:03 pm

      I have been “sexually harrassed” during my college years, a myriad of times.
      It was a college for formation of teachers, 85% females, and I was among the best guys. Unrequested massages on shoulders were extremely common, open discussions about “who is the guy who have the larger penis” and even a discussion about “the best male ass of our school” with girls asking to touch it, in order to test. I’m not kidding. I tought it was the paradise, I still think it, I exchanged more girlfriends than shoes each year.
      I should denounce my former fellow female students? No, I think they were great, and for true equality, the exact opposite of nowadays whining eggshells.

      1. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 6:57 pm

        Part of my college years were spent with women who were cunts to work with. I chose to study in another country for postgrad because of that experience. I don’t think my experience is uncommon, so spare a thought for how many men get little or no love except when the bitches need us to generate cash to support their lifestyle. Fuck most women, they are a pain and liability and unfortunately only excel at serial flings. The white ones have undermined their own men en masse the most, and I shed no tears for when their inevitable destruction comes.

      2. Eric Lauder January 28, 2015 at 2:45 am

        I mostly agree. My female lawyer (and also part-time lover) some months ago was a little drunk and she confessed me: “I suggest you to never cohabitee – we (women) are all whores, an adult woman cannot really love a man: love is just a thing for 15-16 yo girls and it lasts no more than a couple of years and with no more than a couple of boys, in all her life and only when the girl is young. Even girls cannot really love boys: they love the fake image they have of their boyfriends. After that period, men are always viewed by us as utilities, practically objects”.

      3. Nelli P January 28, 2015 at 3:41 am

        american sluts are not us, we dont want to all be evaluated by the actions of american sluts

      4. Eric Lauder January 28, 2015 at 3:04 am

        Regarding college experience: I’m 42 yo, from Italy. Things were very different: there wasn’t feminism at all, there was equality, and girls were enthusiast about their relative and new “sexual freedom” – I took the virginity of 5 of them (5 for sure, even more declared so).. 🙂 now times have changed, feminism is returned but it’s no more about ask for civil rights and equality under the law: feminists are trying to do an impossible compound between “female preciousness” and “total sexual freedom”: they wish we see them as almost goddesses, putted on a pedestal, while at the very same time they are acting like normal and even weak, coward and unaccountable persons, asking for special rights, whining and fucking around: a boy like I was is far better because he fuck even much more than the average female but he’s not a whiner and he put efforts about to be a responsible and accountable person (aka a man).

      5. Nelli P January 28, 2015 at 3:41 am

        and that is not a good thing and it makes me sick tol read about such degraded women. thats what happens when we allow all this sex talk and forget about good manners. you can all “harrass” each other all you want in your social circles but at work you must keep the distance before it gets in the way of professional communication. in Russia it all starts with an innocent slap on the ass and ends with a man threatening to fire you if you dont sleep with him.

      6. Eric Lauder January 28, 2015 at 4:25 am

        My fellow female students weren’t false accusers and they hadn’t special laws treated in order to aid them to falsely accuse boys, like Californian yes-means-yes, they were sexual-positive girls, and the environment was very relaxed.
        I know something about Russian women. A coworker of mine married a Russian woman, then divorced, then married another Russian woman, then divorced, and now he’s cohabiting with a third Russian woman. None of them asked for alimonies, because they had their work. Sadly, I have the suspect that this correctness is even due the bad treatment Russian women are receiving in their country. It’s a pain to say so, but I have see the opposite edge : I lived for 3.5 years in Sweden, women are already on the whole treated better than men, and there’s rampant and man-hater feminism demanding things like 75% quotas for women and tax on men. Sorry, nothing against women, but I was born man, and if I’m forced to choose between Russia and Sweden, my choice can be just only Russia. We should meet halfway, of course, something in the middle between Russia and Sweden, but feminism is polarizing and dividing society.

      7. Nelli P January 28, 2015 at 8:35 am

        your friend seems an insane idiiot who cant hold on to a marriage. dont you realize that if he had three break ups smth must be wrong with him not his exes? he s probably a cold war kid who is somehow fixed on the fantazy of a submissive russian woman that he enjoys taking advantage of but still doesnt understand their mentality and screws up the relationship. some russian women are headcases (especially if they live in the US) but your friend seems to be a headcase himself after going through three relationships smth must be wrong with him.

        as for Russia being better than sweden for men – its only and illusion. like I already mentioned in patriarch countries men suffer from the corrupt and cruel goverment and men are treated like slaves. their only consolation is that women are treated even worse. russia is at the brink of collapse right now thanks to the cruel alpha – machizmo behaviour of russian men while sweden and USA are going strong.

        just like you I think we should meet somewhere in the middle – equality with natural male leadership that is not crushed and stamped out by angry feminists, equal appreciatetion and protection for both genders. but unfortunately russian men have been alpha for too long, their brains cant work otherwise. they want to have it all, to manipulate the whole country, to keep everything under total control. as a result russia is in a mortal combat with ukraine where we are losing thousands of men and all because one man decided that he wants to be alpha, has no respect for the opinions of others and wants to have it all. as a result both men and women will suffer and everybody will lose. this is what happens if you give men unlimited power and control. russian men are not free. they are either slaves or slave owners. they have freedom to rape and drink and abuse but no freedom to study, have a good job and release their full potential. in russia you can get away wiith sexualing assualting a girl but if your own wife gets raped or killed, the criminal wont be pinished either. so since you cant rely on the state you ll have to punish him yourself and go behind bars. also if you get abused and raped in the army the country wont help you either. women in russia are sohorribly and feminist, they have actually started an organization to defend rights of russian soldiers, their organization was qualified as a “foreign agent” and banned. welcome to the patriarchy. Id rather choose sweden instead

      8. Eric Lauder January 28, 2015 at 8:59 am

        My coworker had two breakups, not three, and first time she cheated on him…now he’s happy, although I admit he’s really a “cold war kid”: he’s older than me, and his first marrige was in late 80s or early 90s, there was still communism in Russia or it was just collapsed. I know the problems Russia have, but Sweden (or Australia) system is not the solution: now things seems good but if things will continue to evolve that way (i.e.: if Swedish “F!” party will enter in Parliament in next elections) in a matter of 10 years in Sweden there will be a massive polarization between feminists (and their doormats) and a divided but stronger front composed by islamists and neo-fascists, enemies each other but both anti-feminists. In Sweden there are more muslims than “F!” party members, and far right had 12.9% of votes at the last elections…

      9. Nelli P January 28, 2015 at 9:03 am

        I agree with you and I dont want teh swedish system I want a healthy balance but russian men want full patrarchy that will ultimately destroy them. so as a result our country will be taken over by the islamists

      10. Eric Lauder January 28, 2015 at 9:20 am

        The main trouble is: in the west, due feminist excesses, more and more western men are beginning to view islamism more as a solution than as a problem. I see it everywhere, both in Italy and in USA. In fact, islamism would not be good at all for men and even worse for women, but the switching is already happening. When a man divorce he leaves his home (often paid mostly by him), his childs, and he have to pay the major part of his income for childs and ex-wife. Officially 70% of divorces are started by the wifes, in fact is near 90% because many wifes convince the husband to fill a consensual divorce with the blackmail of childs. 70% of stalking cases are fakes, invented by wifes in order to take more money from their husbands. When these things happens, many men switch in “islamist mode”. And it will be even worse with the new laws on domestic violence, because wifes will be able to claim “emotional abuse” against their husbands.

    2. Booo January 28, 2015 at 4:29 pm

      Hey Nelli are you hot? Are Russian women generally hot? From the way you talk about them it seems so.

  13. seth datta January 27, 2015 at 8:13 am

    An escalation of the war between the sexes is what banksters want and gives us less of what we want. The alienated sexes will become like Japan. What is needed is a rarer woman who rejects the predominant culture, or you find her young and train her up.

    1. Andrea January 27, 2015 at 1:30 pm

      No! Imagining PUAs turning SJWs sounds like a nightmare.

  14. spicynujac January 27, 2015 at 2:56 pm

    I am normally opposed to personal ad hominem attacks or broad generalizations, but in this case, when every woman you have interacted with for a sufficient period of time has shown herself to have anti-social, harmful, hurtful, cruel, or unstable behavior, it is a valid point. The opinion of a woman cannot be given equal credence as the opinion of a man. Much as when Bill Nye did the silly debate against the Ken Hamm guy who thinks the earth is 8,000 years old. These are not equal ideas that should be given an equal 50 / 50 exposure.

    1. Eric Lauder January 28, 2015 at 3:19 am

      Opinions of women changes very often, due their biological irrationality. Opinions of hardcore feminists aren’t opinions at all: just a mass of people following an hive mind. You can see it very clear in the case of “sexist” t-shirt of the British scientist Matt Taylor: on the very first days all feminists condemned the “sexist” t-shirt but when public reaction mocked them no a single feminist said: “we just made an error” – they said: “we never criticized the t-shirt” or “we criticized the t-shirt as inappropriate for the event, not as sexist” – seeehhh, “inappropriate”, we should pretend that now feminists are interested even in male scientists’ fashion? They maked me laugh…

      1. shinypichu January 31, 2015 at 3:09 am

        You and other roosh followers are the irrational, my opinion is very rational, generalizatios are irrational, you cant say that all women are irrational, ¿is anita sarkesian ireational? Yes, but saying that if one feminist is irrationa, l, all feminist are irrational, is generalize and it is a irrational argument.

      2. Eric Lauder January 31, 2015 at 4:45 am

        You’re theorically right, but you just forget that generalizing is good for self-defense: most feminists every day attack all men and masculinity. Emma Watson is campaigning at ONU for the purpose to change men because, according feminists, men aren’t good and should be enlightened by women, because women “knows better”. That’s insulting for all men. Women have no right to tell men how they should be: women aren’t better than men. Michelle Obama declared “women are smarter than men”, and feminists cheers, nobody protested except manosphere. Until this OFFICIALIZED male-bashing will continue, it’s a duty for every worth man to counter-attack with generalizations against women.
        Female brain works differently from male brain, that’s a scientifical truth – most women are more irrational than most men. I’m just exchaging a little, saying “all” instead of “most” – that’s nothing, compared to the insults by Emma Watson and Michelle Obama. I can be far more venomous: women have a bad smell 3-5 days per month, due the cycle, and they are EXTREMELY irrational, stupid and unpleasant in that days. Try to says that’s not the truth…

      3. shinypichu January 31, 2015 at 8:12 am

        Smell and mind dont have relatioship.
        Generalization of people is always bad.
        I dont like that people generalize of women because are attacking my rights.
        Im dont like that people generalize of men because sone men are important for me but i get more angry when people generalize of women because are attacking me.
        Other bad thing of generalize of men is that men are going to attack feminism for a revenge.
        I dont think that all feminists are good, i only think that feminism is good and needed. The ideology is good other think is people who is stupid and do it bad.
        But that some feminist insult men dont give men the right to insult women and all the feminists.

      4. Eric Lauder January 31, 2015 at 8:31 am

        Some feminists insulting men do not give men right to insult all feminists. All feminists cheering or remaining silent when some of them insult men, yeah, give the men right to insult all feminists. “Who remain silent, basically agree” we say in Italy.
        Third wave feminism is basically anti-men. Radical feminists like heterosexual white males as Ku Klux Klan liked mulattos. I lived for 3.5 years in Sweden, their radical feminists are even worse than American ones.
        Besides, I currently have two unserious relationships, two different women, 3-4 days per month each, and I haven’t problems with smell. I’m divorced and I don’t want cohabitee: in Europe, due Convention of Istanbul “against domestic violence on women” (note: it protect just only women, not all spouses, domestic violence against men doesn’t matter), a woman can basically send her man in jail claiming “emotional abuse”. Power is severely unbalanced: “when power is severely unbalanced true consent cannot exist” said old feminists, and it’s true. I was beated by a swedish woman during a cohabitation in Sweden – she also fired me, she was the HR chief of my company, older and richer than me, and now women like her are even more especially protected from men like me even if I never abused of a person. Thanks to feminism.

      5. shinypichu January 31, 2015 at 9:37 am

        Is wrong, remaining silent isnt the same than agree.
        People can prefer dont waste their time in something that they think stupid.
        People dont have to know all the things that happen in the world. Others can think that something is bad but they cant do anything.

        Other like me dont defend men because bad misoginy people can indirectly use our arguments for something that we dont want

      6. Eric Lauder January 31, 2015 at 12:38 pm

        “People can prefer dont waste their time in something that they think stupid”: except when they have to criticize the “sexist” t-shirt of the scientist Matt Taylor. Feminists all agreed about that, then when they have see people upsetted for their bully action, they said they haven’t criticized the t-shirt.
        “People dont have to know all the things that happen in the world”: wrong, every time I put out these problems almost all feminists have tried to justify Michelle Obama or they have remained silent.
        “Other like me dont defend men because bad misoginy people can indirectly use our arguments for something that we dont want”: nobody would use a woman defending men for misoginistic arguments. There are few good feminists, like Christina Hoff Sommers and Wendy McElroy, and nobody use their right words against women.
        In example: MRA says false accusations of rapes are 80%, Radical Feminists says are less than 2%. Both sides are liars, out-of-reality, misoginists and misandrists. Wendy McElroy writed false accusations are about 25% – women said the truth most times, 3 out of 4, but due process is really need because 1 out of 4 times the accuse is a lie. I trust her, that match my experience. When I was at college I exchanged four or five girlfriends each year, and some of them were upsetted when I leaved them or I cheated on them. During last year an ex-girlfriend pierced the tires of my car in act of revenge (I admit I partially deserved it: first I cheated on her with her sister, then I leaved her for a her best friend 🙂 ) – in another environment and time, with yes-means-yes law in example, there would be good chances that she would have falsely accused me instead of simply piercing the tires. Still, to cheat was my right (who cares? We weren’t married!) and also to leave a girl was my right, when instead piercing tires is a little crime and false accusations are far worse because the life of a boy is ruined by that.

      7. shinypichu January 31, 2015 at 4:27 pm

        Yes is right that all sides lies.
        I am feminist and i never criticed the t-shirt. Exist more than one tipe of feminism, i prefer follow my feminism and no the other person ideology, i can think the same than others feminist of a thing but i dont have to agree in all.
        I think that you do wrong and the girl do wrong too.
        All you do wrong, it is right tha you have the right to do it but have the right to do something dont do that you do good but it is right that is worse the thing that the girl do.
        The men do this things too, they do bad thighs for revenge, same than women do.
        This isnt a thing that only women do, men do it too, evil is a human thing but roosh triying to say than only women are evil.

      8. Eric Lauder January 31, 2015 at 6:30 pm

        Nowadays women have LEGAL power to revenge through false accusations, due biased laws and courts. Men can revenge only in ILLEGAL ways. That’s a big difference. Nobody should be helped by the law to get a revenge.
        A man like Roosh is and like I was when I was a pick-up artist ante-litteram, can NOT really hate women. Women feel it, and that’s why they like us. Roosh is just reacting against an attack: real men and every worthy human being do so, just only manginas/doormats grovel and apologize to women when they’re insulted. And doormats are not worthy, that’s why most feminists are so screwed and angered. And that’s why I never answer to feminist men but just only to feminist women: women are people, feminist men, since they grovel to normal human beings (women) are sub-humans, by their own choice. If radical feminists will continue to write the agenda of feminism, like it happened with yes-means-yes law in USA and Convention of Istanbul in Europe, that will spread misogyny, more and more, and that reaction is just only human and even in some ways, right. Western world don’t need feminism anymore, western world need egalitarianism addressing the still remaining issues pertaining women, the new issues pertaining men, and the issues pertaining both genders in a very equal way. Personally, I fully support LGBT rights, and I have a biological son with a lesbian woman (also I have two childs with my ex-wife): she understand perfectly what I mean, and she’s bashing radical feminist because she was abused by her woman and I saved her, and since we maked a son with scheduled drunk sex she’s now aware men’s sexuality have nothing abusive (even she still like much more lesbianism). She consider “radical feminism” as a threat for her son, now. Think about it.

      9. shinypichu February 1, 2015 at 5:47 am

        The problem is that roosh defend he attacking inoccent women. And yes, roosh dont hate women, he only see us like a object, this is evil too. We arent collectionable thinghs, we are people with feelings and thinkings like men.

      10. Eric Lauder February 1, 2015 at 11:23 am

        It’s not enough to say “we have feelings and thinkings like men”, that should be showed. I was a pick-up artist ante-litteram, but that doesn’t prevent me from marry a woman, stay married and faithful for 13.5 years. My marriage ended just because she becomed narcissistic, self-centered, extremely arrogant, with “no-fault complex” and with compulsory shopping. That’s the result of the influence of third wave feminism on a smart woman, a college professor who was quite traditional when I married her. Now she’s trying to catch me again and, AT THE VERY SAME TIME, she’s trying to catch an older and richer man. That’s a third wave feminist idea: the alpha lover and the beta provider for a “princess without faults”. Sorry, she’s not a princess, she’s not special, she have A LOT of faults (exactly like me).
        Using men as providers and cash machines is using men as objects.
        Viewing men just only for their usefulness is treating men as objects.
        Value of a man isn’t the usefulness that women get from him.
        Value of a man is unrelated with what women thinks.
        Roosh treat women as collectionable things? Quite moderate, since that’s how many feminists view men NOWADAYS:
        “I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” – Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor.
        “Women who have sex with men are traitors to their sex” – Tiina Rosenberg, professor at Lund University and leader of Swedish “F!” party – 5.3% of votes in Sweden (a woman out of ten!!!) and A SEAT IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.

      11. shinypichu February 2, 2015 at 9:24 am

        Is bad using men but is bad using women.
        I agree with the prhase ” Value of a man is unrelated with what women thinks” but you then must agree than value of a woman is unrelated with what man thinks. ¿right?. Roosh said that value of woman is related whit man thinks, he said that ugly women dont have values.

      12. Eric Lauder February 2, 2015 at 9:58 am

        That’s different: Roosh write that value of a woman FOR A MAN is related with what man thinks. The value of the woman FOR THE MAN not FOR THE SOCIETY, very different. For a man is much worse: we are pressured by THE SOCIETY to be useful for women. That must end. I’m teaching to my son his value is unrelated with what women wants (ala because most women have not even an hint about what they really wants). Ugly women are valuable persons, even for a relationship, as long as they are able to compensate their bad look with other things. For sure, a traditional but ugly woman is far more valuable than a beautiful but feminist woman. Traditional doesn’t mean “without sexual freedom”, traditional means she’s not self-centered, and ABOVE ALL she’s ready to do some sacrifices and compromises to keep alive a relationship. Including to renounce to some career opportunities – I did the same renounces for my family, and I’m a man. Otherwise, if she’s self-centered and she do not accept any compromise, it’s good to view her as an object. PS: according my experience under-the-average looking women are likely to be better in bedroom, and also a really manly man doesn’t really need a super-beautiful woman to get aroused. To be snobbish and very exigent about her look is a sign of lack of manliness, according me.

      13. shinypichu February 2, 2015 at 2:29 pm

        Ok then i can critic it but i can critic other thinghs that he say.

  15. rreot January 28, 2015 at 3:21 am

    “What monster would be again that?”

  16. Dunkerbeck January 28, 2015 at 4:14 am

    If you are not happy with the status quo, most likely you will have some mental issues. As a man stuck in this age, it would be quite a miracle not to become depressed over time. The same goes for feminists. These people struggle, but they don’t know why. So they pick an enemy, who is nothing more than an embodiment of the drawback of these modern times, the alleged cause of the alienation we are facing nowadays. I’m sad to say, but the only right decision would be to declare war on modern times itself, not on jews, not on foreigners, not on men, not on feminists,.. It would be the most reasonable, but also the most insane decision, because it’s very reasonable to trade in your false enemies for the real ones, but very insane to let up on an enemy, who seems to be defeatable and to take on an enemy, who appears to be invincible instead.

    > Under a street lamp there stands a man, slightly intoxicated, who is searching for something. In the lighted area he searches over and over. A policemen comes along, asks him what he is looking for, and the man answers, My Keys. Now they both search. After a while the policeman wants to know, wether the man is sure that he lost the keys here, and the latter answers, No, not here, back there – but there it is much too dark.<

  17. shinypichu January 28, 2015 at 1:43 pm

    I am a 19 years old girl and I false, you roosh, you are a hypocrite. You critic that in rape claims they accept all but you want that they refuse all rape claims.
    You say that if a rape claim is false, people should think that all they are false. And you critic that people think that all rape claims are true.
    ¡YOU WANT THE SAME THAT YOU CRITIC! You dont want justice you want your benefit. The same that people that you critic want.

    And about Transexuality i dont agree with this definition(this contradict the equality) but.
    1all people have rights about their body.
    2 transexuals are transexuals because they have accepted anti-equiality ideology, the society is the bad and people like you.

    1. shinypichu January 28, 2015 at 1:44 pm

      I i hate you roosh , i dont know why i have written false i want to say hate.

    2. Eric Lauder January 31, 2015 at 7:18 pm

      I’m 42 yo, from Italy.
      When I was 19 yo my fellow female students had not even an hint about what was “feminism” or “rape”, and there weren’t rapes at all within my college nor my university.
      Males were ALLOWED by the girls to enter in female bathrooms during college: it was the place where we all secretly smoked cigarettes (prohibited, in all other places we would be catched by professors). The greatest scandals were: a couple catched performing sex in an empty classrom, a bunch of girls surprised smoking marjuana, and, at university, an affair between a male student and a female professor.
      Every time I read something about “rape culture” it still seems to me a Sci-Fi novel…really, I cannot even imagine a 19 yo boy raping his fellow female student.

      1. shinypichu February 1, 2015 at 6:00 am

        I cant know how schools was in your times but the few times that in my school somebody have smoke in the bathroom, i become very angry.
        This is bad and i hate the tobacco smell, i think that people who smoke in the bathrooms must have a expulsion. I going to bathroom to do that i need and i have the right can do it without this horrible smell.

      2. Eric Lauder February 1, 2015 at 11:42 am

        In late 80s and early 90s smoking was still viewed as a transgression, and basically praised, especially by girls. I remember a popular joke girls told each other: “smoke will make you sterile” – and the other always answered something like: “I always tought sex without contraception is better!” 🙂 – it was, in every respect, another world. Most of these students are now teachers in secondary schools and colleges in Italy – as long as they’ll be teachers, I do not see a great future for radical feminist victimhood within Italian schools 🙂

      3. shinypichu February 2, 2015 at 9:38 am

        All teachers that i know (girls and boys) are inteligent people, they can have their ideology but they know what students can do something evil and who cant. I dont think that you should have fear for school, a good teacher dont judge their student. It is right that bad teachers exist.

  18. Guest January 28, 2015 at 6:31 pm

    Tactic number three: Name the Jew.

  19. No to SJW bullying January 29, 2015 at 10:16 am

    SJW harrasment, which leads to inability for employment (noone wants to risk provoking their anger) and social death, is a king od discrimination.

    It’s very similar to STASI East German secret police bullying tactics, Zersetzung.
    It is a process of character assassination and threats developed to persecute dissidents, a more sophisticated Orwellian form of torture that was developed to cause “severe and prolonged suffering” without leaving marks.

    In fact, it seems as if they studied it after it was publicly disclosed (the fall of Berlin Wal in 1989)!

  20. Church is for Girls February 2, 2015 at 3:21 pm

    “If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts.” – Camille Paglia

  21. SteveTirone March 6, 2015 at 4:38 pm

    Your statement “irreversible surgical changes to your body *that leave you as neither man nor woman*” is fallacious and actually plays directly into the other side’s nonsense. These irreversible surgical changes to your body leave you as a profoundly damaged man or woman, but they have *no* power whatsoever to change your gender in the slightest. They don’t change your chromosomes.

  22. Manuel April 27, 2015 at 3:12 pm

    Sounds like many SJWs have a lot in common with the Dudestroyer.

  23. wtf June 26, 2015 at 5:40 pm

    This dude is all about divide and conquer, just like our government. He promotes hate and mistrust between men and women, just like our government. Protip: If you hate, fear and distrust women – that might be a clue why you can’t find a good woman.

  24. Charlie August 28, 2015 at 12:51 am

    Being trans is not about changing sex, necessarily. It’s about changing gender. Gender is a social construct, and not all societies have a binary system such as the one we have in the the westernized nations. A good example of this is the hijras in Indian culture. Look it up.

    Transsexualism is a social problem, not one of the “psychoses” you described. It would also do you well to look up the actual meaning of what psychosis is.

    There are also transgender people, who make no physical changes to their body, but live their lives as the the gender that they feel they are, as opposed to the (by comparison insignificant) biological sex they were born as.

    Just thought I’d clear that up, seeing how your obsession with both sex and gender (remember, biology vs social construct) makes up the bulk of what you have to say here.

    Oh, and saying that a transsexual person is neither a man not a woman… they very much are one or the other. I do not see the logic in your statement. What ever they transition to is what they are.

    If you’d like elaboration on any points in this comment, I’m more than happy to discuss them with you.

    Knowledge is power, bro.


    Edit: Not to say your tactics are wrong! But you want to be as informed as possible. Don’t want people poking holes in your argument based on technicalities.

  25. tgordon August 30, 2015 at 12:56 am

    I declare this the official anthem for the ‘modern’ female. Every empowered, righteously (selfie righteously) independent trollop in the Western world should listen to this as they prepare themselves to slip out of the door for a day’s or night’s glamour on the postmodern merry go round. Thank you Axl.