We Are Nothing More Than Distracted Sheep In The Real Game Of Power

Beliefs in the manosphere are often termed “red pill,” an analogy to the Matrix, where those who know “truth” are unplugged from the system and can see the world for what it really is, but men who use this analogy did not watch the two Matrix sequels, where we learn that the robots allowed the resistance to operate. The robots had to give humans who couldn’t tolerate the Matrix an outlet that could be controlled and monitored, and when the resistance got too big, they could be easily destroyed in one attack. The reset button would allow the status quo to continue, unimpeded.

The current war between feminists and progressives against the manosphere and those with more conservative beliefs is by design. The manosphere is allowed to broadcast because it shows to the masses that “free speech” or opposing viewpoints are allowed, proving that we all live in a “democratic” society. However, ideas from the manosphere do nothing to legitimately threaten the power elite, those in possession of real power. Besides influencing a tiny minority of men, the manosphere is—as of now—meaningless and ineffective on a societal level.

What Is The Best Way To Control Human Beings?

I’ve spent over two years now in Eastern Europe. I’ve learned about its history, especially since World War 2 when the Russians gobbled up countries by installing their own puppet regimes. They believed in the use of hard control: rigid censorship, political persecution, relentless propaganda, and pervasive spying. It worked for nearly 50 years until unraveling in the 1980’s. Depending on who you read, communism failed due to many reasons such as Ronald Reagan, inefficient economies, or “the people.” The last may not have been the main reason, but it was significant: citizens didn’t believe in the system and protested every way they could, often sacrificing their lives in the process. Communism, it turns out, was a poor method of human control.

How does the American government control its population? The same way it always has: divide and conquer. It pits one group against the other and lets them fight. Native-Americans against whites. Blacks against whites. Red states against blue states. Pro-choice against pro-life. Women against men. Liberals against conservatives. Straight against gay. The fighting is endorsed and encouraged by the power elite because it distracts their unjust or illegal methods of control, that if carefully examined and brought to light, would bring into question their very justification of authority.

I did an interview recently with the Daily Dot. It was a hit piece, as you’d expect from such a liberal publication that endorses feminism, but what interested me was the public reaction—the most talked about portion was my remarks about homosexuals. It led to hundreds of comments on three active Reddit threads. Five years ago, such a response to homosexual critique would not have been nearly as strong. Why does it suddenly seem like everyone cares about the homosexual issue? Why is it on the tip of everyone’s tongue? Because they’ve been programmed to care and talk about it.

It does not matter where you lie on the issue as long as you develop passionate opinions about homosexuals that you share in place of other issues that can threaten the power elite. Every minute you talk about homosexuals or immigrants or blacks or feminism or celebrities is one minute you’re not talking about an idea that reveals criminality of the government. For the issues that don’t threaten those who have power, you will be allowed the ability to speak about them indefinitely without disturbance. In other words, if you have gotten into an argument or debate about homosexual marriage in the past year, you are an obedient sheep that is doing what it is supposed to do. You will keep talking about it because you’ve been fed propaganda to do so, and when you get bored of it, there will be a new “hot button” topic that will keep you busy and emotional.

Do You Have Opinions That Threaten The State?

There is a test to know if you are allowed to share a certain opinion or engage in specific activism:

  • Does it threaten the interests of those who possess the most economic and political power in the United States (i.e. the top 10,000 men)?
  • Does it significantly reduce income of the most powerful corporations in the United States?

If the answer to these questions are “no,” you may proceed. This is why the manosphere is thriving—it doesn’t threaten the power elite. This is why feminists can do whatever they want, because they don’t threaten the elite either. Feminism has actually solidified power of the elite through three mechanisms:

  • They increased the labor supply, decreasing wages (in real terms), which increases profits for corporations
  • They caused women to be dependent on the government instead of men (those who rely on the government are less likely to fight it)
  • They expanded the consumer and tax base (benefiting both corporations and the government)

When a movement is bubbling within society, the power elite discuss in private through one of their groups (Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Council of Foreign Relations, Paris Club, etc.) if allowing new rights or victories through legislation will reduce their power or income. If it doesn’t, it will be allowed in a way that maximizes citizen distraction. Homosexual marriage, it has been determined, does not threaten the elite, so it will be allowed and the peasants (me and you) can be distracted about it for several years while ignoring the backroom deals which continue to destroy the American middle class.

Did giving blacks civil rights threaten the government? Not at all. The entrenchment of the welfare state and prison system makes blacks easy to control (it also helped that we allowed the CIA to profit off crack use in the inner cities), and not since the days of Malcolm X and the Black Panthers have blacks threatened the state. They are harmless sheep just like white people. Let them have their rap music, sports, and thug culture to keep them busy, and as an extra bonus we’ll divert the energies of intelligent white men into hating blacks instead of using that brain power to find out exactly how they’re being screwed over by the state.

Who Is The State Scared Of?

If the elite are threatened, state power will swiftly destroy the movement. Can you think of two recent cases where state power was threatened?

—Occupy Wall Street. You can argue that they were all dirty hippies, but they were bringing too much attention to the elite’s thievery, disseminating information on how power really worked in this country. They lasted a few months until their movement was thoroughly dismantled, and nothing has come to replace it. In fact, one of the leading organizers has gone on to work for Google, that whether willingly or not, has made it a trivial matter to spy on most Americans.

—Edward Snowden. He may not have committed any crimes, but the full might of the United States government came down on him because he exposed their crimes and the impunity at which they treat the law. He can not sleep well for the rest of his life.

How do you know if your voice is getting too close to threatening those in power? For most people, they will see increased “correspondence” from the IRS, with the intent to impoverish the individual. Otherwise, he will be outright imprisoned for violating an obscure law.

The Second Kind Of Power

The power elite has the backing of the state to silence you. In other words, a policeman with a gun will knock down your door or a government agent will go through your tax returns to discover “mistakes” that will make you destitute. The second base of power is the cultural elite. These are the journalists, professors, bloggers, and non-profit organizations—the useful idiots of the state. Instead of hard power, they use propaganda, lies, distortions, information blackouts, and libelous attacks to shape public opinion in a way to firstly benefit them and their ideology. Their main motivations are to feel powerful and keep their $80,000 a year job instead of admitting to serve the billionaire oligarch behind the curtain. As long as they don’t threaten the power elite, they will be encouraged, and you may see some overlap between the two when the power elite encourage or bribe the cultural elite in crushing their enemies.

If you are attacked by the cultural elite (maybe through manufactured “news” that gets a mob after you for supporting traditional marriage), that does not mean you are threatening the power elite. It simply means you are offering a challenge to the middle class cultural elite who are trying to maintain the status quo so they can go to Starbucks every day and afford the newest iPhone while feeling like they have influence in society. They can’t have their lies and bullshit revealed to a mass audience because if society changes their opinions on what type of information is “correct,” they may be out of a job or not be able to afford the Prius they have their eyes on (in case of a fascist takeover, they would be imprisoned or executed). While their attacks are not as strong as the state’s, it can be significant: their use of labels like racist, homophobe, sexist, and so on have ruined lives of many individuals.

Think of all the outlets that have attacked manosphere sites in the past couple of years: Buzzfeed, Gawker, ABC News, Washington Post, SPLC, Huffington Post. Not a single one threatens state power. Manosphere information is offensive to these outlets because–as of now—it threatens the cultural elite’s integrity and utopian vision of having a degenerate society, but even that may be giving them too much credit. Attacking us simply gives them page views.

This is where we come full circle. Earlier I remarked that a method of government control is divide and conquer. The masses must be distracted from knowing how they’re being screwed by pitting neighbor against neighbor. The most brilliant tool to do this is the internet, an always-on interactive television with Twitter wars and viral articles and funny memes that keep the populace in a permanent state of distraction with every single insignificant issue under the sun that doesn’t even approach the state’s toes.

Sure, some corners of the internet deal in sharp anti-government activism, but they simply can’t compete with the latest Miley Cyrus antics or cute cat picture compilations that are sweeping the internet by storm (thank you Buzzfeed!). Consider that DARPA, a government agency, played a role in inventing the internet, and you can understand how “dangerous” it is to state power. Proof of it’s harmlessness came during the Arab Spring when government efforts to halt protests by cutting off nationwide internet actually sped up their downfall—without internet people had nothing to do except hit the streets. Even the manosphere’s counter-cultural ideas are safe to the power elite. It’s just the occasional feminist journalist or non-profit worker who doesn’t want her job and ideology threatened or her feelings hurt that you’ll see them call me a rapist or “biggest misogynist in the world” in an attempt to prime the masses to instinctively reject the information I present.

Consider that whenever a ROK article goes viral, the power elite smiles. For two days, people can’t think of what’s going on in Congress.

Whenever there is a Twitter battle between conservatives and LGBT activists, the power elite smiles, because people don’t know that a top dog at the SEC now works for a finance company that’s receiving billions in taxpayer money.

Whenever a famous celebrity does something shocking, the power elite smiles, because no one is wondering how a drug got approved that ended up killing more people than it saved.

Whenever a new app like Flappy Birds is wildly successfully in getting people distracted, the power elite smiles, because questions about how the government failed to protect its citizens on 9/11 can be ignored.

The power elite especially smiles whenever someone votes. Understand there is absolutely no way that they’d let smartphone-addicted sheep take away their power. The fact that the elite donates to both parties in legally sanctioned bribery called “campaign contributions” has guaranteed the puppet status of all modern Presidents and irrelevancy of every single election on the Federal level.

Anything you do that doesn’t decrease the elite’s power or income is an approved activity. If your grassroots group is large enough, a corporation will throw you a bone during your change.org boycott against their product so you continue your thoughtless consumer behavior and the top executives can upgrade their yachts come summer time as planned. You may occasionally get heat from the cultural elite because of your opinions, but it’s not impossible to fight their soft power. Yes, I can fight the Huffington Post or Jezebel, but I can not fight the state, and neither can you. If you choose to go that route, and are scratching at their ankles, it will be over for you.

What Threatens State Power?

The greatest threat to state power is nationalism. There is nothing scarier to the state than a large percentage of the population who self-identifies with each other and has similar beliefs they’re willing to die for. Brussels does a good job spreading propaganda that the European Union is a way to prevent another World War, or to “increase European harmony,” but it’s actually an ingenious means for the Western European power elite to maintain control over the East. The Soviet Union was too heavy-handed in its power, but Brussels is brilliant in that it makes countries apply to give up both their economic and cultural sovereignty. The elites of the Eastern European backwaters throw their populace under the bus so they can get loans from their German masters at a slightly discounted rate.

You can actually predict whether a new belief system will be propagated by the cultural elite based on if it threatens the power elite. Does masculinity threaten the power elite? Strong-willed and reliant men have historically been one of the greatest threats to state power, especially if these men are idle without circus distractions. Therefore, masculinity must be written off in the media as a poison or antiquated accident of humanity that has no place in modern society.

Does sex equality threaten the power elite? Homosexuality? Celebrity obsession? Obesity? None of those offer a threat. They enhance state power by distracting the populace.

Does immigration threaten the power elite? Absolutely not. Immigrants are the easiest to control, they reduce nationalism, they put downward pressure on wages, and they offer a great distraction for citizens to whine about what’s happening to “my country.”

Does the 45,000-strong Red Pill subreddit threaten the power elite? No, they’re helping in the divide and conquer strategy by giving the cultural elite a justification for their existence. Their growth is irrefutable evidence of the war against women—let’s start a new #antimisogyny hashtag! Let’s pass more laws against “street harassment!” Even I am a pawn in this game. My image can be shown as proof that men are mean and women need their own safe space during playground recess. If it wasn’t me it’d be the next guy in line. It doesn’t matter who it is, but they need some type of human embodiment to stir emotions in their audience and keep the puppet master hidden, just like how Lindy West is the human embodiment (or more like whale embodiment) of what we find disgraceful and awful with society.

I’m being used just as much as the reporter who writes a hit piece on me is being used, both to entertain and distract the masses so we all ignore what’s going in all these government agencies and the hundreds of decisions they make every day with our money. The manosphere and myself are allowed to proceed because we are playing within rules of the game.

One man nipping on the toes of the power elite is Glen Greenwald. Say what you want about his mostly liberal politics, but his reporting on the criminality of the NSA has frightened the US Government. If you’re wondering how he’s able to do this, it’ll make sense once I tell you he lives in Brazil and hasn’t stepped foot in the States in years. They tried to ignore him but his voice has gotten too loud, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he never returns to America again. Most other reporters who threaten the elite (Matt Taibbi comes to mind) have a voice that is too small for a country of over 300 million people who are hooked to their smartphones and are distracted by Trayvon Martin, gay marriage, Sandra Fluke, and the latest affair a politician is having. The power elite is quite snug in its position because we remain addicted to bullshit that pushes our emotional buttons. It would take a handful of more Edward Snowdens (and Julian Assanges and Glen Greenwalds) combined with a unique black swan event to really threaten them. One Snowden does not make a revolution, and neither does one manosphere.

So Where Does That Leave Us?

Does that mean we shouldn’t expose the damage that feminism and its related ideologies are doing? It depends on the strength of your microscope. On the state level, our attacks do absolutely nothing to cause change, but if you zoom in a little closer, we are having delightful success at revealing cracks in the cultural elite’s facade while helping men on the individual level re-discover their masculinity and achieve personal success. On the other hand, I’m beginning to see how more men are treating the manosphere as an outlet for entertainment and distraction than a means of self-improvement. Men are reading the game posts on Return Of Kings but not commenting or acting on the advice, but if we put up an article bashing ugly haircuts or how gay people are bad for the culture, the response is massive and emotional.

Nothing says safe like a viral article that can be understood without much thought while triggering base emotions that ultimately serve as distraction from the real problems caused by those who have power. Therefore if manosphere or neo-traditional ideals become the new status quo, it’s because the power elite determined that it would serve their long-term interests. We wouldn’t be able to declare victory—we simply happened to correctly pick the next cultural movement that would benefit them, just like how the liberals who currently have cultural power happen to be useful to them today. They will one day go out of favor for something different and the cycle will continue. Only a revolution can disturb the power elite (though not always if recent history is a guide), but that’s something that is just not in the cards for America with its distracted sheep shitting all over their wool for half a year after seeing a black man and a Hispanic “white” man get into a fight to the death. The divide and conquer strategy is so entrenched in America that they don’t even care if the man’s race doesn’t quite fit the narrative.

I don’t want to spend my free time doing the bidding of the elite by engaging in another Twitter beef with a tattooed feminist. At the same time I realize that some of that is necessary since it acts as marketing to attract men who share my views, but it’s still a distraction for most guys, a reason for them to feel alive in their otherwise monotonous lives. Fighting the state begins with fighting your own addictive needs for entertainment and emotional validation. Cut off the television and the internet. Avoid propaganda. Read old books. Stop participating in race and homosexual debates. Think for yourself, without Twitter, Facebook, smartphones, or Netflix, and come to realize the important truths of the world through your own observation, meditation, action, and study. Once you’ve helped yourself think clearly and live deliberately, all that’s left is helping one other man do the same.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out my book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain my operation.

Read Next: The Internet Is Doing You More Harm Than Good

Related Posts For You

newest oldest most voted
James Michael
Guest
James Michael
Offline

The only thing to do is to leave the system, as much as you possibly can. Say no to marriage, debt, 9-5 slave work, child support. I think that is why the MGTOW movement is so appealing, a big fuck you to society.

Acehole
Guest
Acehole
Offline

Leaving the system is not the only way, but for the average guy it probably is the best and most sensible thing to do. Some guys can and will handle the bullshit 9-5 grind, the pointless raising of children in a fucked-up world, etc. Some guys will make that work and claim to be happy doing it. But for the most part, the average guy will just crack up and go nuts trying to pursue the socially prescribed lifestyle.

Potionguy
Guest
Potionguy
Offline

Most people have other peoples expectation as the blueprint for their life, that is what every individual has to battle and evolve out of, you do not need a wife child and dog to lead a worhtwhile life, you do not need material wealth or wants to lead a worthwhile life, you definately do not need an image or ego to lead a worthwhile life. All you need is to take in everything and learn to comprehend things as they truly are, no longer naming then, labeling them. And think before you act, think and analyse exactly what things mean to you, and why they make you feel the way you do, and if that is what you want to be if it is relevant to the good of the future.

Bongstar420
Guest
Bongstar420
Offline

Thats right. Most people should expect to get what donald trump gets due to their similar aptitudes.

I will be generous to trumpski and give him a 110IQ
comment image

Tom Dane
Guest
Tom Dane
Offline

I dont agree with this. Making your own life a hell is not the solution. I would say, mass marriage to foreign women and boycott of Western women is a better solution and more realistic.

Hammerstrike
Guest
Hammerstrike
Offline

Mass-marriage to more gold diggers? Import even more immigrants, is that heaven to you?

Tom Dane
Guest
Tom Dane
Offline

As long as the immigrants are beautiful women I have no objections.
I dont see a problem replacing angry, whorish, feminists golddiggers with nice, feminine golddiggers.

Hammerstrike
Guest
Hammerstrike
Offline

J: Tell your men they work for me now. This is my city.
C: They won’t work… for a FREAK!
J: [pulls out a knife] Freak? Why don’t we cut you up into little pieces and feed you to your pooches, hmm? And then we’ll see just how loyal a hungry dog REALLY is!

If they aren´t fleeing Murika once they know the deal, that should tell you enough about them.

Tom Dane
Guest
Tom Dane
Offline

Im from Denmark a country riddled with problems caused by immigrants. But those immigrants are middle eastern MEN..they keep their women to themselves and you better stay away from them or you might get killed.
That skew the female/male ratio quite bit for us Danes.
There would be no problems if all those immigrants where Asian women. None at all. Only one who would be bitching would be the Danish women.

Hammerstrike
Guest
Hammerstrike
Offline

Given how mooslimas often looks like, the option wouldn´t be that much higher if they wheren´t kept hidden.

In any case, the dynamics of money-making changes with immigration to a heavily feminized country.
When coming to a heavily feminized society, the foreign gold digger´s self-interest becomes the same as the local one.

Tom Dane
Guest
Tom Dane
Offline

Perhaps, but a higher percentage of women means more choice to us and less to them.

greatguy999
Guest
greatguy999
Offline

Your taxes will go up, because, women, by their very definition, are free riders, and they ALWAYS vote for freebies.

Bongstar420
Guest
Bongstar420
Offline

Na. You got played tho

Papa Chango
Guest
Papa Chango
Offline

Amen brother

splooge
Guest
splooge
Offline

ya but then youll be “bringing diversity” to another land. And those guys will be like stormfags and say to fix your own countries problems.

Tom Dane
Guest
Tom Dane
Offline

You forget that white don’t bring diversity. We are just a bunch of racists smile

Bongstar420
Guest
Bongstar420
Offline

Why would you pay for vagina?

Or is your marriage equal and not even necessary?

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

I doubt I can survive without a 9-5 slave job in overpriced Toronto, and the city hates innovative businessmen, so I would stick with my servitude for now, save some coin, and then find a female to co-habit in a country which doesn’t have feminist laws.

Before you quit your job, remember that most of the social workers are feminist females. Don’t put yourself in that situation.

csmass
Guest
csmass
Offline

Wow.. you guys don’t get it do you? No offense to anyone, but you all blither on about women and marriage. I find it quite pathetic. You are the epitome of what Roosh is talking about in this article. All you want is women and sex, and you will kick and scream to defend your man-hood against my accusations, but please spare me the irony.

You do not need women or the state. You need brothers, and brotherhood. Society needs Fraternal organizations to bring back a strong and proper sense of masculinity, not foreign brides and poony. Stop buying into the media’s idea that you need sex and a wife or some sort.

datanon
Guest
datanon
Offline

Bravo, csmass.

Mingus
Guest
Mingus
Offline

More of that jack donovan bullshit.

You know he’s a homo who wants to fuck straight guys, right? The whole brotherhood thing surrounds him with straight dudes. Maybe thats your thing though.

Hammerstrike
Guest
Hammerstrike
Offline

That is your best shot? Pathetic!

csmass
Guest
csmass
Offline

Wow.. you guys don’t get it do you? No offense to anyone, but you all blither on about women and marriage. I find it quite pathetic. You are the epitome of what Roosh is talking about in this article. All you want is women and sex, and you will kick and scream to defend your man-hood against my accusations, but please spare me the irony.

You do not need women or the state. You need brothers, and brotherhood. Society needs Fraternal organizations to bring back a strong and proper sense of masculinity, not foreign brides and poony. Stop buying into the media’s idea that you need sex and a wife or some sort.

Marlon G.
Guest
Marlon G.
Offline

why don’t you try Cow town AKA Calgary?

Lee Minho
Guest
Lee Minho
Offline

Hey everyone here, many of you seem to know or have been in Eastern Europe, so do you know how exactly big is the Korean Hallyu wave there, at first I read the Hallyu was quite powerful there, but I did have doubts , and then I see how in the Trending topics of Twitter Russia, Korean music like Super Junior, SHINee or Exo are in top! I though at first that maybe Asian Siberians made it at the top, and then I did remember clearly that Buddhists or Asians are minority in Russia, plus those same Korean music were also trending in twitter Poland! the Hallyu is bigger in the East of Europe than the West of it

Manuel
Guest
Manuel
Offline

Agree but that doesn’t mean you have to reject women and getting laid. Don’t through the baby out with the bathwater!

wtf
Guest
wtf
Offline

The only chains holding most of us to the ‘system’ are mental. I pay my taxes because I don’t want to go to jail. Other than that, the ‘system’ does not exist. I don’t watch the ‘news’, I don’t look to others for ideas or opinions. I pay for shelter, food and health insurance. I have an internet connection, hot and cold running water, heat and air conditioning. What more could I ask for?

If you think of our current situation as ‘a corrupt world under the control of a few corrupt individuals’, that’s the world you will experience. If you can allow the possibility there is more to the world than just that narrow definition, you may find there is really nothing preventing you from being exactly who you want to be, living life exactly as you choose.

Darth Folwart
Guest
Darth Folwart
Offline

Change happens first within the self, then externally through being the change we want to see, locally in our communities and states. If people put forth more effort on the micro-culture and micro-economics , then change is inevitable.

A local church is trying to think outside the box to get more members, I’m going to join. We need to bring back a sense of unity and community. If they are willing to back off the preaching and man-injected absurdities, and open up to learning with a focus on missions and community, I am down. I see this as a stepping stone, the church is looking for new leadership. The flocks need shepherds.

“Tell us what is right, what is good and what is just”.

“I shall, my children. I shall. Let us speak of Fatherhood, and what it means to truly be a father.”

There are few left, and women and children need them. Father’s need each other as brothers. Divided we are weak, together we form the most stalwart of brotherhoods. Do not judge a man by his shortcomings and cast him aside, identify his strengths and make him part of the team.

YuriliPizmyov
Guest
YuriliPizmyov
Offline

Or breed – out of spite, because they hate it when you breed. There is no shame in being a slave. Who among us is not descended from a slave? But cast your DNA over the fence and into the future, and there is hope. Reproduction is the most revolutionary act of all.

Alberio
Guest
Alberio
Offline

Roosh V-
Have you ran game in Bulgaria? Is it a decent location for women?

cartman
Guest
cartman
Offline

So. RV is a honeypot?

USSA TODAY
Guest
USSA TODAY
Offline

Couple of things-

At the end of the day its the Central bankers who run it all. Plenty of alternative media guys online (Jeff Rense- rense.com Texe Marrs powerofprophecy.com Alex Jones Infowars.com Henry Makow.com etc.)

Fritz Springmeier exposed the who’s who of the power elite in his book “Bloodlines of the Illuminati” and was falsely imprisoned for doing so.

All the lawyers and financial professionals read The Economist because its straight from the dragons mouth/ the Rothschild family hint at what conngame they will run relatively soon in the magazine similarly to Council on Foreign Relations monthly periodocals

A retired intelligence guy told me the only thing the USSA peasants could hope for to change it all was an economic boycott/ sit in where they don show up to work for a few weeks to grind the game to a halt for a while
To show the upper echelon you need all the little guys to make an economy run.
The problem is the masses will never do this with Facebook, Twitter wars, NFL obsession, and iPhone/Starbucks culture.

Others had said a military coup could change the USSA in the alternative media.

“You are allowed to say you are free just don’t act free in America”- Kenneth W. Royce aka Boston T. Party (one of my favorite authors). I think all the mental
Masturbation we do pointing out the Bderbergers is a other tool they use is that they make their crap
So common that everybody just writes about them and points them out in camera like you would if you were a blind sheep the sex
Life of some Hollywood personality like Bieber or Timberlake. Theses elites know what they’re doing that’s why here family’s have $75 million dlar mansions and most of our families worked for groceries and a golden watch for several generations.

lavista4u
Guest
lavista4u
Offline

The game goes even beyond Aliens…We are in the territory of Artificial Intelligence ruling humanity for millions of years

AaA
Guest
AaA
Offline

A little off topic but I want to ask this from the guys.

What should a man do if he follows one of the Abrahamic religion,but still wants to game ? I mean, he cannot commit fornication as that is huge sin. He can’t swing around and have fun with multiple women,just the like folks who are not restricted due to religion. We all know that finding a virgin wife in North America is almost non-existent. The man also can’t move from this country because of factors which are not in control. So, what holds true for his future ? Is he destined to be alone because he simply can’t find one woman who had respect and saved herself for marriage or any LTR ?

Can the folks over here guide us.

Frank
Guest
Frank
Offline

I think this is fair to you and the readers here-
Go ask your Rabbi/Priest/Imam.

Why “can’t” you move abroad?

Have you tried?

Roosh did it and most hereagree that Western women aren’t that good even an acid tripping bunch of Brit hippies in the 60s knew with their song “American Woman”.

Don’t beat yourself up- continue to learn game and do the approaches. Ask your spiritual leader for spiritual answers.

Armchair General
Guest
Armchair General
Offline

Elites are federalizing planet, while liberalizing market (liberalization = theft, of both taxpayers money and va general blackmail and extortion), unifying laws to an WB and IMF model, while desexualizing and fragmenting our social lives and micro-cultures.

Sometimes i think that only cure being a regular sheep is returning to 19. century style thought, education and philosophy, of course, applied to modern context and technological advancement.

Most people act as if they are about to live another 300 years.

Myles
Guest
Myles
Offline

I would read your artfe on this whole struggle of the elite central banking crowd vs the common man.

People need to also remember the social networking media craze and smart phones are subtle tools
Of indoctrination to make the whole World ready to be micro chilled and ruled from The Hague using only one form of currency. If you don’t accept the chip you will starve. America is a after thought- it’s the trailer park full of radicals- the Rothshilds can’t have that.

Hammerstrike
Guest
Hammerstrike
Offline

Elites, really? Haha! The “elite” of the manipulative scum and parasites are still manipulative scum and parasites. They are James Taggart and Lillian Rearden, not John Galt or Adolf Hitler.

You know why Ayn Rand was able to nail it so well?

jl02
Guest
jl02
Offline

This critique, which I agree with, has much in common with traditionalist Catholic writers. However, the missing piece is political control via passion. E. Michael Jones – a critic who will hit you straight in the nuts, time and again – wrote a great book about this.

http://www.culturewars.com/Reviews/LibidoDominandiReviews.html

SeuthestheThird
Guest
SeuthestheThird
Offline
David
Guest
David
Offline

YOU OPENED A NEW DOOR IN MY LIFE !! THANK YOU AND THANK DARYOUSH.

Anon
Guest
Anon
Offline

This morning, I went to read a technology article about Mozilla, which quickly turned to LBGT rights: https://medium.com/p/7645a4bf8a2

The next article on the list? “How I turned into a femininst”.

You’re right about how this plays out.

turkishcandy
Guest
turkishcandy
Offline

Absolutely brilliant. So much intellect in one post. I have one thing to add.

Your audience has gone quiet international in the last years. Naturally, the international readers are less interested in how U.S government, NSA and the elite are grasping power and more interested in all that gay, feminist, obesity and attention-whoring issues that you find trivial, since the entire world is carbon-copying U.S’s culture and their (and mine) primary concern is the world-wide cultural decline that these issues cause. So the reason people engage in these issues more might be more about their priorities and concerns and less about them simply looking to be entertained, emotionally stimulated and distracted.

In my humble opinion, you are helping the entire world more by bashing and unmasking the liberals, gay activists, feminists, fat accepters etc, because that is what makes the international men swallow the red pill, not realizing how government is scamming you. Every liberal you could publicly defeat would be more beneficial to unplug more men than revealing another government scam/ illegality/ thought control, in my opinion.

USSA Today
Guest
USSA Today
Offline

I would hope the World is too
smart than to follow the USAs gruesome ways.

yohami
Guest
yohami
Offline

True. And feminism is yet another distraction.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

Feminism is a distraction, demoralizing and destroying the economy from within. How many males can’t find a job or receive grants to start up a business because a feminist in her 20s could sell her holes to the highest bidder and cry out oppression? Ever wonder why the middle class in Canada and America are shrinking while the rich get richer? And why most government jobs and teaching jobs are represented by feminists?

This shit is outrageous. I used to believe that with hard work, anyone can get anywhere in Canada and America, but noticing that a feminist with a Bachelors in Women Studies can promote herself up the ladder while a male with a Phd struggles to find employment or lives in fear of job loss is something to ponder.

Hammerstrike
Guest
Hammerstrike
Offline

Which shows without a doubt that feminism is far more than a mere distraction, it is a major feature.
The system is not pitting women against men, it have clearly picked one side against the other, the one that is the easiest to control vs the one that is hardest to control.

By thoroughly alienating one side, the system is binding the other side to it.

Say you are a general for example and you want former enemy POWs fighting on the side of your army.
If you have them kill other POWs before that. chances are that if they volunteer, they do not intend to just defect back to the enemy because they know they will be punished as traitors.
Your own soldiers will be less willing to desert too if they believe they will be mercilessely killed if captured.

VV
Guest
VV
Offline

Feminism’s main purpose, from the elite’s point of view, seems to be to increase the labor supply through having women work, decrease the birthrate among White people, and give upper middle class White women something an “oppressed” identity to identify with.(In this world “oppressed” is code word for “good” in the eyes of the cultural elite)

Hammerstrike
Guest
Hammerstrike
Offline

No, feminist women do not believe in working, only in salaries. They would have not much chances getting employed without Affirmative Action, their importance is that they are dependent on beta pussies and Affirmative Action for their careers.

Hammerstrike
Guest
Hammerstrike
Offline

Very much false.

The New Century Man
Guest
The New Century Man
Offline

…GREAT piece of writing.

Joe
Guest
Joe
Offline

Man I’ve read tons of pua- I just seem to like Roosh because he’s blunt, direct, gritty, intelligent, and funny. He’s a little weird but its cool because its creative. Julien from RSD is the man too- I like the European style be and Roosh have. After you’ve been in the McWalmart trailer park of America you can really appreciate Euro style, and isn’t it cool how some parts of Europe retain their spine, culture, and women- kudos to you Rusland! I hope Putin bitch slaps anyone who impedes on his freedom- damn AIPAC Anglosphere central banker cons.

Geyr7
Guest
Geyr7
Offline

Some parts of Europe retain their spine? Which parts? France, UK and the Netherlands are slaves to political correctness and cultural (any but their own) fairness. Also, Putin’s annexing Crimea is not a good example of ‘freedom’ in my estimation.

Geyr7
Guest
Geyr7
Offline

Geert Wilders…just thought of an example of European spine.

CrabRangoon
Guest
CrabRangoon
Offline

Terrific post. There is so much underlying the vapid culture in America and we gleefully float along, checking Facebook and buying the latest and greatest gadgets to pull us further from reality. The most powerful continue to consolidate their power and we’re getting closer to a 2 tier/class society. You’ll have the super wealthy elite and everyone else being lower middle class/poor. I see it locally in Chicago while apartment hunting. You either have to be making over 100k to afford anything half way decent or fight over the cheap scraps with everyone else making average salaries. And most of the affordable places border on slums-some of these places haven’t been updated in 30+ years even in desirable areas. You see the rise of multiple family members(parents with their adult kids and even grandparents) under the same roof to afford to live in a better neighborhood. But yes let’s focus on how mean fat shaming can be and making sure gays get that marriage tax subsidy.

Petey
Guest
Petey
Offline

The Daily Bell has been all over this the last few years as well. Excellent site with well written insightful arguments and observations. Well worth checking out.

Barry W
Guest
Barry W
Offline

Article of the year.,…a wake up call that hits like an electric shock

TheGenXFactor
Guest
TheGenXFactor
Offline

This piece took guts to write along with immense insight, thank you.

I would humbly add that The Matrix trilogy theme is that the human outliers also served a purpose to help one control group solve its own problems with another. The power elite is not always monolithic and has factions that compete within it. The communists that you speak of in Eastern Europe were servants of an elite. They were becoming a liability or at least outlived their purpose. Communism faked its own death so that the real power structure could tempt the people with something new such as corruption and strong men and then pseudo free market and then a new power cycle. The greatest conspiracy is that of keeping people busy, and the outliers are kept a special busy known as change disguised as revolution.

The manosphere is slowly programing young men for their next role whether we intend it or not. The only way to not get caught in it is to be personally aware, a calling only meant for a few.

Quintus Curtius
Guest

Now this is an article. A grand slam.

Cedric
Guest
Cedric
Offline

I get the whole intellectual empowerment, awareness, comradeship we share here in the “red pill” (beginning to hate the cheap over use of the term-true red pill would take the power back not write till they drop) zone, dropping out of a rigged game (seems the Illuminati bankers are the ultimate pimps gaming the rest of the World), etc. but other than mutual intellectual affirmation-how does any of this change in the end game?
WIll we become more free mutually affirming each other and sharing links- you and Roosh are very smart guys and that would lead me to believe your’e an expat as well because America is on the way down. THe smart people see this-you know the red necks who grunt when they speak think they can stay here and shoot it out but, between the bioweapons, bombs, shit tons of ruthless stone cold killer mercs, theyr’e delusional and watched too much “Mon-dee Night Raw” and “Stee-van See-gahl” (how they annuciate it) growing up.

Jones
Guest
Jones
Offline

“Think for yourself … and come to realize the important truths of the world through your own observation, meditation, action, and study. Once you’ve helped yourself think clearly and live deliberately, all that’s left is helping one other man do the same.”

José Ortega y Gasset’s “The Revolt of the Masses”, although it was published nearly eighty-five years ago in Spanish, still describes the situation with the “mass man” that Roosh has echoed in this piece.

http://www.globalchristians.org/politics/DOCS/Ortega%20y%20Gasset%20-%20The%20Revolt%20Of%20The%20Masses.pdf

The “Ortega thesis” will undoubtedly be recognisable to Roosh, given his long-term indentured servitude within the scientific-technologic complex.

As for apprehending more fundamental truths, the possibility is there, but as with Ortega’s philosophy, it stands not as an N-valued choice (of what pill to consume, red or blue, or even purple, for instance), but instead as an invitation.

Lately there have been several of these pieces — another may be found on the amerika.org blog, for instance.

I would prefer less of a cri de coeur and more of an acceptance of the invitation that is being offered.

The Frankfurt School offers its “Great Refusal” by way of Herbert Marcuse. Something else is being offered here, a “Great Invitation”, where you may join the glass bead game that is already in progress …

Your invitation awaits.

The game is already afoot.

anon1
Guest
anon1
Offline

I was going to find a very lengthy and eloquent way to agree with you, but i’ll cut to the chase, this is an excellent deconstruction of the real lay of the power political landscape.

What saddens me is that few are going to think deeply enough to actually apply some of what’s written here.

like some sort of corollary of cassandra, we’re basically doomed to know the future, know whats wrong and yet still have things happen the way they happen.

the kind of nationalism roosh was talking about that would shake and upend the corridors of power simply only exists in one demographic today: zealots.

And you can’t control zealots.

K
Guest
K
Offline

No one listens to the damned.

Hammerstrike
Guest
Hammerstrike
Offline

John Doe: Wanting people to listen, you can’t just tap them on the shoulder anymore. You have to hit them with a sledgehammer, and then you’ll notice you’ve got their strict attention.

In time, they will listen to the damned, oh yes!

Sam Spade
Guest
Sam Spade
Offline

best thing I’ve read since Harry Browne.

anon
Guest
anon
Offline

Okay, here is a comment from the article…

“Cole Fulwider
Check his genes to see if he’s worth anything for reproduction. If not, sterilize him.”
This is truly disturbing. This faggot white night wants to sterilize someone for having viewpoints that are different from his own. Roosh opened up ideas that are counter to feminism and this tool is so threatened by it that he would literally be okay with a barbaric act like that.

Elvis
Guest
Elvis
Offline

A bit heavy on the conspiracy theory. Is there a nation where there is NOT disagreement among its people?

dirtydan
Guest
dirtydan
Offline

Roosh, what an insightful and completely spot on article. I started coming to your site and roissy’s and return of kings as well as /pol/ because I felt that something I was feeling needed expression and I lacked the words to do it myself. Reading your insightful posts helps me articulate and organize my own thoughts as well as be comforted that I am not the only one in the world that is starting to see past the veil. Your article is nothing new in the sense that it is a theme that is gaining traction and that I have heard several times now. I have to say though Roosh, it is not the masses that need to be convinced of the validity of this theory or any other like homosexuality, feminism, global interventionism etc. As you aptly point out, they are sheep and follow where the intellectual elite lead them to pasture. This means that as long as we attack the edifice of the “catherdral” of liberal, globalist and consumerism values, we are working to convince the 3.5% of the population that actually matters, and the proportion of the population that you need to bring about genuine social change. I mean look at how few people participate in the manosphere or flat out reject it in a flamboyant display of white knight faggotry. Put simply its because most people are not ready to wake up! It takes a person that is somehow different, a deviant capable of entertaining subversive thought, to really embrace the values espoused by the redpill, and we will never compromise the majority of the population.

On a related note, I’m glad you’ve fallen in love with Ukraine, I am from there myself and currently studying in DC.

If you’re in DC for april 22, come by Georgetown University, I’ve worked very hard to put on an event with a student organization to bring several whistleblowers and journalists like Greenwald, Thomas Drake, Jesselyn Raddack, Daniel Ellsberg and some others to come speak over two days about the NSA and the constant state of surveillance our society has allowed itself to be pulled into over the last decade.

Maybe we can even get you to speak sometime?

D Beguiled
Guest
D Beguiled
Offline

That was awesome.

I think it goes even deeper than that. Even people who have devoted their lives to helping those worse off than them have about as much effect as a kitty pic.

I remember a long time ago listening to an interview with Noam Chomsky where the interviewer asked him why, if the elites were so oppressive, did they let him travel around the world speaking against them. He was quick to say that the reason they allow him a measure of freedom is that no one who listens to him really acts on what he says.

The interviewer then asked what would happen to him if people did act. This time there was an uncomfortable pause, a nervous laugh, and Chomsky said he would probably end up like Rosa Luxemburg. (The old rifle butt to the head.)

TheGenXFactor
Guest
TheGenXFactor
Offline

Yes, if you oppress someone, you make him a martyr and highlight his teachings. The communists were too oppressive; our system justs lets people shout into the wind. Ignoring people gives no credibility to their message.

karmageddon
Guest
karmageddon
Offline

I used to really look up to Chomsky. But it’s obvious now that people like him are “controlled opposition”.

A Nony Mouse
Guest
A Nony Mouse
Offline

Indeed. I call him Chumsky.

And as much as I love Roosh’s latest article, he has mentioned several notables who are also Controlled Opposition:

Greenwald
Snowden
Assange
Taibbi

I don’t want to make this thread about 911 Truth because as Roosh so eloquently and correctly points out – that would be nipping at the heels of the elite. But that entire line of inquiry is the KEY to the elite matrix and the one area they can NEVER allow to be fully explored in the mainstream. It would bring down the whole house of cards.

And all of the above mentioned names, including Chumsky, have gone out of their way to ridicule, trivialize and diminish 911 Truth. In addition, EVERYTHING that those names have “leaked” were either ALREADY known in the activist community or had been published in the foreign press. And the rest of the “leaks” actually work in FAVOR of US & EU foreign policy objectives. Those facts alone demonstrates that these guys are all deep cover, cointelpro-style operatives. The elite always control both sides of any debate, shining their spotlight on their chosen RIGHT and LEFT luminaries. For more just read anything by Webster Tarpley or Michel Chossudovsky.

Okay, I went off topic a bit. But I had to mention that stuff.

Getting back on topic, I feel Roosh is right on. As long as the manosphere stays clear of certain topics (like the one I just mentioned!) we CAN make a dent in the cultural fabric and at least bring sanity and justice back into the lives of men.

For more sensitive topics like 911 Truth (or whatever your particular poison) there are other sites and movements for that.

VV
Guest
VV
Offline

Chomsky says politically incorrect things about our current power structure, but he remains wedded to the old hippie notion that if only we could get rid of some certain BAD PEOPLE then we would all live in peace and prosperity.

pup
Guest
pup
Offline

Damn! Amen brother…

ActionJackson
Guest
ActionJackson
Offline

I think da GBFM put it best:

“becayuse teh federal reserve funded feminisma nd cretaed feminisms to transfer welath from men to the fed, break up teh family, but teh kids in corprate state daycare, and expand teh powers of teh stae into teh home, repalcing teh classical rugged fateh with fiat cash, the fed created the PUA game by changing the game and stakcing it against men lzozlzlzlzllz

now the fed also supports the PUA game as men wearing furry hats and spenidng tehir days working wmeiangless jobs while buying books on game purporting to help them get tehir cocks wet onece every two years is exactly what the fed wants. they DO NO wan t the men to read mises or hayek or jefferson or the us constitution lzozlzlzlz they want to keep the men in the fiat masters’ cave — the fiat butthex matrix — “gaming” and fighting over the table scraps of all the desoulaed, haggaard, std-ridden, vicious, gold-digging, cold, defeminized, prozac-addled womenz the fiat masters buttthexed and deosuled in college during teh primae nocate ceremeonies, instead of manning up and fighting for their dvine irght to something far greater — an honorable, virtuous wife. lzozllzllzllzozzlzl”

Jeff
Guest
Jeff
Offline

I loves this article but id like to know where I can get more information on the goings-on of my government? The major news corporations are so skewed in their reporting I won’t be getting true information. There are corporations like aljazeera that are committed to raw news but what other options do I have to discover the truth?

Ali
Guest
Ali
Offline

Jeff, rt.com is good for an antidote to the west-centric perspective of most MSM. A pro-Russian bias but hey, it only balances out against what your’e used to.

Acehole
Guest
Acehole
Offline

Man, this is a frighteningly accurate discription of how power in the Western World actualy works. Roosh is a brave man for writing this stuff.

Eddie Morra
Guest
Eddie Morra
Offline

I guess Charlie Rose is doing his part (for the Bilderberg Group, of which he is a member) on his show. I think Obama is a member too or the Council of Foreign Relations.

TheGenXFactor
Guest
TheGenXFactor
Offline

You can further breakdown the idea of a cultural elite. There are many levels of slavery. Yes, the members of the cultural elite may know this at the higher end, but at the lower end the troops do not. This is why the middle class is often part of the cultural elite for a time, mistakenly thinks that they are part of it and gets ejected when they have served their purpose, case-in-point the destruction of their marriage system and male mid-twentieth century success.

The concept of an administrative elite who are not the real elite and include the cultural elite is hard for people to fathom. There is a defining characteristic between various members and is key to your safety, yes safety. Some members of the administrative elite know very well that they are slaves in some level of the hierarchy and plan accordingly. They are of little threat to you if they know that you will not threaten their existence by your words, actions or desire for advancement. There is a lot of cloak and dagger here, but if you do it right, you can advance and make a nice nest. You have to be discrete and not draw attention to yourself. In other words, your playboy life and philosophy must be private and not openly preached in your own name, not difficult to do. You also cannot get a sudden pang of conscience.

The very dangerous members are often at the lower levels of the administrative elite, but this is not always the case. The defining characteristic is that they believe in what they are doing and consider it right. They are often sacrificed by public scandal or input a lot of energy to the system.

The takeaways here are that these can be your teachers, paid professionals that you need, almost anyone above you or around you. They do not have to be part of any conspiracy or have enforced direction. This is where the concept of systematic evil comes into play. The base, carnal nature of people, this is well described in the satanist community, is what drives the decisions of most. This universal tendency causes females to do their thing, men to do theirs, educators to seek their profession as a cushy job and do what is needed to keep it, law enforcement to do the wrong thing to keep their early retirement and keep their pensions, we could go on forever. The real power elite does not have to do much other than slowly remove consequence for these actions from the administrative class by directing certain members of the administrative class to do so. Each new escalation of this creates more wealth and power for them. This is the simple formula. Feed the ego which releases the carnal id by selling it as good and safe. It is not very expensive to do this. The egos of others will take over and do the remainder of the work. The manipulation of the female has been progressing for over one hundred years in this way, men additionally. It is the simple removal of consequence such as social security, city jobs, unions, welfare, for just long enough to get a desired result. Eventually a new consequence will be put in place to start another movement.

The way to hack The Matrix is not to let the matrix know that you know what the game is. This only begins when you come to terms with your wants and carnal desires and learn to moderate and control them. The system also takes you in like it did to men by creating a situation where a man thought that he could come home to the goodness of a female. By creating what he thought was a safe place, our guard was dropped collectively. Once you look at a female as a carnal being, you can use her as you want. The hard part for men is facing the reality of what this is and what you are going to do with it, her in this example. There becomes no safe place, no safe relationship other than maybe your children, but what do you teach them. The way to avoid despair is to help those who want it to exploit the others. You must feed the system without feeding it yourself and pretend long enough to take what you need and want out of it.

You cannot unsee something. The horror is not some vast conspiracy outside but what is inside all of us that is used to make this possible.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

Excerpt: Let’s pass more laws against “street harassment!”

NO NO!!! This same theory is enforced in Toronto, and trust me, even staring at a woman (DON’T EVER EVEN WATCH IF SHE IS UNDER 21 BECAUSE THE MANGINAS WILL ACCUSE YOU OF PEVERT) is harassment.

A situation occurred where a female in her 20’s pulled the train alarm because a male in his 30s was staring at her ass. Her outfit was a winter jacket it did not reach her yoga pants so her back was showing and it is common.

Edward
Guest
Edward
Offline

As a guy in Toronto (live downtown) I don’t find this to be the case. Toronto is a tad overhyped about how bad feminism is here…

Is that anecdote about the TTC true? Couldn’t find any sources about it online.

Murchison
Guest
Murchison
Offline

Awesome Roosh

Bosch V
Guest
Bosch V
Offline

I’m a silent reader and I usually agree with what you write but I think you are wrong here. Our systems developed over the ages and we sticked to stuff that worked. Democracy doesn’t work and will never work because most people are idiots but what are we suppose to do else? Do you want a guy like Louis XIV back?
The reality is that the system we are living in is the system we deserve and it will be our dead in the end. If you want to get your mind blown read Freuds Civilization and Its Discontents: https://archive.org/details/CivilizationAndItsDiscontents

No name still no game
Guest
No name still no game
Offline

Louis XIV=Democratic immunization against centralized power. People who cite terrible leaders always neglect to mention people such as Frederick the Great. We should not take on Democracy as our government because “What else are we supposed to do?” Democracy is degenerate, hedonistic, and power is held by those who influence public opinion, meaning that a Democracy functions best when diluted by lies. I’d rather take my “Chances” with a monarchy or aristocracy that doesn’t need to lie, than take the broken system we have here which specializes in distorting the truth to fit it’s own agenda.

Deebos
Guest
Deebos
Offline

Truly powerful article, very deep and insightful. The manosphere can be entertaining but truly taking the red pill and living accordingly is harder than merely enjoying the show with occasional weekend forays into red pill and pick up culture running game. How many of us return to work Monday pass HR with its shrill women, perhaps report to a female boss or white knight ladder climber, attend team building exercises, annual picnicks and see fellow male coworkers railroaded out of the company only to be replaced by a know it all recent female college grad. Ohh but lets just play along and hopefullu get that bonus or 2% annual raise. The next generation of red pill life must be truly not being plugged into their system in any meaningful way. (As others already have done)

Directm
Guest
Directm
Offline

Divide and conquer is a old way of thinking. The concept moves around the ideas of thesis and antithesis. This way of thinking produces a limited number of outcomes, usually just one. It’s easy to use this method to frame the discourse and push the participants towards a predetermined outcome.

We should look at the Chinese way of thinking using the I-Ching. In this method each decision has 64 possible outcomes. But why be limited by 64 choices? In reality, each decision has a infinite amount of outcomes.

Your ability to function chaotically within a structurally rigid system is based on your creatively and the your ability to see beyond the game of masks.

Dr. Bernays
Guest
Dr. Bernays
Offline

Anyone ever wonder if some of the masks in pua community are multi millionaire marketers who pose as one of the brahs- hey brah I’m just like you but I’ve got a camera on YouTube and I lay 2 girls/month but sell products claiming you can bang models if you listen to me regardless of looks age income. It helps that I have made millions “helping” so many.

Dr. Freud
Guest
Dr. Freud
Offline

Unlikely. The smart money are “hamster whisperers.”

Hey girl, buy this latte.
Hey girl, buy this electonic bauble.
Hey girl, buy this detergent.

De Oliveira
Guest
De Oliveira
Offline

Brilliant article – certainly one of Roosh’s best. Reading it put me in mind of both Albert Jay Nock and Leo Strauss – not to mention James Kalb’s The Tyranny of Liberalism. Kalb’s book features this very good paragraph:

“Every man who starts his own business, every family that adds to its Independence by reducing its expenses, every woman who stays home to run the household and educate her children, every local congregation that takes on more demanding standards of conduct, every independently minded scholar who writes a book, gives a speech, contributes to a little magazine, or sets up a website, establishes a zone of ordered freedom within the anarchic tyranny that is advanced liberalism. Collectively, such people can establish a living alternative to the ways and understandings now dominant. The inhumanity of life within large organizations, and the degradation of journalism, formal education, popular entertainment, and official expert opinion, will make such alternatives increasingly attractive. Eventually we may reach a tipping point, and social life begin to take on a different form.” p.268

Super Rich Study
Guest
Super Rich Study
Offline

Should be mandatory reading for every man.

Johan Strand
Guest
Johan Strand
Offline

Fantastic piece. You’ve transcended the intellectual confines of the manosphere.

Aurini
Guest
Aurini
Offline

Did you ever expect to hear “Great article, I shared it with my mom”?

Because this was a great article, I shared it with my mom.

Blas de Lezo
Guest
Blas de Lezo
Offline

Great article. I have only missed references to libertarians. I see very strong connections between the search of freedom, liberalism and manosphere. The people that really feel the opression of the State and the oligarches.

Eblö
Guest
Eblö
Offline

The older you get the better articles you write,nice one Roosh.

blake richards
Guest
blake richards
Offline

Good insight! Hopefully everyone who starts reading this won’t stop after 140 characters…

Ency-14
Guest
Ency-14
Offline

the internet is doing more harm than good and this article are some of the best I have read..reminds me of some of george carlin’s “rants” on these issue…..

I also realise at some level i am one of those guys who come on this sites and other such sites, get an emotional fix and get back to old habits, most of which (habits) are not productive at all….

you have some great writing on here Sir

moneco
Guest
moneco
Offline

Roosh, I would like to introduce you- if you are not already aware of- the crypto-anarchist movement. It is a movement based on anarcho-capitalist (market-anarchist/ Libertarian), Austrian Economics, Open-Source technology, and Cryptography. Like the motivation of the manosphere mentioned mentioned above- the point is to empower Man (humanity) from within. Not to fight the state but to ignore it by providing alternative systems to the establishment. Example of this are Decentralized Applications and Protocols such as Bitcoin: http://nakamotoinstitute.org/

Zelcorpion
Guest
Zelcorpion
Offline

Liebertarianism = wet dream of Super-Elite, financed and designed by Rockefeller foundation etc. (Albeit I sympathize with many manosphere bloggers who support libertarianism, because an Alpha can usually manage better in a libertarian system. However in the end stage of capitalism there SHALL NOT BE ANY SMALL BUSINESS LEFT. Competition is sin – remember? You simply cannot compete with 250 years of compound interest and fraudulent money creation.) Research Anthony Migchels – financial blogger. Bitcoin is an even greater scam.

Really threatening topics are interest free money creation via social credit, mutual credit or even debt-free state issuance (Canada 1930s-60s, Woergl 1932 etc.) , interest free credit (i.e. for asset backed debts like mortgages – JAK Bank Sweden exists for decades offering interest free mortgage, why nowhere else?), technology which essentially produces energy practically for nothing (geo-magnetic motors, Nitinol, various TESLA-patents etc.).

Those topics are true and immediate dangers to the status quo.

VV
Guest
VV
Offline

Libertarianism is just another way for the elite to exploit the working class. Sure some of the elite would suffer in it, those dependent on government handouts would, but even more would benefit from the “right” to claim control over resources over which there is a limited supply and extract rent from it. Controllers of resources > workers, every time.

Problem with bitcoin is that the government could easily ban it. They would do that way before they would inflate the dollar into oblivion. Same problem with the Tor Browser and cryptography software.

Zelcorpion
Guest
Zelcorpion
Offline

Good one.

Nationalism however despite its inherent dangers is no longer a real threat. Most countries can be easily divided even with an inherently similar population not destroyed by rampant immigration.

I agree with you that the Manosphere has mainly individual successes and helps those men to turn around their lives, IF they are willing to actually act on the knowledge.

Partly the manosphere is supporting the elite-plans to a Brave-New-World-rampant-fornication-world by more men becoming cads, PUAs or god-forbid basement-dwelling MGTOWs. It has basically succeeded by widening the number of “Naturals”. Positive Alphas who successfully manifest a traditional family will remain the minority. As you stated correctly – most men who come into contact with the manosphere will just bitch about feminism while their lifestyles will remain unchanged.

On the other hand – who cares if we cannot save the world? We can save ourselves and meet like-minded people and carve a good life out of it as long as it is possible.

Evan
Guest
Evan
Offline

So well articulated… This is great material to share with people who are skeptical about the future and/or suspicious of the government/media etc.
A real red pill awakening piece you’ve done here Roosh.

Francesco
Guest
Francesco
Offline

Great article, beautiful explanation of the modern “Weapons of Mass Distraction”. With some minor changes, the same rules are probably applied to many western countries ( for sure in Italy, the one I can talk of).

Ninja man
Guest
Ninja man
Offline

“I have not come to fight flesh and blood, but spiritual wickedness in high and low places” Bob Marley

Great article Roosh. You are right, more personal action is needed, peaceful, silent and deep reasoning will lead to a healthier life. Many examples of this exist already, some people are more ready for this than others… Only time will amend all things, this I believe is inevitable.

5+ year lurker
Guest
5+ year lurker
Offline

More of this, please.

OMYG
Guest
OMYG
Offline

Eye opening piece. As a young guy that actually grew up in this generation of internet and technology I really feel sad seeing all my peers go to shit with all the social media.
Not only that but simply knowing and having such strong beliefs does leave you in a state of isolation as I have experienced it myself.
Great post!

ray
Guest
ray
Offline

“Men are reading the game posts on Return Of Kings but not commenting or acting on the advice, but if we put up an article bashing ugly haircuts or how gay people are bad for the culture, the response is massive and emotional.”
Gee. Maybe “men” know something that you don’t know? Could such a thing be possible?!!
:O)
Most men don’t buy into the obsession of the “leaders” of PUA/Game that Game will solve relational problems, return masculinity to men, and accomplish all the other wonders advertised over the past five or six years. Most men don’t “act on” the sage advice of Roosh (as, clearly, they should!) because they recognize that Game isn’t the panacea advertised and sold, but instead the pet project of a few youngsters who set themselves up as Experts and Profiteers, then expect (often older and more experienced men) to “act on their advice.”
I guess if “men” don’t act on the advice of Roosh and Mystery and Kraser, well, something’s wrong with them, eh? LOL!!
It’s a thoughful piece overall, as usual. You, young man, however are still very much in the Matrix, tho you imagine otherwise. Cheers.

Ali
Guest
Ali
Offline

This is completely correct, and this more than corroborates some of what you say: http://rt.com/news/snowden-nsa-us-facebook-717/. Govt has a powerful vested interested in steering, manipulating and even creating public discourse.

Jordan
Guest
Jordan
Offline

Your writing is going to the next level….