What Is A Social Justice Warrior (SJW)?

Social justice warriors believe in an extreme left-wing ideology that combines feminism, progressivism, and political correctness into a totalitarian system that attempts to censor speech and promote fringe lifestyles while actively discriminating against men, particularly white men. They are the internet activist arm of Western progressivism that acts as a vigilante group to ensure compliance and homogeny of far left thought.

The true definition of SJW is up for debate, but most generally it has become a catch-all term that describes feminists and liberals who actively try to solve the perceived social injustices of modern society by organizing in online communities to disseminate propaganda, censor speech, and punish individuals by getting them terminated from their employment. They have also been successful at positioning themselves in the upper echelons of universities, media organizations, and tech companies.

SJW’s do not view all humans as equal

Using a “privilege” hierarchy, SJW’s calculate the worth of a human being based on perceived injustices or wrongs that group has suffered since the time of ancestral man, using selective and narrow interpretations of history. SJW’s elevate groups that they believe have received the least amount of “privilege” in the past, and then use internet activism in the form of mobs and community purges to target those who are determined to have greater amounts of privilege. The idea of privilege is so essential to SJW ideology that a common debate tactic they use is to say “check your privilege,” which roughly translates to, “you must immediately halt or change your speech because your ancestors may or may not have done bad things to women or minority races.”

For example, if a notable white American male makes a joke about a lesbian black woman who practices Islam, SJW’s will coordinate using a combination of blogs, Youtube, and social networking to dox him (publish his personal information, including where he works). They will then pressure the man’s company by flooding it with calls and messages with the goal to remove his source of income while engaging in a mass reporting campaign to get his online accounts suspended.

Their ultimate goal is to silence all speech that they don’t like and which they find offensive while also punishing the speech offender by removing his source of income. As they grow in power, the acceptable range of speech that would trigger an SJW witch hunt is becoming more narrow, and those who are high up on the privilege hierarchy (white men) have to speak through a careful filter if they don’t want to be subject to an SJW attack.

mozilla-witch-hunt
Former Mozilla CEO was subject to a successful witch hunt for his past support of traditional marriage

They believe consensus is more important than objectivity

SJW’s do not believe in objectivity. Instead, speech and ideas must be viewed relatively depending on the source and its intended audience. The feeling of the statement must also be taken into account, which can be affected by current news, cultural moods, and pop trends.

For example let’s consider the statement “Asian people are nerds.” If a famous white man uttered this phrase on Twitter after a major Japanese earthquake, a punitive SJW witch hunt may be triggered, but if a popular gay black female Youtuber said the exact same statement, no action would be taken. The reason is because the black woman is low in the SJW privilege hierarchy and therefore has a greater range of free speech that she could give before triggering a witch hunt. The white man, who is at the top of the privilege hierarchy, has no leeway to make a joke about any race since he is not in a protected SJW class. He would be decried as racist and a bigot, in spite of the fact that a statement like “Asian people are nerds” has low ambiguity regardless of the race or status of the person who said it.

The lack of such objectivity in SJWism is by design. It’s borrowed from Cultural Marxist thought, which argues that objectivity and the idea of right or wrong is less important than consensus. The reason is that consensus can be easily accomplished by controlling the narrative—cultural facts, ideas, and memes that are possessed by a specific population. If one can manufacture consensus by controlling this narrative through domination of the media or by swiftly eliminating speech which goes against what “should” be believed, specific beliefs can be held even if they go against proven scientific thought or basic rationale. SJW tactics evolved by necessity to keep their ideology alive in a modern climate where science—even 100-year-old science—contradicts the bulk of their ideas.

For example, a basic tenet of SJW thought is that there is no difference between men and women besides their physical bodies, that evolution stopped at the neck for human beings and gave both sexes an identical brain. Human biology can not sustain this notion [1] [2] [3], so when a person tries to state that men and women are different to a large audience, the SJW does one of three things:

(1) Attempts to censor the speech through mob action
(2) Calls the person a misogynist who hates women to inoculate the general population from considering the accurate information presented
(3) Destroys the livelihood of the person by contacting his employer so that he is less able to exercise his free speech

You’ll often encounter SJW debate tactics trying to use consensus to persuade you: “How can you think X when so many people think Y?” As you may already know, consensus is a poor judge of facts or morality. Consensus used to believe that the earth was flat and that the sun revolved around the Earth. Sadly, many great men were imprisoned or executed for going against consensus on beliefs that we know are true today. Consensus in America also supported the institution of slavery, which of course didn’t make it right. And not long ago consensus believed in segregation between whites and blacks, even in the north where slavery was not practiced. Consensus has been shown to be a dangerous method to validate ideas or behavior.

Observers will note that information control is a huge component of SJW ideology. They have no other choice—their ideas do not hold water to basic science and logic so SJW’s evolved mechanisms where they must control and censor speech which goes against their beliefs. By controlling what arguments or ideas people are exposed to, they have a greater chance of convincing others through manipulation and outright bullying of their world view to create the consensus they need to affect societal change. Some individuals buy into their cause because opposing viewpoints were hidden from them, often labeled as “hate speech.”

stop-pursuing-scientific-area-of-study
An SJW writer implores readers not to pursue an area of study that conflicts with her world view

objectivity-marx
Cultural Marxist thought promotes subjectivity

The messenger is more important than the message

A big chunk of their activism depends on subjective feeling and perceived value of the parties involved. Before an SJW can make a decision on what is right or wrong, she must first know the race, gender, and sexuality of the involved participants so that she can decide whether or not to be outraged. A statement or idea in isolation is not enough for them to come to a conclusion on the acceptability of a statement. For example, consider the following statement:

“Abortion should not be used as a method of birth control.”

An SJW could not definitively respond to this statement unless they knew who uttered it. If I—a Caucasian man—published this statement on a popular site like CNN, the outrage would be immense. Most comments would accuse me of hating women and wanting to control their bodies. A petition would be started to prevent me from ever writing on CNN again. On the other hand, if a popular feminist like Jessica Valenti said this statement in the same publication, the response would be more balanced. She would receive some criticism but even support from individuals who would try to destroy my life had I said the exact same thing.

A person who believes in the scientific method would not be swayed by the messenger. They would analyze the statement and attempt to either verify it or not based on logic. SJW’s avoid such objective behavior.

justice-over-freedom
A Harvard university student urges we replace academic freedom with her sense of social justice

Some groups are more deserving of equality than others

SJW’s make a big show of wanting “equality,” but as the Animal Farm quote goes: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” They absolutely do not believe that a man deserves the same treatment that should be given to a woman of his same race. When they say “equality,” what they really mean is to apply special benefits to protected groups in order to create equality based on their subjective perception and feeling. They even go so far as to claim that women and non-whites can not possibly be racist against white men. If a black woman calls a white man a cracker, honky, redneck, hick, or peckerwood, she’s correcting historical wrongs and injustices, not being a racist individual.

Since they have no objective measure or guide of equality, it is only achieved when they feel it has been achieved, but then that would destroy the very reason for their existence, meaning that their war on inequality is similar to the war on drugs or terrorism. It’s a perpetual war that will never be won in their minds because there will always be the creation of a new group needing privilege and equality. If you substitute the word “power” whenever they use “equality,” you’ll come to a more accurate descriptor of what motivates their activism.

If you want to do a simple test that hurts an SJW’s argument that she is about equality, ask her the following: “Do you believe a black woman is equal to a white woman?” They will squirm mightily and may look to the left and right at their SJW friends to know what they think first before giving you a muddled answer that is inconsistent with their other stated beliefs.

prison-rape-funny
Rape jokes are okay against those groups who have no protection in the SJW privilege hierarchy

SJW’s are human label machines

If censorship is not an option, SJW’s attempt to destroy the reputation of the speech offender by labeling him a racist, misogynist, creep, bigot, xenophobe, homophobe, or transphobe. This is one of their most reliable tactics to prime the general public against listening to individuals they don’t like because of the negative weight that such terms still carry. I personally have been called every label under the sun and a site I operate, Return Of Kings, was denounced in mainstream blogs sympathetic to SJW’s and then put on blacklists.

While labels are still effective today, SJW’s are diluting the power of them through overuse. If the majority of men are decided to be “misogynist,” the general public will become desensitized to hearing it. We are already seeing signs of this whereby SJW’s have to escalate the labels to outright crimes. A tactic I have been seeing lately is accusing men of “sexual harassment,” which is often when a man did nothing more than factually criticize a woman or flirt with her.

Even worse, SJW’s have started labeling men as rapists based on anonymous internet allegations, even when the supposed victims never reported the crime to police. It doesn’t matter that a conviction is not present via due process of law, and “rapist” labels persist against men even when authorities refuse to file charges. This eradicates the presumption of innocence whereby an individual is innocent until proven guilty, a basic right used since Roman times and included in the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It’s possible that we may reach a point where all men are presumed to have raped a woman, and when a men says something improper, this label will be used against him to limit his speech.

misogyny copy
When SJW corruption was revealed in gaming journalism, the “misogyny” label was used to marginalize the speech of concerned gamers

buzzfeed-sam
Buzzfeed published an anonymous rape accusation against a man who was subject to a massive SJW witch hunt on Youtube (the alleged victim never went to the police)

uchicago-rape-list
A female at the University Of Chicago publicly posted a “rape list” denouncing men who have never been accused or convicted of rape

lack-of-due-process
An SJW does not believe that men should get due process

Unwilling to engage in open debate

Another feature of the SJW is their total unwillingness to engage in a civilized one-on-one debate instead of mob action through what they call “campaigns” or “pressure groups.” Unable to take criticism or consider factual evidence, a lone SJW will respond to having her arguments defeated by playing the victim card (“Stop attacking me!”, “Stop triggering me!”, “Stop shaming me!”) or engaging in one of numerous argumentative fallacies. These tactics are used to buy time before fading back into the power and safety of her large mob group.

SJW’s avoid engaging in debate because they do not have the logical tools that an objective discussion requires. If your beliefs are held together by subjectivity, feelings, and the perceived worth of an individual based on an imaginary scale of privilege, it would be impossible for you to debate someone else who uses facts. The lack of educational rigor in SJW communities means they are more comfortable re-blogging content on Tumblr or sharing funny images than sifting through scientific data to find proof of what they claim.

On university campuses, it’s common for SJW’s to obstruct speakers they can not defeat with facts. To some observers, this behavior may resemble a child putting his fingers in his ears and yelling as loud as he can. They have no choice but to silence someone else’s speech because their own speech can not properly counter arguments that go against their world view. They simply don’t have the intellectual rigor to do so.


SJW’s shout down a university speech and then halt it completely by setting off a fire alarm, possibly breaking local laws in the process


SJW’s at the University Of Toronto push and shove in an attempt to cancel a speech by a speaker they disagree with


Feminist professor steals protests signs that she disagrees with and then assaults the protester (she was later charged and given probation)

Complete absence of fixed morality

Thanks to the subjectiveness of their ideology, SJW’s lack morality or virtue. The reason this is a feature and not a bug to the SJW is because accumulated knowledge, morals, and wisdom of the past was developed and promoted by white men, who are seen as the harbingers or pain and doom to the classes that they want to protect.

Even if Aristotle, Seneca, Marcus Aurelius, Thomas Aquinas, or Henry David Thoreau had valuable wisdom that continues to help how millions of people live today, the information derived from their work must be completely discarded since they were white men. Since white men were at the forefront of advancing humanity for the past several centuries, especially after the decline of the Egyptian, Persian, Mongol, and Ottoman empires, this precludes the bulk of moral guidance that we can use to determine right and wrong. SJW’s invent their own moral code but it is often based on what they are upset about in the present moment. It does not serve as a guide for more than a month or two, suggesting that their book of code would have to be written in pencil.

The biggest exception I’ve found to their discrimination against white men is Steve Jobs, inventor of the iPhone, a gadget that SJW’s prefer to use. The irony of this is that SJW’s are against “greedy” capitalism in favor of socialism or communism, but iPhones are made with low-cost labor in Asia where some workers have committed suicide in the very factories the phones are produced because of horrid working conditions. SJW’s are capable of applying blind spots to their most cherished ideals so that their consumer lifestyle is not inconvenienced.

SJW’s don’t believe in god, have no belief in the heterosexual nuclear family as the principal unit of human organization, and have no sense of local community as opposed to ones that exist solely on the internet. Instead of reading historical texts for guidance, they read Huffington Post, Buzzfeed, and Reddit. A significant amount of them gets their information from image-based memes that they share enthusiastically on Imgur and Facebook. They are pagans who worship women, minorities, homosexuals, and other non-capitalistic or non-Catholic features of humanity. Since their belief system is based on trends and feelings, an SJW will display rapidly shifting thought from one month to the next depending on what is “hot” or not in SJW discussion forums.

As of late, homosexuality—an alternative lifestyle at best and the disseminator of HIV at worst—seems to be the centerpiece of their activism, especially as the homosexual marriage issue has become suddenly more urgent in America in the past five years. Some predict that the bulk of their activism will now move onto transsexuality, and one must wonder how the movement will handle so many fringe groups that are angling for least privileged status.


A convention for the Tumblr platform, the principal online home of most SJW’s, displays how alternative the lifestyles of these individuals are

SJW’s are sexually confused and admittedly mentally ill

Many SJW’s readily admit to serious mental illness and being bullied or mocked as a kid. They have gone on to be bullies themselves on the internet, a platform where physical strength, courage, or defined identity is not needed to be an effective activist. Even though they are confused about how to live their own lives thanks to the lack of values they possess, and many deal with suicide, cutting, or other mental issues that prevent them from reading certain articles without a “trigger warning” to act as a disclaimer to reality, they have no problem telling society how to live. It’s unclear why they respond to their life problems in such a manner instead of seeking professional help or reading self-help, but we can speculate that they seek to control others to compensate for the lack of control they have in their own lives. SJWism is a form of treatment to their problems because they can focus on the perceived problems of other people instead of their own.

A common problem SJW’s have is confusion about their own sexual identity or outright biological sex. Most of them find out about SJWism when they are in their teen years and not yet absolutely certain of their sexual preference. Once exposed to SJW writing that presents the theory that two sexes don’t exist, proven biology is wrong, and that you are free to place yourself on a kaleidoscope of gender including multiple kinds of homosexuality and transsexuality, the newly SJW activist mixes and matches her sexual identity to seek approval within her new group.

SJW’s have invented new sexes and sexual preferences, the most popular of which being pansexual, the definition of which can vary depending on which SJW you ask but which comes close to bisexuality. Other inventions include polysexuality, genderqueer, pangender, skoliosexual, and the most curious one of all which assumes a new mammalian life form that science has yet to describe—trigender.

While many of their members are plain vanilla heterosexual, they despise any sexuality or behavior that comes from the straight male. A male is someone exhibiting offensive privilege when he rates a girl on her attractiveness, exhibits a preference for thin women, or flirts with a woman he wants to have sex with, but when a woman does the same things, she is making an empowered display of her sexuality and must therefore be encouraged. The male sex drive is considered dangerous and oppressive to women but the female sex drive is wonderful, natural, and deserving of firm praise.

It’s worth noting that some in the SJW community believe that all penis-in-vagina sex is rape, even when the sex is consensual. Masculinity exhibited by men is dangerous and criminal, but masculine behaviors in women (cutting their hair short, becoming burly in body size, cursing, sexually pursuing other women) are promoted. Again, this highlights the subjectivity and inequality of SJW thought.

male-gay-privilege
A popular website tries to persuade its readers with images that homosexual marriage is “better” than traditional marriage


Youtube is full of young SJW’s coming out to declare their pansexuality

How did SJW’s become such a powerful force?

We can only speculate why an ideology that is so removed from science and Western values has established roots in America. One theory is that their ideology is soma for confused people who have been disappointed in life or have failed in achieving their goals. It’s easy for these sub-performers to flock to an ideology that says, “You failed because you were held down by the white patriarchy, who still maintains invincible privilege and is robbing you of your daily bread and happiness.”

Obviously, it’s a much easier job to blame others or play the victim card than to solve the individual problems of your life. Hard work is not as valued in today’s society as in the past, so when you give someone a choice between expending effort on one hand to complaining and mob bullying on the other, it’s not hard to see how many (as in millions of people) pick the latter option. It’s also more satisfying to their egos from a power standpoint.

That leads to the question of why straight white males become a part of the SJW movement, since it would be similar to a Jewish person joining the Nazis. Most of these men are shy with low confidence and low muscle mass. They have social anxiety issues and simply want to be part of a co-ed group that increases their access to women. It turns out that white men are carrying the water of SJW’s who would denounce them in a second all for the hopes of getting sex. The male sex drive is so strong that a man is willing to throw his entire race and sex under the bus in order to possibly fornicate with a woman.

Even though men are usually the targets of SJW’s, it is not uncommon for them to turn on their own. For example, if a white woman, a protected group in SJW ideology, offends a transsexual, who is more protected on the privilege scale, SJW’s may attack the white woman, even if they may have defended her previously (this happened with Laci Green, a protected feminist who once used the word “tranny” and was threatened with death by transsexual SJW’s). Since SJW’ism is so subjective, at whim to constantly shifting winds, an SJW who is on the right side of SJW thought today may find themselves on the wrong side tomorrow.


Video shows how a video game organization was infiltrated by feminists

4chan-infiltration2
Infographic shows how popular image forum 4chan was infiltrated by SJW’s (click here for full image)

check-your-privilege
A parody image suggesting that anything can be considered offensive to an SJW

What do SJW’s want to achieve?

Their goal is power and domination over the Western cultural narrative to manufacture a consensus that is aligned with their extreme far-left ideology. Since their ideas are so far removed from science, logic, and rationale, this requires a complete control of information to disseminate their immoral world view along with the complete silencing of those who contradict them. It is not clear what their end game is when it comes to the white men who they believe are a bane to planet Earth, but it’s not a stretch to predict violence in the future assuming their mobs grow in size, anger, and power, which would put them close to being classified as terrorists according to the FBI. Currently their main strategies are bullying, spreading propaganda, and censoring opponents.

A growing way they have been accomplishing this goals is by installing SJW activists in prominent institution and communities. Many are now active moderators on popular forums, leaders in campus groups, tenured professors, or popular bloggers and entertainers who have huge audiences they spread SJW propaganda to. Some SJW’s, like Zoe Quinn, simply achieved prominent status by having heterosexual sex with men who have access to information that they want to modulate. Since most feminists, progressives, and liberals are sympathetic to the SJW cause, it’s easy to see how they have reached a stunning amount of influence in America to spread their message.

sjws-threaten-violence
SJW’s threaten violence if they don’t get their way

evolution-games-journalism
SJW’s have co-opted games journalism to review video games as sexist, misogynist, and racist


Prominent SJW Laurie Penny is humiliated at a conference after labeling a distinguished male historian as racist and xenophobic

Social Justice Warriors are a threat to Western values

SJW’s utilize censorship, discriminate against white men, and disagree with basic human rights concerning due process that has existed in the Western legal canon for centuries. They are against free speech as granted by the US Constitution and don’t believe that all men are created equal. They disregard science and wrongly apply labels, accusations, and criminal allegations to those who dare cross their path. They have determined that some groups should be elevated to receive more benefits and speech rights than others, and have been successful in silencing the speech of those whom they disagree with through their internet witch mobs. They continue to infect every group, platform, and community that they come into contact with. Their goal is not to add value or to create, but to control the flow of ideas and thereby thought. Their values are opposed to Western values.

SJW ideas have reached a critical mass in America. University students are indoctrinated with progressive thought that is becoming aligned with SJWism, and even students in grade school are becoming exposed to SJW ideas through feminist-friendly teachers who read the same sites as SJW’s. My fear is that their efforts at censorship and cultural domination will become more onerous as they cement positions in prominent media companies, Silicon Valley, universities, and even in politics. If your belief system is against that of SJW’s, it would be prudent to take measures to protect yourself from their witch hunts, because there is no sign that they will be weakening in power anytime soon.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out my book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain my operation.

Read Next: Cultural Collapse Theory

Related Posts For You

398
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
  
smilegrinwinkmrgreenneutraltwistedshockunamusedcooleviloopsrazzrollcryeeklolmadsadexclamationquestionideahmmbegwhewchucklesillyenvyshutmouth
Photo and Image Files
 
 
 
180 Comment threads
218 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
264 Comment authors
Alantor29SriShulkZóbány Állam (jobbel göjény)RD Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Guest
Guest
Guest
Offline

Cant wait to see the comments on this post.

evilwhitemalempire
Guest
evilwhitemalempire
Offline

“While labels are still effective today, SJW’s are diluting the power of them through overuse. If the majority of men are decided to be “misogynist,” the general public will become desensitized to hearing it.”

————————————–

 

We should, whenever possible, accelerate this.

 

Blogs, tweets, etc. where we proudly claim to be misogynists, racists, rapists, homophobes and arachnaphobes (we absolutely loathe spiders!).

(OR living doll-a-phobes or spinnach-a-phobes)

 

Do you see what I’m getting at here?

 

Take THEIR labels, apply them to ourselves, BUT add ridiculous bits into the mix in order to further dilute the power of their words!

 

Maybe even going so far as to tweet accusations of say, arachnophobia (at someone inquiring about pesticides) as if we’re dead serious about it.

 

Sufficiently outlandish tweets in the right time/place might well go viral!

 

Words are our enemy’s hammers. Let’s take them out of their hands.

rampant
Guest
rampant
Offline
chaoguy
Guest
chaoguy
Offline

Pic kind of related.

Zóbány Állam (jobbel göjény)
Guest
Zóbány Állam (jobbel göjény)
Offline

Also, applying the principles of Game while handling SJW-s is not only working, but entertaining too. After all, leftist behaviour is essentially unrestrained female behaviour, regardless of the sex of the perpetrator.

Keep frame, agree and amplify, and overall just stop giving the slightest fuck.

Gustav
Guest
Gustav
Offline

This is a brilliant essay. In this climate of madness where SJWs are not only given a platform, but have their demands met by governments and corporations we need to unveil this toxic excuse for an ideology.

seth datta
Guest
seth datta
Offline

I just got told by my folks now, how they were watching the BBC in the UK and the news channel had a piece on how Tom and Jerry is racist. Sooooo, I know we’re f*cked because soon we will not be allowed any free speech or freedom of expression that is permitted by the authorities. I will soon be leaving this over-populated island of defeated peoples and move to Europe where they are less defeated. IMHO, it looks all the worse for countries where SJW ideology (fake justice) predominates, which means the 7 Anglo English speaking countries. Lots of fake wars, as admitted even by a prominent feminist in a UK big time newspaper, along with mass unregulated immigration and a dumbed down populace who have become hedonistic degenerates does not bode well. Its not that people in these places are not capable of more – they have been socially engineered from birth to behave a certain way and once in their late teens/twenties, cannot change themselves.

There is a ROK article saying that MGTOW is bad, though that is not to say that MGTOW sponsors celibacy, only a ‘distancing’ from a society gone insane (the west). Who do you think would win in a war. The divided anglo nations? Or Russia/China etc? (NOT isis, who are sponsored by western governments for re-structuring the middle east). Considering the fact that older generations of women have become useless dry vaginas shrieking for justice, and that the younger generation of men and women have become faggots, apathetic and lovers of pleasure rather than of freedom, I think history only paints a repeated picture of how such societies fell; and fell slow and painfully.

Last of all, the ideology is sponsored by the same people. I know there are trolls here. And I know that many are brainwashed or do not share my ideology. But I figure I post for raising awareness as in five to ten years time I will not be left to post – the more westernised a nation, the greater its index for ending up as an enforcer of the fourth reich of unparalleled horrors. And those who have sat by in silence or paying the taxes and blaming the obviously corrupt systems must reap what they have sown. And most of all, this entails all women-
A commentator on ROK once mentioned that women are being set up for a fall by the bankers. Yes, they are. But it will be a fall that neither benefits men nor women. For the 4% of thinking women out there, many of these women will not have children and propagate society, or they are paying for immoral wars and other useless shit. The remaining 96% are degenerates who desire game or a carefree life, not understanding the shitstorm that is about to come or how they have betrayed their men. They will be made economic slaves, lucky to be sheltered and fed, defacto whores who have sex to be able to afford to live, and eventually after many years of this abusive lifestyle, western society will collapse. There’s only about ten years to live it up left, and most people seem to have gone full steam into self-destruct mode. Soooo, can’t say that you weren’t warned, as a society needed all sorts of people in the past to raise the alarm bells – a fact that is sadly forgotten these days.

GRock
Guest
GRock
Offline

I rock my Tom & Jerry Tee Shirt with pride… in public. And I get positive comments for paying tribute to one of the greatest cartoons in history. Anyone who takes a cartoon like that and contorts it into something else should lose their job and be required to prove their value to society before being allowed to be a part of it.

The current state of affairs is make sure it’s completely broken and fucked before even considering fixing it. There was a time in the US we as a whole, and individuals performed preventative maintenance on our lives in general, and society to avoid a mess like this being supported and growing. It’s all a momentum play at this point.

Hugh mentions in comments below that the similarity between SJW and Jihadists are striking. Well SJW is really a soft Jihad. Ironically, it may prove destructive to more lives than Jihad in the long run.

Quik
Guest
Quik
Offline

Seems like extremist SJW mentality to me

Femghazi
Guest
Femghazi
Offline

Check your privilege!

Dave R
Guest
Dave R
Offline

Who r u to tell him that! Check your privilege!

Now excuse me while I go self-flaggelate for not checking my privilege.

NewToRoK
Guest
NewToRoK
Offline

It depends where in Europe you want to move to. If it is Poland, Ukraine or other Eastern European countries, well… yes, these countries are less influenced by the politically correct virus. But I would not recommend Belgium or Scandinavia. E.g. an ad showing Antwerp “how it really is” sparked outrage in politically correct circles since there were no (or few) minority groups represented in that ad. So basically, if you say something, no matter what, it can be considered racist and offensive. And if you say nothing, it can be considered racist and offensive as well. I’m tired of this shit. In addition, Belgian news, television programs and magazines are increasingly getting gay-centered. And as for Scandinavia, take the power of 6 from the latter.

Barry Homan
Guest
Barry Homan
Offline

I’m an American and have lived in Denmark for 15 years. This country is NOT so inclined to PCness as some might think. Danes like to act like normal people, oh yes, there are a few small clusters of nerds and dishrags around, spouting pc rubbish, but nothing at all like in the UK and US. Danes tend to shy away from extreme left-wing pc self-righteousness, the Muslim presence here is relatively small, people generally get along with each other, and the MSM doesn’t try to shove new pc-ness down your throat every week. You can still go down to some local pubs and smoke. Plus, Danish women can be very attractive, fun-loving and forthright. Most under-50s in Denmark speak English very well. If you want to re-locate, you might consider Denmark.

Scotty Gunn
Guest
Scotty Gunn
Offline

So’s Bugs Bunny because one episode he did black face.

David Alvaro
Guest
David Alvaro
Offline

This is beyond ridiculous and hypocritical. Every single accusation here applies equally, if not more so, to all of you pseudo-alphas or masculine men or MRAs or whatever the hell the members of this little subcult calls themselves. Except for the bit about being a powerful force, of course. You guys are a laughingstock even among the other social cults of bitter, unsuccessful men seeking scapegoats for their own inadequacies.

Gustav
Guest
Gustav
Offline

Lots of ad hominem, not many valid points. Of course there are the bitter caricatures that you describe, they exist in all and every ‘online community’. This article is a layman’s guide to the SJW movement that takes inspiration from the Frankfurt School. If you are going to comment on these blogs try and find something to say other than “you guys are a bunch of xxxx morons”.

SUPRA luca
Guest
SUPRA luca
Offline

“If you are going to comment on these blogs try and find something to say other than “you guys are a bunch of xxxx morons”.”
Very difficult to find anything else to say about you guys, I must be honest.

Montgomery Draxel
Guest
Montgomery Draxel
Offline

“Very difficult to find anything else to say about you guys, I must be honest.”

You’re bringing a knife to a gun fight. We eeeevil he-man woman haters and racists demand horrible things like “backing up one’s claims”, “logic” and those oh-so-horrible nightmares called “facts”.

Name calling is the domain of children.

Shawn Smith
Guest
Shawn Smith
Offline

Kind of funny, because Roosh found plenty of specific criticisms with vivid examples for people like you. It’s almost like one side knows how to present an argument and the other just insults and accuses.

Warsie
Guest
Warsie
Offline

You used dashcon as an example of SJWism. Just to point out, dashcon was a tumblr con NOT a SJW meetup.

Shawn Smith
Guest
Shawn Smith
Offline

I did not use Dashcon as an example of anything. The author did. And if it is principally attended by SJW types, it illustrates the point just fine.

Warsie
Guest
Warsie
Offline

I meant Roosh then. derp. I was at dashcon, it was not ‘principally attended by SJW types’ – there was AFAIK only one panel on ‘feminism’ there. There was a strong overlap with anime culture etc as opposed to CHECK YOUR PRIVILEDGE type people (yes I know there is an overlap but it’s not as strong as the people here made it)

Shawn Smith
Guest
Shawn Smith
Offline

Fine, then one example is mistaken. He still has many others, unless you are ready to disqualify all of those as well.

Morgan
Guest
Morgan
Offline

Oh boohoo, is someone butt-hurt that their arguments have been disproved by facts and logic? Better do what SJWs do best and resort to ad hominem and straw man attacks! Who cares if there aren’t any MRAs or “pseudo-alphas” around, let’s keep pretending that everyone who questions SJWs is!

As far as being “bitter and unsuccessful” while “seeking scapegoats for their own inadequacies…” yeah, you pretty much just described 95% of feminists I know. I’ve known pretty of intelligent, successful women in my time who couldn’t give two shits about “teh patriarchy!!!” or “rape culture,” whereas all the feminists I know are perpetually butt-hurt failures who usually have serious psychological disorders that affect their perception of reality, and yet still think they’re right in blaming their problems on society, justifying their inadequacies by saying everything is “the patriarchy’s fault.”

Feminists may be smug cyber-bullies at the moment, but decades from now, they’ll all find themselves lonely and bitter, alone in a cabin in the woods, waiting to die cold and alone with nothing but a dozen cats to keep them company.

YuriGotBack
Guest
YuriGotBack
Offline

i’ve noticed the same thing actually, the beautiful and successful women i know never once mention or retweet or reblog any of this patriarchy or rape culture nonsense, it’s funny how that works, the tumblr SJW appears to be the female equivalent of a reddit neckbeard.

Drone Killa
Guest
Drone Killa
Offline

did you even read the article? go back to catching HIV through degenerate, pansexual intercourse. (i don’t usually insult people on the internet, i prefer arguments backed by logic and evidence, but an eye for an eye.)

David Alvaro
Guest
David Alvaro
Offline

I know never, ever having sex makes you guys angry and makes everyone your enemy, but you aren’t ever going to fix yourself by aligning yourself with this nasty, pandering garbage. Maybe someday feminists will be as lonely and isolated as you guys, but it doesn’t seem very likely. This is the most self-defeating subculture ever.

Drone Killa
Guest
Drone Killa
Offline

again, talking shit with nothing to back it up. i encourage you to read the article, realize you are using the tactics mentioned (which are basically a way of opting out of an argument with slander instead of logic/facts) and write something of substance.

David Alvaro
Guest
David Alvaro
Offline

The article itself is an example of the very things it is railing against. To use your favorite buzzwords, it contains no “facts” or “logic” and is entirely a “straw man” attack against a composite of basically anyone who disagrees with the void represented by this community, reducing anyone who doesn’t share your anachronistic views on gender, society, and politics as a single person, with an insane projection of the social dysfunction of its audience onto its perceived enemies, all so you guys can have a scapegoat to blame for your misfortunes. It makes me sad that you people have so little that you turn to this for validation and succor.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

blah, blah, blah…more nothing. Do you even read what you write? “Facts” and “logic” are now “buzzwords? For that piece of anti-civilization nonsense, please do the world a favor and just hurl yourself off of the first perch that you can reach that’s greater than three stories. You are literally a waste of food.

There are tracts upon tracts of philosophy and logic explaining our general views available on the net, much of it with deep historical, social, and political analysis. The equivalent SJW diatribe reads like your last paragraph: lots of words and name calling with very little substance. There wasn’t a single valid piece of rhetoric in your paragraph. That’s okay, though. We’re registering exactly how we are being addressed.

SJWs, like you, are basically best demarcated by what they hate or which mafia du jour they wish to empower.

David Alvaro
Guest
David Alvaro
Offline

Yes, they are buzzwords here, as in anything that supports your point of view is hailed as being rich in them (like this article here, which is utterly devoid of either) and any criticism is attacked for lacking them. That’s rhetorical buzzwords drained of any meaning. I love how Roosh here admits that legit academia is completely stocked with these so-called SJWs, but I’m supposed to be impressed with the online tracts written by your cult.

You can pretend to have some kind of coherent philosophy all you want. But the bottom line, as always comes out in these comment sections, is that you hate feminism and all SJWs (even though that doesn’t even make sense as a collective group at all) because you imagine that they are responsible for your inability to have sex with the women that you desire, instead of just facing the reality that you are undesirable. The people you are criticizing have all kinds of motivations for trying to improve the world, and that drive is where literally ever positive element of human civilization came from. You, on the other hand, just want to stop the world from spinning and go back to some idealized time that never existed, when a reactionary asshole like you could fuck an attractive woman without paying her enough to overcome her revulsion. But it never happened, and it never will happen, and all your “philosophy” will ever get you is upvotes from the other social rejects here. You are roleplaying as intellectual, macho men with some kind of moral authority, but once you step outside these walls, you are the same pathetic loser you always were.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

This article is a deconstructivist essay or working/applied theory. It is extremely logical. I know that you re used to getting away with unchallenged assertions, but here you can’t. Our own conversation has the context of thousands of previous conversations. We don’t need to provide the factual context for you because you happened to stroll by during whatever other internet faggotry you participate in. The theory is approved as true in practice by people who need to counter SJW BS. So, it’s logical. It’s not a historical account. The point is that we hold it to be logical and factual. It’s not for you, and as I told you, I’d be impressed if you jumped off of a building. No one here thinks you are supposed to be impressed by anything. We’d rather see you fuck off permanently. “Facts” and “logic” are buzzwords to you (I still don’t see your bullshit logic) because they counter your political interests and you haven’t a legitimate argument but to randomly and weakly attack the use of two out-of-context words. We don’t give a shit about your analysis. You’re the fucking enemy. The last thing we have to do is meet your approval or standards. Go and kill yourself, quickly and painfully.

Your second paragraph is typical SJW non-intellectual, non-interaction. This is why your kind will eventually lose. It’s also clear that you’re way out of your league context-wise and have zero idea of what you’re talking about.

Shinku
Guest
Shinku
Offline

Truth. SJW types are powered by emotion and subjectivity. Whatever rag they’re on or how intense there feelings trumps facts or even logic.

Gaston
Guest
Gaston
Offline

You just proved our point…. Stop talking, it makes the rest of your team look bad. You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about, and are an utter disgrace to just about everything. My apologies for stating “fact” that has been proven in your actions.

Philip Lishman
Guest
Philip Lishman
Offline

There is nothing ‘anachronistic’ about traditional attitudes to sex, society and politics. They have been tried and tested for millennia. Your movement has proved itself thoroughly destructive to civilization, and has unleashed forces it will not be able to control for much longer – forces which will destroy social revolutionaries such as yourself preferentially, with vigor and relish, before moving on to the rest of us.

If you doubt it, have a look at what ISIS is posting on Youtube these days, about its love and tolerance for women, homosexuals and anyone else who is not right on message with their particular strain of Islam.

tori
Guest
tori
Offline

Did you just say “pansexual intercourse”? A pansexual is attracted to all genders. A pansexual has the same chance of catching HIV as a heterosexual.

Drone Killa
Guest
Drone Killa
Offline

Pansexual is a made up idea to make weak, useless people feel special. Bisexual is the same thing minus transgender. I challenge any “pansexual” to become aroused by a tranny. Put your god damn money where your mouth is and fuck one of those freaks. And if a man fucks other men, yes he has a massively greater chance of catching HIV.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

It in no way shape or form applies equally. You can’t even get through single paragraph without reflexively using oppressive, invalid language and rhetoric. SJW shaming is on its way out, and won’t be dealt with nicely due to its oppressive political effect. The things we take issue with are real politics, with real economic and social effects on real lives. Yet, you attempt to shame us into not opposing that which harms us by calling us names. You’re a perfect example of western rot and your system of oppression will be dealt with.

Tom Dane
Guest
Tom Dane
Offline

We also live in our moms basement and have small dicks. And oh, we’re also afraid of strong, independent woman because they intimidate us.
I understand why you feel the need to exclaim “wow..just..WOW” but we cant help it.

Shinku
Guest
Shinku
Offline

He’s a card carrying member of the White Knight Klan. He needs to white knight to get pussy. Typical beta-male if I may say so myself.

teapartydoc
Guest
teapartydoc
Offline

HAHAHAHAHA

Earl of Sandwich
Guest
Earl of Sandwich
Offline

“” pseudo-alphas or masculine men or MRAs or whatever the hell the members of this little subcult calls themselves”””

How about ‘real people’?

Its the progressives who feel compelled to slap labels on everyone else.

Warsie
Guest
Warsie
Offline

your affiliate returnofkings talks about being “masculine men” and “Alpha males” and MRA is an affiliated group. Honestly I’m a MRA I’d rather be called that than be attached to the PUA scene….

polo
Guest
polo
Offline

Labels like “SJW”?

Shinku
Guest
Shinku
Offline

You are jealous of alpha males because you are a weak beta male. As the article said you are WEAK.

Guest
Guest
Guest
Offline

Is it possible for you to make a statement without bringing gender into the mix or is that how you breathe?

paendragon
Guest
paendragon
Offline

… said the beta-cucktard.

Anomalocaris of the North
Guest
Anomalocaris of the North
Offline

Except MRAs don’t control people’s lives, like you fascists! Piss off!

day2knight
Guest
day2knight
Offline

Apparently you totally missed the unintentional irony in this opinion piece.

Dayna Gallagher
Guest
Dayna Gallagher
Offline

Hail Gustav!

BReakingBEta
Guest
BReakingBEta
Offline

Wow. Utter btilliance. Perhaps your best work to date. Stunned

Christopher Bear
Guest

if this were REALLY brilliant it wouldn’t just stun you. It would have you do something. like actually do something

BReakingBEta
Guest
BReakingBEta
Offline

If it were almost any other topic I would agree with you. However, as the topic is SJW, there is nothing to do aside from ignoring their existence and denouncing people in public who spew their copy/pasted dogma.

Christopher Bear
Guest

tru. i side with you on the ignoring bit

BReakingBEta
Guest
BReakingBEta
Offline

I’m open for hearing ideas though. That would be a nice thread. How can you in your daily life combat the SJW machine?

I just come up with blanks as they don’t listen to reason, which is how men think.

Christopher Bear
Guest

i didnt even know it was a machine before i read this article. still isnt a machine unless i value the opinions of people online. the “problem” isn’t problem to me. they don’t affect the money i make

Itzpapalotl
Guest
Itzpapalotl
Offline

“Won’t listen to reason”

I’m genuinely curious – what exactly are you trying to convey to a SJW? To accept reverting back to the way things used to be, where they were marginalized and seen as inferior to the white male? They’re just as intolerant to oppression as you are. You won’t win so long as there are many of them. The reign of the white male is over – soon, this line of thought will be completely annihilated.

Someone on here also mentioned that SJW’s are least likely to procreate – which will result in their “inevitable extinction” – BUT, since intolerance is becoming less and less tolerated, and with feminism on the rise – women will not seek out males that align themselves with this specific type of philosophy. Women are more career driven than ever and also currently hold 60% of master’s degrees, which will eventually propel them into more positions of power. Women are now choosing later on to have children, which yes, has some biological downfalls to it (since a woman’s fertility is on the decline around the age of 27) – but if you want to perpetuate this ideology – ensure it’s lineage – then the best thing to do is to procreate before it’s too late – also ensure that you stay part of the family so that your children hold your very beliefs. If you divorce, you will rarely see your children, and eventually your wife will marry a beta, and he’ll raise your kids, which will inevitably further the SJW mentality.

Now, since ROK is adamant about not settling down until you’re in 40’s, and with a younger woman which is becoming less and less of a reality (with feminism on the rise, and abortions becoming more obtainable) and more of a fantasy, in a way, you guys are sort of fucking yourselves over.

Sallie Mae
Guest
Sallie Mae
Offline

“[I]ntolerance is becoming less and less tolerated…”

lol. This one’s probably college “educated,” too. Great return on that investment, society.

Itzpapalotl
Guest
Itzpapalotl
Offline

People who are quick to point out insignificant grammatical errors while simultaneously disregarding the point a person was trying to make are fucking annoying as hell.

“It’s not ‘your,’ it’s “you’re” – whooooooooooooo gives a shit, especially considering I’m sure you’ve made an error in grammar at some point in your life? Good to know that you’re 100% perfect and have never once made a mistake, in anything, ever – and if you have, that completely disregards your overall intelligence.

Shawn Smith
Guest
Shawn Smith
Offline

No, he wasn’t pointing out a grammatical error. He was pointing out the grotesque inconsistency of your way of “thinking”. Your inability to understand this further proves his point.

Guest
Guest
Guest
Offline

Grotesq

Itzpapalotl
Guest
Itzpapalotl
Offline

I bet you’re a lot of fun at parties.

Actually, it was a grammatical error – if I feel like someone doesn’t respect me, even if it’s over something arbitrary, more often than not, I’ll fuck up what I say.

Shawn Smith
Guest
Shawn Smith
Offline

I bet you’re a lot of fun at parties.

And I’d bet you’re crappy as a debater. Really? This is the best response you can come up with. I demonstrate the utter stupidity, viciousness, and ingratitude behind your worldview and your best comeback is, sarcastically, “I bet you’re a lot of fun at parties.” You’re pathetic.

So the statement that intolerance will be less and less tolerated (with the implication that this is a good thing) was a grammatical error? Very well, explain what you meant to say, please. I’m pretty sure that said what you meant to say, and if it is, I’m prepared to eviscerate that as well.

Itzpapalotl
Guest
Itzpapalotl
Offline

Oh no, I’m a crappy debater?! How will I ever navigate successfully through life?! Look, I’m not here to participate in a vicious back and forth with you, because, evidently, you’re an uptight shrew, but if you want a medal for pointing out my grammatical error, feel free to print out this conversation and show it to your mom. I sincerely hope your extensive vocabulary, your ability to blow things out of proportion, and first-class skills in online debating keep you warm at night, keyboard killer. <333333333333333

Shawn Smith
Guest
Shawn Smith
Offline

Okay, idiot, I’ve said this already: The problem is not a grammatical error. The problem is that your philosophy is completely incoherent and self-contradictory. I notice you’ve never bothered responding to my more extensive post. I guess you can’t argue with anything I said there.

And as for staying warm at night, my wife does that quite well, thank you. Are there any other vague, baseless slanders you’d like to sling at me?

Itzpapalotl
Guest
Itzpapalotl
Offline

Okay, how is my philosophy self-contradictory?

Shawn Smith
Guest
Shawn Smith
Offline

By the way, I know you’re trying to shame me into shutting up, but it won’t work for two reasons: First, I’ve got truth on my side, not just bullshit cultural marxist slogans I’ve never bothered thinking through. Second, I really don’t care what people like you think about me, largely because I’m not convinced you actually think at all.

Itzpapalotl
Guest
Itzpapalotl
Offline

I’m not shaming you, I just think you, and all the men that are mindlessly following this “War on SJW’s” because you’ve apparently discovered that you like the taste of playing the victim, are blowing all of this completely out of proportion. All this is doing is getting you to file others into neat little boxes so you have some modicum of an excuse to treat them like utter shit when you don’t agree with their political ideologies. Speaking from personal experience, extremists are fucking crazy, and you my friend, are no exception. I’m not saying that feminists aren’t extremists, or that SJW’s aren’t extremists, I’m just pointing out that the males that actively participate/support this website and Roosh, seemingly need some self-victimizing crutch in which they use as an excuse to be unhappy, an asshole, and blame women, as a whole, for being incapable of commitment/monogamy. I can agree that some MRA’s make valid points, but their ideas on women and marriage, and life in general are completely hollow and unrealistic.

Shawn Smith
Guest
Shawn Smith
Offline

I’m not saying that feminists aren’t extremists, or that SJW’s aren’t extremists, I’m just pointing out that the males that actively participate/support this website and Roosh, seemingly need some self-victimizing crutch in which they use as an excuse to be unhappy, an asshole, and blame women,

That’s fascinating, but completely irrelevant to me. You see, I’m not a particular fan of Roosh. I don’t know what he says the rest of the time, but from what little I’ve seen I suspect I disagree with much of it. But what he says here, I wholeheartedly agree with. Weren’t you just criticizing people for “fil[ing] others into neat little boxes so you have some modicum of an excuse to treat them like utter shit”? And yet here you are doing that yourself. All you know about my beliefs is that I think “social justice warriors” are wicked and destructive, but you feel perfectly comfortable ascribing all kinds of other beliefs to me just so you can insult me. The hypocrisy is strong with this one.

Itzpapalotl
Guest
Itzpapalotl
Offline

You acted like an asshole, so I responded like one. You didn’t agree with my original tangent (which is fine), yet you still felt compelled to respond to it, because you didn’t think I was particularly intelligent, so you decided to pounce on the opportunity and attempt to make me look stupid for your own personal satisfaction. That combined with your previous participation in other discussions, makes you an asshole. It has nothing to do with factors that are beyond your control, however. You made the choice to be a dick, so I judged you on that choice.

Shawn Smith
Guest
Shawn Smith
Offline

Grow up. You said something I disagreed with. I carefully and clearly explained why I think you’re wrong. You have responded with nothing but personal attacks and whining. You have not rationally defended your ideas at all and I suspect you ‘re incapable of doing so.

If, when your ideas are challenged, all you can respond with is “You’re an asshole”, you should probably stop publically sharing those ideas.

Grow up.

Itzpapalotl
Guest
Itzpapalotl
Offline

I don’t care if you disagreed with it, the way you went about it came off as shrill/whiny. There is a way to disagree with someone without being rude about it. I didn’t say “You’re an asshole” – I said you’re behavior/comments/wording made you SOUND like an asshole. Stop twisting my words and trying to act like I’m the one who blew it out of proportion. The original comment wasn’t even towards you, yet you felt compelled to jump in. You telling me to “grow up” is rather hypocritical.

Itzpapalotl
Guest
Itzpapalotl
Offline

“You’re an idiot”
“You’re pathetic”
“You’re a crappy debater”
“You don’t think at all”
“The way you think is grotesque”

etc., etc.. – don’t tell me that you didn’t go in all Billy badass, guns a’blazin’, because you did. You chose to make inflammatory remarks from the get go, and even though I was nice and started off with stating that “Sometimes I fuck up what I’m trying to say” – which, sometimes being vulnerable softens the discussion, sometimes it doesn’t – it depends on who you are dealing with.

So you disagree with what I had to say – you don’t need to participate in the discussion any further since you’ve CLEARLY demonstrated a blatant disrespect towards me. As I said – I have no interest in participating in a vicious back and forth with you, but you 1) seem to forget what you said in a previous post and 2) you won’t stop talking about it.

I don’t like your ideology, at all. I think it’s heartless. I think it’s medieval. I think that trying to fit others into neat little boxes and then make them suffer for being anything other than what they’re expected to be is cruel.

And when I said “intolerance is becoming less and less tolerated” – what I meant is that the worldview is attempting to shift in a way that caters to everyone’s happiness, in order to avoid oppression and indifference towards others by refusing to define who they are based upon skin color, sexuality, gender…things of that nature.

Gaston
Guest
Gaston
Offline

You basically just proved the point they were trying to make…..

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

First, your an idiot because SJWs aren’t a political group and theretofore you can’t marginalize an SJW. They’re a political weapon of disparate beliefs. Second, they were indoctrinated to be what they are. Communists put people through re-education camps. SJW’s (communists) will do that to us given enough time. We will do it to them as well as train it out of new generations. Your statistics on women are incompetently stated, to an embarrassing degree. If you don’t know how to talk about science or math, then don’t talk about them to avoid embarrassing yourself. Last, liberals have the least children. PUA is merely an adaptation to liberalized women. There are ways around that which make it unnecessary to a degree, and it is well overshadowed by the greater politics. It has almost nothing to do with what you read in this article.

Shawn Smith
Guest
Shawn Smith
Offline

Well since white males are so irredeemably evil, why don’t we get rid of everything they’ve ever done? What would your life look like then?

You’d be dead several times over. You’d have starved to death because white males created modern agricultural techniques that feed the world. Even if we had the food, you’d still starve because white men invented most of the technology supporting the logistics system distributing that food. Let’s say you managed to eat though, you’d likely still be dead or seriously crippled from one of the many many diseases white men have found treatments or cures for. But let’s say you survived those as well, you’d have no security at all in your life or property, because non-tyrannical governments which respect the rights and property of their citizens and guarantee their freedoms, those were created by white men.

You lefkoarsenikophobia is nothing more nor less than a death wish. If you are so devoted to that, please inflict it merely on yourself rather than our entire society.

juicycarcass
Guest
juicycarcass
Offline

wow, you guys are nuts, lol

keep entertaining me with your circus of failure

David
Guest
David
Offline

I disagree. It is not enough to merely negate an ideology. (The SJW ideology is simply egalitarianism.) Cutting out the noise is good, but you have to offer a signal of your own. That signal is hierarchy and, consequently, nationalism. The idea that “all people are the same/equal” is a false and pernicious concept. (Yes, we can say that the USA is about “equality before the law, not equality of outcome”, but we see that, in practice, declaring people equal even before the law devolved into the SJW nightmare of today.)

Listen to this 60 seconds. TL;DL? Differences are real, and they matter: the young are different from the old, men from women, black from white, smart from stupid, lazy from productive, and so forth. Hierarchy exists everywhere in nature, including in man.

Shinku
Guest
Shinku
Offline

They hate being ignored even more they hate it sooooo much.

Visionquest
Guest
Visionquest
Offline

“if this were REALLY brilliant it wouldn’t just stun you. It would have you do something. like actually do something”

So tell us, what actions are you taking?

Christopher Bear
Guest

this didn’t stun me. I didn’t care for it. I much prefer the stuff on techniques and productivity instead of complaining about people who don’t matter

teapartydoc
Guest
teapartydoc
Offline

Aristotle’s De Anima was brilliant, but it didn’t make me want to do anything.

Some Privileged Dude
Guest
Some Privileged Dude
Offline

I shared it on facebook. Does that count? grin

Hugh
Guest
Hugh
Offline

Roosh, this is brilliant.
Reading your post I couldn’t help but think of the similarities between SJW and jihadists. Both are always pushing it to the next level in a desperate search to be beyond criticism from their peers.
SJWs backed gays and are now moving on to transgenders; Sad young men from my home town (London) backed Al Qaeda, but have now moved on to the purer ISIL.
In the process all that is (was) good and true in Social Justice / Islam is sacrificed and we are left with dangerous caricatures that can only harm us.

Quintus Curtius
Guest

Comprehensive, documented, and irrefutable. This is a very impressive essay.

David Alvaro
Guest
David Alvaro
Offline

You’re right, it is hard to refute fiction. An essay requires some fundamental basis in reality in order to be refuted. This is just scribbling in shit on a bathroom wall.

Harold Teekman
Guest
Harold Teekman
Offline

That must be great quality then cause this shit is gold.

David Alvaro
Guest
David Alvaro
Offline

Exactly. You guys are so desperate for someone to pander to you and validate you, that instead of a rational albeit biased piece on how your enemies are wrong about their positions, you enjoy completely preposterous attacks giving them purely evil motives, and you think this turd shines.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

We’ve done that over and over again, everywhere on the net. This piece is merely meant to outline the SJW, and it accomplishes that admirably if not in a slightly too small aperture. You’re merely commenting on the tip of the nail on the toe of the elephant, David. That’s okay, though, because we know tht information has never been the strong suit of the SJW.

David Alvaro
Guest
David Alvaro
Offline

Yes, you’re right, progressivism has never produced any great minds to match the intellectual weight of the manosphere. You guys are all here praising the sophisticated thinking and strong prose of this failed pickup artist blogger. On the other side, the “SJWs” just have basically ever artist, writer, academic, scientist, and innovator of the century. We are so intimidated.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

Well “great” is relative judgment, isn’t it? The representative culmination of “great” liberal minds are Marx/Lenin who are directly responsible for over 100 million murders in the 20th century. That’s the past legacy of your politics and will continue to be its future. Although I don’t regularly read Roosh, I’ll take him over that because I’m not a murderer nor potential murderer. And who the fuck are you talking about? You’ve just revealed your age and or cognitive maturity level by using “just have basically (best?) ever”. Take a hike, kid because as I said, you are in over your uninformed head. Best ever “academic”??! (not even a rankable category, idiot) Best ever “innovator”?? (hmm…electricity and indoor plumbing would pretty much indisputably top the list, you’re talking about those innovators being SJWs?)! Best ever “writer”??! (100% subjective…what kind of writer?) Please tell me what SJW artist is the “best ever”? You’re truly a moron, or just young.

This isn’t a manosphere article, dimwit. It’s an anti-communist, anti-cultural marxism article. It might surprise you to know that I don’t regularly read this site. I’d venture that many readers of this article don’t regularly peruse this site. I came here for the political article only. You lack perspective on your audience.

I’ll do you a favor. Go read the introductory material by Mencius Moldbug, if you can handle it on your reading level, for an anti-SJW “factual” overview. That’s a start that will enable you to gain enough perspective to begin educating yourself and not coming off like you are talking out of your ass when you address us.

My prediction is that you will come back and parrot an SJW criticims without reading it, replete with ad-hominems. My second prediction is that we could take the best factual, logical representative writing of either of our individual political systems, compete in mutual criticism, and your ultimate argument would rest on “sexist”, “racist”, “cisgenedered” or whatever oppressive non-arguments your political kind is using at the time. The entire foundation of SJW argument relies on not offending people under the premise of any one of these slanderous, oppressive allegations. I could write a 4000 word diatribe based in social history and political theory of how actual political power for the lest of our citizens is cultivated and maintained, supporting my views, but your views would ultimately come down to your idiosyncratic, nihilistic morality contained in your slurs. Meanwhile, you would fail at explaining the wider effect that racial and gender politics has on political power for all people. This is why your accusations against “facts” and “logic” are the most delicious of ironies and why you are a complete waste of time. Good day now.

David Alvaro
Guest
David Alvaro
Offline

This is a manosphere article. It’s a website run by a failed pick up artist guru who now publishes screeds on how he actually hates the women who reject him for sociopolitical reasons. The reason this article is published at all is because the angry virgins of the manosphere feel that progressivism is responsible for giving women sexual agency, and because women can choose who they can fuck, they don’t fuck the losers who read these websites. That’s it.

JP
Guest
JP
Offline

Wait, are you actually ignorant enough to believe that you have every intellectual ever on your side, or are you like the kid I knew that bragged about his 100 karat gold when I was showing off some 14k stuff I had? That is you just say stuff you think sounds good to make yourself feel good. I’m inclined to think the later. Few innovators give shit about your cause and scientific work (hard sciences, not subjective ‘social scientist’, you can have the later type, they’re garbage) is by and large socially neutral, the scientist themselves falling all over the spectrum (well, not if we count practical sciences like engineering and technology, then it weighs against you somewhat. Engineers sick of the ‘token woman’ screwing shit up and all).

But whatever man, have your 100k gold, it just reminds us of how flimsy you actually are.

Alex de Bellencombre
Guest
Alex de Bellencombre
Offline

You might reflect on the fact that highly intelligent people typically don’t care about ad hominem attacks, as they are the stock-in-trade of children, the low IQ, malicious gossips, etc. They are a sign of intellectual weakness as a better tactic would surely be employed if the debater had one at his disposal.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

This “shit on a bathroom wall” has deomstrably enough staying power to have retained your continued and infuriated attention. Let’s see how long you can keep going on hot air.

Deplorable Cis Man
Guest
Deplorable Cis Man
Offline

Writes the wise guy that has shit for brain: not one valid argument.

30+1
Guest
30+1
Offline

How much more oppression will white men endure before it all blows up?

All these pinko commies are like a bunch of cats peeing on the family Rottweiler (white man) who is loyal and intelligent but fed up.

If you look at history what group won wars, designed weapons, combat aircraft, etc. Some white men have weapons and spines like Putin and I can see from Rooshs latest video in Odesaa how healthy and pro Hetero and family EE is compared to the stinking rotten garbage can of Marxism and moral rot called the Anglosphere.

I just can’t believe these SJW/Marxist Thought police are even real. The offspring of a dying civilization becuse only a Country on the decline could produce such loons as this.

The modern World is sick. I can honestly say I wish the Catholic Church ran everything- Id submit to them in a heart beat over Jew/Khazar bankers and their class of thougt control clowns.

Tcheverlika
Guest
Tcheverlika
Offline

It can’t blow since everything was done to strip us of that collective consciousness that has the ability to make us act and think as a unit. In the era of individualism, only a few people can think in terms of “Is this good for my country, my civilization ?”

David
Guest
David
Offline

How much worse can it get? Buddy….you ain’t seen nothin’ yet. The only way modern liberalism will end (and it will) is through good ol’ natural selection: these SJWs, despite their obsession with sex, are largely sexless and entirely childless, and therefore they are self-selecting for extinction. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/18/why-generation-y-less-sex

But DO NOT view Catholicism as a refuge from SJWs or liberalism. As a lifelong Catholic, I can 100% confidently say that the Church has been as infiltrated and subverted as any institution (universities, corporations, government, etc.) by liberalism. Pope’s have been increasingly liberal, and Pope Francis is, unquestioningly, an SJW himself! http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/pope-inequality-root-of/2014/04/28/id/568036/

Joe
Guest
Joe
Offline

I know the Church has been subverted by Masonic/Zionist/Illumiati traitors like evey other social institution from A-Z out here. What I mean is a pure, historical Church that brought Europe out of the ashes of the dark ages and civilized and healed brokenness and brought hope and development.
I know about the Schofield Bible and all the Masonic/Zuonist new world order subversion- the Church should be infallible and a refuge of truth and hope in a World gone mad.

I don’t read this blog to be a player- I read it because of the cultural analysis and its sad most men are around women who do not want to be good, loyal, and feminine. The guys who escape Anglosphere girls for solid, loyal Christian girls like in Poland and Colombia are smart. This blog makes me want to get my act together and do just that. My Dad was right if you woman’s not a Christian you don’t want her-she will only bring you trouble. So true.

Roosh-
I agree with you on culture and foreign women but you should treat a good loyal girl like in Poland with love and respect and marry her. Sin leads none of us anywhere but to hell. We all sin and are a fallen and evil race but we must repent and turn to God. He can cleanse is and set us free and give is a new life and hope. You have said all the notches are pretty meaningless- you need Jesus my friend- He can fulfill you.

We need a revival and we need to pray. We need Jesus Christ to heal our lands and save us from our sins.

seth datta
Guest
seth datta
Offline

Christianity as in the Bible could be interpreted as God’s value system for all races. There is no need to ‘convert’, just a belief in Christ and a belief in a righteous God. Churches are not the original way Christians in ancient times worshipped.

ray
Guest
ray
Offline

That is not just excellent advice. It’s the only advice.
The author is young, like most of the readership here. It’s hard to learn humility in youth; I know I didn’t. But it takes humility and obedience to come before God. None of the proud need bother.
I hope Father touches some of the people here and brings them to Himself. Nothing I say will make that experience understandable. It’s not based on intellect. Words fail. But He does not.
Cheers.

Drone Killa
Guest
Drone Killa
Offline

the church was subverted very early on. look into “gnosticism,” the church censored/destroyed a lot of religious texts around 200 or 300 AD that weren’t recovered until around 1950.

personally i think the gospels are great, but st paul’s teachings are not compatible with Christ’s IMO.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

I agree that Paul, or rather Saul (actual name), was the subversive.

The primary reason for Christ’s presence on Earth was to refute Pharisaic Judaism (modern rabbinical Judaism). His gripe was that the Pharisees (Rabbis) saw their word (the Talmud) as superior to the original word of God to the Hebrews (the Torah). The Talmudic religion raises the Rabbi to god status by making their legalistic interpretation of god’s word superior to the original word itself. Pharisaic Judaism is Judaism. There were no Jews before Pharisaic Judaism. There were Hebrews. The religion of the Hebrews is not Talmudic Judaism (aka Judaism). Essentially, Christ came to restore the religion of the Hebrews through Christians. That’s why Christians, for so long, maintained the supersessionist doctrine that maintained that a new covenant was made for them to replace the Jewish successors to the Hebrews as God’s chosen. That widespread doctrine in mainstream Christianity lasted until circa Vatican II, after Jewish world power firmly asserted itself post WWII. Today, Jews will accuse you of antisemitism, in a very SJW tactical manner, for refuting their claim as the chosen people. What supersessionism meant to the Jews is why they have Jesus boiling in feces in hell in the Talmud and prophecy that his name will be erased. For an entertaining routing of the Rabbis by Jesus, consult Mathew 23 (amongst other places in the NT).

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

The Pope is essentially a Rabbi for Christians, which is as blatantly anti-Christian as it gets. That the Pope is a Rabbi is verified by the simple fact that the Pope’s word is considered to be infallible, apparently even when it conflicts with the word of god. This is the nature of the Rabbi, and it’s the core ideology that Jesus came to denounce. I hold that the Catholic Church is essentially Judaic Christianity. Whereas, in general, that term is an oxymoron despite its propgandic widespread use in the states (for puposes of Christian support for Israel and Jews). Judaism and Christianity are opposite concepts (god’s authority vs man’s authority). Revelation makes some strong future predictions given the current political climate. For context, I’m an agnostic (maybe a future Christian). It’s just that the information in the New Testament is impossible to ignore if current politics are to be understood, as the are inexorably wrapped up in the Abrahamic religions.

ray
Guest
ray
Offline

Catholicism (and most modern ‘churches’) are no refuge from the Sick Jackass Wimps. Rome has been infected for many decades, certainly since Vatican II. The Pope shills for female empowerment etc.
Cheers.

Drone Killa
Guest
Drone Killa
Offline

this new pope is a communist.

seth datta
Guest
seth datta
Offline

Catholic Church is run by the bankers. It has been for hundreds of years. I think the eastern orthodox, protestant and other movements have more validity, though not JH or Mormons IMHO.

SOMEGUY7893 .
Guest
SOMEGUY7893 .
Offline

I don’t know, for a while us Spanish were competing with Britain for top spot. It’s funny though how SJW’s seem to ignore the shit my ancestors did but constantly deride whites for their ancestors actions.

Coldwarvet
Guest
Coldwarvet
Offline

This is flat out knocked out of the park. Can’t wait to blast this one out to the few lib-progs I still spar with.

Tcheverlika
Guest
Tcheverlika
Offline

Just imagine somebody taking a bullet in the head. That man falls on the ground, his leg muscle twitchs, creating a cadaveric spasm. This spasm is purely muscular, the brain being dead.
That’s the state of the society as we know it. We are witnessing the last twitchs of the gigantic human body that is the western civilization.

seth datta
Guest
seth datta
Offline

Its not just western civ. Its far worse. It is the white race becoming a diaspora and minority in each and every nation, but without power and privilege. The orchestrators play a good game of chess. Or is it just that most of humanity, whatever the race, are just good pawns/slaves.

David Alvaro
Guest
David Alvaro
Offline

Will your tinfoil hat protect you from the bullet?

tom
Guest
tom
Offline

Are you denying the eventual reality of his statement, or are you just typing whatever characters appear in the shit between your ears?

David Alvaro
Guest
David Alvaro
Offline

His statement. Western Civilization has always been defined by innovation, by the development of new ideas and a drive to progress forward. America, in particular, has a progressivist tradition that always varies between periods of status quo and bursts of the liberation of more people and more fundamental rights. As far as I can tell, that civilization is very healthy. Eschatology is always the refuge of these least sophositicated thinkers within any cult. Nice heavy metal prose, by the way.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

Your stated perspective is 100% interpretative and myopic. You’re attempting to justify your brand of radical social change, which is absolutely ahistorical in its effects on the family unit and thus the political community, by attaching it to rights that conversely have historically increased the ability of communities (political groups) to assert themselves against hegemonic power. To wit, one of the “bursts” of fundamental rights was that of free political speech. Today, free political speech is being clamped down upon with SJWs leading the charge. Is an effective reduction (and a legal reduction in free speech almost everywhere in the first world west other than the USA) on free speech one of the historical changes in rights that you meant to align yourself with?

We aren’t just talking about gay marriage and we aren’t talking about “fundamental rights” as you so disingenuously claim. Equal rights under the law, with the exception of gay marriage, has been established. The fact is that you are talking about unequal treatment under the law toward equal outcomes. “Equal outcomes” being entirely subjective and biased in terms of which groups are targeted and which groups are ignored to maintain their unequal outcomes. SJWs allow for power toi select which groups they wish to oppress and wish groups they wish to bolster, often with the sole intention of oppressing other groups. SJW’s prevent legitimate political criticism of groups acting politically against other groups for completely selfish interests. Therefore, in preventing free speech, they allow for political mafias to run rampant within nations to advocate for unequal, special treatment under the law.

Your political beliefs are oppressive, undemocratic, unjust, and ahistorical. You’re on the wrong side of history.

David Alvaro
Guest
David Alvaro
Offline

The wrong side of history? The people you call SJWs are trying to move the world forward by continuing the inexorable march of progress from the dark ages to a better future where there is a truly equal society. You guys are so threatened by advances made by other groups because you are losing your stranglehold on power, and desire to either move backward to some kind of idealized past that never existed, where just being a white man guaranteed you the things you want regardless of your lack of education, ambition, skills, charisma, empathy, and physical attractiveness, or to just end civilization altogether. History doesn’t move backward and it doesn’t end.

No one on the left advocates for restrictions on legal free speech. Sponsors walking away from a bigot for spouting hate speech is not a restriction of free speech, no matter how much you people try to cry that it is. You angry virgins have the right to spit whatever kind of delusional, hateful garbage that you want against women, the jews, blacks, Catholics, liberals, and whoever else you want to pretend is responsible for your life being so empty and meaningless. But don’t be surprised that no one wants to hear about it. It’s like your little Gamergate thing. Except for the legitimately illegal death threats, no one tried to silence that garbage. In fact, everyone encouraged the misogynists of video gaming to say all they could, since every thing they said just incriminated and discredited them more in the eyes of everyone outside of that little he-man woman hater club.

Ultimately, you guys think that everyone who advocates for anyone other that straight white men do it for the evilest of motives and are bent on destroying society, while those who advocate exclusively for straight white men are heroes. That’s just sad and ridiculous. And that’s not even to mention the fact that you think that the men who gather together to bitch and moan about how mean women and liberals are and how much they hurt their feelings and don’t love them are the most masculine men in the world. That’s the just pure comedy that keeps bringing normal men and women to these sites for entertainment.

jenkins
Guest
jenkins
Offline

Moving forwards for a better society?….So the food supply is running out, bees are going extinct, global warming, the elite have all the power, half the flora and fauna of the planet is gone, wars are being fought over the depleting oil supply, people are obsessed with materialism, people in western societies have to look to drugs to trigger their dopamine, ceritonine and oxytocin receptors…and you are fighting for the survival of extreme minorities? And you think that’s productive? So we are all going extinct and you are standing there saying: “hey at least we helped the gays and transgender people feel a little more at home during the great extinction”….Btw I don’t have a problem with any one’s sexual or gender preferences I just think those problems can wait, you know until we sort out the survival of our species. But no those things take a lot of effort, more than just a click of your mouse.

Dominic
Guest
Dominic
Offline

There are much bigger problems than these overly-dramatized social justice issues that our society thinks are so important. These “issues” are inflated and in fact shouldn’t be issues at all (ex. gay rights, transgender rights, women’s rights; they have already have these rights, they want more). Attention seeking is promoted and victimizing is encouraged. Why should these behaviors be treated specially? There are many minorities that have had no problem with the law because they follow the system in place. When groups start demanding special or different treatment for attention, there is a problem. Equality exists. Just because someone isn’t pleased with their reality, doesn’t mean they have the right to label themselves as a made-up term and fight for “unjust treatment of their group”.

Alex de Bellencombre
Guest
Alex de Bellencombre
Offline

There is something distinctly semitic about your attitude. Everthing you say is right out of the semitically correct play book (extremely unoriginal, base, common, and popular).

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

That’s an apt analogy considering the level of widespread utter unconsciousness about the situation. SJW’s are like the shit expelled from the bowels after the sphincter relaxes.

Aristophanes
Guest
Aristophanes
Offline

Excellent, yet horrifying article. What do you propose we do to protect ourselves? I think it’s clear that the MRA’s aren’t accomplishing much…

seth datta
Guest
seth datta
Offline

Do western society males have a future? Feminism will collapse in ten years when the bankers stop funding it. Because it will have achieved what it was meant to – to get the women split up from the men, to lower the white birthrate and to re-structure/re-socialise the society to one of multi-cultural state-sponsored wage slavery and spiritual death.

Saturnrules
Guest
Saturnrules
Offline

The “A voice for Men” variety of the MRA’s have been subverted since its inception. Go here for a real politically aware MRA https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr3qf3JVwW_41j4LUQZtu9Q

Itzpapalotl
Guest
Itzpapalotl
Offline

He’s ugly as shit, so I didn’t watch the video.

Saturnrules
Guest
Saturnrules
Offline

You’ve got to be a Leftist.

CheshireCat
Guest
CheshireCat
Offline

“Thanks to the subjectiveness of their ideology, SJW’s lack morality or virtue.”
That sums it up right there, and while everyone is inherently subjective to some extent, what these people do is not driven on any sort of concrete value or rational logic. It is a culture of unbridled, unchecked, and subjective extroverted emotions with no foundation or structure. Agree 100% on every point made.

Mr. B
Guest
Mr. B
Offline

It’s even worse than this. The effort for “social justice” is becoming institutionalized. Some colleges are teaching that the Firm has a social justice responsibility not only to their employees but also the world around them.

This came up in a conversation I had with a 22 year old college junior I mentor on occasion. When given a liberatatian counterpoint he reacted like I just revealed fire for the first time and was completely unaware of the notion that the primary driver of business is a profit motive. Free markets bad; gov’t regulation good. Capitalism bad; social justice good. By the way he is a business major.

Ricky Vaughn
Guest
Ricky Vaughn
Offline

Roosh, I would recommend you add this book to your reading list:

macDamon
Guest
macDamon
Offline

Урррррааааа за Руш!

Mr. B
Guest
Mr. B
Offline

The SWJ is 100% pure, unchecked feminine energy in action.

ray
Guest
ray
Offline

The SJW phenomenon absolutely is grounded in the Feminine Imperative. And it is Big Feminism which rests at the heart of the ‘minority majority’.

SUPRA luca
Guest
SUPRA luca
Offline

Still much less damaging than unchecked masculine energy, which is torturing, raping and killing, I see. Feminine energy is purer in propose, less megalomaniacal and destructive. It is usually nurturing all the way, even when out of control it has peaks of calmness and discipline. I see a good cause behind it all, it just has to come back to the middle.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

All completely invalid, politically motivated opinion without basis.

Masculine energy is why your DNA survived to make you and why your progenitor wasn’t raped by an ape and left in a ditch to rot away, why we have a legal system that is the very basis of society, why you have a computer and electricity to communicate as well as a roof, why you aren’t shitting in the woods, and why you don’t have to worry about getting raped by the next gang over the hill. All very damaging, I know.

Female energy purer in purpose, calm (haha), DISCIPLINED, nurturing and less destructive??! Your smoking crack.

I work with all women. When I say all, I mean 45 women in a graduate education environment. I’m the only man. I get to watch them as if I don’t exist because I lack any political power whatsoever, because I’m the only man, and so I’m easy to ignore. I’m absolutely fine with it, and I have a few women friends there who are great. The greater group, however, is shocking to watch. There is zero sense of individual justice. If one woman becomes politically vulnerable because she somehow loses social traction in the group, she is politically and socially savaged by the greater group to a shocking degree. It doesn’t matter what her extenuating circumstances are. The group mentality, based in group approval, takes over completely. It’s absolutely vicious. After working with these women, I’m completely unconvinced of a woman’s innate ability to be a judge or have any power in which an individual’s life or well being is under their control. Discipline?? Most women have zero impulse control of judgment, with some minority exceptions, when it comes to deciding what is appropriate to speak about in the workplace when unmonitored by men. It’s a literal free-for-all, and the lawsuit worthy gossip in the workplace occurs weekly. Calm?? Over-emotional reactions to the de rigeur of office politics and interpersonal communication are daily events. Calm. You have either zero self-awareness or are an exceedingly poor observer of the female condition.

Never be vulnerable around a woman, in the workplace or otherwise, unless you wish your figurative throat to be torn out.

Anon
Guest
Anon
Offline

It’s not just research, they’re coming for big data and algorithms too: http://io9.com/how-algorithms-can-become-as-prejudiced-as-people-1638768767

Further proof that nothing, including hard data, will trump their emotions.

paddyo
Guest
paddyo
Offline

Confront them directly. Push back hard. Organize. Ridicule them out loud . The moment you lose your fear of being labeled is the moment they lose their power over you.

The mainstream media is nearly dead. A new round of layoffs and buyouts are underway. The survivors are only preaching to the congregation. Don’t underestimate the value of websites like this where like-thinking men can openly discuss the issues. The left will lose its control of the national debate.

Tom Dane
Guest
Tom Dane
Offline

Yea I think its about time that people fight back. For example, talk openly about being against homosexuality could get you fired. Then when they DO fire you, sue them. Because there is nothing in the law that says you cant say that.
Fight for your right for free speech.

prepz
Guest
prepz
Offline

Been there, done that. It’s a chasing after the wind. The best course of action is to retreat and rebulid bastions of male-dominated reality from which to watch the rest of the world burn itself down with it’s mental illnesses. Unlike Nero, you can keep your wits and watch Rome burn with a plan of what do when it’s a an ash heap.

seth datta
Guest
seth datta
Offline

Try talking about Zionism. I would, but in the UK there’s no point as most folk are so brainwashed or fearful/defeated, that they will serve the beast until their death. Absolutely useless. You’re better off talking to a wall.

They’re just waiting to be finished by their slave masters.

paddyo
Guest
paddyo
Offline

Forget Zionism. Talk about England. Talk about your great heritage and history. Talk about Shakespeare!

finndistan
Guest
finndistan
Offline

Dass Raciss…

Slaves built england and english culture.

SUPRA luca
Guest
SUPRA luca
Offline

Fight for your right for free speech for the wrong things. Who cares about decency, respect and good sense.

Uncivilized, ignorant American males being uncivilized, ignorant American males, as always.

Tom Dane
Guest
Tom Dane
Offline

Yea because it would be better if we were all gay, right ?

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

Yes, the battle cry of the SJW: “Das Ignant”!

In Oceania, where ignorance is strength, doublethink dictates that anti-family values individualist politics are pro-civilization and traditional values, running parallel to historical civilization, are anti-civilization.

Got it.

cmp679
Guest
cmp679
Offline

‘The moment you lose your fear of being labeled is the moment they lose their power over you’

Very true. I see some signs this is starting to happen in England.

Jordan
Guest
Jordan
Offline

Fantastic Stuff!!!

Lee
Guest
Lee
Offline

This is great work and a top 5 manosphere article. Everything about these SJW’s is sickening. There all scheming cunts whos only motivation in life is to make everyone as miserable and unsuccessful as they are.

Emahray Trolle
Guest
Emahray Trolle
Offline

They also make money at it. Lots of money.

Salon daily posts click-bait essays on white racism and corporate malfeasance to their target demographic of aging white feminists while raking in cash from corporate advertising. Joan Walsh, the proprieter of Salon, lives in a gated all-white community where she enjoys the security and protection of white patriarchy so she can have time to pen her anti-white-male hate screeds in between collecting cash generated by her harem of unpaid journalists.

The pros know how it works.

Roosh_V
Guest
Roosh_V
Offline
seth datta
Guest
seth datta
Offline

SJW is funded by wealthy bankers promoting an agenda – the enslavement of societies. AS such, feminism, secular humanism and SJW’s have been effective enough, along with social engineering, especially alimony and the like. Making people better slaves for lower pay and who complain less. This will be the end effect of SJW. But you better believe that plenty of men and even more women will sell out because this is where the cash is – they don’t have to be much good, just forward the agenda. As such, the girls will all now want to be useless society-destroying SJWs talking about how men are destroying society, and some men wanting to get laid by these girls will become SJWs to before the west collapses. and becomes a full-on totalitarian slave state of almost global proportions.

SJW = Some Joo Wins.

I await the NSA and multiple comments from posters from the ADL and SPLC etc.. denigrating my manhood, sex life etc, making diversionary comments and just trying to alter the course of the debate where they up vote their comments and drown out this legitimate point in white noise, for freedom of speech will perish under the next five years in the west.

Teedub
Guest
Teedub
Offline

This was quite marvellous

Sanelity
Guest
Sanelity
Offline

Excellent essay. “Mos Eisley Spaceport Tumblr. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.”

Each new cause is an addictive substance to the SJW. Even if it goes against yesterday’s cause. It was fun to watch the #solidarityisforwhitewomen hashtag make a lot of SWPL women uncomfortable. Cis-Het White Women often forget that they are just one small step removed from the source of all evil – CHWM.

Tommy Hass
Guest
Tommy Hass
Offline

I like how Roosh mentions sex differences but not race differences. Lol.

desbest
Guest
desbest
Offline

Sex difference are much more pronounced than race differences, when looking at how the brain is wired.

SUPRA luca
Guest
SUPRA luca
Offline

Scientists still can’t say how brains are wired. Even saying a brain is “wired” somehow is wrong, as there is still no proof any “wiring” (nor sixe or such) difference that can be noticed between the sexes is there from birth.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

lol…there are entire books on specific networks in the brain, all unquestionably accepted and taught in mainstream academia. However, I”ll venture a guess that you’ve never taken a neuroanatamoy course and that, instead, you’re a moron who aspires to be a bullshit artist. I love it when SJW’s attempt to sound like they’ve cracked an undergraduate science text, let alone venture into graduate/med school topics.

colombianreader
Guest
colombianreader
Offline

excellent essay

Bob
Guest
Bob
Offline

Probably the most well written article describing these SJW’s and their toxic influence on society.

Samseau
Guest
Samseau
Offline

Great job Roosh in laying out the case. SJW’s are no different than Communists, Nazi’s, or any other ideological brainwashing movement.

seth datta
Guest
seth datta
Offline

All funded by the same people if you investigate…

Yes, even Nazi-ism, to an extent.

Itzpapalotl
Guest
Itzpapalotl
Offline

Except that men actually defined the true meaning of what it is to be a Nazi, whereas SJW’s haven’t.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

SJW’s serve to empower small mafias amongst the majority. Small mafia’s almost always have some type of supremacist ideology, some older than others. Did you know that Islam doesn’t consider non-Muslims human? Well, like 1-2% human. Judaism has similar ideology, especially in the ultra orthodox and, to an extent, orthodox sects. Unironically, these are the two truly monotheistic Abrahamic religions. Neither tolerates any type of polytheism (an intolerance that is another form of supremacy, not to mention the mandate for all non-Jews in the world to follow Noahide Laws as inferiors in the Jewish legal system). In either case, the ideology is much more extreme than anything the modern white man espouses about his self-interests in European states or the USA. Both of these supremacist ideologies are darlings of willfully ignorant SJW’s.

Additionally, the community/family destructive social effect of SJW is the precise social strategy of communism – a movement you admit is supremacist.

If any Jew predictably wants to counter my assertion of anti-gentitlism, I’ll respond with a litany of very modern Jewish sources that directly confirm my assertion. Just to prepare you. Yeah, yeah, antisemitic, whatever…take a walk. The truth of anti-gentilism is the readily verifiable truth.

Lex Corvus
Guest
Lex Corvus
Offline

This outstanding essay deserves a broad audience. Under the assumption that it will achieve such an audience, and in an effort to make it as polished as possible, I offer the following minor corrections:

it’s intended audience -> its intended audience

Western legal cannon -> Western legal canon

Finally, Sandra Y.L. Korn is not a professor as stated in the essay; at the time of the cited opinion piece, she was a Harvard University undergraduate (class of ’14).

Roosh_V
Guest
Roosh_V
Offline

Fixed, thanks.

ng85
Guest
ng85
Offline

Roosh, this essay is amazing! Living in NYC I have to deal with SJW types on an almost daily basis. But there’s one thing I’d like to add to your points: SJW types can’t exist without the internet.

And what do I mean by that? They’re chicken shit in real life. I highly doubt most SJWs actually believe the bullshit they re-blog or re-post from other social media users (SJWs are usually incapable of coming up with original thoughts and just “repurpose” other people’s ideas as their own). I know several people who post nothing but SJW shit on their blogs on a daily basis, yet when we hang out in person they don’t mention a thing about it. In fact, a lot of them seem to enjoy my offensive and irreverent sense of humor.

One situation stands out to me – I was at a party where this super beta dude was whining about something, and this stereotypical Tumblr feminist chick (Who does have a SJW Tumblr that I’ve seen) goes “Quit being such a FAGGOT!!!” As a joke I go “Excuse me, but that word is VERY offensive to me! What the fuck are you thinking????” She panicked, and just blurts out “I can say it, I have a gay brother!” Which lead me to say “Well I have a black cousin, does that mean I can say ‘nigger’ whenever I want?” She immediately changed the topic of conversation in immediate defeat.

SJW types can only thrive in a bubble of other people that agree with them. The only problem is the people that agree with them are so few and far between that the internet is the only way for them to come together. And if everyone agrees with the same things as you then you start to believe that it’s TRUTH no matter how far-fetched it is. But get them alone and in person and try talking with them and it becomes evident that they can’t debate for shit. It also becomes evident that perhaps they don’t believe their bullshit as much as they claim to since they can’t passionately argue in favor of it off the cuff – It’s lazy herd-thinking at its finest. And it’s not that hard to out-alpha the SJW dudes, which is why I’m pretty sure with minimal effort I could crack gay jokes and get them to laugh along. And I’ve NEVER been called out on this shit in person. The only time I’ve “gotten in trouble” with the SJWs is online, and online ONLY. Away from their keyboards they have no power.

chrisgale
Guest
chrisgale
Offline

Preach it brother.
The cure is plain speech, confrontation, and mockery.
Because these rabbits will run when confronted: and since I am white, heterosexual and Christian I assume that I;m offensive and just get on with letting out the snark.

Al
Guest
Al
Offline

Snark and catty debates must be a millennial thing. When I was growing up there were vestiges of the beat down culture meaning you got out of line or in someone’s face it be on and rights and lefts would be flying. If I were in undergrad today judging by my assessing of it all Id be brawling often- for me it doesn’t end at
A catty snark that’s passive aggressive and quasi homo (basically
Glorified cowardice) but rather rotating my hips with violent intensity as I let those hands go on the mouth of some punk.

chrisgale
Guest
chrisgale
Offline

That gets you arrested, and worse, sacked. What does work is a nice critique. And standing up (literally) to protect which is sacred: I’m thinking of the men standing in front of the Argentinian feminists as they tried to invade a cathedral.

Al
Guest
Al
Offline

Those Marxist clowns disrespecting anyone’s place of worship (Church, Mosque- youll never see them invade a Synagogue-coincidence? Not likely)makes me want punch them in the face. Christians will terate that nonsense more but I doubt they’d clown around at a mosque and if the adherents beat them for disrespecting a ace of worship I would not convict them for it at all. These commies are the worst-cant stand them- remember all Feminism is is gender centric Marxism applied. Communism is a tool of satan and I absolutely hate it.

Clark Kent
Guest
Clark Kent
Offline

I’m from Toronto… those videos are embarrassing… What is even more sad is I know girls like that… and if you’re curious, they don’t have any real problems in life besides the drama they create…

Anon
Guest
Anon
Offline

Brilliant, simply brilliant.

Blue Tropic
Guest

Ironically one of the most threatened groups are the white attractive women.

They resemble the oppressive objectification of women, and are a resemblance to the arcaic and mysoginistic values that value them in terms of their physical attractiveness.

nana
Guest
nana
Offline

Using marx as a reference for ‘cultural marxism’ is intellectually dishonest. It’s a different school.

Leroy X
Guest
Leroy X
Offline

All leftists and commies are destroyers of civilization.

Re your comment above-That’s like saying dont refer to all the gangs in my city as criminals and thugs-my set in the hoods is crips and we are a different school.

tonipepperoni
Guest
tonipepperoni
Offline

Would civilization even be possible if Man decided to be a conservative? Nope.
Your statement is both ironic and retarded.

What really is Left-wing politics? To you American’s it’s “Progressivisism” or “lib-tard”. To Europeans, it’s something completely different.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ny-hn5Mf-Q4

Master Dogen
Guest

Good stuff, Roosh, and true.

“How did SJW’s become such a powerful force?”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School

I was an English major in University, about 16 years ago, at an “upper tier” public school (pretty typical place). I was taught “Critical Theory” there, which is the academic skeleton around which SJW ideas are built. I was very, very good at this stuff, and before I graduated I was taking Master’s and PhD level courses in deconstruction and post-structuralist thought, etc.

The stuff I was learning was way, way “out there” at the time. Now it is the new “normal” for SJW’s. And, of course, what was already normal in the late 1990’s was “way out there” back in the 60’s and 70’s.

This is a deliberate effort to radicalize young people and turn them against their own culture by creating resentment and what Nietzsche called the “tarantula hearts.”

As absurd as the SJW’s have gotten (and one look at the tumblr “otherkin” scene is enough to make you laugh for days), it WILL get worse. Radicalization can never stop on its own because it has an internal logic that MUST destroy whatever is “normal.”

Finally, I live in an extremely liberal neighborhood in an extremely liberal city. We had gay marriage acceptance around here 15 years before it became a big deal nationwide. I’ve seen firsthand how these ideas radiate out from the liberal “fringe” into the wider society. So, based on what I’ve begun to see around here in the last year, prepare yourself for: lots of “genderfuck” people like fat women with beards, men and even school-age boys in dresses (dressed by their abusive “liberated” mothers of course), face and neck tattoos on non gang-related middle class white people, and all kinds of status competitions to be the most “wacky” “liberated” “free-thinker” of them all (in other words, to be the most conformist drone of the Frankfurt School.)

Ironically, of course, all this Marxist-style “liberation” is welcomed by massive, deracinated international capitalists…. people who hate their history, family and community and who talk non-stop about “individuality” and “justice” make the perfect hive-consumers. It’s not by accident that Google pushes SJW agendas and Burger King has rainbow Whoppers.

Mantis
Guest
Mantis
Offline

Great comment on a fantastic article. Cheers to the both of you!

seth datta
Guest
seth datta
Offline

This sounds horrible. Where is this if you don’t mind me asking (rough geographical area will do).

Master Dogen
Guest

Capitol Hill in Seattle.

Ian
Guest
Ian
Offline

Why are they so deranged in Seattle? And passive aggressive?

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

Yeah, that would be an epicenter. It’s that likely only San Francisco would be worse, and maybe not even worse due to the pricing that forces people to be more serious in their lifestyle (in general) as well as the Chinese presence.

tonipepperoni
Guest
tonipepperoni
Offline

This is both philosophically and historically incorrect.
Most of the critical-theory you speak of has been re-hashed American reductionist views which have completely misinterpreted the original thought of European thinkers.

I too am a critique of America’s execution of ‘critical theory’, ‘cultural marxism’ and SJWs.

The problem is simple:
Up until recent American hegemony and globalisation, Europe has been relatively untouched by the idiotic “Women studies” philosophy that’s taught in American universities. Even today, in economically developed countries (excluding Scandinavia which is ‘progressive’ by default due to its Lutherian background and it’s high proficiency and love for Anglo-culture/language) we are yet to see the ridiculous levels of SJW/Feminist batshittery that we see in America. This is ironic considering that post-modernism rose out of the continent.

Simple answer: Americans by default are reductionist. They re-hash things they don’t understand and propagandize it to the masses. Has RooshV ever read Das Kapital? Has he read Hegel? Not likely. Yet his followers accept his sentiments as though it is a sermon delivered in the form of a ‘Red Pill’.

What infected the Arts/History/Philosophy faculties of America infects RooshV’s writings and the manosphere. Reductionist attitude towards life, viewing philosophy and history as being two dimensional, and accepting what the US government and MSM has propogandized as fact “Communism is godless”, “Communism is the devil”, “Marxism is bad”.

It is ironic to me that RooshV can view places like Russia as being traditionalist yet there is no Russian city without a figure of Vladimir Lenin. Fortunately the Russians, while acknowledging the flaws of their communist history, realise that communism in itself was a intellectual movement that was radicalized and perhaps could never have reached fruition due to its own nature or due to the lack of technological development or simply due to its historical execution.

Laci Green for example talks about how they had to use “language which doesn’t involve binary oppositions in her gender theories class” — Did Jacques Derrida ever intend for such things to happen in such a place like America? Fuck no. If anything the dead criticial-theorists would be spewing enmasse had they seen what America turned into.

tonipeperoni
Guest
tonipeperoni
Offline

Btw, if you want to read a good critique of SJWs, feminists, or progressives in general.

Then read “The Dark Enlightenment” by Nick Land – it’s online and free. Unlike RooshV who is yet another anglo-puppet who pretends to have some kind of knowledge, the British philosopher dissects progressivism fully using sophisticated arguments.

tonipepperoni
Guest
tonipepperoni
Offline

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

The Nick Land piece is widely read by this audience.

J5
Guest
J5
Offline

My gut is reeling at the things going on that freak show of a city you’re describing has got to be either San Francisco or Portland- am I right?

FormerCanadian
Guest
FormerCanadian
Offline

Wrong! It’s Toronto The Hell Hole, a city of desperate and sex hungry males and whales of women who think they are Beauty Queens and Miss Universe in 1 package.

Ian
Guest
Ian
Offline

Uncle Roosh,
You seem to be hitting on the topic of suicide and mental illness a lot in many of your recent discussions (this article, Laci Green YT).

You seem like you do care and want to promote whole, civil dialogue so-
What do you think people in the depths of despair like a Laci Green or an incel can do to improve their brokeness?

I honestly think you could get farther with PR and legitimizing your views by showing enemies like Laci Green love and kindness as opposed to hating or being mean. Look at Jesus and Gandhi- people listen to them because that did not show hate but offered love and peace. Something to think about.

ray
Guest
ray
Offline

Jesus didn’t hate, that’s one reason why he’s the King and we are not. But he kicked butt and whooped people out of his house when they’d turned it into a Market Economy.
Yes he offered love, and offers it still. He even COMMANDED love. But he will also punish wickedness, lies, and thuggery with wrath. As this planet is about to see.
Cheers.

penguin
Guest
penguin
Offline

yep, i mean we all know this stuff – but its nice to see it written. Thanks.

prepz
Guest
prepz
Offline

Ms. Lauri Penny is a great case study. Once confronted with facts and an accomplished male who doesn’t lay down and take her unfounded SJW labeling, she’s desperately defensive having to respin her entire position and deny the truth about her motives and past actions. She’s caught in her own web of BS and instinctively switches to victim mode as her only last defense, hoping her vapid appeal to the weak damsel in distress will win the crown over to her, and that mere numbers in consensus is enough to squelch the facts and the accusations against her. She uses the unjust card. And when that fails, she feebly tries to reframe the situation as a violence against her. But it doesn’t work. And even a female in the audience calls her on in, at which point the entire forum must be disbanded lest a riot ensue.

The same happens to me when I publicly call women out on their nonsense. In a way, every female is a SJW for her own cause — herself, if not for her crazy causes. When the SJW’s cause is ripped apart in public for lack of standing, she instinctively resorts to her self preservation mode of lying down as a victim of male violence against her. Male SJW’s do the same because they’ve adopted the female sensibilities to all things — feelings above facts, opinion above truth, and all things yielding power to an inferior intellect and rampant ignorance.

Thank you for illustrating SJW syndrome in such detail and supporting evidence.

Atlanta Man
Guest
Atlanta Man
Offline

The funny thing about SJWs is there is no way to appease them. You could agree with everything they say, make all the changes they want, completely internalize their beliefs and they would turn on a fucking dime and “gotcha” with something new. The goal is not real change with them, it is the act of complaining itself as the goal. The reason why there is no appeasing them is it is that woman are driving the discussion(and you can never make a woman happy), the men are just trying to get laid and don’t really believe(which is odd because SJW woman are repulsed by SJW men, and if SJW men do get laid they are accused of rape, just look at their alt lit scene.). It is just this bizarre academic exercise that has escaped into the real world and is out of control, opportunistically infecting every part of popular culture.

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

Well, you’ve touched on the reality if the situation. For anyone that can accurately extrapolate out the logic of what is going on, the answer comes down to armed conflict. The only way any of this will stop is through violence. I’m not advocating it. I’m just stating the reality of liberal hegemony. The news outlets need to be taken by military swat teams. The Universities need to be overhauled. Without those things, which will only come via militarized methods, nothing will really change. Again, that’s not advocacy. The mistake is believing that SJW’s are perturbed yet relatively benign millennials and not an arm of the death juggernaut that is global communism. They’re deadly serious.

Ternarydemon
Guest
Ternarydemon
Offline

History is cyclical. I see many similarities between 30s fascism and the current far-left agenda, which, like the aforementioned ideology, will also end in cultural catastrophe.

Elroy Delmar
Guest
Elroy Delmar
Offline

True and we all know what happened in the early 40s- very ugly.
We can thank the bankers for that one too.

Marshallaw
Guest
Marshallaw
Offline

Well done Roosh,brilliant article.
The cities and large towns are infected. This is a disease. As with all diseases it will run its course. It is the politics of mediocrity…… they want to stifle exceptional individuals so they can drag everyone kicking and screaming down to their squalid level.
I see so many betas in ltr’s and marriages, not taking control and ending up miserable wondering where they went wrong. Unhappiness will breed (I hope!)contempt for this ideology.
They are sewing the seeds of their own demise. I just hope we are not all brought down with them.

ray
Guest
ray
Offline

“It is the politics of mediocrity…… they want to stifle exceptional individuals so they can drag everyone kicking and screaming down to their squalid level.”
Yep. It’s the Triumph of Mediocrity. Their personal insecurities and inferiorities are re-framed as ‘equality’ and ‘progress’ and of course ‘justice’. But in reality it’s just mondo resentment of their betters, whether that’s God or just the Evil White Male next door that they feel is too privileged. Get enough of them together politically and you have… Amerika.
Cheers.

AnnPelham
Guest
AnnPelham
Offline

Close, but not quite. SJWs are an outgrowth from critical theory (which is part of Marxism). Feminism is also an outgrowth of critical theory.

Chris Adams
Guest
Chris Adams
Offline

Awesome and concise summary of a scourge to mankind!

ray
Guest
ray
Offline

First rate, thanks.

The piece leaves the impression that SJW-ism is still somewhat fringe, and still attempting to break through the ‘establishment’ of ‘normal’ Western Civ.

Obviously, however, the SJWs long ago conquered western civ, and certainly all major U.S. institutions. One need only glance at the Executive … Barry Soetoro, VAWA Joe, Hitlary, Valerie “The Vagina” Jarrett, et al. All destroyers of The Evil White Male. Likewise, government in general, in addition to law, education, and media are already long sold-out to the SJWs and Progressivism in general. This includes the Republicans and ‘conservatives’, with few exceptions. In wealthy, privileged empires like the U.S., it’s just too dangerous and costly to oppose these scumbags, especially any person with a public profile. Thus the cancer metastasizes with little resistance.

The most pathological and hateful of the SJWs indeed do ‘lead’ from PuffHo and Gawker etc., but they are backed by the full force of institutional America. By no means are these punks fringe; they have been the New Establishment for many decades running. In the government offices where I worked in the Eighties, these passive-aggressive cowards already were dictating terms and policies. They are not a new phenomenon.

These people are full of resentment, groupist-cowardice, self-service, and sanctimony. They have placed themselves in the position of God, and there is no end to their ‘reforms’. Placating and rewarding them only incurs more rage, resentment, and surety of entitlement. This will not end peacefully.

Cheers.

Nick
Guest
Nick
Offline

I wish we could figure a way to help people like the author of this article and the other posters in this comment thread get past their irrational and hateful beliefs.

LOL
Guest
LOL
Offline

Here’s what you are probably looking for:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag

Marko
Guest
Marko
Offline

Awesome. This describes every person in DC.

Robert
Guest
Robert
Offline

An excellent expose. How did SJW’s become such a powerful
force? One factor was that the stupid “liberals” and so-called
moderates who were already running powerful institutions like universities by
1970 did nothing to block their advance. They conferred the prestige of places
like Harvard, Columbia, and Berkeley on seditious fanatics like Eric
Holder.

More than that, with the decline in at least naïve belief
in religion, the old ideas of sin and guilt fell into disuse until
the SJW’s and other leftists grabbed them and started exploiting them to spread
their ideology. And “the kids” starting with the Woodstock generation
bought into all of it. (So much for their supposed sophistication.)

Today’s leftists are vying for control of society in much the same way the ecclesiastical politicians of the 4th Century AD got control of the early Church, and then “Christianized” the whole Roman Empire at swordpoint. They destroyed
much of ancient culture, including vandalizing and demolishing the magnificent
temples of “pagan” religions, then outlawed all religion and learning
except their own. A two-column comparison of the modern Left with the
intolerant and ultimately dominant faction of the 4th Century Church
as described in Martin Larson’s The Story of Christian Origins would reveal
much.

Seth Rose
Guest
Seth Rose
Offline

A fantastic and thorough write up. Thanks for taking the time as usual to get the word out.

NeoNationalist
Guest
NeoNationalist
Offline

Excellent work. Thank you for this.

TheGrandAdmiral
Guest

Originally posted as a comment on the RoK article “Inside the Mind of the Social Justice Wanker”:

My first major encounter with an SJW was a blog of a Black man, or shall I say, queer-identified mulatto, that lived in Taiwan when I was researching anti-Black racism in the country. This “brothette” took offense to me sympathizing with his inability to gain the affections of a Taiwanese woman, that right before his very eyes treated a White man to dinner. Not yet knowing that this individual was a queer, I put myself into the situation, knowing that I would indeed be jealous of a White man getting a free meal and some balls-deep action while I would be left to frig myself.

My reasoning in this scenario was incorrect, as instead of wanting to enter that Taiwanese lotus pod as I would, he was furious that he would not have his intestines thoroughly ravaged by the White man’s member. I found this ideology to be quite unnatural, and to a degree, frightening.

Despite this individual’s desire to have his anus pilfered, or his insatiable lust to guzzle from the pricks of heterosexual Black male celebrities, I was a sinner for desiring a normal, run-of-the-mill Taiwanese woman to enjoy. Not only was I a sinner, but I was also a fetishizing piece of shit that promoted White supremacy by wishing to plunge my member into the crevices of an Asian woman, the same gardens that the White supremacists would want to deny me access to. I just did not “get it”, and to this day, my mind is not sharp enough to comprehend this logic.

Of equal interest and vulgarity is his partner in crime, a chunky Chinese-American woman with a disturbing nasal voice and habit of using the idioms of Black women as portrayed in 1990’s sitcoms. This wretch claims that her goal is to crush White supremacy once and for all and stop men from fetishizing Asian women, yet her favorite pastime is hopping on various White pricks. This Skrillex-haired vermin finds it distasteful for the oppressed shaft of a heterosexual Black man to rise and find refuge in the delightful gardens of the East, whilst devouring the discharge of the very same genitals of the oppressor. An interesting and vile character indeed

Tom
Guest
Tom
Offline

Dude, wtf is with the language? No one here wants to read your unnecessarily florid descriptions of that disgusting shit. I’m inclined to think that you’re trolling.

DeepThinker
Guest
DeepThinker
Offline

Roosh, this article is one of your most
“scholarly” yet. I recommend that you make extra efforts to get this
article into the mainstream. It has mass appeal potential. Here are my ideas:

1. Publish this on Return of Kings

2. Make a YouTube video about this, it needs to
have an awesome flow, it must be clean enough to be on CNN, but entertaining

3. Make a PDF 1-sheet version of this article, make
it have strong visuals to encourage people to read and pass it along to every Manosphere/men’s
rights site, have it subtly refer people to ROF and rooshv.com

4. Publish it in an alternate channel where people
will feel comfortable sharing it on social media (think: 9gag)

5. Have a separate marketing effort to target
conservative/libertarian sites, words spreads fast in those circles and it will
increase your relevancy. Start with sites that allow anyone to post/share
articles (think: freerepublic.org)

The purpose of all this effort is to maximize the number of
new viewers.

Roosh_V
Guest
Roosh_V
Offline

I do plan on making a youtube attachment. Others are free to remix this into inforgraphics or other works.

Leroy
Guest
Leroy
Offline

You tell me because you’re the high iq Persian and Im a mulato in Redneck Tennessee but would an action kit on how to deal with sjw Marxist scum in a PDF file be something worth disseminating as our red pill thinking own counter propaganda to those clowns?

FormerCanadian
Guest
FormerCanadian
Offline

What do you need a PDF file for?? Is it that hard to follow some simple rules? Just man up, have own opinion and enough facts/arguments to back it up, dare to stand up and be counted and to lead by example.
Do you really need a PDF for THAT???????????
You ain’t gonna win a battle by some kind of propaganda, but you can lead by example and change by example.

werefish
Guest
werefish
Offline

Another thing is that a lot of them are SJWs full-time, it’s their passion and main occupation. While the people who they mob and get fired do not have the time to defend themselves