What Is A Social Justice Warrior (SJW)?

Social justice warriors believe in an extreme left-wing ideology that combines feminism, progressivism, and political correctness into a totalitarian system that attempts to censor speech and promote fringe lifestyles while actively discriminating against men, particularly white men. They are the internet activist arm of Western progressivism that acts as a vigilante group to ensure compliance and homogeny of far left thought.

The true definition of SJW is up for debate, but most generally it has become a catch-all term that describes feminists and liberals who actively try to solve the perceived social injustices of modern society by organizing in online communities to disseminate propaganda, censor speech, and punish individuals by getting them terminated from their employment. They have also been successful at positioning themselves in the upper echelons of universities, media organizations, and tech companies.

SJW’s do not view all humans as equal

Using a “privilege” hierarchy, SJW’s calculate the worth of a human being based on perceived injustices or wrongs that group has suffered since the time of ancestral man, using selective and narrow interpretations of history. SJW’s elevate groups that they believe have received the least amount of “privilege” in the past, and then use internet activism in the form of mobs and community purges to target those who are determined to have greater amounts of privilege. The idea of privilege is so essential to SJW ideology that a common debate tactic they use is to say “check your privilege,” which roughly translates to, “you must immediately halt or change your speech because your ancestors may or may not have done bad things to women or minority races.”

For example, if a notable white American male makes a joke about a lesbian black woman who practices Islam, SJW’s will coordinate using a combination of blogs, Youtube, and social networking to dox him (publish his personal information, including where he works). They will then pressure the man’s company by flooding it with calls and messages with the goal to remove his source of income while engaging in a mass reporting campaign to get his online accounts suspended.

Their ultimate goal is to silence all speech that they don’t like and which they find offensive while also punishing the speech offender by removing his source of income. As they grow in power, the acceptable range of speech that would trigger an SJW witch hunt is becoming more narrow, and those who are high up on the privilege hierarchy (white men) have to speak through a careful filter if they don’t want to be subject to an SJW attack.

Former Mozilla CEO was subject to a successful witch hunt for his past support of traditional marriage

They believe consensus is more important than objectivity

SJW’s do not believe in objectivity. Instead, speech and ideas must be viewed relatively depending on the source and its intended audience. The feeling of the statement must also be taken into account, which can be affected by current news, cultural moods, and pop trends.

For example let’s consider the statement “Asian people are nerds.” If a famous white man uttered this phrase on Twitter after a major Japanese earthquake, a punitive SJW witch hunt may be triggered, but if a popular gay black female Youtuber said the exact same statement, no action would be taken. The reason is because the black woman is low in the SJW privilege hierarchy and therefore has a greater range of free speech that she could give before triggering a witch hunt. The white man, who is at the top of the privilege hierarchy, has no leeway to make a joke about any race since he is not in a protected SJW class. He would be decried as racist and a bigot, in spite of the fact that a statement like “Asian people are nerds” has low ambiguity regardless of the race or status of the person who said it.

The lack of such objectivity in SJWism is by design. It’s borrowed from Cultural Marxist thought, which argues that objectivity and the idea of right or wrong is less important than consensus. The reason is that consensus can be easily accomplished by controlling the narrative—cultural facts, ideas, and memes that are possessed by a specific population. If one can manufacture consensus by controlling this narrative through domination of the media or by swiftly eliminating speech which goes against what “should” be believed, specific beliefs can be held even if they go against proven scientific thought or basic rationale. SJW tactics evolved by necessity to keep their ideology alive in a modern climate where science—even 100-year-old science—contradicts the bulk of their ideas.

For example, a basic tenet of SJW thought is that there is no difference between men and women besides their physical bodies, that evolution stopped at the neck for human beings and gave both sexes an identical brain. Human biology can not sustain this notion [1] [2] [3], so when a person tries to state that men and women are different to a large audience, the SJW does one of three things:

(1) Attempts to censor the speech through mob action
(2) Calls the person a misogynist who hates women to inoculate the general population from considering the accurate information presented
(3) Destroys the livelihood of the person by contacting his employer so that he is less able to exercise his free speech

You’ll often encounter SJW debate tactics trying to use consensus to persuade you: “How can you think X when so many people think Y?” As you may already know, consensus is a poor judge of facts or morality. Consensus used to believe that the earth was flat and that the sun revolved around the Earth. Sadly, many great men were imprisoned or executed for going against consensus on beliefs that we know are true today. Consensus in America also supported the institution of slavery, which of course didn’t make it right. And not long ago consensus believed in segregation between whites and blacks, even in the north where slavery was not practiced. Consensus has been shown to be a dangerous method to validate ideas or behavior.

Observers will note that information control is a huge component of SJW ideology. They have no other choice—their ideas do not hold water to basic science and logic so SJW’s evolved mechanisms where they must control and censor speech which goes against their beliefs. By controlling what arguments or ideas people are exposed to, they have a greater chance of convincing others through manipulation and outright bullying of their world view to create the consensus they need to affect societal change. Some individuals buy into their cause because opposing viewpoints were hidden from them, often labeled as “hate speech.”

An SJW writer implores readers not to pursue an area of study that conflicts with her world view

Cultural Marxist thought promotes subjectivity

The messenger is more important than the message

A big chunk of their activism depends on subjective feeling and perceived value of the parties involved. Before an SJW can make a decision on what is right or wrong, she must first know the race, gender, and sexuality of the involved participants so that she can decide whether or not to be outraged. A statement or idea in isolation is not enough for them to come to a conclusion on the acceptability of a statement. For example, consider the following statement:

“Abortion should not be used as a method of birth control.”

An SJW could not definitively respond to this statement unless they knew who uttered it. If I—a Caucasian man—published this statement on a popular site like CNN, the outrage would be immense. Most comments would accuse me of hating women and wanting to control their bodies. A petition would be started to prevent me from ever writing on CNN again. On the other hand, if a popular feminist like Jessica Valenti said this statement in the same publication, the response would be more balanced. She would receive some criticism but even support from individuals who would try to destroy my life had I said the exact same thing.

A person who believes in the scientific method would not be swayed by the messenger. They would analyze the statement and attempt to either verify it or not based on logic. SJW’s avoid such objective behavior.

A Harvard university student urges we replace academic freedom with her sense of social justice

Some groups are more deserving of equality than others

SJW’s make a big show of wanting “equality,” but as the Animal Farm quote goes: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” They absolutely do not believe that a man deserves the same treatment that should be given to a woman of his same race. When they say “equality,” what they really mean is to apply special benefits to protected groups in order to create equality based on their subjective perception and feeling. They even go so far as to claim that women and non-whites can not possibly be racist against white men. If a black woman calls a white man a cracker, honky, redneck, hick, or peckerwood, she’s correcting historical wrongs and injustices, not being a racist individual.

Since they have no objective measure or guide of equality, it is only achieved when they feel it has been achieved, but then that would destroy the very reason for their existence, meaning that their war on inequality is similar to the war on drugs or terrorism. It’s a perpetual war that will never be won in their minds because there will always be the creation of a new group needing privilege and equality. If you substitute the word “power” whenever they use “equality,” you’ll come to a more accurate descriptor of what motivates their activism.

If you want to do a simple test that hurts an SJW’s argument that she is about equality, ask her the following: “Do you believe a black woman is equal to a white woman?” They will squirm mightily and may look to the left and right at their SJW friends to know what they think first before giving you a muddled answer that is inconsistent with their other stated beliefs.

Rape jokes are okay against those groups who have no protection in the SJW privilege hierarchy

SJW’s are human label machines

If censorship is not an option, SJW’s attempt to destroy the reputation of the speech offender by labeling him a racist, misogynist, creep, bigot, xenophobe, homophobe, or transphobe. This is one of their most reliable tactics to prime the general public against listening to individuals they don’t like because of the negative weight that such terms still carry. I personally have been called every label under the sun and a site I operate, Return Of Kings, was denounced in mainstream blogs sympathetic to SJW’s and then put on blacklists.

While labels are still effective today, SJW’s are diluting the power of them through overuse. If the majority of men are decided to be “misogynist,” the general public will become desensitized to hearing it. We are already seeing signs of this whereby SJW’s have to escalate the labels to outright crimes. A tactic I have been seeing lately is accusing men of “sexual harassment,” which is often when a man did nothing more than factually criticize a woman or flirt with her.

Even worse, SJW’s have started labeling men as rapists based on anonymous internet allegations, even when the supposed victims never reported the crime to police. It doesn’t matter that a conviction is not present via due process of law, and “rapist” labels persist against men even when authorities refuse to file charges. This eradicates the presumption of innocence whereby an individual is innocent until proven guilty, a basic right used since Roman times and included in the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It’s possible that we may reach a point where all men are presumed to have raped a woman, and when a men says something improper, this label will be used against him to limit his speech.

misogyny copy
When SJW corruption was revealed in gaming journalism, the “misogyny” label was used to marginalize the speech of concerned gamers

Buzzfeed published an anonymous rape accusation against a man who was subject to a massive SJW witch hunt on Youtube (the alleged victim never went to the police)

A female at the University Of Chicago publicly posted a “rape list” denouncing men who have never been accused or convicted of rape

An SJW does not believe that men should get due process

Unwilling to engage in open debate

Another feature of the SJW is their total unwillingness to engage in a civilized one-on-one debate instead of mob action through what they call “campaigns” or “pressure groups.” Unable to take criticism or consider factual evidence, a lone SJW will respond to having her arguments defeated by playing the victim card (“Stop attacking me!”, “Stop triggering me!”, “Stop shaming me!”) or engaging in one of numerous argumentative fallacies. These tactics are used to buy time before fading back into the power and safety of her large mob group.

SJW’s avoid engaging in debate because they do not have the logical tools that an objective discussion requires. If your beliefs are held together by subjectivity, feelings, and the perceived worth of an individual based on an imaginary scale of privilege, it would be impossible for you to debate someone else who uses facts. The lack of educational rigor in SJW communities means they are more comfortable re-blogging content on Tumblr or sharing funny images than sifting through scientific data to find proof of what they claim.

On university campuses, it’s common for SJW’s to obstruct speakers they can not defeat with facts. To some observers, this behavior may resemble a child putting his fingers in his ears and yelling as loud as he can. They have no choice but to silence someone else’s speech because their own speech can not properly counter arguments that go against their world view. They simply don’t have the intellectual rigor to do so.

SJW’s shout down a university speech and then halt it completely by setting off a fire alarm, possibly breaking local laws in the process

SJW’s at the University Of Toronto push and shove in an attempt to cancel a speech by a speaker they disagree with

Feminist professor steals protests signs that she disagrees with and then assaults the protester (she was later charged and given probation)

Complete absence of fixed morality

Thanks to the subjectiveness of their ideology, SJW’s lack morality or virtue. The reason this is a feature and not a bug to the SJW is because accumulated knowledge, morals, and wisdom of the past was developed and promoted by white men, who are seen as the harbingers or pain and doom to the classes that they want to protect.

Even if Aristotle, Seneca, Marcus Aurelius, Thomas Aquinas, or Henry David Thoreau had valuable wisdom that continues to help how millions of people live today, the information derived from their work must be completely discarded since they were white men. Since white men were at the forefront of advancing humanity for the past several centuries, especially after the decline of the Egyptian, Persian, Mongol, and Ottoman empires, this precludes the bulk of moral guidance that we can use to determine right and wrong. SJW’s invent their own moral code but it is often based on what they are upset about in the present moment. It does not serve as a guide for more than a month or two, suggesting that their book of code would have to be written in pencil.

The biggest exception I’ve found to their discrimination against white men is Steve Jobs, inventor of the iPhone, a gadget that SJW’s prefer to use. The irony of this is that SJW’s are against “greedy” capitalism in favor of socialism or communism, but iPhones are made with low-cost labor in Asia where some workers have committed suicide in the very factories the phones are produced because of horrid working conditions. SJW’s are capable of applying blind spots to their most cherished ideals so that their consumer lifestyle is not inconvenienced.

SJW’s don’t believe in god, have no belief in the heterosexual nuclear family as the principal unit of human organization, and have no sense of local community as opposed to ones that exist solely on the internet. Instead of reading historical texts for guidance, they read Huffington Post, Buzzfeed, and Reddit. A significant amount of them gets their information from image-based memes that they share enthusiastically on Imgur and Facebook. They are pagans who worship women, minorities, homosexuals, and other non-capitalistic or non-Catholic features of humanity. Since their belief system is based on trends and feelings, an SJW will display rapidly shifting thought from one month to the next depending on what is “hot” or not in SJW discussion forums.

As of late, homosexuality—an alternative lifestyle at best and the disseminator of HIV at worst—seems to be the centerpiece of their activism, especially as the homosexual marriage issue has become suddenly more urgent in America in the past five years. Some predict that the bulk of their activism will now move onto transsexuality, and one must wonder how the movement will handle so many fringe groups that are angling for least privileged status.

A convention for the Tumblr platform, the principal online home of most SJW’s, displays how alternative the lifestyles of these individuals are

SJW’s are sexually confused and admittedly mentally ill

Many SJW’s readily admit to serious mental illness and being bullied or mocked as a kid. They have gone on to be bullies themselves on the internet, a platform where physical strength, courage, or defined identity is not needed to be an effective activist. Even though they are confused about how to live their own lives thanks to the lack of values they possess, and many deal with suicide, cutting, or other mental issues that prevent them from reading certain articles without a “trigger warning” to act as a disclaimer to reality, they have no problem telling society how to live. It’s unclear why they respond to their life problems in such a manner instead of seeking professional help or reading self-help, but we can speculate that they seek to control others to compensate for the lack of control they have in their own lives. SJWism is a form of treatment to their problems because they can focus on the perceived problems of other people instead of their own.

A common problem SJW’s have is confusion about their own sexual identity or outright biological sex. Most of them find out about SJWism when they are in their teen years and not yet absolutely certain of their sexual preference. Once exposed to SJW writing that presents the theory that two sexes don’t exist, proven biology is wrong, and that you are free to place yourself on a kaleidoscope of gender including multiple kinds of homosexuality and transsexuality, the newly SJW activist mixes and matches her sexual identity to seek approval within her new group.

SJW’s have invented new sexes and sexual preferences, the most popular of which being pansexual, the definition of which can vary depending on which SJW you ask but which comes close to bisexuality. Other inventions include polysexuality, genderqueer, pangender, skoliosexual, and the most curious one of all which assumes a new mammalian life form that science has yet to describe—trigender.

While many of their members are plain vanilla heterosexual, they despise any sexuality or behavior that comes from the straight male. A male is someone exhibiting offensive privilege when he rates a girl on her attractiveness, exhibits a preference for thin women, or flirts with a woman he wants to have sex with, but when a woman does the same things, she is making an empowered display of her sexuality and must therefore be encouraged. The male sex drive is considered dangerous and oppressive to women but the female sex drive is wonderful, natural, and deserving of firm praise.

It’s worth noting that some in the SJW community believe that all penis-in-vagina sex is rape, even when the sex is consensual. Masculinity exhibited by men is dangerous and criminal, but masculine behaviors in women (cutting their hair short, becoming burly in body size, cursing, sexually pursuing other women) are promoted. Again, this highlights the subjectivity and inequality of SJW thought.

A popular website tries to persuade its readers with images that homosexual marriage is “better” than traditional marriage

Youtube is full of young SJW’s coming out to declare their pansexuality

How did SJW’s become such a powerful force?

We can only speculate why an ideology that is so removed from science and Western values has established roots in America. One theory is that their ideology is soma for confused people who have been disappointed in life or have failed in achieving their goals. It’s easy for these sub-performers to flock to an ideology that says, “You failed because you were held down by the white patriarchy, who still maintains invincible privilege and is robbing you of your daily bread and happiness.”

Obviously, it’s a much easier job to blame others or play the victim card than to solve the individual problems of your life. Hard work is not as valued in today’s society as in the past, so when you give someone a choice between expending effort on one hand to complaining and mob bullying on the other, it’s not hard to see how many (as in millions of people) pick the latter option. It’s also more satisfying to their egos from a power standpoint.

That leads to the question of why straight white males become a part of the SJW movement, since it would be similar to a Jewish person joining the Nazis. Most of these men are shy with low confidence and low muscle mass. They have social anxiety issues and simply want to be part of a co-ed group that increases their access to women. It turns out that white men are carrying the water of SJW’s who would denounce them in a second all for the hopes of getting sex. The male sex drive is so strong that a man is willing to throw his entire race and sex under the bus in order to possibly fornicate with a woman.

Even though men are usually the targets of SJW’s, it is not uncommon for them to turn on their own. For example, if a white woman, a protected group in SJW ideology, offends a transsexual, who is more protected on the privilege scale, SJW’s may attack the white woman, even if they may have defended her previously (this happened with Laci Green, a protected feminist who once used the word “tranny” and was threatened with death by transsexual SJW’s). Since SJW’ism is so subjective, at whim to constantly shifting winds, an SJW who is on the right side of SJW thought today may find themselves on the wrong side tomorrow.

Video shows how a video game organization was infiltrated by feminists

Infographic shows how popular image forum 4chan was infiltrated by SJW’s (click here for full image)

A parody image suggesting that anything can be considered offensive to an SJW

What do SJW’s want to achieve?

Their goal is power and domination over the Western cultural narrative to manufacture a consensus that is aligned with their extreme far-left ideology. Since their ideas are so far removed from science, logic, and rationale, this requires a complete control of information to disseminate their immoral world view along with the complete silencing of those who contradict them. It is not clear what their end game is when it comes to the white men who they believe are a bane to planet Earth, but it’s not a stretch to predict violence in the future assuming their mobs grow in size, anger, and power, which would put them close to being classified as terrorists according to the FBI. Currently their main strategies are bullying, spreading propaganda, and censoring opponents.

A growing way they have been accomplishing this goals is by installing SJW activists in prominent institution and communities. Many are now active moderators on popular forums, leaders in campus groups, tenured professors, or popular bloggers and entertainers who have huge audiences they spread SJW propaganda to. Some SJW’s, like Zoe Quinn, simply achieved prominent status by having heterosexual sex with men who have access to information that they want to modulate. Since most feminists, progressives, and liberals are sympathetic to the SJW cause, it’s easy to see how they have reached a stunning amount of influence in America to spread their message.

SJW’s threaten violence if they don’t get their way

SJW’s have co-opted games journalism to review video games as sexist, misogynist, and racist

Prominent SJW Laurie Penny is humiliated at a conference after labeling a distinguished male historian as racist and xenophobic

Social Justice Warriors are a threat to Western values

SJW’s utilize censorship, discriminate against white men, and disagree with basic human rights concerning due process that has existed in the Western legal canon for centuries. They are against free speech as granted by the US Constitution and don’t believe that all men are created equal. They disregard science and wrongly apply labels, accusations, and criminal allegations to those who dare cross their path. They have determined that some groups should be elevated to receive more benefits and speech rights than others, and have been successful in silencing the speech of those whom they disagree with through their internet witch mobs. They continue to infect every group, platform, and community that they come into contact with. Their goal is not to add value or to create, but to control the flow of ideas and thereby thought. Their values are opposed to Western values.

SJW ideas have reached a critical mass in America. University students are indoctrinated with progressive thought that is becoming aligned with SJWism, and even students in grade school are becoming exposed to SJW ideas through feminist-friendly teachers who read the same sites as SJW’s. My fear is that their efforts at censorship and cultural domination will become more onerous as they cement positions in prominent media companies, Silicon Valley, universities, and even in politics. If your belief system is against that of SJW’s, it would be prudent to take measures to protect yourself from their witch hunts, because there is no sign that they will be weakening in power anytime soon.[culturewar]

Read Next: Cultural Collapse Theory


  1. Guest October 6, 2014 at 9:27 am

    Cant wait to see the comments on this post.

    1. evilwhitemalempire October 7, 2014 at 1:33 am

      “While labels are still effective today, SJW’s are diluting the power of them through overuse. If the majority of men are decided to be “misogynist,” the general public will become desensitized to hearing it.”



      We should, whenever possible, accelerate this.


      Blogs, tweets, etc. where we proudly claim to be misogynists, racists, rapists, homophobes and arachnaphobes (we absolutely loathe spiders!).

      (OR living doll-a-phobes or spinnach-a-phobes)


      Do you see what I’m getting at here?


      Take THEIR labels, apply them to ourselves, BUT add ridiculous bits into the mix in order to further dilute the power of their words!


      Maybe even going so far as to tweet accusations of say, arachnophobia (at someone inquiring about pesticides) as if we’re dead serious about it.


      Sufficiently outlandish tweets in the right time/place might well go viral!


      Words are our enemy’s hammers. Let’s take them out of their hands.

      1. chaoguy August 3, 2016 at 7:31 pm

        Pic kind of related.

      2. Zóbány Állam (jobbel göjény) February 3, 2018 at 1:51 pm

        Also, applying the principles of Game while handling SJW-s is not only working, but entertaining too. After all, leftist behaviour is essentially unrestrained female behaviour, regardless of the sex of the perpetrator.

        Keep frame, agree and amplify, and overall just stop giving the slightest fuck.

  2. Gustav October 6, 2014 at 9:46 am

    This is a brilliant essay. In this climate of madness where SJWs are not only given a platform, but have their demands met by governments and corporations we need to unveil this toxic excuse for an ideology.

    1. seth datta October 6, 2014 at 6:47 pm

      I just got told by my folks now, how they were watching the BBC in the UK and the news channel had a piece on how Tom and Jerry is racist. Sooooo, I know we’re f*cked because soon we will not be allowed any free speech or freedom of expression that is permitted by the authorities. I will soon be leaving this over-populated island of defeated peoples and move to Europe where they are less defeated. IMHO, it looks all the worse for countries where SJW ideology (fake justice) predominates, which means the 7 Anglo English speaking countries. Lots of fake wars, as admitted even by a prominent feminist in a UK big time newspaper, along with mass unregulated immigration and a dumbed down populace who have become hedonistic degenerates does not bode well. Its not that people in these places are not capable of more – they have been socially engineered from birth to behave a certain way and once in their late teens/twenties, cannot change themselves.

      There is a ROK article saying that MGTOW is bad, though that is not to say that MGTOW sponsors celibacy, only a ‘distancing’ from a society gone insane (the west). Who do you think would win in a war. The divided anglo nations? Or Russia/China etc? (NOT isis, who are sponsored by western governments for re-structuring the middle east). Considering the fact that older generations of women have become useless dry vaginas shrieking for justice, and that the younger generation of men and women have become faggots, apathetic and lovers of pleasure rather than of freedom, I think history only paints a repeated picture of how such societies fell; and fell slow and painfully.

      Last of all, the ideology is sponsored by the same people. I know there are trolls here. And I know that many are brainwashed or do not share my ideology. But I figure I post for raising awareness as in five to ten years time I will not be left to post – the more westernised a nation, the greater its index for ending up as an enforcer of the fourth reich of unparalleled horrors. And those who have sat by in silence or paying the taxes and blaming the obviously corrupt systems must reap what they have sown. And most of all, this entails all women-
      A commentator on ROK once mentioned that women are being set up for a fall by the bankers. Yes, they are. But it will be a fall that neither benefits men nor women. For the 4% of thinking women out there, many of these women will not have children and propagate society, or they are paying for immoral wars and other useless shit. The remaining 96% are degenerates who desire game or a carefree life, not understanding the shitstorm that is about to come or how they have betrayed their men. They will be made economic slaves, lucky to be sheltered and fed, defacto whores who have sex to be able to afford to live, and eventually after many years of this abusive lifestyle, western society will collapse. There’s only about ten years to live it up left, and most people seem to have gone full steam into self-destruct mode. Soooo, can’t say that you weren’t warned, as a society needed all sorts of people in the past to raise the alarm bells – a fact that is sadly forgotten these days.

      1. GRock October 8, 2014 at 12:16 pm

        I rock my Tom & Jerry Tee Shirt with pride… in public. And I get positive comments for paying tribute to one of the greatest cartoons in history. Anyone who takes a cartoon like that and contorts it into something else should lose their job and be required to prove their value to society before being allowed to be a part of it.

        The current state of affairs is make sure it’s completely broken and fucked before even considering fixing it. There was a time in the US we as a whole, and individuals performed preventative maintenance on our lives in general, and society to avoid a mess like this being supported and growing. It’s all a momentum play at this point.

        Hugh mentions in comments below that the similarity between SJW and Jihadists are striking. Well SJW is really a soft Jihad. Ironically, it may prove destructive to more lives than Jihad in the long run.

      2. Quik January 3, 2015 at 5:06 am

        Seems like extremist SJW mentality to me

      3. Femghazi October 9, 2015 at 2:18 am

        Check your privilege!

      4. Dave R April 23, 2017 at 10:28 am

        Who r u to tell him that! Check your privilege!

        Now excuse me while I go self-flaggelate for not checking my privilege.

      5. NewToRoK October 9, 2014 at 3:06 am

        It depends where in Europe you want to move to. If it is Poland, Ukraine or other Eastern European countries, well… yes, these countries are less influenced by the politically correct virus. But I would not recommend Belgium or Scandinavia. E.g. an ad showing Antwerp “how it really is” sparked outrage in politically correct circles since there were no (or few) minority groups represented in that ad. So basically, if you say something, no matter what, it can be considered racist and offensive. And if you say nothing, it can be considered racist and offensive as well. I’m tired of this shit. In addition, Belgian news, television programs and magazines are increasingly getting gay-centered. And as for Scandinavia, take the power of 6 from the latter.

      6. Barry Homan July 17, 2015 at 4:09 pm

        I’m an American and have lived in Denmark for 15 years. This country is NOT so inclined to PCness as some might think. Danes like to act like normal people, oh yes, there are a few small clusters of nerds and dishrags around, spouting pc rubbish, but nothing at all like in the UK and US. Danes tend to shy away from extreme left-wing pc self-righteousness, the Muslim presence here is relatively small, people generally get along with each other, and the MSM doesn’t try to shove new pc-ness down your throat every week. You can still go down to some local pubs and smoke. Plus, Danish women can be very attractive, fun-loving and forthright. Most under-50s in Denmark speak English very well. If you want to re-locate, you might consider Denmark.

      7. Scotty Gunn August 14, 2015 at 10:01 pm

        So’s Bugs Bunny because one episode he did black face.

    2. David Alvaro October 14, 2014 at 1:59 pm

      This is beyond ridiculous and hypocritical. Every single accusation here applies equally, if not more so, to all of you pseudo-alphas or masculine men or MRAs or whatever the hell the members of this little subcult calls themselves. Except for the bit about being a powerful force, of course. You guys are a laughingstock even among the other social cults of bitter, unsuccessful men seeking scapegoats for their own inadequacies.

      1. Gustav October 14, 2014 at 9:19 pm

        Lots of ad hominem, not many valid points. Of course there are the bitter caricatures that you describe, they exist in all and every ‘online community’. This article is a layman’s guide to the SJW movement that takes inspiration from the Frankfurt School. If you are going to comment on these blogs try and find something to say other than “you guys are a bunch of xxxx morons”.

      2. SUPRA luca October 17, 2014 at 12:07 pm

        “If you are going to comment on these blogs try and find something to say other than “you guys are a bunch of xxxx morons”.”
        Very difficult to find anything else to say about you guys, I must be honest.

      3. Montgomery Draxel October 31, 2014 at 10:25 am

        “Very difficult to find anything else to say about you guys, I must be honest.”

        You’re bringing a knife to a gun fight. We eeeevil he-man woman haters and racists demand horrible things like “backing up one’s claims”, “logic” and those oh-so-horrible nightmares called “facts”.

        Name calling is the domain of children.

      4. Shawn Smith November 1, 2014 at 4:57 pm

        Kind of funny, because Roosh found plenty of specific criticisms with vivid examples for people like you. It’s almost like one side knows how to present an argument and the other just insults and accuses.

      5. Warsie November 2, 2014 at 6:50 am

        You used dashcon as an example of SJWism. Just to point out, dashcon was a tumblr con NOT a SJW meetup.

      6. Shawn Smith November 2, 2014 at 9:27 am

        I did not use Dashcon as an example of anything. The author did. And if it is principally attended by SJW types, it illustrates the point just fine.

      7. Warsie November 3, 2014 at 2:12 am

        I meant Roosh then. derp. I was at dashcon, it was not ‘principally attended by SJW types’ – there was AFAIK only one panel on ‘feminism’ there. There was a strong overlap with anime culture etc as opposed to CHECK YOUR PRIVILEDGE type people (yes I know there is an overlap but it’s not as strong as the people here made it)

      8. Shawn Smith November 3, 2014 at 9:14 am

        Fine, then one example is mistaken. He still has many others, unless you are ready to disqualify all of those as well.

      9. Morgan October 17, 2014 at 7:11 pm

        Oh boohoo, is someone butt-hurt that their arguments have been disproved by facts and logic? Better do what SJWs do best and resort to ad hominem and straw man attacks! Who cares if there aren’t any MRAs or “pseudo-alphas” around, let’s keep pretending that everyone who questions SJWs is!

        As far as being “bitter and unsuccessful” while “seeking scapegoats for their own inadequacies…” yeah, you pretty much just described 95% of feminists I know. I’ve known pretty of intelligent, successful women in my time who couldn’t give two shits about “teh patriarchy!!!” or “rape culture,” whereas all the feminists I know are perpetually butt-hurt failures who usually have serious psychological disorders that affect their perception of reality, and yet still think they’re right in blaming their problems on society, justifying their inadequacies by saying everything is “the patriarchy’s fault.”

        Feminists may be smug cyber-bullies at the moment, but decades from now, they’ll all find themselves lonely and bitter, alone in a cabin in the woods, waiting to die cold and alone with nothing but a dozen cats to keep them company.

      10. YuriGotBack September 14, 2015 at 4:29 am

        i’ve noticed the same thing actually, the beautiful and successful women i know never once mention or retweet or reblog any of this patriarchy or rape culture nonsense, it’s funny how that works, the tumblr SJW appears to be the female equivalent of a reddit neckbeard.

      11. Drone Killa October 20, 2014 at 2:21 pm

        did you even read the article? go back to catching HIV through degenerate, pansexual intercourse. (i don’t usually insult people on the internet, i prefer arguments backed by logic and evidence, but an eye for an eye.)

      12. David Alvaro October 20, 2014 at 3:14 pm

        I know never, ever having sex makes you guys angry and makes everyone your enemy, but you aren’t ever going to fix yourself by aligning yourself with this nasty, pandering garbage. Maybe someday feminists will be as lonely and isolated as you guys, but it doesn’t seem very likely. This is the most self-defeating subculture ever.

      13. Drone Killa October 20, 2014 at 3:17 pm

        again, talking shit with nothing to back it up. i encourage you to read the article, realize you are using the tactics mentioned (which are basically a way of opting out of an argument with slander instead of logic/facts) and write something of substance.

      14. David Alvaro October 20, 2014 at 5:00 pm

        The article itself is an example of the very things it is railing against. To use your favorite buzzwords, it contains no “facts” or “logic” and is entirely a “straw man” attack against a composite of basically anyone who disagrees with the void represented by this community, reducing anyone who doesn’t share your anachronistic views on gender, society, and politics as a single person, with an insane projection of the social dysfunction of its audience onto its perceived enemies, all so you guys can have a scapegoat to blame for your misfortunes. It makes me sad that you people have so little that you turn to this for validation and succor.

      15. Tom October 22, 2014 at 12:52 am

        blah, blah, blah…more nothing. Do you even read what you write? “Facts” and “logic” are now “buzzwords? For that piece of anti-civilization nonsense, please do the world a favor and just hurl yourself off of the first perch that you can reach that’s greater than three stories. You are literally a waste of food.

        There are tracts upon tracts of philosophy and logic explaining our general views available on the net, much of it with deep historical, social, and political analysis. The equivalent SJW diatribe reads like your last paragraph: lots of words and name calling with very little substance. There wasn’t a single valid piece of rhetoric in your paragraph. That’s okay, though. We’re registering exactly how we are being addressed.

        SJWs, like you, are basically best demarcated by what they hate or which mafia du jour they wish to empower.

      16. David Alvaro October 22, 2014 at 1:15 am

        Yes, they are buzzwords here, as in anything that supports your point of view is hailed as being rich in them (like this article here, which is utterly devoid of either) and any criticism is attacked for lacking them. That’s rhetorical buzzwords drained of any meaning. I love how Roosh here admits that legit academia is completely stocked with these so-called SJWs, but I’m supposed to be impressed with the online tracts written by your cult.

        You can pretend to have some kind of coherent philosophy all you want. But the bottom line, as always comes out in these comment sections, is that you hate feminism and all SJWs (even though that doesn’t even make sense as a collective group at all) because you imagine that they are responsible for your inability to have sex with the women that you desire, instead of just facing the reality that you are undesirable. The people you are criticizing have all kinds of motivations for trying to improve the world, and that drive is where literally ever positive element of human civilization came from. You, on the other hand, just want to stop the world from spinning and go back to some idealized time that never existed, when a reactionary asshole like you could fuck an attractive woman without paying her enough to overcome her revulsion. But it never happened, and it never will happen, and all your “philosophy” will ever get you is upvotes from the other social rejects here. You are roleplaying as intellectual, macho men with some kind of moral authority, but once you step outside these walls, you are the same pathetic loser you always were.

      17. Tom October 22, 2014 at 4:08 am

        This article is a deconstructivist essay or working/applied theory. It is extremely logical. I know that you re used to getting away with unchallenged assertions, but here you can’t. Our own conversation has the context of thousands of previous conversations. We don’t need to provide the factual context for you because you happened to stroll by during whatever other internet faggotry you participate in. The theory is approved as true in practice by people who need to counter SJW BS. So, it’s logical. It’s not a historical account. The point is that we hold it to be logical and factual. It’s not for you, and as I told you, I’d be impressed if you jumped off of a building. No one here thinks you are supposed to be impressed by anything. We’d rather see you fuck off permanently. “Facts” and “logic” are buzzwords to you (I still don’t see your bullshit logic) because they counter your political interests and you haven’t a legitimate argument but to randomly and weakly attack the use of two out-of-context words. We don’t give a shit about your analysis. You’re the fucking enemy. The last thing we have to do is meet your approval or standards. Go and kill yourself, quickly and painfully.

        Your second paragraph is typical SJW non-intellectual, non-interaction. This is why your kind will eventually lose. It’s also clear that you’re way out of your league context-wise and have zero idea of what you’re talking about.

      18. Shinku January 14, 2015 at 9:27 pm

        Truth. SJW types are powered by emotion and subjectivity. Whatever rag they’re on or how intense there feelings trumps facts or even logic.

      19. Gaston June 25, 2015 at 4:15 pm

        You just proved our point…. Stop talking, it makes the rest of your team look bad. You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about, and are an utter disgrace to just about everything. My apologies for stating “fact” that has been proven in your actions.

      20. Philip Lishman March 31, 2015 at 1:51 am

        There is nothing ‘anachronistic’ about traditional attitudes to sex, society and politics. They have been tried and tested for millennia. Your movement has proved itself thoroughly destructive to civilization, and has unleashed forces it will not be able to control for much longer – forces which will destroy social revolutionaries such as yourself preferentially, with vigor and relish, before moving on to the rest of us.

        If you doubt it, have a look at what ISIS is posting on Youtube these days, about its love and tolerance for women, homosexuals and anyone else who is not right on message with their particular strain of Islam.

      21. tori February 22, 2015 at 4:44 pm

        Did you just say “pansexual intercourse”? A pansexual is attracted to all genders. A pansexual has the same chance of catching HIV as a heterosexual.

      22. Drone Killa February 23, 2015 at 11:18 pm

        Pansexual is a made up idea to make weak, useless people feel special. Bisexual is the same thing minus transgender. I challenge any “pansexual” to become aroused by a tranny. Put your god damn money where your mouth is and fuck one of those freaks. And if a man fucks other men, yes he has a massively greater chance of catching HIV.

      23. Tom October 22, 2014 at 12:40 am

        It in no way shape or form applies equally. You can’t even get through single paragraph without reflexively using oppressive, invalid language and rhetoric. SJW shaming is on its way out, and won’t be dealt with nicely due to its oppressive political effect. The things we take issue with are real politics, with real economic and social effects on real lives. Yet, you attempt to shame us into not opposing that which harms us by calling us names. You’re a perfect example of western rot and your system of oppression will be dealt with.

      24. Tom Dane October 30, 2014 at 11:43 am

        We also live in our moms basement and have small dicks. And oh, we’re also afraid of strong, independent woman because they intimidate us.
        I understand why you feel the need to exclaim “wow..just..WOW” but we cant help it.

      25. Shinku January 14, 2015 at 9:28 pm

        He’s a card carrying member of the White Knight Klan. He needs to white knight to get pussy. Typical beta-male if I may say so myself.

      26. teapartydoc November 1, 2014 at 8:02 am


      27. Earl of Sandwich November 1, 2014 at 6:30 pm

        “” pseudo-alphas or masculine men or MRAs or whatever the hell the members of this little subcult calls themselves”””

        How about ‘real people’?

        Its the progressives who feel compelled to slap labels on everyone else.

      28. Warsie November 2, 2014 at 6:52 am

        your affiliate returnofkings talks about being “masculine men” and “Alpha males” and MRA is an affiliated group. Honestly I’m a MRA I’d rather be called that than be attached to the PUA scene….

      29. polo December 29, 2016 at 11:48 pm

        Labels like “SJW”?

      30. Shinku January 14, 2015 at 9:22 pm

        You are jealous of alpha males because you are a weak beta male. As the article said you are WEAK.

      31. Guest February 22, 2015 at 11:45 pm

        Is it possible for you to make a statement without bringing gender into the mix or is that how you breathe?

      32. paendragon May 25, 2016 at 12:34 am

        … said the beta-cucktard.

      33. Anomalocaris of the North February 24, 2017 at 5:25 am

        Except MRAs don’t control people’s lives, like you fascists! Piss off!

    3. day2knight July 15, 2015 at 9:43 pm

      Apparently you totally missed the unintentional irony in this opinion piece.

    4. Dayna Gallagher June 11, 2016 at 1:47 pm

      Hail Gustav!

  3. BReakingBEta October 6, 2014 at 9:53 am

    Wow. Utter btilliance. Perhaps your best work to date. Stunned

    1. Christopher Bear October 7, 2014 at 10:58 am

      if this were REALLY brilliant it wouldn’t just stun you. It would have you do something. like actually do something

      1. BReakingBEta October 7, 2014 at 11:23 am

        If it were almost any other topic I would agree with you. However, as the topic is SJW, there is nothing to do aside from ignoring their existence and denouncing people in public who spew their copy/pasted dogma.

      2. Christopher Bear October 7, 2014 at 11:37 am

        tru. i side with you on the ignoring bit

      3. BReakingBEta October 7, 2014 at 11:49 am

        I’m open for hearing ideas though. That would be a nice thread. How can you in your daily life combat the SJW machine?

        I just come up with blanks as they don’t listen to reason, which is how men think.

      4. Christopher Bear October 7, 2014 at 5:04 pm

        i didnt even know it was a machine before i read this article. still isnt a machine unless i value the opinions of people online. the “problem” isn’t problem to me. they don’t affect the money i make

      5. Itzpapalotl October 17, 2014 at 9:59 am

        “Won’t listen to reason”

        I’m genuinely curious – what exactly are you trying to convey to a SJW? To accept reverting back to the way things used to be, where they were marginalized and seen as inferior to the white male? They’re just as intolerant to oppression as you are. You won’t win so long as there are many of them. The reign of the white male is over – soon, this line of thought will be completely annihilated.

        Someone on here also mentioned that SJW’s are least likely to procreate – which will result in their “inevitable extinction” – BUT, since intolerance is becoming less and less tolerated, and with feminism on the rise – women will not seek out males that align themselves with this specific type of philosophy. Women are more career driven than ever and also currently hold 60% of master’s degrees, which will eventually propel them into more positions of power. Women are now choosing later on to have children, which yes, has some biological downfalls to it (since a woman’s fertility is on the decline around the age of 27) – but if you want to perpetuate this ideology – ensure it’s lineage – then the best thing to do is to procreate before it’s too late – also ensure that you stay part of the family so that your children hold your very beliefs. If you divorce, you will rarely see your children, and eventually your wife will marry a beta, and he’ll raise your kids, which will inevitably further the SJW mentality.

        Now, since ROK is adamant about not settling down until you’re in 40’s, and with a younger woman which is becoming less and less of a reality (with feminism on the rise, and abortions becoming more obtainable) and more of a fantasy, in a way, you guys are sort of fucking yourselves over.

      6. Sallie Mae October 20, 2014 at 12:57 am

        “[I]ntolerance is becoming less and less tolerated…”

        lol. This one’s probably college “educated,” too. Great return on that investment, society.

      7. Itzpapalotl October 20, 2014 at 7:29 am

        People who are quick to point out insignificant grammatical errors while simultaneously disregarding the point a person was trying to make are fucking annoying as hell.

        “It’s not ‘your,’ it’s “you’re” – whooooooooooooo gives a shit, especially considering I’m sure you’ve made an error in grammar at some point in your life? Good to know that you’re 100% perfect and have never once made a mistake, in anything, ever – and if you have, that completely disregards your overall intelligence.

      8. Shawn Smith November 1, 2014 at 1:03 pm

        No, he wasn’t pointing out a grammatical error. He was pointing out the grotesque inconsistency of your way of “thinking”. Your inability to understand this further proves his point.

      9. Guest November 2, 2014 at 8:38 am


      10. Itzpapalotl November 2, 2014 at 8:43 am

        I bet you’re a lot of fun at parties.

        Actually, it was a grammatical error – if I feel like someone doesn’t respect me, even if it’s over something arbitrary, more often than not, I’ll fuck up what I say.

      11. Shawn Smith November 2, 2014 at 9:24 am

        I bet you’re a lot of fun at parties.

        And I’d bet you’re crappy as a debater. Really? This is the best response you can come up with. I demonstrate the utter stupidity, viciousness, and ingratitude behind your worldview and your best comeback is, sarcastically, “I bet you’re a lot of fun at parties.” You’re pathetic.

        So the statement that intolerance will be less and less tolerated (with the implication that this is a good thing) was a grammatical error? Very well, explain what you meant to say, please. I’m pretty sure that said what you meant to say, and if it is, I’m prepared to eviscerate that as well.

      12. Itzpapalotl November 12, 2014 at 12:35 pm

        Oh no, I’m a crappy debater?! How will I ever navigate successfully through life?! Look, I’m not here to participate in a vicious back and forth with you, because, evidently, you’re an uptight shrew, but if you want a medal for pointing out my grammatical error, feel free to print out this conversation and show it to your mom. I sincerely hope your extensive vocabulary, your ability to blow things out of proportion, and first-class skills in online debating keep you warm at night, keyboard killer. <333333333333333

      13. Shawn Smith November 12, 2014 at 1:39 pm

        Okay, idiot, I’ve said this already: The problem is not a grammatical error. The problem is that your philosophy is completely incoherent and self-contradictory. I notice you’ve never bothered responding to my more extensive post. I guess you can’t argue with anything I said there.

        And as for staying warm at night, my wife does that quite well, thank you. Are there any other vague, baseless slanders you’d like to sling at me?

      14. Itzpapalotl November 12, 2014 at 2:35 pm

        Okay, how is my philosophy self-contradictory?

      15. Shawn Smith November 12, 2014 at 2:05 pm

        By the way, I know you’re trying to shame me into shutting up, but it won’t work for two reasons: First, I’ve got truth on my side, not just bullshit cultural marxist slogans I’ve never bothered thinking through. Second, I really don’t care what people like you think about me, largely because I’m not convinced you actually think at all.

      16. Itzpapalotl November 12, 2014 at 2:34 pm

        I’m not shaming you, I just think you, and all the men that are mindlessly following this “War on SJW’s” because you’ve apparently discovered that you like the taste of playing the victim, are blowing all of this completely out of proportion. All this is doing is getting you to file others into neat little boxes so you have some modicum of an excuse to treat them like utter shit when you don’t agree with their political ideologies. Speaking from personal experience, extremists are fucking crazy, and you my friend, are no exception. I’m not saying that feminists aren’t extremists, or that SJW’s aren’t extremists, I’m just pointing out that the males that actively participate/support this website and Roosh, seemingly need some self-victimizing crutch in which they use as an excuse to be unhappy, an asshole, and blame women, as a whole, for being incapable of commitment/monogamy. I can agree that some MRA’s make valid points, but their ideas on women and marriage, and life in general are completely hollow and unrealistic.

      17. Shawn Smith November 12, 2014 at 3:07 pm

        I’m not saying that feminists aren’t extremists, or that SJW’s aren’t extremists, I’m just pointing out that the males that actively participate/support this website and Roosh, seemingly need some self-victimizing crutch in which they use as an excuse to be unhappy, an asshole, and blame women,

        That’s fascinating, but completely irrelevant to me. You see, I’m not a particular fan of Roosh. I don’t know what he says the rest of the time, but from what little I’ve seen I suspect I disagree with much of it. But what he says here, I wholeheartedly agree with. Weren’t you just criticizing people for “fil[ing] others into neat little boxes so you have some modicum of an excuse to treat them like utter shit”? And yet here you are doing that yourself. All you know about my beliefs is that I think “social justice warriors” are wicked and destructive, but you feel perfectly comfortable ascribing all kinds of other beliefs to me just so you can insult me. The hypocrisy is strong with this one.

      18. Itzpapalotl November 12, 2014 at 5:45 pm

        You acted like an asshole, so I responded like one. You didn’t agree with my original tangent (which is fine), yet you still felt compelled to respond to it, because you didn’t think I was particularly intelligent, so you decided to pounce on the opportunity and attempt to make me look stupid for your own personal satisfaction. That combined with your previous participation in other discussions, makes you an asshole. It has nothing to do with factors that are beyond your control, however. You made the choice to be a dick, so I judged you on that choice.

      19. Shawn Smith November 12, 2014 at 7:27 pm

        Grow up. You said something I disagreed with. I carefully and clearly explained why I think you’re wrong. You have responded with nothing but personal attacks and whining. You have not rationally defended your ideas at all and I suspect you ‘re incapable of doing so.

        If, when your ideas are challenged, all you can respond with is “You’re an asshole”, you should probably stop publically sharing those ideas.

        Grow up.

      20. Itzpapalotl November 13, 2014 at 8:10 pm

        I don’t care if you disagreed with it, the way you went about it came off as shrill/whiny. There is a way to disagree with someone without being rude about it. I didn’t say “You’re an asshole” – I said you’re behavior/comments/wording made you SOUND like an asshole. Stop twisting my words and trying to act like I’m the one who blew it out of proportion. The original comment wasn’t even towards you, yet you felt compelled to jump in. You telling me to “grow up” is rather hypocritical.

      21. Itzpapalotl November 13, 2014 at 8:25 pm

        “You’re an idiot”
        “You’re pathetic”
        “You’re a crappy debater”
        “You don’t think at all”
        “The way you think is grotesque”

        etc., etc.. – don’t tell me that you didn’t go in all Billy badass, guns a’blazin’, because you did. You chose to make inflammatory remarks from the get go, and even though I was nice and started off with stating that “Sometimes I fuck up what I’m trying to say” – which, sometimes being vulnerable softens the discussion, sometimes it doesn’t – it depends on who you are dealing with.

        So you disagree with what I had to say – you don’t need to participate in the discussion any further since you’ve CLEARLY demonstrated a blatant disrespect towards me. As I said – I have no interest in participating in a vicious back and forth with you, but you 1) seem to forget what you said in a previous post and 2) you won’t stop talking about it.

        I don’t like your ideology, at all. I think it’s heartless. I think it’s medieval. I think that trying to fit others into neat little boxes and then make them suffer for being anything other than what they’re expected to be is cruel.

        And when I said “intolerance is becoming less and less tolerated” – what I meant is that the worldview is attempting to shift in a way that caters to everyone’s happiness, in order to avoid oppression and indifference towards others by refusing to define who they are based upon skin color, sexuality, gender…things of that nature.

      22. Gaston June 25, 2015 at 4:21 pm

        You basically just proved the point they were trying to make…..

      23. Tom October 22, 2014 at 1:02 am

        First, your an idiot because SJWs aren’t a political group and theretofore you can’t marginalize an SJW. They’re a political weapon of disparate beliefs. Second, they were indoctrinated to be what they are. Communists put people through re-education camps. SJW’s (communists) will do that to us given enough time. We will do it to them as well as train it out of new generations. Your statistics on women are incompetently stated, to an embarrassing degree. If you don’t know how to talk about science or math, then don’t talk about them to avoid embarrassing yourself. Last, liberals have the least children. PUA is merely an adaptation to liberalized women. There are ways around that which make it unnecessary to a degree, and it is well overshadowed by the greater politics. It has almost nothing to do with what you read in this article.

      24. Shawn Smith November 1, 2014 at 5:08 pm

        Well since white males are so irredeemably evil, why don’t we get rid of everything they’ve ever done? What would your life look like then?

        You’d be dead several times over. You’d have starved to death because white males created modern agricultural techniques that feed the world. Even if we had the food, you’d still starve because white men invented most of the technology supporting the logistics system distributing that food. Let’s say you managed to eat though, you’d likely still be dead or seriously crippled from one of the many many diseases white men have found treatments or cures for. But let’s say you survived those as well, you’d have no security at all in your life or property, because non-tyrannical governments which respect the rights and property of their citizens and guarantee their freedoms, those were created by white men.

        You lefkoarsenikophobia is nothing more nor less than a death wish. If you are so devoted to that, please inflict it merely on yourself rather than our entire society.

      25. juicycarcass November 4, 2014 at 9:13 pm

        wow, you guys are nuts, lol

        keep entertaining me with your circus of failure

      26. David October 7, 2014 at 11:32 pm

        I disagree. It is not enough to merely negate an ideology. (The SJW ideology is simply egalitarianism.) Cutting out the noise is good, but you have to offer a signal of your own. That signal is hierarchy and, consequently, nationalism. The idea that “all people are the same/equal” is a false and pernicious concept. (Yes, we can say that the USA is about “equality before the law, not equality of outcome”, but we see that, in practice, declaring people equal even before the law devolved into the SJW nightmare of today.)

        Listen to this 60 seconds. TL;DL? Differences are real, and they matter: the young are different from the old, men from women, black from white, smart from stupid, lazy from productive, and so forth. Hierarchy exists everywhere in nature, including in man.


      27. Shinku January 14, 2015 at 9:29 pm

        They hate being ignored even more they hate it sooooo much.

      28. Visionquest October 10, 2014 at 8:09 pm

        “if this were REALLY brilliant it wouldn’t just stun you. It would have you do something. like actually do something”

        So tell us, what actions are you taking?

      29. Christopher Bear October 10, 2014 at 9:46 pm

        this didn’t stun me. I didn’t care for it. I much prefer the stuff on techniques and productivity instead of complaining about people who don’t matter

      30. teapartydoc November 1, 2014 at 8:04 am

        Aristotle’s De Anima was brilliant, but it didn’t make me want to do anything.

      31. Some Privileged Dude November 7, 2014 at 2:21 pm

        I shared it on facebook. Does that count? 😀

  4. Hugh October 6, 2014 at 10:08 am

    Roosh, this is brilliant.
    Reading your post I couldn’t help but think of the similarities between SJW and jihadists. Both are always pushing it to the next level in a desperate search to be beyond criticism from their peers.
    SJWs backed gays and are now moving on to transgenders; Sad young men from my home town (London) backed Al Qaeda, but have now moved on to the purer ISIL.
    In the process all that is (was) good and true in Social Justice / Islam is sacrificed and we are left with dangerous caricatures that can only harm us.

  5. Quintus Curtius October 6, 2014 at 10:55 am

    Comprehensive, documented, and irrefutable. This is a very impressive essay.

    1. David Alvaro October 13, 2014 at 2:07 pm

      You’re right, it is hard to refute fiction. An essay requires some fundamental basis in reality in order to be refuted. This is just scribbling in shit on a bathroom wall.

      1. Harold Teekman October 20, 2014 at 5:01 pm

        That must be great quality then cause this shit is gold.

      2. David Alvaro October 20, 2014 at 8:30 pm

        Exactly. You guys are so desperate for someone to pander to you and validate you, that instead of a rational albeit biased piece on how your enemies are wrong about their positions, you enjoy completely preposterous attacks giving them purely evil motives, and you think this turd shines.

      3. Tom October 22, 2014 at 1:08 am

        We’ve done that over and over again, everywhere on the net. This piece is merely meant to outline the SJW, and it accomplishes that admirably if not in a slightly too small aperture. You’re merely commenting on the tip of the nail on the toe of the elephant, David. That’s okay, though, because we know tht information has never been the strong suit of the SJW.

      4. David Alvaro October 22, 2014 at 1:21 am

        Yes, you’re right, progressivism has never produced any great minds to match the intellectual weight of the manosphere. You guys are all here praising the sophisticated thinking and strong prose of this failed pickup artist blogger. On the other side, the “SJWs” just have basically ever artist, writer, academic, scientist, and innovator of the century. We are so intimidated.

      5. Tom October 22, 2014 at 1:58 pm

        Well “great” is relative judgment, isn’t it? The representative culmination of “great” liberal minds are Marx/Lenin who are directly responsible for over 100 million murders in the 20th century. That’s the past legacy of your politics and will continue to be its future. Although I don’t regularly read Roosh, I’ll take him over that because I’m not a murderer nor potential murderer. And who the fuck are you talking about? You’ve just revealed your age and or cognitive maturity level by using “just have basically (best?) ever”. Take a hike, kid because as I said, you are in over your uninformed head. Best ever “academic”??! (not even a rankable category, idiot) Best ever “innovator”?? (hmm…electricity and indoor plumbing would pretty much indisputably top the list, you’re talking about those innovators being SJWs?)! Best ever “writer”??! (100% subjective…what kind of writer?) Please tell me what SJW artist is the “best ever”? You’re truly a moron, or just young.

        This isn’t a manosphere article, dimwit. It’s an anti-communist, anti-cultural marxism article. It might surprise you to know that I don’t regularly read this site. I’d venture that many readers of this article don’t regularly peruse this site. I came here for the political article only. You lack perspective on your audience.

        I’ll do you a favor. Go read the introductory material by Mencius Moldbug, if you can handle it on your reading level, for an anti-SJW “factual” overview. That’s a start that will enable you to gain enough perspective to begin educating yourself and not coming off like you are talking out of your ass when you address us.

        My prediction is that you will come back and parrot an SJW criticims without reading it, replete with ad-hominems. My second prediction is that we could take the best factual, logical representative writing of either of our individual political systems, compete in mutual criticism, and your ultimate argument would rest on “sexist”, “racist”, “cisgenedered” or whatever oppressive non-arguments your political kind is using at the time. The entire foundation of SJW argument relies on not offending people under the premise of any one of these slanderous, oppressive allegations. I could write a 4000 word diatribe based in social history and political theory of how actual political power for the lest of our citizens is cultivated and maintained, supporting my views, but your views would ultimately come down to your idiosyncratic, nihilistic morality contained in your slurs. Meanwhile, you would fail at explaining the wider effect that racial and gender politics has on political power for all people. This is why your accusations against “facts” and “logic” are the most delicious of ironies and why you are a complete waste of time. Good day now.

      6. David Alvaro October 22, 2014 at 3:01 pm

        This is a manosphere article. It’s a website run by a failed pick up artist guru who now publishes screeds on how he actually hates the women who reject him for sociopolitical reasons. The reason this article is published at all is because the angry virgins of the manosphere feel that progressivism is responsible for giving women sexual agency, and because women can choose who they can fuck, they don’t fuck the losers who read these websites. That’s it.

      7. JP November 3, 2014 at 3:51 pm

        Wait, are you actually ignorant enough to believe that you have every intellectual ever on your side, or are you like the kid I knew that bragged about his 100 karat gold when I was showing off some 14k stuff I had? That is you just say stuff you think sounds good to make yourself feel good. I’m inclined to think the later. Few innovators give shit about your cause and scientific work (hard sciences, not subjective ‘social scientist’, you can have the later type, they’re garbage) is by and large socially neutral, the scientist themselves falling all over the spectrum (well, not if we count practical sciences like engineering and technology, then it weighs against you somewhat. Engineers sick of the ‘token woman’ screwing shit up and all).

        But whatever man, have your 100k gold, it just reminds us of how flimsy you actually are.

      8. Alex de Bellencombre August 12, 2015 at 6:53 pm

        You might reflect on the fact that highly intelligent people typically don’t care about ad hominem attacks, as they are the stock-in-trade of children, the low IQ, malicious gossips, etc. They are a sign of intellectual weakness as a better tactic would surely be employed if the debater had one at his disposal.

      9. Tom October 22, 2014 at 1:05 am

        This “shit on a bathroom wall” has deomstrably enough staying power to have retained your continued and infuriated attention. Let’s see how long you can keep going on hot air.

      10. Deplorable Cis Man August 18, 2016 at 12:37 pm

        Writes the wise guy that has shit for brain: not one valid argument.

  6. Coldwarvet October 6, 2014 at 10:56 am

    This is flat out knocked out of the park. Can’t wait to blast this one out to the few lib-progs I still spar with.

  7. 30+1 October 6, 2014 at 10:56 am

    How much more oppression will white men endure before it all blows up?

    All these pinko commies are like a bunch of cats peeing on the family Rottweiler (white man) who is loyal and intelligent but fed up.

    If you look at history what group won wars, designed weapons, combat aircraft, etc. Some white men have weapons and spines like Putin and I can see from Rooshs latest video in Odesaa how healthy and pro Hetero and family EE is compared to the stinking rotten garbage can of Marxism and moral rot called the Anglosphere.

    I just can’t believe these SJW/Marxist Thought police are even real. The offspring of a dying civilization becuse only a Country on the decline could produce such loons as this.

    The modern World is sick. I can honestly say I wish the Catholic Church ran everything- Id submit to them in a heart beat over Jew/Khazar bankers and their class of thougt control clowns.

    1. Tcheverlika October 6, 2014 at 11:02 am

      It can’t blow since everything was done to strip us of that collective consciousness that has the ability to make us act and think as a unit. In the era of individualism, only a few people can think in terms of “Is this good for my country, my civilization ?”

    2. David October 6, 2014 at 12:53 pm

      How much worse can it get? Buddy….you ain’t seen nothin’ yet. The only way modern liberalism will end (and it will) is through good ol’ natural selection: these SJWs, despite their obsession with sex, are largely sexless and entirely childless, and therefore they are self-selecting for extinction. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/18/why-generation-y-less-sex

      But DO NOT view Catholicism as a refuge from SJWs or liberalism. As a lifelong Catholic, I can 100% confidently say that the Church has been as infiltrated and subverted as any institution (universities, corporations, government, etc.) by liberalism. Pope’s have been increasingly liberal, and Pope Francis is, unquestioningly, an SJW himself! http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/pope-inequality-root-of/2014/04/28/id/568036/

      1. Joe October 6, 2014 at 2:08 pm

        I know the Church has been subverted by Masonic/Zionist/Illumiati traitors like evey other social institution from A-Z out here. What I mean is a pure, historical Church that brought Europe out of the ashes of the dark ages and civilized and healed brokenness and brought hope and development.
        I know about the Schofield Bible and all the Masonic/Zuonist new world order subversion- the Church should be infallible and a refuge of truth and hope in a World gone mad.

        I don’t read this blog to be a player- I read it because of the cultural analysis and its sad most men are around women who do not want to be good, loyal, and feminine. The guys who escape Anglosphere girls for solid, loyal Christian girls like in Poland and Colombia are smart. This blog makes me want to get my act together and do just that. My Dad was right if you woman’s not a Christian you don’t want her-she will only bring you trouble. So true.

        I agree with you on culture and foreign women but you should treat a good loyal girl like in Poland with love and respect and marry her. Sin leads none of us anywhere but to hell. We all sin and are a fallen and evil race but we must repent and turn to God. He can cleanse is and set us free and give is a new life and hope. You have said all the notches are pretty meaningless- you need Jesus my friend- He can fulfill you.

        We need a revival and we need to pray. We need Jesus Christ to heal our lands and save us from our sins.

      2. seth datta October 6, 2014 at 6:57 pm

        Christianity as in the Bible could be interpreted as God’s value system for all races. There is no need to ‘convert’, just a belief in Christ and a belief in a righteous God. Churches are not the original way Christians in ancient times worshipped.

      3. ray October 6, 2014 at 7:15 pm

        That is not just excellent advice. It’s the only advice.
        The author is young, like most of the readership here. It’s hard to learn humility in youth; I know I didn’t. But it takes humility and obedience to come before God. None of the proud need bother.
        I hope Father touches some of the people here and brings them to Himself. Nothing I say will make that experience understandable. It’s not based on intellect. Words fail. But He does not.

      4. Drone Killa October 20, 2014 at 2:31 pm

        the church was subverted very early on. look into “gnosticism,” the church censored/destroyed a lot of religious texts around 200 or 300 AD that weren’t recovered until around 1950.

        personally i think the gospels are great, but st paul’s teachings are not compatible with Christ’s IMO.

      5. Tom October 22, 2014 at 1:38 am

        I agree that Paul, or rather Saul (actual name), was the subversive.

        The primary reason for Christ’s presence on Earth was to refute Pharisaic Judaism (modern rabbinical Judaism). His gripe was that the Pharisees (Rabbis) saw their word (the Talmud) as superior to the original word of God to the Hebrews (the Torah). The Talmudic religion raises the Rabbi to god status by making their legalistic interpretation of god’s word superior to the original word itself. Pharisaic Judaism is Judaism. There were no Jews before Pharisaic Judaism. There were Hebrews. The religion of the Hebrews is not Talmudic Judaism (aka Judaism). Essentially, Christ came to restore the religion of the Hebrews through Christians. That’s why Christians, for so long, maintained the supersessionist doctrine that maintained that a new covenant was made for them to replace the Jewish successors to the Hebrews as God’s chosen. That widespread doctrine in mainstream Christianity lasted until circa Vatican II, after Jewish world power firmly asserted itself post WWII. Today, Jews will accuse you of antisemitism, in a very SJW tactical manner, for refuting their claim as the chosen people. What supersessionism meant to the Jews is why they have Jesus boiling in feces in hell in the Talmud and prophecy that his name will be erased. For an entertaining routing of the Rabbis by Jesus, consult Mathew 23 (amongst other places in the NT).

      6. Tom October 22, 2014 at 1:53 am

        The Pope is essentially a Rabbi for Christians, which is as blatantly anti-Christian as it gets. That the Pope is a Rabbi is verified by the simple fact that the Pope’s word is considered to be infallible, apparently even when it conflicts with the word of god. This is the nature of the Rabbi, and it’s the core ideology that Jesus came to denounce. I hold that the Catholic Church is essentially Judaic Christianity. Whereas, in general, that term is an oxymoron despite its propgandic widespread use in the states (for puposes of Christian support for Israel and Jews). Judaism and Christianity are opposite concepts (god’s authority vs man’s authority). Revelation makes some strong future predictions given the current political climate. For context, I’m an agnostic (maybe a future Christian). It’s just that the information in the New Testament is impossible to ignore if current politics are to be understood, as the are inexorably wrapped up in the Abrahamic religions.

      7. ray October 6, 2014 at 7:06 pm

        Catholicism (and most modern ‘churches’) are no refuge from the Sick Jackass Wimps. Rome has been infected for many decades, certainly since Vatican II. The Pope shills for female empowerment etc.

      8. Drone Killa October 20, 2014 at 2:32 pm

        this new pope is a communist.

    3. seth datta October 6, 2014 at 6:54 pm

      Catholic Church is run by the bankers. It has been for hundreds of years. I think the eastern orthodox, protestant and other movements have more validity, though not JH or Mormons IMHO.

    4. SOMEGUY7893 . April 12, 2016 at 10:19 pm

      I don’t know, for a while us Spanish were competing with Britain for top spot. It’s funny though how SJW’s seem to ignore the shit my ancestors did but constantly deride whites for their ancestors actions.

  8. Tcheverlika October 6, 2014 at 10:57 am

    Just imagine somebody taking a bullet in the head. That man falls on the ground, his leg muscle twitchs, creating a cadaveric spasm. This spasm is purely muscular, the brain being dead.
    That’s the state of the society as we know it. We are witnessing the last twitchs of the gigantic human body that is the western civilization.

    1. seth datta October 6, 2014 at 6:53 pm

      Its not just western civ. Its far worse. It is the white race becoming a diaspora and minority in each and every nation, but without power and privilege. The orchestrators play a good game of chess. Or is it just that most of humanity, whatever the race, are just good pawns/slaves.

    2. David Alvaro October 13, 2014 at 2:08 pm

      Will your tinfoil hat protect you from the bullet?

      1. tom October 22, 2014 at 2:01 am

        Are you denying the eventual reality of his statement, or are you just typing whatever characters appear in the shit between your ears?

      2. David Alvaro October 22, 2014 at 2:32 am

        His statement. Western Civilization has always been defined by innovation, by the development of new ideas and a drive to progress forward. America, in particular, has a progressivist tradition that always varies between periods of status quo and bursts of the liberation of more people and more fundamental rights. As far as I can tell, that civilization is very healthy. Eschatology is always the refuge of these least sophositicated thinkers within any cult. Nice heavy metal prose, by the way.

      3. Tom October 22, 2014 at 2:30 pm

        Your stated perspective is 100% interpretative and myopic. You’re attempting to justify your brand of radical social change, which is absolutely ahistorical in its effects on the family unit and thus the political community, by attaching it to rights that conversely have historically increased the ability of communities (political groups) to assert themselves against hegemonic power. To wit, one of the “bursts” of fundamental rights was that of free political speech. Today, free political speech is being clamped down upon with SJWs leading the charge. Is an effective reduction (and a legal reduction in free speech almost everywhere in the first world west other than the USA) on free speech one of the historical changes in rights that you meant to align yourself with?

        We aren’t just talking about gay marriage and we aren’t talking about “fundamental rights” as you so disingenuously claim. Equal rights under the law, with the exception of gay marriage, has been established. The fact is that you are talking about unequal treatment under the law toward equal outcomes. “Equal outcomes” being entirely subjective and biased in terms of which groups are targeted and which groups are ignored to maintain their unequal outcomes. SJWs allow for power toi select which groups they wish to oppress and wish groups they wish to bolster, often with the sole intention of oppressing other groups. SJW’s prevent legitimate political criticism of groups acting politically against other groups for completely selfish interests. Therefore, in preventing free speech, they allow for political mafias to run rampant within nations to advocate for unequal, special treatment under the law.

        Your political beliefs are oppressive, undemocratic, unjust, and ahistorical. You’re on the wrong side of history.

      4. David Alvaro October 22, 2014 at 2:51 pm

        The wrong side of history? The people you call SJWs are trying to move the world forward by continuing the inexorable march of progress from the dark ages to a better future where there is a truly equal society. You guys are so threatened by advances made by other groups because you are losing your stranglehold on power, and desire to either move backward to some kind of idealized past that never existed, where just being a white man guaranteed you the things you want regardless of your lack of education, ambition, skills, charisma, empathy, and physical attractiveness, or to just end civilization altogether. History doesn’t move backward and it doesn’t end.

        No one on the left advocates for restrictions on legal free speech. Sponsors walking away from a bigot for spouting hate speech is not a restriction of free speech, no matter how much you people try to cry that it is. You angry virgins have the right to spit whatever kind of delusional, hateful garbage that you want against women, the jews, blacks, Catholics, liberals, and whoever else you want to pretend is responsible for your life being so empty and meaningless. But don’t be surprised that no one wants to hear about it. It’s like your little Gamergate thing. Except for the legitimately illegal death threats, no one tried to silence that garbage. In fact, everyone encouraged the misogynists of video gaming to say all they could, since every thing they said just incriminated and discredited them more in the eyes of everyone outside of that little he-man woman hater club.

        Ultimately, you guys think that everyone who advocates for anyone other that straight white men do it for the evilest of motives and are bent on destroying society, while those who advocate exclusively for straight white men are heroes. That’s just sad and ridiculous. And that’s not even to mention the fact that you think that the men who gather together to bitch and moan about how mean women and liberals are and how much they hurt their feelings and don’t love them are the most masculine men in the world. That’s the just pure comedy that keeps bringing normal men and women to these sites for entertainment.

      5. jenkins December 25, 2014 at 8:58 pm

        Moving forwards for a better society?….So the food supply is running out, bees are going extinct, global warming, the elite have all the power, half the flora and fauna of the planet is gone, wars are being fought over the depleting oil supply, people are obsessed with materialism, people in western societies have to look to drugs to trigger their dopamine, ceritonine and oxytocin receptors…and you are fighting for the survival of extreme minorities? And you think that’s productive? So we are all going extinct and you are standing there saying: “hey at least we helped the gays and transgender people feel a little more at home during the great extinction”….Btw I don’t have a problem with any one’s sexual or gender preferences I just think those problems can wait, you know until we sort out the survival of our species. But no those things take a lot of effort, more than just a click of your mouse.

      6. Dominic August 10, 2016 at 3:49 pm

        There are much bigger problems than these overly-dramatized social justice issues that our society thinks are so important. These “issues” are inflated and in fact shouldn’t be issues at all (ex. gay rights, transgender rights, women’s rights; they have already have these rights, they want more). Attention seeking is promoted and victimizing is encouraged. Why should these behaviors be treated specially? There are many minorities that have had no problem with the law because they follow the system in place. When groups start demanding special or different treatment for attention, there is a problem. Equality exists. Just because someone isn’t pleased with their reality, doesn’t mean they have the right to label themselves as a made-up term and fight for “unjust treatment of their group”.

      7. Alex de Bellencombre August 12, 2015 at 7:03 pm

        There is something distinctly semitic about your attitude. Everthing you say is right out of the semitically correct play book (extremely unoriginal, base, common, and popular).

    3. Tom October 22, 2014 at 1:57 am

      That’s an apt analogy considering the level of widespread utter unconsciousness about the situation. SJW’s are like the shit expelled from the bowels after the sphincter relaxes.

  9. Aristophanes October 6, 2014 at 11:06 am

    Excellent, yet horrifying article. What do you propose we do to protect ourselves? I think it’s clear that the MRA’s aren’t accomplishing much…

    1. seth datta October 6, 2014 at 6:52 pm

      Do western society males have a future? Feminism will collapse in ten years when the bankers stop funding it. Because it will have achieved what it was meant to – to get the women split up from the men, to lower the white birthrate and to re-structure/re-socialise the society to one of multi-cultural state-sponsored wage slavery and spiritual death.

      1. Itzpapalotl October 17, 2014 at 9:19 am

        He’s ugly as shit, so I didn’t watch the video.

      2. Saturnrules October 24, 2014 at 1:47 pm

        You’ve got to be a Leftist.

  10. CheshireCat October 6, 2014 at 11:16 am

    “Thanks to the subjectiveness of their ideology, SJW’s lack morality or virtue.”
    That sums it up right there, and while everyone is inherently subjective to some extent, what these people do is not driven on any sort of concrete value or rational logic. It is a culture of unbridled, unchecked, and subjective extroverted emotions with no foundation or structure. Agree 100% on every point made.

  11. Mr. B October 6, 2014 at 11:24 am

    It’s even worse than this. The effort for “social justice” is becoming institutionalized. Some colleges are teaching that the Firm has a social justice responsibility not only to their employees but also the world around them.

    This came up in a conversation I had with a 22 year old college junior I mentor on occasion. When given a liberatatian counterpoint he reacted like I just revealed fire for the first time and was completely unaware of the notion that the primary driver of business is a profit motive. Free markets bad; gov’t regulation good. Capitalism bad; social justice good. By the way he is a business major.

  12. Mr. B October 6, 2014 at 11:39 am

    The SWJ is 100% pure, unchecked feminine energy in action.

    1. ray October 6, 2014 at 7:19 pm

      The SJW phenomenon absolutely is grounded in the Feminine Imperative. And it is Big Feminism which rests at the heart of the ‘minority majority’.

    2. SUPRA luca October 17, 2014 at 12:21 pm

      Still much less damaging than unchecked masculine energy, which is torturing, raping and killing, I see. Feminine energy is purer in propose, less megalomaniacal and destructive. It is usually nurturing all the way, even when out of control it has peaks of calmness and discipline. I see a good cause behind it all, it just has to come back to the middle.

      1. Tom October 22, 2014 at 2:23 am

        All completely invalid, politically motivated opinion without basis.

        Masculine energy is why your DNA survived to make you and why your progenitor wasn’t raped by an ape and left in a ditch to rot away, why we have a legal system that is the very basis of society, why you have a computer and electricity to communicate as well as a roof, why you aren’t shitting in the woods, and why you don’t have to worry about getting raped by the next gang over the hill. All very damaging, I know.

        Female energy purer in purpose, calm (haha), DISCIPLINED, nurturing and less destructive??! Your smoking crack.

        I work with all women. When I say all, I mean 45 women in a graduate education environment. I’m the only man. I get to watch them as if I don’t exist because I lack any political power whatsoever, because I’m the only man, and so I’m easy to ignore. I’m absolutely fine with it, and I have a few women friends there who are great. The greater group, however, is shocking to watch. There is zero sense of individual justice. If one woman becomes politically vulnerable because she somehow loses social traction in the group, she is politically and socially savaged by the greater group to a shocking degree. It doesn’t matter what her extenuating circumstances are. The group mentality, based in group approval, takes over completely. It’s absolutely vicious. After working with these women, I’m completely unconvinced of a woman’s innate ability to be a judge or have any power in which an individual’s life or well being is under their control. Discipline?? Most women have zero impulse control of judgment, with some minority exceptions, when it comes to deciding what is appropriate to speak about in the workplace when unmonitored by men. It’s a literal free-for-all, and the lawsuit worthy gossip in the workplace occurs weekly. Calm?? Over-emotional reactions to the de rigeur of office politics and interpersonal communication are daily events. Calm. You have either zero self-awareness or are an exceedingly poor observer of the female condition.

        Never be vulnerable around a woman, in the workplace or otherwise, unless you wish your figurative throat to be torn out.

  13. macDamon October 6, 2014 at 11:39 am

    Урррррааааа за Руш!

  14. paddyo October 6, 2014 at 11:42 am

    Confront them directly. Push back hard. Organize. Ridicule them out loud . The moment you lose your fear of being labeled is the moment they lose their power over you.

    The mainstream media is nearly dead. A new round of layoffs and buyouts are underway. The survivors are only preaching to the congregation. Don’t underestimate the value of websites like this where like-thinking men can openly discuss the issues. The left will lose its control of the national debate.

    1. Tom Dane October 6, 2014 at 2:50 pm

      Yea I think its about time that people fight back. For example, talk openly about being against homosexuality could get you fired. Then when they DO fire you, sue them. Because there is nothing in the law that says you cant say that.
      Fight for your right for free speech.

      1. prepz October 6, 2014 at 4:58 pm

        Been there, done that. It’s a chasing after the wind. The best course of action is to retreat and rebulid bastions of male-dominated reality from which to watch the rest of the world burn itself down with it’s mental illnesses. Unlike Nero, you can keep your wits and watch Rome burn with a plan of what do when it’s a an ash heap.

      2. seth datta October 6, 2014 at 6:49 pm

        Try talking about Zionism. I would, but in the UK there’s no point as most folk are so brainwashed or fearful/defeated, that they will serve the beast until their death. Absolutely useless. You’re better off talking to a wall.

        They’re just waiting to be finished by their slave masters.

      3. paddyo October 6, 2014 at 7:25 pm

        Forget Zionism. Talk about England. Talk about your great heritage and history. Talk about Shakespeare!

      4. finndistan October 7, 2014 at 2:59 am

        Dass Raciss…

        Slaves built england and english culture.

      5. SUPRA luca October 17, 2014 at 12:24 pm

        Fight for your right for free speech for the wrong things. Who cares about decency, respect and good sense.

        Uncivilized, ignorant American males being uncivilized, ignorant American males, as always.

      6. Tom Dane October 17, 2014 at 3:00 pm

        Yea because it would be better if we were all gay, right ?

      7. Tom October 22, 2014 at 2:37 am

        Yes, the battle cry of the SJW: “Das Ignant”!

        In Oceania, where ignorance is strength, doublethink dictates that anti-family values individualist politics are pro-civilization and traditional values, running parallel to historical civilization, are anti-civilization.

        Got it.

    2. cmp679 October 7, 2014 at 2:34 pm

      ‘The moment you lose your fear of being labeled is the moment they lose their power over you’

      Very true. I see some signs this is starting to happen in England.

  15. Jordan October 6, 2014 at 12:07 pm

    Fantastic Stuff!!!

  16. Lee October 6, 2014 at 12:09 pm

    This is great work and a top 5 manosphere article. Everything about these SJW’s is sickening. There all scheming cunts whos only motivation in life is to make everyone as miserable and unsuccessful as they are.

  17. Emahray Trolle October 6, 2014 at 12:15 pm

    They also make money at it. Lots of money.

    Salon daily posts click-bait essays on white racism and corporate malfeasance to their target demographic of aging white feminists while raking in cash from corporate advertising. Joan Walsh, the proprieter of Salon, lives in a gated all-white community where she enjoys the security and protection of white patriarchy so she can have time to pen her anti-white-male hate screeds in between collecting cash generated by her harem of unpaid journalists.

    The pros know how it works.

    1. seth datta October 6, 2014 at 7:04 pm

      SJW is funded by wealthy bankers promoting an agenda – the enslavement of societies. AS such, feminism, secular humanism and SJW’s have been effective enough, along with social engineering, especially alimony and the like. Making people better slaves for lower pay and who complain less. This will be the end effect of SJW. But you better believe that plenty of men and even more women will sell out because this is where the cash is – they don’t have to be much good, just forward the agenda. As such, the girls will all now want to be useless society-destroying SJWs talking about how men are destroying society, and some men wanting to get laid by these girls will become SJWs to before the west collapses. and becomes a full-on totalitarian slave state of almost global proportions.

      SJW = Some Joo Wins.

      I await the NSA and multiple comments from posters from the ADL and SPLC etc.. denigrating my manhood, sex life etc, making diversionary comments and just trying to alter the course of the debate where they up vote their comments and drown out this legitimate point in white noise, for freedom of speech will perish under the next five years in the west.

  18. Teedub October 6, 2014 at 12:19 pm

    This was quite marvellous

  19. Sanelity October 6, 2014 at 12:32 pm

    Excellent essay. “Mos Eisley Spaceport Tumblr. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.”

    Each new cause is an addictive substance to the SJW. Even if it goes against yesterday’s cause. It was fun to watch the #solidarityisforwhitewomen hashtag make a lot of SWPL women uncomfortable. Cis-Het White Women often forget that they are just one small step removed from the source of all evil – CHWM.

  20. Tommy Hass October 6, 2014 at 12:37 pm

    I like how Roosh mentions sex differences but not race differences. Lol.

    1. desbest October 6, 2014 at 5:04 pm

      Sex difference are much more pronounced than race differences, when looking at how the brain is wired.

      1. SUPRA luca October 17, 2014 at 12:28 pm

        Scientists still can’t say how brains are wired. Even saying a brain is “wired” somehow is wrong, as there is still no proof any “wiring” (nor sixe or such) difference that can be noticed between the sexes is there from birth.

      2. Tom October 22, 2014 at 2:44 am

        lol…there are entire books on specific networks in the brain, all unquestionably accepted and taught in mainstream academia. However, I”ll venture a guess that you’ve never taken a neuroanatamoy course and that, instead, you’re a moron who aspires to be a bullshit artist. I love it when SJW’s attempt to sound like they’ve cracked an undergraduate science text, let alone venture into graduate/med school topics.

  21. colombianreader October 6, 2014 at 12:53 pm

    excellent essay

  22. Bob October 6, 2014 at 1:18 pm

    Probably the most well written article describing these SJW’s and their toxic influence on society.

  23. Samseau October 6, 2014 at 1:39 pm

    Great job Roosh in laying out the case. SJW’s are no different than Communists, Nazi’s, or any other ideological brainwashing movement.

    1. seth datta October 6, 2014 at 6:50 pm

      All funded by the same people if you investigate…

      Yes, even Nazi-ism, to an extent.

    2. Itzpapalotl October 17, 2014 at 9:25 am

      Except that men actually defined the true meaning of what it is to be a Nazi, whereas SJW’s haven’t.

      1. Tom October 22, 2014 at 2:56 am

        SJW’s serve to empower small mafias amongst the majority. Small mafia’s almost always have some type of supremacist ideology, some older than others. Did you know that Islam doesn’t consider non-Muslims human? Well, like 1-2% human. Judaism has similar ideology, especially in the ultra orthodox and, to an extent, orthodox sects. Unironically, these are the two truly monotheistic Abrahamic religions. Neither tolerates any type of polytheism (an intolerance that is another form of supremacy, not to mention the mandate for all non-Jews in the world to follow Noahide Laws as inferiors in the Jewish legal system). In either case, the ideology is much more extreme than anything the modern white man espouses about his self-interests in European states or the USA. Both of these supremacist ideologies are darlings of willfully ignorant SJW’s.

        Additionally, the community/family destructive social effect of SJW is the precise social strategy of communism – a movement you admit is supremacist.

        If any Jew predictably wants to counter my assertion of anti-gentitlism, I’ll respond with a litany of very modern Jewish sources that directly confirm my assertion. Just to prepare you. Yeah, yeah, antisemitic, whatever…take a walk. The truth of anti-gentilism is the readily verifiable truth.

  24. Lex Corvus October 6, 2014 at 2:31 pm

    This outstanding essay deserves a broad audience. Under the assumption that it will achieve such an audience, and in an effort to make it as polished as possible, I offer the following minor corrections:

    it’s intended audience -> its intended audience

    Western legal cannon -> Western legal canon

    Finally, Sandra Y.L. Korn is not a professor as stated in the essay; at the time of the cited opinion piece, she was a Harvard University undergraduate (class of ’14).

    1. Roosh_V October 6, 2014 at 2:47 pm

      Fixed, thanks.

  25. ng85 October 6, 2014 at 2:59 pm

    Roosh, this essay is amazing! Living in NYC I have to deal with SJW types on an almost daily basis. But there’s one thing I’d like to add to your points: SJW types can’t exist without the internet.

    And what do I mean by that? They’re chicken shit in real life. I highly doubt most SJWs actually believe the bullshit they re-blog or re-post from other social media users (SJWs are usually incapable of coming up with original thoughts and just “repurpose” other people’s ideas as their own). I know several people who post nothing but SJW shit on their blogs on a daily basis, yet when we hang out in person they don’t mention a thing about it. In fact, a lot of them seem to enjoy my offensive and irreverent sense of humor.

    One situation stands out to me – I was at a party where this super beta dude was whining about something, and this stereotypical Tumblr feminist chick (Who does have a SJW Tumblr that I’ve seen) goes “Quit being such a FAGGOT!!!” As a joke I go “Excuse me, but that word is VERY offensive to me! What the fuck are you thinking????” She panicked, and just blurts out “I can say it, I have a gay brother!” Which lead me to say “Well I have a black cousin, does that mean I can say ‘nigger’ whenever I want?” She immediately changed the topic of conversation in immediate defeat.

    SJW types can only thrive in a bubble of other people that agree with them. The only problem is the people that agree with them are so few and far between that the internet is the only way for them to come together. And if everyone agrees with the same things as you then you start to believe that it’s TRUTH no matter how far-fetched it is. But get them alone and in person and try talking with them and it becomes evident that they can’t debate for shit. It also becomes evident that perhaps they don’t believe their bullshit as much as they claim to since they can’t passionately argue in favor of it off the cuff – It’s lazy herd-thinking at its finest. And it’s not that hard to out-alpha the SJW dudes, which is why I’m pretty sure with minimal effort I could crack gay jokes and get them to laugh along. And I’ve NEVER been called out on this shit in person. The only time I’ve “gotten in trouble” with the SJWs is online, and online ONLY. Away from their keyboards they have no power.

  26. chrisgale October 6, 2014 at 2:59 pm

    Preach it brother.
    The cure is plain speech, confrontation, and mockery.
    Because these rabbits will run when confronted: and since I am white, heterosexual and Christian I assume that I;m offensive and just get on with letting out the snark.

    1. Al October 6, 2014 at 8:49 pm

      Snark and catty debates must be a millennial thing. When I was growing up there were vestiges of the beat down culture meaning you got out of line or in someone’s face it be on and rights and lefts would be flying. If I were in undergrad today judging by my assessing of it all Id be brawling often- for me it doesn’t end at
      A catty snark that’s passive aggressive and quasi homo (basically
      Glorified cowardice) but rather rotating my hips with violent intensity as I let those hands go on the mouth of some punk.

      1. chrisgale October 6, 2014 at 11:38 pm

        That gets you arrested, and worse, sacked. What does work is a nice critique. And standing up (literally) to protect which is sacred: I’m thinking of the men standing in front of the Argentinian feminists as they tried to invade a cathedral.

      2. Al October 7, 2014 at 10:14 am

        Those Marxist clowns disrespecting anyone’s place of worship (Church, Mosque- youll never see them invade a Synagogue-coincidence? Not likely)makes me want punch them in the face. Christians will terate that nonsense more but I doubt they’d clown around at a mosque and if the adherents beat them for disrespecting a ace of worship I would not convict them for it at all. These commies are the worst-cant stand them- remember all Feminism is is gender centric Marxism applied. Communism is a tool of satan and I absolutely hate it.

  27. Clark Kent October 6, 2014 at 3:29 pm

    I’m from Toronto… those videos are embarrassing… What is even more sad is I know girls like that… and if you’re curious, they don’t have any real problems in life besides the drama they create…

  28. Anon October 6, 2014 at 3:33 pm

    Brilliant, simply brilliant.

  29. Blue Tropic October 6, 2014 at 4:18 pm

    Ironically one of the most threatened groups are the white attractive women.

    They resemble the oppressive objectification of women, and are a resemblance to the arcaic and mysoginistic values that value them in terms of their physical attractiveness.

  30. nana October 6, 2014 at 4:19 pm

    Using marx as a reference for ‘cultural marxism’ is intellectually dishonest. It’s a different school.

    1. Leroy X October 6, 2014 at 8:56 pm

      All leftists and commies are destroyers of civilization.

      Re your comment above-That’s like saying dont refer to all the gangs in my city as criminals and thugs-my set in the hoods is crips and we are a different school.

      1. tonipepperoni October 7, 2014 at 2:04 am

        Would civilization even be possible if Man decided to be a conservative? Nope.
        Your statement is both ironic and retarded.

        What really is Left-wing politics? To you American’s it’s “Progressivisism” or “lib-tard”. To Europeans, it’s something completely different.


  31. Master Dogen October 6, 2014 at 4:22 pm

    Good stuff, Roosh, and true.

    “How did SJW’s become such a powerful force?”


    I was an English major in University, about 16 years ago, at an “upper tier” public school (pretty typical place). I was taught “Critical Theory” there, which is the academic skeleton around which SJW ideas are built. I was very, very good at this stuff, and before I graduated I was taking Master’s and PhD level courses in deconstruction and post-structuralist thought, etc.

    The stuff I was learning was way, way “out there” at the time. Now it is the new “normal” for SJW’s. And, of course, what was already normal in the late 1990’s was “way out there” back in the 60’s and 70’s.

    This is a deliberate effort to radicalize young people and turn them against their own culture by creating resentment and what Nietzsche called the “tarantula hearts.”

    As absurd as the SJW’s have gotten (and one look at the tumblr “otherkin” scene is enough to make you laugh for days), it WILL get worse. Radicalization can never stop on its own because it has an internal logic that MUST destroy whatever is “normal.”

    Finally, I live in an extremely liberal neighborhood in an extremely liberal city. We had gay marriage acceptance around here 15 years before it became a big deal nationwide. I’ve seen firsthand how these ideas radiate out from the liberal “fringe” into the wider society. So, based on what I’ve begun to see around here in the last year, prepare yourself for: lots of “genderfuck” people like fat women with beards, men and even school-age boys in dresses (dressed by their abusive “liberated” mothers of course), face and neck tattoos on non gang-related middle class white people, and all kinds of status competitions to be the most “wacky” “liberated” “free-thinker” of them all (in other words, to be the most conformist drone of the Frankfurt School.)

    Ironically, of course, all this Marxist-style “liberation” is welcomed by massive, deracinated international capitalists…. people who hate their history, family and community and who talk non-stop about “individuality” and “justice” make the perfect hive-consumers. It’s not by accident that Google pushes SJW agendas and Burger King has rainbow Whoppers.

    1. Mantis October 6, 2014 at 4:46 pm

      Great comment on a fantastic article. Cheers to the both of you!

    2. seth datta October 6, 2014 at 6:58 pm

      This sounds horrible. Where is this if you don’t mind me asking (rough geographical area will do).

      1. Master Dogen October 6, 2014 at 7:47 pm

        Capitol Hill in Seattle.

      2. Ian October 7, 2014 at 10:38 am

        Why are they so deranged in Seattle? And passive aggressive?

      3. Tom October 22, 2014 at 3:01 am

        Yeah, that would be an epicenter. It’s that likely only San Francisco would be worse, and maybe not even worse due to the pricing that forces people to be more serious in their lifestyle (in general) as well as the Chinese presence.

    3. tonipepperoni October 7, 2014 at 12:28 am

      This is both philosophically and historically incorrect.
      Most of the critical-theory you speak of has been re-hashed American reductionist views which have completely misinterpreted the original thought of European thinkers.

      I too am a critique of America’s execution of ‘critical theory’, ‘cultural marxism’ and SJWs.

      The problem is simple:
      Up until recent American hegemony and globalisation, Europe has been relatively untouched by the idiotic “Women studies” philosophy that’s taught in American universities. Even today, in economically developed countries (excluding Scandinavia which is ‘progressive’ by default due to its Lutherian background and it’s high proficiency and love for Anglo-culture/language) we are yet to see the ridiculous levels of SJW/Feminist batshittery that we see in America. This is ironic considering that post-modernism rose out of the continent.

      Simple answer: Americans by default are reductionist. They re-hash things they don’t understand and propagandize it to the masses. Has RooshV ever read Das Kapital? Has he read Hegel? Not likely. Yet his followers accept his sentiments as though it is a sermon delivered in the form of a ‘Red Pill’.

      What infected the Arts/History/Philosophy faculties of America infects RooshV’s writings and the manosphere. Reductionist attitude towards life, viewing philosophy and history as being two dimensional, and accepting what the US government and MSM has propogandized as fact “Communism is godless”, “Communism is the devil”, “Marxism is bad”.

      It is ironic to me that RooshV can view places like Russia as being traditionalist yet there is no Russian city without a figure of Vladimir Lenin. Fortunately the Russians, while acknowledging the flaws of their communist history, realise that communism in itself was a intellectual movement that was radicalized and perhaps could never have reached fruition due to its own nature or due to the lack of technological development or simply due to its historical execution.

      Laci Green for example talks about how they had to use “language which doesn’t involve binary oppositions in her gender theories class” — Did Jacques Derrida ever intend for such things to happen in such a place like America? Fuck no. If anything the dead criticial-theorists would be spewing enmasse had they seen what America turned into.

      1. tonipeperoni October 7, 2014 at 12:50 am

        Btw, if you want to read a good critique of SJWs, feminists, or progressives in general.

        Then read “The Dark Enlightenment” by Nick Land – it’s online and free. Unlike RooshV who is yet another anglo-puppet who pretends to have some kind of knowledge, the British philosopher dissects progressivism fully using sophisticated arguments.

      2. Tom October 22, 2014 at 3:04 am

        The Nick Land piece is widely read by this audience.

    4. J5 October 7, 2014 at 10:20 am

      My gut is reeling at the things going on that freak show of a city you’re describing has got to be either San Francisco or Portland- am I right?

      1. FormerCanadian October 7, 2014 at 10:42 am

        Wrong! It’s Toronto The Hell Hole, a city of desperate and sex hungry males and whales of women who think they are Beauty Queens and Miss Universe in 1 package.

  32. Ian October 6, 2014 at 4:49 pm

    Uncle Roosh,
    You seem to be hitting on the topic of suicide and mental illness a lot in many of your recent discussions (this article, Laci Green YT).

    You seem like you do care and want to promote whole, civil dialogue so-
    What do you think people in the depths of despair like a Laci Green or an incel can do to improve their brokeness?

    I honestly think you could get farther with PR and legitimizing your views by showing enemies like Laci Green love and kindness as opposed to hating or being mean. Look at Jesus and Gandhi- people listen to them because that did not show hate but offered love and peace. Something to think about.

    1. ray October 6, 2014 at 7:41 pm

      Jesus didn’t hate, that’s one reason why he’s the King and we are not. But he kicked butt and whooped people out of his house when they’d turned it into a Market Economy.
      Yes he offered love, and offers it still. He even COMMANDED love. But he will also punish wickedness, lies, and thuggery with wrath. As this planet is about to see.

  33. penguin October 6, 2014 at 4:50 pm

    yep, i mean we all know this stuff – but its nice to see it written. Thanks.

  34. prepz October 6, 2014 at 4:55 pm

    Ms. Lauri Penny is a great case study. Once confronted with facts and an accomplished male who doesn’t lay down and take her unfounded SJW labeling, she’s desperately defensive having to respin her entire position and deny the truth about her motives and past actions. She’s caught in her own web of BS and instinctively switches to victim mode as her only last defense, hoping her vapid appeal to the weak damsel in distress will win the crown over to her, and that mere numbers in consensus is enough to squelch the facts and the accusations against her. She uses the unjust card. And when that fails, she feebly tries to reframe the situation as a violence against her. But it doesn’t work. And even a female in the audience calls her on in, at which point the entire forum must be disbanded lest a riot ensue.

    The same happens to me when I publicly call women out on their nonsense. In a way, every female is a SJW for her own cause — herself, if not for her crazy causes. When the SJW’s cause is ripped apart in public for lack of standing, she instinctively resorts to her self preservation mode of lying down as a victim of male violence against her. Male SJW’s do the same because they’ve adopted the female sensibilities to all things — feelings above facts, opinion above truth, and all things yielding power to an inferior intellect and rampant ignorance.

    Thank you for illustrating SJW syndrome in such detail and supporting evidence.

  35. Atlanta Man October 6, 2014 at 4:59 pm

    The funny thing about SJWs is there is no way to appease them. You could agree with everything they say, make all the changes they want, completely internalize their beliefs and they would turn on a fucking dime and “gotcha” with something new. The goal is not real change with them, it is the act of complaining itself as the goal. The reason why there is no appeasing them is it is that woman are driving the discussion(and you can never make a woman happy), the men are just trying to get laid and don’t really believe(which is odd because SJW woman are repulsed by SJW men, and if SJW men do get laid they are accused of rape, just look at their alt lit scene.). It is just this bizarre academic exercise that has escaped into the real world and is out of control, opportunistically infecting every part of popular culture.

    1. Tom October 22, 2014 at 3:12 am

      Well, you’ve touched on the reality if the situation. For anyone that can accurately extrapolate out the logic of what is going on, the answer comes down to armed conflict. The only way any of this will stop is through violence. I’m not advocating it. I’m just stating the reality of liberal hegemony. The news outlets need to be taken by military swat teams. The Universities need to be overhauled. Without those things, which will only come via militarized methods, nothing will really change. Again, that’s not advocacy. The mistake is believing that SJW’s are perturbed yet relatively benign millennials and not an arm of the death juggernaut that is global communism. They’re deadly serious.

  36. Ternarydemon October 6, 2014 at 5:44 pm

    History is cyclical. I see many similarities between 30s fascism and the current far-left agenda, which, like the aforementioned ideology, will also end in cultural catastrophe.

    1. Elroy Delmar October 6, 2014 at 8:59 pm

      True and we all know what happened in the early 40s- very ugly.
      We can thank the bankers for that one too.

  37. Marshallaw October 6, 2014 at 6:00 pm

    Well done Roosh,brilliant article.
    The cities and large towns are infected. This is a disease. As with all diseases it will run its course. It is the politics of mediocrity…… they want to stifle exceptional individuals so they can drag everyone kicking and screaming down to their squalid level.
    I see so many betas in ltr’s and marriages, not taking control and ending up miserable wondering where they went wrong. Unhappiness will breed (I hope!)contempt for this ideology.
    They are sewing the seeds of their own demise. I just hope we are not all brought down with them.

    1. ray October 6, 2014 at 7:47 pm

      “It is the politics of mediocrity…… they want to stifle exceptional individuals so they can drag everyone kicking and screaming down to their squalid level.”
      Yep. It’s the Triumph of Mediocrity. Their personal insecurities and inferiorities are re-framed as ‘equality’ and ‘progress’ and of course ‘justice’. But in reality it’s just mondo resentment of their betters, whether that’s God or just the Evil White Male next door that they feel is too privileged. Get enough of them together politically and you have… Amerika.

  38. AnnPelham October 6, 2014 at 6:42 pm

    Close, but not quite. SJWs are an outgrowth from critical theory (which is part of Marxism). Feminism is also an outgrowth of critical theory.

  39. Chris Adams October 6, 2014 at 6:50 pm

    Awesome and concise summary of a scourge to mankind!

  40. ray October 6, 2014 at 6:55 pm

    First rate, thanks.

    The piece leaves the impression that SJW-ism is still somewhat fringe, and still attempting to break through the ‘establishment’ of ‘normal’ Western Civ.

    Obviously, however, the SJWs long ago conquered western civ, and certainly all major U.S. institutions. One need only glance at the Executive … Barry Soetoro, VAWA Joe, Hitlary, Valerie “The Vagina” Jarrett, et al. All destroyers of The Evil White Male. Likewise, government in general, in addition to law, education, and media are already long sold-out to the SJWs and Progressivism in general. This includes the Republicans and ‘conservatives’, with few exceptions. In wealthy, privileged empires like the U.S., it’s just too dangerous and costly to oppose these scumbags, especially any person with a public profile. Thus the cancer metastasizes with little resistance.

    The most pathological and hateful of the SJWs indeed do ‘lead’ from PuffHo and Gawker etc., but they are backed by the full force of institutional America. By no means are these punks fringe; they have been the New Establishment for many decades running. In the government offices where I worked in the Eighties, these passive-aggressive cowards already were dictating terms and policies. They are not a new phenomenon.

    These people are full of resentment, groupist-cowardice, self-service, and sanctimony. They have placed themselves in the position of God, and there is no end to their ‘reforms’. Placating and rewarding them only incurs more rage, resentment, and surety of entitlement. This will not end peacefully.


  41. Nick October 6, 2014 at 8:11 pm

    I wish we could figure a way to help people like the author of this article and the other posters in this comment thread get past their irrational and hateful beliefs.

  42. Marko October 6, 2014 at 8:33 pm

    Awesome. This describes every person in DC.

  43. Robert October 6, 2014 at 9:00 pm

    An excellent expose. How did SJW’s become such a powerful
    force? One factor was that the stupid “liberals” and so-called
    moderates who were already running powerful institutions like universities by
    1970 did nothing to block their advance. They conferred the prestige of places
    like Harvard, Columbia, and Berkeley on seditious fanatics like Eric

    More than that, with the decline in at least naïve belief
    in religion, the old ideas of sin and guilt fell into disuse until
    the SJW’s and other leftists grabbed them and started exploiting them to spread
    their ideology. And “the kids” starting with the Woodstock generation
    bought into all of it. (So much for their supposed sophistication.)

    Today’s leftists are vying for control of society in much the same way the ecclesiastical politicians of the 4th Century AD got control of the early Church, and then “Christianized” the whole Roman Empire at swordpoint. They destroyed
    much of ancient culture, including vandalizing and demolishing the magnificent
    temples of “pagan” religions, then outlawed all religion and learning
    except their own. A two-column comparison of the modern Left with the
    intolerant and ultimately dominant faction of the 4th Century Church
    as described in Martin Larson’s The Story of Christian Origins would reveal

  44. Seth Rose October 6, 2014 at 9:08 pm

    A fantastic and thorough write up. Thanks for taking the time as usual to get the word out.

  45. NeoNationalist October 6, 2014 at 10:54 pm

    Excellent work. Thank you for this.

  46. TheGrandAdmiral October 7, 2014 at 12:44 am

    Originally posted as a comment on the RoK article “Inside the Mind of the Social Justice Wanker”:

    My first major encounter with an SJW was a blog of a Black man, or shall I say, queer-identified mulatto, that lived in Taiwan when I was researching anti-Black racism in the country. This “brothette” took offense to me sympathizing with his inability to gain the affections of a Taiwanese woman, that right before his very eyes treated a White man to dinner. Not yet knowing that this individual was a queer, I put myself into the situation, knowing that I would indeed be jealous of a White man getting a free meal and some balls-deep action while I would be left to frig myself.

    My reasoning in this scenario was incorrect, as instead of wanting to enter that Taiwanese lotus pod as I would, he was furious that he would not have his intestines thoroughly ravaged by the White man’s member. I found this ideology to be quite unnatural, and to a degree, frightening.

    Despite this individual’s desire to have his anus pilfered, or his insatiable lust to guzzle from the pricks of heterosexual Black male celebrities, I was a sinner for desiring a normal, run-of-the-mill Taiwanese woman to enjoy. Not only was I a sinner, but I was also a fetishizing piece of shit that promoted White supremacy by wishing to plunge my member into the crevices of an Asian woman, the same gardens that the White supremacists would want to deny me access to. I just did not “get it”, and to this day, my mind is not sharp enough to comprehend this logic.

    Of equal interest and vulgarity is his partner in crime, a chunky Chinese-American woman with a disturbing nasal voice and habit of using the idioms of Black women as portrayed in 1990’s sitcoms. This wretch claims that her goal is to crush White supremacy once and for all and stop men from fetishizing Asian women, yet her favorite pastime is hopping on various White pricks. This Skrillex-haired vermin finds it distasteful for the oppressed shaft of a heterosexual Black man to rise and find refuge in the delightful gardens of the East, whilst devouring the discharge of the very same genitals of the oppressor. An interesting and vile character indeed

    1. Tom October 22, 2014 at 3:19 am

      Dude, wtf is with the language? No one here wants to read your unnecessarily florid descriptions of that disgusting shit. I’m inclined to think that you’re trolling.

  47. DeepThinker October 7, 2014 at 1:20 am

    Roosh, this article is one of your most
    “scholarly” yet. I recommend that you make extra efforts to get this
    article into the mainstream. It has mass appeal potential. Here are my ideas:

    1. Publish this on Return of Kings

    2. Make a YouTube video about this, it needs to
    have an awesome flow, it must be clean enough to be on CNN, but entertaining

    3. Make a PDF 1-sheet version of this article, make
    it have strong visuals to encourage people to read and pass it along to every Manosphere/men’s
    rights site, have it subtly refer people to ROF and rooshv.com

    4. Publish it in an alternate channel where people
    will feel comfortable sharing it on social media (think: 9gag)

    5. Have a separate marketing effort to target
    conservative/libertarian sites, words spreads fast in those circles and it will
    increase your relevancy. Start with sites that allow anyone to post/share
    articles (think: freerepublic.org)

    The purpose of all this effort is to maximize the number of
    new viewers.

    1. Roosh_V October 7, 2014 at 9:00 am

      I do plan on making a youtube attachment. Others are free to remix this into inforgraphics or other works.

      1. Leroy October 7, 2014 at 10:44 am

        You tell me because you’re the high iq Persian and Im a mulato in Redneck Tennessee but would an action kit on how to deal with sjw Marxist scum in a PDF file be something worth disseminating as our red pill thinking own counter propaganda to those clowns?

      2. FormerCanadian October 7, 2014 at 10:49 am

        What do you need a PDF file for?? Is it that hard to follow some simple rules? Just man up, have own opinion and enough facts/arguments to back it up, dare to stand up and be counted and to lead by example.
        Do you really need a PDF for THAT???????????
        You ain’t gonna win a battle by some kind of propaganda, but you can lead by example and change by example.

  48. werefish October 7, 2014 at 1:24 am

    Another thing is that a lot of them are SJWs full-time, it’s their passion and main occupation. While the people who they mob and get fired do not have the time to defend themselves

  49. evilwhitemalempire October 7, 2014 at 1:56 am

    Wallflowers that routinely face rejection from tall, rich, handsome men fabricate persecution narratives whereby they are persecuted (oppressed) by tall, rich, handsome men.
    The ‘patriarchy’ narrative is really just the female version of Elliot Rodger’s “all beautiful women are wicked witches” narrative.
    The glaring difference is that Rodger’s didn’t have legions of omega females doting about him hanging on his every word.

  50. AC October 7, 2014 at 7:19 am

    Victims of these SJW mob actions, particularly those who have been falsely accused of sex crimes, need to start filing defamation per se lawsuits.

  51. Phantom October 7, 2014 at 8:24 am

    One of the best social analysis pieces ever penned.

  52. C-MAN (Pencil Jedi) October 7, 2014 at 8:37 am

    “All who gain power are afraid to lose it.” — Chancellor Palpatine

  53. Jackson October 7, 2014 at 8:44 am

    This is a great piece… I’ve spent years researching aspects of the SJW movement for clients of mine who are routinely on the receiving end of their nonsense. What’s important to keep in mind particularly regarding the question of how SJW’s became such a powerful force, is that many of the organizations they represent receive tens (and in some cases hundreds) of millions of dollars from big liberal foundations.

    That’s the big untold story about the SJW movement. As an example, I track a certain subset of the SJW movement as an investigative consultant for corporate clients. The “movement” is made up of various non profit organizations that claim to represent large “grassroots” constituencies. It’s bullshit… The constituencies they represent are manufactured out of thin air giving the appearance of a vibrant, loud, grassroots movement.

    The particular organizations I track have received over $100 million in foundation funding in the past decade alone from liberal foundations such as the Ford Foundation, George Soros’ Open Society Institute, etc. There are literally hundreds of these liberal foundations and they often coordinate and collaborate on the grants they make to effectively make “social change” happen on their pet issues.

    If you want to watch the decline of America in action, take a look at the foundations. You can actually track Ford Foundation grants here: http://www.fordfoundation.org/grants/search. Take a look… Type in some key words… “gay” and “gender” for instance. You’ll be amazed at the obscene amounts of money sloshing around in the SJW movement.

    1. FormerCanadian October 7, 2014 at 9:13 am

      Oh please…. do not count dollars in someone else’s pockets… If sheeple caved in and became submissive to the mainstream propaganda then who’s to blame? The almighty dollar or sheeple themselves?

    2. Allen October 7, 2014 at 10:51 am

      Snows are the rothschilds way to ruin he Internet too. You gotta think these Jews must be some deranged people to hate and subvert like they do. Jew creep of the day- Senator Javits (bring your hordes he said in the 60s) working out nicely America, right?
      The Byzantines had it right keep them out of government, the church, education, and all other core social institutions or you will have a 2014 America on your hands. It’s no confidence the Khazars have been ran out of so many countries.

      1. Allen October 7, 2014 at 10:52 am

        Typo should read sjws are the Rothschilds tool

      2. FormerCanadian October 7, 2014 at 10:54 am

        Oh man…. stop looking for excuses and someone to blame in OWN faults… nothing’s gonna change until you folks realize that changes come from within! Stop blaming others, blame YOURSELF in YOUR OWN faults and setbacks.

      3. Allen October 7, 2014 at 11:02 am

        You must be a Ashkenazi/Khazar as defensive as you get.

        Only a retard can’t see the upper echelon of the Jews runs everything- they’ve got it all In a stranglehold of misery to control the economy and only a complete idiot could not see this as FACT.

        Google Eustace Mullins or Nesta Webster. David Duke has great youtube lectures on this that are 100% truth. Last time I waste a comment on Your Zionist supplicating psycho babel bs.

        The Jews control it all- do they deserve to be attacked- no! But people need to tell them To shove it and not play there games any more.

      4. FormerCanadian October 7, 2014 at 11:09 am

        Man, I’m as far from a Jew as it’s only possible, which doesn’t make me wrong in my visions that changes come from within! Stop blaming others in your OWN faults and it’ll be your first step towards improvement.

        Your quote:” The Jews control it all- do they deserve to be attacked- no! But people need to tell them To shove it and not play there games any more!” END QUOTE.
        Just read my messages and you’ll see that I’m pushing for this all along. And not only in regards of Jews, but entire life and its values!

      5. Allen October 7, 2014 at 11:31 am

        How am I blaming others when those scum at Aipac control co gress like a pimp does 18yo hos, they blew us up on 9/11 so yhey could have a Zionist mass surveilance grid as a means to gather data yo relive their sadistic dna whims like they did to humans i. The gulags i. Their first Jewtopia the USSR, the Rothschilds control the Fed/money supply, Goldman Sachs can rob the flu try blind and advertise this on their cotribalists “news” channels, and other Jews control agriculture and put gmo seeds in the food supply?

        Can I pull out a Napoleon Hill or Dale Carnegie book and positive think my way out of a totalitarian shit hole controlled by the self chosen because the masses are too retarded to step away from Jew Hollywood flicks after they worked for a Jew ran fortune 1000 all day and say screw this monopoly- we aren’t playing this game anymore. Really though people are idiots because who else can watch a bunch of guys run around on a field all weekend doing the same thing week after week and be totally fascinated by this like the retarded public in the US is over the NFL. Idiots.

      6. FormerCanadian October 7, 2014 at 1:44 pm

        Again, just 1 question: how come I never changed my visions, values and priorities in life and that after having lived in the most politically correct, feminist and “upside down inside out” city of Toronto?
        If I can withstand the pressure coming from all the mainstream media and shit then anyone can! If only people could stop looking for excuses and start acting instead of complaining or watching TV for hours and hours.

      7. Rastus Jermaine XVIII October 7, 2014 at 4:47 pm

        No one ever opposes individualism or being practical/action oriented but, you know its true about who runs tv.

        Honestly, who would want to watch tv that has half a brain anything mainstream is crap.

        But dont even try to wiggle worm out of the ugly reality of the source of the oppression aka that the Rothsteins and Fishfinkles invented almost every awful, subversive ideology under the Sun and that they control the press, military-industrial complex, food distributors/gmo and processed additive induction into peoples bodies, the banks, and all the rest.

      8. FormerCanadian October 9, 2014 at 7:04 am

        Again, how come I never felt the impact and never changed my visions and values while living in the most fucked up and politically correct city in the world called Toronto?
        How come I still dare to be a personality, to have an own opinion, to stand up and be counted and to lead by example?
        May be it’s all still within a person whether to become a submissive slave and robot or to continue being a personality?:)

  54. j October 7, 2014 at 8:54 am

    These events are exactly what happened in Ayn Rand’s famous book, The Fountainhead. In fact, Roosh could be the lead character Howard Roark when he was put on trial by the social justice warriors in the book. History always repeats itself. I assume Roosh has read this masterpiece.

  55. FormerCanadian October 7, 2014 at 9:11 am

    Waaaaay too many words, way too many. The problem as well as a solution is very simple.
    It all started to change to the worse when North American males lowered their standards, selection criteria and became some kind of pussified creatures in order to please even the ugliest female to the utmost in a vain hope to get access to that elusive female pussy. It was enough to stand own ground, to speak up, to have an own opinion, to stand up and be counted and to lead by example just to gain parity without surrendering any personal freedoms, but males decided otherwise. As a result an overwhelming majority of males did settle for mediocrity indeed. What did they gain? NOTHING! What did they lose? Everything.
    Please, do not blame females or some unknown “social justice warriors” for the current state of things in the western world. Males and only males are to blame for allowing this to happen and complying with all the female demands and requirements instead of simply being males.
    Yes, mediocrity and political correctness are killing the western world and its real values, but again, it’s males who allowed this to happen, who never objected the changes while turning into an indifferent horde of sheeple.
    Tell me how come I never changed my views, visions and personal behavior under the impact of political correctness, feminism, “social justice warriors”? Why can I still have my own politically incorrect opinion, dare to stand up and be counted and to live my life the way I WANT IT and not the way CBC, CNN, NBC and similar shit want to make me believe is the right way to live one’s life??
    Every , and I repeat EVERY PERSON is a maker of his own destiny and own life!
    And if sheeple decide to settle for the mediocrity and live a life of a 9 to 5 office rat in an eternal rat race without getting laid in 10+ years then sheeple are to blame for it as well as lack of personal will power, tenacity, persistence and self respect in those sheeple.
    It’s possible to write a mile long story about feminism, social justice warriors, political correctness, quota hiring and shit, but nothing’s gonna change until people start changing themselves, one after one. One person can not change shit, but if more and more people wake up and dare to become personalities, to stand up and be counted and to lead by example then they’ll be able to change the ground rules of the “game” called life.
    So far the mainstream is ahead by a mile and I do not see any signs of a situation changing to the better.

  56. Alexandra R. Decheva October 7, 2014 at 10:41 am


    1. FormerCanadian October 7, 2014 at 10:47 am

      And how’s Bulgaria doing these days? Taking it up the ass from the EU and its values like political correctness and quota hiring?
      How about your tomatoes? Are you folks still growing them or are they replaced by Dutch ones? And what about the Bulgarian pepper? Is it already replaced with Italian?:-)

    2. Hugo October 7, 2014 at 11:06 am

      Slavic synonym with slave.

      Caucas mountains kept all of you from being literate for centuries and the Germans tried to educate and bring literacy to you but in your case that did not seem to do much good.

      You are dogs compared to the Germans and piss on your hate against middle easterners like Roosh.

      If you don’t like Rooshs blog start your own little punk.

      What would your blog be about- how to drink beer on the corner all day and have your Mom cook you dinner before you go to bed on her couch at 28yo?


      1. FormerCanadian October 7, 2014 at 11:12 am

        Man, you are losing it:-)

        1. The proper way to spell is “Caucasus mountains” .
        2. Please find out where are those “caucasus mountains” and where is Bulgaria:-)
        3. And what happened to literate Germans when they met the Russian “illiterate” army?:-)

      2. Hugo October 7, 2014 at 11:37 am

        Slavs can’t build a rubber dick yet the Germans build the most glorious things known to man. Compare an HK rifle to some EE piece of frumpty junk. Greater minds- plain and simple. No one wants a Schvenko coupe only Porsche or Mercedes. Nothing Slavic has ever been the premiere in aviation or military land craft. Slavs did not bring us printing presses or the majority of great philosophers. IMO most of Europe is trash compared to Germany.

      3. FormerCanadian October 7, 2014 at 12:32 pm

        In terms of all technical advancements and achievements-TOTALLY AGREE! It’s hard to find anything close to German architecture, quality of all kinds of machinery as well as quality of human minds.
        Too bad Germany is also invaded by hordes of 3rd worlders these days.

      4. Terbelis of Bulgaria October 7, 2014 at 4:28 pm

        Bulgaria invented the Cyrillic alphabet and it was birthplace of the whole Slavic culture which later on expanded into other countries now known as Slavic. For example, the Bulgarian culture was exported to Russia which later created its own very rich culture and lots of inventions in science. Most of the old Russian nobility could be traced back to the Bulgarian nobility. Indirectly, Bulgaria contributed to the richness of the Russian culture.

        In the 14th century Bulgaria felt under Ottoman rule which was very backward and stale. So the country missed the period when other European countries went through the Renaissance period.

        In the later 19th century it was liberated and it was a sovereign country again. It became the number one power in South-Eastern Europe but sadly it was sold to the Russians after the Germans, our allies in the First and Second World War, lost again. Germans and Hitler for example were very fond of Bulgaria. Most Bulgarian were Germanophiles too.

        I am personally a great admirer of the Germans. I have many friends there. Some of noble origin.

        But the communism changed everything in Bulgaria. The country now is totally lost. The same faith awaits the West too as your countries are going through the same phase.

        Read some history. Slavic is not synonym with slave. The word is actually Sloveni not Slavic. Sloveno (словени) means people of the word.

      5. AR October 7, 2014 at 4:41 pm

        Do you have a link to an essay that breaks down the differences between east and West?

      6. Terbelis of Bulgaria October 7, 2014 at 4:54 pm

        To understand the political differences between Eastern and Western Europe you have to study the history of the Byzantine Empire and to a certain extend the history of its main rival – the Bulgarian Empire.

        Second important aspect is the religious division between western predominantly Catholic culture and Eastern predominantly Orthodox culture. Today’s international relationships are still based on that division. Sadly.

        Western Roman vs Eastern Roman Empire. Whilst the Western Roman Empire was living in the dark ages, the Eastern Roman empire was quite advanced in science and culture. The Italian Renaissance was born out of the cultural and scientific legacy of Constantinople.

        It’s a less known fact that the West has never acknowledged … naturally. In the same way as the Russians never acknowledged Bulgaria’s role in their culture and science.

        The cultural differences in Europe are more pronounce in North-South direction rather than West-East. The South where the old Roman Empire existed, we all share the same culture and mentality. Whereas the North is different. In the North people are more tense and maybe that’s why better organised.

        The Southerners know how to enjoy life better and put values in different things, like families, food and wine.

      7. Ian October 8, 2014 at 5:01 am

        It’s geography- sitting in a grey sky, cold crap hole city will drive you nuts and make you climb the walls-I hate it. Whereas, being in a place where its 75 Fahrenheit with a balmy breeze and sun shine makes you happy.

        Another thing no one talks about is how the Byzantines kept the Khazar/”Jews” out of public life through policy that didn’t allow them to hold or influence key areas of civilization (education, government, religion, etc.) and that’s why they were unable to corrupt the Byzantine empire as opposed to the West where they have been pushing their Ashkenazi ideologies of feminism, communism, socialism, envirofascism, etc to the detriment of all sans the upper echelon Khazars like the Rothschild banking family who runs Americas funny money aka the Fed who props up
        Goldman Sachs and starts wars and makes trouble around the World so the elite Khazrs can have more money and power.

    3. Terbelis of Bulgaria October 7, 2014 at 4:36 pm

      Александра, Александра! Защо така с рогата, моето мониче. Ако имаш някакъв контра-аргумент представи го разумно, без емоции. Не излагай страната ни.

    4. bear October 10, 2014 at 9:17 am

      STFU cunt!

  57. Grand_Designs October 7, 2014 at 11:36 am

    that was a good job demolishing and pulverizing the SJW [multiculturists or
    cultural relativist’s] inane subjectivist mindset.

    summer (at 19yo) and then some, I worked for the JHU Press in Baltimore and couldn’t
    believe the horseshit being published by the academics: pallets and pallets of
    worthless paper, all transgender, gay, fucked up titles, ect. Same academics
    that occupy the Humanities departments (who couldn’t get a job anywhere else) and
    help to churn out “worthless” degrees as viewed in the marketplace today. See
    Capt. Capitalism.

    from the Philosophy of the 21 Century: David Kelly (October 2007)

    multiculturalists who dominate the universities and the arts are vehemently
    hostile to reason. It is hostility not in the name of religious faith, as a
    rule, but as sheer, skeptical, nihilistic rejection. Academic philosophers have
    long taught that the validity of the senses can’t be proven, that standards of
    logic are subjective human conventions, that scientific theories can never be
    conclusively verified by the evidence. In the decades since Atlas Shrugged was
    published, these old attacks on the foundations of reason have been taken to
    their logical extremes.

    A student of literature today is likely to be
    taught that there are no objective standards for evaluating the merit of a
    novel, play, or poem, or even for determining what the literary work means.
    Students in the humanities are routinely taught that science is only one way of
    looking at the world, a paradigm that is no better than other paradigms such as
    myth, astrology, or witchcraft. The universities are dominated by the view that
    objectivity is a myth and that standards are arbitrary.

    It gets worse. Today’s multiculturalists
    embrace the Marxist idea that cultures and beliefs are expressions of class
    interest. It’s not just that Western culture—specifically, the Enlightenment
    culture of secular rationalism—is no better than others. It’s worse, because it
    is the culture of an oppressor class. Reason, objectivity, and standards are
    tools by which white males oppress others.

    Thus a prominent feminist asserted, “The very
    objectivity said to be characteristic of scientific knowledge and the whole
    dichotomy between subject and object [that is, between the mind and reality]
    are, in fact, male ways of relating to the world.” Catherine Stimson, a dean at
    Rutgers University, was more blunt: “Under the guise of defending objectivity
    and intellectual rigor, which is a lot of mishmash, [defenders of academic
    standards] are trying to preserve the cultural and political supremacy of white
    heterosexual males.”

    This mindset is hostile not just to reason but
    to individualism. The premise of multiculturalism is that people are tribal
    beings, who are defined—and who define themselves—by the racial, sexual, and
    ethnic groups they belong to. Multiculturalists believe that any disparity
    among groups is the product of unjust discrimination and oppression. This
    egalitarian assumption has been developed into an elaborate theory of
    victimology in which people actually debate such questions as whether a gay
    Afro-American male is more or less oppressed than a handicapped Latino woman


  58. Bobo October 7, 2014 at 6:03 pm

    I’ve notice SJW revel in so-called misogyny thenselvrs but in an ironic manner. They often sing along to the most vile gangsta rap in karaoke bars emulating thugs with their hipster sisters. They partake in objectifying men in the most nasty and creepy manner, but thought rape doesn’t apply to them.

  59. Asbm October 7, 2014 at 6:48 pm

    It’s safe to say that Roosh is concerned because the way he makes his livelihood is very likely to be targeted by SJW. I would be pretty concerned myself if I were him.

    If Sam Pepper got in trouble and became incredibly hated for pinching womens butts in public, an entire blog of a self admitted mysoginist would also cause an outrage.

    Take the youtuber “nerimon” also known as Alex Day. He’s had rape allegations made against him but they were fuzzy, most of what he is being accused of is using his position of power to try to sleep with women. A bunch of them came forward saying how he tried to pressure them when they were sure
    that they were only friends and how he was inflexible and manipulative about getting what he wanted. The result? His career is over. There are other instances of this, the youtuber ‘lukeconard’ had a significant following, two of his ex-girlfriends came out and accused him of being an asshole. His career is also over. It fosters people being pleasant to one another and not play petty mind games.

    People in positions of power that are homophobic/whatever are in the position to make important decisions and further their ideology. In a world where their opinions no longer reflect a majority, or where they reflect an opinion a majority has a problem with, they are no longer representative of their population or wanted. It’s not censorship.

    I mean following your train of thought, you’d have no issue with a CEO openly being a nazi?

    1. Elroy October 8, 2014 at 5:07 am

      I wouldn’t as the nazis were a reaction to the economic and social misery the Jewish aka Khazar bankers put Germany in during and after ww1. The Jew banks created the federal reserve in 1913 and there is a major war a short time later- not a Coincindence!
      Read Ed Griffins “The Creature From Jekyll Island” it’s a Jewish who’s who. You can see what a scam war is via Smedley Butlers (military leader in ww1) book “War is a Racket”.

      1. Asbm October 8, 2014 at 6:07 am

        Well you are a deluded minority or a troll if you think the nazis did any good at all.

  60. Thetruthhurts October 7, 2014 at 7:26 pm

    This is your best post yet. Excellent. I laugh at them, mock them, and ridicule them every chance I get.

  61. Eudaimonic Rex October 7, 2014 at 10:40 pm

    you shitlords just triggered me so hard

  62. Awesome Possum October 8, 2014 at 2:18 am


    This was one of your best posts (if not the best) on political/cultural/non-game related topics.

    Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. 1000x over, for speaking the truth everyone else is too blind or too afraid to say.

    I know these long-winded essays take a lot of time to put together, and I know you’ve stated in the past that it isn’t worth it because you get about the same views and comments, please take an opinion from a humble reader and fan: The quantity may not increase, but believe me, the words you write in these blogs cause a far greater change in the mental landscape of those that read them than even 20 of your 2-3 paragraph filler posts every could.

    I understand that comments are the life-blood of a blog, but please keep in mind, while it may take you many more hours to write these posts, once you place it on the internet, it’s there forever, and it’s likely that these words will live on forever and be read by people long after yourself and your current readers are dead and gone. Did Thoreau imagine his popularity when he was penning his works? I doubt it. Humility is ironically one of your greatest enemies at times, I believe, Roosh. Your words will live on long after you have published them.



    1. Roosh_V October 8, 2014 at 6:46 am

      Comments aren’t life or death, but they are a good indicator of reader interest. I don’t mind spending extra time to share topics/stories that I think are important.

      1. Awesome Possum October 9, 2014 at 1:06 am

        Sorry, I didn’t intend to put words in your mouth. I thought I read something to the effect of those statements in the past, but I could have been misquoting you. What I meant to say is, I know you’ve stated in a past comment reply that you don’t do long posts more often because it takes more time and gets about the same amount of comments/views as a short post, and it’s my opinion that you should focus on the QUALITY of your posts impact rather than the QUANTITY (or number you can post in a given number of hours).

        Anyways, just wanted to clarify that. Always a fan and can’t wait to see what you post next. Also I second the suggestion you post this in a clean Youtube video. And don’t cut it short or rush through it like you did with your “Things wrong with American women” video—this deserves to be fully fleshed out.

  63. Tim Lando October 8, 2014 at 5:44 am

    Great post. One point: Karl Marx didn’t invent dialectic theory; Hegel did.

  64. Ray Haype October 8, 2014 at 8:23 am

    I posted that one about 4chan on 4chan, and I got permabanned for “advertising”. Are any of you surprised?

  65. Daniel Ramos October 8, 2014 at 12:35 pm

    You nailed it Roosh. It’s like you took the sum of my thoughts, research, and debates with these people over the years and summarized it into one elaborate (but insightful) post. God bless you.
    The only way to combat the evil of progressivism is through the God inspired truth.

  66. Visionquest October 8, 2014 at 12:36 pm

    Very well done article. THIS is what could be grounds for a civil war. I had not realized just how bad things have become until now.

    The infiltration of universities is down right scary. But the progressives are very much like chicken hawks preying on the naive college kids; there is very good reason why the expression ‘young and stupid’ contains the words ‘young’ and ‘stupid’.

    And its the infiltration of the young which has to be the first defense.

    Maybe the damn will finally burst…

    1. Glen October 8, 2014 at 2:53 pm

      Progressives ≠ SJW’s

      You’re mistaken if you think the majority of people in our society wish to replace SJW madness with any right-wing regressive value system.

      The author of this article has gone way overboard in conflating progressive values and goals with the SJW fringe.

      1. fokkertism October 10, 2014 at 9:26 am

        Your avatar invalidates anything you say.

      2. GLP123 October 10, 2014 at 2:01 pm

        Really, How so?

        In any event, just FYI your buddy “Roosh” has blocked me with the only posts being the ones I’ve posted. Apparently he only likes sycophants who blow smoke up his ass. Typical of extremists.

        Given that I’ll likely be blocked on this account as well, I’ll just leave you with THAT to think about. It’s little wonder you people remain mired in ignorance.

      3. FormerCanadian October 10, 2014 at 2:08 pm

        How come I disagree with Roosh on several different key points but I’m still here and not blocked?:-)

      4. GLP123 October 10, 2014 at 2:20 pm

        My guess is he fears what I have to say. Worried about its capacity to persuade his readers against his position.

      5. FormerCanadian October 11, 2014 at 1:29 pm

        Ask yourself IF Roosh even has to try and persuade someone with WORDS instead of DEEDS:-)
        I guess that his travels and number of girls he’s been dating are the best persuasion:-) Why should he even use words when he can use deeds:-) Deeds speak, pal:-)

      6. SUPRA luca October 17, 2014 at 12:37 pm

        And you believe all the numbers he lays to you… silly boys, Roosh lovers. 🙂

      7. Tom October 22, 2014 at 3:40 am

        You can try, but my guess is that you’re excessively stupid. I’m guessing that I have 20 if not 30 IQ points on you. But I’m sure that you’ll say something that I haven’t thought, or someone else hasn’t addressed in a well known and detailed argument. Go ahead, we’re anxiously waiting.

      8. Tom October 22, 2014 at 3:37 am

        Right, essentially as traditionalists, we’re the extremists. The genderfucked, science denying SJWs are the moderates.

        The doublethink is strong in this one.

      9. Tom October 22, 2014 at 3:34 am

        Your ridiculous progressive/regressive false dichotomy will get zero traction here. You may as well say nothing.

        Telling us that the “majority” blah, blah, blah is a rhetorical fallacy that is indicative of SJW’s.

        As far as progressives and SJW’s being apparently unrelated entities, you don’t have a grip on your own politics or political models in general. SJW’s are an indisputable result, even an unavoidable evolution, of progressivism. They are by no means fringe. Their tactics are utilized by “progressives” across the board. You can shove your false moderate presentation back up your ass. At least have the balls to not be coy if you’re going to post here.

  67. Glen October 8, 2014 at 12:40 pm

    Wow too bad you destroyed your entire argument against these far left social justice warriors by demonstrating that you don’t actually believe IN social justice.

    I was with you for a little while, but then you completely went off the rails.

    Here’s the thing, we will NEVER defeat the scourge of the Social Justice Warriors, by aligning with people like you who ARE actual misogynists, homophobes, racists, and bigots.

    It’s people like you who also do grave damage to the Men’s Rights movement where there are actual injustices being perpetrated against males in our society.

    Those who DO believe in equal justice for men in our society, in those areas where they are in fact being trampled upon, need to expel actual misogynists (and all around right-wing bigots) from the movement. They are seriously damaging the cause.

    It’s a real shame because there were many good points in your article.

    1. Libertas October 8, 2014 at 1:34 pm

      Correct. We do not believe in social justice because it a losing ideology by and for losers. You are using the very same tactics Roosh outlined in this article, demonstrating that you are an SJW yourself whether you admit it or not.

      But of course, I knew a long time ago to never take anyone that has an “=” as their avatar seriously, so the comment was not unexpected.

      1. Glen October 8, 2014 at 2:43 pm

        Are you kidding me. Half this screed, and most of the commenters, are employing the VERY same tactics and fringe absolutism of the SJW’s.

        I’m just as committed to taking out the far right wing evil (that you seem to be on board with ) as I am the far left wing evil that the radical feminist SJW’s embody.

        Both are a scourge to humanity.

      2. Mike October 22, 2014 at 3:44 am

        You’re way out of your league here, hamster boy. Assertions are not arguments.

        Lemiwinks, go to the light!!!

      3. Roosh_V October 8, 2014 at 4:27 pm

        His avatar is the pro-gay marriage thing that was the rage on Facebook not like ago.

      4. Zelcorpion October 9, 2014 at 9:50 am

        It is really strange – recently I saw moderators of AVfM start using arguments of “anti-gender-stereotypes”. What the fuck is wrong with them? I am waiting for transsexuals to join the MRAs openly and say that gender is a myth – we should all be treated equally, because there is hardly a difference among us.

        It’s like defeating Stalinism with more “moderate” Communism.

    2. dorabella October 17, 2014 at 6:59 pm

      Glen, people like Roosh are not doing grave damage to the Men’s Rights Movement. People like Roosh ARE the Men’s Rights Movement. Have you ever, ever in your life, seen an MRA actually doing something against the injustices being perpetrated against men? Men commit suicide much more than women, in America, have you ever seen an MRA starting a suicide hotline for men, or any such thing? Men are also victims of domestic violence, have you ever seen an MRA opening a shelter for male victims? Men are raped in prison, have you ever seen an MRA doing anything about it, start a movement, protest, write to congressmen, ANYTHING AT ALL?? No. All they do is sit there and write about how horrible women are, how we are all whores, cunts, all the worst insults in the book. And, especially, complain about their sad boners. That’s the only thing they do. Ever. This IS the Men’s Rights Movement.

      1. Factory October 31, 2014 at 11:29 am

        What a load of crap all of that is.

    3. Mike October 22, 2014 at 3:43 am

      Shove your poorly constructed, concern troll commentary up your hamster filled ass.

  68. Libertas October 8, 2014 at 1:18 pm

    Succinct, precise and well-constructed takedown, and quite possibly the most important post you’ve ever written. Make no mistake that these people are the Spanish Inquisition of our time, and if we do not repulse them, we will be living in a new religious prison.

    Like Quintus said on the forum, this is a war, and one for the very soul of the West. We must treat it as such. You should do another post about some tactics to combat these people with.

    1. Glen October 8, 2014 at 2:48 pm

      Like I said, fringe.

      Which is why I am strongly encouraging the men’s rights movement to extricate those like you from their association.

      And if the SJW label is going to maintain it’s appropriate identity as those on the fringe, we can’t have people on the far right fringe as champions of the cause. It would be like those who wish to address legitimate problems with affirmative action quotas associating themselves with the members of the KKK.

      1. Mike October 22, 2014 at 3:49 am

        The only thing that you strongly encourage is bath-house gang invasion.

        Your disingenuous moderate concern troll bullshit is not welcome here nor will it ever, ever, read my lips: ever, work. Only an admittedly progressive faggot with zero sense of ego boundaries could come here and hope to lecture us on what we should do. Your very presence here indicates a mental issue.

  69. Brianmark October 9, 2014 at 3:36 am

    What percentage of the population in their 20s would fall into SGW or feminist or progressive categories? What percentage of the women would? I’m sure the numbers decrease with age.

  70. MrBiggs October 9, 2014 at 4:29 am

    Men must accept the way things are and strengthen themselves from within.

    I would like to mention that I currently work in the entertainment business in Hollywood. I was working as a production assistant on a commercial several weeks ago. The production coordinator actually told me in front of the other PAs that she usually only hires people of color. I did not take initial offense to this because, as Louis CK would say, you can’t offend a straight white male.

    However, I was indignant as to the way she said it with impunity. I wanted to call the union and tell them what she said but figured it would be to no avail and that I would be labeled as racist for calling out a person of color for ILLEGAL racial discrimination.

    However, I regained my thoughts. I spoke with a mentor of mine and he indicated that she most likely hires people of color as she is able to better control them. I will say that she does like me personally because I am smart, speak clearly, can follow directions, and get along with everyone else on set, especially the higher ups. Not that the people of color on set don’t, they are actually all very cool.

    I will end by saying that rather than getting angry and ranting, you must get into action. The battle for a world worth living in is a very protracted endeavor. We have to live our lives in such a way that will bring manifest a world of reason, equity (not equality), logic, and virtue.

    Leo Tolstoy said it best, “every man thinks of changing the world, but no man thinks of changing himself.”

    1. BK October 11, 2014 at 3:09 pm

      I disagree. Shut up and suck it up may work in your personal life, but politically it is a losing strategy. Meek acceptance of bigotry is fine, but don’t delude yourself by spinning it as “honorable” or “virtuous.”

      The progressive march succeeded precisely because there was no opposition; there were too many “honorable” men.

  71. bear October 9, 2014 at 11:31 pm

    Excellent indictment..keep writing articles like this.

  72. sam l October 9, 2014 at 11:35 pm

    Fantastic post, clearly articulated and well written. These points desperately need to be raised in the public sphere. Sensible debates will win over reasonable but uninformed moderates. This post said everything that needs to be said, all that needs to happen now is to get people to read it. Thank you Roosh.

  73. fluffybiskuts October 10, 2014 at 12:13 am

    Damn Roosh…home run. Thank you for these articles….

  74. Elle Bee October 10, 2014 at 6:49 pm

    This is a very good article indeed!

  75. Brianmark October 10, 2014 at 7:53 pm

    Roosh,this is one of your best posts and a very important subject. Thank you!

  76. Glengarry October 11, 2014 at 12:42 am

    Also, the notion of SJW privilege is best understood as an inverted ladder. The highest rung on the inverted ladder means they are at the bottom. Those assigned the “greatest privilege” are in actuality treated worst, those with merely some impurities are in middle ranks that need to be parsed by SJW media, while those with the “least privilege” are treated as stern but just and infallible, or as innocent heroes, regardless of their actual actions.

  77. linnaeus's ghost October 12, 2014 at 9:46 am

    SJW’s are the people Orwell warned us about. Thought-policing everywhere! Funny thing is, you can offend the hell out of these people on Tumblr and all they can really do is get angry and spew buzzwords and modernisms at you, all from the comfort of a computer screen. Actually getting up and finding the person who offended you so you can “educate” them? Too much effort. God forbid any of these people mature beyond over-emotionality! I have seen other people rise up and just take the p!ss out of them, –and effectively–so I am hoping their influence will die off (and their implemented policies with it!) If their agendas seem like the end of the world, time itself will bring all to light. …if something doesn’t work, then it won’t work! One can only try to ram a square peg into a round hole so many times

  78. Sasquatch10 October 15, 2014 at 2:33 pm

    Very comprehensive, and level-headed. Will be very interested to see where this is all going. The institutions of the western world have been completely undermined over the past 50-years by the Baby Boomers. Marriage, nuclear family, religion, gender roles, community, and even the integrity of democracy have all been undermined. How long can the West stand upon a foundation made of sand?

    My expectation is that the Baby Boomers need to be rotting in the ground before any positive change toward sanity can take place. The full consequences of a cultural marxist fatherless society need to be realized before anything can be done. Red Pill philosophy should be refined, physical organizations and communities of these like-minded men need to be grown, and at the appropriate moment, strike.

  79. H October 15, 2014 at 7:56 pm

    Sam Pepper, and anyone whose career has been damaged by the activities of SJWs, should seek legal advice and see if they can sue them through a tort. The SJWs may claim they are upset by people like Sam Pepper, but a lawsuit is what will really scare someone. If they used large corporate platforms such as Slate, then join Slate as a defendant. Large corporations bow down to the SJWs because they just want to hold onto their money and not deal with controversies. Bring them a suit.

    1. SUPRA luca October 17, 2014 at 12:46 pm

      Sam Pepper’s career got damaged by his sexual assault of women in front of the cameras.

      1. DeltaNaught November 1, 2014 at 9:20 pm

        Thumbs-upping your own comments is really lame and pathetic…

  80. Jon October 15, 2014 at 9:51 pm

    Great post…

    “By controlling what arguments or ideas people are exposed to, they have a
    greater chance of convincing others through manipulation and outright
    bullying of their world view to create the consensus they need to affect
    societal change.”

    You just defined Fascism.

  81. Good Stuff October 16, 2014 at 12:12 am

    Internet vigilantism and honey traps are on the rise. So far, digital avengers have more or less limited their activities to shaming and exposing pedophiles, con men and giant douchebags. However, one can easily see a future where the moral-minded folks dish their harsh citizen justice out on anyone who steps outside the tight parameters of their idea of acceptable behavior.

  82. SUPRA luca October 17, 2014 at 3:20 am

    “[Homosexuality is] an alternative lifestyle at best and the disseminator of HIV at worst”

    Really? I thought homosexual women were the ones who contract HIV the least between all possible couples. And that homosexuality is, by what the World Medical Association says, just another sexual orientation and not just some kind of “lifestyle”. But hey, who am I to argue with Roosh, who is the biggest PhD in bullshit in the manosphere? Even the most famous psychiatrists should feel ashamed and admit Roosh knows better!

  83. Всевелод October 17, 2014 at 11:37 pm

    Funny to read this for me. In Russia, we do not have this problem. All of these kinds of scum are either dead or too scared for their lives to speak about it.

  84. Sharrlize October 18, 2014 at 1:44 am

    “…censor speech and promote fringe lifestyles while actively discriminating against men, particularly white men.” Really? Tell that to all the brothers who have been fighting this fight since the CIA’s Gloria Steinem promoted “Black Macho and the Myth of the Superwoman” (back in the 1970’s), gay Broadway promoted “For Colored Girls Who Considered Suicide When the Rainbow Is Enuf” (also the 1970’s) and gay Hollywood and Steven Spielberg promoted “The Color Purple” (early 1980s). We’re the ones who’ve had to deal with super-consumerist fake feminists like Oprah, Beyonce, and the first tramp stampers in our midst. Tell that to Ray Rice and Chris Brown (and all black men) were are periodically turned into the poster boys for domestic abuse (of completely out of control, throw-the-first-punch women).

    Tell that to the Nation of Islam and other black groups falsely labeled “progressive”. Their philosophy (before Farrakhan went Scientology):

    1) Women: Stay the fuck in your place or get lost.
    2) Fuck begging for jobs, create your own business.
    3) Fuck the government, we don’t need them.
    4) Fuck the political system, it’s corrupt and racist.
    5) Fuck begging people to accept you where your not wanted.
    6) Fuck hand outs.

    They called white men “the devil” because back in the day that’s what most white men were acting like.

    You need to get your facts straight. Proudly heterosexual black men have been in the trenches from day one and have suffered the brunt of attacks because of it. If you think far-right or conservatives whites are the only ones fighting the LBGT and feminist movements than your sense of history (and the present) is uninformed and perhaps a bit warped.

    1. DeltaNaught November 1, 2014 at 9:17 pm

      Did you actually read the whole article?

  85. R October 18, 2014 at 2:51 am

    SJW were spawned on Tumblr, they are the “privileged”, they self diagnose as whatever special snowflake they believe will get them most points, and they are usually teens or fugly bitter women in their 40s. Fuck off!

  86. Brian October 22, 2014 at 12:14 am

    Great article. Nice job, Roosh. Some additions, some of which will be more politically incorrect than that which has been already stated:

    First, let’s more precisley define the goal of SJW politics (which btw is fully and scandelously ensconced in graduate social work education in the west): equal group outcomes by any means necessary.

    This is important to understand, if for nothing but the manner in which SJW’s appropriate and distort the traditional western notion of “equality” as put forth by the Bill of Rights. The traditional, moral and therefore legally just notion of “equality’ is equal treatment in the law; not guaranteed equal outcomes. Though the SJW will lobby for equal legal treatment politics when it suits them, equal outcomes by any means necessary is frequently the explicit goal and is the ultimate hidden goal when it isn’t explicitly stated. This equal outcome, obviously communist, ability-leveling philosophy is what allows them to justify discrimination or even violent hostility toward groups such as white men. In their minds, doing so is the only way to assure equal outcomes. They have no problem with unequal political treatment toward that goal, and I have no doubt that genocide is within bounds if that goal cannot be accomplished through non-violent hostility alone. Don’t be fooled into thinking that communist philosophy and movements balk at murder. Their religion actually demands it when it is necessary to fulfill their goals.

    The nuance of their white privilege politics is slightly different than anti-semitism, but the difference is semantic and procedural. The spirit of the discrimination is the same in that an entire group is targeted for hostility due to a perception that individuals are guilty merely by being a member of said ethnic/racial group. Anyone who thinks that this type of ethnic hatred is not a precise road to pogroms needs to ground themselves in historical reality as well as immigration reality as it will play out over the next 40 years. I digress.

    Second, a critical mass of SJW’s is simply the next inevitable phase of the communist conversion of the west. It was inevitable and fully planned and predicted by both friends and enemies of communism. Before the internet, the crawl toward a critical mass of SJW’s was accomplished through indoctrination in media, bench legislation, and the formal education process. Over the decades since WWII, the family has been torn asunder and social values have moved steadily left. The internet has simply served to accelerate the conversion process, which is actually less good for them because the reason that it was working well before was the decades long gradual cultural shift wherein the frogs hardly noticed the boiling (unless one was accidentally jabbed in the eye). The internet has served to both facilitate and necessitate a faster process, through increased written connectivity for SJW’s, their indoctrination targets (kids, minorities, and women), as well as those who oppose them.

    It is a mistake to think that SJW’s are a millenial phenomenon born out of twitter, reddit, and tumblr. Internet-only SJW’s are merely the new trench soldiers. SJW philosophy and power is one of the preeminent force’s in the west, and has been such for 50-65 years. Due to European inability to defend any type of ethnic interest or social conservatism due to the long-time SJW appropriation of the Holocaust to further their ability to silence dissenters, Europe has long been a stronghold of SJW power. This power is embodied in the Human Rights Commission and Human Rights politics, and groups that can easily marginalize any dissenting opinion by accusing a nation, who’s political interests are being trampled by protected groups, of being racists, nazis, or haters. It is fully legitimate to hold that the primary effect of SJW politics is to reduce the power of one nation for the benefit and power of other minority nations (sexual groups, minority ethnic groups, etc). When the upcoming nation is a minority group instead of the majority, whatever than minority may be, the more appropriate term would be ‘mafia’ due to their internal nationalistic politics within a greater majority nation. SjW’s essentially enable various mafia’s to run rampant within a nation, free from effective criticism.

    This leads us to my last point of argument, and perhaps the most politically incorrect argument. However, it is necessary to look into the dead-lights of our enemies to know precisely how the blow must be struck to win against SJW’s. What is necessary must be done, or else no victory is possible. The reason that SJW’s win is because of the power that their words are given. Rossh made the point that their arguments lack logic, and very rarely does an engagement with one contain a logical exchange on issues. When they can silence you with fear of being branded by any one of their censorship words, including and especially the word “racist” (where it all started and therefore where it will necessarily end), then no argument nor victory is possible. The power of that word (and words like it) must be neutralized or they will absolutely win. The power of that word must be neutralized or no just government will be had. The power of that word must be neutralized if tyranny is to be avoided for all people. Otherwise, it will be used to eventually eliminate the first amendment in the USA just as it has been used to eliminate free speech throughout western Europe, under the direction of SJW’s. Once free speech is eliminated under any pretense, free speech will be effectively eliminated for all pretenses that are in any way shape or form antagonistic to formal power. Believe it: the west will be unable to conditionally preserve free speech. When I say free speech I mean right rhetoric. What should be banned is speech that merely serves to restrict other speech without having any rhetorical value, such as that which SJW’s use.

    For red-pill guys that might be reluctant to agree, perhaps because you aren’t white, just hear me out. First, you have to choose. Politics is not a game of the middle. Politics is a game of the strong. The strong systems exist at either end of the spectrum; never in the middle. The weak is always dissolved into the strong. Communism is currently winning, by a wide margin, because any hint of its antithesis is effectively illegal in the USA and is completely illegal in western Europe. Without even weak effective ethnic majority conservatism in western Europe and the USA, you may as well pack it in and go commie because it is absolutely inevitable (absent the fascist, viscous religious slavery of an Arab caliphate).

    Let’s talk about that word: racist (and racism). Every time you give that word the power to silence because you use it in a manner that is meant to shame or skirt legitimate discussion, you boost SJW power immensely because you are legitimizing and reinforcing their anti-intellectual, anti-Socratic tactics through use. That’s a fact. I understand about slavery and I understand about Jim Crow. I understand about Mestizo history with Europe. What you must understand is that the power that is given to the term “racist” or “racism” does not a single thing to change minds. In fact, it often hardens opinions when the people that you silence with that word can no longer publicly voice their grievances. Understand what is being said and look for a solution to their grievance rather than resort to censoring them with slurs. If that solution lies within culture or individual action, then address it that way. If no solution is possible but separation, then why would you choose to live with people who despise you? Make your own happy communities apart from theirs. If a law is racist (extremely rare today), or people are explicitly exclusive, then find a way to voice your disconent without using politically abusive terminology. People have various reasons for racism, some of which have to do with being labeled racists or having their own experiences with hostility. Blacks are frequently racist due to their experiences with hostility. I don’t blame them, and I would never think that shaming them by calling them racist would help the situation nor would I care to force myself into their community through shaming. Many whites are racist due to repeated violent victimization at the hands of blacks. Otherwise, racial animosity is mostly cultural. Racism decreases immensely with truly increased cultural closeness that delves to a deep level. Some disparate groups can achieve this for whatever reason. Some groups remain unable to bridge the divide, and will likely never bridge the divide. Reasons for this failure are widely hypothesized but in my mind are largely irrelevant. Always searching for a reason has the effect of devaluing the constant result. Devaluing the result always works toward interacial tension and even violence. Groups that cannot get along should stop pushing for an anti-racist imaginary utopia that has never existed, because the cost to all of our lives is too great. All discernible groups are happiest when they have the power of self-determination.

    Whatever your hopes for interracial relations, stop giving power to the term ‘racist’. It must be neutered. If you have a grievance, argue it logically or not at all. If you cannot win through logic, then go your separate way. ‘Racism’ is not an argument, if for no other reason that all politics are inherently community oriented and theretofore inherently racial. Many people casting that aspersion are also racially motivated but of a protected group (ie: wanting racial privileges), even if they manage to convince themselves that their racism is just. The hypocrisy is not lost on those whom you would call racist and who have no codified privilege. The use of that word will always remain a tool of oppression of the majority, and nothing more. Therefore, history will not be on the side of its use. Self-interest has to be argued logically or not at all if illogical politically correct SJW culture is to be defeated.

    Right now: black, white, Asian, Mestizo, Latino, or other, the goal is to defeat the erosion of western human civilization. Let’s accomplish that, or at least pick sides, and figure out the rest when the smoke clears. Justine Tunney, the transgendered woman that was perhaps the founding member of Occupy Wall Street, is now a neo-reactionary. There has been troll speculation, but after having read her output via her blog and twitter, I’m reasonably convinced that she’s sincere. She’s an example of a high-IQ individual who was able to put the puzzle together with the assistance of her (negative) Occupy experience and neo-reactionary writers. The logic that models human society and civilization is with us (even if you aren’t entirely with the neo-reaction-specific logic – I’m not). She saw that and is now on-board, even if she retains some remnants of her ideology (which is to be expected given who she is). Frankly, I’d be perfectly fine living in a society with a percentage of Justine Tunneys. Anyone who can legitimately think and is pro-traditional family/community/national values is fine with me and most people who are vying for a liveable alternative to this mess. I don’t understand transgenderism, but I couldn’t. I could care less about people being who they are, as long as the greater good is prioritized. This isn’t 1945 and it shouldn’t be. Marginalizing homosexuals and the like is a huge political mistake, and they can be allies. They will always be a part of the culture, and always have been. The only question is if they are a subversive underground force or if they are given their space as long as the greater good is prioritized and they don’t ‘mob up’ for small-group economic nor political power. I’m thrilled to have Justine Tunney with us, and she reads like she’s a fascinating individual. If her and people like her weren’t able to get along with a greater conservative society for whatever reason, then the just thing would be to give them their own society. However, I don’t see that as realistic nor remotely desirable. What is realistic is that people like her (meaning her mind apart from being transgender) match our culture precisely, and would live seamlessly in a traditional culture that made room for them assuming that they deferred to the greater good as far as the rest of our social values were concerned. She’s of that mind. The point is that the only people who should be marginalized are SJW’s and people who insist on using their tactics. Everyone else: gear up.

  87. Guest October 22, 2014 at 6:35 am

    “Social Justice Warriors are a threat to Western values”

    The great irony to me (a non-western observer) is that SJW is only possible IN the west, and could only come OUT of the west. For them to turn around and decry the culture that birthed them as the worst of all is an obvious blind-spot to their ideology, when it is the only culture that allows them to play around like this or rewards them with influence.

    What I mean is, unlike America, you don’t see Chinese universities teaching their population how bad China is (in fact quite the opposite, and any attempt to do so would be slapped down hard). And Arabic universities don’t seem to have many “Queer studies” departments either, for example. Also any real attempt to “export” SJW-ism outside the west wouldn’t really work because the other cultures don’t have yet developed the “shame hook” of gee-lets-all-be-nice-to-different-peoples-and-coddle-minorities for them to dock on to, because they’re still in a normal, traditional “my people, my rules, and fuck everybody else”-mode. (maaaybe when they get as fat, tired and degenerate as modern America is, they’ll switch over to liberalism too, but that’s doubtful). Of course, SJWs would never admit that the west/white people are actually the most/only progressive, because that contradicts SJW-axion #1: West/white people are the worst of all, wrong about everything, and the root of all evil.

    It’s actually pretty easy and hilarious to short-circuit them into any direction, when you cross the wires of sex and race, for example (as long as these are any other than “white” and “men”, obviously). Try breaching the topic of “treatment of women in islam” and watch the mental contortions – if they side with the feminist universalist plank of the SJW-dogma and condemn it they leave themselves open to attack (mostly even by other SJWs) from the cultural relativism side who say you totally can’t ever other cultures because that would be raaacist, man. Similarly, mention that “black people is actually the most homophobic of all in America” (see prop 8, for example) and watch those sparks of self-implosion fly.

  88. Jesus_Lizard October 25, 2014 at 12:21 pm

    Great Article

  89. Mike Schonewolf October 29, 2014 at 4:57 pm

    To me as a liberal, these people and individuals aren’t liberals or progressives at all, to me they’re more in line with anarcho-communism, neo-marxism, and libertarian socialism. The social justice retards have become the federalist society of the left, and as a result have muddled a noble concept like social justice. What needs to happen is the left needs to exclude these people out. Like the right did, with the John Burch Society 60 years ago.

  90. luscinia October 31, 2014 at 1:05 am

    Just when I thought Hoyt couldn’t get any nuttier, she links to Roosh Doony…

  91. luscinia October 31, 2014 at 7:56 am

    Roosh Doony, Sarah Hoyt, and Shadowdancer the Squealing Douchebag Duskstar can fuck themselves.

  92. Tlu October 31, 2014 at 10:24 am

    Fantastic read! But I do have one question.
    “… because there is no sign that they will be weakening in power anytime soon.”

    Would you consider #GamerGate to be such a sign?

  93. Robot Panda October 31, 2014 at 6:17 pm

    SJW projecting hard in the comments. The article is great – it defines SJW – something that has thus far been hard to do. If all you do in the comments is prove it right, it doesn’t even need to rely on facts – even if every claim made by it can be backed up by fact. It is a definition. Rather than resorting to the behavior this article defines, show how it is wrong, show where the factual errors are. Don’t merely mention them, show them.

    SJW ways of discourse work only on logical fallacies – accepting arguments from authority in particular. That’s why they only know “that’s wrong”. Let’s say a white man talks about minorities’ issues. A a black person steps up and says “you’re wrong and I am right because I am more oppressed than you and you are a racist if you disagree with me”. And the white man has two options – to accept an asinine, logically incoherent argument or be a racist. Authority always wins, and oppression is authority, which is why they are competing so hard to be oppressed. This is also why every single group inflates their statistical numbers of oppression, because this gives them more authority.

    And because when SJWs talk to people who aren’t such idiots, they feel harassed. Because their way of communication does not work against logical people. They know grammar, they have the vocabulary, but they do not have the logic employed by the average human being to communicate in a constructive way.

  94. RedPill Army November 5, 2014 at 6:10 pm

    Excellent post, Roosh. Real journalism still lives.

  95. SHUTTLEWAGON November 7, 2014 at 2:34 am

    FORKLIFTS is the world’s go to resource for industrial and construction forklifts as well as related material handling equipment and support. We are your advocate to assist you to think both inside and outside the box! We attempt to educate you about what is new and what is available for both new and used equipment, parts, quality service, transportation and training – and it is at no charge for our customers!

  96. J November 7, 2014 at 9:01 pm

    Roosh this a great article, but you did not address the most important aspect. How do you defeat them? #NotYourShield seemed relatively effective…

  97. zaqan November 7, 2014 at 11:44 pm

    In the first video, the police should have pulled out their billy clubs and handcuffs.

    I used to be shy and low muscle mass. I always hated homos and weirdo leftists, even as a leftist. I guess I was more of a quasileftist.

  98. sssammisue November 9, 2014 at 3:40 pm

    Oh god I cringe at that old video of me. If you wanted a video about pansexuality you could of at least used my coming out story video. Anyway, thanks for the shoutout. I got about 300 views out of this.

  99. Falconfly November 20, 2014 at 7:33 pm

    >whines about “propaganda”
    >uses emotional manipulation in lieu of facts – fun thing, literally everything posted here has been discredited -, uses fear mongering, uses pretty much everything it’s supposedly advocating against.

    I don’t know what’s more laughable, that you’re an anti-intellectual, bigoted right winger stereotype to end all right winger stereotypes, or that you honestly think “political correctness” means anything.

  100. guest November 21, 2014 at 1:08 am

    It’s actually not that terrible to be attuned to the moral and ethical dimensions of our shared cultural life as a human society. It’s part of the (otherwise culturally defunct) process of ‘growing the fuck up’. The pitiful attempt to denigrate anyone who recognizes the value in this rings hollow in all of its forms.

  101. arizona November 22, 2014 at 2:47 am

    “SJW ideas have reached a critical mass in America”

    aye, especially in mid to southern california, new york state, utah and costal washington. i’m sure there’s a few other places….but i’m not aware of them at the moment.

  102. Renaissance Man November 24, 2014 at 10:36 am

    this is one of the best descriptions of what is going on online, in the media, and in universities that I have yet read

  103. D.C. Douglas November 25, 2014 at 3:20 pm

    Wow… Started off pretty good and then descended into the same crap it is rallying against.

  104. CR7 December 9, 2014 at 12:44 pm

    Nice summary Roosh

  105. KenWind December 11, 2014 at 6:16 pm

    Excellent stuff, the alpha and omega of anti-SJW articles.

  106. Marcos_Brazil December 14, 2014 at 11:19 am

    Marxism is more alive than ever. The difference is that they exchanged the military boots by the cultural marxist boots on our necks.
    Do research about the School of Frankfurt, the gradual takeover taught by Antonio Gramsci, the tactics for power by Saul Alinski.
    Latin America has fallen to Marxism, thru the Forum of Sao Paulo organization, led by Cuba, Brasil and Venezuela. Corruption in stratospheric levels, rampant crime, poverty. Next target: America.

  107. JudgeDeadd December 15, 2014 at 6:28 pm

    From what I see, SJWs have popped up in the comment section to bash the author mindlessly without actually addressing any of his claims or arguments.

    Very nice of them to confirm what we think of them.

  108. monteboss December 16, 2014 at 2:44 pm

    Social insane losers shoud be the real name of this shit.

  109. Steve December 17, 2014 at 7:56 pm

    When people who unsurprisingly find ‘Hatred’ an example of trashy hate-speech games too far, get labelled ‘SJWs’ for their natural disgust, it sort of reflects poorly on people with genuine arguments about the state of modern gaming journalism and any actual ‘feminazi’ agenda (man-hating).

    I’m a pretty damn liberal 29yo white guy who has been gaming since my first Sega Mega-drive. Take it to heart guys, when I say defending trash like Hatred means you’ve gone too far and joined the dark-side.

    Oh and P.S.: It’s not a utterly terrible thing in this day and age to question blatant misogyny, racism, and other throw-back attitudes in gaming. It’s 2014 ffs, we’re supposed to be regarded as equals. When my black friends or my female friends can’t enjoy a game without being shouted out by edgelord kiddies, it speaks poorly of the hobby we all enjoy. Online console gaming has already had it’s reputation firmly tarnished by it;s reputation for foul-mouthed children spouting off attitudes that in public would likely get them knocked out.

    There’s a fine line between freedom of speech, etc, and just trying to excuse being a completely repulsive shell of a human being. Especially in this day and age where what you do and say on the internet can follow you for the rest of your life.

    Genuinely repellent people (actual racists, etc) need not bother replying.

  110. Sergey Russian December 19, 2014 at 2:03 am

    poor western guys.

  111. MrSonicAdvance December 19, 2014 at 4:06 am

    Use their own weapons against them.

  112. d18kv178 December 20, 2014 at 2:56 am

    umm… good stuff – but Roosh also readily swallows stories about “iPhone factory suicides” without checking real facts. he doesn’t realizes that he does exactly the same thing as the people he criticizes.

  113. Benito Camelas December 22, 2014 at 6:18 pm

    …Nothing but this Marx’s sentence, isn’t it? Fucking relativists!

  114. Benito Camelas December 22, 2014 at 6:20 pm

    Sorry, this is the sentence I was referring to.

  115. buttplugs42 December 23, 2014 at 5:29 am

    A little known fact is that Steve Jobs isn’t white – he’s half-white half-arab. But SJWs are probably unaware of it, and would consider him white, like they consider their half-black half-white president black.

  116. David Greene January 1, 2015 at 3:24 am

    A very biased post trying to personify a buzzword used by ignoramuses and idiots alike, especially in forum and imageboard contexts, to deride and dismiss opinions they believe to be too liberal or characteristic of the contemporary neoliberal hipster counterculture, I find it hard to take much of anything said here as anything more than the opinionated ramblings of a dissatisfied Internet denizen.

    So-called “social justice warriors (SJWs)” are a stereotype and although there are undoubtedly some which fit the above description, to oversimplify and caricature the entire position in such a skewed way discredits the author more than the demographic he stereotypes.

    Certainly an interesting read, but ultimately based on fallacious reasoning.

  117. tzioneretz January 5, 2015 at 7:12 pm

    Yes, they are extreme Leftists, so much so that they make the full circle and employ extreme Rightist tactics.

    I have to say though that the author of this piece would make a far more persuasive argument if he did not use logical fallacies (ad antiquitatem being a more prominent one) or disparage homosexuals and atheists. Neither of the two has anything to do with being a logical, decent individual.

    Excellent work otherwise.

  118. Shetland Pony January 17, 2015 at 12:21 pm

    I was with you until you ranted about not believing in god (irrelevant, generalized and lacking evidence), claims of paganism (generalization that isn’t the least bit true) and false claims about homosexuality.

  119. Otter January 20, 2015 at 5:29 am

    Permission to repost portions of this article, please? I shall of course link back to the original and provide a link to my posting.

  120. Bryan Leger February 6, 2015 at 11:49 am

    Keep calm and carry on. Ask questions, use logic and sealion the fuck out of them.

  121. Eric Lauder February 7, 2015 at 7:45 am

    SJW hate heterosexual white males. But most SJW are silly heterosexual white females: the most privileged category. Hypocrits and liars.

  122. TechZilla February 14, 2015 at 3:31 pm

    Please seriously, can you at least try and not smear Marx with ideologies he never believed. Marx was a hard money, modernist, kind of guy. This crap that passes in academia, and promotes totalitarianism PC, is post-modernist… a rejection of Marx. Marx = Modernist (structural), SJW = Post-Modernist (relative).

    BTW stop quoting him out of context also, I’m not sure if he isn’t the real target by association with something horrible. BTW, I’m a Trotskist and i HATE SJWs, and Social liberalism. Leftists really do hate Liberals…. stop saying they are like us, because we hate them too.

  123. Odile Lee March 15, 2015 at 10:34 am

    Beautifully done.

    I went and read on Dialectical Philosophy, and found critique of it by Popper ( “What is Dialectic?” )

    ‘ “The whole development of dialectic should be a warning against the dangers inherent in philosophical system-building. It should remind us that philosophy should not be made a basis for any sort of scientific system and that philosophers should be much more modest in their claims. One task which they can fulfill quite usefully is the study of the critical methods of science” (Ibid., p. 335). ‘

    I now can support my knowledge of poor use of science, by SJW, with what you’ve taught here.

  124. Demonthedog March 17, 2015 at 2:16 am

    Wow. Some parts are actually spot on, some are really inflammatory. I think my favorite is the “unwilling to engage in open debate” because this actually is something I’ve found to be incredibly accurate. In debates, the “SJW” tends to be the first to say “I’m tired of this” or something else to get out of the conversation. Maybe the non SJW is being unreasonable and it’s a waste of the SJWs time to continue the debate, but regardless of validity of reason, they do usually “give up” first. Ironically, though, this ends with the statement that they use logical fallacies- and then goes on to talk about how SJWs are confused or mentally ill. An ad hominem if I have ever seen one.

  125. Neko March 27, 2015 at 6:35 pm

    Umm… Okay, so being a hetrosexual white male is bad? Hahahahahaha…
    That’s bullshit, but really just because I’m a hetrosexual white male (actually wait I might be asexual.) doesn’t mean I’m a woman hater, racist, homophobic, dumb, musclehead, rapist, conartist, swindler (I’m supposedly a WHRHDMHRCS, that’s way too long.).

    Short Version
    I’m a white male, I have feelings, I have respect for people that follow the law (rioting is against the law), support their beliefs with facts (excluding religion, that’s a hard subject.). I’m not racist, sure I joke about it sometimes but that’s because I live in a mixed race family (were only missing Hispanic.)

    I believe there is no way to discern good and bad, the world isn’t black and white, it’s black, white, and all colors and shades inbetween plus humans can’t see all colors.

    Long Version
    I might be a virgin, white, male, gamer, otaku (that’s actually an insult.).

    I’m a virgin because I’m a respectable teenager.
    I’m white because of genetics, it’s a race it doesn’t control my personality I’m also mainly Asian, I just got my grandma’s red hair and pale complexion (Caucasian Asian?).
    I’m male because of genitals (fun fact all human babies start out as female.).
    I’m a gamer because games are a media for entertainment, I grew up on Pokemon, Final Fantasy, and Kingdom Hearts. Recently got into the Survival genre, although RPGs are the bomb still. Let see Racism, Homophobia, Women Dispowerment? Nope haven’t seen any of those in my games. Woman over-sexualized? Totally but also the men are too and over-sexualization isn’t in every game, look especially at the games I play:

    LIST (Leaving out quite a bit.)

    Last of Us (Oh man you have to save Ellie!! Actually no she just stabbed that guy in the fucking head.)
    Final Fantasy Series (Do I have to say anything?)
    Uncharted Series (Oh man you have to save that reporter girl!! Wait… actually no she has a fucking gun.)
    Kingdom Hearts Series (It’s fucking Disney, damn you.)
    Pokemon (You use fucking cute animals in fights where they don’t actually get hurt.)

    I’m an otaku because anime and manga are cool, are lots of the girls over-sexualized? Yep. Are they all dispowering woman? Nope, you’ll get fucking shot; assaulted; beat the fuck up; and more!!

    Now what does all this say about me SJW? I’m a fucking normal person with actually feelings and… I don’t know actually think of logic before accusing people of things that they didn’t do; I don’t beat people either, I would never hit some unless my safety or someone else’s was in danger; I have respect for people that are lawful aren’t cowards and have proof to back up their claims; I’m pro equality but really? Grow up from your delusions, the whole world won’t see your opinion cuz that what it is, an opinion. Nor is equality ever gonna happen because people will always think they’re better than you, and a fully equal world is impossible, each role has a purpose in society from manual-labor to government officials. Without the bottom the top will fall; without support the structure will fall; without a beginning there isn’t an end.

    There’s no discerning good and bad, the world isn’t black and white… it’s black, white, and every color and shade inbetween, and humans can’t see all colors.

  126. some1guy May 7, 2015 at 9:43 pm

    As a actual misogynist and equal opportunity hater, i can tell you most men are not this… Stop trying to steal my thunder.
    Giving my one defining trait to every other guy is annoying.

  127. hostage707 May 18, 2015 at 4:21 pm

    This was a great piece of writing but the fact that it is so long tells me we are spending way to much time on something that should get a wink and a nod and sent packing with pat on the behind…. SJW is a commie psy op designed to bring WASP America to its final resting place 6′ under. Defend our values, it is responsible for the greatest economic wealth and freedom this planet has ever seen. It is not perfect but it works.

  128. scottruplin June 10, 2015 at 2:45 pm

    It’s funny but the SJWs almost never discuss the main category of Marx’s thought – social class. This allows wealthy white women to attack blue collar guys with smirking impunity. Crazy shit.

  129. Romulus June 10, 2015 at 11:38 pm

    Spot on bro. I couldn’t have said it better.

  130. Richard June 13, 2015 at 6:45 pm

    Problem here is it’s nearly impossible to change their minds, due to a fallacy I can’t recall the name of, when you “attack” their POV they only stregthen their opinions. You can’t win, because you are the enemy, any reason you have must be trickery and lies of the patriarchy. It’s the same thing with trans”gender” and otherkin, they just invent new things to satisfy their craving of differnece so they can be viewed as outcast. But don’t dare call them outcast or abnormal, even though they by all means of the definition are, or else you’re in for a big lecture. They try so hard to be different and if you treat them with equal respect and no difference they get upset for not being treated special, I’ve literally seen them think everyone is blind to the “way they are” so “alone in the world”. The reason you ignore these people isn’t because you hate them or are oppressing them, it’s the same reason you pass by EVERYBODY else in the world without a second thought.

    Let me just STOP everything and first ask you your preferred pronouns, then get a list of your trigger words, followed by headmates, kinnity, gender-identification, and anything else that might make me an ableist, scum shitlord. I wouldn’t want to make anyone feel offended.

  131. Ted June 26, 2015 at 10:07 pm

    Dear Mr Roosh, F U. I’ve always believed that someone who fights for social justice is a good guy. You and your tea-party cronies aren’t going to change that.

  132. Ossian July 4, 2015 at 5:50 pm

    They are just reactive women or feminine types of people. The good woman may think similarly but is without reactivity. Hopefully things will go the way of the good woman and not the shitty woman. See for all their talk about e-quality there is this real thing called quality, and there’s a great difference in quality amongst the women and if the lower quality person win everyone loses. The west is collapsing, lets find the good people and abandon the rest.

  133. day2knight July 15, 2015 at 9:42 pm

    The irony in this article nearly knocked me over.

  134. Levular Mandamus July 27, 2015 at 12:57 pm

    Well, even though it’s somehow a detail, I would say that it’s a Leninist tactics more than Marxist.

  135. Xtianslater August 1, 2015 at 4:56 am

    I wish someone would point out the connection between the rockefeller funded (i think?), sorry I could be wrong.. Outcome based Education model. I know Clinton was spearheading this in the 90’s and I heard it had some rockefeller social engineering type origins. I’m guessing that the Outcome based Education model has deliberately socially engineered this race of entitled, subhumans, lacking in intelligence and morals. I wish someone would get on this and talk more about it.

  136. David August 21, 2015 at 1:43 am

    Not even going to point out how stupid your definition of homosexuality as a Lifestyle choice is, because the rest is too accurate.

  137. Xiaoping August 29, 2015 at 12:30 pm

    Too stupid to understand that the entire system is based on bigotry and racism, by the fact that there is a hierarchy. No that’s too easy. Racism is racism, no matter who it’s directed at.

  138. Tom999 October 2, 2015 at 5:34 pm

    I heard the term “SJW” today for the first time, so I looked it up and this was the first site I checked.
    I gotta say this text was quite disappointing. It’s very obvious how biased it is. It smells like hypocrisy and as if the author felt attacked on a personal level.
    From what I’ve read I’ve seen a lot of bad sides in the SJW movement but also some good sides.
    The author of this article was clearly unable to switch perspectives.
    Hopefully I’ll find more objective information about “SJW” now.

  139. Robert McBride October 7, 2015 at 8:41 pm

    Well written, thoroughly explained, and spot on. Now we just need to make them go away. (So any trolling SJW’s don’t get the wrong idea and accuse me of threats, that last line was not a death threat, “go away” as in dissolve in power and authority)

  140. Towgunner77 October 9, 2015 at 9:00 pm

    I think Roosh said it best, these are losers. And it’s easier to be a loser and blame others for your lack of achievement than to take action and better yourself. Indeed the power that these losers have somehow obtained is very concerning but it remains that these are the pathetic dregs of society.

  141. Anne Evane October 16, 2015 at 10:44 am

    The last part of the Dashcon2014 video was (like) a joke, right?
    Great article.
    This PC cult is an American problem about to set sail for Europe.
    If my Kenian neighbor slaps my arse and calls me whitey, do I report rape or rasism or…. am I allowed to twist his nipple, and call him blacky or Zwarte Piet. Kick his butt because he stole my beer… again

  142. JT October 31, 2015 at 5:16 pm

    Nietzsche long warned of the rise of the SJW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyfwxRsTZ2k

    The SJW is a sign of the 4th turning, right before the collapse of society. Rome went through this. Germany went through this. Now the west is undergoing it. This is a precursor to the very last holocaust.

    SJWism is a mental illness (of which I myself almost fully succumbed to). It is pathological revenge on everything that the individual was deprived of in childhood. It is anti-civilizational.

    Tragically though, men like Roosh, in his desire to fuck as many women as possible, is, in the long term, creating a world full of SJWs. It is no “virtue” to fuck as many women as possible. This of course ultimately (over generations) creates feminism, and the eventual total collapse of society. For even though women posture themselves as wanting to get attention from as many men as possible, deep down they hate themselves for being so trite and superficial.

    Like men, women are at war with themselves, and deep down want just one man (despite their superficial claims otherwise) to love them and take care of them.

    The REAL man will strive to faithfully love ONE woman, and also try to help that one woman overcome any tendency she may have to give in to the temptation to whore herself out to the attention of other males. Roosh is helpful in many ways, but he doesn’t not see the connection between his male whoredom, and his creation of SJWism in the long-term.

  143. ChadMedia November 11, 2015 at 10:05 am

    This article hits it on the head so well it’s not even funny.

  144. Ace December 9, 2015 at 8:52 pm

    Makes Anders Breivik not seem so bad after all

  145. Ace December 9, 2015 at 8:53 pm

    From now on I support the Westboro Baptist Church if for no other reason because it pisses the SJW scum off – the enemy of my enemy is my friend

  146. Gee Aye February 4, 2016 at 3:24 pm

    You’re a fucking idiot.

    1. riiight June 2, 2016 at 1:41 am

      What does it say about SJW.s intelligence that after reading a lengthy article with many examples and arguments they cannot come up with anything else than ad hominem attack? You have just proven that Roosh was right: SJW are unable to form arguments, unable to think objectively and act based not on reason but on scale of privilege and feeewings.

  147. SJWsAreScum February 6, 2016 at 8:47 am

    I remember once, when I didn’t even really knew shit about feminism, that a female ‘tutor’ gave me a dirty look simply because I mentioned to someone , after they asked if I liked cooking, that the only cooking happened when my girlfriend was around. This bitch, all of a sudden, mentioned Afghanistan and how badly women are treated there. I could not even make any sense of it, I simply kept my mouth shut. Later on I thought about it and concluded that the bitch was a feminist. First time I ever met one, and luckily for me, I never met another one again. I mean, what the fuck? I was talking about my girlfriend’s cooking and this bitch starts blathering about Afghanistan? I still feel angry when I think of that. Next time I find one of these fuckwits, I’ll give them a piece of my mind.

  148. SJWsAreScum February 6, 2016 at 8:55 am

    ”It’s borrowed from Cultural Marxist thought, which argues that
    objectivity and the idea of right or wrong is less important than

    I don’t believe for a single instant that a thinker like Marx meant that all consensus can nullify the idea of right or wrong. REASONABLE consensus, yes. The consensus of reasonable people, with a mind free of dogma and bias. Not the consensus of an isolated group of fuckwits like SJWs or feminists.

  149. Burtb0 February 19, 2016 at 7:48 pm

    SJW’s seem to be the tip of the Alinisky spear.
    They seem to be using the tactics of the Frankfurt school, to destroy Western Civilization.
    short tutorial on PC and the Frankfurt school.

    Some SJW’s don’t even know they are helping that cause. However, many of them are socialist, who would agree that “the USA needs to become more like western Europe”. MHO, Canada has been infected with the need to emulate western Europe, and to that extent, is becoming a place where masculine males are being discouraged by “Society”

  150. Mech Shop February 28, 2016 at 12:37 am

    SJW’s often self identify as progressive, this is inaccurate. They are actually the opposite. Functionally they are juvenile, conservative, nonindustrial and regressive. Those who are directly challenging SJW’s often are labeled as conservatives, this is technically inaccurate, operationally they are progressive. Challengers of SJW aggressive censorship and thought police are often forward looking, reform-minded, modern, post-industrial and libertarian. In history the closest thing can find to SJW type behaviors is the Salem Witch Trials.

  151. deathslover March 29, 2016 at 6:05 am

    WTAF did i just read……..

  152. paendragon May 25, 2016 at 12:30 am

    In other words, SJWs are criminally-negligent slanderous parasites who endorse extortion and promote idolatrous false group (gang) “rights” over all real live individual human rights. Basically, they are all lazy criminal scum.

  153. SadStateofAffairs May 25, 2016 at 7:29 pm

    SJW’s are nothing more than the product of Cultural Marxism, and a third generation of brainwashing.

  154. Guesty June 1, 2016 at 1:57 am

    I love how disgusting you are, its proven by Australian Senator Cory Bernadi (a well known cunt) linking to this article.

  155. Jane June 1, 2016 at 4:42 am

    what a load of paranoid, reactionary, childish nonsense. Just because people think differently to you or disagree with you doesn’t mean they’re all part of some hideously scary conspiracy involving feminists or leftists or environmentalists or whatever the latest “ist” or group or demographic you’re using as a scapegoat for everything is. Stop living in denial. People of different backgrounds, philosophies, beliefs etc are tired of seeing particular injustices in the world and will try to work towards rectifying them or changing things for the better. Any mature individual will see the benefit of that for all humankind. If you can’t cope with differences of opinion that’s your problem not everyone else’s.

  156. bobo June 1, 2016 at 8:25 am

    You’re as bad as each other…

    Most of your points are normative just like most of theirs…

  157. redpigeons June 2, 2016 at 4:47 am

    Rightly said. Political correctness is a plague taking over the democracy. We should stop it.

  158. Alex June 2, 2016 at 1:15 pm

    I have to applaud Roosh for how much of what he predicted in here came true in the last 2 years.

  159. scemar June 4, 2016 at 9:21 pm

    roosh you are a god damn sage,a genius and a visionary with a better grasp of the real world and forward vision than any so called professional analyst could have predicted

    you successfully saw events and narrative changes two years back then with remarkable accuracy

    and it’s all presented in a way that’s well structured, unapologeticaly honest, logical, simple, welcoming and devoid of any emotional or inflammatory tone, it’s all just a straight forward tour through the political landscape of our age

    someday you might inspire the world and help save it

    1. OceanSon June 9, 2016 at 3:45 am

      What a trip…I just read the entire article for the first time here in June 2016, watched the embedded media, and essentially had much of your post’s exact same sentiments, almost verbatim.

  160. OceanSon June 9, 2016 at 3:47 am

    This goes to the very core of the subject and the zeitgeist…elite-level x-ray vision, well done…

  161. David Roddis July 2, 2016 at 11:09 am

    Hmmm. Interesting. I didn’t know what SJW stood for, and a search led me to this fascinating article.

    For the record, “homosexual” marriage is actually just as traditional as traditional marriage – it’s the same institution of marriage, you see? A better way to talk about it is “equal marriage”, because it’s about equal rights. But whatever. I’m not going to attempt to take down your longstanding distaste with a comment. I like to choose my battles.

    There’s much here I agree with – I abhor speakers being shouted down just because you don’t agree with them, for example. That’s reprehensible. What are they scared of? A discussion? The truth?

    I also hate ideology, a rigid way of thinking by which we start with conclusions and opinions and look for ways to justify them, tossing out anything that doesn’t support them. I prefer nuanced thinking based on facts – with facts, there’s no need to argue, really. With facts, we can all move forward.

    But overall, I see that SJW is a pejorative catch-all for ranting about any kind of “liberalism” – whatever that is, though I wonder if we’d be sharing opinions online if it weren’t for this “liberalism” – and looking for the worst possible examples of the term, according to your definition. It’s like decrying capitalism by using Ebeneezer Scrooge as the only example (before he went all bleeding heart, that is) – a tad on the biased side.

    Well, thanks for the definition.

  162. ... August 21, 2016 at 8:33 pm

    Sometimes I wish all these SJW shitheads could be deported to Syria and Iraq so they know what real oppression feels like.

  163. $124180339 September 27, 2016 at 4:26 am

    Great post! Thoroughly and informative. And spot on!

  164. Jamie Kincaid October 18, 2016 at 7:17 am

    I admit I dont know much about this subject, but I will say this… sjws aren’t the ones who created labels in the first place are they? They might call someone who is against gay people homophobic, but was is it not he or she who is against gay people who came up with the label “homosexual” in the first place? I don’t particularly like labels either, and I think I am somewhat of a sjw. Why not just let people be themselves instead of creating labels for them?

    I didn’t read all of that, but I have a feeling it is bullshit and not very accurate. Again, I don’t know much about it, I just want our society to progress and move on. Im not against free speech. Sure everyone has their own opinion about things, but that doesnt give you the right to bash anyone who is different from you. Even if you are against the LGBTQ community, that doesnt give you the right to shun their rights. Every human deserves the same respect and opportunities as each other, regardless of race, sex, gender or sexual orientation

    You can say that you think gay marriage is “shameful” or “disguisting”, but you don’t have the means to abolish it

  165. Hilltop Watchman December 27, 2016 at 7:30 am

    You forgot the love affair that SJWs have with every murdering terrorist, Islamic nutjob and in particular the so-called “Palestinians”. The SJW mob are particularly exercised with Jews, but in particular, white male Jews. The lies, omissions, distortions and outright slanders and blood libels are eagerly seized upon by this mob. They also don’t understand irony and that despite creating their ever diverse “victim” groups who me they must protect and fight for, however ridiculous are behaving in exactly the same way as the Nazis, Communists and others against their perceived targets.

  166. Gareth Harris January 9, 2017 at 3:42 pm

    As a white male who believes in equality, I tried read this with an open mind – then realised that it was pretty poorly constructed and lacking in real insight into the way that the world in general and society in particular has evolved into it’s current state.
    Then I read the ‘About’ part of this site which included such gems as:

    I quit my job and finished my first book called Bang, a textbook for picking up girls and getting laid.
    A woman’s value significantly depends on her fertility and beauty. A
    man’s value significantly depends on his resources, intellect, and

    Is it any wonder that you get called a mysoginist? You seem to have little use for women as anything other than sexual objects and that their sole purpose is breeding.
    Then I realised who you are – you’re the guy that had to cancel his seminars in the UK on picking up women due to safety concerns because people were arranging to protest against it.
    Your attitudes belong in a long bygone age – society has moved on, you haven’t. The reason that racial and gender equality are such emotive issues are because we as a species are realising that there IS a need to redress the balance of power away from the white, alpha male model towards one where everyone has a say.
    I will agree that there are some who take this too far but, like you, they are vastly in the minority among people I have met in my life (and yes I have travelled and lived and worked with people of all races, faiths, sexual preferences/identities and almost all nationalities) as most have psychologically evolved and educated themselves beyond the alpha-male model of control which, lets be honest, has ripped up and wasted the planet’s natural resources and, throughout history, has caused conflict between nations due to this alpha-male posturing and greed.
    Women are no longer just required to be a pretty face and a womb, people are free (in most of the world) to fall in love with whoever they fall in love with and have consentual sex with whoever they wish to and most of all to be respected for what they achieve and for how they behave towards others rather than for what they look like or who they want to be with.
    The widespread acceptance of these changes in society is still quite recent – racial segregation, the belief that a woman’s place is in the home and homosexuality being considered an abomination was a standard belief only 50 or 60 years ago and, like your flat earth example, is of a bygone age that has been shown to be both ignorant and just plain wrong.
    Welcome to the 21st Century. We as a species are not where we should be as far as social equality and greater harmony but we are moving in the right direction in spite of archaic attitudes like yours.

    1. SkulloManiac July 25, 2017 at 1:55 pm

      Your post made me vomit. It’s interesting to see how a mentally ill person “thinks” however.

  167. hudstar2011 . February 9, 2017 at 4:47 pm

    Global populism is extreme on both sides and somehow both radicalised the meaning of freedom and equality. Maybe after the blood letting we will find a midway point and create some kind of peace

  168. Aimee February 13, 2017 at 3:29 pm

    Boy is this article spot on! It is invading the HIGH SCHOOLS now, sanctioned and sponsored by institutions that accept TAXPAYER FUNDING. Parents, wake up! These snowflakes show up on college campuses preprogrammed and ready to rumble.

  169. disqus_2015ScorpioWater February 13, 2017 at 10:32 pm

    SJW definition: Social Justice Warrior, typically a female college student or female college graduate that likes to engage in advocacy for groups or individuals allegedly wronged by the prevailing social order. These individuals merely engage in these activities for their own self promotion and to demonstrate to the others that they are not prejudiced but really do not care about anyone but themselves. In everyday reality the typical SJW will cross the other side of the street if a minority approached them while walking in their direction. In other words they are bullshit artists and in the closet bigots.

  170. Alberto Santa Maria March 30, 2017 at 1:52 pm

    In Chile, they are a plague, as in all Latin America.

  171. Qur'an 18:86 August 22, 2017 at 12:19 pm

    Superb explanation of the term and all about it! Meanwhile be sure to read Allah’s greatest book not least verses 18:86-18:90 which prove all the “modern science” to be wrong and the Flat Earthers were right all along.

  172. RD October 9, 2017 at 12:01 pm

    SJW’s are mentally ill.

  173. Shulk February 17, 2018 at 3:11 am

    Boo hoo hoo I’m a SJW who hates everyone who doesn’t agree with me and isn’t politically correct. Fucking pathetic ass immature whiny little bitches. I don’t have to agree with your facism with manners known as political correctness and I surely have a right to my own Goddamn opinion.
    Personally all those SJW weaklings can take their desire to turn the world into censored speech & shove it so far up their ass they don’t crap for a week. Stupid ass shit like this is why I avoid people. I don’t feel like wasting my time with people who lack the constitution to just get the fuck over it and not let everything offend them.

    Whatever happened to people speaking their mind. Oh wait SJW’s are saying you can’t well fuck you. I’ll say what I feel from my heart, and Go fuck yourself. Also wtf is wrong with these people ruining others lives because they don’t agree with another so they have that persons speech censored and lose their job in the process. Perhaps its time we take all these SJW weaklings and send them off to an uncharted island isolated from the world where they have to forage to survive. Then come back a month later and see if these people have the guts to live. They take it for granted because of how much this whole PC mess has gotten way too much out of hand. I know in my heart that in time SJW’s will be ignored and being PC will die off along with it.

    People in time will just stop giving a fuck about something so plainly stupid, and unnecessary. We are all part of the human race. I’m just waiting for the rest of humanity to finally realize it.

    1. Alantor29 February 23, 2018 at 12:13 pm

      …You’re an immature brat, you know that, right?

    2. Alantor29 February 23, 2018 at 12:33 pm

      Then again, I wouldn’t expect more from a crybaby like you. I got it, for now on, your new nickname is Crybaby Shulk. Cause you have no control over your Asbergers. I have them too, but I have more control over it than you.

  174. Sri February 23, 2018 at 2:11 am

    Everyone’s a liberal until they find someone who has a different opinion from theirs. Then they’re not so different.