Diversity is when merit, skill, and ability is downplayed in favor of a person’s race, sexual orientation, or other identity affiliation. Diversity goals have the inevitable result of ensuring that less qualified applicants are given academic and employment opportunities over other applicants who are objectively more qualified. There is no means to achieve diversity for the sole sake of diversity without discriminating against other individuals or groups that are more capable.

Diversity policies were implemented in America because of claims that structural discrimination caused minority groups to lose out on opportunities in spite of equivalent or superior qualifications. To solve this problem, America has embraced a legal policy of openly discriminating against majority groups. While this was usually constricted to race, it has broadened in recent years to include sex.

A diversity program like affirmative action in the past benefited black men, for example, but white women have successfully hijacked the definition of diversity to include themselves. A white woman who claims to have “black friends” will not criticize a program that gives her a position at a Fortune 500 company over that of a black man who has more qualifications. Diversity programs that used to benefit historically marginalized races now increasingly focus on giving white women, homosexuals, and transsexuals more of the diversity pie.

How much damage does diversity programs cause in the short term on the individual level? Is a white man who has to go to UVA instead of Harvard really suffering? On such a scale, damage is hard to perceive or measure, but if we look at it from a societal level and measure the economic and intellectual growth of a nation when compared to its nation peers that do not use diversity programs, logical deduction shows that those nations that have been infected with the diversity virus will lag behind when it comes to scientific research, political leadership, organization, and innovation.

Over the course of decades and centuries, a nation that uses diversity as a measuring stick to promote its citizens in industry, politics, and intellectual culture will experience less growth and achievement than countries that do not. This is compounded over many years, and as described in The Rise And Fall Of The Great Powers, can allow an inferior country to overtake a formely superior country in dominance and hegemony.

Let’s do an example that shows how a slight decrease in a nation’s growth rate can lead to an unambiguous decline. Country U has a value (i.e. GDP) of 100 with a growth rate of 6% per annum. Policies of diversity, however, have caused a slowing of corporate growth, with a continuous rash of failures in companies led by women who were promoted because of their sex over more qualified male applicants. The country’s annual growth rate slips to 5%. In 100 years, here is their compounded value:

100 x (1.05)^100 = 13,150 economic units

Country C is experiencing brisk industrialization and achieves 7% yearly growth, no doubt helped by their lack of diversity programs. Their initial value is only 20, one-fifth that of country U. Nonetheless, country C will surpass country U in 100 years:

20 x (1.07)^100 = 17,354

If country U did not employ diversity programs and were able to maintain its growth at 6%, it would have double the value of country C:

100 x (1.06)^100 = 33,930

Over the long term, any variable which decreases a country’s growth rate can cause a decline relative to other countries that do not implement the damaging variable. In 100 years, country C will be better able to compete against country U for the planet’s scarce resources and also provide its citizens with a higher standard of living. If its military is strong enough, it could come to dominate country U using a combination of hard and soft power, as the United States does to dozens of nations today.

My simulation is quite rudimentary for two reasons. First, we have no exact number of how much diversity can decline a country’s growth rate besides the fact that is must do so by a value greater than zero. It could be 0.01% or greater than 1%—this number is unknown. Secondly, there are hundreds of variables working together to determine the growth rate of a specific country that prevents it from being constant over such great lengths of time.

In spite of these flaws, the simulation does show the long-term damage caused when a national policy of diversity in any country promotes inferior and less skilled citizens into roles that are vital to economic growth. Even a barely noticeable decline in the yearly growth rate, something that diversity programs would provide, is enough to severely damage a nation over the long run and make it vulnerable to strengthening nations that are hungrier for resources or planetary domination.

Whenever you see the word “diversity,” replace it with the word “decline,” because that’s exactly what it does to any organization or country that implements it on a wide scale. The second that merit is removed from the highest priority of a system is when that system will decline relative to other systems that don’t use diversity. In a country such as the United States, the most economically successful nation the world has seen, diversity is a needless poison pill that guarantees it will fare worse in the future.

Nature will punish any system, organic or inorganic, that forsakes its own survival by going against selection of the strongest unit that is most capable at the task given to it. Unfortunately, this will punish the Western world in future generations, all for bowing down to the altar of diversity.

Read Next: Social Welfare Creates A Society Of Sluts


  1. Kevin December 17, 2014 at 9:18 am

    Do you see Eastern Europe countries like Ukraine and Poland growing exponentially in the next 50 years?

    1. Zelcorpion December 17, 2014 at 10:53 am

      Of course not. Most growth is not generated by the rise of diversity but by a multitude of factors: current state of development, education system, tax base, economic policies, standard of living, average corporate competitiveness in a country, growth of average disposable, tariffs (also protective tariffs), patents produced each year in the country, high investment in R&D both by the State as well as private businesses etc. Poland and all FSU countries are sorely lacking in all those areas. Diversity currently begins to impact some government organizations as well as big corporations on low to mid management levels as some undeserving women and workers are being promoted. But since ever less workers are actually needed for growth and decent production output I personally don’t regard diversity as having much of an impact unless you exacerbate the trend for decades and centuries.

      1. Kevin December 17, 2014 at 11:16 am

        Why is so much of the World a ghetto? Man Ill be honest with you in America where I’ve been a lot of places SUCK. The wealthy parts of LA, Miami, etc. are awesome but so many places are just half ass dumps. From the footage I see on YouTube Ukraine, Poland, Romania, etc is run down looking but safe, cheap, and with hot girls but it doesn’t have the cleanliness, natural beauty, or vast top tier dining and entertainment like Southern California- am I right?

        Basically guys live in an artic industrial shit hole for hot girls

      2. Zelcorpion December 17, 2014 at 11:28 am

        Well – I live in EE and it is far far off from more advanced countries in the West. They will also never catch up with the West – they are not South Korea which pumps an enormous amount of effort into science, education & R&D. All EE & FSU countries have yearly patents numbering between 50-150. While Germany has 45.000+ and most Western countries range between 1.500 to 10.000 patents per year. The gap will never be closed – main streets and cities will look better, because wealth is a strange thing that sometimes gets created not via any productivity gains but by sheer expectation. For example in most EE 80% of the wealth for the average Joe came from the rise in real estate valuations due to increased economic activity. But that cannot last without long-term strategic changes – as was clearly visible with Greece, Portugal or Spain.

        And you can live very very well in EE with enough money – by far higher living standard if some things do not bother you. It’s not just pussy that makes it more welcome – you just have to travel more as it can get tiresome all year long. But many wealthy local people in EE do so too.

      3. RAdesign December 18, 2014 at 8:19 pm

        As for EE it all depends on country. In Ukraine and Russia you have total contrasts, mostly because they are being ruled by oligarchs – they develop they home districts with loads of money, but other parts of countries are laid to waste, drained of resources, young people.
        As for CE post-soviet countries as Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia – it`s getting better, step by step.
        In Poland we`ve been too naive and most of our companies and brands were destroyed by hostile takeovers by westerners, only to make place in the market for they own products, thus strenghtening their economies and weakening potential rival.

        Also remember historical background – Western Germany was flowing in billions of USD of Marshalls plan, and was quickily restored after the war, had 40 years of relatively safe development.

        Eastern Germany was also lucky – after the reunion billions of GM and EUR was poured into their budget, and even that was not enough to restore damages form the communist regime.
        All other Central Europe countries under Soviet “protection” did not have so much luck, being drained of resources for 50 years.
        But slowly it`s getting better.

      4. Zelcorpion December 19, 2014 at 2:15 am

        Most of EE was backwards for different reasons even before WWII and the communist crap. Germany was the top in science well before the WWI. Their success is not derived from the Marshall plan – not even mainly.
        And Eastern Germany was not lucky – it got completely destroyed, the few solid companies it had gutted and sold off to the highest bidder. Their “indebtedness” was a scam – they could have survived easily, but the West did not want competition, so they rather created an interesting con by saying that the must-have-production-values that each public company had to generate towards the State – that would be a debt. This was bollocks of course, since that was only for communist book-keeping purposes. The real debt of German companies was very small and they could have survived. Now you have East Germany which might resemble Poland someday: many women gone (30-50% less women in ages 18-35), worthless private real estate since people are leaving, hardly any jobs, but at least they have reconstructed infrastructure and nice town halls. Good luck with that.

      5. Tom December 19, 2014 at 2:27 am

        Comparing the USA to almost any country but China is ridiculous on its face.

        The average EE country, or any country in Europe other than Russia, is lucky if it is as large as an average US state. Germany, one of the largest countries in Europe, is barely as large as a 1.5 to 2 average to larger states. Whatever gymnastics that anyone does to explain the economics of most countries, economic development in countries populated by majority Europeans has a lot of correlation with both physical geographic size and population density.

        The USA is developmentally shitty in perhaps even a technical majority of its geography because it is only a united country on paper. In reality, everything is local. The localities that do well have high standards of living like France minus the culture and the places without economic production are nominally like Bulgaria minus the culture.

        You can’t compare Poland to the USA or even South Korea. Compare it to something like Nebraska, North Dakota, or Oklahoma.

      6. Anon 1 December 20, 2014 at 12:59 am

        Actually, Poland and Germany are about the same size (Germany lost one third of its former size after WW II. Each is about twice the size of Missouri. Britain is smaller. On the other hand, France is huge – about the size of Texas. That’s probably why the French don’t travel as much as the Germans – they have a huge beautiful country to explore

      7. Anon 1 December 19, 2014 at 11:59 pm

        Wrong! According to data.worldbank.org, the number of patents granted in 2012 was (in selected countries): Poland – 4,410, Ukraine – 2,491, Romania – 1,022, Hungary – 692, Czech R. – 867. Elsewhere in Europe, Sweden – 2,288, Norway – 1,009, Netherlands – 2375, Greece – 628, Spain – 3,266, Austria – 2258. Of course, countries with much larger populations like Russia, Germany, France, U.K. produce more patents but Europe, in general, is returning to the pre-WW II division between Northern and Southern Europe. Before the war, countries like Spain, Portugal, Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, were much poorer than northern countries like Poland. Then the Yalta Treaty intervened and confined Poland, etc to the communist prison. Things in Europe are now returning to the usual state: the rich North and the poor South. Italy, for example, is beginning to slip badly. Sweden, Norway, and Finland are Europe’s Alaska. Stockholm has almost the same latitude as Anchorage, Alaska

      8. Zelcorpion December 20, 2014 at 2:41 am

        Interesting – the new EU patent applications are exactly as I said: http://bi.gazeta.pl/im/88/2a/bc/z12331656Q,Ile-wnioskow-zlozyly-firmy-z-poszczegolnym-panstw-.jpg
        Obviously there is a local patent application procedure.The thing is this – the local patent application procedure is cheaper – the European patent applications cost between 20.000EUR to 200.000EUR or more. I did not know there was such a discrepancy between the 2 patent lines. Also interesting is the fact that Russia has 28.000 patents while Germany has 45.000 of EU patent caliber. I severely doubt the Russian economy is 65% as innovative as the German one. Obviously one would have to take a good look what creates that enormous discrepancy for some EE countries to have 90% less EU-wide patents vs. local ones. Certainly the costs are a factor, but then what about the quality & potential of the patent itself?
        But I agree that some of the EE countries will surpass the European South within the next years/decades again. And the geography of Norway has little to do with effective wealth of a country in our current technological development.

      9. Chris Brony December 21, 2014 at 5:55 am

        Do you know what I think is sad. The UK is lagging. That’s where I am from. If you adjust that map for per capita…Sweden, Finland, germany, Holland, Switzerland and Austria are doing so much better. Even Ireland per capita is doing much better than the UK.

        How do you make the UK more like Germany when it comes to manufacturing and research and invention. We used to lead the world in it.

        When it comes to the USA, it out performs the UK per capita but still lags far behind Germany, Holland and those I other countries in Northern Europe that I just listed.

      10. EvigtRegn December 28, 2014 at 4:25 pm


        “Sweden, Norway, and Finland are Europe’s Alaska. Stockholm has almost the same latitude as Anchorage, Alaska”

        Yes, I’m from Europe’s Alaska in that case. Could have been great but unfortunately, it’s infected with cultural marxism. Finland seems best off in that regard but they are having crappy economic times for other reasons.

      11. EvigtRegn December 28, 2014 at 3:31 pm

        With all due respect, I think you’re being too negative about EE.


        Plenty of EE countries in Bloomberg’s list of 50 Most innovative countries. You can see patent activity for each country & from that, it seems to be quite high for many EE countries. But they count many other factors too.

        In in all, I personally see great potential in EE in general. In the long term (as in a 100 year period), I think EE will do better than the west. At least if the west doesn’t gives up cultural marxism & such self-destructive ideologies.

      12. RAdesign December 18, 2014 at 8:31 pm

        Meh. Most of polish cities are much cleaner than some western ones I`ve been to. I`m not talking swiss, because they have OCD, but german ones, like Cologne, are run down even in central districts.

        Most italian or spanish ones, London after weekend, Paris – are not very clean.
        Try some easter german medium sized cities – like Zwickau.
        Run down houses with broken windows in the very centre, almost no nightlife, large ones like Leipzig or Dresden are somewhat better, but still they have districts you wouldn`t like to go into, especially with neo-nazi “nightlife”, Dresden is the worst of them – unofficial capital of neo-nazi movement…

        And that`s still after pouring billions of EURO from central government on public space revitalization, creating new jobs, and so on.

      13. Evan Williams December 18, 2014 at 8:39 pm

        Roosh footage of Odessa and Bucharest showed how clean and orderly those cities are. America is a land of contrasts- the upscale places are awesome and the poor areas are terrible. It seems more level in EE in terms of socio economics but without technological advances and increased production I doubt the EE countries will ever get much better (at least they have fine girls). Thanks for the E Germany tip-makes me want to visit tommorrow especially Dresden.

      14. RAdesign December 18, 2014 at 8:45 pm

        Since when Odessa and Bucharest are in Poland ? ;>
        They are in southern Ukraine and Romania – more like southern culture cities of the Black Sea. Try comparing them with…maybe Greece or Turkey ? Or Mexico ?

      15. EvigtRegn December 28, 2014 at 4:29 pm

        Well, at least me for me, as a white person, I’m more worried about the multicultural areas than any theoretical nazi areas. More likely for me to get gangraped and/or shot in the former.

      16. Joseph December 19, 2014 at 9:40 am

        It is an unspoken truth that the American middle class is disappearing because good jobs are going to China. Also many Black Americans do not move up in society because of racism and lack of ambition among many although racism is still a problem its not as bad as people say and its mostly the lazy attitude of many black Americans and the encouragement of leftist whites for blacks to live like degenerates.

        America also gets a lot of unskilled immigrants from Mexico and other South American countries, they take middle class jobs for lower pay, so they wind up living in poorer looking areas.
        I just went to Poland, Katowice, which is considered to be a dump, I live in Los Angeles and honestly thought it was nicer than many parts of LA except for where the rich and famous live.
        Southern California has become a shithole!!! Are you kidding me!!! Also the women seem to go for black alpha guys, even Jennifer Lawrence just went black.

      17. DaleVM14W December 30, 2014 at 5:59 pm

        “Diversity” is a code word for “White genocide”.

      18. zaqan December 17, 2014 at 8:57 pm

        Growth is not generated by taxes or government spending. Try again.

    2. Chris Brony December 21, 2014 at 5:50 am

      To be honest Poland has a great chance of achieving the same kind of GDP per head that the USA and other western countries have achieved. Ukraine is in a different position as there are many factors that have a mush greater negative impact than diversity policies.

      1. Nick December 30, 2014 at 5:01 pm

        What are you basing this on? I live in Poland now and its gotten much better in the past 25 years, but two critical factors that haven’t been discussed are billions of dollars in EU funding and 2-3 million Poles who have left the country to live elsewhere. The “zielona wyspa” (“green island” referring to Poland’s economy during the financial crisis) is largely a myth. The unemployment rate would be 20% or more if expatriate Poles returned.

        On the plus side, Poland isn’t a diverse country. I don’t miss the multicultural cesspool of California.

      2. Chris Brony December 30, 2014 at 5:30 pm

        Are you Polish Nick?

        I lived in Warsaw for 4 years and have seen great progress.

        You are right about the EU funding and migration. If you took these two things away they would have a great impact on making the figures look worse, but at the same time the Polish people and the country are making progress.

        Educational levels are good. The thing I found missing was a creative mindset, imaginative, positive and risk taking mindset that will in the end slow down progress. But this could well come through in the younger people over the next few decades.

      3. Nick December 31, 2014 at 1:53 am

        Yes, I was born in California and lived there most of my life, but now reside in Warsaw. I’ve seen great progress as well, though I agree about the lack of creativity and optimism. This is a tragic relic of Poland’s communist past. While I think younger generations have a chance of overcoming many of these roadblocks, a huge problem I see are Polish politicians. I don’t see much interest on their part in making Poland a more hospitable environment for business and families. This article makes good points: http://niezalezna.pl/62693-miliony-polakow-na-swieta-poza-ojczyzna-w-tym-numerze-gp-wstrzasajacy-film-o-polskiej-emigracj

      4. cynical realist January 17, 2015 at 7:11 am

        On the upside, it’s better to have a communist past than a communist future. This alone makes Poland a better place to live in than USA.

    3. John Smith December 31, 2014 at 2:42 am

      If USA lets go/europe of russia’s economic sanctions. I can see Russia easily becoming a much more powerful country in the near future.

  2. Skoll December 17, 2014 at 9:53 am

    Diversity will bring about social and cultural ruin to Western countries, but I hardly think it’s the only cause for a decline, let alone an economical one. One needs to look no further than Japan where men are emasculated and the population is shrinking as a result of low birth rate. Not sure what the US population growth is for white people, but Western Europe is facing the same problem as Japan with their population shrinking. Because it’s harder to encourage native population to reproduce more, they just decided to take the easy way out by letting immigrants flood in. All developed nations have to eventually choose between Japan’s population shrinkage or Europe’s open door immigration policy if they can’t get their women to reproduce.

    Funny enough, although this problem started because women entered the workforce and stopped becoming mothers, feminist countries like Sweden respond by giving them even more affirmative action. It’ll be interesting to see how they will defend their feminist values against muslim immigrants in the future.

    1. Johnn December 17, 2014 at 8:40 pm

      The average middle class couple in Europe has to pay so much taxes for the subvention of the numerous children from lower class immigrants and the whole social welfare system that they are totally discouraged economically to have many children. Change the policies and the fertility rate of white Europeans will increase dramatically and suddenly.

      1. Nick December 30, 2014 at 5:07 pm

        There are many symptoms of the West’s decline, but I think the main cause is a transnational elite that is ceaselessly consolidating power. Mass immigration dilutes the electorate with pliable peasants. If these elites actually wanted whites to reproduce more they’d create a variety of incentives instead of importing poor, uneducated, culturally-alien masses that lead to the breakup of the once-dominant culture, language and traditions.

  3. seth datta December 17, 2014 at 10:07 am

    It’s about diversity of race, but equality of opportunity in that we are all to be poor and enslaved in around ten to fifteen years as they inflate the currency, nationalise pensions and totalitarianise the society. All races will be equally downtrodden save for the ‘elite’.

    Its much worse than people know. But still, consider that Dapper Laughs (a comedian) and Julien Blanc were both made into social pariahs for their ‘extreme’ behaviours. Soon, anyone deviating from tight social norms will be an extremist. You’re an extremist if you like guns. Now its you’re an extremist if you are red pill and pick up girls. Pretty soon it’ll be, you’re an extremist if we say you are and you better toe the line and you are disposable at any time. Western men are heading this way because of social re-engineering.

    I recently just watched some music video where the tag line is ‘these hoes ain’t loyal’. That is true because it is the only social option given to them considering all the brainwashing we get from a young age. The video also had a ‘white slut’ stolen by the rapper who had his homies beat up the white guy who was with the girl initially. What kind of message does that send out and who is making this shit? We are all being played against each other and divided and conquered not just on racial and gender levels, but individually being picked off one by one as the banker and his group laugh at us.

    1. G December 19, 2014 at 10:09 pm

      “Got a white girl with some fake titties” — yeah, rap / top 40 is trash.

  4. Chris Adams December 17, 2014 at 10:15 am

    Diversity is a wondrous, wonderful melting pot of flowers and puppy dogs and rainbows! 🙂

  5. Deebos December 17, 2014 at 10:27 am

    These last two posts rank near the top of your best writings. It should cause every Western man to step back and marvel at how manipulative and cunning Western women are. I firmly believe feminism has not been their greatest triumph but rather usurping the black male on the heirarchy of diversity programs and perceived discrimination. Notice how readily statistics are mentioned about the amount of women in a field or perceived pay gap for women. Women saw a thumbscrew into not needing to meet established criteria and immediately usurped it. Remember when diversity programs were introduced it was still necessary to have the necessary qualifications. It is only since women have usurped diversity that we hear the qualifications are too hard or unrealistic to meet.

  6. Slashfund December 17, 2014 at 10:30 am

    There probably is some truth that there is a negative tendency to uniformity, e.g. hiring family members, alumni of your school, or in general people you are comfortable, but this drift away from merit can only be (imperfectly) corrected by the competitive market, while “diversity” is just about institutionalizing an even less productive uniformity.

  7. Molnár András December 17, 2014 at 10:45 am

    A time capsule should be created with a simple message:

    “Do not let women vote, or you will face certain doom.”

    1. Skoll December 17, 2014 at 11:57 am

      Men have already been warning for centuries, we just chose to ignore them.

      “When the hen crows, the house goes to ruin” – Japanese proverb

      1. Aryan Jesuite December 17, 2014 at 4:04 pm

        men tend to ignore warnings and other men’s misfortune because ‘it won’t happen to me’ or ‘I’m better than him’ – ‘he’s just a loser’ and ‘I’m special’.

    2. Schultz December 17, 2014 at 12:30 pm

      “A time capsule should be created with a simple message:

      “Do not let women vote, or you will face certain doom.” ”


      And yet it is so true. The beginning of the end was pulling off the leash and giving hormonal driven animals the right to vote. It’s about as stupid as giving a loaded rifle to a chimpanzee.

      That said, this millenium is fucked.

      1. Molnár András December 17, 2014 at 2:25 pm

        Rifle loaded chimpanzees would be at least fun to hunt down.

    3. Martin Woo December 20, 2014 at 2:15 pm

      The first thing women did wth their votes? Prohibition , which was done to control their husbands.

  8. Conrad Stonebanks December 17, 2014 at 10:51 am

    A handicapped but otherwise intelligent white guy like Frederick Brennan (the founder of 8chan, see http://www.returnofkings.com/44535/interview-with-the-founder-of-8chan) has a significant chance of losing out to a healthy white woman when seeking employment or applying for an academic position using affirmative action. One will be considered more disadvantaged than the other, guess which one.

    To give an anecdote, I’ve know a deaf guy in grad school who worked hard to get there, yet received exactly *zero* financial support, while there were special financial incentives for female PhD candidates, because these women were somehow “disadvantaged” and needed financial support in order to succeed. And I was ridiculized by the faculty for having the audacity to question this…

    Let that sink in for a moment. Ponder the sheer insanity of a system that considers a healthy white woman more disadvantaged and hence more deserving of affirmative action than a handicapped guy!

  9. gogogogo December 17, 2014 at 11:19 am

    Good Observation. In Germany and Austria diversity somehow means the same Thing – privilege to german women and not for any minorities. Working for universities for 7 years as a White male Immigrant has proven this to me. It is often stated openly that “University tries to increase their number of women employees and if qualifications are equal, women will be selected” which leads to the Situation that in 80% of competitions either a woman wins, or the competition is appealed because a woman didn’t win and feels equally qualified. Once I have seen even a vacancy as a “diversity and equality officer” or smth like that at one austrian University and it had openly stated two discriminative requirements: that they will prefer women and German native Speakers (around 10-20% of Austrian Population consists of second or third Generation immigrants who have turkish, serbian or other languages as their mother tongues but of course know german at near native Level as there are only German Schools in Austria). So this University of Vienna wanted to hire diversity and equality officer, but did not want to be diverse or treat People equally even for hiring of this Position!

  10. Harry Moreno December 17, 2014 at 11:36 am

    Roosh I’m torn on this issue. While on the one hand your analysis of the growth rate dominating over time is correct. Diversity isn’t all bad.
    In the same way that diversification of your investment portfolio is advised for hedging against risk. A company should diversify it’s workforce for similar reasons. Its a hedge against the risk of not covering blindspots. The reasoning is that a diverse team would be better able to identify market opportunities and pitfalls (costly social damage can be dealt via social media). This is augmented by the (fact?) trend that certain demographics, in America at least, are less discretionary with their income. This translates directly into market opportunities that your company should target.

    1. Martin Woo December 17, 2014 at 9:11 pm

      LOL Funnny, Hire people so they can “speak the language” of their own group?
      Everything is not the marketing department.

    2. Emblematic December 17, 2014 at 11:26 pm

      If diversity made things better it wouldn’t need to be imposed.

    3. EvigtRegn December 28, 2014 at 5:09 pm

      Any company should naturally have people that “get the sort of people they are primarily selling to” but few companies aims for “everyone in the world.” Yet Diversity is an ideology that says “diversity for diversity’s sake”. This could be in a country that has exactly one ethiopian woman in it & they are selling to e.g primarily polish men aged 25 to 45. And that ethiopian woman (who here happens to be 55 years old) would, in diversity ideology, be a better asset than a polish man age 30 with the right qualifications.

      Like Emblematic says, it wouldn’t need to be mandated & written into laws if it was profitable naturally. Companies don’t need a whole ideology to serve their customers naturally.

  11. Ian December 17, 2014 at 11:54 am

    Welcome to the Rockefeller-Rothschild USSA plantation where everyone’s kept poor and messed up with taxes, debt, payops/main stream media, and big brother to keep the game running.

  12. yessir December 17, 2014 at 12:08 pm

    how about ASS diversity. Sizes, shapes and bouncability?

  13. apparentlyimagrammarnazi December 17, 2014 at 12:58 pm

    A great article, I liked the obvious references to America and China in the mathematical comparison. Just a couple of grammatical corrections: It’s altar, not alter, at the end. Also you said “does” instead of “do” once, in this sentence: How much damage does diversity programs cause in the short term on the individual level?

  14. NoPasaran December 17, 2014 at 2:00 pm

    Diversity? It’s the opposite of University, of course!

  15. Sean December 17, 2014 at 2:04 pm

    “What is diversity?” Rampant discrimination and permitted expulsion of straight, white males in society.

    1. USSA Today December 17, 2014 at 6:41 pm

      Zionist bs that’s an ideology for suckers they target to conform to so they will be shabbus Goys in their own people’s enlslavement and demise.

    2. 1812 Immigrant December 18, 2014 at 4:08 pm

      The white women in Canada [except Quebec of course] have already waged war against the white man. The white women in Toronto are HORRIBLE and they are behind the scenes spreading their feminist dogma to every square foot on the planet.

  16. Martin Woo December 17, 2014 at 3:02 pm

    Great article , Roosh

  17. armenia4ever December 17, 2014 at 3:09 pm

    I say we use all this “diversity” stuff to your advantage. Whenever you gender comes into play and it involves your job, identify as transgender and demand special treatment. Who knows, it may get you a promotion.

  18. invisiblehand85 December 17, 2014 at 3:41 pm

    awesome post

  19. mclovin89 December 17, 2014 at 7:21 pm

    read an article about this affirmitive action that it benefitted middle class white women more then poor minorities whom will commit crime for money then. goes to show how cold and selfish western women are.
    women will never build a good system. theyll just ruin the current ones.

  20. Takeshi Young December 17, 2014 at 8:08 pm

    Some pretty big claims here, with some shaky math. The US definitely embraces diversity, but is it “falling behind” in areas of “scientific research, political leadership, organization, and innovation”? I’d argue that despite some hiccups, the US still leads the world in terms of scientific research and innovation. Political leadership is more difficult to quantify, but if there has been any decline in that regard, I don’t see how it could be attributed to a nebulous concept such as “diversity”.

    1. upsetwhitemale December 18, 2014 at 3:43 am

      Simple response: women,and the Yes means Yes law in California. Women were selected into positions not because of superior merit, but because of their sex. These inferior people then rose to the top through diversity quotas, and then used their inferior abilities to make laws. The effect isn’t immediately apparent, but over time the result is ugly.

  21. ritchieharps December 17, 2014 at 8:57 pm

    “Privilege” Paradigm

    Minority Bisexual/Transgendered/Miscellaneous/Disabled Veteran Women

    Gay Minority Women

    Straight Minority Women

    Gay Minority Males

    Gay White Males

    Straight White Females

    Straight Minority Males

    Liberal Straight White Males

    Conservative Straight White Males <—- you are (probably) here

    1. Martin Woo December 17, 2014 at 9:08 pm

      Liberal straight white males………now that is really a minority.

    2. 1812 Immigrant December 18, 2014 at 4:07 pm

      Women in Toronto are at the top of the pyramid as long as their skin is white. The black female population in Toronto need to wake up and wonder why they have to become lesbians and Marxists in order to get a good job these days in KKKanada.

      1. Clark Kent December 21, 2014 at 12:40 pm

        If you want to understand what “women’s solipsism” means from the manosphere… go talk to a white-girl in Tdot.

  22. Emblematic December 17, 2014 at 11:36 pm

    To know what diversity really is you need to ask how it is measured. By what means are we supposed to gauge the amount of diversity present in a particular company, club, school, town, or any other entity.
    If you look carefully at how ‘lack of diversity’ is identified, you’ll eventually realize diversity just means: too many white (male) people.

  23. SlickyBoy December 18, 2014 at 4:43 am

    Even using a rough order of magnitude, the trend is obvious – diversity is not a strength, it is a weakness that must be compensated, not multiplied. The sad part is that the word itself has infected other parts of American culture, specifically financial planning. Everyone knows diversity is good, right? So you need to diversify your financial plan, since diversity makes so much sense everywhere else and it’s got to at least reduce risks, they say. Going against that would be sacrilegious.

    Well sure, people like Buffet and Soros have diversified portfolios, and those guys if nothing else are pretty good with money. The fatal flaw in that correlative evidence is it is assumed to be causative when it is not. Sure, Buffet and Soros have diversified portfolios, but they did not set out to make portfolio with diversity as a goal – they simply made well thought out decisions on investing and by happenstance their portfolios turned out to be diversified.

  24. The truth December 18, 2014 at 6:07 am

    A sand nigger claiming against diversity…is time for you to recieve a severe antidiversity policy from a bunch of Easter Europe skinheads

    1. fokkertism December 18, 2014 at 6:50 am

      Fuck you. Roosh is a legend.

      1. 1812 Immigrant December 18, 2014 at 4:05 pm

        The sluts in Toronto gave Roosh a hard time because those sluts are messed up in the head.

        Boycott anything made from Toronto.

    2. Cedric December 18, 2014 at 7:39 am

      I wish you white trash would try that stupid archaic shit on the streets in America. Go to Oakland or Atlanta and see what happens.

      I bet you’re Polish-all those Polish guys have this shit hostile attitude. Its not intimidating it just makes the recipiet of the bs want to shoot them in the face.

      Like I said try this with some Americans and the mentality many of them have. Look at history-it was the Americans who beat the Germans while the slavs rode bitch (as usual right)-all you guys have is the women-otherwise its a broke, cold, miserable dump. I wouldn’t advise messing with Americans in America-you won’t like the outcome and people here will take threats out with zero hesitation. You see we have wars and kill in the streets all the time here- we do more than binge on vodka and sit in our shit soviet row apartments hating life.

      1. manmade December 18, 2014 at 8:10 am

        one says sand nigger, one says white trash, ‘I bet you are Polish’….seriously, how fucking sad. It’s 2014 and we still have this kind of morons with tiny brains. I am a ‘white man’ (whatever the hell it means), I came out of a tiny village, and yet I have NEVER noticed that someone is black, white, or fucking green. I look at what people do and say, not how they appear.

        Roosh, good article. The message is that there’s this completely unfounded ‘belief’ that the poor white woman is somehow ‘downplayed’, so she needs to ‘raise up to her true worth’. I don’t know what’s more pathetic, of the two examples above.

        A week ago I heard an ugly woman saying to another woman, ‘for us women is more difficult’. I thought ‘really? let’s see, you are dog-ugly and I would rather jerk off to porn for the rest of my life than ever having sex with you, yet I am not ugly, but you are married to a man who, incredibly, settled down to the likes of you. And you are saying that for you it’s more difficult than for men?. Poor ugly bitch, you are delusional.’

        And let it be said, I have nothing against ugly people. Not everybody is pretty, so what, it’s a fact of life. I don’t diss people because they aren’t ‘pretty’. But I diss people who are ignorant and stupid.

      2. FormerCanadian December 18, 2014 at 8:33 am

        Care to elaborate HOW “Americans beat the Germans in World War 2”??;) I’d LOVE to hear that;)

      3. Cedric December 18, 2014 at 12:34 pm

        On the EE racist-
        That guy pisses me off. Im Latin so I know if he tried his bs in the barrio it wouldnt work out to well in the US. You’re right racist name calling is not good but he provoked the response he got-it was not done arbitrarily but with provocation.

        On EE-
        Zelcorpion above in the comments has got the macroeconomic outcome down to a science-read that comment.

        On WW2-
        Obviously, Hitler got his ass handed to him by over extending on the Eastern front and invading in the middle of Winter but other Slavs besides the Russians got beat down hard by the Germans as they considered them inadequate and acted as such. Economists hav said the mountain ranges between Western and Eastern Europe slowed down the educational and technological development for EE of course today the West self restricts via a combination of vice and social engineering.

        America won WW2- how do you think all the implements of the Marshall plan were put into place other than through a miltary victory? From The battle of the bulge to the siege of Berlin the German’s were retreating when they had done nothing but advance-their behavior of running as they did from the Russians says enough. I think if Hitler had not been fighting on the other fronts and invaded hard in old weather he could have beat the Russians. Always remember war is a racket.

      4. FormerCanadian December 18, 2014 at 2:31 pm

        Holy crap… American brainwashing at its best…
        I have some questions to you, my friend;))
        1. Please Google and tell me the exact day of German invasion to Soviet Union in 1941.
        2. When did America really join the war in Europe?;) You may Google it as well;)

      5. Cedric December 18, 2014 at 8:27 pm

        You never answered about the Marshall plan and lets look at the casualty rates by Country well.

        Modernly with all the bases, planes, subs, and missiles do you think many countries want to tangle with his deranged American system? I never said any of it was just or even smart but this system here is armed to teeth.

        Look at this chart and lets only analyze military deaths- (link wouldn’t post google Wikipedia ww2 casualties by country)

        The US had way less (400k) than Germany (4mil) or Russia (8mil). The numbers tell the story on that one and ill be the first guy to say all these men died so the central banking elite could manipulate their countrymen and governments to create a global government to enslave future generations. May all those brave men who the Rothschilds had their local politicians lie to them to get them to fight the bs War rest in peace. American Marine Officer Smedley Butlers book “War Is A Racket” is spot on and honest.

      6. EvigtRegn December 28, 2014 at 6:48 pm

        What does lower casualties say? That they managed to hide behind rocks in Normandy? Some countries were in it from the beginning, others came later, some came later still.

        Inflicted casulties on german soldiers, now that is a measurement that may work.

      7. Tom December 19, 2014 at 2:46 am

        We stay out of nigger capitals, like Atlanta and Oakland, with high murder rates by design.

        We know that low murder rates are archaic and we don’t want to taint your modern nigger cities that run on your modern nigger technology like peanut butter.

        Btw, as an American, I know that niggers would get owned by Slavs. Slavs can think, organize, fight, and govern. Only niggers “take threats out” with zero hesitation, “kill in the streets”, and can barely hold back the impulse to “shoot them in the face”. We know. Trust us. Then they sit in jail for 5 to 10 or longer and bitch about the “white privilege” way that doesn’t “take threats out without hesitation”. If they fought the Slavs, likely using Slav invented technology like Kalashnikov Rifles, we know that they’d expend magazines without hitting anything gangster style and would also turn-tail the moment the group leader was killed. Niggers have little individual valor.

        Also, like a typical nigger, you’re completely ignorant of anything resembling knowledge that requires reading a book to gain. The Soviets unquestionably broke Germany. That’s why Israel has a two-story monument dedicated to the Red Army and not the American Army you fucking ignorant nog.

      8. EvigtRegn December 28, 2014 at 6:36 pm

        Not to ruin your party but it was actually largely slavs (east slavs) that beat the germans. The U.S came in late but was essential throughout due to financial help to the Soviet Union (among others). So saying the slavs “rode bitch” isn’t very accurate. Perhaps if you say west slavs.

        Easy for an american to be cocky when you haven’t fought a war in your territory since the civil war. The situation for many in central & Eastern Europe is like if the U.S had Russia instead of Canada to the north, and China instead of Mexico to the south. Plus tons of nations to the east & west instead of ocean. And have way smaller population. Have fun in that scenario 😉

    3. 1812 Immigrant December 18, 2014 at 4:03 pm

      Your white women act like bloody whores and they spread their feminist communist trash to other countries.

    4. Jon December 19, 2014 at 3:12 am

      Ah yes, the “KKK/skin-head” strawman. The single reason, other than “whiteswanttokill6millionJews” why indigenous-European Americans aren’t allowed to be overtly ethnically or politically cohesive.

      Its also the single reason why whites are becoming furious and why they might eventually snap into full-blown fascism, with legitimately tragic consequences, as a necessary reaction. Because whites never fight back when pushed too far. Your perspective is very well thought out.

      The reality is that cultural conformity as well as political inheritance is the soul of the argument. I’m white as the driven snow, and I know Latinos who are culturally whiter than am I because I was forced to grow up near black culture that unknowingly influenced my culture growing up. Why would they be at risk? They make the culture whiter than can I. Granted, they are a rarity in my experience but they exist. Culture breeds politics and so we can focus on culture. People like Roosh and others who are for all intensive purposes culturally white will always have a permanent place in the USA amongst a majority who is technically more racially European. The vast neighborhoods of people who aren’t culturally European, and who have proven that they will likely never be because they are getting worse and we are importing more, are the political problem. We now have a political culture that caters to the lumpenprole. Some people have proven themselves to be widely and incorrigibly lumpenrpole to an extreme that ruins cities. If you mean to warn that “skinheads” might put lumpenproles at risk, then you have a point. The political culture that defends lumpenproles and fascist, foreign-to-Europe religions against traditional European style civilization has to die. In a healthy culture, people like Roosh are at zero risk and would even be defended by a nation who can comfortably embrace enlightenment/Calvinist values without being forced to take them to their culturally tragic extreme. It’s a culture which isn’t allowed to keep a balance that tragically puts people of slightly differing racial characteristics at risk. So you can kindly fuck off with your illogical, totalist perspective.

  25. GRock December 18, 2014 at 12:28 pm

    I’ve interviewed at Chrysler locally where I live twice. Fist time was by a gay black man, 2nd time a black woman. Chrysler’s new mantra since Fiat bought them out a few years back is ;”Diversity in management..” During both interviews I could tell the interviewers turn off to me, and rushed through the interview when they could tell I was a white man. It was very obvious.

    Upon further investigation, despite interviewing for supervisory positions, I’ve spoke to supervisors working there who’ve informed me 5/6 line workers are black and more than half the mid-lower management positions are filled with minority status employees. My city’s population demographic is NOT representative of this employee base whatsoever.

    They seemingly have gotten people in hiring positions, especially HR, that filter you OUT based on your lack of minority or diversity status. Yea, and I’m plenty qualified to be hired. It’s complete b,s.

    1. Ian December 18, 2014 at 12:53 pm

      Chrysler sucks-always has and ways will.

  26. Das auto December 18, 2014 at 2:30 pm

    Diversity is code word for Decline.

    I like it uncle Roosh

    1. 1812 Immigrant December 18, 2014 at 4:02 pm

      The white women in Toronto love diversity because they can play the victim card like the other disadvantaged groups, but one thing, white sluts are not a fucking disadvantaged group.

      1. OJ Simpsun December 18, 2014 at 8:30 pm

        They like the bbc diversity brings them too lol
        After they’ve rode the carousel for a decade a fat 10″ is all that will run their walls right anymore.

  27. Dave6034 December 18, 2014 at 2:57 pm

    Kevin, when I visited Hungary and Poland in the early 2000s, the restaurant food was excellent, and very cheap at the exchange rates of the time. Meanwhile, restaurants in Ukraine and Russia served mediocre food at New York City prices.

    I think it’s because the former Soviet Union was under communist rule for an entire human lifetime (74 years) whereas in the satellite nations, old people in 1990 still remembered life before communism and were thus able to re-create it.

  28. 1812 Immigrant December 18, 2014 at 4:04 pm

    White Toronto women love diversity because they can disenfranchise the white man and allow the non-whites to put these white fucking sluts on a pedestal. Fuck Canadian multiculturalism, its only for women who benefit.

  29. Maxx Wiskers December 18, 2014 at 4:11 pm

    Diversity is a code word for special treatment for a particular group. It is discrimination based on politics. It has nothing to do with the dictionary definition of diversity. Typically it is blacks and women who use this form of discrimination based purely on self preferential politics. This is anti merit and reason based philosophy. Diversity is a hypocrisy to solve shortcomings and inadequacies of these groups and it does work at a price.

    As in so many forms of political correctness “diversity” accomplishes the exact opposite of what is stated. When you seek neuro diversity, diversity of talent or mastery of skill you will have to violate politically enforced quotas to avoid sacrificing merit and ability. All unhappy companies are the same all happy companies are unique.


  30. FormerCanadian December 18, 2014 at 4:14 pm

    Oh well… I can write a mile long article about political correctness and diversity in Canada…
    Canada is the world’s capital of political correctness, diversity, affirmative action and quota hiring. Folks in America have NO idea about how bad it can get until they happen to deal with Canada.
    Canada is by far the worst. There are several grades of political correctness and diversity in Canada. You people mention affirmative action and quota hiring, but in Canada there are also “organizational needs”. Ever heard about them? I guess not.
    Someone already wrote about the “grades” in diversity here, so I’ll just say how it works in Canada.
    Priorities are always given to women, aboriginals, members of LGTB “community” (ever heard about being “intersexual” by the way? NO? Google it, cause one of major Canadian banks was looking for “intersexual” employees), handicapped folks and obviously all kinds of “visible minorities”.
    An able bodied straight white male stands NO chance in this competition! NONE! ZERO! ZILCH!
    There will always be someone who has the right skin color, sexual orientation, gender etc to be given a hiring priority!
    I’m very well educated, very sporty, a perfect honest citizen so to say. Thus I did try to apply to several police service in Canada (GTA area) as well as CBSA (Canadian border services, cause I also speak several foreign languages).
    And not ONE of them was ever interested in my application. Too bad I didn’t save/made a screenshot of a job posting from CBSA stating those “organizational needs”.
    I know a lot of other white males who were qualified enough to join police services but were rejected because of the need to hire women, minorities and LGTB folks in order to “reflect the changing face of Canadian population”.
    Diversity is killing the Western world by promoting merits like having the right skin color, sexual orientation etc over knowledge, experience, education, honesty, integrity, desire and willingness to work and to contribute!
    And this was a major reason for me coupled with Canadian feminism to leave Canada for good and to start a new and happy life in Eastern Europe!

    1. Cedric December 18, 2014 at 8:33 pm

      Those Toronto people that post here are the sickest people I’ve ever encountered. I don’t think Id want to see that hole if they comped at the local 4 Seasons. Forget that city man. They make LA look like traditionalists (a lot of the hot Mexican spinners there actually are).

    2. Clark Kent December 21, 2014 at 12:55 pm

      I’ve posted on RoK a bunch about the absurd things my white female co-workers have gotten away with… They can literally frivolously destroy other peoples’ careers and no one will question them on it… In fact they will get a paid vacation for the stress they had to “endure.”

  31. Mick December 18, 2014 at 6:21 pm

    A bit off topic from the article, but a few days ago I heard a guest on some Fox late night talk show hosted by Greg Gutfeld, refer to himself sarcastically as diehard “Cultural Marxist Social Justice Warrior”. Interesting..

  32. YosarriansRight December 18, 2014 at 9:59 pm

    Diversity is when a radical, oversized government decrees that everyone else besides white men are either retarded or too physically weak to meet basic requirements for everything from attending certain schools, to serving in the military, to becoming a doctor.

    But in the name of “equality”, governments and governing bodies waive said requirements, thus watering down everything, many times promoting extremely incompetent individuals to positions of power, where they then commence to fuck everything in their paths up.

  33. Guest December 18, 2014 at 11:56 pm

    Diversity is good for the Jews

    1. d18kv178 January 10, 2015 at 1:01 pm

      another dumb comment from a total idiot.

    1. FormerCanadian December 19, 2014 at 7:20 am

      Absolute BULLSHIT targeting sex hungry North Americans as yet another video to jerk off to!
      Y’all folks seem to be living in some kind of an artificial/imaginary world replacing real sex and relationships with videos like this one!

    2. Tim December 19, 2014 at 9:53 am

      Retarded and they have a goofy pinko look like San Francisco people.

  34. brocuz11 December 21, 2014 at 9:27 pm

    I am one of the many victims of “Diversity”. The liberals in society reward “the weak” at the expense of the “strong” and do so according to however the hell they want do( latino, African american, women, transgender, gays, lesbians, etc). Let me give my take.

    Grad schools I interviewed at had booklets about their “gay, lesbian, and transgender clubs” given to you at their interviews and students went ” blah blah blah” about how diverse their school was and how important diversity was( they were basically heavy medicated on the “diversity Kool Aid” spoon fed to them by these liberal deans and administrators”. Even listed under their selection factors, it is stated ” high school quality, family success, diversity, background, life experiences, where your from” play a role in your consideration. This is some bullshit. Why are we jeopardizing the advancement of our medical care and science by “admitting” incompetent individuals to serve role in societies ” that are traditional reserved for the best and brightest”? Wont their incompetence impede the advancement of society when in nature they would normally be defeated because in nature success is determined by “survival of the fittest”. I mean, in a sense, having some incompetent individuals enter these professions is “awesome” for drug companies, schools, governmental agencies, and food companies who can not think for themselves and question governmental guidelines that are at fault for most of America’s health and scientific issues( food pyramid, whole grain movement, sugar industries, anti paleo diet movement to preserve their financial interests in things such as statins, whole grains, obesity, processed addicting foods, addicting fast foods, and sugars that are bankrupting medicare). Many of these incompetent people can not think for themselves and do not question authority along with needing their hands hold along the way to accomplish their goals.

    Sure, I am pretty bitter about diversity and I am pretty bias. But when people that just smoked pot during their academic careers and did very poorly in academics, standardized test scores, group projects, and resume building activities and still get selected over people that performed overall much better in all aspects of the game and worked their tails off to do so, society has failed us. I would regularly lead group projects and have to perform the portion of tasks assigned in group projects for these people that are given “diversity preference” because they are not capable of performing the tasks at a high level and are a detriment to the groups success. In addition, people with” legacies” also lucked out when it comes with “Diversity”. Guess what, the alpha working his ass off and taking charge is more frequently getting left out in todays society.

    Lets ask ourselves: Who is going to be more likely to advance society: ” those that are given free lunches or those that work their asses off to earn their prime rib steak’? Unfortunately, the answer these days more likely than not is “those that are given a free lunch”.

  35. trudatness December 25, 2014 at 11:47 am

    I have seen many very brilliant, capable women in the workplace and I work in tech. I for one welcome any female colleague who produces and pulls her weight. If she has the ability and has earned her position via hard work and achievement then I say great. I’m all for a meritocracy and am against discrimination. That goes for any individual of any stripe. If you can kick ass at work then God fucking bless you.

    Affirmative action is difficult to implement in heavy tech industries because tech companies are lean and the bleeding edge is constantly evolving. In any given 3 years, the technological base can completely turn on it’s head. If you promote undeserving candidates into positions of heavy responsibility you will be out-competed. Period end of story. Time and again we’ve seen this happen. Tech companies that try to buy goodwill by spending meaningful portions of their margin on diversity programs get torn asunder in the marketplace.

    Why do think tech is currently under attack by feminists? Market forces have largely mitigated the pervasiveness of gender identity politics and feminist-granted free rides are hard to come by. Feminists don’t like this. They want to bludgeon the competition with PC accusations, condemning all masculinity as workplace hostility and put all their ideologue friends into positions of influence in companies. They are frustrated by their lack of deep infiltration into the tech industry. This is different from other industries, like banking, which is a cesspool of political correctness and “diversity” hiring and promotional practices.

    Take Wells Fargo for example. Someone I know was employed in a lower management position with them for a brief time. He constantly saw lesser deserving female candidates get hired and promoted over more qualified males. Men constantly found themselves towing extra weight to support the incompetence of their female bosses and co-workers. It was an absolute fucking joke. It probably had something to do with the fact that the greater area manager was a turbo lesbian who made sure she included descriptions of her activities with her life partner in company newsletters – like how they would go for a stroll on the beach after eating gluten free pizza or some dumb shit like that – like that has anything to do with the hard sell tactics Wells Fargo makes its employees use on their customers.

    If you work for a company like Wells Fargo and are a heterosexual man, you might as well show up for work everyday with a ball gag shoved in your mouth, because of the masochistic nature of the work environment. It’s openly hostile towards men (oh the irony) and the advancement opportunities are non-existent. The intersectional feminist LGBT crowd is blatantly discriminatory towards “cis gendered heteronormative” males. When they get into corporate positions of authority every man that works underneath them is fucked. If you find yourself working in a company with this kind of culture throw up your resume on Ladders IMMEDIATELY and plan your exit post-haste.

    1. Nelli P January 10, 2015 at 3:27 am

      move to eastern europe where your talents will be more appreciated

  36. Nelli P January 9, 2015 at 3:37 pm

    you know here s the thing. on one hand I agree with you. in the US men are competent, highly educated and definetely work better than women. I believe no gender must have an advantage, but instead all must be given equal opportunities, then the best candidates will push the country to the top. in some cases the best candidates are women (for example in the field of nursing, school education, translation from foreighn languages etc women usually fare better than men). but all of this really doesnt matter. all candidates must be given equal opportunities.

    but it shouldnt mean pushing men above women artificially. men must have healthy competition from women if competent female specialists are available. it will only make them all work better.

    the reason why affirmative action was used in the US was because of racism and segregation. for generations white people wouldnt hire black people for the top positions because they were racist. affirmative action was used to make sure that qualified black people got jobs. the goal was to change the mindset of a white person who could not believe that a black person could accomplish anything, now things in the US are different. racism is not that prevalent, people not care about colour this much anymore, they only care about money. so top companies will hire qualified people of colour as long as those can work hard. but the continuing affrimative action pushes unqualified candidates for good positions just because they are balck. as a result it damages the chances of the companies for success. so what we have is, black people feel they can get into good colleges or get jobs just by being black. that makes them slack and they dont work hard. companies are still forced to hire them but their work efficiency is low. as a result we are back to the point where white people again become mistrusting towards blacks, not expecting them to do well. so eventually affiormative action works against black people. same with women.

  37. Nelli P January 9, 2015 at 4:23 pm

    on the other hand I have to disagree with roosh and heres why. in the US men are given tough conditions but they still survive and succeed. in Russia its the other way around. men here kind of suck. there are given preferential treatment everywhere they go, from college to work. male bosses almost always hire males for work. they will only hire a female if she is extremely qualified and attractive. as aresult men here feel littke to no competition and no motivation to do anything and grow. they dont build anything, they dont invent anything. a typical life of a Russian man goes like this: slacking in high school with good grades given by the symphatetic teacher to help the kid get into college and escape the cruelty of the russian army (imposed by men btw). then slacking in college becasue in most colleges there are like 10 beautiful girls to one guy and they usually let the gusy use their schoolwork to get passing grades plus male solidarity from male teachers who give them preferential treatment.

    than slacking at work, sometimes even showing up drunk to work but because everyone does it its ok. the surplus of women leaves no motivation to work and chage as a result – lots of unkept. fat guys who can hardly provide for themselves. all this idea of putting a man on a pedstal clearly gets intio a mans head and he begins to degrade. just like US women decline and get fatter and uglier, same way Russian men get more ugly, hatefull and prone to violence with years. a recent conflict with Ukraine where our assholes thought they could easily invade a neighboring country and get away with it is a fine example. when so much stuff is forgiven to men this is what they become.

    in russia I would say we definitely need some pro women affirmative action. and I am not a feminist I simply want my country to survive. we need to push women in Goverment and public service areas. those services are extrememly violent and incompetent. russian police is a force most people are simply afraid of since there is no justice there just murder and unjustified incareration. men here treat their fellow men with incrediubel cruelty so if you are a decnt guy your chances of surival are close to minimal. however if you are an asshead you can get away with a lot of stuff. rape against women is justified. violence agaisnt women is justified. rape in prison and in the army is fairly common too. russian men treat each other with unthinkable cruely and than out of frustration pass on this cruelty onto the women. if we had normal guys, like the US or UK guys id be the first person to support patriarchy. but in russia patriarchy killes russian men, prevents our country from developing normnally and humiliates russian women. as a result men in this country have no opportunity to fullfill their potential and woemn have no chance to become loving mothers and wives. I would say that a little affrimative action would have done all of us a lot good

  38. me January 17, 2015 at 7:03 am

    That such obvious obviosities even need to be put in writing is downright depressing…