Diversity is when merit, skill, and ability is downplayed in favor of a person’s race, sexual orientation, or other identity affiliation. Diversity goals have the inevitable result of ensuring that less qualified applicants are given academic and employment opportunities over other applicants who are objectively more qualified. There is no means to achieve diversity for the sole sake of diversity without discriminating against other individuals or groups that are more capable.

Diversity policies were implemented in America because of claims that structural discrimination caused minority groups to lose out on opportunities in spite of equivalent or superior qualifications. To solve this problem, America has embraced a legal policy of openly discriminating against majority groups. While this was usually constricted to race, it has broadened in recent years to include sex.

A diversity program like affirmative action in the past benefited black men, for example, but white women have successfully hijacked the definition of diversity to include themselves. A white woman who claims to have “black friends” will not criticize a program that gives her a position at a Fortune 500 company over that of a black man who has more qualifications. Diversity programs that used to benefit historically marginalized races now increasingly focus on giving white women, homosexuals, and transsexuals more of the diversity pie.

How much damage does diversity programs cause in the short term on the individual level? Is a white man who has to go to UVA instead of Harvard really suffering? On such a scale, damage is hard to perceive or measure, but if we look at it from a societal level and measure the economic and intellectual growth of a nation when compared to its nation peers that do not use diversity programs, logical deduction shows that those nations that have been infected with the diversity virus will lag behind when it comes to scientific research, political leadership, organization, and innovation.

Over the course of decades and centuries, a nation that uses diversity as a measuring stick to promote its citizens in industry, politics, and intellectual culture will experience less growth and achievement than countries that do not. This is compounded over many years, and as described in The Rise And Fall Of The Great Powers, can allow an inferior country to overtake a formely superior country in dominance and hegemony.

Let’s do an example that shows how a slight decrease in a nation’s growth rate can lead to an unambiguous decline. Country U has a value (i.e. GDP) of 100 with a growth rate of 6% per annum. Policies of diversity, however, have caused a slowing of corporate growth, with a continuous rash of failures in companies led by women who were promoted because of their sex over more qualified male applicants. The country’s annual growth rate slips to 5%. In 100 years, here is their compounded value:

100 x (1.05)^100 = 13,150 economic units

Country C is experiencing brisk industrialization and achieves 7% yearly growth, no doubt helped by their lack of diversity programs. Their initial value is only 20, one-fifth that of country U. Nonetheless, country C will surpass country U in 100 years:

20 x (1.07)^100 = 17,354

If country U did not employ diversity programs and were able to maintain its growth at 6%, it would have double the value of country C:

100 x (1.06)^100 = 33,930

Over the long term, any variable which decreases a country’s growth rate can cause a decline relative to other countries that do not implement the damaging variable. In 100 years, country C will be better able to compete against country U for the planet’s scarce resources and also provide its citizens with a higher standard of living. If its military is strong enough, it could come to dominate country U using a combination of hard and soft power, as the United States does to dozens of nations today.

My simulation is quite rudimentary for two reasons. First, we have no exact number of how much diversity can decline a country’s growth rate besides the fact that is must do so by a value greater than zero. It could be 0.01% or greater than 1%—this number is unknown. Secondly, there are hundreds of variables working together to determine the growth rate of a specific country that prevents it from being constant over such great lengths of time.

In spite of these flaws, the simulation does show the long-term damage caused when a national policy of diversity in any country promotes inferior and less skilled citizens into roles that are vital to economic growth. Even a barely noticeable decline in the yearly growth rate, something that diversity programs would provide, is enough to severely damage a nation over the long run and make it vulnerable to strengthening nations that are hungrier for resources or planetary domination.

Whenever you see the word “diversity,” replace it with the word “decline,” because that’s exactly what it does to any organization or country that implements it on a wide scale. The second that merit is removed from the highest priority of a system is when that system will decline relative to other systems that don’t use diversity. In a country such as the United States, the most economically successful nation the world has seen, diversity is a needless poison pill that guarantees it will fare worse in the future.

Nature will punish any system, organic or inorganic, that forsakes its own survival by going against selection of the strongest unit that is most capable at the task given to it. Unfortunately, this will punish the Western world in future generations, all for bowing down to the altar of diversity.

Read Next: Social Welfare Creates A Society Of Sluts

103 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kevin
Kevin
5 years ago

Roosh,
Do you see Eastern Europe countries like Ukraine and Poland growing exponentially in the next 50 years?

Zelcorpion
Zelcorpion
5 years ago
Reply to  Kevin

Of course not. Most growth is not generated by the rise of diversity but by a multitude of factors: current state of development, education system, tax base, economic policies, standard of living, average corporate competitiveness in a country, growth of average disposable, tariffs (also protective tariffs), patents produced each year in the country, high investment in R&D both by the State as well as private businesses etc. Poland and all FSU countries are sorely lacking in all those areas. Diversity currently begins to impact some government organizations as well as big corporations on low to mid management levels as some undeserving women and workers are being promoted. But since ever less workers are actually needed for growth and decent production output I personally don’t regard diversity as having much of an impact unless you exacerbate the trend for decades and centuries.

Kevin
Kevin
5 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

Why is so much of the World a ghetto? Man Ill be honest with you in America where I’ve been a lot of places SUCK. The wealthy parts of LA, Miami, etc. are awesome but so many places are just half ass dumps. From the footage I see on YouTube Ukraine, Poland, Romania, etc is run down looking but safe, cheap, and with hot girls but it doesn’t have the cleanliness, natural beauty, or vast top tier dining and entertainment like Southern California- am I right?

Basically guys live in an artic industrial shit hole for hot girls

Zelcorpion
Zelcorpion
5 years ago
Reply to  Kevin

Well – I live in EE and it is far far off from more advanced countries in the West. They will also never catch up with the West – they are not South Korea which pumps an enormous amount of effort into science, education & R&D. All EE & FSU countries have yearly patents numbering between 50-150. While Germany has 45.000+ and most Western countries range between 1.500 to 10.000 patents per year. The gap will never be closed – main streets and cities will look better, because wealth is a strange thing that sometimes gets created not via any productivity gains but by sheer expectation. For example in most EE 80% of the wealth for the average Joe came from the rise in real estate valuations due to increased economic activity. But that cannot last without long-term strategic changes – as was clearly visible with Greece, Portugal or Spain.

And you can live very very well in EE with enough money – by far higher living standard if some things do not bother you. It’s not just pussy that makes it more welcome – you just have to travel more as it can get tiresome all year long. But many wealthy local people in EE do so too.

RAdesign
5 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

As for EE it all depends on country. In Ukraine and Russia you have total contrasts, mostly because they are being ruled by oligarchs – they develop they home districts with loads of money, but other parts of countries are laid to waste, drained of resources, young people.
As for CE post-soviet countries as Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia – it`s getting better, step by step.
In Poland we`ve been too naive and most of our companies and brands were destroyed by hostile takeovers by westerners, only to make place in the market for they own products, thus strenghtening their economies and weakening potential rival.

Also remember historical background – Western Germany was flowing in billions of USD of Marshalls plan, and was quickily restored after the war, had 40 years of relatively safe development.

Eastern Germany was also lucky – after the reunion billions of GM and EUR was poured into their budget, and even that was not enough to restore damages form the communist regime.
All other Central Europe countries under Soviet “protection” did not have so much luck, being drained of resources for 50 years.
But slowly it`s getting better.

Zelcorpion
Zelcorpion
5 years ago
Reply to  RAdesign

Most of EE was backwards for different reasons even before WWII and the communist crap. Germany was the top in science well before the WWI. Their success is not derived from the Marshall plan – not even mainly.
And Eastern Germany was not lucky – it got completely destroyed, the few solid companies it had gutted and sold off to the highest bidder. Their “indebtedness” was a scam – they could have survived easily, but the West did not want competition, so they rather created an interesting con by saying that the must-have-production-values that each public company had to generate towards the State – that would be a debt. This was bollocks of course, since that was only for communist book-keeping purposes. The real debt of German companies was very small and they could have survived. Now you have East Germany which might resemble Poland someday: many women gone (30-50% less women in ages 18-35), worthless private real estate since people are leaving, hardly any jobs, but at least they have reconstructed infrastructure and nice town halls. Good luck with that.

Tom
Tom
5 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

Comparing the USA to almost any country but China is ridiculous on its face.

The average EE country, or any country in Europe other than Russia, is lucky if it is as large as an average US state. Germany, one of the largest countries in Europe, is barely as large as a 1.5 to 2 average to larger states. Whatever gymnastics that anyone does to explain the economics of most countries, economic development in countries populated by majority Europeans has a lot of correlation with both physical geographic size and population density.

The USA is developmentally shitty in perhaps even a technical majority of its geography because it is only a united country on paper. In reality, everything is local. The localities that do well have high standards of living like France minus the culture and the places without economic production are nominally like Bulgaria minus the culture.

You can’t compare Poland to the USA or even South Korea. Compare it to something like Nebraska, North Dakota, or Oklahoma.

Anon 1
Anon 1
5 years ago
Reply to  Tom

Actually, Poland and Germany are about the same size (Germany lost one third of its former size after WW II. Each is about twice the size of Missouri. Britain is smaller. On the other hand, France is huge – about the size of Texas. That’s probably why the French don’t travel as much as the Germans – they have a huge beautiful country to explore

Anon 1
Anon 1
5 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

Wrong! According to data.worldbank.org, the number of patents granted in 2012 was (in selected countries): Poland – 4,410, Ukraine – 2,491, Romania – 1,022, Hungary – 692, Czech R. – 867. Elsewhere in Europe, Sweden – 2,288, Norway – 1,009, Netherlands – 2375, Greece – 628, Spain – 3,266, Austria – 2258. Of course, countries with much larger populations like Russia, Germany, France, U.K. produce more patents but Europe, in general, is returning to the pre-WW II division between Northern and Southern Europe. Before the war, countries like Spain, Portugal, Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, were much poorer than northern countries like Poland. Then the Yalta Treaty intervened and confined Poland, etc to the communist prison. Things in Europe are now returning to the usual state: the rich North and the poor South. Italy, for example, is beginning to slip badly. Sweden, Norway, and Finland are Europe’s Alaska. Stockholm has almost the same latitude as Anchorage, Alaska

Zelcorpion
Zelcorpion
5 years ago
Reply to  Anon 1

Interesting – the new EU patent applications are exactly as I said: http://bi.gazeta.pl/im/88/2a/bc/z12331656Q,Ile-wnioskow-zlozyly-firmy-z-poszczegolnym-panstw-.jpg
Obviously there is a local patent application procedure.The thing is this – the local patent application procedure is cheaper – the European patent applications cost between 20.000EUR to 200.000EUR or more. I did not know there was such a discrepancy between the 2 patent lines. Also interesting is the fact that Russia has 28.000 patents while Germany has 45.000 of EU patent caliber. I severely doubt the Russian economy is 65% as innovative as the German one. Obviously one would have to take a good look what creates that enormous discrepancy for some EE countries to have 90% less EU-wide patents vs. local ones. Certainly the costs are a factor, but then what about the quality & potential of the patent itself?
But I agree that some of the EE countries will surpass the European South within the next years/decades again. And the geography of Norway has little to do with effective wealth of a country in our current technological development.

Chris Brony
Chris Brony
5 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

Do you know what I think is sad. The UK is lagging. That’s where I am from. If you adjust that map for per capita…Sweden, Finland, germany, Holland, Switzerland and Austria are doing so much better. Even Ireland per capita is doing much better than the UK.

How do you make the UK more like Germany when it comes to manufacturing and research and invention. We used to lead the world in it.

When it comes to the USA, it out performs the UK per capita but still lags far behind Germany, Holland and those I other countries in Northern Europe that I just listed.

EvigtRegn
EvigtRegn
5 years ago
Reply to  Anon 1

Indeed.

“Sweden, Norway, and Finland are Europe’s Alaska. Stockholm has almost the same latitude as Anchorage, Alaska”

Yes, I’m from Europe’s Alaska in that case. Could have been great but unfortunately, it’s infected with cultural marxism. Finland seems best off in that regard but they are having crappy economic times for other reasons.

EvigtRegn
EvigtRegn
5 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

With all due respect, I think you’re being too negative about EE.

http://www.bloomberg.com/slideshow/2013-02-01/50-most-innovative-countries.html#

Plenty of EE countries in Bloomberg’s list of 50 Most innovative countries. You can see patent activity for each country & from that, it seems to be quite high for many EE countries. But they count many other factors too.

In in all, I personally see great potential in EE in general. In the long term (as in a 100 year period), I think EE will do better than the west. At least if the west doesn’t gives up cultural marxism & such self-destructive ideologies.

RAdesign
5 years ago
Reply to  Kevin

Meh. Most of polish cities are much cleaner than some western ones I`ve been to. I`m not talking swiss, because they have OCD, but german ones, like Cologne, are run down even in central districts.

Most italian or spanish ones, London after weekend, Paris – are not very clean.
Try some easter german medium sized cities – like Zwickau.
Run down houses with broken windows in the very centre, almost no nightlife, large ones like Leipzig or Dresden are somewhat better, but still they have districts you wouldn`t like to go into, especially with neo-nazi “nightlife”, Dresden is the worst of them – unofficial capital of neo-nazi movement…

And that`s still after pouring billions of EURO from central government on public space revitalization, creating new jobs, and so on.

Evan Williams
Evan Williams
5 years ago
Reply to  RAdesign

Roosh footage of Odessa and Bucharest showed how clean and orderly those cities are. America is a land of contrasts- the upscale places are awesome and the poor areas are terrible. It seems more level in EE in terms of socio economics but without technological advances and increased production I doubt the EE countries will ever get much better (at least they have fine girls). Thanks for the E Germany tip-makes me want to visit tommorrow especially Dresden.

RAdesign
5 years ago
Reply to  Evan Williams

Since when Odessa and Bucharest are in Poland ? ;>
They are in southern Ukraine and Romania – more like southern culture cities of the Black Sea. Try comparing them with…maybe Greece or Turkey ? Or Mexico ?

EvigtRegn
EvigtRegn
5 years ago
Reply to  RAdesign

Well, at least me for me, as a white person, I’m more worried about the multicultural areas than any theoretical nazi areas. More likely for me to get gangraped and/or shot in the former.

Joseph
Joseph
5 years ago
Reply to  Kevin

It is an unspoken truth that the American middle class is disappearing because good jobs are going to China. Also many Black Americans do not move up in society because of racism and lack of ambition among many although racism is still a problem its not as bad as people say and its mostly the lazy attitude of many black Americans and the encouragement of leftist whites for blacks to live like degenerates.

America also gets a lot of unskilled immigrants from Mexico and other South American countries, they take middle class jobs for lower pay, so they wind up living in poorer looking areas.
I just went to Poland, Katowice, which is considered to be a dump, I live in Los Angeles and honestly thought it was nicer than many parts of LA except for where the rich and famous live.
Southern California has become a shithole!!! Are you kidding me!!! Also the women seem to go for black alpha guys, even Jennifer Lawrence just went black.

DaleVM14W
5 years ago
Reply to  Kevin

“Diversity” is a code word for “White genocide”.

zaqan
zaqan
5 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

Growth is not generated by taxes or government spending. Try again.

Chris Brony
Chris Brony
5 years ago
Reply to  Kevin

To be honest Poland has a great chance of achieving the same kind of GDP per head that the USA and other western countries have achieved. Ukraine is in a different position as there are many factors that have a mush greater negative impact than diversity policies.

Nick
5 years ago
Reply to  Chris Brony

What are you basing this on? I live in Poland now and its gotten much better in the past 25 years, but two critical factors that haven’t been discussed are billions of dollars in EU funding and 2-3 million Poles who have left the country to live elsewhere. The “zielona wyspa” (“green island” referring to Poland’s economy during the financial crisis) is largely a myth. The unemployment rate would be 20% or more if expatriate Poles returned.

On the plus side, Poland isn’t a diverse country. I don’t miss the multicultural cesspool of California.

Chris Brony
Chris Brony
5 years ago
Reply to  Nick

Are you Polish Nick?

I lived in Warsaw for 4 years and have seen great progress.

You are right about the EU funding and migration. If you took these two things away they would have a great impact on making the figures look worse, but at the same time the Polish people and the country are making progress.

Educational levels are good. The thing I found missing was a creative mindset, imaginative, positive and risk taking mindset that will in the end slow down progress. But this could well come through in the younger people over the next few decades.

Nick
5 years ago
Reply to  Chris Brony

Yes, I was born in California and lived there most of my life, but now reside in Warsaw. I’ve seen great progress as well, though I agree about the lack of creativity and optimism. This is a tragic relic of Poland’s communist past. While I think younger generations have a chance of overcoming many of these roadblocks, a huge problem I see are Polish politicians. I don’t see much interest on their part in making Poland a more hospitable environment for business and families. This article makes good points: http://niezalezna.pl/62693-miliony-polakow-na-swieta-poza-ojczyzna-w-tym-numerze-gp-wstrzasajacy-film-o-polskiej-emigracj

cynical realist
cynical realist
5 years ago
Reply to  Nick

On the upside, it’s better to have a communist past than a communist future. This alone makes Poland a better place to live in than USA.

John Smith
John Smith
5 years ago
Reply to  Kevin

If USA lets go/europe of russia’s economic sanctions. I can see Russia easily becoming a much more powerful country in the near future.

Skoll
5 years ago

Diversity will bring about social and cultural ruin to Western countries, but I hardly think it’s the only cause for a decline, let alone an economical one. One needs to look no further than Japan where men are emasculated and the population is shrinking as a result of low birth rate. Not sure what the US population growth is for white people, but Western Europe is facing the same problem as Japan with their population shrinking. Because it’s harder to encourage native population to reproduce more, they just decided to take the easy way out by letting immigrants flood in. All developed nations have to eventually choose between Japan’s population shrinkage or Europe’s open door immigration policy if they can’t get their women to reproduce.

Funny enough, although this problem started because women entered the workforce and stopped becoming mothers, feminist countries like Sweden respond by giving them even more affirmative action. It’ll be interesting to see how they will defend their feminist values against muslim immigrants in the future.

Johnn
Johnn
5 years ago
Reply to  Skoll

The average middle class couple in Europe has to pay so much taxes for the subvention of the numerous children from lower class immigrants and the whole social welfare system that they are totally discouraged economically to have many children. Change the policies and the fertility rate of white Europeans will increase dramatically and suddenly.

Nick
5 years ago
Reply to  Johnn

There are many symptoms of the West’s decline, but I think the main cause is a transnational elite that is ceaselessly consolidating power. Mass immigration dilutes the electorate with pliable peasants. If these elites actually wanted whites to reproduce more they’d create a variety of incentives instead of importing poor, uneducated, culturally-alien masses that lead to the breakup of the once-dominant culture, language and traditions.

seth datta
seth datta
5 years ago

It’s about diversity of race, but equality of opportunity in that we are all to be poor and enslaved in around ten to fifteen years as they inflate the currency, nationalise pensions and totalitarianise the society. All races will be equally downtrodden save for the ‘elite’.

Its much worse than people know. But still, consider that Dapper Laughs (a comedian) and Julien Blanc were both made into social pariahs for their ‘extreme’ behaviours. Soon, anyone deviating from tight social norms will be an extremist. You’re an extremist if you like guns. Now its you’re an extremist if you are red pill and pick up girls. Pretty soon it’ll be, you’re an extremist if we say you are and you better toe the line and you are disposable at any time. Western men are heading this way because of social re-engineering.

I recently just watched some music video where the tag line is ‘these hoes ain’t loyal’. That is true because it is the only social option given to them considering all the brainwashing we get from a young age. The video also had a ‘white slut’ stolen by the rapper who had his homies beat up the white guy who was with the girl initially. What kind of message does that send out and who is making this shit? We are all being played against each other and divided and conquered not just on racial and gender levels, but individually being picked off one by one as the banker and his group laugh at us.

G
G
5 years ago
Reply to  seth datta

“Got a white girl with some fake titties” — yeah, rap / top 40 is trash.

Chris Adams
Chris Adams
5 years ago

Diversity is a wondrous, wonderful melting pot of flowers and puppy dogs and rainbows! 🙂

Deebos
Deebos
5 years ago

These last two posts rank near the top of your best writings. It should cause every Western man to step back and marvel at how manipulative and cunning Western women are. I firmly believe feminism has not been their greatest triumph but rather usurping the black male on the heirarchy of diversity programs and perceived discrimination. Notice how readily statistics are mentioned about the amount of women in a field or perceived pay gap for women. Women saw a thumbscrew into not needing to meet established criteria and immediately usurped it. Remember when diversity programs were introduced it was still necessary to have the necessary qualifications. It is only since women have usurped diversity that we hear the qualifications are too hard or unrealistic to meet.

Slashfund
Slashfund
5 years ago

There probably is some truth that there is a negative tendency to uniformity, e.g. hiring family members, alumni of your school, or in general people you are comfortable, but this drift away from merit can only be (imperfectly) corrected by the competitive market, while “diversity” is just about institutionalizing an even less productive uniformity.

Molnár András
Molnár András
5 years ago

A time capsule should be created with a simple message:

“Do not let women vote, or you will face certain doom.”

Skoll
5 years ago

Men have already been warning for centuries, we just chose to ignore them.

“When the hen crows, the house goes to ruin” – Japanese proverb

Aryan Jesuite
Aryan Jesuite
5 years ago
Reply to  Skoll

men tend to ignore warnings and other men’s misfortune because ‘it won’t happen to me’ or ‘I’m better than him’ – ‘he’s just a loser’ and ‘I’m special’.

Schultz
Schultz
5 years ago

“A time capsule should be created with a simple message:

“Do not let women vote, or you will face certain doom.” ”

LMAO

And yet it is so true. The beginning of the end was pulling off the leash and giving hormonal driven animals the right to vote. It’s about as stupid as giving a loaded rifle to a chimpanzee.

That said, this millenium is fucked.

Molnár András
Molnár András
5 years ago
Reply to  Schultz

Rifle loaded chimpanzees would be at least fun to hunt down.

Martin Woo
Martin Woo
5 years ago

The first thing women did wth their votes? Prohibition , which was done to control their husbands.

Conrad Stonebanks
Conrad Stonebanks
5 years ago

A handicapped but otherwise intelligent white guy like Frederick Brennan (the founder of 8chan, see http://www.returnofkings.com/44535/interview-with-the-founder-of-8chan) has a significant chance of losing out to a healthy white woman when seeking employment or applying for an academic position using affirmative action. One will be considered more disadvantaged than the other, guess which one.

To give an anecdote, I’ve know a deaf guy in grad school who worked hard to get there, yet received exactly *zero* financial support, while there were special financial incentives for female PhD candidates, because these women were somehow “disadvantaged” and needed financial support in order to succeed. And I was ridiculized by the faculty for having the audacity to question this…

Let that sink in for a moment. Ponder the sheer insanity of a system that considers a healthy white woman more disadvantaged and hence more deserving of affirmative action than a handicapped guy!

gogogogo
gogogogo
5 years ago

Good Observation. In Germany and Austria diversity somehow means the same Thing – privilege to german women and not for any minorities. Working for universities for 7 years as a White male Immigrant has proven this to me. It is often stated openly that “University tries to increase their number of women employees and if qualifications are equal, women will be selected” which leads to the Situation that in 80% of competitions either a woman wins, or the competition is appealed because a woman didn’t win and feels equally qualified. Once I have seen even a vacancy as a “diversity and equality officer” or smth like that at one austrian University and it had openly stated two discriminative requirements: that they will prefer women and German native Speakers (around 10-20% of Austrian Population consists of second or third Generation immigrants who have turkish, serbian or other languages as their mother tongues but of course know german at near native Level as there are only German Schools in Austria). So this University of Vienna wanted to hire diversity and equality officer, but did not want to be diverse or treat People equally even for hiring of this Position!

Harry Moreno
Harry Moreno
5 years ago

Roosh I’m torn on this issue. While on the one hand your analysis of the growth rate dominating over time is correct. Diversity isn’t all bad.
In the same way that diversification of your investment portfolio is advised for hedging against risk. A company should diversify it’s workforce for similar reasons. Its a hedge against the risk of not covering blindspots. The reasoning is that a diverse team would be better able to identify market opportunities and pitfalls (costly social damage can be dealt via social media). This is augmented by the (fact?) trend that certain demographics, in America at least, are less discretionary with their income. This translates directly into market opportunities that your company should target.

Martin Woo
Martin Woo
5 years ago
Reply to  Harry Moreno

LOL Funnny, Hire people so they can “speak the language” of their own group?
Everything is not the marketing department.

Emblematic
Emblematic
5 years ago
Reply to  Harry Moreno

If diversity made things better it wouldn’t need to be imposed.

EvigtRegn
EvigtRegn
5 years ago
Reply to  Harry Moreno

Any company should naturally have people that “get the sort of people they are primarily selling to” but few companies aims for “everyone in the world.” Yet Diversity is an ideology that says “diversity for diversity’s sake”. This could be in a country that has exactly one ethiopian woman in it & they are selling to e.g primarily polish men aged 25 to 45. And that ethiopian woman (who here happens to be 55 years old) would, in diversity ideology, be a better asset than a polish man age 30 with the right qualifications.

Like Emblematic says, it wouldn’t need to be mandated & written into laws if it was profitable naturally. Companies don’t need a whole ideology to serve their customers naturally.

Ian
Ian
5 years ago

Welcome to the Rockefeller-Rothschild USSA plantation where everyone’s kept poor and messed up with taxes, debt, payops/main stream media, and big brother to keep the game running.

yessir
yessir
5 years ago

how about ASS diversity. Sizes, shapes and bouncability?

apparentlyimagrammarnazi
apparentlyimagrammarnazi
5 years ago

A great article, I liked the obvious references to America and China in the mathematical comparison. Just a couple of grammatical corrections: It’s altar, not alter, at the end. Also you said “does” instead of “do” once, in this sentence: How much damage does diversity programs cause in the short term on the individual level?

NoPasaran
NoPasaran
5 years ago

Diversity? It’s the opposite of University, of course!

Sean
Sean
5 years ago

“What is diversity?” Rampant discrimination and permitted expulsion of straight, white males in society.

USSA Today
USSA Today
5 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Zionist bs that’s an ideology for suckers they target to conform to so they will be shabbus Goys in their own people’s enlslavement and demise.

1812 Immigrant
1812 Immigrant
5 years ago
Reply to  Sean

The white women in Canada [except Quebec of course] have already waged war against the white man. The white women in Toronto are HORRIBLE and they are behind the scenes spreading their feminist dogma to every square foot on the planet.

Martin Woo
Martin Woo
5 years ago

Great article , Roosh

armenia4ever
armenia4ever
5 years ago

I say we use all this “diversity” stuff to your advantage. Whenever you gender comes into play and it involves your job, identify as transgender and demand special treatment. Who knows, it may get you a promotion.

invisiblehand85
invisiblehand85
5 years ago

awesome post

mclovin89
mclovin89
5 years ago

read an article about this affirmitive action that it benefitted middle class white women more then poor minorities whom will commit crime for money then. goes to show how cold and selfish western women are.
women will never build a good system. theyll just ruin the current ones.

Takeshi Young
5 years ago

Some pretty big claims here, with some shaky math. The US definitely embraces diversity, but is it “falling behind” in areas of “scientific research, political leadership, organization, and innovation”? I’d argue that despite some hiccups, the US still leads the world in terms of scientific research and innovation. Political leadership is more difficult to quantify, but if there has been any decline in that regard, I don’t see how it could be attributed to a nebulous concept such as “diversity”.

upsetwhitemale
upsetwhitemale
5 years ago
Reply to  Takeshi Young

Simple response: women,and the Yes means Yes law in California. Women were selected into positions not because of superior merit, but because of their sex. These inferior people then rose to the top through diversity quotas, and then used their inferior abilities to make laws. The effect isn’t immediately apparent, but over time the result is ugly.

ritchieharps
ritchieharps
5 years ago

“Privilege” Paradigm

Minority Bisexual/Transgendered/Miscellaneous/Disabled Veteran Women

Gay Minority Women

Straight Minority Women

Gay Minority Males

Gay White Males

Straight White Females

Straight Minority Males

Liberal Straight White Males

Conservative Straight White Males <—- you are (probably) here

Martin Woo
Martin Woo
5 years ago
Reply to  ritchieharps

Liberal straight white males………now that is really a minority.

1812 Immigrant
1812 Immigrant
5 years ago
Reply to  ritchieharps

Women in Toronto are at the top of the pyramid as long as their skin is white. The black female population in Toronto need to wake up and wonder why they have to become lesbians and Marxists in order to get a good job these days in KKKanada.

Clark Kent
Clark Kent
5 years ago
Reply to  1812 Immigrant

This.
If you want to understand what “women’s solipsism” means from the manosphere… go talk to a white-girl in Tdot.

Emblematic
Emblematic
5 years ago

To know what diversity really is you need to ask how it is measured. By what means are we supposed to gauge the amount of diversity present in a particular company, club, school, town, or any other entity.
If you look carefully at how ‘lack of diversity’ is identified, you’ll eventually realize diversity just means: too many white (male) people.

SlickyBoy
SlickyBoy
5 years ago

Even using a rough order of magnitude, the trend is obvious – diversity is not a strength, it is a weakness that must be compensated, not multiplied. The sad part is that the word itself has infected other parts of American culture, specifically financial planning. Everyone knows diversity is good, right? So you need to diversify your financial plan, since diversity makes so much sense everywhere else and it’s got to at least reduce risks, they say. Going against that would be sacrilegious.

Well sure, people like Buffet and Soros have diversified portfolios, and those guys if nothing else are pretty good with money. The fatal flaw in that correlative evidence is it is assumed to be causative when it is not. Sure, Buffet and Soros have diversified portfolios, but they did not set out to make portfolio with diversity as a goal – they simply made well thought out decisions on investing and by happenstance their portfolios turned out to be diversified.

The truth
The truth
5 years ago

A sand nigger claiming against diversity…is time for you to recieve a severe antidiversity policy from a bunch of Easter Europe skinheads

fokkertism
fokkertism
5 years ago
Reply to  The truth

Fuck you. Roosh is a legend.

1812 Immigrant
1812 Immigrant
5 years ago
Reply to  fokkertism

The sluts in Toronto gave Roosh a hard time because those sluts are messed up in the head.

Boycott anything made from Toronto.

Cedric
Cedric
5 years ago
Reply to  The truth

I wish you white trash would try that stupid archaic shit on the streets in America. Go to Oakland or Atlanta and see what happens.

I bet you’re Polish-all those Polish guys have this shit hostile attitude. Its not intimidating it just makes the recipiet of the bs want to shoot them in the face.

Like I said try this with some Americans and the mentality many of them have. Look at history-it was the Americans who beat the Germans while the slavs rode bitch (as usual right)-all you guys have is the women-otherwise its a broke, cold, miserable dump. I wouldn’t advise messing with Americans in America-you won’t like the outcome and people here will take threats out with zero hesitation. You see we have wars and kill in the streets all the time here- we do more than binge on vodka and sit in our shit soviet row apartments hating life.

manmade
manmade
5 years ago
Reply to  Cedric

one says sand nigger, one says white trash, ‘I bet you are Polish’….seriously, how fucking sad. It’s 2014 and we still have this kind of morons with tiny brains. I am a ‘white man’ (whatever the hell it means), I came out of a tiny village, and yet I have NEVER noticed that someone is black, white, or fucking green. I look at what people do and say, not how they appear.

Roosh, good article. The message is that there’s this completely unfounded ‘belief’ that the poor white woman is somehow ‘downplayed’, so she needs to ‘raise up to her true worth’. I don’t know what’s more pathetic, of the two examples above.

A week ago I heard an ugly woman saying to another woman, ‘for us women is more difficult’. I thought ‘really? let’s see, you are dog-ugly and I would rather jerk off to porn for the rest of my life than ever having sex with you, yet I am not ugly, but you are married to a man who, incredibly, settled down to the likes of you. And you are saying that for you it’s more difficult than for men?. Poor ugly bitch, you are delusional.’

And let it be said, I have nothing against ugly people. Not everybody is pretty, so what, it’s a fact of life. I don’t diss people because they aren’t ‘pretty’. But I diss people who are ignorant and stupid.

FormerCanadian
FormerCanadian
5 years ago
Reply to  Cedric

Care to elaborate HOW “Americans beat the Germans in World War 2”??;) I’d LOVE to hear that;)

Cedric
Cedric
5 years ago
Reply to  FormerCanadian

On the EE racist-
That guy pisses me off. Im Latin so I know if he tried his bs in the barrio it wouldnt work out to well in the US. You’re right racist name calling is not good but he provoked the response he got-it was not done arbitrarily but with provocation.

On EE-
Zelcorpion above in the comments has got the macroeconomic outcome down to a science-read that comment.

On WW2-
Obviously, Hitler got his ass handed to him by over extending on the Eastern front and invading in the middle of Winter but other Slavs besides the Russians got beat down hard by the Germans as they considered them inadequate and acted as such. Economists hav said the mountain ranges between Western and Eastern Europe slowed down the educational and technological development for EE of course today the West self restricts via a combination of vice and social engineering.

America won WW2- how do you think all the implements of the Marshall plan were put into place other than through a miltary victory? From The battle of the bulge to the siege of Berlin the German’s were retreating when they had done nothing but advance-their behavior of running as they did from the Russians says enough. I think if Hitler had not been fighting on the other fronts and invaded hard in old weather he could have beat the Russians. Always remember war is a racket.

FormerCanadian
FormerCanadian
5 years ago
Reply to  Cedric

Holy crap… American brainwashing at its best…
I have some questions to you, my friend;))
1. Please Google and tell me the exact day of German invasion to Soviet Union in 1941.
2. When did America really join the war in Europe?;) You may Google it as well;)
Thanks;)

Cedric
Cedric
5 years ago
Reply to  FormerCanadian

You never answered about the Marshall plan and lets look at the casualty rates by Country well.

Modernly with all the bases, planes, subs, and missiles do you think many countries want to tangle with his deranged American system? I never said any of it was just or even smart but this system here is armed to teeth.

Look at this chart and lets only analyze military deaths- (link wouldn’t post google Wikipedia ww2 casualties by country)

The US had way less (400k) than Germany (4mil) or Russia (8mil). The numbers tell the story on that one and ill be the first guy to say all these men died so the central banking elite could manipulate their countrymen and governments to create a global government to enslave future generations. May all those brave men who the Rothschilds had their local politicians lie to them to get them to fight the bs War rest in peace. American Marine Officer Smedley Butlers book “War Is A Racket” is spot on and honest.

EvigtRegn
EvigtRegn
5 years ago
Reply to  Cedric

What does lower casualties say? That they managed to hide behind rocks in Normandy? Some countries were in it from the beginning, others came later, some came later still.

Inflicted casulties on german soldiers, now that is a measurement that may work.

Tom
Tom
5 years ago
Reply to  Cedric

We stay out of nigger capitals, like Atlanta and Oakland, with high murder rates by design.

We know that low murder rates are archaic and we don’t want to taint your modern nigger cities that run on your modern nigger technology like peanut butter.

Btw, as an American, I know that niggers would get owned by Slavs. Slavs can think, organize, fight, and govern. Only niggers “take threats out” with zero hesitation, “kill in the streets”, and can barely hold back the impulse to “shoot them in the face”. We know. Trust us. Then they sit in jail for 5 to 10 or longer and bitch about the “white privilege” way that doesn’t “take threats out without hesitation”. If they fought the Slavs, likely using Slav invented technology like Kalashnikov Rifles, we know that they’d expend magazines without hitting anything gangster style and would also turn-tail the moment the group leader was killed. Niggers have little individual valor.

Also, like a typical nigger, you’re completely ignorant of anything resembling knowledge that requires reading a book to gain. The Soviets unquestionably broke Germany. That’s why Israel has a two-story monument dedicated to the Red Army and not the American Army you fucking ignorant nog.

EvigtRegn
EvigtRegn
5 years ago
Reply to  Cedric

Not to ruin your party but it was actually largely slavs (east slavs) that beat the germans. The U.S came in late but was essential throughout due to financial help to the Soviet Union (among others). So saying the slavs “rode bitch” isn’t very accurate. Perhaps if you say west slavs.

Easy for an american to be cocky when you haven’t fought a war in your territory since the civil war. The situation for many in central & Eastern Europe is like if the U.S had Russia instead of Canada to the north, and China instead of Mexico to the south. Plus tons of nations to the east & west instead of ocean. And have way smaller population. Have fun in that scenario 😉

1812 Immigrant
1812 Immigrant
5 years ago
Reply to  The truth

Your white women act like bloody whores and they spread their feminist communist trash to other countries.

Jon
Jon
5 years ago
Reply to  The truth

Ah yes, the “KKK/skin-head” strawman. The single reason, other than “whiteswanttokill6millionJews” why indigenous-European Americans aren’t allowed to be overtly ethnically or politically cohesive.

Its also the single reason why whites are becoming furious and why they might eventually snap into full-blown fascism, with legitimately tragic consequences, as a necessary reaction. Because whites never fight back when pushed too far. Your perspective is very well thought out.

The reality is that cultural conformity as well as political inheritance is the soul of the argument. I’m white as the driven snow, and I know Latinos who are culturally whiter than am I because I was forced to grow up near black culture that unknowingly influenced my culture growing up. Why would they be at risk? They make the culture whiter than can I. Granted, they are a rarity in my experience but they exist. Culture breeds politics and so we can focus on culture. People like Roosh and others who are for all intensive purposes culturally white will always have a permanent place in the USA amongst a majority who is technically more racially European. The vast neighborhoods of people who aren’t culturally European, and who have proven that they will likely never be because they are getting worse and we are importing more, are the political problem. We now have a political culture that caters to the lumpenprole. Some people have proven themselves to be widely and incorrigibly lumpenrpole to an extreme that ruins cities. If you mean to warn that “skinheads” might put lumpenproles at risk, then you have a point. The political culture that defends lumpenproles and fascist, foreign-to-Europe religions against traditional European style civilization has to die. In a healthy culture, people like Roosh are at zero risk and would even be defended by a nation who can comfortably embrace enlightenment/Calvinist values without being forced to take them to their culturally tragic extreme. It’s a culture which isn’t allowed to keep a balance that tragically puts people of slightly differing racial characteristics at risk. So you can kindly fuck off with your illogical, totalist perspective.

GRock
GRock
5 years ago

I’ve interviewed at Chrysler locally where I live twice. Fist time was by a gay black man, 2nd time a black woman. Chrysler’s new mantra since Fiat bought them out a few years back is ;”Diversity in management..” During both interviews I could tell the interviewers turn off to me, and rushed through the interview when they could tell I was a white man. It was very obvious.

Upon further investigation, despite interviewing for supervisory positions, I’ve spoke to supervisors working there who’ve informed me 5/6 line workers are black and more than half the mid-lower management positions are filled with minority status employees. My city’s population demographic is NOT representative of this employee base whatsoever.

They seemingly have gotten people in hiring positions, especially HR, that filter you OUT based on your lack of minority or diversity status. Yea, and I’m plenty qualified to be hired. It’s complete b,s.

Ian
Ian
5 years ago
Reply to  GRock

Chrysler sucks-always has and ways will.