Neomasculinity combines traditional beliefs, masculinity, and animal biology into one ideological system. It aims to aid men living in Westernized nations that lack qualities such as classical virtue, masculinity in males, femininity in females, and objectivity, especially concerning beauty ideals and human behavior. It also serves as an antidote for males who are being programmed to accept Western degeneracy, mindless consumerism, and immoral state authority. The purpose of this article is to list and describe the principal doctrines of neomasculinity.

Table Of Contents


Due to changes in mating behavior and pair bonding brought on by technology, shifting demographics, migration to cities from rural towns, universal suffrage, promotion of sexually promiscuous behaviors, and destruction of traditional sex roles, most men do not have the ability or knowledge to successfully reproduce with a modern woman on a comparable attractiveness and socioeconomic level. Their “natural” self will lead to reproductive failure without purposeful intervention that increases their attractiveness in the eyes of women who are actively encouraged to seek out high-value males.

“Game” is a collection of socially-based tactics and reproducible behaviors that increase a man’s sexual attractiveness to women and therefore his access to reproduction. It can range from a trivial aid like an opening line that starts a conversation with a woman in an interesting manner to a physical move that escalates intimacy in the bedroom in a way that is most likely to lead to sex. Its primary goal is to give men a set of tools and beliefs that allow him to more easily enter sexual relationships with the women he desires. In modern Western societies, a man who doesn’t at least subconsciously understand game concepts is unlikely to have sex at all.

Game is ultimately a response to signals that women in any environment are displaying, giving them what they want in sexual partners based on their desires and tastes of the day. These desires are undergoing regular change, meaning that game is a constantly shifting set of outward rules and practices while the inward game beliefs governing those practices remain mostly static, based on known biological truths that stem from animal reproductive science and studies based on female human sexual behavior.

The 3 Principal Types Of Game
The Death Of Male Authenticity

Traditional sex roles

Humans purportedly diverged from chimpanzees 4-8 million years ago. During that stretch, natural selection has applied different pressures on the men and women of our hunter-gatherer ancestors to increase their likelihood of survival. The most visible difference between the sexes is muscle mass, whereby a modern woman is only 60% as strong as a man, since stronger men were more likely to ensure individual and group survival.

Selection did not stop at the neck, meaning that our brains have accumulated differences in behavior, psychology, and how we respond to various environmental stimuli. For those who don’t believe in evolutionary processes, sex differences would have been bestowed onto humans by some type of creator.

The sum of these differences lead to a strength and weakness profile for each sex that allows them to either excel or be deficient in certain roles compared to the opposite sex. The term “traditional sex roles” is slightly a misnomer—a more accurate term is “human sex roles,” since they have likely existed since the beginning of the human species.

Traits possessed by men in greater percentage than women: dominance, independence, intelligence, rationale, analytical thinking

Traits possessed by women in greater percentage than men: submissiveness, dependence, emotional nature, faster intuition, cooperative sharing

The idea of “gender equality” is a myth that has no scientific basis. Pushing for it is detrimental to both sexes because it minimizes their innate strengths and maximizes their weaknesses, decreasing their overall chances of reproduction, survival, and even happiness, especially in an environment that is constrained with resources.

Forcing men to cooperate, share, and nurture like a woman is as unusual as training a house cat to bark like a dog. In the same way that we have the economical division of labor, where you are trained to perform a narrow set of tasks better than others in order to earn a successful living, traditional sex roles have done the same in splitting the burden of survival and child-rearing between two sexes.

While women don’t “belong” in the home, they do a better job than men at nesting and child raising. While men don’t belong in coal mines or on oil rigs, they do a better job at digging minerals from the earth and raising it above ground. Creating government programs or propaganda that aim to show women can be coal miners and firefighters as good as men is a foolish, politically correct behavior that comes from a false notion (“men and women are equal”) that cannot ever be made true without us evolving into a new species. Westerners, as defined by those living in the Anglosphere and Western Europe, are currently forced to digest all manner of manipulation and dissemination of falsehoods to make equality truthful.

Men and women should have some degree of free will to live a life compatible in their respective societies, but there should not be coordination between the media, government, and academia to program citizens to abandon their innate strengths for imagined ideas of utopia.

Traditional Gender Roles Create Feminine Women
The Contradiction Of Pursuing Casual Sex While Advocating For Traditional Values
Traditional Sex Roles Are What Nature Intended

Understanding the true nature of women

By the time most men finish puberty, they will have an impression of women that is mostly fantasy. Modern culture has undertaken huge steps to portray women simultaneously as victims needing male assistance and empowered superheros who are so capable and brave that they don’t even need men at all. It’s not surprising to find that many men have an understanding of women that is not far from what you would find in an old Disney movie, of women who display amazing acts of courage one moment and then needing approval and assistance from dashing princes the next.

Women are reactionary in that they subconsciously assess the environment to determine how to proceed with mate selection. If survival is hard, and her basic food and shelter needs are difficult to attain, she will latch onto a provider male at an early age that aids in her survival. If survival is easy, and she already has her food and shelter needs met, she will then pursue more base hedonistic instincts while leisurely shopping around for the most high status male she can obtain.

If she fails in her search of the latter, she will procure a provider male well past her peak beauty and fertility (after 30 years of age) so that she does not grow old without any life partner at all. (A provider male, or beta male, is a man who eagerly, kindly, and sometimes mindlessly shares his financial resources with a woman of dubious worth in exchange for sexual benefits, companionship, and the chance to reproduce.)

Women are also craftily aware of local legal conditions and how it can be manipulated in their favor. If rape laws tighten against men, more women will use false rape accusations as a weapon to punish men, alleviate feelings of sexual guilt, attract the attention of high-status men, or get out of being caught cheating. If domestic violence laws tighten, women will use that as a weapon to control their husbands. Women are skilled at using the structure and rules of the local environment to fulfill their goals, which is to secure the highest possible value male, gain as much material resources as possible, pursue the female primal need for pleasure and vanity, and compete successfully against other females.

A woman behaving as the model of femininity and kindness in an environment with conditions favoring males will behave quite differently in an environment with conditions favoring females. A woman’s nature is therefore not static, and takes the shape of the container of her environment.

The true nature of men, on the other hand, is in turn reactionary to signals women put out that declare their sexual preferences in males. Women act according to the broader environment to accumulate resources and self-satisfaction while men act according to the best method and strategy to secure female sexual partners. The mating feedback loop that results, involving untold number of variables, can help explain differences in mating strategies of people living in nations that have similar cultural values.

In the past, the best male strategy to reproduce was resource sharing since survival was difficult and in no way guaranteed, but now with survival needs easily met, men are moving into a “clown” strategy of providing entertainment, excitement, and alpha male simulated behavior to women who are quicker to reward this set of tactics with commitment-free sex than with provider male tactics of yesterday.

Men Are Nothing More Than Clowns To The Modern Woman
Women In Their Prime Prefer Sex With Damaged Men


Western society is moving away from a patriarchal-based system where men held sole power and determined the rules governing society. In the past, men like Arthur Schopenhauer and HL Mencken understood the true nature of women and the chaos that would ensue if patriarchal rules were dismantled by allowing women to pursue mating without constraints and compete directly with men in the labor market. This has the simultaneous effect of making women less able to fulfill their motherly duties while impoverishing men economically and making them less able or likely to fulfill important provider roles that foster societal stability.

Patriarchy does have its flaws in locking in roles for males and females who are outliers, but it was undoubtedly a superior societal system that catered to the innate abilities of the sexes and provided them with roles that not only furthered their own abilities and interests but civilization as a whole. Men were able to provide through their labor while women were able to nurture and raise children in an imperfect but mostly harmonious family system. It’s likely due to patriarchy that humans did survive various threats to their existence. Patriarchal systems must therefore be regained as the primary organizing structure of modern societies.

The End Game Of Feminism
20 Signs That We’re Not Living In A Patriarchy
This Accidental Experiment Shows The Superiority Of Patriarchy

Sexual marketplace value

The job market in a capitalist country is fluid and free. Employers can hire and fire workers at will and workers can join or leave a company at will. Neither have much in the way of loyalty or dedication to each other, and each party is attempting to extract as much money, labor, knowledge, and experience as possible from the other party.

Some corporations hold more value in the eyes of employees than others, due to their brand name, salary, facilities, and perks. Some workers are eagerly sought out by corporations because of their experience, ability, and reputation. The top corporations can easily retain the best talent while the bottom corporations continually lose their best talent to corporations above them. At the same time, the best workers are promoted and lavished with higher salaries while the worst workers can only retain the lowest paying jobs or have to suffer persistent unemployment.

The modern dating market is now as fluid as the job market. Once traditional sex roles were dismantled and women were allowed to embrace their hypergamous nature of seeking top males, they began shopping for the best “corporation” that they could land, hopping from one man to the next as a way to maximize the value they could receive. At the same time, men at the top could attract the very best females, while men at the bottom struggle to attract even one.

In the days of Christian monogamy, women were culturally shamed and prevented from shopping for men, and encouraged to marry the first good man they bed, one they often met through family or church. This ensured society stability and sexual equality in that most able-bodied men would be able to procure a wife. These women would gain a dedicated provider male instead of being sexually used for short-term sexual pleasure by high-status men until being replaced by a younger beauty.

The breakdown of traditional sex roles and Christian-style egalitarian monogamy with the promotion of fluid dating has begun to revert society into a harem model currently practiced by Arab royalty in countries like Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates, where high status men reap nearly all the highest quality fertile women and maintain concubines on retainer while low status men receive no women and struggle to have their basic survival needs met.

In America today, famous and good-looking men are hotly pursued by beautiful women while the majority of “average” men are forced to undergo strenuous efforts to increase their sexual marketplace value (SMV) to compete, just like how any worker must increase their job market value by educating themselves in university and working in low-paying internships.

With fluid dating, every man must vigorously improve his SMV in order to land sexual relationships, and if he doesn’t, he’s at risk of failing to experience any sexual success. At the same time, women also have an SMV that is tied mainly to their beauty and fertility. Men have to work at increasing their SMV while women are given the bulk of theirs by nature.

Except for natural-born alpha males, a man’s SMV is still rising in his late teens and early 20’s before he has accumulated significant resources, social status, and game, during a time when a woman’s SMV is at her highest, thanks to her being at the peak of her beauty. If a woman is unable to gain commitment of a man during the height of her SMV, it will be a game of musical chairs in her 30’s or even 40’s to find any man who will walk down the aisle with her. A woman who doesn’t lower her standards in her 30’s will undoubtedly fail to find commitment, since there is little she will be able to do to increase her value. A man, however, has many options even into old age for keeping his SMV relatively high, such as increasing his status or wealth.

A healthy and stable society will put limitations upon both men and women to fully maximize their SMV as if they were working in a capitalistic job market. Men would be limited from excessive philandering for extended periods of time and “using up” a woman’s beauty for hedonistic pleasure while women would be limited in using her sexuality and peak beauty to sleep with dozens of men in the hopes that one high-status man will keep her. Sexual experimentation should be self-limiting, but as long as dating is fluid, male participants have no choice but to play the game and work on their SMV to hopefully land some semblance of a normal relationship. The more fluid the dating market is, the less likely that will happen.

How To Be A Great Man
8 Things American Women Must Do To Make Themselves More Attractive For Men
How The Game Changes When You Get Older


Self-improvement is necessary for a man to transform the raw material of his genetics to maximize his sexual marketplace value, accumulate enough material resources to live comfortably (and protect himself from the actions of an unjust state or hysterical mob), and to gain enough wisdom and experience to live a virtuous life with a mind free of falsehoods and brainwashing. This is an individual journey that better suits a man with an above-average mind that resists the trends and styles of the day to pursue truths and conditions that were no less relevant hundreds of years ago. Four basic components this includes is physical fitness, hard work ethic, individual responsibility, and lifestyle optimization.

Weightlifting and fitness

Body development increases a man’s overall health, instills into him hard work ethic, and increases his confidence, which facilitates attainment of his other goals. At the same time body development is important, it should not be so involved that it begins to take away from development of the mind.

For the average man, the mind exists solely for the pleasures and functions of the body, but for the above-average man, the body exists for the functioning of the mind. Men must be careful not to overcompensate in body development to pursue goals of vanity or narcissism that end up limiting their overall development.

Individual responsibility

Men are not victims. While we have been placed on the Earth during a unique time in humanity that can be institutionally oppressive to men, we’re still allowed enormous ability to affect the fabric of our lives. Even the most repressive regime on the planet today will afford men the opportunity to privately develop themselves, so no excuse must be made to quit, obsessively gripe, or not even attempt the difficult steps that can improve our stations.

While there are some features of modern Western society that make it harder to achieve our goals, such as finding a loyal wife to raise a family with, there is still room for a disciplined and focused man to win in a climate that wants him to lose. The limitations stopping us exist partly in our minds, as any brief study of history can show that men never had it easy. Blame for our failures in life must be put squarely on our own shoulders to train our minds to focus on what we can control instead of what we cannot.

Hard work ethic

Men are the mules of the human species. Their DNA drives for them to work endlessly until they perish, and so a neomasculine man is one who sets a goal for himself and tirelessly labors for its realization. Success may not be a guarantee in his journey, but labor is, and the man who doesn’t labor is not more deserving of the fruits of male life than one who does. While some men have to work less at their goals because of innate talents and abilities they were born with, work is a significant equalizer that allows one born with a lower stock to raise himself up to those men born above him.

Society is now structured to teach men to work for corporations to earn money for products that go right back to corporations. After a man has put in a shift of eight hours in the office, his mind and body is too tired to work for himself, and so this is how the modern format of work inhibits a man in developing his potential. Along his life’s journey, a man must figure out how he can work for himself first, during times his mind is fresh, instead of giving the best parts of himself to a corporation that does little more than satisfy consumer wants that were programmed into him.

We Are All Sisyphus
Everyone Is Hoping That You’ll Fail

Lifestyle optimization

Every man’s nature is different. Some are morning birds, some are night owls. Some have fast metabolisms, some have slow metabolisms. Some are extroverted, some are introverted. Every man has a responsibility to discover his own nature, his strengths and his flaws, to understand how his mind and body responds to stimuli to better construct a way of living that suits him best and allows him to accomplish goals instead of trying to merely copy someone else’s formula.

Man must find the best diet, sleep, supplements, and workout regime for his body. He must find the best work habits for completing his labor. He must find the social environments to further his friendships or relationships with women. This requires men to be open to trying different things, be vigorous with experimentation, and self-reflect honestly without ego. By the time a man is 35, he should have a custom lifestyle in place that is seamlessly integrated with a program of self-development that aids in his goals instead of hindering them

6 Life Tips That Will Make You More Productive

Free speech and due process

Free speech is important from the perspective that concerned men or women should be able to speak out once they have identified corruption and degeneracy in their societies. In a well-educated population that is resistant to mob rule and raised on virtue and honorable values, ideas are only likely to be accepted if they are correct or scientifically sound. Otherwise, they are discarded, meaning that theoretically, there should be no large danger posed by an incorrect idea within a healthy society.

Without free speech, reading this document right now may not be possible, meaning you might have stayed less aware of the sickness our society is currently facing. For that reason, citizens must be able to speak intelligently and freely as a defense mechanism against the backwards slide to cultural toxicity, of which it’s worth noting that free speech alone was no defense to current ills. It should be no surprise that men today who have shared views that fall within the realm of neomasculine thought have been subject to censorious mob action.

Equal due process is also important. While men should be treated as the sex that knows more about how to structure society than women, both sexes, along with different races, must be held to the same legal standard.

Western law has gone so far to the side of women that men are no longer being treated with equal due process. They are being held to a different standard when it comes to consensual sex in colleges where extra-legal tribunals are punishing them and ruining their livelihoods based on allegations without sound evidence. Additionally, they are being imprisoned if they fail to pay child support, regardless of their employment status.

In spite of the fact that a man’s word is often more credible than a woman’s, since a woman is naturally more skilled at quickly inventing stories and rationalizations based on the feelings and emotions she’s experiencing, both sexes should be charged or prosecuted for crimes based on the legal evidence at hand, without consideration of their sex.

What Is A Social Justice Warrior (SJW)?
Are You An Enemy Of Liberty?


Testosterone is the biological hormone that is responsible for masculine behavior and characteristics such as muscle development, voice deepening, body hair, aggression, and a host of positive cognitive effects. Men are a unique sex primarily because of this hormone, and any decrease of its concentration in a population of men through environmental pollution or dystopian regulation will decrease masculine behaviors.

Being a man is not a social construct—it’s a primarily biological construct that is heavily dependent on healthy body and brain functioning that results from appropriate testosterone levels. An unhealthy society will undoubtedly be composed of males with stunted levels of testosterone.


Major sources of employment for men are corporations and medium-sized businesses, but they have become an increasingly unreliable and hostile means for men to earn their daily bread, especially if the work environment includes women.

Men in modern workplaces are forced to submit to the authoritarian whims of the female-dominated Human Resources department, where their statements and behaviors are monitored for anything causing the slightest offense, meaning that men are one politically incorrect statement away from losing out on a promotion or getting outright fired. Even if they behave according to corporate regulations, they are still subject to dubious training programs which treat them as innate harassers of women and minorities. In such an environment, a woman can easily hurt a man’s employment through false allegations.

Even if a man exhibits perfect behavior, a slight downturn in business means he can get fired immediately. The corporation is designed to have no loyalty to a man and his prior service, even if he was an integral part of the company’s prior success.

For the above reasons, it is important for a man to start his own business or firm. He will be able to pick and choose the customers that he wants to serve and not have his livelihood be dependent on a petty manager or disgruntled woman who sets out to destroy him.

Most men begin their path to entrepreneurship by developing a freelancing side business while employed full time, but at some point he will have to make the jump from being primarily dependent on only one company. The world is so hostile to the ideas and behavior of the neomasculine man that he must view corporate employment as a short-term solution until he can develop his own business. Otherwise, he sets himself up for future destitution.

It’s Better To Have Guts Than Brains
There Are No Rules

Red pill truths

While “red pill” has many definitions, it’s consistently used as a way or means to view the world in an objective, truthful, and factual manner, no matter how inconvenient or painful. It may seem redundant to need a method of seeking truth of the world, since it should be a default technique for all educated persons in a society, but identity politics and special interests deliberately conceal and distort truths to further utopian ideals or to consolidate their own selfish need for power.

For example, today’s left-leaning establishment deliberately conceals differences in sex and race in order to promote an ideal of equality that is meant to severely handicap men. They also downplay a woman’s true nature and deceive the public by falsely stating benefits of fluid dating when it is in fact wreaking havoc on monogamy through encouraging women to tickle their most hedonistic urges that breed anarchy and instability into human pair bonding.

The opposite of red pill truth is “blue pill” ignorance, whereby people maintain large blind spots in their thinking or observations to shield themselves from the undeniable facts of human behavior and reality. Some people adhere to blue pill ideas because they have been brainwashed while others do so purposefully to raise their position in the hierarchy of the group they’re a member of.

The 5 Paths To Realizing Truth
11 Hard Truths I Learned From Taking The Red Pill

Male-only spaces

The ability to be a man—as according to nature—has diminished in recent years as women invade all spaces that were traditionally male, going so far as to protest to be served in male barber shops (1, 2).

After women are included in male spaces, men have to speak and act with a filter to not offend the sensitive women, removing the masculine banter and jockeying that is an important part of male friendship and development. By having women in all spaces, men are no longer able to nurture their masculine side, and instead sacrifice the strength of their friendships and limit display of their natural identity in order to appease the females that are now present, who relish the male attention they can receive at little cost.

Men and women should be allowed to co-mingle in designated spaces, but other spaces should be exclusively male, forbidding women from participating. At the same time, women are encouraged to have their own female spaces free of men so that they can nurture their feminine qualities.

Why Women And Gays Should Not Be Allowed In Male-Safe Spaces

Sexual moderation

Men have a biological need for sex that must be sated for them to function normally, but if that need is overshot, such as in the case of sleeping with women only for ego gratification, the man begins sacrificing more important needs for fleeting pleasure that will provide no lasting meaning. It is normal for a man to pursue sex because he wants sex, but pursuing sex because he wants to impress others, hit an artificial notch count of women, or alleviate personal insecurities will invariably result in self-harm and lost time.

Game is a tool that allows a man to fulfill his sex and relationship needs, but once game is used outside of those needs, he will succumb to hedonistic urges that are no different than a woman uploading selfies every day on Facebook to receive validation for her appearance. A man must always check his sexual behavior with the needs of his body and spirit to make sure he is not trying to satisfy the bottomless pit of his animalistic hunger.

The sexual activity of women must be even more closely monitored than men. Repeated studies show that a marriage is more likely to fail based on higher number of sexual partners a woman—but not a man—had before marrying (1, 2, 3, 4), a fact that should be obvious to any man who has experienced the highly impulsive and shallow behavior of easy women. The results of these studies clearly show that a marriage is at high risk of failure if a woman had more than two sexual partners before marrying. (An additional study showed that promiscuous women are more likely to abuse substances, regardless of her age.)

A high level of promiscuity on the part of the woman will also expose her to more sexually transmitted diseases, particularly the common infections of chlamydia and gonorrhea, that may render her sterile and incapable of reproducing. Lastly, the ingestion of birth control in pill form, which offers a frictionless path to promiscuity, impairs their ability to become pregnant up to a year (and possible longer) after they stop taking it, harming their reproductive potential.

Even though traditional marriage is the best path towards societal stability, it is becoming extremely difficult for a man today to find a woman with an acceptable sexual history and proper values that wouldn’t put a possible marriage at great risk of failure. This risk, combined with the fact that the state has marriage laws biased in disproportionate favor towards women, essentially turns husbands into hostages within their own homes, making them have to suffer a woman’s impulsive “no-fault” decision for divorce (80% of them are initiated by women). With the ensuing financial ruin and emotional turmoil that would result, it is no longer an automatic safe bet for men to marry in a Western nation.

Western Men Are Becoming Evolutionary Dead-Ends
Ego Sex
Is Your Game Sustainable?

Nuclear family

The most stable family unit that fosters normal development of children is a nuclear family composed of one father and one mother in the same home. Further aid may possibly come from extended family members living either nearby or in the same household.

Single parent households must be avoided because they have shown to significantly harm the development and overall well-being of children. In England, children from single-parent households are nine times likely to engage in crime, and a Department Of Justice study (PDF) found that 70% of incarcerated youth came from single parent homes. A newer study with a sample size of over 16,000 shows that children raised by single mothers are 70% more likely to develop Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), which harms their mental development and education while increasing their risk of hospitalization due to injury and respiratory infections. Even more severe, children raised in single parent households are 82% more likely to be raised in poverty than children raised in nuclear family homes.

It is now politically incorrect to question if being raised by a single mother increases the child’s risk for poverty, homelessness, mental illness, physical disease, and substance abuse, even though a multitude of studies clearly point in that direction. Those who have an agenda in pushing single motherhood are ignoring existing data at hand that shows it brings great harm to children and, as a result, society.

Female Empowerment Is Slavery
How Hypergamy Is Destroying The Nuclear Family

Binary sex model

The binary sex model consists of only two sexes, male and female, which is determined at birth by a person’s genetics. It is the most stable, natural, and biological approach to human classification. Behaviors by genetically born males will lean masculine while behaviors by genetically born females will lean feminine, though variation in human stock can cause marginal overlap. There are also exceptions with hermaphrodites, deformed humans who are born with genitalia from both sexes.

Any attempt to manually seek out a gender or identity outside of the binary sex model is artificial, non-biological, and deviant. Such a practice is not conducive to family formation or sanity on a societal level. A society can be definitively labeled ill if it enables its citizens to artificially invent gender identities and pick them at will as if shopping for fruit in a supermarket. Even worse is outright facilitating mentally ill individuals to change their sex, which leads to an increase in suicide and drug use without alleviating the underlying mental disorder.

Academics and corporations are now eagerly promoting and catering to “new” genders such as polysexual, genderqueer, pangender, and skoliosexual. If a child believed it was a snake and started biting others, we would get him professional help, but we are now taking seriously grown adults who go so far as to claim they are “two spirit,” which means that they have the spirit of both men and women inside them, or “otherkin,” where they claim to be animals like wolves, badgers, or deer mistakenly born into a human body. Such delusions are being normalized as mentally acceptable human behavior.

The binary sex model has flaws in that it will not perfectly suit those who possess personality and behavioral traits from the opposite sex, meaning that institutions and spaces for homosexuals or transsexuals won’t be constructed, but at the same time it is inappropriate to encourage or enable a person to jump out of their genetically determined sex by opening the door on dozens of different gender identities and orientations that definitively harm the individual.

In a patriarchal society with traditional sex roles, only a tiny minority will have trouble with their assigned sex at birth. They should not be allowed to disrupt the lifestyle and healthy traditions of those who soundly fit into the natural binary model.

The Rise Of Heterophobia
America Is Becoming A Homosexual Nation

Feminine beauty ideals

Feminine beauty is highly objective and can be reliably measured across different cultures in two principal ways: body measurement and facial symmetry.

Body measurement comprises three numbers in inches that are displayed in the following format: 36-24-36. The first number is the size of the chest around the breasts, the second number is size of the waist right above the navel, and the third is the size of hips around the buttocks.

Scientific studies have shown that a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 is linked to high fertility in women. The distribution of fat around bodies produced by such a ratio is biologically linked to an optimal concentration of bodily hormones that would most greatly aid in reproduction. Not coincidentally, such a ratio is found to be most attractive to men from all around the world.

Men therefore subconsciously determine a large part of a woman’s attractiveness based on her ability to successfully reproduce, and this is exemplified by an hourglass figure that a 0.7 waist-to-hip ratio consistently displays. While certain aspects of beauty taste may change over the years, such as hair color or lip fullness, a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 leads to the best biological functioning for reproduction, and so will be seen as most attractive by virile men.

The hourglass figure can also come in different shapes, which is why even more voluptuous women can still be seen as highly attractive if their waist-to-hip ratio is still close to the optimum value. But if a woman’s body resembles something more like a milk carton, she is far away from the ideal ratio and should not be dismayed if men find her unattractive.

0.7 waist to hip ratio

0.7 waist to hip ratio

0.7 waist to hip ratio

Facial symmetry is the second component of beauty that can be reliably measured. You may be surprised to know that the left and right sides of your face are quite different. One artist created two full faced figures by doubling a person’s left side or right, leading to images that can look drastically different. Additional studies consistently show that people rate others with symmetrical faces as more attractive and in better health, two traits that humans want to pass on to their offspring.

Even if symmetrical individuals are not actually in better health that those who are asymmetrical, our genetic wiring clearly prefers symmetrical individuals, a fact known since the time of the Ancient Greeks if we judge the art they left behind. It is thought that animals who display asymmetry had poor development that exposed them to environmental or genetic stress, lowering their reproductive fitness.

Here is a selection of attractive celebrities with highly symmetrical faces:

sym1 sym2 sym3 sym4

Symmetrically challenged individuals are consistently rated as less beautiful:

Facial asymmetry Facial asymmetry Facial asymmetry

While female attraction for males can be complex and dependent on many factors that include a man’s resources, charisma, social status, and appearance, male attraction for females is more narrow and highly correlated to body shape and facial symmetry. Therefore we can easily debunk notions that beauty is a social construct or that women with a waist-to-hip ratio over 1, suggesting advanced obesity and diabetes, can be attractive to a man with a functioning brain and normal vision. The movement of fat acceptance is a particularly damaging notion since obesity shortens human life spans, increases public health expenditures by at least $190 billion a year in the USA alone, and is one of the most reliable symptoms of mental illness.

From the available data, we must conclude that there are objective patterns in beauty that make some individuals clearly more attractive than others. In America, women who are not beautiful, due to their genetic bad luck or gluttonous lifestyle, are using bogus science and shaming to convince the masses they are indeed beautiful. Such attempts should be immediately discarded as absurd.

The War Against Beauty
Long Hair In Women Correlates To Beauty, Fertility, And Health
6 Reasons Why Fat Women Are Defective

Natural health and hygiene

Modern medicine has made great advances in treating ailments that used to more easily kill our ancestors, especially bacterial and viral infections. If you are suffering from illness, your first instinct should be to see a doctor. However, the pharmaceutical industry, along with corporations that sell health products, have a financial incentive to maintain profits by selling expensive medicines or health solutions that must be used over a long period of time without solving the underlying problem.

A man must carefully weigh the costs and benefits of whatever medicine, supplement, and health product he’s using and ask himself if there is a more cheap and effective alternative with less side effects. A classic example is baking soda, which has been found by large numbers of men to be superior to chemical deodorants. Other men swear by non-pharmaceutical solutions that either maintain good health or solve existing body issues. Examples include apple cider vinegar (various ailments), coconut oil (skin), vitamin D (mood), zinc (male sex drive), hydrogen peroxide (bad breath), cranberry extract (UTI), light therapy (sleep), green tea (antioxidant), nasal irrigation (sinus infection), and fish oil (dry eye). Many others can be found on Earth Clinic.

There are serious diseases and problems that only modern medicine can handle, but for minor ailments and hygiene issues, men would be better served by finding more natural remedies that don’t carry an unnecessarily heavy cost.

Male virtue and development

We’re taught that the biological reason we are here is to survive and reproduce, but since both are now easy to accomplish without much of a strain on our energy or resources, we are given extra time to live for reasons beyond the biological. How should men spend that time? What code of morality or principles should guide men in their daily lives? Is there a deeper life meaning that can help us set better goals?

The answers to these questions are difficult, but they must be asked. While most of the world is running downhill to pursue immorality, degeneracy, and base pleasures, the self-actualized man must instead climb upwards along the harder path that makes him a better man today than he was yesterday. He must instill within himself a code that creates right action and right thoughts to separate himself from the hysterical masses, allowing him to operate on an elevated level of consciousness and existence.

Aristotle’s cardinal virtues were prudence, temperance, courage, and justice. Eastern philosophies teach self-control of desire. Stoicism tempers desire and aims for mental fortitude against misfortune. Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau taught self-reliance. It’s important to examine the great men of the past to construct a living code that can aid men in the present, because it’s certain that a consumer lifestyle with authoritarian deference to false prophets fails to lead to male virtue or character advancement. Such progress can only come from deeper thought and self-examination.

7 Reasons Why American Culture Is The Most Degenerate In The World
The Lives Of Great Men As Moral Instruction
An Introduction To Stoicism With The Enchiridion By Epictetus
How To Reverse America’s Cultural Decline


The two biggest problems with socialism as an ideology is that (1) it takes from the strong to give to the weak, and (2) it makes individuals dependent on the government to survive.

Those who apply effort to obtain benefits deriving from their labor, virtue, or fortunate genetics should be able to keep the bulk of its rewards instead of making forceful donations under the barrel of the state’s gun to those with a lower worth ethic or constitution. Beautiful women are—due to nature’s prescription—more deserving of high value men. Men who are born with a higher level of intelligence are more deserving of advanced jobs that pay more. Anyone who is more willing to trade their labor for income is deserving of a higher income.

We must not allow the poor to starve on the streets, but it is counterproductive to encourage those on the bottom to beg for more benefits instead of lifting up their own station to a suitable job position that can provide for their basic survival needs.

The effects of socialism are even more damaging when it comes to gender relations, because women now seek out the government as a substitute provider to help them survive instead of using the feminine gifts given to them by nature to land a husband. With a woman’s survival needs met thanks to a government bending over to bail out her impulsive decisions, she can spend up to two decades pursuing excitement in the males she meets without any worry about her future. She is no longer punished for her mistakes.

It’s no surprise that single motherhood in the United States has exploded in the past few decades. Why should a woman find a good man who she must serve and satisfy when she can fornicate with sexy men and have the government send her monthly checks and crates of food at no cost? The perverse incentives that socialist policies create mean that women are encouraged to treat men as battery-operated sex dildos that can satisfy her present desires instead of carefully evaluating men for their long-term worth. This has decimated the institution of marriage and also created future criminals and emotional man-children of the state who did not have the opportunity to develop strong values in a stable nuclear home that included a father.

People in genuine need can be provided with temporary assistance by the state to help them through rough spots in their lives, but it shouldn’t be the job of the government to enable citizens to make poor decisions by providing permanent assistance with no strings attached. Limiting such aid would bring out the more industrious and hard-working side of those on the lower economic scale while encouraging women not to whore around and have bastard children because they wanted to gratify their boredom by seeking out bad boys who are exciting to pursue.

Social Welfare Creates A Society Of Sluts
Appearance Is Ideology
The Frenchman Who Took A Stand Against Socialism
Is Democracy Dying?

Technological skepticism

Technology has brought many benefits to those living in the 21st century. Food is cheaper than in the past (as a percentage of total income expenditure), appliances make maintaining and cleaning the home easier, and electronic devices allow you to instantly access information and media. Very few individuals would like the clock rolled back to a time when we didn’t have such developments, but we must accept that there is a human cost of each step forward made in technological advancement.

Food is cheaper, but now over 50% of Americans are morbidly obese. It’s easier to maintain a home, but now women have left that home to serve a corporate master instead of their husbands. The internet has given us information and entertainment that makes reading this very article a simple matter, but it has created electronic junkies with short attention spans who are less able and willing to rationally communicate with their fellow man. The laws of the universe ensure that there is no free lunch.

One obvious example of a heavy technological cost is the smartphone, a handheld computer and communication device that was rapidly adopted by most individuals in the Western world starting in 2007 when the first generation Apple iPhone was released. Heralded by most as an amazing invention that will bring forth informational bliss, it’s clear that the smartphone has damaged gender relations by making women less capable of love and more capable of resistance-free hypergamy, cheating, and attention whoring.

Not a single technologist stopped to think about how the smartphone would affect humans, so now we are left with the wreckage it has created. While it’s a great tool for business and playing rudimentary games, humanity would suffer only minor effects if they were suddenly banned overnight.

With every technological benefit, there is also a cost, and we must carefully examine such costs before the widespread encouragement and adoption of any shiny new gadget that is forced upon us by corporate marketers or the utopists in Silicon Valley.

Is Digital Technology Destroying The Middle Class?
Amusing Ourselves To Death
Building A Bridge To The 18th Century

Deeper meaning and spirituality

While nihilism may be preferable for some, it does not provide sufficient answers for most men who want to live their one life with deliberate purpose and meaning. Being trapped in a completely random existence while floating on a big rock hurtling through an infinitely growing universe can cause men to lose sight of their own self development of masculinity and virtue. Traditional religious beliefs can fill in these gaps of meaning.

In spite of the faults of organized religion, believers pursue a moral code that has been tested and refined for hundreds of years, giving it far more weight and value than Western consumerism and hedonism, a relatively modern invention. While the scientific conclusions of atheism can provide some answers of our reality, such a purely logical set of beliefs will lack the traditional and heuristic components that aid man with living well today, leaving them with a value system of Swiss cheese that allows skilled profiteers and propagandists to fill the holes. It’s highly likely that atheists would be well-served by incorporating some religious traditions or beliefs to help guide them towards more purposeful and worthwhile life outcomes.

Does God Have A Place In The Red Pill Man’s Life?
A Dialogue With A Pious Monk
Why You Need To Set Your Precepts For A Productive Life


Neomasculinity is a new term that uses old ways of helping men live in a virtuous manner while catering to the masculine side of their biological nature. It gives men the practical tools to receive the benefits possible with a male existence while living in natural harmony with women and improving the sustainability and value of their societies. It also provides a man with powerful mental defenses to aid his navigation through a world that wants to reduce him to a zombified consumer who serves at the altar of the corporate state. It will serve as a superior ideological alternative for men who reject the poison pills prescribed by the modern political and cultural elite.

Read Next: The Origins Of Neomasculinity


  1. Roger May 6, 2015 at 9:36 am

    Brilliant, encyclopedic article, Roosh. While I don’t particularly like the term “neomasculinity”, you have really explained a lot of foundational ideas and principles in a logical, clear fashion here.

    1. Shortest Straw May 6, 2015 at 11:51 pm

      I actually like the term. What you have is “new masculinity”, which is nothing more than masculinity that acknowledges all the fundamental drivers of human sexual behavior.

      What about neofemininity? Does anybody have the courage to articulate what true unfettered femininity looks like? We’re seeing it, we’re all talking about it; someone needs to articulate the end game.

      1. Ray W May 7, 2015 at 12:18 pm

        the term is OK… but only just OK… the problem is it sounds a bit homo to me…. a bit contrived, a bit faggy…. masculine is already a dirty word, and neo reminds people of things like neo nazi or neo conservative…..

        there must be a better byword….

      2. Earnward May 13, 2015 at 9:17 am

        A way to very Easy with rooshv < my classmate's step-aunt makes $72 hourly on the laptop . She has been fired for 7 months but last month her payment was $17104 just working on the laptop for a few hours..

        pop over here SEE MORE DETAIL

      3. Donington May 14, 2015 at 10:46 am

        It’s very Easy with rooshv < my neighbor's mom makes $64 hourly on the computer . She has been without work for 6 months but last month her check was $14236 just working on the computer for a few hours.

        learn the facts here now SEE MORE DETAIL

      4. Jessica November 27, 2015 at 4:53 pm

        I think you are onto something here. I consider myself to be a woman failed by the push for equality.

        For some time I considered myself to be a feminist until I learned how much damage the 3rd wave feminism has done. I pushed myself to be independent and successful and strong to the point where it had damaging effect on my marriage. In many ways my husband and I were amazing to each other, resulting in much growth to become better and more capable people. But we both tried to push for equality that went against our true nature. That means my pursuit of dominance had damaging affect on his masculinity as much as my own feminine needs. And he held himself back resulting in loss of confidence. As a result our roles in this relationship were confusing and tiresome and in the end the relationship fell a part.

        I’m now discovering my feminine side with a wonderful and very manly man. I’ve seen a massive change in myself to be more feminine in his company – I’m much more caring, supporting, serving and very happy to be so. When describing his effect on me I once told him “it is incredible how a woman can blossom with the right man”.

        Although I can’t claim to represent the unfettered femininity here, I can point our some areas of femininity I myself have reclaimed and found most satisfying:

        – as a woman can blossom through the manly man, so can a man find more strengh, confidence and ambision as a result of having a feminine woman next to him. A feminine woman would understand that and celebrate masculinity.
        – a woman can be caring and serving without losing autonomy. it is all about learning each others “love language” – in stead of giving love the way you thing it should be given, carefully study how the other person receives it. For example when asking my boyfriend what actions of mine make him feel most loved, he pointed out cooking, listening and blowjobs. All these would outrage a feminist but in my case putting more focus and creative thinking on these areas has made my relationship a more fulfilling one.
        – being happy in your body means you can also be sexy. I believe a feminine woman is happy with her body, happy to show it to her man, happy to give it to her man – sometimes by being fragile in the arms of your man, sometimes through hot steamy sex.

        So these are the main three things I’ve learned so far. I hope more people will go against feminist push for unreasonable equality. I hope neomasculinity will awake neofemininity in women who are currently tired and confused in an unnatural role. I’m not claiming that women should stay home cooking, but instead I hope more people will understand that this is still an option, and it can be very happy partnership where both sides can have their natural needs met.

        Long rant. But I hope there is some answer to your question here.


      5. Shortest Straw November 27, 2015 at 6:12 pm

        Thanks for sharing. My take on what you have said:

        My god, you’re lucky.

      6. Knut February 13, 2016 at 8:51 am

        Jessica: You should be a role-model to feminists world-wide. If only feminists could just understand that their relationships with men should be all about having equal rights as men – while ALSO recognizing that they have different biological gender-roles.

        Men and women are biologically designed for different purposes. So, it’s only natural that they’ll desire different things – such as different gender-roles in sexual relationships, different types of hobbies, different types of occupations etc.; because they ARE different.
        They are not inferior or superior to men; they are just different – designed for another purpose than men.

        If feminists would just accept this, they would be so much happier in their relationships with men (as you have perfectly examplified in your comment above), and it would eliminate a lot of unnecessary confusion for both men and women.

        For a better world,
        Knut 🙂

      7. Frank B. June 11, 2017 at 11:42 am

        You are insane!

      8. NextLeader June 7, 2016 at 12:59 am

        I would just call it manhood. It is man’s natural ways.

      9. Ravi Macho June 17, 2016 at 8:31 pm

        Exactly, well said.

    2. anon1 May 7, 2015 at 10:47 am

      the content is broadly fantastic (i cant find much objectionable in the post, its what we all mostly agree upon), the name sounds like something a bruno “sacha baron cohen” type hyper aesthete fashion designer would come up with though.

    3. anon May 9, 2015 at 3:04 am

      Aha, how about “neoubermensch”.

    4. Wave Txlitl Met May 24, 2015 at 4:39 am

      I didn’t like the term, at first, either. Then I did a mental trick with it. I get the “neo-” part, making a call to a new masculinity since the world has a new enemy. I find its call to classicism, where the rippling muscle marble statues of gods and heroes defines the image form, returns us to the idea of the original man. The mental trick I did was also imagine “Neo” from the Matrix taking his male rights warrior red pill “-Masculinity”. Weighed together, I give the term more credit than detraction.

      1. iBooB August 17, 2015 at 1:43 am

        U be bad at math bro

    5. iBooB August 17, 2015 at 1:48 am

      “While I don’t particularly like the term “neomasculinity””

      They be like – “Ugh.. Hey flag raisers, I told you the name sucked, all that work down the drain for nothing! This was supposed to be the pinnacle on our penis!! Call Roosh I want to ravage his anus now from all this stress!”

    6. Caroline Carlson February 25, 2016 at 2:29 pm

      Why not just join up with the Taliban? Your ideals and attitudes of women are identical. Why reinvent the wheel when the Taliban are your intellectual twins?

      1. Ravi Macho June 17, 2016 at 8:32 pm

        Go F yourself !!!

      2. Caroline Carlson June 17, 2016 at 8:37 pm

        Awwwww you pissed Taliban man😂😂😂😂😂

  2. Anon. May 6, 2015 at 10:09 am

    Another is that liberalism kills all types of love between human beings. Women are not good for pairbonding, but only for pornstar sex. This inability to feel something trascendental for a member of the opposite sex, likely one of the most intense human desires, is actually the saddest part of modern life.

    1. MajorStyles May 7, 2015 at 1:11 am

      You hit the nail on the head here.

      Modern liberal women are infested with the Ebola of “equality.” If I cook dinner, then you have to wash the dishes. If I do the laundry, then you have to dry it. And on and on. Everay action musy have a return transaction.

      What they miss is a fundamental aspect of love – I want to do something for this person because I enjoy making them happy. I want nothing in return. Seeing my partner smile is reward enough.

      It’s this simple change of thought – masked as equality – that contributes to their deficiency in the experiencing of something transcendental.

      1. Just Me May 9, 2015 at 12:18 am

        And is that how you live your life? You simply do things to make your partner happy? Not because you want sex from them?

        It’s not so much about a “return transaction” as it is about showing “reciprocal behavior”. And that’s something we all want, man, woman or other. And frankly, you’re lying to say otherwise.

      2. MajorStyles May 9, 2015 at 12:05 pm

        “And is that how you live your life? You simply do things to make your partner happy?”

        Yes, and she does the same. Then again, she was never poisoned with second wave feminism.

      3. Anon. May 9, 2015 at 1:13 pm

        What I said was bastardized here. I agree with the part about gestures, but the problem goes way farther than that.

        ANY kind of affection or love is impossible. Any kind of male-female interaction that isn’t an unemotional fuck is impossible. I have spent a great amount of time gaming in both the FSU and in the West, and comparison between the two has made it evident to me over the years that feminism destroys women from the inside out. It destroys their soul and spirit. It turns them into mindless whores. Much like prostitutes, where you can see that they are hollow and broken inside.

        Western men, even ones who get laid, say that women are horrible. The only reason they say this is because they have grown up in a kind-of Orwellian nightmare where women are of a quality lower than ever before in the history of mankind. True happiness isn’t fucking 100 women, or any other artificial game idea, It’s having lived in shit-land your whole life, then stepping off the plane into a land full of classically beautiful feminine women. That is true happiness.

      4. Just Me May 9, 2015 at 2:32 pm

        Frankly Anon, any person that says that “women are horrible” or “men are horrible” is holding onto some massive prejudices against an entire group of people – against half the population of the world. That’s just rational talk to hold that massive of a prejudice against half the population of the world. Women are far from perfect. Then again, so are men. We need to work together. Feminism has not destroyed women. Feminism is not what is stopping you from findling love, sex and/or a relationship. Unfortunately, I think that some of you are struggling with the fact that femininsm gave women choices and those choices gave women more social power and that’s what your responding to. The scales had to balance out more and some men don’t like the idea of loosing social power. But this doesn’t have to be a race to who has more social power. We can work together for the betterment of both men and women.

        I will say that while I don’t think feminism is perfect, I think that it’s been a good movement. And while I’m sure that some would like to believe in the holy grail of foreign women, the truth is that the grass isn’t greener on the other side, it only looks that way because it’s easy to fantasize about a place where women are who you want them to be. And believe me, women do plenty of their own fantasizing where they also want men to be who they want them to be and not neccessarily who they are. But in most cases, if you have the emotional intelligence for it, we learn that who people really are, vs the fantasy of who we wish they are, can in the long run, be more fullfilling for us and our own personal growth.

      5. Anon. May 9, 2015 at 2:38 pm

        A woman who values independence above all else is clearly not good for love or affection.

        I don’t see what part of this you don’t understand.

      6. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 3:37 am

        and men who are interested in recreating patriarchy aren’t good for love either. Women aren’t interested in forming these types of relationships anymore. What part of that don’t you understand ?

      7. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:31 pm

        what part of what don’t you understand?

      8. MajorStyles May 9, 2015 at 2:56 pm

        “And while I’m sure that some would like to believe in the holy grail of foreign women, the truth is that the grass isn’t greener on the other side”

        For me, it’s been pretty frickin’ green. As I speak, my beautiful foreign wife is preparing me lunch. The last Western woman I dated practically called the police on me when I asked her to do the same: followed with a speech on gender rights, etc.

        Feminists want all the benefits of traditionalism, with none of the responsibilities.

      9. Just Me May 9, 2015 at 7:09 pm

        Hey, I am totally glad you are happy and married. That’s great. That doesn’t mean that the grass is greener though. Just as many men have horrible stories about their foreign brides.

      10. MajorStyles May 9, 2015 at 2:52 pm

        “I have spent a great amount of time gaming in both the FSU and in the West, and comparison between the two has made it evident to me over the years that feminism destroys women from the inside out. It destroys their soul and spirit. It turns them into mindless whores.”

        I have done the same, and I can attest to the truth of that statement.

      11. iBooB August 17, 2015 at 1:52 am

        “It’s having lived in shit-land your whole life, then stepping off the plane into a land full of classically beautiful feminine women. That is true happiness.”

        You stole this from Bin Ladens presidential address to the caves..

      12. Ziro February 3, 2016 at 2:49 am

        These people are all horrible. Roosh or whoever this ass clown is can die. He sounds like a closeted gay that was hurt so bad by a woman that he isn’t ever gonna come out and now hates them.. Or to be more accurate, he sounds like a gay with a really really really really really long and fuckin confusing fetish for the idea of masculinity. And I’m gay, so.. This whole idea is stupid. “Lets have an entirely new way of thinking and existing in society today based on radical ideas of gender; based off of an adjective.” Why the fuck do things have to be over complicated? Quit crying about shit like this and (for lack of more appropriate terms) man up. We’re all stick here until we die, focus on the life you are in an the interactions you have in it. No one is gonna give a fuck what you did after your dead. Your taking something that’s complicated enough as it is and trying to overcomplicate it in an irrational and needless way. I’ve read through some of this stuff before. It’s all trash. Your ideas are flawed and your ideals are cracked. Quit bein a bitch and come out of the closet or let all this go and fucking settle for once in your life. It’s an adjective. More precisely, it refers to a state something can obtain. If I fucking wanted to I could start a move that challenging literally everything on the plate today as well based on the idea of “wetness,” if I follow the guidelines you just laid for me above. Do you see the preposterousness in that? Obviously not, you’re to busy complaining that you can’t be a man any more. Get over yourself and your festish, you narcissistic and condescending shit smear. Your bad and all of your supporters are bad. Not to send hate upon those who respect opinion, just those who live by this needless and overly complex lifestyle.
        With no respect due because you’re a bunch of unqueer-queers,

      13. Just Me May 9, 2015 at 2:23 pm

        Major, it’s not that I disagree that doing things just to make your partner isn’t wonderful. It is. That’s certainly something that helps to build a relationship, being giving and kind to your partner. There is also an element of desiring that it be recipocated. I do disagree that Feminism is somehow a great evil. Women want to be respected, just like you as a man want to be respected. That’s at the heart of what feminism, in it’s purest form is about. Thanks for the response though and the respectful conversation.

      14. Aryan Jesuite May 22, 2015 at 1:35 pm

        women prefer adoration to respect… different from men who prefer respect over adoration.

      15. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 3:37 am

        Sounds like you don’t know shit about women.

      16. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:27 pm

        shit – oh puhleese school me, beotch! tell me about women… beggin’ you on my knees, please, pretty please ~

      17. Michael Manthey February 7, 2016 at 8:37 pm

        While at the same time, this bitch thinks she knows men lol

      18. Linda B August 11, 2016 at 10:36 am

        uh, is it opposite day?

  3. martinho May 6, 2015 at 11:05 am

    You could actually expand this post and sell it as a book but you took the time and effort to write it and put it online for free. You are a great man and I thank you Roosh. Keep up the good work.

    1. iBooB August 17, 2015 at 1:53 am

      Not free. That will cost you 29842 hours of your time to read and a small chunk of your soul and a bigger chunk of your anus.

      1. Ravi Macho June 17, 2016 at 8:38 pm

        And a still bigger chunk of your smelly cunt !!!

      2. iBooB June 29, 2016 at 9:58 pm

        Shut up paki

      3. iBooB December 4, 2016 at 7:23 pm

        Still smells better than your mothers

  4. frank rook May 6, 2015 at 11:10 am

    Outstanding. This is a great one stop reference article for readers of the site & masculine men. The content & presentation might be lost on the ad hominem & logical fallacy loving crowd but for the rest of us, this is a well thought out & structured piece.

    1. ex-convict September 16, 2015 at 10:05 pm


  5. Costello May 6, 2015 at 11:23 am

    Really quite excellent Roosh.

  6. Clint Barton May 6, 2015 at 11:31 am

    Required reading for the modern man.

  7. Clark Kent May 6, 2015 at 12:50 pm

    Bravo Roosh.
    I really hope you are creating a back-up of rooshv/ROK somewhere on a hard-drive or something.
    This article ties together the entire project and shows that the ‘sphere continues to evolve. When I discovered this side of the internet only a few years ago there was nothing quite like this at the time.
    Be sure to create a copy of all this work. Give it enough time and I wont be surprised if the sphere gets shut down or co-opted somehow.
    The evolution of ROK is worth preserving.

    1. JQ May 6, 2015 at 2:13 pm

      Use GoToKindle, Pocket or Readability. With the last one you can create your own eBooks out of the articles you gather.

      1. anon1 May 7, 2015 at 10:49 am

        >GoToKindle, Pocket or Readlist

        never heard of those, very useful cheers

      2. Finally July 23, 2015 at 2:15 am

        I love you, I didn’t know about Readlist I’ve been tryna get that damn send to kindle bullshit working for the longest. gracias

  8. Vincent Vinturi May 6, 2015 at 12:50 pm

    “While women don’t “belong” in the home, they do a better job than men at nesting and child raising.”

    I think this statement could be be better qualified. It’s contentious that women are better at raising children, since both a male and female influence are necessary for healthy kids.

    Single parent homes, especially single mother homes, produce a disproportionately large number of delinquents.

    On the intellectual front, women are arguably much worse at raising kids than men. They provide a lot of touch and warmth, which babies certainly need. However, they speak to their kids like they’re dogs with inane baby babble, they spoil them, and they pussify male children unwittingly.

    So it isn’t that they’re better at raising kids. Rather, they’re better at the aspects of raising kids to which they’re better suited.

    1. Just Me May 9, 2015 at 12:26 am

      Vincent, there is nothing “intellectual” or “factual” about the statement that “women are arguably much worse at raising kids than men”. At the very least, at least women show up to raise their kids while men routinely leave the family homes and their own children for their own selfish pursuits.

      But please, show us actual factual information that documents your statement that women “speak to their kids like they’re dogs with inane baby babble, spoil them, and pussify male children unwittingly.” You tried to make it sound like these were logical intellectual points. If they are, lets see the factual information that would actually substantiate your claims.

      I would actually say the most logical point here is that you could not possibly qualify that women as a whole or men as a whole are better at raising children. People are ultimately individuals and the world is filled with great moms and dads, and poor ones. Although “baby talk” hardly qualifies as to what makes someone a “bad parent”. Now I know it makes you feel better to create the these illusions and use words like “intellectual” that you believe fortify your argument even more. But just because you use the word “intellectual”, doesn’t mean it is.

      1. Zelcorpion May 9, 2015 at 4:19 pm

        Silence woman! Don’t talk before you are deliberately addressed here.

      2. Just Me May 9, 2015 at 7:07 pm

        Lol. Do you really think that’s going to work? Lets hug Zelcorpion. 🙂

      3. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 3:27 am

        Awwww how cute you think she gives a flying fuck what you think. Adorable.

      4. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:30 pm

        Awww how cute – look – a flying fuck

      5. JC May 29, 2015 at 5:55 pm

        As women divorce men in droves and separate good fathers from their children…I call BS. Men are FaR less likely to leave their women over some new ass. Women however are the opportunists.

      6. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 3:30 am

        The law doesn’t allow women to separate good fathers from their children. They have legal rights and the opportunity for shared custody/ visitation. Good fathers stay in their children’s lives. Whiney men who want to sulk claim so and fail to show up for their kids because their ego is bruised the mother left the relationship.

      7. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:29 pm

        it’s all whiney men’s fault!!

      8. Caroline Carlson February 24, 2016 at 11:58 pm

        Not all men but the whiney men yes. You sound like a whiney one. My condolences.

      9. JC February 24, 2016 at 8:44 am

        Lmao, I’ve gone through the system lady. I’m a great dad. The Family Court LAW allows me *visitation*with my child every other weekend and a few hours during the week. Most likely you speak from ZERO experience on this. I’m mad, because I should have equal parenting time with my child and not treated like a Second-Class Parent.
        Shared custody? That’s what they tell you.
        Maybe some are successful with receiving shared custody, but only after shelling out a MORTGAGE worth (I sh** you not) of money toward lawyer fees to achieve that.
        See, for fathers we have to PAY! Heavily! For what *should* be our fair rights to equal shared parenting. I can’t tell you lady, how many non custodial fathers, Good fathers, spent over $100,000, even $200,000, for the rights to be in their child’s life EQUALLY….and STILL didn’t succeed. Lol smh. You know nothing about which you speak of, only what you hear and makes you feel ok with what’s going on.
        If women were treated this way, forget it! The sh** would hit the fan, and rightfully so.
        Why are non custodial fathers treated like second class parents? We did nothing wrong. We are good to our kids, still in their lives.
        So it would be ok for you as a *good* mom to have visitation with your child *twice* monthly JUST because your marriage didn’t work out? You’d be ok with many women going through this too I suppose? …

      10. Caroline Carlson February 24, 2016 at 11:55 pm

        So let’s do the math. If you get your child every other weekend then I am assumeing like most situations I am seeing you are allowed to get the child Friday right after school until Sunday right before bed or Monday morning when the child goes to school. That is three over nights in a row and it’s every other weekend. That is seeing your child more than twice a month. You also say you get the child a few hours during the week. Is that two evenings a week where you can get the child from school and keep them until almost bed time? So would t that make it more like twelve days a month you can have contact and not two? Kids who are in school don’t have that much time between when school gets out and bedtime. Your ex isn’t getting that much time either when you think about it and much of her time is also spent doing care for the child which isn’t actually time spent on the child. For example are you doing any of your child’s laundry or are you getting an overnight bag full of clean clothes for the weekend and then returning the child with a bag of clothes to be laundered? Who is dealing with that? What I’m hearing from both moms and dads is that dad time is all fun time while mom time is the get stuff done time. Not getting you child right from school due to work conflicts? Your choice to prioritize work and not kid time. Not choosing to use your during the week visits because you are busy? Also your choice. Want more time with the kid. Offer to twice a week pick up the kid early before school and take the kid to break fast. Show up with a lunch made and sit down with the kid during breakfast and do homework . Moms jump on getting this extra help nine times out of ten. Listen you are divorced/separated. Neither party gets everyday contact. That’s what happens and by the way your ex is paying court fees and lawyers as well to get things finalized. Every other full weekend and weekday visits is more than twice a month. If you are bitching about it but not showing up due to hurt ego that’s your fault. You are getting mostly fun time free from chore related activities. You also have the option of calling you child everyday to check in and kids over 12 or so can email. You get more than two days of visits a month.

      11. Ravi Macho June 17, 2016 at 8:41 pm

        Don’t reply to this kind of brain less wimyn !!!

      12. Dudebro Zero February 4, 2016 at 12:44 pm

        Children of single fathers don’t show the same symptoms as those of single mothers. It’s not a single PARENT problem, it’s a single MOTHER problem. The truth may hurt but it’s the only truth there is.

      13. Caroline Carlson February 24, 2016 at 11:57 pm

        No facts to back that up dude bro. It’s not ” the only truth there is”.

      14. Dudebro Zero February 25, 2016 at 12:22 pm

        This is the best easy to digest source I can find right now. Note that it doesn’t have a category for normal single fathers and normal single mothers. It distinguishes between lesbian single mothers and gay single fathers, and as it turns out lesbians are abysmal parents, even worse than gay men.

        YES, I acknowledge that this isn’t proof that straight women are worse at parenting than straight men. I thought I had an infographic like that but it turns out the other one I have is only about “single parents” as well. Too bad.

      15. Caroline Carlson February 25, 2016 at 2:28 pm

        Dude bro if it was such an obviously proven fact then you should be able to reproduce tons of information to support your claim. As it is not you are not able to produce such information.

        Here is what I suggest . None of you Mgtow or neo masculine aspiring men in any way respect or value women. What you state repeatedly is that women are deceptive , irrational and lacking intellect. What makes sense then is for you all to refrain from contact with women unless it its required for professional purposes. If women are bad at raising children you should either adopt as a single man or hire a surrogate to carry one for you. What you have said is that men do a far superior job of raising children and if that is the case wouldn’t it be abusive of you to expose your children to the care of women? Don’t you love your children enough to protect them from that?

        Why is Roosh and his followers spending so much time focused on what women should be doing? Why so focused on trying to spend time with us? We clearly aren’t respected or valued. Stop trying to learn the ways of the the pick up ” artist” and stop having any contact with us. As you have said women aren’t capable of interacting with children to their benefit. Women only add difficulty to your lives. Please stay far far away from women at all times and you lives will be improved.

      16. Dudebro Zero February 28, 2016 at 10:35 am

        >If women are bad at raising children

        Noone said that. I said they’re bad at raising children WITHOUT A MAN, and if I should specify I would say without the father of the child.

        >you should either adopt

        Adoption is literally volunteering to be cuckolded. Fertile people willing to adopt are mentally ill.

        >or hire a surrogate

        If I hit 35 and I still can’t find a young White woman willing to have children I’ll probably consider this, but it’s not what I want.

        >What you have said is that men do a far superior job of raising children

        Raising children *alone*. The image I posted clearly states that INTACT BIOLOGICAL FAMILIES do the best job. A man with a woman does a better job than without. Hence my answer above.

        >Why is Roosh and his followers spending so much time focused on what women should be doing?
        >Why so focused on trying to spend time with us?

        Because you’ve been growing less and less happy over the past 40 years ( and most women, and you in particular, are clearly unfit to figure out the obvious reason by yourself, judging by the way you keep asking for all the things that make you unhappy to get even worse. Divorce and child custody laws have made marriage a terrible deal for men, so marriage and birth rates are down and most women spend their lives without male affection and more importantly male guidance. But in your mind the answer must be MUH FEMINISM. Yeah, “respect” will fix it, you genius. We’ll just have to start “respecting” spinsters and sluts, that’ll make them happy.

        And now I’ll ask you a question: Why would any man respect women at this point? How could we?

        We built civilization FOR YOU. And you took it and ruined it AND you keep crying out for more chaos and disorder to this day. You demand and vote to reward failure with even more welfare. You invite immigrants into our countries because “we’re all the same XD”, disregarding all crime statistics. You vote for more sexist discrimination against men, and then you wonder why men don’t respect you! Men, you know, those people you clearly have no respect for either.

        How could we respect someone who keeps voting to have OUR wealth redistributed to you and your pets while we get nothing in return? Did you ever consider that it might be hard to find a man who has his shit together because you keep voting for the government to take all of men’s shit away?

        The only crime EVIL WHITE MEN are guilty of is giving women the right to vote. We did respect you, and you proved us wrong.

    2. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 3:26 am

      ” baby talk ” is actually done for a reason. The higher tone and repetition of words and phrases actually is proven to teach language to infants better. As to holding and cuddling children research has found that child who are touched more and touched on more parts of the body regularly have higher IQs. You seem to have ideas on child rearing that are in no way based in either experience or actual research. Male infants actually are biologically weaker than female infants. More males are conceived naturally and more are born but they are more likely to miscarry, be still born or to die in infancy. Males have always been more valued as a society so they are given more attention and generally breast fed for longer. What you see as ” pussifying ” male children is women’s attempt to preserve their lives and ensure their health and well being. You don’t know a fucking thing about child rearing or how to produce a more healthy and smart child.

      1. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:29 pm

        fucking A!

  9. Joe Shanley May 6, 2015 at 1:25 pm

    I was just thinking the other day that an article like this would be nice. Thanks Roosh.

  10. Shortest Straw May 6, 2015 at 1:47 pm

    Nice manifesto. Actually picked up a couple of novel thoughts there, particularly about resource scarcity.

    Think you have a typo, by the way: understood the true nature of women and the chaos that would ensure if. Pretty sure you meant “ensue”.

  11. Lemon May 6, 2015 at 2:01 pm


  12. Zuikurkler Yamizangthang May 6, 2015 at 2:12 pm

    great summary and article. This is a good post for anyone to start out and use as a table of contents if they are new to red pill a.k.a. (truth).

  13. Uzisuicide May 6, 2015 at 2:43 pm

    With that column, you’ve woven so much of your thought and work into a tapestry of red pill truths and observations. That’s pretty much the compendium right there. Perfect place to send a man who’s beginning to awaken to the truths of our time.

  14. Marshallaw May 6, 2015 at 2:57 pm

    A lot to take in….. will read again and again…..

  15. General Stalin May 6, 2015 at 3:06 pm

    This is quite the compendium. I also believe you could expand on this and make it into a book easily. Thanks for writing.

  16. kpitonak May 6, 2015 at 3:29 pm

    I am still reading it–but this article looks like the most important piece of content on the manosphere for next few years…

  17. kpitonak May 6, 2015 at 4:40 pm

    Nice. I’d say more descriptive and structured way to comprehend what Roosh explains here is reading Rollo’s ‘The Rational Male’–like three time a month for the first few months. I am actually surprised he’s not linking to any of his articles, or better, to his book in the section on ‘SMV’ and ‘Red Pill’. But all in all, Roosh, you’ve become a very informed man and thank you for sharing all that knowledge while internalizing it.

  18. C. Darwin May 6, 2015 at 5:03 pm

    I disagree with this:

    “While female attraction for males can be complex and dependent on many factors that includes a man’s resources, charisma, social status, and appearance, male attraction for females is more narrow and highly correlated to body shape and facial symmetry.”

    Science has already proven that for women, physicality is the most important trait she looks for in a man. Her feral physical attraction to an attractive man is what inspires “romantic desire” in her. You place “appearance” as a factor at the end but it is the most important. See the following studies for proof:

    Facial Attractiveness Is Appraised in a Glance.
    Olson, Ingrid R.; Marshuetz, Christy (2005)

    What leads to romantic attraction: similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study.
    Luo S1, Zhang G. (2009)

    I know we all know about outliers but subjective analysis does us no good for objective truths. In the realm of the mating game: Appearance is of primary importance.

  19. Psquare May 6, 2015 at 5:40 pm

    Your best post by far. Simply fantastic

  20. BJ May 6, 2015 at 8:10 pm

    Back to your best, Roosh. There is a level of intellectual depth in the manosphere that jezebel or xojane will never be able to match. Respect!

  21. 66Scorpio May 6, 2015 at 8:44 pm

    I am still trying to digest the whole article but one thing is obvious: we need a better term than “neomasculine”.

    1. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 3:40 am

      How’s about old fashioned patriarchy? It’s accurate .

      1. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:39 pm

        old fashioned

      2. 66Scorpio February 7, 2016 at 6:42 pm

        There is a new twist and a new reality.

  22. Ephemerae May 6, 2015 at 9:48 pm

    Incredible article – thank you Roosh.

  23. Brad Turner May 6, 2015 at 10:11 pm

    This is wonderful! It should be the constitution of the manosphere.

  24. Bearded Bear May 6, 2015 at 11:22 pm

    Roosh is on fire. First the article on jews and now this. Bravo.

  25. Ryan Lewis May 7, 2015 at 3:04 am

    well done roosh. I read every word whilst I was at my corporate job

  26. Zelcorpion May 7, 2015 at 5:39 am

    Excellent article combining all current themes and directions.

  27. skillet May 7, 2015 at 5:57 am

    I also do not like the term. But this article is one of the best. If the system does not change, a dude has to live within the system.

  28. ExCanadian May 7, 2015 at 7:42 am

    Way too many words trying to find a system within the system of Western values and visions of life. Ain’t gonna happen.
    I didn’t finish even 1 paragraph of the text.
    The solution is very simple: get educated and sporty, learn a trade and a foreign language, save some money and GET THE HELL OUT OF NORTH AMERICA! Get out for good!! Never look or come back!!! NEVER!
    You ain’t gonna change a system of North American/Western values. Vote with your feet. Dare to differ from the mainstream, to stand up and be counted, to have an own opinion and to lead by example!
    And don’t blame anyone but YOURSELF if after years of applying “neomasculinity” y’all still end up “home alone” in North America jerking off to some endless porn instead of living a life YOU WANT somewhere else with a beautiful, stylish and sexy lady by your side! Words are empty, deeds speak.

    1. Samuel Roberts May 21, 2015 at 7:17 pm

      Have you done this? Where did you go? How did it work out?

    2. Dudebro Zero February 4, 2016 at 12:46 pm

      “I didn’t finish even 1 paragraph of the text.”

      And yet you feel qualified to comment. Kill yourself, my man.

  29. anon1 May 7, 2015 at 10:45 am

    “leaving them with a value system of Swiss cheese that allows skilled profiteers and propagandists to fill the holes”

    so true, exploiting man’s search for meaning and all that

  30. anon1 May 7, 2015 at 11:02 am

    great polemic roosh, mostly agreeable. i would say with respect to entrepreneurship though that not all men are inclined or destined to work for themselves.

    Being an entrepreneur or any kind of self made man requires a strong emphasis on personal responsibility and leadership.

    Not all men are leaders. They can be leaders of their own homes (if they have a traditional family) or in their places or worship or male spaces among friends.

    But, and its a big but, most men prefer to follow. The manosphere happens to be an area where the 20% men that prefer to take the steps to lead, gather.

    Some guys are content with hard rewarding work for a boss they like or a company they follow (oil field sector for example) and they put in their hours and prefer to have a separation of home life to work life.

    They come home, make love to their wives and just rest. Then they get up the next day and go back to work again.

    There’s nothing wrong with that and they should not be treated as a underclass in any way. But they are the workforce and not the leaders, they dont want the hassle of running a business for mostly 22hrs a day, taking calls while on vacation and the like.

    The things that separate the leader class from the hard working followers is that to them creativity and stressful problems and negotiations, marketing and networking are profoundly enjoyable (even in the tough times). As WSP said “For 1%ers there’s an addiction to making money, not having money”.

    There’s a need for leaders and for followers. it’s a symbiotic relationship.

  31. Dogbert II May 7, 2015 at 1:37 pm

    Thank you for the wisdom, Roosh.

  32. TyskKille May 7, 2015 at 4:01 pm

    I prefer the term “remasculinization”.

  33. Generate May 8, 2015 at 7:14 am

    You did it man.

  34. zbyszek May 8, 2015 at 10:37 am

    This is an interesting post with great insights, especially when in comes to the emphasis on self-improvement. Some aspects are a little confused though. How can you talk about entrepreneurship and technological skepticism at the same time? The two are almost inherently linked.

    I think the problem with smartphones is not the electronics and the technology per se. Rather, it’s the lack of will power and indulgence in mindless consumerism that makes so many women value Tinder matches over real life experiences.

  35. splooge May 8, 2015 at 3:54 pm

    dont forget kids in single mom households are likely to be promiscious, have kids outta wedlock and get stds, they are more likely drop out and be bad at school and more likley to be obese since single moms apparently have no time to cook.

    1. Just Me May 9, 2015 at 12:15 am

      Do you know why we don’t know anything about single dad households? Because a lot of men skimp on their responsibilities. Women make it work the best they can. Just because a man leaves you, doesn’t mean you cease to exist. You do the best you can with what you got. And single moms work twice as hard to make it work.

      Maybe more dads should stick around and actually be responsible for the kids they make instead of skipping out on their families.

      1. Roosh_V May 9, 2015 at 6:44 am

        Woman spotted.

      2. Just Me May 9, 2015 at 2:13 pm

        Totally. I’m a woman. Am I not allowed to comment and share thoughts? *scratches head*

      3. darren bravo May 9, 2015 at 3:17 pm


      4. Miss.Andie May 9, 2015 at 10:17 pm

        “Yep– female on the radar..danger! danger!!! Put the Vag- shield up and your heads down boys…” We are not your enemy..Look-you have some good points.. Very valid ones in fact ..just need to change your game up a bit…

      5. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 3:43 am

        Wow,good job there Roosh. Now see if you can spot a pony. You’ve been practicing with flash cards haven’t you.

      6. Zelcorpion May 9, 2015 at 4:24 pm

        70%+ of divorces are initiated by women and for the rest of the women – it is up to them to pick the boring, but dependable “Nice Guy” as a father instead of the exciting “bad boy”. 80%+ of all separations and bad parenting situations are created by women. Domestic violence is at 40 year old lows, so why do women divorce their husbands or pick assholes for dads?

        And don’t bother responding here, woman. Your quoted lies and mentioning the few exceptions won’t matter.

      7. Just Me May 9, 2015 at 7:07 pm

        If I have something to say, I’ll respond. You don’t get to dictate where I talk and don’t talk. We are both adults and we can show each other more respect than that. I choose to be respectful right now. You can make whatever choice you want but it’s of no major consequence to me.

        I did not “quote lies”. Men have a higher instance of stepping out on their familes and their kids than women do. Yes, women do initiate most of the divorces. I suspect that women initiate the divorces because men become complacent in the status que. Not because men are neccesarily any more happy within their marriages than women are.

        I actually don’t see men in terms of “nice guys” and “bad boys”. The true holy grail that every woman wants, no matter what kind of man she is currently picking and the mistakes she may be making, are “good men”. Women want “good men”. They don’t want a boring guy and they don’t want jerks. They want someone they feel excited about. What women want is probably not that different from what you want. How many men have passed over “nice girls”. Girls that you said where nice but not very exciting? We all do this at some point in our life. No one is entitlted to have a partner just because their “nice”. I’m a “nice girl” and i’ve been passed over by guys. So what? I wasn’t what they were looking for.And that’s okay. I want someone who is excited by me. You should want the same.

        I don’t think women “divorce their husbands” or “pieck asshoels for dads”. I think that some women divorce their husbands and go on to either have healthy or not so healthy relationships. Men do the same. I know so many men that stayed in abusive relationships with gorgeous girls just because she was gorgeous and he was willing to put up with her tantrums because of her looks and the status he felt it brought him.

      8. NotCanadian May 10, 2015 at 5:46 am

        Ohhhhh fuck…. another one with the line “women want good men”….
        The ONLY thing y’all North American women want is someone with a LOT of money and status in the society! And your ONLY dream is to sell yourself to the highest male bidder on a dating market. The rest is plain bullshit!
        You want good men? Then why the fuck don’t y’all value qualities like honesty, integrity, dignity, respect, mutual understanding and support in a male??? Why do y’all run scared and hide as soon as you encounter a male who dares to differ, to be a personality, to have an own opinion, to stand up and be counted and to lead by example? Why do you label such a male “loser” and “enemy of the state”?? Is everyone supposed to be politically correct above the limit and comply with affirmative action, quota/organizational needs hiring and feminism?
        You want good men?? BULLSHIT! Y’all want robots, androids, puppets and slaves who’ll never object anything you say or want and will comply with every order they are given!
        Y’all want a clown who’ll entertain you non stop , or as y’all like to put it in your endless dating profiles:” Make me laugh!”
        FUCK OFF! I ain’t no clown nor will I comply or agree with anything you say!
        You want good men? BULLSHIT! You want a “walking wallet” who automatically becomes “good” as soon as he takes you a level up on a career and status ladder!
        P.S. I’ve left Hell called Canada 6+ years ago and never looked back or regretted my decision!
        I hope you have at least some arguments to present while answering my questions;) Good luck with that!

      9. Just Me May 10, 2015 at 10:18 am

        Seriously, what world do you live in? I see regular women marrying regular guys every day. The majority of North American women are regular people. Not the top 1% you seem to be referring to. Use some logic please.

        NotCanadian, do you value qualities like honesty, integrity, dignity, respect and mutual understanding? Do you live by your belief in these qualities? As it stands, this blog focuses on two primary things about women.1. Looks. 2. Age. This is not a blog that is supporting qualities such as honesty, integrity, dignity, respect and mutal understanding. Men are running around responding calling women “cunts” and pretty much degrading women left and right. When you begin to truly value these qualities, you attrack other people who value these equalities. We do not live in a society where men value honesty, integrity, dignity, respect and mutual understanding and women don’t. We live in a society where some men honestly value those qualities and somen women do as well. There are also men and women who don’t. Making a monothic claim that women don’t value these qualities but men do makes little sense .

        As for ‘running scared”, you do see how I was talked to above and demanded that I basically stop talking simply because he didn’t like my point of view. Sure, there are bad apples out there. But bad apples exist in men and in women. This is a very easy thing to understand.

        Women do want ‘good men’. Just in the same way you want “good women”. In that regard, men and women are not that different. We all want “good” people in our lives.

      10. NotCanadian May 10, 2015 at 11:29 am

        Oh, thanks for a meaningful reply.

        What world do I live in? Modern politically correct world based on affirmative action, quota/organizational needs hiring, feminism and other brainwashed bullshit promoted by the mainstream media.

        Regular women marrying regular guys every day?? Then how come Canada is the world leader in the number of dating websites and dating profiles created by Canadians?

        My logic is still telling me that an overwhelming majority of Canadian females dream about selling themselves to the highest male bidder on a dating market. I don’t even need any logic to know that, it’s enough to get out on the streets or to read WHAT they say in their endless dating profiles. There is always a laundry list of requirements to a male from a female!

        I sure DO value qualities like honesty, integrity, dignity, respect and mutual understanding in BOTH males and females. And YES, I do live by my belief in these qualities.

        I DO NOT CARE what this blog focuses on, I live by my own principles and standards/criteria, but at the same time I HATE double or even triple Canadian standards and hypocrisy in everything.

        You ain’t ever gonna find me calling women “cunts” or judging them just by their age and looks.

        The problem is that TRUTH always remains the TRUTH and Canadians can NOT tolerate any truth spoken! NONE! They love to live in a rosy colored politically correct lie.

        I’ve NOT indicated that ALL men do value the above mentioned qualities.

        I’ve sure noticed the way you were talked to above here.

        Did I do that? NO.

        Women want good men? But WHY do they reject and ignore anyone NORMAL then? Anyone with OWN opinion, thoughts and visions of life and a relationship?

        Why don’t North American women realize that a strong and evolving relationship is a TWO WAY street and it takes a JOINT effort from BOTH male and female to make it work????

        North American ladies absolutely WANT and DEMAND everything to be handed them on a silver platter WITHOUT ever making ANY effort on their part!!!

        WHY does the first date in North America resemble a job interview??

        Somehow I refuse to believe in what you say… I ain’t 15 y.o. any longer and I’ve seen too much in my life and traveled to way too many places around the world to know the difference about how a relationship should work and how they do work in North America.

      11. Just Me May 10, 2015 at 8:38 pm

        NonCanadian, I don’t think all political correctness is always a bad thing. Sometimes political correctness is just about treating people with kindness and equality. Political correctness is important for the health of our culture. Feminism is actually important for the health of our culture. I’m not saying everything within feminism is perfect either. I’m also not saying there are bad eggs who call themselves Feminists. But it is not monolithically bad either. Infact, there are many parts that are good. Feminism is actually the movement that is redefining what a man’s role is within his family. Today’s men are so much more hands on with their kids then the Dads of my father’s generation. It’s pretty awesome to see. We are also seeing more men be stay-at-home-dads and supporting the family in these new ways. Men aren’t just being seen as “walking-wallets”. Without things like affirmative action or Feminism, previous generations treated anyone who wasn’t white and male as a sub-class of people.

        I can’t say what the marriage rate is in Canada. But yes, there are tons of dating websites out there. There is also tons of porn sites out there that have grown more abusive to women that men are enjoying non-stop, all day long, on their computers and now even in public on their iphones. I will say that I do think that the internet in general, dating websites and porn does produce a fair amount of discontent and the need for continuous new material that does over-spill into how we treat people.

        I am sure you’ve had many frustrating experiences in dating and with women. I totally get that. People in general aren’t always easy to deal with. I too, have had many frustrating experiences in dating and with men. There are lots of men out there that are looking to use women for sex. They send you messages asking you send them pictures of your boobs before they even ask your name. In one or Roosh’s blogs he goes into detail about trying to get sex from random younger women. It’s very easy for both men and women to feel used and minimized.

        I also know, from my experience in dating online, that men also have their own set of requirements about women and they are not always very positive. This, again, isn’t something that only women do. That is all I really want you to understand. I’m not looking to minimized your experiences. They are totally valid. But so are my experiences and the experiences I hear about from other women. Dating isn’t easy for either side.

        I actually really liked how you said you don’t care what this blog focuses on and how you live by your own principals. That, for me, is one marker, of a good man. I also think it’s really coo that you don’t call women ‘cunts” or judge them for shallow features. I can’t tell you how much I appreciate that as a woman.

        The only reason I pointed out above how I was spoken to was to show you that that women are not the exclusive problem in these issues. I was not implying in anyway that you spoke like that to me.

        Women do want good men. But women are also human and they are also individuals. Some women aren’t emotionally there yet. Which is why, yes, some women will choose “bad boys”. But you wouldn’t want one of those women anyway because they haven’t learned all the lessons they need to learn yet to be a healthy person in a relationship. I also think that sometimes even when someone is really nice, kind, and good; we aren’t always attracted to them. I’m a pretty nice girl. There have been men who haven’t been attracted to me. Even though I am kind and consider myself a ‘good woman’.I am sure you can think of a few girls you know who are ‘nice’, but you have no interest in dating them. we all know people like that.

        There are lots of North American Women that realize that relationships are a two way street. There are lots, who might not. But again, the same exact thing can be said for men too. There are lots of North American Men that don’t think relationships are two way streets either..and then there are lots who do.

        I am not trying to convince you to forgo your own experiences and believe something other then what you believe. The only think I wish for you to see is that relationships issues are not exclusive to women alone. Relationship issues are something that both men and women contribute to. Dating hasn’t always been a great experience for me. Then again, I’m not 5’10, 19, with a perfect body either. Sometimes I think that some men only care about the top 10% of women who are really hot and perfect and then they get bitter that they, an average guy, couldn’t get with the super hot girl and get angry that she dared choose someone else. They they project their anger onto all women. Women have as many dating issues as men do. Sometimes they are different issues, but dating isn’t all that easier for us either.

        With all that said, thank you for the respectful dialogue.

      12. NotCanadian May 11, 2015 at 7:25 am

        Thanks again!

        But I beg to differ on almost any point you’ve mentioned in your message.

        Political correctness is absolutely the worst thing which happened to the Western world. It ruined all the main principles and cornerstones of the society giving advantages to those who DID NOT deserve them!

        It ain’t about kindness and equality, it’s totally about blocking/ignoring the truth and doing things upside down and inside out!

        I’ll give a couple of examples. Canada is a country of immigrants, but now it’s being invaded by hordes of 3rd worlders who don’t give a shit about Canadian laws, traditions and standards! They want FREE money form of welfare and other bonuses like subsidized housing, free medical care, free English lessons (though they ain’t ever gonna learn a word of English!) and they also want Canadians to adopt THEIR rules and traditions instead of adopting Canadian ones!

        And then some of the new immigrants who finally get tired of sitting on their asses at home doing nothing decide to join Canadian workforce. Obviously they don’t want an entry level position, they want to enter the government offices, police forces or CBSA (border services).

        And what do they use to accomplish that? Right, they use or rather abuse political correctness, affirmative action, quota hiring and feminism!

        WHY or since when does Canada give a priority to the “right” skin color, gender, sexual orientation and other bullshit over education, experience, knowledge, willingness to work, honesty, integrity and reliability???

        I’ve never ever mentioned that I object a man’s role or involvement a family since I always keep saying that a strong and evolving relationship is a TWO WAY street!

        Again, you fail to notice that feminism and political correctness turned things upside down and NOW white able bodied males are being pushed out of the workforce and replaced with unskilled and unqualified workers just in order to meet the demands of the quota hiring and affirmative action!!

        And ideal Canadian employee now is a divorced “visible minority” transsexual with 4 kids.

        Do I want to live in such a society?? NO WAY!!!

        You’ve made a good point-Canada is also the “capital of porn”! But the reason is a TOTAL absence of normal human interactions in REAL life forcing people into the virtual world of porno and easy access to virtual sex.

        I’ve had tons of frustrating experiences in dating in Canada resulting in me giving up and moving out of the country 6+ years ago!

        Yes, people ain’t easy to deal with, but Canadian females seem to be something negatively special… Every, yes, EVERY fucking date is like a job interview and every female seems to play 10 head games at a time while wearing 10 different “masks” for every occasion during the day!

        And every Canadian female wants a millionaire with an upscale lakefront condo/house and 2-3 cars in his garage!

        People make dating hard in North America!

        It’s very easy to live by one’s own visions and principles. Canadians tend to lie a lot to themselves while living in some kind of an imaginary world. Canada is the world leader in hypocrisy!

      13. Just Me May 11, 2015 at 8:56 am

        NonCanadian, the world before political correctness was part of our culture was a world where predominate white men ruled. Not even the guy who runs this blog would have been of the elite. And yes, it is about kindness and equality. The way men ran the world was to lord over everyone, showing very little desire to share equality or basic human rights. White men largely denied every other group of people basic human rights. It was a system that benefitted white men most. Fast forward to today, white men have been forced to share social power with other groups of people and this is actually what is making a lot of them angry. They are feeling disenfranchised looking for the “good old days” whenever one else was sub-human compared to themselves.

        Oh by the way, I do agree about your comments about immigrants who come into other countries looking for free money without respecting the cultural. But you can not shun equality because of these people. It’s not like men where giving much social equality to other groups of people before they were forced to.

        Again, I can’t speak for Canada but hear in America, the reason that we are seeing more companies consider factors such as race and gender is because race and gender are significantly undermined in many areas. Lets go through an example. Lets say we have a company that is run by all white men higher-ups. Who do you think these white men are more likely to hire? A woman, a black woman, an asian man or another white man? this is actually what has been happening in our culture since the beginning of time. Because men want to retain their power over other groups of people, and because they relate better to other men in their own social group, there is a disproportionate amount of men creating power among each other. Why do you assume that someone of a different race or gender is not as qualified though? Women are out performing men in education now-a-days.

        I am seriously sorry you feels so poorly about an entire country of women. But it’s just not right. Everyone has difficult experiences dating. MEN and women. Men are just as guilty for treating women like crap as women are for treating men like crap. And blogs like this do nothing to help men and women relations, all it does is fuel anger and hate.

      14. NotCanadian May 11, 2015 at 2:39 pm

        I have a feeling that you somehow fail to understand what I’m trying to say…

        It ain’t about “oh those evil and oppressive white males” who were running the world and humiliating other genders and nationalities…. Forget about that! It’s the past and ain’t ever coming back!

        TODAY white men do NOT share the social power! They are being pushed out of all social, life and work circles under the pretext of political correctness, equality, feminism, affirmative action and quota hiring! Where is the equality when people ain’t seem to be equal after all under the new “laws” of political correctness???

        Immigrants come to North America fully EXPECTING everything to be given them on a silver platter without them ever needing to give anything back! Just like North American females treat males these days-you HAVE TO give me everything NOW and “then may be one day in a blue moon if I so want I might think about occasionally making you a little favor”!

        Again, WHY and since WHEN are gender, skin color, sexual orientation MORE IMPORTANT than skills, education, experiences, knowledge, honesty, integrity and willingness to work??

        Companies and organizations these days ain’t run exclusively by white males… You always seem to blame “those evil white males” in anything happening.

        I just happen to know a lot about the quality of new recruits in Toronto Police, York Regional Police, Peel Regional Police, Durham Region Police and Canadian Border Services Agents at Pearson International Airport in Toronto. An overwhelming majority of them speak very little English, ain’t physically fit enough to do the job and have no “people” skills or proper education whatsoever!

        How did they get the job? Thanks to the affirmative action, quota and organizational needs hiring.

        And now tell me HOW a female 5’2 ,110 lbs police officer can arrest or even stop an adult male criminal? She’ll be overwhelmed by him in NO time putting her own life and the life of her partner in danger!!!

        And how about minority police officers “covering” the crimes committed by their nationalities in Brampton, Markham, Mississauga, Bramalea, Richmond Hill etc????

        I can go on and on and on…

        I do agree with you though that males are as guilty as females for NOT making relationships work in North America… But trust me-political correctness and feminism play a huge role in that…

      15. Coach June 17, 2015 at 9:08 am

        NO. Not “predominate white men ruled”…. but “the strongest” ruled. The strongest just happened to be white men. But they didn’t rule because of their skin color… they ruled because they were the dominant members of humanity. The system benefited anyone who stepped up to the plate and risked what it took to be the dominant leader. Some did that better than others. That’s called nature. Do you see a Grizzly bear say to the mountain goat “oh… in the interest of fairness… here… have this salmon that I just caught”. No.

      16. ChimpGod May 13, 2015 at 3:36 am

        Bravo.. Tell them like it is.

      17. Rob May 20, 2015 at 9:07 pm

        You sound like someone who hasn’t had much luck with women and blames them for your lack of “game”. Dude, good women want good men. There are promiscuous men and there are promiscuous women, but keep in mind that men AND women both make mistakes in their decisions.

      18. NotCanadian May 24, 2015 at 4:51 am

        True that, I’ve never had much luck with women in CANADA! All it takes is a plane ticket out of the hell hole called Canada and things change dramatically. Guess it’s not me after all, eh?;)
        I’ve left Canada 6+ years ago and never regretted my decision or looked back.

      19. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 3:52 am

        No women just don’t want misogynistic assholes.

      20. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:36 pm

        misogynistic assholes… assholes… holes… les

      21. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 3:57 am

        This page is full of men who seem bent on thinking of women as inferior intellectually and in need of being controlled. So I am assuming that’s the same ” opinion” you are expressing. Guess what we are repulsed pretty much by those men. My guess is you expressed this idea to women with a shred of dignity and they had the good sense to,run away. I suspect your inability to fail to be” politically correct” means you spouted patriarchal bullshit to,the wrong audience and just can’t handle rejection. Interesting other men on this page seem to have had the same problem.

      22. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:36 pm

        inferior intellectually, in need of being controlled. Repulsed, dignity, good sense, politically correct, patriarchal bullshit, rejection, same problem… it’s like an echo chamber – echo chamber – chamber – …

      23. Dudebro Zero February 4, 2016 at 12:52 pm

        “Men have a higher instance of stepping out on their familes and their kids than women do.”

        Laws around the world assume that the mother is more important so when the decision for the child to live with one of the two parents comes up (this is in 80% of cases after the WOMAN has ended the relationship) the default is to give the woman custody. How do you blame men for this? Men aren’t even more likely to cheat, they’re just more likely to tell the truth in anonymous surveys. There’s another lovable aspect of femininity – believing your own lies so much you lie even when you’re guaranteed noone will find out.

        Here in Germany parents get mutual custody per default but kids still end up living with their mothers out of tradition, it just means that fathers get a right to see their kids without having to fight tooth and nail for it like they do in other parts of the world. Our system is probably the best and it still sucks.

      24. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 3:50 am

        Women leave because their need aren’t met or they don’t feel respected or safe. Yes women are leaving much more than they used to. However a good percentage of these women “initiated ” divorces are actually cases where men leave and don’t file paper work. The percentages are based on who files the paperwork. If a man is absent then although he may have initiated the break up she may be the one actually doing the paperwork to achieve the divorce. The divorce may be mutual but if she files the paperwork then she is still seen as initiating the divorce. She may not qualify for child care assistance or housing assistance if still legally married so it may be more of a motivator for her to ensure paperwork is filed. At the end of the day some women aren’t happy and yes it’s their right to leave.

      25. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:39 pm

        needs aren’t met, don’t feel respected or safe, men leave, man is absent, she may be the one to achieve divorce, she files the paperwork, she may not qualify, more of a motivator to ensure paperwork if filed, women aren’t happy… it’s their right to leave.

  36. dheeraj May 9, 2015 at 9:39 am

    This article should be spammed in every male teenagers inbox of today’s time. Only then we can save them from tomorrow’s politically correct utopia.

  37. guest May 9, 2015 at 11:34 am

    Western males are pussy whipped.

  38. Ms. Andie May 9, 2015 at 9:06 pm

    That was an interesting read no doubt.
    Agreed with a few of your points but facts outweigh your opinion.. Tell me exactly.. If men are so logical–why do they make up such a huge proportion of the prison population?? Logic and rational should keep one from prison- or getting caught in true first place…

    Why are the vast majority of those diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder- a diagnosis highly afilliated with lack of impulse control
    ( the opposite of logic and reason).. Men?? Yes there are other PDs.. But none more prevalent in society than these. Very odd in the face of the male logic myth..Glad women are here to keep you grounded though..

    1. kalsonmandela May 10, 2015 at 9:55 am

      ☁☁☁☁it’s Easy Make With rooshv < i started working online, completing some basic jobs that only requires from you a computer and internet access and I am happier than ever… It's been 6 months since i started this and i got paid so far total of 36,000 bucks… Basicly i profit close to 80 bucks/h and work for 3-4 hrs most of the days.Best part to whole this thing is that you can decide when to work yourself and for how long and you get a paycheck
      at the end of each week.
      Here’s A More Detail

    2. Séan May 29, 2015 at 5:24 am

      Why are there more men in prison? Male “logic myth?” What the fuck are you on about?

      For a hoodrat who can barely read or write making $$$ slinging crack or holding up liquor stores is a VERY logical option from where he’s standing. He does a cost/benefit analysis and decides the reward is very much worth the risk.

      We are the more logical gender. The proof is all around you – from the device you’re using to send this message, to the engineering involved in building your home.

      All built and designed by men. I wish more women would appreciate that fact. Instead all they can do is bitch and moan about how “oppresive” us men are, instead of showing some goddamn gratitude. Without us you’d be back living in straw huts within hours.

    3. Rob October 4, 2015 at 9:31 pm

      The reason men are in prison than greater numbers than women? (if that’s what you’re asking) ?

      Simple: Testosterone. Also, an inability to control male aggression. Women don’t have near the levels of T. Also, not every man is able to control themselves through logic, just more men, by and large than women are. There are always exceptions. Hence, the male criminals in prison.

  39. anonmasculinity May 9, 2015 at 11:14 pm

    Neomasculinity? Ahah, sounds like a term for a 21st century gay male with a beard.

  40. Libertas May 10, 2015 at 10:56 am

    I’m sure this took you a long time to write. Well done.

    At the end though, there’s nothing found in science that would necessarily lead to atheism (even though I am one). There’s just no evidence of God. One is a matter of belief and the other a matter of knowledge.

  41. Eric May 10, 2015 at 2:58 pm

    Excellent post, Roosh should publish this as a booklet or some other printed form. It’s a work of modern philosophy, in my opinion. A Magnum Opus of Roosh’s ideas about the relationship between men and women.

  42. Anonymous May 10, 2015 at 9:29 pm

    This is the 21st century. A lot of things have changed. And while you mention that female fertility declines in their 30s, you fail to mention that it is scientifically proven that a man’s fertility also declines and a man in his 40s is more likely to have children with certain disabilities. Older men also take longer to get women pregnant, and from age 45 some men nay have serious fertility issues that need to be addressed if they want to have children. You also fail to mention that women’s fertility differs and these days many women can give birtn to healthy kids in their 40s. Plus things like IVF and adoption are around. Its very dangerous of you to be spreading misinformation, especially regarding fertility, as a lot of men ocer 30 do not realise that they may not in fact be fertile forever. Please read updated modern medicine and fertility papers, its everyone’s responsibility to be fully informed of the facts.

    1. Eilllyean May 11, 2015 at 10:37 am

      ☁☁☁☁it’s Easy Make With rooshv < i started working online, completing some basic jobs that only requires from you a computer and internet access and I am happier than ever… It's been 6 months since i started this and i got paid so far total of 36,000 bucks… Basicly i profit close to 80 bucks/h and work for 3-4 hrs most of the days.Best part to whole this thing is that you can decide when to work yourself and for how long and you get a paycheck
      at the end of each week.
      Click Here for More Detail

    2. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 4:05 am

      Male fertility is declining rapidly right now actually and testosterone levels also. Men are producing more sperm that is damaged and more sperm which is less likely to be motile. Plus erection issues are happening with younger and younger men. Traditionally men didn’t have erectile issues until their 50s and now it’s common to find men in their twenties with erectile dysfunction. The rates of erectile dysfunction of men in their 30s are the same rates for men in their 50s back in the 1980s.

      1. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:33 pm

        damaged sperm… dysfunction… issues… motility… younger and younger…

  43. Pogi May 12, 2015 at 5:19 pm

    If symmetry is what makes faces beautiful, shouldn’t the symmetrically edited pictures of asymmetrical people be more beautiful? This doesn’t seem to be the case.

    1. Roosh_V May 12, 2015 at 7:18 pm

      Their better half, when made symmetrical, is definitely more beautiful than their normal face.

  44. Kitten Holiday May 15, 2015 at 8:42 am

    This is very well done. I hope this article gets distributed widely.

    1. hneyjhon May 17, 2015 at 12:52 pm

      ►➤➤♫♫With♫you♫ ♪rooshv♪♪♪.-. < my roomate's mom makes $85 /hr on the internet . She has been without work for eight months but last month her paycheck was $17976 just working on the internet for a few hours.

      Try this site. GET MORE INFO

  45. Chase Myles May 17, 2015 at 1:32 pm

    Basically, men need to have a backbone, be in shape, be disciplined, and not be afraid to achieve what they want. Amen.

  46. AlaskaRandy May 18, 2015 at 9:54 pm

    I am very happy to see strategies for men reclaiming masculinity being articulated more. I found myself in the sexodus, but after reading this article now realize that I have been for sometime working towards neomasculinity. It is always awesome to find advanced information about your own direction.

  47. CrazyCauckz May 19, 2015 at 2:44 am

    LOL This is nothing but attacking MGTOW. It’s pathetic considering AFVM is obviously behind this.

    1. Dudebro Zero February 4, 2016 at 1:07 pm

      In practice you could consider me a “MGTOW” but it’s hardly by choice. It’s a temporary step for young men. It’s a phase we can go through, knowing our SMV will only increase over time while women’s will only ever decrease. If I can’t have the kind of woman I want right now and I know my chances to get her are increasing over time then it makes sense to just wait it out and not waste my time “dating down” in the meantime (expending resources, most importantly TIME, that I could spend more wisely preparing for later). As long as I haven’t built some foundation for financial stability and as long as I’m still improving physically and mentally I’d be a fool to settle for a woman who is willing to settle for me as I am now. But as soon as I hit some sort of plateau I need to get out there even if the conditions haven’t improved. Anything else would be failure due to not even trying.

      And that’s exactly what I see much of the MGTOW community preaching. Many of these prominent “MGTOWs” are over 40! Their SMV is past its peak and rapidly declining. They have nothing to wait FOR. These men seem to think they’re in some sort of hunger strike against feminism (usually too PC to call out Western degeneracy on a larger scale). Voluntary genetic dead-ends is what they are. You’d have to be an imbecile to follow their advice in any category.

      1. MikeTO February 4, 2016 at 3:34 pm

        LOL Yeah ok kid. You think you know it all. Older men are great in value. I didn’t need a PUA handbook to get dates with women.

      2. Dudebro Zero February 8, 2016 at 10:19 am

        Your username is “danah” and you’ve got a bitchy looking woman as a profile picture. If you’re a man you’re a self-loathing one. Pathetic.

        Older men absolutely have value – as teachers, as experts, as politicians, as fathers and grandfathers. Older men who refuse to mature and want to relive their 30s over and over are a plight though. The only reason for a young woman to “””date””” them is money. Enjoy being conned by easy gold diggers.

  48. Daniel Holland May 19, 2015 at 11:23 pm


  49. wgone May 20, 2015 at 1:09 am

    BULLSHIT ! Improve yourself for YOUR own worth NOT because you are trying to impress a woman. Neomasculinity = SIMPing.

  50. Rob May 20, 2015 at 8:14 pm

    Whoever wrote this does not understand women at all. This article was good for a laugh, but also very educational in understanding why the men who come to this site come here: because they’really told what they want to hear without the the burden of logic. You guys need to leave the U.S. and join ISIS to establish your own patriarchal society in some other country.

  51. Zeta May 22, 2015 at 1:35 am

    Paul Joseph Watson and Infowars have been doing alot of red pill stories, some directly based on things you’ve covered
    The movement’s influence continues to grow

  52. T Fenik Junior May 23, 2015 at 2:54 pm

    Adopting the principles of neomasculinity is the only way I can see men steering the ship back on course. Fantastic work, you have made a believer out of me.

  53. Patchfur May 23, 2015 at 9:23 pm

    Excellent summation of what I have been attempting to organize my thoughts around. I will be using this as a resource in the future to guide men towards a better life. Thank you.

    1. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 4:10 am

      Yes just guide them away from women. We don’t want men like this. We don’t need you and we saw what this did to the women who,had to deal with it involuntarily. Feel free to practice neomasculinity just with your other guy friends. We women will watch and laugh from a safe distance

  54. Andrew Dodson May 24, 2015 at 6:54 pm

    not a single mention of modesty in this whole article. You need to read corinthians 11 Roosh.

  55. Jag_Levak May 25, 2015 at 5:02 pm

    “Feminine beauty is highly objective and can be reliably measured across
    different cultures in two principal ways: body measurement and facial

    While facial symmetry is likely a factor in attractiveness, I suspect it has been a favored subject of study more because of it being easy to measure and having good test/retest reliability than because it plays a dominant or determining role in attractiveness. The illustrations in this article highlight the importance of other factors. Otherwise, all of the synthetically symmetrical faces should have had similar levels of attractiveness, and all should have seemed more attractive than the less symmetrical natural faces.

  56. cmp679 May 26, 2015 at 4:00 pm

    Terrific article, I agree with most of the points.

  57. Mr.H May 26, 2015 at 6:47 pm

    Brilliant write up, Roosh. Thank you for taking the time, effort and energy into putting this gem together! This is something ALL men must read. Thus, I am incorporating many of these elements into my life.

    Thank you!

  58. MatsPT May 28, 2015 at 7:16 am

    Neomasc will be the short term. Neomasker is the follower of neomasculinity.

  59. Better dead than red June 2, 2015 at 4:55 am

    Please, Roosh, find another name. The prefix neo- is poisonous. You know what I mean…

  60. jesusvegdotcom June 3, 2015 at 4:46 pm

    Aren’t China and Cuba socialist/communist countries? China has a one child policy and people are always talking about how women in Asia are better than American women. Just posing the question.

  61. Artirles June 6, 2015 at 6:35 am

    < col Hiiiiiii Friends…''——–.''???? ?++dailysnark++Jeremiah . you think Herbert `s storry is super… last tuesday I bought a great Porsche 911 since I been earnin $9845 this – four weeks past and even more than ten grand lass-month . it's actualy my favourite work I've ever done . I began this nine months/ago and right away earned more than $71, per hour . Get More Info < Find More='' ……..''


  62. mnsd June 8, 2015 at 2:39 pm

    Is this a joke site? This can’t be real

    1. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 4:12 am

      Roosh is a joke alright but the pathetic thing is he’s serious and think women will fall for it.

      1. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:34 pm

        ….women will fall for it… will fall for it… for it. it it it…

  63. Brian Boru July 4, 2015 at 8:53 am

    This is a great summary on the mindset. As a transhumanist myself I was a bit skeptical (heh) of the Technological Skepticism but it was quite reasonable as it boiled down to “technology is good, but it can have its drawbacks”.

  64. john doe July 20, 2015 at 4:46 am

    Hi Roosh,
    you may also wish to draw ideas from the MAN-R-FESTO which was something that I thought about and then wrote on toilet paper while I was in a German jail last October.

    It had such an interesting and somewhat “romantic” birthing.

    The MAN-R-FESTO is not collective and not a movement. It is a set of ideas based on the possibility of what a man might choose to be.

    There are 30 statements of ideas and a man might choose to adopt 1, some, none or all.

    The MAN-R-FESTO is about individual men and individualism. This would appear to be different to neo masculinity.

    Here you go, for your reading pleasure.

  65. john doe July 20, 2015 at 4:59 am

    Just by the way Roosh…if you are moving to the area of philosophies and wishing to affect the world on a broader basis than just the GAME/PUA mens lifestyle area, you might want to read “Living Free in the Femnazi World” if you have not bothered to read it before.

    I have taken it down from a-man-zon. You can get an old copy here.

    I have taken down “The Truth Be Told” because men most certainly do not want to hear the truth.

    I will also let you know that the mens business association has already established a new jurisdiction outside the influence of any governments and we are 5 years down the track of getting the World Passport recognised by various governments.

    If you are going to talk about neo-masculinity one of the VERY FIRST issues you are best advised to deal with is passports. No point being a “neo-masculinist” only to be kept in a sheep pen by you masters, right?

    The single most important idea in living in freedom is the freedom to move about without restriction as long as you are an honest man. This is why I was in jail in Germany. I was jailed in Germany because I defied the German regulations on border crossings to challenge their validity.

    I was successful in challenging that validity which is why they threw me in jail. They were forced to commit a crime because they had no grounds on which to apply their legislation to me.

    If you wish to co-operate and collaborate with me on the issue of the World Passport? I would like that. I would certainly not advise you to go back to square one and start again.

    As far as I know? There is only one other guy who knows all this stuff better than I do. I would be pleased to introduce you to him and recommend you if you wish to learn from him.

    As you go down this path of “neo-masculinity” that you are talking about you are going to have to deal with the question “how will we interact with governments”?

    Because today men are totally, utterly and completely the slaves of their governments. Men are easily picked off and incarcerated on an individual basis by governments.

    Sooner or later. You are going to have to address the question of governments. When you wish to address those questions? I would be pleased to answer any questions you have and allow you to use what we have developed with recognition of course.

    But…in my opinion? The #1 item on the agenda to address is the agenda item of the world passport…for, without the freedom to move? While our movements are totally at the control of our governments? How “neo-masculine” can we really be?

    Also? I think you are being harsh on the MGTOWs…..that is a VERY diverse group and you can hardly put them all in the one basket like MRAs are most easily grouped. I do not identify as a MGTOW but there are few men going their own way as much as I am!!

    Anyway….when you are ready to listen….I will be ready to answer the questions that you have….and sure, you may never be! LOL!!

    Best Regards


  66. Boe Jangles August 16, 2015 at 12:49 pm

    The Achilles heel of women is Relationships, as it always has been.

    When you slice through the toxic garbage of all the interpersonal stuff she has going on with her elderly parents or her thankless progeny…you expose the underlying feminine being which is based on her DNA (reptilian-limbic system) and not her delusional social expectations (neocortex system).

    I have effectively removed all female relationships and associated interrelationships from my inner sanctum, and now I’m having a better experience interacting with women in any situation (from the coffee bar to work and elsewhere) since the interaction is primed in DNA. This is neither Alpha or Beta, it is the Way of Zeta.

    I recommend the film ‘Quest for Fire’ for an illustration of primal interactions and the inherent instability of life on Earth.

  67. anonymous October 5, 2015 at 12:08 am

    Hey everyone,

    I’m new to this site. I must say, it’s quite a beautiful place. The page has a very aesthetically appealing layout, and the author writes clearly – something hard to find online. But I can’t help but notice that there’s something a little…off.

    You see, I’m allergic to belief systems that are infallible. And it seems to me neomasculinity is one of them. There are, of course, plenty of others. Marxism, Feminism, Capitalism, and loads more come to mind. I can appreciate the expressive value of these views the same way I appreciate the bible, the quran or a poem. But to take them literally is, I think, a mistake.

    There is no doubt that Feminism can take on an ideological spin, like any other philosophy or worldview. However I’m not so sure neomasculinity solves this problem. It seems to have the same traits as bad Feminism – a rigid dogma, in favour of one camp over another.

    Perhaps what we really need is a little more “humanism,” for a lack of better terms,

  68. Hara Minami November 3, 2015 at 4:25 pm

    …this has to be the most shit post I have ever read.

  69. 66Scorpio December 25, 2015 at 11:57 pm

    The big problem is that Roosh lists 20 points. If someone cares to differ then tell me but no mass movement has been propagated on more than 5 points, but ideally 3 points. We need to distill and clarify. The major points can ultimately lead to 20 or 30 or 50 sub-points but we need simplicity in the explanation of the idea because most people have the attention span of a goldfish.

  70. Blake Andrews January 9, 2016 at 2:26 am

    I’ve found that Objectivism, the philosophy put forth by Ayn Rand, has a great value system for atheists who don’t want to sacrifice reason to faith in order to form a cohesive system of values.

  71. Ereetreeya January 9, 2016 at 4:12 am

    Thank you Roosh, this is truly great material and badly needed by men of all ages and walks of life. Skimming through though, I do have to disagree when you say that a fluid dating market is a disadvantageous one for the majority of men, or that it is somehow skewed to benefit only the top “1%”.

    I guess I disagree that this is a bad thing, not that it doesn’t exist. It does. It all sounds too familiar, like the occupy Wall Street movement, which as you know is a socialist movement. If you know anything about Wall Street and the capital markets, you know that the game is rigged enormously, and the average investor gets robbed. Sound familiar? Guys without perfect game will lose any shot at many 7s and 8s, let alone 9s and 10s by an Alpha who was taught since he was old enough to talk how to lead. I believe in the free market absolutely though. Markets are never wrong. What I don’t agree with is how our generation must be the victim of this stacked deck that crushes the chances of any guy who himself is not a 9 or 10 to get a decent girl without enormous effort. Even worse is the fact that learning game is a huge fucking waste of time other than to get laid that almost always works against making you a good, virtuous man.

    Just for full disclosure, I used to be “nice”. Oh I still put on the clown suit when I walk out my front door, but since my Bachelor’s built on four years of my youth got me a job earning as much as an immigrant who mops floors at McDonalds (and btw, I did a job similar to this so no, I am not better than those hard working people who do those very difficult jobs), there was literally no choice but to swallow the red pill at that point. It was at my lowest point of depression that I decided I NEEDED to learn how to build businesses and invest, or die.

    I am not nice anymore. If you are a cold, ungenerous person, man or woman, I MUST out-compete you. There is no choice. If there is any motivation to push yourself in a single pursuit in the modern world today, it would be for vindication for yourself and victims who had no positive influence in their life brought on by this careless, Godless heathen culture.

    I would stress that learning to control your finances is paramount to the development of men and deserves its own section in this guide to Neomasculinity.

  72. char February 1, 2016 at 9:25 am

    I’m a woman and I’m ignoring the advice that I can’t comment here. But you’d be surprised to know that I agree with most of this stuff. I hate what feminism has done to women. I naturally want to be a nurturer in my home but society tells me that I need to dump my kids in childcare and get a job and that my husband can help with housework and the kids while I’m at work.. no just no. Men can’t do housework. It’s like asking a kid to do it. Same with looking after the kids. They’re more like a big brother. I want to do what I was biologically built for. Raise my children, keep the house clean, cook and take care of my man. But society tells me that that is bludging and my husband would be an a**hole to make me look after him.
    Men were always the hunters and women the nurturers. Unfortunately you’re fighting a loosing battle. It’s never going to go back to the way it was. Women have to work because wages are too low and the cost of living is ridiculous. It’s seriously effed. That’s why the new generation of kids are little a**holes, raised in childcare. The world is doomed

  73. slainz February 2, 2016 at 2:33 am

    Fuck there are some sad mofo’s in the world. They all seem to be conservatives and butt ugly into the bargain. You lot just don’t get layed because you are wankers.

  74. James Frederick Shoop February 2, 2016 at 4:25 pm

    I swear to God, you write about people like you are from a different planet. Are you a human being?

  75. CWill February 2, 2016 at 9:44 pm

    Women already won, suck it men!

    1. Dudebro Zero February 25, 2016 at 1:16 pm

      Women are less happy than ever before. Congrats on your victory!

      1. CWill February 27, 2016 at 3:25 pm

        Yeah that seems like a legit fact!



      2. Dudebro Zero February 28, 2016 at 9:18 am

        Here’s the fact:

        And there’s how delusional feminists spin it:

        Quick summary: Clearly marriage and children are still being demanded by “society” and that’s why women are unhappy. Clearly happiness could be immediately attained by everyone without doing anything! If only these pesky expectations of us accomplishing something in life didn’t get in the way. And clearly the items on the list aren’t what people actually want to accomplish in life, what we actually want is to just sit around, do nothing and be happy about nothing.

        So yeah, that’s feminism for you. Always lower the bar, always absolve of responsibility. It works pretty well when it comes to the fact that this unhappiness is CAUSED by the feminist policy of robbing men of everything, redistributing it to women who are then left to their own devices with nothing but a bunch of money, and then wondering why everyone is off worse than before. Surely it’s men’s fault somehow! There’s got to be a way we can blame men for this.

      3. CWill March 8, 2016 at 4:24 am

        I’m not unhappy, I’m not worse off, and I am very grateful for the women who have paved the way for me to live my life in the way I choose.

        Stop winging because you can’t compete in a world in which women and men are on an equal playing field. Your failures in life have nothing to do with feminism – they are a reflection of your own inferiority.

      4. Dudebro Zero March 8, 2016 at 12:54 pm

        “Statistics don’t matter because I, this one person, am different”

        Wow. If this is BEFORE common core I can’t wait to see how bad it gets after -.-

        “in which women and men are on an equal playing field”

        We aren’t. Governments across the globe are forcing companies to employ women and whoever counts as a “minority” despite lack of qualification. Women and “minorities” do not compete fairly, they have created the boogieman “White men” and are using THE LAW to create an equal OUTCOME world where every perceived ethnicity and both sexes get equal amounts of high paying jobs despite White men being more qualified for all of those jobs. White men built civilization FOR YOU and instead of being grateful you blame them for things getting worse. That is, when you’re not in denial about things getting worse for an argument’s sake.

        Companies are creating boatloads of useless “HR” and “service” positions to forfill quotas in my country, that’s money going from everyone (including actual qualified women!) to some unqualified women. It’s a net loss justified with nothing but women’s easily manipulated emotions and predictably you’re defending it.

  76. rooshvneedsabigdick February 3, 2016 at 9:33 am

    Is this real? I can’t believe somebody hasn’t murdered this piece of shit yet. And everyone of his supporters. the planet would be much better off without any of you.

    1. Dudebro Zero February 25, 2016 at 1:12 pm

      >calling for murder
      >obsession with dicks

      Gee, who could be behind this post?

  77. Visiteur February 3, 2016 at 5:13 pm

    It is obvious that only an american, who through his cultural background (or the lack of) lacks every connections to the ideas of enlightenment, which lead Europe out of medieval darkness on a path that lead to a sophisticated culture and finally showed, that mankind is indeed more than an ordinary animal. This degree of cultural, philosophical and social…let’s call it refinement is, was and will always be called “degenerate” by lesser developed, lesser refined, lesser civilized individuals (radical muslims, radical christians, inhabitants of rogue-gone colonies)

    To use the prefix “Neo-” to describe an idea, that finally means nothing more than a step back to archaic tribal-families (something that deserves to be described as degeneration) is something, the people in my country call a “starkes Stück” (this means, at least in this context, an action that is equally brave and stupid)

    I was quite surprised, to read Schopenhauers Name in this text, as I did not expect to read the name of a proper philosopher in this….thing. But, I suppose you didn’t know, there were a lot of brilliant philosophers after Schopenhauer and german Philosophy has developed since his days…But social progress is not your strength, eh?

    This…Idea (Platon is spinning in his grave) is very american. As Oscar Wilde said, the colonies skipped culture completely. While there is obviously a vague knowledge about some ideas, that brought us quite some progress in our thinking and the way our societies work, two things are dominant in this:
    1. A complete missunderstanding of simple concepts that should be known since…wow…1848? But I suppose this year is of little to no interest for this cultural rohrkrepierer (another fine term from my mothertongue) across the Sea.
    2. The immanent fear of not being the strong alpha-male the author wants to be. The fear of loosing his place in society due to changes in the system, the belief in a governmental conspiracy that wants to programm us…If I would be more into freudian psychology I would say, you had quite an interesting father-son-relationship.

    I am offended. As a white, atheist, male academic with stable finances who grew up with the ideals of the enlightenment (Aufklärung is a more fitting term, I think) I feel offended by this pile of intellectual junk.
    Reading this was not even remotely amusing. Despite the attempt, this just denies everything that makes the noblesse of mankind and degrades it to a mere animal.
    Denying 8000 years of culture, defiling the names of great thinkers and calling it a superior ideological alternative… I still hope, this is some kind of satire, I didn’t get.

    1. redpillyogi February 5, 2016 at 8:21 am

      ahhhh a self proclaimed “academic” who “feels offended”…it all makes sense now. Enjoy your Brave New World.

      1. Dudebro Zero February 25, 2016 at 1:10 pm

        Now do you understand why Germany is so fucked right now? It’s because of pretentious dumbasses like him who when presented with a decaying society simply look the other way and pretend there is still “progress” being made. When Western civilization was at its best almost everyone lived in traditional nuclear families (yet he thinks families are primitive) and almost everyone was Caucasian (yet you KNOW he thinks mass migration is a good idea, he has to, that’s the “enlightened” thing to chant right now). Nuclear, White families created the stability and productivity needed to run an orderly society where you can expect to have your wallet returned WITH CASH if you lose it. Those times are long gone but academia has simply turned away. Academia has convinced the fool that he lives in the greatest time of our “culture” when in fact our “culture” is dying and some parts of academia are doing their best to make it die faster.

  78. Chris February 3, 2016 at 6:08 pm

    are you married Roosh?

    1. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 4:15 am

      Nah he still lives in his mama’s basement.

      1. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:41 pm

        mama’s basement

  79. Morgaine February 3, 2016 at 7:37 pm

    I’ve been reading this site in the aftermath of the recent media storm, as well as the “Attendance Guidelines” for the Saturday meeting coming up. You folks seem to dislike women in general quite a bit, so why you don’t just try dating men? You clearly prefer them. Honest question. I mean, if your values really are Classical or Greek, then you must consider sexual relationships with other men to be an option. Why not just leave it at that?

    1. redpillyogi February 5, 2016 at 8:17 am

      No, we love women. First you need to get your facts straight before hating on us. Chances are we could be friends, or at least frienemies, with the understanding that we both have a common enemy, which is the global elite. Did you know that 6,000 people own half the wealth in the entire world? Think about that!!

      1. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 4:17 am

        Telling women we are your intellectual inferior sounds pretty hating . I gotta be honest. Roosh tells women they are irrational and need to be under the control of a male relative at all times. Even a younger male relative. So,yes that is hating because it is about dominating.

      2. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:39 pm

        inferior, hating, irrational, control, all times, hating, dominating…

  80. Graylady February 4, 2016 at 12:22 am

    Wait….I’m confused. If your advocating a return to traditional gender roles and a traditional value system so that women will marry and stay faithful, then WHO are you having sex with on the first date? After reading this post, which I mostly agreed with, I saw a post about how to have game and have sex on the first date. If the world switched gears and functioned as you say in this article, who are the empty vessels you’re having meaningless sex with on the first date? I’m not trying to be difficult, as I say I agree with most of this post, I just truly am confused.

    1. redpillyogi February 5, 2016 at 8:15 am

      Basically Roosh WAS a pickup artist but he no longer is and now is a proponent of neomasculinity and traditional values. If you agree with this article, then you are on the right track.

  81. Dani February 4, 2016 at 9:33 am

    Muricans …

  82. Anon February 4, 2016 at 11:46 am

    I’m neither woman, nor gay, so I reckon I should be ‘welcome’ on this place.
    Seriously, what the fuck? I wish this all was the work of a massive troll. Unfortunately, it seems to be not. It is unbelievable how monstruous can people get. Go find a psychiatrist. You’re in serious need of mental help.
    Not to mention that part where you describe that “women are encouraged to treat men as battery-operated sex dildos that can satisfy her present desires instead of carefully evaluating men for their long-term worth”, which is EXACTLY what you and your horde of scatterbrained pseudopeople do to women. You treat them as battery-operated fleshlights that can satisfy your present desires instead of carefully evaluating women for their long-term worth. Worse than that, you also see them as slaves.
    Seriously, shut the fuck up. You will die alone.

  83. Proud Woman February 4, 2016 at 4:10 pm

    I am a woman proud of the gender I was assigned. I am also a lesbian and have no desire to be with a man, or be a man. But I love men; I love my father, I love my brothers, and I love my non-dramatic male friends.
    I have always worked in a male dominated field, first in law enforcement, then in agriculture. I have been extremely successful at both careers and as a result, I get one of two reactions from my male counterpart: either I gain their utmost respect when they witness my success under extreme adversity (because as I a woman, I am expected to fail in a “man’s” job that requires physical strength), or I am hated because my success in a male dominated field creates deep insecurities in my male counterparts. As a supervisor of law enforcement personnel, I also witnessed the difference between female and male mental processes when faced with similar volatile situation. A male making an arrest of a citizen, almost always escalated the encounter because his testosterone would over take his mental capability to properly and efficiently access the situation at hand. This sometimes resulted in unnecessary violence towards the officer or the citizen. When a female was confronted with the same situation there was rarely any violence used against the officer or citizen because, unaffected by testosterone, she was able use common sense to properly and safely assess and maneuver the situation. Technology is part of human evolution. The invention of a gun has allowed a woman to take on an authoritative role in protecting our society. Some males have not adjusted to this evolution and as a result are creating chaos and destruction in an evolving society (as demonstrated by our law enforcement’s use of excessive force against unarmed citizens). The author of this article does not take into consideration natural evolution of all living things. He wants societies to go back to a patriarchy structure because it is under those conditions that he can win. That would be like me demanding half way through the game that the rules be changed to accommodate and compliment my strengths. While I agree that our society is under control by the powers to be, hiding behind “capitalism,” it is the same power that instilled on our previous societies the idea of “Cristian marriage and ideals.” So I urge my male counterparts reading this to take the red pill, see your male insecurities for what they are–FEAR! And take part in this natural evolution process because you will only become a better you…a more complete human being. Remember what an extremely intelligent ancestor of ours once said, “The only thing that is constant is change.” –Heraclitus. Otherwise, if we continue to fight against this natural evolution process, we will face self destruction.

    1. Proud Woman February 4, 2016 at 4:23 pm

      I wanted to add after this comment but forgot to before posting:

      “That would be like me demanding half way through the game that the rules be changed to accommodate and compliment my strengths.”

      Well, life is not a game. It’s suppose to be a growing experience. If you take the red pill, you will have a deep understanding of that. If you take the blue pill you will continue chugging through life fearing and fighting.

    2. johnathan blaze February 7, 2016 at 9:11 pm

      The problem with this “new evolution” is that everyone is miserable. Without patriarchal family values, there is nothing. No stability for children to grow up into. No fathers to raise their daughters & sons, which leads to more a mentally screwed-up populace. You’ve seen how messed up women get because of “daddy issues” as well as sons who never had dads.

      There is nothing “natural” about feminism. Women aren’t happier being consumerist corporate slaves, and men aren’t happy being emasculated. You are trying to tell men to give up and accept the pile of shit the world is becoming. Well it’s not going to work. The backlash against “progressivism” will eventually become dominant again. The media will try to stop it with fake stories about rape, but once people start seeing the truth even the media wont be able to stop it.

  84. Jean-Luc Genereau February 4, 2016 at 6:05 pm

    I can’t get a read on this. Is this misogynistic, cuz a lot of it seems to be calling women harlots. Do you think there should be the same opportunities for women and men, or just men? I think there should be the same opportunities, but merit based, not based on gender. Besides that, I love your views on capitalism, religion, and nearly everything else. Well written article that actually makes sense. The talk of old values by Aristotle and other philosophers and writers definitely hit hard. The concept of good values, like chivalry, seem to be completely forgotten.

  85. Stephen February 4, 2016 at 7:22 pm

    I was considering making a serious comment until this note popped up on the sign saying “Signup today to my free game tips newsletter and learn how to tell if a girl will be receptive to your approach”. At this point, I revisited some of your key points in the article. Your lack of evidence is less absurd than only your extreme bias. It’s strikingly similar to a fourth grade boy’s essay titled “Why boys are better than girls”; your article parallels this work in both quality of content and skill of the writer.

  86. Bob February 4, 2016 at 9:13 pm

    Very interesting. For those of you who like traditional women and know how to spot the real ones from those faking it international dating outside of english speaking countries and Europe is the way to go.

    Personally? I like all women lol

  87. PChuck February 4, 2016 at 10:47 pm

    Fantastic article. Wish this was around twenty years ago.

  88. RKB February 5, 2016 at 8:47 am

    I think that you make some interesting arguments about feminists and the modern society disregarding the biological differences between the male and female anatomy. It is very clear that men and women have different strengths and weaknesses, and can never be expected to perform equally on all fronts. However, it seems like you are ignoring components that are essential to understanding modern civilization.

    Technological advancements have changed working conditions, and will continue to do so. From the Stone Age until the industrial revolution, most types of labor revolved around physical activity and strength. However, the introduction of machines, computers and other forms of technology are causing the focus to shift: Physical power is no longer required in order to be a valuable worker. As the need for manual labor declines, the need for innovative ideas and solutions to global (environmental) issues is growing. These domains require different qualities from working individuals, such as creativity, intellect, cooperativeness and self-criticism. In other words: technology reduces the demand for masculine qualities and increases the need for feminine qualities. This, however, does not mean that men can not possess these qualities, or that masculine qualities become obsolete. Rather, it means that a need for balance is unfolding.

    By neglecting this, you are presenting a false depiction of modern society and its issues.

    1. Dudebro Zero February 25, 2016 at 1:30 pm

      >These domains require different qualities from working individuals, such
      as creativity, intellect, cooperativeness and self-criticism.

      Okay, sounds reasonable.

      >increases the need for feminine qualities

      LMAO, what the hell kinda jump is that? Women are in NO WAY more creative (all great artists were men), more intelligent (women fare worse in IQ tests), cooperative (cooperation has always been important in civilized society) or more self-reflective. They have lower self-esteem but ultimately they have it for a reason. They ARE inferior to men, that’s why they feel inferior. Modern society forces women to compete with men and women know that they cannot win, hence why they keep voting for affirmative action aka sexist discrimination against men. The only way women can compete with men is if they covertly have some powerful men (most important politicians are still men) fuck over the less powerful men on their behalf. Wow, so cooperative, so self-reflective, women are wonderful!

      This delusion that women are better than men, or even as good, AT ANYTHING is our downfall. Reality will prove you wrong and any country where people think like you will pay the ultimate price and serve as a warning to those other countries that are fortunate enough to reach the same point of technological advance slightly later. With the horrors of feminism on display world-wide, and with the complete failure of feminist hotspots such as Sweden and the UK, other places are going to think long and hard if they really want to “empower” women in the same ways. At least I hope so, it would be tragic if all of humanity was sent back to the stone age over white knight thirst. Please, god, at least let the Asians figure it out before it’s too late. It may already be too late for us White people but spare the Asians so our sacrifice has meaning.

  89. Áine Hee von Sax February 5, 2016 at 10:43 am

    A lot of the points made in this article are points I have been supporting long before it became a movement, yet the writer of this article same time publishes books about how to best ‘get laid’. Travel guides (my yieks.. I still think of travel guides as pointing out architecture or history o.O) titled ‘Bang women from this or that place’, just have me cringe. To me this is a lack of integrity, and if there is one thing truly off-putting in a male, then it is a lack of integrity.

    I was raised by a powerful alpha male, a ‘patriarch’, who deserved every bit of respect he got from us, because he definitely embodied the meaning of integrity. Even feminists ate out of the palm of his hand, and not just because he came from nowhere and fought himself to the top of his chosen profession, but also because he loved women. He enjoyed female company and made women feel cherished, and he would have never partaken in something like ‘fat shaming’ for example, as to him women were just marvellous beautiful creatures, no matter their shape or size. Same time though, this was also a man who had married young and stayed faithful to his wife all his life (my amazing mother, he died in her arms). He kissed my mother’s hand every day, and I grew up watching it, and while every decision ever made in our household was ultimately made by him, every decision ever made by him also involved my mother’s thoughts. He would always come to her and ask for her input, trusting and valuing her opinion. My father was never afraid of any female, he simply knew who he was, and he certainly did not feel a need to sleep around to consider himself manly.

    It is this which I feel is at odds with the writer as well as many supporting this specific movement – the over emphasis in regards to sex (or so it appears to me at least). If you make valid points, do not de-value them through your actions. You long for feminine females, who respect you and stay loyal to you, but then head off and play right into what is going so wrong these days. By over emphasising sex, you appear nothing but a slave to a drive, which in turn puts you right at the feet of women, for they are the ones whose attention you have to grab to get your drive satisfied.
    To me that at best confuses me, in its worst truly repulses me… A man who is slave to his drive to me is weak beyond measure.

    The idea and ideal is that we find others to compliment us, support our strength and cover the back of our failings in our every day struggle for physical and mental survival. You can ‘bang’ countless females, but sex does not grant this support, only love does, founded on mutual respect and sincere care.
    My parents had that down to the T, and yes, my father was a ‘patriarch’, but same time my mother was also the matriarch of our family, and it was an act of ‘together’ above all else, combining forces, which ensured the success of their union for a life time.

    1. Áine Hee von Sax February 5, 2016 at 11:55 am

      Eeps, just realized me mentioning my father could be interpreted by some as a ‘daddy complex’, alas my father was very much a human of flesh and blood, with strong with weak points, just as every one has them. However, my parents relationship worked. I myself have never drunk a drop of alcohol, and I do not believe in sex outside of solid relationship. I was taught to curtsey at the age of 5 and still curtsey today, even at super market tills. Soap operas are a disease, as is a lot of other stuff people consume on TV (I don’t watch TV at all). I have entered major battles with feminists (mentioning that I believe wearing a veil isn’t all bad, doesn’t go down well..), but while I have been told that I uphold a lot of ‘traditional values’, I also try to realize that not everyone shares my views and ideals. I was clearly influenced by my own upbringing and watching my parents success, but this does not mean my parents marriage would work for everyone. It just makes me sad how difficult it seems to have become for everyone, really, with fewer and fewer unions forming and lasting. I feel an overall shallowing of society is to blame for a lot of it, but of course I could be wrong -.-

  90. Fitz February 5, 2016 at 2:18 pm

    You know absolutely nothing about ‘the nature of women’ and your thoughts are not representative of the thoughts and characters of men, but of the thoughts and characters of small-minded individuals that see equality as threatening their undeserving supremacy. There is nothing ‘neo’ about the masculinity you advocate. It is traditionalism, unchanged.

  91. Fitz February 5, 2016 at 2:52 pm

    You know nothing about the ‘nature of women’ and your views are not representative of the views and characters of men, but of the views and characters of small-minded individuals who see equality as threatening their undeserving supremacy. There is nothing ‘neo’ about the masculinity you advocate. It is traditionalism, unchanged. And you apperantly do not respect an opposition to your ideas, since you’ve already deleted this post once.

  92. Fitz February 5, 2016 at 3:21 pm

    You know nothing about the ‘nature of women’ and your views are not representative of the views and characters of men, but of the views and characters of small-minded individuals who see equality as threatening their undeserving supremacy. There is nothing ‘neo’ about the masculinity you advocate. It is traditionalism, unchanged. And you apperantly do not respect an opposition to your ideas, since you’ve already deleted this post twice. Very brave and manly of you to cower away from a discussion or a statement that you don’t know how to respond to, or that you don’t want your readers to come across.

  93. B.E. K. February 6, 2016 at 4:22 pm

    So where are all you neomasculine men? I have yet to meet one of you. Years of conditioning and circumstance almost obliterated femininity; women need to know that there are men who value the side of us we are taught to suppress. Otherwise, we will keep being what we are taught is right. By the way, there are plenty of women that agree with your basic premise.

  94. RLH February 6, 2016 at 11:31 pm

    No self respecting woman would ever have a relationship with a man with such disgusting and oppressive values. I’m happy you have built yourself up to become this image of “modern-masculinity” by fundamentally dividing humans in a way that not only aides sexual exploitation but which does the complete opposite of what this group was founded for. Patriarchy is in no way a masculine feat. If anything it is a pathetic attempt at intimidating an equal sex. No real man would behave in this foul manner. I think you need to sort out your priorities.. and clearly insecurities too. #subvertthepatriarchy.

  95. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 3:35 am

    Awww cute article Roosh. If you could find a woman gullible enough to fall for,your archaic plan I’m sure you would have snatched her up by now. You could bring her to,live in mummy’s basement. You can promote your ideas all you want to with your single male buddies but that doesn’t mean women are likely to sign up for your return to the dark ages. Pontificate all you want . We women will continue to laugh our asses off at you and your followers. I’m sure your meet ups went great. Rooms full of men sitting together talking about their plans to create patriarchal relationships with zero women in attendance …..that’ll work.

    1. Aryanblindboy February 7, 2016 at 6:41 pm

      cute, gullible, archaic, snatched, mummy’s basement, single male, dark ages, laugh our asses off, followers, men sitting together, “followers”, zero women…

  96. matt February 8, 2016 at 8:59 am

    Neomasculinity? All i see is a bunch of weak men stuck in the 50s.

  97. Knut February 13, 2016 at 7:34 am

    Hey Roosh. I didn’t bother to read through the entire page, but from the few pieces I did read, you seem to be one of the guys who actually “get it”, and that the media has just made you into an unjust scapegoat – just like they did with Julian Blanc from RSD.

    And if that’s the case, that you really are one of the guys that actually “get it” (considering that I haven’t read through most of this page), then this comment of mine is completely unnecessary, because then you will already know that you’re doing the right thing. But none the less, I still want to help encourage you even more by reminding you of the fact that you have a lot of supporters out there (like me) – in contrast to the hardcore feminists and all the other ignorant people out there who are against you.

    Take care 🙂

  98. Aitor Tilla February 17, 2016 at 5:02 am

    disgusting and misogynist article

    1. Dudebro Zero February 25, 2016 at 1:18 pm

      Wow, can you feel the vicious impact those buzzwords are having! It just never wears off! Oh wait, it already did years ago.

  99. Tom Dane February 23, 2016 at 4:12 pm

    What does the “neo” stand for ?

  100. lillian February 25, 2016 at 10:59 pm

    As a woman I can honestly say I agree with everything I have read here. I had heard so many bad things… yet I don’t get what the big deal is. This seems normal to me?

  101. Vicki Kelly Was Townsend May 2, 2016 at 5:11 pm

    Well I hope my daughters find neomasculine men! It would make a change from latte drinking, eyebrow waxing men for sure….I myself grew up in South Africa which being about 20 years behind the curve was pretty much patriarchal and probably still is compared to Western Europe. I enjoyed being ‘looked after’ by men and having them fix my car while I played the ‘girl role’. I was rather surprised by the state of Western European men when I arrived in the UK in my mid 20’s……we were all ‘equal’ nobody paid for dinner, opened the car door, so boring and unsexy frankly! So hoorah for neomasculine men and I hope to see you re-assert yourself in the UK pretty damn quickly.

  102. Ranjjiet Varhmen July 15, 2016 at 6:22 am

    It is worth reading, though I dont agree to all of what is shared. thanks!

  103. Ranjjiet Varhmen July 15, 2016 at 6:42 am

    The best idea of Masculine and Feminine, I have ever come across is from Sadhguru.

    The ideal society does not look at the genitals of a person and judge that person and there is no need to do that.

    Everyone is worth what they are capable of, not what body part they have. There is no need to identify the gender especially in a work/business atmosphere.

  104. David August 15, 2016 at 12:10 pm

    This was very informative. I particularly liked the sections on Deeper Meaning and Spirituality as well as Understanding the true nature of women. 🙂

  105. Kalo Yankulov August 25, 2016 at 9:11 am

    Brilliant article! Bookmarked

  106. Ainalem Pmurt December 11, 2016 at 4:54 pm

    Wow… you are a serious nutcase and a horrible, deeply damaged human being. Has it ever occurred to you that women are people and that equality is a no-brainer, rather than some unreasonable demand?

    Anyone who supports this pathetic, angry moron – God help you.

  107. Ainalem Pmurt December 11, 2016 at 5:00 pm

    Also – Roosh or whatever your name is: Please know that all self-respecting women who have the misfortune of stumbling on your website ALL know that (1) you can’t get a real woman to save your life, (2) somewhere along the line a real woman hurt you and this website is your cry for help, and (3) what you really want is an equal partner who can stimulate and support you and make you a better man (which you desperately need). You are fooling no one but other pathetic souls.

    Now run off and do some work on yourself so that you will finally DESERVE a real woman.

  108. Frank B. June 11, 2017 at 11:41 am

    You people are SERIOUSLY CRAZY!!!!

  109. Michelle Lee June 27, 2017 at 11:05 pm

    ahahahah now this just proves what I already knew….99 percent of you male types see women as good for cooking cleaning and fucking. OH and taking care of all that mindfuck numbing job of caring for and raising children AND working 10 hours a day and paying for half the bills. LOL. of course women are not going to want to stay married to and be some asshole’s servant and sex toy. Why would any sane woman sign up for all that extra work and be someone’s bitch too? fuck that shit….

  110. John Kievlan May 23, 2018 at 1:06 am

    Ohh…haha. You silly, sad little boys 🙂