Neomasculinity combines traditional beliefs, masculinity, and animal biology into one ideological system. It aims to aid men living in Westernized nations that lack qualities such as classical virtue, masculinity in males, femininity in females, and objectivity, especially concerning beauty ideals and human behavior. It also serves as an antidote for males who are being programmed to accept Western degeneracy, mindless consumerism, and immoral state authority. The purpose of this article is to list and describe the principal doctrines of neomasculinity.

Table Of Contents

Game

Due to changes in mating behavior and pair bonding brought on by technology, shifting demographics, migration to cities from rural towns, universal suffrage, promotion of sexually promiscuous behaviors, and destruction of traditional sex roles, most men do not have the ability or knowledge to successfully reproduce with a modern woman on a comparable attractiveness and socioeconomic level. Their “natural” self will lead to reproductive failure without purposeful intervention that increases their attractiveness in the eyes of women who are actively encouraged to seek out high-value males.

“Game” is a collection of socially-based tactics and reproducible behaviors that increase a man’s sexual attractiveness to women and therefore his access to reproduction. It can range from a trivial aid like an opening line that starts a conversation with a woman in an interesting manner to a physical move that escalates intimacy in the bedroom in a way that is most likely to lead to sex. Its primary goal is to give men a set of tools and beliefs that allow him to more easily enter sexual relationships with the women he desires. In modern Western societies, a man who doesn’t at least subconsciously understand game concepts is unlikely to have sex at all.

Game is ultimately a response to signals that women in any environment are displaying, giving them what they want in sexual partners based on their desires and tastes of the day. These desires are undergoing regular change, meaning that game is a constantly shifting set of outward rules and practices while the inward game beliefs governing those practices remain mostly static, based on known biological truths that stem from animal reproductive science and studies based on female human sexual behavior.

Related:
The 3 Principal Types Of Game
The Death Of Male Authenticity

Traditional sex roles

Humans purportedly diverged from chimpanzees 4-8 million years ago. During that stretch, natural selection has applied different pressures on the men and women of our hunter-gatherer ancestors to increase their likelihood of survival. The most visible difference between the sexes is muscle mass, whereby a modern woman is only 60% as strong as a man, since stronger men were more likely to ensure individual and group survival.

Selection did not stop at the neck, meaning that our brains have accumulated differences in behavior, psychology, and how we respond to various environmental stimuli. For those who don’t believe in evolutionary processes, sex differences would have been bestowed onto humans by some type of creator.

The sum of these differences lead to a strength and weakness profile for each sex that allows them to either excel or be deficient in certain roles compared to the opposite sex. The term “traditional sex roles” is slightly a misnomer—a more accurate term is “human sex roles,” since they have likely existed since the beginning of the human species.

Traits possessed by men in greater percentage than women: dominance, independence, intelligence, rationale, analytical thinking

Traits possessed by women in greater percentage than men: submissiveness, dependence, emotional nature, faster intuition, cooperative sharing

The idea of “gender equality” is a myth that has no scientific basis. Pushing for it is detrimental to both sexes because it minimizes their innate strengths and maximizes their weaknesses, decreasing their overall chances of reproduction, survival, and even happiness, especially in an environment that is constrained with resources.

Forcing men to cooperate, share, and nurture like a woman is as unusual as training a house cat to bark like a dog. In the same way that we have the economical division of labor, where you are trained to perform a narrow set of tasks better than others in order to earn a successful living, traditional sex roles have done the same in splitting the burden of survival and child-rearing between two sexes.

While women don’t “belong” in the home, they do a better job than men at nesting and child raising. While men don’t belong in coal mines or on oil rigs, they do a better job at digging minerals from the earth and raising it above ground. Creating government programs or propaganda that aim to show women can be coal miners and firefighters as good as men is a foolish, politically correct behavior that comes from a false notion (“men and women are equal”) that cannot ever be made true without us evolving into a new species. Westerners, as defined by those living in the Anglosphere and Western Europe, are currently forced to digest all manner of manipulation and dissemination of falsehoods to make equality truthful.

Men and women should have some degree of free will to live a life compatible in their respective societies, but there should not be coordination between the media, government, and academia to program citizens to abandon their innate strengths for imagined ideas of utopia.

Related:
Traditional Gender Roles Create Feminine Women
The Contradiction Of Pursuing Casual Sex While Advocating For Traditional Values
Traditional Sex Roles Are What Nature Intended

Understanding the true nature of women

By the time most men finish puberty, they will have an impression of women that is mostly fantasy. Modern culture has undertaken huge steps to portray women simultaneously as victims needing male assistance and empowered superheros who are so capable and brave that they don’t even need men at all. It’s not surprising to find that many men have an understanding of women that is not far from what you would find in an old Disney movie, of women who display amazing acts of courage one moment and then needing approval and assistance from dashing princes the next.

Women are reactionary in that they subconsciously assess the environment to determine how to proceed with mate selection. If survival is hard, and her basic food and shelter needs are difficult to attain, she will latch onto a provider male at an early age that aids in her survival. If survival is easy, and she already has her food and shelter needs met, she will then pursue more base hedonistic instincts while leisurely shopping around for the most high status male she can obtain.

If she fails in her search of the latter, she will procure a provider male well past her peak beauty and fertility (after 30 years of age) so that she does not grow old without any life partner at all. (A provider male, or beta male, is a man who eagerly, kindly, and sometimes mindlessly shares his financial resources with a woman of dubious worth in exchange for sexual benefits, companionship, and the chance to reproduce.)

Women are also craftily aware of local legal conditions and how it can be manipulated in their favor. If rape laws tighten against men, more women will use false rape accusations as a weapon to punish men, alleviate feelings of sexual guilt, attract the attention of high-status men, or get out of being caught cheating. If domestic violence laws tighten, women will use that as a weapon to control their husbands. Women are skilled at using the structure and rules of the local environment to fulfill their goals, which is to secure the highest possible value male, gain as much material resources as possible, pursue the female primal need for pleasure and vanity, and compete successfully against other females.

A woman behaving as the model of femininity and kindness in an environment with conditions favoring males will behave quite differently in an environment with conditions favoring females. A woman’s nature is therefore not static, and takes the shape of the container of her environment.

The true nature of men, on the other hand, is in turn reactionary to signals women put out that declare their sexual preferences in males. Women act according to the broader environment to accumulate resources and self-satisfaction while men act according to the best method and strategy to secure female sexual partners. The mating feedback loop that results, involving untold number of variables, can help explain differences in mating strategies of people living in nations that have similar cultural values.

In the past, the best male strategy to reproduce was resource sharing since survival was difficult and in no way guaranteed, but now with survival needs easily met, men are moving into a “clown” strategy of providing entertainment, excitement, and alpha male simulated behavior to women who are quicker to reward this set of tactics with commitment-free sex than with provider male tactics of yesterday.

Related:
Men Are Nothing More Than Clowns To The Modern Woman
Women In Their Prime Prefer Sex With Damaged Men

Patriarchy

Western society is moving away from a patriarchal-based system where men held sole power and determined the rules governing society. In the past, men like Arthur Schopenhauer and HL Mencken understood the true nature of women and the chaos that would ensue if patriarchal rules were dismantled by allowing women to pursue mating without constraints and compete directly with men in the labor market. This has the simultaneous effect of making women less able to fulfill their motherly duties while impoverishing men economically and making them less able or likely to fulfill important provider roles that foster societal stability.

Patriarchy does have its flaws in locking in roles for males and females who are outliers, but it was undoubtedly a superior societal system that catered to the innate abilities of the sexes and provided them with roles that not only furthered their own abilities and interests but civilization as a whole. Men were able to provide through their labor while women were able to nurture and raise children in an imperfect but mostly harmonious family system. It’s likely due to patriarchy that humans did survive various threats to their existence. Patriarchal systems must therefore be regained as the primary organizing structure of modern societies.

Related:
The End Game Of Feminism
20 Signs That We’re Not Living In A Patriarchy
This Accidental Experiment Shows The Superiority Of Patriarchy

Sexual marketplace value

The job market in a capitalist country is fluid and free. Employers can hire and fire workers at will and workers can join or leave a company at will. Neither have much in the way of loyalty or dedication to each other, and each party is attempting to extract as much money, labor, knowledge, and experience as possible from the other party.

Some corporations hold more value in the eyes of employees than others, due to their brand name, salary, facilities, and perks. Some workers are eagerly sought out by corporations because of their experience, ability, and reputation. The top corporations can easily retain the best talent while the bottom corporations continually lose their best talent to corporations above them. At the same time, the best workers are promoted and lavished with higher salaries while the worst workers can only retain the lowest paying jobs or have to suffer persistent unemployment.

The modern dating market is now as fluid as the job market. Once traditional sex roles were dismantled and women were allowed to embrace their hypergamous nature of seeking top males, they began shopping for the best “corporation” that they could land, hopping from one man to the next as a way to maximize the value they could receive. At the same time, men at the top could attract the very best females, while men at the bottom struggle to attract even one.

In the days of Christian monogamy, women were culturally shamed and prevented from shopping for men, and encouraged to marry the first good man they bed, one they often met through family or church. This ensured society stability and sexual equality in that most able-bodied men would be able to procure a wife. These women would gain a dedicated provider male instead of being sexually used for short-term sexual pleasure by high-status men until being replaced by a younger beauty.

The breakdown of traditional sex roles and Christian-style egalitarian monogamy with the promotion of fluid dating has begun to revert society into a harem model currently practiced by Arab royalty in countries like Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates, where high status men reap nearly all the highest quality fertile women and maintain concubines on retainer while low status men receive no women and struggle to have their basic survival needs met.

In America today, famous and good-looking men are hotly pursued by beautiful women while the majority of “average” men are forced to undergo strenuous efforts to increase their sexual marketplace value (SMV) to compete, just like how any worker must increase their job market value by educating themselves in university and working in low-paying internships.

With fluid dating, every man must vigorously improve his SMV in order to land sexual relationships, and if he doesn’t, he’s at risk of failing to experience any sexual success. At the same time, women also have an SMV that is tied mainly to their beauty and fertility. Men have to work at increasing their SMV while women are given the bulk of theirs by nature.

Except for natural-born alpha males, a man’s SMV is still rising in his late teens and early 20’s before he has accumulated significant resources, social status, and game, during a time when a woman’s SMV is at her highest, thanks to her being at the peak of her beauty. If a woman is unable to gain commitment of a man during the height of her SMV, it will be a game of musical chairs in her 30’s or even 40’s to find any man who will walk down the aisle with her. A woman who doesn’t lower her standards in her 30’s will undoubtedly fail to find commitment, since there is little she will be able to do to increase her value. A man, however, has many options even into old age for keeping his SMV relatively high, such as increasing his status or wealth.

A healthy and stable society will put limitations upon both men and women to fully maximize their SMV as if they were working in a capitalistic job market. Men would be limited from excessive philandering for extended periods of time and “using up” a woman’s beauty for hedonistic pleasure while women would be limited in using her sexuality and peak beauty to sleep with dozens of men in the hopes that one high-status man will keep her. Sexual experimentation should be self-limiting, but as long as dating is fluid, male participants have no choice but to play the game and work on their SMV to hopefully land some semblance of a normal relationship. The more fluid the dating market is, the less likely that will happen.

Related:
How To Be A Great Man
8 Things American Women Must Do To Make Themselves More Attractive For Men
How The Game Changes When You Get Older

Self-improvement

Self-improvement is necessary for a man to transform the raw material of his genetics to maximize his sexual marketplace value, accumulate enough material resources to live comfortably (and protect himself from the actions of an unjust state or hysterical mob), and to gain enough wisdom and experience to live a virtuous life with a mind free of falsehoods and brainwashing. This is an individual journey that better suits a man with an above-average mind that resists the trends and styles of the day to pursue truths and conditions that were no less relevant hundreds of years ago. Four basic components this includes is physical fitness, hard work ethic, individual responsibility, and lifestyle optimization.

Weightlifting and fitness

Body development increases a man’s overall health, instills into him hard work ethic, and increases his confidence, which facilitates attainment of his other goals. At the same time body development is important, it should not be so involved that it begins to take away from development of the mind.

For the average man, the mind exists solely for the pleasures and functions of the body, but for the above-average man, the body exists for the functioning of the mind. Men must be careful not to overcompensate in body development to pursue goals of vanity or narcissism that end up limiting their overall development.

Individual responsibility

Men are not victims. While we have been placed on the Earth during a unique time in humanity that can be institutionally oppressive to men, we’re still allowed enormous ability to affect the fabric of our lives. Even the most repressive regime on the planet today will afford men the opportunity to privately develop themselves, so no excuse must be made to quit, obsessively gripe, or not even attempt the difficult steps that can improve our stations.

While there are some features of modern Western society that make it harder to achieve our goals, such as finding a loyal wife to raise a family with, there is still room for a disciplined and focused man to win in a climate that wants him to lose. The limitations stopping us exist partly in our minds, as any brief study of history can show that men never had it easy. Blame for our failures in life must be put squarely on our own shoulders to train our minds to focus on what we can control instead of what we cannot.

Hard work ethic

Men are the mules of the human species. Their DNA drives for them to work endlessly until they perish, and so a neomasculine man is one who sets a goal for himself and tirelessly labors for its realization. Success may not be a guarantee in his journey, but labor is, and the man who doesn’t labor is not more deserving of the fruits of male life than one who does. While some men have to work less at their goals because of innate talents and abilities they were born with, work is a significant equalizer that allows one born with a lower stock to raise himself up to those men born above him.

Society is now structured to teach men to work for corporations to earn money for products that go right back to corporations. After a man has put in a shift of eight hours in the office, his mind and body is too tired to work for himself, and so this is how the modern format of work inhibits a man in developing his potential. Along his life’s journey, a man must figure out how he can work for himself first, during times his mind is fresh, instead of giving the best parts of himself to a corporation that does little more than satisfy consumer wants that were programmed into him.

Related:
We Are All Sisyphus
Everyone Is Hoping That You’ll Fail

Lifestyle optimization

Every man’s nature is different. Some are morning birds, some are night owls. Some have fast metabolisms, some have slow metabolisms. Some are extroverted, some are introverted. Every man has a responsibility to discover his own nature, his strengths and his flaws, to understand how his mind and body responds to stimuli to better construct a way of living that suits him best and allows him to accomplish goals instead of trying to merely copy someone else’s formula.

Man must find the best diet, sleep, supplements, and workout regime for his body. He must find the best work habits for completing his labor. He must find the social environments to further his friendships or relationships with women. This requires men to be open to trying different things, be vigorous with experimentation, and self-reflect honestly without ego. By the time a man is 35, he should have a custom lifestyle in place that is seamlessly integrated with a program of self-development that aids in his goals instead of hindering them

Related:
6 Life Tips That Will Make You More Productive

Free speech and due process

Free speech is important from the perspective that concerned men or women should be able to speak out once they have identified corruption and degeneracy in their societies. In a well-educated population that is resistant to mob rule and raised on virtue and honorable values, ideas are only likely to be accepted if they are correct or scientifically sound. Otherwise, they are discarded, meaning that theoretically, there should be no large danger posed by an incorrect idea within a healthy society.

Without free speech, reading this document right now may not be possible, meaning you might have stayed less aware of the sickness our society is currently facing. For that reason, citizens must be able to speak intelligently and freely as a defense mechanism against the backwards slide to cultural toxicity, of which it’s worth noting that free speech alone was no defense to current ills. It should be no surprise that men today who have shared views that fall within the realm of neomasculine thought have been subject to censorious mob action.

Equal due process is also important. While men should be treated as the sex that knows more about how to structure society than women, both sexes, along with different races, must be held to the same legal standard.

Western law has gone so far to the side of women that men are no longer being treated with equal due process. They are being held to a different standard when it comes to consensual sex in colleges where extra-legal tribunals are punishing them and ruining their livelihoods based on allegations without sound evidence. Additionally, they are being imprisoned if they fail to pay child support, regardless of their employment status.

In spite of the fact that a man’s word is often more credible than a woman’s, since a woman is naturally more skilled at quickly inventing stories and rationalizations based on the feelings and emotions she’s experiencing, both sexes should be charged or prosecuted for crimes based on the legal evidence at hand, without consideration of their sex.

Related:
What Is A Social Justice Warrior (SJW)?
Are You An Enemy Of Liberty?

Testosterone

Testosterone is the biological hormone that is responsible for masculine behavior and characteristics such as muscle development, voice deepening, body hair, aggression, and a host of positive cognitive effects. Men are a unique sex primarily because of this hormone, and any decrease of its concentration in a population of men through environmental pollution or dystopian regulation will decrease masculine behaviors.

Being a man is not a social construct—it’s a primarily biological construct that is heavily dependent on healthy body and brain functioning that results from appropriate testosterone levels. An unhealthy society will undoubtedly be composed of males with stunted levels of testosterone.

Entrepreneurship

Major sources of employment for men are corporations and medium-sized businesses, but they have become an increasingly unreliable and hostile means for men to earn their daily bread, especially if the work environment includes women.

Men in modern workplaces are forced to submit to the authoritarian whims of the female-dominated Human Resources department, where their statements and behaviors are monitored for anything causing the slightest offense, meaning that men are one politically incorrect statement away from losing out on a promotion or getting outright fired. Even if they behave according to corporate regulations, they are still subject to dubious training programs which treat them as innate harassers of women and minorities. In such an environment, a woman can easily hurt a man’s employment through false allegations.

Even if a man exhibits perfect behavior, a slight downturn in business means he can get fired immediately. The corporation is designed to have no loyalty to a man and his prior service, even if he was an integral part of the company’s prior success.

For the above reasons, it is important for a man to start his own business or firm. He will be able to pick and choose the customers that he wants to serve and not have his livelihood be dependent on a petty manager or disgruntled woman who sets out to destroy him.

Most men begin their path to entrepreneurship by developing a freelancing side business while employed full time, but at some point he will have to make the jump from being primarily dependent on only one company. The world is so hostile to the ideas and behavior of the neomasculine man that he must view corporate employment as a short-term solution until he can develop his own business. Otherwise, he sets himself up for future destitution.

Related:
It’s Better To Have Guts Than Brains
There Are No Rules

Red pill truths

While “red pill” has many definitions, it’s consistently used as a way or means to view the world in an objective, truthful, and factual manner, no matter how inconvenient or painful. It may seem redundant to need a method of seeking truth of the world, since it should be a default technique for all educated persons in a society, but identity politics and special interests deliberately conceal and distort truths to further utopian ideals or to consolidate their own selfish need for power.

For example, today’s left-leaning establishment deliberately conceals differences in sex and race in order to promote an ideal of equality that is meant to severely handicap men. They also downplay a woman’s true nature and deceive the public by falsely stating benefits of fluid dating when it is in fact wreaking havoc on monogamy through encouraging women to tickle their most hedonistic urges that breed anarchy and instability into human pair bonding.

The opposite of red pill truth is “blue pill” ignorance, whereby people maintain large blind spots in their thinking or observations to shield themselves from the undeniable facts of human behavior and reality. Some people adhere to blue pill ideas because they have been brainwashed while others do so purposefully to raise their position in the hierarchy of the group they’re a member of.

Related:
The 5 Paths To Realizing Truth
11 Hard Truths I Learned From Taking The Red Pill

Male-only spaces

The ability to be a man—as according to nature—has diminished in recent years as women invade all spaces that were traditionally male, going so far as to protest to be served in male barber shops (1, 2).

After women are included in male spaces, men have to speak and act with a filter to not offend the sensitive women, removing the masculine banter and jockeying that is an important part of male friendship and development. By having women in all spaces, men are no longer able to nurture their masculine side, and instead sacrifice the strength of their friendships and limit display of their natural identity in order to appease the females that are now present, who relish the male attention they can receive at little cost.

Men and women should be allowed to co-mingle in designated spaces, but other spaces should be exclusively male, forbidding women from participating. At the same time, women are encouraged to have their own female spaces free of men so that they can nurture their feminine qualities.

Related:
Why Women And Gays Should Not Be Allowed In Male-Safe Spaces

Sexual moderation

Men have a biological need for sex that must be sated for them to function normally, but if that need is overshot, such as in the case of sleeping with women only for ego gratification, the man begins sacrificing more important needs for fleeting pleasure that will provide no lasting meaning. It is normal for a man to pursue sex because he wants sex, but pursuing sex because he wants to impress others, hit an artificial notch count of women, or alleviate personal insecurities will invariably result in self-harm and lost time.

Game is a tool that allows a man to fulfill his sex and relationship needs, but once game is used outside of those needs, he will succumb to hedonistic urges that are no different than a woman uploading selfies every day on Facebook to receive validation for her appearance. A man must always check his sexual behavior with the needs of his body and spirit to make sure he is not trying to satisfy the bottomless pit of his animalistic hunger.

The sexual activity of women must be even more closely monitored than men. Repeated studies show that a marriage is more likely to fail based on higher number of sexual partners a woman—but not a man—had before marrying (1, 2, 3, 4), a fact that should be obvious to any man who has experienced the highly impulsive and shallow behavior of easy women. The results of these studies clearly show that a marriage is at high risk of failure if a woman had more than two sexual partners before marrying. (An additional study showed that promiscuous women are more likely to abuse substances, regardless of her age.)

A high level of promiscuity on the part of the woman will also expose her to more sexually transmitted diseases, particularly the common infections of chlamydia and gonorrhea, that may render her sterile and incapable of reproducing. Lastly, the ingestion of birth control in pill form, which offers a frictionless path to promiscuity, impairs their ability to become pregnant up to a year (and possible longer) after they stop taking it, harming their reproductive potential.

Even though traditional marriage is the best path towards societal stability, it is becoming extremely difficult for a man today to find a woman with an acceptable sexual history and proper values that wouldn’t put a possible marriage at great risk of failure. This risk, combined with the fact that the state has marriage laws biased in disproportionate favor towards women, essentially turns husbands into hostages within their own homes, making them have to suffer a woman’s impulsive “no-fault” decision for divorce (80% of them are initiated by women). With the ensuing financial ruin and emotional turmoil that would result, it is no longer an automatic safe bet for men to marry in a Western nation.

Related:
Western Men Are Becoming Evolutionary Dead-Ends
Ego Sex
Is Your Game Sustainable?

Nuclear family

The most stable family unit that fosters normal development of children is a nuclear family composed of one father and one mother in the same home. Further aid may possibly come from extended family members living either nearby or in the same household.

Single parent households must be avoided because they have shown to significantly harm the development and overall well-being of children. In England, children from single-parent households are nine times likely to engage in crime, and a Department Of Justice study (PDF) found that 70% of incarcerated youth came from single parent homes. A newer study with a sample size of over 16,000 shows that children raised by single mothers are 70% more likely to develop Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), which harms their mental development and education while increasing their risk of hospitalization due to injury and respiratory infections. Even more severe, children raised in single parent households are 82% more likely to be raised in poverty than children raised in nuclear family homes.

It is now politically incorrect to question if being raised by a single mother increases the child’s risk for poverty, homelessness, mental illness, physical disease, and substance abuse, even though a multitude of studies clearly point in that direction. Those who have an agenda in pushing single motherhood are ignoring existing data at hand that shows it brings great harm to children and, as a result, society.

Related:
Female Empowerment Is Slavery
How Hypergamy Is Destroying The Nuclear Family

Binary sex model

The binary sex model consists of only two sexes, male and female, which is determined at birth by a person’s genetics. It is the most stable, natural, and biological approach to human classification. Behaviors by genetically born males will lean masculine while behaviors by genetically born females will lean feminine, though variation in human stock can cause marginal overlap. There are also exceptions with hermaphrodites, deformed humans who are born with genitalia from both sexes.

Any attempt to manually seek out a gender or identity outside of the binary sex model is artificial, non-biological, and deviant. Such a practice is not conducive to family formation or sanity on a societal level. A society can be definitively labeled ill if it enables its citizens to artificially invent gender identities and pick them at will as if shopping for fruit in a supermarket. Even worse is outright facilitating mentally ill individuals to change their sex, which leads to an increase in suicide and drug use without alleviating the underlying mental disorder.

Academics and corporations are now eagerly promoting and catering to “new” genders such as polysexual, genderqueer, pangender, and skoliosexual. If a child believed it was a snake and started biting others, we would get him professional help, but we are now taking seriously grown adults who go so far as to claim they are “two spirit,” which means that they have the spirit of both men and women inside them, or “otherkin,” where they claim to be animals like wolves, badgers, or deer mistakenly born into a human body. Such delusions are being normalized as mentally acceptable human behavior.

The binary sex model has flaws in that it will not perfectly suit those who possess personality and behavioral traits from the opposite sex, meaning that institutions and spaces for homosexuals or transsexuals won’t be constructed, but at the same time it is inappropriate to encourage or enable a person to jump out of their genetically determined sex by opening the door on dozens of different gender identities and orientations that definitively harm the individual.

In a patriarchal society with traditional sex roles, only a tiny minority will have trouble with their assigned sex at birth. They should not be allowed to disrupt the lifestyle and healthy traditions of those who soundly fit into the natural binary model.

Related:
The Rise Of Heterophobia
America Is Becoming A Homosexual Nation

Feminine beauty ideals

Feminine beauty is highly objective and can be reliably measured across different cultures in two principal ways: body measurement and facial symmetry.

Body measurement comprises three numbers in inches that are displayed in the following format: 36-24-36. The first number is the size of the chest around the breasts, the second number is size of the waist right above the navel, and the third is the size of hips around the buttocks.

Scientific studies have shown that a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 is linked to high fertility in women. The distribution of fat around bodies produced by such a ratio is biologically linked to an optimal concentration of bodily hormones that would most greatly aid in reproduction. Not coincidentally, such a ratio is found to be most attractive to men from all around the world.

Men therefore subconsciously determine a large part of a woman’s attractiveness based on her ability to successfully reproduce, and this is exemplified by an hourglass figure that a 0.7 waist-to-hip ratio consistently displays. While certain aspects of beauty taste may change over the years, such as hair color or lip fullness, a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 leads to the best biological functioning for reproduction, and so will be seen as most attractive by virile men.

The hourglass figure can also come in different shapes, which is why even more voluptuous women can still be seen as highly attractive if their waist-to-hip ratio is still close to the optimum value. But if a woman’s body resembles something more like a milk carton, she is far away from the ideal ratio and should not be dismayed if men find her unattractive.

0.7 waist to hip ratio

0.7 waist to hip ratio

0.7 waist to hip ratio

Facial symmetry is the second component of beauty that can be reliably measured. You may be surprised to know that the left and right sides of your face are quite different. One artist created two full faced figures by doubling a person’s left side or right, leading to images that can look drastically different. Additional studies consistently show that people rate others with symmetrical faces as more attractive and in better health, two traits that humans want to pass on to their offspring.

Even if symmetrical individuals are not actually in better health that those who are asymmetrical, our genetic wiring clearly prefers symmetrical individuals, a fact known since the time of the Ancient Greeks if we judge the art they left behind. It is thought that animals who display asymmetry had poor development that exposed them to environmental or genetic stress, lowering their reproductive fitness.

Here is a selection of attractive celebrities with highly symmetrical faces:

sym1 sym2 sym3 sym4

Symmetrically challenged individuals are consistently rated as less beautiful:

Facial asymmetry Facial asymmetry Facial asymmetry

While female attraction for males can be complex and dependent on many factors that include a man’s resources, charisma, social status, and appearance, male attraction for females is more narrow and highly correlated to body shape and facial symmetry. Therefore we can easily debunk notions that beauty is a social construct or that women with a waist-to-hip ratio over 1, suggesting advanced obesity and diabetes, can be attractive to a man with a functioning brain and normal vision. The movement of fat acceptance is a particularly damaging notion since obesity shortens human life spans, increases public health expenditures by at least $190 billion a year in the USA alone, and is one of the most reliable symptoms of mental illness.

From the available data, we must conclude that there are objective patterns in beauty that make some individuals clearly more attractive than others. In America, women who are not beautiful, due to their genetic bad luck or gluttonous lifestyle, are using bogus science and shaming to convince the masses they are indeed beautiful. Such attempts should be immediately discarded as absurd.

Related:
The War Against Beauty
Long Hair In Women Correlates To Beauty, Fertility, And Health
6 Reasons Why Fat Women Are Defective

Natural health and hygiene

Modern medicine has made great advances in treating ailments that used to more easily kill our ancestors, especially bacterial and viral infections. If you are suffering from illness, your first instinct should be to see a doctor. However, the pharmaceutical industry, along with corporations that sell health products, have a financial incentive to maintain profits by selling expensive medicines or health solutions that must be used over a long period of time without solving the underlying problem.

A man must carefully weigh the costs and benefits of whatever medicine, supplement, and health product he’s using and ask himself if there is a more cheap and effective alternative with less side effects. A classic example is baking soda, which has been found by large numbers of men to be superior to chemical deodorants. Other men swear by non-pharmaceutical solutions that either maintain good health or solve existing body issues. Examples include apple cider vinegar (various ailments), coconut oil (skin), vitamin D (mood), zinc (male sex drive), hydrogen peroxide (bad breath), cranberry extract (UTI), light therapy (sleep), green tea (antioxidant), nasal irrigation (sinus infection), and fish oil (dry eye). Many others can be found on Earth Clinic.

There are serious diseases and problems that only modern medicine can handle, but for minor ailments and hygiene issues, men would be better served by finding more natural remedies that don’t carry an unnecessarily heavy cost.

Male virtue and development

We’re taught that the biological reason we are here is to survive and reproduce, but since both are now easy to accomplish without much of a strain on our energy or resources, we are given extra time to live for reasons beyond the biological. How should men spend that time? What code of morality or principles should guide men in their daily lives? Is there a deeper life meaning that can help us set better goals?

The answers to these questions are difficult, but they must be asked. While most of the world is running downhill to pursue immorality, degeneracy, and base pleasures, the self-actualized man must instead climb upwards along the harder path that makes him a better man today than he was yesterday. He must instill within himself a code that creates right action and right thoughts to separate himself from the hysterical masses, allowing him to operate on an elevated level of consciousness and existence.

Aristotle’s cardinal virtues were prudence, temperance, courage, and justice. Eastern philosophies teach self-control of desire. Stoicism tempers desire and aims for mental fortitude against misfortune. Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau taught self-reliance. It’s important to examine the great men of the past to construct a living code that can aid men in the present, because it’s certain that a consumer lifestyle with authoritarian deference to false prophets fails to lead to male virtue or character advancement. Such progress can only come from deeper thought and self-examination.

Related:
7 Reasons Why American Culture Is The Most Degenerate In The World
The Lives Of Great Men As Moral Instruction
An Introduction To Stoicism With The Enchiridion By Epictetus
How To Reverse America’s Cultural Decline

Anti-socialism

The two biggest problems with socialism as an ideology is that (1) it takes from the strong to give to the weak, and (2) it makes individuals dependent on the government to survive.

Those who apply effort to obtain benefits deriving from their labor, virtue, or fortunate genetics should be able to keep the bulk of its rewards instead of making forceful donations under the barrel of the state’s gun to those with a lower worth ethic or constitution. Beautiful women are—due to nature’s prescription—more deserving of high value men. Men who are born with a higher level of intelligence are more deserving of advanced jobs that pay more. Anyone who is more willing to trade their labor for income is deserving of a higher income.

We must not allow the poor to starve on the streets, but it is counterproductive to encourage those on the bottom to beg for more benefits instead of lifting up their own station to a suitable job position that can provide for their basic survival needs.

The effects of socialism are even more damaging when it comes to gender relations, because women now seek out the government as a substitute provider to help them survive instead of using the feminine gifts given to them by nature to land a husband. With a woman’s survival needs met thanks to a government bending over to bail out her impulsive decisions, she can spend up to two decades pursuing excitement in the males she meets without any worry about her future. She is no longer punished for her mistakes.

It’s no surprise that single motherhood in the United States has exploded in the past few decades. Why should a woman find a good man who she must serve and satisfy when she can fornicate with sexy men and have the government send her monthly checks and crates of food at no cost? The perverse incentives that socialist policies create mean that women are encouraged to treat men as battery-operated sex dildos that can satisfy her present desires instead of carefully evaluating men for their long-term worth. This has decimated the institution of marriage and also created future criminals and emotional man-children of the state who did not have the opportunity to develop strong values in a stable nuclear home that included a father.

People in genuine need can be provided with temporary assistance by the state to help them through rough spots in their lives, but it shouldn’t be the job of the government to enable citizens to make poor decisions by providing permanent assistance with no strings attached. Limiting such aid would bring out the more industrious and hard-working side of those on the lower economic scale while encouraging women not to whore around and have bastard children because they wanted to gratify their boredom by seeking out bad boys who are exciting to pursue.

Related:
Social Welfare Creates A Society Of Sluts
Appearance Is Ideology
The Frenchman Who Took A Stand Against Socialism
Is Democracy Dying?

Technological skepticism

Technology has brought many benefits to those living in the 21st century. Food is cheaper than in the past (as a percentage of total income expenditure), appliances make maintaining and cleaning the home easier, and electronic devices allow you to instantly access information and media. Very few individuals would like the clock rolled back to a time when we didn’t have such developments, but we must accept that there is a human cost of each step forward made in technological advancement.

Food is cheaper, but now over 50% of Americans are morbidly obese. It’s easier to maintain a home, but now women have left that home to serve a corporate master instead of their husbands. The internet has given us information and entertainment that makes reading this very article a simple matter, but it has created electronic junkies with short attention spans who are less able and willing to rationally communicate with their fellow man. The laws of the universe ensure that there is no free lunch.

One obvious example of a heavy technological cost is the smartphone, a handheld computer and communication device that was rapidly adopted by most individuals in the Western world starting in 2007 when the first generation Apple iPhone was released. Heralded by most as an amazing invention that will bring forth informational bliss, it’s clear that the smartphone has damaged gender relations by making women less capable of love and more capable of resistance-free hypergamy, cheating, and attention whoring.

Not a single technologist stopped to think about how the smartphone would affect humans, so now we are left with the wreckage it has created. While it’s a great tool for business and playing rudimentary games, humanity would suffer only minor effects if they were suddenly banned overnight.

With every technological benefit, there is also a cost, and we must carefully examine such costs before the widespread encouragement and adoption of any shiny new gadget that is forced upon us by corporate marketers or the utopists in Silicon Valley.

Related:
Is Digital Technology Destroying The Middle Class?
Amusing Ourselves To Death
Building A Bridge To The 18th Century

Deeper meaning and spirituality

While nihilism may be preferable for some, it does not provide sufficient answers for most men who want to live their one life with deliberate purpose and meaning. Being trapped in a completely random existence while floating on a big rock hurtling through an infinitely growing universe can cause men to lose sight of their own self development of masculinity and virtue. Traditional religious beliefs can fill in these gaps of meaning.

In spite of the faults of organized religion, believers pursue a moral code that has been tested and refined for hundreds of years, giving it far more weight and value than Western consumerism and hedonism, a relatively modern invention. While the scientific conclusions of atheism can provide some answers of our reality, such a purely logical set of beliefs will lack the traditional and heuristic components that aid man with living well today, leaving them with a value system of Swiss cheese that allows skilled profiteers and propagandists to fill the holes. It’s highly likely that atheists would be well-served by incorporating some religious traditions or beliefs to help guide them towards more purposeful and worthwhile life outcomes.

Related:
Does God Have A Place In The Red Pill Man’s Life?
A Dialogue With A Pious Monk
Why You Need To Set Your Precepts For A Productive Life

Conclusion

Neomasculinity is a new term that uses old ways of helping men live in a virtuous manner while catering to the masculine side of their biological nature. It gives men the practical tools to receive the benefits possible with a male existence while living in natural harmony with women and improving the sustainability and value of their societies. It also provides a man with powerful mental defenses to aid his navigation through a world that wants to reduce him to a zombified consumer who serves at the altar of the corporate state. It will serve as a superior ideological alternative for men who reject the poison pills prescribed by the modern political and cultural elite.

Read Next: The Origins Of Neomasculinity

242 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Roger
Roger
5 years ago

Brilliant, encyclopedic article, Roosh. While I don’t particularly like the term “neomasculinity”, you have really explained a lot of foundational ideas and principles in a logical, clear fashion here.

Shortest Straw
Shortest Straw
5 years ago
Reply to  Roger

I actually like the term. What you have is “new masculinity”, which is nothing more than masculinity that acknowledges all the fundamental drivers of human sexual behavior.

What about neofemininity? Does anybody have the courage to articulate what true unfettered femininity looks like? We’re seeing it, we’re all talking about it; someone needs to articulate the end game.

Ray W
Ray W
5 years ago
Reply to  Shortest Straw

the term is OK… but only just OK… the problem is it sounds a bit homo to me…. a bit contrived, a bit faggy…. masculine is already a dirty word, and neo reminds people of things like neo nazi or neo conservative…..

there must be a better byword….

Earnward
Earnward
5 years ago
Reply to  Shortest Straw

A way to very Easy with rooshv < my classmate's step-aunt makes $72 hourly on the laptop . She has been fired for 7 months but last month her payment was $17104 just working on the laptop for a few hours..

pop over here SEE MORE DETAIL

Donington
Donington
5 years ago
Reply to  Shortest Straw

It’s very Easy with rooshv < my neighbor's mom makes $64 hourly on the computer . She has been without work for 6 months but last month her check was $14236 just working on the computer for a few hours.

learn the facts here now SEE MORE DETAIL

Jessica
Jessica
4 years ago
Reply to  Shortest Straw

I think you are onto something here. I consider myself to be a woman failed by the push for equality.

For some time I considered myself to be a feminist until I learned how much damage the 3rd wave feminism has done. I pushed myself to be independent and successful and strong to the point where it had damaging effect on my marriage. In many ways my husband and I were amazing to each other, resulting in much growth to become better and more capable people. But we both tried to push for equality that went against our true nature. That means my pursuit of dominance had damaging affect on his masculinity as much as my own feminine needs. And he held himself back resulting in loss of confidence. As a result our roles in this relationship were confusing and tiresome and in the end the relationship fell a part.

I’m now discovering my feminine side with a wonderful and very manly man. I’ve seen a massive change in myself to be more feminine in his company – I’m much more caring, supporting, serving and very happy to be so. When describing his effect on me I once told him “it is incredible how a woman can blossom with the right man”.

Although I can’t claim to represent the unfettered femininity here, I can point our some areas of femininity I myself have reclaimed and found most satisfying:

– as a woman can blossom through the manly man, so can a man find more strengh, confidence and ambision as a result of having a feminine woman next to him. A feminine woman would understand that and celebrate masculinity.
– a woman can be caring and serving without losing autonomy. it is all about learning each others “love language” – in stead of giving love the way you thing it should be given, carefully study how the other person receives it. For example when asking my boyfriend what actions of mine make him feel most loved, he pointed out cooking, listening and blowjobs. All these would outrage a feminist but in my case putting more focus and creative thinking on these areas has made my relationship a more fulfilling one.
– being happy in your body means you can also be sexy. I believe a feminine woman is happy with her body, happy to show it to her man, happy to give it to her man – sometimes by being fragile in the arms of your man, sometimes through hot steamy sex.

So these are the main three things I’ve learned so far. I hope more people will go against feminist push for unreasonable equality. I hope neomasculinity will awake neofemininity in women who are currently tired and confused in an unnatural role. I’m not claiming that women should stay home cooking, but instead I hope more people will understand that this is still an option, and it can be very happy partnership where both sides can have their natural needs met.

Long rant. But I hope there is some answer to your question here.

Cheers

Shortest Straw
Shortest Straw
4 years ago
Reply to  Jessica

Thanks for sharing. My take on what you have said:

My god, you’re lucky.

Knut
Knut
4 years ago
Reply to  Jessica

Jessica: You should be a role-model to feminists world-wide. If only feminists could just understand that their relationships with men should be all about having equal rights as men – while ALSO recognizing that they have different biological gender-roles.

Men and women are biologically designed for different purposes. So, it’s only natural that they’ll desire different things – such as different gender-roles in sexual relationships, different types of hobbies, different types of occupations etc.; because they ARE different.
They are not inferior or superior to men; they are just different – designed for another purpose than men.

If feminists would just accept this, they would be so much happier in their relationships with men (as you have perfectly examplified in your comment above), and it would eliminate a lot of unnecessary confusion for both men and women.

For a better world,
Knut 🙂

Frank B.
Frank B.
3 years ago
Reply to  Knut

You are insane!

NextLeader
NextLeader
4 years ago
Reply to  Shortest Straw

I would just call it manhood. It is man’s natural ways.

Ravi Macho
Ravi Macho
4 years ago
Reply to  NextLeader

Exactly, well said.

anon1
anon1
5 years ago
Reply to  Roger

the content is broadly fantastic (i cant find much objectionable in the post, its what we all mostly agree upon), the name sounds like something a bruno “sacha baron cohen” type hyper aesthete fashion designer would come up with though.

anon
anon
5 years ago
Reply to  Roger

Aha, how about “neoubermensch”.

Wave Txlitl Met
Wave Txlitl Met
5 years ago
Reply to  Roger

I didn’t like the term, at first, either. Then I did a mental trick with it. I get the “neo-” part, making a call to a new masculinity since the world has a new enemy. I find its call to classicism, where the rippling muscle marble statues of gods and heroes defines the image form, returns us to the idea of the original man. The mental trick I did was also imagine “Neo” from the Matrix taking his male rights warrior red pill “-Masculinity”. Weighed together, I give the term more credit than detraction.

iBooB
iBooB
5 years ago

U be bad at math bro

iBooB
iBooB
5 years ago
Reply to  Roger

“While I don’t particularly like the term “neomasculinity””

They be like – “Ugh.. Hey flag raisers, I told you the name sucked, all that work down the drain for nothing! This was supposed to be the pinnacle on our penis!! Call Roosh I want to ravage his anus now from all this stress!”

Caroline Carlson
Caroline Carlson
4 years ago
Reply to  Roger

Why not just join up with the Taliban? Your ideals and attitudes of women are identical. Why reinvent the wheel when the Taliban are your intellectual twins?

Ravi Macho
Ravi Macho
4 years ago

Go F yourself !!!

Caroline Carlson
Caroline Carlson
4 years ago
Reply to  Ravi Macho

Awwwww you pissed Taliban man😂😂😂😂😂

Anon.
Anon.
5 years ago

Another is that liberalism kills all types of love between human beings. Women are not good for pairbonding, but only for pornstar sex. This inability to feel something trascendental for a member of the opposite sex, likely one of the most intense human desires, is actually the saddest part of modern life.

MajorStyles
MajorStyles
5 years ago
Reply to  Anon.

You hit the nail on the head here.

Modern liberal women are infested with the Ebola of “equality.” If I cook dinner, then you have to wash the dishes. If I do the laundry, then you have to dry it. And on and on. Everay action musy have a return transaction.

What they miss is a fundamental aspect of love – I want to do something for this person because I enjoy making them happy. I want nothing in return. Seeing my partner smile is reward enough.

It’s this simple change of thought – masked as equality – that contributes to their deficiency in the experiencing of something transcendental.

Just Me
Just Me
5 years ago
Reply to  MajorStyles

And is that how you live your life? You simply do things to make your partner happy? Not because you want sex from them?

It’s not so much about a “return transaction” as it is about showing “reciprocal behavior”. And that’s something we all want, man, woman or other. And frankly, you’re lying to say otherwise.

MajorStyles
MajorStyles
5 years ago
Reply to  Just Me

“And is that how you live your life? You simply do things to make your partner happy?”

Yes, and she does the same. Then again, she was never poisoned with second wave feminism.

Anon.
Anon.
5 years ago
Reply to  MajorStyles

What I said was bastardized here. I agree with the part about gestures, but the problem goes way farther than that.

ANY kind of affection or love is impossible. Any kind of male-female interaction that isn’t an unemotional fuck is impossible. I have spent a great amount of time gaming in both the FSU and in the West, and comparison between the two has made it evident to me over the years that feminism destroys women from the inside out. It destroys their soul and spirit. It turns them into mindless whores. Much like prostitutes, where you can see that they are hollow and broken inside.

Western men, even ones who get laid, say that women are horrible. The only reason they say this is because they have grown up in a kind-of Orwellian nightmare where women are of a quality lower than ever before in the history of mankind. True happiness isn’t fucking 100 women, or any other artificial game idea, It’s having lived in shit-land your whole life, then stepping off the plane into a land full of classically beautiful feminine women. That is true happiness.

Just Me
Just Me
5 years ago
Reply to  Anon.

Frankly Anon, any person that says that “women are horrible” or “men are horrible” is holding onto some massive prejudices against an entire group of people – against half the population of the world. That’s just rational talk to hold that massive of a prejudice against half the population of the world. Women are far from perfect. Then again, so are men. We need to work together. Feminism has not destroyed women. Feminism is not what is stopping you from findling love, sex and/or a relationship. Unfortunately, I think that some of you are struggling with the fact that femininsm gave women choices and those choices gave women more social power and that’s what your responding to. The scales had to balance out more and some men don’t like the idea of loosing social power. But this doesn’t have to be a race to who has more social power. We can work together for the betterment of both men and women.

I will say that while I don’t think feminism is perfect, I think that it’s been a good movement. And while I’m sure that some would like to believe in the holy grail of foreign women, the truth is that the grass isn’t greener on the other side, it only looks that way because it’s easy to fantasize about a place where women are who you want them to be. And believe me, women do plenty of their own fantasizing where they also want men to be who they want them to be and not neccessarily who they are. But in most cases, if you have the emotional intelligence for it, we learn that who people really are, vs the fantasy of who we wish they are, can in the long run, be more fullfilling for us and our own personal growth.

Anon.
Anon.
5 years ago
Reply to  Just Me

A woman who values independence above all else is clearly not good for love or affection.

I don’t see what part of this you don’t understand.

Caroline Carlson
Caroline Carlson
4 years ago
Reply to  Anon.

and men who are interested in recreating patriarchy aren’t good for love either. Women aren’t interested in forming these types of relationships anymore. What part of that don’t you understand ?

Aryanblindboy
Aryanblindboy
4 years ago

what part of what don’t you understand?

MajorStyles
MajorStyles
5 years ago
Reply to  Just Me

“And while I’m sure that some would like to believe in the holy grail of foreign women, the truth is that the grass isn’t greener on the other side”

For me, it’s been pretty frickin’ green. As I speak, my beautiful foreign wife is preparing me lunch. The last Western woman I dated practically called the police on me when I asked her to do the same: followed with a speech on gender rights, etc.

Feminists want all the benefits of traditionalism, with none of the responsibilities.

Just Me
Just Me
5 years ago
Reply to  MajorStyles

Hey, I am totally glad you are happy and married. That’s great. That doesn’t mean that the grass is greener though. Just as many men have horrible stories about their foreign brides.

MajorStyles
MajorStyles
5 years ago
Reply to  Anon.

“I have spent a great amount of time gaming in both the FSU and in the West, and comparison between the two has made it evident to me over the years that feminism destroys women from the inside out. It destroys their soul and spirit. It turns them into mindless whores.”

I have done the same, and I can attest to the truth of that statement.

iBooB
iBooB
5 years ago
Reply to  Anon.

“It’s having lived in shit-land your whole life, then stepping off the plane into a land full of classically beautiful feminine women. That is true happiness.”

You stole this from Bin Ladens presidential address to the caves..

Ziro
Ziro
4 years ago
Reply to  iBooB

These people are all horrible. Roosh or whoever this ass clown is can die. He sounds like a closeted gay that was hurt so bad by a woman that he isn’t ever gonna come out and now hates them.. Or to be more accurate, he sounds like a gay with a really really really really really long and fuckin confusing fetish for the idea of masculinity. And I’m gay, so.. This whole idea is stupid. “Lets have an entirely new way of thinking and existing in society today based on radical ideas of gender; based off of an adjective.” Why the fuck do things have to be over complicated? Quit crying about shit like this and (for lack of more appropriate terms) man up. We’re all stick here until we die, focus on the life you are in an the interactions you have in it. No one is gonna give a fuck what you did after your dead. Your taking something that’s complicated enough as it is and trying to overcomplicate it in an irrational and needless way. I’ve read through some of this stuff before. It’s all trash. Your ideas are flawed and your ideals are cracked. Quit bein a bitch and come out of the closet or let all this go and fucking settle for once in your life. It’s an adjective. More precisely, it refers to a state something can obtain. If I fucking wanted to I could start a move that challenging literally everything on the plate today as well based on the idea of “wetness,” if I follow the guidelines you just laid for me above. Do you see the preposterousness in that? Obviously not, you’re to busy complaining that you can’t be a man any more. Get over yourself and your festish, you narcissistic and condescending shit smear. Your bad and all of your supporters are bad. Not to send hate upon those who respect opinion, just those who live by this needless and overly complex lifestyle.
With no respect due because you’re a bunch of unqueer-queers,
Ziro.

Just Me
Just Me
5 years ago
Reply to  MajorStyles

Major, it’s not that I disagree that doing things just to make your partner isn’t wonderful. It is. That’s certainly something that helps to build a relationship, being giving and kind to your partner. There is also an element of desiring that it be recipocated. I do disagree that Feminism is somehow a great evil. Women want to be respected, just like you as a man want to be respected. That’s at the heart of what feminism, in it’s purest form is about. Thanks for the response though and the respectful conversation.

Aryan Jesuite
Aryan Jesuite
5 years ago
Reply to  Just Me

women prefer adoration to respect… different from men who prefer respect over adoration.

Caroline Carlson
Caroline Carlson
4 years ago
Reply to  Aryan Jesuite

Sounds like you don’t know shit about women.

Aryanblindboy
Aryanblindboy
4 years ago

shit – oh puhleese school me, beotch! tell me about women… beggin’ you on my knees, please, pretty please ~

Michael Manthey
Michael Manthey
4 years ago
Reply to  Aryanblindboy

While at the same time, this bitch thinks she knows men lol

Linda B
Linda B
4 years ago
Reply to  Aryan Jesuite

uh, is it opposite day?

martinho
martinho
5 years ago

You could actually expand this post and sell it as a book but you took the time and effort to write it and put it online for free. You are a great man and I thank you Roosh. Keep up the good work.

iBooB
iBooB
5 years ago
Reply to  martinho

Not free. That will cost you 29842 hours of your time to read and a small chunk of your soul and a bigger chunk of your anus.

Ravi Macho
Ravi Macho
4 years ago
Reply to  iBooB

And a still bigger chunk of your smelly cunt !!!

iBooB
iBooB
4 years ago
Reply to  Ravi Macho

Shut up paki

iBooB
iBooB
3 years ago
Reply to  Ravi Macho

Still smells better than your mothers

frank rook
frank rook
5 years ago

Outstanding. This is a great one stop reference article for readers of the site & masculine men. The content & presentation might be lost on the ad hominem & logical fallacy loving crowd but for the rest of us, this is a well thought out & structured piece.

ex-convict
ex-convict
5 years ago
Reply to  frank rook

Exactly.

Costello
5 years ago

Really quite excellent Roosh.

Clint Barton
Clint Barton
5 years ago

Required reading for the modern man.

Clark Kent
Clark Kent
5 years ago

Bravo Roosh.
I really hope you are creating a back-up of rooshv/ROK somewhere on a hard-drive or something.
This article ties together the entire project and shows that the ‘sphere continues to evolve. When I discovered this side of the internet only a few years ago there was nothing quite like this at the time.
Be sure to create a copy of all this work. Give it enough time and I wont be surprised if the sphere gets shut down or co-opted somehow.
The evolution of ROK is worth preserving.

JQ
JQ
5 years ago
Reply to  Clark Kent

Use GoToKindle, Pocket or Readability. With the last one you can create your own eBooks out of the articles you gather.

anon1
anon1
5 years ago
Reply to  JQ

>GoToKindle, Pocket or Readlist

never heard of those, very useful cheers

Finally
Finally
5 years ago
Reply to  JQ

I love you, I didn’t know about Readlist I’ve been tryna get that damn send to kindle bullshit working for the longest. gracias

Vincent Vinturi
5 years ago

“While women don’t “belong” in the home, they do a better job than men at nesting and child raising.”

I think this statement could be be better qualified. It’s contentious that women are better at raising children, since both a male and female influence are necessary for healthy kids.

Single parent homes, especially single mother homes, produce a disproportionately large number of delinquents.

On the intellectual front, women are arguably much worse at raising kids than men. They provide a lot of touch and warmth, which babies certainly need. However, they speak to their kids like they’re dogs with inane baby babble, they spoil them, and they pussify male children unwittingly.

So it isn’t that they’re better at raising kids. Rather, they’re better at the aspects of raising kids to which they’re better suited.

Just Me
Just Me
5 years ago

Vincent, there is nothing “intellectual” or “factual” about the statement that “women are arguably much worse at raising kids than men”. At the very least, at least women show up to raise their kids while men routinely leave the family homes and their own children for their own selfish pursuits.

But please, show us actual factual information that documents your statement that women “speak to their kids like they’re dogs with inane baby babble, spoil them, and pussify male children unwittingly.” You tried to make it sound like these were logical intellectual points. If they are, lets see the factual information that would actually substantiate your claims.

I would actually say the most logical point here is that you could not possibly qualify that women as a whole or men as a whole are better at raising children. People are ultimately individuals and the world is filled with great moms and dads, and poor ones. Although “baby talk” hardly qualifies as to what makes someone a “bad parent”. Now I know it makes you feel better to create the these illusions and use words like “intellectual” that you believe fortify your argument even more. But just because you use the word “intellectual”, doesn’t mean it is.

Zelcorpion
Zelcorpion
5 years ago
Reply to  Just Me

Silence woman! Don’t talk before you are deliberately addressed here.

Just Me
Just Me
5 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

Lol. Do you really think that’s going to work? Lets hug Zelcorpion. 🙂

Caroline Carlson
Caroline Carlson
4 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

Awwww how cute you think she gives a flying fuck what you think. Adorable.

Aryanblindboy
Aryanblindboy
4 years ago

Awww how cute – look – a flying fuck

JC
JC
5 years ago
Reply to  Just Me

As women divorce men in droves and separate good fathers from their children…I call BS. Men are FaR less likely to leave their women over some new ass. Women however are the opportunists.

Caroline Carlson
Caroline Carlson
4 years ago
Reply to  JC

The law doesn’t allow women to separate good fathers from their children. They have legal rights and the opportunity for shared custody/ visitation. Good fathers stay in their children’s lives. Whiney men who want to sulk claim so and fail to show up for their kids because their ego is bruised the mother left the relationship.

Aryanblindboy
Aryanblindboy
4 years ago

it’s all whiney men’s fault!!

Caroline Carlson
Caroline Carlson
4 years ago
Reply to  Aryanblindboy

Not all men but the whiney men yes. You sound like a whiney one. My condolences.

JC
JC
4 years ago

Lmao, I’ve gone through the system lady. I’m a great dad. The Family Court LAW allows me *visitation*with my child every other weekend and a few hours during the week. Most likely you speak from ZERO experience on this. I’m mad, because I should have equal parenting time with my child and not treated like a Second-Class Parent.
Shared custody? That’s what they tell you.
Maybe some are successful with receiving shared custody, but only after shelling out a MORTGAGE worth (I sh** you not) of money toward lawyer fees to achieve that.
See, for fathers we have to PAY! Heavily! For what *should* be our fair rights to equal shared parenting. I can’t tell you lady, how many non custodial fathers, Good fathers, spent over $100,000, even $200,000, for the rights to be in their child’s life EQUALLY….and STILL didn’t succeed. Lol smh. You know nothing about which you speak of, only what you hear and makes you feel ok with what’s going on.
If women were treated this way, forget it! The sh** would hit the fan, and rightfully so.
Why are non custodial fathers treated like second class parents? We did nothing wrong. We are good to our kids, still in their lives.
So it would be ok for you as a *good* mom to have visitation with your child *twice* monthly JUST because your marriage didn’t work out? You’d be ok with many women going through this too I suppose? …

Caroline Carlson
Caroline Carlson
4 years ago
Reply to  JC

So let’s do the math. If you get your child every other weekend then I am assumeing like most situations I am seeing you are allowed to get the child Friday right after school until Sunday right before bed or Monday morning when the child goes to school. That is three over nights in a row and it’s every other weekend. That is seeing your child more than twice a month. You also say you get the child a few hours during the week. Is that two evenings a week where you can get the child from school and keep them until almost bed time? So would t that make it more like twelve days a month you can have contact and not two? Kids who are in school don’t have that much time between when school gets out and bedtime. Your ex isn’t getting that much time either when you think about it and much of her time is also spent doing care for the child which isn’t actually time spent on the child. For example are you doing any of your child’s laundry or are you getting an overnight bag full of clean clothes for the weekend and then returning the child with a bag of clothes to be laundered? Who is dealing with that? What I’m hearing from both moms and dads is that dad time is all fun time while mom time is the get stuff done time. Not getting you child right from school due to work conflicts? Your choice to prioritize work and not kid time. Not choosing to use your during the week visits because you are busy? Also your choice. Want more time with the kid. Offer to twice a week pick up the kid early before school and take the kid to break fast. Show up with a lunch made and sit down with the kid during breakfast and do homework . Moms jump on getting this extra help nine times out of ten. Listen you are divorced/separated. Neither party gets everyday contact. That’s what happens and by the way your ex is paying court fees and lawyers as well to get things finalized. Every other full weekend and weekday visits is more than twice a month. If you are bitching about it but not showing up due to hurt ego that’s your fault. You are getting mostly fun time free from chore related activities. You also have the option of calling you child everyday to check in and kids over 12 or so can email. You get more than two days of visits a month.

Ravi Macho
Ravi Macho
4 years ago
Reply to  JC

Don’t reply to this kind of brain less wimyn !!!

Dudebro Zero
Dudebro Zero
4 years ago
Reply to  Just Me

Children of single fathers don’t show the same symptoms as those of single mothers. It’s not a single PARENT problem, it’s a single MOTHER problem. The truth may hurt but it’s the only truth there is.

Caroline Carlson
Caroline Carlson
4 years ago
Reply to  Dudebro Zero

No facts to back that up dude bro. It’s not ” the only truth there is”.

Dudebro Zero
Dudebro Zero
4 years ago

http://i.imgur.com/UBVyVnl.png

This is the best easy to digest source I can find right now. Note that it doesn’t have a category for normal single fathers and normal single mothers. It distinguishes between lesbian single mothers and gay single fathers, and as it turns out lesbians are abysmal parents, even worse than gay men.

YES, I acknowledge that this isn’t proof that straight women are worse at parenting than straight men. I thought I had an infographic like that but it turns out the other one I have is only about “single parents” as well. Too bad.

Caroline Carlson
Caroline Carlson
4 years ago
Reply to  Dudebro Zero

Dude bro if it was such an obviously proven fact then you should be able to reproduce tons of information to support your claim. As it is not you are not able to produce such information.

Here is what I suggest . None of you Mgtow or neo masculine aspiring men in any way respect or value women. What you state repeatedly is that women are deceptive , irrational and lacking intellect. What makes sense then is for you all to refrain from contact with women unless it its required for professional purposes. If women are bad at raising children you should either adopt as a single man or hire a surrogate to carry one for you. What you have said is that men do a far superior job of raising children and if that is the case wouldn’t it be abusive of you to expose your children to the care of women? Don’t you love your children enough to protect them from that?

Why is Roosh and his followers spending so much time focused on what women should be doing? Why so focused on trying to spend time with us? We clearly aren’t respected or valued. Stop trying to learn the ways of the the pick up ” artist” and stop having any contact with us. As you have said women aren’t capable of interacting with children to their benefit. Women only add difficulty to your lives. Please stay far far away from women at all times and you lives will be improved.

Dudebro Zero
Dudebro Zero
4 years ago

>If women are bad at raising children

Noone said that. I said they’re bad at raising children WITHOUT A MAN, and if I should specify I would say without the father of the child.

>you should either adopt

Adoption is literally volunteering to be cuckolded. Fertile people willing to adopt are mentally ill.

>or hire a surrogate

If I hit 35 and I still can’t find a young White woman willing to have children I’ll probably consider this, but it’s not what I want.

>What you have said is that men do a far superior job of raising children

Raising children *alone*. The image I posted clearly states that INTACT BIOLOGICAL FAMILIES do the best job. A man with a woman does a better job than without. Hence my answer above.

>Why is Roosh and his followers spending so much time focused on what women should be doing?
>Why so focused on trying to spend time with us?

Because you’ve been growing less and less happy over the past 40 years (http://www.nber.org/papers/w14969) and most women, and you in particular, are clearly unfit to figure out the obvious reason by yourself, judging by the way you keep asking for all the things that make you unhappy to get even worse. Divorce and child custody laws have made marriage a terrible deal for men, so marriage and birth rates are down and most women spend their lives without male affection and more importantly male guidance. But in your mind the answer must be MUH FEMINISM. Yeah, “respect” will fix it, you genius. We’ll just have to start “respecting” spinsters and sluts, that’ll make them happy.

And now I’ll ask you a question: Why would any man respect women at this point? How could we?

We built civilization FOR YOU. And you took it and ruined it AND you keep crying out for more chaos and disorder to this day. You demand and vote to reward failure with even more welfare. You invite immigrants into our countries because “we’re all the same XD”, disregarding all crime statistics. You vote for more sexist discrimination against men, and then you wonder why men don’t respect you! Men, you know, those people you clearly have no respect for either.

How could we respect someone who keeps voting to have OUR wealth redistributed to you and your pets while we get nothing in return? Did you ever consider that it might be hard to find a man who has his shit together because you keep voting for the government to take all of men’s shit away?

The only crime EVIL WHITE MEN are guilty of is giving women the right to vote. We did respect you, and you proved us wrong.

Caroline Carlson
Caroline Carlson
4 years ago

” baby talk ” is actually done for a reason. The higher tone and repetition of words and phrases actually is proven to teach language to infants better. As to holding and cuddling children research has found that child who are touched more and touched on more parts of the body regularly have higher IQs. You seem to have ideas on child rearing that are in no way based in either experience or actual research. Male infants actually are biologically weaker than female infants. More males are conceived naturally and more are born but they are more likely to miscarry, be still born or to die in infancy. Males have always been more valued as a society so they are given more attention and generally breast fed for longer. What you see as ” pussifying ” male children is women’s attempt to preserve their lives and ensure their health and well being. You don’t know a fucking thing about child rearing or how to produce a more healthy and smart child.

Aryanblindboy
Aryanblindboy
4 years ago

fucking A!

Rollo Tomassi
5 years ago

Well done. My only critique would be including this post as a related link in the SMV section for clarity:

http://www.rooshv.com/the-myth-of-the-natural

Joe Shanley
Joe Shanley
5 years ago

I was just thinking the other day that an article like this would be nice. Thanks Roosh.

Shortest Straw
Shortest Straw
5 years ago

Nice manifesto. Actually picked up a couple of novel thoughts there, particularly about resource scarcity.

Think you have a typo, by the way: understood the true nature of women and the chaos that would ensure if. Pretty sure you meant “ensue”.

Lemon
Lemon
5 years ago

Bravo!

Zuikurkler Yamizangthang
Zuikurkler Yamizangthang
5 years ago

great summary and article. This is a good post for anyone to start out and use as a table of contents if they are new to red pill a.k.a. (truth).

Uzisuicide
Uzisuicide
5 years ago

With that column, you’ve woven so much of your thought and work into a tapestry of red pill truths and observations. That’s pretty much the compendium right there. Perfect place to send a man who’s beginning to awaken to the truths of our time.

Marshallaw
5 years ago

A lot to take in….. will read again and again…..

General Stalin
General Stalin
5 years ago

This is quite the compendium. I also believe you could expand on this and make it into a book easily. Thanks for writing.

kpitonak
kpitonak
5 years ago

I am still reading it–but this article looks like the most important piece of content on the manosphere for next few years…

kpitonak
kpitonak
5 years ago

Nice. I’d say more descriptive and structured way to comprehend what Roosh explains here is reading Rollo’s ‘The Rational Male’–like three time a month for the first few months. I am actually surprised he’s not linking to any of his articles, or better, to his book in the section on ‘SMV’ and ‘Red Pill’. But all in all, Roosh, you’ve become a very informed man and thank you for sharing all that knowledge while internalizing it.

C. Darwin
C. Darwin
5 years ago

I disagree with this:

“While female attraction for males can be complex and dependent on many factors that includes a man’s resources, charisma, social status, and appearance, male attraction for females is more narrow and highly correlated to body shape and facial symmetry.”

Science has already proven that for women, physicality is the most important trait she looks for in a man. Her feral physical attraction to an attractive man is what inspires “romantic desire” in her. You place “appearance” as a factor at the end but it is the most important. See the following studies for proof:

Facial Attractiveness Is Appraised in a Glance.
Olson, Ingrid R.; Marshuetz, Christy (2005)

What leads to romantic attraction: similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study.
Luo S1, Zhang G. (2009)

I know we all know about outliers but subjective analysis does us no good for objective truths. In the realm of the mating game: Appearance is of primary importance.

Psquare
Psquare
5 years ago

Your best post by far. Simply fantastic

BJ
BJ
5 years ago

Back to your best, Roosh. There is a level of intellectual depth in the manosphere that jezebel or xojane will never be able to match. Respect!

66Scorpio
66Scorpio
5 years ago

I am still trying to digest the whole article but one thing is obvious: we need a better term than “neomasculine”.

Caroline Carlson
Caroline Carlson
4 years ago
Reply to  66Scorpio

How’s about old fashioned patriarchy? It’s accurate .

Aryanblindboy
Aryanblindboy
4 years ago

old fashioned

66Scorpio
66Scorpio
4 years ago

There is a new twist and a new reality.

Ephemerae
Ephemerae
5 years ago

Incredible article – thank you Roosh.

Brad Turner
Brad Turner
5 years ago

This is wonderful! It should be the constitution of the manosphere.

Bearded Bear
Bearded Bear
5 years ago

Roosh is on fire. First the article on jews and now this. Bravo.