What Is The Real Purpose Of Women?

I thought of this question after reading Schopenhauer’s essay On Women. Is their main purpose in life to push papers in an office? To become fans of pop music? Addicts of smartphones? Mindless consumers of corporate brands?

No, it’s simply to reproduce.

Quick—name a female scientist besides Marie Curie. Name a female artist during the Renaissance. Name a famous female architect or Nobel Prize winner. Women have been quiet in the history of the world not because of male privilege, but because they’re not designed to achieve. The advantage that nature has given them concerns solely their appearance.

[Nature] has provided her with superabundant beauty and charm for a few years at the expense of the whole remainder of her life, so that during these years she may so capture the imagination of a man that he is carried away into undertaking to support her honorably in some form or another for the rest of her life, a step he would seem hardly likely to take for purely rational considerations.

A woman loses her beauty during motherhood because it’s superfluous to her existence. For every MILF you encounter there are 100 mothers whose drab appearance would not even breach your consciousness. Western women, through their stupidity and lack of self-control, have rebuked nature’s call of taking advantage of those few years of beauty by staying fat and masculine for their entire lives. It’s too little, too late when she’s unable to attract decent men in her mid 30s or silence the call of her genes telling her to become a mother. She will remain barren, a failure in life.

I’ve always said that even shy and young girls have a competence of game that would rival that of experienced men who are much older. Female game, in the form of cunning, manipulation, lying, and charm, is hard-wired into their genetics. While some men are also born with such skills, most have to learn it through trial and error. Men of the past have found it much easier at becoming skilled at a specific trade and earning money in order to land a wife than to compete with women in the game arena. But when having a good job is no longer sufficient, like it is today, the arduous process of becoming competent at game must be undertaken. The demand for game advice has become so great that it has spawned its own industry in several countries, the first time that has happened in world history.

[Women] are sexus sequior, the inferior second sex in everything respect: one should be indulgent towards their weaknesses, but to pay them honour is ridiculous beyond measure and demeans us even in their eyes.

This is a fact that white knights will never understand. As any game practitioner knows, a woman does not respect you if you respect her. Call this sad or unfortunate but that’s the reality of human nature. Women do not like you if you attribute value to them that is not actually there. Complimenting a woman beyond her appearance, such as on her personality, courage, intelligence, or what have you, is a sure-fire way to not sleep with her. Even complimenting her beauty has become dangerous. Do so at your own peril and be hated by your penis for all eternity.

That the property which has cost men long years of toil and effort, and been won with so much difficulty, should afterwards come into the hands of women, who then, in their lack of reason, squander it in a short time, or otherwise fool it away, is a grievance and a wrong as serious as it common, which should be prevented by limiting the right of women to inherit.

There is a reason why a woman’s vagina was locked up and guarded in ancient times until marriage: she could not be trusted with her sexual choices. Look at a modern woman’s sexual behavior and ask yourself who is gaining from her promiscuity. Alpha men are gaining. She’s wasting the few years of beauty she has to fuck them with absolutely no commitment or strings, and soon will be left alone, without a provider, and nothing to show for her prime years of beauty besides HPV and a bitter attitude. Ancient practices were followed to specifically avoid this outcome, no matter how “misogynist” they are to the modern feminist cunt.

There is no point in wasting any more energy worrying about their plight. They made their bed and will now lie in it while sucking off the alpha she just met in the bar. Having game, being alpha, and understanding the true nature of women allow today’s man to be harem masters of the past. I’m enjoying this party to no end, but one day the music will stop. And then I’ll adapt again.

Related Posts For You

newest oldest most voted
Rich
Guest
Rich
Offline

Truth..

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

As for the Madame Curie comment, one anecdote I read about her was that she refused to have a wedding dress, unless it was practical enough to be worn in the lab after the wedding. Forget how smart or hard working she was to achieve what she did — that anti-bridezilla attitude would put her at 1 in a million women on its own.

donalda
Guest
donalda
Offline

Madame Curie was obviously a dyke.

Tampa
Guest
Tampa
Offline

People will laugh at this post, but it is so damn true. I can’t get over how women have no fear and no sense of urgency when it comes to finding a husband. Trolling the dating scene in your mid-30’s is like gambling in a casino on a line of credit….stupid….bad management and highly risky. I hope your number comes up on that roulette table.

I mean why would women wait? The beauty and gift they are given to this world is the ability to have children and to create a family. But, nope, they will only do that with a dude who doesn’t give a shit about them.

It’s pretty comical if you see it for face value.

A scary and real look at women in the 21st century. Good post.

red knight
Guest
red knight
Offline

Let them laugh bro. That’s just a coping mechanism. The obvious truths have been pushed in their chubby faces and they don’t know how to handle it.

Kelly Taylor
Guest
Kelly Taylor
Offline

I can’t imagine any woman delaying marriage on purpose. Most women would instinctively know that men put very high value on youth, beauty and health. To maximize the chances of a woman marrying well , she needs to marry When she is young. ( at least before 25). The ideal is for smart women to marry at 18 to 20 to men that are 30 to 35 who can and WANT to provide for them. Once a woman hits 30 her odds of finding a great man are almost nill! When I hit 30 I knew this to be true, yet so many well meaning people told me I could still get married even though I was past 30! To whom ??? What a joke. My goal was to marry before 21. I wasn’t stupid. If women are intelligent they choose and try their best to get married very early in life. Cold , true reality. I bet most women know this , they just don’t want to say it! It is what it is, I say. It’s only natural for males to seek out young women. Childbearing potential is at its best 15 to 25. Nature intended this and so did the Creator. Everyone would be better off , if we all looked reality in the face. No dreaming. Life without motherhood is pointless.

Denis
Guest
Denis
Offline

wise girl

Zorro
Guest
Zorro
Offline

Bingo on all counts.

dickbutt
Guest
dickbutt
Offline

“Complimenting a woman beyond her appearance, such as on her personality, courage, intelligence, or what have you, is a sure-fire way to not sleep with her. Even complimenting her beauty has become dangerous. ”

do you mean this in everyday life or even during a pickup? because in the latter there comes a point where you do have to hit on girls, where you do have to make them pass through hoops to impress you. you never talk about qualification in your works yet it’s probably the important thing in pickup

Aenimaxoxo
Guest
Aenimaxoxo
Offline

To simply state a woman’s only merit is that they can reproduce would be a bit cold hearted on any person who has ever felt the embrace of a quality woman.

Yes, your time of having the comfort may not exist for long without game, but there is much wonder in the nature, or rather, the true nature of woman. Woman was created to aid man, to nurture the species and to supplement the man. What would the world be like without the lure of our favorite plaything? When women were proper, they would take care of all the things man didn’t have time for so he could focus on progressing the world forward.

The entire human timeline has not been like it is now. People haven’t always been conditioned their entire lives. People are more than just conditions. In a natural society without the constant fear mongering, constantly competition for mind conditioning(this includes feminists), woman would be a wonderful companion, lover, partner to life.

When a woman can understand her true ways, and wants to take up life as a side to her alpha male, she will be happier than ever, he will be happy, and he will be successful.

A good example is a scientist I am very fond of by the name of Dr. Alexander Shulgin. He is a living legend, a pharmacologist, an organic chemist and his wife is his personal research partner and also a well known psychologist (which is, in fact, a very good job for a professional woman.)

I understand the need to bend mens will to snap them out of their programming for the pedastalization of women, but when you lose sight of the prize and focus only on the journey, it makes people wonder why you are doing it in the first place.

Boheme Chinois
Guest

Wow, this post goes to the core of this whole website and the modern man’s dilemma when it comes to the opposite sex.

Good post, Roosh.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

What if you compliment a woman on her ability to perform at a feminine hobby, such as sewing or playing a musical instrument?

Dax
Guest
Dax
Offline

Women’s terrible aging process is one of the greatest gifts of nature. Whenever I approah a very sexy woman, I always tell myself, she’s going to look like shit in 7-10 years. Thanks to “pedo” hysteria against men, the de facto age of female consent around the world is now 18, so an 18 year old girl has at the very most, 7-10 more years of beauty left in her. If you dare to date any girl younger than 18, they (the feminazis and police thugs) can fuck up your life for doing something as harmless as taking a sexy photo of your girlfriend or having her send one to you. So the age of consent in your state might be 16 years old, but is it worth the risk of being charged with “child” porn and being a pedophile or child molester because your 16 year old ex-girlfriend decides to report you for that nude photo she sent you when you were still together? Stand up and change the laws, men. Stand. Up. And. Fight. Back. Against these draconian feminist laws.

alisa odincova
Guest
alisa odincova
Offline

apart from the fact that 16 year old is not yet capable mentally to understand the concept of action-result. hy any normal human would claim to have a relationship with someone who is not mentally capable yet of having one? It’s plain abuse to force 16 year old to have sex and then bitch about her posting pictures. 16 year old is a child, she can’t make decisions because her brain is lacking and need to develop.So yeah, anyone having sex with a child is a molester, you are abusing someone who is not yet capable to father that they are being used. It’s like having sex with mentally challenged and then complain how they wanted it, oh really? it’s not a draconian feminist law after all. Besides to endure stupid useless sex even 30 years too little, women should be protect from your stupid male sex all together, so lets fight stupid male laws allowing sex regardless how painful and humiliating or abusive it is for a woman.

donalda
Guest
donalda
Offline

Maybe European women have 10 more years of beauty left, but not WOC. I have been looking youthful and delicious for YEARS past 30 and got married past 30. So WTF are you talking about? And 16??? Dude, that’s pederasty. Sixteen is a child, she looks fully developed but she’s not grown yet mentally or physiologically. Exploiting children is wrong and there’s a disgusting history around the world of 40-year-old dudes robbing girls of their childhood and an education by marrying them at 8 and 9 years old. Women are more than brood mares just like men are more than studs. Although Richard Dawkins would say we’re all here merely to reproduce. Women have achieved less because men have had their heels on our necks for centuries keeping us barefoot, pregnant and undereducated. NOT because we’re only around to have babies. This is some sad ignorant, bullsh*** you fools are spewing.

namae nanka
Guest
namae nanka
Offline

“Quick—name a female scientist besides Marie Curie. ”

Her father was her first teacher, her husband helped her immensely and was instrumental in her getting the physics Nobel. She reproduced, more than once. This was much much before the grrrl power feminism.

“As any game practitioner knows, a woman does not respect you if you respect her. ”

Respect the men who made her so.

“You need only look at the way in which she is formed, to see that woman is not meant to undergo great labor, whether of the mind or of the body.”

The thing being that today women can use men’s inventions to look like men, copy their behavior in assertiveness seminars, and read up on Newton’s theory of gravity and yet don’t think of his ‘shoulders of giants’ quote, even though they aren’t looking any farther.

donalda
Guest
donalda
Offline

Women helped human kind to survive and thrive. We were the gather part of that whole hunter-gather thing. Without our contribution man would have starved because meat was not easy to come by. The knowledge of where to find foods, what was poison what was not, lay with the elder women who passed the knowledge on to her daughters. By the way, some famous women scientist :http://womenshistory.about.com/od/airspacesciencemath/tp/Famous-Women-Scientists.htm

A_Stranger
Guest
A_Stranger
Offline

Let there be light
….and there was light

The Rationalist
Guest

Roosh…if you definitely come down on one side of the nature vs. nurture debate in your quest against feminism, you will unleash a pandora’s box.

Race relations will dramatically change as a result of “music stopping,” on feminism. Be careful what you wish for.

e
Guest
e
Offline

I’m reading a book about female artists during the Renaissance. Just because you can’t name them and are ignorant of art history, doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Many of them had their names painted over with credit taken by famous male artists of that time.

I hope you never have a daughter. And I’m so sorry for your mother. This kind of warped, bitter, anti-social view must make her cry at night.

forever_rachel
Guest

We may soon read that Kant’s and Nietzsche’s thoughts, Leopardi and Eliot’s poetry, Newton and Einstein’s discoveries have in truth been made by women, and presented as men’s achievements due to patriarchy.

We may read it on either school books or internet comments by weak-minded frustrated individuals trying to reach some equilibrium by self-hallucination and insulting the others. The latter case, frankly speaking, arises my sympathy. You are welcome, and I hope you feel better by now.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Artemisia Gentileschi

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Very well written.

e
Guest
e
Offline

This blog does to women, everything you hate done to men.
I’m sure I can dig up a few underground man-hater sites that match your views word for word.

Question, if you hate women so much, why do you spend your life trying to win them? Your entire career is based on it.

You are right, when you aren’t 30 anymore, you WILL have to adapt. And PRAY that she can’t google your name.

Justin
Guest
Justin
Offline

I don’t think the “name a female painter/scientist/etc” from ancient times is a fair measure. You probably can’t name many minority men from those times, due to fewer opportunities and openness then.

The big change I see in society is that men are losing in a big way. Look at numbers like unemployment (2/3 male), university graduation rates (2/3 female), or prisoners (92% male). Men are falling behind when it comes to achievement. I suppose you can say they’re all beta and blame the feminists, but that doesn’t really solve the problem.

Boheme Chinois
Guest

@ Justin

If men are losing big time, women will lose big time eventually. After all, who are society’s electricians, plumbers, captains of industry, construction workers, soldiers in combat, innovators, etc….

If men don’t give a shit about society more and more, society will eventually go to shit. Name a single major civilization in history that did not have strong men leading it? Name one that did not have its roots in patriarchy? Name one which women lead?

Ancient Rome? Ancient China? Napoleonic France? The Byzantine Empire? Ancient India? Pre-feminist America?

ALL of them have been lead by men in patriarchal setups. The only matriarchies in this world are small, village-sized societies. I bet you can’t even name a rich, strong country that has its roots in matriarchal rule.

Please, men have run the world for all of history and make civilization go. Without men working hard, we’re all fucked, including the women.

If things don’t change in the US and men have little to no interest in contributing to society, I guarantee you our society will fall in 20-30 years max. The deficits, financial problems, economics problems and obesity are just symptoms and the tip of the iceberg, buddy.

I’ll be enjoying decline from Asia.

Armed with Knowledge
Guest

I have reached a point where I could care less about the entire thing, just as you have here described. It’s ironic that in tribal times women were the cheer bringers and feeling support. Nowadays you tell your feelings to a woman, she writes you off and leaves you cold and alone. Worse, the empathizer role is the career of a working girl, who listens to your problems and gives you sex, and looked upon with disdain. Fuck the modern world to hell.

donalda
Guest
donalda
Offline

If men are running sh** it’s up to them to figure out what the f** is wrong and fix sh**, since ya’ll are sooooo brilliant. Whatever is the matter cannot possibly be the fault of women or feminist. So get it together, men. We are all in this together. This boy vs. girl is so 4th grade.

williemaize24
Guest
williemaize24
Offline

Name a female scientist besides Marie Curie? That’s easy– Nancy Hopkins (if she’s recovered by now from swooning over Larry Summers’s talk.)
There was also a friend of mine’s ex-girlfriend. She could do physics and math better than most guys, but what was interesting was that the other girls gave her a wide berth. They didn’t seem to hate her, it just seemed that they saw her as being different and didn’t have much to do with her.

donalda
Guest
donalda
Offline

I wish she were my friend because my math sucks balls.

moses
Guest
moses
Offline

This is the money quote: “Women have been quiet in the history of the world not because of male privilege, but because they’re not designed to achieve.”

Women are capable of hard work. They are capable of achievement that comes through hard work.

Where women pale in comparison to men is their ability to take risks, start businesses, explore oceans, conquer nature, innovate and create. They simply aren’t wired that way.

Sure, some women can — and do — achieve and innovate great things. But they are few and far between and the exception proves the rule.

It is men that propel civilization forward through industry, innovation, invention. Men are willing to die to explore and achieve. Men are willing to risk poverty and failure to start businesses. Women by nature are conservative and risk averse.

This is just the role nature gave men and women. Men, who are expendable, take risks and move society forward. Women, far less expendable, guard the population of the race.

After all, 1 man and 100 women can have over 500 babies. 100 men and 1 woman can have at most 10 babies. Do the math.

Guest
Guest
Guest
Offline

No point in doing the math here – both 1 man and 100 women, as well as 100 men and 1 woman are doomed. What – when 1 man and 100 women have 500 babies, they are all going to be half-brothers and half-sisters. If they reproduce, and then their kids reproduce, their kids are going to get very ugly and very stupid very quickly. They are not going to survive out of sheer inbred retardation. You need more than 1 and more than a few of both men and women in order for a population to survive and thrive.

And don’t even get me started on married couples in China and India aborting female fetuses as soon as they find out that they are in fact female. Over there, sons are valued because they can work, earn money, and support the parents in their old age – whereas daughters are considered a liability. That’s what – over 2 billion people considering daughters a liability? Even if they don’t all think the same way, too many of them do to be wrong.

Yes, then you get freaky marriages like in that village in India where five brothers marry one woman at the same time, and she sleeps with each of them on a different day. That’s pretty freaky in my book. But then again – if that woman were to get married to only one guy, she would be cheating on him severely, don’t you think?

donalda
Guest
donalda
Offline

What you get out of that China and India mess where females are murdered as soon as they’re born is societal instability and apparently a lot of rape, judging from India. We cannot value one sex over the other. We need to value both.

The Damage Dealing Meat Shield
Guest

I’ve been saying the same thing about reproduction ratios that the MRM and MGTOWs always mention, which you’ve excellently pointed what the end result would be. Too many of these MGTOWs, MRAs, and boys don’t understand basic genetics.

And to add to your statement, most pregnancies of half brothers and half sisters rarely make to full term. Due to genetic errors, the baby would be still born.

Sid
Guest
Sid
Offline

Schopenhauer on love:

It’s nothing personal.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeFQsF-umH0

Tampa
Guest
Tampa
Offline

@moses
Talking about how expendable men are…..that’s a great point.

“After all, 1 man and 100 women can have over 500 babies. 100 men and 1 woman can have at most 10 babies. Do the math.”

Justin
Guest
Justin
Offline

@Boheme

I agree — men are the risk-takers and are vital to the economy. However, the % of risk-takers versus worker bees needed is relatively low. Men seem to be losing the worker bee part of the race.

Dax responds
Guest
Dax responds
Offline

Men are NOT expendable:

I’d rather see 10 QUALITY children be raised in a village with lots of men versus a 500 ghetto trash babies being raised in a village of single mothers with very few men around. Anyone who thinks a healthy society is all about the numbers is clearly retarded. Human beings aren’t furry little rabbits. A society of single mothers = chaotic violent trash

donalda
Guest
donalda
Offline

I agree with you whole-heartedly. Men and fathers are important to society. Boys and girls need their dad: Girls so they don’t end up as cum-dumpsters and single mothers and boys so they don’t end up in some substitute father situation of a gang “family.” Well said, sir.

Rivelino
Guest
Rivelino
Offline

roosh, sometimes you just knock it out of the park.

A fucking plus.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

“Having game, being alpha, and understanding the true nature of women…”

BEING alpha or BECOMING alpha?

Wow, Im gettin a littl philosophical here….to BE or not to BE, lol…

great post by the way. This is the Mature Roosh I was looking for. Approaching Sade

yeah get some
Guest
yeah get some
Offline

@19
“After all, 1 man and 100 women can have over 500 babies. 100 men and 1 woman can have at most 10 babies. Do the math.”

That would make sense if the human species was worrying about being extinct. There are over 7 billion people on earth now. If a few women end up not having any babies it won’t be a big deal.

Biological URge
Guest
Biological URge
Offline

Thanks SID for the Shopenhauer video. Part 2 is even better. Following his ideas, Night game would only have one single purpose: making a baby!

We should be grateful to Roosh for helping our species, but going raw should become the rule 🙂

deepcov3r
Guest
deepcov3r
Offline

16 Justin
2 hours, 4 minutes ago
I don’t think the “name a female painter/scientist/etc” from ancient times is a fair measure.

1) Statement of fact:
You probably can’t name many minority men from those times,

2) Alleged Cause of facet:
due to fewer opportunities and openness then.

Statement #1 seems factual to me; vaccines, the integrated circuit, calculus, the transistor, discovery of sanitation ( Semmelweiss), light bulb, telephone,–all were White or Asian men.

Your alleged cause– I think that these White guys were, while inventing all this shit, also oppressing an equal amount of Black geniuses and preventing them from equal inventiveness, may or may not be true. I don’t there’s any way to prove the case.

All we have are the inventions that exist, and the facts that White men created almost all the most important inventions of civilization ( Also the lovely atom bomb and Spanish Inquisition too!)

That’s cool, we still have Jon Coltrane and jimi Hendrix, the foremost geniuses of American Music; and the great Martin Luther King, the advanced proponent of non-violence and human harmony.

It’s not like we don’t all get something from each other.

Tampa
Guest
Tampa
Offline

This is a verbatim intro to a profile on a major online dating website that I copied and pasted – welcome to the world of American women. The chick is about a 6 on a 1-10 scale. Good luck sweet pea. Wish I could upload her photo.

I have focused on my career for many years, assuming I would naturally meet someone along the way. Since that has not happened, I am trying to take a proactive approach to meeting people, while continuing to get out more and focusing on hobbies and interests in my limited free time.

My favorite people are funny, caring, have integrity, are hard-working, and are what I consider good-hearted. Those are traits I deem important because I’m proud of them in me.

While I’ve been very narrow in my ‘type’ in the past, I’m learning that there are a lot of great people I’ve missed that I shouldn’t have passed up. I can be hesitant about making the first move and reaching out to someone, but I do think that it’s important to get out there as much as possible and meet new people.

Tampa
Guest
Tampa
Offline

The chick above is 35 by the way. 35 and probably weight in at 150 lbs.

samseau
Guest
samseau
Offline
Boheme Chinois
Guest

wow, 35, i’m surprised her profile doesn’t sound more desperate.

Dax
Guest
Dax
Offline

To 28 deepcov3r

We have a ton of Chinese and Indian men creating new breakthroughs and advancing cutting edge industry today. They’re doing this both in Western labs and back in their home country. So the white man doesn’t have a monopoly on high-tech innovation anymore, it’s just that women, all white, yellow, brown and black of them, still aren’t creating shit except babies. A formal education never stopped all colors of men from inventing, in the past, and in the present. China was the most technologically advaned country in the middle ages before Rennaisances. So for you to say only white men invent shit, is dishonest, but for you to say women don’t invent shit, is true.

GulliverFredrich
Guest
GulliverFredrich
Offline

China was not the most advanced country in the middle ages before the Rennaisance*, this is more liberal bullshit you are espousing….

Sif
Guest
Sif
Offline

The history is full of female rulers. Cleopatra, Nefertiti, Queen Victoria, Catherine the Great, Queen Isabel to name a few. As for the modern times, the legendary Golda Meir, Benazir Butto, Corason Aquino, Margaret Thatcher, Queen Elizabeth II, Queen Beatrice are a few to name.

There are a load of female scientists who won the Nobel, they are just not famous as Madame Curie, but there is a considerable number. Here is a list of female scientists who won the Nobel prize:

The Nobel Prize in Physics
1963 Maria Goeppert Mayer
1903 Marie Curie

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry
2009 Ada E. Yonath
1964 Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin
1935 Irène Joliot-Curie
1911 Marie Curie

The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
2009 Elizabeth H. Blackburn
2009 Carol W. Greider
2008 Françoise Barré-Sinoussi
2004 Linda B. Buck
1995 Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard
1988 Gertrude B. Elion
1986 Rita Levi-Montalcini
1983 Barbara McClintock
1977 Rosalyn Yalow
1947 Gerty Cori

Check this link for the full list of other Nobel winners, including literature:

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/women.html

I am not saying all women should be scientists or engineers and compete with men. A lot of women are definitely cut to be housewives, some are awesome school teachers (studies show women are better suited than men for teaching preschool and elementary) and a few are cut to be scientists, researchers and engineers. The nobel laurate list above is not small by any means.

I guess reducing women to housewives and breeding vessels has to do with culture. Some European cultures had shield maidens and female warriors. Spartans put their daughters through vigorous physical training and taught them how to fight, cause they believed a true Spartan warrior could only be born to a Spartan mother. They did not raise their women to be submissive house slaves.

Ancient Norse culture had Valkyries and war maidens, one of their main deities was a goddess of war. Same goes for the ancient Greeks whose hunting deity was a goddess. There are hunting and war goddesses in heathen religions (including Hinduism).

Some Caucasian (meaning the people from Caucasia region west of Caspian Sea) and Black Sea tribes teach their daughters how to ride horses and wield weapons (even in this day and age), their women cook and clean and raise children of course, but they are not reduced to subservient slaves by any means. My mother was a working mother, she cooked us fresh meals from scratch every day and kept a career, she also made most of our childhood clothes from scratch, made fruit preserves and home canned food, crocheted pillowcases and tableclothes, all of that while working full time until retirement age. I have Scandinavian, German, American girlfriends who have full time jobs and feminine hobbies such as sewing and crocheting. Lazy TV culture and consumerism is the main reason urban American women don’t pursue anything other than their job. having a full time job is no excuse for being a lazy ass. There are lots of women around the world who can keep a job and run a household.

You folks are judging all women based on a bunch of cutthroat feminazis and drunken bar sluts in urban concrete jungles. Have any of you ever been to places like Iowa, Wisconsin, rural Texas?

I personally know quite a few American girls who stay chaste until marriage, in this day and age. My American girlfriends all know how to cook, knit, sew, crochet, make home canned fruit preserves, and all of them have a college degree or working on getting one. And no, they aren’t all fatties, most of them have normal BMI.

Using the testosterone ridden cutthroat bitches of urban jungles who are brainwashed by Cosmopolitan and retarded HBO shows as an example to stereotype 150 million+ women is just plain illogical.

Maybe it’s time y’all take off those blinders and go on road trip through the corn fields… Just sayin’!

134
Guest
134
Offline

SIF, right on the money. MIdwestern women are far more feminine than east coast bitches.

Yes, there are highly accomplished women in the field of mathematics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_mathematicians

Wikipedia is a good resource on this. Search for female scientists, inventors, pioneers, etc.

you will see a boatload.

Boheme Chinois
Guest

@ Sif

I hope you realize that those “good girls” have the same feminist brainwashing that our culture spews out on a daily basis. There’s a high probability those girls will get fat after marriage and change for the worse. Besides, why bother when the divorce laws will screw men over so badly?

Our country is in decline. It’s best to hasten the process and rebuild afterwards. Getting hitched because you think it’s still relevant in this day and age is retarded.

There are very few marriageable women left.

GENTLEMAN.
Guest
GENTLEMAN.
Offline

WORLD CLASS ACCOMPLISHED WOMEN

1. Hypatia of Alexandria
(355 or 370 – 415) – Greek – philosopher, astronomer, mathematician – She was the salaried head of the Neoplatonic School in Alexandria, Egypt, from the year 400. Her students were pagan and Christian young men from around the empire. She was killed by a mob of Christians in 415, probably inflamed by the bishop of Alexandria,

2. Elena Cornaro Piscopia
(1646-1684) – Italian (Venice) – mathematician, theologian – She was a child prodigy who studied many languages, composed music, sang and played many instruments, and learned philosophy, mathematics and theology. Her doctorate, a first, was from the University of Padua, where she studied theology. She became a lecturer there in mathematics.

3. Maria Agnesi
(1718-1799) – Italian (Milan) – mathematician – Oldest of 21 children and a child prodigy who studied languages and math, she wrote a textbook to explain math to her brothers which became a noted textbook on mathematics. She was the first woman appointed a university professor of mathematics, though there’s doubt she took up the chair.

4. Sophie Germain
(1776-1830) – French – mathematician – She studied geometry to escape boredom during the French Revolution when she was confined to her family’s home, and went on to do important work in mathematics, especially her work on Fermat’s Last Theorem.

5. Mary Fairfax Somerville
(1780-1872) – Scottish and British – mathematician – known as the “Queen of Nineteenth Century Science,” she fought family opposition to her study of math, and not only produced her own writings on theoretical and mathematical science, she produced the first geography text in England.

6. Ada Lovelace (Augusta Byron, Countess of Lovelace)
(1815-1852) – British – mathematician – The only legitimate daughter of Byron, the poet, her translation of an article on Charles Babbage’s Analytical Engine includes notations (three-fourths of the translation!) that describe what later became known as a computer and as software. In 1980, the Ada computer language was named for her.

7. Charlotte Angas Scott
(1848-1931) – English, American – mathematician, educator – Raised in a supportive family that encouraged her education, Charlotte Angas Scott became the first head of the math department at Bryn Mawr College. Her work to standardize testing for college entrance resulted in the formation of the College Entrance Examination Board.

8. Sofia Kovalevskaya
(1850-1891) – Russian – mathematician – She escaped her parents’ opposition to her advanced study by a marriage of convenience, moving from Russia to Germany and, eventually, to Sweden, where her research in mathematics included the Koalevskaya Top and the Cauchy-Kovalevskaya Theorem.

9. Alicia Stott
(1860-1940) – English – mathematician – She translated Platonic and Archimedean solids into higher dimensions, taking years at a time away from her career to be a homemaker.

10. Amalie Emmy Noether
(1882-1935) – German, Jewish, American – mathematician – Called by Albert Einstein “the most significant creative mathematical genius thus far produced since the higher education of women began,” Noether escaped Germany when the Nazis took over, and taught in America for several years before her unexpected death.

[Roosh: Was it hard to research this list since Wikipedia is down?]

Sincere
Guest
Sincere
Offline

I usually dig your posts Roosh, but this one is a fail.

What happens if we follow these ideas to their logical conclusion? Won’t be long before we’re talking about the “master race” and doing cartwheels because our father’s father was a great man.

The best part – those same German philosophers catalyzing these posts built the ideological framework that lead to National Socializm. And we all know how that went. So, like The Rationalist mentioned above… do we really want to open up that Pandora’s box?

dustup
Guest
dustup
Offline

props for the open discussion in the comments today.

your last comment though strikes me a little off….you say : “I’m enjoying this party to no end, but one day the music will stop.”

me thinks the host doth protest too much. are you really enjoying this “party” to no end?

as a game practitioner, i enjoyed the services of many females riding the carousel. but ultimately i was dismayed at the current state of affairs, depressed at the outcomes and really hopeless about the future.

there really truly is more to life than just banging bitches.

and roosh, really? are you that happy where you are doing what you’re doing right now?

Cocoon
Guest
Cocoon
Offline

We are not “inferior” to you. We need eachother.

Not every invention man has created has been good anyway, it would have been better for the planet if we had stayed in the trees and still hunted with bows.

Dan Fletcher
Guest
Dan Fletcher
Offline

Lol at sif and GENTLEMEN

Compare those lists to an equivalent list about men. You may as well be weighing a feather against an anvil. Honestly, you are really scrapping the barrel. How many of those women have you actually heard of before you scrambled to wikipedia to try and hold up your weak argument? Could you name their contributions without having to look it up first? I doubt it.

Look up the list of inventions by women. It is embarrassingly short.

Sure, some women have made some contributions to civilisation. But considering that women make up 50% of the population, they haven’t really done squat. Roosh’s point still stands.

Magnum
Guest
Magnum
Offline

Roosh, I like the way you advocate mens rights but some of your posts are starting to get as blatantly biased as the feminist nonsense from the other side.

Not all women are dimwitted sluts.Plenty of women contribute meaningful work to society and help fill the tax coffers.Some are low lifes for sure but the same goes for men.

I dont see a big problem with some women not having children.The world is overpopulated as it is.As long as the geneticly blessed ones are having kids and the ugly ones miss out who cares?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Why so cranky lately? And you have always confused respecting women with being a beta faggot. You were a beta faggot when you were younger and women wouldn’t even fart on you. Now you are convinced that women didn’t like you because you were too nice to them. Newsflash dickfag, women want to be respected and they also want to feel protected from danger. The sooner you realize that, the sooner you will be able to spend more than 3 weeks with a woman from a non 3rd world country. Suck it, tits.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

margaret thatcher was a badass…i’m pretty sure she and reagan single-handedly defeated communism with ninja karate and free market capitalism

chicks can do awesome shit too. i don’t feel like less of a man for saying that

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Getting better with women is something I’ve been attempting for a while now and Roosh has been a good influence on me in that pursuit…

…but it’s sad to have to dig through the sexist material to get to the worthwhile reads. I’m beginning to feel sorry for him. He sounds like he’s trying to constantly paper-over a whole lot of hurt underneath. These hate pieces are evidence of that.

What will he be left with when this “party” is over? It’s a question I find myself asking more and more.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Offline

Women have a dual purpose ..pushing men too is their thing. What about ambitious men throughout history? They have always been self motivated but married to “pushy women”.Eleanor Roosevelt, Hilary Clinton, Michelle Obama, Maria Shriver,etc. in our culture. Have any of these men settled with women who were not highly ambitious themselves? Look at CEO’s, Athletes, Entertainers..most have un-attractive pushy wives.

Armed with Knowledge
Guest

Of course, but: if women no longer act in this manner and we are left to carry on without that support and expected to be successful without it too, like nothing has changed, then that role apparently never mattered at all, and neither did women.

dimwitted slut
Guest
dimwitted slut
Offline

As a long time fan of the casanova exploits of our handsome narrator, I can’t help but agree with people who are put off by the lines of thinking recently. It’s just… sad.

But, I’m still naive enough to hope this is just a build up to the real revelation, when Roosh meets a woman he respects and loves. One who understands and nurtures him like no other, bolsters his best qualities and improves his worst, births his offspring and suffers his follies with grace.

Good luck in love, no matter what form it finally takes.

Sif
Guest
Sif
Offline

Nikola Tesla inherited his inventor genes from his mother, who was well known for inventing tools in their village. He was greatly influenced by his mother. If she wasn’t an illiterate village housewife, I’m sure she’d be like her son. The only reason women didn’t contribute as much to science and and technology is cause they were oppressed by the male dominated Judeo-Christian religions. Healers were predominantly female in heathen Europe until Christianity came along and restricted practicing medicine to men for centuries.

@Boheme Chinois: not all women get fat after marfiage and childbirth. Rural women do gardening, and cook healthy homemade foods. They don’t have drive thru fast food joints in rural towns of the Midwest. Excessive driving culture and lack of physical activity, combined with the widely available cheap junk food is what makes people (not just women) fat. Male obesity rate is higher than or equal to female obesity in most states. Where there are fat women, there are fat men. Blame the poor/nonexistent mass transit system, suburban drive-thru lifestyle, the fast food joints and the high fructose corn syrup for the rampant obesity.

If you find a gal who has hobbies like hiking, backyard gardening or rock climbing, you won’t have to worry about her gaining weight. Upper middle class and health nut types don’t get fat. When I go to whole foods, I don’t see any morbidly obese whales. Most women shopping there (a lot of them with children in tow) are pretty thin. And this is in one of the fattest cities in the continental US.

@ ‘All women are feminists’ pessimists: Let me help you get a grip on reality. Homemaking and cooking magazines sell far more than Cosmopolitan and celebrity gossip magazines.

Here is the 2011 magazine circulation figures for the USA:

Better Homes and Gardens(#3 national best seller) 7,648,900
Good Housekeeping 4,336,711
Woman’s Day(cooking&homemaking): 3,895,814
Family Circle 3,816,958
Ladies’ Home Journal: 3,267,239
Taste of Home: 3,235,718
Cosmopolitan: 3,032,211
Southern Living (cooking&homemaking magazine): 2,830,178
Parenting: 2,227,351

If most American women are dumb bar sluts, masculine feminiazis, sex&the city wannabes and career freak spinsters, who is buying these millions of good housewife magazines?

The circulation of Better Homes and Gardens is a whopping 7,648,900. More than twice the circulation of Cosmopolitan.

Solid evidence says most American women are not feminists or sex&the city wannabes, in fact most American women are good homemakers or aspiring to be so.

Like I said, take a road trip and get to know your own country before making assumptions based on the small environment you’re exposed to. It’s a HUGE country.

Want a traditional lifestyle with a traditional homemaker wife? Get out of NYC, Chicago, DC. You really don’t have to go to 3rd world countries, but you can’t expect your good tratitional wife to not get corrupted in an urban sprawl environment. Even if you bring a 3rd world woman over, she’ll become just as corrupted by the feminazi programming. Don’t want ltr or marriage and just bang away? Go right ahead, who’s stopping you? But if you are a true PUA, why all the bitching about American women? Just go to whatever foreign country and bang away.