Starting at the end of 2015, I began seeing a sharp rise of women declaring themselves to be “anti-feminist.” They created Twitter accounts and Youtube channels to mock social justice warriors and feminists in similar ways that we have, even borrowing our talking points. While they may come across as genuine, these female infiltrators are mostly attention whoring to a male audience. They don’t want to change the world—they just want you to look at them.

If you have an anti-feminist movement with a high percentage of women in it, you don’t have an anti-feminist movement. The reason is that single women raised in the West will find it impossible to go against the female urge of sleeping with whomever they want and having complete control over their lives to pursue useless college degrees and degenerate behaviors. The only exception is women who want to be mothers before 30, but such women wouldn’t waste her time “building a brand” online instead of creating the family she greatly desires.

Anti-feminists share great overlap in ideology with actual feminists

The new anti-feminist will bash SJWs and their censorship efforts with great vigor, but when it’s time for society to stop them from opening their legs to sexy alpha males, they throw a temper tantrum. When it’s time to force them adopt traditional behaviors of maintaining a home instead of merely agreeing to traditional ideas in theory, they reveal themselves to be feminists at heart and use SJW language that labels you a “misogynist” or “rapist.”

I’ve had numerous “anti-feminists” in infiltrated movements (alt right, gamergate, men’s rights) attack me to the point where I can’t tell the difference between them and standard issue SJWs, even though our enemy is supposedly the same. This includes popular “anti-feminist” Shoe0nhead, pictured at the top of this article with one of her many Arabian lovers that she is desperate to keep secret for some reason. The reality is that anti-feminists like her are more aligned with the enemy than ourselves. They used entryist tactics that started with merely uploading a female avatar and looking pretty in webcam pictures.

One of the reasons for the rise of anti-feminists is not necessarily the strength of our ideas, but the fact that the feminist camp is too crowded. Being a feminist and holding an “I need feminism” sign used to be a great way to get attention online without having to show tits, but with thousands of girls doing it, any one girl no longer stands out. The practice of anti-feminism by females is therefore an alternative strategy to getting attention. Consider that a girl who is a 6 out of 10 can now make a Youtube video denouncing feminism and easily get 25,000 views. It’s also a way for girls to show men that they are “hip,” “dangerous,” and “cool.” Men online are so thirsty and lonely that they lavish these girls with attention because they’re “just like one of the guys.”

The anti-feminist test

These anti-feminist females are not traditional and not even conservative. They are liberals in disguise. You can ask them these questions to reveal where their true sympathies lie:

  • “Are you against homosexual marriage?”
  • “Do you believe it’s ideal for a woman to remain a virgin until she gets married?”
  • “Do you believe that it’s best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home mother?”
  • “Do you believe a woman’s choices should be constrained by her husband, tribe, or church with the intention of doing what’s best for her?”
  • “Do you believe it’s wrong for a young girl to find herself by traveling around the world and trying new experiences?”

Good luck finding an anti-feminist who says yes to even two of the above questions. I suspect the only girl who would is already married and a stay-at-home mother who happily submits to her masculine husband.

While the anti-feminists have been useful during group actions against SJWs online, the drawback is that their platform size may grow enough to cause damage in the future when they have a difficult menstrual cycle and start needless drama by attacking genuine conservatives. They will not submit to anything but their female biology and bottomless pit of narcissism while the weak men who follow them act as their enablers and white knights.

In spite of their big talk online, anti-feminists ultimately want to maintain the status quo, and have taken on our ideas as a strategy to get attention and fill the childless void in their lives. They will have absolutely no place within the sphere of neomasculinity.[culturewar]

Read Next: Women Must Have Their Behavior And Decisions Controlled By Men


  1. GenKittVonKnox April 21, 2016 at 8:14 am

    So What’s your view of Lauren Southern? Does she pass the test in your opinion or is she really a feminist in disguise?

    1. Roosh April 21, 2016 at 9:26 am

      You can ask her the set of questions and see how she responds.

      1. spicynujac April 21, 2016 at 4:35 pm

        UnicornHunt2016 is on!

      2. Petronilla April 23, 2016 at 9:44 am

        Just curious, what’s your current opinion of Karen Straughan?

      3. Hugo August 26, 2016 at 8:33 am

        Won’t answer for Roosh but, anyone who cares what ANY woman thinks about masculinity doesn’t get it. We should not concern ourselves with any of these women. We’re men. They’re women.

      4. Arminds' copy of Swank April 24, 2016 at 12:20 pm

        I’m answered no to all those and I’m a guy who is against feminism. I don’t want women subservient to men or without choice. I simply want men to have equal choice and men’s issues to be validated and for gender issues not not be just about women while men are viewed as unable to be victims.

        Anti-feminism isn’t anti-women’s rights. It’s anti-feminism; which is a movement for demonising all men and female superiority

      5. jimmy April 24, 2016 at 1:02 pm

        The problem with the stance you have adopted is it would only make sense intellectually if men and women are equal. In reality men and women are unequal, they are very different.

        Put a negative spin on it with a word like subservient and it sounds bad. But in reality most women naturally want to marry a strong man who will protect them and provide for them. Beautiful teenage girls always have and always will throw themselves at rich powerful men.

        Now women generally lack rationality or logic and at a young age are best protected from their own instincts by a father or society who cares. If they save their virginity and get married to a loving husband it might seem they are being made “subservient” and they are certainly having their behaviour controlled aged 18-22 but it results in a lifetime of love and happiness. This was the norm for women until a couple of generations ago. It is also better for society to have well balanced children raised in a solid marriage.

        So just saying something like men and women should have equal choice sounds appealing in a certain simple minded way. But put it in the context of real human beings and real human societies and it all falls apart.

      6. Little Bo Peep April 30, 2016 at 3:57 am

        Yeah, that’s true, Jimmy. It’s the dilemma feminists face, too. They say they want to be equal in a relationship, but they aren’t attracted to men who are of equal or lower income and status than they are. That’s a simple fact. In fact, statistics actually show that women with higher incomes actually raise their standards and prefer even higher income men than poorer women do.

        It’s biology. It’s fucking funny.

      7. SomeRandomFellow April 27, 2016 at 3:23 am

        That’s gay. Women cannot be equal.

        “Once women and men are equal women become superior”
        Some greek philosopher

        Women are not biologically equal. They are not physically fit to be in the military. Most shitty jobs are done by men (99 % of boiler makers and oil drillers are men).

        Not to mention the Women are Wonderful effect, the female tribal solidarity (vagina tribalism), gynocentrism as well as male thirst give women incredible social power.

        Why should they be given equal rights if they are not equal, do not contribute equally, and have an unspoken ammount of power granted them by nature.

        When given the right to vote, they Vote Trudeau, importing muslims, welfare state, single mom support and celebration, male persecution by law, etc.

        Even if they claim otherwise, reality shows a different picture. Go to any pro-migrant rally, mostly women and beta cucks. Go to any nationalist rally, mostly men (95 % +).

        When given equal opportunity women used it to fuck around, hate men, draw art and sing songs about their vagina, bring in muslim hordes, consume degenerate art, etc.

        Under patriarhy they were civilized, well dressed, feminine, respectful. Now what ?

        You are simply advocating Soft Patriarchy, we are advocating ard patriarchy. Women do not deserve even “equal opportunity”. They must be legally handicapped to account for their social power granted by just having a vagina and ability to fuck shit up.

        That is if you value social harmony, whether you realize it yet or not.

        Not to mention “equality” and “democracy” won’t let us win over muslim hordes. Only hardcore patriarchy and male supremacy.

        I rest my case, women belong to men, and will either follow the benevolent rule of white males(if we are generous enough to be benevolent after all the shit they have done) or the brutal rule of muslims.

        The only right women have is to choose their masters.

        As for Soft Patriarchy vs Hard Patriarchy watch this video

      8. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 7:04 am

        Patriarchy is a myth. It never existed and never will.

      9. Aldous Huxley May 2, 2016 at 5:30 am

        It did exist, you are the same breed of short sighted delusional idiotic woman that was common at the end of the roman empire. You will not have it all, you will be murdered and raped until the legacy of your bloodline is completely wiped from existence by the foreign hordes you thought it wise to be kind to. Nature’s about to teach humanity another harsh lesson about who’s really in charge.

      10. Aldous Huxley May 2, 2016 at 10:24 am

        I just realized you’re a mentally ill person. You need to be in an institution. Shunning the drive to reproduce is nothing more than being insane.
        Oh, and if muslims take over this country you will be raped to death. No amount of calling me names will change that, you sheltered scornful idiot.

      11. Aldous Huxley May 2, 2016 at 2:21 pm

        Not only are you too stupid to not walk willingly into your own death, I hope it comes sooner than later. I cannot think of a more expedient way to improve the gene pool.

      12. Demonica Perduta May 2, 2016 at 3:41 pm

        I think we should just get rid of sniveling faceless cowards who hide behind fake names and don’t even have the balls to use an avatar on line, but admittedly I can’t think what we could use them for… maybe we could turn them into chicken feed?!

      13. Aldous Huxley May 3, 2016 at 3:26 am

        No, you just want to bait me to destroy my livelihood. You lack any real capabilities, so you try to borrow the power of others for ridiculously purposeless personal vendettas to protect yourself from self-scrutiny. A good dose of nature ignoring your priveledge as a protected class in a society you are destroying out of vanity is exactly what is called for. I intend to watch.

      14. Demonica Perduta May 3, 2016 at 5:21 am

        How the fuck can I have a “personal vendetta” against an impersonal troll account that I don’t remember ever seeing before?
        Patriarchy is a myth and femitardism is a paranoid delusion.

      15. Amazing_Jeff May 3, 2016 at 3:34 pm

        Why do drag queens like you lie?

      16. Demonica Perduta May 3, 2016 at 5:27 pm

        you are just jealous of of my cool trans style, and superior intellect… and so you should be. :o)

      17. Amazing_Jeff May 3, 2016 at 6:04 pm

        Dude, you think I’m someone else and you have no proof. Then you think you are a “woman” and you are not. Lying. Did you always dream of looking like a man in bad clothes and a bad wig?

      18. vlad the impaler August 7, 2016 at 5:18 am

        you couldn’t punch your way out of a wet paper bag big talker.youll be back to washing our socks and making soap you cow.

      19. Angry Young Man May 15, 2016 at 3:30 am

        Thumbed up. Tell it like it is. American women “people” deserve to be berated, if not physically beaten.

      20. Angry Young Man May 15, 2016 at 3:27 am

        Okay, “demonica”. Women or trans-woman (whatever) are evil.

      21. Demonica Perduta May 16, 2016 at 7:02 pm

        Sure thing, “Angry”, but basically it’s ypu pussy chassers that are dumb suckers who fall for it every time. #amIright?

      22. Angry Young Man June 15, 2016 at 2:42 am

        Not with me. I haven’t fucked any women in over a year, and I’ve had my chances. I would like to, but I’m really not the scum-sucker you are describing, “Demonica”, though I would agree that thirsty simps are enablers. What’s to say about drag whores like you, Demonica? Are you blame free? AmeriKan women are trash.

      23. Demonica Perduta June 15, 2016 at 3:34 am

        why you buy Rooshie boy’s book he explains all the tricks of trade :o)

      24. vlad the impaler August 7, 2016 at 5:20 am

        we will just have to take the pussy then,i don’t like chasing it anyway.we’ll wait by the watering hole behind a rock and wait for women tobend over to drink ,then we’ll run over there and slip you the meat.

      25. vlad the impaler August 7, 2016 at 5:16 am

        bitch ,you aint got nobody by the balls you long as we can beat your asses ,we will remain in charge,and god help you if society ever collapses,there will be no one to cry rape to.not that anybody would want to rape your manly ass.

      26. Julius Cesar August 22, 2016 at 6:06 pm

        “Women do not deserve even “equal opportunity”. They must be legally
        handicapped to account for their social power granted by just having a
        vagina and ability to fuck shit up.”

        I’ve heard it all before: double standards justified by white privilege, male privilege, which are all obviously bullshit and coming from a place of resentment… but vagina privilege is a new one.

        Is this satire? Bravo!

      27. Mikko L. January 3, 2018 at 9:58 am

        That’s a fantasy ideal.

        Jimmy is correct, though.

      28. Dick Johnson April 24, 2016 at 1:29 pm

        Roosh, just read all the comments on this article and all the women who commented (except one, a commenter named “Lauren”) prove your point. Other than that one commenter, they don’t even believe women should be virgins at marriage, and lots of them whined “well Roosh wants women to be virgins but he doesn’t think men should be virgins.” Men can’t even be “virgins.” The term historically was not used to describe men. Have you ever met a woman who valued a man’s “virginity?”

        They don’t realize they’re proving your point.

      29. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 7:05 am

        it seem pretty stupid to want to play “the game” if the girls you play with have to remain virgins… #duh4brains.

      30. Dick Johnson April 27, 2016 at 10:45 am

        First of all, I happen to be in a relationship and planning to start a family with a girl who was a virgin when I met her.

        Second of all, you’re CLEARLY not an anti-feminist. Your comment the same thing I’ve seen from tons of feminist trolls on this site and others.

      31. Dick Johnson April 28, 2016 at 4:06 am

        LOL. I HOPE you’re a troll. If you’re not a troll, something is SERIOUSLY wrong with you. PLEASE tell me you’re a troll.

      32. Angry Young Man June 15, 2016 at 2:46 am

        Quit playing drag queen and go back to being a boy. By the way, you have evil eyes. I know them when I see them.

      33. Demonica Perduta June 15, 2016 at 3:36 am

        my other persona is Angelica.. and she’s just the sweetest little transgirl a guy could ever meet 💋♡♡♡

      34. Angry Young Man June 15, 2016 at 2:46 am

        No, this “Demonica” person is destined for Hell. Totally void of rationality, this person is mentally unstable.

      35. vlad the impaler August 7, 2016 at 5:21 am

        youre a dude,youre just a fag or a tranny or something ,you are too vulgar to be female.hence the sissy comment.

      36. Demonica Perduta August 9, 2016 at 5:40 am

        you live in a delusion that us girls would be all sweet sugar and spice. You are clearly a delusional pussy licking mangina.

      37. Caggybear May 23, 2016 at 4:25 pm

        “I happen to be in a relationship and planning to start a family with a girl who was a virgin when I met her.” or so she claimed ^_^

      38. Dick Johnson May 24, 2016 at 2:32 am

        Why, is that what you tell men in order to keep them around?

        Judging by your picture, if you told me you were a virgin, I wouldn’t believe you for a second.

      39. Caggybear May 29, 2016 at 11:44 pm

        I’m not the one lying to you about my virginity. Your girlfriend is lol.

      40. Dick Johnson May 30, 2016 at 4:54 pm

        You think just because you’re a slut, it means all other women are also sluts? Is that what you tell yourself to feel better about all the cock you’ve taken in your holes?

      41. Caggybear May 30, 2016 at 9:29 pm

        You’re just saying this to make yourself feel better for being taken for a sucker. xD unless of course, you’re dating a 13 year old girl, then chances are you’ve been lied to. lmao.

      42. Dick Johnson May 31, 2016 at 10:37 am

        I’ve been dating her since we were both 16. I’m now 24. She’s also not American and comes from a very traditional family (who I know well). I’m gonna show her this and we’re both gonna laugh at you.

        Just because you lost your virginity at 13 doesn’t mean all girls do. It’s telling that you haven’t even denied being a slut or taking tons of cock.

      43. Dirk Diggler June 8, 2016 at 11:23 am

        It is also proof of why we are encouraged to ignore their comments. They pollute the discourse and get us off track.

      44. phallocentrist/androcentrist ♂ May 23, 2016 at 3:19 am

        Roosh V, you are not so smart. You can barely even form a decent
        sentence live without your computer. The most honorable thing you did
        was go on mainstream tv. & state that overweight females ( although I
        personally do enjoy chubby females, in addition to other types.) are
        inexcusable. ¶ You p.u.a. types are mostly just feminine emulators. You
        act like women while proclaiming the “real-man” thing. You understand,
        whether subconsciously or full, the nature of females, & you take
        advantage of it like traitors to only waste time rather than pointing
        the major problems of it, such as one fact that females are
        collectivists, so because of that, you adopt feminine tactics to be
        approved by female herd mentality. ¶ I have some respect for people like
        Mark Rudolf because with that approach, it is just weeding by remaining
        completely masculine & not an actor. ¶ You idiots on here need to
        read some ‘Sex & Character’ by Otto Weininger. ¶ You p.u.a. idiots
        just act like women. ¶ Now go cry to mommy because one isn’t even slightly impressed by your sleazy effeminacy.

      45. phallocentrist/androcentrist ♂ May 23, 2016 at 3:21 am

        (Oh, & by the way, the weird paragraph formatting is due to glitchy system, not I. )

      46. Caggybear May 29, 2016 at 11:51 pm

        you probably copied and pasted that comment from another site.

    2. Martin April 21, 2016 at 9:28 am

      I think Lauren is a far right traditionalist disguised as a moderate anti-feminist.

    3. SomeRandomFellow April 21, 2016 at 3:28 pm

      She makes fun of “nazis”. Typical lolbertrarian.

      How is the Libertrarian movement still taken seriously after Ron Paul left is beyond me.

      She is a typical media whore, but at least she grabs attention by fighting SJWs, respect for that.

    4. Misanthropist April 22, 2016 at 7:48 am

      Speaking for myself, I get the impression that Lauren Southern is a fairly decent, well intentioned girl. But she is still pretty naive about the full extent to which feminism is a totalitarian, destructive and evil movement. She seems to be on the right track though.

      1. Thorverine April 23, 2016 at 11:18 am

        She needs a neomasculine guy to help show her the light…and his cock

    5. General Stalin April 24, 2016 at 1:27 am

      She is just an alt-right media personality. A commentator/contributor for an online media outlet. If she was truly “anti-feminist” then she would likely be too busy being a homemaker and taking care of her kids and loving husband to have time to be on camera all the time talking about her political views.

      1. Arminds' copy of Swank April 24, 2016 at 12:23 pm

        Being anti-feminist doesn’t mean being a person from the 50s. It means being against feminism against female superiority and man-hating

      2. SomeRandomFellow April 27, 2016 at 3:34 am

        You are fighting the symptom not the disease.

        Equality with women if folly because men are superior and should be unquestionable rulers of society.

        Women do not deserve equality. They as a group belong to the men of their tribe and as an individual should be property of the husband.

        If they find it offensive, then let’s see how they will defend themselves from foreign hordes, who will build the roads and do all the dirty jobs and who will pay the taxes.

        Male supremacy has been the social order for thousand of years, and is the only true harmonious order.

        You are an equality cuck, we are unabashed male supremacists.

        This is why we advocate hardcore patriarchy and female servitude and having social obligations forced on them (aka patriarchy).

        Without hardcore patriarchy society eventually collapses either from the inside or is conquered by foreign hordes.

        PS : LOL at the “50’s” scarecrow. The 50’s were very liberal.

        We will reverse the social order by millenia. Read Julius Evola if you want to understand.

      3. Caggybear May 23, 2016 at 2:59 pm

        lmao ISIS defector detected. Requesting permission to open fire!

      4. SomeRandomFellow May 24, 2016 at 10:34 pm

        Lol, as if common sense means being ISIS . I bet Europe of a few centuries ago would have let women with blue hair and tats run around in slut walks talking about “privilege”.

        San Fransisco is that way —–>

      5. Caggybear May 29, 2016 at 11:44 pm

        Bet you have a real boner for burkas lol.

    6. Jack Burton June 6, 2016 at 12:55 am

      Virtually every Western woman is a feminist to some degree.

      What Lauren is against is Third Wave feminism, which is a mutated, ugly, “intersectional” monstrosity of feminism.

      Lauren is very liberal in many ways, but she’s not a cunt. She’s genuinely sweet which is hard to find among Western women these days. Even women on the racial right are typically really nasty cunts with no respect for anyone but themselves.

    7. Mikko Lopez December 31, 2017 at 3:08 am


      1. SaltySarge January 6, 2018 at 5:17 pm

        Agreed. Somethings up there. She gives too many excuses and never follows through.

  2. Zelcorpion April 21, 2016 at 8:21 am

    Generally true, but with some notable exceptions. Judgybitch for example is one who very consciously decided to settle down with a man while being young and then built a family with him. Also she somewhat distanced herself from the AVfM crowd who have become light feminists and anti-Game:

    1. SomeRandomFellow April 21, 2016 at 3:29 pm

      She is still a woman though. I don’t think women bring anything new to the table, but respect to her anyway.

      1. Zelcorpion April 24, 2016 at 10:32 am

        She has some interesting viewpoints on her blog.

        But of course she will never ever represent men on topics like Game, seduction, self-improvement – and she does not make that claim. Those are exclusively male topics.

        As for anti-feminism, then women can be strong supporters of that giving praise to male contribuations while promoting feminine virtues and family planning.

      2. SomeRandomFellow April 27, 2016 at 3:01 am

        Good enough.

      3. Odile Lee May 30, 2016 at 12:41 am

        I dont think a woman has a valid viewpoint in Game, as how could we understand what it IS to be a man, let alone something that does not concern us. Any woman has the choice to say no. Or yes, but then must accept that she does not hold a final say in any relationship. Only a part, and only if this is a mutual thing. To complain about double standards, seems to be connected to a will of power in controlling who makes the rules. To willfilly ignore reality, and older standards of morals ( which gives a clue to how Western societies handled morality towards sex, and why) strikes me as willfully ignorant immaturity. There is a reason novels were written by both men and women( example; Jane Austin, Zola ) to illustrate consequences of poor choices.

  3. Brutus Maximus April 21, 2016 at 8:25 am

    They are the equivalent of male feminists. There’s something wrong about it.

  4. EuryaΛe April 21, 2016 at 8:33 am

    I’ve said it before and will say it again: Männerbund FTW!

  5. Janet Bloomfield April 21, 2016 at 9:19 am

    I say ‘no’ to your first two questions, and ‘yes’ to the last three.

    I built my family BEFORE amusing myself on line. Otherwise, all of this is sadly true.

    I didn’t include ‘to obey’ in my wedding vows. I wish I had. That’s the killer question: will you vow to ‘obey’ your husband? Most women don’t understand it’s a trade, and one in which they receive the lion’s share of the advantages. I am all for full legal equality – women and men must be under the equal protection of the law, but in my own personal life, I am dependent and subservient to my husband, and that’s the smartest, safest place any woman can be.

    How many anti-feminist women understand that? Some, but not many.

    1. SomeRandomFellow April 21, 2016 at 3:31 pm

      I do not believe in equal rights, but I will give you that women should be defended by police just like men.

      Female voting rights must be taken away.

      1. AmicusC April 22, 2016 at 11:04 am

        most peoples voting rights should be taken away.

      2. Shmalkandik April 24, 2016 at 6:34 am

        But note h ow female voting rights were achieved in the US. The argument advanced by populists such as William Jennings Bryan was ‘the hand that rocks the cradle should guide the nation’. His argument was that Christian women had a perspective that was both beneficial and formative in building character, and thus their influence in public life should be increased. One hundred years later, we can analyze female influence in public policy and see that it was often detrimental. Examples include the campaigns against alcohol, tobacco, paid sex, and other ‘crusades against vice’.

        But, these were all positions supported by leaders of the Christian community. These same leaders were the ones who enlisted in the movement for the Women’s vote, anticipating increased support for their Christian agenda. The new religion that is replacing Christianity has a similar strategy. What hope in defeating this moment is showing that the most dangerous enemy to women in Feminism, much like the greatest killer of workers and peasants was Communism.

        I wish to suggest we are in the Brezhnev years of Feminism. There will be a social implosin, much the same way and much the same reason, as there was an economic collapse of the Soviet system. But, I don’t know that is cause for rejoicing. The Soviet system was replaced, after some stumbling about, by Putin’s Slavo-Fascims. This seems to be a genuinely popular movement in Russian, much the same way Mussolini was successful from 1922-1934. Similarly, the defeat of Feminism in the US may not presage a better future. It will be interesting but unpleasant to watch the decline.

      3. SomeRandomFellow April 27, 2016 at 3:03 am

        Putin is hardly a slavo-fascist. Any Russian fascist will tell you that. He is a populist like Donald Trump.

      4. lerellen April 29, 2016 at 5:39 pm

        Good luck with that.

    2. Morrison April 21, 2016 at 4:19 pm

      “I say ‘no’ to your first two questions, and ‘yes’ to the last three”

      So do us all a favor and fuck off.

    3. Travis April 21, 2016 at 4:24 pm

      I don’t necessarily agree with this article. Personally, I’m a fan of the old maxim, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”. I don’t believe in turning away any allies in the fight against feminism. But I’m curious. You say that men and women should be equal in the eyes of the law, but I’ve seen you posting under the hashtag #WhyWomenShouldn’tVote on Twitter. And unfortunately, after seeing the Yes Means Yes laws, the tendency of women to want to curb free speech, Trudeau in Canada, the unbelievably fucked up mess that is Sweden, women in Germany eagerly welcoming the Muslim invasion, etc, it’s a sentiment that I’ve come to share. If we continue to allow women to vote, I think it’s going to accomplish what no other army or nation has been able to. Namely, the end of western civilization. So I’m wondering if you could clarify your position.

      1. Janet Bloomfield April 21, 2016 at 8:06 pm

        Women should not vote. I don’t see that as politically tenable. Too bad. So if women cannot be prevented from voting, then strict equality is the only other option.

        Personally, I think women have to decide: the patriarchy of enlightened white men, or Islam.

        No contest, for me.

        In my heart, I prefer patriarchy. The rule of white, liberal, enlightened, Western men.

      2. Travis April 21, 2016 at 11:52 pm

        I don’t know about the rest of these guys, but that’s good enough for me.

      3. Doctor Mayhem April 22, 2016 at 12:38 am

        Unfortunately, the time for that is past. The only way to set things right will be a very gross overreaction in the other direction. White Boy Sharia.

      4. Demonica Perduta April 22, 2016 at 4:24 am

        patriarchy is a myth. Men control power and we control them :o)

      5. rationalize April 22, 2016 at 10:24 am

        “I can’t help it, I’m just drawn that way.”

      6. Demonica Perduta April 22, 2016 at 10:43 am

        masculine and feminine evolved in symbiosis. Neither is subordinate… the girls get what we want and the boys get what they want… although why they should want it remains a mystery to me ;o)

      7. Doctor Mayhem April 22, 2016 at 4:26 pm

        You mean… men control power, and then you try to become a woman in hopes to… I don’t fucking know. Go kill yourself, tranny.

      8. Doctor Mayhem April 22, 2016 at 9:33 pm

        I think you went to wrong place. hehehehehehe

      9. Demonica Perduta April 22, 2016 at 11:39 pm

        I think you are a sad bitter old closet tranny and you just jealous of my stylish trans-cool and my cool trans-style. #amIright?

      10. SomeRandomFellow April 27, 2016 at 8:48 am

        Godammit Roosh.

        Trannies are taking over the site.

      11. Adam Levinson April 22, 2016 at 12:12 pm

        Women’s suffrage has been the most tragic joke ever played on Western Civilization. They’ve led us right into the gutter.

      12. Odile Lee May 29, 2016 at 10:39 am

        The book “Fresh Lipstick” shows how the feminist cannon was selectively edited, towards a stream that negated any man-positive women.

    4. spicynujac April 21, 2016 at 4:25 pm

      That doesn’t even make sense. How could you believe a woman shouldn’t be a virgin at marriage but that she should submit to rules restricting her behavior? Rules constraining single women’s sexuality would be the first ones made. If you can’t obey your father before marriage, how are you going to obey your husband when your father passes you off to him?

      1. I'm not fat I'm just curvy lol October 13, 2016 at 12:49 am

        Well, she’s an undercover feminist. Deep inside her heart, she is.
        Because nothing can contradict itself real fast like feminism and feminists.

        A masculine man can sense that pretty quick.

        Just like you.

    5. Martin April 22, 2016 at 12:03 am

      Janet, I find it disheartening that so many of the “anti-feminist” women arrogantly detest any hint of traditionalism. People need to stop acting like the basic biological relationships of almost all men and women of the past, in almost all countries, was not some tragic, sadistic horror story of exploitation and hatred. But that’s what they conjure if you say the wrong buzzword.

    6. Odile Lee May 30, 2016 at 12:45 am

      A woman’s power comes from submitting to a man- not from trying to emulate one. A wise person advised. True, as known by any good woman taught to respect men. And men’s power, so very different from a woman’s.

    7. Maximus Decimus Meridius December 6, 2017 at 11:40 am

      >>> “I am dependent and subservient to my husband”

      And then you walk into the voting booth and vote against him… in the single most POLITICAL act that is the act of exercising public POWER in society.

      This is why Roosh called out hypocritical “trad” women. If you are voting in the public sphere, affecting public policy, and that vote goes AGAINST your husbands wisdom for the better running of society (i.e. the public sphere affecting ALL citizens)…

      Then no amount of “submission” in the home is of any value. You have publicly humiliated the very man you have sworn “to obey” in your wedding vows…

      Oh wait… you did not include those vows… and still want the right to vote.

      Can you see now WHY you will be LOSING the vote?

      If you are under the PROTECTION of your husband… and only MEN are allowed to vote… you are DE FACTO under the full legal protection of men FOR YOUR BEST INTERESTS. You do not need to be “equal” to be under men’s protection, but you do need to submit if you wish to continue to receive it.

      You can’t be “equal” if you want to be a partner.

      Try dancing with a woman who insists she can EQUALLY lead as well as HE can. No one dances… nothing but fights.

      Either western women learn to ACCEPT their submissive role… or be replaced by Muslim women who currently do and are out reproducing them 6 to 1.

      Don’t hate the message or the messenger.

  6. Abigail Pereira Aranha April 21, 2016 at 10:13 am

    Hi, fellow! You were going well, but you failed here (quoting and commenting):
    “These anti-feminist females are not traditional and not even conservative.”
    I myself am so, though you are not addressing your text to me. Is it needed to be a Puritan to be anti-Feminist? I will come back to this point.
    “You can ask them these questions to reveal where their true sympathies lie:
    “‘Are you against homosexual marriage?'”
    “Do you believe its ideal for a woman to remain a virgin until she gets married?”
    Absolutely no!
    “Do you believe that its best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home mother?”
    YES! Or, at least, a mother who is always aside them.
    “Do you believe a woman’s choices should be constrained by her husband, tribe, or church with the intention of doing what’s best for her?”
    Absolutely no!
    “Do you believe it’s wrong for a young girl to find herself by traveling around the world and trying new experiences?”
    Now, I will answer that question. I wrote 2015 March “Women Against Feminism and Feminism against them – part 4: twenty years of silence”: When you visit my blog, you will see two things: 1) lots of porn, not only because my male readers will enjoy, it’s also because is unfair and immoral to want them ashamed of enjoying it; 2) I have this ANTIFEMINIST blog since 2006, being an Atheist, Anarchist and pro-licentiousness girl. Ah, see what traditional Evangelical women made, together with Gail Dines, 2013, and what I said that epoch:

    1. Lunostrelki April 21, 2016 at 2:20 pm

      You support hypergamy, a key point of modern feminism and even Marxism, which calls for the “community (i.e. communal use) of women.” That’s what Roosh is getting at in his article.

      1. Roosh April 21, 2016 at 2:39 pm

        I’m glad she is able to provide instant proof of my argument.

      2. Morrison April 21, 2016 at 4:21 pm

        “I’m glad she is able to provide instant proof of my argument”

        Those are excellent questions that provide a perfrct litmus test.

      3. Abigail Pereira Aranha May 7, 2016 at 9:36 am

        Fuck! It was refuted in Communist Manifesto, 1848! Karl Marx destroyed anti-Socialists like you more than 160 years ago! Incidentally, how can a movement who defend pink buses and pink trains support hypergamy? And why, to fight against sex, you are together with the ugly fat Feminist lesbian Gail Dines? This chat of angry false moralist virgins will only help their true enemy.

      4. SomeRandomFellow May 24, 2016 at 10:49 pm

        Wait what ? Are you saying Karl Marx was right ?

        South American socialist feminists. Surprise surprise. Did you not get full of it yet in Brazil ? Socialism has worked great on the continent up till now, hasn’t it ? lol.

        We do not fight against sex, like lesbians. We fight for sex in the confines of a heterosexual monogamous context, preferably for the goal of creating as many children as possible. We are all pro-monogamous sex.

        “Angry virgins” LOL no.

        “True enemy” – Please enlighten me, who is it ? Lesbian dykes are not my enemy. They are a symptom. They are a result of a decadent hyper-atomized neo-liberal society. The true enemies of man are the elites who empower women at the expense of men as well as gynocentric attitudes overall. Fighting dykes and other assorted schyzos is fighting a useful idiot of a system and not the system itself.

      5. Abigail Pereira Aranha May 26, 2016 at 9:52 pm

        “We do not fight against sex (…). We fight for sex in the confines of a heterosexual monogamous context, preferably for the goal of creating as many children as possible.” It sounds like “we don’t forbid free traffic in this country, but you can’t leave your town”.
        You skipped exactly the parts about law enforcement of the worst of Feminism, including the criminalization of prostitution and pornography defended by Gail Dines. Interesting! What is the true enemy, you ask me? What about Socialism, in which is the Feminism?
        That’s OK you defend Conservatism, like the most of my friends in Facebook do, but “South American socialist feminist” is a [email protected]$%

      6. SomeRandomFellow May 24, 2016 at 11:45 pm

        I also like how when confronted with views that oppose you , you result to calling your opposition angry virgins. Shaming men for not towing the line, that’s so not feminist.

        Your anti-feminism kind is only inches away from 3rd wave feminism.

        I will give you that, I would rather support your kind of anti-feminism as at least it does not pathologize male sexuality and is not full-blown misandry, but that is not saying much.

      7. Odile Lee May 29, 2016 at 10:43 am

        Hypergamy cannot exist in a supportable society.Cultures in history created laws around sex, because of this. Am I correct?

    2. SomeRandomFellow April 21, 2016 at 3:46 pm

      We are radical traditionalists, you are just a liberal who hates extreme liberals.

      I have nothing against liberals per se. But the times when we could afford licentiousness and sexual freedom are over. Muslims are taking over Europe and if we do not concentrate on monogamous relationships, high breeding rates and moral conservativism we will lose to muslims who have a much more efficient social order, although it has less freedoms.

      I know it sucks, but party is over. We will take away your voting rights and right to be a proud slut. Women will be property of husbands and there will be no free divorce. Also women will be married from their teens, what do you anti-feminists have to say about that ?

      1. splooge April 22, 2016 at 4:06 pm

        interesting how americans obsess about the muslims, but forget their mexicans. Arent the largest gangs in usa right now the latino gangs

      2. SomeRandomFellow April 22, 2016 at 5:30 pm

        I’m european.

        On a global scale muslims matter more because they blow themselves up and shit. Mexicans just sell drugs, they are easy to deal with. Muslims are a bigger issue.

      3. ochizuro April 23, 2016 at 9:35 am

        Mexican here. I will have to say that mostly all the people who migrate to the states from my country are from the poorest and not so well educated areas of the country ( predictable), but I will like to say there is a strong difference between the problem of the US with the hispanic population and the Muslims in Europe. It is Islam. People from hispanic backgrounds will integrate eventually to society if they are given the chance, muslism (besides from turkish ones) will not.

        You may ask why. Well, muslims lack of nacionalism is maybe the biggest problem in their culture I think, maybe thats why the turkish is kind of an exception.

      4. OrthodoxChristian April 24, 2016 at 3:54 am

        “interesting how americans obsess about the muslims, but forget their mexicans. Arent the largest gangs in usa right now the latino gangs”

        Where would 99.99% of non Muslims prefer to live?

        Mexico? Or pretty much anywhere dominated by Islam?

      5. questioningall1 . April 23, 2016 at 9:47 am

        The day will come in the US, when women embrace Purdah con gusto, and hate anyone who objects. But it won’t come from the actions of conservatives, or neomasculinity. The desire to escape society will come from the left.

      6. SomeRandomFellow April 24, 2016 at 3:54 am

        Please explain.

      7. OrthodoxChristian April 24, 2016 at 4:00 am

        “Please explain.”

        I’m guessing he might be thinking along these lines.

        What was the progressive pose yesterday may be an unacceptably reactionary position tomorrow. The French Revolution and the Communist Revolution and the Cultural Revolution spent a lot of time purging comrades who had failed to recognize that the new progressive position had been adopted tomorrow and had become reality yesterday and was subject to a loyalty oath today.


        The Democrats borrowed their interest in black civil rights from the left, which was only working with urban minorities because it was hoping to include them in its revolutionary coalition of coal miners and lettuce pickers who would help overthrow the reactionary capitalist American Dream and replace it with a bunch of people shouting slogans and shooting each other. These days the NAACP does not look like a good bet for overthrowing America and the favorite progressive minority du jour actually keeps black slaves and hangs homosexuals.

        Muslims have currently trumped blacks and gays, not to mention every other group, on the crush list of the left. And the Muslim world is one of the few places that still has slaves and kills black people in large numbers, whether it’s in the Sudan or the newly liberated Muslim utopia of Libya. The day may come when the Democratic Party and its leftist hag riders decide that slavery was progressive after all and that all men should have the right to own slaves. And then this new policy position will immediately travel backward in time and loyal comrades will turn to the little red books of DailyKos, Think Progress, the Center for American Progress and ProgressProgressProgress to learn the new official position they are obligated to learn and abide by.

        That notion may seem ridiculous, but so would the idea that the party of bra burning would become the party of the hijab. Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, said Ralph Waldo Emerson. To be a true progressive, you cannot afford to be small-minded. Every idea, value and belief is waiting to be demolished and replace by a newer more progressive idea. And if that newer more progressive idea actually seems backward, that’s okay, because progressive ideas are like buses, if you wait around long enough they’ll come right back to where they were.

        Progressivism is chaos. It is a force that is constantly destroying old things to make way for new things and with so much destruction, it can’t be expected to tell the new old things and the old new things apart. Progressivism is a contrary talker, a teenager who knows everything, it doesn’t know a whole lot, but it knows that everything you know is wrong. And then off it goes in its retro clothes to shock all the adults with gay marriage, euthanasia clinics and then maybe slavery.


        Under the multicultural umbrella, Muslims terrorize Sikhs and Africans in London, and gays in New York, which like Boston and Chicago is too good for a Chick-A-Fil, but not too good for a Ground Zero Mosque or a sitdown with Calypso Louie Farrakhan and his Fruits of Islam. The burka has gone from a symbol of oppression to a symbol of liberation. Leftist activists smash Jewish stores AND WHEN THE TIME COMES WILL THROW ACID IN THE FACE OF FEMALE TEACHERS in solidarity with their Taliban brothers.

      8. questioningall1 . May 5, 2016 at 12:20 pm

        This should not be too difficult. Both men and women are created in the image of God. Different aspects of God. but in the image of God all of the same. Watch children play. Boys want to be mighty heroes in their play. Girls want to be queens and princesses in need of rescue. Look at every single fairy tale. That is the roles of our most cherished stories. Our own unique creation both male and female is exactly what Progressives are hell-bent (pun intended) on driving out of existence. It doesn’t require a whole lot of math to figure out what the end result of that will be for women.

      9. Abigail Pereira Aranha May 7, 2016 at 9:21 am

        Here, there are many things in which you are right. But you traditionalists are divorced to reality and you have been defeated continuously for 50 years only after Second Wave of Feminism, because you only care about promoting your myths. Are you really thinking Islam can conquer the developed world AND withstand? If a cancer reaches the brain of its host, the entire body does not become cancer, the body dies and the cancer dies with it. So is Islamism. You are thinking that Muslims’ sons raised in Europe and United States will be Muslims too, meanwhile Feminism is entering, at least, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Incidentally, was not Islam your ally against LGBT-Feminism 10 years ago?
        If you did not understand what I said: do you think CIA and billionaires in developed world invested in Middle East to end it up having illiterate serial-killers in front of their own homes?

      10. SomeRandomFellow May 25, 2016 at 12:48 am

        “There are many things in which you are right”. – pretty much everything

        “You traditionalists are divorced from reality” – not really, we are the realest around here

        “You have been defeated continuously for the last 50 years ” – so ? This does not make us less right. And we have been losing for way longer. Ever since fascists lost the war, and before that monarchies were replaced by republics and before that we had the classic middle ages taken over by the Renaissance. But it is a cycle. Just like Rome went from kings -> republic -> Caesar -> fall. We are going : kings -> republic -> fascism -> mass democracy -> collapse. It is a cycle. Your scope is too small. We think big. A social collapse is bound to happen this century, caused by the failure of debt-based economies and mass migration. Your social order of free sex and socialism is just a temporary silence before the storm.

        “Do you think Islam can survive modernization ? ” – So far it has. In fact Islam went the opposite way of modernization. Iran used to be liberal in the 70’s , so did Egypt. And now what ? Even Turkey is becoming radicalized. Also , I don’t care if they become modernized in the end. By that time they will manage to conquer Europe and turn it into a caliphate. So we will have a progressive caliphate like Sweden, but a caliphate nonetheless.

        “Was not Islam your ally against LGBT ? ”

        No, Islam has never been our ally. Muslims are enemies to Europeans all around the world. We might agree on some things, like the fact that you must control women, shun gays and never trust Jews, but that’s as far as it goes. Not to mention we are not as radical. At least for now.

        “Do you think CIA invested in the middle East to have serial killers in front of their homes ? ”

        US and all of it’s agencies are vassals of Israel and globalists. They do not care of the consequences that affect 90% of Europeans and Americans. For all they know the rest of the world can burn as long as they, and they alone, prosper.

    3. Davis M.J. Aurini April 21, 2016 at 5:48 pm

      The banner on her blog is literally the venus symbol getting gang banged. XD

      1. Abigail Pereira Aranha May 7, 2016 at 8:55 am

        Thank you! I thought I drawed it bad. And, yeah, this authoress based it in her real stories, hehehehe.

    4. Adam Levinson April 22, 2016 at 12:15 pm

      And unfortunately this is all we will get from female “anti-feminists”.
      Sluts looking for a different brand of rationalization hamster.

      “pro-licentiousness girl.” Lolz. That means slut, right?

      1. Abigail Pereira Aranha May 7, 2016 at 8:51 am

        No, I am not a “slut”. Sluts are sometimes crazies, but sluts are always women who valuate the worst men, even when they had one or two in their whole life. I am licentious, but I am responsible. After all, a gangbang requires a selection of kind boys.

  7. Ace FAce April 21, 2016 at 10:20 am

    Just a Question Roosh, what dixies think about you ?

  8. advancedatheist April 21, 2016 at 10:22 am

    Might as well post my current rant here: If you follow Ayn Rand cultism, you might have heard about the Atlas Society’s new CEO, a childless single woman pushing 50 named Jennifer Anju Grossman.

    She published this drivel as one of her first acts as the Atlas Society’s leader:

    Date the Atlas, Not the Shrug

    I laughed when I read this; it reads like a blog post about dating written by a teenage girl. And it also says a lot about how Rand cultism promotes female immaturity and degeneracy, because many female Objectivists like Grossman, following the horrible examples shown in Rand’s novels, seek sexual fulfillment in a futile quest for “perfect” men, while they blow their only opportunity to marry at their peak fertility and start families. Grossman herself writes about her disappointing dating experiences in her 40’s, at an age when women traditionally started to welcome their grandchildren into the world.

    This shows the complete and utter bullshit in Rand propaganda that her philosophy promotes human “flourishing,” when its instantiation in people’s lives fails to do so on the most basic biological level, namely, replenishing human life in healthy patriarchal families.

    And this also explains this creepy practice where Rand cultists have to keep trying to recruit teenagers from other people’s families into their cult by pushing Rand’s novels into teens’ hands, to counter Rand obsessives’ natural attrition: They don’t produce their own teenagers organically.

    By contrast, traditional religious families simply don’t have this problem. Their adults do the sensible thing of replenishing their ranks with their own descendants.

    1. Cecil J April 23, 2016 at 1:36 am

      The global Communist-Zionist NWO plantation requires both revolution and counter revolution as a mechanism of the Hegelian dialectic to dupe the masses. Rand et al were no saviors of Western civilization they were just a Zionist ran counter revolution smoke screen. We haven’t ever really seen classical liberal capitalism in the West since Andrew Jacksons battles with the Rothschild bankers.

  9. Against Modernity April 21, 2016 at 10:24 am

    I don’t think there’s any problem with traveling around the world and trying new experiences for anyone (male or female) under 25. Even the hyper-traditional Amish have their “Rumspringa”, where young adults are encouraged to explore the world before they settle down.

    Still, beyond that you do raise several valid points.

    1. duh April 21, 2016 at 1:52 pm

      In this context, “exploring the world” really means “taking kilometers of exotic cock.”

      More prior partners == more failed marriages == more fucked up kids and a progressively degraded society. It’s not innocent fun.

      1. duh April 21, 2016 at 2:27 pm

        By the way, like Roosh says, try to find a female “anti-feminist” who agrees with that last line, even in principle.

        I guarantee your average “conservative” millennial/x/boomer chick will insta-meltdown. Should you bother to inquire, you can expect an outpouring of narcissistic rage, idiotic rationalizations and personal invective in response. No refutation.

        Other writers have termed this aversion to traditional moral structure “preserving the feminine imperative.” The usual follow-on squid-inking: “rebuilding the mound.” I prefer “idiotic hamstering.”

        Remember, these people vote. They will decide the fate of your civilization.

  10. DM April 21, 2016 at 10:31 am

    Ideological purity has been the death of many good movements. The reason being sub groups tend to form that claim a finer level of purity. Humans need a bit more latitude in regard to their Ideological clockwork. Remember you are creating a culture not platonic solids.

  11. ng85 April 21, 2016 at 10:45 am

    Spoiler alert about Shoe0nhead: She’s actually Boxxy, a well-known attention whore who was famous on 4chan years ago. I guess the well of admirers ran dry over there so she had to try a new approach to get attention.

    1. Marshallaw April 21, 2016 at 11:24 am

      She doesn’t do drugs? Or ADD? This bird is batshit fucking crazy…..I think I saw her in a gangbang vid…..10 guys…. damn that porn!!!!

    2. AV April 21, 2016 at 5:01 pm

      Not Shoe0nHead. This is ShoeOnHead’s parody of Boxxy. It’s better in lots of ways.

      Other than that, I agree with Roosh that the anti-feminist women should be taken with a grain of salt.

      1. ng85 April 21, 2016 at 6:30 pm

        I just did a Google search and I’m finding so many varying consensus’s on Shoe0nhead’s identity. I was always under the impression she’s an adult Boxxy.

      2. AV April 21, 2016 at 7:54 pm

        Nothing like a good internet mystery! I watched the vids side-by-side in increments — both are totally hilarious imo — and I think that their hands are different and that Boxxy has a heavier skeletal structure than Shoe0nHead. While they both look very very similar, if I had to bet (no more than ten-bucks)… I’d bet that they are two different people.

    3. No one important April 21, 2016 at 5:09 pm

      She looks incredible young in this video. While I am by no means a fan of this girl, with her blocking me on Twitter for commenting negatively on some of her views, I cannot help but think you are being unnecesarily harsh on her. None of us are the same person at 40 as we were at 20. It is a journey. You cannot expect the same level of maturity from people whatever their age is. I have to admit that if I meet the 20-years-old-me now, I would think he is an idiot and would not like him too much. For this reason, I am always compassionate when judging on young people’s characters, because they are just the project of the person they could get to be. And predicting they will turn out this or that way (either positive or negative) in the next years is just arrogant on us.

      Shoe is an interesting Internet celebrity. I do not care what she was in the past or what she will be in the future, I just care about the content she produces now, as entertainer. Lets judge that content rather than the person that creates it. So who cares about if she had arabic-looking lovers or not. I am not going to marry her, that information is of no consequence to me. If she was some pure virgin, that would not change in the least what I think of the content she creates, either. If she is pro-gay marriage, as long as she is not making videos about the importance of gay rights, I do not really care. She could even think Hitler did nothing wrong, because unless what is inside of her mind surfaces on her videos, I am not going to comment on it.

      And what about the guys that fawn about her, praising her as if she was some kind of perfect Goddess that can do no wrong. While we are being critical at young women that get drunk on attention, we cannot ignore the guys that are intoxicating them with blind praise and feeding their egos. That can only lead to their stunted growth as persons. If women in our society are the way they are, I think the real reason for it has been the failure of men in our society to act like men and hold them back.

      1. Davis M.J. Aurini April 21, 2016 at 5:44 pm

        She intentionally pulled an Anita Sarkeesian on me; insulted me on twitter, then when I told her to fuck off she deleted the initial tweet, and behaved as if I were harassing her.

        There’s some forgiveness for youthful idiocy, but this girl’s working with some low-quality raw material.

    4. Nightwatch20 April 24, 2016 at 3:00 am

      I Knew it. Shoe doesn’t just resmeble her but happens to have the same mannerisms.

  12. TSK April 21, 2016 at 1:20 pm

    Women will always cause falter among men and become a source of nuisance and trouble. It has always been this way and will always be. If you want to have a great male brotherhood bonding, do NOT include females whatsoever.

    If you want to fuck her with your buddies or even have three way gangbang, then that’s your prerogative but women do NOT belong in men’s movement. Their best place is at home in the kitchen, taking care of your kids and (if she is not married) then her best place should be under the guidance of her father or male relative.

    They will always cause some sort of drama, arouse jealousy and competition among men and they don’t really give a shit about men’s issue and will even mock you secretly or even outright for your (what they perceive) weaknesses.

    Since women are also void of any logical conversation, your best bet is to rather have a discussion with a brick wall.

    1. Maximus Decimus Meridius December 6, 2017 at 11:19 am

      >> “If you want to have a great male brotherhood bonding, do NOT include females whatsoever.”

      >> “They will always cause some sort of drama, arouse jealousy and
      competition among men and they don’t really give a shit about men’s
      issue and will even mock you secretly or even outright for your (what
      they perceive) weaknesses.”

      You know… when you really boil it down… THIS is ALSO why heterosexual men do not trust homosexuals. You got “guys” on the “team”… who are fucking each other. Thus, they are not on the team, but out for themselves or to protect their mate or secure power/authority “as a couple”.

      From the Italian to the Russian mafia… none of them trust homos. You can’t trust another man who can only think with his dick… and if that dick is going into another man?

      1. TSK December 6, 2017 at 3:13 pm

        Well what are the chances that a homosexual will run into a Mafia or even want to join one? Or if I can ask the question other way around. What are the chances that the Mafia would even want to hire homosexuals? I would think that homosexuals would be smart enough to avoid Mafia (if they can recognize one or anyhow)…

      2. Maximus Decimus Meridius December 6, 2017 at 10:27 pm

        I don’t know. It is just something I have picked up that seems to be a theme in that sphere of life. Where crime is a FAMILY business. If you have not watched Eastern Promises (movie) with Viggo Moertensen (Yes, Aragorn!)… give it a look. Lots of in depth research done on Russian mafia and Viggo is fanatical about his characters. It addressses this theme because… there seems to be something about CRIME and homosexuality that is intimately linked. When the psychopath/fag that was Kinsey wrote the book that began America’s decline into degeneracy… ALL of his research for the sexual life/drives of the “average” adult male… were from PRISON INMATES… most of which are (as don’t drop the soap is caution, not a joke)… homosexual and perverted in nature. Remember Denzel & Ethan in Training Day… and the scene where the Mexican gang was going to take Ethan out and threatening him with sodomy (push it – shit – in real good). You CAN’T trust these people. And if crime is a FAMILY business… you DOUBLY can’t trust these people. So… it is not a matter of them avoiding the mafia… there nature seems bent on destruction, which the criminal world attracts. Just look at the reaction to Trump, a family man. Which side of politics in America is TRULY and WHOLLY corrupt? It ain’t the conservative side, and it sure as hell ain’t the TRUMP MAGA side. Also… those “conservatives” who put on the mask and then get caught having gay sex (recent American politician)… well… where is the corruption, once again? In the OLD GUARD Republicans which… you guessed it… homos.

        Good lord. I wonder how long I will even have DISQUS comments once someone reports me.

      3. TSK December 6, 2017 at 11:56 pm

        Homosexuality is disgusting and I never understand how a Man can get turned on or even have thought of sticking his penis into another man’s anus or have any arousal feelings of having his cornhole violated by another male. Like how can they even get it up for that… seems like a mystery to me.

        Some people told me that it is done for (showcase of male dominance, need for ‘hierarchy’, humiliation and for power). Not sure about other countries prison but American prison is full of male to male rape (including interracial rape as well)…

        If someone reports you for your comment, then that person is probably a faggot himself.

        Your comments are gold.

  13. Gwen Jackson April 21, 2016 at 2:25 pm

    I’m a woman and I see feminism for the vile evil that it is. I agree that a woman is not truly an anti-feminist unless she embraces traditional values and the necessity of patriarchy in order to have a healthy family and society. Oh, and I would add that no woman is truly an anti-feminist unless she agrees that female suffrage was a horrible idea.

    1. Zelcorpion April 23, 2016 at 10:18 am

      Men and women are a team – building society together. Men create and maintain most of human creation, while women make it all worthwhile and creating the next generation. Human genders can never be looked upon apart and have to exist in a balance that serves the needs of both. Stable families led by husbands in marriage was found to be the most civilization-beneficial bond.

      Feminism was designed to destroy that bond and drive a wedge between men and women – it was never meant to “liberate” women. And it was highly successful in that.

      1. OrthodoxChristian April 24, 2016 at 4:54 am

        “Human genders can never be looked upon apart and have to exist in a balance that serves the needs of both.”

        Sex is the “classification of living things as male or female,
        according to their reproductive organs and functions assigned by chromosomal complement.” (American Medical Association Manual of Style)

        Gender is the grouping (in various languages) of nouns, pronouns, and verbs as masculine, feminine, or neutral.

        Read the exchange between Alice and Humpty Dumpty below.

        Replace “glory” with “gender.”

        Replace “a nice knock-down argument” with “a person’s self-representation as man or woman, or how that person is responded to by social institutions on the basis of the person’s gender presentation.”

        “I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory,’ ” Alice said.

        Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!’ ”

        “But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected.

        “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”

        “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”

        “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”

  14. PrivacyInA9M80 April 21, 2016 at 2:38 pm

    Well said.

  15. Tali April 21, 2016 at 3:18 pm

    I think that one problem with your suggestion is that the type of women that you’re looking for are non combative, “if you can’t say something nice …” type, and the questions you listed require them to pass negative judgement on others. A true sweet woman would be like, these are the choices I make myself, but I don’t judge others who make other choices. At least I suspect that is the case.

    I also think that this anti-feminist movement is good news, not because these are the women you want, but because young impressionable women would be increasingly exposed to this attitude, and might end up choosing that over feminism (most normal women want to have babies and be with them, so it really shouldn’t be such a hard sell).

    Anyway, look for a woman who respect you, listen to what you say and actually try to understand where you’re coming from. Ideally you should be able to give her the same courtesy. I think this would work better than stock questions with stock answers.

    1. SomeRandomFellow April 21, 2016 at 3:36 pm

      If you have to rely on luck to find a quality woman, that means society is wrong. There should be no “right types”. All types should be right.

      Good women should be the standard, not rare gems. The opinion of any particular woman does not matter.

      We must create a legal system that removes a woman’s ability to fuck things up.

      Meaning no voting rights, free divorce or welfare.

      We are not here to discuss things with women but to force them to comply with our rules.

      That said a woman who naturally follows this set-up without being forced by society is worthy of respect.

      1. Odile Lee May 29, 2016 at 10:47 am

        A woman who was taught respect for men, by her father-does not need to be forced.

  16. SomeRandomFellow April 21, 2016 at 3:25 pm

    Bravo Roosh.

    Keep the hoes in line. The Classical Liberal fags can go cry tears in a corner.

    We do not believe in “equal rights”. Only hardcore patriarchy.

    No female voting rights.
    No female freedom to act against her own tribe.
    No freedom to be lazy, foul-mouthed and a slut.

    Bring’em hell Roosh. I am so tired of these half-baked jokers like Sarcuck of Mossad, claiming to fight feminism while calling nationalists right-wing SJWs, claiming Paki rape gangs are a “british problem”, claiming women should vote and faggots should be allowed to prance in the streets.

    Patriarchy or bust.

    1. Doctor Mayhem April 21, 2016 at 7:53 pm

      Patriarchy? Not enough. White Boy Sharia, now! Women’s lib has done so much wrong that only full, brutal, ruthless suppression will be able to set things right.

      1. Maximus Decimus Meridius December 6, 2017 at 11:28 am

        As I have always warned… the matriarchy that was the age of the goddess, was slowly supplanted by Zeus and his gang of “unreasonable” men. Then came Rome, and the hammer came down even harder regarding women’s freedoms and especially tolerance of homosexuality (the Greeks were too close to the goddess, the Romans put more distance from the practices of The Greeks). Then Rome collapsed… and instead of a return to pagan goddess “free love”, we got… Christianity… the singular best formulation and crystallization of patriarchy within a goddess (virgin Mary) structure to date. All these feminists and liberals who are “going to war” against the patriarchy and The West… have not learned the lessons of history. When The West truly and completely collapses this time round… the PATRIARCHY that will replace it… will make Christian Rome in the dark ages like like a stroll for ice cream at Coney Island. It is now just a matter of the patriarchal flavour that wins out – a renewed western… or an eastern one (Islam). Of course, women, feminists and homos will fight it to the bitter end, but stupid is as stupid does.

    2. John May 3, 2017 at 2:49 pm

      Recently Sargoy has been moving closer to the right, but he still entertains retarded leftist ideals such as the Justice Democrats Committeee, but soon he will lose hope and give up on his socialist utopia.

  17. NonCanadien April 21, 2016 at 3:38 pm

    Neomasculinity? WHAT neomasculinity?;)
    Oh, those cowards and behind the screen warriors who ran scared with their tails between their legs as soon as they faced some possible protests during the World Neomasculinity Day or whatever it was called?;)
    It ain’t no masculinity, folks;)

  18. Morrison April 21, 2016 at 4:18 pm

    “While they may come across as genuine, these female infiltrators are mostly attention whoring to a male audience. They don’t want to change the world—they just want you to look at them”

    True. And also some want to hijack the awakening of men to turn it around; a pace and lead manuver straight NLP. I never trust female anti-feminists.

    1. Inês de Castro January 13, 2018 at 3:19 am

      A women’s appearance is still the ultimate power. So now we are addicted to using it every chance we get!
      I have no facebook and GPLUS anymore but two years ago it was a like needing a fix and I had to post more and more photos! For a women it is like drugs I imagine you get this high and it feels incredible. I am just being honest here. Once again even here I post a photo on my avatar hopefully I will not go down that road again but truly this selfie nonsense it is an addiction. The attention is thrilling that is all I know.

      Ever noticed how highly successful women but not that great looking always absolutely hate the pretty girl with less intellectual aspirations or accomplishments to her name?


      Our appearance equals POWER. It always has and nothing will ever change that.
      Why does Oprah insist on putting herself as the “covergirl” of her own magazines because of branding?

      Give me a break! She too loves being looked at. We thrive and get off on being looked at and that includes me too!
      It is so dumb…..

      Unless the world goes through some major WW3 catastrophe and all technology is lost in the process sorry to say guys but I see this never stopping and we are doomed!

  19. Jordan April 21, 2016 at 5:03 pm

    That’s called the Chameleon Sydrome, how Revlawrence Shannon describes it in The Predatory Female:

    1. Skeptic At Heart May 30, 2016 at 12:04 am

      Not in my case. I wouldn’t convert to Judaism or to Anarcho Capitalism for my previous loves so I lost them. But I was red pilled by the man I’m now in love with. If any of you can succeed at it, she’s think you’re a hero. I was already really into him before the red pill, but after that he’s my hero, so swoon. Standing up to crazy feminists to actually protect women and our society, in the long run, from the political effects of women, who apparently like to destroy societies. Especially when you let us all get programmed. So mean, they said feminism was about female empowerment, not global elite empowerment. I hate memes that use our desire to be good to actually make us do bad, argh, humans and their dangerous memes.

  20. splooge April 21, 2016 at 5:22 pm

    think the reason why shoeonhead is hiding her arabian boyfriend because it kills a good chunk of her viewership since many of them are from the alt-right or white nationalist movement and dont want to be reminded that they are cucks.
    Though i think give it time, he could get her to submit. Tsarniov did it and he seems masculine as well.

  21. splooge April 21, 2016 at 5:25 pm

    Think at the most genuine these ant-feminists gets is if OTHER women had to live by those questions like a tradition woman while she herself gets to live the hedonistic lifestyle.
    After all they know a stable new generation has to be born. And she knows her lifestyle cannot be the norm. Its not sustainable.
    Much can be said here in PUA, if everyones fucking around, no new generation would come in since no one wants to marry and everyone goes degenerate.

  22. Doctor Mayhem April 21, 2016 at 7:52 pm

    Hell, one could even say the same in regards to just about all of the women who infiltrate the Alt-Right as well. You see all of these dumpster fires, particularly the ones who embrace paganism, advocating the exact same bullshit as any other feminist whore. The only exceptions would be the ones Roosh pointed out: Traditional housewives. Even then, one has to ask what the fuck a housewife is doing on Twitter, whoring for attention.

    Never let women have a voice in any movement. They will always distract from real goals.

  23. Cecil J April 21, 2016 at 9:48 pm

    Women lie and love liars. That’s all game really is- tell the monkey some lies and show it some shiny bullshit so you can squirt in its hole.

  24. Demonica Perduta April 22, 2016 at 4:20 am

    I disagree with you. Different people have different reasons for being anti feminist. My concern is with the way feminism disparages femininity: I don’t want to be shamed for failing to compete with men in masculine pursuits. I like being a girl… and that’s final. 😛

    1. GoingSane April 22, 2016 at 12:32 pm

      ” feminism disparages femininity: I don’t want to be shamed for failing
      to compete with men in masculine pursuits. I like being a girl… and
      that’s final.”

      Worthy both of note and of upvote.

      1. BlueBot22 April 22, 2016 at 9:22 pm

        It would be if it wasn’t a man saying it.

      2. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 7:11 am

        I’m a girl… a trans girl… we are real women. I like the man to be in charge then I can surrender to him and trust him :o)

    2. Dick Johnson April 24, 2016 at 1:00 pm

      what are your answers to Roosh’s 5 questions?

      1. Demonica Perduta April 24, 2016 at 1:25 pm

        Q: “Are you against homosexual marriage?”
        A: Yes, I am against ALL marriage. It is an anachronism that at one time served the purpose of providing a stable environment for raising children. Today it is just a scam for the divorce industry.

        Q: “Do you believe its ideal for a woman to remain a virgin until she gets married?”
        A: I don’t believe in marriage, however I do believe she should not have unprotected sex unless BOTH her and her partner are willing to take joint responsibility for a child.

        Q: “Do you believe that its best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home mother?”
        A: I believe they should be raised by both parents and not farmed out to “early learning” schemes.

        Q: “Do you believe a woman’s choices should be constrained by her
        husband, tribe, or church with the intention of doing what’s best for
        A: No… I believe women have just as much right to fuck up their own lives as men do.

        Q: “Do you believe it’s wrong for a young girl to find herself by traveling around the world and trying new experiences?”
        A: I think she might need some guidance and to have a clear idea of what the dangers might be.

        p.s. I think they are leading question with the intention of getting a ‘No’ reply even though the intent of my reply would have similar impact to a conservative’s ‘yes’.

      2. Dick Johnson April 24, 2016 at 1:45 pm

        You did not give a straight answer to any of the questions. Obviously Roosh was talking about true marriage and not today’s “marriage.” Nice try, though.

        Here, I re-wrote the questions to make it easier for you to give straight answers:

        Please answer “yes” or “no” to every question. Feel free to
        give an explanation afterwards.

        1. Do you think homosexuality is wrong and should not be encouraged by society? YES OR NO?

        2. Do you think it is best for a woman to remain a virgin until she meets the future father of her children? YES OR NO?

        3. Do you believe it is best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home mother? YES OR NO? (This is not a question about if you believe in public schooling, or whether the child should be raised by both parents).

        4. Obviously, women have just as much of a right to fuck up their own lives as men have. Do you not believe a woman’s family and community have a responsibility to guide her (forcibly if necessary) away from making these mistakes?

        4b. Do you understand that a man can (almost) always recover from his mistakes life, but that if a woman makes the mistake of sleeping with the wrong man, this is IRREVERSIBLE? Do you not believe her family and community need to prevent her from making this mistake?

        5. Do you believe it is WRONG for a young girl to “find herself” by traveling around the world and trying new “experiences” (read: men)? YES OR NO? (the question is not whether you think she should be warned about potential consequences).

      3. Demonica Perduta April 24, 2016 at 2:00 pm

        Those are still leading questions and I’ll explain why with my answers:

        1. Do you think homosexuality is wrong and should not be encouraged by society? YES OR NO?
        A: NO. It’s something the individual has no control over, and society is unable to change a person’s sexuality so encouraging is just as pointless as discouraging it.

        2. Do you think it is best for a woman to remain a virgin until she meets the future father of her children? YES OR NO?
        A: No, she can use contraceptives and have lots of fun together with men playing ‘the Game’.

        3. Do you believe it is best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home
        mother? YES OR NO?
        A: NO I think they need their father to be involved in raising them too.

        4. Obviously, women have just as much of a right to fuck
        up their own lives as men have. Do you not believe a woman’s family
        and community have a responsibility to guide her (forcibly if necessary)
        away from making these mistakes?
        A: No more so than guiding a young man. The question should not be gender specific.

        4b. Do you understand that a man
        can (almost) always recover from his mistakes life, but that if a woman
        makes the mistake of sleeping with the wrong man, this is IRREVERSIBLE?
        Do you not believe her family and community need to prevent her from
        making this mistake?
        A: Bull Shit… go ask any MGTOW how sleeping with the wrong cunt has fuct up his life real good.

        5. Do you believe it is WRONG for a young
        girl to “find herself” by traveling around the world and trying new
        “experiences” (read: men)? YES OR NO? (the question is not whether you
        think she should be warned about potential consequences).
        A: No I think she has a right to go seek her fame and fortune and doesn’t need some white knight mangina to infantilize her.

        There happy now… you got 6 straight No’s to 5 questions and I’m still an anti-feminist. ^_^

      4. Dick Johnson April 24, 2016 at 5:25 pm

        exactly, you’re still an “anti-feminist,” proving Roosh’s point about female anti-feminists

      5. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 7:17 am

        proving my point that your questions are leading.

      6. Dick Johnson April 27, 2016 at 10:46 am

        Yes. They are leading questions. That’s kind of the point.

        Did you figure that out all by yourself??

      7. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 12:02 pm

        no… my alter ego helped me work it out… she also says that you are a dick… but I already noticed that’s what it says in your name :o)

  25. Boom April 22, 2016 at 10:27 am

    I will answer YES! What passes as your brain is a smelly pile of dog shit, and your ideas are the flies that circle around it. Any time a woman shows a modicum of autonomy your little pea-sized testicles retract into your body and you are unable to achieve an erection. You are… pathetic.

    1. Adam Levinson April 22, 2016 at 12:23 pm

      Female autonomy has led Western Civilization into the garbage heap, because females are incapable of making mature, responsible decisions, without firm male leadership. Every decision a woman makes is totally self-centered, whereas men commonly make decisions that benefit the whole tribe.

      Germany and Sweden are all but fully destroyed, due completely to their tragic errors of embracing feminism and electing female “leaders”.

      1. Boom April 22, 2016 at 1:14 pm

        Do you have a source for all of that bullshit, or are you just pulling it out of your ass?

      2. Boom April 22, 2016 at 1:29 pm

        Since my last reply was deleted because it made too much sense- I want a fucking source for this information. A scientific study by non-biased observers complete with verifiable fact. Otherwise, it’s you and a whole bunch of asshats’ opinions, that you pulled fully from your collective asses.

      3. Adam Levinson April 22, 2016 at 1:56 pm

        All of history is your source. The empirical sum of developments of the past 50 years is your source. If you are incapable of opening your eyes, looking at our world, and seeing that I’m correct, then I just can’t help you.

        I don’t waste time trying to find a cure for blindness.

      4. Boom April 22, 2016 at 2:10 pm

        Uh uh, uh uh… so it’s just your opinion, and you’re pulling it out of your ass. Got it.

      5. Adam Levinson April 22, 2016 at 2:27 pm

        I never claimed it was anything other than an opinion. An opinion based on decades of research, and a lot of life wisdom. All we see from you is name-calling, and childish hissy fits. Clearly you don’t possess the intellectual horsepower to develop comprehensive theories based on complex data inputs. Perhaps you should defer to men on this one.

      6. Boom April 22, 2016 at 2:29 pm

        Oh, good. You admit it’s opinion and you have no evidence. I’m glad we got it all sorted out! (I just love how this old fart thinks that I should accept his biased perceptions as fact simply because he was born with a dick. That is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read, and I’ve read this article)

      7. Adam Levinson April 22, 2016 at 2:42 pm

        Sure, just don’t go through life thinking that you will be presented with concrete proof of everything that is true. Life doesn’t work that way. Good luck out there.

      8. Dick Johnson April 24, 2016 at 1:03 pm

        fuck off, feminist!

        if you don’t agree with us, go read buzzfeed or something. why come here? do you really think you’re gonna convince anyone here to become feminist?

        by the way, you have a filthy mouth. no man finds that shit attractive.

      9. Boom April 24, 2016 at 2:04 pm

        I’m here to troll you, you dumbfuck, you really didn’t pick up on that? Goddamn you’re fucking stupid.

      10. Boom April 24, 2016 at 2:09 pm

        I’m here to troll you, you dumbfuck, you really didn’t pick up on that? Goddamn you’re fucking stupid.

      11. Boom April 24, 2016 at 2:18 pm

        Well shit fuck damn I guess I’m just gonna have to be sad that I can’t land a dumb motherfucker like you who can’t even tell when someone is trolling.

      12. Adam Levinson April 22, 2016 at 1:58 pm

        Men built civilization, while women do all they can to destroy it (through promiscuity, frivolous divorce, liberalism, miscegenation, mass immigration, etc). What more evidence do you need?

      13. Boom April 22, 2016 at 2:12 pm

        Do you understand what “evidence” is?

      14. Boom April 22, 2016 at 2:14 pm

        Again, do you understand what “evidence” is?

      15. advancedatheist April 22, 2016 at 2:30 pm

        And we can see definitive proof in health care. Men had to develop both veterinary medicine and gynecology because animals and women couldn’t do this for themselves.

      16. Boom April 24, 2016 at 1:13 am

        Oh, look! My comments disappeared again! What a fucking surprise!

      17. Ben April 24, 2016 at 11:35 pm

        How did you get out of the kitchen?

      18. Boom April 25, 2016 at 12:24 pm

        See, what happened was, I never was in the kitchen in the first fucking place because I realized that men are (in theory) grown ass fucking adults and should learn how to cook for their goddamn selves. If they can’t then they should fucking starve because they are too motherfucking stupid to live.

      19. Ben April 25, 2016 at 7:07 pm

        I don’t see any sandwich making or sucking cock going on.. you aren’t doing your job.

      20. Boom April 25, 2016 at 10:01 pm

        Whelp… guess you’re gonna have to suck dick for me. I know you’re good at it, so I don’t feel bad about it.

      21. Boom April 25, 2016 at 10:23 pm

        You know, the more I think about it the more I know you’re right. I am so glad that you volunteer to take care of my dick-sucking deficiencies. So, before you reply back, I want you to suck off three dudes. That’s a minimum- if you were really dedicated you’d suck off ten or more. You need to have salty cum breath before you come back, show me who’s boss. SHOW ME WHAT KIND OF MAN YOU ARE! SUCK THAT DICK!

      22. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 7:21 am

        cum isn’t salty… didn’t they teach you anything in gender studies class?

      23. Boom April 27, 2016 at 2:37 pm

        What does it taste like?

      24. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 3:29 pm

        it has it’s own flavor… sort of soapy I would say.

      25. Boom April 27, 2016 at 3:48 pm

        Interesting. Presuming they are clean, of course. Then, I imagine it would be less soapy and more like chode cheese. Bleargh.

      26. Boom April 27, 2016 at 3:58 pm

        Ugh… I dunno. I’ve seen it, naturally. It creeps me out to be honest with you.

        Can I ask… what the hell are you doing here? Don’t these PUA dipshits treat you like shit? I get the impression that they despise anything they deem “unnatural” and even slightly gay.

      27. Demonica Perduta April 28, 2016 at 3:55 pm

        I’m exploring different perspectives. Have you ever tried to understand or empathize with THEIR point of view?

      28. Boom April 28, 2016 at 4:19 pm

        You mean, that anyone that doesn’t fit their social standard of heterosexuality is a freak and should be ignored or annihilated? I’d have to get a lobotomy for that.

      29. Demonica Perduta April 28, 2016 at 5:02 pm

        not me… I can cope with it and I’m going to change their opinion once I work out their triggers ;o)

      30. Boom April 28, 2016 at 5:03 pm

        Good for you 🙂 I truly do appreciate a little bit of honest trolling.

      31. Boom April 28, 2016 at 5:10 pm

        It’s clearly altered. The font on the banner matches the comment at the bottom. But yes, yes you are 🙂

      32. Boom April 25, 2016 at 12:30 pm

        See, what happened was, I was never in the kitchen in the first place because I realized that (in theory) men are grown ass fucking adults that should know how to cook for themselves. If they can’t, they should starve because they are literally too stupid to live.

      1. Boom April 27, 2016 at 4:06 pm

        Nicely spotted! I like the imaginative picture. I should make up one for PUAs! It would explain their tantrum throwing because women don’t want to fuck them, crying while masturbating, and being utterly delusional that its not because women are shallow or want alphas, but because they have the personality of a rusty cheese grater and smell like an unwashed, sweaty asshole.

      2. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 5:54 pm

        oh… but I thought that PUAs like Roosh V would be just the perfect companions for feminists slut walkers… just imagine… sex without commitment… nobody trying to ‘oppress’ you under a patriarch regime. Nobody expecting you to make them sandwiches… true equality at last!

        Then there is the MGTOWS: No sexual harassment, no objectification, no cat calling, no wolf whistling… just ignoring you like every feminist should be! :o)

        WTF have you got to whine about this time?

      3. Boom April 27, 2016 at 6:06 pm

        The thing is, I never said anything about a patriarchal regime, or oppression, or sandwiches, or sexual harassment, or objectification, or cat calling, or wolf whistling. That was purely your own invention of what you presume my argument is. Want to try again?

      4. Demonica Perduta April 28, 2016 at 5:22 pm

        damn… no, not really… you got me there :^/
        My bad!

      5. Boom April 28, 2016 at 5:28 pm

        You know what, we don’t agree on feminism for shit and I know we never will, but I like you. You’re feisty and honest.

      6. Boom April 28, 2016 at 6:14 pm

        Indeed. Ideologies aside, I do think we have a lot in common. You’re clearly very analytical, and you don’t just accept things at face value. That is good. I like that you look at different perspectives, too, and it seems you try to be open-minded. It must be hard to live life as a trans woman, so you have a lot of courage, too. You’re not afraid to stand up and talk a lil shit 🙂

      7. Demonica Perduta April 28, 2016 at 6:47 pm

        Although I don’t pass very well and although it took a long time to overcome the aversion therapy I had been given… ever since I transitioned at age 58… I don’t care what other say to me , I’ve been so very happy every single day… I feel like dancing & singing in the sunshine. In fact I think I will… You know… I just hated life as a man… completely hated it.

      8. Boom April 28, 2016 at 6:56 pm

        I’m glad that you took that step and did what you needed to be happy, and to live the fullest life that you can. I cannot even imagine what it must have been like to have been that miserable. You’re very brave 🙂

        If it is not too painful to talk about… what aversion therapy were you given? Were they trying to make you feel like a man?

        I dunno about “passing” or not (you look fine to me) but you’re gorgeous, and you do NOT look like you’re 59.

      9. Demonica Perduta April 28, 2016 at 8:09 pm

        Thank you :o)

        They gave me aversion therapy against homosexuality. It was effing stupid, because I already had a downer on myself for being an effeminate male… (Note: IMO there seems to be an instinctive aversion to such in humanity, maybe it served an evolutionary purpose at one time, but when the aversion is to the self… then the only remedy that works is to be able to think of one self as a woman!)

        That’s probably why some trans people get so uptight when they are misgendered. Luckily I’m content with thinking of myself as a transwoman, and nobody can argue with that ;o)

        But I digress (as usual) … so they wanted to give me electroshock therapy. I said no-effing-way! They could not force me without consent because I was still a virgin back then.

        None the less, convinced i would be a mentally ill sex pervert (who had never even had sex), I shut out a large part of me in total denial for decades… trying to find my “healthy natural sexuality”. I thought I was managing to act “manly” but so many people were still calling me “gay” even after I had a wife and a child. My wife said our son didn’t need two mothers and that I should do my job and let her do hers. I don’t remember agreeing whose job would be what… but whatever… it was a shit life until this:

      10. Boom April 28, 2016 at 9:10 pm

        I’m really, really sorry 🙁 for everything. It really breaks my heart that this happened to you. This society can be needlessly fucking cruel. It sounds like so-called “christians” got a hold of you. I’m an Agnostic, myself… I don’t really know what to believe, but if Jesus existed at all, he would never have perpetrated some shit like that. He would be loving and kind. He would have embraced you as you were. He rubbed elbows with whores and thieves. The people that did that to you didn’t care, though. They viewed it as a “sin”, and performed horrific acts.

        I’m glad you didn’t succeed in killing yourself, too. I feel like my words are inadequate for everything, but I am glad that you are defining yourself as you wish to see yourself. Fuck everyone else, this is your life and you are hurting no one.

        Before I go on (belatedly) you want to move this conversation elsewhere? I know you don’t care and can deal with it, but I don’t want these asshats giving you any shit for opening up to me like this.

      11. Demonica Perduta April 28, 2016 at 9:32 pm

        The year was 1977. The “experts” didn’t even recognize transgender as being separate from homosexual. In New Zealand homosexuality was still illegal (for another 12 years).

      12. Boom April 28, 2016 at 9:41 pm

        Wait a fucking minute… they were fucking mental health care professionals? Supposedly? Fucking wow. I can’t imagine it has improved much since then, either.

        In the US we have “wondrous” christians that believe you can “pray the gay away”. That is why I made the (clearly wrong) assumption that they did it. But to have someone that is supposedly an expert in the field do that? Unbelievable.

      13. Demonica Perduta April 28, 2016 at 10:07 pm

        They had classified homosexuality as a mental disorder. It wasn’t until they realized all their therapies did not work that finally the “experts” realized it isn’t.
        p.s. I had gone there asking for gender reassignment but was referred to the psychiatric department. I had no money of my own, so I had to accept whatever they would give me.

      14. Boom April 28, 2016 at 10:10 pm

        At least there was some improvement… I guess?

      15. Demonica Perduta April 28, 2016 at 10:16 pm

        It made me hate myself. Under hypnosis they had persuaded me to take up smoking and drinking which I had never done. I remember trying to think of an excuse even though I was under hypnosis.. all I could say was “I don’t know how” so head of department came show me how to smoke.. I can still see him now when I close my eyes.
        ANyway I sought refuge for my dysphoria in alcohol and drugs and I dropped out of university… I ended up homeless and destitute and I realized I had to do something radical or I would not survive the winter. Whatever … it’s a very long time ago and at least I’m happy now 🙂

      16. Boom April 29, 2016 at 5:55 am

        That is awful 🙁 Are you still smoking and drinking? I smoked for a long time before I finally was able to quit. It took years and dozens of tries before I finally succeeded. It was somewhat easier to quit drinking, although it was an ingrained social habit. I had some, ahem… legal troubles which finally convinced me it was no longer worth it.

        It’s common to self-medicate, to attempt to escape our awful lives and/or experiences through chemical solace.

        You learned from it, you lived through it, and you are stronger now for it. I’m glad you did 🙂

        p.s. I am a member of a lineage based organization and we are having a state conference today and tomorrow. I’m going to be playing dress-up over the next two days and probably won’t reply for that length of time. I’ll be back, though 🙂

      17. Demonica Perduta April 29, 2016 at 9:12 am

        I gave up smoking completely 16 years ago… I had cut down a lot when I got a real job, but I was living with other smokers and drinkers and it took my mind of wanting to transition. I still have a drink sometimes, but I don’t need it to dispel dysphoria any more… I just like getting a bit tipsy occasionally :o)

      18. Boom May 3, 2016 at 10:03 am

        Me too 🙂 Sorry it took so long to reply, I am an introvert by nature. Schmoozing and smiling drains me of energy. I am also starting a new medication, it’s not helping, yet.

      19. Demonica Perduta May 3, 2016 at 11:48 am

        oh… I don’t think there is any known cure for feminism… you could try placebo, and hope that the placebo effect kicks in ;o)

      20. Boom May 3, 2016 at 12:12 pm

        Feminism has yet to make me sick 😛 My life is rather shit right now- difficult to deal with. Half of the time I feel I’d almost rather die than deal with the shit I have on my plate right now. Have you ever been so fucking angry that you don’t even know what to do with that emotion, constructively?

      21. Demonica Perduta May 3, 2016 at 12:59 pm

        only teasing… I’ll not mention that f’ word again… hate the disease… not the person. ;o)
        Anyway at the moment I have members of organized crime ring extorting money from me and they said they will kill me if I go to the police… so I told the police but that I don’t want to press charges. Hopefully they won’t kill me but will leave me alone rather than add to their criminal record. I could be angry or frightened or whatever… but I just choose to be happy instead… I’m always happy, ever since I had my sex change. Happiness is a choice you can make.

      22. Boom April 27, 2016 at 6:39 pm

        I find it funny that you make these assertions about PUAs and MGTOWs, that these are fair-minded individuals that would treat you so well. I said what I did about sucking dudes off and salty cum breath not because there is anything wrong with sucking dick, whether or not you are male or female, but because I knew how that dudebro would react. Their greatest fear, the one that causes their testicles to retreat inside of their bodies, is that someone would think that they are anything other than the masculine paragon and woman seducer they believe themselves to be. Despite the fact that I’m pretty sure “Ben” watches dudes ass cheeks spread apart when they are doing squats and likes it, and watches the head of their dick flop against their shorts when they are walking and not wearing a jock strap, he shut the fuck up fast when it was even insinuated that he would suck dick.

        So, if you are really a transsexual woman, do you really think they would accept you? They don’t. If you walked up and tried to hit on them in person, they’d sooner punch you in the mouth for undermining their masculinity than accept you.

        You’re delusional.

      23. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 8:36 pm

        Maybe some would… but I’ve been more persecuted by feminists than by maculinists. Look in the comments here to see the latest one heckling me *in the comments* on MY Youtube channel with an impostor account:

        I blocked her but the only effect is that i can’t see her comments while I’m logged in, so I can’t remove them… Note: Angelica is my main account, but she got banned on sight by lots of disqus channels because impostors had been posting hate speech in her name.

        Whatever, I do get wolf whistles and cat calling, directed at me, and sometimes guys asking me for a date. I just take it as a compliment and I think your tarring all PUAs and MGTOWs with the brush of transphobia, is just based on prejudice and not on actual data.

      24. Boom April 27, 2016 at 8:57 pm

        Your attitude towards feminists is just the same- based on prejudice and not on actual data. You tried to put forth arguments that I did not make, all because I am a feminist. It certainly didn’t come from anything I actually said.

        Find me one MGTOW or PUA that is accepting of transsexuals. An article. A really nice post. Even a comment from someone saying- “hey, all transsexuals want to do is go to the bathroom, they aren’t a danger to anyone”. Prove me wrong.

        That being said- it’s extremely fucked up that that person is stalking you and harassing you. The comments on there are exceedingly fucking vile. I don’t see any proof she is a feminist, though. There is no sign of any connection there, whatsoever.

      25. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 9:33 pm

        My comment was based entirely on what you said: You were demeaning his virility as well as the size of his brain. The reality is that adult male people on average have a 10% bigger brain than female people.

        You mentioned female autonomy, which is precisely what PUA’s provide: They don’t WANT to get married to you. They don’t want you oppressed in the kitchen… they want you to go support yourself.

        What they do offer is the solution to woman’s sexual liberation. You should be happy such sexy PUAs abound, IMHO.

        As for men’s rights activists accepting trans people… well why would they agree to make an anti-feminist T shirt in coalition with us… if it wasn’t for them being trans inclusive? I’m not asking them for a date… they are MGTOW FFS!

      26. Boom April 27, 2016 at 9:49 pm

        Yep, I was totally serious, too. I wasn’t just trolling, or anything.

        “Male brains have more connections within hemispheres to optimize motor skills, whereas female brains are more connected between hemispheres to combine analytical and intuitive thinking”

        In other words, women are better at logical thinking, among other things. Moving on…

        Maybe you’re right- a PUA in no way infringes on a woman’s autonomy- until they don’t want to fuck them, in which case prepare for a fucking tantrum. That’s what these websites are all about- advice from a rapey motherfucker on how to get a woman to tolerate you long enough to fuck you.

        Like, more power to you if you like them for some godawful reason, but damn. No. They’re so gross.

        Okay, are they MRA or MGTOW? Those are two different groups, but congrats on finding one small, exceedingly marginal group that combined a mutual interest- hating feminists.

        In all fairness, I have heard that there are such feminists known as TERFs- Trans-exclusionary radical feminists, so there you go, now you can claim all feminists are horrible. Proof!

      27. Boom April 28, 2016 at 5:59 am

        Sometimes I have to put up one foot to shit. It doesn’t make it a common occurrence (those are some pesky turds, boy howdy).

        She must do a splendid job of ignoring the transphobia of her chosen ideologues, too.

        Didn’t you just say that this isn’t the place to discuss trans issues just before you posted this?

      28. Demonica Perduta April 28, 2016 at 9:25 am

        It’s about feminism. My support for anti-feminists like Milo and Lauren is not conditional on reciprocal support for trans issues.

        Feminism is a direct threat to transgender. Feminism postulates our gender identity is not inherent, but merely an acquired social construct. Feminism seeks to etiolate & erase us by insinuating “gender fluidity” and by brainwashing trans women to play the pathetic victim of a mythical “patriarch” oppression that never was. Feminism is a contagious mental disorder.

      29. Boom April 28, 2016 at 4:13 pm

        I’m glad they are paying attention, and brought some form of resolution.

      30. Boom April 27, 2016 at 9:03 pm

        Here’s one from an MGTOW about how a man transitioning from male-to-female “She had slowly lost her ability to think logically as she did before and ‘the change’ has now become very emotion drive (becoming hostile at any criticism, breaking into treats over minor issues or events, ect.) as well as changing her mentality to one where she looks at people for their utility value more so than their friendship with her.”

      31. Boom April 27, 2016 at 9:09 pm

        This one’s interesting.

        “Transgender woman is upset because STRAIGHT men don’t like DICKS”

        Or this one:

        Transgender Man Leads ‘Men’s Health’ Cover Contest in Popular Votes

        Or this one:

        Transgender bathroom choices…

        That’s straight from the horse’s mouth. That’s just MGTOWs, though. What about PUAs?

      32. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 9:47 pm

        There are plenty of feminists who don’t want us invading “their safe spaces” and the MGTOW guy said he couldn’t care less.. he just expressed a hypothetical case of trans women coming into the men’s loos and then complaining about men exposing themselves… so I read it that he’s happy for us to go in the ladies. Anyway I put it to the test and not one man objected:

      33. Boom April 27, 2016 at 9:56 pm

        Whoop de doo… besides, that was a man and not someone that necessarily designates themselves as an MGTOW PUA or MRA. There is a difference.

        Let me get this straight.

        You read shit like

        ” I’ve been fortunate enough to avoid the pitfalls and I want to make a simple easy list that anyone can apply to check if that ‘freak’ in a dress is an actual freak of nature.”


        “They will be like any other gold digger try to leech off you. They always expect some mythical figure to pay for their whims.”

        and you make apologies for it. Why the fuck is that? Why are you constantly whining about feminism when you make excuses for that shit?

      34. Demonica Perduta April 28, 2016 at 12:01 am

        Well this isn’t the place for me to be arguing about trans issues. The topic is female anti-feminists.

      35. Boom April 28, 2016 at 5:28 am

        Naturally you would like to redirect the topic. It clearly isn’t going your way. But fuck, why worry about your enemies (feminists)? Look at your fucking “friends”. I can only conclude that there is an entirely different set of criteria that makes you give PUAs a free pass on blatant transphobia and bigotry and not feminists. Hmm… what could that be… I just don’t know!

      36. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 9:41 pm

        Not wanting to have sex with us is anybody’s right. As an asexual person myself I don’t want to have sex with anyone at all, but that doesn’t mean that I hate everyone does it?

        As for trying to discourage cisgender men who aren’t actually transgender from having an inappropriate sex change… surely that’s a good thing? It’s not something you should do without due consideration.

      37. Demonica Perduta May 2, 2016 at 10:07 am

        I would like to upvote you again on these links .. Imma go have some fun with the transphobic PUA’s now ^_^
        … oh and I want to point them to this video from another awesome trangirl. We think men should grow some balls… or have a sex change like we do :o)

      38. Boom May 3, 2016 at 10:04 am

        LOL good 🙂 I’m sure they’ll just LOVE it!

      39. Boom May 3, 2016 at 12:13 pm

        Well shit 🙁

  26. LindaB April 22, 2016 at 10:43 am

    Most female anti-feminists are anti- Third-wave feminists. As a woman I have a really good life in the west but SWJs and modern feminists are destroying everything because they cannot get enough.

    -“Are you against homosexual marriage?
    It doesn´t make sense to me. People today have the impression that marriage is just about love but in the first place it is a live long contract. The Government protects this contract because it is interested in healthy children.

    But no-fault-insta-divorce is just as stupid.

    -“Do you believe its ideal for a woman to remain a virgin until she gets married?”
    Because every wannabe player deserves an innocent virgin girl? A woman should just wait for a man who is rich or who is a vrigin himself.

    A player who was with dozens of women is just as broken and disgusting as the sluts he likes to fuck.

    -“Do you believe that its best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home mother?”
    No. Young children should be with their mother but as they get older the woman should do something else. In not time in history children had a stay-at-home mother who cared for them 24/7.

    My grandmother, great-grandmother and great-great-grandmother worked. They worked in the house and on the field.

    -“Do you believe a woman’s choices should be constrained by her
    husband, tribe, or church with the intention of doing what’s best for
    And a man´s choices? Why are you always acting like the men knows best. Just look around and you will see most modern men are just as fucked up as the women.

    -“Do you believe it’s wrong for a young girl to find herself by traveling around the world and trying new experiences?”
    Nope. Her live. She has do deal with the consequences.

    1. Adam Levinson April 22, 2016 at 12:25 pm

      So you are a liberal, communist, progressive, feminist. Congratulations. You are one of the herd.

      1. LindaB April 22, 2016 at 1:48 pm

        Nice straw man

      2. Adam Levinson April 22, 2016 at 2:34 pm

        A straw man is a weak or imaginary argument or opponent that is set up to be easily defeated.

        I did not put any words in your mouth. You told us exactly what you are. All I did was put it into more succinct language.

      3. LindaB April 22, 2016 at 2:57 pm

        Oh… please explain. How do you get the idea that I am a communist?

        I am 20 year old and engaged. I have kissed one man in my entire life. I am closer your ideal than roosh will ever be because he is a hypocrite. He is a virus who claims to be medicine.

      4. Adam Levinson April 22, 2016 at 4:08 pm

        Your responses to Roosh’s questions reveal that you are obsessed with achieving precise gender parity, in a tit-for-tat match of all benefits that men enjoy.

        That is nothing new. It’s the basic premise of Feminism.

        It can only be achieved by eliminating all difference between the sexes, and emerging as an androgynous society. Obviously this is what Hollywood and the NWO have been pushing for. It is the same exact method that was used to destroy the family structure and usher in totalitarian communism in Russia.

        Of course in practice, Feminism Inc. has only fought for an expansion of female rights and benefits, with a reduction in female responsibility and accountability.

        This is why you were correctly identified as a communist.

      5. LindaB April 23, 2016 at 7:25 am

        “Your responses to Roosh’s questions reveal that you are obsessed with
        achieving precise gender parity, in a tit-for-tat match of all benefits
        that men enjoy.”
        There is a difference. I want equal opportunity and equal rights. Communism and feminism want to achieve equal outcome (or privilege for a certain group).

        I am strongly against welfare or anything that enables people to avoid the consequences of their actions.

        And a lot of rights should be bound to certain duties. For example: Someone shouldn´t be able to vote if he doesn´t pay taxes or does not want to serve in the military.

        If there is no welfare state, people are forced to build stable families because they are giving security.

        So a woman is free to do whatever she wants but if she chooses to spent tons of money on a useless degree, she will have to live in poverty. If she has a child with a bad man, she has to live in poverty. No state to protect her.

        Taxes and government intervenion should be as small as possible.

      6. Adam Levinson April 25, 2016 at 2:55 pm

        The problem, of course, is that women are simply not equal to men, and so to expect them to achieve anything resembling equal outcomes is pure folly.

        The obsession with equality is what gives rise to communism and totalitarianism in the first place. There is massive government intervention to attempt to achieve equality where there can be none, and this gives the government enough power and money to take over every aspect of our lives.

        The quest for equality has destroyed the West because we simply are not equal, and equality is not possible nor even desirable.

        As long as women lag behind the economic accomplishments of men, they will always falsely blame the patriarchy or the misogynist system that is in place, because that is easier than accepting personal responsibility.

        Some of your thoughts are on the right track, but your naivete is what has led the West into the garbage dumpster. Women just don’t seem to think things through.

      7. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 7:26 am

        it’s about equal opportunity, not equal performance or outcome and in somethings women out perform men on average because we are complementary genders, not competing adversarial ones.

      8. Dick Johnson April 24, 2016 at 1:11 pm

        So…let me get this straight. You are engaged and you were a virgin when you met him, but you don’t think OTHER women should be virgins ar marriage?

        Do you just enjoy bringing other women down? Watching them suffer?

        God damn, women really do hate each other.

    2. Dick Johnson April 24, 2016 at 1:07 pm

      At least you’re honest. Thank you for proving Roosh’s point.

  27. TeamEdwardJace April 22, 2016 at 12:57 pm

    While I haven’t been been inclined to comment on the stupidity factor embedded within in your entries in a somewhat long while, I must say that this most recent posts takes it to staggering heights and then some . Shoeonhead (along with various other non-feminist and certain anti -feminists) is neither a feminist, MRA(some I’m cool with) or traditionalist. She is mostly like a humanist, egalitarian, a combination of the two or mostly likely fits those archetypes. One who is pro-equality, human , civil rights and liberties (that don’t infringe on said human or civil rights ) for humankind in general which are all very positive principles and things to continuously strive for . Futhermore, Certain ideals that pro-equality groups/individuals can agree on (including certain factions of the feminist population) are not exclusive to certain people who identify with the feminist movement (which the entry sort of touched on in a completely distorted format) . If Roosh or certain people do not support the principles of egalitarian or humanism(including the choice to be a stay at home or working parent, or Evan a caregiver at all)
    then that’s their problem. In the end,Any rational person in the society isn’t going to want it to revert back to the climate of the 1950s or to regress into cultural ideals that endorse such detrimental norms.

    1. SomeRandomFellow April 22, 2016 at 5:47 pm

      “Any rational person in the society isn’t going to want”

      By rational person you mean who ? liberal fags ?

      “cultural ideals that endorse such detrimental norms”

      How is monogamy and patriarchy “detrimental” ?

      “If Roosh or certain people do not support the principles of egalitarian or humanism”

      We don’t

      ” One who is pro-equality, human , civil rights and liberties (that
      don’t infringe on said human or civil rights ) for humankind in general
      which are all very positive principles and things to continuously strive
      for .”

      Bullshit. Humans are not equal therefore the political order should reflect that. All these poppycock is just fluffer meant to disguise that liberalism, and yes I mean classical liberalism and Enlightment values are an inversion of the natural order. A muslim will have no ” civil rights” or “liberties” when we take over in Europe. We will ressurect the glory of Dracula and make them play by our rules or die by the sword.

      When people claim they want “civil rights” they means taking the well deserved privilleges of western men, who earn them by building civilization and dying in war and giving it to women, sexual degenerates and racial minorities. Fuck that. Straight white males have built the west, and only they should have the absolute power to rule in the west. No rights to anyone else, they will have to earn our grace and mercy.

      “revert back to the climate of the 1950s”

      Your thinking small, read Julius Evola. The rot is older then decades, we will revert back by millenia and restore the natural order.

      The only answer is the complete domination of the west by straight white males. Everyone else plays by our rules or they can go fuck themselves.

      1. TeamEdwardJace April 23, 2016 at 12:05 pm

        Ahh- resorting to the typical bashing of all liberals and anyone who doesn’t subscribe to Roosh’s worldview instead of formulating an intelligent response are you?

  28. TeamEdwardJace April 22, 2016 at 1:15 pm

    I’m aware the “Evan” in my previous comment was a typo which I’ve been trying to edit but can’t seem to do without it going haywire on my iphone.

  29. advancedatheist April 22, 2016 at 2:37 pm

    “Do you believe it’s wrong for a young girl to find herself by traveling around the world and trying new experiences?”

    Ultra-Orthodox Jews, whom I call the Ultra-Jews, certainly think that way. I defend their right not to sit next to such women on airliners. Ultra-Jews might rationalize it with biblical superstitions about the uncleanness of menstruating women, but I suspect they fear that such women have probably done degenerate things as sex tourists during their travels, and the Ultra-Jews want to shun these harlots.

  30. William Baker April 22, 2016 at 3:40 pm

    What fucking nonsense! Stop trying to alienate women from the cause and alienating our allies you idiots. this is counter-productive and hypocritical and makes you no better than the radical gender feminists are. Learn from their errors..don’t imitate them.

    People like you give the MRA movement a bad name.

    Stop it! Enough! An an MRA I’m sick of this hypocritical shit. First AVFM’s founder attacks one of our greatest allies Christina Hoff Sommers, and now this?

    Seriously, grow the fuck up and stop poisoning our movement!

    Fuck you Roosh

      1. Zelcorpion April 23, 2016 at 10:15 am

        Sargon is an anti-SJW, but he certainly won’t side with strong masculinity and neither would Christina Hoff Sommers.

        The biggest gulf between us and them is once again the full acceptance of strong leading masculinity and Game. Usually women who are for strong leading men also accept our viewpoints.

    1. SomeRandomFellow April 22, 2016 at 6:11 pm

      “Stop trying to alienate women from the cause”

      Your cause is gay. We do not want equality, we want absolute domination.

      “alienating our allies”

      Your allies are attention whores who want to fight radical poison with moderate poison. Your favorite Sargon of Akkad claimed that Pakistani rape gangs are “a british problem” and that nationalists are right wing SJWs. Everyone else like Christina Summers are just as gay, they pander to men for shekels, and you slurp it up because “a person with a vagina agrees with me …. HOLY SHIT!
      “. Aaron Clarey had a great video on that.

      They will never discuss hypergamy, or how the problem arises because of female NATURE and not legislation and how the “evil 1950’s” were just gynocentrism light. MGTOW are right on this one.

      And, by the way, will your favorite jewess Christina Sommers mention the jewish influence on feminism and how it is basically a tool jews used to destabilize western society in an act of ethnic competition ?

      We will smash equalism in all forms. We will remove female voting rights. Straight white males will dominate the West again, deal with it Pussy Boy.

      “People like you give the MRA movement a bad name.”

      MRA’s like you give OUR movement a bad name. Your movement is made out of limp-wristed faggots whose solution is to bitch like faggots, thinking that anyone cares about male suffering. SPOILER ! They don’t.

      We are men and are expected to be strong. Deal with it. Instead of debating feminists we will smash and opress them. You are still engaging in a useless and gay tactic instead of going “full patriarchy” like us and embracing much deserved male supremacy

  31. Homine April 22, 2016 at 5:19 pm

    It is mating instinct. Equality is also about mating.
    Sex, love, politics, college, invading male spaces, etc. etc.
    It is how the female chases the male, and seeks his attention.
    It is about learning from other females about men’s preferences.
    It is about being like you, to have you think she is special.
    Mating is basically imitation of masculinity.

    You will find them even here, even in MGTOW, everywhere…
    And naive males will believe, because they want to believe, stupidly in denial.

    1. tango May 7, 2016 at 8:28 am

      You know sometimes women do things without thinking of men; for example she might wear a dress because its her favourite colour, or she may apply for a job because she needs to pay rent, or she may pop to the shops to get ingredients for lasagne. She may put on make up because she thinks it looks nice, and for it to not be to get a mans attention.
      Not everything a woman does is for a man, like how not everything a man does is for a woman, and if it is that just sounds a bit sad that you can’t be happy enough with yourself that you neeeed to impress someone else.

      1. Homine May 7, 2016 at 3:25 pm

        Thinking ? vs instinct, and then “motivation”, which is derived from abstract things people -most of the time-, can’t recognize consciously.

        Things like the color of a dress, that she likes, but Why ?, the source of her motivation is associated with her nature, and that gives her pleasure.

        We are slaves of our physical nature, but we want to think we are free.

        Women, specially women, are extremely instinctive about mating. But It is much easier to give her a different explanation for her behavior:
        – She just wants to look beautiful, not for attention, her clothes are not sexual, not a sexual provocation but men are perverts, she just wants sex like men for no other psychological reason, she wants to study/work like men, but with special opportunities due to historical oppression. etc.

        All women do this, they redefine reality to feel good with themselves.

  32. Tessio Was Always Smarter April 22, 2016 at 6:46 pm

    Yep. No such thing as a “red pill woman,” fellas.

  33. Anti-Social JustAss Wario April 22, 2016 at 6:58 pm

    Some men are born with it, the rest of you pleps need pick up advice from forums LOL

    If you need this site for “tips” on getting women, you’re a beta dweeb who probably has a shitty beard like this clown, in an attempt to appear more masculine.

    P.U.A have ruined dating. You clowns are clowns. Thirsty lamewads suffering countless rejection for that golden low sself esteem drunk bar slut who will get your dick wet for a night. Fags. Bombard women with attention,then whine they act like “entitled bitches”. DUH. They got a steady stream of below average dweeb fags,trying out their newest P.U.A fag routine. There’s plenty of you lame turds.
    You fags are just lame.

  34. Clark Kent April 22, 2016 at 10:04 pm

    Wat about this chick? came across her randomly. i’ve never seen an anti-feminist that passed the boner test. What’s going on here?
    She’s using all of the manosphere terminology verbatim.

    1. Roosh April 23, 2016 at 10:05 am

      Probably looking for e-fame.

      1. GGG April 23, 2016 at 11:32 am

        Same doubt could be cast on any male putting himself forward as well. Ultimately it doesn’t necessarily matter, it’s all about gaining power anyway. Whether someone’s a useful idiot or a real ally, use them for what they are. And make them benefit from the relationship as long as you benefit from it.

      2. jarvy May 7, 2016 at 8:20 am

        ah looking for e-fame like you, m8.

  35. Lauren April 23, 2016 at 12:35 am

    I usually like your posts but this one is just mean!

    I am an anti-feminist woman and I have other anti-feminist friends and none of us are anything near to being an attention whore, we have no facebook and hardly go online. It’s insulting because we have dedicated our entire lives to our lifestyles! And to think of being told we are not “real?”

    I’ve dedicated everything to traditionalism. I quit university to be a stay at home wife and mother, married at 22, have 3 white children and hope for more, cook all from scratch, getting ready to homeschool now, etc etc. As for your questions I answer “yes” to all! I do not use or believe in birth control. I hate everything about feminism – careers for women, abortion killing little babies, our society we live in with so many people living isolated and not forming families, the death of the west, children raised by daycares instead of by their mothers, I could go on all day with reasons.

    It is not right to insult genuine people, who believe in fighting the poisons of modernity just like you do.

    Thank you and good day!

    1. Dick Johnson April 24, 2016 at 1:19 pm

      If you answered “yes” to all his questions, then the article wasn’t talking about you. Learn to read.

  36. Drago April 23, 2016 at 12:54 am

    Well spotted. I have also noticed a lot of so called Anti SJW social media groups are deceptively mixing a lot of their liberalism equality preaching in with redpill talking points. Some are very similar to JIDF type operations the way they consistently attack any dissenters of Israel or Jews.

    Reminds me of an interesting point you made in one of your blogs.

    “incubating social justice and then losing control of it has left out Jews as a victimized group and promoted Palestinian interests instead.

    Their overshot explains why the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a neocon organization, has in the past two years begun attacking feminism, an ideology that developed with disproportionate Jewish support. They’re doing so because minorities are clamoring for a bigger piece of the victim pie and introducing anti-Semitic and pro-Palestine thought. Some Jews have calculated that at this point it’s better to introduce some truth and realtalk in gender issues (but not race) so that non-Jewish groups don’t gain too much power. Don’t be surprised if Jews throw multiculturalism under the bus at some point and claim that they are the true “white” Americans in need of protection from the anti-Semitic minority hordes”

  37. questioningall1 . April 23, 2016 at 9:42 am

    A woman can only submit to her husband, her tribe or her church if these allow her to submit to God. “We must obey God, not man” Acts 5:29. She is accountable for that. She stands before God in judgment of her obedience to God. No one but God can stand as her advocate. Neither can she blame her husband, her tribe or her church, should she choose to rebel against God.

  38. M_ April 23, 2016 at 4:30 pm

    >“Are you against homosexual marriage?”
    Removing government from marriage, if a church wishes to marry a gay couple, should the church be allowed?

    >“Do you believe its ideal for a woman to remain a virgin until she gets married?”
    I am curious the thoughts if a man should remain a virgin until married as well?

    >“Do you believe a woman’s choices should be constrained by her husband, tribe, or church with the intention of doing what’s best for her?”
    Should the man’s choices be constrained by the tribe and church?

    >“Do you believe it’s wrong for a young girl to find herself by traveling around the world and trying new experiences?”
    I find this hypocritical given that Roosh travels extensively.

    1. Dick Johnson April 24, 2016 at 1:22 pm

      LOL. Totally proving Roosh’s point 100%! Do you not get what we’re about or believe in?

      The ENTIRE POINT is that men and women are DIFFERENT. VERY DIFFERENT. You don’t seem to get this, do you?

      1. M_ April 24, 2016 at 2:21 pm

        >You don’t seem to get this, do you?
        Please enlighten me.

  39. Nightwatch20 April 24, 2016 at 2:49 am

    So far there have been exactly two girls I can think that could pass this test. They happen to be sisters, Anna Marria and Gaberiella Hoffman. They run a couple of blogs one of which is a cooking blog called A Taste of Patriachy. The only thing I could see being held against them (on here at least) is the fact they are hardline Cruz supporters.

  40. Misanthropist April 24, 2016 at 5:49 am

    I agree with the broad thrust of this article that many so-called female anti-feminists are unreliable allies in most ways that count. But the problem is that it doesn’t really provide much of a guide for judging such women other than offering an ideological litmus test of whether a woman is reliably conservative on most issues. Yet many conservative women could not care much about issues that affect men or boys either.

    The problem with most female anti-feminists is that, albeit with some exceptions, most such women don’t oppose feminism because they recognize that it unfairly treats and demonizes males. They more often choose not to identify with feminism because of a few policy disagreements with the feminist party line on some issues, or because they prefer alternative systems for securing women’s interests. Most women I know don’t care much for feminist politics. Yet equally so, most such women don’t care much about issues that affect men or boys or feel any moral compulsion to really help them. Feminism is simply one, albeit more extreme, manifestation of societal gynocentrism.

    Moreover, the problem with lumping feminism in with other liberal social causes is that it downplays the particularly pernicious nature of feminism in particular. People who support causes like same-sex marriage are daft. But I don’t think they should be lumped in the same category as feminists. Feminism is really in its own class as far as being a Stalinist hate movement.

    1. Odile Lee May 29, 2016 at 11:00 am

      If a woman cannot identify with issues that affect young boys, she hasn’t any maternal feeling.This is mentally ill.
      If she cannot identify with issues that affect men, she has been eaten by the pod people. Any women, who hasn’t been ruined, will know these men are our fathers, our brothers, our husbands, our male relatives-all the men who care for her.
      Roost’s article on 5 types of people the SJW’s forget, is telling. The moral compulsion to help, is a sign of humanity. The moral compulsion to help young boys and men, is a sign of femininity.

  41. Taignobias April 24, 2016 at 2:17 pm

    Stumbled on your “36 Things Wrong With American Women” video from last year. So many recent hate comments – you must be doing something right 🙂

  42. Skeptic At Heart April 25, 2016 at 9:46 am

    I am a female anti-feminist but that doesn’t mean I have to agree with everything anyone who is an anti-feminist says, I don’t like dogma. The main reason I’m anti-feminist is the clear harm feminism has done to families in the West, which are the backbone of society.

    My other reason is I have a PhD in science and I know many highly intelligent women (and men) who are not having children and this disturbs me. We are loosing excellent genetic material in our gene pool and I think any female scientist should recognize and speak out about it, even if it offends people, because truth and the future of our gene pool are more important than feelings. Feminism is a mind meme trap to take the genetic material of the women with the best traits, those we need the most in the future (intelligence, determination, motivation) and push them into careers where they won’t pass on their DNA, or won’t do it as much. Additionally, women are less happy today than in the 70’s, probably because the stress of juggling career and family.

    Personally, I think if Western men want to make Western women submit like Muslim women, it will not work. Muslim women have had 1400 years of submission and been bred for it. Male/female relationships in the West were never quite so submissive. I’d run away or kill myself before submitting to Allah or submitting to a man who treats me like a thing. Why was I give a brain if not to use it?

    I try to put my perspective into the anti-feminist world not because I want attention, but because I think we need to build bridges and figure out how to get Western women and men working on the same team, building strong and loving families, rather than complaining about each other. I don’t like what feminism has done to our society, bringing the genders at odds, but I think the idea of throwing out the entire idea that women can have some level of self ownership is silly. Just stop letting Jews program your females’ minds, dudes. Don’t get mad at women for being programmable, the vast majority of human beings are fairly easy to program, I’ve seen it first hand with cult thought reform.

    1. SomeRandomFellow May 25, 2016 at 12:09 am

      I agree with your message, it is pretty reasonable.

      Are you actually a woman though ? The way you write makes you sound like a man.

      1. Skeptic At Heart May 25, 2016 at 9:42 pm

        I have a PhD in physics, so I am several standard deviations from the norm on many traits compared to the average female. But yes, I am female.

      2. SomeRandomFellow May 26, 2016 at 12:29 pm

        Good stuff.

    2. Odile Lee May 29, 2016 at 11:01 am

      Feminism is a tool of Big Business, to cause gender war, and make more single people, who buy things to fill a hole devoid of love.

      1. Skeptic At Heart May 29, 2016 at 10:14 pm

        Yep, totally. And they have convinced all of the Western women that it’s some sort of awesome thing FOR US, when it’s all about $ and power and subverting our society to replace Westerners with a more controllable population and sow disharmony via mass immigration. It makes me so sad now, to know so many women are a part of this and don’t know it and I really hope we can get some of their minds back 🙁

      2. Odile Lee May 30, 2016 at 12:26 am

        I myself, escaped due to disability and the common sense to realize, due to reading a unbelieveable amount of literature – that causing gender war solves nothing. I was very lucky, that my father ( a excommunicated Mormon turned hip ) was kind enough to teach me ( in my disabled, and unbelievable naievity/ ignorance/ stupidity ) – that being a wife/ mother – was not a disgraceful thing. That lacking a career or any chance of it, perhaps could be a very good thing for me. Being sensible, he also kicked bum in making me face up to the hard realities of working for a living. Without his undoubtedly hard, heart-aching assessment of reality, I would no doubt be a delusional, victimised, loss.

      3. Odile Lee May 30, 2016 at 12:33 am

        It will be a hard, won battle. The only comfort I have , is in that men have always been forced to accept brutal reality. As a rite of becoming a man. Although women are very different, no doubt the wisdom of ages, and what modern men such as ROK know to be truth- women like myself, and hopefully others can face facts.
        I was very fortunate to have a kind, and understanding man( in the course of one arguement, on Jezebel of all things ) to enlighten me about things I had i intuited but not fully integrated, by pointing me out to Karen Strough, and from mentioning her, another equally kind and helpful man, suggested I view manwomanmyth. Being as she is a lesbian woman, the gentleman behind manwomanmyth, gave me a more male viewpoint of what actually is going on.

  43. 2Fish April 26, 2016 at 2:26 pm


    1. Demonica Perduta April 27, 2016 at 7:44 am

      sluts & pua: a marriage made in heaven :o)

  44. jq747 April 27, 2016 at 8:27 pm

    I’m gonna reserve judgement on Shoeonhead (and other female anti-feminists), but the recent Twitter exchanges ‘twixt her and Roosh are illuminating. They demonstrate that these women end up surrounded by the same cadre of white-knighting beta-orbiters that typifies vocal feminists. And that is probably the best argument in favor of this article, sadly.

    Curiously, these new anti-feminists seem distinct from the Women Against Feminism phenomenon of a couple of years back. For one thing, the WAFs were far more conservative (Janet Bloomfield springs to mind).

  45. Shmalkandik April 27, 2016 at 8:56 pm

    We need to distinguish, strongly, between the Women’s movement and feminism. The Women’s movement supported programs which, in their belief, supported women in their traditional roles as wives and mothers. They sought to ban alcohol, prostitution, abortion, and sweatshops, because they believe things like these were a threat to families., Once females could vote, the women’s movement sought and obtained exemptions from jury duty for married women, whom they argued needed to be left at home to care for husband and children.

    The Feminist program is nearly the complete opposite.

  46. Panther April 29, 2016 at 10:50 am

    “the drawback is that their platform size may grow enough to cause damage in the future when they have a difficult menstrual cycle and start needless drama by attacking genuine conservatives. They will not submit to anything but their female biology and bottomless pit of narcissism while the weak men who follow them act as their enablers and white knights.”

    This fragment has two thumbs up Roosh.

  47. Tantalus XVI May 3, 2016 at 10:16 pm

    But… Shoe IS a liberal… she said so herself. Like Aaron Clarey said the easiest way for a woman to succeed on Youtube is to spit out some libertarian talking points here and there, “yay capitalism” and shit on a few feminists here and there and boom 100k subs in six months. Shit you don’t even have to work that hard. Shoe puts out (heh) a video like every couple weeks? Men just sop that shit up like gravy.

    NAWALT IS BULLSHIT. Stop falling for it!

  48. Misti May 6, 2016 at 7:05 am

    I believe you speak of the “if you can’t beat ‘Em join ‘Em” types… Essentially looking for a way into the perceived “in crowd” without any real genuine basis.

  49. jarvy May 6, 2016 at 3:31 pm

    lol women can’t win can they fam

  50. Angry Young Man May 15, 2016 at 3:25 am

    Whatever… these women are pathetic- not even real people. It doesn’t matter whether they come to you as feminist, anti-feminist, or otherwise. “Liberated” women are the rot of freedom and accelerate the destruction of nations. In all of my 27 years, I have never met one woman under any label who was a decent human being. They are evil.

  51. Andros May 21, 2016 at 11:58 pm

    Shoeonhead is just an attention whore. Knew it from the beginning. Lauren Southern seems to be more genuine, but like others below me have said, is just naive to how deep the rabbit hole goes.

  52. phallocentrist/androcentrist ♂ May 23, 2016 at 3:16 am

    Roosh V, you are not so smart. You can barely even form a decent sentence live without your computer. The most honorable thing you did was go on mainstream tv. & state that overweight females ( although I personally do enjoy chubby females, in addition to other types.) are inexcusable. ¶ You p.u.a. types are mostly just feminine emulators. You act like women while proclaiming the “real-man” thing. You understand, whether subconsciously or full, the nature of females, & you take advantage of it like traitors to only waste time rather than pointing the major problems of it, such as one fact that females are collectivists, so because of that, you adopt feminine tactics to be approved by female herd mentality. ¶ I have some respect for people like Mark Rudolf because with that approach, it is just weeding by remaining completely masculine & not an actor. ¶ You idiots on here need to read some ‘Sex & Character’ by Otto Weininger. ¶ You p.u.a. idiots just act like women.

    1. LittleGoomba March 30, 2017 at 6:18 pm

      wassup bruh

  53. Jim Johnson May 24, 2016 at 2:03 pm

    You have feminists, your typical American slut (well described in this article), and genuine morally based anti-feminists. I liked your list of questions at the end. My wife would answer in the affirmative for every one of those questions (if you rephrased #4).

    The trick is to weed out the bad ones before marriage. While you cannot ask those questions and expect an honest answer from the frauds, there is one test that will confirm who you are dealing with. Refuse to have sex with them prior to marriage. If she is a keeper, she will think more of you for being virtuous. Your “anti-feminist” skanks will go away. They are akin to white knights sucking up to feminists.

  54. Odile Lee May 29, 2016 at 11:18 am

    This may very well be truth. I do MRA support and posts on twitter,myself, because my husband told me I should. He was nearly destroyed by feminism, and thinks there should be support for men/young boy’s issues, publicly by women. To show there are actually some who care.
    He is much smarter than I am, and I trust his guidance.

  55. Dirk Diggler June 8, 2016 at 11:15 am

    All true, and yet even in these comment sections, women will put in their two bits while many of you thirsty, wanna-be Betas engage them, thus polluting the discourse. This is despite the fact our host has specifically asked us to ignore them.

  56. QueenOfPentacles June 20, 2016 at 4:43 pm

    Can someone go into more detail about the 4th bulletin point? Maybe it’s the wording that has be baffled: “Do you believe a woman’s choices should be constrained by her husband,
    tribe, or church with the intention of doing what’s best for her?”

    A yes from me on the other points, but I don’t think I’m understanding this one fully.

  57. Alex July 6, 2016 at 7:40 pm

    Well fuck me and call me stacy. You’ve got a damn good point.

  58. Jenni Lee July 24, 2016 at 7:36 am

    Are you shitting me? I hate the SJW’s and feel this article was decent until I read about how men are being marginalized. Get the fuck out of here!!

    Let’s get this clear. There’s are rights and there are privileges. It seems too many Americans can’t tell the two fucking apart. But it’s easy to do. You know how? If everyone doesn’t get to do it, it’s a fucking privilege. If everyone gets to do it, it’s a right.

    So let’s talk about male and female privilege. Because that seems to be where the divide is at. Men think it’s privileged to stay at home to take care of the house and children. They feel this is a woman’s privilege. But when you look at it deeper, you find it makes more sense for a woman to stay home because the work force will not provide her with the same income it would her male partner. My fiance and I tried taking about it, but know is a joke to have me work and him stay home. Modern society would never pay me enough even with college degrees.

    So, as you can see… something thought of as a privilege to women was really a hidden privilege to men. So if men want to be able to stay home, they’re gonna have to fix their privilege first. Not that many of us women think it’s a privilege at all. Some feel like it’s a jail sentence. Some feel like they’ll never be independent and will always need a man. Not all women want to be house maids, but they don’t exactly get the choice. Its not like she can provide for the family.

    I identify as a true feminists (going off of websters dictionary). The anti-feminists are just as much of a joke as the SJW’S. You can’t let people redefine a word and fight them on their new definition. This whole thing is a fucking joke. Shit, the writer here played into it. Like the fucking defintion doesn’t even matter anymore because a bunch of stupid kids took everything over.

    1. Jenni Lee July 24, 2016 at 7:54 am

      And you want to read a good book… read “Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men” by Lundy Bancroft (best seller).

      This is an opposing view from a renowned abuse psychologist. This book contains years of research on both the abusers and victims. Its the most healing book I have ever read. I experience 8.5 years of domestic violence. One of the most misunderstood situations to date. There are too many misconceptions about abuse to even keep up with these days. Try not to be biased and read that! The guy should win awards. And he does get into social implications that contribute to the abuser in our culture–in detail. Hard to deny the way he lays things out. But, sadly… even though he’s a man, most will discredit his amazing credentials and the fact that he’s even a man. That’s the first clue I’m dealing with a sexist idiot. Surprisingly men also dominant the movement to stop abuse against women. Why? Because they loved their mothers and daughters. Many of them watched their mothers get abused as children and decided not to become their fathers… instead choosing to fight against it. This makes them more of a man, showing strength & compassion, to me. That, and most fields of employment are dominated by men. Especially when you get to CEO posistions. That’s a fact and the statistics can be easily Googled (if it’s not already obvious).

      I’m not arguing with stupid sexist males. I’m not responding to abusive language towards me. In fact, if you respond to this with anything other than respect for my opinion (agree or not), I will not respond. Because that kind of childish, ignorant, disrespectful behavior will not deserve my attention. I’m sick of people abusing each other online. And I will not accept it as something normal. It’s not. It’s a narcisstic America. Just look at how many people who would vote for a man with an obvious antisocial disorder!

      1. LittleGoomba March 30, 2017 at 6:17 pm

        what the hell did I just read?

  59. vlad the impaler August 7, 2016 at 5:13 am

    who’s the niggr?i suppose shes screwing that ugly ape.what a loser.

  60. Pvblivs August 28, 2016 at 4:31 pm

    You basically act as though you think all anti-feminism is traditionalism. It’s not. In fact, in a way, traditionalism is “feminism lite.” Just like feminism, traditionalism has men doing the grunt work and providing for women. Feminism just takes it a step further by maintaining all the obligations on the man while allowing the woman not to have him around. He still has to do the grunt work and provide for the woman, but at a distance. A lot of people, myself included, oppose feminism precisely because it is not about the equality it claims to be.

    The biggest problem I have with your “feminists in disguise” model is the large number of examples of women who have acted against their own interests according to that model.

  61. Liz September 2, 2016 at 5:15 pm

    I am a female anti-feminist traditional conservative. I’ll prove it.
    * I’m against homosexual marriage because sex is meant (primarily) for procreation. It also sets the stage for pedophilia and child marriage. Here’s why. Before the ’60s, homosexuality was called “homophilia” (like PEDOphilia), it was illegal and considered a mental illness. Now, not only is that no longer the case, they can marry who they’re attracted to. I predict that pedophilia will become “pedosexuality” (like HOMOsexuality), it will be legalized and not be considered a mental illness and they’ll be able to marry who THEY’RE attracted to (children). And liberals will say the same things: “Love is love/They were born that way/Where’s your tolerance?” It’s horrible.
    * I believe that yes, ideally, a woman should stay a virgin until marriage or else she’s like sloppy seconds to her lifetime partner. Losing your virginity on your honeymoon signifies that you are theirs and no one else’s. And yes, I’m still a virgin.
    * I believe a stay-at-mother is crucial because who will watch the children if both parents work? Nannies these days are untrustworthy (hence nanny cams). Daycare abuse happens a lot, too. Plus, it’s harder for children to form emotional connections with their mothers if they’re mostly in someone else’s care. Although, it IS difficult to support a family on just one salary now.
    * I believe if a woman is making a bad choice, then yes, she should be overridden by her husband/tribe/church.
    * I don’t really see how traveling the world will make one discover their purpose in life. It may make one appreciate the world more, but I think finding one’s passion and talent will make them find themselves.
    * BONUSES: I’m also against abortion. It’s murder (unborn does not mean not alive), it’s dangerous to the mother (mental decline/sterilization/death), the various methods are horrifying (I have a book that describes them in graphic detail), and there are many infertile couples out there that have been waiting a long time to adopt a child.
    * I’m also against interracial marriage. It destroys racial purity and preservation for all ethnic groups.
    So there you have it.

  62. Sarah Gower October 26, 2016 at 2:45 pm

    The most feminine women tend to be very fickle. Sometimes they do whatever their husbands want them to do.

  63. LittleGoomba February 8, 2017 at 6:04 pm

    Seriously guys, ignore the trolls. They really do get off on the attention you give them.

  64. Lucy February 23, 2017 at 1:11 pm

    There are actually many girls that could easily answer “yes” to all those questions, including in the Western world, in traditional Christian circles. But if you want a girl of virtue and integrity, then you yourself must be a man of virtue and integrity. If a man has slept around, he should not expect to be with a girl who has not. The level of morality between the man and woman should match up. Equally yoked.

    1. LittleGoomba March 30, 2017 at 6:12 pm

      wassup bruh

  65. Sonic123 April 30, 2017 at 1:18 am

    Interesting, “Roosh” is actually this guy

    He’s a convicted rapist and just looking at him, i can tell why he has insecurities and inferiority complexes. The white guy of which he posted a pic of in this article is very average looking even by european standards; FYI. 5-6/10 max. But yes, compared to Roosh, he is a 10 and hence the Danish-cock worship by Roosh.

  66. Volmornu Unromlov July 29, 2017 at 4:39 pm

    You don’t have to be a bigot to be anti-feminist. FYI.

  67. Astrid Esther 1972 August 24, 2017 at 5:52 pm

    Very surprised that my answers are “Yes” to the five questions because it is hard for a woman to swim against the mainstream.

  68. ana October 7, 2017 at 9:56 am

    your article is shite

  69. MWest December 1, 2017 at 7:16 am

    Yes, I agree with all five statements. Being around degenerate “females” for most of my life has truly been a sickening experience—feminist, anti-feminist, or whatever label they choose to give themselves.

  70. just a human December 4, 2017 at 8:27 pm

    Big thanks for your latest YouTube video ” Tradhots are not “. There are too many naive guys out there. Everyone of them should watch it. Excellent ! Stop pedestalising people who are nobody ! Don’t be an idiot. Go to rooshv YouTube channel and watch it!

  71. Trad Girl December 7, 2017 at 6:11 am

    How dare you!!! you think is funny??

  72. viking viking December 7, 2017 at 5:00 pm

    you should pick a fight against vargs wife for being a european traditionalist i dear you.

  73. Rees Welsh January 20, 2018 at 4:21 pm

    Even ANTI FEMINISTS dislike you.
    That’s gotta tell you a lot 😂😂😂