Starting at the end of 2015, I began seeing a sharp rise of women declaring themselves to be “anti-feminist.” They created Twitter accounts and Youtube channels to mock social justice warriors and feminists in similar ways that we have, even borrowing our talking points. While they may come across as genuine, these female infiltrators are mostly attention whoring to a male audience. They don’t want to change the world—they just want you to look at them.

If you have an anti-feminist movement with a high percentage of women in it, you don’t have an anti-feminist movement. The reason is that single women raised in the West will find it impossible to go against the female urge of sleeping with whomever they want and having complete control over their lives to pursue useless college degrees and degenerate behaviors. The only exception is women who want to be mothers before 30, but such women wouldn’t waste her time “building a brand” online instead of creating the family she greatly desires.

Anti-feminists share great overlap in ideology with actual feminists

The new anti-feminist will bash SJWs and their censorship efforts with great vigor, but when it’s time for society to stop them from opening their legs to sexy alpha males, they throw a temper tantrum. When it’s time to force them adopt traditional behaviors of maintaining a home instead of merely agreeing to traditional ideas in theory, they reveal themselves to be feminists at heart and use SJW language that labels you a “misogynist” or “rapist.”

I’ve had numerous “anti-feminists” in infiltrated movements (alt right, gamergate, men’s rights) attack me to the point where I can’t tell the difference between them and standard issue SJWs, even though our enemy is supposedly the same. This includes popular “anti-feminist” Shoe0nhead, pictured at the top of this article with one of her many Arabian lovers that she is desperate to keep secret for some reason. The reality is that anti-feminists like her are more aligned with the enemy than ourselves. They used entryist tactics that started with merely uploading a female avatar and looking pretty in webcam pictures.

One of the reasons for the rise of anti-feminists is not necessarily the strength of our ideas, but the fact that the feminist camp is too crowded. Being a feminist and holding an “I need feminism” sign used to be a great way to get attention online without having to show tits, but with thousands of girls doing it, any one girl no longer stands out. The practice of anti-feminism by females is therefore an alternative strategy to getting attention. Consider that a girl who is a 6 out of 10 can now make a Youtube video denouncing feminism and easily get 25,000 views. It’s also a way for girls to show men that they are “hip,” “dangerous,” and “cool.” Men online are so thirsty and lonely that they lavish these girls with attention because they’re “just like one of the guys.”

The anti-feminist test

These anti-feminist females are not traditional and not even conservative. They are liberals in disguise. You can ask them these questions to reveal where their true sympathies lie:

  • “Are you against homosexual marriage?”
  • “Do you believe it’s ideal for a woman to remain a virgin until she gets married?”
  • “Do you believe that it’s best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home mother?”
  • “Do you believe a woman’s choices should be constrained by her husband, tribe, or church with the intention of doing what’s best for her?”
  • “Do you believe it’s wrong for a young girl to find herself by traveling around the world and trying new experiences?”

Good luck finding an anti-feminist who says yes to even two of the above questions. I suspect the only girl who would is already married and a stay-at-home mother who happily submits to her masculine husband.

While the anti-feminists have been useful during group actions against SJWs online, the drawback is that their platform size may grow enough to cause damage in the future when they have a difficult menstrual cycle and start needless drama by attacking genuine conservatives. They will not submit to anything but their female biology and bottomless pit of narcissism while the weak men who follow them act as their enablers and white knights.

In spite of their big talk online, anti-feminists ultimately want to maintain the status quo, and have taken on our ideas as a strategy to get attention and fill the childless void in their lives. They will have absolutely no place within the sphere of neomasculinity.[culturewar]

Read Next: Women Must Have Their Behavior And Decisions Controlled By Men

349 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GenKittVonKnox
GenKittVonKnox
4 years ago

So What’s your view of Lauren Southern? Does she pass the test in your opinion or is she really a feminist in disguise?

Roosh
4 years ago
Reply to  GenKittVonKnox

You can ask her the set of questions and see how she responds.

spicynujac
spicynujac
4 years ago
Reply to  Roosh

UnicornHunt2016 is on!

Petronilla
Petronilla
4 years ago
Reply to  Roosh

Just curious, what’s your current opinion of Karen Straughan?

Hugo
Hugo
4 years ago
Reply to  Petronilla

Won’t answer for Roosh but, anyone who cares what ANY woman thinks about masculinity doesn’t get it. We should not concern ourselves with any of these women. We’re men. They’re women.

Arminds' copy of Swank
Arminds' copy of Swank
4 years ago
Reply to  Roosh

I’m answered no to all those and I’m a guy who is against feminism. I don’t want women subservient to men or without choice. I simply want men to have equal choice and men’s issues to be validated and for gender issues not not be just about women while men are viewed as unable to be victims.

Anti-feminism isn’t anti-women’s rights. It’s anti-feminism; which is a movement for demonising all men and female superiority

jimmy
jimmy
4 years ago

The problem with the stance you have adopted is it would only make sense intellectually if men and women are equal. In reality men and women are unequal, they are very different.

Put a negative spin on it with a word like subservient and it sounds bad. But in reality most women naturally want to marry a strong man who will protect them and provide for them. Beautiful teenage girls always have and always will throw themselves at rich powerful men.

Now women generally lack rationality or logic and at a young age are best protected from their own instincts by a father or society who cares. If they save their virginity and get married to a loving husband it might seem they are being made “subservient” and they are certainly having their behaviour controlled aged 18-22 but it results in a lifetime of love and happiness. This was the norm for women until a couple of generations ago. It is also better for society to have well balanced children raised in a solid marriage.

So just saying something like men and women should have equal choice sounds appealing in a certain simple minded way. But put it in the context of real human beings and real human societies and it all falls apart.

Little Bo Peep
Little Bo Peep
4 years ago
Reply to  jimmy

Yeah, that’s true, Jimmy. It’s the dilemma feminists face, too. They say they want to be equal in a relationship, but they aren’t attracted to men who are of equal or lower income and status than they are. That’s a simple fact. In fact, statistics actually show that women with higher incomes actually raise their standards and prefer even higher income men than poorer women do.

It’s biology. It’s fucking funny.

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago

That’s gay. Women cannot be equal.

“Once women and men are equal women become superior”
Some greek philosopher

Women are not biologically equal. They are not physically fit to be in the military. Most shitty jobs are done by men (99 % of boiler makers and oil drillers are men).

Not to mention the Women are Wonderful effect, the female tribal solidarity (vagina tribalism), gynocentrism as well as male thirst give women incredible social power.

Why should they be given equal rights if they are not equal, do not contribute equally, and have an unspoken ammount of power granted them by nature.

When given the right to vote, they Vote Trudeau, importing muslims, welfare state, single mom support and celebration, male persecution by law, etc.

Even if they claim otherwise, reality shows a different picture. Go to any pro-migrant rally, mostly women and beta cucks. Go to any nationalist rally, mostly men (95 % +).

When given equal opportunity women used it to fuck around, hate men, draw art and sing songs about their vagina, bring in muslim hordes, consume degenerate art, etc.

Under patriarhy they were civilized, well dressed, feminine, respectful. Now what ?

You are simply advocating Soft Patriarchy, we are advocating ard patriarchy. Women do not deserve even “equal opportunity”. They must be legally handicapped to account for their social power granted by just having a vagina and ability to fuck shit up.

That is if you value social harmony, whether you realize it yet or not.

Not to mention “equality” and “democracy” won’t let us win over muslim hordes. Only hardcore patriarchy and male supremacy.

I rest my case, women belong to men, and will either follow the benevolent rule of white males(if we are generous enough to be benevolent after all the shit they have done) or the brutal rule of muslims.

The only right women have is to choose their masters.

As for Soft Patriarchy vs Hard Patriarchy watch this video http://youtu.be/dLV36YD-Om4

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago

Patriarchy is a myth. It never existed and never will.

Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley
4 years ago

It did exist, you are the same breed of short sighted delusional idiotic woman that was common at the end of the roman empire. You will not have it all, you will be murdered and raped until the legacy of your bloodline is completely wiped from existence by the foreign hordes you thought it wise to be kind to. Nature’s about to teach humanity another harsh lesson about who’s really in charge.

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  Aldous Huxley

well here is a lesson in harsh reality for you: We’ve got you by the balls … now lick mah pussy… patriarch boy ^_^ https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b2849da95ea5773aba26a25b7d645c6b2ea08a9f3c0a30e6eecf7f20c135c93d.jpg

Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley
4 years ago

I just realized you’re a mentally ill person. You need to be in an institution. Shunning the drive to reproduce is nothing more than being insane.
Oh, and if muslims take over this country you will be raped to death. No amount of calling me names will change that, you sheltered scornful idiot.

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  Aldous Huxley

Too late… I already reproduced… here I am with my son: https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/dfb9d7125a3e4a915672bb87f109e2ffa8bc0e7e996bc7bc4aa6e50a7d604dc9.jpg

BTW some muslims do believe we were given our trans gender identity by God, and so they don’t hate us, whereas many Christians do.. I don’t see any reason to prefer one over the other… do you?

Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley
4 years ago

Not only are you too stupid to not walk willingly into your own death, I hope it comes sooner than later. I cannot think of a more expedient way to improve the gene pool.

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  Aldous Huxley

I think we should just get rid of sniveling faceless cowards who hide behind fake names and don’t even have the balls to use an avatar on line, but admittedly I can’t think what we could use them for… maybe we could turn them into chicken feed?!

Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley
4 years ago

No, you just want to bait me to destroy my livelihood. You lack any real capabilities, so you try to borrow the power of others for ridiculously purposeless personal vendettas to protect yourself from self-scrutiny. A good dose of nature ignoring your priveledge as a protected class in a society you are destroying out of vanity is exactly what is called for. I intend to watch.

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  Aldous Huxley

How the fuck can I have a “personal vendetta” against an impersonal troll account that I don’t remember ever seeing before?
Patriarchy is a myth and femitardism is a paranoid delusion.

Amazing_Jeff
Amazing_Jeff
4 years ago

Why do drag queens like you lie?

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  Amazing_Jeff

you are just jealous of of my cool trans style, and superior intellect… and so you should be. :o)

Amazing_Jeff
Amazing_Jeff
4 years ago

Dude, you think I’m someone else and you have no proof. Then you think you are a “woman” and you are not. Lying. Did you always dream of looking like a man in bad clothes and a bad wig?

vlad the impaler
vlad the impaler
4 years ago

you couldn’t punch your way out of a wet paper bag big talker.youll be back to washing our socks and making soap you cow.

Angry Young Man
Angry Young Man
4 years ago
Reply to  Aldous Huxley

Thumbed up. Tell it like it is. American women “people” deserve to be berated, if not physically beaten. women-suck.blogspot.com

Angry Young Man
Angry Young Man
4 years ago

Okay, “demonica”. Women or trans-woman (whatever) are evil. women-suck.blogspot.com

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago

Sure thing, “Angry”, but basically it’s ypu pussy chassers that are dumb suckers who fall for it every time. #amIright?

Angry Young Man
Angry Young Man
4 years ago

Not with me. I haven’t fucked any women in over a year, and I’ve had my chances. I would like to, but I’m really not the scum-sucker you are describing, “Demonica”, though I would agree that thirsty simps are enablers. What’s to say about drag whores like you, Demonica? Are you blame free? AmeriKan women are trash.

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago

I haven’t fuct any womyn for IDK like well a long long time… I’m a happy MGTOW transgirl you see.
http://angelica.x10host.com/mgtow.html

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago

why you buy Rooshie boy’s book he explains all the tricks of trade :o)

vlad the impaler
vlad the impaler
4 years ago

we will just have to take the pussy then,i don’t like chasing it anyway.we’ll wait by the watering hole behind a rock and wait for women tobend over to drink ,then we’ll run over there and slip you the meat.

vlad the impaler
vlad the impaler
4 years ago

bitch ,you aint got nobody by the balls you faggot.as long as we can beat your asses ,we will remain in charge,and god help you if society ever collapses,there will be no one to cry rape to.not that anybody would want to rape your manly ass.

Julius Cesar
Julius Cesar
4 years ago

“Women do not deserve even “equal opportunity”. They must be legally
handicapped to account for their social power granted by just having a
vagina and ability to fuck shit up.”

I’ve heard it all before: double standards justified by white privilege, male privilege, which are all obviously bullshit and coming from a place of resentment… but vagina privilege is a new one.

Is this satire? Bravo!

Mikko L.
Mikko L.
2 years ago

That’s a fantasy ideal.

Jimmy is correct, though.

Dick Johnson
Dick Johnson
4 years ago
Reply to  Roosh

Roosh, just read all the comments on this article and all the women who commented (except one, a commenter named “Lauren”) prove your point. Other than that one commenter, they don’t even believe women should be virgins at marriage, and lots of them whined “well Roosh wants women to be virgins but he doesn’t think men should be virgins.” Men can’t even be “virgins.” The term historically was not used to describe men. Have you ever met a woman who valued a man’s “virginity?”

They don’t realize they’re proving your point.

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  Dick Johnson

it seem pretty stupid to want to play “the game” if the girls you play with have to remain virgins… #duh4brains.

Dick Johnson
Dick Johnson
4 years ago

First of all, I happen to be in a relationship and planning to start a family with a girl who was a virgin when I met her.

Second of all, you’re CLEARLY not an anti-feminist. Your comment the same thing I’ve seen from tons of feminist trolls on this site and others.

Dick Johnson
Dick Johnson
4 years ago

LOL. I HOPE you’re a troll. If you’re not a troll, something is SERIOUSLY wrong with you. PLEASE tell me you’re a troll.

Angry Young Man
Angry Young Man
4 years ago

Quit playing drag queen and go back to being a boy. By the way, you have evil eyes. I know them when I see them.

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago

my other persona is Angelica.. and she’s just the sweetest little transgirl a guy could ever meet 💋♡♡♡

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago

pretty trans colors <3

Angry Young Man
Angry Young Man
4 years ago
Reply to  Dick Johnson

No, this “Demonica” person is destined for Hell. Totally void of rationality, this person is mentally unstable.

vlad the impaler
vlad the impaler
4 years ago

youre a dude,youre just a fag or a tranny or something ,you are too vulgar to be female.hence the sissy comment.

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago

you live in a delusion that us girls would be all sweet sugar and spice. You are clearly a delusional pussy licking mangina.

Caggybear
Caggybear
4 years ago
Reply to  Dick Johnson

“I happen to be in a relationship and planning to start a family with a girl who was a virgin when I met her.” or so she claimed ^_^

Dick Johnson
Dick Johnson
4 years ago
Reply to  Caggybear

Why, is that what you tell men in order to keep them around?

Judging by your picture, if you told me you were a virgin, I wouldn’t believe you for a second.

Caggybear
Caggybear
4 years ago
Reply to  Dick Johnson

I’m not the one lying to you about my virginity. Your girlfriend is lol.

Dick Johnson
Dick Johnson
4 years ago
Reply to  Caggybear

You think just because you’re a slut, it means all other women are also sluts? Is that what you tell yourself to feel better about all the cock you’ve taken in your holes?

Caggybear
Caggybear
4 years ago
Reply to  Dick Johnson

You’re just saying this to make yourself feel better for being taken for a sucker. xD unless of course, you’re dating a 13 year old girl, then chances are you’ve been lied to. lmao.

Dick Johnson
Dick Johnson
4 years ago
Reply to  Caggybear

I’ve been dating her since we were both 16. I’m now 24. She’s also not American and comes from a very traditional family (who I know well). I’m gonna show her this and we’re both gonna laugh at you.

Just because you lost your virginity at 13 doesn’t mean all girls do. It’s telling that you haven’t even denied being a slut or taking tons of cock.

Dirk Diggler
Dirk Diggler
4 years ago
Reply to  Dick Johnson

It is also proof of why we are encouraged to ignore their comments. They pollute the discourse and get us off track.

phallocentrist/androcentrist ♂
phallocentrist/androcentrist ♂
4 years ago
Reply to  Roosh

Roosh V, you are not so smart. You can barely even form a decent
sentence live without your computer. The most honorable thing you did
was go on mainstream tv. & state that overweight females ( although I
personally do enjoy chubby females, in addition to other types.) are
inexcusable. ¶ You p.u.a. types are mostly just feminine emulators. You
act like women while proclaiming the “real-man” thing. You understand,
whether subconsciously or full, the nature of females, & you take
advantage of it like traitors to only waste time rather than pointing
the major problems of it, such as one fact that females are
collectivists, so because of that, you adopt feminine tactics to be
approved by female herd mentality. ¶ I have some respect for people like
Mark Rudolf because with that approach, it is just weeding by remaining
completely masculine & not an actor. ¶ You idiots on here need to
read some ‘Sex & Character’ by Otto Weininger. ¶ You p.u.a. idiots
just act like women. ¶ Now go cry to mommy because one isn’t even slightly impressed by your sleazy effeminacy.

phallocentrist/androcentrist ♂
phallocentrist/androcentrist ♂
4 years ago

(Oh, & by the way, the weird paragraph formatting is due to glitchy system, not I. )

Caggybear
Caggybear
4 years ago

you probably copied and pasted that comment from another site.

Martin
Martin
4 years ago
Reply to  GenKittVonKnox

I think Lauren is a far right traditionalist disguised as a moderate anti-feminist.

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago
Reply to  GenKittVonKnox

She makes fun of “nazis”. Typical lolbertrarian.

How is the Libertrarian movement still taken seriously after Ron Paul left is beyond me.

She is a typical media whore, but at least she grabs attention by fighting SJWs, respect for that.

Misanthropist
Misanthropist
4 years ago
Reply to  GenKittVonKnox

Speaking for myself, I get the impression that Lauren Southern is a fairly decent, well intentioned girl. But she is still pretty naive about the full extent to which feminism is a totalitarian, destructive and evil movement. She seems to be on the right track though.

Thorverine
Thorverine
4 years ago
Reply to  Misanthropist

She needs a neomasculine guy to help show her the light…and his cock

General Stalin
General Stalin
4 years ago
Reply to  GenKittVonKnox

She is just an alt-right media personality. A commentator/contributor for an online media outlet. If she was truly “anti-feminist” then she would likely be too busy being a homemaker and taking care of her kids and loving husband to have time to be on camera all the time talking about her political views.

Arminds' copy of Swank
Arminds' copy of Swank
4 years ago
Reply to  General Stalin

Being anti-feminist doesn’t mean being a person from the 50s. It means being against feminism against female superiority and man-hating

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago

You are fighting the symptom not the disease.

Equality with women if folly because men are superior and should be unquestionable rulers of society.

Women do not deserve equality. They as a group belong to the men of their tribe and as an individual should be property of the husband.

If they find it offensive, then let’s see how they will defend themselves from foreign hordes, who will build the roads and do all the dirty jobs and who will pay the taxes.

Male supremacy has been the social order for thousand of years, and is the only true harmonious order.

You are an equality cuck, we are unabashed male supremacists.

This is why we advocate hardcore patriarchy and female servitude and having social obligations forced on them (aka patriarchy).

Without hardcore patriarchy society eventually collapses either from the inside or is conquered by foreign hordes.

PS : LOL at the “50’s” scarecrow. The 50’s were very liberal.

We will reverse the social order by millenia. Read Julius Evola if you want to understand.

Caggybear
Caggybear
4 years ago

lmao ISIS defector detected. Requesting permission to open fire!

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago
Reply to  Caggybear

Lol, as if common sense means being ISIS . I bet Europe of a few centuries ago would have let women with blue hair and tats run around in slut walks talking about “privilege”.

San Fransisco is that way —–>

Caggybear
Caggybear
4 years ago

Bet you have a real boner for burkas lol.

Jack Burton
Jack Burton
4 years ago
Reply to  GenKittVonKnox

Virtually every Western woman is a feminist to some degree.

What Lauren is against is Third Wave feminism, which is a mutated, ugly, “intersectional” monstrosity of feminism.

Lauren is very liberal in many ways, but she’s not a cunt. She’s genuinely sweet which is hard to find among Western women these days. Even women on the racial right are typically really nasty cunts with no respect for anyone but themselves.

Mikko Lopez
Mikko Lopez
2 years ago
Reply to  GenKittVonKnox

Tradthot.

SaltySarge
SaltySarge
2 years ago
Reply to  Mikko Lopez

Agreed. Somethings up there. She gives too many excuses and never follows through.

Zelcorpion
Zelcorpion
4 years ago

Generally true, but with some notable exceptions. Judgybitch for example is one who very consciously decided to settle down with a man while being young and then built a family with him. Also she somewhat distanced herself from the AVfM crowd who have become light feminists and anti-Game:

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

She is still a woman though. I don’t think women bring anything new to the table, but respect to her anyway.

Zelcorpion
Zelcorpion
4 years ago

She has some interesting viewpoints on her blog.

But of course she will never ever represent men on topics like Game, seduction, self-improvement – and she does not make that claim. Those are exclusively male topics.

As for anti-feminism, then women can be strong supporters of that giving praise to male contribuations while promoting feminine virtues and family planning.

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

Good enough.

Odile Lee
Odile Lee
4 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

I dont think a woman has a valid viewpoint in Game, as how could we understand what it IS to be a man, let alone something that does not concern us. Any woman has the choice to say no. Or yes, but then must accept that she does not hold a final say in any relationship. Only a part, and only if this is a mutual thing. To complain about double standards, seems to be connected to a will of power in controlling who makes the rules. To willfilly ignore reality, and older standards of morals ( which gives a clue to how Western societies handled morality towards sex, and why) strikes me as willfully ignorant immaturity. There is a reason novels were written by both men and women( example; Jane Austin, Zola ) to illustrate consequences of poor choices.

White Cis Male
4 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

she looks like eggman lol

Brutus Maximus
Brutus Maximus
4 years ago

They are the equivalent of male feminists. There’s something wrong about it.

EuryaΛe
4 years ago

I’ve said it before and will say it again: Männerbund FTW!

Janet Bloomfield
4 years ago

I say ‘no’ to your first two questions, and ‘yes’ to the last three.

I built my family BEFORE amusing myself on line. Otherwise, all of this is sadly true.

I didn’t include ‘to obey’ in my wedding vows. I wish I had. That’s the killer question: will you vow to ‘obey’ your husband? Most women don’t understand it’s a trade, and one in which they receive the lion’s share of the advantages. I am all for full legal equality – women and men must be under the equal protection of the law, but in my own personal life, I am dependent and subservient to my husband, and that’s the smartest, safest place any woman can be.

How many anti-feminist women understand that? Some, but not many.

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago

I do not believe in equal rights, but I will give you that women should be defended by police just like men.

Female voting rights must be taken away.

AmicusC
AmicusC
4 years ago

most peoples voting rights should be taken away.

Shmalkandik
Shmalkandik
4 years ago

But note h ow female voting rights were achieved in the US. The argument advanced by populists such as William Jennings Bryan was ‘the hand that rocks the cradle should guide the nation’. His argument was that Christian women had a perspective that was both beneficial and formative in building character, and thus their influence in public life should be increased. One hundred years later, we can analyze female influence in public policy and see that it was often detrimental. Examples include the campaigns against alcohol, tobacco, paid sex, and other ‘crusades against vice’.

But, these were all positions supported by leaders of the Christian community. These same leaders were the ones who enlisted in the movement for the Women’s vote, anticipating increased support for their Christian agenda. The new religion that is replacing Christianity has a similar strategy. What hope in defeating this moment is showing that the most dangerous enemy to women in Feminism, much like the greatest killer of workers and peasants was Communism.

I wish to suggest we are in the Brezhnev years of Feminism. There will be a social implosin, much the same way and much the same reason, as there was an economic collapse of the Soviet system. But, I don’t know that is cause for rejoicing. The Soviet system was replaced, after some stumbling about, by Putin’s Slavo-Fascims. This seems to be a genuinely popular movement in Russian, much the same way Mussolini was successful from 1922-1934. Similarly, the defeat of Feminism in the US may not presage a better future. It will be interesting but unpleasant to watch the decline.

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago
Reply to  Shmalkandik

Putin is hardly a slavo-fascist. Any Russian fascist will tell you that. He is a populist like Donald Trump.

lerellen
lerellen
4 years ago

Good luck with that.

Morrison
Morrison
4 years ago

“I say ‘no’ to your first two questions, and ‘yes’ to the last three”

So do us all a favor and fuck off.

Travis
Travis
4 years ago

I don’t necessarily agree with this article. Personally, I’m a fan of the old maxim, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”. I don’t believe in turning away any allies in the fight against feminism. But I’m curious. You say that men and women should be equal in the eyes of the law, but I’ve seen you posting under the hashtag #WhyWomenShouldn’tVote on Twitter. And unfortunately, after seeing the Yes Means Yes laws, the tendency of women to want to curb free speech, Trudeau in Canada, the unbelievably fucked up mess that is Sweden, women in Germany eagerly welcoming the Muslim invasion, etc, it’s a sentiment that I’ve come to share. If we continue to allow women to vote, I think it’s going to accomplish what no other army or nation has been able to. Namely, the end of western civilization. So I’m wondering if you could clarify your position.

Janet Bloomfield
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis

Women should not vote. I don’t see that as politically tenable. Too bad. So if women cannot be prevented from voting, then strict equality is the only other option.

Personally, I think women have to decide: the patriarchy of enlightened white men, or Islam.

No contest, for me.

In my heart, I prefer patriarchy. The rule of white, liberal, enlightened, Western men.

Travis
Travis
4 years ago

I don’t know about the rest of these guys, but that’s good enough for me.

Doctor Mayhem
Doctor Mayhem
4 years ago

Unfortunately, the time for that is past. The only way to set things right will be a very gross overreaction in the other direction. White Boy Sharia.

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago

patriarchy is a myth. Men control power and we control them :o)

rationalize
rationalize
4 years ago

“I can’t help it, I’m just drawn that way.”

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  rationalize

masculine and feminine evolved in symbiosis. Neither is subordinate… the girls get what we want and the boys get what they want… although why they should want it remains a mystery to me ;o)

Doctor Mayhem
Doctor Mayhem
4 years ago

You mean… men control power, and then you try to become a woman in hopes to… I don’t fucking know. Go kill yourself, tranny.

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  Doctor Mayhem

No way I’m having loads of fun being a girl. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UE1B8dHjXUA What about you cissie boy? Are you happy?

Doctor Mayhem
Doctor Mayhem
4 years ago

I think you went to wrong place. hehehehehehe

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  Doctor Mayhem

I think you are a sad bitter old closet tranny and you just jealous of my stylish trans-cool and my cool trans-style. #amIright?

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago

Godammit Roosh.

Trannies are taking over the site.

Adam Levinson
Adam Levinson
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis

Women’s suffrage has been the most tragic joke ever played on Western Civilization. They’ve led us right into the gutter.

Odile Lee
Odile Lee
4 years ago
Reply to  Adam Levinson

The book “Fresh Lipstick” shows how the feminist cannon was selectively edited, towards a stream that negated any man-positive women.

spicynujac
spicynujac
4 years ago

That doesn’t even make sense. How could you believe a woman shouldn’t be a virgin at marriage but that she should submit to rules restricting her behavior? Rules constraining single women’s sexuality would be the first ones made. If you can’t obey your father before marriage, how are you going to obey your husband when your father passes you off to him?

I'm not fat I'm just curvy lol
I'm not fat I'm just curvy lol
4 years ago
Reply to  spicynujac

Well, she’s an undercover feminist. Deep inside her heart, she is.
Because nothing can contradict itself real fast like feminism and feminists.

A masculine man can sense that pretty quick.

Just like you.

Martin
Martin
4 years ago

Janet, I find it disheartening that so many of the “anti-feminist” women arrogantly detest any hint of traditionalism. People need to stop acting like the basic biological relationships of almost all men and women of the past, in almost all countries, was not some tragic, sadistic horror story of exploitation and hatred. But that’s what they conjure if you say the wrong buzzword.

Odile Lee
Odile Lee
4 years ago

A woman’s power comes from submitting to a man- not from trying to emulate one. A wise person advised. True, as known by any good woman taught to respect men. And men’s power, so very different from a woman’s.

Maximus Decimus Meridius

>>> “I am dependent and subservient to my husband”

And then you walk into the voting booth and vote against him… in the single most POLITICAL act that is the act of exercising public POWER in society.

This is why Roosh called out hypocritical “trad” women. If you are voting in the public sphere, affecting public policy, and that vote goes AGAINST your husbands wisdom for the better running of society (i.e. the public sphere affecting ALL citizens)…

Then no amount of “submission” in the home is of any value. You have publicly humiliated the very man you have sworn “to obey” in your wedding vows…

Oh wait… you did not include those vows… and still want the right to vote.

Can you see now WHY you will be LOSING the vote?

If you are under the PROTECTION of your husband… and only MEN are allowed to vote… you are DE FACTO under the full legal protection of men FOR YOUR BEST INTERESTS. You do not need to be “equal” to be under men’s protection, but you do need to submit if you wish to continue to receive it.

You can’t be “equal” if you want to be a partner.

Try dancing with a woman who insists she can EQUALLY lead as well as HE can. No one dances… nothing but fights.

Either western women learn to ACCEPT their submissive role… or be replaced by Muslim women who currently do and are out reproducing them 6 to 1.

Don’t hate the message or the messenger.

Davis M.J. Aurini
4 years ago

I’m just going to leave this here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAb1gKl7K_M

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Hi, fellow! You were going well, but you failed here (quoting and commenting):
“These anti-feminist females are not traditional and not even conservative.”
I myself am so, though you are not addressing your text to me. Is it needed to be a Puritan to be anti-Feminist? I will come back to this point.
“You can ask them these questions to reveal where their true sympathies lie:
“‘Are you against homosexual marriage?'”
YES!
“Do you believe its ideal for a woman to remain a virgin until she gets married?”
Absolutely no!
“Do you believe that its best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home mother?”
YES! Or, at least, a mother who is always aside them.
“Do you believe a woman’s choices should be constrained by her husband, tribe, or church with the intention of doing what’s best for her?”
Absolutely no!
“Do you believe it’s wrong for a young girl to find herself by traveling around the world and trying new experiences?”
No!
Now, I will answer that question. I wrote 2015 March “Women Against Feminism and Feminism against them – part 4: twenty years of silence”:
http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com.br/2015/03/women-against-feminism-and-feminism.html. When you visit my blog, you will see two things: 1) lots of porn, not only because my male readers will enjoy, it’s also because is unfair and immoral to want them ashamed of enjoying it; 2) I have this ANTIFEMINIST blog since 2006, being an Atheist, Anarchist and pro-licentiousness girl. Ah, see what traditional Evangelical women made, together with Gail Dines, 2013, and what I said that epoch: http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com.br/2013/12/the-puritan-feminism-episode-9-some.html

Lunostrelki
Lunostrelki
4 years ago

You support hypergamy, a key point of modern feminism and even Marxism, which calls for the “community (i.e. communal use) of women.” That’s what Roosh is getting at in his article.

Roosh
4 years ago
Reply to  Lunostrelki

I’m glad she is able to provide instant proof of my argument.

Morrison
Morrison
4 years ago
Reply to  Roosh

“I’m glad she is able to provide instant proof of my argument”

Those are excellent questions that provide a perfrct litmus test.

Abigail Pereira Aranha
Reply to  Lunostrelki

Fuck! It was refuted in Communist Manifesto, 1848! Karl Marx destroyed anti-Socialists like you more than 160 years ago! Incidentally, how can a movement who defend pink buses and pink trains support hypergamy? And why, to fight against sex, you are together with the ugly fat Feminist lesbian Gail Dines? This chat of angry false moralist virgins will only help their true enemy.

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago

Wait what ? Are you saying Karl Marx was right ?

South American socialist feminists. Surprise surprise. Did you not get full of it yet in Brazil ? Socialism has worked great on the continent up till now, hasn’t it ? lol.

We do not fight against sex, like lesbians. We fight for sex in the confines of a heterosexual monogamous context, preferably for the goal of creating as many children as possible. We are all pro-monogamous sex.

“Angry virgins” LOL no.

“True enemy” – Please enlighten me, who is it ? Lesbian dykes are not my enemy. They are a symptom. They are a result of a decadent hyper-atomized neo-liberal society. The true enemies of man are the elites who empower women at the expense of men as well as gynocentric attitudes overall. Fighting dykes and other assorted schyzos is fighting a useful idiot of a system and not the system itself.

Abigail Pereira Aranha

“We do not fight against sex (…). We fight for sex in the confines of a heterosexual monogamous context, preferably for the goal of creating as many children as possible.” It sounds like “we don’t forbid free traffic in this country, but you can’t leave your town”.
You skipped exactly the parts about law enforcement of the worst of Feminism, including the criminalization of prostitution and pornography defended by Gail Dines. Interesting! What is the true enemy, you ask me? What about Socialism, in which is the Feminism?
That’s OK you defend Conservatism, like the most of my friends in Facebook do, but “South American socialist feminist” is a [email protected]$%

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago

I also like how when confronted with views that oppose you , you result to calling your opposition angry virgins. Shaming men for not towing the line, that’s so not feminist.

Your anti-feminism kind is only inches away from 3rd wave feminism.

I will give you that, I would rather support your kind of anti-feminism as at least it does not pathologize male sexuality and is not full-blown misandry, but that is not saying much.

Odile Lee
Odile Lee
4 years ago
Reply to  Lunostrelki

Hypergamy cannot exist in a supportable society.Cultures in history created laws around sex, because of this. Am I correct?

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago

We are radical traditionalists, you are just a liberal who hates extreme liberals.

I have nothing against liberals per se. But the times when we could afford licentiousness and sexual freedom are over. Muslims are taking over Europe and if we do not concentrate on monogamous relationships, high breeding rates and moral conservativism we will lose to muslims who have a much more efficient social order, although it has less freedoms.

I know it sucks, but party is over. We will take away your voting rights and right to be a proud slut. Women will be property of husbands and there will be no free divorce. Also women will be married from their teens, what do you anti-feminists have to say about that ?

splooge
splooge
4 years ago

interesting how americans obsess about the muslims, but forget their mexicans. Arent the largest gangs in usa right now the latino gangs

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago
Reply to  splooge

I’m european.

On a global scale muslims matter more because they blow themselves up and shit. Mexicans just sell drugs, they are easy to deal with. Muslims are a bigger issue.

ochizuro
4 years ago

Mexican here. I will have to say that mostly all the people who migrate to the states from my country are from the poorest and not so well educated areas of the country ( predictable), but I will like to say there is a strong difference between the problem of the US with the hispanic population and the Muslims in Europe. It is Islam. People from hispanic backgrounds will integrate eventually to society if they are given the chance, muslism (besides from turkish ones) will not.

You may ask why. Well, muslims lack of nacionalism is maybe the biggest problem in their culture I think, maybe thats why the turkish is kind of an exception.

OrthodoxChristian
OrthodoxChristian
4 years ago
Reply to  splooge

“interesting how americans obsess about the muslims, but forget their mexicans. Arent the largest gangs in usa right now the latino gangs”

Where would 99.99% of non Muslims prefer to live?

Mexico? Or pretty much anywhere dominated by Islam?

questioningall1 .
questioningall1 .
4 years ago

The day will come in the US, when women embrace Purdah con gusto, and hate anyone who objects. But it won’t come from the actions of conservatives, or neomasculinity. The desire to escape society will come from the left.

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago

Please explain.

OrthodoxChristian
OrthodoxChristian
4 years ago

“Please explain.”

I’m guessing he might be thinking along these lines.

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-speed-of-progressivism.html

What was the progressive pose yesterday may be an unacceptably reactionary position tomorrow. The French Revolution and the Communist Revolution and the Cultural Revolution spent a lot of time purging comrades who had failed to recognize that the new progressive position had been adopted tomorrow and had become reality yesterday and was subject to a loyalty oath today.

[..]

The Democrats borrowed their interest in black civil rights from the left, which was only working with urban minorities because it was hoping to include them in its revolutionary coalition of coal miners and lettuce pickers who would help overthrow the reactionary capitalist American Dream and replace it with a bunch of people shouting slogans and shooting each other. These days the NAACP does not look like a good bet for overthrowing America and the favorite progressive minority du jour actually keeps black slaves and hangs homosexuals.

Muslims have currently trumped blacks and gays, not to mention every other group, on the crush list of the left. And the Muslim world is one of the few places that still has slaves and kills black people in large numbers, whether it’s in the Sudan or the newly liberated Muslim utopia of Libya. The day may come when the Democratic Party and its leftist hag riders decide that slavery was progressive after all and that all men should have the right to own slaves. And then this new policy position will immediately travel backward in time and loyal comrades will turn to the little red books of DailyKos, Think Progress, the Center for American Progress and ProgressProgressProgress to learn the new official position they are obligated to learn and abide by.

That notion may seem ridiculous, but so would the idea that the party of bra burning would become the party of the hijab. Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, said Ralph Waldo Emerson. To be a true progressive, you cannot afford to be small-minded. Every idea, value and belief is waiting to be demolished and replace by a newer more progressive idea. And if that newer more progressive idea actually seems backward, that’s okay, because progressive ideas are like buses, if you wait around long enough they’ll come right back to where they were.

Progressivism is chaos. It is a force that is constantly destroying old things to make way for new things and with so much destruction, it can’t be expected to tell the new old things and the old new things apart. Progressivism is a contrary talker, a teenager who knows everything, it doesn’t know a whole lot, but it knows that everything you know is wrong. And then off it goes in its retro clothes to shock all the adults with gay marriage, euthanasia clinics and then maybe slavery.

[…]

Under the multicultural umbrella, Muslims terrorize Sikhs and Africans in London, and gays in New York, which like Boston and Chicago is too good for a Chick-A-Fil, but not too good for a Ground Zero Mosque or a sitdown with Calypso Louie Farrakhan and his Fruits of Islam. The burka has gone from a symbol of oppression to a symbol of liberation. Leftist activists smash Jewish stores AND WHEN THE TIME COMES WILL THROW ACID IN THE FACE OF FEMALE TEACHERS in solidarity with their Taliban brothers.

questioningall1 .
questioningall1 .
4 years ago

This should not be too difficult. Both men and women are created in the image of God. Different aspects of God. but in the image of God all of the same. Watch children play. Boys want to be mighty heroes in their play. Girls want to be queens and princesses in need of rescue. Look at every single fairy tale. That is the roles of our most cherished stories. Our own unique creation both male and female is exactly what Progressives are hell-bent (pun intended) on driving out of existence. It doesn’t require a whole lot of math to figure out what the end result of that will be for women.

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Here, there are many things in which you are right. But you traditionalists are divorced to reality and you have been defeated continuously for 50 years only after Second Wave of Feminism, because you only care about promoting your myths. Are you really thinking Islam can conquer the developed world AND withstand? If a cancer reaches the brain of its host, the entire body does not become cancer, the body dies and the cancer dies with it. So is Islamism. You are thinking that Muslims’ sons raised in Europe and United States will be Muslims too, meanwhile Feminism is entering, at least, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Incidentally, was not Islam your ally against LGBT-Feminism 10 years ago?
If you did not understand what I said: do you think CIA and billionaires in developed world invested in Middle East to end it up having illiterate serial-killers in front of their own homes?

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago

“There are many things in which you are right”. – pretty much everything

“You traditionalists are divorced from reality” – not really, we are the realest around here

“You have been defeated continuously for the last 50 years ” – so ? This does not make us less right. And we have been losing for way longer. Ever since fascists lost the war, and before that monarchies were replaced by republics and before that we had the classic middle ages taken over by the Renaissance. But it is a cycle. Just like Rome went from kings -> republic -> Caesar -> fall. We are going : kings -> republic -> fascism -> mass democracy -> collapse. It is a cycle. Your scope is too small. We think big. A social collapse is bound to happen this century, caused by the failure of debt-based economies and mass migration. Your social order of free sex and socialism is just a temporary silence before the storm.

“Do you think Islam can survive modernization ? ” – So far it has. In fact Islam went the opposite way of modernization. Iran used to be liberal in the 70’s , so did Egypt. And now what ? Even Turkey is becoming radicalized. Also , I don’t care if they become modernized in the end. By that time they will manage to conquer Europe and turn it into a caliphate. So we will have a progressive caliphate like Sweden, but a caliphate nonetheless.

“Was not Islam your ally against LGBT ? ”

No, Islam has never been our ally. Muslims are enemies to Europeans all around the world. We might agree on some things, like the fact that you must control women, shun gays and never trust Jews, but that’s as far as it goes. Not to mention we are not as radical. At least for now.

“Do you think CIA invested in the middle East to have serial killers in front of their homes ? ”

US and all of it’s agencies are vassals of Israel and globalists. They do not care of the consequences that affect 90% of Europeans and Americans. For all they know the rest of the world can burn as long as they, and they alone, prosper.

Davis M.J. Aurini
4 years ago

The banner on her blog is literally the venus symbol getting gang banged. XD

Abigail Pereira Aranha

Thank you! I thought I drawed it bad. And, yeah, this authoress based it in her real stories, hehehehe.

Adam Levinson
Adam Levinson
4 years ago

And unfortunately this is all we will get from female “anti-feminists”.
Sluts looking for a different brand of rationalization hamster.

“pro-licentiousness girl.” Lolz. That means slut, right?

Abigail Pereira Aranha
Reply to  Adam Levinson

No, I am not a “slut”. Sluts are sometimes crazies, but sluts are always women who valuate the worst men, even when they had one or two in their whole life. I am licentious, but I am responsible. After all, a gangbang requires a selection of kind boys.

Ace FAce
Ace FAce
4 years ago

Just a Question Roosh, what dixies think about you ?

advancedatheist
advancedatheist
4 years ago

Might as well post my current rant here: If you follow Ayn Rand cultism, you might have heard about the Atlas Society’s new CEO, a childless single woman pushing 50 named Jennifer Anju Grossman.

She published this drivel as one of her first acts as the Atlas Society’s leader:

Date the Atlas, Not the Shrug

http://atlassociety.org/commentary/commentary-blog/5956-date-the-atlas-not-the-shrug

I laughed when I read this; it reads like a blog post about dating written by a teenage girl. And it also says a lot about how Rand cultism promotes female immaturity and degeneracy, because many female Objectivists like Grossman, following the horrible examples shown in Rand’s novels, seek sexual fulfillment in a futile quest for “perfect” men, while they blow their only opportunity to marry at their peak fertility and start families. Grossman herself writes about her disappointing dating experiences in her 40’s, at an age when women traditionally started to welcome their grandchildren into the world.

This shows the complete and utter bullshit in Rand propaganda that her philosophy promotes human “flourishing,” when its instantiation in people’s lives fails to do so on the most basic biological level, namely, replenishing human life in healthy patriarchal families.

And this also explains this creepy practice where Rand cultists have to keep trying to recruit teenagers from other people’s families into their cult by pushing Rand’s novels into teens’ hands, to counter Rand obsessives’ natural attrition: They don’t produce their own teenagers organically.

By contrast, traditional religious families simply don’t have this problem. Their adults do the sensible thing of replenishing their ranks with their own descendants.

Cecil J
Cecil J
4 years ago

The global Communist-Zionist NWO plantation requires both revolution and counter revolution as a mechanism of the Hegelian dialectic to dupe the masses. Rand et al were no saviors of Western civilization they were just a Zionist ran counter revolution smoke screen. We haven’t ever really seen classical liberal capitalism in the West since Andrew Jacksons battles with the Rothschild bankers.

Against Modernity
4 years ago

I don’t think there’s any problem with traveling around the world and trying new experiences for anyone (male or female) under 25. Even the hyper-traditional Amish have their “Rumspringa”, where young adults are encouraged to explore the world before they settle down.

Still, beyond that you do raise several valid points.

duh
duh
4 years ago

In this context, “exploring the world” really means “taking kilometers of exotic cock.”

More prior partners == more failed marriages == more fucked up kids and a progressively degraded society. It’s not innocent fun.

duh
duh
4 years ago
Reply to  duh

By the way, like Roosh says, try to find a female “anti-feminist” who agrees with that last line, even in principle.

I guarantee your average “conservative” millennial/x/boomer chick will insta-meltdown. Should you bother to inquire, you can expect an outpouring of narcissistic rage, idiotic rationalizations and personal invective in response. No refutation.

Other writers have termed this aversion to traditional moral structure “preserving the feminine imperative.” The usual follow-on squid-inking: “rebuilding the mound.” I prefer “idiotic hamstering.”

Remember, these people vote. They will decide the fate of your civilization.

DM
DM
4 years ago

Ideological purity has been the death of many good movements. The reason being sub groups tend to form that claim a finer level of purity. Humans need a bit more latitude in regard to their Ideological clockwork. Remember you are creating a culture not platonic solids.

ng85
ng85
4 years ago

Spoiler alert about Shoe0nhead: She’s actually Boxxy, a well-known attention whore who was famous on 4chan years ago. I guess the well of admirers ran dry over there so she had to try a new approach to get attention.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yavx9yxTrsw

Marshallaw
4 years ago
Reply to  ng85

She doesn’t do drugs? Or ADD? This bird is batshit fucking crazy…..I think I saw her in a gangbang vid…..10 guys…. damn that porn!!!!

AV
AV
4 years ago
Reply to  ng85

Not Shoe0nHead. This is ShoeOnHead’s parody of Boxxy. It’s better in lots of ways.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyclUE2RC8k

Other than that, I agree with Roosh that the anti-feminist women should be taken with a grain of salt.

ng85
ng85
4 years ago
Reply to  AV

I just did a Google search and I’m finding so many varying consensus’s on Shoe0nhead’s identity. I was always under the impression she’s an adult Boxxy.

AV
AV
4 years ago
Reply to  ng85

Nothing like a good internet mystery! I watched the vids side-by-side in increments — both are totally hilarious imo — and I think that their hands are different and that Boxxy has a heavier skeletal structure than Shoe0nHead. While they both look very very similar, if I had to bet (no more than ten-bucks)… I’d bet that they are two different people.

No one important
No one important
4 years ago
Reply to  ng85

She looks incredible young in this video. While I am by no means a fan of this girl, with her blocking me on Twitter for commenting negatively on some of her views, I cannot help but think you are being unnecesarily harsh on her. None of us are the same person at 40 as we were at 20. It is a journey. You cannot expect the same level of maturity from people whatever their age is. I have to admit that if I meet the 20-years-old-me now, I would think he is an idiot and would not like him too much. For this reason, I am always compassionate when judging on young people’s characters, because they are just the project of the person they could get to be. And predicting they will turn out this or that way (either positive or negative) in the next years is just arrogant on us.

Shoe is an interesting Internet celebrity. I do not care what she was in the past or what she will be in the future, I just care about the content she produces now, as entertainer. Lets judge that content rather than the person that creates it. So who cares about if she had arabic-looking lovers or not. I am not going to marry her, that information is of no consequence to me. If she was some pure virgin, that would not change in the least what I think of the content she creates, either. If she is pro-gay marriage, as long as she is not making videos about the importance of gay rights, I do not really care. She could even think Hitler did nothing wrong, because unless what is inside of her mind surfaces on her videos, I am not going to comment on it.

And what about the guys that fawn about her, praising her as if she was some kind of perfect Goddess that can do no wrong. While we are being critical at young women that get drunk on attention, we cannot ignore the guys that are intoxicating them with blind praise and feeding their egos. That can only lead to their stunted growth as persons. If women in our society are the way they are, I think the real reason for it has been the failure of men in our society to act like men and hold them back.

Davis M.J. Aurini
4 years ago

She intentionally pulled an Anita Sarkeesian on me; insulted me on twitter, then when I told her to fuck off she deleted the initial tweet, and behaved as if I were harassing her.

There’s some forgiveness for youthful idiocy, but this girl’s working with some low-quality raw material.

Nightwatch20
Nightwatch20
4 years ago
Reply to  ng85

I Knew it. Shoe doesn’t just resmeble her but happens to have the same mannerisms.

TSK
TSK
4 years ago

Women will always cause falter among men and become a source of nuisance and trouble. It has always been this way and will always be. If you want to have a great male brotherhood bonding, do NOT include females whatsoever.

If you want to fuck her with your buddies or even have three way gangbang, then that’s your prerogative but women do NOT belong in men’s movement. Their best place is at home in the kitchen, taking care of your kids and (if she is not married) then her best place should be under the guidance of her father or male relative.

They will always cause some sort of drama, arouse jealousy and competition among men and they don’t really give a shit about men’s issue and will even mock you secretly or even outright for your (what they perceive) weaknesses.

Since women are also void of any logical conversation, your best bet is to rather have a discussion with a brick wall.

Maximus Decimus Meridius
Reply to  TSK

>> “If you want to have a great male brotherhood bonding, do NOT include females whatsoever.”

>> “They will always cause some sort of drama, arouse jealousy and
competition among men and they don’t really give a shit about men’s
issue and will even mock you secretly or even outright for your (what
they perceive) weaknesses.”

You know… when you really boil it down… THIS is ALSO why heterosexual men do not trust homosexuals. You got “guys” on the “team”… who are fucking each other. Thus, they are not on the team, but out for themselves or to protect their mate or secure power/authority “as a couple”.

From the Italian to the Russian mafia… none of them trust homos. You can’t trust another man who can only think with his dick… and if that dick is going into another man?

TSK
TSK
2 years ago

Well what are the chances that a homosexual will run into a Mafia or even want to join one? Or if I can ask the question other way around. What are the chances that the Mafia would even want to hire homosexuals? I would think that homosexuals would be smart enough to avoid Mafia (if they can recognize one or anyhow)…

Maximus Decimus Meridius
Reply to  TSK

I don’t know. It is just something I have picked up that seems to be a theme in that sphere of life. Where crime is a FAMILY business. If you have not watched Eastern Promises (movie) with Viggo Moertensen (Yes, Aragorn!)… give it a look. Lots of in depth research done on Russian mafia and Viggo is fanatical about his characters. It addressses this theme because… there seems to be something about CRIME and homosexuality that is intimately linked. When the psychopath/fag that was Kinsey wrote the book that began America’s decline into degeneracy… ALL of his research for the sexual life/drives of the “average” adult male… were from PRISON INMATES… most of which are (as don’t drop the soap is caution, not a joke)… homosexual and perverted in nature. Remember Denzel & Ethan in Training Day… and the scene where the Mexican gang was going to take Ethan out and threatening him with sodomy (push it – shit – in real good). You CAN’T trust these people. And if crime is a FAMILY business… you DOUBLY can’t trust these people. So… it is not a matter of them avoiding the mafia… there nature seems bent on destruction, which the criminal world attracts. Just look at the reaction to Trump, a family man. Which side of politics in America is TRULY and WHOLLY corrupt? It ain’t the conservative side, and it sure as hell ain’t the TRUMP MAGA side. Also… those “conservatives” who put on the mask and then get caught having gay sex (recent American politician)… well… where is the corruption, once again? In the OLD GUARD Republicans which… you guessed it… homos.

Good lord. I wonder how long I will even have DISQUS comments once someone reports me.

TSK
TSK
2 years ago

Homosexuality is disgusting and I never understand how a Man can get turned on or even have thought of sticking his penis into another man’s anus or have any arousal feelings of having his cornhole violated by another male. Like how can they even get it up for that… seems like a mystery to me.

Some people told me that it is done for (showcase of male dominance, need for ‘hierarchy’, humiliation and for power). Not sure about other countries prison but American prison is full of male to male rape (including interracial rape as well)…

If someone reports you for your comment, then that person is probably a faggot himself.

Your comments are gold.

Gwen Jackson
Gwen Jackson
4 years ago

I’m a woman and I see feminism for the vile evil that it is. I agree that a woman is not truly an anti-feminist unless she embraces traditional values and the necessity of patriarchy in order to have a healthy family and society. Oh, and I would add that no woman is truly an anti-feminist unless she agrees that female suffrage was a horrible idea.

Zelcorpion
Zelcorpion
4 years ago
Reply to  Gwen Jackson

Men and women are a team – building society together. Men create and maintain most of human creation, while women make it all worthwhile and creating the next generation. Human genders can never be looked upon apart and have to exist in a balance that serves the needs of both. Stable families led by husbands in marriage was found to be the most civilization-beneficial bond.

Feminism was designed to destroy that bond and drive a wedge between men and women – it was never meant to “liberate” women. And it was highly successful in that.

OrthodoxChristian
OrthodoxChristian
4 years ago
Reply to  Zelcorpion

“Human genders can never be looked upon apart and have to exist in a balance that serves the needs of both.”

Sex is the “classification of living things as male or female,
according to their reproductive organs and functions assigned by chromosomal complement.” (American Medical Association Manual of Style)

Gender is the grouping (in various languages) of nouns, pronouns, and verbs as masculine, feminine, or neutral.

Read the exchange between Alice and Humpty Dumpty below.

Replace “glory” with “gender.”

Replace “a nice knock-down argument” with “a person’s self-representation as man or woman, or how that person is responded to by social institutions on the basis of the person’s gender presentation.”

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f0/Humpty_Dumpty_Tenniel.jpg/800px-Humpty_Dumpty_Tenniel.jpg

“I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory,’ ” Alice said.

Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!’ ”

“But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected.

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”

“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”

“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”

PrivacyInA9M80
PrivacyInA9M80
4 years ago

Well said.

Tali
Tali
4 years ago

I think that one problem with your suggestion is that the type of women that you’re looking for are non combative, “if you can’t say something nice …” type, and the questions you listed require them to pass negative judgement on others. A true sweet woman would be like, these are the choices I make myself, but I don’t judge others who make other choices. At least I suspect that is the case.

I also think that this anti-feminist movement is good news, not because these are the women you want, but because young impressionable women would be increasingly exposed to this attitude, and might end up choosing that over feminism (most normal women want to have babies and be with them, so it really shouldn’t be such a hard sell).

Anyway, look for a woman who respect you, listen to what you say and actually try to understand where you’re coming from. Ideally you should be able to give her the same courtesy. I think this would work better than stock questions with stock answers.

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago
Reply to  Tali

If you have to rely on luck to find a quality woman, that means society is wrong. There should be no “right types”. All types should be right.

Good women should be the standard, not rare gems. The opinion of any particular woman does not matter.

We must create a legal system that removes a woman’s ability to fuck things up.

Meaning no voting rights, free divorce or welfare.

We are not here to discuss things with women but to force them to comply with our rules.

That said a woman who naturally follows this set-up without being forced by society is worthy of respect.

Odile Lee
Odile Lee
4 years ago

A woman who was taught respect for men, by her father-does not need to be forced.

SomeRandomFellow
SomeRandomFellow
4 years ago

Bravo Roosh.

Keep the hoes in line. The Classical Liberal fags can go cry tears in a corner.

We do not believe in “equal rights”. Only hardcore patriarchy.

No female voting rights.
No female freedom to act against her own tribe.
No freedom to be lazy, foul-mouthed and a slut.

Bring’em hell Roosh. I am so tired of these half-baked jokers like Sarcuck of Mossad, claiming to fight feminism while calling nationalists right-wing SJWs, claiming Paki rape gangs are a “british problem”, claiming women should vote and faggots should be allowed to prance in the streets.

Patriarchy or bust.

Doctor Mayhem
Doctor Mayhem
4 years ago

Patriarchy? Not enough. White Boy Sharia, now! Women’s lib has done so much wrong that only full, brutal, ruthless suppression will be able to set things right.

Maximus Decimus Meridius
Reply to  Doctor Mayhem

As I have always warned… the matriarchy that was the age of the goddess, was slowly supplanted by Zeus and his gang of “unreasonable” men. Then came Rome, and the hammer came down even harder regarding women’s freedoms and especially tolerance of homosexuality (the Greeks were too close to the goddess, the Romans put more distance from the practices of The Greeks). Then Rome collapsed… and instead of a return to pagan goddess “free love”, we got… Christianity… the singular best formulation and crystallization of patriarchy within a goddess (virgin Mary) structure to date. All these feminists and liberals who are “going to war” against the patriarchy and The West… have not learned the lessons of history. When The West truly and completely collapses this time round… the PATRIARCHY that will replace it… will make Christian Rome in the dark ages like like a stroll for ice cream at Coney Island. It is now just a matter of the patriarchal flavour that wins out – a renewed western… or an eastern one (Islam). Of course, women, feminists and homos will fight it to the bitter end, but stupid is as stupid does.

John
John
3 years ago

Recently Sargoy has been moving closer to the right, but he still entertains retarded leftist ideals such as the Justice Democrats Committeee, but soon he will lose hope and give up on his socialist utopia.

NonCanadien
NonCanadien
4 years ago

Neomasculinity? WHAT neomasculinity?;)
Oh, those cowards and behind the screen warriors who ran scared with their tails between their legs as soon as they faced some possible protests during the World Neomasculinity Day or whatever it was called?;)
It ain’t no masculinity, folks;)

Morrison
Morrison
4 years ago

“While they may come across as genuine, these female infiltrators are mostly attention whoring to a male audience. They don’t want to change the world—they just want you to look at them”

True. And also some want to hijack the awakening of men to turn it around; a pace and lead manuver straight NLP. I never trust female anti-feminists.

Inês de Castro
Inês de Castro
2 years ago
Reply to  Morrison

A women’s appearance is still the ultimate power. So now we are addicted to using it every chance we get!
I have no facebook and GPLUS anymore but two years ago it was a like needing a fix and I had to post more and more photos! For a women it is like drugs I imagine you get this high and it feels incredible. I am just being honest here. Once again even here I post a photo on my avatar hopefully I will not go down that road again but truly this selfie nonsense it is an addiction. The attention is thrilling that is all I know.

Ever noticed how highly successful women but not that great looking always absolutely hate the pretty girl with less intellectual aspirations or accomplishments to her name?

Why?

Our appearance equals POWER. It always has and nothing will ever change that.
Why does Oprah insist on putting herself as the “covergirl” of her own magazines because of branding?

Give me a break! She too loves being looked at. We thrive and get off on being looked at and that includes me too!
It is so dumb…..

Unless the world goes through some major WW3 catastrophe and all technology is lost in the process sorry to say guys but I see this never stopping and we are doomed!

Jordan
Jordan
4 years ago

That’s called the Chameleon Sydrome, how Revlawrence Shannon describes it in The Predatory Female:

Skeptic At Heart
Skeptic At Heart
4 years ago
Reply to  Jordan

Not in my case. I wouldn’t convert to Judaism or to Anarcho Capitalism for my previous loves so I lost them. But I was red pilled by the man I’m now in love with. If any of you can succeed at it, she’s think you’re a hero. I was already really into him before the red pill, but after that he’s my hero, so swoon. Standing up to crazy feminists to actually protect women and our society, in the long run, from the political effects of women, who apparently like to destroy societies. Especially when you let us all get programmed. So mean, they said feminism was about female empowerment, not global elite empowerment. I hate memes that use our desire to be good to actually make us do bad, argh, humans and their dangerous memes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOMkl3ApTK0

splooge
splooge
4 years ago

think the reason why shoeonhead is hiding her arabian boyfriend because it kills a good chunk of her viewership since many of them are from the alt-right or white nationalist movement and dont want to be reminded that they are cucks.
Though i think give it time, he could get her to submit. Tsarniov did it and he seems masculine as well.

splooge
splooge
4 years ago

Think at the most genuine these ant-feminists gets is if OTHER women had to live by those questions like a tradition woman while she herself gets to live the hedonistic lifestyle.
After all they know a stable new generation has to be born. And she knows her lifestyle cannot be the norm. Its not sustainable.
Much can be said here in PUA, if everyones fucking around, no new generation would come in since no one wants to marry and everyone goes degenerate.

Doctor Mayhem
Doctor Mayhem
4 years ago

Hell, one could even say the same in regards to just about all of the women who infiltrate the Alt-Right as well. You see all of these dumpster fires, particularly the ones who embrace paganism, advocating the exact same bullshit as any other feminist whore. The only exceptions would be the ones Roosh pointed out: Traditional housewives. Even then, one has to ask what the fuck a housewife is doing on Twitter, whoring for attention.

Never let women have a voice in any movement. They will always distract from real goals.

Cecil J
Cecil J
4 years ago

Women lie and love liars. That’s all game really is- tell the monkey some lies and show it some shiny bullshit so you can squirt in its hole.

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago

I disagree with you. Different people have different reasons for being anti feminist. My concern is with the way feminism disparages femininity: I don’t want to be shamed for failing to compete with men in masculine pursuits. I like being a girl… and that’s final. 😛

GoingSane
4 years ago

” feminism disparages femininity: I don’t want to be shamed for failing
to compete with men in masculine pursuits. I like being a girl… and
that’s final.”

Worthy both of note and of upvote.

BlueBot22
BlueBot22
4 years ago
Reply to  GoingSane

It would be if it wasn’t a man saying it.

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  BlueBot22

I’m a girl… a trans girl… we are real women. I like the man to be in charge then I can surrender to him and trust him :o)

Dick Johnson
Dick Johnson
4 years ago

what are your answers to Roosh’s 5 questions?

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  Dick Johnson

Q: “Are you against homosexual marriage?”
A: Yes, I am against ALL marriage. It is an anachronism that at one time served the purpose of providing a stable environment for raising children. Today it is just a scam for the divorce industry.

Q: “Do you believe its ideal for a woman to remain a virgin until she gets married?”
A: I don’t believe in marriage, however I do believe she should not have unprotected sex unless BOTH her and her partner are willing to take joint responsibility for a child.

Q: “Do you believe that its best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home mother?”
A: I believe they should be raised by both parents and not farmed out to “early learning” schemes.

Q: “Do you believe a woman’s choices should be constrained by her
husband, tribe, or church with the intention of doing what’s best for
her?”
A: No… I believe women have just as much right to fuck up their own lives as men do.

Q: “Do you believe it’s wrong for a young girl to find herself by traveling around the world and trying new experiences?”
A: I think she might need some guidance and to have a clear idea of what the dangers might be.

p.s. I think they are leading question with the intention of getting a ‘No’ reply even though the intent of my reply would have similar impact to a conservative’s ‘yes’.

Dick Johnson
Dick Johnson
4 years ago

You did not give a straight answer to any of the questions. Obviously Roosh was talking about true marriage and not today’s “marriage.” Nice try, though.

Here, I re-wrote the questions to make it easier for you to give straight answers:

Please answer “yes” or “no” to every question. Feel free to
give an explanation afterwards.

1. Do you think homosexuality is wrong and should not be encouraged by society? YES OR NO?

2. Do you think it is best for a woman to remain a virgin until she meets the future father of her children? YES OR NO?

3. Do you believe it is best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home mother? YES OR NO? (This is not a question about if you believe in public schooling, or whether the child should be raised by both parents).

4. Obviously, women have just as much of a right to fuck up their own lives as men have. Do you not believe a woman’s family and community have a responsibility to guide her (forcibly if necessary) away from making these mistakes?

4b. Do you understand that a man can (almost) always recover from his mistakes life, but that if a woman makes the mistake of sleeping with the wrong man, this is IRREVERSIBLE? Do you not believe her family and community need to prevent her from making this mistake?

5. Do you believe it is WRONG for a young girl to “find herself” by traveling around the world and trying new “experiences” (read: men)? YES OR NO? (the question is not whether you think she should be warned about potential consequences).

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  Dick Johnson

Those are still leading questions and I’ll explain why with my answers:

1. Do you think homosexuality is wrong and should not be encouraged by society? YES OR NO?
A: NO. It’s something the individual has no control over, and society is unable to change a person’s sexuality so encouraging is just as pointless as discouraging it.

2. Do you think it is best for a woman to remain a virgin until she meets the future father of her children? YES OR NO?
A: No, she can use contraceptives and have lots of fun together with men playing ‘the Game’.

3. Do you believe it is best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home
mother? YES OR NO?
A: NO I think they need their father to be involved in raising them too.

4. Obviously, women have just as much of a right to fuck
up their own lives as men have. Do you not believe a woman’s family
and community have a responsibility to guide her (forcibly if necessary)
away from making these mistakes?
A: No more so than guiding a young man. The question should not be gender specific.

4b. Do you understand that a man
can (almost) always recover from his mistakes life, but that if a woman
makes the mistake of sleeping with the wrong man, this is IRREVERSIBLE?
Do you not believe her family and community need to prevent her from
making this mistake?
A: Bull Shit… go ask any MGTOW how sleeping with the wrong cunt has fuct up his life real good.

5. Do you believe it is WRONG for a young
girl to “find herself” by traveling around the world and trying new
“experiences” (read: men)? YES OR NO? (the question is not whether you
think she should be warned about potential consequences).
A: No I think she has a right to go seek her fame and fortune and doesn’t need some white knight mangina to infantilize her.

There happy now… you got 6 straight No’s to 5 questions and I’m still an anti-feminist. ^_^

Dick Johnson
Dick Johnson
4 years ago

exactly, you’re still an “anti-feminist,” proving Roosh’s point about female anti-feminists

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  Dick Johnson

proving my point that your questions are leading.

Dick Johnson
Dick Johnson
4 years ago

Yes. They are leading questions. That’s kind of the point.

Did you figure that out all by yourself??

Demonica Perduta
4 years ago
Reply to  Dick Johnson

no… my alter ego helped me work it out… she also says that you are a dick… but I already noticed that’s what it says in your name :o)