After a long period in society of women having unlimited personal freedom to pursue life as they wish, they have shown to consistently fail in making the right decisions that prevent their own harm and the harm of others. Systems must now be put in place where a woman’s behavior is monitored and her decisions subject to approval of a male relative or guardian who understands what’s in her best interests better than she does herself.

Women have had personal freedoms for less than a century. For the bulk of human history, their behavior was significantly controlled or subject to approval through mechanisms of tribe, family, church, law, or stiff cultural precepts. It was correctly assumed that a woman was unable to make moral, ethical, and wise decisions concerning her life and those around her. She was not allowed to study any trivial topic she wanted, sleep with any man who caught her fancy, or uproot herself and travel the world because she wanted to “find herself.”

You can see this level of control today in many Muslim countries, where expectations are placed on women from a young age to submit to men, reproduce (if biologically able), follow God’s word, and serve the good of society by employing her feminine nature instead of competing directly against men on the labor market due to penis envy or feelings of personal inferiority.

The reason that women had their behavior limited was for the simple reason that they are significantly less rational than men, in a way that impaired their ability to make good decisions concerning the future. This was eloquently described by German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer in his important essay On Women. He described them as overgrown children, a comparison that any man who has dated more than a dozen of them can quickly agree to after having consistently witnessed their impulsive and illogical behavior firsthand.

Women are directly fitted for acting as the nurses and teachers of our early childhood by the fact that they are themselves childish, frivolous and short-sighted; in a word, they are big children all their life long—a kind of intermediate stage between the child and the full-grown man, who is man in the strict sense of the word. See how a girl will fondle a child for days together, dance with it and sing to it; and then think what a man, with the best will in the world, could do if he were put in her place.

[…]

…women remain children their whole life long; never seeing anything but what is quite close to them, cleaving to the present moment, taking appearance for reality, and preferring trifles to matters of the first importance.

[…]

That woman is by nature meant to obey may be seen by the fact that every woman who is placed in the unnatural position of complete independence, immediately attaches herself to some man, by whom she allows herself to be guided and ruled. It is because she needs a lord and master.

When you give a female unlimited choice on which man to have sex with, what type of man does she choose? An exciting man who treats her poorly and does not care for her well-being.

When you give a female choice on what to study in university, what does she choose? An easy liberal arts major that costs over $50,000 and dooms her to a life of debt and sporadic employment.

When a female lacks any urgent demands upon her survival, what behavior does she pursue? Obsessively displaying her half-naked body on the internet, flirting with men solely for attention, becoming addicted to corporate-produced entertainment, and over-indulging in food until her body shape is barely human.

When you give a female choice on when to have kids, what does she do? After her fertility is well past its peak, and in a rushed panic that resembles the ten seconds before the ringing of the first school bell, she aims for limited reproductive success at an age that increases the likelihood she’ll pass on genetic defects to her child.

When you give a female choice of which political leader to vote into office, who do they vote for? The one who is more handsome and promises unsustainable freebies that accelerate the decline of her country.

When you give a female unwavering societal trust with the full backing of the state, what does she do? Falsely accuse a man of rape and violence out of revenge or just to have an excuse for the boyfriend who caught her cheating.

When you give a female choice on who to marry, what is the result? A 50% divorce rate, with the far majority of them (80%) initiated by women themselves.

While a woman is in no doubt possession of crafty intelligence that allows her to survive just as well as a man, mostly through the use of her sexuality and wiles, she is a slave to the present moment and therefore unable to make decisions that benefit her future and those of the society she’s a part of. Once you give a woman personal freedom, like we have in the Western world, she enslaves herself to one of numerous vices and undertakes a rampage of destruction to her body and those who want to be a meaningful part of her life.

A man does not need to look further than the women he knows, including those in his family, to see that the more freedom a woman was given, the worse off she is, while the woman who was under the heavy hand of the church or male relative comes out far better on the other side, in spite of her rumblings that she wants to be as free as her liberated friends, who eagerly and regularly post soft porn photos of themselves on social networking and dating sites while selecting random anonymous men for fornication every other weekend.

Men, on average, make better decisions than women. If you take this to be true, which should be no harder to accept than the claim that lemons are sour, why is a woman allowed to make decisions at all without first getting approval from a man who is more rational and levelheaded than she is? It not only hurts the woman making decisions concerning her life, but it also hurts any man who will associate with her in the future. You only need to ask the many suffering husbands today on how they are dealing with a wife who entered the marriage with a student loan debt in the high five figures from studying sociology and how her wildly promiscuous sexual history impairs her ability to remain a dedicated mother, with one foot already out the door after he makes a reasonable demand that is essential for a stable home and strong family.

I propose two different options for protecting women from their obviously deficient decision making. The first is to have a designated male guardian give approval on all decisions that affect her well-being. Such a guardian should be her father by default, but in the case a father is absent, another male relative can be appointed or she can be assigned one by charity organizations who groom men for this purpose, in a sort of Boy’s Club for women.

She must seek approval by her guardian concerning diet, education, boyfriends, travel, friends, entertainment, exercise regime, marriage, and appearance, including choice of clothing. A woman must get a green light from her guardian before having sex with any man, before wearing a certain outfit, before coloring her hair green, and before going to a Spanish island for the summer with her female friends.

If she disobeys her guardian, an escalating series of punishments would be served to her, culminating in full-time supervision by him. Once the woman is married, her husband will gradually take over guardian duties, and strictly monitor his wife’s behavior and use all reasonable means to keep it in control so that family needs are met first and foremost, as you already see today in most Islamic societies. Any possible monetary proceeds she would get from divorce would be limited so that she has more incentive to keep her husband happy and pleased than to throw him under the bus for the most trivial of reasons that stem from her persistent and innate need to make bad decisions.

A second option for monitoring women is a combination of rigid cultural rules and sex-specific laws. Women would not be able to attend university unless the societal need is urgent where an able-minded man could not be found to fill the specific position. Women would not be able to visit establishments that serve alcohol without a man present to supervise her consumption. Parental control software on electronic devices would be modified for women to control and monitor the information they consume. Credit card and banking accounts must have a male co-signer who can monitor her spending. Curfews for female drivers must be enacted so that women are home by a reasonable hour. Abortion for women of all ages must be signed off by her guardian, in addition to prescriptions for birth control.

While my proposals are undoubtedly extreme on the surface and hard to imagine implementing, the alternative of a rapidly progressing cultural decline that we are currently experiencing will end up entailing an even more extreme outcome. Women are scratching their most hedonistic and animalistic urges to mindlessly pursue entertainment, money, socialist education, and promiscuous behavior that only satisfies their present need to debase themselves and feel fleeting pleasure, at a heavy cost for society.

Allowing women unlimited personal freedom has so affected birth rates in the West that the elite insists on now allowing importation of millions of third world immigrants from democratically-challenged nations that threaten the survival of the West. In other words, giving women unbridled choice to pursue their momentary whims instead of investing in traditional family ideals and reproduction is a contributing factor to what may end up being the complete collapse of those nations that have allowed women to do as they please.

I make these sincere recommendations not out of anger, but under the firm belief that the lives of my female relatives would certainly be better tomorrow if they were required to get my approval before making any decisions. They would not like it, surely, but due to the fact that I’m male and they’re not, my analytical decision-making faculty is superior to theirs to absolutely no fault of their own, meaning that their most sincere attempts to make good decisions will have a failure rate larger than if I was able to make those decisions for them, especially with intentions that are fully backed with compassion and love for them to have more satisfying lives than they do now.

As long as we continue to treat women as equals to men, a biological absurdity that will one day be the butt of many jokes for comedians of the future, women will continue to make horrible decisions that hurt themselves, their families, and their reproductive potential. Unless we take action soon to reconsider the freedoms that women now have, the very survival of Western civilization is at stake.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out my book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain my operation.

Read Next: People Should Not Be Allowed Unlimited Personal Freedom

1,356 Comments

  1. Roosh September 20, 2015 at 2:01 pm

    One more thing to add is that this article is not satire in any way. I firmly stand behind the recommendations I made.

    1. MoralsAndDogma September 21, 2015 at 9:23 am

      Well then… Roosh the crypto-Muslim

      1. Simba September 21, 2015 at 9:48 am

        So, you do like they way we live in today’s society, where women do as they please and are assisted by an army of white-nights to do it?
        Because otherwise he is right.
        It is often said here in the manosphere that feminism and the general degeneracy have reach this level because we men have let it. And I agree.
        So, how do you take control back? Will you ask for it, like a good boy? Maybe try to do it the democratic way, expecting the wisdom of “the people” to reach the correct answer?(That’s the way it is in my country. Idiots)
        The answer is take control back. Don’t ask for it. Just take it.
        It won’t be easy, surely. It will take a lot of time, and a societal change, not just from individuals.
        But, aside from throw at you their police and army(who by the way are mostly men) women have no power on their own.

      2. Anon. September 21, 2015 at 5:20 pm

        These things are not going to happen. Just focus on knowing the nuts and bolts of how the world works, and with complete accuracy of information, proceed to model your life as you see fit.

        The world cannot be changed by a small powerless group. There are people with far more hold on the course of history than the people posting on these boards. Don’t try to change the system, just try to fully understand it, without emotional judgements or hatred that will just plague your life and happiness. Then create the life you want for yourself, knowing that you are priveliged in that the information you possess about the world is accurate.

        We are lucky people. We are like brokers who already know how the stock market is going to change. You don’t try to change the system, or hate the system for the way it is. You use your inside information to cheat the system, become a billionaire, and retire off to some private island.

        Fuck the system. Quite frankly, I couldn’t give two fucks what Western women do. If they want to become Mother Teresa, great, if they want to throw themselves off a skyscraper, whatever. It’s not my concern. A slut is a slut, and she provides the value that a slut can give. I don’t hate her, but I know what her role is. She can have a very positive role in my life, but the limits must be clear in my head as to what her role is and what place she has in my life, according to the type of person she is. If you sex with pleasant-enough girls, Western countries can actually provide that. They are not bad people, just sluts. If you want love, there are plenty of countries on the planet where women can fulfill that role.

        My point is that hatred towards will just make you bitter and unhappy. Rid yourself of hatred and see things as they are, without making judgements or what should or shouldn’t be. Then, take your life from there. You will be much happier.

      3. in_Dei_servitium September 21, 2015 at 9:10 pm

        There’s a lot of hate in your comment, dude. Evil prevails when good men just accept the world as it is.

      4. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 8:57 am

        You’re both hateful. How is women’s equality evil? Oh yes from the site trying to legalize rape and control all facets of their existence, is your masculinity threatened by powerful women?

      5. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 2:43 pm

        No, but civilization is.

      6. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:02 pm

        No they are not.

      7. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:17 pm

        That’s your theory. Draw a picture of Sweden for me circa 2100. Are there any feminists left in Sweden then? How about any genetic Swedes? Do the math.

        Or maybe you just can’t accept that your ideology is fundamentally bankrupt.

      8. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:29 pm

        Yes and Joe McCarthy warned of commies. You’re wrong, you lost, get over it. You’re like every Seahawks fan saying if only they gave lynch the ball on the one yard line in the super bowl. your type has seen it’s heyday and it’s over.

      9. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:56 pm

        Joe McCarthy warned of commies and was wrong? Where are you living?

        You’re type hasn’t seen a hey day and never will.

      10. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 4:31 pm

        He ruined plenty of people who had nothing to do with anything improper. Was he not the thought police? My type is the new normal, enjoy being the last of your type.

      11. I Art Laughing September 25, 2015 at 1:08 pm

        Says the commie without a hint of irony whose very existence destroys his latest “point”.

      12. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 1:19 pm

        We are the new normal, you are the last of your breed and the world will be better for it.

      13. I Art Laughing September 25, 2015 at 1:21 pm

        Haven’t seen much of the world have you? BTW, bandwagon fallacy.

        If a majority are wrong, they are still wrong.

        This is right next door to the “Power extends from the barrel of a gun”. argument (might makes right). And is the next expected move of any leftoid. But I suppose I’m “theorizing” again.

      14. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 1:23 pm

        I love your argument is essentially you need men like me to protect you from men like me.

      15. I Art Laughing September 25, 2015 at 1:24 pm

        No, you don’t need men like me. Men like me aren’t going to protect you from the reality you have so willingly built for yourself. Dig a hole, fall in it.

      16. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 2:38 pm

        I’ll be fine, go hide in your bunker.

      17. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 9, 2018 at 7:03 am

        Men like you need to be buried in that hole because you represent the worst of humanity and are an embarrassment to men the world over.

      18. WrestlersRuleMMA May 21, 2018 at 3:45 am

        Why are you out of the kitchen Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson? Get back in there and make me a sandwich. And you must remember. You cannot speak unless you are first spoken to by a man.

      19. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 2:40 pm

        I know that’s why most of the population believe in sky fairies. Tolerance and equality in general are the right thing to do.

      20. I Art Laughing September 25, 2015 at 2:41 pm

        Then why are you such a proponent of intolerance and inequality?

      21. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 2:44 pm

        I tolerate being wrong when it doesn’t hurt anyone. I don’t promote religious persecution I just find religion stupid, I only bring it up if it’s been brought up already . You’d think a learned man like yourself could see the writing on the wall.

      22. I Art Laughing September 25, 2015 at 2:48 pm

        When I was a child in elementary school and read “Harrison Bergeron” I thought it was funny. That is, in the sense that I thought Vonnegut was way out there. Yet, here you are.

      23. Angry Young Man April 24, 2016 at 11:01 pm

        Equality… sounds cute. Does it work? Are we truly equal now that men are at the brunt of every bad joke, walked on by our corrupt women? This article is so spot on and describes the true role for women- BEHIND the men. That’s what works for humanity in my view. This whole “equality” thing has been a train wreck.

      24. JJ Hockley February 3, 2017 at 9:16 pm

        Exactly, men and women whilst very different should tessellate together. A form of symbiosis is required, not confrontation.

      25. wolfgang548 . September 8, 2017 at 1:23 pm

        The only thing that makes men and women equal to one another is we are equally human to each other. Women believe men are the weaker sex and they are superior to men but they never explain why they have to battle and compete against men to become equal. If they were so superior to men as they claim, they wouldn’t have to do anything. Their status would already be above men. They are only selfish and want control of everything like the control freaks they are. Without men, the infrastructure they live in would collapse in a heartbeat.

      26. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 9, 2018 at 7:06 am

        Our status has always been above men… that’s is what has scared men for centuries and drove them to the oppressive behavior of women… very sad

      27. WrestlersRuleMMA May 21, 2018 at 3:50 am

        How funny you say this because —- women could not survive without men. Women are there to support a man’s decisions, to give birth to our children, and to make our sandwiches. Period.

      28. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson May 25, 2018 at 10:42 am

        Men can’t make sound decisions…that the whole point! So get you ass in the kitchen man. Make dinner, clean up the mess and shut up. If it weren’t for a woman who sacrificed a lot, you wouldn’t even fucking be here! You should be on your pathetic knees thanking her for you pathetic life every day.

      29. Jalice January 10, 2018 at 10:54 pm

        Without women, there would be no men to build the infrastructure. Why are there two genders and not just one? Please use your brain.

      30. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 9, 2018 at 7:04 am

        😂😂😂😂😂Someone sounds butt hurt over loosing their entitlement!

      31. JJ Hockley February 3, 2017 at 9:13 pm

        Tolerance is a product of variation within a society. The society you wish for is a totalitarian run state apparatus without variety.
        That is the paradox inherent in the beliefs of the left.
        A right thinking adult understands that society must by it’s nature exist in some form of flux, all things are unequal including men and women. Your logic would suggest that we attempt to feed whales bananas or make chimpanzees more suitable for deep water life.

      32. Shmalkandik September 27, 2015 at 9:21 pm

        No, McCarthy was generally right. Eisenhower had the information, but chose not to release it; as that would h ave let the Soviets know we had broken their security codes. Look up the ‘Venona’ project on the Web, or read the book ‘The Venona Secrets’.

        FYI, the book covers the Rosenberg case, where the problem, again, was the the Feds could not released all the evidence they had on the couple for the same reason it was not given to McCarthy.

      33. Count MonteCristo November 29, 2016 at 4:02 pm

        yes mccarthy was right . he was just mean. read SpyCatcher by Peter Wright.

      34. Aldous Huxley October 7, 2016 at 4:12 pm

        We’re leaving the country and having many children. Meanwhile, liberals have a birth rate of less than 1 per couple. You are the one who will go extinct in the long run. Obtuse of me to try to pull a leftist out of hedonistic short term thinking, though.

      35. BobTrent September 4, 2017 at 7:30 am

        Senator McCarthy warned of Communists, Soviet agents, in the US State Department. He was correct. The Pinko-Progressives used character assassination (and attempts to actually assassinate) and hysteria to attempt to discredit Sen. McCarthy.

      36. GerryAllwin September 25, 2015 at 5:26 am

        McCarthy only accused Communists in the State Department. Others expanded the exposure of Communists elsewhere. Every State Dept. official he accused WAS a Communist, or what the Communists called a fellow roader (sympathizer and supporter though not an enrolled member of a Communist party).

      37. James April 11, 2016 at 12:11 pm

        Something else communist sympathizers choose to ignore is the fact that “communism” was so strongly connected to certain foreign powers who were actively spying on the US. The valid purpose for investigating “communists” was the reasonable search for spies, especially in the government. Communist operatives in Hollywood might have been overlooked, but communists in government could not possibly be ignored, unless we didn’t care about national security.

      38. Jason Rogers February 15, 2017 at 4:42 am

        Mccarthy was 100% correct.The Jew media still vilify him because he dared to expose their tentacles in government,media,finance and most everything else.Mccarthy mysteriously died of a heart attack at 48.The good Lord knows he was true and so do I and many others.

      39. Lily October 31, 2017 at 12:43 pm

        McCarthy’s fallacy was his extremism The man saw commies inn his soup. He insisted they were everywhere, conspiring. The thing is, true commies in America have always been a tiny, silent minority with no influence nor power. They are entitled to form their party and cannot be outlawed, but they aren’t going to get anywhere with it and never have. The New Right wants you to equate socialism with communism. However, the former can and does exist consistently and stably without the latter. If America had no socialism, we would have become a feudal oligarchy run by private kings ages ago and at some point might have had a ‘Bolshevik Revolution” of our own once enough peasants/debt-serfs got pissed off enough at the unaccountable abuse of property rights overriding personal rights…. basically, Lassez faire and communism both have the same weakness: Human nature, and we’re greedy, selfish, and morbidly individualistic to the point of altruism existing only when it benefits us. It happened in Russia and I expect it to happen here if/when the New Right manged to have their day and replace most of the governments functionality with corporate powers. That age of fedualism will last only for so long before the “commies” rise up and repeat history…. protip: it’s the anti-commies who would have instigated it, ironically.

      40. Aldous Huxley October 7, 2016 at 4:11 pm

        90% of McCarthy’s predictions have come true. Try looking at results and accuracy rather than what the television and indoctrination centers say is rhetorically acceptable.

      41. m April 3, 2018 at 6:58 am

        And here we are three years later. My country –– Germany, ruled by women –– a complete joke and the natives in deep deep trouble.

        You lost. I lost. We all lost.

        And Who is to blame?
        Women. And week men.

        Roosh, of course, is right.

      42. BobTrent January 18, 2016 at 5:15 pm

        Sweden’s government is failing to protect Swedish women from the hordes of Muslim rapists the government is PAYING to come invade Sweden.
        Muslim men are not from their perspective raping “infidel” Swedish women. To them, “infidel” women are provided them by “Allah” for their pleasure and to produce hordes of new little Muslims. Swedish women who go about dressed as whores (in the sharia law Muslim viewpoint) and without being accompanied by an adult male Muslim relative, therefore they are for the taking.

      43. Jason Rogers February 15, 2017 at 4:38 am

        The all-female ruling cabinet of Sweden hates White men and Whiteness yet several days ago donned the burqa and kept their heads bowed in submission for Iranian ministers.White females MUST be controlled because they betray their own as if its a natural instinct.

      44. Caroline Carlson June 11, 2016 at 12:01 pm

        Civilization is threatened because climate change will make food production impossible. Women aren’t doing that. Men at the top of major corporations are doing that. You gonna blame women when the world is 6 degrees warmer than it is now?

      45. wolfgang548 . September 9, 2017 at 9:35 am

        If men are responsible for climate change, then explain to us what caused the ice age that is said to have occurred approximately 10,000 years ago considering there were no big companies back then.

      46. Caroline Carlson September 9, 2017 at 5:49 pm

        Extremely high levels of carbon released from volcanoes. This is a well known fact. I’m so sorry you didn’t receive a decent education. My condolences.

      47. Peter January 9, 2018 at 3:34 pm

        It is the women who want the babies that will consume and thus increase the level of CO2. But your way of argumenting is really not intelligent as I could find a million things in the world that women have done wrong. And, btw., to comment on your specific argument, women are the main consumers of society, not only are they the ones who really urge to reproduce biologically, they also love shopping a million times more than men. Women are much more materialistic than men, by nature.

      48. Jalice January 10, 2018 at 11:07 pm

        Shopping in companies owned by men…. Men make the products that we buy…. Men create the supply. Why are you acting like we determine what is made in the market? Your gender is not a victim. Even Victoria’s Secret is owned by a man.

        If you think about it, you still control how we dress and what we eat. YOUR gender created GMOs. Let me guess, somehow this was a woman’s idea. I am not trying to say these are bad things, I’m saying you run shit and you’re still unhappy. You have control and yet continue to be miserable.

        You need to look inside and figure out what you want cause no amount of control has quenched your thirst.

      49. kaia July 12, 2018 at 6:42 pm

        wow. one bad thing made by a female, all are bad. Is this the world you want to live in? Rise above all judgments you may have and create some real happiness. I am sorry you feel women took your place. That was not the goal. There is room in the spotlight for more than just one. Bullshitting over underlying feelings is hard, but sometimes not as hard as communicating real thoughts. These thoughts can be confusing and you may think they are feelings, or reality. It doesn’t make it wrong to feel this way sometimes, you just have to know that these thoughts aren’t the truth. Thoughts are there for a reason, and it can be hard once you get caught up in them. I believe people are stronger, and can get past thoughts you know are not real, just a cover up.

      50. Bahlza Dragon September 23, 2015 at 1:06 am

        “Powerful women”? I assume from your pathetic man-boy video game avatar that you’re a dude, so I’ll discuss this with you as such. Any power that women have in this society was given to them by men. They do not generate anything that creates leverage, strength–whatever you want to call it.

        The term “powerful women” is a joke; physically, they are inferior and mentally they are undisciplined. WE–men–granted them suffrage, WE allowed them into the work place and yet, WE are the source of evil in society because most of us are straight and like to look at pretty women and fuck them? WE are evil because we’re fulfilling our biological imperative? THAT is the narrative with which the neo-feminists and SJWs are proselytizing misguided liberals.

        Yet, only in our society have the rulers (men) VOLUNTARILY abdicated their positions of superiority without violence; we have tried to be reasonable and fair, only to be vilified and betrayed for wrongs perpetrated by previous generations. So, fuck all of you whining, ungrateful ass wipes.

      51. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 7:26 am

        Most dogs have the biological imperative to eat their own shit. Try to rise about that. Honestly though if you think you’re right, you would be warring with most men and almost all women you don’t have the numbers. You do realize you’re committing those wrongs all over again by being here in a serious manner right?

      52. Bahlza Dragon September 23, 2015 at 10:41 am

        “Most dogs have the biological imperative to eat their own shit.” I guess you should stop French kissing your pets if that bothers you.

        “You do realize you’re committing those wrongs all over again by being here in a serious manner right?” No, I’m not. I’m not physically abusing women. I’m not preventing them from advancing in the corporate world. I’m not preventing them from earning their own money, nor preventing them from voting.

        It’s people like you who make it easy to have disdain for women’s rights arguments; any disagreement is vituperatively painted as an attack on all women with respect to all aspects of their lives. Your hyperbole is the equivalent of the constant din of false rape claims, or using said claim to sensationalize any disagreement, like Madonna equating the leak of her music as rape.

      53. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 11:21 am

        Look at the name of this article. Now look in the mirror and see an idiot.

      54. Bahlza Dragon September 23, 2015 at 11:26 am

        This coming from someone who French kisses dogs after they eat their own shit.

        Anyhoo, you’ve missed your own point, apparently. The only thing you have is that I read an article. That’s it. Yet, somehow you attribute that to me participating in the violation/oppression of women.

        Do you cry while watching your soaps, too?

      55. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 11:29 am

        I never made false accusations at you but obviously you need to hide behind them. You are on this site and take it seriously and have taken this article seriously. Do you deny the claims I have laid out?

      56. Bahlza Dragon September 23, 2015 at 11:49 am

        Yes, you did: you made an implicit claim that I was somehow participating in the oppression of women (excuse me, wymyn) because I read this article.

        Not that it’s any of your business, but for your edification, I read items from all over the political and social spectrum, including pieces from Saffire; I watch videos by Rachel Maddow; I read outrageous things and consider how each uses evidence and reasoning to build their arguments. And then . . . here’s the kicker: I form my own opinion that is shaped by my own mind. The act of me reading this article is part of that process. My personal conclusions? I don’t owe you that explanation.

      57. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 12:02 pm

        You already disclosed your opinion earlier but obviously you’re a fucking moron.

      58. Bahlza Dragon September 23, 2015 at 3:42 pm

        Oh, did I touch a nerve, princess? Calling me a moron because YOU can’t make a point? Wow, you fall apart easily. Clearly, you DO indeed belong with the SJWs. They have yet another beta bitch upon whom they can rely to carry their water.

      59. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 3:47 pm

        No you already said your opinion on women disclosing that you saw them as inferior and needing to be controlled but you must have gotten distracted beating your wife or locking your daughter in a closet until she’s old enough to be a sex slave, and forgot.

      60. Bahlza Dragon September 23, 2015 at 3:53 pm

        Oh, wow, I really did upset, you bitch. Problems with your pathetic “comeback”:
        1. I’ve never been married, nor has my home been infested with children;
        2. The fact that this was hatched from your diseased, little mind tells us more about you than about me. Are the words, “daddy, please, no!” still ringing in your ears from last night? Remember, you’re the one who wanted to go in this direction.

        If you want your wife’s bruises to heal more quickly dab them with cold vinegar.

        Step up your game, loser; you’re boring me.

        Btw, physically women ARE inferior; however, reality doesn’t seem to appeal to you.

      61. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 4:01 pm

        You keep making false accusations so why should i ground my insults in reality? I have a girlfriend, who is my equal, no children and unlike you i’ve never been violent with a woman. You claim to think women are undisciplined? How are you going to discipline them? Beating them some more? Step up your game you pathetic little bitch, going on these rapey forums to make up for your physical, mental and emotional inadequacies, “NOOOO it’s not my fault i suck, it’s women!!!” you are so pathetic.

      62. Bahlza Dragon September 23, 2015 at 6:43 pm

        “Beating them some more”? Can you really NOT read your OWN comments? MORE assumes that there was something before, that I had previously beaten women when in truth I have not; ergo, you are making the false claims, you pathetic bastard. You can try to argue in circles, but that just shows how lazy and dishonest you are.

        I don’t understand your fury here; are you so unempowered in real life that you need to lash out like some sissy with long finger nails, trying to scratch someone any way you can? I guess I should feel sorry for you.

      63. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 6:53 pm

        You clearly don’t understand what’s going on here.

      64. Bahlza Dragon September 24, 2015 at 2:15 am

        Of course I understand; you’ve abrogated your membership with the male gender in order to obsequiously offer your allegiance to the SJWs. Somehow, you’re so out of touch with reality that you see the world as you’ve been instructed to: that somehow wymyn are victims of some vast, male conspiracy to hold them down–despite the fact that these same wymyn have FAR more freedom than about 80% of the rest of the women on the planet, despite all of the positive changes and additional freedom they’ve secured even in my lifetime. However, you’ve become so solipsistic in your pursuit of whatever you’ve been trained to see as justice, that you don’t understand that it’s revenge, revenge against those who did not perpetrate those wrongs.

      65. Zechs Marquise September 24, 2015 at 9:12 am

        Listen here son, it’s more about the fact that you regularly beat your girlfriend, to make up for your overwhelming inadequacies as a “man”. Stop beating women.

      66. Bahlza Dragon September 24, 2015 at 11:21 am

        You can pull all of the red herrings out of your ass that you want, it doesn’t change the fact you’ve lost this debate–and lost it badly. You have no facts–just conjecture–and this is demonstrated by you pulling out the cheap, emotional trope of “he doesn’t agree with me, so I’ll paint him as an abuser to try to score some negative emotional points against him.” This is what makes you a loser in the truest sense of the word; further, given your predilection towards using abuse/rape imagery (which, to borrow from Hamlet, seems to be the coinage of your own brain), such scenarios must have rendered a profound impression upon your own experience. Ergo, you were either abused, or you are an abuser, which means that you were also likely abused as well. That makes you a victim and thus the object of my pity, the same emotion I’d feel if I were to see a starving dog on the street.

      67. Zechs Marquise September 24, 2015 at 11:33 am

        You’ve literally made no point What so ever, other than you think the men on this site aren’t pieces of shit, because controlling everything a women does is somehow a defensible position. There is no debate, because no matter what you’ve already lost, you lost the culture war and nothing will ever bring it back.

      68. Bahlza Dragon September 24, 2015 at 12:29 pm

        If you really believed that, princess, you wouldn’t be trying so hard to convince everyone here it’s true. YOU’RE the one who feels as though you’re losing. Why else would you go to a site like this and try to argue with not only me, but several other posters? That’s like a vegetarian prancing into a steak house and trying to convince the patrons that they should eat tofu instead.

      69. Zechs Marquise September 24, 2015 at 4:19 pm

        No really it’s the fact your mere existence makes life worse, so I come here to hopefully at the very least be annoying. Furthermore were you not the not the one to say the quickest way to make a woman stop being hot is for her to talk? So basically women should be seen and not heard? Just there to be sexual objects? Does your abuse know no limit? What did a woman do to you to make you feel this way? Was your mother absent, did your girlfriend call your penis small? Were you cheated on? Most misogyny starts with one specific woman and then you apply it to all. I’m sorry about your experience.

      70. Bahlza Dragon September 24, 2015 at 5:02 pm

        You’re funny–funny in the “wow, this piece of dog shit won’t get off the bottom of my shoe” sense.

        My mere existence makes life worse? I’m impressed that I have such a profound effect on your life–without even trying. You’ve basically just screamed (all you SJW bitches do that) “I’m pathetic and weak because some guy on the internet just made my life worse” from the rooftops. Nice.

        “So basically women should be seen and not heard? Just there to be sexual objects?” So, you do understand . . .

        Nice attempt at turning this all back on me, but once again, you seem to forget you’re the one on THIS website, complaining about its contents when all you would have to do is not come back if you were so offended. You could go back to Cosmo or whatever else you manginas read to keep your estrogen levels high; instead, however, you come here because you’re jealous that you lack the courage to be masculine, free yourself from the oppression of feminist thought and be your own man. You need permission from women to do anything and must have whatever passes for thought sanctioned by them before you can utter it. Are your post-gender overlords happy with you?

      71. Zechs Marquise September 24, 2015 at 5:08 pm

        if you can’t get shit off your shoe maybe licking isn’t the best way to go about it. I’m not jealous of your patheticness, I’d rather die than be anything like you. you don’t make my life worse you make life in general the fact you exist lowers every average in the world for factors that matter to a good society. You clearly don’t understand equality and I’m sorry you’re so alone and will never have an emotional connection. You clearly have no justification for your opinion and you never will sorry about you needing to over compensate for your small member and sorry that some woman made you feel bad about yourself and you need to lash out at all of them. You already admitted you’re a sick misogynistic freak and it would be best if you left the gene pool, before you have a daughter who you look in a closet til she’s old enough to be a sex slave.

      72. Caroline Carlson February 3, 2016 at 4:23 pm

        No pathetic losers on the internet fuel the pathetic losers who go out and rape and beat women. So while you are an impotent piece of shit you are providing justification for violent men to act on your assertions. That actually does ruin women lives. You are just a joke.

      73. RealMan January 8, 2018 at 11:51 am

        “Did your girlfriend call your penis small” haha good one dude. I died laughing. You roasted his ass.

      74. Caroline Carlson February 3, 2016 at 4:21 pm

        He isn’t painting you as an abuser. You have admitted you are an abuser.

      75. flybabycrybaby February 4, 2016 at 11:17 pm

        He’s right. What really matters in choosing a mate – and in life in general – is winning internet dates based on the most basic understandings of logic and society. Ergo, Bahlza Dragon asl?

      76. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 9, 2018 at 7:10 am

        Mark…you’re an idiot. How about shutting the fuck up.

      77. BobTrent January 18, 2016 at 5:35 pm

        Once they resort to ad hominem attacks there isn’t any point in keeping on. The lawyer equivalent is “pound on the table.”

      78. Dirk Diggler February 6, 2016 at 3:07 am

        If they are a shitty lawyer, yes you are correct.

      79. FuckThisGuysPost January 8, 2018 at 11:46 am

        He’s out of touch with reality?? Haha that makes me laugh. It seems to me that your the one out of touch with reality. Get a life. And if I were a women I sure as hell wouldn’t wanna be monitored and controlled by some pathetic man. Get real dude. My girlfriend is the badass sweetest chick ever but she knows how to kick some ass. And if I were you ide watch my mouth because there a lot of independent women out there that can kick your ass. Your points are invalid and most of them are wrong. Men like you makes us good men out here look like shit and look bad. Men like you are garbage. Girls should be treated like a queen not like a pet.

      80. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 18, 2018 at 2:42 am

        Thank you! More men need to speak out when like this when you see other men engaging in the ridiculous behavior.

      81. caamib September 24, 2015 at 2:13 am

        “no children”
        Good. I hope it will stay that way.

      82. Zechs Marquise September 24, 2015 at 9:15 am

        Eh, I have a feeling my children would be better off, since they wouldn’t have to listen to me beating anyone as the site is clearly advocating for and that my relationship would be happy instead of yours (assuming you have one, which you probably don’t) where you make someone your slave. I mean obviously your daughter if you had one, would be emotionally damaged by all your bs.

      83. caamib September 25, 2015 at 12:59 am

        Yeah, yeah, I know, I’m evil, my kids would be traumatized, yadda, yadda. Now tell me – do you plan on having kids?

      84. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 7:13 am

        At least you admit your failings! Change while you still can!

      85. caamib September 25, 2015 at 11:42 am

        Will you finally quit embarrassing yourself by not recognizing obvious sarcasm and answer my damn question, you fucking tool?

      86. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 12:12 pm

        I obviously recognize your sarcasm I just find your frustration hilarious. Why should I ? You can’t answer why you’re a misogynist.

      87. Shmalkandik September 27, 2015 at 9:25 pm

        ‘infested with children’? This is not universalizable. I appreciate those who take the burden and risk of raising another generations of humans. I am angry at how men are punished for it. We need to have a generation of women ‘die in the desert’ so that we can enter a Promised Land.

      88. Caroline Carlson February 3, 2016 at 4:26 pm

        Yes since you are so clearly interested in controlling women what would you do in a woman less society? You would have to admit you have nothing of worth going on in your own lives.

      89. Shmalkandik February 3, 2016 at 8:05 pm

        I propose toyou that the non-traditional model of marriage will failr due to changes in reproductive biology, genetics, and leadership dynamics.There are some potentially disturbing trends that would indeed make women dispensable.

        1. Genetics and reproduction without women.

        I’m sure we’ve all read about the success of “Dolly” when a sheep was successfully clone.

        Further dvances in genetics will make it possible to grow humans from blastula to decanting, entirely without a human carrier. Even if human sperm and eggs are required, the market mechanisms already exist for sale and distribution. One of the traditional drivers for men to marry is to have children. This could disappear. I would predict a very large demand from the male homosexual community.

        The complementary step are advances in Virtual Reality (VR). Soon men will have access to “better than sex” technology that provide a complete phrusical experience. The end use need not have all the gear on premises – a Software as a Service (SaaS) offering will require on the physical interfaces at home – all the computing, image generation, management can be provided from a Data Center..

        The mutation of social mores, combined with Family Law that increasingly supports Women’s’ interests over that of their children, will be a further driver for a complete separation of pleasure and progeny for men, from women.

        Even before these technical advancements are generally available, the failure of the egalitarian model of marriage has become evident. In every organization small or large, there is always one, unambiguous leader. Hierarchy is the natural method of organization for the human species. Organization theory suggest to us that Leadership is not to be confused to arbitrary acts. It recommends free flow of information, ‘manager as a service’, self-organization of work, and other techniques that makes better use of the intelligence in any group activity.

        But, in every way of productive work, some one must make the decisions. The traditional model of marriage with one man, one woman, with the man providing the lead, has proven itself more scalable and durable than any of the alternatives that have been proposed since the 1960s cultural putsch. Indeed, comparative studies have even shown that the older model of arranged marriage works better for longevity, stability, more successful child rearing, and accumulation of capital.

        To be sure, ,there will always be statistical outliers, but outliers are not the descriptors of a central tendency. Leaders can and will exert great or lesser degrees of control as a function of the perceived operational risk, but they can never abandon their responsibilities as leaders.

        No fault divorce, Family Court bias, financial disincentives, technology, and recreational computing have created both the attraction and possibility of heterosexual males living in a female-free social order. While I concede that “a world of made is not a world of born”, I laso note the basic product life cycle maxim that very often “good enough is good enough”.

        The implications for women are very clear. They can continue to become corporate slaves, disposable, cheap sources of labor. Corporations, as fictive people, are far less less amenable to the kind of influence wives have always been able to exert over their husbands; they do not know mercy, and are far more diregiste’ than the most sterotyped ‘patriarchal male. The are increasingly focused on driving down wage rates, and are never going to love women except as a means to increase the labor supply at secularly declining levels.

        This isn’t about beating women, or devaluing the function of mothers, or expression of opinions. This is about examining what conditions help the human race flourish. Humans grow well when they are raised in a stable family environment. This, the Brave New World of egalitarian , has provably failed to deliver.

        Women can continue to choose the Brave New World, or they can revolt,, and choose to become part of team where their man, whom they have carefully selected, is allowed to lead.

        Your turn.

      90. Caroline Carlson February 4, 2016 at 4:10 am

        Dolly wasn’t a success. All instances of cloning have resulted in much much greater incidents of illness. While sheep may carry certain genes for disease or birth defects clones are vastly vastly more likely to have the expression of these genes express themselves. We have seen this to be the case in every single instance of cloning.

        Again as I have mentioned women are half as likely to want marriage and children as men. What you are describing is of better advantage to men than women. Men overall enjoy marriage more and have more advantages to being married. Married men are healthier, happier and married men make more money and enjoy further career advancement than single men of similar education and employment history. You men are more than welcome to fuck machines. Go for it. We women are statistically happier being single. We are less likely to want to remarry once divorced than do men. We are more likely to report being happy five years post divorce. We enjoy no career advantages to being married. I’m not worried in the slightest that we will be replaced and there will be a female less society. I encourage you to eliminate women from your world. I think women deserve it. You say you the neo masculine movement isn’t about devaluing women yet your mentor here says that when you think of women you shouldn’t think of moonlight walks on the beach you should think of choking her while fucking her in the ass. That hurting her should be a goal. Many women do perceive this as devaluing. I’m sorry you can’t understand that. The neo masculinists and the Mgtow men keep,saying we will go away and not pay any attention to you…..see how you like that. Women of America are saying ” yes please”. We don’t need you. We won’t miss you. Don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out. If you really wanted to ” go your own way” would you please hurry up and do so. You seem to be comstantly obsessed with us and seem to only be able to define your masculinity in terms of your relationships with us. You are all acting like dramatic, codependent 13 year old girls.

      91. Dana Scully February 4, 2016 at 10:25 am

        😻😻😻😻😻

      92. PolishKnightUSA February 7, 2016 at 11:24 am

        It’s amazing that someone who claims to have a master’s degree doesn’t understand basic statistics. Married men are happier and healthier and enjoy further career achievement. Ever hear “correlation is not causation?” Ice cream consumption rates closely match that of burglary rates. Does ice cream cause crime or is the fact that as the weather improves the burglars tend to be outdoors more often and breaking into places?

        If you don’t get the point, let’s try this one: Pretty women probably tend to be happier. Will a woman then becoming happy make her more pretty? I would propose that certainly unhappy women will probably be perceived as less attractive but statistical claims often confuse a cart for a horse.

        Men who marry tend to be more affluent and then afterwards, work longer hours to support a family (“liberated” career women don’t tend to do so. Feminists are angry that men get paid more for working harder. Such injustice!)

        Anyhoo, since the burdens of marriage are greater for men than women, that means that men (who are smart at least), can demand more just as pretty women demand more from men than an ugly one. Affluence for men are like big tits for women. I dated some women in their 30’s who wanted to marry with bad attitudes and I told them off. I’ve now been married for over a decade. Heck, one great advantage for men is that if we’re jerks in our 20’s, we still have time. I started a family in my 40’s. Feminists with bad attitudes, well, they should roll out the welcome mat for Islamic Syrian refugees to take over, eh? 🙂

        You claim that feminists are happy to see men leave them alone yet… they freaked out as men figured out that they could marry foreign women and came up with IMBRA to supposedly “protect” these women and restrict their entry. Gee, these same women didn’t want to protect their illegal immigrant underpaid nannies from exploitation. Or protect african children from exploitation from the blood diamond industry for baubles they show off to each other. But “mail order brides” and competition? Shut That Down Now.

        hahahaha! It’s not working. The law is largely moot. Loopholes in it make it easy for men to continue meeting foreign women and the marriage rates are superior to local career women marrying: 80%. That’s from the state department website.

        In addition, feminists don’t want legalized prostitution because meal whoring is so popular here. Again, limiting the choices of other women to try to keep men in their place.

        Finally, after decades of feminist man-bashing, women who DO want men to approach them are rejecting the label in the majority. Most women would rather say they’re going to join ISIS than become a feminist.

      93. Harshvardhan Singh June 1, 2016 at 6:36 pm

        she is utter stupid indoctrinated pussy,,who doesnt even know difference between hypothesis and fact..

      94. Ravi Macho June 5, 2016 at 1:27 pm

        Well said Harshvardhan. We shouldn’t reply to this kidn of smelly cunts !

      95. wolfgang548 . September 9, 2017 at 9:55 am

        Not only are feminists claiming to be happy men are leaving them alone then freaking out that men are marrying foreign women, but Juli Bindel, one of the lead feminists said marriage was an institution and slavery for women, yet their pissed that men are not marrying western world women. And what Bindel also didn’t mention when she said marriage was an institution was how the husbands were slaving away at an institution of their own called a job/career to support the wife. These women are so full of hypocrisy but they claim they could do a better job at ruling the world. Ah ha ha ha ha. Camille Paglia, who is or was a professor in Philadelphia had stated, ” If civilization would have been left in women’s hands, we would still be living in grass huts.”

      96. PolishKnightUSA September 9, 2017 at 10:08 pm

        Let’s be even more philosophical about it: If marriage is so bad, why are gays so hot to get in on the action?

        I would like to write a piece in RoK regarding so-called “nice feminism” or that feminism was ever really nice to begin with including Puglia whom I think is an apologist. She wants to say that “if feminism could just stop being anti-male, then it could move forward to make women and men legal equals and all could be good”.

        Nope. Because in the post-feminist era, so to speak (post 3rd wave), we now see that even if women get 6 figure salaries, they are still addicted to the men taking care of them financially. OK, a few will marry “down”, sort of (perhaps marry a hot firefighter) but 9 times out of 10, men are still breadwinners like in 1950.

        So what’s the friggin’ point?

        All feminism did was push women to compete with men, lower wages, and so women “earn” more but really less adjusted for inflation and their men bring in less so for a married woman, the net gain is moot and even less. Here’s the thinking that went through the hamster wheel:

        They would earn as much as a man and then marry a “real” man who earned more than them. But “liberated” feminists who would want to marry down, could, and they could marry those losers (which is ok with them) but they would all personally continue to marry up. Sort of like them thinking that they’ll recycle but instead throw their stuff in the trash but OTHER women could go through the hassle, right?

        So yeah, feminists are enraged that “loser” men go overseas to get foreign brides but consider: Nothing is stopping American women from doing this. There are many handsome Eastern European men with high degrees who would marry for a green card if these women could just slap a smile on their face and do a little legwork. Or heck, as we all know here a typical woman with a decent online profile gets a hundred hits within an hour of posting it. They just have to do a LITTLE legwork, that’s all. About 1/10th as much as most men here have done. But they’re SUPER lazy when it comes to EARNING relationships with men compared to just seething about it.

        So IMBRA was passed which has had little effect.

      97. Person March 8, 2018 at 10:39 pm

        Actually, the number of male bread winners, at least in america, has been declining. I think last I read was back in 2015 42% of women were either the sole, or primary “breadwinners.” Lol that’s such a weird term. I wanna win some rye.

      98. PolishKnightUSA March 9, 2018 at 8:51 am

        When I read a statistic such as this, I’m reminded of this great Seinfeld scene:
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDmA2xoIoFU&t=46s

        The 42% number doesn’t state whether these women head households that include men. 31% of households are single mothers. This doesn’t include, of course, single women without children, widows, etc. But let’s just go with the 31% for now. That lops off of 42% leaving 11% of households, probably have the woman earning more than the man at any particular time.

        In my own personal example, I had been out of work for a year while my wife worked part-time and we managed to eke by. It wasn’t pleasant. I probably contributed to that 11% statistic for that year. I tried to make the best of it by spending quality time with my 1 year old daughter and getting some home projects complete, but I’m aware that I didn’t enjoy any significant improvement in support from my wife than my great-great grandfather would have experienced in similar circumstances.

        My wife has a friend whose a successful professional who had a husband who was struggling professionally for longer than that. She just divorced him. She’s not a statistical anomaly: statistics show (ha! I can do this too!) that divorce rates are 3X when the woman earns more.

        As I’ll discuss in another comment of yours about the standard of living and whether there’s a profit in all this (if someone gets a job that pays more but the cost of living is higher, are they better off?) let’s address the fact that the number of male breadwinners is declining. I agree with you which is why marriage rates are declining as well. Feminism seeks to emasculate men while demanding more of them.

        If feminists don’t hate men, I can’t imagine how they could hurt them more if they didn’t.

        https://youtu.be/Wzr12gBrXA8?t=37

        Later on, we’ll address how feminists hate women too.

      99. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 9, 2018 at 7:14 am

        You lost me with the argument that men work more and therefore deserve more pay! Unfortunately it doesn’t work that way! At least in the United States you paid the hour and you can demand to see the pay rates of others if you feel you are being underpaid. Both men and women work hard and both men and women are slackers. Equal pay for equal work. Period.

      100. PolishKnightUSA January 9, 2018 at 8:38 pm

        When you say “men work more and therefore deserve more pay”, how is that NOT a logical thing to observe? The wage gap statistic is a falsehood that uses per capita earnings (comparing average women’s earnings to men) without consideration of the type of work being performed.

        In regards to your generalization that “both men and women work hard”. So what? A waiter may work just as hard as a doctor but one is paid more. Even two waiters may work hard but one gets paid more. My wife actually figured this out at her first job: She saw that if she waited 12 tables, she got the same tips (just less per table) then if she paid more attention to 6. So she asked for less tables. She got paid the same for less work. Just a life observation.

        Regarding slacking: If you google the adjusted pay rates between men and women considering similar jobs, experience, cost-of-living, etc. then the wage gap shrinks to about a nickel. Note that doesn’t prove discrimination but even if it did, consider the difference between the quoted wage gap of 23 cents compared to that nickel: This means that sexist choices BY WOMEN (which I’ll address in another comment) results in an income transfer from men to women via marriage, the welfare state, etc. of 18 cents.

        How many feminists are crying to correct that disparity and return the funds to men?

        Exactly.

      101. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 12, 2018 at 9:30 pm

        Hey dumb ass, I didn’t say that….I was replying to the comment above that said that. Men don’t work more than women do so the agument is null and void. You will find hard workers of both sexes.
        You think you’re being smart by attacking my comments…when in reality you’re just showing your lack of intelligence.

      102. PolishKnightUSA January 12, 2018 at 10:08 pm

        So what?

        A maid probably works just as hard as the most skilled brain surgeon who keeps 3 day a week office hours, but do you want to pay the maid the same as the doctor? Do you want to pay people who work half as many hours the same as those that work twice as long?

        Men earn more because men literally EARN more. Pay based upon merit: The ultimate patriarchal oppression.

        The “lack of intelligence” snipe is a clear ad-hominem attack that actually reveals your own desire to be perceived as intelligent and relevant based upon authority rather than the merit of your actual arguments. If you have a point that’s valid, just make it. Don’t go running to the Patriarchy intelligence beauty judge to decide who wins because they’re smarter. Man up.

      103. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 13, 2018 at 12:15 am

        Are you really as ignorant as your comment makes you sound??? Equal pay for equal work means that a male maid should not receive more money than a female one and the same for the brain surgeon. Either you truly are stupid or as I suspect are still trying to further your ludicrous argument, which is also very unintelligent.

      104. PolishKnightUSA January 13, 2018 at 2:59 pm

        In answer to your first question: I can’t answer it because it’s loaded.

        Now let’s go with the examples you just provided starting with brain surgeon.

        Forget the hypothetical example I gave (which is the same scenario you provided) and imagine this:

        This means that ALL brain surgeons should be paid EXACTLY the same.

        Do you think brain surgeons are all of equal capacity? Do you think some are better than others?

        I’m going through elective process for my healthcare right now and there are the better doctors my wife and I prefer who insist upon being paid more. They do this by insisting on particular healthcare plans (PPOs) that pay them more. Using your logic, ALL doctors should be forced onto an HMO and the rates all set the same.

        What this would mean is that the best doctors would all be full up including with patients that have less needs (because those patients may have just lucked out and happen to have gotten in the HMO first) while the more needy patients, who need a more experienced specialist, would be out of luck because they wouldn’t be allowed to pay more for them.

        I worked as a “maid” cleaning houses back when I was 19. I actually found it a very nice job because the manager was pleasant and respectful and the pay was alright (it was a set rate for all who worked at the temp agency). I believe there ultimately is a merit system in place: maids who work faster or better (do a more thorough job) or are willing to come in on holidays or on short notice, etc. would get paid more.

        https://fee.org/articles/truth-and-myth-on-the-gender-pay-gap/

        Now note that the study claims that there is up to 5% of the wage gap that can’t be explained but this doesn’t mean it’s necessarily due to discrimination. Quote: “So it is not a myth that there might be discrimination in labor markets.” Note: MIGHT. And at most, 5 percent.

        In the meantime, women’s own sexism of marrying up, family and criminal courts, welfare, social security benefits that disproportionately benefit women, etc. is at least 20 percent by the studies’ own explained gap that’s due to women’s own choices.

        When do us men get repaid for all of that female “privilege?” Hmmm? 🙂

      105. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 13, 2018 at 4:39 pm

        You are undoubtedly one of the most ignorant people to ever be born! Can’t answer the question because it’s loaded??? Sounds like a cop out… no, wait it is a cop out! Your next load of rubbish is just that…rubbish. What is your point you’re trying to make? That people should or shouldn’t be paid by performance? Or are you insinuating that one gender is more gifted than the other? Either way what you’re trying to say has nothing to do with what I originally said, which was equal pay for equal work….a concept that you obviously have grave difficulty grasping. So once again, let’s explain it to you. Equal pay for equal work means just that! If you are a male surgeon you have no right to more money based solely on that fact. You should only receive more based on performance. Earlier you tried to insinuate that equal pay for equal work meant that men and women should receive the same amount regardless of the task….now you’re trying to backhandly insinuate that based on performance alone, men are somehow more deserving because they will perform better! Which of course is false and ignorant of your to assume. You talk a lot and say nothing….
        Instead of trying argue bullshit about women….you need go back to school.
        Yes men act entitled….if you need proof of that….
        Read the bullshit you wrote and are trying to pass off as an intellectual argument! It’s proof of exactly what we’re saying!
        Thanks for providing such a brilliant example of how men attempt to discredit women by attacking their intellect….patheticly trying to discredit what they say. You’re only making yourself appear ignorant.

      106. PolishKnightUSA January 13, 2018 at 5:09 pm

        Whenever you say ignorant, I’m reminded of this:
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qR5tRwvuas

        If you know what a loaded question is, it’s not a copout to answer a question that requires me to make an assumption I disagree with. Are you being ignorant not knowing what a loaded question is or are you just ignorant? 🙂

        The point I’m “trying” to make is that it’s rare to find two people (male, female or otherwise) who are of the same value in any particular role and that hurts the whole “equal pay” concept from the onset. It’s funny how diversity advocates claim that everyone provides something different yet at the same time, feminists say that everyone should be paid the same in a role. This seaways into your question about performance which an ‘equal’ pay for all in a role would effectively ignore performance. And THAT seaways into the third question which does imply that if men outperform women that, maybe, men are “more gifted” at some higher paying roles than women. Note that “gifted” may mean works longer hours, doesn’t take as much time off, or more men take on higher paying and less desirable roles.

        Note that it’s not me whose saying that performance, but rather feminists who demand equal pay, period, even as:

        1) The quoted 77 cents dollar on a statistic lumps in all earnings mixing maids and brain surgeons working overtime or not together and therefore isn’t about “equal” work in the first place.
        2) Women currently are given preferential treatment in university admissions and corporate hiring already and STILL are not making as much as men.

        There is no conflict from me stating that feminist demands for equal pay for “equal work” undermines performance pay. It’s already the case considering number 1 and 2 above. It’s just a man hating feminist goodie grab. Nothing more. No conflict from me.

        You accuse me to trying to attack your intellect while I’ve merely stated my points and criticized your arguments and argued (and explained) that your behavior illustrates a lack of life experience (note: I didn’t say intelligence.) You’ve called me ignorant both at the beginning and end of the article and called my argument rubbish twice as well. That type of argument is not an intellectual response but rather childish name calling.

      107. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 13, 2018 at 5:27 pm

        When you say “loaded question” I think of “ignorant”. Why? Because you’re avoiding answering the question because you know i’m right. You have no point that you are trying to make….that’s why you’re just spouting off senseless nonsense!

      108. PolishKnightUSA January 13, 2018 at 9:35 pm

        Avoiding a question isn’t ignorance. Look up the meaning of the word (which I guess means you’re ignorant of what ignorant means). Refusing to answer a question because one doesn’t like the answer is called DENIAL.

        Which is precisely what you’re engaging in by sputtering such invectives in lieu of a response to the points I made.

        If you stopped for a moment, you might realize I’m trying to help you. You want to be a breeder for a beta male wimp? Or a gang banger 3rd world patriarch? Or a cat lady at the age of 40? You may get over this victim-entitlement nonsense by then but think of wasting the best years of your life.

        Hey, tell you what, when I was in my 20’s I tried to also be a “SJW” of sorts and ask women to live up to equality, found they weren’t interested, and moved on by my 30’s but as a man, that’s ok because that’s when I was at my peak. I had/have a great career, was more interesting, and it was actually better for me to settle down then. But you’re not in the same boat. It’s just different for you. This is when you should be HAPPY with men and ready to find a good one and settle down. But what man you’d respect would want a nasty man hater like you?

        Tell you what. If you’re interested I’d like to talk to your father and see if he can talk some sense into you. Are you interested in me and him having a talk?

      109. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 14, 2018 at 4:27 am

        Of course it’s ignorant! It conveys that you’re to weak to admit you do not have a valid answer. Face it dude…no matter how much time you waste talking you can’t change the fact that many, not all, but many men are subscribing to a toxic form of masculinity that brings about extreme behavior like what’s highlighted in this article, that hurts all of you. Another fact: current parameters for masculinity do not include healthy management of emotions. This makes life difficult for all men. Men want to be accepted and they want sympathy….want forgiveness for misbehavior. NO! Change how you view masculinity to correct the issues, mainly healthy emotional control, so that you don’t need special treatment! Every man on the planet is tortured soul to a some degree and that has zero to do with women because it’s you guys who keep towing this flawed party line. Women demand that you grow…you change you ideals because they are flawed.
        The ball is in your court. You can either grow and become a better man to be a counterpart for todays woman, or cling to your archaic beliefs and be left behind. What you have to accept is women aren’t going back to the way things used to be. That ideal was never how humans were supposed to live.
        Each person brings to the table their own personal talents….none of those are determined by gender.

      110. PolishKnightUSA January 14, 2018 at 11:38 am

        Again, you aren’t using the word “ignorant” in the proper context. Keep trying though. Is this your “go to” word in an argument?

        Next, you argue that “all” men are hurt by toxic trolls even as we started this particular discussion with you attempting to downplay the collective sexist choices and consequences of women to marry up in income or work fewer hours by arguing that we should see everyone as individuals.

        So you want to see the world in terms where it’s convenient to you and switch rules when it suits you. Did it ever occur to you that others could do the same including powerful men? Since you appear to lack empathy towards men, wouldn’t it make sense for the toxic privileged men to perhaps not rush to put their trust in someone such as you?

        So whose making which gender look bad, then?

        Regarding men growing. Er, Men are living up to the provider role in most families and have been doing so since caveman times. If anything, the reason why it’s so easy to dominate you, Lisa, is that because after millennia of YOU gals slacking, you’ve evolved to the point where you are physically and emotionally dependent upon men. This may be why you’re so p*ssed at me: Because your claimed desire for independence goes against your natural craving for a strong alpha male.

        Sorry, I’m taken. But you may be able to still have a wonderful life is you wise up before you hit your Wall (look it up in the urban dictionary)

        FYI: Saying that women won’t go back to the way it used to be is hilarious considering that feminism has turned around and embraced the most patriarchal cultures on the planet:

        https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/german-girls-refugees-welcome.jpg

        Finally, your argument about individuality conflicts with your demand that women and men be paid the same for the “same” work. If everyone brings something different to the table, that means by definition that nobody can be paid the same regardless of gender.

        http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WZZRQC9abX4/TrWre6uWUnI/AAAAAAAAAYo/kwN_1PnzRAU/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/logic101.jpg

      111. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 14, 2018 at 11:52 pm

        Once again you’re only showing your ignorance by attempting to defend the behavior discussed in the article!
        I can’t think of a better word for what you’re doing… unless it would be stupid! Trying to defend the most deplorable behavior, and bashing me for speaking out against it, is indeed ignorant. There is not one legitimate thing you can say in defense of the behavior discussed in the article. End of discussion.

      112. PolishKnightUSA January 15, 2018 at 10:08 pm

        Where do I defend the behavior of the trolls? At best, I observe that women who are so easily cowed by such trolls illustrate why men have dominated women for millennia in the first place. As long as women depend upon men to protect them, they’ll be dependent upon men.

        You call for men to grow to run up as Sir Lancelot and rescue the women from being treated as unequal. But this doesn’t make any sense. It reminds me of Emma Watson’s “he for she” program to call for weak men to run to the rescue of feminists.

        Here’s what I don’t defend. This:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J33cwr-rZvM&t=214s

        Feminism has resulted in a weak west where the weak men are so cowed by feminists that they stand aside while women are being attacked by foreign patriarchs filling in the power gap.

        Congratulations. Good job and good night.

      113. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 16, 2018 at 8:39 am

        So you’re saying the article was written by trolls??? I think you need to re-read your comments because you ARE defending this idiotic dribble.
        Moreover, you’re showing your ignorance once again because I stated in my previous comment “end of discussion”….that’s your cue to stop commenting.

      114. PolishKnightUSA January 16, 2018 at 8:30 pm

        Perhaps you can educate me as to the manners of someone making last minutes arguments and then declaring the discussion is over (without giving the other person a chance to respond) and then responding again (after the discussion is supposedly over) to make another point/question..

        Silly me. If someone keeps responding and asking questions, it’s hard to take their claims the discussion is over seriously.

        And you accuse men of acting entitled while you think you’re entitled to the last word.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qv7YB4Bs1mU

      115. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 18, 2018 at 2:54 am

        You need to educate yourself….that’s not my responsibility. You seem to talk a lot and say nothing. Like has been stated before, the views in the article are deplorable. If you support that nonsense, you’re ignorant. End of discussion.

      116. Person March 8, 2018 at 10:50 pm

        Everyones in their peak in their 30’s. They’re the years when you’re still pretty/handsome, whatever, and you’re mature with a steady job and home and have the option to get another pet without your roommate reminding you this isn’t a zoo, goddamnit, Amanda. I remember a neighbor telling me the best decision she ever made was getting married in her 30’s, and relaxing and getting an education in her 20’s. It’s not different for women, who wants to settle down that early when you’re still gone be alive for probably another 60 years? That’s dumb. Settle down when you’re mentally ready. My friends 80 year old grandma just started dating, it’s never too late.

      117. PolishKnightUSA March 9, 2018 at 9:52 am

        Hehehe. When I was in my early 30’s, I dated women in their 30’s who wouldn’t have ordinarily given me the time of day.

        Even with space technology, the window on starting a family for a woman is closing pretty quickly in their early 30’s not just biologically but emotionally. My wife married me in her 20’s and she says that she was getting set in her ways even then. This was one factor why those dates didn’t work out: those women had developed “independant” personalities that turned off a lot of choice men aside from their aging.

        Women’s own dating lifestyles certainly doesn’t help them “age” well either: For men, it’s “make or break”. Either a man learns how to deal with rejection, personal emotional growth to become more interesting and valuable, how to be more “charming”, etc or… he winds up alone. Men aren’t shown Disney films telling us to sleep in a tower waiting for a princess to kiss and wake us up and cash in.

        For attractive women, it’s kind of a trap for them to think their behavior in their 20’s is charming and cute because men put up with it. It’s like going to a high end store with a fist full of cash and the clerks all telling you how charming you are. Then you go and don’t have money and your bad jokes aren’t funny anymore.

        So 30 year old women still have a lot of options, don’t get me wrong. Heck, they’re still better off than most men but NOT as much as in their 20’s when hiding in Shrek’s dragon tower could still get a few beta males with money to scale it. They need to get out there and develop some emotional “common sense.”

        Back to those women I dated: They acted on dates like they were 2 year olds at Chuck-E-Cheeses. They wanted to be wined and dined and entertained and would dump me for the slightest infraction. By the time I developed my clown game skillset, I realized that I could have better choices too. You know the saying “It’s just as easy to fall in love with a rich man as a poor one?” Well, the same goes even moreso for men who mature: I had choices and used them.

        Even so, looking back, I have compassion for the situation these women faced. They weren’t all bad. They lacked social skills due to atrophy (like some kid playing Dungeons and Dragons his whole teenage years and then trying to date) and they wanted to have a family and had a target date of 5 years or so to make that happen and so they didn’t want to waste their time (and mine). The traditional dinner date where men pays ironically also creates that sense of urgency but even so, the woman’s time (even with a free meal) was quickly running out.

        Note: This is in their _30s_.

        Keep in mind like I said that a woman that goes online and just does some basic stuff like post a photo with less than 10 face piercings, takes a bit of care of herself, and such can get a hundred responses in less than a day. But they won’t all be from 6 foot tall professionals. It’s still pretty easy for a woman who makes a sincere EFFORT in her 30’s to get married and have kids with a decent man but it’s not like the fish jumping into the bucket a decade earlier.

        This was my father’s dream day:
        https://youtu.be/x3Bf0WhvsNk?t=153

        So your claim that “everyones in their peak in their 30’s” is, pardon my language, such complete utter bullshit. Really. Ask any woman whose 35 if she wouldn’t want to look like she’s 25 again if she could push a button.

        For men, our health in our 30’s is certainly not as much as in our 20’s BUT that’s not our primary, er, fishing equipment. Women don’t attract men with their income and tastes because they don’t offer them. If I’m paying for dinner, what does it matter whether the woman sitting across from me is a doctor or store clerk? I’m reminded that I’m still going to have to earn a living. I personally know some exceptionally attractive, successful men who said they would NEVER date a woman doctor. Ever.

      118. PolishKnightUSA March 9, 2018 at 10:10 am

        An additional observation about why I think it’s especially tough for (decent, but provincial) women in their 30’s to date:

        The standard dinner date paradigm encourages men to be liars. The more he invests in a woman, the more incentive he has to just “see it through” to nookie even if he doesn’t see a long term relationship. His time has value as well in that he had to put on a show (to avoid getting rejected for saying something stupid) and pay for the dates so like Apolla 13, it’s easier to just go to the moon than turn back.

        So 30 something women on dates with a timeline may face the fear that if she does spend a month or so with a guy and rejects other prospects to focus on him, that he’s “playing” her. This “play” is partially due to her own demand that he “earn” her attention. After sleeping with him and her becoming emotionally attached and even starting to make plans, he then may look for ways to break it off. And how these men may do it reminds me of when a girl broke up with me:

        She just became nasty and disconnected to try to drive me to break up with her. She didn’t answer my phone calls right away. She found things to complain about. She lowered my self esteem which ironically made it harder for me to want to break up with her (sort of unintentional DV abuse). Under normal circumstances, I would have been happy to tell her adios and move on but she didn’t want the burden of telling me to my face why she wanted to break up with me (it was shallow) so she wound up being a jerk for a few months and then pulled the trigger. I got over it relatively quickly in that I figured out what happened a week later.

        But imagine the situation these men are in: They got nookie and now they want to dump her but how? If they just say: “I used you for nookie”, she might go crazy. If he acts like a jerk, he may also get some serious blowback. So instead he may play disconnected or just string her along for a while until she loses interest or decides it’s not going anywhere. Ironically, due to the social chivalrous construct to protect women, it encourages men to be even more dishonest with them.

        So it’s not uncommon for these waste relationships to last a year or more. One woman colleague told me that she was with such a guy for _6_ years.

        This is one messed up, dysfunctional society we live in.

      119. Jack July 6, 2018 at 1:49 am

        There is no male maid that makes more than a woman. Use your brain. But you could do an experiment and go to every business in America and ask if there is a difference in wage between male and female for the same job–there isn’t. You hold this view because the mainstream media has brainwashed you into seeing it. Men only make more money annually that women–that is the wage gap “issue”. And this is because they work longer and more.

      120. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson July 6, 2018 at 5:18 am

        😂😂😂😂 How do you know?! If had a brain you know that, yes men are still often paid more than women for the same work. It’s sickening. Men need to grow up and stop acting superior, when it’s more than obvious they aren’t….your comment is proof of that. 😂😂

      121. Jack July 6, 2018 at 4:11 pm

        No they aren’t. There is no proof of this because it doesn’t happen. The 0.76$ on the dollar nonsense is only ANNUALLY. Because women get pregnant and don’t work as much overtime. The reason you believe otherwise is literally because the mainstream media pushes the view you have even when presented with facts. It’s an agenda. Roosh points out why this is so in his cultural collapse theory. Regardless of your opinion of him, facts are facts. Worry more about the sociopaths that ultimately own the mainstream media and their agenda to stay in power and direct your anger at them.

      122. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson July 6, 2018 at 10:38 pm

        More bullshit! Women don’t work less overtime, they work MORE! Plus most jobs don’t offer family leave so you don’t get more than a week tops for birth, unless you have banked vacation time. Unless you quit, you can’t take off time. Whether you like or not there is still a major pay gap and it’s absolutely disgusting that it’s happening in 2018.

      123. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 13, 2018 at 12:17 am

        Oh you need to change your avatar here because you do have the integrity to call yourself a “knight” of anything.

      124. Person March 8, 2018 at 10:43 pm

        I read a study where identical resumes were submitted to scientists for a laboratory manager position. Half were under male names, and the other under female names. The resumes were the same, yet the female applicants still were offered less salary than the men, were considered less competent, less likely to be mentored, and less employable. Key words being “less salary.” If they were actually hired, the women would have earned less for the same position. I’m sure this has actually happened in other places.

      125. kai July 12, 2018 at 6:44 pm

        Lisa look at all your comments! you have so much to say and bless the world with your knowledge

      126. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson July 12, 2018 at 6:59 pm

        Ooooo Trying to shame me for speaking out…How mature of you! YOU should read my comments because they are undoubtedly the most accurate you will read on this comment thread.😉

      127. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 18, 2018 at 2:49 am

        So you’re saying because some married men made bad choices and are not happy that means all married men are unhappy…. dude your pathetic attempt to undermine her answer just proved that it’s right! A majority of married men are happy…. and statistics back that statement up! Since you commented somewhere here that you were married… are you one of the ones who made a bad choice? Is that why you’re so butt hurt because you choose poorly? Instead of taking responsibility for that, you’re blaming women and the institution of marriage it’s self…
        Typical immature male.

      128. PolishKnightUSA January 18, 2018 at 9:48 pm

        Er, in answer to your first question, I said, quote: “Married men are happier and healthier” So that hardly means that all married men are unhappy.

        I argued something slightly different: “Happy” (or successful, wealthy men) tend to be more attractive to women than “unhappy” or poor men who tend to have health issues, etc.

        And that’s not necessarily a bad thing. It’s quite reasonable for sensible women to avoid loser men just as sensible men should avoid young and pretty train wrecks.

        Now that I’ve restated and elaborated on what I said, I won’t answer your next questions (they are irrelevant), a few remarks about personal responsibility you brought up:

        Numerous studies (including from leftist journals) agree that women are LESS happy as women’s rights progress:

        https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/may/18/womens-rights-happiness-wellbeing-gender-gap

        So either happiness isn’t all it’s cracked up to be or women are making lousy choices, eh?

        Lisa, based upon the tone of your articles, you don’t sound very happy yourself which isn’t a bad thing if you’re doing so in order to explore new ideas and to perhaps reconsider what you want out of life. I went through it too. The process of change requires a confrontation that what one has been doing has been a mistake, fighting for the ideals that you hold dear, and then letting them go and moving on to something better. Sometimes it means being happy that although a situation is bad, that you accept the consequences of it and will live with it. I’m saying I went through similar choices myself.

        I also abandoned some ideas that I thought made sense in my 30’s. That’s why I’m happily married. Well, happier than I was single. 🙂 But I did also find ways to make lemons out of lemonade and adapt to the changes I felt I needed to make.

        Note that I’m not just saying “you’re bad and I’m great” here. I’m having a philosophical discussion about the choices that we make as people and uniquely as men and women.

      129. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 18, 2018 at 10:17 pm

        You’re talking out of your ass. You talk a lot and say nothing…so how about shutting the fuck up. I’m sick of you trying to talk your sorry ass out of the fact that you’re continuing to support this bullshit article.

      130. Person March 8, 2018 at 10:57 pm

        Women are less happy, because life is full of bills, college, broken down cars, coworkers who don’t like you, or you don’t like, pain, disappointment and then death. I know I was a lot happier when I thought I went to the magic beard in the sky. We caught up to where men did, because they shouldn’t carry that burden alone. I’m sure if women stopped working, especially in this economy where a tiny house is the same price as a regular house and a trailer costs 3,000 just to move, they’re be worse off. That’s too much pressure for one person to handle.

      131. PolishKnightUSA March 9, 2018 at 9:25 am

        This argument of yours is counter logical: You just acknowledged that the post-feminist economy has increased the cost of living so why would going back make things worse?

        But indeed, in the short run, feminism has made it so that most women HAVE to work rather than as a pleasant option. It wasn’t to help men “carry the burden” but rather was pitched to women as what I refer to as “the double dip”:

        https://youtu.be/jY2T_fDQi4g?t=12

        Women were told they could earn as much as a man AND still marry a man who earned at least as much as they did. But with “choice”, of course, some women could marry men who earned less but THEY didn’t have to do that if they didn’t want to. (wink).

        And during the 70’s and 80’s, the early days, it worked. There was a massive number of baby boomers with Gen X women (fewer in number) who wanted to marry them. So it was possible to have prices remain relatively static while the man’s income went to pay for all that stuff and she could splurge on diamonds, designer handbags and shoes, and flushing money down the toilet for the fun of it (ok, not quite that but pretty close.)

        This is still portrayed as the dream lifestyle in films such as Fifty Shades or S*x and the City. These urban women would spend their modest incomes entirely on shoes and clothes and expect men to pick up the rest of the tab. Since this so rarely happens now, these programs are wish fulfillment similar to adult films pitched at men that have hot women deliver pizza and take “trade” in lieu of payment.

        In regards to another comment you made about women who outearn men: There are some special cases where that has worked such as high income women who marry community college professors who have high status but low income. It’s also pretty sweet to be a policeman or civilian marine (handsome also is a plus) because successful career women want to get out of parking tickets and what woman friend at a party is going to DARE frown down upon such a man? Those particular top-level blue collar working class Joe Six Packs used to marry working class women but now they’re off the market. This helps to explain why marriage rates imploded for blue collar women: Their choice men were picked off the top by the professional women leaving them with leftovers they didn’t want (and ironically raised. Most poor and criminal men are raised by single mothers).

        When I see a single lower income woman with a boy I often wonder if she should perhaps just let him play in traffic and get it out of the way. This segways to your ridiculous claim that feminism was intended to REMOVE pressure from working men.

        Do you see now why that is so hilarious? Feminism has put more minority men into prison than Jim Crow!

        But hey, for a $2,000 handbag that is fashionable for a few years or so, it’s worth it.

      132. wolfgang548 . September 9, 2017 at 12:09 pm

        Married men make more money than single men, that’s because companies like to hire married men more because he needs to work more to support a family. And after he’s made more money due to this fact, he loses most if not all that he worked for after she divorces him. Single men may make less than married men, but single men keep what they earned and will never lose it to divorce. And single men outlive married men.

        And women are happy that MGTOW men are leaving them alone? I wonder why this is.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqp071t2Bds

      133. wolfgang548 . September 9, 2017 at 12:57 pm

        Since 3rd wave feminism, many women changed for the worst. They act more like men. They sleep and slut themselves around without shame. They preach how men need to learn to respect them when they can’t even respect themselves. And I believe nature sees this imbalance and has given man a choice in a newly formed woman, at least for those wise enough to see it.

        https://transsingleblog.wordpress.com/2016/05/30/why-get-a-transgender-girlfriend/

        https://buzzfeed.com/dominicholden/estimated-transgender-population-doubles?utm_term=.sj4ybVRpB#.qn9jzmyD6

        https://mic.com/articles/128972/uterus-transplant-surgery-could-transwomen-carry-children#.LtXOXm3s4

      134. BobTrent January 18, 2016 at 5:32 pm

        “…physically women ARE inferior…”
        Except for one thing that a properly functioning one does: reproduce our kind. The purpose of a woman, distinct from a man, is to receive semen, gestate a new human being, pop him, or her, out and nurture the child while she or he is small.
        What else do they do better than men?
        A sexless human, whether DNA-coded male or female, has nothing in its crotch, no breasts, and a generally soft, effeminate masculine physique.
        A female that is missing ovaries, uterus and vagina looks pretty much like a 10 year old boy. A male that is missing testicles will grow up to resemble that same 10 year old boy. The female will have a vestigial penis, a clitoris, like genitally complete women. The male will have a vestigial penis not much larger than a normal clitoris.
        Female eunuchs are rare as females who don’t have ovaries usually had them while they were growing up but had to have them removed. Congenital female eunuchs are quite rare.

      135. Caroline Carlson February 3, 2016 at 4:28 pm

        Women do most of the work in most cultures. We deal with pain better than men and spend more time supporting the society.

      136. harold August 3, 2016 at 6:37 pm

        Why can’t women stop themselves from being raped?

      137. Caroline Carlson August 3, 2016 at 9:20 pm

        Probably the same reasons men can’t stop themselves from being raped from other men

      138. harold August 3, 2016 at 10:28 pm

        I wouldn’t know anything about that. But the majority of men seem to be able to.

      139. Caroline Carlson August 4, 2016 at 1:18 am

        Maybe educate yourself on the topic.

      140. harold August 4, 2016 at 4:34 pm

        Why would I educate myself on homo rape

      141. Caroline Carlson August 4, 2016 at 4:35 pm

        Because you are clearly uneducated about the subject of rape in general.

      142. Sangelia May 10, 2017 at 9:50 pm

        harold, rape isn’t about sex. It is about trying to maintain control over someone the rapist considers to be second or third class. And is trying to send a message to the victim that they were supposedly getting too uppity.

      143. dudester4 June 21, 2017 at 3:33 am

        Debunked along with the rest of the Duluth theory of male oppression. The percentage of elderly women who get raped is very small.

      144. Person March 8, 2018 at 11:12 pm

        Men are not psychically superior. Women are more flexible, and I’ve heard that the longer a distant in marathons and long distance swimming, they greater a chance we have at winning. There have been some studies saying we have better endurance, but none that I’ve seen suggesting men do. So, at the very least, we’re equal in that way.

      145. Pinns February 3, 2016 at 2:40 pm

        Women are physically inferior? Hmm. They only have the ability to grow humans…. Retard.

      146. Bahlza Dragon February 3, 2016 at 4:07 pm

        So, despite the fact that I pointed out that men are physically stronger and have more stamina (weight lifting, marathons, etc.) and that they’re more durable (combat, etc.), you focus on the fact that women are effective receptacles. At least we agree on that.

      147. Caroline Carlson February 3, 2016 at 4:29 pm

        Women do most of the farming and food production. Men would starve. The tasks you are describing( weight lifting ) is frivolous . Look globally at the fact that women do most of the actual food production and farming.

      148. I Art Laughing February 4, 2016 at 2:59 pm

        Citation?

      149. Caroline Carlson February 4, 2016 at 3:35 pm

        Umm laughing man here is where you need to put on a pair of big girl panties and actually not rely on this site to provide you with your entire education. If you went to college and took sociology this was covered. We’re you sleeping off a hang over that day. If you look globally at food production women do the majority of the food production. If I said water was wet would you require citations for that? I’m not going to waste time outlining basic , general information. Again your local library is a great source if you need help with reading comprehension. Many have free classes. Discover the magic that is Google if you don’t remember facts from your entry level college courses.

      150. I Art Laughing February 4, 2016 at 11:52 pm

        Brought to us by the socialists from the Critical Theory school. Sociology class? Try reading a book dummy (one that isn’t propaganda).

      151. Caroline Carlson February 5, 2016 at 12:18 am

        I have a masters degree. I read a lot of books. Sociology was an elective when I got my undergrad degree. Not propaganda. Standard sociology 101. I wasn’t a sociology major but I enjoyed reading about other cultures and social theory so I took a number of sociology classes as electives. University of Minnesota . And for the record and maybe I’m taxing your brain here …..sociology isn’t the study of socialism….that’s political theory……and a whole different branch of study……comes under the realm of political science……. Sociology is about the theories of social behavior and societal norms in different cultures as well as our own. Wow you did sleep through class. Did you really sleep through you whole,college experience. Basic basic shit . Aren’t you at all interested in actual facts and research?

      152. I Art Laughing February 5, 2016 at 11:56 am

        Basically “1984” put into practice. Soft science propaganda.

        Actual facts? Show me the studies and their metrics. Because based on what I know about the hard science of statistics there was no decent aggregation of facts to support your claims. Just women’s studies pontification off of a cocktail napkin pipe dream.

      153. Dana Scully February 4, 2016 at 10:37 am

        I fail to see how men being more apt to display feats of explosive strength justifies their higher social status when women have longer stamina, do better in survival situations, are less prone to disease, have higher pain thresholds, and literally can make people in their bodies. But sure, it’s cool that some male specimens are kind of strong. Though men should remember, that doesn’t mean the average man is strong. Most men I see have soggy tummies and skinny legs and a woman half their size with a lower center of gravity could easily incapacitate them with a leg sweep or palm thrust to the nose. Somehow male Olympians have become the stand in for all men, but that, given the reality of male physical mediocrity, is a myth that women need to expose simply by talking about it more.

      154. I Art Laughing February 4, 2016 at 2:58 pm

        LOL. I guess all of that supposed raping is being perpetrated by the weaker sex. Or maybe it’s not rape, or maybe it’s better not forcable. Oh, who will stop the big strong men?

      155. ADN the Deplorable April 5, 2016 at 6:44 am

        Interesting how all these leg sweeps and palm thrusts never seem to do them much good when confronting real world violence.

      156. I Art Laughing April 5, 2016 at 3:11 pm

        Cognitive dissonance never slows down the true SJW. They have no cognition to begin with.

      157. Ravi Macho June 6, 2016 at 9:28 pm

        Well said. They will never accept the fact that they are far far far far far inferior and weaker than Men. I guess we Men have to blame ourselves in trusting and giving these s**t h***s this much of freedom, entitlement, “free pass” in many aspects and allowing them to get away without any repercussions, consequences and accountability.

        Let’s take a simple example of what we use in our daily routine:

        Air conditioner, Fan (Ceiling/Table), Microwave, Refrigerator, Dish washer, Washing Machine/Dryer, Lighter, Gas, Radio / Tape recorder, CD / DVD / VHS, Television, Watches, Lighting, Electricity / Power, Computer, Internet, USB / Blue-Tooth etc., Lift / Elevator, Vehicles, Transmission, Engine / Gear / Ball bearing / Tires, Printing technology, Photography / Cameras / Lenses, Cinema / Entertainment, Type writer, Antiseptics, Antibiotics, Surgery, Mathematics / Geography / Chemistry / Physics / Biology etc., Diagnostics (X-Ray etc.), Music / Instruments, Web / Internet, Sewing Machine, Aeronautical, Shoes, Sewage System, Toilet paper !

        OMG, I just can’t go with the full list …

        Wimyn should find themselves lucky to be able to “effortlessly” live and bask on the “success and hard work” of Men, ever since the evolution began.

      158. Person March 8, 2018 at 11:33 pm

        YOU didn’t give us anything. Logical, smart and caring men gave us those freedoms and creations. Again, not you. You did nothing. And you probably never will. Don’t piggy back off the work those men did. I’m sure a lot of those inventions were probably stolen, just like the woman who invented the paper back machine, who if I recall correctly said something like “I couldn’t let a woman make such a discovery.” Then there was nuclear fission (eventually the atom bomb) that was jacked from a woman, and signal flares. Oh, and then there was the first computer programmer, ada lovelace. In fact, computer programming was considered woman’s work. Then men wanted in and started calling it too complicated for us, and are now saying it’s because we’re intellectually inferior. Yet, it was a woman who invented the algorithm. You know nothing, Jon Snow.

      159. Ravi Macho June 6, 2016 at 9:16 pm

        Even before a women with “lower gravity” could incapacitate Men, Men can pretty much & quite easily could “pulp” the women, in more ways (not just a leg sweep or palm thrust to the nose).
        Women are more “weaker, tender and vulnerable in the groin”, just refer Wikipedia. It’s only because of social, cultural and legal reasons Men don’t “serve” a “nice and clean leg sweep” to women !!!
        I know that there is no point in arguing with your kind of inferior, weaker and smelly cunts !.

      160. Person March 8, 2018 at 11:41 pm

        Mgtow is designed to make women look bad. You find the worst examples of women, and make it look like it’s a general rule. Look up survival lily. And women had won on that show survival. Here’s the difference between male and female survival skills: Sons are usually taken out and shown how to hunt, how to start fires, how to fish, how to pitch a tent or find shelter or water. Daughters aren’t taught any of those things. Women are just as capable to survive as men, but if you aren’t shown how to do something, you won’t KNOW HOW. It’s as simple as that. Men don’t have some biological advantage to, you know, live anywhere not air conditioned or with plumbing.

      161. wolfgang548 . March 13, 2018 at 9:40 am

        Person – And feminism was designed to make men look bad. MGTOW is men walking walking from the gynocentrism that has laws biased against them and in favor of women.

      162. Person March 29, 2018 at 6:50 pm

        What? Example? What biased laws? Feminism doesn’t make men look bad. You fell for the propaganda, like most mgtows do.

      163. Person March 8, 2018 at 11:15 pm

        Men do not have more stamina. The reason men beat marathons is because men are generally faster, but women are less fatigued by the end of it. I’ve seen reports saying women have more stamina, but none suggesting men do. The greater the distance, the more likely the woman is to win. Plus, we’re more flexible.

      164. PolishKnightUSA March 9, 2018 at 2:49 pm

        Logic 101: If this was the case then women would hold the record for longest and fastest marathons. FYI, the world record (kenyans seem to have some type of physique that’s useful for the task) is 2:02 for men and 2:15 for women.

        How that works on average, of course, is another matter and especially consider average men and women versus athletes.

      165. Ravi Macho August 26, 2016 at 9:10 pm

        Ability to grow humans ? Hmm. without a MAN penetrating/impregnating/fertilizing the Eggs !? Hmm… what a MORON you are !!! Women are NOT doing any FAVOR or anything GREAT or EXTRA ORDINARY ! Getting pregnant and giving birth is 100% NATURAL damn it !!!

        BUT:
        Penicillin is NOT Natural !
        Power/Current/Electricity (in the form we are using) is NOT Natural !
        Washing Machine is NOT Natural !
        Refrigerator is NOT Natural !
        Television is NOT Natural !
        Camera/Lens/Audio/Video Recording is NOT Natural !
        Computer/Internet etc. are NOT Natural !
        Google, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn are NOT Natural !

        Lookout who Invented, Innovated and Pioneered things that are NOT Natural !!!! And yes, women are inferior to MEN; not just physically but in ALL the aspects !!!

      166. Ravi Macho May 11, 2017 at 12:31 pm

        Showing or pointing out “exceptions” doesn’t change the reality ! Indeed, better programmers are pussies ! yes, pussies invented Operating Systems, Programming Languages, Compilers, Scripting, Hardware and what not !! Indeed, pussies invented the Internet, the Keyboard and the Disqus platform using which you typed your “pathetic” reply !

        Ever heard about “Father of GYNECOLOGY ” or “Tampon” (the one you keep between your lower lips !) !? Indeed, that woman Invented Transmission, Gears, Ball Bearings, Tires, Glass, and NOW “wiper blades” !!!

        Tissue Paper (with which you wipe your ass every day !), Flush, Electricity/Power, Telephone, Refrigerator, Microwave, Radio, Battery Cell (using which you enjoy the MAN MADE dildo !!) … ALL these things are indeed Invented by pussies !!!

        This will be my last reply, reason !? Replying to your kind of “inferior, weak, pathetic” pussies is like; throwing stone on “pile of shit” !

      167. Person March 8, 2018 at 11:47 pm

        I hope that if you ever need a heart transplant, it’s done by a woman so you can understand that we aren’t the pathetic, useless things you think we are. And btw, you didn’t do any of those things. So, you are in no place to talk. Just because our ancestors didn’t do as much as your ancestors, even though it’s justified because when they did they usually got their credit stolen from them, and they were vastly discouraged from doing anything other than birth, doesn’t mean we aren’t capable of greater things. And just because your ancestors did great things, doesn’t mean you deserve the credit. Because you don’t. Again, you are more than likely an average man, but studies do show that men do have are extremely arrogant and constantly over estimating their abilities.

      168. PolishKnightUSA March 9, 2018 at 2:43 pm

        Hello Person. Tell you what: If men as a group could be judged as individuals rather than sharing collective guilt, then your argument that men aren’t entitled to credit would be valid.

        But even with that consideration, I chuckled at your claim that women got credit stolen from them or they were vastly discouraged from doing anything but their assigned role.

        Didja ever think that maybe most men have been in the same boat?

        News flash: Not all men were privileged CEO’s throughout history. Thomas Edison and JP Morgon famously stole Tesla’s AC power patents (after trying to discredit them). The Television patent was stolen from Farnsworth via muscled litigation by RCA and GE. Most men did not get their hands held to get where they wanted to go. On the contrary, this is why the millennial “snowflakes” are so easily offended and discouraged: THEY have lived their lives with everything handed to them while the rest of humanity throughout history had to “fight” for it, so to speak.

        And giving birth is not a bad thing. Many women now would love to have children but can’t. To have children is a privilege that men had to EARN by providing an income. Only in a welfare state (which robs from others, you know, “stealing”) can feminists pretend that they can give birth, or not, when they please without concern with how to pay for it.

        How long would the Sweden’s gender equality last without a “stealing” welfare state?

      169. Keith May 11, 2017 at 6:04 pm

        That’s nonsense. There were other patents held by men for wind screen wipers before Mary Anderson proffered hers. Mary Anderson hired a male designer to flesh out her idea. She just gets more credit for being female. Women were not the first programmers. Females were merely hired to do a job that involved moving cables on the ENIAC because it was to tedious work more suited for females. These women did not invent programming. They did not know programming. They just followed directions and learned by rote. These were bright women who were given a an incredible opportunity by the amazing men who built a computer and developed programming. Men have to create the opportunities before women can exploit them. That was typical chauvinistic cherry picking but now start your list of the almost infinite contributions of men that benefit us all.

      170. Caroline Carlson February 3, 2016 at 4:19 pm

        Women live longer and can deal with physical pain much better than men. If the only think you base men’s ” superior” physical status on is their ability to lift more weight then you have a sad concept of superior.

      171. Harshvardhan Singh June 1, 2016 at 4:40 am

        women have that ability only in labor pain , and to bear that pain hormones gets activated by body…not in general women have more capablity of dealing with pain..your nonsense is has been debunked way back.but it seems social sciences studies and specially women studies are creating bunch of idiots insociety.high time to go for har sciences

      172. Caroline Carlson June 1, 2016 at 12:30 pm

        I work in medicine. Have a masters degree. There have been studies on this. Women can perceive pain. More quickly but we tolerate it much much longer than men. These were not studies of women in labor. These were double blind studies of men and women in pain tolerance . Your assumptions are ill informed and incorrect.

      173. Harshvardhan Singh June 1, 2016 at 1:16 pm

        do u really think whatever u say in name of being a medical student i will take it as gospel of truth..such kind of feminist ,researchs are well debunked ,,u ppl disguise as scholars and are agenda driven,,there is no such scientifically proved fact what u r claiming,,its mere a theory ,open tochallenge and refutable not a universal truth like law of gravitation…u work in medicine ,i also have many doctors friends who are well in different kinds of medical fields having awesome careers and doing great research,,they dont agree with claim that u made,,nor they push their reserach because they aren’t idelogically driven,and cite me refrence ,who has done such study n where its published is it well recieved by medical experts world wide, has it become a medical fact?,in which journal it was published ,what is reputation of that n journal on international platform? ..to me u r just sounding a person simply making claims ,even one more person asked u for refrences of your one of feminists claims of so called women superiority and u dindt provide any..and gone are those days when science used to be true inquiry of truth ,post feminism every scientific claims are being just made to prove superiority of females..bigots disguise themselves as scientists and make variou claims which any sane mind witnessing reality findit totallyflawed..anyways citations plz.i alsowant to see who made that great discovery what u claim..on contrary , i can also cite studies made by well practicing medics that women are far inferior ,than men in pain tolernce,,but i never do that in any forum,because i myself a p.hd student in engineering field ,and i percisely know the differnece between scientific theory and scientific fact,,one changes with time an is subject to scrutiny and can be proved to be false whereas scientific fact is that no one in this world can deny example sun rising in east or universal law of gravitation,,even darwins theory of evolution has been under sccrutiny and scientits now have some other theories as well.because it was a theory not fact hence it isalways open to scrutiny.scientific ideas n theories keep changing with time unless they turn into scientific fact..this is what any true researcher knows.he just puts his theory forward ,never makes claims as being ultimate..unlike u ..now luking at your childish behaviour of making claim regarding one gener based on theory(which is doubtful weather its true or agenda driven) i seriously doubt your degree..

      174. Ravi Macho June 6, 2016 at 10:22 pm

        Well said Bro. We clearly know that these wimyn inherently suffer with inferiority complex. If indeed “child labor pain” is that much (excruciatingly) painful, I don’t think the world population would be this large (billions !!!).

        Strange enough, how many times a wimyn goes through the so called “labor pain” and for how loooooong !!!!!????
        Are we still living in a century old world !? Medical advances (almost ALL of them by MEN) have “drastically” reduced any pain/side effects.

        Society in general has always done “injustice” to Men. A man also goes through similar (I bet more pain) “emotional” pain when his wife is carrying and delivering. And this pain is often ignored ! I don’t want to list the sacrifices, burdens, stress, tension, physical, emotional and “financial” issues a Man goes through. Guess no body (including his better-half) gives a shit !

        I am not really concerned and am least bothered about the amerikan/western wimyn (they are “separate” species !). Let them go to hell. But I am concerned about our wimyn.

        Our wimyn will do B.E / B.Tech in Private collges (majority of them) by paying donation, which is paid by their father (a man !). After that they will try their best to get F1-Visa in a “so so” University in the States and get into the corporate companies on entry level positions. It’s a FACT them majority of them take help of their “friends” (read: MEN) in each and every aspect and still they believe they are independent/strong/empowered !!!

        When they are here, they will see ALL the wimyn of the “separate” species in every place wearing “sweat pants” / half naked dressing / displaying thighs/thongs / imitating Men in every aspect (walking style, body language, expressions).

        Our wimyn also notice the attitude, entitlement, bitchy, arrogant, UN-feminine nature of these “separate” species coupled with the fact that “how easily” they can get away with their irresponsible, stupid, terrible, violent and dangerous behavior.

        This is sending “wrong” signals to our already half-spoiled wimyn !

        These wimyn surpass Men in Smoking, Drinking Alcohol, Sleeping with ‘n’ number of people/Slutting, Drunk driving, Crossing “Red” signals, Visiting Bars/Clubs, well the list goes on…

        Come ON MEN, enough is enough. Time for Masculinity and Machismo.

      175. MatrixSnowden February 24, 2017 at 5:13 am

        Actually, women feel pain MORE than men on average. Tolerance threshold bases is ambiguos in the empirical research youre pseudo citing. Men, if youre going to let her make us look stupid, youre contributing to the bullshit. Furthermore Caroline, if you are in any way shape or form debating that men overall are more built for survival purposes and endurance and I am not saying you are, but you would clearly be oblivious to reality. We now have military women in america competing AND passing at MUCH lower standards than the men, puting lives at risk. Please give me a effin break.

      176. Mario June 4, 2016 at 5:04 pm

        Really? Are you trying to suggest that what lift weight isn’t the same thing that made men protectors of women? You really think women are better suited for survival then men? And it is not survival the whole essence of “superior”?

      177. Caroline Carlson June 11, 2016 at 11:58 am

        Food production is the whole essence of survival and women have always done the majority of that.

      178. MatrixSnowden February 24, 2017 at 5:17 am

        Again, Caroline… because women gathered while men hunted because women have always until recentlt been expected to hold their own weight an chilling with the tribe picking berries was EASIER than taking down game and fighting off other tribes. Lay off of the anthropology and do some evolutionary biology research or is STEM to hard for the irrational female brain?

      179. Donny Burgon October 25, 2016 at 3:02 am

        lol women live longer because they take fewer risks. Men are risk-takers, innovators, the people who bring change about. Also, the streets you walked to day, all of that was built by men in sky-high scaffolds and men kneeling on the ground moving large blocks of concrete. A world without men would be a post-apocalyptic one..

      180. Caroline Carlson October 25, 2016 at 11:01 pm

        Top three killers of men are 1. heart attacks. 2. Cancer 3. Cerebrovascular events ( strokes) So men taking risks isn’t as relevant as you think it is . More boys have birth defects, intellectual disabilities , autism and die as fetus,infants and children. Just biologically weaker due to a preference for male offspring. Males being more desired have always gotten preferential treatment over females. So the result was that heartier girls survived and a weaker strain of boys was promoted. Weaker males are the product of selective care difference. However nature sees the necessity of females to the continuation of the species so perhaps that plays a part. No one is asking for a world without men. We are asking for a world not dominated by men. There was civilization before sky high scaffolding . Women worldwide produce the majority of the food. Food is more important to survival than skyscrapers and always has been. Women have always been innovators and inventors. Social restrictions just mask the reality of that.

      181. wolfgang548 . September 9, 2017 at 10:44 am

        Why shouldn’t we have a world without men? After all, women are always ranting how they don’t need a man, are men necessary, etc. Or is it that you women know you need men more than you want to admit? If the world, especially western world countries, are so dominated by men, why is it that there are so many laws that favor women over men, many where the woman only has to point the finger at a man and he’s automatically assumed guilty? Or how divorce courts award the woman everything the man worked for? 97% of alimony is paid by men. Most of the time the woman gets to take his children. Some, if not many states have a law where a man has to have his wife’s permission to get a vasectomy if he wants one but the wife doesn’t need his permission to get the similar procedure done( I forget the name). If a man lives with his girlfriend for 6 months, she’s entitled to half his possessions, even if they’re not married. When women gained the right to vote about 100 years ago, the first 2 things they voted for was no fault divorce and prohibition.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMjiY5BdBE
        What women did back then was a form of oppression, but women today somehow say they are the ones systematically oppressed.

        And you’re right that food is important to survival, but yet skyscrapers, and even cities we live in aren’t? Maybe men should tear down everything they built because it seems women don’t ever appreciate anything they have. All the jobs they brag about getting nowadays would exist if it weren’t for the buildings that house those job positions in the first place. But the topic matter of what would happen if all men worldwide would go on strike is being discussed more and more on the internet. That day could be just over the horizon. And if that happens, I’d like to see how far women would get without men.

      182. StuntDevil January 8, 2018 at 12:20 pm

        Women take fewer risks? Geez I’m a women and I love blowing shit up and riding dirt bikes and preforming par core stunts and shit like that. You make me laugh. A world without men would be a post-apocalyptic one? Get real dude. I train in marshal arts and love kicking some ass. I’m a female gamer and I can defend my self instead of some man doing it for me. I’ve lived on the streets basically my whole childhood and teenager years. Hell im 19 rn. I’m street smart. i love god and I think that all humans are equal. And to the original post I dont want a man to control me fuck that. I can grow food on my own built shelter outta the woods around me. I have a boyfriend who treats me like a princess and he doesn’t ever control me nor I control
        Him.
        we get along really great and have fun racing cars and doing stupid shit. Once it was snowing outside and I walked out and he was on the roof drunk and he said “Look babe I can fly” and he jumped. I was worried he broke his leg dumb as fuck but it was funny as fuck.

      183. StuntDevil January 8, 2018 at 12:25 pm

        Also my uncle is a man like the dude that post this post. Garbage and a pos. He tried to rape me once when I was little. 12 years old to be exact. And I bashed his fucking head in with a frying pan. Worse experience ever. I’m not gonna be controlled by a man. I can make decisions on my own. I don’t need a duchebag to control me.

      184. Sammy 2 Tires February 4, 2016 at 1:33 am

        LMAO – “nor has my home been INFESTED with children”. (I’m not speaking against you – I too do not have kids and I understand the sentiment)

      185. Ravi Macho June 6, 2016 at 9:50 pm

        Typical inferior, helpless and arrogant attitude ! Highlighting what you are interested in (or feel that you are able to find fault and can “rant”) without even considering the “context” and looking into the details !

        As long as the Societal and Legal Double Standards are on your side, your kind of wimyn will keep on pooping out one-sided and mindless comments !

      186. flybabycrybaby February 4, 2016 at 11:14 pm

        Can we go on a date soon?

      187. A Frenchy In Eire February 11, 2016 at 4:53 pm

        Says every guy who cannot get laid ever.

      188. Sandra Sturgiss June 2, 2016 at 12:16 am

        Of course you have never been married – obviously this is why you are such a bitter, twisted fuckwit. If women are physically inferior why is it that we can do something you NEVER can – give birth. Morons like you are the best reason yet for birth control and abortion. You are a sad, pathetic loser who needs to get a life – oh wait, that would involve having people that actually care about you which obviously no-one does.

      189. Bahlza Dragon June 2, 2016 at 12:21 pm

        It’s funny how deeply I’ve obviously hurt you with that comment–you really come out of your corner, scratching away. Unfortunately for the intellectually under powered, your argument has no merit because you can’t separate your feelings from your argument. You take baseless personal shots at me–no surprise there–yet can’t form a cogent claim. Calling me a “pathetic loser” just because I don’t agree with you bears out my claim of your erratic, emotional response–typical womyn stuff, right?

        You claim that nobody cares about me. Upon what proof do you base that claim? Again, scratching away like a little, defenseless kitten isn’t an argument.

        The most outrageous comment you offer is that my existence makes the case for birth control and/or abortion; do my comments present such a threat to your existence that you wish for my death or my very existence to be eradicated? Based upon a disagreement? A simple psychological insight indicates that those who project incessant hostility do so because they themselves have been profoundly hurt in the past, that said hostility is an armor against the outside world. In other words, hostile people have been convinced of their own weakness and thus overcompensate with belligerence. Therefore, I pity you and all the other shrill harpies who come by this site for the sole purpose of angering themselves further and subsequently flinging bile so that they can feel “empowered.”

        Oh, and by the way: just because womyn can give birth, it doesn’t mean that they aren’t physically inferior by any number of measurable criteria. If womyn were so strong, why do so many of them have fewer rights in so many places in the world? Why do they put up with forced marriages and genital mutilation? If they’re strong, they must like it and if they don’t like it, but put up with it, they must be weak. Which is it?

      190. Sandra Sturgiss June 2, 2016 at 8:31 pm

        Firstly, I am not hurt by your comments – do you think you are so important that your ridiculous ideas would have that effect on anyone? I just wonder what the hell happened to you to make you so bitter and twisted as you obviously are. Did your mother drop you on your head as a baby? Is this why you hate women so much? More likely you feel threatened by women – your ludicrous comments only go to show that men are absolutely not the superior sex that you seem to think they are. Most REAL men would see you as an embarrassment to their gender. As to your comment regarding incessant hostility – have a look in the mirror. Your comments are nothing BUT hostile, angry and bitter. I, unlike you, am not stating that one gender is superior to the other – whether you like it or not we are all created equal, but different. I’m sorry that your limited intelligence can’t figure that out. However when I read comments such as yours I am tempted to believe in female superiority. As for your statements regarding forced marriages and FGM – this only serves to show how many so-called men are controlling, despicable creatures. You cannot ignore the fact that the majority of robberies, rapes assaults You are most certainly not a threat to my existence, anymore than a cockroach would be. I just see you as a total waste of space, hence the fact that if you had been aborted the world would be no worse off.

      191. Bahlza Dragon June 2, 2016 at 8:42 pm

        You just expended a rather considerable amount of energy–only to prove my points. Your third-grade mentality is evident by your pathetic attempt to turn my comments back on me and once again you resort to cheap emotional appeals because you have nothing you can reference in my comments that you can disprove.

        How are my comments “hostile, angry and bitter”? I simply reviewed and commented upon your previous post–which was a rabid response to one of mine. Nothing you can say will change those facts. YOU chose to go to a site devoted to men’s rights issues and then complain about the content. YOU chose to resort to ad hominem and non-sequitur attacks rather than use facts and reasoning. That all on you, cupcake.

        You write that you haven’t stated one gender is superior to another. Really? Previously, you wrote, “If women are physically inferior why is it that we can do something you NEVER can – give birth” and “However when I read comments such as yours I am tempted to believe in female superiority.” Are you so stupid that you can’t read your own comments? Not only do you profess superiority, you’ve admitted that my comments influence your thoughts and patterns of behavior.

        Again, you show how fragile you are by writing, “I just see you as a total waste of space, hence the fact that if you had been aborted the world would be no worse off.” Again, I’m forced to point out that all that has occurred here is that we’ve had a difference of opinion–nothing else happened–and you wish that my existence were eradicated as a result. If that’s not the sick, twisted power fantasy of someone who has been deeply injured, what is? Yours is the sign of weakness.

      192. Sandra Sturgiss June 3, 2016 at 10:48 pm

        Firstly I went to this site as one of our politician’s endorsed it, and being an intelligent woman ( yes, they do exist)! who likes to be informed I needed to see what it was about before commenting. What I found was the biggest load of bullshit ever written – not just by you but other sad, pathetic excuses for men. If you hate women (by the way that is the correct spelling), why do you subscribe to a site that gives you tips on picking them up? This site should be shut down for it’s promotion of hate and inequality. By the way, do you realise that your idol Roosh was not granted a visa to enter Australia? Thank God for that. I know you have trouble with comprehension so I will explain this to you again. I DID NOT state that females are superior, merely that basic biology dictates that you will NEVER be able to perform the most fundamental part of life ie. give birth. I also stated that comments such as yours do not in any way help your argument re superior intellect. You state that we had a difference of opinion. This is untrue – it is not a matter of opinion as I am 100% correct in saying that humans are created equal. By your reasoning just over 50% of the population has low intelligence and should be controlled!!! I don’t know what the hell you base YOUR argument upon. Men and women were put on this earth to complement each other, somehow you have taken this to mean that one is superior to the other. EVERY human being has strengths and weaknesses – even you, however in your case I use the term human loosely. My guess is that you are racist and homophobic as well. Your arrogance is as astounding as your views are non-sensical. By the way, if you have the courage of your convictions, why do you hide behind a pseudonym?

      193. Sandra Sturgiss June 2, 2016 at 9:05 pm

        Firstly, I am not hurt by your comment – just astounded that someone could be so bitter and twisted. What the hell happened to make you like that – did you mother drop you on your head as a baby? Is that why you hate women so much? I wonder what she thinks of your twisted ideology. Your comments are no threat to my existence, any more than a cockroach would be. You are merely a waste of space, the world certainly would be no poorer if you hadn’t existed in the first place. As to your comments on incessant hostility – have a look in the mirror. The vitriolic bile that your spout is the ultimate in hostility and hatred. I am not, unlike you, proposing that one gender is superior to the other. We are all created equal, albeit different. I’m sorry that your limited intelligence can’t see the difference. However when I read ludicrous comments such as yours I am tempted to believe in female superiority. Most REAL men would find you an embarrassment to their gender. Check the crime statistics – most robberies, assaults, rapes, DUI’s, driving offences, car accidents, manslaughters and murders are committed by men. Regarding your comments on forced marriage and FGM this only serves to show that there are millions of controlling, heinous men in the world – hardly something to be proud of. Fortunately I don’t personally know any “men” ( I use that word loosely) like you – the men that I know are appalled by attitudes such as yours.

      194. Vlinder33 January 10, 2017 at 12:04 pm

        Even though you are being rude by calling women names I have to address the “men are physically superior” comment, I cannot resist because I have seen it said often.
        To determine what constitutes physical superiority you employ a set of arbitrary standards.
        One of those standards is pure physical strength. According to that logic, a gorilla is superior to you. You don’t believe that so it is a combination of traits that you believe make men superior. Most arguments I have read combine the trait of superior physical strength with the trait of being more intelligent and being less emotional. This is the usual trifecta of standards with which men proclaim themselves superior.
        That combination of traits is arbitrary.
        If I change the combination of traits to
        “all the different functions a body can perform”
        “include anger in the list of emotions”
        “rate emotional intelligence as high as other forms of intelligence
        “superior control over sexual impulses
        then women are superior because
        1.our bodies can do everything men’s bodies can do-maybe not as well, or as fast-but men’s bodies can not do everything women’s bodies can do, such as give life.
        2.men are far more emotional than women because they are quicker to anger and get violent.
        3. men are often less emotionally intelligent
        4. women are not slaves to their sexual urges to the same degree men are
        Men and women are complementary and designed to bring out the best in each other. Women protect their sons and daughters when they are young, and men protect their families.

      195. Bahlza Dragon January 11, 2017 at 1:33 pm

        I’m sure that you think that your communications certificate–or whatever passes for advanced education in your life–means that you’re clever. Wrong. I find your pathetic attempts to parse your response amusing, so I’ll respond. First, acknowledging and then trying to divert someone’s point is not only dishonest, it’s incorrect.
        1. What part of “physically superior” do you not understand? In terms of physical strength, men are ON AVERAGE, stronger than women. By that definition, yes, gorillas ARE PHYSICALLY superior to men. How does that constitute you making a point?
        2. If your metric for superiority is to “give life,” women are no better than men, honey. You may own the oven in which the bun bakes, but we men give you the yeast to make the dough come alive. Reproduction cannot happen without both sexes, thus obviating your point.
        3. Men may be quicker to anger, but women are, on average, quicker to cry, prattle like a monkey on amphetamines, and engage in all sorts of emotional behavior; in fact, women are so addicted to emotional outbursts, they often seek quick fixes in soap operas, Lifetime movies and attending weddings. Women are so emotionally codependent, they prattle for hours about romantic relationships–often those of others, such as celebrities.
        4. It’s so funny that you think that being interested in sex makes men “slaves to their sexual urges.” It’s also amusing how modern feminists eschew any labels pertaining to sexual desire (“our bodies, our choice, no judgements”), but men can still be judged for theirs. At this point, you’ll trot out the “women have been labeled as sluts, but men haven’t” argument, to which I’ll preemptively respond by saying that if you want freedom from judgment today, you can’t punish today’s men for crimes of the past–especially ones that were perpetrated before the men of this generation were even born.
        You then wrap up your war on stereotypes by citing others in support of your “argument,” the antiquity of which is amusing. You know–the old “nuclear family trope” based upon the stereotypes you claim to abhor.

      196. Realist April 21, 2017 at 9:13 pm

        Dear Idiots of Earth…
        Without men we would all die.
        Without woman we would all die.
        We need sperm.
        They need us.
        Everyone calm the fuck down and listen:
        WE ARE ABSOFREAKINGLUTELY EQUAL.
        Yes men are stronger.
        Yes woman have more stamina.
        Yes men are genetically bigger.
        Yes woman can stand much more pain.
        EVERYONE GOT PROS AND CONS BOYS AND GIRLS. SO SHUT UP AND GO BACK TO SCHOOL.

      197. FuckBullshit January 8, 2018 at 12:37 pm

        This made my day 😂😂 the only person on here that made complete sense and not a bunch of bs.

      198. GerryAllwin September 25, 2015 at 5:32 am

        Your collapse into ad hominem attacks demonstrates your realization of your illogic and incapacity to reason.
        “Idiot!” “Moron!” “Shit-eating dog!” If that’s your best, “Bahlza” is wasting his energy in further banter with you.

      199. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 7:11 am

        There is no logic or reason you’re all idiots who can’t deal with female rejection.

      200. Peter Bensley February 18, 2016 at 8:27 pm

        >shaped by my own mind.

        I’m not convinced that you have a mind, given that your repetitive dodging away from having to admit to your own moronic opinions could easily be explained away as a reflex action or some kind of perl script.

      201. Darth Folwart May 20, 2016 at 5:12 am

        “Most dogs have the biological imperative to eat their own shit. Try to rise about that. Honestly though if you think you’re right, you would be warring with most men and almost all women you don’t have the numbers. You do realize you’re committing those wrongs all over again by being here in a serious manner right?”

        One masculine-minded man is worth at least a dozen feminine-minded blind follower types. Battle of Thermopylae proves the point. If they got serious and they could organize, they’d turn this country inside out, shake it out and put it back right side up. 300 elite could manage it too I bet, it would be fitting.

      202. Fuck You September 23, 2015 at 3:52 pm

        I don’t believe you’ve allowed me anything may I remind you, a woman brought you into this world. Although with the disappointment you turned out to be I bet she’s thinking she should’ve had an abortion.

      203. Bahlza Dragon September 23, 2015 at 6:40 pm

        Ah, showing how enlightened you are by wishing me dead. And yes, you are allowed by men. It is men who fight to keep this country protected; if the military were exclusively or even mostly women, enemy combatants would easily defeat us. Just look at the results of co-ed military exercises to dispel the conceit of female equality.

        Look at this another way: if women were so equal, your victim claims would be false; otherwise, how is it men supposedly held women down for so many MILLENNIA? If your victimization claims (i.e. patriarchy) are true, how can women be equal? You can’t have it both ways; we either held you down and ALLOWED you equality, or you were ALWAYS EQUAL, which means your claims of patriarchy are a lie. Which is it?

      204. Caroline Carlson February 3, 2016 at 4:31 pm

        If men are so,powerful how are they being ” controlled” by women now? You say women are controlling you. How is this possible if you are so strong?

      205. JJ Hockley February 3, 2017 at 9:47 pm

        Caroline; you really ought to attempt to communicate in a more positive manner, you appear quite passive aggressive. It is not uncommon for a person with little strength to coerce another, especially with assistance from the state.

      206. person May 13, 2016 at 3:49 pm

        Why do you think you fight for our country? Duh! The country is ruled by men who wouldn’t want their, oh so precious women getting hurt in battle! The only reason women don’t fight is because we mean to much to men. To be honest i don’t want to fight for a country that has horrible people like you abusing women and hating them because they dare to express opinions.
        “Infested with children” – you were one once, i guess your parents taught you that you were a piece of nothing and that you were the meaning of ‘infestation’… oh, i don’t blame them.

      207. Bahlza Dragon May 13, 2016 at 4:06 pm

        Wow, what a great laugh you provided! Your ignorance is so profound that even in print, you sound like someone with Down’s Syndrome who also took a crane hook to the temple.

        Factual error #1: there is a bill in Congress that would compel women to register for Selective Service (in other words, the draft, dumb ass), so I wouldn’t take your privileged position for granted.

        Factual error #2: I’ve never hit a woman, nor a child. But, with your child-like intellect, I imagine it’s easier just to fling an emotional accusation like that, rather than use facts and reasoning–wouldn’t want to overheat that delicate, feminine mind of yours.

        Factual error #3: I don’t hate all women; I just hate ignorant assholes, a group to which you clearly belong.

      208. Person May 15, 2016 at 4:18 am

        You have stated your opinions perfectly and it is obvious that you are disgusted by the mere presence of women on this planet.
        So let me state my opinions clearly right now, I do not wish to argue with you or insult you but I will admit that I am outraged at your false assumptions.
        1) I am not dumb or ignorant just because I dare to speak up for myself and state a totally fair opinion.
        2) I believe that women and men are equals and that the way you think is twisted and old-fashioned. Women are not inferior to men and men are not inferior to women.
        3) I am interested to know your opinion on what delicate, feminine mind actually means. I take it by stating that a female’s mind is delicate you know how we think and our intelligence. It is a well known fact that female grades are practically always above male grades- don’t make a fool of yourself, our minds aren’t delicate.
        4) OK, I apologise for assuming that you have abused women, it obviously upset you and I don’t like making people feel hurt. I only wish to express myself calmly and without anger or any bias.
        5) Fine, laugh about me if you wish to- if it makes you feel any better about yourself. I really couldn’t care less what you say about ME in person, but it’s what you say about women in general that I want to stand up for.

      209. Bahlza Dragon May 15, 2016 at 9:49 pm

        I don’t owe you any sort of explanation. YOU accused me of abusing women, yet you’ve never met me, have no idea who I am, nor do you have any clue about the history of any relationships I’ve had. So, upon what evidence did you base that accusation? NONE. THAT is the sign of a weak mind, one which relies upon cheap emotionalism in the absence of facts to make a point. You’ve apologized. Fine, but any intellectually honest person–in other words, one possessed of a strong mind–would not have resorted to that in the first place.

        Since you’re from Canada, I’ll assume you’re unfamiliar with the First Amendment of the US Constitution. As long as I don’t commit libel or issue a death threat, I can write any opinion I damn well choose. Don’t like it? Well, I’m pretty sure no one is holding a gun to your head to visit this website, nor to read my posts.

      210. Person May 21, 2016 at 1:53 pm

        Look, you clearly don’t understand. I don’t have a weak mind just because I apologized. I apologized because i am humble enough to do so. I am not the sort to hold a grudge against others, because I believe in kindness, equality and i always try not to judge people, which is why I apologized, because I admit that I DID indeed judge you. By your definition of weak mind then you have one. Because now you are also making assumptions, I never specified where i came from and Canada is certainly not where i live.
        Please, stop trying to seem superior- we all make the same mistakes, thanks for proving that.
        I never mentioned anything about you not stating any “Damn well opinion”, I appreciate your view I am only, very calmly debating and stating my opinion.
        No, no one is forcing me to go onto this website or read these posts I went onto this website for research purposes and then became curious as to what people think of the article.

      211. Fuckthisguy January 8, 2018 at 12:47 pm

        You Contradicted yourself there buddy.

      212. Grow up. January 8, 2018 at 12:44 pm

        Dude. You think your opinion is always right. Anyone on here that says somthing you don’t like it agree with you got some sort of fucked up bullshit answer for it. You say “oh did I hurt your feelings that you have to respond” your basically saying the same about yourself. Grow up.

      213. I agree fuck this guy too. January 8, 2018 at 12:40 pm

        Nice. I died laughing

      214. Nat G October 13, 2015 at 11:10 am

        So you include yourself in people who granted us suffrage, allow us to work?

      215. Bahlza Dragon October 13, 2015 at 6:32 pm

        Well, given that you bitches expect men of today to shoulder the blame for the transgressions of past generations, why not? To thank me, you can fix me a sandwich and then shut the fuck up.

      216. Nat G October 14, 2015 at 2:13 pm

        If someone is blaming you for something it must be for the attitude you have now about women. I don’t blame people for things that happened before they were borne or on what they don’t have any control. It’s misogynists who are really good at that. Thank you for what? It’s obvious that if it was your decision women would not be allowed to vote.

      217. LivingLIfeHere January 8, 2018 at 12:52 pm

        Ide rather you make me a sandwich. 🙂 Im a women and I need to be “monitored”. I would probably make a bad decision on how to make it. I’m also the “weaker” sex according to this post. So I probably can’t lift up the butter knife. I prefer to have peanut butter and jelly thank you.

      218. person February 5, 2016 at 10:33 pm

        woman don’t need permission to work and do the exact same things as men, bloody men and woman are equal and neither are superior to the other. And last time I checked bloody men aren’t classified as rulers.

      219. Vlinder33 January 10, 2017 at 11:22 am

        We women give you life, at great cost to ourselves. You should shown some appreciation for our sacrifices, which you take for granted.
        We create babies-that is strength and leverage. If women refused to feed and raise male children, none of you would be here today. That is power. Fortunately for you we do not abuse it because through being mothers we gain love and wisdom. Women are powerful and strong, you would know that if you had to give birth.
        Not all women think men are the source of all evil. Some of us realize all the great gifts you have given this world, such as antibiotics, great inventions such as central heating (love that!) the light bulb, cars, beautiful music and art. Thank you for those wonderful contributions to our society. It is because of you we live better and longer. It is because of you that not half of our babies die before they turn two years old. I love men for that. Why does it always have to be all or nothing? Men and women are to work side by side with each other, not to hurt each other but to help each other.
        Sadly we live in a society of victimhood and finger pointing. We don’t appreciate how good we have it. I do and I cherish every day of my life and seek out men that I respect. I find plenty of them. I believe if you look for the good in women you will find it also.

      220. Bahlza Dragon January 11, 2017 at 1:45 pm

        Oh, man. You are so unaware of yourself it is almost literally breathtaking. I really have to chuckle every time you trot out the “we give you life and you would die if we withheld that function” argument. That’s only true if you want to commit suicide. You can’t seem to understand that just because you represent HALF of the biological underpinnings of life, that doesn’t mean you own it all. “If women refused to feed and raise male children, none of you would be
        here today.” You wouldn’t be here, either, because there’d be no sperm donors.
        You also write, “Fortunately for you we do not abuse it
        because through being mothers we gain love and wisdom.” Say that to the guy with the bitchy mother-in-law.
        You continue to harp on this point by writing, “Women are
        powerful and strong, you would know that if you had to give birth.” Great, you took one for the team by wrecking your playground, but that is self-serving because it also perpetuates the existence of women–it’s not some favor you extend solely to men.
        You seem totally tone deaf to the actual implications of this discussion. The point isn’t the biological necessity of one gender or the other, but rather the cultural impetus to vilify men–especially white ones–as the source of all ills and injustices. Today’s culture paints all men with the same broad brush, but then decries stereotypes and then “progressives” want special protection for themselves and their point of view while demanding punishment from those who don’t share their viewpoints or fit into their own rigidly enforced orthodoxy.

      221. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 9, 2018 at 7:08 am

        😂😂😂😂😂
        Women are naturally powerful! I think you’re confusing status with power. Women have earned the equal status they have today and will keep gaining that.

      222. Jalice January 10, 2018 at 11:26 pm

        You might be rulers but we can make your life difficult. Problems begin when one gender starts thinking the other one is obsolete. You rule, we carry life and society’s next working class. Get out of the clouds. Remember that your mother spared your life. No matter how many laws men create, women determine who is born.

        When birth control wasn’t available women poisoned themselves. Women are not physically strong and yet we involuntarily control you. Ask yourself, why are you so obssess with dominating us? You are well aware that we are less stronger than you and yet you feel the urge to dominate us.

        Let’s give each other a break. This shit life is already hard we don’t need to make it worse for each other.

      223. ex-convict September 23, 2015 at 5:27 am

      224. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 7:15 am

        Aww you still care 😉 i thought you were done responding?

      225. I Art Laughing September 24, 2015 at 11:17 am

        Conspiracy Theories.

        Rape culture and subjugation of women are just leftist Conspiracy Theories.

      226. Zechs Marquise September 24, 2015 at 11:36 am

        The Muslims are coming to kill us all 😉 see that’s a conspiracy theory, the fact that you don’t care about what happens to 50% of the population does not make it not true.

      227. I Art Laughing September 24, 2015 at 12:40 pm

        Nah, you SJW’s (that’s the very definition of social justice) have more conspiracy theories than we can shake a stick at. Where did I say I didn’t care about 50% of the population? More leftoid nuttery.

        What is it today, racial conspiracy against the black man?

        Misogynistic conspiracy against women? Homophobic conspiracy against gays? Islamophobic conspiracy against Muslims? You people are a veritable list of neuroses and paranoia.

        Somehow you can keep tilting at the windmills of social change without seeing that you are a conspiracy theorist. You label it “privilege” but it’s all made of the same stuff. I conspired with my great, great, great, great grandfather to take native lands and keep the black man down…..haha.

        We probably pillaged and raped Rome too. LOL

      228. Zechs Marquise September 24, 2015 at 4:22 pm

        You do realize there are a lot of ways society limits non straight white Christian men? Right? I guess not. Also why are you scared of Muslims bringing about the end times? Shouldn’t you get raptured first? Unless your faith is shaken.

      229. I Art Laughing September 25, 2015 at 12:39 pm

        All conspiracies in your mind no doubt.

      230. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 12:52 pm

        More a moral blind spot in yours.

      231. I Art Laughing September 25, 2015 at 1:05 pm

        You mean like making black men not jaywalk, and gays not showing their asses in the street?

      232. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 1:21 pm

        Killing people for jaywalking does seem extreme but I see your point.

      233. I Art Laughing September 25, 2015 at 1:28 pm

        Yeah it would, when did that happen?

      234. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 2:36 pm

        Well he was in a wheel chair so is it jaywalking or not hmm… There are quite a few police that respond far more aggressively to blacks than white it’s a pattern whether you agree or not.

      235. I Art Laughing September 25, 2015 at 2:38 pm

        You talk about police as if they were universally straight white and male. How oppressive of you.

      236. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 2:45 pm

        The majority are.

      237. BobTrent January 18, 2016 at 5:49 pm

        Funny that in a country where the Black population is about 10% half of the cops aren’t Black. And everyone else, North American, Mexican, Central and South American “Indian,” Asian, India Indian, is categorized as “White” for these purposes.

      238. Caroline Carlson February 3, 2016 at 4:32 pm

        But women dominating men today isn’t ?

      239. I Art Laughing February 4, 2016 at 3:02 pm

        Not in the West, unless you are talking about the Muslim “refugees” they insist on importing to rape them (Angela Merkel).

      240. Caroline Carlson February 4, 2016 at 3:25 pm

        One out of three women raped in her lifetime. Less than 3% doing a day in jail. Prosecutors 48% less likely to charge with rape since the creation of sex offender lists. 1 out of 9 women being beaten by boyfriends/ husbands. Your inability to dominate more angers you. Your inability to read rape / domestic abuse stats leaves you uninformed. Show me where women are dominating men. Attempts at creating equality feel like oppression to small minded men. Clearly you are one of them.

      241. I Art Laughing February 4, 2016 at 3:54 pm

        Citation? Pure B.S. is the easiest to fabricate. Plus it kind of defeats your whole “women are the stronger gender” schtick. Oops, I guess cognitive dissonance doesn’t cause you any discomfort.

      242. PolishKnightUSA February 7, 2016 at 11:13 am

        Feminists statistics like the 77 cents on a dollar meme that has been well debunked but they still try to use it. Or the laughable claim that DV hotline calls double on Super Bowl Sunday (which is today.) That was just made up and then repeated until it became an “established” “fact”. It’s laughable because logically, wouldn’t wife beaters be too busy watching the game to abuse their wife? (Feminist scholars and logic don’t go together it appears…)

        The high rape statistic claims are based upon a broad definition of rape. If a man pestered a woman for sex or refused to buy her dinner, then she’s a victim of attempted sexual assault according to the “sociologist” studies funded by the womyn’s man-hating resource center.

        Prosecutors are less likely to charge defendants for a variety of reasons including fear of racial profiling. You can thank leftists such as Bill Clinton for the high rate of black on white rapes (or the rapes he committed personally.) In addition, people (including women), often make false accusations. Google “Duke LaCrosse.”

      243. Walker Texas Wanker September 24, 2015 at 12:58 pm

        “Oh yes from the site trying to legalize rape and control all facets of
        their existence, is your masculinity threatened by powerful women?”

        Only if those powerful women can bounce off bullets from my gun, otherwise, meh.

      244. 1432fpchero September 24, 2015 at 10:41 pm

        your daddy did’t love you… obviously

      245. Zechs Marquise September 24, 2015 at 10:44 pm

        Obviously you are redirecting your own insecurities out at me, feeling the need to reinforce your own masculinity by putting down others. I’m sorry that at some point one woman treated you poorly and as a result you hate them all, I hope some day you recover and are able to have an emotional connection with someone.

      246. 1432fpchero September 24, 2015 at 10:59 pm

        reading comprehension is obviously not a skill you learned. go back and re-read this article and figure out if there are some legitimate errors you can debate. every example shown is the result of a women making a bad choice. statistically you’ll find that the number of incidents of those poor choices are significantly higher in women without a strong proper male influence in their lives. the proof that women are fundamentally and emotionally flawed is identified by the number of women who do have strong proper male influences in their lives, and are still dingbats!!

      247. Zechs Marquise September 24, 2015 at 11:29 pm

        I don’t read any of the articles, I don’t want to lower my intelligence by reading biased articles by creepy dudes only interested in controlling women and raping them, if I did I’d read the bible. Men commit a much higher degree of crime both violent and not so I guess we should keep them in chains just in case. Perhaps you should volunteer to start. I bet you hate Muslims and if one of them wrote an article like this you’d be up in arms but do go on about your new world order conspiracy theories. I’m sorry no woman has ever loved you and never will.

      248. flybabycrybaby February 4, 2016 at 11:20 pm

        asl? Let’s go out.

      249. A.W.E.S.O.M.-O October 19, 2015 at 10:01 am

        I love when feminists show how stupid they are in being mentally incapable of distinguishing satire from reality. You are as stupid as we say.

      250. BobTrent January 18, 2016 at 5:07 pm

        No such thing as a powerful woman. “Powerful” women’s so-called power is composed of the men whose purposes she serves.
        JUST LIKE POWERFUL MEN. Men don’t have power as individuals. A powerful man’s power is composed of the men whose purposes he serves.
        How did women get “rights?” As privileges granted by the men who rule their societies. How did women get to vote? Men voted to give it to them. Suffragettes fought proposals to let women vote in special referenda yea or nay on extending the franchise (vote) to women BECAUSE THE SUFFRAGETTES KNEW THAT WOMEN WOULD VOTE TO DENY WOMEN THE VOTE. Anti-suffragettes, women organized to oppose woman suffrage, did not want to let women vote on woman suffrage because to do so would be to canvass women to come out and vote, even though they were, like the pro-woman-suffrage activists, certain that if allowed to vote one time on woman suffrage, the women would reject getting to vote any more.
        So both sides opposed a special referendum limited to women on woman suffrage.

      251. flybabycrybaby February 4, 2016 at 11:22 pm

        asl? Let’s date.

      252. Aldous Huxley October 7, 2016 at 4:08 pm

        Go look at all the bastard children. Silent and alone as kids, and in prison as adults. Then come back.
        I have no patience for people like you. Whether for votes or to appease, you turn nature on its head and damn the future for the sake of greed or egotism.

      253. Jason Rogers February 15, 2017 at 4:34 am

        No such thing as a powerful woman Mark not even your Jewess mother.

      254. BobTrent September 4, 2017 at 7:26 am

        Two reasons to decriminalize (“legalize”) rape:
        · rape of healthy postpubertal women does not harm them. Don’t confuse brutal violence that is associated with a small portion of rapes with mere sexual intercourse, an act ordained by nature (or, if you prefer, God).
        · defining rape as crime opens the gate to false accusations of rape, a far more harmful act than simple, non-brutal rape. Rape is an offense by one individual against another individual. False accusation, including unfounded and unsubstantiated, sets the state (the government) against an individual.

      255. wolfgang548 . September 9, 2017 at 1:35 pm

        How is women’s equality evil? It’s not their equality, it’s their nature that is evil. Type in ” Deadly Women” on Youtube and have fun watching countless episodes of a show that appeared on Ivestigation Discovery. A little reality women and feminists don’t ever discuss.

      256. GerryAllwin September 25, 2015 at 5:21 am

        A man should recognize his limitations. For one man to attack a stone castle with only a rock is doomed to failure and will merely annoy the guards.

      257. Jason Rogers February 15, 2017 at 4:33 am

        Well said in_Dei_servitium.Agreed

      258. Dirk Diggler February 6, 2016 at 2:59 am

        You do make a valid point.

      259. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 7:17 pm

        You can’t win. There’s too many against you. Women can do as they please just like men.

      260. Remo September 22, 2015 at 7:25 am

        Men cannot do as they please – we pay for it in terms of consequences – women do not and that’s the difference.

      261. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 7:44 am

        You’re quite the fool, do you ever think the reason you can’t know love is because of attitudes like this?

      262. Remo September 22, 2015 at 10:03 am

        Hmmm… are you a homo? You must enjoy it when men bend you over the sink. Lift your head up occasionally and get some blood and oxygen flowing there so you don’t sound so stupid.

      263. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 10:18 am

        Of course any man who has emotion is gay? Maybe you should deal with your internal suffering in a more constructive way than blaming women for not loving you.

      264. Remo September 22, 2015 at 10:29 am

        Is that what you call taking it up the butt? Emotion? I guess I’m not up on all the new terms for fudgepacking, my apologies.

      265. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 10:31 am

        I’m straight but only a moron would use gay as an insult. Do you prefer to be called a misogynistic homophobe or a homophobic misogynist? Try respect and decency it will get you a lot further in life.

      266. Remo September 22, 2015 at 10:54 am

        I think you’d be happier if you just fessed up and came clean. Your attitude towards women shows you are a fruit and derive pleasure from dick. You might be able to hide it for awhile but your attitude gives you away. Good luck finding yourself.

      267. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 11:00 am

        Good luck dealing with eternal loniness by raging against an imagined matriarchy on an online message board dedicated to oppressing people, mostly women, and legalzing rape. I know exactly who I am but tell me when you look in the mirror do you see the monster staring back at you?

      268. Remo September 22, 2015 at 11:20 am

        So you really do love to do little boys and can’t come to grips with it? Lying to yourself everyday and trying to explain it to others isn’t constructive. I wish you luck.

      269. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 11:30 am

        You are a pathetic person. Obviously you know I’m right so you make false accusations to make up for your failings as a person. Enjoy hiding in the bushes.

      270. Remo September 22, 2015 at 11:35 am

        Right? You haven’t said anything other than an opening insult. Rhetoric. Okay so you choose the game and I’m simply playing it. I’m sorry your pedophilia is negatively affecting your psyche but that isn’t my fault. In the other world of Dialectic *yes* no woman should have freedom and rights unless this comes with the responsibilities that come along with same. Since no woman anywhere will ever tolerate this one must view them as children. And yes I know you’re aroused since I said the word “children” but please try to control yourself.

      271. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 11:53 am

        You’re the only pedophile I see since you both want to treat women as children and rape them/own them. I have a loving woman who is my equal, we share equal control and equal responsibility and I’ve never been happier. Blame women when you’re the monster that makes no sense. I wonder how your mother would react to your hatefulness, probably as disgusted as all women are with you. Plenty of women have demonstrated that they excel at responbility and without your fragile ego they can actually improve on everything you do.

      272. Remo September 22, 2015 at 7:25 pm

        So you let your wife dominate you? Oh okay I see how you roll now. You like it when she wears the big old pink strap on and takes you from behind. This makes you happy. Now is this enough to get you off or do you also need a child to give you a reach around during these foul proceedings? You label this as responsibility on a womans part? Okay – yours is a twisted little world.

      273. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 7:28 pm

        Wow you’re an actual crazy person, never mind thought you were just a typical misogynist. False accusations are just that false, where as my accusations are all true.

      274. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 2:55 pm

        Good luck dealing with the eternal loneliness of realizing that if you ever expressed masculinity that you will be roundly condemned, vilified and hated by those people you align yourself with.

      275. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 2:58 pm

        I express masculinity in a way that doesn’t intimidate, or cause others pain. Dominance is for fools. Enjoy being a sore loser.

      276. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:10 pm

        I’m not losing. Let a woman define what is acceptable masculinity and feel the deep seated gut wrenching truth that whatever it is they come up with it is not masculinity.

        Can’t decide for yourself because you have been emasculated and the women that did this to you understand it in an even deeper part of their brain then you do.

      277. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:21 pm

        Your entire side has already lost and the world is a better place for it. I have defined masculinity for myself and your definition is sickening.

      278. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:57 pm

        Haven’t lost. Can’t lose. It’s hard wired on our DNA and your rejection of your own nature is seen as pathetic by everyone. Even your “allies”.

      279. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 4:29 pm

        Enjoy dying early from repressed emotion.

      280. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 9:50 pm

        I don’t repress my emotions, I control them.

      281. Remo September 23, 2015 at 7:08 am

        He’s a queer who was probably turned that way via a free ride in the back of his Uncles ice cream truck. So now he has to pretend he’s a man (while clearly being gay) and that anyone who really is a man is to be pitied. Appreciate the situation his wife must be in (assuming being married isn’t a lie). She has to live with a gamma level dweeb who leaves her dry as a bone down south. If she isn’t a fat disgusting beast she’s probably doing the mailman just to get *something* between her thighs that doesn’t viscerally disgust her.

      282. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 7:29 am

        I realize my words sting so your emotional response it to strike back when really I’m just trying to help you see the wrong path you’re on. Perhaps it would be best if you had your mind and body controlled by feminists

      283. Remo September 23, 2015 at 7:42 am

        Your words amuse me on their face but I also realize just how sad you’ll be if you never figure anything out. I’m waiting for that moment when the DNA test comes back or you find that facebook post showing your beloveds affair. All you had to be was a man but you chose to be a mangina instead. You’ve been warned, you’ve been told and you still prefer to have a broomstick up your arse. Oh well, that probably turns you on so well met.

      284. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 7:48 am

        Enjoy beating, raping and being alone. Enjoy your faux masculinity.

      285. Remo February 13, 2016 at 3:01 pm

        Yeah you express “masculinity” as a dick up your butt. How progressive!

      286. Snowden October 10, 2015 at 11:55 pm

        Holy fuck you cuck faggot you’ve ruined the comments section of a good article. I guess your troll job was successful.

      287. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 2:53 pm

        You’re delusional. How’s that for a label. SJW’s always lie, and throw around labels they think shame people.

        Worn out labels, worn out narratives, worn out ideas. Took about 15 minutes.

        You don’t respect masculinity. Why is it okay to force your values on us and not okay for us to have our opinions? Seems like a double standard to me. SJW hypocrisy and scolding. Typical.

      288. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 2:59 pm

        There’s a difference between masculinity and rape and control which is what you advocate for. Go be a cave man if that’s what you want. Sore loser.

      289. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:12 pm

        Where did I advocate that, oh eunuch of the broad brush?

      290. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:23 pm

        You support roosh he supports that ergo you’re a piece of shit.

      291. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:58 pm

        I support Roosh? Really? And I’m to take your goosestepping word on what is to be believed concerning him? Think not.

      292. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 4:29 pm

        You mean he didn’t write an article advocating rape or the one we’re on right now?

      293. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 10:07 pm

        SJW’s usually have a strangely twisted version of the the English language AND reality. You seem to be no exception. Part of it stems from the fact that you think that you have reinvented human nature in the past 100 years and think that you can mold the universe to fit your collective emotions. Mao and Stalin killing off millions of people of people hasn’t even put a wrinkle in your delusions.

      294. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 10:13 pm

        Mao and Stalin seem right in line with the patriachy. Also way to avoid the question.

      295. ReleaseTheKraken September 22, 2015 at 8:50 pm

        Just out of curiosity, what is your opinion or expression of masculinity?

      296. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 8:59 pm

        Having a penis mostly, it means different things to different people but it should not mean subjugation of women.

      297. ReleaseTheKraken September 22, 2015 at 9:04 pm

        Wait, so thats mostly it? Having male genatalia encompasses most of Masculinity is.

        Im putting aside Roosh’s article here, merely debating you on what the definiton of masculinity is.

      298. BAT 21 October 7, 2015 at 3:43 pm

        Kaitlin Jenner still has male genatalia I guess that’s your idea of masculinity! I got it Zechs is a tranny!

      299. Remo September 23, 2015 at 7:44 am

        You have a penis? Where do you keep it seriously? In a jar on the mantle? 😀

      300. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 7:51 am

        Hmm a man who respects women has no penis? Or is it that you’re hurt by my words and need to lash out as you claim about women?

      301. Remo February 5, 2016 at 6:41 pm

        Zechs likes penis – we’ve established that already. Its old news. In fact he previously admitted to being attracted to little boys and lord knows what other perversions likely slink around inside his brain. I’ll bet an excavation of his back yard would turn up all kinds of interesting things. You just know he’s got a serious S&M dungeon under his house.

      302. BobTrent January 18, 2016 at 5:52 pm

        Calling anyone a homosexual, even if they are, is an insult.

      303. flybabycrybaby February 4, 2016 at 11:24 pm

        Talking dirty on the internet is fun! <3 <3 <3 Now tell me I'm a pretty girl grrrrr daddy

      304. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 2:49 pm

        Love? ROFL!

        The non-existent carrot on the feminist blue pill stick.

        Yeah right.

      305. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:01 pm

        I’m in love, but a lot of things are starting to make sense about you right now. Of course a man who has never experienced emotional connection would be as closed off as you.

      306. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:13 pm

        You’re “in love”? Oh, my. He has an emotion! How wonderful!!! I experience emotional connection. I have the full array. Only a sackless piece of shit lets them control him.

      307. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:24 pm

        Clearly not because if any woman saw your thoughts they’d be sick.

      308. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:59 pm

        Quite the contrary. Your supplication is what they find sickening. The minute you are no longer useful you’ll be kicked to the curb.

      309. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 4:33 pm

        Not true, I know you only believe your wife loves you because of “usefulness” but love is a thing, sorry you haven’t experienced it.

      310. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 2:28 pm

        Love is an action, not an emotion.

      311. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:34 pm

        Sex is an action, if that’s your implication, love is an emotion.

      312. 66Scorpio September 22, 2015 at 8:26 am

        There is ample evidence for this. Criminal prosecution statistics show that men are more likely to be 1) stopped and questioned 2) charged 3) convicted and 4) serving longer sentences for the same crime.
        .
        Men and women get drunk but the women get excused for what they do when drunk.

      313. flybabycrybaby February 4, 2016 at 11:26 pm

        asl?

      314. flybabycrybaby February 4, 2016 at 11:22 pm

        Soooo true. Omg. Men have it so much worse :'( :'( :'( can I make you a casserole?

      315. Remo February 5, 2016 at 12:44 am

        Casseroles are too complex for a modern independent woman to make correctly. They have more than two ingredients and you have to know how work an oven. Make me a sandwich – peanut butter and jelly. Chop chop!

      316. Bee Warren February 9, 2016 at 8:48 pm

        “Men cannot do as they please – we pay for it in terms of consequences – women do not and that’s the difference.”

        Since when was that? I await the day! That’s almost a handful of deluded fools here who dwell on planet fantasy and throw their toys out the pram because the universe refuses to revolve around them. Try and grow up please, you spoilt little boys.

      317. Remo February 9, 2016 at 9:00 pm

        Woman gets drunk and sleeps with some guy she considers “hot” at the time. Gets herself preggers. She can: kill the baby at taxpayer (men) expense, adopt it away without penalty, or demand 50 different types of government welfare payments designed to save her from her stupidity. Women are saved from the consequences of their own stupidity – men are not. The guy in the above example (assuming she can even remember his name) has only crushing child support to look forward too – certainly no rights to any decision about the baby. Either way its always the men who pay for womens bad decisions which is why women should properly be classified with the same basic fundamental rights as 4 year old children.

        They should not be given voting rights as they seek to use those to impose and take from others. They should not be given the right to own property anymore than you would title a 4 year old child with running a major corporation, and you certainly wouldn’t trust a young child with autonomy.

      318. Bee Warren February 10, 2016 at 6:35 pm

        Oh of course the man had nothing to do with getting her drunk, having sex without contraception (risking STDs), possibly without consent if she was too drunk, or later abandoning her to bring up a child alone, did he? That would be far too much responsibility to expect of a simple minded bloke, wouldn’t it?

        What, did he just lie there passively, reluctantly, an unwilling participant? Was he so brainless he was incapable of realising possible consequences for himself?

        She may or may not have been careless on that occasion but no way is he some innocent victim. It takes two to tango, matey!
        It is physically impossible for a woman to force a man to have sex if he doesn’t want to or is unconscious, yet not the other way round. That’s what rape is. It is only men (well, pseudo men really) who use drugs to inflict it. Your little story is weaker than a flaccid penis… it just doesn’t stand up.

        If pregnancy does result from a one-off mistake it is she who pays the price with all her freedom and career prospects for the next 16 + years or so of her life. He can just walk away – and very often does.

        Since you admit you’re a control freak you must be devoid of empathy but why not give it a go? It’s what marks out humans from lower animals.
        Do you imagine it is easy having to abort or give up a child you’re instinctively and physically bonded to? Of course it isn’t. Only on RARE occasions does anyone do so because they feel unable to give that child a decent life, for whatever reason. Maybe the father is a violent psychopath whom they fear, or even just an arrogant twat who thinks he can own and enslave another person (a control freak) and therefore not someone you’d let anywhere near a child. In all cases it’s an extremely traumatic, desperate last resort.

        Naturally you haven’t the faintest idea what it’s like to be pregnant, even less to give birth. No man is strong enough to handle that kind of pain. Many are too selfish to sacrifice the rest of their life putting someone else’s needs before their own as a mother does.
        Certainly all you gullible sheep who follow that nasty lunatic Roosh’s ideas have no concept of caring for others. If you can’t even be kind to the mother of your child there’s not much hope for the kiddy, is there?

      319. Remo February 10, 2016 at 7:40 pm

        Bee… you old war horse did some man somewhere done you wrong? Did you pass out drunk and wake up preggers after doing the entire football team? Nature has your answer: too damn bad. Idiocy of the kind you describe can and rightly should be punished. Women are too stupid and immature to actually consider future consequences so its up to men to firmly guide them and too keep their expected f**kups to a minimum. Men in the U.S. make a mistake when they gave in to these stupid moronic children – they think they’re gonna get laid – WRONG. Best thing to do is slap the shit out of one of them if they get out of line. Just like a dog – a woman is happiest with firm discipline and guidance. You don’t leave a dog or a child in the position of having to make adult decisions.

        Don’t confuse the presence of discipline with a lack of kindness – I love women! That is why I want to see them in the home rather than whoring around. They are too dumb, and too easily led astray to be trusted with any real responsibilities outside the home. Give a woman an inch and she’s preggers. Give her the vote and she’ll make damn sure she never has to pay for her own stupidity. Give her a public voice and naturally you’ll get a system where its basically illegal to criticize even the stupidest of welfare queens. Women are children which is why they need a father or husband to keep them in check. Failing that you have nature which is far more cruel and vicious as the winter winds care not about evil patriarchy. Moronic women need a master and men must rise to the occasion or forfeit civilization as we know it (which also solves the female problem). In a medieval world you don’t get slut walks do you? You don’t see them protesting in Islamic countries … wonder why? Oh yeah because the men would beat the shit out of them, rape them, put them back in their proper place and make sure the other women learn from the example. Personally I don’t advocate a return to Islam but ultimately that’s the choice you stupid spoiled children have – western patriarchy or the burka. You *WILL* get one of those and given your attitude I hope you aren’t afraid of razors – I hear female circumcision hurts like a bitch.

      320. Bee Warren February 11, 2016 at 9:24 am

        Ahahahaha! You love women do you? What kind of love is expressed by the sadistic brutality, domination, oppression and contempt you advocate. The only more insanely hateful thing would be murder. What a charming and civilized human being you must be – NOT!

        Get off your arrogant, self-appointed pedestal, ditch the ignorant bigotry – it just makes you look incredibly stupid from anybody’s perspective, be they woman or man.

        Maybe you have been wronged by a woman. Did your mother not nurture you well? Did your girlfriend dump you? You can’t blame her if she did – you obviously deserved it as you are a nasty, cruel bastard.
        Still you don’t seem grown up enough to accept your share of responsibility for your own actions.

        It is not me that has a problem with men. Yes, I have been wronged by one or two men, also one or two women. That’s life. So what? I once saw a three legged dog. That means all dogs have three legs, does it?

        At least half of my friends are men. Of course, since I live in a normal society, they are all mentally balanced and have no delusions of grandeur and superiority. We have lots of fun together working, playing, discussing world affairs, socialising AS EQUALS, with equal respect for each other and everybody’s happy.

        So why don’t you get back in your miserable little Neanderthal cave with your bitter and twisted prejudice and rot in the putridness of your own heart?

      321. Remo February 11, 2016 at 12:28 pm

        Oh dear daddy’s absence really did a number on you didn’t it? On the one hand you want to prove your feminist chops and the other you secretly yearn for the firm hand to show you the proper way. I’ll bet the binding on your copy of 50 shades of gray is barely holding together from being read and re-read so many times. Yes Bee discipline – women need it and you’re proving my point.

        You see how much more pleasant you would be if you’d get off the computer and go make a man somewhere a sammich? Everyone would be happier including you. You would actually be doing something kind and productive and people wouldn’t think (correctly) that you were a bitter graying dyke with 50+ cats. You should seek out a real man, one who isn’t afraid to guide you and control your childish outbursts. You’ll be a better person for it once he corrects you and starts making you behave. Cheers!

      322. Bee Warren February 11, 2016 at 9:17 pm

        There you go talking out of your backside again.

        1)My father was a gentleman with a loving heart. Someone to be proud of. Someone worthy of respect.

        2)Trash like 50 Shades – written by a man and, from what I hear of it, pure fantasy with zero understanding of women, (like yourself) – is the last thing I would waste my eyes on.
        3) If any man laid a violent hand on me he’d regret it the rest of his short life. I am not an aggressor but will defend myself fiercely if I have to… and of course the law would be on my side. Thugs and brutes have no place in a civilised society.

        In the probability that he were bigger and stronger than me, ie. a snivelling bully, my male friends wouldn’t hesitate to flatten him. Because real men [and women] loathe bullies. Only the biggest cowards pick on people smaller than themselves. You like beating up little girls and old ladies, don’t you? What a big, brave fellow you must be! So how do you fancy your chances with a 6’2″ Glaswegian man?
        4) My sex life is none of your business but I can assure you you are as wrong as it’s possible to be.

        I repeat – it is not me that has a problem with men. I have a very healthy relationship.
        It is you that has some weird notion about women and your hatred of women, your desire to hurt and cause suffering just proves you to be a pervert of the lowest kind. I’ve seen more advanced lifeforms crawl out from under a rock. You’re hardly worth the pity I feel for you, but pitiful is what you are.
        Since you want to inflict only misery on others then you must want a life of misery for yourself. What you give is what you get

        Of course you do have the option of dropping the pseudo-macho bullshit and being a normal, mature person. You might even find somebody to like you one day.

      323. Remo February 12, 2016 at 10:56 am

        Bee! So good to hear from u again. Im sure you’re father was a great man but when he and your mother were on Maury did the DNA test come back yea or nay?
        Given your demeanor I’m pretty sure there’s a drunken late night session or two passed out behind the stop and rob in your mothers past. It would explain a lot.

        (2) men are smart aren’t they? He wrote that obvious pulp nonsense to make a buck and you gals fought over copies of it like it was the bouquet at a wedding with a bunch of 30 somethings. What drivel – and you broads ate it up and pleaded for more to the tune of a big Hollywood movie deal complete with lines around the block at the premier. Never ever underestimate the vacuousness and stupidity of the modern woman who is so incapable of understanding herself, her own desires, and the world around her – such moronic children you all are. 50 shades is proof howvery easy to manipulate and bait you all into pursuing the short term gina tingles over your long term betterment. 50 shades shows why men need to take women back to the 1750’s – it absolutely epitomizes the levels of depravity and selfish stupid obsessions that women have and are completely unable to refrain themselves from indulging in regardless of any long term cost of same.

        (3) ahh bee… You’ve been watching lots of Angelina Jolie movies haven’t you? Some dimwit cunt weighing in at 120 pounds downing a room full of 200 pound body builders. You do believe in fairy tales don’t you? Any man could kick you to the curb (or back into the kitchen and/or bedroom where u belong) in a New York minute. And YES widdle cupcake YES the “law” (big large MEN with guns) are necessary to protect you from your own stupidity if you get into a scuffle with a man. Woody Allen has more muscle than you dimwit. Thank you for admitting that your stupid fantasy requires men to work and potentially die for you. What’s the biggest contradiction ever written since “military intelligence”? “Independent woman”… There just isn’t such a thing. Just another full of herself dyke sitting on the shoulders of men and feeling tall.

        You see the wisdom here don’t you now bee? We don’t hate women we just correctly understand that they are grossly inferior to men and need to be firmly guided. Men love children and care for them but do not acknowledge them as equals because they aren’t – same with the women. Now go make your daddy a sammich cupcake and remember not to cut yourself or forget which way to cut it this time! If youre really good daddy will read you a story and ravish you later after you do the dishes.

      324. Bee Warren February 12, 2016 at 6:02 pm

        Now your drivel has sunk beyond comprehension. I’ve no idea what you’re on about.
        Something about men being so incompetent they can’t make their own ‘sammich’ (presumably baby talk for sandwich?) and want to be patronised and molly coddled like helpless babies all their lives. I suppose it’s just another symptom of your profound immaturity.

        I know the men in my life would be very insulted and humiliated at such degrading treatment. And, like any normal human being, would be very miserable in such a one-sided situation.

        As far as I can tell, in your fantasy world women do all the giving in a relationship while the men only take selfishly and contribute absolutely nothing except intestinal gas… well apart from the cruelty, violence and child abuse.

        But in your case, obviously you wouldn’t know how to ravish a woman even if you could get near one. With your inability to live without a mummy-figure wipe your arse for you, your best chances would be to employ a cook, a housekeeper and a nurse, and stick with the blow-up doll for sex with something that doesn’t have feelings and you don’t have to give pleasure to.
        Why do you think the term ‘wanker’ is given to the most useless, self-serving wastes of space?

        As you are intent on a life of crime, or at least bragging that that’s the highest ambition you have, I hope you like prison food because I doubt you’ll like what some of the more hardened inmates do to shit-for-brains losers who pick on women and little girls.
        With a bit of luck the castration you are so desperately crying out for will be done under anaesthetic – because if you laid a hand on one of my daughters or granddaughters I wouldn’t be so merciful… Come to think of it, all being perfectly capable of standing up for themselves, even the littl’un, I doubt they’d need help from me or anyone else. After all, you’re only a pathetic little runt, aren’t you?

      325. Remo February 13, 2016 at 2:45 pm

        Bee! Happy valentines day! I’m sure Felix and Mr. Tiddlesworth are keeping you good company in leu of an actual man this holiday. Give them each a sprig of catnip for me will you please?

        All this hostility over the simple chore of making a sandwich! My oh my you’d think that I was asking you to dig a mine, or clean out a sewer, or serve combat duty (without the get of jail free card of pregnancy that women use whenever theres a deployment). Please do try to hide your sexual arousal a little better m’kay? Yes I know you long for a real man to bend you over the sink and take you in a manly fashion but my dear that won’t happen until you hit a stair master and lose some weight! Stop cutting your hair, gorging on Ben and Jerry’s and pretending that you are anything other than a complimentary sexual object for a man to enjoy. Embrace this and you will be free. Learn to cook, keep yourself trim and sexy, and happiness in the form of a nice strong man (who you secretly get wet over) will be yours!

        Continue in your stupid feminazi ways and only cats await you while your hair grays and you become useless – unable to even make a man a sammich! 😀

      326. Bee Warren February 14, 2016 at 10:27 am

        There you go again, knowing zero about women and even less about me, you’re as wrong as it’s possible to be on all counts. Try reversing your whole comment back at yourself and I expect you’d be much closer to reality.
        Considering the only reason I looked into this site was to defend normal people from the insane pseudo-macho gender Naziism being promoted by a tiny cult of control-freak turdwits, the term ‘feminazi’ hardly applies to anyone espousing equality, does it?

        Pity your own mother got pregnant – probably raped by a subhuman moron who then abandoned her to risk her life in giving birth and then to sacrifice her health, hopes and dreams to feed, raise and protect the abomination you have become.

        Sadly, her most serious mistake was to spoil you rotten and erroneously let you believe dictatorship and bullying could help you through life. She really should have taught you – not with violence of course – that it just makes you look incredibly stupid and will gain you nothing.

        Still, never too late to learn. It’s possible that deep inside the ugly, cowardly creep you present to the world is a reasonable man who, given enough therapy and education maybe… just maybe… could become acceptable to a woman.
        Then again, if it’s a genetic fault that has made you into a mindless thug it’s probably best you are never allowed to breed.

        I am totally aware that, due to the utter ridiculousness of your fascist ideas, it is likely just a wind-up, but that doesn’t make it any less dangerous.and irresponsible. If Roosh’s idiotic propaganda influenced just one gullible young simpleton into thinking there was any credence in brutality toward women, and he went out and raped someone, that would be at least two people’s lives ruined. She’d be injured, traumatised, potentially made pregnant and unable to engage in a normal relationship ever again, while he’d be locked up, beaten up, put on the sex offender’s register and future relationship and employment prospects scuppered… and either could be at risk of STIs and AIDS.

        Some of us give the best of our lives to making the world a better place. Then there are the insane and mean-spirited who want to create hell on Earth. As if the world doesn’t have enough problems due, almost entirely, to twisted, self-important men obsessed with power!

      327. Remo February 15, 2016 at 9:41 am

        Bee! Zero about women? No my dear I have “known” in the biblical sense many women and I can testify that each and every one required training in order to please me. On the bright side though each of them were much happier after being firmly lead into the light. The joy of serving your man is just something a stupid fat loud feminazi will never enjoy – just the purring of too many cats and stench of the beasts urine throughout your studio apartment. Such a life. Sad.

        ‘…raped by a subhuman..’ Bee! Are you racist? Are you saying that you believe all that KKK stuff in addition to your stupid feminist fantasies? Oh how delightful. Bee is one of those racial purists where only a select group of lesbian is allowed to munch her cooter. Personally I like a wide range of females and race for me is no issue. Who’d have thought that I would be more progressive than you? All women are basically the same anyway, all of them children requiring guidance, so I see no reason to sign on to bitter racism as you have. I suggest you go find a nice man of color to bend you over the sink and knock that stupid concept of racism out of your empty head. Don’t limit yourself to only white girls and cats bee, experiment!

        Roosh’s propaganda? Oh no you poor deluded child. Roosh speaks the absolute truth and he and i both have the notches to prove it. You gals love us when we treat you badly, act like jerks, cheat on you, and dominate you and such is the stuff of your dreams. I have the stained bed sheets to prove it bee, you gals are wired to love domination but your too dishonest to admit it. I’m sure the horror of being born a lesser vessel just nags at you but it is what it is bee and you can’t help being a woman just like I can’t help it that I can’t unlearn the truth. Embrace your true position and know and grow to love your place. Get to know the sandwich and how happy you will be when you please your man by serving him. That is the way to happiness for a woman.

        You don’t need to make the world a better place bee you just need to learn how to make your man happy and he will do great things! You don’t have the pressure, the weight of the crown a man must wear you only need serve locally to act globally. When you learn to behave and serve you’ll make the world a better place like a good obedient child should. Peace bee and remember who and what you are.

      328. Bee Warren February 15, 2016 at 11:36 am

        Bla.. bla..bla.. same old vain, vile and ignorant bullshit there Remo. Obviously your deluded, egotistic, fantasy blinds you to everything I actually say. As you’re so narcissistic and incapable of listening to anyone else I expect you bore women into a coma then go to the mirror for your wank fodder.
        Just one more point I’d like to make clear (if the strain of understanding simple facts isn’t too taxing for you) ;
        I said ‘subhuman’. This has nothing whatsoever to do with race. That’s entirely your twisted interpretation and reflects your attitude not mine at all, which makes you the only racist, as well as the only Nazi.

        Well, I suppose a bigot with a pathological superiority complex would have multiple prejudices.

      329. Remo February 15, 2016 at 6:08 pm

        You’re a racist Bee and your little slip shines the light on the slime living in the depth of your soul. I’m not blind to what you say I just don’t agree with a bitter racist harridan whose racism and obvious effututam taints everything about her. You label other races subhuman so you cannot be treated with even the passing smirking respect I was giving you before. You’re not an innocent child who is simply ignorant of what makes her tick, you’re a genocidal racist whose voice should be ignored or silenced completely when she reaches for her favorite brown shirt.

      330. Bee Warren February 16, 2016 at 1:08 pm

        Oh you tiresome cretin! Never did I, nor would I ever, imply that subhuman referred to someone of another race. You did. That makes you the racist.

        For your information, subhuman means an unevolved animal.
        The profound ignorance in your twisted assumptions show you to be an even bigger fool than you already have proven.
        You don’t even know which races I descend from.
        I don’t recognise racial differences, never have. I’ve travelled widely and have friends across the world. People are just people as far as I’m concerned and I merit each by their individual heart.
        Who cares what race, religion, creed or gender a person is? Only bigots like you.

        Prejudice against women is no different from any other kind of prejudice… it’s just irrational hatred of those you don’t understand and are unwilling to listen to.
        Your arguments are so weak. I see you squirm and throw as much sewage as you can dig up because you have no foundation, no substance, no truth – just empty self-aggrandising bullshit. You convince no -one but yourself.

        It’s blatantly clear you are clueless about women and are desperately clinging to some archaic myth borne of a frightened little boy’s sense of impotence.

        Your refusal to accept the fact that men are more dependent on women than women are on men; that women are intelligent and strong in their own right; that no person can own another; that control freaks, of either sex, are obnoxious, despicable and repellant; that human relationships are built on mutual love, trust and respect, not bullying and humiliation.

        Your bragging about your sexual prowess just goes to show what a tosser you are. Real men don’t need to brag. Real men attract real women by natural charm, kindness, intelligence, and potential as a loyal life partner and wise father for her children. No one in their right mind would let a violent thug anywhere near their children even if he were the biological father.

        There is nothing less sexy than an ill-mannered, pig-headed narcissist who thinks that because a woman finds him repulsive she must be a lesbian. How stupid can you get? It is because all but maybe the most naive young girls fail to be impressed by such arrogant twats.

      331. Remo February 16, 2016 at 7:42 pm

        Bee you’re a filthy racist moron. Judging people by their skin color and calling them subhuman makes you the uneducated twat. Regardless of my feelings on women I certainly don’t judge an entire race of people as one nor do I call them subhuman as you have done. You want to see a subhuman? Look in the mirror and there you go. You’re right I don’t know what race you are but if whether or not you’re self hating or other hating really doesn’t matter to me – its the fact that you feel judging an entire race is valid. It is not and you are not, period. Yes I’m sure like every racist you have a flip card full of stock photos of “friends” to try to prove you aren’t what you slipped up and admitted publicly. Color me not impressed (pun intended).

        In your screed I see you say that “one person cannot own another” and I bet that just makes you yearn for the antebellum days of yore doesn’t it Scarlet? And as for your obvious sexual arousal over my truth telling – sorry but I’m not interested. I’d never give some KKK burning cross carrying monstrosity such as yourself a crack at the good stuff. Black women are beautiful – REALLY beautiful – there I said it – and I know that makes your squirm doesn’t it? Go find some David Duke to fill your nethers – I’m not interested.

      332. Bee Warren February 17, 2016 at 3:59 pm

        Oh dear oh dear! You really have lost the plot, haven’t you? You know perfectly well I never even mentioned or made the remotest reference to race or skin colour. The whole issue is entirely your bizarre invention, just because you didn’t like me saying you were the product of a subhuman assault on your mother. I only said that because rapists exhibit a subhuman, ie. lower animal, attitude to sex.

        You can make up as much false accusations and nonsensical crap as you like, but my conscience is squeaky clean.
        I suggest you change your medication because it’s making you more and more delusional as you twist the facts beyond all recognition.

      333. Michelle Green February 13, 2016 at 12:03 pm

        Amusing that you call women children when you may as well be rolling around on the floor with a pacifier in your mouth with this tantrum.

      334. Remo February 13, 2016 at 2:56 pm

        Um yeah I label women children because a person dies as she considers it inconvenient. So you consider MURDER a small thing?!?!

      335. Michelle Green February 13, 2016 at 9:54 pm

        You ass, I’m pro-life. I believe Roe Vs. Wade was largely voted in by a mostly make Supreme Court yes? And the overwhelming majority of physicians performing abortions are male.

        People are killed out of “inconvenience” during robberies…. More frequently committed by men. But I’ve got enough brain cells to run together and realize that this isn’t a characteristic trait of the whole gender. I’m sorry you lack that same ability of reasoning.

      336. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 2:47 pm

        Too many in a democracy. That is about to be remedied. Won’t be any democracies at all before long. Know why? Too many idiot women voting in ways that ensure their destruction via invasion by Theocratic Muslims (male chauvinists) and Marxist Dictator backing Latino’s (also male chauvinists). Add to this the destruction of the family and the collapse of all of the social contracts (civil society) and you have an environment NOT conducive to women. Good luck with that, you’re going to need it.

      337. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:02 pm

        Conspiracy theories, when will the aliens get here?

      338. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:16 pm

        Conspiracy theories? You mean like the kind a Western Roman would have had when he realized that his government was paying tribute to the Huns? It’s neither a conspiracy, nor a theory. Just glaring facts.

      339. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:25 pm

        Kind of like how many think aliens exist And visit earth constantly and Obama is a reptile? It’s bullshit.

      340. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 4:00 pm

        It’s not bullshit. You don’t want to acknowledge reality. We’ve established that. Your version of reality has Muslims acting as feminists and Commies not viably running for the office of the Presidency. You’re all wet.

      341. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 4:32 pm

        I’m confused as to why you’re not defending muslims if they are as you say they are in regards to women?

      342. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 9:52 pm

        I don’t understand why you are but not so vocally.

        I think their religion is entirely hypocritical and disgusting. It is repressive and disrespectful of women. It is misogynistic. They don’t believe in personal liberties (such as freedom of expression/speech) of any sort.

      343. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 9:53 pm

        Neither do you or any of your ilk, look at the damn title of this article.

      344. Ken Bourne September 24, 2015 at 12:06 am

        Zechs, write an article dude. Please, show us how great your life is, we’re just so eager to learn from your great wisdom! Surely logic will win the day!

      345. Zechs Marquise September 24, 2015 at 12:17 am

        Dbaa would be the general gist but obviously you have to rage because women can vote so that is an impossibility.

      346. flybabycrybaby February 4, 2016 at 11:26 pm

        Obama is from the planet Zorp. All hail Zorp.

      347. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 9:47 pm

        You probably like Conspiracy Theorists such as George Santayana (“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”) and Strauss and Howe (“The Fourth Turning”). You know people that believe that history is cyclical and all. That’s generally what my opinion is based on. That and the consistency of human nature based on observations dating back a few thousand years.

      348. Derek Flounders October 3, 2015 at 4:01 am

        Yeh man, did you see what he did there? I saw that he said muslim, so I replaced all words woman with palestine and all words man with isreal. Roosh is a genius it’s obvious palestine must be control by the superior of israel and the rest of those mussy places too; free up some of that pussy for the rest of us.

        I’m visiting israel in a week can’t wait, I’m gonna get me some palestine pussy, show the dumbass musilm who the real allah is; if you know what I mean *wink wink* TAKE BACK CONTROL! mussies can’t be left alone they haev to be controlled by superior society

        I posted Roosh for advice but my post is not there, can you help? I only have one more week.

      349. Bee Warren February 2, 2016 at 1:31 pm

        What bullshit propaganda has corrupted you and your ilk into such deranged control freaks? What made you become a self-important idiot who irrationally hates his own mother. Is it because you realise, deep down, that women are generally more vital to your existence than you are to theirs that you fear them?

      350. Simba February 2, 2016 at 9:39 pm

        Jajajajaja

        That was lovely, trying to make me feel guilty for using my own brain to think.

        Go away, woman. This is no place for you.

      351. Bee Warren February 3, 2016 at 6:08 pm

        Hahahaha! Using your own brain to think? Very funny! If that were so you wouldn’t be getting sucked into the truly sick sphere of absurd nonsense spouted by that criminally insane, sex pervert, Roosh. Good to know you are capable of feeling guilt, Simba. Hopefully it will prevent you acting out the vile thuggery you seem to approve. I do pity you for whatever horrendous experience twisted you into the bitter creature you are letting yourself become, but you can’t blame half the human race for something maybe just one woman did to you. We’ve all suffered at the misdeeds of others. Some people just have a nasty streak (eg Roosh). Gender has nothing to do with it.
        As a woman it is very much my place to come here to stand up in self defence to any warped bully obsessed with domination and who would consider rape.
        I am also defending all the decent, real men, (ie. 99.999…%) of the world who are disgraced and imprisoned by simply sharing the gender of sicko psychos like Roosh. Of all the comments on facebook it was the men who most wanted to tear him limb from limb. Not only does he shame them but poses a serious threat to their mothers, sisters, daughters and wives – people they love.

        Do yourself a favour, lad, get some therapy or whatever, but do not throw your life away on an irrational hatred. It will eat you from the inside and the ugliness of your soul will repel all others and destroy you. What’s more you are liable to end up in prison – as Roosh most definitely will.

        Dispel the hatred. Get yourself a nice boyfriend, if that’s what you prefer, and go live a peaceful life.

      352. Simba February 3, 2016 at 10:51 pm

        Nice speech, nothing I haven’t heard before, considering the feminist hive mind programs it all.

        Once more, go away woman. It’s clear you don’t know what you’re talking about and I’m sure you’ll find the kitchen more suited to your talents.

        Be gone now.

      353. Bee Warren February 3, 2016 at 6:59 pm

        I do have to wonder what planet you’re on where women just ‘do as they please’… and what on earth is a white-night when its at home? Some weird fantasy you have there!
        In the world I live in society has for a long time been very much a patriarchy – usually to the detriment of all. Apart from early history (and in a few societies today) when the goddess was most revered, and women given the respect due, men have dominated and oppressed women, probably because their own perceived spiritual and intellectual inadequacies could be hidden behind a facade of physical strength.

        Thankfully in the last century women have started standing up for themselves, refusing to be bullied into compliance and slavery and breaking out of the cruelty and injustice. In so doing they have realised their true value and liberated men from the burdensome role they had brought upon themselves. As the 21st century progresses there’s still a way to go before it’s properly fair – equal say, equal pay, etc. – but this increasing equality makes for a much happier state of affairs for everyone.

        Why anyone would want to take us back to the dark ages is a reflection of their own unhingedness.

      354. Simba February 3, 2016 at 11:03 pm

        “In the world I live in society has for a long time been very much a patriarchy – usually to the detriment of all.”

        Sure thing. That’s why you live surrounded by technology that makes your life easier. Technology invented by men…

        “men have dominated and oppressed women, probably because their own perceived spiritual and intellectual inadequacies could be hidden behind a facade of physical strength.”

        Jajaja what an idiotic bit. You may want to study a little history and biology, woman.

        -Men have been the ones in control of culture, society, warfare and religion. If women came near any of this mentioned things there’s a common denominator. She was a wife, widow or daughter of the man who was in power. And that’s it.

        -There is no facade of strenght, dear. We’re stronger than you.

        “Thankfully in the last century women have started standing up for themselves, refusing to be bullied into compliance and slavery and breaking out of the cruelty and injustice.”

        You mean, you’ve been allowed to do so by men. That’s the only reason today you play to be “equal” to us, darling. You did nothing on your own. Men gave you the things you have today. And men can take them away once again.

      355. Bee Warren February 4, 2016 at 8:20 am

        Ok, Simba, you go and live your sad-act existence in your obscene fantasy world. Shrivel up in your own hatred if you really want. Of course, you’ll never know the joys of a loving relationship, or fatherhood (thank goodness) and probably get yourself regularly beaten up by the real men you insult and the women you abuse.

        Everyone knows bullies are really the worst cowards – so how about getting a backbone? It might help you overcome your obsession for false bravado and domination of other people. Oh, and when you get locked up, be it prison or mental institution, you might find yourself getting raped by some other pervy inmates.You’d like that, wouldn’t you? Perhaps that’s what you’re really hoping for so you never have to be a responsible grown-up.

        Maybe while you’re there you could try and get a proper education – but take the blindfold off first. Blind prejudice and ignorance shows you to be very weak in the head. With the utter bullshit you dribble you obviously haven’t a clue about the great things women have done for the world – positive things that could save your life one day… more’s the pity.
        And I can’t think of anything I enjoy less than being in the kitchen. Maybe I could come and live on your planet where you say women do whatever they want. Sounds great. I’ve never seen such a place before.

      356. Simba February 4, 2016 at 8:41 am

        “And I can’t think of anything I enjoy less than being in the kitchen. ”

        Well, that explains evrything.

      357. Bee Warren February 4, 2016 at 10:34 pm

        Explains everything – really? All it explains is that I’m a normal human being that doesn’t love menial drudgery and cooking just isn’t one of my several hobbies or talents. Not being a mindless robot I’d rather be doing something more interesting, employing the practical and creative skills I was born with. Who wouldn’t? It doesn’t mean I don’t do what needs to be done even if I don’t like it because, unlike some [old-fashioned] men I’ve had the misfortune to know in my many years, I don’t selfishly and childishly neglect my responsibilities, go down the pub and come home a useless, repulsive, maybe aggressive mess, while expecting another person to be the prisoner in the home, singlehandedly raising my kids, keeping house, doing all the chores and grown up stuff. That’s why your absurd claim that women just do what they want is no more than a silly excuse to be a nasty because you don’t have a valid reason.

        Your chosen pseudonym and symbol, Simba, a male lion. Haha! What a joke. Who do you think you’re kidding? Transparent as glass.This is an obvious fantasy screen for a pathetic, screwed-up little coward. Although thought to be a symbol of nobility, which no woman hater could ever be, the male lion is a lonely chap and totally helpless without a group of females to do the hunting.To win the acceptance of the pride he has to prove his worth as a potential mate and gentle father of the cubs. In humans if a man wants to procreate he has to earn the love and respect of a woman by his wisdom and kindness – something that seems to have passed you by. As did evolution evidently.

        Since ugly, hateful, violent rapists are about as repellant to women (and men, for that matter) as it’s possible to be you stand a better chance of walking to Mars than you do of ever getting a mate. Don’t listen to that stupid prick Roosh. He hasn’t the remotest clue about women. Only the most gullible and feeble minded would fall for that load of old tripe.

        Women are smart and can instinctively sniff out a bad’un, however slick he imagines he is. In fact the more fake and arrogant the more ridiculous he looks.You can see the evil and insanity in that one’s eyes just from his photo!

        Besides, however old you actually are, your immaturity is remarkable. I doubt you’re even capable of doing the deed. No chance of a pride for you, deluded Neanderthal boy! Your kind are doomed to extinction.

      358. Simba February 5, 2016 at 8:27 am

        “Explains everything – really?”

        Sure it does. Rejecting one of the most basic things you would be required to do in a relationship is a clear sign of someone that needs to be avoided.

        “the male lion is a lonely chap and totally helpless without a group of females to do the hunting.”

        Wrong. They are excellent hunters, just as good as the females and even better at taking big game. Lions do NOT need females to hunt for them. They do it themselves and with their brothers.

        “To win the acceptance of the pride he has to prove his worth as a potential mate and gentle father of the cubs.”

        That’s the little kids version.

        The reality is that the coalition of males take a territory by force, not asking permission. One or several prides that is within that territory then become theirs, whether they like it or not.

        Do you know how they “proves their worth”?

        They force THEIR will over the females. Meek, “gentle” and therefore weak males are discarted by the lionesses.

        With the cubs the fathers are tolerant and patient, letting them eat with them the first and best parts of a kill, and keep the females away. Do you know why? Because the females don’t allow the cubs to do this.

        So, wrong again with all your theory and lame attempt of shaming me.

        I would suggest that you take some cooking classes. Trust me, it’s for the best. You’re welcome.

      359. Bee Warren February 6, 2016 at 6:33 pm

        For a start I didn’t say I can’t cook or that I don’t, I just don’t much enjoy it – it’s a chore. You can’t make someone like something that isn’t part of their nature. That’s as irrational and narrow-minded as if I said all men have to enjoy and be good at, say, car mechanics.

        Secondly you are wrong about male lions cooperating with each other – they compete… and kill each other’s cubs. And never would lionesses keep their cubs from the food – the first priority af any mother of any species is the welfare of her young. That is well known. Have you never heard that the most dangerous thing in the world is to come between a mother bear and her young? Since all you Idiot followers of Roosh’s hate incitement pose a serious potential threat to my offspring, how could I not be compelled to fight you?

        But anyway, we are not lions, we are human – a social, cerebral species designed for monogomous, long-term relationships. Brute strength is not what made us the most successful species on the planet but intelligence, the ability to communicate and cooperate. Most of all it is the capacity for love, empathy and compassion that marks out the higher mammals.

        I am a mother and grandmother and have a loving, well balanced family – something you will never know as long as you hang on to that twisted, bitter heart. Their father/grandfather is intelligent, caring, just so happens to enjoy cooking more than I do as do many men(note – all top chefs are male), and has no weird hang-ups about having to dominate and abuse women – a well loved and respected member of the community. We’d both give our lives to protect the children (anybody’s children) from vicious predators like you – the girls from your brutality and the boys from your corruption (although they are smart enough to see for themselves how despicable you thugs are and wouldn’t hesitate to defend their sisters/mothers/female friends from you).

        Among my many male friends not one would dream of being so cruel to
        their wives or throwing their lives away for some perverse power trip.

        In a healthy household domestic duties are shared fairly without anybody bullying anyone else. Mutual respect is all it takes – it’s so easy for everyone that way. Why do you insist on trying to make it so sour and difficult? No relationship can survive the gross inequality you seem to crave.

        So what do you think you, barely out of nappies by the sound of it, know about human relationships? Bugger all! If you imagine any woman in her right mind would put up with a violent control freak that hated her, demanded her to be his slave in the home, inflicted the traumatising abuse of rape on her and condemned her to a life in fear and total misery… well, she’d have to be one hell of a masochist, wouldn’t she? And would you really want to invite such hatred upon yourself when, if you had any decency or charm at all, you might actually find happiness through love. You can only receive according to what you give.

        Arrogance is very unattractive, even in sane people, but do you know an exaggerated sense of self importance and compulsion to control, megalomania, is a mental disease? This is clearly one part of Roosh’s complex psychological disorder and it seems you are suffering a similar sickness.
        Yes, I’ve heard about those archaic societies where perverted sadists and paedophiles get away with the imprisonment of young girls and ruin their lives for ever. Some evil, heartless parents will even coerce in the crime by selling their daughters into forced marriages with these vile, subhuman beasts. I’ve heard about the desperation and lengths some women have to go to to escape, even on occasion, being left with no choice but to commit manslaughter by way of self-defence. And who can blame them?

      360. Simba February 7, 2016 at 10:49 am

        “you are wrong about male lions cooperating with each other – they compete… and kill each other’s cubs.”

        No, I’m not. They cooperate their whole lives, until the day they die. As for the cubs, as long as they didn’t live somewhere else and never saw the cub, they consider the cubs theirs.

        “And never would lionesses keep their cubs from the food – the first priority af any mother of any species is the welfare of her young. ”

        Denial. And, frankly, I’m not surprised.

        You may want to stop babbling about things you don’t know, for once.

      361. Bee Warren February 7, 2016 at 2:41 pm

        Denial of what? Having done no wrong I have nothing to deny. It is not me who has a pathological desire to harm half the human race. That’s entirely your insanity.

        In my world I live in peace with my fellow humans – gender is irrelevant.
        But I do not tolerate bullies! And nor do REAL men. That’s how I know you are not a grown up, not mentally anyway.

        Also, having studied and worked with nature and ecology, as well as medicine and psychology, for over half a century I can assure you I do know something about animal and human behaviour.
        And it is crystal clear that you are a feeble little coward trying to hide behind a sham tough-guy image, as are all bully boys, and barely worth the pity I feel for you.

        The only other boy I ever met who had any measure of mysogony (though nowhere near as bonkers as you) was the son of a prostitute so had lacked a stable father figure. He wasn’t a totally bad lad but his ignorance about women was very sad and his ruin. None of the other lads had any time for him and thought him a bit of a twat.

        I’d take a bet that your idea of what a man’s role is has been conjured up out of your imagination due to lack of a proper male role model and fatherly guidance.

        Of course, women never become prostitutes out of choice but because evil, good-for-nothing pimps force them into it and then other men, sad old losers, are willing to pay for it.
        Then there’s the [male run] porn industry misleading gullible young lads (such as yourself) into thinking sex is something that it isn’t, perhaps involving violence and other sick perversions, and leading them to a state of impotence when they venture into the real world. Don’t you know those actors are ficticious and that porn-film sex acts are staged? It’s nothing like that in real life.

        Of course, with your hostile attitude to women (wherever it came from) there’s little chance you’ll ever find out what real sex is other than with men, whom you obviously prefer, for how could you possibly enjoy intimacy with someone you despise? It just doesn’t work that way.
        I cannot shame you, I can only point out how you shame yourself and your family. Your poor mother must be heartbroken by your hatred of her and your father, if he’s aware you exist, must struggle to hold his head up with the disgrace you bring on him. Either that or he is a nasty piece of work too and has bullied your mother into breakdown and you into the screwed up mess you’ve become

        For your sake and that of the world in general, I really hope you manage to mature into a civilised human being one day and quit this stupid gender terrorism.

        Like they say – it ain’t big and it ain’t clever!

      362. Simba February 9, 2016 at 9:23 am

        “Denial of what?”

        Can you read properly? I qouted the exact words.

        “But I do not tolerate bullies!”

        Says the one who’s here bullying the ones who think differently.

        “And nor do REAL men.”

        Oh, right. So now you want to tell me how to be a “real” man. Jajajaja what a hypocrit.

        “Also, having studied and worked with nature and ecology, as well as medicine and psychology, for over half a century I can assure you I do know something about animal and human behaviour.”

        Sure you do. Your answers though, reflect a veeeery different reality.

      363. Bee Warren February 9, 2016 at 10:19 am

        When the deranged bigot and control freak, Hitler, launched his despotic attack on the world and countries fought back in self defence, who was the bully there?

        I am not telling you how to be a real man, I am simply telling you what real men think of know-nothing losers like you. My knowledge of the world comes from well known scientific fact as well as a long lifetime’s observation and experience. I have no need to invent stuff as you do.
        If I say you are a pathetic little worm that is a kindness by comparison to what all the men I know (mentally balanced men who have no need to pretend to be big) are calling you and would like to do to you if they met you in person.
        Incidentally, I hear that attention seeker brat, Roosh, apparently still dependant on his mum, has chickened out of visiting UK and many other educated countries. He must have got wind of the kind of welcome Glaswegians give to nasty little creeps. Hahaha!

        What else would you expect when you threaten innocent people for no reason other than irrational prejudice and spitefulness?

        Most 2 year olds are more emotionally mature and the average amoeba more socially evolved.

      364. Simba February 9, 2016 at 6:03 pm

        “I am not telling you how to be a real man”

        Sure you are. You’ve been doing that all this time, pretending to know what “a real man” is. Hypocrit.

        “If I say you are a pathetic little worm that is a kindness by comparison to what all the men I know (mentally balanced men who have no need to pretend to be big) are calling you and would like to do to you if they met you in person.”

        Like I said. A bully. You really need that kitchen, woman.

      365. Bee Warren February 9, 2016 at 9:30 pm

        I have a kitchen thanks, genderNazi. It is not me who needs anything. I’m fine. I have love in my life. I have plenty of friends. I am near the end of my life and have never knowingly harmed a soul. I can go to my grave with a clear conscience. What more could anyone wish for?
        But what you clearly need is psychiatric help because all you have is hate in your heart and a warped desire to control and harm innocent people. The only reason I am wasting my precious time on you is to prevent unnecessary suffering for them and try to save you from your very mixed up self by pointing out how ugly and ridiculous you look with your irrational hostility.

        Why not admit to yourself that you are gay, be content with it and just leave the women alone? Don’t be afraid, It’s ok to be gay. This is the 21st century and those old bigotted, archaic and ignorant attitudes must be consigned to history.
        As must the gross inequality that has kept women as slaves to self-important bully-boys for far too long.

      366. Bee Warren February 9, 2016 at 9:41 pm

        And by the way, I do know what a real man is. A man is someone strong in moral fibre, is humble and gracious and earns respect by giving it. And receives pleasure by giving it. There are millions who naturally fit the bill.

        I don’t understand why you find it so difficult to aspire to proper masculinity other than the fact that you have a developmental block, but I’m sure it could be treated.

      367. Simba February 11, 2016 at 5:20 pm

        “I don’t understand why you find it so difficult to aspire to proper masculinity”

        You, woman, do not dictate what “proper” masculinity is to me or to other men, because you simply can’t know what is it, aside from what it suits you.

      368. Bee Warren February 11, 2016 at 10:06 pm

        I am not dictating – unlike you petty little Hitlers I have no more desire to dominate anybody than I do to be dominated. Why would I want to stoop as low as you?
        All I am doing is pointing out the obvious facts, from everybody’s point of view, both male and female. Facts that your tiny, prejudice crippled brain finds so difficult to grasp. Have you not seen the comments made by men on the facebook post about Roosh? I am merely the messenger that’s bothered to convey what all sane people think of you deranged fools. Your futile attempts to shoot me down do not change the message.

        The reality of the world seems to frighten you into trying to puff yourself up to look bigger. A tiny kitten pretending to be a lion is very comical to see.
        Maybe if you knew that women are the same species as men you’d stop being afraid of them. Stop drawing artificial lines between the sexes, who essentially have the same needs, hopes, desires, and intellectual capacity and understand that with mutual respect and consideration everyone’s a winner.

        But respect has to be earned. As long as you persist in behaving like the scum of the earth, wishing to control and harm, you’ll never merit respect from anyone.

        Most people are good-ish, a few are bad-ish and the odd handful are downright evil (Hitler, Saddat, Daesh, Taliban, Trump, Roosh V, etc.) At the moment you are choosing to be one of the latter.
        When will you realise gender is irrelevant and free yourself from a life of completely unnecessary self-imposed torture?

      369. Simba February 12, 2016 at 4:09 pm

        “I am not dictating”

        Sure you are, your words were quoted.

        “Have you not seen the comments made by men on the facebook post about Roosh?”

        “Men” Jaja keyboard warriors, white knights, manginas.

        None of them went to actually stop the meetings and the only idiot who did was arrested.

        “Stop drawing artificial lines between the sexes, who essentially have the same needs, hopes, desires, and intellectual capacity and understand that with mutual respect and consideration everyone’s a winner.”

        No, we don’t. 6.000 years of history and biology prove otherwise.

        “When will you realise gender is irrelevant?”

        Gender is irrelevant, it’s merely used to talk about differentt ways of writing and adjetives.

        SEX, however, is extremely important and that’s something you can’t change.

      370. Bee Warren February 9, 2016 at 4:47 pm

        I never criticize or mock anyone for their race, colour, gender, size, religion, disabilities – anything god given where they have little choice in the matter. THAT would be bullying. That is what mysogonists do.

        But you have voluntarily joined the lunatic at the top of this page and stepped into the limelight of ridicule. Nobody forced you to. You are free to drop the nonsense and step back into normal society but you choose to persist in spouting idiotic, hate-contaminated tripe. Therefore you are inviting the rest of the world to mock and laugh at you. We are just obeying your command. That’s what you want, isn’t it, O Mighty One?

        You wish to lead an immoral life inflicting cruelty and breaking the laws of all civilized societies. Didn’t mummy or daddy ever teach you that to take something without consent is stealing? Once upon a time you could have had your hands cut off for less. Or that picking on someone smaller/weaker than yourself is the ultimate in cowardice? Or that the only person you have the right to control, indeed a duty to control, is yourself?
        Since intent to or actual rape is a combination of failure to grasp all these basic rules of humanity, perhaps an apt punishment would be castration as well as incarceration.
        It is very sad that your parent(s) seems to have let you down in teaching right from wrong but it is time to accept responsibility for yourself and stop
        using women as a scapegoat for your inadequacies.

      371. Simba February 9, 2016 at 6:01 pm

        “I never criticize or mock anyone for their race, colour, gender, size, religion, disabilities – anything god given where they have little choice in the matter. THAT would be bullying. That is what mysogonists do.

        But you have voluntarily joined the lunatic at the top of this page and stepped into the limelight of ridicule.”

        Switching the posts so that it only is bullying when you say so. When you do it is not. Very convenient.

      372. Bee Warren February 9, 2016 at 9:01 pm

        Just pointing out the fact that you are choosing to make a fool of yourself therefore you can’t complain when people call you a fool.

        Nobody hates to hear the truth more than Satan (or other evil deity of your preference) and those who serve his will.

      373. Michelle Green February 13, 2016 at 12:16 pm

        Regarding Cubs….he actually kills any Cubs that are not his. He is only gentle with his own

      374. Simba February 13, 2016 at 1:47 pm

        Not really.

      375. Simba February 16, 2016 at 4:26 pm

        No, not really. Your article only referres to cubs killed by foreign males, which is an obvious thing. They have no need of being cucks, and raising another lion’s kids.

        Now, in the midst of the pride of females, many of the cubs won’t be of a single male, but from any of his coalition brothers. That doesn’t mean that the male will go on and kill the cubs.

        “It’s pretty common knowledge this day and age”

        Like I said, not really.

      376. flybabycrybaby February 4, 2016 at 11:27 pm

        all hail Zorp.

      377. April Martin February 4, 2016 at 1:42 pm

        Basically you are advocating for destroying the basic human rights of women: education, voting, reproductive rights, who they have sex with, their careers, financial freedom, and a multitude of other things. Clearly you are insecure in your own value as a male if you cannot handle a strong, beautiful, intelligent woman.

      378. Simba February 5, 2016 at 8:33 am

        “Clearly you are insecure in your own value as a male if you cannot handle a strong, beautiful, intelligent woman.”

        So, you complain about men saying what they look for in a woman, and then try to say how mem should be? Jaja what a hypocrit.

        Baby, you do not dictate my value as a man. I do that myself, thank you. And it will be on my terms, not yours.

      379. Michelle Green February 13, 2016 at 12:20 pm

        She doesn’t dictate your value as a man

        Just just as none of you dictate our value

      380. Simba February 13, 2016 at 1:53 pm

        She clearly is trying.

        And, darling, as long as there are men paying for your stuff, then we have a say in it. Not in your intrinsic value as a person, but in how feminine you are.

      381. Michelle Green February 13, 2016 at 10:01 pm

        A man paying for my stuff? What man is paying for my stuff? My 5 year old son? Oh yeah he did buy me some popcorn at the hockey game last month… My husband? Well, we have a joint account it’s our money not mine or his.

        …..and I happen to earn most of our money. So I’ll say it again. No man needs to determine my value thanks.

      382. Simba February 16, 2016 at 4:31 pm

        “A man paying for my stuff? What man is paying for my stuff?”

        As a society, woman. What do you think welfare’s for? And who do you think pays it?

        “Well, we have a joint account it’s our money not mine or his.

        …..and I happen to earn most of our money.”

        So, basically you’re saying it’s your money. Got it.

        “So I’ll say it again. No man needs to determine my value thanks.”

        No man was doing that. If you didn’t notice, not everything is about you.

      383. Caroline Carlson June 1, 2016 at 12:33 pm

        And it sounds as though the only way you can define your success is by controlling women. If you had anything positive going on in your life you wouldn’t have to resort to living off the achievements of the women around you. Maybe if you had some productive way of defining your masculinity you could stop focusing on women. How pathetic to define your success through others.

      384. Simba June 1, 2016 at 5:45 pm

        “Maybe if you had some productive way of defining your masculinity”

        I define my masculinity, woman. Not you.

        “you could stop focusing on women.”

        Says the one focusing on me.

      385. Caroline Carlson June 1, 2016 at 8:40 pm

        Said the man who replied. Yes you define your masculinity through the actions of the women beside you. Sad and pathetic. It’s an insecure man who needs to control the women around them.

      386. Simba June 2, 2016 at 7:47 pm

        “Said the man who replied.”

        You started it. Now suck it up.

        “Yes you define your masculinity through the actions of the women beside you.”

        How would you know?. You’re not a man.

        “It’s an insecure man who needs to control the women around them.”

        Oh, is it now?

        So, is it only ok when you bitches try to control us?…

      387. Tiger Bos February 23, 2017 at 4:53 am

        Heaven forbid women have human rights and ‘do as they please ‘ you insecure little boy

      388. Simba March 1, 2017 at 2:11 pm

        They already do. And look where that has taken us. Go try to shame some effette that will listen to you.

      389. Tiger Bos March 6, 2017 at 12:08 am

        Yeah, because men love being in control and controlling…again, a huge sign of insecurity….where has it gotten YOU? Nowhere. Grow up.

      390. Simba March 10, 2017 at 2:36 pm

        Sure it has.

        SIX THOUSAND years of human history.

        You’ve had the right to vote for, what, a hundred years now.

        Aside from dildos, fat women acceptance and pussy hats, what else have you done?…

      391. Tiger Bos March 13, 2017 at 6:07 pm

        What does women having the right to vote have to do with men destroying all humanity with war and casting women aside also has done nothing to help humanity either…but don’t let this discussion interrupt your manly circle jerk, discussions of which porno film to watch next or the vast collection of games you have collected in your basement.

      392. Simba March 24, 2017 at 5:32 pm

        Predictable answer, little girl.

      393. Tiger Bos March 31, 2017 at 3:39 am

        I think you are simply upset because you have a micro-penis…see what I did there?

      394. Simba March 31, 2017 at 4:30 pm

        That’s it? The “micro penis” shaming try? Is that all you’ve got?

      395. Tiger Bos April 20, 2017 at 8:26 pm

        Truth hurts doesn’t it…little ding dong lol

      396. Tiger Bos April 20, 2017 at 8:28 pm

        It just boils your blood I have the right to vote and have so much power in the family court system doesn’t it little boy? lol Must be awful to be a slave to your weiner. lol

      397. Jalice January 10, 2018 at 10:43 pm

        So the only way people will like you is if you force them? Lol. This doesn’t make sense.

      398. Simba January 19, 2018 at 10:54 am

        Who said anything about “liking” it? It matters little how they feel about it.

        And, another thing, they clearly have no problems with forcing us, do they?…

      399. Simba March 29, 2018 at 12:36 pm

        This was never about women “liking” us.

        That comes along for the ride as a natural consequence, but it isn’t the focus of the discussion.

      400. SamuelNock September 21, 2015 at 9:59 pm

        It is interesting that the suggestions are very fundamentally Middle Eastern in their approach. It points to the importance of biology over almost everything else.

      401. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 2:43 pm

        Muslims aren’t the only ones that have adopted this truth.

      402. Bee Warren February 4, 2016 at 10:42 pm

        What truth would that be? I see no truth whatsoever in the dickhead’s evil fantasy. It’s all just an egotistic sham to cover up for an extremely cowardly and impotent turdwit.

      403. GerryAllwin September 25, 2015 at 5:18 am

        But without the burqas, pussy-cutting, clitoris-removing, public humiliating, raping of unaccompanied women, etc. abuses all too much associated with fundamentalist sharia-law Islam.
        Rather than gang-rape a woman who is unaccompanied by her male relative, police should take her home. If she keeps doing it, her father, mother, elder brother or husband, as the case may be, should first be counseled with the importance of keeping her restrained, then, if neglect continues, punished.
        Teenage girls being allowed to run loose is a major contributor to unwed pregnancy, which in turn pushes abortion, the greatest degradation of females. Murder doesn’t degrade women. Rape doesn’t degrade women; sexual intercourse and reproduction is what they are designed for. Abortion insults a female’s core purpose in life, which is to reproduce her and her impregnator’s kind.
        One female conservative pundit recently said that she would GLADLY give up her vote if ALL women were disfranchised (barred from voting).
        Women should be allowed only the equivalent of a learner’s permit, requiring an adult male in the seat beside her when she is driving.
        One man in the past wrote that allowing women to go out into the markets and workworld brought about “uncertainty of issue,” meaning that all too many women will fuck anything when not restrained, particularly if he is powerful, has some wealth, is handsome, amusing, and has a large, thick penis.
        Until societies were collapsing, their women were not allowed to divorce their husbands any more than slaves were permitted to walk off from their masters.
        Men who abused the woman or women under their charge were, until the 1930s, subject to whipping on a public whipping post. He was whipped on a Friday afternoon so that he would have the weekend to recover and return to work Monday morning.
        If you don’t believe me, just look at the world around you.
        Is this roughly what Roosh means?

      404. James April 11, 2016 at 12:06 pm

        Maintaining the boot on women’s neck in order to preserve civilization is not unique to Islam, comma, doofus. Suppressing female behavior was the rule, not the exception, and without such suppression civilization was impossible. Letting girls go wild means the collapse of society, that’s all there is to it.

    2. A.W.E.S.O.M.-O September 21, 2015 at 10:08 am

      I was wondering if you were taking it quite far in order to reveal an inherent truth in what you’re saying. My problem is, how can I reconcile this with my mother and my grandmother? I would never discuss this with them… The key with them though is that they have specifically chosen a strong male (dad/grandpa) who already does lead…

      1. Reason And Believing September 21, 2015 at 10:16 am

        He’s taking a shot at the Islamic invasion of Europe. and getting the FemNazis to spread it.

      2. Philalethes September 21, 2015 at 10:37 am

        Yes, in the past relations between the human sexes were handled more or less unconsciously, as other animals do it without thinking. And the system, however imperfect, worked well enough to get us this far. Now it’s all been brought into the light of consciousness, and I’m afraid there’s no going back: It must be worked through with reason (what distinguishes Homo sap from other animals, even if we don’t use it very often) if the species is to survive in any tolerable condition.

        Very difficult, likely to involve much suffering (including the ~55 million aborted children in the US, not to mention that something like half the women of Shanghai have taken that “easy” route to avoiding responsibility), but I can see no way around it. So an article like this is a necessary step.

    3. A Concerned Troll September 21, 2015 at 10:46 am

      I used to have a modicum of respect for your writing, but when you sucked up to Christianity and the scum Vox Day, you jumped the shark.

      Just. One. More. Stupid. Blogger.

      1. A Concerned Troll September 21, 2015 at 10:47 am

        And PS: If you seriously think your life’s work is a reflection of Christian ethics, go drink a bottle of DRAN-O and die.

      2. Philalethes September 21, 2015 at 11:07 am

        And here they come…

        The author lists a number of serious problems, which are causing tremendous chaos, destruction and suffering. (If you can’t see that, you are really living in a dream world.) If you have a workable alternative solution, here’s your chance to present it.

      3. Berserker September 21, 2015 at 10:48 pm

        A Concerned (feminist) Troll.

      4. Ir September 21, 2015 at 11:27 am

        He’s just saying whatever he’s thinking out loud.. and he looooves the attention he gets from it. And it’s clickbait.

        When he was collection notches it required him to keep his feet on the ground, but now he’s just sailing away.. he has already theorized way beyond a 3rd world war and with the confidence of a proven prophet.

        There’ll always be a crowd to cheer him so he feels just fine. And anyone who speaks against him is simply ‘brainwashed by the leftist media and the jews’ that’s all.

        So he’s got all angles covered.

        Pretty much like an SJW thinks actually, except with opposite underlying beliefs.

      5. GiladAtzmon_JenniferPeto September 21, 2015 at 8:31 pm

        Unfortunately, it really is Elite Jewry running the show into the ground.

        Even Professor Janince Fiamengo who is almost the sole voice of reason in support of Men’s Issues and Anti-Feminism is a proud Tribal Zionist who states in one of her videos the discomfort faced by Jews on University campuses.

        Oh poor Jewish people (I myself am formerly Jewish until I realized that The JEWISH State of Israel and a religion that labels themselves as God’s Chosen People, is actually racist supremacism.

        SO, it’s not racist or hateful to point out the racist supremacism of the most powerful (and sadistic) group of people on earth.

        Dig into GASCHAMBERHOAX.COM, GERMARRUDOLF.COM, RADICALPRESS.COM and PROFESSOR NICHOLAS KOLLERSTROM’S new book to understand Jewish global machinations and the COMPLETE FRAUD and SCIENTIFIC IMPOSSIBILITY of the so-called Holocaust.

        Or the HOLOHOAX more accurately.

        It is the ONLY, the ONLY fking event in history that is illegal to freely inquire or speak about in 17 countries, including Canada and Germany, which even has a law called “The Truth is No Defense!”

        Cue Twilight Music here please.

        Check out how they locked up Lawyer Sylvia Stolz for 3 years for simply trying to submit relevant evidence for her client.

        WE ARE SLAVES. THEY ARE OUR MASTERS. ELITE SECRET SOCIETIED JEWRY AND THEIR ANGLO LACKEYS, DUPES AND OPPORTUNISTS.

        WAKE THE F U N K UP FOLKS

        Votaire said – “Look to see who you cannot criticize to see who rules over you.”

        And listen to JFK’s Press Club Speech!!!!:

        “The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and
        open society and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed
        to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided
        long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of
        pertinent facts far outweigh the dangers which are cited to justify it.

        “Even
        today, there is little threat of opposing a secret society by imitating
        its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in
        insuring the future of our nation if our traditions do not survive with
        it and there is great danger that an announced need for increased
        security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to
        the very limits of official censorship and concealment – that I do not
        intend to allow to permit to the extent that it is in my control.

        “For
        we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy
        that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of
        influence — on infiltration instead of invasion — on subversion instead
        of elections — on intimidation instead of free choice — on guerrillas by
        night instead of armies by day.

        “It is a
        system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the
        building of a tightly-knit, highly efficient machine that combines
        military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political
        operations. Its preparations are concealed not published. Its mistakes
        are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No
        expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed”.

      6. PaulEisen_DavidStein-Cole September 21, 2015 at 8:42 pm

        It’s quite possible, as Roosh has mentioned in his article http://www.rooshv.com/we-are-nothing-more-than-distracted-sheep-in-the-real-game-of-power , that she is a gatekeeper shill who seems to be helping the Men’s Rights/Human Rights movement, but her deeper goal is to keep up all away from realizing the major frauds of history.

        1.
        That 9/11 was an Outside Job by Mossad, in conjunction with the CIA. And tonnnnes of Israeli dual Nationals.

        2.
        The so-called Holocaust is a sick lie designed to create eternal sympathy and victimhood for the poor Jews that people throughout history have had no reason whatsoever for disliking.

        There are nuances in these arguments of course, but you have to start digging to find it. It’s not going to come to you.

        Practice the method of seeking DISCONFIRMING EVIDENCE until you can’t any longer.

        Thank you for reading.

        Me: A secular humanist. Jew by birth but repudiated it when I awoke to their ways.

      7. Sara Welch February 4, 2016 at 5:02 am

        My friend’s mom was in a concentration camp but I guess she’s just lying right? The “tattoo” will probably wash off?

      8. in_Dei_servitium September 21, 2015 at 6:46 pm

        Vox Day is a Christian? By their fruits ye shall know them…

      9. Remo September 22, 2015 at 7:26 am

        That’s funny we never had respect for you.

      10. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 8:02 am

        That’s how the whole internet feels about everyone on this site.

      11. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 2:58 pm

        Did a poll did you?

      12. DissidentRight September 22, 2015 at 8:38 am

        SJWs Always Lie 101

    4. Clark Kent September 21, 2015 at 4:41 pm

      “Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”

      1. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 9:15 am

        He was never fighting monsters he always was one.

      2. Apollyon September 22, 2015 at 3:10 pm

        Monsters are the ones that shut down dissent and use fear, doxxing, legal threats and criminal charges to suppress any and all opposition.
        Fighting that is heroic.

      3. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:12 pm

        Typical segregationist talk.

      4. Apollyon September 22, 2015 at 3:17 pm

        Are you disagreeing with my point?

      5. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:22 pm

        The revolution has already happened. You lost. You are in favor of controlling all a women’s actions I am for equality. Being trolled is the price you pay for being a piece of shit.

      6. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 4:01 pm

        Reality is in favor of this. Antiquity established this. Time will prove it again.

      7. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 4:23 pm

        We have moved more as a society in the last 100 years than all of humanity combined. Deal with losing “like a man”.

      8. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 9:54 pm

        Yeah, and history always moves in a straight line to “Progressive” ideologues by dint of the sheer power of how they feel.

      9. Apollyon September 23, 2015 at 9:25 am

        It’s an unsustainable ideology. Comparable to Communism. It took 3 generations, but eventually the Soviet Union collapsed.
        If you favour ‘equality’ – what is it?
        Feminism can only survive in a technologically and economically advanced society with a state-funded/supported apparatus and collusion from media, education, corporate and entertainment. In addition, one must have sufficient ‘beta providers’ – that is, male producers (who must ‘over-produce’ in order to support the consumers. These provider males must be willing to work in jobs that are ‘production-oriented’ – the jobs that build and sustain a civilization. This is the critical piece that is beginning to erode.
        We are in the equivalent of 1980 in terms of where communism was. It was in trouble but nobody knew it.
        The system will collapse.

      10. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 10:14 am

        Have you considered the worst institutions often last the longest, look at the various world religions. Additionally every president has been viewed as the beginning of the end of America, Jefferson was accused of atheism just like you guys think Obama is a Muslim and each generation believed the biblical end times drew near pointing to the depravity of youth “look at their evil sock hops! Sinners repent”. Your conspiracy theories bore me. The fact is that you don’t have the numbers to win. Most men don’t consider the world to have changed and most women see it as better. You’re like a bitter segrationalist saying “just you watch, just you watch” while shaking your wrinkled fist and cane. The world is a better place then when you were born. I’m sorry that you don’t want a better world for your potential daughter and just want her to be a sex slave.

      11. Apollyon September 23, 2015 at 10:39 am

        You seem to have issues with religion.
        No idea about Obama. don’t care.
        The issue is not ‘end times’ or each generation thinking this is it. It is quite simply that the Leftist ideology is entirely unsustainable. It will collapse on itself the way Communism did. You can’t have so-called ‘equality’ that is enforced by the State, where unnecessary rules and regulations are imposed on corporations, universities, etc to enforce ‘equality’ (which is entirely unequal). A society cannot be sustained where an ever expanding government, deeply in debt and sinking deeper, spends ever more tax (and debt-funded) dollars providing services to women while the production-oriented jobs disappear and the men willing to do them disappear.
        A society that does not reproduce itself (every Western Country is below population sustainability). The reality is, the system is failing. We are in the twilight of the Feminist revolution. What comes next is anyone’s guess but it won’t be pretty.

      12. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 11:27 am

        Religion is the opiote of the masses, and when used as a shield for bigotry and persecution you’re right I have a problem with it. You do realize reagan accelerated the debt in a big way, increased taxes 6 times, and have amnesty to illegals? So is he leftist? Production oriented job disappear because of corporate greed not leftism. Tax evasion, lower wages, poisoning the environment are all a lot easier when you send jobs overseas. A fair living wage is too much to ask. Equal opportunity is deserved by all people, obviously you would fight equality so the government has to step in. You’re not acting very Christian, since Christ was clearly on the left.

      13. Apollyon September 23, 2015 at 12:00 pm

        Said by Marx who inspired the most brutal and atheist (religion was repressed) system ever.
        Yes, the Republicans have expanded debt and gov’t for quite a long time. Same with the Dems. That is the precise opposite of conservative.
        Corporate Greed which should not have been allowed to offshore jobs – or at least been severely restricted. That is not Leftism – I agree. It is the Elite taking care of themselves. But, Leftists support mass immigration – which further reduces real wages.
        Fair living wage would make sense if massive immigration was greatly restricted. Equal opportunity is impossible but it’s also hard to prove. It inevitably blends with Equal Outcome.
        You do not know Christ then. He was clearly about personal responsibility. The Left believes the gov’t should help the poor, etc. Christ says you, the individual should help. Voting for a socialist gov’t does not make you a good person. Personally sacrificing and/or helping someone in need is what is called for.

    5. Alvin Tan September 21, 2015 at 6:56 pm

      You have to place a punishment system for incompetent guardians too.

    6. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 7:09 pm

      You’re a monster.

      1. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 11:45 pm

        You claim Roosh is a monster for having one belief, but then (in another post) excuse Muslims for holding the same beliefs. You’re a fucking hypocrite who can’t keep his own opinion straight.

    7. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 7:23 pm

      I have a feeling your end will be similar to Ken McElroy, he was a town bully shot to death in front of 35 people and “no one saw a thing.”

      1. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 9:52 pm

        So holding an unpopular opinion is justification for murder? Your ilk are worse than the Nazis.

      2. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 9:58 pm

        Never said I would murder him, just that he’s going to get himself killed, and that if he was no one would care and everyone would pretend not to notice. He’s a monster. You calling me a Nazi on a site filled with (misogyny, racism, antisemitism) hating of all things the Nazis hated is quite humorous. Nazis killed millions, roosh hates women, gays, blacks, and Jews and advocates for legal rape, I just think he’s an asshole who is going to get himself killed.

      3. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 10:00 pm

        Don’t backpedal, you called him “a monster” in your other post, so it’s clear what you’re suggesting here. You hope someone kills him. I didn’t call you a Nazi, I said you were WORSE than the Nazis. Anyone who hopes someone gets killed simply for holding an opinion is the real asshole.

      4. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 10:03 pm

        He is a monster but, I don’t believe in the death penalty. Many an opinion have gotten people killed check out MLK, at least he was a revolutionary instead of a militant misogynist. You clearly have no clue about the Nazis unless you’re a holocaust denier, which being on this site you probably are. Have fun with your “game”.

      5. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 10:08 pm

        I didn’t ask if you believed in the death penalty, but it’s pretty clear what you were trying to say between the lines. Spare me the microaggressions, bro.

        Oooh “the Nazis!” RUN! Give me a break. You sound like Joe McCarthy rambling about the imaginary Commies in your head. There are no Nazis, just as there are no Commies, and if there are they have virtually no power. We all know who the real status quo is, and it’s not people like Roosh. So spare me the fearmongering.

      6. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 10:13 pm

        If someone was walking on train tracks, you’d tell them to get off right? I’m trying to help. He tells the wrong person he thinks rape should be legal and pop goes the piece of shit. Don’t call me bro I’m the furthest thing from your brother. Are you talking about Nazis in the 30’s and 40’s or now? Because one is genocidal monsters and the others are just monsters like roosh. Having an unpopular opinion is “meat is murder” being a monster is advocating for men controlling all facets of women’s lives. The fact that people who aren’t trolls are on this site lowers my opinion of all humanity.

      7. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 10:19 pm

        You’re obviously not my bro. I believe it takes a child years to recognize sarcasm, so you must not be that stage of development yet. There are no Nazis, you fool. Look, I get it, everyone who doesn’t agree with your political beliefs is a “Nazi.” Do you really think there’s any chance what Roosh is arguing will ever happen? You’re nothing more than the Thought Police, here to police unpopular opinions. Roosh believes the same thing as the Muslims do, are you calling Muslims monsters?

      8. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 10:26 pm

        You seem to not know anything so I wasn’t sure if you even knew what sarcasm was. Are you denying there were ever Nazis? Wow holocaust denial and misogyny, truly this is an all you can eat hate buffet. Also there are neo Nazis too, and the kkk who fly the swastika. I said roosh was like a Nazi not that he was one. I never called anyone a Nazi only you did. Not all muslims, also muslims don’t advocate legal rape, or “game”, most religion is stupid in general. Anyone can believe want but militant hate can get trolled.

      9. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 10:30 pm

        You seem to think I’m a Holocaust denier, but I’m not. Desperately looking to change the subject, huh? Roosh’s dad is a Muslim, and it affected Roosh’s beliefs. Now this guy has zero political power, nor does he have authority over any women, nor does he even live in a Western country, he simply has an opinion, albeit a very old-fashioned one. Because you’re an intolerant religious bigot, you can’t even accept that someone might have a different opinion than you. Of course he’s “like a Nazi,” anyone who disagrees with you is a “Nazi.” Militant? I’ve never heard Roosh talk about guns. I doubt he even owns one.

      10. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 10:39 pm

        ImWow you’re an idiot, I never mentioned Nazis until you did you’re straw manning hard, I responded to each claim how is that changing the subject, idiot. Also militant means combative and aggressive in support of a political or social cause, and typically favoring extreme, violent, or confrontational methods. So you’re an idiot three times over. You said there weren’t Nazis when there are both historical and current Nazis so you’re an idiot five times over. I know there are people like roosh my problem is he has actual followers aka people like you. It’s just really sad.

      11. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 10:45 pm

        There are no Nazis today, you moron. I’m sorry, I thought you were above a 5th grade level of reading comprehension. Noted. Nice attempt to define “militant” to mean “someone who has a blog and an opinion.” You’re a jackass. You social justice jerkoffs are the most obnoxious an intolerant scum on Earth. Even South Park hates your guts. You’re nothing more than the Thought Police. Roosh has commited a Thought Crime by agreeing with Muslims, so you’re here to scold him.

      12. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 10:52 pm

        should i link you to stormfront or any other neonazi organization? Furthermore you never said today. Also that’s the oxford english dictionary definition of militant so I guess they thought of blogging pretty early. Google militant, I’ll wait. The word has been around since around 1375. I think I’m getting under your skin 😉 I can tolerate a lot of opinions that differ from my own, I just find Roosh to be his own particular brand of scum. He goes well beyond muslim beliefs he fully hates women and doesn’t believe they should be allowed to achieve anything. Are you not thought policing my thought policing?

      13. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 10:56 pm

        LMAO! Hey Joe McCarthy, have you actually seen stormfront’s facebook page? It has like 10 likes. If that’s the definition of “militant” than you are militant yourself, given your complete opposition to free speech. I’m not thought policing you because, unlike you, I’m not pro-censorship.

      14. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 10:59 pm

        Oh yes stormfront’s facebook page in the liked section of about me is going to look great to everyone on my friends list. Check their blog and actual site fuckface. Roosh is militantly pro-rape and misogyny, i’m militantly anti both those things and proud of it. You clearly are trying to police my thoughts 😉

      15. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 11:01 pm

        There you go again, Joe, you know there’s Commies out there in Hollywood, and by god you’re gonna find them! Let’s call a senate hearing! You’re militant anti-free speech and an anti-Muslim bigot.

      16. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 11:05 pm

        Straw man alert. I’m pro socialism anyway. I don’t have to look for or accuse people of anything they’re openly identifying themselves as misogynists. Free speech is not a blanket shield that protects you from being called out on your bullshit, it just protects your from government prosecution, moron. I’m not anti-muslim, roosh isn’t even religious, again you’re a moron, and quite an agitated one at that.

      17. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 11:08 pm

        Talk about a strawman, I’m aware of what free speech is, kid. In fact, I probably knew what it was before you discovered your own crotch. That’s why I’m calling you out on your bullshit. You said muslims were monsters. I bet you support the Syrian refugees, despite the fact thousands of them believe the same things in this article.

      18. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 11:13 pm

        I never called muslims monsters, straw man again. You keep changing the subject, you brought up nazis and then acted like I brought up nazis. You’re literally the dumbest person i’ve trolled and that’s saying something. What bullshit? that anyone who isn’t trolling on this site is a piece of shit for supporting roosh? I do support the refugees, as again no one deserves what they’re going through. Most of the people on this site are islamaphobic, and only support straight white christian men, you do realize right?

      19. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 11:15 pm

        You said men who believed their women should be controlled were monsters. What do you think the Quran teaches, you dolt? That women are equal? So you think Muslims are monsters, or you agree with them and hence Roosh. Make up your fucking mind and stop trying to play both sides of the fence. I’m calling you out on your doubletalk bullshit.

      20. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 11:20 pm

        The bible teaches the same thing but not everyone follows to the T, you thick idiot, thank goodness. No muslim I’ve met believes in legalizing rape, which roosh does, hence why roosh is a monster. Obviously i disagree with any religious literalist, of any creed, but we are moving towards secular society and then the mind will win over superstition. Women are equal. Obviously you disagree or you wouldn’t be here. I’m calling you on your inability to not strawman.

      21. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 11:22 pm

        “The bible teaches the same thing…” LMAO! Look at you try to change the subject! BAHAHA! You said men who want to control their women are monsters. That’s what the Quran and Mohammad teaches. Hence, you believe muslims are monsters. Keep backpedaling. You’re just an intolerant islamophobic piece of shit. Keep trying to change the subject, as if your red herring isn’t completely obvious. 😉

      22. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 11:26 pm

        I know i got to you. it’s okay. Obviously you’ve never heard of a counter point, which is not changing the subject, changing the subject would be bringing up how roosh advocates LEGALIZING RAPE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! how do you not get that you fucking moron. If muslims are monsters then so are christians if they follow their holy text to the t. You obviously don’t know the difference between a follower and an extremist. You are the one defending the guy who wants to be able to rape your mother.

      23. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 11:34 pm

        Red herring. The Quran teaches that men need to dominate over women, and these guys keep their women completely covered up so other men can’t check them out. So the “follower” is the person who is a Muslim but doesn’t follow the Quran. Right… your cognitive dissonance right now is hilarious! So you admit that Muslims are monsters then?

      24. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 11:31 pm

        But seriously bring up commies and nazis again like that isn’t changing the fucking subject you hypocrite piece of shit, who’d rather defend a rapist than be a decent human being. I’m calling it a night. Enjoy bigotry and cowardice, because a private profile shows you don’t stand behind your word. Peace.

      25. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 11:37 pm

        Zechs, you’re an intellectual lightweight. You claim Roosh is a monster for holding one belief, but then excuse Muslims for holding the same beliefs. You’re a fucking hypocrite who can’t keep his own opinion straight. I just want you to know you’re a piece of shit, and people like me are going to expose you for the liars and trash you are.

        I have a private profile? Boo hoo! You can’t stalk me. :'( Cry me a river, loser.

      26. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 11:49 pm

        I never excused muslims or any relgion for that matter, because as you know the bible says the same thing google it, i know you had to google the definition of militant, roosh is a monster for advocating for legal rape and total control. I said i disagree with muslim teachings and religion in general. you have made no point or argument, just that I’m the thought police and apparently am hunting commies because like i said you’re a fucking moron who keeps changing subjects. i understand you’re going “Alpha” like you would be rapists are known to do. Do you believe in legalizing rape and total control over women? do you believe that equality for women is wrong? you are a fool defending a monster. Hopefully he doesn’t sexually assault someone you care about, but then you’d just say it’s a fake rape accusation as you guys often do. Enjoy your red pills and blaming women for your problems. Do you agree with him? yes or no? if not why the fuck are you here? other than being a moron who apprently doesn’t believe in Nazis? Anyway enjoy trying to catch a sex slave. I’m going to sleep next to someone who loves me and is my equal.

      27. Haven Monahan September 21, 2015 at 11:51 pm

        Actually I just trolled the living shit out of you, HAHAHAHA. The thing about you social justice types is that your beliefs are always incongruent. In this case, you have created a double standard where you don’t hold Muslims to the same standard you hold Roosh. You’re a hypocite. I just want you to know that.

      28. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 7:56 am

        look up how to read and how to argue. Clearly said I disagree with it. You still never answered any of my questions. Have fun trying to defend a rapist.

      29. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:03 pm

        Police thoughts? What precisely is it that you are trying to do by posting here.

        Typical SJW raging hypocrite.

      30. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:07 pm

        Clearly I was responding sarcastically to his response I guess you’re incapable of reading that.

      31. Dieudonné M'bala M'bala.COM September 21, 2015 at 11:51 pm

        NOW THEY’RE PUSHING YOU ONTO STORMFRONT… WHICH IS RUN BY CRYPTO-JEWS. THEY REALLY ARE THAT CRAFTY!

        THEY’RE PUSHING YOU ONTO THAT SITE LIKE IT’S THE ONLY SITE, OR EVEN A DECENT SITE TRYING TO EXPOSE TRUE REALITY.

        I SEE YOU BITCHES LIKE A CAT SEES A MOUSE IN THE DARK.

        YOU’RE GOING TO GET KILLED BY… ME!

        GO BACK TO ONE OF THESE PIECES OF SHIT’S EARLIEST COMMENTS TALKING ABOUT HOW HE’S GOING TO GET HIMSELF KILLED.

        IF THERE WERE NO JEWISH POWER WHY WOULD HE HAVE ANYTHING TO WORRY ABOUT??

        THESE GUYS ARE FRAMING AN INDIRECT THREAT AT ROOSH, UNDER THE GUISE OF ‘TRYING TO HELP HIM.’

        WEEE SEEEE THRUUUUUU UUUUUU.

      32. RED ICE CREATIONS.COM September 21, 2015 at 11:45 pm

        THE CONVERSATION BETWEEN THESE TWO GUYS HAVEN AND ZECHS IS A CONTROLLED OPPOSITION FRAMING TECHNIQUE.

        THEY ARE BOTH HASBARA JEWS WHO KEEP SAYING THE WORDS NAZI AND HOLOCAUST DENIER OVER AND OVER AGAIN, ONE OF THEM SEEMINGLY AGAINST THE NOTION.

        BUT WHAT THE EFFECT OF THEIR BANTER IS DESIGNED TO DO IS NOT GET YOU THINKING OUTSIDE OF THEIR FRAME OR DECONSTRUCTING THE LANGUAGE USED TO CREATE THEIR FRAMES.

        IT’S A FALSE DEBATE THEY ARE HAVING.

        ONLY THE MOST AWARE AND AWAKE CAN SEE IT THOUGH.

      33. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:02 pm

        Do Muslims believe that a husband can rape his wife?

        ????

      34. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:03 pm

        Christians certainly do.

      35. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:06 pm

        Not the real ones.

        “Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.” 1 Cor 7:5

        (In other words you have to mutually consent NOT to have sex in a Christian marriage).

        But that’s not an answer. Debating SJW’s is like trying to nail down unset gelatin.

      36. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:13 pm

        Marital rape was legal in the u.s. until 1993. So much for a Christian nation.

      37. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 4:03 pm

        Yeah, it’s not. It’s mostly a punky sort of socialist, kind of like what Joe McCarthy predicted.

      38. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 4:45 pm

        Well at least you agree it’s a secular nation , tell your friends please.

      39. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 9:55 pm

        Yeah why? It shouldn’t be. It’s why it’s doomed to collapse.

      40. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 10:05 pm

        It’s the only reason it’s lasted this long.

      41. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 1:19 pm

        Again you prove your ignorance of history.

      42. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 1:29 pm

        People accused Jefferson of atheism just like you accuse Obama of Islam. Favoring one religion persecutes other religions which is why there is the establishment clause.

      43. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 2:29 pm

        Broad brush again?

      44. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:32 pm

        You broad brush all day long, muslims, sjw, women, Jews, etc what was I broad brushing again? That there is an overwhelming portion of the tight that thinks Obama is a Muslim?

      45. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:01 pm

        You’re walking on the train tracks. And there is a train coming from both directions. Too bad you’re in a tunnel and there is only one set of tracks.

      46. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:03 pm

        Well I guess the two trains are being run by people like you to schedule like that.

      47. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 3:08 pm

        Nope, feminists and authoritarians. One leads to the other.

      48. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:13 pm

        You want men to hold all authority, I guess you have at least one train.

      49. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 4:06 pm

        Nope. Difference between authority and authoritarianism Einstein. Men holding authority at a family level is a far cry from Putin-esque dictatorships and Islamic mullahs.

        So you guess wrong. Not seeing that the demotion of the family patriarch is only going to give rise to national patriarchs.

      50. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 4:36 pm

        Conspiracy theories.

      51. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 9:56 pm

        You clearly don’t know what you are talking about. That and you haven’t picked up either a history book or read or listened to anything concerning current events.

      52. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 10:04 pm

        Fleeing death is not an invasion, most muslims aren’t extremists, and most islamic extremism is our own countries fault for meddling their affairs.

      53. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 12:51 pm

        Fleeing death? Hyperbolic drama.

      54. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 12:57 pm

        I realize you are without empathy but their country is a war zone.

      55. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 1:20 pm

        Syria? Yeah, because all of those people are coming from Syria. Sell your propaganda to someone else.

      56. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 1:30 pm

        Sell your conspiracy theories else where.

      57. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 2:31 pm

        Theory, look it up in the dictionary.

        If someone says they are going to kill you and they have the means to do it believing them is not a “theory”.

      58. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:35 pm

        Then enlist and go kill them all. You are more likely to be killed by the police than terrorists.

      59. I Art Laughing September 25, 2015 at 12:41 pm

        5 minutes after women got the right to vote we got the 18th Amendment.

      60. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 12:55 pm

        The 18th amendment was an act of congress but nice try. Also nice generalization. Seeing all women as the same is the major problem. Or should I blame you for slavery segregation and genocide?

      61. I Art Laughing September 25, 2015 at 6:02 pm

        Act of Congress? Two more things for you to read up on. The amendment process and the history of temperence.

      62. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 6:06 pm

        Volstead act. Plenty of people still support total sobriety, I personally believe in the legalization of all drugs.

      63. I Art Laughing September 25, 2015 at 6:17 pm

        Carry Nation ring a bell? And nice pretense of dodging how representative democracy works.

      64. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 6:19 pm

        You mean Carrie? She is one figure where there are plenty of men too, you misogynistic fool. 36 states ratified the act but yes it was women even though not a single representitive was a woman.

      65. Zechs Marquise September 25, 2015 at 6:15 pm

        The problem with you is you see any woman as all women, any black as all blacks, any Muslim as all Muslims but you see every white man as an individual. You stereotype. Who enforced racial based slavery? White men, but you’ll say old white men from years past not modern white men, but you still hold modern women accountable for the temperance movement, which given the attitude on wife beating at the time (which you probably want to bring back) is probably why there was a temperance league in the first place.

      66. ***JimStoneFreelance.com*** September 21, 2015 at 11:41 pm

        You can’t deny something that never happened!

        And guess what… Holocaust is not even defined in law… Watch Sylvia Stolz’s talk in Switzerland I believe it was.

        Don’t take this brainwashed Zechs Marquise teenagers word for anything… He’s not saying anything you haven’t heard before.

        And he’s got a picture of a cartoon, showing his age and corresponding cognitive capacity.

        Ya, that’s right, that’s an ad hominem attack.

        I can’t stand naive little children who suck on the cock of power.

        Oh, and dig into http://www.JimStoneFreelance.com and find the Fukushima Report… Proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Israeli Mossad used a Stuxnet attack on Japan in coordination with a mini nuke to blow up a couple reactor vessels.

        It was Israel security company Magna BSP that ran Fukushima.

        WAKE UP WAKE UP WAKE UP WAKE UP WAKE UP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        IRAN LIE SAME AS IRAQ LIE –

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24AMP_bttd8

      67. Veni Vidi Vici September 22, 2015 at 2:37 am

        Wrong, MLK was a known womanizer.
        If you ever seen the Spike Lee’s movie Malcolm X in the part 2 FBI agents taping his phone say “Compared to King this guy is a monk.” quite true.

      68. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 7:48 am

        He was still a revolutionary and he never called for controlling women or legalized rape like the people on this site. Personally I’m more of Huey Newton kind of guy read his work on the gay and women’s liberation front.

      69. Jew Paul Eisen of the UK September 21, 2015 at 11:32 pm

        Anti-semitism doesn’t mean anything you fucking idiot.

        90% of Jews aren’t even Semitic people. They are Ashkenazi.

        The Palestinians on the other hand are 90% Semitic.

        ONCE AGAIN…. FOR THE TROLLS AND THE UNRESEARCHED – DO YOUR FUCKING DUE DILIGENCE.

      70. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 2:59 pm

        I think you’re an asshole who’s going to get himself killed. While white knighting no doubt. For the “love” of a woman.

      71. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 3:05 pm

        You’ll die of something easily preventable if someone was around who cared but there won’t be.

      72. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 4:08 pm

        No, I’m surrounded by a loving family. As the guiding patriarch they know that I see through the shit storm and act as an anchor. Funny, most of them are RN’s and I’m an EMT. I think we can prevent this unfortunate eventuality.

      73. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 4:36 pm

        So do you let other races die? Do you beat your wife? If you don’t does it bother you you can’t?

      74. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 9:58 pm

        Let other races die? How’s that? Here let me sit in my chair and LET other races die. You mean like passive genocide, or by not performing the SJW version of ethnic cleansing by removing myself from the planet?

        Why would I want to beat my wife? She’s submissive and honors me.

        You are out to lunch.

      75. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 10:01 pm

        You said you are an emt, do you let other races die when it is your duty to save them? If your wife wanted to be treated as an equal would you beat it out of her?

      76. I Art Laughing September 22, 2015 at 10:09 pm

        Why would I? They are created in God’s image?

        Treated as “equal”? What is that? Who defines that? Let me define it, is that equal? Let her define it? Trade days?

        Equality is a game for suckers. If she wanted to be treated this way maybe it would have been better to avoid marriage altogether.

        What if I just left her? That would probably be enough of a threat to get her to amend her ways. Also, she likes that I now have control of my emotions and have a strong frame/hand in our marriage. She’s much happier now.

      77. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 10:16 pm

        So you do save them or not? Equal say and equal responsibility, not that difficult. She certainly should have because dealing with you is quite the raw deal.

      78. JenniferPeto September 21, 2015 at 11:29 pm

        The National Socialist Part (Nazis) were very popular with the German people because just like JFK, Hitler took the power of money creation away from the Rothschild International Jewish Banking Cartel and started printing their own money… AND THE GERMAN ECONOMY THRIVED.

        The International Jewish Bankers couldn’t have that.

        Also, the Germans were Conservative people, but before World War I the International Jewish Money Power came into the country, bought up Newspapers and Entertainment corporations and started doing what they’re now doing once again… Spreading DEGENERACY in the form of pornography and Miley Cyrus type hypersexuality.

        The dominant population of Germans thought it was gross, but since they were not the cultural producers in their own country anymore since the Jews could print money and buy everything up, this minority of Jews pushed it on the German public who didn’t even want it.

        How many guys ask to have a dick joke (bigger is better) in literally every single TV show or Movie?

        This disempowers all men so they will be too emotionally emasculated to even think about fighting the power.

        Just the way they like it.

        Hollywood/Jewllywood control at its finest.

        DIVIDE AND CONQUER.

        Parallel example for you:

        The first thing the Zionist Occupied US Government did after ILLEGALLY INVADING Iraq based on lies, was to set up porn shops in every city. Ask yourself why?

        The Nazis were actually BY FAR the most compassionate soldiers between the Russians, and the US/British.

        Don’t believe the Jew owned establishment nowadays.

        EVERYTHING IS 180 degrees backwards.

        YOU OWE IT TO YOURSELF TO WATCH AN ALTERNATIVE VERSION OF HISTORY BEFORE MAKING UP YOUR MIND.

        ****************************
        The Greatest Story NEVER Told – The Untold Story of Adolf Hitler

    8. Yeah, really! September 21, 2015 at 8:16 pm

      I didn’t think it was satire from the first suggestion. Unfortunately, your sound recommendations will fall on the deafened ears of a depraved generation who only listens to, embraces and obeys its inner child.

    9. BJ September 21, 2015 at 9:28 pm

      Great in theory, but very unlikely to work in practice unfortunately…

    10. 66Scorpio September 22, 2015 at 8:22 am

      The fact that you have to state this is just indicative of how tone deaf your critics are.
      .
      We can talk about “Neomasculinity” for a year but your point seems to be – and I tend to agree with these – is:
      1) Girls, stop being sluts
      2) Guys, the bitches are not listening, so here is GAME because we have to live in the messed up world they have created.

    11. TyskKille September 22, 2015 at 1:23 pm

      I agree with the suggested system in general, but it should also be applied to men at the low end of the IQ range, where men are clearly overrepresented. In the current situation, nobody helps those persons.

    12. Hunter P September 22, 2015 at 2:00 pm

      Article of the Year!!!!

    13. Neg1 September 24, 2015 at 12:33 am

      I thought maybe it was satire when you said “the claim that lemons are bitter”. Lemons are sour. Acid is sour and alkali is bitter, so they are opposites and no food can be both. I think I read that you have a science background, so I am sure that you know this. Maybe you just got your negatives flipped.

    14. AnneMarie Dickey September 24, 2015 at 7:38 pm

      OMG this is too freaking funny for words. Crying man-baby who wonders why girls won’t give him sexy time and throw beer in his face instead. BTW, how was your beer shower last month? Refreshing?

    15. Joe Soap September 25, 2015 at 3:24 pm

      It’s people like you who give the internet a bad name. I don’t know what you’re going to do if Clinton gets elected. Here’s a suggestion. Take a long walk off a short pier.

    16. Suicide_King September 28, 2015 at 7:53 pm

      I think that not only are women more rational but the female power is also much more damaging to civilization. how do you think things in the west will change if they are able to take control of their women again? as opposed to the islamic way of just beating them and covering their bodies do you think there are technological ways to enslave women again?

    17. Derek Flounders October 3, 2015 at 4:31 pm

      Yo dude, none of my posts are coming through, I really wanted your opinion on mussy cunny man, show some palestinian mussy bitches some allah fuckbar, if you cach my drift *wink wink*

    18. RationaliseThis October 4, 2015 at 3:40 am

      As a generalisation I agree with you. However there are far to many women that are exceptions to the rule and that one can rate as more rational than many men. By not noting the considerable number of exceptions the article looses believability for those new to this area. Yet I still agree the ‘balance’ has shifted too much. There are of course other forces at work in society and the ‘feminist’ impulse is merely a pre-existing tendency that has been exploited and grossly enlarged.

    19. Jacqueline N October 9, 2015 at 4:16 pm

      I agree with him. When I was younger I became friends with a Pakistani girl who lived in my neighborhood in New York City. Her family opened their home to me. They were the most loving family I had ever met. Absolutely nothing like my family. Her mother cooked every day and was home every day. Her home felt safe to me. I admired their way of life and envied how the men treated the women in the family. The females were treated with such love, they were cared for and protected so much by the men in the family. . I wish I was so lucky to have grown up that way. I learned from her mother to never have sex before marriage, to dress modest, to be humble. I held on to the things this woman taught me and because of this (thank God) I was looked at as “weird” by most men and I believe that this is why I did not end up becoming promiscuous, or worse….become a feminist. And almost 20 years later, and unlike many of my American friends who have come and gone, I am still friends with this family. They are very genuine and loving people, traits that are very hard to find in people these days…. especially in this country

    20. NawtVolkishEnuf October 14, 2015 at 10:22 pm

      Then please fuck off back to Iran and leave our countries alone.

    21. sweetpea October 23, 2015 at 7:50 pm

      Wouldn’t this destroy easy sex for guys who want a harem of conquests?

    22. Mark Citadel January 12, 2016 at 4:01 pm

      Roosh, I like a lot of what you said, although I do not think abortion should appear in any society (its undoubtedly immoral as well as aesthetically vile, as I argue in an article which does give you a nice shout-out: http://www.socialmatter.net/2016/01/12/battling-the-aesthetics-of-modernity/ ). I also think we should be slightly more lax than you propose, as Occidental people are not predisposed to this level of harshness, though Persians and Arabs may be. Look at the history of somewhere like Tsarist Russia, or the Eastern Roman Empire.

      We certainly need Patriarchy, but you may be laboring men with too much responsibility to micromanage women. I think with solid religious and cultural guardrails (disapproval and ostracization for violations), women are predisposed to behave. They want to obey, they just need men worthy of obeying, and a surrounding structure that will encourage obedience.

      Also, I want to commend your journey from PUA to open advocacy for the patriarchy. Do not listen to those complaining you are too extreme. St. Antony the Great once said: “a time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying “You are mad; you are not like us!”

      Very pertinent.

    23. Bee Warren February 2, 2016 at 1:20 pm

      Aww, did mummy do something so very awful to the little psychopath with delusions of grandeur, Roosh, that he decided to be a gender terrorist if he ever grew up? Or is he just a spoilt megalomaniac brat who imagines brutal thuggery somehow makes him look big? What an immature, pathetic twat! Castration without anaesthetic would be too good for such a waste of planet space. Of course I would never condone such abhorrences as rape in any circumstance, but when you end up in prison for your hate crimes it would be poetic justice if you get to know what rape is like from the receiving end!

    24. Carolina Uribe February 2, 2016 at 2:01 pm

      You are a moron. You can’t get laid because of your idiotic views about women. That’s why you rape them, because you can’t have a normal functioning relationship. You Make me sick

    25. Caroline Carlson February 3, 2016 at 4:12 pm

      If men were so good at long term thinking why are we in the sixth mass extinction process right now? Nuclear waste is flowing into the ocean everyday due to fufkushima’s disaster. Synthia was dumped into the ocean and is decimating wild life. PCB s have destroyed water systems . These were all decisions made largely by men. Why were they not using their ability to think long term? Is the long term survival of the human population just not a priority? It’s nice you stand by your recommendations. Only pathetically weak minded men agree with you but you are at least in the company of men you can relate to.

      1. Harshvardhan Singh June 1, 2016 at 5:16 am

        u feminists claims that women are superior tomen then why dont u superior women do something about the prblm..fact is all u genius superiorwomen study is “women studies” and claim yourself tobe superior..if men arent good then how come a civilization u r enjoying andtyping shit over here was bulit by men..every great idea was born in man’s mind..the idea of gravity came in newton’s mind ,andlist is unending…barking is easy but all u need to do is prove in reeality..give all almost all starting frmbasic mathematics ,science ,tech,phylosophy..that men made and make your own civilization better than present one..only thenu idiots can claim your superiority

    26. Bee Warren February 3, 2016 at 7:13 pm

      Satire is funny. You’re not! It’s all about attention seeking, isn’t it? If you’re so desperate for attention (like a neglected 3 year old) why not develop some talent and do something worthwhile for the world instead of inflicting your hatred like a cancer on it?

    27. flybabycrybaby February 4, 2016 at 11:13 pm

      Me too! Satire is confusing :’/

    28. Caroline Carlson February 5, 2016 at 12:19 am

      Your analytical mind seems to justify rape,which is a crime. Seems like your analytical mind would encourage illegal behavior given your history

      1. I Art Laughing February 5, 2016 at 11:57 am

        Men can’t rape women. We’re the weaker sex, remember?

      2. PolishKnightUSA February 7, 2016 at 11:07 am

        There’s a recent movie “Suffragetttes” that celebrates the so-called civil rights movement and spoiled white women committing crimes for what they think are just causes.

      3. Caroline Carlson February 7, 2016 at 2:29 pm

        Yes! I haven’t seen it yet. It’s supposed to be really good. I’m sure I will. I have read all about the suffragettes. Civil disobedience seemed to work. We got the vote. It’s a good thing to fight against an unjust law and I admire their sacrifices. Hard to define someone as spoiled when they have been denied basic rights. They were tough women who fought very hard and were united. Love them. They took a lot of abuse and kept on. Many were beaten by men too terrified of women having the vote. Scared and pathetic men fought against them heavily. I am so so so grateful to each and every one of them.

      4. PolishKnightUSA February 8, 2016 at 1:24 pm

        You’ve presented me with a wonderful talking point. Thank you. The notion of voting as this essential, “basic” right that is so important or even valuable. It’s another example of how naive women are and why so-called (western) women’s equality is so artificial and fragile.

        For starters, I personally know plenty of people who are not legally entitled to vote in the USA. No, they aren’t felons (also known as products of unwed mother households) but rather resident legal aliens. My father-in-law, for example. Also, my downstairs neighbor from Poland. They’re green card holders (it’s not green anymore, BTW) and they can’t legally vote in this country and rarely vote in their own elections.

        Yet… life goes on for them. How is that? Oh, wait, because voting is not a basic right.

        In the meantime, the reason why women took so long to get the vote wasn’t because of a “fight” but rather a problem that persists with modern feminism: It likes goodies but not adult responsibilities. You know, “manning up.”

        The suffragettes were making progress with their “equality” cry until about 4/15/1912 when “basic rights” was a wooden lifeboat seat. Sufragettes onboard grabbed the seats and then tried to weasle about it later by arguing that men “made them” get on the boat (yet, they wanted to object when asking for goodies. Amazing how they are so selective about what men tell them to do, eh?)

        A poem was even written about it.

        ENOUGH SAID
        by Clark McAdams
        St. Louis Dispatch [1912]

        “Votes for women!” was the cry
        Reaching upward
        to the sky
        Crashing glass
        and flashing eye
        “Votes for women”
        was the cry.

        “Boats for women!”
        was the cry
        When the brave
        Were come to die.
        When the end was drawing nigh –
        “Boats for women”
        was the cry.

        Life has many
        Little jests
        Insignificant
        as tests.
        Doubt and bitterness assail
        But “Boats for women”
        tells the tale.

        —————————————

        Yeah, “scared and pathetic men”. When feminism isn’t a goodie grab by a bunch of cowardly, spoiled white women, then I’ll take labels such as that seriously.

        “Walk a mile in my shoes. You’ll stumble in my footsteps.” — Depeche Mode

    29. judyt00 February 7, 2016 at 6:09 pm

      you are an uneducated douchebag. its men who ned to be controlled

    30. A Frenchy In Eire February 11, 2016 at 5:22 pm

      It is pretty amusing how Roosh is so obviously sexually frustrated and incapable of forming any type of relationship with women, being short or long-term.

      It’s even funnier how all his cronies cannot see how full of crap he is, being themselves the same type of pathetic losers and being desperate to believe that the utopia he depicts could actually happen.

      A real man, and by that I mean a man with testosterone and masculinity, does not need to belittle women to feel better about himself. A real man does not feel threatened by strong women and can handle them without trying to bully them into submission. A real man is secure enough to not feel disturbed by the idea of homosexuality.

      He advocates men to be the ruler of their own sex-life but has a whole methodology on how to cheat on your girlfriend without her finding out. Why does he need to lie and hide if he is such a boss? He pretends to be well travelled and encourages American men to leave the US to find more biddable women and more freedom and is not able to name ONE city where that could happen. It’s all a bunch of vague statements about “foreign countries”. Seriously, Roosh, I hope you’re aware that “abroad” is not one big country. Just check Google maps, you’ll see.

      He calls himself an alpha male and ran his tail between his legs to his mummy when shit hit the fan. Suffragettes were persecuted, beaten, jailed, starved themselves for what they believed in and did not back down. Basically ladies living at the beginning of the 20th century had more balls than this sissy.

      I am entirely convinced that 99% of the hook up stories Roosh comes up with are just a product of his imagination. The 1% being the few times he could pick up a girl that was too drunk to realise what she was doing. I have yet to see any of his posts backed up with facts and sources.

      All his post about women read like some angry and horny teen writing down his wet dreams.

      It’d be sad if it was not so freaking hysterical XD

      1. Juan February 11, 2016 at 5:26 pm

        Thank you, my friend.

    31. executor February 21, 2016 at 3:05 am

      You have the right to stand firm on your recommendations. But as the majority have spoken, I believe your views on this matter are unjust and no longer relevant to the modern day views of the world. I kindly advice you to first seek the opinions of at least 5 other women or teenage girls on this subject matter to prove your point, as your argument is very one-sided and does not share the views of the female population and human rights activists. To prove that I am not being biased and saying this out of a whim to a small extent, I am a male of 17 years of age and I speak on behalf of those who would prefer concrete evidence before such radical claims.

    32. Xx February 29, 2016 at 10:58 am

      Congrats. This proves that you don’t respect women and that your “satirical article” is not meant as satirically as you pretend. Very sad.

    33. Chiefs_Echo_Chamber April 1, 2016 at 9:45 am

      Sorry, late to this conversation. New guy here. Love the website and learning a lot. IMO, I don’t think we can turn back the damage of equal decisions. That’s a done deal. Isn’t there an option to educate and help women become more rational beings??

    34. Shadowninja July 29, 2016 at 3:53 am

      Late to the party, but like this article.

    35. Natalie November 10, 2016 at 4:43 pm

      As a female, I must say I agree with you on some things. I’m trying to readjust my ways of being. I was wondering if you habe any articles on helping us become more submissive or respectful? I could use some guidance 🙁

    36. Anon December 8, 2016 at 10:19 pm

      I deeply resent this article.

      I am a woman studying Computer Science at a Canadian university. I am frugal with my money and make decisions now that will see future long term benefit. The nature of my studies requires an analytical mind that can look at problems and think logically about them, so get out of here with that “grown children” garbage.

      I treat my boyfriend with equal respect, as he does for me. We are happy and committed to one another but this bit is really none of your business.

      My student loans are minimal and only total around $1200, and this is due to my good management of money. Not only do I have a minimal amount of student loans, but when I obtain a job (in a field where the career market is not only plentiful, but also lucrative) I will be able to pay them off before they start collecting interest.

      My father for the most part stopped being involved in my life when I was about 15 years old. I love him very much and still see him from time to time, but it’s 7 years later now and I am doing just fine. I also have a very strong mother figure who works in STEM.

      These generalizations are incredibly hurtful to all women, especially those of us that don’t fit into your terrible description of a woman.

      You mention how women have only had personal freedom in the last century or so. If you are so logical, why can you not make the conclusion that the reason society has been built largely by men is because for a number of millenniums it has ONLY been men that had power to make society changing decisions.

      I’m not looking for a pat on the back for what I am capable of, but I wish you wouldn’t be so quick to generalize all women based on what is represented in the mainstream media. After all, isn’t it a bit hypocritical to form most of your opinions from what you see sensationalized online and in the media?

    37. zaid toma February 7, 2017 at 10:09 pm

      You are a God and speak the truth but the powers that be will never allow woman to smarten up

    38. Tiger Bos February 22, 2017 at 12:19 pm

      Lol oh believe me this is satire why would any species with half a brain treat the gender that gives birth to the world with such hatred? You’re a real piece of shite

    39. Prism Arya June 21, 2017 at 8:03 am

      I do not agree by any of the options you recommended and as well on the thoughts you made. Whatever circumstances you mentioned above are felt by not just women but also men and these traits are found more in men. You have forgotten one important thing – women can control their feelings unless they want to go ahead with it, while men cant in most cases if they are attracted to other women. You also forgot another imp fact that in all circumstances, there is involvement of men too. As a women, I can tell you that we feel no attraction towards other men if we seriously love the man in our life. I can talk long but i dont think I need to waste my more time here, hence proved women can think!!! Stop being stupid, bro!

    40. Ina Iascu September 30, 2017 at 6:35 pm

      I am currently writing a paper on respecting cultural differences in the medical field. Concentrating on cultures where the male takes a leading role and how that affects the patient’s medical decision or lack of. (Sorry if this does not interest you, seeing as I should not be writing papers of any kind or is it ok if I have an assigned male editor?) Either way, the internet led me to this article. I would love to say that I did not even glance at it as it was not worth my time, but that is not the case. I did take an interest in how premeditated Mr. Roosh’s worked out plan was. You really thought this through, which tells me it came from the heart. All I can say to Mr. Roosh is that I hope you meet a woman that will change your perception on women. I’m sorry, truly, that you have had such bad experiences with women in the past…

    41. Ana November 2, 2017 at 6:25 pm

      This is a little bit unfair.
      I know there are women like that when given freedom, but most of them are not. In fact, this is why feminism keeps pushing its agenda, because is “upseting” that women keep doing the same choices once we are free.
      For example, feminists think it is “degrading” that a wife takes her husband’s surname and they make it a free option, more than 60% of women keep choosing to change surname once married and this is when feminists start talking about “internalized misoginy” and so on
      Lets put it this way: after all of this manipulative propaganda (some) women are not behaving like this… so I think it’s a little bit too much to say that they are simply craving this behaviour

    42. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson January 9, 2018 at 7:00 am

      You’re an idiot too… the only behavior that needs controlled is your idiotic behavior. You run your own life and leave women alone.

    43. Jalice January 10, 2018 at 10:41 pm

      Society is controlled by men…. Some of you will never be happy regardless of how much control you already possess. That is probably bc no one will be near you if they had the option to leave. That makes you an insufferable human being.

    44. Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson July 6, 2018 at 5:18 am

      😂😂😂😂😂 and you’re an idiot for it too!

  2. Dr. Weezil September 21, 2015 at 9:50 am

    Let’s play spot the fallacy:

    1. All women think and act the same, therefore all must be subject to such measures – fallacy of composition, hasty generalization, association fallacy

    2. Custodians, men, guardians, etc. have the best interests of those under their care, know what they are doing, are suitable for their roles – Variation of ad verecundiam, i.e., appeal to authority, fallacy of composition, association fallacy, hasty generalization

    By these two logical failures, this whole appeal falls apart. So much for superior analytical abilities. These are basic, basic.

    1. Reason And Believing September 21, 2015 at 10:05 am

      Let’s spot the fallacy
      1 – Strawman- Roosh does not claim all, You do.
      2 Another Strawman.
      You must be a chick or something.. None of your cited fallacies even apply, and that points to you being a female or a homosexual.

      1. Conrad Stonebanks September 21, 2015 at 10:43 am

        It boils down to the classic NAWALT (not all women are like that) argument.

    2. StraightTalk September 21, 2015 at 10:06 am

      100% success isn’t required for improvement. Having a father or brother play the role of guardian until a husband is vetted is usually reliable. Will it ever happen that a guardian makes worse decisions? Sure. Shark bites happen too. But even if we suppose a guardian is uninterested in his charge’s well-being, the woman’s more-or-less independent decisions will be improved by having to expose herself to shame while getting the guardian’s consent. Even a guardian who rubber stamps everything substantially improves the woman with the threat of scorn.

    3. Philalethes September 21, 2015 at 10:10 am

      And your solution is…?

    4. SHAMPOO BRACELETS September 21, 2015 at 3:05 pm

      “1. All women think and act the same”

      Inexperienced chode spotted. 99.99% of women are hardwired the exact same way. You’d know if you ever interacted with more than 100 women in your life and ran game on em. Or even just observed them and considered the factors when observing.

      You’re a dumbass, gtfo of here with “NAWALT!!!1”

      “2. Custodians, men, guardians, etc. have the best interests of those under their care, know what they are doing, are suitable for their roles”

      Healthy Men are proven to be faster, stronger, more intelligent, more creative, have better pain/stress threshold, and even morally superior to any women on average. Testosterone is the GENIUS and natural STEROID drug – and we HEALTHY MEN are full of it. We got you women beat everywhere – no women will ever lead ANYTHING better than a healthy Man would. Sorry buttercup.

      Who else is going to guide women? Please make that case. Your father, if he was a masculine positive male role model, is the most valuable person in your life. Unless you’re a fucking degenerate.

      Now drink nut thru a funnel.

      1. KenO'Keefe_YaThatOne! September 21, 2015 at 8:53 pm

        Fuck man, I agree with you. But how aggressive he writes it isn’t helping us. He has the cogntive-linguistic capacity to make a nuanced argument without talking about how all chicks are fat. Some of them go the other end and go masculine in the gym/cross fit and get all muscular or even anorexic.

        I want to be able to use this guy as a resource to convince my lady of things, but he’s too belligerent and unbalanced in his discourse.

        He used to be less so, so I’m assuming the Feminasties have gotten to him the same way the establishment and Jewish control system has gotten to me.

        The only difference is that I am forced to moderate my language, else I go to prison. He can just rant, even if there is so much truth in it that we can’t even believe.

        One thing my mother told me, which I was resistant to for years, was “It doesn’t matter as much about what you say, as How you say it.”

        Same goes for comedy or politics or whatever.

        He’s just being inflammatory to get more press and make more money.

        But in terms of really helping things to get better. If I’m actually put off by him, and we’re on the same fking page, I see this as a problem.

        Demean the feminists sure, but DON’T GO OVERBOARD.

        A couple reasonable digs per article is fine.

        Nuance nuance nuance!

  3. Philalethes September 21, 2015 at 10:18 am

    Btw, lemons are sour, not bitter.

    Otherwise, an excellent article, succinctly analyzing and outlining the present predicament of Western civilization. These questions must be addressed if survival is a priority. Will be interesting to see if, among the many expressions of outrage – once this article is discovered by the Matriarchal media – any workable, real-world-based alternative proposals will appear.

    Congratulations, Mr. Valizadeh, on a job well done.

    1. ActionJackson23 September 21, 2015 at 12:00 pm

      “When the cow rides the bull – priest, watch your skull.”

      1. Philalethes September 21, 2015 at 12:31 pm

        Where did you get that quote? I saw it somewhere, in a book about English history, decades ago, and included it in a post at the Men’s Action News Network in 2003. Has it appeared elsewhere?

      2. Philalethes September 21, 2015 at 12:51 pm

        Well, thanks; good to know that one is read. A search finds it in numerous places on the ‘Net now, most reprints of the essay you link; but other instances seem to be related to the kerfuffle over Henry VIII’s marriage to Anne Boleyn – which apparently was what made it a known “saying”. And it may have originated with Cardinal Wolsey, a major player in Henry’s melodrama (and martyr to Henry’s ambition – as prompted by his wife, i.e. the referenced “Cow”).

        (I’m pleased to find that these “essays” posted on Rob Fedders’ site – originally posts in comment threads at MANN ca. 2001-03, then collected in a .doc by one reader and posted for download on another forum, whence I suppose Rob got them – still read pretty well a dozen years later.)

    2. ex-convict September 21, 2015 at 6:20 pm

      “Will be interesting to see if, among the many expressions of outrage –
      once this article is discovered by the Matriarchal media – any workable, real-world-based alternative proposals will appear.”

      Well said.

      “Btw, lemons are sour, not bitter.”

      Indeed, like the lemon slice that turns my Boulevard Wheat monster draft into an exquisite, slightly tangy, bubbly blend of goodness.

  4. Tom the Wizard September 21, 2015 at 10:39 am

    Being 68 yrs old, I can say that this is all so very true, for I have lived the disaster of women’s rights. It all sounded so reasonable when I was a innocent young man, but it has been a disaster.
    Unfortunately, it will probably take a civilization collapse, a religious crusade or some other disaster to get this in place.

    1. Philalethes September 21, 2015 at 11:13 am

      At age 72, I concur. Coming of age in the counterculture of the 60s, I bought nearly the whole program. So it has been the behavior of “liberated” women themselves, observed over the last six decades, which has brought me to see the wisdom of the Ancients in regard to the true nature of the female, and what must be done to avoid the destruction she can cause – to herself no less than to society at large – when left unregulated.

      1. Bee Warren February 8, 2016 at 1:11 pm

        72 and still immature.? Typical bloke! Though of course, in your case you could get away with blaming it on senility.
        There was no counterculture in the 60s, just a leap forward in social progress for which the whole of society has much to thank today. It’s called evolution.
        As the [partial] abolition of slavery bothers you so much, perhaps you’d like to try it from the receiving end? There is still plenty of it going on in the world; women and children labouring in inhumane conditions; being forced into hellish marriages with revolting old paedophiles or being sold into the sex industry to have humiliation, pain and internal injury regularly inflicted on them. How do you fancy swapping places with them?
        Or since you are hankering to go back to Neanderthal times you’d better give up your cosy home, your easy food, your clothes, your medical care, make yourself a sharpened stone on a stick and go hunting and foraging for yourself. But don’t expect to survive long, especially without the women who, despite you being an ungrateful wretch of a mysogonist, would be healing your wounds when you fall.

      2. Philalethes February 12, 2016 at 3:29 pm

        Well, perhaps you should be thanked for providing a perfect example (several, I see here) of just what inspired this article and comment thread in the first place.

        For the record, I do not disagree that women have suffered terribly throughout human history. What I do dispute is the relentlessly repeated feminist dogma that only women have suffered, or that women have suffered more, or that women’s suffering is somehow special, and deserving of special consideration therefor.

        Everybody – every body – suffers. All living beings suffer in this world. That’s what it’s about here. I’m sorry for your suffering, but I’m afraid there’s little I can do about it. Your mind is your business, and only you can change how it works. There are things that you could do to ameliorate your situation, but hysterical interjections designed to protect your eternal #1 Victim Status dropped into a calm discussion are not among the productive responses.

    2. Bee Warren February 8, 2016 at 2:02 pm

      Stupid old git! What utter drivel you dribble. At 68 it’s time you grew up isn’t it? All you bully-boy mysogonists are the dead spit of a spoilt 2 year old who expects mummy to put him on a pedestal and bow to his every petulant desire, and who throws his toys at his baby sister when having to accept the universe doesn’t revolve around him. Self important limp dicks!

      So what disaster has women’s [human] rights ever caused, exactly?
      98% of all the wars in history? Oh no, that’s men isn’t it? (Thatcher being the exception, but she didn’t really count as a real woman.); The current humanitarian crisis coming out of the Middle East? Oh no, that’s the fault of that civilian murderer President Saddat (now assisted by Vlad Putin); The scum that are Daesh who strap explosives to little children?Taliban thugs who shot a little girl just because they’re so ignorant and insecure they can’t bear the fact that she’s smarter than them? Unbelievably bigotted pillocks like Donald Trump (actually he’d fit in this group very well) with his hatred rousing bullshit?… the list is eternal. Is that the kind of civilization collapse/religious crusade you had in mind? Yeah they’re really sorting the world’s problems out, eh?

      But no, I see no women there. They’re too busy trying to save the children, heal the wounds, drum some commonsense into you idiot promoters of mindless aggression.

  5. Dolan Duk September 21, 2015 at 10:41 am

    Roosh you might want to rethink this one. Id be willing to go out on a limb here and say theres just as many guys out there who make dumb ass decisions too. The only difference is that society actually holds men responsible for their fuck ups whereas women just get a slap on the wrist.

    Woman fucks up and gets pregnant: abortion
    Man fucks up and gets woman pregnant: 18 years child support

    Woman fucks up by marrying the “wrong guy”: half the guys shit plus monthly payments
    Man fucks up by marrying the wrong woman (pretty much any woman): gets cut in half and has his wages garnished

    Woman makes false accusation that is blatantly false: 0 repercussions
    Man makes false accusation that is blatantly false: counter-suit as well as false accusation charge

    Woman runs up a massive college loan bill for a worthless major: affirmative action hiring and marrying a beta bux to cover the cost
    Man runs up massive college loan bill for a worthless major: lol fuck you you’re on your own son

    Woman drinks too much and wakes up with a strange man and buyers remorse: she was raped, not her fault
    Man drinks to much and wakes up with his pants, shoes, and wallet missing: don’t drink so much next time dipshit

    Woman kills her kids: mentally unstable, shes obviously a victim, minimum sentencing.
    Man kills his kids: 25 to life bitch

    Woman attacks man: well he shouldnt have provoked her
    Man defends himself by knocking her out: woman beater!! Send him to prison!!

    Woman wants to fuck multiple guys: she’s discovering her sexuality
    Man wants to fuck multiple women: misoginystic creep

    Older woman fucks underage guys: yeah rob that cradle, you go girl!
    Older man fucks underage girls: pedophile creep, send him to prison!

    When you live in a society that holds the ideal that nothing your gender does is your fault then yeah, you’re going to keep making some dumb ass decisions because you’re actions are completely divorced from any consequences.

    And as far as muslims controlling their women, yeah you’ve got a point there but on the other hand muslim society is also backwards as fuck to the point that they take their religion so seriously that they’re flying planes into buildings and bombing cartoon studios because they don’t agree with them. Whats rational about that shit?

    If men want women to stop being fucking retards then we have to reform the system so that they actually have to start living with the consequences of their shitty life choices.

    1. Slashfund September 21, 2015 at 10:58 am

      True, but it’s impossible to hold them responsible because the truth is they are retards. Eliminating women’s voting entitlement would go a long way, for the sake of justice a minority of women could earn the vote (and a larger number of men would lose it)

    2. Philalethes September 21, 2015 at 11:38 am

      Yes, most everything you say is true – though I wouldn’t agree with the “just as many guys” bit. There are a lot of foolish men, true – after all, it was men who voted to give the vote to women (note: it was given to them; men had to earn it) – but I’d say that on average men are significantly more likely to act on reason than are women.

      Women can employ reason, but it’s not their default mode, it’s not expected of them, they can avoid it by claiming a privilege as ancient as sex itself, and they use it only when they feel it is to their advantage. Thus not often, especially as sex is so much more effective at getting them what they want. Men are expected to be reasoning, and reasonable, and know – even if they are reluctant to admit it to themselves – they are not being fully men when they don’t. So men will accede to reason even when it is not to their advantage – something women will almost never do, unless somehow forced.

      The only difference is that society actually holds men responsible for their fuck ups whereas women just get a slap on the wrist. Yes, but this is not the trivial difference you make it seem. It is the difference, in fact, between civilization and barbarism. It is also the difference between adults and children. In law, an adult is a person who is held responsible for es actions; otherwise, e is a child, and not entitled to the privileges and freedoms of an adult.

      If men want women to stop being fucking retards then we have to reform the system so that they actually have to start living with the consequences of their shitty life choices. Indeed, that is the problem, made doubly difficult by the fact that women are (a) the majority of the population and (b) the majority of the electorate. The ideal would be a social order in which all who are willing to behave responsibly – of either sex, any age – would be classified as adults, while those who are unwilling or unable to do so would be under guardianship. How we could get there I don’t know, but certainly we never will if we don’t at least start thinking about it.

      1. Dolan Duk September 21, 2015 at 1:06 pm

        So you’re arguing that since women are more guided by emotion than men that they should be curtailed in how they go about making decisions and living their lives?

        Since most women are basically overgrown children what your suggesting would be effective but not at all plausible. Firstly because the progressive shithole we call the civilized world would fight you tooth and nail against it and secondly because thats a lot of work to implement. Think of all the responsibilities men have on a day to day basis. Now they would have to be baby sitters to women on top of that.

        I say give them what they’ve always wanted, equality. TRUE equality, and with it they get to deal with all the consequences that come with it. If they fuck it up then they’re on their own just like men are. No big daddy govt to come to their rescue and no white knights to help them out.

        Of course, now that i think about it thats about equally implausible as women can now vote themselves biased treatment and white knighting will never go away without a complete overhaul of societal values.

    3. js27195 September 21, 2015 at 5:26 pm

      You’re right, but men don’t disassociate and rationalize by nature like women. They usually do (and are forced to) take responsibility.

    4. Dr.JamesFetzer & ArthurTopham September 22, 2015 at 12:47 am

      EVERYTHING GREAT until “Muslims flying Planes into Buildings”…

      No sorry champ. Another lie you haven’t woken up to, or you’re another Israeli Hasbara troll.

      Those planes were TV Fakery. Plain and simple. Who controls the media to be able to make it happen??? Starts with a J and ends with an ish.

      There are only FOUR, count em 4, videos of the supposed planes.

      ALL Computer Graphics. And poorly coordinated ones at that.

      They made big mistakes if you bother to know how to investigate.

      !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Watch SEPTEMBER CLUES to figure that out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Planes cannot fly at ground level as fast as those computer graphics planes were shown to. The air is too dense and they will stall out. Call Boeing and ask them max speed near ground level. You’ll get wise real quick.

      I’m not even going to mention about the Road Runner cartoon physics of these supposed planes as they can’t cut through concrete and steel like a knife through butter.

      Want an insider’s statement… Look up Dr. Morgan Reynolds, who tells it like it is.

      What about the witnesses you say… Oh, you mean “Harley Shirt Guy” or “Gary Welz”… I’m not Black, but a Nigga Please is appropriate here!

      Or how about the Passport of Mohammad Atta they found on the ground with a slight tear and burn on the corner. Nigga please.

      Or Flight Attendant Cee Cee Lyles’ burnt corner driver’s license found in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, when no bodies or seats or plane was. Honkey please.

      Listen to Cee Cee’s phone call they made her make before they killed her. Those fucks!

      THE WORLD IS A STAGE MY NEEEGGAS.

      Here’s what likely happened:

      Jassam Missile, which has wings and looks like a plane to people below, if anything at all, hits the towers… Shape charges go off to give the impression of wings. Please, they would have fallen off by any reasonable physics… And again, planes could not fly that fast at that altitude to begin with, which is what they establishments needs to convince you that a plane actually could perfectly slice its way through reinforced steel and concrete with so much as a piece falling off.

      (Oh, and in addition to the passports they found, I mean planted, do you not remember the piece of landing gear they said the found under a walkway down the road… NOT EVEN FROM THE SAME TYPE OF PLANE! They likely had it sitting on top of the construction walkway overhang, then just had a spook pull it down when the mayhem started.

      Bet you didn’t know that the WTC had a lot of supposedly fiber optics upgrade techs with huge black bags come into the building a few weeks prior to to 9/11 to work on the core columns. Mini nukes planted in the core columns anyone?

      Simple controlled demolition or even nanothermite does not fit the evidence for WTC 1 or 2.

      For WTC 7, (please tell me you’re not still ignorant of this one people!) conventional controlled demolition fits the bill. There was the proper building height to rubble ration as per prior demolitions. Not so with the 110 story WTC 1 and 2 turning into 2.5 stories of rubble… And no it didn’t all go into the underground floors and to the bathtub of the site.

      The subway tunnels weren’t full. The Warner Brothers prop room wasn’t caved in and the props were in tact.

      The vast majority of the material of those two buildings turned to dust!

      There’s only two things that produce enough energy to accomplish this..

      1. nuclear weapon technology

      2. directed energy weapons not yet public.

      Considering Israel is a rogue and undeclared nuclear state (check out Mordecai Vanunu) capable of producing these weapons, and smuggling them into the country since the Helium 3 used in nuclear weapon detectors was made to be purposely out of stock.

      http://jimstonefreelance.com/blackmail.html

      “Many of my readers have seen my article Nuclear Blackmail, which
      outlines the mysterious disappearance of helium 3 and the resulting
      inability of America to detect nuclear weapons moving into the nation
      through the ports, and also to track them around the country. Because
      helium 3 is a byproduct of the nuclear weapons industry, there is no
      reason at all for the lack of it in America, yet this is precisely what
      has happened – America ran out of it and because nuclear weapons
      detectors, which look for neutrinos actually consume helium 3 and need
      to be replenished, they are all now offline and America cannot protect
      its ports.

      The reason for the lack of this isotope of helium can only be by pure
      intent, with people in key places making sure it somehow vanishes. THAT
      is how defeated America now is. And I do not believe it happened by
      accident, the article Nuclear Blackmail pretty much says it all.

      Now the big question

      Is our Federal government being blackmailed with a nuclear threat from Israel to attack Syria? Consider this – Never in the history of this nation has the government lacked the support of the people so strongly with any other topic. Even Faux (Fox) News is reporting that support for the war is hovering around 15 percent, with 85 percent of the people against it. The real number? 91 percent of the American populace is against this war. And if you have a number that high, you can bet that the top 30 to 40 percent are rabidly opposed to this war.

      If America really is still a democratic republic, numbers like these are a death sentence to those in office.

      There is no way the Israeli lobby or any zionist front could ever
      convince the elected leaders of a nation to act against numbers this
      strong. I believe that there is a very high probability that the
      American government is behaving belligerently because it has been placed under threat. And if such a threat is in place, it’s probably WAR ON.

      My article Nuclear Blackmail outlines how Brazil, Germany, Japan, and America have been placed under threat after getting security contracts with the same Mossad front that destroyed Fukushima. This was accomplished by getting gun type nuclear weapons into the facility poorly disguised as stereoscopic cameras.

      Magna BSP’s Owl clearly explains how reactor 4 exploded without a core at all while the fuel pool remained intact, which makes reactor 4 Fukushima’s building 7.

      But it’s not just nuke cameras that are the issue when it comes to Israel, and it is not just Magna BSP”

      It continues… and so will it.

      At the WTC, there was wayyy too much Tritium and other radioactive materials there.

      The destruction of the Twin Towers could only have been done by a series of timed daisy-chained mini nukes, placed every 10 floors going off in the right sequence… which is why you see the mushroom cloud going up, the vaporization of steel and concrete to dust (Dr. Judy Wood’s thesis doesn’t hold up either), and the testimony of people saying they felt massive explosions.

      ONLY THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE.

      Don’t bother writing your CongresSHILL.

      1. Same guy September 22, 2015 at 12:57 am

        Shit, apologies for the half dozen typos in there. When you write that much, sometimes you just want to get it off your hands if you know what I mean. Gotta keep it tight though.

        Why no edit function on this comment board?

      2. Tom Dane September 22, 2015 at 1:34 pm

        So there was no eyewitnesses or what ?

      3. Bee Warren February 8, 2016 at 1:07 pm

        You’re a doctor? Sod that! Remind me never to get sick when you’re on duty. I’d prefer my life to be in the hands of someone rational and in touch with reality. Plus, if you’re in any kind of agreement with the sick psychos on here you should definitely be struck off… and locked up.

    5. Eric Daggerfall December 11, 2016 at 7:04 pm

      >Woman wants to fuck multiple guys: she’s discovering her sexuality
      Man wants to fuck multiple women: misoginystic creep

      Now that’s completely untrue…

  6. Rondo September 21, 2015 at 10:53 am

    Annnnnnnnnnnnnnd, this is the type of article that will ensure that you never get more than a niche audience….Jesus man.

    1. Philalethes September 21, 2015 at 11:04 am

      And your solution is…?

    2. ActionJackson23 September 21, 2015 at 11:54 am

      Seriously, this kind of stuff does nothing but turn off women and mangina faggots like yourself …

      1. Rondo September 21, 2015 at 1:46 pm

        Nah, what it does is turn off the gigantic middle between the extremists (articles like this are the opposite of Lindy West articles) with preposterous suggestions that women shouldn’t be allowed to attend university unless all the men have had a shot at it first or that women need male guardians to monitor them.

        Mangina Faggot? I remember being 19.

      2. ActionJackson23 September 21, 2015 at 1:50 pm

        Exactly, you were a mangina faggot at 19 and you’re still one today …

      3. Rondo September 21, 2015 at 1:51 pm

        You’re a little boy. You probably will always be a little boy. Run along son.

      4. ActionJackson23 September 21, 2015 at 1:58 pm

        Not surprisingly, your “insults” sound exactly like what a woman would say …

      5. Rondo September 21, 2015 at 2:00 pm

        Nah, just someone whose mature enough not to call someone Mangina Faggot just because he disagrees with their opinion.

        You’re a child. Its fine. Hopefully you grow up. Like I said, I remember being an opinionated teen who thought he knew everything. Disrespect is so cool!

      6. ActionJackson23 September 21, 2015 at 2:19 pm

        The amount of estrogen in your comments is embarrassing … if you really are a man, you should maybe look into TRT or at least start lifting some weights or something …

    3. Roosh September 21, 2015 at 1:09 pm

      I care about the truth, not about an “audience”. The size of it does not affect what must be said.

      1. Rondo September 21, 2015 at 1:50 pm

        What truth? If you want to make the argument that men are more rational than women in certain aspects of life, then by all means, go for it.

        But someone could just as easily say that men need to female guardians because they commit more crime, are more violent, more likely to drink themselves into destruction, etc. When I go out, I see a lot more men who are sloppy drunk than women. At college, women were the ones more likely to take their coursework seriously.

        Is it really so hard to just say that if a woman is capable of doing something, she should be allowed to do it without harassment? You just sound like the polar opposite of Lindy West. She says all men are awful slavers and that the only reason women aren’t taking over the world with their brilliance boils down to being held down by men. You say that all women are children who need parental supervision. Why not just be reasonable in the way you claim men are and actually come up with something logical and remotely feasible rather than whatever laughable fantasy this is.

      2. Roosh September 21, 2015 at 2:05 pm

        Your vagina (or low testosterone if you are a male) is making it impossible for you to think carefully. You are having some sort of panic attack and need to step away from the computer.

        If a man is in trouble or has been led down the wrong path, he needs guidance from another man, not a woman. Otherwise it would be the blind leading the blind. The only time you see a woman on firm footing is either when she’s pretending to be a man in the case of a stable career, or when she’s being led by a man.

        As of right now, most American men are not capable of being leaders of women or the family, but the masculinity I teach is attempting to solve that, and my readers are definitely more capable than the general male population.

      3. NonCanadian September 21, 2015 at 2:11 pm

        THIS: ” As of right now, most American men are not capable of being leaders of women or the family!!!!!!!”
        +10000000000000000000000000000000000

      4. Rondo September 21, 2015 at 3:06 pm

        “While my proposals are undoubtedly extreme on the surface and hard to imagine implementing”

        Your response (childish and progressive in nature “Obviously, there is something wrong with you because you disagree”) doesn’t address the extremity of your suggestions. If you want spread the masculinity you preach, you’ll need to appeal to people. All this article does is provide ammunition against you and in this case, the people shooting are correct.

        Its not difficult: Men and women are different. There’s a reason men have done pretty much everything of note in the world. Therefore, it should not surprise anyone that men succeed more than women at so many different things. It should also not surprise people that the sex that has been given the tools to have and raise children are more qualified to do so and if a high % of women end up in that capacity, its nature at work. There are exceptions, but generally, most people know this, even if its deep down. And you can tap into that and spread your message by saying the traditional family unit is the ideal building block for any country/nation.

        But when you go off the deep-end and start suggesting policies that exclude women from all aspects of university and business (unless of course all men have had their shot), needing guardians and contracts to do just about every little thing, most people who would actually agree with you on the family unit are going to back away slowly and rightfully so because you’re suggesting 1984ing women.

        But you’ll lap up applause from your followers, just like Lindy does from her own. And another echo chamber forms and nothing ever changes.

      5. Tom Dane September 21, 2015 at 5:50 pm

        It gives ammunition to people who already hates him…who cares.

      6. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 7:37 pm

        You are everything that’s wrong with society.

      7. GRock September 22, 2015 at 4:34 am

        Funny you should say that. Since clearly the minimal number of people supporting Roosh makes us a minority, and not conforming to what society is attempting to shove down everyone’s throats. When I have to explain to a 7 yr old child why ABC family channel has teenage lesbians french kissing, which is something she should not be exposed to in the first place, I’m confident the feminist imperative represents a massive chunk of what’s wrong with society.

      8. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 7:52 am

        Being against the majority is not always good I mean look at the racism, antisemitism, misogyny and homophobia. According to your beliefs Should a girl even be watching tv? I mean shouldn’t she just sit in a closet til she’s old enough to be controlled by a man? And if not maybe it’s time you accept that more than there’s nothing wrong with being gay just being a misogynist and homophobic and that if a man treats your daughter the way the people on this site act you’re likely to kill him, either that or you’re no true man.

      9. frank rook September 22, 2015 at 6:27 am

        ……………….

      10. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 7:44 am

        At Ieast you agree.

      11. Timothy Sterling September 21, 2015 at 6:06 pm

        Men commit “more crime” because abortion is not counted as a murder.

      12. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 7:38 pm

        True Hitler started off small too.

      13. me September 28, 2015 at 1:32 am

        At least Hitler wasn’t as hateful and violent as feminism is.

      1. Rondo September 21, 2015 at 1:59 pm

        Its not about popularity, this is just a poor article with an extreme message and its solution is so extreme that all it will be used for is rightly slandering Roosh. Which is disappointing, because it will undo a lot of good work that he’s done these past few months.

      2. spicynujac September 21, 2015 at 2:11 pm

        Historically speaking, there is nothing extreme about the message at all. Neomasculinity is a return to the way things were run almost universally throughout history. If you think this solution is “poor” or “extreme” we’d be happy to consider your appraisal of things along with your proposed solution. I don’t really care how extreme a solution is if it works.

      3. Rondo September 21, 2015 at 2:53 pm

        Sure. Rather than be a crazy, Lindy West type extremist (who would say similar crazy shit about men trying to have sex with women) and say that women need to sign contracts to do just about anything, can’t attend university unless all the men have a spot and have guardians, just do the obvious: Point out the obvious, biological differences between men and women. Point out that disparities don’t mean discrimination. Abolish all laws that give women special treatment. Campaign that being a housewife is not slavery the way that Jezebellians would make it out to be. That having children is a good thing. Point out that women are natural child raisers.

        When you get into the territory Roosh is stepping into (where you are saying “OH, YOU ARENT A MAN IF YOU DISAGREE WITH ME”, which is childish and hilariously dumb) you lose your ability to connect with people and you end up in an echo chamber where your ideas get crazier and crazier because you lock out everyone else as being “Low-Testosterone”. Just like a progressive echo chamber locks out the “racists” and “sexists”. And then the movement stops because you’re no longer reaching anyone but the people you’ve already convinced and you lose people who (like most people) aren’t the low IQ ActionJackson23 types.

      4. ActionJackson23 September 21, 2015 at 4:18 pm

        “the low IQ ActionJackson23 types”

        Bringing me up in another thread? Looks like I really did manage to get your panties in a twist …

      5. Tom Dane September 21, 2015 at 5:54 pm

        Point out point out point out..women will not do any of those things because you “point them out”…yea if so many does it that they feel the cultural pressure, they will. But then we are back to using force again, though indirectly.

      6. spicynujac September 21, 2015 at 11:24 pm

        I think if I could be transplanted into an ideal time, it would be something like the America of the 1900s-1950s where men and women were seen as different, unequal, and primarily mothers, while they still had a good bit of personal freedom. I think this is probably (but not definitely) better than the way of life in Saudi Arabia, where women indeed have guardians and must obtain male permission to do many things women can independently do elsewhere.
        However, I also understand that when advocating a position, especially one requiring significant change, one must often take up a more hard line position. (See the old: What do we want!? Gradual change. When do we want it!? In the relatively near future joke which never gets results)

      7. in_Dei_servitium September 21, 2015 at 6:52 pm

        Give him time. Old habits die hard.

      8. GRock September 22, 2015 at 4:46 am

        We’d be speaking German or Japanese right now if extreme measures weren’t taken to stop very bad people. This is not extreme at all. If you went to the front lines, or even the mess haul in 1945, Korean War, or Vietnam and told the soldiers; “By year 2015 gay marriage will be legal and marketed in every state, your daughters will be encouraged to be whores and openly bisexual, and men like you will be shamed for disagreeing, let alone fighting to stop the immorality and destruction of the sanctity of marriage and the family unit, and your sons will be thrown out of college for having consensual sex, or accused of harassment” they’d drop their guns and let everyone deal with the homeland invasion. I’m not a serviceman. Certainly they’re saying to themselves:”I fought for the freedom of THESE people? Fuck this shit.

      9. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 9:13 am

        You realize the gay liberation movement started before nam right and that premarital sex has been going on since there was marriage? Your side has failed and there’s no putting it back. I honestly doubt most Nam vets would care but You know that WW1 vets would feel the same way about blacks being able to vote right, and desegregation? Are you just upset you can’t beat your wife?

    4. Scythian Arrows September 21, 2015 at 9:23 pm

      Quality over quantity. Overturning the evils of this modern world requires resolute men of strength and honor, and better to have only two of them on your side than a million sycophants and cowards.

    5. Shortest Straw September 22, 2015 at 12:04 am

      I know what you’re saying, but the important meta-message is that the world is broken. This isn’t a realistic prescription for fixing it, but no one knows what that prescription is, and until it’s found, we’re living on borrowed time. The invasion of Europe illustrates this perfectly.

  7. Inki Snowe September 21, 2015 at 11:15 am

    I am female, and although I personally bristle at the broad-stroked harsh condemnation of female nature and intelligence, I agree with much of the practical outline. Men screwed up when they let the reigns slide. Everyone will benefit if they pick them back up and start exercising their God-given power. I do, however, think there is middle ground between the complete laxity of modern Western society and the extreme rigid oppression of Muslim culture; and that fertile middle ground is exactly where we find traditional, historic European society.

    1. spro23 September 21, 2015 at 11:17 am

      White Europeans will be gone in a generation or two. Muslims and other sorts of brown people are breeding like rabbits. whereas white women don’t want to be bothered with childbearing.
      and unlike Roosh, they won’t write an essay trying to convince women of their point of view. They will brutally beat you into submission and you’ll never get out.
      But hey, feminism says white Christian men are the worst right?

      1. Inki Snowe September 21, 2015 at 11:51 am

        Leftism in general says that, including feminism in its arsenal of weapons against us. Traditional white, Christian society is the best women ever had it. I honestly fear for my daughter’s future.

      2. Cisyf1 September 21, 2015 at 4:05 pm

        I agree with nearly everything in the article and it is a brilliant take on a topic that might get a man literally thrown out of a public place were it brought up in public. Still, it’s as interesting a topic there can be in humanness, because wouldn’t we completely fuck up what the animal kingdom already sorted out for us? I comment on this particular paragraph though because, concerning White Euro’s, I often think ~who cares if the white race dies out? I have no kids and I’ll be gone in 35 years anyway. Aren’t you all just worrying about something you’ll never even witness?~

      3. Tom Dane September 21, 2015 at 5:57 pm

        We worry about it because we think ahead, even past our own death.

      4. Inki Snowe September 21, 2015 at 6:13 pm

        Future time orientation. It’s a white people thing. 😀

      5. in_Dei_servitium September 21, 2015 at 6:57 pm

        No, it’s an ‘understanding the concept of eternity’ thing, and other races had it long before the white people did.

      6. Inki Snowe September 21, 2015 at 7:08 pm

        No other race had it “before white people” – except maybe the people who eventually became white people. However, I am aware that other races share this trait; I was simply pointing out that a concern with future and legacy is one of the defining characteristics of traditional white European psychoculture, while being almost entirely absent from certain others. Modern Western culture encourages hedonism, nihilism and high time preference, because it makes people easy to control when all they care about is here and now and their immediate needs and appetites.

      7. in_Dei_servitium September 21, 2015 at 9:19 pm

        Your point about modern Western civilisation is clear. The steps you’re taking to explain its “psychoculture” (if you mean husbandry) are ridiculous, however. All civilisations depend on a future time orientation and there were many of these in Asia while Western Europe was still in infancy. Even when it emerged as a mature civilisation, much of it was funded by pillaging or otherwise subsuming the husbanded resources, useful methods and ideas, and often sophisticated artifacts of other more developed cultures. Every race has members who like to claim theirs is responsible for what we know today as Western civilisation, when in fact it is a conglomerate and aggregation of the best parts of many. There’s a strong argument to be made that because of its decline and hugely disproportionate contribution to environmental problems, the systems and civilities of the West don’t in fact have sufficient future time orientation to succeed over the long term. From a Christian standpoint, one could similarly argue that God is abandoning the West. If that is true, the next civilisation could just as easily select the parts of history that support its predominance and teach that (and whatever it chooses to subsume from other civilizations) to its people, just as Western Europe regularly proves it is wont to do.

      8. Inki Snowe September 21, 2015 at 9:28 pm

        Ok…

      9. Inki Snowe September 21, 2015 at 11:07 pm

        I didn’t say civilization, I said psychoculture. Of course all civilizations depend on future time orientation; that is why only peoples with a psychoculture that is future time oriented develop civilizations. I said I was aware that there are other cultures and races which also had/have future time orientation as a defining characteristic; however, they didn’t *precede* white people. They developed independently and concurrently. Evidence for the importance of legacy and awareness of the eternal is present in the earliest recorded history of European peoples, and archaeological evidence for the same goes back to pre-neolithic times.

    2. paul B September 21, 2015 at 12:43 pm

      Searching for the middle ground is how it all started — and how it always usually starts.

      1. Inki Snowe September 21, 2015 at 1:30 pm

        Traditional European society didn’t “search” for the middle ground, it was just naturally there. It’s our natural and optimal state, and we never should have left it.

      2. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 12:56 pm

        And the Hegelian dialectic is about constantly changing the definition of what “middle ground” is. Sucks when you can be manipulated so easily.

      3. Inki Snowe September 29, 2015 at 9:09 pm

        True; but we are speaking of a middle ground between two readily apparent points, which I think most people here understand in roughly the same way. That’s the beauty of a shared cultural history.

    3. iBooB September 21, 2015 at 3:26 pm

      Explain how you, a woman on the receiving end of divine masculine power see and feel it when exercised, if I may so kindly ask?

      1. Inki Snowe September 21, 2015 at 3:46 pm

        Oh, that is a huge question, and very intimate too, by its nature; but I will do my best to answer it honestly.

        First of all, the only divine masculine power exercised on me *directly* is that of my husband. The thing that first attracted me to him was his calm, matter-of-fact dominance. He is strong and protective, he takes care of me and will never let anyone hurt me. He treats me like his whore in the bedroom and like a princess in public. He makes the final decisions in our marriage, and I know that he always has my best interests at heart. I also know that he is a fair and just man who loves me more than anyone in the world, and will always consider my opinions.

        He keeps me in line when I get ornery, as women sometimes do, and he knows that a smack on the behind or a good hard pounding will work wonders for my attitude, no matter how much I may protest. 🙂

        We agreed on these parameters when we first got together. He is the boss. He is the Captain to my First Mate. He makes rules for me, and I do my best to obey. He has the right to discipline me, to take me sexually however and whenever he pleases, and he has blanket consent to ignore my “noes” if ever I utter such a thing (it has never happened yet, though we sometimes play at it just for fun!). He can also impregnate me whenever he chooses.

        What do I get out of all this? I am loved, cherished, protected, and sometimes even spoiled! I feel safe and secure in a way I have never experienced before, which is partly a result of trusting him more deeply and completely than I have trusted anyone since I was a child. There is a peace and relief in that kind of trust which can’t be explained, especially after being as gun-shy as I was from being mistreated by other men.

        I have a happy husband, and I feel fulfilled as a woman by pleasing him and knowing he can go out into the world and stand tall among other men, proud and confident in his masculinity. I am proud to be his. To me, he is a king among men. He is *my* king, and I wouldn’t have it any other way.

      2. uncrowned September 21, 2015 at 4:23 pm

        But ultimately the King is the Lord and Saviour JC.

      3. Inki Snowe September 21, 2015 at 4:40 pm

        I’m Orthodox, so of course!

        “Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, as also Christ is head of the church; and He is the Savior of the body. Therefore, just as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything.”

        My husband is my lord and king, through whom I give glory and honor to Christ the Lord and King of all, by honoring and obeying him as is right; while he, for his part, “nourishes and cherishes” me, and “loves me as his own body” and “as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her.” 🙂

      4. Tom Kaye September 23, 2015 at 4:05 am

        Oh, stop trolling for attention. I hate it when people butt into a conversation they are not a part of with some self-righteous proclamation about how THEY are a true Christian and the other person couldn’t possibly be a Christian because they didn’t spit it out self-righteously from their mouth while answering a post that had nothing to do with it!

        Doing that makes me wonder if you even know what it means to submit to Jesus. You probably only submit to the Jesus in your head. The “other” Jesus Paul talked about. We’ll see how “submissive” you are to Jesus when He’s here to unequivocally demand your obedience.

      5. iBooB September 21, 2015 at 8:26 pm

        Thank you for this beautiful response.

        It may help men and women realize what types of dynamics are involved in a more naturally inclined male/female courtship. It doesn’t have to involve BDSM, spanking or that fluff. There is a kind of freedom you give a woman by being utterly responsible over her that can only be reciprocated by her through further submission to you.

        Instead of whining of having to be responsible for a woman, celebrate men. The more responsibility you have over her and for her, the more she trusts you and submits to you.

      6. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 8:00 am

        Coming from the guy named iboob, clearly the only way you know how to get near a woman involves hiding behind bushes.

    1. Saphira Violette September 21, 2015 at 1:49 pm

      You know it’s a satire, right?

  8. Крум Безстрашни September 21, 2015 at 12:45 pm

    Roosh, as you mention Schopenhauer, I’d be interested to read your reviews on Weininger’s work “Sex and Character”.

    For Weininger, the female is sexuality. The male is sexuality and something more. The female is unconsciousness. The male has the possibility of consciousness. The female is non-rational (not irrational). The male has the possibility of being rational. The female is non-moral (not immoral), while the male has the possibility of morality. The female is nothing. The male has the possibility of being something.

    So following Weininger’s logic, Roosh actually has a point. The female can make a decision concerning herself only as she lacks the possibility of morality. The male is more altruistic and moral so he can make decision concerning his interests BUT in reagards of the interests of the whole group.

    1. Inki Snowe September 21, 2015 at 7:33 pm

      So, insofar as there are in fact conscious, rational, moral females (I know this to be true, because I myself am one), what does that mean? Am I really male?

      I tend to see literal readings of Weininger as a mistake. Same thing with the writings on the sexes by Evola, et. al. The use of gender in these philosophers’ writings only makes sense as a sort of ontological category, equivalent to the Chinese concept of yin and yang. The terms “male” and “female” stand for dualistic ontological qualities, rather than being literal descriptions of men and women as they exist in real life. Here, we all contain a mixture of the two, with the “female” qualities being generally more prevalent in women and the “male” being generally more prevalent in men, though there are obviously outliers on both sides of the spectrum.

      There is no creature on earth more altruistic than a devoted mother.

      1. Apollyon September 23, 2015 at 10:08 am

        Females can be moral, if the morality is handed down from a patriarchal culture and family. Nevertheless, female morality tends to naturally follow how she feels. Note Churches with female ministers. In short order they go from considering homosexuality a sin to pushing for ordaining them.

      2. Inki Snowe September 29, 2015 at 9:10 pm

        How did those churches end up with female ministers in the first place? Men following their “feels” instead of logic and tradition.

      3. Apollyon September 29, 2015 at 9:52 pm

        Yes, along with a desire to please women and a misplaced sense of justice. Men have both protective instincts and a desire for female approval. When women complained about ‘inequality’, rather than holding firm, men appeased women. Note these men tend to be, as you noted (indirectly), less masculine.

  9. YoBravaFrumAnuvaMuva September 21, 2015 at 1:00 pm

    The only men worthy of being followed or master of the household are those that are righteous according to the Christian moral code. Otherwise, you merely have degenerates following other degenerates.

    1. Inki Snowe September 21, 2015 at 6:32 pm

      Truth.

  10. Imprevist September 21, 2015 at 1:06 pm

    “why is a woman allowed to make decisions at all without first getting approval from a man who is more rational and levelheaded than she is?”

    Precisely because thats how the government wants it. The more purchasing power a woman has, the more money and taxes is pumped into the system since women are irrational and emotional spenders. If women were “controlled” the economy would go into a tailspin. Women need to be liberated not for their own benefit but the benefit of the economy. This isnt about equality, its about money.

    1. spicynujac September 21, 2015 at 1:08 pm

      The troubling facts are that American society literally cannot afford to restrain women. Our overleveraged economy would collapse if all the profligate spending of women was constrained.

  11. spicynujac September 21, 2015 at 1:07 pm

    I am tempted to call this brilliant advice, but it is really just logical conclusion based on observing the world.

    I would add: when you give a female advanced high level post graduate education and training what does she do? Work at 2/3 the rate of men, often dropping out of her field entirely, wasting the valuable resources that were devoted to her training.

    And in addition to having children right when fertility is ending, their other choice is to have a kid with whatever guy gave her tingles and knocked her up in high school (Teen Mom phenomenon) because it makes her empowered and her welfare child Always Comes First.

  12. BurningPinto September 21, 2015 at 1:10 pm

    Women should have their decisions by men…GOOD men. Not assholes.
    Sometimes a strong father figure is enough these days.

  13. NonCanadian September 21, 2015 at 1:58 pm

    I beg to disagree. “Control” is a very bad thing in all aspects be it a male or female control.
    A family with control issues will never be able to actually develop itself and evolve as a unity of a man and a woman!
    I’ve been married for 7 years now and we’ve never had any control issues in our family between me and my wife and us and our kids. We know and we value our family freedoms but again our family is based on values like mutual understanding, respect, support, dignity and integrity. We never control each other or try to force one of us to do things we do not want to do.
    Instead we DISCUSS all the things we have to do within our family, we talk about anything from minor issues to major decisions, purchases and trips.
    And we always manage to find a solution suitable for all participants and not for a male only. And it’s always done with respect and understanding of our mutual needs.

    1. iBooB September 21, 2015 at 3:22 pm

      Exactly. But if push comes to shove one day that’s when you whip out the cock and start slapping people with it. After, find out what you did wrong to spurn that kind of mutiny in your own ranks, heal it and grow stronger.

    2. Крум Безстрашни September 21, 2015 at 3:42 pm

      You sound more like the wife.

      1. NonCanadian September 21, 2015 at 3:49 pm

        yeaaaah right;) Take your time and read my thoughts about political correctness, affirmative action, quota hiring, feminism in general, mass immigration to the Western world, LGBT community and similar shit;)
        It ain’t nothing bad in having a family based on respect and mutual understanding. I know it’s almost impossible in North America, but still possible in the normal world.

  14. Spider58x September 21, 2015 at 2:02 pm

    100 years ago this would just have been called common sense. This knowledge is only considered “profound” by modern people is because of dumbed down we have become.

  15. Davi504 September 21, 2015 at 2:33 pm

    I don’t think there’s a need to ‘control’ women. But young women today need to be told that the choices they make and are continuing to make are extremely detrimental. The number one horrible choice they make is becoming single mothers. In 2015, no woman accidentally gets pregnant. Its purely irresponsible on her part. Next, is sleeping around. Now, I don’t care if anyone sleeps around, male or female. But as a young woman, I’m made to fell bad if I haven’t slept around with this guy or that guy. Its not my thing. Our media is saturated with the idea that you’re not an independent adult if you are not having sex with this and that.
    I don’t know if this comes from men or women, but I think so many women run from femininity because we feel there’s an inherent weakness in being a woman. There’s nothing wrong with being pretty and having a family and all that but hearing from both of my grandmother’s, those things don’t give a strong sense of power.

    1. spro23 September 21, 2015 at 4:04 pm

      Your grandmothers in their traditional ways had a huge amount of power. Those large white Christian families were the great foundation of the USA’s dominance of the 20th century. Without families and caring mothers, USA would not have dominated like it did.
      But now you and every other young woman is convinced that working in a cubicle is more ’empowering’ than creating life. Previous generations of women who married young laid the foundation for all the nice things we have today.

      Now, without families, we have declining birthrates (soon to replaced by muslims and browns), and dysfunctional children from single parent homes.
      Besides, today with womens’ ‘freedom’ and ‘choice, all they do is vote for more safety nets to cover their bad choices. It’s like women can’t handle freedom anyways without government there for every little thing.

      If what you said was true, women would be embracing capitalism but they’re not, they voted in Obama and probably vote in Hillary cause they don’t think.

      1. Davi504 September 21, 2015 at 5:56 pm

        “Now, without families, we have declining birthrates (soon to replaced by muslims and browns”

        I wonder what you mean by ‘browns’ because I’m black. And, for me its not about empowering myself. My mother told me “As long as you depend on me, you do what I say.” And that is when I realized I would never want to be put in that position. Especially in a relationship. And for me personally, having a kid isn’t all that.

    2. Tom Dane September 21, 2015 at 6:00 pm

      You can “tell” it to them as many times as you want. But they will not listen. It’s like telling a teenage boy smoking is bad for him.

      1. Davi504 September 21, 2015 at 6:13 pm

        One must admit that Roosh’s advice is extreme. If he cares about women’s overall happiness, then I don’t see how he would wish to exercise so much control over them. That’s what started all this in the first place. Women feeling as if they have no power. I don’t see a problem with women going to college but they are getting useless degrees. I’m going for accounting. I hope to become a CPA and open my own business. I don’t see a problem with sleeping around (if that’s what you really want to do and not doing it because society pressures you) but too many women are getting pregnant and the worst thing for a woman to be is a single mother. There’s a middle ground. I do believe people in general spend too much not just women. We live in a society ruled by men AND women who tell average citizens we must have this expensive car or purse.

      2. Vlinder33 January 31, 2017 at 1:53 pm

        Agree with you 100%. Kudos to you for responding in a calm and rational way after someone mentions brown people as if that is something negative. Good luck to you with your accounting degree and business.

      3. ex-convict September 21, 2015 at 6:53 pm

        Like a poor fool stuck in the “friend zone”… He tells her over and over and over…. “Now, baby, I’m good for you… that other guy… he’s bad news.”

        How’d that work out for him?

  16. Crowhill September 21, 2015 at 2:56 pm

    This is radical stuff, but I believe you are essentially correct, and that husbands and fathers who don’t take this approach are doing their wives and daughters a disservice.

    1. NonCanadian September 21, 2015 at 3:07 pm

      How come? I’m a husband and a father for 7 years now! How come I ain’t using no “control” in my family and we are able to talk about all the issues freely and openly?
      Yes, we do live in Ukraine and not in Western Europe, USA or Canada, but it’s very possible to have an evolving family without the need to control anyone in the family.

      1. Roosh September 21, 2015 at 4:02 pm

        Unless you have a Westernized wife, your attempt at picking an argument is a waste of our time. Ukrainian women are already primed to behave in a way that is mostly compatible with normal family formation and a stable home. No one is telling Ukrainians to better control their woman, and even if your woman is a magical exception, that does absolutely nothing to change the fact that most women in the West are feral and need to be constrained.

      2. NonCanadian September 21, 2015 at 4:20 pm

        Totally agree with what you wrote!

        Especially THIS: “that does absolutely nothing to change the fact that most women in the West are feral and need to be constrained”.
        Western women should absolutely be avoided or controlled, no argument HERE.

      3. GRock September 21, 2015 at 10:41 pm

        “feral”, perfect word choice Sir.

      4. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 9:14 am

        Are you compensating for something?

  17. NothingMan00 September 21, 2015 at 2:59 pm

    Well, Roosh, now they are going to go from calling you just a “rapist” to a “rapist who wants to keep women in cages” or something else as ridiculous, thanks to this piece.

  18. Loki September 21, 2015 at 3:11 pm

    I would recommend the same things. Bring back the system before the enlightment.
    And before someone shouts Crypto-muslim, you should take a look at all the other societies in the world before Liberalism invaded their Culture.
    Like in Rome, Ancient Greec City Staates, Hinduism, Christianity, Judaism…

    We want the Patriarchy back and it looks very similar in every culture.

    Funny Anecdote:
    There is a direct causation between the declining birthrates of the Aristocracy of Rome and the growing rights of its female members.
    Augustus had basicly to appoint a new ruling class to manage the Empire further.

  19. GRock September 21, 2015 at 3:12 pm

    This is merely the corollary of what has occurred thus far in society. All accountability was removed circa 1920 for western(ized) women, this is simply the direct-path correction for an experiment which has gone terribly wrong. It represents the most expedient corrective option, and potentially the only effective method.

    It boils down to the fact men created society and it’s infrastructure, and we’re letting otherwise useful men be led around and enslaved by illogical females and their consistently piss poor decision making (also in the aggregate and majority of women) that are detouring entire families, thus in aggregate, entire cultures, and society as a whole worldwide now.

    The argument that this is radicalism is no more radical than lesbians raising a young boy, naked slut walks, transgenderism, trophies for losers, PC everything, family court and state children services. Track all that shit back to it’s source and you’ll find an adult child who started throwing a fit, otherwise known as a woman.

  20. iBooB September 21, 2015 at 3:16 pm

    It is not the fault of women for being unlike men. It’s like pointing at a squirrel and saying “look at that squirrel, it can’t even fucking fly, buahaha”. Men excel at being dominant and women excel at being submissive. We gave up our dominance after becoming indoctrinated by forces controlling the medium to do so ie. Tv and Radio. The very nature of Man has been under attack for the past what, 100 years or so by forces who seek to profit from the ensuing consequences of which we see today. That is where the true war is. Not between each other.

    The man/woman union was sacred and one needs the other as much as the other needs that one. With that said, I have a use for the useless cum-rag women (who will become slaves eventually) – use them as teachers to teach courses in university to newlywed women how to fuck, suck and please their man. It will be a mandatory course for all newlyweds.

    A real, natural woman is a beautiful thing if you can find it in this moral wasteland. And only a true man is worthy of her total submission to him. The answer is not to victimize, degrade or chastise them for what they are or are not. It is to let them witness your naturally divine dominance and guide them in their naturally divine submission into the light and wads of cum.

    1. Inki Snowe September 21, 2015 at 6:33 pm

      I wish I could could upvote this more than once.

    2. Harshvardhan Singh June 1, 2016 at 5:35 am

      your argument is sensible,,but y name iboob?

      1. iBooB June 1, 2016 at 11:35 pm

        eh

  21. Rob September 21, 2015 at 4:08 pm

    I got one word for you : Taken. As in the movie.

    Remember what happened when his daughter and ignorant shaming ex wife got their way over Liam Neeson’s character? Yeah, that’s right. Bimbo daughter got abducted and caused the family all manner of suffering for years to come ( Hence the sequels)

    Bottom line – they can’t make decisions for themselves.

    1. ex-convict September 21, 2015 at 7:09 pm

  22. uncrowned September 21, 2015 at 4:16 pm

    Fair point Roosh, but impractical. How many here don’t understand that the Enemy is at work to continue the destruction of western Christian civilisation? Centuries have been lost to the degradations of Humanism and Naturalism amongst many other ‘isms’. Point being with these 2 ‘isms’ especially one cannot make the same error. The Catholic Church has always held the unchanging Truth, and is a powerful antidote to the corruption and decadence of today. I invite your readers, Roosh, to seek the true teachings of the Church, before Vatican II at the very latest and take it back (the Church that is which itself has fallen in part to the Enemy). Mark my words that with the Church and the community of good men, the Enemy can be checked and defeated.

  23. js27195 September 21, 2015 at 5:22 pm

    I think there is some truth to this… I’m not overly religious, but even in the Bible it talks about woman being the original root of sin and unable to hold out to temptation which lead to everyone’s detriment. While the story may not have literally happened, or maybe it did, I think the underlying lesson is the same. Ancient man, modern man, and everyone in between can see that left unchecked by social norms and men’s value guidance women eventually devolve into a hedonistic lifestyle, doing whatever pleases them at the moment living for the greatest short term gain. Its not good for men, children, or the women themselves. This whole idea of do whatever you want, whenever you want, and someone needs to be there to bail you out when you get into trouble (ie Government) and no one is accountable for anything is a landslide into cultural failure…. one we are all affected by.

  24. ex-convict September 21, 2015 at 5:47 pm

    Here is a question to consider… Deep down, are women TRULY HAPPY with the current situation?

    I say no, for the following reasons:

    1.) Approximately one in four women in their 40’s and 50’s is currently taking an anti-depressant medication.

    2.) Middle aged women use anti-anxiety medications at TWICE the rate of men.

    These are facts. Now, on to some speculation as to why this is happening (that is backed by a MOUNTAIN of anecdotal evidence easily found on the internet).

    I propose that this is happening because women are GOING AGAINST their naturally feminine and submissive tendencies. They’ve been tricked (see Garden of Eden) into following a faulty social construct. And most men aren’t doing JACK SHIT about it. And with the female mating strategy now optimized, you can bet that women in their primes will do NOTHING either. They’re short sighted, and in their prime years of youth (and perhaps beauty) they often won’t listen to reason and logic, unless men FORCE them to.

  25. Academiack September 21, 2015 at 6:32 pm

    This is some real talk.

  26. in_Dei_servitium September 21, 2015 at 6:43 pm

    In other words, you want us to convert to Islam and adopt Sharia law. Be careful what you wish for, as you may well get it.

  27. Genie September 21, 2015 at 6:50 pm

    Interesting photo you paired with your article. I watched that show and those wives completely manipulated him into erectile dysfunction.

    Anyway, I pity the poor sap assigned to guard over every aspect of a woman’s life. He will want to shoot himself after the first week.

    It is sickening to see girls porn it out on tinder but there has to be a fine line between free range slut and having your face burned off because you refused to marry your psychotic 50 year old uncle. Just sayin:)

  28. Genie September 21, 2015 at 7:10 pm

    It’s also interesting that you draw comparisons to western women and women in Islamic states. Yes the men control the women ( to guard their modesty and honour), controlling how they dress, who they interact with, and preventing them from looking at or talking to men that are not their relatives. When you think about it, this is an extreme example of putting pussy on a pedestal, which is something you keep reiterating not to do. I went to school with a girl from Saudi Arabia whose father let her go to school abroad. She thought all men were mindless apes with erections. She thought she was an untouchable queen and how dare some random guy even look at her for more than a second much less try to talk to her. We took her to a club, she told off some drunk guy who put his arm around her and tried to get a bouncer to throw him out for sexual assault. Because in Saudi Arabia that guy would of been arrested if he did that to her in a mall or something.

    So you see, controlling women for the reasons you listed may seem logical, but it could translate to women thinking they are more precious and valuable than they actually are, which translates to putting pussy on a pedestal.

    1. iBooB September 22, 2015 at 12:24 am

      In a normal society, that is normal. The fact that said Arab is going out to clubs now leads me to believe that the vag will be given up sooner or later. They all break sooner or later

  29. Zechs Marquise September 21, 2015 at 7:16 pm

    I hadn’t realized how many monsters there were out there until I found this site by accident.
    ideas are infectious and children throw out the traditions of their parents. Women have been liberated and you will never take it back. Mostly because you just don’t have the numbers even if it came to physicality. 70% of men and 95% of women vs the small cesspool of fools congregating in the dark corners of the web. I hope every one you know and try to know gets to see the darkness you hide here.

    1. Rascal September 22, 2015 at 7:57 pm

      You do realize that there are 1.6 billion Muslims that will do it anyways. A patriarchy is coming to the West, but it will most likely be a Muslim one. Either way, people like you will lose.

      The most hilarious thing about this, is that white feminists are the most likely to support the immigration of their future conquerors.

      1. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 8:11 pm

        Nice conspiracy theory.

      2. Rascal September 22, 2015 at 9:11 pm

        You haven’t been reading the news than. Maybe I will say fuck it, convert to Islam and we can all happily live in the 7th century together.

      3. Zechs Marquise September 22, 2015 at 9:13 pm

        I have and they’re fleeing death not invading. You do that.

      4. Apollyon September 23, 2015 at 10:21 am

        Not following the truth are we? Precisely who are fleeing death?

      5. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 10:24 am

        Syrian refugees.

      6. Apollyon September 23, 2015 at 10:32 am

        70 – 80% are young, able-bodied men. This is an economic migration, not refugees fleeing a war torn country (unless you think they left their women and children behind in a dangerous country)?
        Most of the ‘refugees’ are not even Syrian. Are you aware of this?

      7. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 12:59 pm

        They are fleeing the wrong direction then.

      8. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 1:08 pm

        Are you implying we’re going to kill them?

      9. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 1:36 pm

        I’m implying that we are not a safe place.

        For one thing when they get here their children will be subjected to the brain rotting principles of social justice and they will cease to exist in three generations (much like the SJW’s which are the disease’s primary vector). Either that or they exterminate you.

        Reminds me of Sesame Street, “One of these things is not like the other”.

        Can’t wait until you tell the Muslim father that his child MUST attend school and that his child will be called “Xe” and have to use unisex bathroom arrangements. I’ma breaking out the popcorn.

      10. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 1:52 pm

        You see their problems as a symptom of their religion i see it as a symptom of third world conditions, poverty, and the fact we keep killing them. Religion is more important when life sucks and a drone could kill your whole family any moment. Just like how your insecurities make you over compensate about masculinity. The fact of the matter is that we’re all people and everyone deserves safety(I thought you were pro life) I understand not enjoying having your ideology attacked but what is so bad about fighting for equality or treating women with respect and dignity?

      11. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 2:00 pm

        So put a little money in Muhammad’s pocket and he won’t mind you putting Ahmed in a dress? Too funny.

        Just because religion doesn’t mean anything to you (besides your SJW platitudes that is) doesn’t exactly give you great insight into the inner workings of the pride a devout individual takes in their beliefs.

        I’m here, I make really good money. I still think that your mind is diseased in such a way that I suspect God’s judgement is coming in the form of a jihadi to deal with you.

        Have a nice day!

      12. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:04 pm

        No one is forcing anyone to wear a dress, but he can if he wants to. It only takes one generation of peace for this all to be fine. You didn’t answer my question. Have a nice day of hating anyone different than you in any way.

      13. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 1:52 pm

        It’s going according to the book, the “fanners” are arriving. Not a good day to be a pagan in Babylon…

        Thus saith the LORD; Behold, I will raise up against Babylon, and against them that dwell in the midst of them that rise up against me, a destroying wind;

        And will send unto Babylon fanners, that shall fan her, and shall empty her land: for in the day of trouble they shall be against her round about.

        Against him that bendeth let the archer bend his bow, and against him that lifteth himself up in his brigandine: and spare ye not her young men; destroy ye utterly all her host.

        Thus the slain shall fall in the land of the Chaldeans, and they that are thrust through in her streets. Jeremiah 51: 1-4

      14. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 1:56 pm

        You fail to recognize that it matters not what someone is born, but what they grow to be. Harry potter and the goblet of fire

      15. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 2:03 pm

        Sounds vaguely Leninesque:

        ‘Give me just one generation of youth, and I’ll transform the whole world.’

        Problem was for that generation of Ukrainians who died at the hands of his pupil Stalin.
        :

      16. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:11 pm

        I thought you said you were leaving? And I agree with Lennon.

      17. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 2:38 pm

        Lenin or Lennon? “Have a nice day!” was an expression (added to the prior comment, think context). Not evidence of a rage quit = your “victory”.

      18. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:41 pm

        my phone autocorrected it without me noticing although the answer is both.

      19. Harshvardhan Singh June 1, 2016 at 5:41 am

        dont argue with her ,,she is just making points in article to be true

      20. Rascal September 23, 2015 at 2:55 pm

        You really are naive aren’t you. People like yourself will make good additions to their harems.

      21. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:58 pm

        Give peace a chance.

      22. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 12:58 pm

        Hey dipshit, it’s not a theory when they say to your face that their religion is about conquering the world for Allah.

      23. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 1:06 pm

        some Christians say the same thing, you are generalizing. You act like u.s. foreign policy isn’t to blame for all of this

      24. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 1:29 pm

        Go look at the Temple Mount, the Hagia Sophia? You know what they are? Mosques.

        The religion is built on the idea of jihad. Your hand waving about “what some Christians” say doesn’t change that.

        U.S foreign policy? British foreign policy…..aka Rothschild foreign policy. Brought to you by the lovely Liberation Theologist Barrack Hussein 0bama, and his lovely assistant Hillary Clinton.

        Now all Putin has to do to destabilize Eastern Europe is back Assad and wait for useful idiots such as yourself to embrace the jihadis with open arms.

        Here’s a question I’d actually like answered. If 0bama can have rapprochement with the Castro’s what is stopping him from doing so with Assad? Backing Assad against ISIS seems to be the stabilizing play. Why won’t he do it?

      25. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:02 pm

        More people have died in the name of Christ than have in the name of Islam and it’s not even close. It goes back to British petroleum having the cia and mi5 overthrow Iran, you might notice Islamic extremism was born under the brutal dictator we brought in, and are you stupid or do you not realize that Bush created this problem by overthrowing Saddam? Maybe barrack can’t back a brutal dictator because it would make a mockery of operation Iraqi freedom, where isis was born, and his predecessor doomed a million to die.

      26. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 2:15 pm

        What is Fidel again?

      27. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:25 pm

        Fidel is about to die.

      28. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 2:05 pm

        So again. If someone tells you that they plan to do something out in the clear, where is the “theory”? That believing that people will do what they actually say they will do makes me a dupe and disbelieving them makes you the good and proper skeptic?

        Dipshit.

      29. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:12 pm

        Obviously you can’t get enough of me. Extremists are a very small part of their religion. I know you’re in favor of letting them die but that seems unlikely Christ and his “give me your sick” shtick.

      30. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 2:16 pm

        And history isn’t cyclical, because you don’t feel like it. I know.

        Your version of social justice is an imbalance in search of a counterweight.

      31. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:25 pm

        So you have to be rapy, racist, and antisemitic to counter balance that?

      32. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 2:40 pm

        No, how about not a gender queer hugbox afflicted SJW who insists that the world can ALWAYS be a better place if we can just adjust everything and everybody just so ad nauseaum. Where does it end? I posit very badly.

      33. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:43 pm

        So you believe in the subjugation of all women, other religions, other races, and the LGBT community other the straight white man?

      34. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 2:55 pm

        Or we could just call straight white men “kulaks”, label their starvation “counterrevolutionary” sabotage after we take all of their possessions away from them and pretend like they don’t have rights to life, liberty or property. That would be the leftist MO.

      35. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 2:57 pm

        Wow this said all i needed to see. You truly are insane.

      36. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 3:04 pm

        Yeah, because Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot and Robert Mugabe never happened. Right?

        Leftists have a track record. It’s very consistent.

        And this points to that other nonsense you tried to pass, that humans aren’t generally “extremist”. Status quo delusions of Progressives would be hilarious if they weren’t so damned dangerous (to humans).

      37. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 3:12 pm

        Zog, Hilter, Mussolini, Tiso are all right wing dictators and they have a track record.

      38. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 3:25 pm

        What is “right wing”? All a part of the self-same “state controls everything” (aka State Communist) bird. Leftist is as leftist does whatever the leftist label.

      39. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 3:35 pm

        I have to admit now that i think about it your definition of muslims should fit right in with your side. You both hate women, gays, other religions and other races and want a theocracy, that’s all pretty right wing to me.

      40. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 3:37 pm

        Difference being that I would go out of my way to save your life. And they may go out of their way to end it.

      41. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 3:39 pm

        Aw you’re sweet 😉 so if you saw a group of skin heads(your compatriots) beating a jew/black/gay/some of the above/all of the above in the streets you’d give your life to save them?

      42. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 3:41 pm

        Depends. If they were holding a pro-pedophilia rally on a those people’s neighborhood playground there is a good chance I’d hold my peace.

      43. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 3:42 pm

        On?

      44. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 3:43 pm

        If they were throwing a pro-pedophilia rally at said “skinheads” neighborhood playground I’d probably hold my peace.

      45. Zechs Marquise September 23, 2015 at 3:45 pm

        Your ilk treat women as if they’re children so i thin your side is the more likely pedophiles, especially given the duggar, catholic priest crowd.

      46. I Art Laughing September 23, 2015 at 3:46 pm

        Nope, SJW’s are already down with pedophilia. It’s been pretty well established. The only time you condemn it is when it isn’t one of you.

        Josh Duggar and Catholic pedophiles are roundly condemned. Not so “Sarah” Nyberg.