Women Must Have Their Behavior And Decisions Controlled By Men

After a long period in society of women having unlimited personal freedom to pursue life as they wish, they have shown to consistently fail in making the right decisions that prevent their own harm and the harm of others. Systems must now be put in place where a woman’s behavior is monitored and her decisions subject to approval of a male relative or guardian who understands what’s in her best interests better than she does herself.

Women have had personal freedoms for less than a century. For the bulk of human history, their behavior was significantly controlled or subject to approval through mechanisms of tribe, family, church, law, or stiff cultural precepts. It was correctly assumed that a woman was unable to make moral, ethical, and wise decisions concerning her life and those around her. She was not allowed to study any trivial topic she wanted, sleep with any man who caught her fancy, or uproot herself and travel the world because she wanted to “find herself.”

You can see this level of control today in many Muslim countries, where expectations are placed on women from a young age to submit to men, reproduce (if biologically able), follow God’s word, and serve the good of society by employing her feminine nature instead of competing directly against men on the labor market due to penis envy or feelings of personal inferiority.

The reason that women had their behavior limited was for the simple reason that they are significantly less rational than men, in a way that impaired their ability to make good decisions concerning the future. This was eloquently described by German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer in his important essay On Women. He described them as overgrown children, a comparison that any man who has dated more than a dozen of them can quickly agree to after having consistently witnessed their impulsive and illogical behavior firsthand.

Women are directly fitted for acting as the nurses and teachers of our early childhood by the fact that they are themselves childish, frivolous and short-sighted; in a word, they are big children all their life long—a kind of intermediate stage between the child and the full-grown man, who is man in the strict sense of the word. See how a girl will fondle a child for days together, dance with it and sing to it; and then think what a man, with the best will in the world, could do if he were put in her place.

[…]

…women remain children their whole life long; never seeing anything but what is quite close to them, cleaving to the present moment, taking appearance for reality, and preferring trifles to matters of the first importance.

[…]

That woman is by nature meant to obey may be seen by the fact that every woman who is placed in the unnatural position of complete independence, immediately attaches herself to some man, by whom she allows herself to be guided and ruled. It is because she needs a lord and master.

When you give a female unlimited choice on which man to have sex with, what type of man does she choose? An exciting man who treats her poorly and does not care for her well-being.

When you give a female choice on what to study in university, what does she choose? An easy liberal arts major that costs over $50,000 and dooms her to a life of debt and sporadic employment.

When a female lacks any urgent demands upon her survival, what behavior does she pursue? Obsessively displaying her half-naked body on the internet, flirting with men solely for attention, becoming addicted to corporate-produced entertainment, and over-indulging in food until her body shape is barely human.

When you give a female choice on when to have kids, what does she do? After her fertility is well past its peak, and in a rushed panic that resembles the ten seconds before the ringing of the first school bell, she aims for limited reproductive success at an age that increases the likelihood she’ll pass on genetic defects to her child.

When you give a female choice of which political leader to vote into office, who do they vote for? The one who is more handsome and promises unsustainable freebies that accelerate the decline of her country.

When you give a female unwavering societal trust with the full backing of the state, what does she do? Falsely accuse a man of rape and violence out of revenge or just to have an excuse for the boyfriend who caught her cheating.

When you give a female choice on who to marry, what is the result? A 50% divorce rate, with the far majority of them (80%) initiated by women themselves.

While a woman is in no doubt possession of crafty intelligence that allows her to survive just as well as a man, mostly through the use of her sexuality and wiles, she is a slave to the present moment and therefore unable to make decisions that benefit her future and those of the society she’s a part of. Once you give a woman personal freedom, like we have in the Western world, she enslaves herself to one of numerous vices and undertakes a rampage of destruction to her body and those who want to be a meaningful part of her life.

A man does not need to look further than the women he knows, including those in his family, to see that the more freedom a woman was given, the worse off she is, while the woman who was under the heavy hand of the church or male relative comes out far better on the other side, in spite of her rumblings that she wants to be as free as her liberated friends, who eagerly and regularly post soft porn photos of themselves on social networking and dating sites while selecting random anonymous men for fornication every other weekend.

Men, on average, make better decisions than women. If you take this to be true, which should be no harder to accept than the claim that lemons are sour, why is a woman allowed to make decisions at all without first getting approval from a man who is more rational and levelheaded than she is? It not only hurts the woman making decisions concerning her life, but it also hurts any man who will associate with her in the future. You only need to ask the many suffering husbands today on how they are dealing with a wife who entered the marriage with a student loan debt in the high five figures from studying sociology and how her wildly promiscuous sexual history impairs her ability to remain a dedicated mother, with one foot already out the door after he makes a reasonable demand that is essential for a stable home and strong family.

I propose two different options for protecting women from their obviously deficient decision making. The first is to have a designated male guardian give approval on all decisions that affect her well-being. Such a guardian should be her father by default, but in the case a father is absent, another male relative can be appointed or she can be assigned one by charity organizations who groom men for this purpose, in a sort of Boy’s Club for women.

She must seek approval by her guardian concerning diet, education, boyfriends, travel, friends, entertainment, exercise regime, marriage, and appearance, including choice of clothing. A woman must get a green light from her guardian before having sex with any man, before wearing a certain outfit, before coloring her hair green, and before going to a Spanish island for the summer with her female friends.

If she disobeys her guardian, an escalating series of punishments would be served to her, culminating in full-time supervision by him. Once the woman is married, her husband will gradually take over guardian duties, and strictly monitor his wife’s behavior and use all reasonable means to keep it in control so that family needs are met first and foremost, as you already see today in most Islamic societies. Any possible monetary proceeds she would get from divorce would be limited so that she has more incentive to keep her husband happy and pleased than to throw him under the bus for the most trivial of reasons that stem from her persistent and innate need to make bad decisions.

A second option for monitoring women is a combination of rigid cultural rules and sex-specific laws. Women would not be able to attend university unless the societal need is urgent where an able-minded man could not be found to fill the specific position. Women would not be able to visit establishments that serve alcohol without a man present to supervise her consumption. Parental control software on electronic devices would be modified for women to control and monitor the information they consume. Credit card and banking accounts must have a male co-signer who can monitor her spending. Curfews for female drivers must be enacted so that women are home by a reasonable hour. Abortion for women of all ages must be signed off by her guardian, in addition to prescriptions for birth control.

While my proposals are undoubtedly extreme on the surface and hard to imagine implementing, the alternative of a rapidly progressing cultural decline that we are currently experiencing will end up entailing an even more extreme outcome. Women are scratching their most hedonistic and animalistic urges to mindlessly pursue entertainment, money, socialist education, and promiscuous behavior that only satisfies their present need to debase themselves and feel fleeting pleasure, at a heavy cost for society.

Allowing women unlimited personal freedom has so affected birth rates in the West that the elite insists on now allowing importation of millions of third world immigrants from democratically-challenged nations that threaten the survival of the West. In other words, giving women unbridled choice to pursue their momentary whims instead of investing in traditional family ideals and reproduction is a contributing factor to what may end up being the complete collapse of those nations that have allowed women to do as they please.

I make these sincere recommendations not out of anger, but under the firm belief that the lives of my female relatives would certainly be better tomorrow if they were required to get my approval before making any decisions. They would not like it, surely, but due to the fact that I’m male and they’re not, my analytical decision-making faculty is superior to theirs to absolutely no fault of their own, meaning that their most sincere attempts to make good decisions will have a failure rate larger than if I was able to make those decisions for them, especially with intentions that are fully backed with compassion and love for them to have more satisfying lives than they do now.

As long as we continue to treat women as equals to men, a biological absurdity that will one day be the butt of many jokes for comedians of the future, women will continue to make horrible decisions that hurt themselves, their families, and their reproductive potential. Unless we take action soon to reconsider the freedoms that women now have, the very survival of Western civilization is at stake.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out my book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain my operation.

Read Next: People Should Not Be Allowed Unlimited Personal Freedom

Related Posts For You

newest oldest most voted
Roosh
Guest
Roosh
Offline

One more thing to add is that this article is not satire in any way. I firmly stand behind the recommendations I made.

MoralsAndDogma
Guest
MoralsAndDogma
Offline

Well then… Roosh the crypto-Muslim

Simba
Guest
Simba
Offline

So, you do like they way we live in today’s society, where women do as they please and are assisted by an army of white-nights to do it?
Because otherwise he is right.
It is often said here in the manosphere that feminism and the general degeneracy have reach this level because we men have let it. And I agree.
So, how do you take control back? Will you ask for it, like a good boy? Maybe try to do it the democratic way, expecting the wisdom of “the people” to reach the correct answer?(That’s the way it is in my country. Idiots)
The answer is take control back. Don’t ask for it. Just take it.
It won’t be easy, surely. It will take a lot of time, and a societal change, not just from individuals.
But, aside from throw at you their police and army(who by the way are mostly men) women have no power on their own.

Anon.
Guest
Anon.
Offline

These things are not going to happen. Just focus on knowing the nuts and bolts of how the world works, and with complete accuracy of information, proceed to model your life as you see fit.

The world cannot be changed by a small powerless group. There are people with far more hold on the course of history than the people posting on these boards. Don’t try to change the system, just try to fully understand it, without emotional judgements or hatred that will just plague your life and happiness. Then create the life you want for yourself, knowing that you are priveliged in that the information you possess about the world is accurate.

We are lucky people. We are like brokers who already know how the stock market is going to change. You don’t try to change the system, or hate the system for the way it is. You use your inside information to cheat the system, become a billionaire, and retire off to some private island.

Fuck the system. Quite frankly, I couldn’t give two fucks what Western women do. If they want to become Mother Teresa, great, if they want to throw themselves off a skyscraper, whatever. It’s not my concern. A slut is a slut, and she provides the value that a slut can give. I don’t hate her, but I know what her role is. She can have a very positive role in my life, but the limits must be clear in my head as to what her role is and what place she has in my life, according to the type of person she is. If you sex with pleasant-enough girls, Western countries can actually provide that. They are not bad people, just sluts. If you want love, there are plenty of countries on the planet where women can fulfill that role.

My point is that hatred towards will just make you bitter and unhappy. Rid yourself of hatred and see things as they are, without making judgements or what should or shouldn’t be. Then, take your life from there. You will be much happier.

in_Dei_servitium
Guest
in_Dei_servitium
Offline

There’s a lot of hate in your comment, dude. Evil prevails when good men just accept the world as it is.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

You’re both hateful. How is women’s equality evil? Oh yes from the site trying to legalize rape and control all facets of their existence, is your masculinity threatened by powerful women?

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

No, but civilization is.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

No they are not.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

That’s your theory. Draw a picture of Sweden for me circa 2100. Are there any feminists left in Sweden then? How about any genetic Swedes? Do the math.

Or maybe you just can’t accept that your ideology is fundamentally bankrupt.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Yes and Joe McCarthy warned of commies. You’re wrong, you lost, get over it. You’re like every Seahawks fan saying if only they gave lynch the ball on the one yard line in the super bowl. your type has seen it’s heyday and it’s over.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Joe McCarthy warned of commies and was wrong? Where are you living?

You’re type hasn’t seen a hey day and never will.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

He ruined plenty of people who had nothing to do with anything improper. Was he not the thought police? My type is the new normal, enjoy being the last of your type.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Says the commie without a hint of irony whose very existence destroys his latest “point”.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

We are the new normal, you are the last of your breed and the world will be better for it.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Haven’t seen much of the world have you? BTW, bandwagon fallacy.

If a majority are wrong, they are still wrong.

This is right next door to the “Power extends from the barrel of a gun”. argument (might makes right). And is the next expected move of any leftoid. But I suppose I’m “theorizing” again.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

I love your argument is essentially you need men like me to protect you from men like me.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

No, you don’t need men like me. Men like me aren’t going to protect you from the reality you have so willingly built for yourself. Dig a hole, fall in it.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

I’ll be fine, go hide in your bunker.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

Men like you need to be buried in that hole because you represent the worst of humanity and are an embarrassment to men the world over.

WrestlersRuleMMA
Guest
WrestlersRuleMMA
Offline

Why are you out of the kitchen Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson? Get back in there and make me a sandwich. And you must remember. You cannot speak unless you are first spoken to by a man.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

I know that’s why most of the population believe in sky fairies. Tolerance and equality in general are the right thing to do.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Then why are you such a proponent of intolerance and inequality?

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

I tolerate being wrong when it doesn’t hurt anyone. I don’t promote religious persecution I just find religion stupid, I only bring it up if it’s been brought up already . You’d think a learned man like yourself could see the writing on the wall.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

When I was a child in elementary school and read “Harrison Bergeron” I thought it was funny. That is, in the sense that I thought Vonnegut was way out there. Yet, here you are.

Angry Young Man
Guest
Angry Young Man
Offline

Equality… sounds cute. Does it work? Are we truly equal now that men are at the brunt of every bad joke, walked on by our corrupt women? This article is so spot on and describes the true role for women- BEHIND the men. That’s what works for humanity in my view. This whole “equality” thing has been a train wreck.

JJ Hockley
Guest
JJ Hockley
Offline

Exactly, men and women whilst very different should tessellate together. A form of symbiosis is required, not confrontation.

wolfgang548 .
Guest
wolfgang548 .
Offline

The only thing that makes men and women equal to one another is we are equally human to each other. Women believe men are the weaker sex and they are superior to men but they never explain why they have to battle and compete against men to become equal. If they were so superior to men as they claim, they wouldn’t have to do anything. Their status would already be above men. They are only selfish and want control of everything like the control freaks they are. Without men, the infrastructure they live in would collapse in a heartbeat.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

Our status has always been above men… that’s is what has scared men for centuries and drove them to the oppressive behavior of women… very sad

WrestlersRuleMMA
Guest
WrestlersRuleMMA
Offline

How funny you say this because —- women could not survive without men. Women are there to support a man’s decisions, to give birth to our children, and to make our sandwiches. Period.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

Men can’t make sound decisions…that the whole point! So get you ass in the kitchen man. Make dinner, clean up the mess and shut up. If it weren’t for a woman who sacrificed a lot, you wouldn’t even fucking be here! You should be on your pathetic knees thanking her for you pathetic life every day.

Jalice
Guest
Jalice
Offline

Without women, there would be no men to build the infrastructure. Why are there two genders and not just one? Please use your brain.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

😂😂😂😂😂Someone sounds butt hurt over loosing their entitlement!

JJ Hockley
Guest
JJ Hockley
Offline

Tolerance is a product of variation within a society. The society you wish for is a totalitarian run state apparatus without variety.
That is the paradox inherent in the beliefs of the left.
A right thinking adult understands that society must by it’s nature exist in some form of flux, all things are unequal including men and women. Your logic would suggest that we attempt to feed whales bananas or make chimpanzees more suitable for deep water life.

Shmalkandik
Guest
Shmalkandik
Offline

No, McCarthy was generally right. Eisenhower had the information, but chose not to release it; as that would h ave let the Soviets know we had broken their security codes. Look up the ‘Venona’ project on the Web, or read the book ‘The Venona Secrets’.

FYI, the book covers the Rosenberg case, where the problem, again, was the the Feds could not released all the evidence they had on the couple for the same reason it was not given to McCarthy.

Count MonteCristo
Guest
Count MonteCristo
Offline

yes mccarthy was right . he was just mean. read SpyCatcher by Peter Wright.

Aldous Huxley
Guest
Aldous Huxley
Offline

We’re leaving the country and having many children. Meanwhile, liberals have a birth rate of less than 1 per couple. You are the one who will go extinct in the long run. Obtuse of me to try to pull a leftist out of hedonistic short term thinking, though.

BobTrent
Guest
BobTrent
Offline

Senator McCarthy warned of Communists, Soviet agents, in the US State Department. He was correct. The Pinko-Progressives used character assassination (and attempts to actually assassinate) and hysteria to attempt to discredit Sen. McCarthy.

GerryAllwin
Guest
GerryAllwin
Offline

McCarthy only accused Communists in the State Department. Others expanded the exposure of Communists elsewhere. Every State Dept. official he accused WAS a Communist, or what the Communists called a fellow roader (sympathizer and supporter though not an enrolled member of a Communist party).

James
Guest
James
Offline

Something else communist sympathizers choose to ignore is the fact that “communism” was so strongly connected to certain foreign powers who were actively spying on the US. The valid purpose for investigating “communists” was the reasonable search for spies, especially in the government. Communist operatives in Hollywood might have been overlooked, but communists in government could not possibly be ignored, unless we didn’t care about national security.

Jason Rogers
Guest
Jason Rogers
Offline

Mccarthy was 100% correct.The Jew media still vilify him because he dared to expose their tentacles in government,media,finance and most everything else.Mccarthy mysteriously died of a heart attack at 48.The good Lord knows he was true and so do I and many others.

Lily
Guest
Lily
Offline

McCarthy’s fallacy was his extremism The man saw commies inn his soup. He insisted they were everywhere, conspiring. The thing is, true commies in America have always been a tiny, silent minority with no influence nor power. They are entitled to form their party and cannot be outlawed, but they aren’t going to get anywhere with it and never have. The New Right wants you to equate socialism with communism. However, the former can and does exist consistently and stably without the latter. If America had no socialism, we would have become a feudal oligarchy run by private kings ages ago and at some point might have had a ‘Bolshevik Revolution” of our own once enough peasants/debt-serfs got pissed off enough at the unaccountable abuse of property rights overriding personal rights…. basically, Lassez faire and communism both have the same weakness: Human nature, and we’re greedy, selfish, and morbidly individualistic to the point of altruism existing only when it benefits us. It happened in Russia and I expect it to happen here if/when the New Right manged to have their day and replace most of the governments functionality with corporate powers. That age of fedualism will last only for so long before the “commies” rise up and repeat history…. protip: it’s the anti-commies who would have instigated it, ironically.

Aldous Huxley
Guest
Aldous Huxley
Offline

90% of McCarthy’s predictions have come true. Try looking at results and accuracy rather than what the television and indoctrination centers say is rhetorically acceptable.

m
Guest
m
Offline

And here we are three years later. My country –– Germany, ruled by women –– a complete joke and the natives in deep deep trouble.

You lost. I lost. We all lost.

And Who is to blame?
Women. And week men.

Roosh, of course, is right.

BobTrent
Guest
BobTrent
Offline

Sweden’s government is failing to protect Swedish women from the hordes of Muslim rapists the government is PAYING to come invade Sweden.
Muslim men are not from their perspective raping “infidel” Swedish women. To them, “infidel” women are provided them by “Allah” for their pleasure and to produce hordes of new little Muslims. Swedish women who go about dressed as whores (in the sharia law Muslim viewpoint) and without being accompanied by an adult male Muslim relative, therefore they are for the taking.

Jason Rogers
Guest
Jason Rogers
Offline

The all-female ruling cabinet of Sweden hates White men and Whiteness yet several days ago donned the burqa and kept their heads bowed in submission for Iranian ministers.White females MUST be controlled because they betray their own as if its a natural instinct.

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Civilization is threatened because climate change will make food production impossible. Women aren’t doing that. Men at the top of major corporations are doing that. You gonna blame women when the world is 6 degrees warmer than it is now?

wolfgang548 .
Guest
wolfgang548 .
Offline

If men are responsible for climate change, then explain to us what caused the ice age that is said to have occurred approximately 10,000 years ago considering there were no big companies back then.

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Extremely high levels of carbon released from volcanoes. This is a well known fact. I’m so sorry you didn’t receive a decent education. My condolences.

Peter
Guest
Peter
Offline

It is the women who want the babies that will consume and thus increase the level of CO2. But your way of argumenting is really not intelligent as I could find a million things in the world that women have done wrong. And, btw., to comment on your specific argument, women are the main consumers of society, not only are they the ones who really urge to reproduce biologically, they also love shopping a million times more than men. Women are much more materialistic than men, by nature.

Jalice
Guest
Jalice
Offline

Shopping in companies owned by men…. Men make the products that we buy…. Men create the supply. Why are you acting like we determine what is made in the market? Your gender is not a victim. Even Victoria’s Secret is owned by a man.

If you think about it, you still control how we dress and what we eat. YOUR gender created GMOs. Let me guess, somehow this was a woman’s idea. I am not trying to say these are bad things, I’m saying you run shit and you’re still unhappy. You have control and yet continue to be miserable.

You need to look inside and figure out what you want cause no amount of control has quenched your thirst.

kaia
Guest
kaia
Offline

wow. one bad thing made by a female, all are bad. Is this the world you want to live in? Rise above all judgments you may have and create some real happiness. I am sorry you feel women took your place. That was not the goal. There is room in the spotlight for more than just one. Bullshitting over underlying feelings is hard, but sometimes not as hard as communicating real thoughts. These thoughts can be confusing and you may think they are feelings, or reality. It doesn’t make it wrong to feel this way sometimes, you just have to know that these thoughts aren’t the truth. Thoughts are there for a reason, and it can be hard once you get caught up in them. I believe people are stronger, and can get past thoughts you know are not real, just a cover up.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

“Powerful women”? I assume from your pathetic man-boy video game avatar that you’re a dude, so I’ll discuss this with you as such. Any power that women have in this society was given to them by men. They do not generate anything that creates leverage, strength–whatever you want to call it.

The term “powerful women” is a joke; physically, they are inferior and mentally they are undisciplined. WE–men–granted them suffrage, WE allowed them into the work place and yet, WE are the source of evil in society because most of us are straight and like to look at pretty women and fuck them? WE are evil because we’re fulfilling our biological imperative? THAT is the narrative with which the neo-feminists and SJWs are proselytizing misguided liberals.

Yet, only in our society have the rulers (men) VOLUNTARILY abdicated their positions of superiority without violence; we have tried to be reasonable and fair, only to be vilified and betrayed for wrongs perpetrated by previous generations. So, fuck all of you whining, ungrateful ass wipes.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Most dogs have the biological imperative to eat their own shit. Try to rise about that. Honestly though if you think you’re right, you would be warring with most men and almost all women you don’t have the numbers. You do realize you’re committing those wrongs all over again by being here in a serious manner right?

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

“Most dogs have the biological imperative to eat their own shit.” I guess you should stop French kissing your pets if that bothers you.

“You do realize you’re committing those wrongs all over again by being here in a serious manner right?” No, I’m not. I’m not physically abusing women. I’m not preventing them from advancing in the corporate world. I’m not preventing them from earning their own money, nor preventing them from voting.

It’s people like you who make it easy to have disdain for women’s rights arguments; any disagreement is vituperatively painted as an attack on all women with respect to all aspects of their lives. Your hyperbole is the equivalent of the constant din of false rape claims, or using said claim to sensationalize any disagreement, like Madonna equating the leak of her music as rape.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Look at the name of this article. Now look in the mirror and see an idiot.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

This coming from someone who French kisses dogs after they eat their own shit.

Anyhoo, you’ve missed your own point, apparently. The only thing you have is that I read an article. That’s it. Yet, somehow you attribute that to me participating in the violation/oppression of women.

Do you cry while watching your soaps, too?

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

I never made false accusations at you but obviously you need to hide behind them. You are on this site and take it seriously and have taken this article seriously. Do you deny the claims I have laid out?

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

Yes, you did: you made an implicit claim that I was somehow participating in the oppression of women (excuse me, wymyn) because I read this article.

Not that it’s any of your business, but for your edification, I read items from all over the political and social spectrum, including pieces from Saffire; I watch videos by Rachel Maddow; I read outrageous things and consider how each uses evidence and reasoning to build their arguments. And then . . . here’s the kicker: I form my own opinion that is shaped by my own mind. The act of me reading this article is part of that process. My personal conclusions? I don’t owe you that explanation.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

You already disclosed your opinion earlier but obviously you’re a fucking moron.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

Oh, did I touch a nerve, princess? Calling me a moron because YOU can’t make a point? Wow, you fall apart easily. Clearly, you DO indeed belong with the SJWs. They have yet another beta bitch upon whom they can rely to carry their water.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

No you already said your opinion on women disclosing that you saw them as inferior and needing to be controlled but you must have gotten distracted beating your wife or locking your daughter in a closet until she’s old enough to be a sex slave, and forgot.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

Oh, wow, I really did upset, you bitch. Problems with your pathetic “comeback”:
1. I’ve never been married, nor has my home been infested with children;
2. The fact that this was hatched from your diseased, little mind tells us more about you than about me. Are the words, “daddy, please, no!” still ringing in your ears from last night? Remember, you’re the one who wanted to go in this direction.

If you want your wife’s bruises to heal more quickly dab them with cold vinegar.

Step up your game, loser; you’re boring me.

Btw, physically women ARE inferior; however, reality doesn’t seem to appeal to you.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

You keep making false accusations so why should i ground my insults in reality? I have a girlfriend, who is my equal, no children and unlike you i’ve never been violent with a woman. You claim to think women are undisciplined? How are you going to discipline them? Beating them some more? Step up your game you pathetic little bitch, going on these rapey forums to make up for your physical, mental and emotional inadequacies, “NOOOO it’s not my fault i suck, it’s women!!!” you are so pathetic.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

“Beating them some more”? Can you really NOT read your OWN comments? MORE assumes that there was something before, that I had previously beaten women when in truth I have not; ergo, you are making the false claims, you pathetic bastard. You can try to argue in circles, but that just shows how lazy and dishonest you are.

I don’t understand your fury here; are you so unempowered in real life that you need to lash out like some sissy with long finger nails, trying to scratch someone any way you can? I guess I should feel sorry for you.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

You clearly don’t understand what’s going on here.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

Of course I understand; you’ve abrogated your membership with the male gender in order to obsequiously offer your allegiance to the SJWs. Somehow, you’re so out of touch with reality that you see the world as you’ve been instructed to: that somehow wymyn are victims of some vast, male conspiracy to hold them down–despite the fact that these same wymyn have FAR more freedom than about 80% of the rest of the women on the planet, despite all of the positive changes and additional freedom they’ve secured even in my lifetime. However, you’ve become so solipsistic in your pursuit of whatever you’ve been trained to see as justice, that you don’t understand that it’s revenge, revenge against those who did not perpetrate those wrongs.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Listen here son, it’s more about the fact that you regularly beat your girlfriend, to make up for your overwhelming inadequacies as a “man”. Stop beating women.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

You can pull all of the red herrings out of your ass that you want, it doesn’t change the fact you’ve lost this debate–and lost it badly. You have no facts–just conjecture–and this is demonstrated by you pulling out the cheap, emotional trope of “he doesn’t agree with me, so I’ll paint him as an abuser to try to score some negative emotional points against him.” This is what makes you a loser in the truest sense of the word; further, given your predilection towards using abuse/rape imagery (which, to borrow from Hamlet, seems to be the coinage of your own brain), such scenarios must have rendered a profound impression upon your own experience. Ergo, you were either abused, or you are an abuser, which means that you were also likely abused as well. That makes you a victim and thus the object of my pity, the same emotion I’d feel if I were to see a starving dog on the street.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

You’ve literally made no point What so ever, other than you think the men on this site aren’t pieces of shit, because controlling everything a women does is somehow a defensible position. There is no debate, because no matter what you’ve already lost, you lost the culture war and nothing will ever bring it back.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

If you really believed that, princess, you wouldn’t be trying so hard to convince everyone here it’s true. YOU’RE the one who feels as though you’re losing. Why else would you go to a site like this and try to argue with not only me, but several other posters? That’s like a vegetarian prancing into a steak house and trying to convince the patrons that they should eat tofu instead.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

No really it’s the fact your mere existence makes life worse, so I come here to hopefully at the very least be annoying. Furthermore were you not the not the one to say the quickest way to make a woman stop being hot is for her to talk? So basically women should be seen and not heard? Just there to be sexual objects? Does your abuse know no limit? What did a woman do to you to make you feel this way? Was your mother absent, did your girlfriend call your penis small? Were you cheated on? Most misogyny starts with one specific woman and then you apply it to all. I’m sorry about your experience.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

You’re funny–funny in the “wow, this piece of dog shit won’t get off the bottom of my shoe” sense.

My mere existence makes life worse? I’m impressed that I have such a profound effect on your life–without even trying. You’ve basically just screamed (all you SJW bitches do that) “I’m pathetic and weak because some guy on the internet just made my life worse” from the rooftops. Nice.

“So basically women should be seen and not heard? Just there to be sexual objects?” So, you do understand . . .

Nice attempt at turning this all back on me, but once again, you seem to forget you’re the one on THIS website, complaining about its contents when all you would have to do is not come back if you were so offended. You could go back to Cosmo or whatever else you manginas read to keep your estrogen levels high; instead, however, you come here because you’re jealous that you lack the courage to be masculine, free yourself from the oppression of feminist thought and be your own man. You need permission from women to do anything and must have whatever passes for thought sanctioned by them before you can utter it. Are your post-gender overlords happy with you?

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

if you can’t get shit off your shoe maybe licking isn’t the best way to go about it. I’m not jealous of your patheticness, I’d rather die than be anything like you. you don’t make my life worse you make life in general the fact you exist lowers every average in the world for factors that matter to a good society. You clearly don’t understand equality and I’m sorry you’re so alone and will never have an emotional connection. You clearly have no justification for your opinion and you never will sorry about you needing to over compensate for your small member and sorry that some woman made you feel bad about yourself and you need to lash out at all of them. You already admitted you’re a sick misogynistic freak and it would be best if you left the gene pool, before you have a daughter who you look in a closet til she’s old enough to be a sex slave.

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

No pathetic losers on the internet fuel the pathetic losers who go out and rape and beat women. So while you are an impotent piece of shit you are providing justification for violent men to act on your assertions. That actually does ruin women lives. You are just a joke.

RealMan
Guest
RealMan
Offline

“Did your girlfriend call your penis small” haha good one dude. I died laughing. You roasted his ass.

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

He isn’t painting you as an abuser. You have admitted you are an abuser.

flybabycrybaby
Guest
flybabycrybaby
Offline

He’s right. What really matters in choosing a mate – and in life in general – is winning internet dates based on the most basic understandings of logic and society. Ergo, Bahlza Dragon asl?

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

Mark…you’re an idiot. How about shutting the fuck up.

BobTrent
Guest
BobTrent
Offline

Once they resort to ad hominem attacks there isn’t any point in keeping on. The lawyer equivalent is “pound on the table.”

Dirk Diggler
Guest
Dirk Diggler
Offline

If they are a shitty lawyer, yes you are correct.

FuckThisGuysPost
Guest
FuckThisGuysPost
Offline

He’s out of touch with reality?? Haha that makes me laugh. It seems to me that your the one out of touch with reality. Get a life. And if I were a women I sure as hell wouldn’t wanna be monitored and controlled by some pathetic man. Get real dude. My girlfriend is the badass sweetest chick ever but she knows how to kick some ass. And if I were you ide watch my mouth because there a lot of independent women out there that can kick your ass. Your points are invalid and most of them are wrong. Men like you makes us good men out here look like shit and look bad. Men like you are garbage. Girls should be treated like a queen not like a pet.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

Thank you! More men need to speak out when like this when you see other men engaging in the ridiculous behavior.

caamib
Guest
caamib
Offline

“no children”
Good. I hope it will stay that way.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Eh, I have a feeling my children would be better off, since they wouldn’t have to listen to me beating anyone as the site is clearly advocating for and that my relationship would be happy instead of yours (assuming you have one, which you probably don’t) where you make someone your slave. I mean obviously your daughter if you had one, would be emotionally damaged by all your bs.

caamib
Guest
caamib
Offline

Yeah, yeah, I know, I’m evil, my kids would be traumatized, yadda, yadda. Now tell me – do you plan on having kids?

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

At least you admit your failings! Change while you still can!

caamib
Guest
caamib
Offline

Will you finally quit embarrassing yourself by not recognizing obvious sarcasm and answer my damn question, you fucking tool?

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

I obviously recognize your sarcasm I just find your frustration hilarious. Why should I ? You can’t answer why you’re a misogynist.

Shmalkandik
Guest
Shmalkandik
Offline

‘infested with children’? This is not universalizable. I appreciate those who take the burden and risk of raising another generations of humans. I am angry at how men are punished for it. We need to have a generation of women ‘die in the desert’ so that we can enter a Promised Land.

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Yes since you are so clearly interested in controlling women what would you do in a woman less society? You would have to admit you have nothing of worth going on in your own lives.

Shmalkandik
Guest
Shmalkandik
Offline

I propose toyou that the non-traditional model of marriage will failr due to changes in reproductive biology, genetics, and leadership dynamics.There are some potentially disturbing trends that would indeed make women dispensable.

1. Genetics and reproduction without women.

I’m sure we’ve all read about the success of “Dolly” when a sheep was successfully clone.

Further dvances in genetics will make it possible to grow humans from blastula to decanting, entirely without a human carrier. Even if human sperm and eggs are required, the market mechanisms already exist for sale and distribution. One of the traditional drivers for men to marry is to have children. This could disappear. I would predict a very large demand from the male homosexual community.

The complementary step are advances in Virtual Reality (VR). Soon men will have access to “better than sex” technology that provide a complete phrusical experience. The end use need not have all the gear on premises – a Software as a Service (SaaS) offering will require on the physical interfaces at home – all the computing, image generation, management can be provided from a Data Center..

The mutation of social mores, combined with Family Law that increasingly supports Women’s’ interests over that of their children, will be a further driver for a complete separation of pleasure and progeny for men, from women.

Even before these technical advancements are generally available, the failure of the egalitarian model of marriage has become evident. In every organization small or large, there is always one, unambiguous leader. Hierarchy is the natural method of organization for the human species. Organization theory suggest to us that Leadership is not to be confused to arbitrary acts. It recommends free flow of information, ‘manager as a service’, self-organization of work, and other techniques that makes better use of the intelligence in any group activity.

But, in every way of productive work, some one must make the decisions. The traditional model of marriage with one man, one woman, with the man providing the lead, has proven itself more scalable and durable than any of the alternatives that have been proposed since the 1960s cultural putsch. Indeed, comparative studies have even shown that the older model of arranged marriage works better for longevity, stability, more successful child rearing, and accumulation of capital.

To be sure, ,there will always be statistical outliers, but outliers are not the descriptors of a central tendency. Leaders can and will exert great or lesser degrees of control as a function of the perceived operational risk, but they can never abandon their responsibilities as leaders.

No fault divorce, Family Court bias, financial disincentives, technology, and recreational computing have created both the attraction and possibility of heterosexual males living in a female-free social order. While I concede that “a world of made is not a world of born”, I laso note the basic product life cycle maxim that very often “good enough is good enough”.

The implications for women are very clear. They can continue to become corporate slaves, disposable, cheap sources of labor. Corporations, as fictive people, are far less less amenable to the kind of influence wives have always been able to exert over their husbands; they do not know mercy, and are far more diregiste’ than the most sterotyped ‘patriarchal male. The are increasingly focused on driving down wage rates, and are never going to love women except as a means to increase the labor supply at secularly declining levels.

This isn’t about beating women, or devaluing the function of mothers, or expression of opinions. This is about examining what conditions help the human race flourish. Humans grow well when they are raised in a stable family environment. This, the Brave New World of egalitarian , has provably failed to deliver.

Women can continue to choose the Brave New World, or they can revolt,, and choose to become part of team where their man, whom they have carefully selected, is allowed to lead.

Your turn.

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Dolly wasn’t a success. All instances of cloning have resulted in much much greater incidents of illness. While sheep may carry certain genes for disease or birth defects clones are vastly vastly more likely to have the expression of these genes express themselves. We have seen this to be the case in every single instance of cloning.

Again as I have mentioned women are half as likely to want marriage and children as men. What you are describing is of better advantage to men than women. Men overall enjoy marriage more and have more advantages to being married. Married men are healthier, happier and married men make more money and enjoy further career advancement than single men of similar education and employment history. You men are more than welcome to fuck machines. Go for it. We women are statistically happier being single. We are less likely to want to remarry once divorced than do men. We are more likely to report being happy five years post divorce. We enjoy no career advantages to being married. I’m not worried in the slightest that we will be replaced and there will be a female less society. I encourage you to eliminate women from your world. I think women deserve it. You say you the neo masculine movement isn’t about devaluing women yet your mentor here says that when you think of women you shouldn’t think of moonlight walks on the beach you should think of choking her while fucking her in the ass. That hurting her should be a goal. Many women do perceive this as devaluing. I’m sorry you can’t understand that. The neo masculinists and the Mgtow men keep,saying we will go away and not pay any attention to you…..see how you like that. Women of America are saying ” yes please”. We don’t need you. We won’t miss you. Don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out. If you really wanted to ” go your own way” would you please hurry up and do so. You seem to be comstantly obsessed with us and seem to only be able to define your masculinity in terms of your relationships with us. You are all acting like dramatic, codependent 13 year old girls.

Dana Scully
Guest
Dana Scully
Offline

😻😻😻😻😻

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

It’s amazing that someone who claims to have a master’s degree doesn’t understand basic statistics. Married men are happier and healthier and enjoy further career achievement. Ever hear “correlation is not causation?” Ice cream consumption rates closely match that of burglary rates. Does ice cream cause crime or is the fact that as the weather improves the burglars tend to be outdoors more often and breaking into places?

If you don’t get the point, let’s try this one: Pretty women probably tend to be happier. Will a woman then becoming happy make her more pretty? I would propose that certainly unhappy women will probably be perceived as less attractive but statistical claims often confuse a cart for a horse.

Men who marry tend to be more affluent and then afterwards, work longer hours to support a family (“liberated” career women don’t tend to do so. Feminists are angry that men get paid more for working harder. Such injustice!)

Anyhoo, since the burdens of marriage are greater for men than women, that means that men (who are smart at least), can demand more just as pretty women demand more from men than an ugly one. Affluence for men are like big tits for women. I dated some women in their 30’s who wanted to marry with bad attitudes and I told them off. I’ve now been married for over a decade. Heck, one great advantage for men is that if we’re jerks in our 20’s, we still have time. I started a family in my 40’s. Feminists with bad attitudes, well, they should roll out the welcome mat for Islamic Syrian refugees to take over, eh? smile

You claim that feminists are happy to see men leave them alone yet… they freaked out as men figured out that they could marry foreign women and came up with IMBRA to supposedly “protect” these women and restrict their entry. Gee, these same women didn’t want to protect their illegal immigrant underpaid nannies from exploitation. Or protect african children from exploitation from the blood diamond industry for baubles they show off to each other. But “mail order brides” and competition? Shut That Down Now.

hahahaha! It’s not working. The law is largely moot. Loopholes in it make it easy for men to continue meeting foreign women and the marriage rates are superior to local career women marrying: 80%. That’s from the state department website.

In addition, feminists don’t want legalized prostitution because meal whoring is so popular here. Again, limiting the choices of other women to try to keep men in their place.

Finally, after decades of feminist man-bashing, women who DO want men to approach them are rejecting the label in the majority. Most women would rather say they’re going to join ISIS than become a feminist.

Harshvardhan Singh
Guest
Harshvardhan Singh
Offline

she is utter stupid indoctrinated pussy,,who doesnt even know difference between hypothesis and fact..

Ravi Macho
Guest
Ravi Macho
Offline

Well said Harshvardhan. We shouldn’t reply to this kidn of smelly cunts !

wolfgang548 .
Guest
wolfgang548 .
Offline

Not only are feminists claiming to be happy men are leaving them alone then freaking out that men are marrying foreign women, but Juli Bindel, one of the lead feminists said marriage was an institution and slavery for women, yet their pissed that men are not marrying western world women. And what Bindel also didn’t mention when she said marriage was an institution was how the husbands were slaving away at an institution of their own called a job/career to support the wife. These women are so full of hypocrisy but they claim they could do a better job at ruling the world. Ah ha ha ha ha. Camille Paglia, who is or was a professor in Philadelphia had stated, ” If civilization would have been left in women’s hands, we would still be living in grass huts.”

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

Let’s be even more philosophical about it: If marriage is so bad, why are gays so hot to get in on the action?

I would like to write a piece in RoK regarding so-called “nice feminism” or that feminism was ever really nice to begin with including Puglia whom I think is an apologist. She wants to say that “if feminism could just stop being anti-male, then it could move forward to make women and men legal equals and all could be good”.

Nope. Because in the post-feminist era, so to speak (post 3rd wave), we now see that even if women get 6 figure salaries, they are still addicted to the men taking care of them financially. OK, a few will marry “down”, sort of (perhaps marry a hot firefighter) but 9 times out of 10, men are still breadwinners like in 1950.

So what’s the friggin’ point?

All feminism did was push women to compete with men, lower wages, and so women “earn” more but really less adjusted for inflation and their men bring in less so for a married woman, the net gain is moot and even less. Here’s the thinking that went through the hamster wheel:

They would earn as much as a man and then marry a “real” man who earned more than them. But “liberated” feminists who would want to marry down, could, and they could marry those losers (which is ok with them) but they would all personally continue to marry up. Sort of like them thinking that they’ll recycle but instead throw their stuff in the trash but OTHER women could go through the hassle, right?

So yeah, feminists are enraged that “loser” men go overseas to get foreign brides but consider: Nothing is stopping American women from doing this. There are many handsome Eastern European men with high degrees who would marry for a green card if these women could just slap a smile on their face and do a little legwork. Or heck, as we all know here a typical woman with a decent online profile gets a hundred hits within an hour of posting it. They just have to do a LITTLE legwork, that’s all. About 1/10th as much as most men here have done. But they’re SUPER lazy when it comes to EARNING relationships with men compared to just seething about it.

So IMBRA was passed which has had little effect.

Person
Guest
Person
Offline

Actually, the number of male bread winners, at least in america, has been declining. I think last I read was back in 2015 42% of women were either the sole, or primary “breadwinners.” Lol that’s such a weird term. I wanna win some rye.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

When I read a statistic such as this, I’m reminded of this great Seinfeld scene:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDmA2xoIoFU&t=46s

The 42% number doesn’t state whether these women head households that include men. 31% of households are single mothers. This doesn’t include, of course, single women without children, widows, etc. But let’s just go with the 31% for now. That lops off of 42% leaving 11% of households, probably have the woman earning more than the man at any particular time.

In my own personal example, I had been out of work for a year while my wife worked part-time and we managed to eke by. It wasn’t pleasant. I probably contributed to that 11% statistic for that year. I tried to make the best of it by spending quality time with my 1 year old daughter and getting some home projects complete, but I’m aware that I didn’t enjoy any significant improvement in support from my wife than my great-great grandfather would have experienced in similar circumstances.

My wife has a friend whose a successful professional who had a husband who was struggling professionally for longer than that. She just divorced him. She’s not a statistical anomaly: statistics show (ha! I can do this too!) that divorce rates are 3X when the woman earns more.

As I’ll discuss in another comment of yours about the standard of living and whether there’s a profit in all this (if someone gets a job that pays more but the cost of living is higher, are they better off?) let’s address the fact that the number of male breadwinners is declining. I agree with you which is why marriage rates are declining as well. Feminism seeks to emasculate men while demanding more of them.

If feminists don’t hate men, I can’t imagine how they could hurt them more if they didn’t.

https://youtu.be/Wzr12gBrXA8?t=37

Later on, we’ll address how feminists hate women too.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

You lost me with the argument that men work more and therefore deserve more pay! Unfortunately it doesn’t work that way! At least in the United States you paid the hour and you can demand to see the pay rates of others if you feel you are being underpaid. Both men and women work hard and both men and women are slackers. Equal pay for equal work. Period.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

When you say “men work more and therefore deserve more pay”, how is that NOT a logical thing to observe? The wage gap statistic is a falsehood that uses per capita earnings (comparing average women’s earnings to men) without consideration of the type of work being performed.

In regards to your generalization that “both men and women work hard”. So what? A waiter may work just as hard as a doctor but one is paid more. Even two waiters may work hard but one gets paid more. My wife actually figured this out at her first job: She saw that if she waited 12 tables, she got the same tips (just less per table) then if she paid more attention to 6. So she asked for less tables. She got paid the same for less work. Just a life observation.

Regarding slacking: If you google the adjusted pay rates between men and women considering similar jobs, experience, cost-of-living, etc. then the wage gap shrinks to about a nickel. Note that doesn’t prove discrimination but even if it did, consider the difference between the quoted wage gap of 23 cents compared to that nickel: This means that sexist choices BY WOMEN (which I’ll address in another comment) results in an income transfer from men to women via marriage, the welfare state, etc. of 18 cents.

How many feminists are crying to correct that disparity and return the funds to men?

Exactly.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

Hey dumb ass, I didn’t say that….I was replying to the comment above that said that. Men don’t work more than women do so the agument is null and void. You will find hard workers of both sexes.
You think you’re being smart by attacking my comments…when in reality you’re just showing your lack of intelligence.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

So what?

A maid probably works just as hard as the most skilled brain surgeon who keeps 3 day a week office hours, but do you want to pay the maid the same as the doctor? Do you want to pay people who work half as many hours the same as those that work twice as long?

Men earn more because men literally EARN more. Pay based upon merit: The ultimate patriarchal oppression.

The “lack of intelligence” snipe is a clear ad-hominem attack that actually reveals your own desire to be perceived as intelligent and relevant based upon authority rather than the merit of your actual arguments. If you have a point that’s valid, just make it. Don’t go running to the Patriarchy intelligence beauty judge to decide who wins because they’re smarter. Man up.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

Are you really as ignorant as your comment makes you sound??? Equal pay for equal work means that a male maid should not receive more money than a female one and the same for the brain surgeon. Either you truly are stupid or as I suspect are still trying to further your ludicrous argument, which is also very unintelligent.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

In answer to your first question: I can’t answer it because it’s loaded.

Now let’s go with the examples you just provided starting with brain surgeon.

Forget the hypothetical example I gave (which is the same scenario you provided) and imagine this:

This means that ALL brain surgeons should be paid EXACTLY the same.

Do you think brain surgeons are all of equal capacity? Do you think some are better than others?

I’m going through elective process for my healthcare right now and there are the better doctors my wife and I prefer who insist upon being paid more. They do this by insisting on particular healthcare plans (PPOs) that pay them more. Using your logic, ALL doctors should be forced onto an HMO and the rates all set the same.

What this would mean is that the best doctors would all be full up including with patients that have less needs (because those patients may have just lucked out and happen to have gotten in the HMO first) while the more needy patients, who need a more experienced specialist, would be out of luck because they wouldn’t be allowed to pay more for them.

I worked as a “maid” cleaning houses back when I was 19. I actually found it a very nice job because the manager was pleasant and respectful and the pay was alright (it was a set rate for all who worked at the temp agency). I believe there ultimately is a merit system in place: maids who work faster or better (do a more thorough job) or are willing to come in on holidays or on short notice, etc. would get paid more.

https://fee.org/articles/truth-and-myth-on-the-gender-pay-gap/

Now note that the study claims that there is up to 5% of the wage gap that can’t be explained but this doesn’t mean it’s necessarily due to discrimination. Quote: “So it is not a myth that there might be discrimination in labor markets.” Note: MIGHT. And at most, 5 percent.

In the meantime, women’s own sexism of marrying up, family and criminal courts, welfare, social security benefits that disproportionately benefit women, etc. is at least 20 percent by the studies’ own explained gap that’s due to women’s own choices.

When do us men get repaid for all of that female “privilege?” Hmmm? smile

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

You are undoubtedly one of the most ignorant people to ever be born! Can’t answer the question because it’s loaded??? Sounds like a cop out… no, wait it is a cop out! Your next load of rubbish is just that…rubbish. What is your point you’re trying to make? That people should or shouldn’t be paid by performance? Or are you insinuating that one gender is more gifted than the other? Either way what you’re trying to say has nothing to do with what I originally said, which was equal pay for equal work….a concept that you obviously have grave difficulty grasping. So once again, let’s explain it to you. Equal pay for equal work means just that! If you are a male surgeon you have no right to more money based solely on that fact. You should only receive more based on performance. Earlier you tried to insinuate that equal pay for equal work meant that men and women should receive the same amount regardless of the task….now you’re trying to backhandly insinuate that based on performance alone, men are somehow more deserving because they will perform better! Which of course is false and ignorant of your to assume. You talk a lot and say nothing….
Instead of trying argue bullshit about women….you need go back to school.
Yes men act entitled….if you need proof of that….
Read the bullshit you wrote and are trying to pass off as an intellectual argument! It’s proof of exactly what we’re saying!
Thanks for providing such a brilliant example of how men attempt to discredit women by attacking their intellect….patheticly trying to discredit what they say. You’re only making yourself appear ignorant.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

Whenever you say ignorant, I’m reminded of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qR5tRwvuas

If you know what a loaded question is, it’s not a copout to answer a question that requires me to make an assumption I disagree with. Are you being ignorant not knowing what a loaded question is or are you just ignorant? smile

The point I’m “trying” to make is that it’s rare to find two people (male, female or otherwise) who are of the same value in any particular role and that hurts the whole “equal pay” concept from the onset. It’s funny how diversity advocates claim that everyone provides something different yet at the same time, feminists say that everyone should be paid the same in a role. This seaways into your question about performance which an ‘equal’ pay for all in a role would effectively ignore performance. And THAT seaways into the third question which does imply that if men outperform women that, maybe, men are “more gifted” at some higher paying roles than women. Note that “gifted” may mean works longer hours, doesn’t take as much time off, or more men take on higher paying and less desirable roles.

Note that it’s not me whose saying that performance, but rather feminists who demand equal pay, period, even as:

1) The quoted 77 cents dollar on a statistic lumps in all earnings mixing maids and brain surgeons working overtime or not together and therefore isn’t about “equal” work in the first place.
2) Women currently are given preferential treatment in university admissions and corporate hiring already and STILL are not making as much as men.

There is no conflict from me stating that feminist demands for equal pay for “equal work” undermines performance pay. It’s already the case considering number 1 and 2 above. It’s just a man hating feminist goodie grab. Nothing more. No conflict from me.

You accuse me to trying to attack your intellect while I’ve merely stated my points and criticized your arguments and argued (and explained) that your behavior illustrates a lack of life experience (note: I didn’t say intelligence.) You’ve called me ignorant both at the beginning and end of the article and called my argument rubbish twice as well. That type of argument is not an intellectual response but rather childish name calling.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

When you say “loaded question” I think of “ignorant”. Why? Because you’re avoiding answering the question because you know i’m right. You have no point that you are trying to make….that’s why you’re just spouting off senseless nonsense!

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

Avoiding a question isn’t ignorance. Look up the meaning of the word (which I guess means you’re ignorant of what ignorant means). Refusing to answer a question because one doesn’t like the answer is called DENIAL.

Which is precisely what you’re engaging in by sputtering such invectives in lieu of a response to the points I made.

If you stopped for a moment, you might realize I’m trying to help you. You want to be a breeder for a beta male wimp? Or a gang banger 3rd world patriarch? Or a cat lady at the age of 40? You may get over this victim-entitlement nonsense by then but think of wasting the best years of your life.

Hey, tell you what, when I was in my 20’s I tried to also be a “SJW” of sorts and ask women to live up to equality, found they weren’t interested, and moved on by my 30’s but as a man, that’s ok because that’s when I was at my peak. I had/have a great career, was more interesting, and it was actually better for me to settle down then. But you’re not in the same boat. It’s just different for you. This is when you should be HAPPY with men and ready to find a good one and settle down. But what man you’d respect would want a nasty man hater like you?

Tell you what. If you’re interested I’d like to talk to your father and see if he can talk some sense into you. Are you interested in me and him having a talk?

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

Of course it’s ignorant! It conveys that you’re to weak to admit you do not have a valid answer. Face it dude…no matter how much time you waste talking you can’t change the fact that many, not all, but many men are subscribing to a toxic form of masculinity that brings about extreme behavior like what’s highlighted in this article, that hurts all of you. Another fact: current parameters for masculinity do not include healthy management of emotions. This makes life difficult for all men. Men want to be accepted and they want sympathy….want forgiveness for misbehavior. NO! Change how you view masculinity to correct the issues, mainly healthy emotional control, so that you don’t need special treatment! Every man on the planet is tortured soul to a some degree and that has zero to do with women because it’s you guys who keep towing this flawed party line. Women demand that you grow…you change you ideals because they are flawed.
The ball is in your court. You can either grow and become a better man to be a counterpart for todays woman, or cling to your archaic beliefs and be left behind. What you have to accept is women aren’t going back to the way things used to be. That ideal was never how humans were supposed to live.
Each person brings to the table their own personal talents….none of those are determined by gender.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

Again, you aren’t using the word “ignorant” in the proper context. Keep trying though. Is this your “go to” word in an argument?

Next, you argue that “all” men are hurt by toxic trolls even as we started this particular discussion with you attempting to downplay the collective sexist choices and consequences of women to marry up in income or work fewer hours by arguing that we should see everyone as individuals.

So you want to see the world in terms where it’s convenient to you and switch rules when it suits you. Did it ever occur to you that others could do the same including powerful men? Since you appear to lack empathy towards men, wouldn’t it make sense for the toxic privileged men to perhaps not rush to put their trust in someone such as you?

So whose making which gender look bad, then?

Regarding men growing. Er, Men are living up to the provider role in most families and have been doing so since caveman times. If anything, the reason why it’s so easy to dominate you, Lisa, is that because after millennia of YOU gals slacking, you’ve evolved to the point where you are physically and emotionally dependent upon men. This may be why you’re so p*ssed at me: Because your claimed desire for independence goes against your natural craving for a strong alpha male.

Sorry, I’m taken. But you may be able to still have a wonderful life is you wise up before you hit your Wall (look it up in the urban dictionary)

FYI: Saying that women won’t go back to the way it used to be is hilarious considering that feminism has turned around and embraced the most patriarchal cultures on the planet:
comment image

Finally, your argument about individuality conflicts with your demand that women and men be paid the same for the “same” work. If everyone brings something different to the table, that means by definition that nobody can be paid the same regardless of gender.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WZZRQC9abX4/TrWre6uWUnI/AAAAAAAAAYo/kwN_1PnzRAU/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/logic101.jpg

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

Once again you’re only showing your ignorance by attempting to defend the behavior discussed in the article!
I can’t think of a better word for what you’re doing… unless it would be stupid! Trying to defend the most deplorable behavior, and bashing me for speaking out against it, is indeed ignorant. There is not one legitimate thing you can say in defense of the behavior discussed in the article. End of discussion.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

Where do I defend the behavior of the trolls? At best, I observe that women who are so easily cowed by such trolls illustrate why men have dominated women for millennia in the first place. As long as women depend upon men to protect them, they’ll be dependent upon men.

You call for men to grow to run up as Sir Lancelot and rescue the women from being treated as unequal. But this doesn’t make any sense. It reminds me of Emma Watson’s “he for she” program to call for weak men to run to the rescue of feminists.

Here’s what I don’t defend. This:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J33cwr-rZvM&t=214s

Feminism has resulted in a weak west where the weak men are so cowed by feminists that they stand aside while women are being attacked by foreign patriarchs filling in the power gap.

Congratulations. Good job and good night.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

So you’re saying the article was written by trolls??? I think you need to re-read your comments because you ARE defending this idiotic dribble.
Moreover, you’re showing your ignorance once again because I stated in my previous comment “end of discussion”….that’s your cue to stop commenting.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

Perhaps you can educate me as to the manners of someone making last minutes arguments and then declaring the discussion is over (without giving the other person a chance to respond) and then responding again (after the discussion is supposedly over) to make another point/question..

Silly me. If someone keeps responding and asking questions, it’s hard to take their claims the discussion is over seriously.

And you accuse men of acting entitled while you think you’re entitled to the last word.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qv7YB4Bs1mU

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

You need to educate yourself….that’s not my responsibility. You seem to talk a lot and say nothing. Like has been stated before, the views in the article are deplorable. If you support that nonsense, you’re ignorant. End of discussion.

Person
Guest
Person
Offline

Everyones in their peak in their 30’s. They’re the years when you’re still pretty/handsome, whatever, and you’re mature with a steady job and home and have the option to get another pet without your roommate reminding you this isn’t a zoo, goddamnit, Amanda. I remember a neighbor telling me the best decision she ever made was getting married in her 30’s, and relaxing and getting an education in her 20’s. It’s not different for women, who wants to settle down that early when you’re still gone be alive for probably another 60 years? That’s dumb. Settle down when you’re mentally ready. My friends 80 year old grandma just started dating, it’s never too late.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

Hehehe. When I was in my early 30’s, I dated women in their 30’s who wouldn’t have ordinarily given me the time of day.

Even with space technology, the window on starting a family for a woman is closing pretty quickly in their early 30’s not just biologically but emotionally. My wife married me in her 20’s and she says that she was getting set in her ways even then. This was one factor why those dates didn’t work out: those women had developed “independant” personalities that turned off a lot of choice men aside from their aging.

Women’s own dating lifestyles certainly doesn’t help them “age” well either: For men, it’s “make or break”. Either a man learns how to deal with rejection, personal emotional growth to become more interesting and valuable, how to be more “charming”, etc or… he winds up alone. Men aren’t shown Disney films telling us to sleep in a tower waiting for a princess to kiss and wake us up and cash in.

For attractive women, it’s kind of a trap for them to think their behavior in their 20’s is charming and cute because men put up with it. It’s like going to a high end store with a fist full of cash and the clerks all telling you how charming you are. Then you go and don’t have money and your bad jokes aren’t funny anymore.

So 30 year old women still have a lot of options, don’t get me wrong. Heck, they’re still better off than most men but NOT as much as in their 20’s when hiding in Shrek’s dragon tower could still get a few beta males with money to scale it. They need to get out there and develop some emotional “common sense.”

Back to those women I dated: They acted on dates like they were 2 year olds at Chuck-E-Cheeses. They wanted to be wined and dined and entertained and would dump me for the slightest infraction. By the time I developed my clown game skillset, I realized that I could have better choices too. You know the saying “It’s just as easy to fall in love with a rich man as a poor one?” Well, the same goes even moreso for men who mature: I had choices and used them.

Even so, looking back, I have compassion for the situation these women faced. They weren’t all bad. They lacked social skills due to atrophy (like some kid playing Dungeons and Dragons his whole teenage years and then trying to date) and they wanted to have a family and had a target date of 5 years or so to make that happen and so they didn’t want to waste their time (and mine). The traditional dinner date where men pays ironically also creates that sense of urgency but even so, the woman’s time (even with a free meal) was quickly running out.

Note: This is in their _30s_.

Keep in mind like I said that a woman that goes online and just does some basic stuff like post a photo with less than 10 face piercings, takes a bit of care of herself, and such can get a hundred responses in less than a day. But they won’t all be from 6 foot tall professionals. It’s still pretty easy for a woman who makes a sincere EFFORT in her 30’s to get married and have kids with a decent man but it’s not like the fish jumping into the bucket a decade earlier.

This was my father’s dream day:
https://youtu.be/x3Bf0WhvsNk?t=153

So your claim that “everyones in their peak in their 30’s” is, pardon my language, such complete utter bullshit. Really. Ask any woman whose 35 if she wouldn’t want to look like she’s 25 again if she could push a button.

For men, our health in our 30’s is certainly not as much as in our 20’s BUT that’s not our primary, er, fishing equipment. Women don’t attract men with their income and tastes because they don’t offer them. If I’m paying for dinner, what does it matter whether the woman sitting across from me is a doctor or store clerk? I’m reminded that I’m still going to have to earn a living. I personally know some exceptionally attractive, successful men who said they would NEVER date a woman doctor. Ever.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

An additional observation about why I think it’s especially tough for (decent, but provincial) women in their 30’s to date:

The standard dinner date paradigm encourages men to be liars. The more he invests in a woman, the more incentive he has to just “see it through” to nookie even if he doesn’t see a long term relationship. His time has value as well in that he had to put on a show (to avoid getting rejected for saying something stupid) and pay for the dates so like Apolla 13, it’s easier to just go to the moon than turn back.

So 30 something women on dates with a timeline may face the fear that if she does spend a month or so with a guy and rejects other prospects to focus on him, that he’s “playing” her. This “play” is partially due to her own demand that he “earn” her attention. After sleeping with him and her becoming emotionally attached and even starting to make plans, he then may look for ways to break it off. And how these men may do it reminds me of when a girl broke up with me:

She just became nasty and disconnected to try to drive me to break up with her. She didn’t answer my phone calls right away. She found things to complain about. She lowered my self esteem which ironically made it harder for me to want to break up with her (sort of unintentional DV abuse). Under normal circumstances, I would have been happy to tell her adios and move on but she didn’t want the burden of telling me to my face why she wanted to break up with me (it was shallow) so she wound up being a jerk for a few months and then pulled the trigger. I got over it relatively quickly in that I figured out what happened a week later.

But imagine the situation these men are in: They got nookie and now they want to dump her but how? If they just say: “I used you for nookie”, she might go crazy. If he acts like a jerk, he may also get some serious blowback. So instead he may play disconnected or just string her along for a while until she loses interest or decides it’s not going anywhere. Ironically, due to the social chivalrous construct to protect women, it encourages men to be even more dishonest with them.

So it’s not uncommon for these waste relationships to last a year or more. One woman colleague told me that she was with such a guy for _6_ years.

This is one messed up, dysfunctional society we live in.

Jack
Guest
Jack
Offline

There is no male maid that makes more than a woman. Use your brain. But you could do an experiment and go to every business in America and ask if there is a difference in wage between male and female for the same job–there isn’t. You hold this view because the mainstream media has brainwashed you into seeing it. Men only make more money annually that women–that is the wage gap “issue”. And this is because they work longer and more.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

😂😂😂😂 How do you know?! If had a brain you know that, yes men are still often paid more than women for the same work. It’s sickening. Men need to grow up and stop acting superior, when it’s more than obvious they aren’t….your comment is proof of that. 😂😂

Jack
Guest
Jack
Offline

No they aren’t. There is no proof of this because it doesn’t happen. The 0.76$ on the dollar nonsense is only ANNUALLY. Because women get pregnant and don’t work as much overtime. The reason you believe otherwise is literally because the mainstream media pushes the view you have even when presented with facts. It’s an agenda. Roosh points out why this is so in his cultural collapse theory. Regardless of your opinion of him, facts are facts. Worry more about the sociopaths that ultimately own the mainstream media and their agenda to stay in power and direct your anger at them.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

More bullshit! Women don’t work less overtime, they work MORE! Plus most jobs don’t offer family leave so you don’t get more than a week tops for birth, unless you have banked vacation time. Unless you quit, you can’t take off time. Whether you like or not there is still a major pay gap and it’s absolutely disgusting that it’s happening in 2018.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

Oh you need to change your avatar here because you do have the integrity to call yourself a “knight” of anything.

Person
Guest
Person
Offline

I read a study where identical resumes were submitted to scientists for a laboratory manager position. Half were under male names, and the other under female names. The resumes were the same, yet the female applicants still were offered less salary than the men, were considered less competent, less likely to be mentored, and less employable. Key words being “less salary.” If they were actually hired, the women would have earned less for the same position. I’m sure this has actually happened in other places.

kai
Guest
kai
Offline

Lisa look at all your comments! you have so much to say and bless the world with your knowledge

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

Ooooo Trying to shame me for speaking out…How mature of you! YOU should read my comments because they are undoubtedly the most accurate you will read on this comment thread.😉

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

So you’re saying because some married men made bad choices and are not happy that means all married men are unhappy…. dude your pathetic attempt to undermine her answer just proved that it’s right! A majority of married men are happy…. and statistics back that statement up! Since you commented somewhere here that you were married… are you one of the ones who made a bad choice? Is that why you’re so butt hurt because you choose poorly? Instead of taking responsibility for that, you’re blaming women and the institution of marriage it’s self…
Typical immature male.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

Er, in answer to your first question, I said, quote: “Married men are happier and healthier” So that hardly means that all married men are unhappy.

I argued something slightly different: “Happy” (or successful, wealthy men) tend to be more attractive to women than “unhappy” or poor men who tend to have health issues, etc.

And that’s not necessarily a bad thing. It’s quite reasonable for sensible women to avoid loser men just as sensible men should avoid young and pretty train wrecks.

Now that I’ve restated and elaborated on what I said, I won’t answer your next questions (they are irrelevant), a few remarks about personal responsibility you brought up:

Numerous studies (including from leftist journals) agree that women are LESS happy as women’s rights progress:

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/may/18/womens-rights-happiness-wellbeing-gender-gap

So either happiness isn’t all it’s cracked up to be or women are making lousy choices, eh?

Lisa, based upon the tone of your articles, you don’t sound very happy yourself which isn’t a bad thing if you’re doing so in order to explore new ideas and to perhaps reconsider what you want out of life. I went through it too. The process of change requires a confrontation that what one has been doing has been a mistake, fighting for the ideals that you hold dear, and then letting them go and moving on to something better. Sometimes it means being happy that although a situation is bad, that you accept the consequences of it and will live with it. I’m saying I went through similar choices myself.

I also abandoned some ideas that I thought made sense in my 30’s. That’s why I’m happily married. Well, happier than I was single. smile But I did also find ways to make lemons out of lemonade and adapt to the changes I felt I needed to make.

Note that I’m not just saying “you’re bad and I’m great” here. I’m having a philosophical discussion about the choices that we make as people and uniquely as men and women.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

You’re talking out of your ass. You talk a lot and say nothing…so how about shutting the fuck up. I’m sick of you trying to talk your sorry ass out of the fact that you’re continuing to support this bullshit article.

Person
Guest
Person
Offline

Women are less happy, because life is full of bills, college, broken down cars, coworkers who don’t like you, or you don’t like, pain, disappointment and then death. I know I was a lot happier when I thought I went to the magic beard in the sky. We caught up to where men did, because they shouldn’t carry that burden alone. I’m sure if women stopped working, especially in this economy where a tiny house is the same price as a regular house and a trailer costs 3,000 just to move, they’re be worse off. That’s too much pressure for one person to handle.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

This argument of yours is counter logical: You just acknowledged that the post-feminist economy has increased the cost of living so why would going back make things worse?

But indeed, in the short run, feminism has made it so that most women HAVE to work rather than as a pleasant option. It wasn’t to help men “carry the burden” but rather was pitched to women as what I refer to as “the double dip”:

https://youtu.be/jY2T_fDQi4g?t=12

Women were told they could earn as much as a man AND still marry a man who earned at least as much as they did. But with “choice”, of course, some women could marry men who earned less but THEY didn’t have to do that if they didn’t want to. (wink).

And during the 70’s and 80’s, the early days, it worked. There was a massive number of baby boomers with Gen X women (fewer in number) who wanted to marry them. So it was possible to have prices remain relatively static while the man’s income went to pay for all that stuff and she could splurge on diamonds, designer handbags and shoes, and flushing money down the toilet for the fun of it (ok, not quite that but pretty close.)

This is still portrayed as the dream lifestyle in films such as Fifty Shades or S*x and the City. These urban women would spend their modest incomes entirely on shoes and clothes and expect men to pick up the rest of the tab. Since this so rarely happens now, these programs are wish fulfillment similar to adult films pitched at men that have hot women deliver pizza and take “trade” in lieu of payment.

In regards to another comment you made about women who outearn men: There are some special cases where that has worked such as high income women who marry community college professors who have high status but low income. It’s also pretty sweet to be a policeman or civilian marine (handsome also is a plus) because successful career women want to get out of parking tickets and what woman friend at a party is going to DARE frown down upon such a man? Those particular top-level blue collar working class Joe Six Packs used to marry working class women but now they’re off the market. This helps to explain why marriage rates imploded for blue collar women: Their choice men were picked off the top by the professional women leaving them with leftovers they didn’t want (and ironically raised. Most poor and criminal men are raised by single mothers).

When I see a single lower income woman with a boy I often wonder if she should perhaps just let him play in traffic and get it out of the way. This segways to your ridiculous claim that feminism was intended to REMOVE pressure from working men.

Do you see now why that is so hilarious? Feminism has put more minority men into prison than Jim Crow!

But hey, for a $2,000 handbag that is fashionable for a few years or so, it’s worth it.

wolfgang548 .
Guest
wolfgang548 .
Offline

Married men make more money than single men, that’s because companies like to hire married men more because he needs to work more to support a family. And after he’s made more money due to this fact, he loses most if not all that he worked for after she divorces him. Single men may make less than married men, but single men keep what they earned and will never lose it to divorce. And single men outlive married men.

And women are happy that MGTOW men are leaving them alone? I wonder why this is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqp071t2Bds

wolfgang548 .
Guest
wolfgang548 .
Offline

Since 3rd wave feminism, many women changed for the worst. They act more like men. They sleep and slut themselves around without shame. They preach how men need to learn to respect them when they can’t even respect themselves. And I believe nature sees this imbalance and has given man a choice in a newly formed woman, at least for those wise enough to see it.

https://transsingleblog.wordpress.com/2016/05/30/why-get-a-transgender-girlfriend/

https://buzzfeed.com/dominicholden/estimated-transgender-population-doubles?utm_term=.sj4ybVRpB#.qn9jzmyD6

https://mic.com/articles/128972/uterus-transplant-surgery-could-transwomen-carry-children#.LtXOXm3s4

BobTrent
Guest
BobTrent
Offline

“…physically women ARE inferior…”
Except for one thing that a properly functioning one does: reproduce our kind. The purpose of a woman, distinct from a man, is to receive semen, gestate a new human being, pop him, or her, out and nurture the child while she or he is small.
What else do they do better than men?
A sexless human, whether DNA-coded male or female, has nothing in its crotch, no breasts, and a generally soft, effeminate masculine physique.
A female that is missing ovaries, uterus and vagina looks pretty much like a 10 year old boy. A male that is missing testicles will grow up to resemble that same 10 year old boy. The female will have a vestigial penis, a clitoris, like genitally complete women. The male will have a vestigial penis not much larger than a normal clitoris.
Female eunuchs are rare as females who don’t have ovaries usually had them while they were growing up but had to have them removed. Congenital female eunuchs are quite rare.

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Women do most of the work in most cultures. We deal with pain better than men and spend more time supporting the society.

harold
Guest
harold
Offline

Why can’t women stop themselves from being raped?

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Probably the same reasons men can’t stop themselves from being raped from other men

harold
Guest
harold
Offline

I wouldn’t know anything about that. But the majority of men seem to be able to.

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Maybe educate yourself on the topic.

harold
Guest
harold
Offline

Why would I educate myself on homo rape

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Because you are clearly uneducated about the subject of rape in general.

wolfgang548 .
Guest
wolfgang548 .
Offline
Sangelia
Guest
Sangelia
Offline

harold, rape isn’t about sex. It is about trying to maintain control over someone the rapist considers to be second or third class. And is trying to send a message to the victim that they were supposedly getting too uppity.

dudester4
Guest
dudester4
Offline

Debunked along with the rest of the Duluth theory of male oppression. The percentage of elderly women who get raped is very small.

Person
Guest
Person
Offline

Men are not psychically superior. Women are more flexible, and I’ve heard that the longer a distant in marathons and long distance swimming, they greater a chance we have at winning. There have been some studies saying we have better endurance, but none that I’ve seen suggesting men do. So, at the very least, we’re equal in that way.

Pinns
Guest
Pinns
Offline

Women are physically inferior? Hmm. They only have the ability to grow humans…. Retard.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

So, despite the fact that I pointed out that men are physically stronger and have more stamina (weight lifting, marathons, etc.) and that they’re more durable (combat, etc.), you focus on the fact that women are effective receptacles. At least we agree on that.

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Women do most of the farming and food production. Men would starve. The tasks you are describing( weight lifting ) is frivolous . Look globally at the fact that women do most of the actual food production and farming.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Citation?

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Umm laughing man here is where you need to put on a pair of big girl panties and actually not rely on this site to provide you with your entire education. If you went to college and took sociology this was covered. We’re you sleeping off a hang over that day. If you look globally at food production women do the majority of the food production. If I said water was wet would you require citations for that? I’m not going to waste time outlining basic , general information. Again your local library is a great source if you need help with reading comprehension. Many have free classes. Discover the magic that is Google if you don’t remember facts from your entry level college courses.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Brought to us by the socialists from the Critical Theory school. Sociology class? Try reading a book dummy (one that isn’t propaganda).

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

I have a masters degree. I read a lot of books. Sociology was an elective when I got my undergrad degree. Not propaganda. Standard sociology 101. I wasn’t a sociology major but I enjoyed reading about other cultures and social theory so I took a number of sociology classes as electives. University of Minnesota . And for the record and maybe I’m taxing your brain here …..sociology isn’t the study of socialism….that’s political theory……and a whole different branch of study……comes under the realm of political science……. Sociology is about the theories of social behavior and societal norms in different cultures as well as our own. Wow you did sleep through class. Did you really sleep through you whole,college experience. Basic basic shit . Aren’t you at all interested in actual facts and research?

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Basically “1984” put into practice. Soft science propaganda.

Actual facts? Show me the studies and their metrics. Because based on what I know about the hard science of statistics there was no decent aggregation of facts to support your claims. Just women’s studies pontification off of a cocktail napkin pipe dream.

Dana Scully
Guest
Dana Scully
Offline

I fail to see how men being more apt to display feats of explosive strength justifies their higher social status when women have longer stamina, do better in survival situations, are less prone to disease, have higher pain thresholds, and literally can make people in their bodies. But sure, it’s cool that some male specimens are kind of strong. Though men should remember, that doesn’t mean the average man is strong. Most men I see have soggy tummies and skinny legs and a woman half their size with a lower center of gravity could easily incapacitate them with a leg sweep or palm thrust to the nose. Somehow male Olympians have become the stand in for all men, but that, given the reality of male physical mediocrity, is a myth that women need to expose simply by talking about it more.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

LOL. I guess all of that supposed raping is being perpetrated by the weaker sex. Or maybe it’s not rape, or maybe it’s better not forcable. Oh, who will stop the big strong men?

ADN the Deplorable
Guest
ADN the Deplorable
Offline

Interesting how all these leg sweeps and palm thrusts never seem to do them much good when confronting real world violence.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Cognitive dissonance never slows down the true SJW. They have no cognition to begin with.

Ravi Macho
Guest
Ravi Macho
Offline

Well said. They will never accept the fact that they are far far far far far inferior and weaker than Men. I guess we Men have to blame ourselves in trusting and giving these s**t h***s this much of freedom, entitlement, “free pass” in many aspects and allowing them to get away without any repercussions, consequences and accountability.

Let’s take a simple example of what we use in our daily routine:

Air conditioner, Fan (Ceiling/Table), Microwave, Refrigerator, Dish washer, Washing Machine/Dryer, Lighter, Gas, Radio / Tape recorder, CD / DVD / VHS, Television, Watches, Lighting, Electricity / Power, Computer, Internet, USB / Blue-Tooth etc., Lift / Elevator, Vehicles, Transmission, Engine / Gear / Ball bearing / Tires, Printing technology, Photography / Cameras / Lenses, Cinema / Entertainment, Type writer, Antiseptics, Antibiotics, Surgery, Mathematics / Geography / Chemistry / Physics / Biology etc., Diagnostics (X-Ray etc.), Music / Instruments, Web / Internet, Sewing Machine, Aeronautical, Shoes, Sewage System, Toilet paper !

OMG, I just can’t go with the full list …

Wimyn should find themselves lucky to be able to “effortlessly” live and bask on the “success and hard work” of Men, ever since the evolution began.

Person
Guest
Person
Offline

YOU didn’t give us anything. Logical, smart and caring men gave us those freedoms and creations. Again, not you. You did nothing. And you probably never will. Don’t piggy back off the work those men did. I’m sure a lot of those inventions were probably stolen, just like the woman who invented the paper back machine, who if I recall correctly said something like “I couldn’t let a woman make such a discovery.” Then there was nuclear fission (eventually the atom bomb) that was jacked from a woman, and signal flares. Oh, and then there was the first computer programmer, ada lovelace. In fact, computer programming was considered woman’s work. Then men wanted in and started calling it too complicated for us, and are now saying it’s because we’re intellectually inferior. Yet, it was a woman who invented the algorithm. You know nothing, Jon Snow.

Ravi Macho
Guest
Ravi Macho
Offline

Even before a women with “lower gravity” could incapacitate Men, Men can pretty much & quite easily could “pulp” the women, in more ways (not just a leg sweep or palm thrust to the nose).
Women are more “weaker, tender and vulnerable in the groin”, just refer Wikipedia. It’s only because of social, cultural and legal reasons Men don’t “serve” a “nice and clean leg sweep” to women !!!
I know that there is no point in arguing with your kind of inferior, weaker and smelly cunts !.

wolfgang548 .
Guest
wolfgang548 .
Offline

Women do better in survival situations?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cG7BEArbzQM

Person
Guest
Person
Offline

Mgtow is designed to make women look bad. You find the worst examples of women, and make it look like it’s a general rule. Look up survival lily. And women had won on that show survival. Here’s the difference between male and female survival skills: Sons are usually taken out and shown how to hunt, how to start fires, how to fish, how to pitch a tent or find shelter or water. Daughters aren’t taught any of those things. Women are just as capable to survive as men, but if you aren’t shown how to do something, you won’t KNOW HOW. It’s as simple as that. Men don’t have some biological advantage to, you know, live anywhere not air conditioned or with plumbing.

wolfgang548 .
Guest
wolfgang548 .
Offline

Person – And feminism was designed to make men look bad. MGTOW is men walking walking from the gynocentrism that has laws biased against them and in favor of women.

Person
Guest
Person
Offline

What? Example? What biased laws? Feminism doesn’t make men look bad. You fell for the propaganda, like most mgtows do.

Person
Guest
Person
Offline

Men do not have more stamina. The reason men beat marathons is because men are generally faster, but women are less fatigued by the end of it. I’ve seen reports saying women have more stamina, but none suggesting men do. The greater the distance, the more likely the woman is to win. Plus, we’re more flexible.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

Logic 101: If this was the case then women would hold the record for longest and fastest marathons. FYI, the world record (kenyans seem to have some type of physique that’s useful for the task) is 2:02 for men and 2:15 for women.

How that works on average, of course, is another matter and especially consider average men and women versus athletes.

Ravi Macho
Guest
Ravi Macho
Offline

Ability to grow humans ? Hmm. without a MAN penetrating/impregnating/fertilizing the Eggs !? Hmm… what a MORON you are !!! Women are NOT doing any FAVOR or anything GREAT or EXTRA ORDINARY ! Getting pregnant and giving birth is 100% NATURAL damn it !!!

BUT:
Penicillin is NOT Natural !
Power/Current/Electricity (in the form we are using) is NOT Natural !
Washing Machine is NOT Natural !
Refrigerator is NOT Natural !
Television is NOT Natural !
Camera/Lens/Audio/Video Recording is NOT Natural !
Computer/Internet etc. are NOT Natural !
Google, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn are NOT Natural !

Lookout who Invented, Innovated and Pioneered things that are NOT Natural !!!! And yes, women are inferior to MEN; not just physically but in ALL the aspects !!!

Sangelia
Guest
Sangelia
Offline

Wiper blades on a vehicle is not natural. But wiper blades was invented by a woman. A woman who saw a male wipe off the window of the streetcar with his hand.
Also the better programmers in computers they have found out, are women.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/computer-programming-used-to-be-womens-work-718061/

Ravi Macho
Guest
Ravi Macho
Offline

Showing or pointing out “exceptions” doesn’t change the reality ! Indeed, better programmers are pussies ! yes, pussies invented Operating Systems, Programming Languages, Compilers, Scripting, Hardware and what not !! Indeed, pussies invented the Internet, the Keyboard and the Disqus platform using which you typed your “pathetic” reply !

Ever heard about “Father of GYNECOLOGY ” or “Tampon” (the one you keep between your lower lips !) !? Indeed, that woman Invented Transmission, Gears, Ball Bearings, Tires, Glass, and NOW “wiper blades” !!!

Tissue Paper (with which you wipe your ass every day !), Flush, Electricity/Power, Telephone, Refrigerator, Microwave, Radio, Battery Cell (using which you enjoy the MAN MADE dildo !!) … ALL these things are indeed Invented by pussies !!!

This will be my last reply, reason !? Replying to your kind of “inferior, weak, pathetic” pussies is like; throwing stone on “pile of shit” !

Person
Guest
Person
Offline

I hope that if you ever need a heart transplant, it’s done by a woman so you can understand that we aren’t the pathetic, useless things you think we are. And btw, you didn’t do any of those things. So, you are in no place to talk. Just because our ancestors didn’t do as much as your ancestors, even though it’s justified because when they did they usually got their credit stolen from them, and they were vastly discouraged from doing anything other than birth, doesn’t mean we aren’t capable of greater things. And just because your ancestors did great things, doesn’t mean you deserve the credit. Because you don’t. Again, you are more than likely an average man, but studies do show that men do have are extremely arrogant and constantly over estimating their abilities.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

Hello Person. Tell you what: If men as a group could be judged as individuals rather than sharing collective guilt, then your argument that men aren’t entitled to credit would be valid.

But even with that consideration, I chuckled at your claim that women got credit stolen from them or they were vastly discouraged from doing anything but their assigned role.

Didja ever think that maybe most men have been in the same boat?

News flash: Not all men were privileged CEO’s throughout history. Thomas Edison and JP Morgon famously stole Tesla’s AC power patents (after trying to discredit them). The Television patent was stolen from Farnsworth via muscled litigation by RCA and GE. Most men did not get their hands held to get where they wanted to go. On the contrary, this is why the millennial “snowflakes” are so easily offended and discouraged: THEY have lived their lives with everything handed to them while the rest of humanity throughout history had to “fight” for it, so to speak.

And giving birth is not a bad thing. Many women now would love to have children but can’t. To have children is a privilege that men had to EARN by providing an income. Only in a welfare state (which robs from others, you know, “stealing”) can feminists pretend that they can give birth, or not, when they please without concern with how to pay for it.

How long would the Sweden’s gender equality last without a “stealing” welfare state?

Keith
Guest
Keith
Offline

That’s nonsense. There were other patents held by men for wind screen wipers before Mary Anderson proffered hers. Mary Anderson hired a male designer to flesh out her idea. She just gets more credit for being female. Women were not the first programmers. Females were merely hired to do a job that involved moving cables on the ENIAC because it was to tedious work more suited for females. These women did not invent programming. They did not know programming. They just followed directions and learned by rote. These were bright women who were given a an incredible opportunity by the amazing men who built a computer and developed programming. Men have to create the opportunities before women can exploit them. That was typical chauvinistic cherry picking but now start your list of the almost infinite contributions of men that benefit us all.

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Women live longer and can deal with physical pain much better than men. If the only think you base men’s ” superior” physical status on is their ability to lift more weight then you have a sad concept of superior.

Harshvardhan Singh
Guest
Harshvardhan Singh
Offline

women have that ability only in labor pain , and to bear that pain hormones gets activated by body…not in general women have more capablity of dealing with pain..your nonsense is has been debunked way back.but it seems social sciences studies and specially women studies are creating bunch of idiots insociety.high time to go for har sciences

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

I work in medicine. Have a masters degree. There have been studies on this. Women can perceive pain. More quickly but we tolerate it much much longer than men. These were not studies of women in labor. These were double blind studies of men and women in pain tolerance . Your assumptions are ill informed and incorrect.

Harshvardhan Singh
Guest
Harshvardhan Singh
Offline

do u really think whatever u say in name of being a medical student i will take it as gospel of truth..such kind of feminist ,researchs are well debunked ,,u ppl disguise as scholars and are agenda driven,,there is no such scientifically proved fact what u r claiming,,its mere a theory ,open tochallenge and refutable not a universal truth like law of gravitation…u work in medicine ,i also have many doctors friends who are well in different kinds of medical fields having awesome careers and doing great research,,they dont agree with claim that u made,,nor they push their reserach because they aren’t idelogically driven,and cite me refrence ,who has done such study n where its published is it well recieved by medical experts world wide, has it become a medical fact?,in which journal it was published ,what is reputation of that n journal on international platform? ..to me u r just sounding a person simply making claims ,even one more person asked u for refrences of your one of feminists claims of so called women superiority and u dindt provide any..and gone are those days when science used to be true inquiry of truth ,post feminism every scientific claims are being just made to prove superiority of females..bigots disguise themselves as scientists and make variou claims which any sane mind witnessing reality findit totallyflawed..anyways citations plz.i alsowant to see who made that great discovery what u claim..on contrary , i can also cite studies made by well practicing medics that women are far inferior ,than men in pain tolernce,,but i never do that in any forum,because i myself a p.hd student in engineering field ,and i percisely know the differnece between scientific theory and scientific fact,,one changes with time an is subject to scrutiny and can be proved to be false whereas scientific fact is that no one in this world can deny example sun rising in east or universal law of gravitation,,even darwins theory of evolution has been under sccrutiny and scientits now have some other theories as well.because it was a theory not fact hence it isalways open to scrutiny.scientific ideas n theories keep changing with time unless they turn into scientific fact..this is what any true researcher knows.he just puts his theory forward ,never makes claims as being ultimate..unlike u ..now luking at your childish behaviour of making claim regarding one gener based on theory(which is doubtful weather its true or agenda driven) i seriously doubt your degree..

Ravi Macho
Guest
Ravi Macho
Offline

Well said Bro. We clearly know that these wimyn inherently suffer with inferiority complex. If indeed “child labor pain” is that much (excruciatingly) painful, I don’t think the world population would be this large (billions !!!).

Strange enough, how many times a wimyn goes through the so called “labor pain” and for how loooooong !!!!!????
Are we still living in a century old world !? Medical advances (almost ALL of them by MEN) have “drastically” reduced any pain/side effects.

Society in general has always done “injustice” to Men. A man also goes through similar (I bet more pain) “emotional” pain when his wife is carrying and delivering. And this pain is often ignored ! I don’t want to list the sacrifices, burdens, stress, tension, physical, emotional and “financial” issues a Man goes through. Guess no body (including his better-half) gives a shit !

I am not really concerned and am least bothered about the amerikan/western wimyn (they are “separate” species !). Let them go to hell. But I am concerned about our wimyn.

Our wimyn will do B.E / B.Tech in Private collges (majority of them) by paying donation, which is paid by their father (a man !). After that they will try their best to get F1-Visa in a “so so” University in the States and get into the corporate companies on entry level positions. It’s a FACT them majority of them take help of their “friends” (read: MEN) in each and every aspect and still they believe they are independent/strong/empowered !!!

When they are here, they will see ALL the wimyn of the “separate” species in every place wearing “sweat pants” / half naked dressing / displaying thighs/thongs / imitating Men in every aspect (walking style, body language, expressions).

Our wimyn also notice the attitude, entitlement, bitchy, arrogant, UN-feminine nature of these “separate” species coupled with the fact that “how easily” they can get away with their irresponsible, stupid, terrible, violent and dangerous behavior.

This is sending “wrong” signals to our already half-spoiled wimyn !

These wimyn surpass Men in Smoking, Drinking Alcohol, Sleeping with ‘n’ number of people/Slutting, Drunk driving, Crossing “Red” signals, Visiting Bars/Clubs, well the list goes on…

Come ON MEN, enough is enough. Time for Masculinity and Machismo.

MatrixSnowden
Guest
MatrixSnowden
Offline

Actually, women feel pain MORE than men on average. Tolerance threshold bases is ambiguos in the empirical research youre pseudo citing. Men, if youre going to let her make us look stupid, youre contributing to the bullshit. Furthermore Caroline, if you are in any way shape or form debating that men overall are more built for survival purposes and endurance and I am not saying you are, but you would clearly be oblivious to reality. We now have military women in america competing AND passing at MUCH lower standards than the men, puting lives at risk. Please give me a effin break.

Mario
Guest
Mario
Offline

Really? Are you trying to suggest that what lift weight isn’t the same thing that made men protectors of women? You really think women are better suited for survival then men? And it is not survival the whole essence of “superior”?

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Food production is the whole essence of survival and women have always done the majority of that.

MatrixSnowden
Guest
MatrixSnowden
Offline

Again, Caroline… because women gathered while men hunted because women have always until recentlt been expected to hold their own weight an chilling with the tribe picking berries was EASIER than taking down game and fighting off other tribes. Lay off of the anthropology and do some evolutionary biology research or is STEM to hard for the irrational female brain?

Donny Burgon
Guest
Donny Burgon
Offline

lol women live longer because they take fewer risks. Men are risk-takers, innovators, the people who bring change about. Also, the streets you walked to day, all of that was built by men in sky-high scaffolds and men kneeling on the ground moving large blocks of concrete. A world without men would be a post-apocalyptic one..

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

Top three killers of men are 1. heart attacks. 2. Cancer 3. Cerebrovascular events ( strokes) So men taking risks isn’t as relevant as you think it is . More boys have birth defects, intellectual disabilities , autism and die as fetus,infants and children. Just biologically weaker due to a preference for male offspring. Males being more desired have always gotten preferential treatment over females. So the result was that heartier girls survived and a weaker strain of boys was promoted. Weaker males are the product of selective care difference. However nature sees the necessity of females to the continuation of the species so perhaps that plays a part. No one is asking for a world without men. We are asking for a world not dominated by men. There was civilization before sky high scaffolding . Women worldwide produce the majority of the food. Food is more important to survival than skyscrapers and always has been. Women have always been innovators and inventors. Social restrictions just mask the reality of that.

wolfgang548 .
Guest
wolfgang548 .
Offline

Why shouldn’t we have a world without men? After all, women are always ranting how they don’t need a man, are men necessary, etc. Or is it that you women know you need men more than you want to admit? If the world, especially western world countries, are so dominated by men, why is it that there are so many laws that favor women over men, many where the woman only has to point the finger at a man and he’s automatically assumed guilty? Or how divorce courts award the woman everything the man worked for? 97% of alimony is paid by men. Most of the time the woman gets to take his children. Some, if not many states have a law where a man has to have his wife’s permission to get a vasectomy if he wants one but the wife doesn’t need his permission to get the similar procedure done( I forget the name). If a man lives with his girlfriend for 6 months, she’s entitled to half his possessions, even if they’re not married. When women gained the right to vote about 100 years ago, the first 2 things they voted for was no fault divorce and prohibition.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMjiY5BdBE
What women did back then was a form of oppression, but women today somehow say they are the ones systematically oppressed.

And you’re right that food is important to survival, but yet skyscrapers, and even cities we live in aren’t? Maybe men should tear down everything they built because it seems women don’t ever appreciate anything they have. All the jobs they brag about getting nowadays would exist if it weren’t for the buildings that house those job positions in the first place. But the topic matter of what would happen if all men worldwide would go on strike is being discussed more and more on the internet. That day could be just over the horizon. And if that happens, I’d like to see how far women would get without men.

StuntDevil
Guest
StuntDevil
Offline

Women take fewer risks? Geez I’m a women and I love blowing shit up and riding dirt bikes and preforming par core stunts and shit like that. You make me laugh. A world without men would be a post-apocalyptic one? Get real dude. I train in marshal arts and love kicking some ass. I’m a female gamer and I can defend my self instead of some man doing it for me. I’ve lived on the streets basically my whole childhood and teenager years. Hell im 19 rn. I’m street smart. i love god and I think that all humans are equal. And to the original post I dont want a man to control me fuck that. I can grow food on my own built shelter outta the woods around me. I have a boyfriend who treats me like a princess and he doesn’t ever control me nor I control
Him.
we get along really great and have fun racing cars and doing stupid shit. Once it was snowing outside and I walked out and he was on the roof drunk and he said “Look babe I can fly” and he jumped. I was worried he broke his leg dumb as fuck but it was funny as fuck.

StuntDevil
Guest
StuntDevil
Offline

Also my uncle is a man like the dude that post this post. Garbage and a pos. He tried to rape me once when I was little. 12 years old to be exact. And I bashed his fucking head in with a frying pan. Worse experience ever. I’m not gonna be controlled by a man. I can make decisions on my own. I don’t need a duchebag to control me.

Sammy 2 Tires
Guest
Sammy 2 Tires
Offline

LMAO – “nor has my home been INFESTED with children”. (I’m not speaking against you – I too do not have kids and I understand the sentiment)

Ravi Macho
Guest
Ravi Macho
Offline

Typical inferior, helpless and arrogant attitude ! Highlighting what you are interested in (or feel that you are able to find fault and can “rant”) without even considering the “context” and looking into the details !

As long as the Societal and Legal Double Standards are on your side, your kind of wimyn will keep on pooping out one-sided and mindless comments !

flybabycrybaby
Guest
flybabycrybaby
Offline

Can we go on a date soon?

A Frenchy In Eire
Guest
A Frenchy In Eire
Offline

Says every guy who cannot get laid ever.

Sandra Sturgiss
Guest
Sandra Sturgiss
Offline

Of course you have never been married – obviously this is why you are such a bitter, twisted fuckwit. If women are physically inferior why is it that we can do something you NEVER can – give birth. Morons like you are the best reason yet for birth control and abortion. You are a sad, pathetic loser who needs to get a life – oh wait, that would involve having people that actually care about you which obviously no-one does.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

It’s funny how deeply I’ve obviously hurt you with that comment–you really come out of your corner, scratching away. Unfortunately for the intellectually under powered, your argument has no merit because you can’t separate your feelings from your argument. You take baseless personal shots at me–no surprise there–yet can’t form a cogent claim. Calling me a “pathetic loser” just because I don’t agree with you bears out my claim of your erratic, emotional response–typical womyn stuff, right?

You claim that nobody cares about me. Upon what proof do you base that claim? Again, scratching away like a little, defenseless kitten isn’t an argument.

The most outrageous comment you offer is that my existence makes the case for birth control and/or abortion; do my comments present such a threat to your existence that you wish for my death or my very existence to be eradicated? Based upon a disagreement? A simple psychological insight indicates that those who project incessant hostility do so because they themselves have been profoundly hurt in the past, that said hostility is an armor against the outside world. In other words, hostile people have been convinced of their own weakness and thus overcompensate with belligerence. Therefore, I pity you and all the other shrill harpies who come by this site for the sole purpose of angering themselves further and subsequently flinging bile so that they can feel “empowered.”

Oh, and by the way: just because womyn can give birth, it doesn’t mean that they aren’t physically inferior by any number of measurable criteria. If womyn were so strong, why do so many of them have fewer rights in so many places in the world? Why do they put up with forced marriages and genital mutilation? If they’re strong, they must like it and if they don’t like it, but put up with it, they must be weak. Which is it?

Sandra Sturgiss
Guest
Sandra Sturgiss
Offline

Firstly, I am not hurt by your comments – do you think you are so important that your ridiculous ideas would have that effect on anyone? I just wonder what the hell happened to you to make you so bitter and twisted as you obviously are. Did your mother drop you on your head as a baby? Is this why you hate women so much? More likely you feel threatened by women – your ludicrous comments only go to show that men are absolutely not the superior sex that you seem to think they are. Most REAL men would see you as an embarrassment to their gender. As to your comment regarding incessant hostility – have a look in the mirror. Your comments are nothing BUT hostile, angry and bitter. I, unlike you, am not stating that one gender is superior to the other – whether you like it or not we are all created equal, but different. I’m sorry that your limited intelligence can’t figure that out. However when I read comments such as yours I am tempted to believe in female superiority. As for your statements regarding forced marriages and FGM – this only serves to show how many so-called men are controlling, despicable creatures. You cannot ignore the fact that the majority of robberies, rapes assaults You are most certainly not a threat to my existence, anymore than a cockroach would be. I just see you as a total waste of space, hence the fact that if you had been aborted the world would be no worse off.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

You just expended a rather considerable amount of energy–only to prove my points. Your third-grade mentality is evident by your pathetic attempt to turn my comments back on me and once again you resort to cheap emotional appeals because you have nothing you can reference in my comments that you can disprove.

How are my comments “hostile, angry and bitter”? I simply reviewed and commented upon your previous post–which was a rabid response to one of mine. Nothing you can say will change those facts. YOU chose to go to a site devoted to men’s rights issues and then complain about the content. YOU chose to resort to ad hominem and non-sequitur attacks rather than use facts and reasoning. That all on you, cupcake.

You write that you haven’t stated one gender is superior to another. Really? Previously, you wrote, “If women are physically inferior why is it that we can do something you NEVER can – give birth” and “However when I read comments such as yours I am tempted to believe in female superiority.” Are you so stupid that you can’t read your own comments? Not only do you profess superiority, you’ve admitted that my comments influence your thoughts and patterns of behavior.

Again, you show how fragile you are by writing, “I just see you as a total waste of space, hence the fact that if you had been aborted the world would be no worse off.” Again, I’m forced to point out that all that has occurred here is that we’ve had a difference of opinion–nothing else happened–and you wish that my existence were eradicated as a result. If that’s not the sick, twisted power fantasy of someone who has been deeply injured, what is? Yours is the sign of weakness.

Sandra Sturgiss
Guest
Sandra Sturgiss
Offline

Firstly I went to this site as one of our politician’s endorsed it, and being an intelligent woman ( yes, they do exist)! who likes to be informed I needed to see what it was about before commenting. What I found was the biggest load of bullshit ever written – not just by you but other sad, pathetic excuses for men. If you hate women (by the way that is the correct spelling), why do you subscribe to a site that gives you tips on picking them up? This site should be shut down for it’s promotion of hate and inequality. By the way, do you realise that your idol Roosh was not granted a visa to enter Australia? Thank God for that. I know you have trouble with comprehension so I will explain this to you again. I DID NOT state that females are superior, merely that basic biology dictates that you will NEVER be able to perform the most fundamental part of life ie. give birth. I also stated that comments such as yours do not in any way help your argument re superior intellect. You state that we had a difference of opinion. This is untrue – it is not a matter of opinion as I am 100% correct in saying that humans are created equal. By your reasoning just over 50% of the population has low intelligence and should be controlled!!! I don’t know what the hell you base YOUR argument upon. Men and women were put on this earth to complement each other, somehow you have taken this to mean that one is superior to the other. EVERY human being has strengths and weaknesses – even you, however in your case I use the term human loosely. My guess is that you are racist and homophobic as well. Your arrogance is as astounding as your views are non-sensical. By the way, if you have the courage of your convictions, why do you hide behind a pseudonym?

Sandra Sturgiss
Guest
Sandra Sturgiss
Offline

Firstly, I am not hurt by your comment – just astounded that someone could be so bitter and twisted. What the hell happened to make you like that – did you mother drop you on your head as a baby? Is that why you hate women so much? I wonder what she thinks of your twisted ideology. Your comments are no threat to my existence, any more than a cockroach would be. You are merely a waste of space, the world certainly would be no poorer if you hadn’t existed in the first place. As to your comments on incessant hostility – have a look in the mirror. The vitriolic bile that your spout is the ultimate in hostility and hatred. I am not, unlike you, proposing that one gender is superior to the other. We are all created equal, albeit different. I’m sorry that your limited intelligence can’t see the difference. However when I read ludicrous comments such as yours I am tempted to believe in female superiority. Most REAL men would find you an embarrassment to their gender. Check the crime statistics – most robberies, assaults, rapes, DUI’s, driving offences, car accidents, manslaughters and murders are committed by men. Regarding your comments on forced marriage and FGM this only serves to show that there are millions of controlling, heinous men in the world – hardly something to be proud of. Fortunately I don’t personally know any “men” ( I use that word loosely) like you – the men that I know are appalled by attitudes such as yours.

Vlinder33
Guest
Vlinder33
Offline

Even though you are being rude by calling women names I have to address the “men are physically superior” comment, I cannot resist because I have seen it said often.
To determine what constitutes physical superiority you employ a set of arbitrary standards.
One of those standards is pure physical strength. According to that logic, a gorilla is superior to you. You don’t believe that so it is a combination of traits that you believe make men superior. Most arguments I have read combine the trait of superior physical strength with the trait of being more intelligent and being less emotional. This is the usual trifecta of standards with which men proclaim themselves superior.
That combination of traits is arbitrary.
If I change the combination of traits to
“all the different functions a body can perform”
“include anger in the list of emotions”
“rate emotional intelligence as high as other forms of intelligence
“superior control over sexual impulses
then women are superior because
1.our bodies can do everything men’s bodies can do-maybe not as well, or as fast-but men’s bodies can not do everything women’s bodies can do, such as give life.
2.men are far more emotional than women because they are quicker to anger and get violent.
3. men are often less emotionally intelligent
4. women are not slaves to their sexual urges to the same degree men are
Men and women are complementary and designed to bring out the best in each other. Women protect their sons and daughters when they are young, and men protect their families.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

I’m sure that you think that your communications certificate–or whatever passes for advanced education in your life–means that you’re clever. Wrong. I find your pathetic attempts to parse your response amusing, so I’ll respond. First, acknowledging and then trying to divert someone’s point is not only dishonest, it’s incorrect.
1. What part of “physically superior” do you not understand? In terms of physical strength, men are ON AVERAGE, stronger than women. By that definition, yes, gorillas ARE PHYSICALLY superior to men. How does that constitute you making a point?
2. If your metric for superiority is to “give life,” women are no better than men, honey. You may own the oven in which the bun bakes, but we men give you the yeast to make the dough come alive. Reproduction cannot happen without both sexes, thus obviating your point.
3. Men may be quicker to anger, but women are, on average, quicker to cry, prattle like a monkey on amphetamines, and engage in all sorts of emotional behavior; in fact, women are so addicted to emotional outbursts, they often seek quick fixes in soap operas, Lifetime movies and attending weddings. Women are so emotionally codependent, they prattle for hours about romantic relationships–often those of others, such as celebrities.
4. It’s so funny that you think that being interested in sex makes men “slaves to their sexual urges.” It’s also amusing how modern feminists eschew any labels pertaining to sexual desire (“our bodies, our choice, no judgements”), but men can still be judged for theirs. At this point, you’ll trot out the “women have been labeled as sluts, but men haven’t” argument, to which I’ll preemptively respond by saying that if you want freedom from judgment today, you can’t punish today’s men for crimes of the past–especially ones that were perpetrated before the men of this generation were even born.
You then wrap up your war on stereotypes by citing others in support of your “argument,” the antiquity of which is amusing. You know–the old “nuclear family trope” based upon the stereotypes you claim to abhor.

Realist
Guest
Realist
Offline

Dear Idiots of Earth…
Without men we would all die.
Without woman we would all die.
We need sperm.
They need us.
Everyone calm the fuck down and listen:
WE ARE ABSOFREAKINGLUTELY EQUAL.
Yes men are stronger.
Yes woman have more stamina.
Yes men are genetically bigger.
Yes woman can stand much more pain.
EVERYONE GOT PROS AND CONS BOYS AND GIRLS. SO SHUT UP AND GO BACK TO SCHOOL.

FuckBullshit
Guest
FuckBullshit
Offline

This made my day 😂😂 the only person on here that made complete sense and not a bunch of bs.

GerryAllwin
Guest
GerryAllwin
Offline

Your collapse into ad hominem attacks demonstrates your realization of your illogic and incapacity to reason.
“Idiot!” “Moron!” “Shit-eating dog!” If that’s your best, “Bahlza” is wasting his energy in further banter with you.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

There is no logic or reason you’re all idiots who can’t deal with female rejection.

Peter Bensley
Guest
Peter Bensley
Offline

>shaped by my own mind.

I’m not convinced that you have a mind, given that your repetitive dodging away from having to admit to your own moronic opinions could easily be explained away as a reflex action or some kind of perl script.

Darth Folwart
Guest
Darth Folwart
Offline

“Most dogs have the biological imperative to eat their own shit. Try to rise about that. Honestly though if you think you’re right, you would be warring with most men and almost all women you don’t have the numbers. You do realize you’re committing those wrongs all over again by being here in a serious manner right?”

One masculine-minded man is worth at least a dozen feminine-minded blind follower types. Battle of Thermopylae proves the point. If they got serious and they could organize, they’d turn this country inside out, shake it out and put it back right side up. 300 elite could manage it too I bet, it would be fitting.

Fuck You
Guest
Fuck You
Offline

I don’t believe you’ve allowed me anything may I remind you, a woman brought you into this world. Although with the disappointment you turned out to be I bet she’s thinking she should’ve had an abortion.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

Ah, showing how enlightened you are by wishing me dead. And yes, you are allowed by men. It is men who fight to keep this country protected; if the military were exclusively or even mostly women, enemy combatants would easily defeat us. Just look at the results of co-ed military exercises to dispel the conceit of female equality.

Look at this another way: if women were so equal, your victim claims would be false; otherwise, how is it men supposedly held women down for so many MILLENNIA? If your victimization claims (i.e. patriarchy) are true, how can women be equal? You can’t have it both ways; we either held you down and ALLOWED you equality, or you were ALWAYS EQUAL, which means your claims of patriarchy are a lie. Which is it?

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

If men are so,powerful how are they being ” controlled” by women now? You say women are controlling you. How is this possible if you are so strong?

JJ Hockley
Guest
JJ Hockley
Offline

Caroline; you really ought to attempt to communicate in a more positive manner, you appear quite passive aggressive. It is not uncommon for a person with little strength to coerce another, especially with assistance from the state.

person
Guest
person
Offline

Why do you think you fight for our country? Duh! The country is ruled by men who wouldn’t want their, oh so precious women getting hurt in battle! The only reason women don’t fight is because we mean to much to men. To be honest i don’t want to fight for a country that has horrible people like you abusing women and hating them because they dare to express opinions.
“Infested with children” – you were one once, i guess your parents taught you that you were a piece of nothing and that you were the meaning of ‘infestation’… oh, i don’t blame them.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

Wow, what a great laugh you provided! Your ignorance is so profound that even in print, you sound like someone with Down’s Syndrome who also took a crane hook to the temple.

Factual error #1: there is a bill in Congress that would compel women to register for Selective Service (in other words, the draft, dumb ass), so I wouldn’t take your privileged position for granted.

Factual error #2: I’ve never hit a woman, nor a child. But, with your child-like intellect, I imagine it’s easier just to fling an emotional accusation like that, rather than use facts and reasoning–wouldn’t want to overheat that delicate, feminine mind of yours.

Factual error #3: I don’t hate all women; I just hate ignorant assholes, a group to which you clearly belong.

Person
Guest
Person
Offline

You have stated your opinions perfectly and it is obvious that you are disgusted by the mere presence of women on this planet.
So let me state my opinions clearly right now, I do not wish to argue with you or insult you but I will admit that I am outraged at your false assumptions.
1) I am not dumb or ignorant just because I dare to speak up for myself and state a totally fair opinion.
2) I believe that women and men are equals and that the way you think is twisted and old-fashioned. Women are not inferior to men and men are not inferior to women.
3) I am interested to know your opinion on what delicate, feminine mind actually means. I take it by stating that a female’s mind is delicate you know how we think and our intelligence. It is a well known fact that female grades are practically always above male grades- don’t make a fool of yourself, our minds aren’t delicate.
4) OK, I apologise for assuming that you have abused women, it obviously upset you and I don’t like making people feel hurt. I only wish to express myself calmly and without anger or any bias.
5) Fine, laugh about me if you wish to- if it makes you feel any better about yourself. I really couldn’t care less what you say about ME in person, but it’s what you say about women in general that I want to stand up for.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

I don’t owe you any sort of explanation. YOU accused me of abusing women, yet you’ve never met me, have no idea who I am, nor do you have any clue about the history of any relationships I’ve had. So, upon what evidence did you base that accusation? NONE. THAT is the sign of a weak mind, one which relies upon cheap emotionalism in the absence of facts to make a point. You’ve apologized. Fine, but any intellectually honest person–in other words, one possessed of a strong mind–would not have resorted to that in the first place.

Since you’re from Canada, I’ll assume you’re unfamiliar with the First Amendment of the US Constitution. As long as I don’t commit libel or issue a death threat, I can write any opinion I damn well choose. Don’t like it? Well, I’m pretty sure no one is holding a gun to your head to visit this website, nor to read my posts.

Person
Guest
Person
Offline

Look, you clearly don’t understand. I don’t have a weak mind just because I apologized. I apologized because i am humble enough to do so. I am not the sort to hold a grudge against others, because I believe in kindness, equality and i always try not to judge people, which is why I apologized, because I admit that I DID indeed judge you. By your definition of weak mind then you have one. Because now you are also making assumptions, I never specified where i came from and Canada is certainly not where i live.
Please, stop trying to seem superior- we all make the same mistakes, thanks for proving that.
I never mentioned anything about you not stating any “Damn well opinion”, I appreciate your view I am only, very calmly debating and stating my opinion.
No, no one is forcing me to go onto this website or read these posts I went onto this website for research purposes and then became curious as to what people think of the article.

Fuckthisguy
Guest
Fuckthisguy
Offline

You Contradicted yourself there buddy.

Grow up.
Guest
Grow up.
Offline

Dude. You think your opinion is always right. Anyone on here that says somthing you don’t like it agree with you got some sort of fucked up bullshit answer for it. You say “oh did I hurt your feelings that you have to respond” your basically saying the same about yourself. Grow up.

I agree fuck this guy too.
Guest
I agree fuck this guy too.
Offline

Nice. I died laughing

Nat G
Guest
Nat G
Offline

So you include yourself in people who granted us suffrage, allow us to work?

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

Well, given that you bitches expect men of today to shoulder the blame for the transgressions of past generations, why not? To thank me, you can fix me a sandwich and then shut the fuck up.

Nat G
Guest
Nat G
Offline

If someone is blaming you for something it must be for the attitude you have now about women. I don’t blame people for things that happened before they were borne or on what they don’t have any control. It’s misogynists who are really good at that. Thank you for what? It’s obvious that if it was your decision women would not be allowed to vote.

LivingLIfeHere
Guest
LivingLIfeHere
Offline

Ide rather you make me a sandwich. smile Im a women and I need to be “monitored”. I would probably make a bad decision on how to make it. I’m also the “weaker” sex according to this post. So I probably can’t lift up the butter knife. I prefer to have peanut butter and jelly thank you.

person
Guest
person
Offline

woman don’t need permission to work and do the exact same things as men, bloody men and woman are equal and neither are superior to the other. And last time I checked bloody men aren’t classified as rulers.

Vlinder33
Guest
Vlinder33
Offline

We women give you life, at great cost to ourselves. You should shown some appreciation for our sacrifices, which you take for granted.
We create babies-that is strength and leverage. If women refused to feed and raise male children, none of you would be here today. That is power. Fortunately for you we do not abuse it because through being mothers we gain love and wisdom. Women are powerful and strong, you would know that if you had to give birth.
Not all women think men are the source of all evil. Some of us realize all the great gifts you have given this world, such as antibiotics, great inventions such as central heating (love that!) the light bulb, cars, beautiful music and art. Thank you for those wonderful contributions to our society. It is because of you we live better and longer. It is because of you that not half of our babies die before they turn two years old. I love men for that. Why does it always have to be all or nothing? Men and women are to work side by side with each other, not to hurt each other but to help each other.
Sadly we live in a society of victimhood and finger pointing. We don’t appreciate how good we have it. I do and I cherish every day of my life and seek out men that I respect. I find plenty of them. I believe if you look for the good in women you will find it also.

Bahlza Dragon
Guest
Bahlza Dragon
Offline

Oh, man. You are so unaware of yourself it is almost literally breathtaking. I really have to chuckle every time you trot out the “we give you life and you would die if we withheld that function” argument. That’s only true if you want to commit suicide. You can’t seem to understand that just because you represent HALF of the biological underpinnings of life, that doesn’t mean you own it all. “If women refused to feed and raise male children, none of you would be
here today.” You wouldn’t be here, either, because there’d be no sperm donors.
You also write, “Fortunately for you we do not abuse it
because through being mothers we gain love and wisdom.” Say that to the guy with the bitchy mother-in-law.
You continue to harp on this point by writing, “Women are
powerful and strong, you would know that if you had to give birth.” Great, you took one for the team by wrecking your playground, but that is self-serving because it also perpetuates the existence of women–it’s not some favor you extend solely to men.
You seem totally tone deaf to the actual implications of this discussion. The point isn’t the biological necessity of one gender or the other, but rather the cultural impetus to vilify men–especially white ones–as the source of all ills and injustices. Today’s culture paints all men with the same broad brush, but then decries stereotypes and then “progressives” want special protection for themselves and their point of view while demanding punishment from those who don’t share their viewpoints or fit into their own rigidly enforced orthodoxy.

Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Guest
Lisa Ann Lowry-Johnson
Offline

😂😂😂😂😂
Women are naturally powerful! I think you’re confusing status with power. Women have earned the equal status they have today and will keep gaining that.

Jalice
Guest
Jalice
Offline

You might be rulers but we can make your life difficult. Problems begin when one gender starts thinking the other one is obsolete. You rule, we carry life and society’s next working class. Get out of the clouds. Remember that your mother spared your life. No matter how many laws men create, women determine who is born.

When birth control wasn’t available women poisoned themselves. Women are not physically strong and yet we involuntarily control you. Ask yourself, why are you so obssess with dominating us? You are well aware that we are less stronger than you and yet you feel the urge to dominate us.

Let’s give each other a break. This shit life is already hard we don’t need to make it worse for each other.

ex-convict
Guest
ex-convict
Offline

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Aww you still care wink i thought you were done responding?

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Conspiracy Theories.

Rape culture and subjugation of women are just leftist Conspiracy Theories.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

The Muslims are coming to kill us all wink see that’s a conspiracy theory, the fact that you don’t care about what happens to 50% of the population does not make it not true.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Nah, you SJW’s (that’s the very definition of social justice) have more conspiracy theories than we can shake a stick at. Where did I say I didn’t care about 50% of the population? More leftoid nuttery.

What is it today, racial conspiracy against the black man?

Misogynistic conspiracy against women? Homophobic conspiracy against gays? Islamophobic conspiracy against Muslims? You people are a veritable list of neuroses and paranoia.

Somehow you can keep tilting at the windmills of social change without seeing that you are a conspiracy theorist. You label it “privilege” but it’s all made of the same stuff. I conspired with my great, great, great, great grandfather to take native lands and keep the black man down…..haha.

We probably pillaged and raped Rome too. LOL

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

You do realize there are a lot of ways society limits non straight white Christian men? Right? I guess not. Also why are you scared of Muslims bringing about the end times? Shouldn’t you get raptured first? Unless your faith is shaken.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

All conspiracies in your mind no doubt.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

More a moral blind spot in yours.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

You mean like making black men not jaywalk, and gays not showing their asses in the street?

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Killing people for jaywalking does seem extreme but I see your point.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Yeah it would, when did that happen?

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Well he was in a wheel chair so is it jaywalking or not hmm… There are quite a few police that respond far more aggressively to blacks than white it’s a pattern whether you agree or not.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

You talk about police as if they were universally straight white and male. How oppressive of you.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

The majority are.

BobTrent
Guest
BobTrent
Offline

Funny that in a country where the Black population is about 10% half of the cops aren’t Black. And everyone else, North American, Mexican, Central and South American “Indian,” Asian, India Indian, is categorized as “White” for these purposes.

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

But women dominating men today isn’t ?

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Not in the West, unless you are talking about the Muslim “refugees” they insist on importing to rape them (Angela Merkel).

Caroline Carlson
Guest
Caroline Carlson
Offline

One out of three women raped in her lifetime. Less than 3% doing a day in jail. Prosecutors 48% less likely to charge with rape since the creation of sex offender lists. 1 out of 9 women being beaten by boyfriends/ husbands. Your inability to dominate more angers you. Your inability to read rape / domestic abuse stats leaves you uninformed. Show me where women are dominating men. Attempts at creating equality feel like oppression to small minded men. Clearly you are one of them.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Citation? Pure B.S. is the easiest to fabricate. Plus it kind of defeats your whole “women are the stronger gender” schtick. Oops, I guess cognitive dissonance doesn’t cause you any discomfort.

PolishKnightUSA
Guest
PolishKnightUSA
Offline

Feminists statistics like the 77 cents on a dollar meme that has been well debunked but they still try to use it. Or the laughable claim that DV hotline calls double on Super Bowl Sunday (which is today.) That was just made up and then repeated until it became an “established” “fact”. It’s laughable because logically, wouldn’t wife beaters be too busy watching the game to abuse their wife? (Feminist scholars and logic don’t go together it appears…)

The high rape statistic claims are based upon a broad definition of rape. If a man pestered a woman for sex or refused to buy her dinner, then she’s a victim of attempted sexual assault according to the “sociologist” studies funded by the womyn’s man-hating resource center.

Prosecutors are less likely to charge defendants for a variety of reasons including fear of racial profiling. You can thank leftists such as Bill Clinton for the high rate of black on white rapes (or the rapes he committed personally.) In addition, people (including women), often make false accusations. Google “Duke LaCrosse.”

wolfgang548 .
Guest
wolfgang548 .
Offline
Walker Texas Wanker
Guest
Walker Texas Wanker
Offline

“Oh yes from the site trying to legalize rape and control all facets of
their existence, is your masculinity threatened by powerful women?”

Only if those powerful women can bounce off bullets from my gun, otherwise, meh.

1432fpchero
Guest
1432fpchero
Offline

your daddy did’t love you… obviously

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Obviously you are redirecting your own insecurities out at me, feeling the need to reinforce your own masculinity by putting down others. I’m sorry that at some point one woman treated you poorly and as a result you hate them all, I hope some day you recover and are able to have an emotional connection with someone.

1432fpchero
Guest
1432fpchero
Offline

reading comprehension is obviously not a skill you learned. go back and re-read this article and figure out if there are some legitimate errors you can debate. every example shown is the result of a women making a bad choice. statistically you’ll find that the number of incidents of those poor choices are significantly higher in women without a strong proper male influence in their lives. the proof that women are fundamentally and emotionally flawed is identified by the number of women who do have strong proper male influences in their lives, and are still dingbats!!

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

I don’t read any of the articles, I don’t want to lower my intelligence by reading biased articles by creepy dudes only interested in controlling women and raping them, if I did I’d read the bible. Men commit a much higher degree of crime both violent and not so I guess we should keep them in chains just in case. Perhaps you should volunteer to start. I bet you hate Muslims and if one of them wrote an article like this you’d be up in arms but do go on about your new world order conspiracy theories. I’m sorry no woman has ever loved you and never will.

flybabycrybaby
Guest
flybabycrybaby
Offline

asl? Let’s go out.

A.W.E.S.O.M.-O
Guest
A.W.E.S.O.M.-O
Offline

I love when feminists show how stupid they are in being mentally incapable of distinguishing satire from reality. You are as stupid as we say.

BobTrent
Guest
BobTrent
Offline

No such thing as a powerful woman. “Powerful” women’s so-called power is composed of the men whose purposes she serves.
JUST LIKE POWERFUL MEN. Men don’t have power as individuals. A powerful man’s power is composed of the men whose purposes he serves.
How did women get “rights?” As privileges granted by the men who rule their societies. How did women get to vote? Men voted to give it to them. Suffragettes fought proposals to let women vote in special referenda yea or nay on extending the franchise (vote) to women BECAUSE THE SUFFRAGETTES KNEW THAT WOMEN WOULD VOTE TO DENY WOMEN THE VOTE. Anti-suffragettes, women organized to oppose woman suffrage, did not want to let women vote on woman suffrage because to do so would be to canvass women to come out and vote, even though they were, like the pro-woman-suffrage activists, certain that if allowed to vote one time on woman suffrage, the women would reject getting to vote any more.
So both sides opposed a special referendum limited to women on woman suffrage.

flybabycrybaby
Guest
flybabycrybaby
Offline

asl? Let’s date.

Aldous Huxley
Guest
Aldous Huxley
Offline

Go look at all the bastard children. Silent and alone as kids, and in prison as adults. Then come back.
I have no patience for people like you. Whether for votes or to appease, you turn nature on its head and damn the future for the sake of greed or egotism.

Jason Rogers
Guest
Jason Rogers
Offline

No such thing as a powerful woman Mark not even your Jewess mother.

BobTrent
Guest
BobTrent
Offline

Two reasons to decriminalize (“legalize”) rape:
· rape of healthy postpubertal women does not harm them. Don’t confuse brutal violence that is associated with a small portion of rapes with mere sexual intercourse, an act ordained by nature (or, if you prefer, God).
· defining rape as crime opens the gate to false accusations of rape, a far more harmful act than simple, non-brutal rape. Rape is an offense by one individual against another individual. False accusation, including unfounded and unsubstantiated, sets the state (the government) against an individual.

wolfgang548 .
Guest
wolfgang548 .
Offline

How is women’s equality evil? It’s not their equality, it’s their nature that is evil. Type in ” Deadly Women” on Youtube and have fun watching countless episodes of a show that appeared on Ivestigation Discovery. A little reality women and feminists don’t ever discuss.

GerryAllwin
Guest
GerryAllwin
Offline

A man should recognize his limitations. For one man to attack a stone castle with only a rock is doomed to failure and will merely annoy the guards.

Jason Rogers
Guest
Jason Rogers
Offline

Well said in_Dei_servitium.Agreed

Dirk Diggler
Guest
Dirk Diggler
Offline

You do make a valid point.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

You can’t win. There’s too many against you. Women can do as they please just like men.

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Men cannot do as they please – we pay for it in terms of consequences – women do not and that’s the difference.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

You’re quite the fool, do you ever think the reason you can’t know love is because of attitudes like this?

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Hmmm… are you a homo? You must enjoy it when men bend you over the sink. Lift your head up occasionally and get some blood and oxygen flowing there so you don’t sound so stupid.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Of course any man who has emotion is gay? Maybe you should deal with your internal suffering in a more constructive way than blaming women for not loving you.

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Is that what you call taking it up the butt? Emotion? I guess I’m not up on all the new terms for fudgepacking, my apologies.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

I’m straight but only a moron would use gay as an insult. Do you prefer to be called a misogynistic homophobe or a homophobic misogynist? Try respect and decency it will get you a lot further in life.

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

I think you’d be happier if you just fessed up and came clean. Your attitude towards women shows you are a fruit and derive pleasure from dick. You might be able to hide it for awhile but your attitude gives you away. Good luck finding yourself.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Good luck dealing with eternal loniness by raging against an imagined matriarchy on an online message board dedicated to oppressing people, mostly women, and legalzing rape. I know exactly who I am but tell me when you look in the mirror do you see the monster staring back at you?

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

So you really do love to do little boys and can’t come to grips with it? Lying to yourself everyday and trying to explain it to others isn’t constructive. I wish you luck.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

You are a pathetic person. Obviously you know I’m right so you make false accusations to make up for your failings as a person. Enjoy hiding in the bushes.

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Right? You haven’t said anything other than an opening insult. Rhetoric. Okay so you choose the game and I’m simply playing it. I’m sorry your pedophilia is negatively affecting your psyche but that isn’t my fault. In the other world of Dialectic *yes* no woman should have freedom and rights unless this comes with the responsibilities that come along with same. Since no woman anywhere will ever tolerate this one must view them as children. And yes I know you’re aroused since I said the word “children” but please try to control yourself.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

You’re the only pedophile I see since you both want to treat women as children and rape them/own them. I have a loving woman who is my equal, we share equal control and equal responsibility and I’ve never been happier. Blame women when you’re the monster that makes no sense. I wonder how your mother would react to your hatefulness, probably as disgusted as all women are with you. Plenty of women have demonstrated that they excel at responbility and without your fragile ego they can actually improve on everything you do.

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

So you let your wife dominate you? Oh okay I see how you roll now. You like it when she wears the big old pink strap on and takes you from behind. This makes you happy. Now is this enough to get you off or do you also need a child to give you a reach around during these foul proceedings? You label this as responsibility on a womans part? Okay – yours is a twisted little world.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Wow you’re an actual crazy person, never mind thought you were just a typical misogynist. False accusations are just that false, where as my accusations are all true.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Good luck dealing with the eternal loneliness of realizing that if you ever expressed masculinity that you will be roundly condemned, vilified and hated by those people you align yourself with.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

I express masculinity in a way that doesn’t intimidate, or cause others pain. Dominance is for fools. Enjoy being a sore loser.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

I’m not losing. Let a woman define what is acceptable masculinity and feel the deep seated gut wrenching truth that whatever it is they come up with it is not masculinity.

Can’t decide for yourself because you have been emasculated and the women that did this to you understand it in an even deeper part of their brain then you do.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Your entire side has already lost and the world is a better place for it. I have defined masculinity for myself and your definition is sickening.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Haven’t lost. Can’t lose. It’s hard wired on our DNA and your rejection of your own nature is seen as pathetic by everyone. Even your “allies”.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Enjoy dying early from repressed emotion.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

I don’t repress my emotions, I control them.

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

He’s a queer who was probably turned that way via a free ride in the back of his Uncles ice cream truck. So now he has to pretend he’s a man (while clearly being gay) and that anyone who really is a man is to be pitied. Appreciate the situation his wife must be in (assuming being married isn’t a lie). She has to live with a gamma level dweeb who leaves her dry as a bone down south. If she isn’t a fat disgusting beast she’s probably doing the mailman just to get *something* between her thighs that doesn’t viscerally disgust her.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

I realize my words sting so your emotional response it to strike back when really I’m just trying to help you see the wrong path you’re on. Perhaps it would be best if you had your mind and body controlled by feminists

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Your words amuse me on their face but I also realize just how sad you’ll be if you never figure anything out. I’m waiting for that moment when the DNA test comes back or you find that facebook post showing your beloveds affair. All you had to be was a man but you chose to be a mangina instead. You’ve been warned, you’ve been told and you still prefer to have a broomstick up your arse. Oh well, that probably turns you on so well met.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Enjoy beating, raping and being alone. Enjoy your faux masculinity.

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Yeah you express “masculinity” as a dick up your butt. How progressive!

Snowden
Guest
Snowden
Offline

Holy fuck you cuck faggot you’ve ruined the comments section of a good article. I guess your troll job was successful.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

You’re delusional. How’s that for a label. SJW’s always lie, and throw around labels they think shame people.

Worn out labels, worn out narratives, worn out ideas. Took about 15 minutes.

You don’t respect masculinity. Why is it okay to force your values on us and not okay for us to have our opinions? Seems like a double standard to me. SJW hypocrisy and scolding. Typical.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

There’s a difference between masculinity and rape and control which is what you advocate for. Go be a cave man if that’s what you want. Sore loser.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Where did I advocate that, oh eunuch of the broad brush?

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

You support roosh he supports that ergo you’re a piece of shit.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

I support Roosh? Really? And I’m to take your goosestepping word on what is to be believed concerning him? Think not.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

You mean he didn’t write an article advocating rape or the one we’re on right now?

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

SJW’s usually have a strangely twisted version of the the English language AND reality. You seem to be no exception. Part of it stems from the fact that you think that you have reinvented human nature in the past 100 years and think that you can mold the universe to fit your collective emotions. Mao and Stalin killing off millions of people of people hasn’t even put a wrinkle in your delusions.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Mao and Stalin seem right in line with the patriachy. Also way to avoid the question.

ReleaseTheKraken
Guest
ReleaseTheKraken
Offline

Just out of curiosity, what is your opinion or expression of masculinity?

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Having a penis mostly, it means different things to different people but it should not mean subjugation of women.

ReleaseTheKraken
Guest
ReleaseTheKraken
Offline

Wait, so thats mostly it? Having male genatalia encompasses most of Masculinity is.

Im putting aside Roosh’s article here, merely debating you on what the definiton of masculinity is.

BAT 21
Guest
BAT 21
Offline

Kaitlin Jenner still has male genatalia I guess that’s your idea of masculinity! I got it Zechs is a tranny!

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

You have a penis? Where do you keep it seriously? In a jar on the mantle? grin

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Hmm a man who respects women has no penis? Or is it that you’re hurt by my words and need to lash out as you claim about women?

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Zechs likes penis – we’ve established that already. Its old news. In fact he previously admitted to being attracted to little boys and lord knows what other perversions likely slink around inside his brain. I’ll bet an excavation of his back yard would turn up all kinds of interesting things. You just know he’s got a serious S&M dungeon under his house.

BobTrent
Guest
BobTrent
Offline

Calling anyone a homosexual, even if they are, is an insult.

flybabycrybaby
Guest
flybabycrybaby
Offline

Talking dirty on the internet is fun! <3 <3 <3 Now tell me I'm a pretty girl grrrrr daddy

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Love? ROFL!

The non-existent carrot on the feminist blue pill stick.

Yeah right.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

I’m in love, but a lot of things are starting to make sense about you right now. Of course a man who has never experienced emotional connection would be as closed off as you.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

You’re “in love”? Oh, my. He has an emotion! How wonderful!!! I experience emotional connection. I have the full array. Only a sackless piece of shit lets them control him.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Clearly not because if any woman saw your thoughts they’d be sick.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Quite the contrary. Your supplication is what they find sickening. The minute you are no longer useful you’ll be kicked to the curb.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Not true, I know you only believe your wife loves you because of “usefulness” but love is a thing, sorry you haven’t experienced it.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Love is an action, not an emotion.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Sex is an action, if that’s your implication, love is an emotion.

66Scorpio
Guest
66Scorpio
Offline

There is ample evidence for this. Criminal prosecution statistics show that men are more likely to be 1) stopped and questioned 2) charged 3) convicted and 4) serving longer sentences for the same crime.
.
Men and women get drunk but the women get excused for what they do when drunk.

flybabycrybaby
Guest
flybabycrybaby
Offline

asl?

flybabycrybaby
Guest
flybabycrybaby
Offline

Soooo true. Omg. Men have it so much worse :'( :'( :'( can I make you a casserole?

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Casseroles are too complex for a modern independent woman to make correctly. They have more than two ingredients and you have to know how work an oven. Make me a sandwich – peanut butter and jelly. Chop chop!

Bee Warren
Guest
Bee Warren
Offline

“Men cannot do as they please – we pay for it in terms of consequences – women do not and that’s the difference.”

Since when was that? I await the day! That’s almost a handful of deluded fools here who dwell on planet fantasy and throw their toys out the pram because the universe refuses to revolve around them. Try and grow up please, you spoilt little boys.

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Woman gets drunk and sleeps with some guy she considers “hot” at the time. Gets herself preggers. She can: kill the baby at taxpayer (men) expense, adopt it away without penalty, or demand 50 different types of government welfare payments designed to save her from her stupidity. Women are saved from the consequences of their own stupidity – men are not. The guy in the above example (assuming she can even remember his name) has only crushing child support to look forward too – certainly no rights to any decision about the baby. Either way its always the men who pay for womens bad decisions which is why women should properly be classified with the same basic fundamental rights as 4 year old children.

They should not be given voting rights as they seek to use those to impose and take from others. They should not be given the right to own property anymore than you would title a 4 year old child with running a major corporation, and you certainly wouldn’t trust a young child with autonomy.

Bee Warren
Guest
Bee Warren
Offline

Oh of course the man had nothing to do with getting her drunk, having sex without contraception (risking STDs), possibly without consent if she was too drunk, or later abandoning her to bring up a child alone, did he? That would be far too much responsibility to expect of a simple minded bloke, wouldn’t it?

What, did he just lie there passively, reluctantly, an unwilling participant? Was he so brainless he was incapable of realising possible consequences for himself?

She may or may not have been careless on that occasion but no way is he some innocent victim. It takes two to tango, matey!
It is physically impossible for a woman to force a man to have sex if he doesn’t want to or is unconscious, yet not the other way round. That’s what rape is. It is only men (well, pseudo men really) who use drugs to inflict it. Your little story is weaker than a flaccid penis… it just doesn’t stand up.

If pregnancy does result from a one-off mistake it is she who pays the price with all her freedom and career prospects for the next 16 + years or so of her life. He can just walk away – and very often does.

Since you admit you’re a control freak you must be devoid of empathy but why not give it a go? It’s what marks out humans from lower animals.
Do you imagine it is easy having to abort or give up a child you’re instinctively and physically bonded to? Of course it isn’t. Only on RARE occasions does anyone do so because they feel unable to give that child a decent life, for whatever reason. Maybe the father is a violent psychopath whom they fear, or even just an arrogant twat who thinks he can own and enslave another person (a control freak) and therefore not someone you’d let anywhere near a child. In all cases it’s an extremely traumatic, desperate last resort.

Naturally you haven’t the faintest idea what it’s like to be pregnant, even less to give birth. No man is strong enough to handle that kind of pain. Many are too selfish to sacrifice the rest of their life putting someone else’s needs before their own as a mother does.
Certainly all you gullible sheep who follow that nasty lunatic Roosh’s ideas have no concept of caring for others. If you can’t even be kind to the mother of your child there’s not much hope for the kiddy, is there?

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Bee… you old war horse did some man somewhere done you wrong? Did you pass out drunk and wake up preggers after doing the entire football team? Nature has your answer: too damn bad. Idiocy of the kind you describe can and rightly should be punished. Women are too stupid and immature to actually consider future consequences so its up to men to firmly guide them and too keep their expected f**kups to a minimum. Men in the U.S. make a mistake when they gave in to these stupid moronic children – they think they’re gonna get laid – WRONG. Best thing to do is slap the shit out of one of them if they get out of line. Just like a dog – a woman is happiest with firm discipline and guidance. You don’t leave a dog or a child in the position of having to make adult decisions.

Don’t confuse the presence of discipline with a lack of kindness – I love women! That is why I want to see them in the home rather than whoring around. They are too dumb, and too easily led astray to be trusted with any real responsibilities outside the home. Give a woman an inch and she’s preggers. Give her the vote and she’ll make damn sure she never has to pay for her own stupidity. Give her a public voice and naturally you’ll get a system where its basically illegal to criticize even the stupidest of welfare queens. Women are children which is why they need a father or husband to keep them in check. Failing that you have nature which is far more cruel and vicious as the winter winds care not about evil patriarchy. Moronic women need a master and men must rise to the occasion or forfeit civilization as we know it (which also solves the female problem). In a medieval world you don’t get slut walks do you? You don’t see them protesting in Islamic countries … wonder why? Oh yeah because the men would beat the shit out of them, rape them, put them back in their proper place and make sure the other women learn from the example. Personally I don’t advocate a return to Islam but ultimately that’s the choice you stupid spoiled children have – western patriarchy or the burka. You *WILL* get one of those and given your attitude I hope you aren’t afraid of razors – I hear female circumcision hurts like a bitch.

Bee Warren
Guest
Bee Warren
Offline

Ahahahaha! You love women do you? What kind of love is expressed by the sadistic brutality, domination, oppression and contempt you advocate. The only more insanely hateful thing would be murder. What a charming and civilized human being you must be – NOT!

Get off your arrogant, self-appointed pedestal, ditch the ignorant bigotry – it just makes you look incredibly stupid from anybody’s perspective, be they woman or man.

Maybe you have been wronged by a woman. Did your mother not nurture you well? Did your girlfriend dump you? You can’t blame her if she did – you obviously deserved it as you are a nasty, cruel bastard.
Still you don’t seem grown up enough to accept your share of responsibility for your own actions.

It is not me that has a problem with men. Yes, I have been wronged by one or two men, also one or two women. That’s life. So what? I once saw a three legged dog. That means all dogs have three legs, does it?

At least half of my friends are men. Of course, since I live in a normal society, they are all mentally balanced and have no delusions of grandeur and superiority. We have lots of fun together working, playing, discussing world affairs, socialising AS EQUALS, with equal respect for each other and everybody’s happy.

So why don’t you get back in your miserable little Neanderthal cave with your bitter and twisted prejudice and rot in the putridness of your own heart?

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Oh dear daddy’s absence really did a number on you didn’t it? On the one hand you want to prove your feminist chops and the other you secretly yearn for the firm hand to show you the proper way. I’ll bet the binding on your copy of 50 shades of gray is barely holding together from being read and re-read so many times. Yes Bee discipline – women need it and you’re proving my point.

You see how much more pleasant you would be if you’d get off the computer and go make a man somewhere a sammich? Everyone would be happier including you. You would actually be doing something kind and productive and people wouldn’t think (correctly) that you were a bitter graying dyke with 50+ cats. You should seek out a real man, one who isn’t afraid to guide you and control your childish outbursts. You’ll be a better person for it once he corrects you and starts making you behave. Cheers!

Bee Warren
Guest
Bee Warren
Offline

There you go talking out of your backside again.

1)My father was a gentleman with a loving heart. Someone to be proud of. Someone worthy of respect.

2)Trash like 50 Shades – written by a man and, from what I hear of it, pure fantasy with zero understanding of women, (like yourself) – is the last thing I would waste my eyes on.
3) If any man laid a violent hand on me he’d regret it the rest of his short life. I am not an aggressor but will defend myself fiercely if I have to… and of course the law would be on my side. Thugs and brutes have no place in a civilised society.

In the probability that he were bigger and stronger than me, ie. a snivelling bully, my male friends wouldn’t hesitate to flatten him. Because real men [and women] loathe bullies. Only the biggest cowards pick on people smaller than themselves. You like beating up little girls and old ladies, don’t you? What a big, brave fellow you must be! So how do you fancy your chances with a 6’2″ Glaswegian man?
4) My sex life is none of your business but I can assure you you are as wrong as it’s possible to be.

I repeat – it is not me that has a problem with men. I have a very healthy relationship.
It is you that has some weird notion about women and your hatred of women, your desire to hurt and cause suffering just proves you to be a pervert of the lowest kind. I’ve seen more advanced lifeforms crawl out from under a rock. You’re hardly worth the pity I feel for you, but pitiful is what you are.
Since you want to inflict only misery on others then you must want a life of misery for yourself. What you give is what you get

Of course you do have the option of dropping the pseudo-macho bullshit and being a normal, mature person. You might even find somebody to like you one day.

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Bee! So good to hear from u again. Im sure you’re father was a great man but when he and your mother were on Maury did the DNA test come back yea or nay?
Given your demeanor I’m pretty sure there’s a drunken late night session or two passed out behind the stop and rob in your mothers past. It would explain a lot.

(2) men are smart aren’t they? He wrote that obvious pulp nonsense to make a buck and you gals fought over copies of it like it was the bouquet at a wedding with a bunch of 30 somethings. What drivel – and you broads ate it up and pleaded for more to the tune of a big Hollywood movie deal complete with lines around the block at the premier. Never ever underestimate the vacuousness and stupidity of the modern woman who is so incapable of understanding herself, her own desires, and the world around her – such moronic children you all are. 50 shades is proof howvery easy to manipulate and bait you all into pursuing the short term gina tingles over your long term betterment. 50 shades shows why men need to take women back to the 1750’s – it absolutely epitomizes the levels of depravity and selfish stupid obsessions that women have and are completely unable to refrain themselves from indulging in regardless of any long term cost of same.

(3) ahh bee… You’ve been watching lots of Angelina Jolie movies haven’t you? Some dimwit cunt weighing in at 120 pounds downing a room full of 200 pound body builders. You do believe in fairy tales don’t you? Any man could kick you to the curb (or back into the kitchen and/or bedroom where u belong) in a New York minute. And YES widdle cupcake YES the “law” (big large MEN with guns) are necessary to protect you from your own stupidity if you get into a scuffle with a man. Woody Allen has more muscle than you dimwit. Thank you for admitting that your stupid fantasy requires men to work and potentially die for you. What’s the biggest contradiction ever written since “military intelligence”? “Independent woman”… There just isn’t such a thing. Just another full of herself dyke sitting on the shoulders of men and feeling tall.

You see the wisdom here don’t you now bee? We don’t hate women we just correctly understand that they are grossly inferior to men and need to be firmly guided. Men love children and care for them but do not acknowledge them as equals because they aren’t – same with the women. Now go make your daddy a sammich cupcake and remember not to cut yourself or forget which way to cut it this time! If youre really good daddy will read you a story and ravish you later after you do the dishes.

Bee Warren
Guest
Bee Warren
Offline

Now your drivel has sunk beyond comprehension. I’ve no idea what you’re on about.
Something about men being so incompetent they can’t make their own ‘sammich’ (presumably baby talk for sandwich?) and want to be patronised and molly coddled like helpless babies all their lives. I suppose it’s just another symptom of your profound immaturity.

I know the men in my life would be very insulted and humiliated at such degrading treatment. And, like any normal human being, would be very miserable in such a one-sided situation.

As far as I can tell, in your fantasy world women do all the giving in a relationship while the men only take selfishly and contribute absolutely nothing except intestinal gas… well apart from the cruelty, violence and child abuse.

But in your case, obviously you wouldn’t know how to ravish a woman even if you could get near one. With your inability to live without a mummy-figure wipe your arse for you, your best chances would be to employ a cook, a housekeeper and a nurse, and stick with the blow-up doll for sex with something that doesn’t have feelings and you don’t have to give pleasure to.
Why do you think the term ‘wanker’ is given to the most useless, self-serving wastes of space?

As you are intent on a life of crime, or at least bragging that that’s the highest ambition you have, I hope you like prison food because I doubt you’ll like what some of the more hardened inmates do to shit-for-brains losers who pick on women and little girls.
With a bit of luck the castration you are so desperately crying out for will be done under anaesthetic – because if you laid a hand on one of my daughters or granddaughters I wouldn’t be so merciful… Come to think of it, all being perfectly capable of standing up for themselves, even the littl’un, I doubt they’d need help from me or anyone else. After all, you’re only a pathetic little runt, aren’t you?

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Bee! Happy valentines day! I’m sure Felix and Mr. Tiddlesworth are keeping you good company in leu of an actual man this holiday. Give them each a sprig of catnip for me will you please?

All this hostility over the simple chore of making a sandwich! My oh my you’d think that I was asking you to dig a mine, or clean out a sewer, or serve combat duty (without the get of jail free card of pregnancy that women use whenever theres a deployment). Please do try to hide your sexual arousal a little better m’kay? Yes I know you long for a real man to bend you over the sink and take you in a manly fashion but my dear that won’t happen until you hit a stair master and lose some weight! Stop cutting your hair, gorging on Ben and Jerry’s and pretending that you are anything other than a complimentary sexual object for a man to enjoy. Embrace this and you will be free. Learn to cook, keep yourself trim and sexy, and happiness in the form of a nice strong man (who you secretly get wet over) will be yours!

Continue in your stupid feminazi ways and only cats await you while your hair grays and you become useless – unable to even make a man a sammich! grin

Bee Warren
Guest
Bee Warren
Offline

There you go again, knowing zero about women and even less about me, you’re as wrong as it’s possible to be on all counts. Try reversing your whole comment back at yourself and I expect you’d be much closer to reality.
Considering the only reason I looked into this site was to defend normal people from the insane pseudo-macho gender Naziism being promoted by a tiny cult of control-freak turdwits, the term ‘feminazi’ hardly applies to anyone espousing equality, does it?

Pity your own mother got pregnant – probably raped by a subhuman moron who then abandoned her to risk her life in giving birth and then to sacrifice her health, hopes and dreams to feed, raise and protect the abomination you have become.

Sadly, her most serious mistake was to spoil you rotten and erroneously let you believe dictatorship and bullying could help you through life. She really should have taught you – not with violence of course – that it just makes you look incredibly stupid and will gain you nothing.

Still, never too late to learn. It’s possible that deep inside the ugly, cowardly creep you present to the world is a reasonable man who, given enough therapy and education maybe… just maybe… could become acceptable to a woman.
Then again, if it’s a genetic fault that has made you into a mindless thug it’s probably best you are never allowed to breed.

I am totally aware that, due to the utter ridiculousness of your fascist ideas, it is likely just a wind-up, but that doesn’t make it any less dangerous.and irresponsible. If Roosh’s idiotic propaganda influenced just one gullible young simpleton into thinking there was any credence in brutality toward women, and he went out and raped someone, that would be at least two people’s lives ruined. She’d be injured, traumatised, potentially made pregnant and unable to engage in a normal relationship ever again, while he’d be locked up, beaten up, put on the sex offender’s register and future relationship and employment prospects scuppered… and either could be at risk of STIs and AIDS.

Some of us give the best of our lives to making the world a better place. Then there are the insane and mean-spirited who want to create hell on Earth. As if the world doesn’t have enough problems due, almost entirely, to twisted, self-important men obsessed with power!

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Bee! Zero about women? No my dear I have “known” in the biblical sense many women and I can testify that each and every one required training in order to please me. On the bright side though each of them were much happier after being firmly lead into the light. The joy of serving your man is just something a stupid fat loud feminazi will never enjoy – just the purring of too many cats and stench of the beasts urine throughout your studio apartment. Such a life. Sad.

‘…raped by a subhuman..’ Bee! Are you racist? Are you saying that you believe all that KKK stuff in addition to your stupid feminist fantasies? Oh how delightful. Bee is one of those racial purists where only a select group of lesbian is allowed to munch her cooter. Personally I like a wide range of females and race for me is no issue. Who’d have thought that I would be more progressive than you? All women are basically the same anyway, all of them children requiring guidance, so I see no reason to sign on to bitter racism as you have. I suggest you go find a nice man of color to bend you over the sink and knock that stupid concept of racism out of your empty head. Don’t limit yourself to only white girls and cats bee, experiment!

Roosh’s propaganda? Oh no you poor deluded child. Roosh speaks the absolute truth and he and i both have the notches to prove it. You gals love us when we treat you badly, act like jerks, cheat on you, and dominate you and such is the stuff of your dreams. I have the stained bed sheets to prove it bee, you gals are wired to love domination but your too dishonest to admit it. I’m sure the horror of being born a lesser vessel just nags at you but it is what it is bee and you can’t help being a woman just like I can’t help it that I can’t unlearn the truth. Embrace your true position and know and grow to love your place. Get to know the sandwich and how happy you will be when you please your man by serving him. That is the way to happiness for a woman.

You don’t need to make the world a better place bee you just need to learn how to make your man happy and he will do great things! You don’t have the pressure, the weight of the crown a man must wear you only need serve locally to act globally. When you learn to behave and serve you’ll make the world a better place like a good obedient child should. Peace bee and remember who and what you are.

Bee Warren
Guest
Bee Warren
Offline

Bla.. bla..bla.. same old vain, vile and ignorant bullshit there Remo. Obviously your deluded, egotistic, fantasy blinds you to everything I actually say. As you’re so narcissistic and incapable of listening to anyone else I expect you bore women into a coma then go to the mirror for your wank fodder.
Just one more point I’d like to make clear (if the strain of understanding simple facts isn’t too taxing for you) ;
I said ‘subhuman’. This has nothing whatsoever to do with race. That’s entirely your twisted interpretation and reflects your attitude not mine at all, which makes you the only racist, as well as the only Nazi.

Well, I suppose a bigot with a pathological superiority complex would have multiple prejudices.

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

You’re a racist Bee and your little slip shines the light on the slime living in the depth of your soul. I’m not blind to what you say I just don’t agree with a bitter racist harridan whose racism and obvious effututam taints everything about her. You label other races subhuman so you cannot be treated with even the passing smirking respect I was giving you before. You’re not an innocent child who is simply ignorant of what makes her tick, you’re a genocidal racist whose voice should be ignored or silenced completely when she reaches for her favorite brown shirt.

Bee Warren
Guest
Bee Warren
Offline

Oh you tiresome cretin! Never did I, nor would I ever, imply that subhuman referred to someone of another race. You did. That makes you the racist.

For your information, subhuman means an unevolved animal.
The profound ignorance in your twisted assumptions show you to be an even bigger fool than you already have proven.
You don’t even know which races I descend from.
I don’t recognise racial differences, never have. I’ve travelled widely and have friends across the world. People are just people as far as I’m concerned and I merit each by their individual heart.
Who cares what race, religion, creed or gender a person is? Only bigots like you.

Prejudice against women is no different from any other kind of prejudice… it’s just irrational hatred of those you don’t understand and are unwilling to listen to.
Your arguments are so weak. I see you squirm and throw as much sewage as you can dig up because you have no foundation, no substance, no truth – just empty self-aggrandising bullshit. You convince no -one but yourself.

It’s blatantly clear you are clueless about women and are desperately clinging to some archaic myth borne of a frightened little boy’s sense of impotence.

Your refusal to accept the fact that men are more dependent on women than women are on men; that women are intelligent and strong in their own right; that no person can own another; that control freaks, of either sex, are obnoxious, despicable and repellant; that human relationships are built on mutual love, trust and respect, not bullying and humiliation.

Your bragging about your sexual prowess just goes to show what a tosser you are. Real men don’t need to brag. Real men attract real women by natural charm, kindness, intelligence, and potential as a loyal life partner and wise father for her children. No one in their right mind would let a violent thug anywhere near their children even if he were the biological father.

There is nothing less sexy than an ill-mannered, pig-headed narcissist who thinks that because a woman finds him repulsive she must be a lesbian. How stupid can you get? It is because all but maybe the most naive young girls fail to be impressed by such arrogant twats.

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Bee you’re a filthy racist moron. Judging people by their skin color and calling them subhuman makes you the uneducated twat. Regardless of my feelings on women I certainly don’t judge an entire race of people as one nor do I call them subhuman as you have done. You want to see a subhuman? Look in the mirror and there you go. You’re right I don’t know what race you are but if whether or not you’re self hating or other hating really doesn’t matter to me – its the fact that you feel judging an entire race is valid. It is not and you are not, period. Yes I’m sure like every racist you have a flip card full of stock photos of “friends” to try to prove you aren’t what you slipped up and admitted publicly. Color me not impressed (pun intended).

In your screed I see you say that “one person cannot own another” and I bet that just makes you yearn for the antebellum days of yore doesn’t it Scarlet? And as for your obvious sexual arousal over my truth telling – sorry but I’m not interested. I’d never give some KKK burning cross carrying monstrosity such as yourself a crack at the good stuff. Black women are beautiful – REALLY beautiful – there I said it – and I know that makes your squirm doesn’t it? Go find some David Duke to fill your nethers – I’m not interested.

Bee Warren
Guest
Bee Warren
Offline

Oh dear oh dear! You really have lost the plot, haven’t you? You know perfectly well I never even mentioned or made the remotest reference to race or skin colour. The whole issue is entirely your bizarre invention, just because you didn’t like me saying you were the product of a subhuman assault on your mother. I only said that because rapists exhibit a subhuman, ie. lower animal, attitude to sex.

You can make up as much false accusations and nonsensical crap as you like, but my conscience is squeaky clean.
I suggest you change your medication because it’s making you more and more delusional as you twist the facts beyond all recognition.

Michelle Green
Guest
Michelle Green
Offline

Amusing that you call women children when you may as well be rolling around on the floor with a pacifier in your mouth with this tantrum.

Remo
Guest
Remo
Offline

Um yeah I label women children because a person dies as she considers it inconvenient. So you consider MURDER a small thing?!?!

Michelle Green
Guest
Michelle Green
Offline

You ass, I’m pro-life. I believe Roe Vs. Wade was largely voted in by a mostly make Supreme Court yes? And the overwhelming majority of physicians performing abortions are male.

People are killed out of “inconvenience” during robberies…. More frequently committed by men. But I’ve got enough brain cells to run together and realize that this isn’t a characteristic trait of the whole gender. I’m sorry you lack that same ability of reasoning.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Too many in a democracy. That is about to be remedied. Won’t be any democracies at all before long. Know why? Too many idiot women voting in ways that ensure their destruction via invasion by Theocratic Muslims (male chauvinists) and Marxist Dictator backing Latino’s (also male chauvinists). Add to this the destruction of the family and the collapse of all of the social contracts (civil society) and you have an environment NOT conducive to women. Good luck with that, you’re going to need it.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Conspiracy theories, when will the aliens get here?

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

Conspiracy theories? You mean like the kind a Western Roman would have had when he realized that his government was paying tribute to the Huns? It’s neither a conspiracy, nor a theory. Just glaring facts.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Kind of like how many think aliens exist And visit earth constantly and Obama is a reptile? It’s bullshit.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

It’s not bullshit. You don’t want to acknowledge reality. We’ve established that. Your version of reality has Muslims acting as feminists and Commies not viably running for the office of the Presidency. You’re all wet.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

I’m confused as to why you’re not defending muslims if they are as you say they are in regards to women?

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

I don’t understand why you are but not so vocally.

I think their religion is entirely hypocritical and disgusting. It is repressive and disrespectful of women. It is misogynistic. They don’t believe in personal liberties (such as freedom of expression/speech) of any sort.

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Neither do you or any of your ilk, look at the damn title of this article.

Ken Bourne
Guest
Ken Bourne
Offline

Zechs, write an article dude. Please, show us how great your life is, we’re just so eager to learn from your great wisdom! Surely logic will win the day!

Zechs Marquise
Guest
Zechs Marquise
Offline

Dbaa would be the general gist but obviously you have to rage because women can vote so that is an impossibility.

flybabycrybaby
Guest
flybabycrybaby
Offline

Obama is from the planet Zorp. All hail Zorp.

I Art Laughing
Guest
I Art Laughing
Offline

You probably like Conspiracy Theorists such as George Santayana (“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”) and Strauss and Howe (“The Fourth Turning”). You know people that believe that history is cyclical and all. That’s generally what my opinion is based on. That and the consistency of human nature based on observations dating back a few thousand years.

Derek Flounders
Guest
Derek Flounders
Offline

Yeh man, did you see what he did there? I saw that he said muslim, so I replaced all words woman with palestine and all words man with isreal. Roosh is a genius it’s obvious palestine must be control by the superior of israel and the rest of those mussy places too; free up some of that pussy for the rest of us.

I’m visiting israel in a week can’t wait, I’m gonna get me some palestine pussy, show the dumbass musilm who the real allah is; if you know what I mean *wink wink* TAKE BACK CONTROL! mussies can’t be left alone they haev to be controlled by superior society

I posted Roosh for advice but my post is not there, can you help? I only have one more week.

Bee Warren
Guest
Bee Warren
Offline

What bullshit propaganda has corrupted you and your ilk into such deranged control freaks? What made you become a self-important idiot who irrationally hates his own mother. Is it because you realise, deep down, that women are generally more vital to your existence than you are to theirs that you fear them?

Simba
Guest
Simba
Offline

Jajajajaja

That was lovely, trying to make me feel guilty for using my own brain to think.

Go away, woman. This is no place for you.

Bee Warren
Guest
Bee Warren
Offline

Hahahaha! Using your own brain to think? Very funny! If that were so you wouldn’t be getting sucked into the truly sick sphere of absurd nonsense spouted by that criminally insane, sex pervert, Roosh. Good to know you are capable of feeling guilt, Simba. Hopefully it will prevent you acting out the vile thuggery you seem to approve. I do pity you for whatever horrendous experience twisted you into the bitter creature you are letting yourself become, but you can’t blame half the human race for something maybe just one woman did to you. We’ve all suffered at the misdeeds of others. Some people just have a nasty streak (eg Roosh). Gender has nothing to do with it.
As a woman it is very much my place to come here to stand up in self defence to any warped bully obsessed with domination and who would consider rape.
I am also defending all the decent, real men, (ie. 99.999…%) of the world who are disgraced and imprisoned by simply sharing the gender of sicko psychos like Roosh. Of all the comments on facebook it was the men who most wanted to tear him limb from limb. Not only does he shame them but poses a serious threat to their mothers, sisters, daughters and wives – people they love.

Do yourself a favour, lad, get some therapy or whatever, but do not throw your life away on an irrational hatred. It will eat you from the inside and the ugliness of your soul will repel all others and destroy you. What’s more you are liable to end up in prison – as Roosh most definitely will.

Dispel the hatred. Get yourself a nice boyfriend, if that’s what you prefer, and go live a peaceful life.

Simba
Guest
Simba
Offline

Nice speech, nothing I haven’t heard before, considering the feminist hive mind programs it all.

Once more, go away woman. It’s clear you don’t know what you’re talking about and I’m sure you’ll find the kitchen more suited to your talents.

Be gone now.