When the iPhone started gaining popularity, I wrote about how it makes women less capable of love. It puts them on such a thrilling roller coaster ride of attention and fleeting validation that the love of one man becomes just too boring. And now women are attempting to get that love back on social networking, through the very means that caused them to lose the ability to love in the first place.
A girl who shares a photo on Instagram, a status update on Facebook, or a tweet about her day is simply trying to receive love from people on the internet. There is no reason to share a photo with strangers unless in that moment you are feeling a lack of love, which is why it’s most commonly done when a woman is alone. When she’s experiencing a momentary feeling of emptiness or lack of attention, she shares a selfie and then relaxes from the soothing effects of dopamine as the likes and comments come in, all without having to understand or cater to the needs of others.
Unfortunately for the girl, this will not work in finding real love. She already damaged her love mechanism by swallowing whole all the depression-causing feedback loops that autistic Silicon Valley technologists threw at her, and now she’s trying to get it back through piecemeal bytes from people she ultimately doesn’t care about. It’s the same as crushing your leg with a sledgehammer and then using the same sledgehammer to bang it back into place. To save your life, a doctor will end up having to amputate the leg.
The only possible treatment for a woman is to completely withdraw participation from social networking. She must never share anything personal online. She must only follow other people without commenting. She must never anticipate or hope for a potential response that could spike her dopamine. Combined with a healthy search for a male partner, she may be able to love again, but we all know that this asks too much of the modern female. Your average woman will not be able to quit all her social networking accounts and observe so many other women getting a million likes from strangers while she receives none, but unless she does this, the odds of her being content with the love from one man are zero. She will become a love amputee.
It turns out that many men use social networking to feel love as well. If the intent of what you’re sharing is to receive attention, compliments, and validation, you’re starved of real-life love. When the only response to what you’re sharing is discussion about you, the internet has become your lover. This is one of the reasons I’ve been so incompetent with managing my Instagram account. Sharing a photo of myself, where the only response can be likes on my image or comments about me, is love-thirst behavior, but I am still a human being and sometimes experience moments where I feel a lack of love. I’m still capable of love in real life, but I know that using the internet to receive it will just damage that ability. It turns out that sleeping with so many sluts did less harm to me than if I had the habit of uploading a selfie every day.
If you want to predict whether the a woman you meet in the future will be satisfied by your love, ask yourself what trends you see with smartphone usage. Are women becoming more dependent on it or less? You already know the answer: women have showed absolutely no indication that they want to lessen their social networking usage, and if anything, they are doubling down to such an extent that they may even prefer it to normal friendships.
An entire generation of men have to suffer worsening relationships with women because a few hundred technologists wanted to create a utopia. Instead, they created a hell where the only time you’ll be able to feel a little bit human is while staring at a tiny computer in your hand.
Read Next: Patricia’s Smartphone
The sad reality is that social media can never provide long lasting emotional joy or happiness. It is a con.
At my age (early-mid 30s), social media is being used by my similarly aged peers to just show off their successes in life.
It’s either the birth of a child, their child being sent off on their first day of school, standing beside their brand new car, their new home “purchased” (mortgaged for 30 years), or an increasingly swanky holiday.
Anybody who is down and out, just over broke, or just plain unfulfilled in life is setting themselves up for depression and resentment by just logging into social media. Of course everyone has bad times, they just never share it.
What personally drives me nuts is the liberal white chicks I grew up with who now shill for diversity on Facebook after they clearly moved to the country to pop out babies for a blue-collar conservative husband.
It’s dreamland… Total fucking lunacy…
I posted elsewhere previously that if they support feminism, then they must support the diversity mass immigration agenda as females get their ‘power’ from bankers and not from true female empowerment. Most people are sheep and the women will blindly follow the agendas set out for them. Women currently ‘benefit’ from having to work ‘jobs'(if you call that a benefit), but they are not supposed to be net beneficiaries in the long term. Feminism naturally leads to diversity, which naturally leads to race-replacement. That’s why it should’ve been stopped by our great-grandparents 100 years ago – its too late now… even most men are ‘feminists’ by supporting casual sex and supporting women’s ability to work meaningless jobs(which sabotages the family unit as she is now competing for a limited supply of ‘make work’ jobs against many potential male providers, driving down wages earned by such family men).
Been three years since I quit social media, never felt better.
I also find old friends tend to appreciate seeing me every now and then a lot more since they no longer know every single detail of my life.
You haven’t quit social media, as you are still commenting on a blog.
way to be a smartass, I was obviously talking about shit like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram
I wasn’t being a smart ass, I was stating something obvious. Blogs are social media. Perhaps starting now you should give it up for Lent.
Troll alert
Social media is for crafting a very carefully curated public image (driven by the false self), frequently with little to no basis in reality. Unfortunately, many (most) people fall for it, feel they don’t “measure up”, and the cycle of depression continues to deepen. Even those who are aware of the issue and claim that it doesn’t affect them (I was once in this camp, before I quit social media for good), don’t realize how it affects the subconscious until they detox.
As a general rule, the more you see posted about how “amazing” or “incredible” a person/place/relationship is, the more the opposite is in fact true. If it were true, if everything was so wonderful, why are you trying so hard to convince others (and, ultimately, yourself), through the feedback loop of “likes” and comments?
Hate to break it to you man but often this is not true. There are really some people who just have it all.
They are good looking, photogenic, creative, and have money. They live amazing lives and just post pictures from time to time without too much thought or effort. They have lots of real friends, healthy romantic relationships, and come from good families.
The social media just amplifies it all. They are constantly doing cool shit with other 1%’ers and you just get a glimpse inside the life, it’s not fake, they really live that life. For these people instagram is a completely different experience, and can be used for networking and as a dating app.
I know alot of people like this, guys and girls, and have seen how they live their lives first hand.
Eat your heart out.
Maybe you are right that these kind of peole exists. But within their abilitys, and pride they are more likely to regret the most important thing in life- their salvation! This doesnt give you the real joy that is available for everybody.
12 There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death. 13 Even in laughter the heart
is sorrowful; and the end of that mirth is heaviness.
– Proverbs, chapter 14
Dont be looking jeleos on these kind if people. Our father in heaven is just and gives his gift to ALL PEOPLE. Even those who arent good looking, rich, photogenic, creative and with money. He reaches to the poorest… and they are even more likely to recieve his gift of salvation.
15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. 17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but
he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.
1. John, chapter 2
Thank you for that uplifting message. (A medium that lets us reach more people with our messages can’t be all bad!)
I’ll bet you the 1% get bored of the ‘cool shit’ you talk about. I’ve done some of that shit(despite not being the 1%, just knowing them) and its not all that.
Yeah but dude by definition not everybody is the 1%, so how is it that so many people online are living these incredible lives?
You haven’t really proved that people don’t tailor their social media profiles to look more amazing than they are.
Yes. Such people exist, but for way too many it works as a substitute for real relationships and love.
Especiallly if such a female/person has sort of preferred social media at the expense of relationships; like her or she actually sees Instagram or Youtube as more important than to prioritize a LTR.
But this may also overlap careeerism and/or celebrity worship. Social media has become a way to gain more followers and make a career, while some use it only to magnify their careers in other business areas.
Generally speaking, social media is just one facet of the contemporary degeneracy: girls sleeping around, and focusing on careers instead of families are just as bad if not worse than social media addiction.
You make a key point: “girl sleeping around, and focusing on careers instead of families are just as bad if not WORSE than social media addiction”. Yes, sadly, as much as I enjoy interacting with women at work, it is true that career women are detrimental to family formation, the same being true of sluts.
“Yes, sadly, as much as I enjoy interacting with women at work, it is true that career women are detrimental to family formation, the same being true of sluts.”
No, it is other than true. Career men and women are able to form families. Whether or not they are successful at it remains to be seen.
“If it is cubicle wage-slaves who are easily cucked or manipulated by their partners/wives, then their male children will see this and will learn to be weak-minded, and their daughters will learn to disrespect men the same way they see their mother disrespecting their dad.
There is observably no such thing as “cubicle wage slave”.
“So a large percentage of both males and females are to blame for the weak, collapsing society we see today; in addition to the manipulative banksters.”
Basically, you are saying tens of millions of white men and women who have high IQ and high time preferences are to blame. You are a degenerate to “race realism”.
^Anti-Gnostic is a woman.
More projection on your part. You got summarily trashed and are now lashing out. Sad.
If you say so.
I know so.
More projection on your part. You got summarily trashed and are now lashing out. Sad.
Bingo
good point. however, roosh’s argument of their inability (or massive difficulty) to really love still holds, even for the 1% echelon IG user you just mentioned.
Telling this to the average joe is considered absolute insanity. However this is probably the only use conventional social media has. Isn’t it ironic that 70% of the women I have added post from time to time the act of feeling depressed and anxious? This same behavior is repressed by fishing and obtaining likes. No matter how smart a woman can be, she has absolutely no escape from this. All her friends, parents and teachers are riding the same insanity car. She just wants to “go with the boys”.
Social media is for crafting a very carefully curated public image (driven by the false self), frequently with little to no basis in reality. Unfortunately, many (most) people fall for it, feel they don’t “measure up”, and the cycle of depression continues to deepen. Even those who are aware of the issue and claim that it doesn’t affect them (I was once in this camp, before I quit social media for good), don’t realize how it affects the subconscious until they detox.
As a general rule, the more you see posted about how “amazing” or “incredible” a person/place/relationship is, the more the opposite is in fact true. If it were true, if everything was so wonderful, why are you trying so hard to convince others (and, ultimately, yourself), through the feedback loop of “likes” and comments?
“Sharing a photo of myself, where the only response can be likes on my image or comments about me, is love-thirst behavior, but I am still a human being and sometimes experience moments where I feel a lack of love. I’m still capable of love in real life, but I know that using the internet to receive it will just damage that ability. It turns out that sleeping with so many sluts did less harm to me than if I had the habit of uploading a selfie every day.”
No disrespect Roosh but the elephant in the room is, how does the rest of your online activity affect you? Youtube videos, tweets, blog posts plus a forum named after you, all with a logo of your face – isn’t the effect of the likes, retweets, comments and other feedback on your brain’s wiring just as powerful as what you’re describing?
Have you seen the comments I get? I rarely get compliments, and many try to psycho analyze my flaws/defects. The majority of comments debate my ideas instead of me.
As for rewiring my brain, I’m sure it has in some way, though I don’t believe it has affected my personal relationships. No way to say for sure.
It’s why I hate texting. Fake intimacy, even the sexting. I just ended my first “modern” relationship and it sucks the joy out of everything.
I’m still relying on a dumb phone and keeping the texting to a minimum.
When i get into an LTR i’m going back to the analog flip-phone
The only reason i had to conform to the smartphone was for maps while living in Ukraine
flip phones are rare these days, sadly
I personally love to be in a relationship, because it makes sex easy and regular.
Used to be a side benefit of marriage. Now? “I’m a married man, of course I don’t get laid”.
Married men of today get sex on a regular basis. Clearly you are the outlier.
I am not married. last I looked. And I doubt that data point is an outlier. But of course there is a Parelo.
Smartphones and social networking only further contribute to the ‘zombie apocalypse’ that is upon us all.
Technology enslaves us to the bankers and the media masters. It is not really meant to be for our benefit.
In the not-too-distant future, they will replace feminism with a society where men marry young and their wives answer to these men. The reason being that it is easiest to control a man via using his wife and kids. The current feminism for divide-and-conquer has run its course and whilst in 2018 we see peak feminism, in a few years following the impending economic collapse it will die off. Feminism was created by bankers and it will be killed by bankers as having achieved its purpose, the collapse of the current social order, thus becoming obsolete. Humans in general are easy to control and if you make men answerable to the state by controlling their wallets via their ‘wives’ and their dependents, you have a good obedient little slave.
How is that arranged marriage working out for you?
“In the not-too-distant future, they will replace feminism with a society where men marry young and their wives answer to these men.”
What social conditions lead you to draw to this inevitable conclusion?
“Feminism was created by bankers and it will be killed by bankers as having achieved its purpose, the collapse of the current social order, thus becoming obsolete.”
The second time you made this statement. Where is your evidence?
“Most people are sheep and the women will blindly follow the agendas set out for them.”
No, in reality, most people are consciously aware of the decisions they make and their consequences. Clearly, you are trolling here.
“Feminism naturally leads to diversity, which naturally leads to race-replacement.”
That is Fake News.
I do plan on an arranged marriage of a sort, by getting my friends to set me up with a suitable partner. They, being my friends, would be most likely to know what I am looking for in a partner. I am single for now.
Feminism was created by bankers and the same people push for mass immigration. If you can’t/don’t want to see it, so be it. I am not interested in arguing a point that to me is obviously true and you don’t want to see it. I respect that you may perhaps have a different point of view, but this is the way I see it/the way things are.
How can I be trolling – that is a ridiculous statement when even studies such as those performed by establishment figures such as Edward Bernays show that 90% of people don’t actually think for themselves, hence the usefulness of propaganda.
I disagree with your criticisms. The only criticism I can understand that you find it difficult to see is the one where I mentioned a society where men marry and their wives are answerable to these men in the future – this is not immediately obvious.
I’d like to believe that you are unable to see what I am saying is true. But it is also possible you just won’t see what I am saying is true (for a variety of reasons). I’m not interested in debating the issues as debating a person who just will not see is pointless and a waste of my time. But I wish you nothing but peace.
Hmm..my reply got deleted the first time I see. I mentioned in it that I would do an arranged marriage of a sort, where my friends would pick a suitable partner for me.
I said that banksters funded feminism, as well as other social movements, which is a well known fact.
I mentioned that establishment proponent Edward Bernays showed that 90% of people do not think critically and are thus ‘sheeple’. Yes, they are responsible for their decisions, yet most people are unthinking ‘zombies’ of a sort.
I also said that you may not want to see what I have said is the truth (for various reasons) and I have no need to debate nor waste my time in such a fashion debating someone who just will not see. I wish you peace.
“I mentioned in it that I would do an arranged marriage of a sort, where my friends would pick a suitable partner for me.”
So you haven’t actually gone through the process?
“I said that banksters funded feminism, as well as other social movements, which is a well known fact.”
It is not a well known fact, it is a Fake News.
“I mentioned that establishment proponent Edward Bernays showed that 90% of people do not think critically and are thus ‘sheeple’. Yes, they are responsible for their decisions, yet most people are unthinking ‘zombies’ of a sort.”
No, he showed how people could potentially be manipulated. In reality, the majority of people are able to think critically.
“I also said that you may not want to see what I have said is the truth (for various reasons) and I have no need to debate nor waste my time in such a fashion debating someone who just will not see. I wish you peace.”
It’s not the truth, it’s just your opinions. And since you are unwilling to engage in debate, it only shows that you are neck deep in confirmation bias. Congratulations, you are part of that 90%.
you’re j3wish aren’t you?
Only a j3w makes the kind of arguments you have about feminism not being related to banksters, as well as multiculturalism etc.. It wouldn’t surprise me if you were a paid sayanim here to manipulate people’s thoughts. Still, whilst I harbour no ill will towards you even though you’re a lying manipulative POS the original poster still has valid points to make whilst you’re just an unworthy keyboard warrior who has nothing to contribute to the conversation but lame comebacks.
Do some people get PAID to comment? Please share the employers’ contact info if you have it.
Yes of course certain people get paid to comment, but wth with your suggestion for employers contact info – you’re unlikely to get that, its not like they’re going to admit it or tell who their employer is!
Darn–thought YOU might know, since you mentioned the subject. 😉
Dang are you serious?? You mean I could be making MONEY commenting? Jeez all this time they’ve been sending me a big bag of M&Ms every week and TWO BAGS whenever I write a masterpiece. But Money? Man I could use some of that. I need to talk to somebody about this. They think I’m some Buckwheat gonna write for M&Ms and other chumps are getting real money. What kind of monkey they think I am? But thanks for the intel. Money! I gotta check this out.
“you’re j3wish aren’t you?”
Clearly you are a Russian bot, as this obsession with Jews is trolling material.
“Only a j3w makes the kind of arguments you have about feminism not being related to banksters, as well as multiculturalism etc..”
Offer specific evidence as to how and why bankers and feminism is related, rather than state it as a fact. Are you able to engage in this intellectual task?
“It wouldn’t surprise me if you were a paid sayanim here to manipulate people’s thoughts.”
Projection is your strong suit.
“Still, whilst I harbour no ill will towards you even though you’re a lying manipulative POS the original poster still has valid points to make whilst you’re just an unworthy keyboard warrior who has nothing to contribute to the conversation but lame comebacks.”
More projection on your part. It is even more clearer you are a Russian bot.
You’re a really angry guy anti-gnostic. Not only that, but you didn’t even deny or disprove his argument! 🙂
Sattad never made an argument, just accusations.
And as far as me being angry, that would be Fake News on your part.
You’re a really angry guy anti-gnostic.
If anti-gnostic is biologically a guy then I’m biologically a dragon, heh.
She is a “guy” the same way a person who possess a cock claims to be a “woman” on the internet and/or in real life.
When it comes to women doing it then she’s all “YOLO viva la sexual liberation”, and “how does it impact you personally” towards any male critics, and “life is not about exclusively procreation, but making the most of what the world has to offer”.
But she’s all “y’all sexual deviants who are contributing to society’s moral degeneracy”, “men have the duty to curb their rutting instincts”, and “how many WHITE offspring you’re siring” when it comes to men.
And, believe it or not – the “how many WHITE offspring you’re siring” part comes from a woman who is all fine & dandy with race mixing. #Dafuq???
Not only that, but you didn’t even deny or disprove his argument! 🙂
Of course not, I’ve had perhaps 4 dozens encounters with her already and had witnessed countless of her interactions with other men here as well.
Don’t let her once-in-a-blue-moon seemingly live-and-let-live attitude towards men fools you, she is here to hurl insults and to shame any man whom she perceives not living up to her own ideals of what a man supposed to be and supposed to do.
And it’s utterly immaterial whether she’s actually a feminist masquerading as a male tradcon or a female tradcon masquerading as a male libertarian or a gender-fluid liberal, for they are all gynocentric and they all demand you as a man to man-up and make women’s existence as comfy as possible.
anti-gnostic is a woman (Jewish at that), not a man. obvious from her comments and general pissyness.
Not a guy
I think that means, “Yes, Jewish.” And a woman.
Again, projection is your strong suit. It’s your only defense against your lack of intellect.
^This commenter is a woman. Thank you, drive thru.
Bingo.
Not quite. It used to be that employers were encouraged to dsicriminate in favor of married men with children. This restricte4d the labor supply, and required companies to pay wages to one breadwinner to support an entire family. With the cultural revolution of the 1960s, and the influx of women permanently in the work force, the supply of professional greatly expanded. As one might expect, this drove wages down. Men and women were indeed now paid the same wage for the same work – but both at a lower rate. Wages dropped till two incomes were required to do what one income had supported.
This is why corporations have been such avid supporters of feminism – it keeps the labor supply higher and the wage rates lower than previously. By forcing women, encouraging women, to replace men in the work place, it also encourages them to place as their highest value not family but the company. The company is husband, and companies do all they can to encourage this attitude among its female employees. Whatever their legal marital status, women their men as the junior partner in a polyandrous marriage.
FYI, there’s a typographical error in the third paragraph: ‘It’s the same the same…’
Nothing women do on social media is worse than the non-stop dick size measuring competition at RVF.
Oh, you mean the forum full of masculine men that get easily offended & ask for banishment?
See, both men and women get something from modern technology! That’s fine, as long as it doesn’t become a substitute for real life. (And by the way–is porn a problem? What about interactive porn?)
It has become a substitute and a shitty one at that
No, real human interaction remains a fixture in people’s lives. Social media merely compliments it.
Real Human interaction has become hci human computer interaction
It may sound very strange, but it’s interesting sometimes to read lesbian forums – it reveals true nature of women. When masks are off, they are emotionally weak and very fragile creatures, and my conclusion was- basically they are looking for love. Funny thing is, they have the same problems with women, that men have with women, except maybe a sponsor thing. The same flakiness, the same ” I have changed my mind” and so. And the same lack of sex in LTR. That was some interesting revelation…
I’ll start reading those to see this. Sounds hilarious
I cant other than agree. Its fucking insane.
A very accurate analysis, Id love for you to finish with some solutions on a personal level to tackle this.
I got two sets of friends who are in relationships. First that marry the over the hill women, girl that used to be hot as fuck but now hit 30 and wants to settle down. Second, friends who gets girls and has open relationship, which I learned means she fucks around alot.
Both those are just no go zones for me.
My three thoughts i been juggling, since Im about ready for some adventure in life again.
1.
I live in the most vain city on earth, LA. I dont travel anymore and fuck mostly local hoes. Its been going on for so long that these insta hoes is what im now used to, its my new normal. One idea is to stay here until im ready for a serious relationship and then go abroad and even thou they are degenerate in other places too these days any personality will look like great compared to LA hoes.
2. I just stay here having dumb bitches, maybe knock one or two or three of them up to have some local offspring. Be a shitty dad and focus on my own business.
3. Move to a beach in a third world country like the Philippines and find 2-3 women poor women, reclassify myself as a muslim and can legally marry them all and forbid them to use any social media or degenerate western cultural influences.
“If the intent of what you’re sharing is to receive attention, compliments, and validation, you’re starved of real-life love.”
Heartist in a recent post, wrote: What Is Love? Reciprocal obsession. I know this is more of a rhetorical answer while a dialectic answer would describe the four loves Storge, Philia, Eros, and Agape. (link) So what category of real life love is being starved?
A more humorous take on compliments.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi8ShAosqzI
This doesn’t get brought up nearly as much as it should…
I remember the days before 2007, when smartphones didn’t exist, dating was much better. You still had flip-phones & constant nonstop texting though
These days, people have forgotten how to communicate verbally. I dated this one bitch, she wouldn’t stop texting. All day. I needed my phone up to my face 24/7 & if i went longer than 30 minutes without a response, she got pissed.
Finally, i told her no more texting, it’s ruining our relations & she got even more pissed. She’d text & i’d respond with a call…she wouldn’t answer & then text me again. I’d call & she’d act as though i was weird for calling. Inevitably, it was the texts that ended the relationship
75 minutes of texting daily or a 90 second phone call to say what needs to be said???
Good riddance, time-waster
u should watch chris rock’s Tamborine special on netflix. im paraphrasing — and perhaps inaccurately — but the gist of it is a 1 yr relationship now is more intimate than a 40 yr marriage was in the 20th century. “intimate” in that you just know EVERYTHING about that person, even if ur not talking to them at the moment. you see their snap story, ig story, fb post, etc etc.
as rock puts it, “youre in each others pocket every second of every day now”
I don’t believe women HAVE love mechanism at all (other than love for themselves). Women used to stay in villages and men go to hunt animals, they RISK their lives to gain food. So, men died more often than women. That means when a man died his woman need to forget about him and forget quick, because she need protection from another man.
If she can love (which I doubt), her love cannot be too deep.
Even more, when she have babies, one of them must be from another man – when the first man died, the second father will protect female with kids. That means women are cheaters by nature.
It’s fucked up from the beginning, that’s why muslims are so rigoristic – BAN for female cheaters! And when a man dies his brother taken care of his wife and kids, right?
“I don’t believe women HAVE love mechanism at all (other than love for themselves).”
Feel free to have that opinion, but you are decidedly wrong in your thought process.
“If she can love (which I doubt), her love cannot be too deep.”
In reality, men and women are equipped to love very deeply.
I’m wainting for some proof that women have love mechanism. If you have an opinion you need to prove why you’re right.
Men and women have this “love mechanism”. It is not even up for debate.
http://www.youramazingbrain.org/lovesex/sciencelove.htm
http://www.youramazingbrain.org/lovesex/sciencelove.htm
*SCRATCHES HEAD*……..not even once money or financial stability or earning potential is mentioned in the supposedly “science” of love…….hmmm………..
So, all those women who require their would-be lovers to be financially stable and to make certain amount of money, don’t know how to love or aren’t capable of love or both?
Or mayhaps ’tis simply the case that those “scientists” whose “scientific” researches cited in the article have never had the pleasure of meeting with a non-lesbian woman who actually cares about the earning potential of her would-be lover?
Often a woman can divine the approximate earning potential in a man by observing his dress attire. For example, the tie or the pocket square is a unique piece that says a bit about not only the man’s character but his station in his finances. He picks the tie with the right design print for the right occasion and it also often reflects his bankroll.
Of late, I’ve seen less ties and more exposed briefs of many varying print designs. But the briefs seem to resemble ties in a way – always unique and seemingly chosen and displayed with care and flair.
http://www.miamibeach411.com/ee/images/uploads/prison-pants.jpg
If anyone can help me out here, say a woman is seeking an earnest man with decent earning potential, how does she ‘read’ the man’s selection of brief design? That is to say, that if there are no ties or pocket squares to be seen in the entire zipcode, then how do you ‘read’ a man’s briefs? Is the man with the pasely briefs more alpha and worldly than say the man with the pastel briefs as we see with these two gentlemen in the head shop as they conisseur the fine vaping equipment??
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-p2kOoTP3dU0/UEWlAFfNjTI/AAAAAAAAAQI/giwIsrK52Nk/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/saggingpants.jpg
I’m perplexed. And does a man with NY Jets briefs exceed the earning potential of say a man with polka dot briefs?? Hmmm . . I don’t mean to be judgemental here but a little voice in my head keeps saying that they’re all just a bunch of broke azz n¡ . . . . . .
I’m perplexed. And does a man with NY Jets briefs exceed the earning potential of say a man with polka dot briefs?? Hmmm . . I don’t mean to be judgemental here but a little voice in my head keeps saying that they’re all just a bunch of broke azz n¡ . . . . . .
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/34820fb6caa94e70cb78532aede3dcdd18d7a2d426d24c5a32b4fdbb862848da.jpg
^Woman
Projection is your strong suit.
You could not possibly be more faggoty. And a woman.
More projection on your part.
troll chick
Are we really old enough to start kneejerk-hating on “that newfangled technology”? Relax; for many, social media usage is not a substitute for in-person love. It’s more like chatting with casual acquaintances (or strangers) in a bar, or talking with your neighbor over the back fence. It’s a place to get advice and feedback from others, and also to share achievements (like, pictures of that fish you caught) and seek compliments and constructive criticism. It’s an especially good place for platonic quasi-friendships, and to hear from people of the other sex and learn how they think. As long as the exchanges are not one-sided–as long as one “gives” as well as “taking”–social media use, in moderation, is probably harmless. It’s no substitute for “real-life” relationships, but a supplement to them. (And it occasionally leads to real-life meetups and more–although we shouldn’t assume it will.)
Actually, much social media interaction is not all that different from what happens on this site and in this very comment section. (Upvote if you’ve ever benefited from participating here!)
^Women know not what they do.
Why is it women like them like to force themselves onto a “gents only” space? I don’t do that to “ladies only” zones. Never. Not once.
Women are naturally driven to attempt to interfere in men’s affairs and tell them what to do – “real men do this real men do that”. #RealMenDoWomen’sBiddings
Moreover, women’s desire for attention, validation and hypergamy drive them to seek out male enclaves both in real life and/or the internet.
Because man-only spaces are better than female spaces. They are drawn to us like moths to a flame. Pathetic, ain’t it?
Lol. Even they can’t stand each other in female only spaces. We don’t even have to show our body parts like they’re showing their cleavage and ass.
“An entire generation of men have to suffer worsening relationships with women because a few hundred technologists wanted to create a utopia. Instead, they created a hell where the only time you’ll be able to feel a little bit human is while staring at a tiny computer in your hand.”
It’s time like these that make unpluggewd men eagerly keep an eye out for that doomsday meteor that will sure to make the proper paradign shift.
You are like Jiminey Cricket here, wishing upon a star.
Roosh freedomL here bud. GOLD!
“An entire generation of men have to suffer worsening relationships with women because a few hundred technologists wanted to create a utopia. Instead, they created a hell where the only time you’ll be able to feel a little bit human is while staring at a tiny computer in your hand.”
I read that over and over. So fn true. We’ve been reduced to goddamn hand held microprocessors! That little light of fake hope shines from our hands as we wave it around tap it and interact with a digitizer and illuminated pixels lmfaoooo this society is going to shit!
“I read that over and over. So fn true. We’ve been reduced to goddamn hand held microprocessors! That little light of fake hope shines from our hands as we wave it around tap it and interact with a digitizer and illuminated pixels lmfaoooo this society is going to shit!”
If you have a phone, or are using any form of social media, including responding to blogs, you are also a slave to it.
discussing the problem inside the problem is a good thing bud.
Not by using social media. Go out and physically talk to people.
I read somewhere (here?) that social media removes historical geographical constraints in women’s eternal quest to submit to an alpha man.
Throughout history the pool of men reachable by a woman was confined to her city or town. Once the few alpha males in that town were taken a woman had to settle for a beta in her town. All was fine.
Social media exploded that constraint.
Women are now able to advertise themselves to a far larger pool of alphas, virtually unlimited. And why settle down with a beta where there are always more alphas out there? Plus legions of thirsty beta orbiters in cyberspace who’ll shower her with compliments, even buy her free stuff.
I’ve watched female family members turn into Facebook whores. Social media definitely releases the uglier side of the female character.
Humans were not meant for this. It’s going to f*ck up our societies.
“I read somewhere (here?) that social media removes historical geographical constraints in women’s eternal quest to submit to an alpha man.”
You can certainly hold this opinion, but offer as evidence specific facts and/or scientific studies on this matter. There needs to be evidence rather than mere speculation. Because the majority of men do not necessarily believe in this social-sexual hierarchy, or they have a much different take on it than you. And since when has it been a woman’s “eternal quest to submit to an alpha man”?
“Throughout history the pool of men reachable by a woman was confined to her city or town. Once the few alpha males in that town were taken a woman had to settle for a beta in her town. All was fine.”
The adherents to the SSH are essential a cult, similar to SJW’s. In reality, that pool of men for women is still available today, alpha males are taken, and men and women “settle” for a mate of their choosing.
“Women are now able to advertise themselves to a far larger pool of alphas, virtually unlimited.”
This is where your gamma butthurt comes into play, and it is not a pretty sight.
“And why settle down with a beta where there are always more alphas out there?”
I thought today’s men are less than alpha, that is actually a dearth of them among the Generation Y and Generation Z crowd. It really depends on one’s personal definition of alpha male and beta male. Among the men in my social circle, all of us have qualities that are “alpha” and “beta”, i.e. abilities and skill sets. At various points in time, we have “pulled” women in the 7-9 range. Why? Because they viewed us as “alpha”. So it’s a matter of perception.
“Plus legions of thirsty beta orbiters in cyberspace who’ll shower her with compliments, even buy her free stuff.”
You are overexaggerating here. Let us assume there are these “beta orbiters”. First, who cares? Second, how does it personally impact you? Third, how do you know they actually “beta”?
“I’ve watched female family members turn into Facebook whores.”
So have you confronted them? How have that turned out? And what about guys who act in a similar fashion? How do you address their conduct?
“Social media definitely releases the uglier side of the female character.”
In reality, social media demonstrates the uglier side of people.
“Humans were not meant for this. It’s going to f*ck up our societies.”
Thanks, Mr. Philosopher.
You remind me of my sunday school teacher.
Offer up cogent rebuttals, rather than a hair-brain SJW response on your part.
Do you have the requisite intellectual capacity to offer even a modicum of an argument?
Yes but this is also the same for guys. Technology has opened a lot of avenues for men. The problem is many of us don’t take advantage of it enough. Tech has diverted a lot of our male energy into trivial pursuits like video games and porn
You’re a woman, aren’t you?
Also, if a woman vacations a lot, it means that they are running away/trying to get away from something and aren’t happy. If they were truly happy, they wouldn’t need to get away so much, would they?
Happy women would still go on vacations…with family.
No, it just means they are happy when women go on vacation, similar to men.
Same for Hi5, and there are some women that go out of their way to outdo each other’s web page.
It’s unfortunately created what I like to call the celebrity syndrome. Girls feeling like celebrities, having lots of “followers” and all that gibberish that has combined to fabricate a sense of fame and admiration from others. I like to name these websites the Fake Triad: YouTube, Facebook and Instagram.
That would also apply to men as well.
Some are caught up on this too, though less than women, and about 40% of them are homosexual.
Polarity. Fuse the two and become whole.
you are kind of obsessed with ‘polarity’, aren’t you? anyways, good look with your alchemic experiments
Lol
grossly fat, and even proud of it
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-australia-43237144/big-in-asia-the-woman-showing-plus-size-can-be-beautiful
It’s absolutely true. I just don’t understand why some girls can’t post normal pics of doing interesting stuff in their life rather than an endless stream of selfies. Some girls post essentially nothing _but_ selfies and then live for the dopamine rush of getting Likes
Yes. I agree with everything written but…. I still like browsing IG and looking at average girls with average bodies in tight revealing clothes. I’m a simple man. I too need my dopamine hits. I figure this is less bad than binge watching porn for 5 hours
Aaaah that animate pic tho wtf is that Roosh? Too funny. And yea screw social media, honestly you pick up women through vibes not screens.
even women who should be serious about what they do, are chronic attention seekers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGOIPoIxC-w
there’s another one, forever undecided between a porn star career and a pianist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghyXWBjj5TI
Great article. Lots of truth in here.
So true…even an average looking woman say 4 to 6 is getting propositioned/affirmed/validated by numerous simp manginas via social media to the point she has an overinflated self worth. I’m meeting many women who are addicted to the social media rush to the point they are now in their late 30’s early to mid 40’s, never married, few LTR’s and likely to enter old age alone (except with their fake social media orbiters). They basically have lived at least the last decade or more in a fantasy world. Stay clear of these women (most are thots anyway).
Talking outside of the topic. Isn’t it hilarious how we all seem to interact with each other on these platforms? We our spread around the world with the same ideals against the norm. I am to see guy’s everyday who claim to be smart and are completely unaware of these understandings. Our knowledge on RedPill dives deep into biology just as much we men use to do a long fought ago. I even have everyone in my regular day to be surprised at the fact that I want a submissive wife. This world is absolutely insane.