The charade of the left-right political spectrum is being fully revealed as American and European “conservative” politicians and media pundits continue to be outed as sellouts who serve liberal interests above conservative interests. In the political arena, left versus right is an artificial theater constructed to trick the public that opposing forces are battling it out or compromising for the good of the nation. In reality, both sides are controlled by the same group of elites.

Should you vote for this puppet or that puppet?

If you voted for a Democrat slate, thinking the Democrats were looking out for you, or if you voted a Republican slate, thinking that Republicans were looking out for you, you were tricked. You voted for the same puppet masters who stand behind both parties and ensure that their globalist and collectivist vision of the world is achieved. Their aims are to maximize their power and wealth while satisfying whatever sinister agenda they may have in the name of “world order,” which includes depopulation.

Even though my views have become more traditionally conservative over the years, I never saw Republicans as the party that represented them. How could I when they support homosexual marriage, feminism, and even open-borders immigration? On the big issues—the ones that determine the fate of a country—the Democrats and Republicans match almost exactly. This is because they are sponsored by corporations and billionaires with similar agendas and cravings for globalization, hedging their bets between the sponsored candidate in blue or the sponsored candidate in red. Every US Presidential election has had sponsored candidates on both sides, meaning that to those with real power, it barely matters who wins.

Establishment candidates believe in the globalist platform:

  • Open-borders
  • Consumerism
  • Feminism and matriarchy
  • Multiculturalism, diversity, and egalitarianism
  • Paganism or atheism
  • Global solutions for local problems
  • Empire building
  • Centralization
  • Collectivization
  • Unarmed populace

All the while, we are not allowed to select a candidate with a nationalist platform:

  • Closed borders
  • Protectionism
  • Patriarchy
  • Homogeneous population
  • Monotheism
  • Local solutions for local problems
  • War as self-defense
  • Decentralization
  • Individual rights
  • Armed populace

Let them eat blue or red cake

It’s very possible to put a conservative and liberal in the room but have them completely agree on multiculturalism, immigration, democracy, and transgenderism, though disagree on more hot-button topics like abortion and gun rights. They can agree at least half of the time because they both share a primarily globalist belief system, even when they may see each other as enemies. On the other hand, if you get a globalist and nationalist in the same room, they will disagree on more than 80% of issues, even including the basics such as the proper system of government.

While mainstream liberals tend to lean globalist, and mainstream conservatives tend to lean nationalist, the dividing line between them is becoming more narrow as nationalist views are prevented from being properly discussed in the public sphere. Soon, it will be impossible to tell liberals and “conservatives” apart. The only true dividing line left is globalism versus nationalism, especially since nationalism has not yet been co-opted by the elite, and is seen by them as the only real threat that could sever their heads.

I’m firmly in the nationalist camp, even though I am a man of mixed race who does not have an ancestral nation he can call home (I’m half Persian and half Armenian). If you’re wondering how the product of the Immigration And Nationality Act of 1965 can become nationalist, I’ll tell you: globalism greatly harms heterosexual native-born men such as myself. Before I even knew what globalism was, I empirically identified all of its tentacles and how they greatly inhibit a man’s masculinity, life purpose, and pursuit of happiness. Therefore I firmly believe that a heterosexual man who is a minority, like myself, will fare better in a nationalist country than in a globalist one, where he will definitely be swept up by degenerate winds that either make him a social justice zombie or get him persecuted for merely behaving as a man.

My nearly three years of living in a mostly nationalist country, Poland, confirmed to me that nationalism is the most natural state for man. I saw firsthand how a country that leans towards globalism becomes a more toxic environment for men and women, encouraging them to effectively destroy themselves for short-term pleasure and material gain. Nationalism, not to be confused with ultra-nationalism, promotes a more meaningful human existence by using morality, virtue, and genetic identity as building blocks for society, and so therefore serves as a more compatible operating system for human beings.

The mainstream media never threatens the ruling agenda

The American media will go off on left versus right controversies all day long, and make a big show of various battles between them, because the open discussion of these issues do not harm globalist platforms. Once you understand that conservative outlets like Fox News and National Review are globalist, not nationalist, you can realize how an entire belief system has been concealed from you. Whenever a nationalist idea is shared in the media, there is a quick and vicious condemnation of it as “far right,” “extreme right,” or “radical right.” Anything that is not labeled these three terms is a safe idea that does not harm globalist concerns.

When I mentioned late last year that the narrative is collapsing, I was referring to the globalist narrative. The only belief system that can fill that vacuum is nationalism, and the question that remains is how fascist the new nationalism will become. Neomasculinity, a model of patriarchy that is compatible with nationalism (if not outright essential for its success), is a vehicle that can serve men of various backgrounds, as long as minority men such as myself understand that they must follow the rules of any homogeneous population they find themselves in. I did that in Poland and can continue to do that in the future, because I know that if you believe in masculinity and the traditional ideas that are compatible with a life of meaning, nationalism is a better outcome for you that the globalist nightmare that many Western men find themselves trapped in today.[culturewar]

Read Next: Letter From A Member Of The Global Elite


    1. ActionJackson23 January 27, 2016 at 11:20 am

      1. rotekz January 27, 2016 at 12:00 pm

        That’s the cunt version.

      2. ActionJackson23 January 27, 2016 at 12:21 pm

        No it’s Ben’s original unaltered version … stop trying to shut him down …

      1. just a girl October 17, 2017 at 9:43 pm

        You think that’s bad….you have not a f..king clue what living in a police state will be like.

    2. February 6, 2016 at 8:56 pm

      If your nationalist you would be at the and not reading sandniger crap

      1. rotekz February 7, 2016 at 5:04 am

        You’re confusing nationalism with racism.

  1. SomeRandomFellow January 27, 2016 at 11:24 am

    What is the dividing line between nationalism and ultra-nationalism though, Roosh ? I’d be interested in your opinion.

    On one hand I can’t disagree completely with white nationalists that the diference between humans are biological and some populations are incompatible by virtue of IQ and future time orientation for example. So saying, Pakistanis can be British too, but with nationalist values sounds like a stretch.

    On the other hand I witnessed how the Alt-Right melted and fell in a mass hysteria because of you. ‘Muh Muslim terrorist is having sex with Aryan beauties while promoting Islam’.

    I think minorities are on a spectrum and some highly devloped ones might be compatible with living along the majority, but only a select few.

    On one side we should exclude based on genetics(that’s the point of nationalism), on the other hand we have to recognize that there are certain minority individuals compatible with a homogenous nation.

    What do you think is the difference between these two types of nationalism, and where should we draw the line ?

    1. splooge January 27, 2016 at 1:43 pm

      actually found that alt right bit funny. i found roosh to be alil islamaphobic an rather critical to get wns clicking.
      but those alt right guys do nothing. ironically a persian has done more for whites then them. but course theyd never accept him…ironically.

    2. Timothy Sterling January 27, 2016 at 2:20 pm

      For a guy with Moon Man as his avatar, that was a very balanced analysis 🙂

    3. Roosh January 27, 2016 at 2:43 pm

      “What is the dividing line between nationalism and ultra-nationalism though, Roosh ?”

      When the ovens are fired up.

      1. SomeRandomFellow January 27, 2016 at 2:44 pm


      2. Cat5krusher January 28, 2016 at 11:53 am


      3. lol January 30, 2016 at 3:40 pm

        lol wow. I am not the least bit surprised that Roosh’s community attracts white supremacist.

      4. SomeRandomFellow January 30, 2016 at 4:39 pm

        I’m not a “white supremacist”.

      5. Conrad Stonebanks January 27, 2016 at 3:01 pm

        I wonder if the current brand of globalism doesn’t lead to the same thing. The EU is getting more totalitarian by the day, usurping natives’ rights and freedoms one by one.

      6. Daniel Freeman February 4, 2016 at 6:30 pm

        Yep. It’s anarcho-tyranny, and it’s coming for the U.S. too.

      7. Dirk Diggler July 23, 2016 at 11:10 pm

        I’m curious as to how you view your comment six months later, as the EU is now on the verge of collapse. I agree that you nailed their goal, but their fiscal incompetence and the immigration fiasco was their undoing. Strange that things went downhill for them so quickly.

      8. Corey January 27, 2016 at 3:23 pm

        How about if they deport all non-nationals based on race?

      9. Blinko23 January 28, 2016 at 7:19 pm

        That might work in places like Iceland, Northern Ireland and Poland, where non-white populations are relatively low. But how in the world would that work in Western Europe or especially in America? It’s just not practical.

        Blacks, for e.g., have been in the USA since the beginning of the nation and were even 20% of the population as far back as 1790. Chinese have been here since the 1800s. All of these millions of families aren’t just going to get up and leave, even if guns were pointed at their heads. They are Americans, whether white nationalists like that or not.

        The only sensible solution is to cut off all immigration from now on and keep it shut for at least 60 years. Deport illegals only. Cut off all welfare and essentially force Black America to reconstitute families – no more single mothers on the government dole. Crime would go way down and racial frictions reduced. And while immigration is shut, that will give the white population a chance to regenerate back to a solid majority (80%). After that, just live in peace as Americans under one national, patriarchal culture, like it was in the mid 1960s before everything was turned upside down.

      10. Rico Sadao January 29, 2016 at 9:30 pm

        Secession is the only alt. for the US.
        Plenty of white states in middle America
        Whites should flee there and leave the PC and black/latino mess to the shitlibs
        It might take a civil war to get there though.

      11. John Yossarian September 13, 2016 at 5:18 pm

        That’s exactly what I’ve been proposing – Shut down immigration, deport the illegals and rebuild America. Shut off the welfare tap and watch the scum stop reproducing. The increased incomes to the productive will cause them to breed instead. Black America will benefit the most, as the most worthy will succeed. IQ’s will increase across the board.

        I’d considered allowing the continued immigration of high-IQ people, but don’t want to deprive the rest of the map. Probably better for them to stay in place, fixing the problems in their home countries. Hey – I’m not greedy! The brain drain benefited America for a very long time, but at the expense of countries that have remained socialist backwaters as a result. No more of that – Nationalism for everyone!

      12. David Lloyd-Jones February 17, 2017 at 1:34 pm


        You write, ” Shut off the welfare tap and watch the scum stop reproducing. ”

        Your problem is the “welfare trap” is the red states. All of the Midwestern States are net recipients of Federal money. Cheques from Washington are the only thing that keep the Confederate states going. Army bases? ‘Nuther form of welfare.


      13. John Yossarian February 17, 2017 at 1:59 pm

        Michael Moore,

        If you were literate, you’d have read my post about individual recipients of social welfare. Instead, you produced a not-too-slick film about federal funds provided to state governments.

        Two completely different things! But then a third…

        Comparing military installations to social welfare is the icing on your cake – A strawman cake on which your ass just choked.

        Slugs and kickses,
        Chuck Norris

      14. porchhound February 19, 2017 at 5:11 pm

        Yeah and once we manage to rid ourselves of the millions of welfare recipients who WASHINGTON has allowed to flow across our borders we won’t need the money. The notion that Washington actually PRODUCES anything of value is the pipe dream of fools! They TAKE…they don’t produce!

      15. Batman3.0 January 27, 2016 at 4:29 pm

        I think the real question is, “what is the dividing line between nationalism and bigotry, racism, etc.?”

      16. anon1 January 27, 2016 at 6:47 pm

        difficult. if you’re a bigot or a racist you may be more likely to be a nationalist, but just because you’re a nationalist does not mean you are a racist.

        At this point the term racist has lost all meaning though. If ethnic-on-white attacks were called racist as well, then there might be dialogue for that but unfortunately with the way society is set up at the moment there is not a deeper examination of these things.

      17. spicynujac January 27, 2016 at 4:36 pm

        At that point, when one must scramble the combined power of the remaining first world nations into a last ditch confederation, and completely pause civilization, economic production, culture, and life to focus on a multi year sustained war in order to end this out of control ultra nationalism, isn’t it a risk that is not congruent with its rewards?

      18. anon1 January 27, 2016 at 6:30 pm


    4. Hank Davis January 28, 2016 at 12:08 pm

      I would use the Japanese as an example of nationalist vs ultranationalist. Immigration system designed to produce homogeneity, pride in homogeneity, slight stigma associated with excessive closeness to foreigners, ethnocentric education, participation and pride in traditional arts, food, etc. but still open to outside influences, well traveled, open to tourists, students and other short term visitors.

      1. David Lloyd-Jones February 17, 2017 at 1:36 pm

        Wey-yull, my Japanese-American grandchildren seem to be doing fine.

        Japanese industry is doing OK, too, thanks to all the Iranian immigrants they’re importing to oil the robots.


    5. Blinko23 January 28, 2016 at 7:08 pm

      Indians have integrated quite will in Britain for several generations now, especially the professional class. Most Brits I have talked to don’t seem to have any issues with Indians. But they do hate Pakistani Muslims as that group refuses to integrate and, for the most part, comes across as aggressive and primitive.

      So I don’t think the issue is solely genetic, since Pakistanis and Indians are essentially the same genetically. It is religion, culture and values that seem to make the biggest difference.

      Muslims and Zionists just don’t seem to be compatible with Western culture. Both subvert their host cultures from different angles. Most other of the major religions can fit in, as long as their sheer numbers are kept small relative to the native population. For e.g., if 1% of America became Buddhist tomorrow, would most people care? Probably not. In fact, I, for one, would welcome that as they are a largely peaceful group that minds their own business.

      1. Tom Dane January 28, 2016 at 7:14 pm

        Hell, 90% could become Buddhist and it wouldnt be a problem.

      2. Tommy Hass July 8, 2016 at 11:51 pm

        “So I don’t think the issue is solely genetic, since Pakistanis and Indians are essentially the same genetically.”

        You’re a fool. Pakistanis in Britain are from the worst and most backwards part of Pakistan and already backwards country.

        Indians in Britain are from the highest caste of India. Lower caste Indians are probably less civilized than Pakistanis. Luckily for Brits, they don’t come over.

    6. Aldous Huxley February 1, 2016 at 3:53 pm

      The Alt-right is a group of men who are (justifiably) angry after being brainwashed to kill their kin for so long. So they scream on the internet a lot, I’d give them time since they are relatively new and finding themselves. Roosh is half-armenian, which is good enough for this nationalist. I don’t consider slavs and other R1bs to be less white.

  2. EuryaΛe January 27, 2016 at 11:27 am

    I’ll be curious to see who shows up at the meetup in Paris.

    My view on France:

    My view on Germany:

  3. ActionJackson23 January 27, 2016 at 11:37 am

    One nuance to note Roosh is that the (((elites))) aren’t always on the same page about everything — e.g. Zionists pretty much agree with all Globalist goals but also want more war in the Middle East pronto while Globalists would rather them just chill out about that stuff … this is why Netanyahu hates Obama so much since Obama is more of a Globalist puppet (i.e. Obama and the Globalists pushed for the Iran nuclear deal while Bibi was fuming) … also, while the Democratic party remains a Globalist bastion, in the last 15-20 years the Zionists have hijacked the GOP and that is why you see Republican candidates always drone on and on about Israel to a ridiculous degree … check out this link:

    1. TSK January 27, 2016 at 12:10 pm

      interesting observation. I knew Obama and Bibi did not like each other but didn’t know Obama was more of a globalist on that matter.

  4. Laguna Beach Fogey January 27, 2016 at 11:42 am

    Well said. That’s pretty much it, Roosh.

    “Left” and “Right” are increasingly meaningless.

    Things are escalating. On a related note, I’m seeing more mention of “Nationalism” and “civil war” in the political and cultural discourse these days.

  5. TSK January 27, 2016 at 12:11 pm

    As a minority (heterosexual) male myself (who happen to be in the west) who share most (if not almost all) views with Roosh, I fully endorse this article.

    1. jz95 January 27, 2016 at 5:22 pm

      I hear you, but on the one hand I’m a bit wary as to what the future holds. I oppose globalism and leftism in just about every way, and would love to see America (and, perhaps by proxy the west in general) restored to its former glory. However, as a minority man myself I don’t see things looking good for a lot of us over the next few years. Whites, especially white men, have just been continually shit on for the last several decades, and there WILL be a breaking point. I have said it many times before, white people have just as much right to take pride in their racial, ethnic and national heritages as do all other peoples. However, I am afraid that the anger will be blinding, and many minorities, and in particular minorities such as ourselves who agree with many traditionally conservative viewpoints, may be purged. Hopefully, the future will see nationalism return with a minimal amount of violence, but I think that it may be too far gone for that.

      1. TSK January 27, 2016 at 6:12 pm

        yeah I know what you mean. Like we could be on the crossfire between angry white nationalists and other leftists and immigrants. Law abiding, successful minority men could be used as a scapegoat. In that case, we dip. Move out. This is why being independent location entrepreneur is a must; so that you aren’t tied down to one location. If there is a huge race riot in your city and you had to work the next day but the streets are blocked by angry protesters ready for violent revolution, you be screwed.

        If you see signs of trouble like that beforehand and know when to make an escape route before all that happens then you be in better position. You wouldn’t have to worry about your financial situation being a black hole assuming you had large padding in the bank.

        Similar example.

        Imagine the plight of shop keepers (most of them minority Asian and Arab owned shops) during the Baltimore race riot after Freddie Grey was killed. Many of the shops were robbed, destroyed, and targeted because they happened to be at the wrong place and at the wrong time.

        All men should have some sort of internet job where they make money online (even if they work for some corporation) as a back up. You never know when you would be fired, laid off, can’t go to work because (insert millions of reason), your city is going through “government drills”, violent race riot and protest, and/or your city becomes unbearable to live.

        I will give you another example.

        Russia is one good place where nationalism can turn into ULTRA-nationalism. Many central Asian immigrants and Africans end up being beaten up by neo-Nazi skinheads. But these guys have ‘no choice’ (and I put that in quotation) but to be in Russia to make small end living and they are often targeted by teenager white power movement dudes. Some of these immigrants are visa students. They don’t have the luxury to go hop places to places (if they were internet entrepreneur, they can do that and not have a reason to be locked down in one place).

        On the polar extreme, Western Europeans are being targeted by “migrants” and if you happen to be in the wrong street in some parts of UK and you are Non-Muslim, you can risk violence. So I guess it really comes down to “using personal judgment” and knowing if certain places are safe relative to others and most importantly using gut instinct and at the very least know how to throw down (fight) and run if you have to (your life is more important than ego).

        In the USA (at least where I am at), you don’t know who is armed and who is not. I try to be polite and distant with people I meet on short everyday encounter. Small polite talk.

        I don’t think you would end up being beaten up by even far right wing white nationalist. Most of them keep to themselves and usually avoid us (minorities) instead but when shit hits the fan (like the one in Cologne sexual attack), they can “have had enough” and may unleash these fury and if we happen to be at the wrong place and wrong time, we can end up being the victim.

        To be honest, I be more worried about my personal safety being around inner city ghetto places than being around armed ring wing republicans.

        Bottom line though is I MUCH rather be in healthy nationalistic (on healthy dose–nonviolent) country where men and women values are clearly defined rather than be in “liberal” places where tolerance isn’t so much tolerance and crazy becomes norm where men get fired from job for making such and such statements.

      2. anon1 January 27, 2016 at 6:52 pm

        Good thread here. i really think there needs to be a #notyourshield gamergate equivalent for minorities that are pro nationalist for their host nations.

        at the moment its a bit difficult because many people in minorities are full SJW in policy such is the fear of racism. The double irony is that most minorities actually came from or were very conservative cultures, and its the second and third generation immigrants [particularly minority women] that go full retard SJWs.

      3. bucky January 28, 2016 at 7:00 am

        “I am afraid that the anger will be blinding, and many minorities, and in
        particular minorities such as ourselves who agree with many
        traditionally conservative viewpoints, may be purged.”

        i’m a blue-eyed white guy of almost 100% of northern european descent, and this is why i’m worried about the growing racism in the alt right. i get it, it’s a reaction to the SJW anti-white agenda, but at the same time i recognize that there are minorities like you out there who are natural allies. take my wife’s family, brown-skinned central americans, most of whom don’t speak english, but their values are much closer to ours than those of the average white american, at this point.

      4. jz95 January 28, 2016 at 9:06 am

        I’m cautiously optimistic that we will be able to avoid this sort of violence in America. However, I am convinced that it WILL happen in western Europe. However bad it may be here, it’s far worse in countries like Sweden and Germany.

      5. Johnny Five January 28, 2016 at 4:18 pm

        America is a huge mishmash of an empire. There has never been one in history that hasn’t collapsed and broken up into different countries. Typically it happens violently, but the USSR was able to achieve a peaceful breakup.

      6. jz95 January 28, 2016 at 4:46 pm

        To be honest, it’s amazing that America has been able to last THIS long. Forget about the differences between whites and minorities, look at all the differences between whites in the north and the south, or on the east and west coasts!

      7. Johnny Five January 28, 2016 at 4:53 pm

        Yes, it could literally split up into forty different countries. For instance, South Florida could easily be its own country, as could the state of Vermont, NH, and Maine.

      8. @free_ub May 5, 2016 at 10:31 am

        lol, they all sed to be there own countries with separate presidents incl texas and else where.. Louisiana any1?

      9. David Lloyd-Jones February 17, 2017 at 1:44 pm

        South Florida its own country?

        South Florida is going to be another chain of Caribbean islands toot sweet. And the islands occupied by Cubans will be shooting at the islands occupied by Guatemalans — going to war over who gets the jobs on the island of Palm Beach.



      10. Johnny Five January 28, 2016 at 4:17 pm

        No offense, but your family is no longer White. You have a Hispanic family. When an empire begins to break apart, you want to be around your majority ethnic group. This is a fact. All you have to do is study the breakdowns of empires and multiethnic nations (most recently, Yugoslavia).

        My sister married a Mexican, and I’m going to disagree with you completely. They really have nothing at all in common with people of European descent. Almost nothing. Their culture and family lives are diametrically opposed.

        When the economy breaks down, any interethnic cooperation vanishes. Always has, always will. That’s why the police are becoming militarized. They’re preparing for ethnic strife, etc.

      11. Untergang07 January 28, 2016 at 9:47 pm

        My sister married a Mexican, and I’m going to disagree with you
        completely. They really have nothing at all in common with people of
        European descent. Almost nothing.

        Unless your sister married a man of the lowest rungs in society, Mexican (and by extension hispanic except for Indian majority countries like Bolivia) culture is heavily influenced by The Old Spain and family lives are much more in line with what used to be the West 50 years ago. Now thanks to American “kultur” that’s rapidly dissolving…

      12. Johnny Five January 28, 2016 at 10:01 pm

        Actually, he was rich, owned several salons, drove a porsche, etc. The Mexican culture and family life is extremely different. It’s very low trust, even within the family. They’re constantly back-stabbing each other and screwing each other over. The marriage broke up, and the half-White kids are dysfunctional. She has a White kid from a previous relationship, and that kid was raised by two White parents, makes straight A’s, and turned out well.

        Hispanics’ out-of-wedlock birth rates are somewhere near fifty-five percent; is that what Old Spain is like?

      13. Untergang07 January 28, 2016 at 10:48 pm

        As I said before, American influence is destroying that. Hispanic culture in many parts is of low trust (this is specially true in Mexico) but is (or used to be) low trust in reference to strangers and the government, not within the family, an arrangement somewhat similar to what you can find in certain parts of Italy. For the rest, maybe South America is really different from Mexico (more heavily influenced by America and as the Catholic church slow motion collapse proceeds, the Indian barbaric influence begins to grow…).

        Hispanic out-of-wedlock in the U.S. is that way. In South America even today is lower. Mexico and Central America are ever more Americanized so you can expect the same pathologies as the U.S. By the way Spain is even worse than any country in Latin America when it comes to family life (rampant feminism, widespread female promiscuity, diving birthrates, anti-male laws where men are guilty until proven innocent etc.), just like most of Western Europe.

        Besides, by what you are telling me, your sister was not a saint and no sane man will balls would have taken her for anything but a one night stand.

      14. Johnny Five January 29, 2016 at 5:51 am

        Yeah, American culture is disgusting, I agree. I despise it. That is mainly the influence of the usual suspects, though.

        I didn’t tell you anything about my sister. When I say they were constantly backstabbing each other, I’m talking about the brothers and sisters within the Mexican family, although later in the marriage, they were constantly fighting.

      15. Johnny Five January 29, 2016 at 6:30 am

        Also, Hispanic IQ is an average of 85. That’s not because of American influence, it’s because, they’re, on average, much dumber. There are exceptions, of course, but exceptions don’t disprove rules.

      16. Untergang07 January 29, 2016 at 8:40 am

        That is correct, they are much dumber on average, however dumb != evil. After all the people responsible for the mess we are in are people that can outthink most of the human race and think easily in 4th and 5th order of consequences of their actions vs the rest of mankind that can mostly think and or imagine the first order consequences of their actions. This statement is valid even among whites and Asians, let alone the rest.

      17. Johnny Five January 29, 2016 at 8:57 am

        Good point. I’ve known plenty who were good people, but they also have their violent gangbanger types.

      18. Batman3.0 January 30, 2016 at 11:21 pm

        It’s a horrible westernization virus that’s wrecking havoc in many parts of Brazilian, Colombian, and Panamanian society . I have seen it with my own eyes over the years! Family life and women are better down there but you can easily see the rapid increase of American culture, some of it is good (business, economic, and entrepreneurship perks) but most of it is bad (materialism, obesity, feminism, pollution, diving birthrates, etc.) for Latin America.
        I think this whole zika virus outbreak was purposely planned and implemented to depopulate Latin America (as well as the rest of the southern hemisphere) and further destroy their traditional culture — “the crisis” encourages married women to use contraceptives or abort unborn children.

      19. Untergang07 January 31, 2016 at 1:25 pm

        I think this whole zika virus outbreak was purposely planned and
        implemented to depopulate Latin America (as well as the rest of the
        southern hemisphere) and further destroy their traditional culture —
        “the crisis” encourages married women to use contraceptives or abort
        unborn children.

        Yes, I’ve been thinking along those lines. Keep in mind that Latinamerica has been for a long time the target of depopulation practices, specially the biggest countries (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Mexico) where the American culture, through the usual outlets (tv, music, internet) has been spreading like a plague, along with programmes financed by corporations and multilateral organizations with the sole purpose of sterilizing and “preventing unwanted births”.

        Not to fall into the same category of “Conspiracy theorists”, the Georgia Guidestones speak of maintaining a population <500 million, however in order to carry out such plan, the remnant will have to be well under the 500 million mark, in order to leave space for the mankind to grow and not worry constantly about the 500 million milestone. If you begin to think of it, If the TPTB have their way, the remaining human population will have to be well below 500 million (that would include the cleansing of most whites, blacks, Asians, hispanics alive), otherwise the surviving ones will not be able to have the nation sized plantations…

      20. Batman3.0 February 1, 2016 at 2:07 am

        Yes. Plus the largest existing Catholic (and other Christian groups) population…and the rapid growth of Catholicism (and other Christian groups) in Sub-Saharan Africa and the explosion of extremist Muslims on that continent. Think about it Eastern Europe, Russia, Latin America, and Sub-Saharan Africa…traditional and Christian…and under attack by war, disease, and feminist propaganda.

      21. matt February 6, 2016 at 12:47 pm

        Russia is seeing a huge growth in Orthodox Christianity. In cuba, Catholicism is growing again.

      22. Batman3.0 February 6, 2016 at 10:04 pm

        I know it. I love to see the extremist on both sides (the jihadist and feminist) squirm. Christianity will continue to explode in Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and the Former Soviet Union and there is nothing they can do about it. LOL!

      23. matt February 8, 2016 at 7:06 am

        Only Cuba will see a huge increase in Christianity. Latin America is growing slowly.

      24. matt February 6, 2016 at 12:46 pm

        the ethnic groups are mostly being killed off are the indigenous, blacks, black/indigenous mixtures and some mestizos. The whites and the whites ones are in good hands.

      25. Batman3.0 February 6, 2016 at 10:01 pm

        That’s not good. What about the future talent pool of baseball players and footballers. The vast majority of the talent comes from Latin America. I don’t want the favorable sex ratios (more hot girls than men) getting fucked with either.

      26. matt February 8, 2016 at 7:05 am

        I would prefer more women to men. It makes competition among women more intense. They will have to make themselves attractive for men. Just look at Russia. The men there are spoiled lol. The men knows if his woman slips, he can easily get another one.

      27. Batman3.0 February 8, 2016 at 4:10 pm

        Same thing in Colombia and Brazil. I loved it when I was there. The sexual market favors men.

      28. matt February 6, 2016 at 12:43 pm

        The zika virus will have a greater impact on the lower classes since they don’t have enough money for adequate protection against mosquito and treatment in case of an infection. The lower classes happen to be mostly black, indigenous and some mestizos. The middle and upper classes who happen to be white or mostly white will have adequate resources to combat the mosquitos.

      29. Batman3.0 February 6, 2016 at 9:55 pm

        I don’t think it will be contained that easy and the middle and upper middle class whites and pardos will still be effected but we’ll see over the next couple of months.

      30. matt February 8, 2016 at 7:03 am

        We don’t have any Zika virus cases here. I am considered middle middle class here. I usually wear repellent . From what I’ve observed, middle to upper do have resources to prevent mosquito bites. the poor here don’t have much.

      31. Batman3.0 February 8, 2016 at 4:16 pm

        I get your point. Yeah if you had to choose between eating and things like repellant that would be a tough call. I hear very positive things about the banking industry down there for foreigners. Does it seem like that trend will continue?

      32. David Lloyd-Jones February 17, 2017 at 1:46 pm

        Fidel Castro — the only Castillian leader in Latin America.


      33. bucky January 28, 2016 at 10:02 pm

        none taken. i’m not a white supremacist and would prefer a good brown-skinned wife to a bad blond wife. although, a lot of her grandmother and her cousins are very fair skinned and could easily pass for spaniards or italians. so maybe with my fair skin and blue eyes our kids will look white. unless of course, it’s speaking spanish that makes you non-white, but i’ve got a friend from uruguay who is as fair skinned as i am, with blue eyes and lighter hair, and if she’s not white, i don’t know who is.

      34. Johnny Five January 28, 2016 at 10:06 pm

        Many from Uruguay are actually White. Same with Paraguay and Argentina, and some from Brazil. I’m not a supremacist either, but I have been studying empires and multiethnic societies and what happens when they break down. Ethnic cleansing happens, so it’s best to be in an area where your ethnic group is the majority.

        My sister married a Mexican, and one came out with blue eyes, and other is very mestizoish looking.

      35. bucky January 29, 2016 at 1:34 am

        yeah, i’m actually pretty interested to see how our kids looks, since she and i are so completely different looking.

      36. Johnny Five January 29, 2016 at 5:59 am

        Based on my sister’s kids, I think genes aren’t evenly distributed. Her son has blondish-brown hair with dark blue eyes and looks like he has Amerindian ancestry, and her daughter has very indigenous features with dark skin and dark brown hair. The interesting thing is the kids don’t look like the mother or the father, nor do the siblings look like sister and brother. The brother and sister are also total opposites.

      37. matt February 6, 2016 at 12:39 pm

        Argentina and Uruguay are both countries with pure whites being a super majority..93+% or more while Chile has 75%+ white population. Paraguy is majority mestizo. Southern Brazil is basically white.

      38. Johnny Five February 6, 2016 at 2:10 pm

        In Chile, don’t mestizos call themselves White, or am I mistaken there?

      39. Batman3.0 February 2, 2016 at 7:57 pm

        Agree. I have friends from Argentina and Brazil. Same thing If they are not white then I do not know what is either. They are European white in all caps. If I don’t marry a Russian woman then I’ll probably marry a Brazilian, Colombian, or Argentine. I just click with them easier for some reason.

      40. matt February 6, 2016 at 12:32 pm

        I’m considered Castizo, i have a cousin, she is castiza, married an Anglo saxon man from Texas. her daughters all have blond hair but brown eyes. Their dad is a blond hair blue eyed man. Castizos are 3/4 white spanish and 1/4 Amerindian.

        I’ve always prefer castizas to full white women. Across Latin america you will see strong preference of people for their own kind. In North America, it is considered racist and xenophobic.

      41. Batman3.0 February 6, 2016 at 10:47 pm

        I like Castiza to full European too…It’s just my preference. I have a white Mexican friend that only likes tall mulattas/light skinned black women. My last Mexican girlfriend was a (natural) blond haired brown eyed castiza, fair skinned, very nice body, classy, and extremely feminine.

      42. KBB Removal January 29, 2016 at 3:19 pm

        This is understandable given the fake narrative everyone has been force fed about the holocaust and white racists being the foremost threat to society. But it should be self evident that whites are some of the most altruistic and empathetic on earth, to a pathological and dysfunctional degree. The Danger isn’t that White people might wake up and reclaim their countries, it’s that actually there is a good chance that on their own, they WON’T.
        I don’t sincerely believe that a war with, or oppression/genocide of minorities could or will take place, unless it is led or manipulated from above by sinister forces. Any legitimate resistance movement will likely be nationalistic, but also primarily anti-communist. Any conflict along racial or religious lines would likely be a set up job(of both sides) by the powers that be.

  6. encylopedia brown January 27, 2016 at 1:17 pm

    Sounds like a great Ben Garrison comic I recently saw:

    1. ActionJackson23 January 27, 2016 at 1:26 pm

      Stop posting the altered version … here is Ben’s original version for your reference:

      1. ActionJackson23 January 27, 2016 at 1:52 pm

        Oy vey when will we finally eradicate the scourge of anti-Semitism???

  7. TheToryStorm January 27, 2016 at 1:52 pm

    Roosh is making the mistake of dividing all those ideas into either Gobalist or Nationalist camps, which is ironic since he accuses the modern two-party system of doing the same thing: applying a rigid description and dictating that you are either one side or the other. Its one of the oldest “divide and conquer” strategies.

    More fundamentally, such divisions eschew the nuance that is well known to be present in almost any inventory of the various “ideologies” in the world: As a proud Imperialist who supports the expansion of the American Empire (or a return to the British Empire), I obviously support Empire building. However, I am completely at odds with those who support feminism, open borders, multiculturalism and atheism.

    Conversely, I am a huge supporter of patriarchy, monotheism, local solutions for local problems, wars of self defense, individual rights and an armed American/European citizenry.

    At the core of it, Roosh is equating nationalism with isolationism. Isolationism in 2016 is a fundamentally flawed policy: it was a viable foreign policy for great nations as recently as the mid 1800s (when Great Britain practiced “Splendid Isolation” from the internal strife in continental Europe post Waterloo). However, given the deep economic links between nation states, America cannot afford to merely put “men on the wall”: to protect our national(ist) interest, we must be prepared to utilize expeditionary forces to protect those interests.

    At its most basic level, take control of the high seas: Having a powerful Navy and controlling the high seas was a defensive imperative for Great Britain. Had she not controlled the high seas, or her Imperial holdings, she would not have been able to resist Napoleon, Kaiser Wilhelm II or Hitler when they attempted to invade. They learned this lesson at Hastings: had William the Conqueror never been able to cross the Channel, the land battle itself would have been moot.

    Roosh’s assumption that Imperialism is linked to feminism and other undesirable goals is fundamentally flawed. So too is his assumption that in 2016, America can practice isolation or non-intervention.

    To Roosh personally, I would recommend studying the long term economic and strategic implications of nations that practiced isolation: China comes to mind, and they were badly beaten by European powers when they retreated from the world in the 16th century. Further, I’d recommend some research on strategy and tactics from the Napoleonic Wars, WWI and the Crimean War. You will find that in all major conflicts, the ability to tap into great economic resources (such as from Imperial holdings) and control of the high seas (and therefore trade) determine whether or not your nation falls to an invading army.

    1. The Thraex January 27, 2016 at 2:38 pm

      In other words you’re in favour of parasitism.

      Why doesn’t down voting work on this site?

    2. Corey January 27, 2016 at 3:16 pm

      What you think of as ‘American Empire’ doesn’t exist; American global intervention only exists to further Globalist plans and the wealth of the elites. Anyone who thinks American military actions around the world are done for the sake of average Joe living in the States is a pawn.

      1. redpillyogi January 27, 2016 at 10:05 pm

        Spot on. There is no America, only a bunch of slaves working for the global elite. It’s quite ironic that the same “pawns” that promote national pride are at the same time encouraging their own enslavement.

      2. Johnny Five January 28, 2016 at 4:21 pm

        America is an empire, as an empire is a multiethnic/multiracial/multinational entity. America is not a nation.Not one in history has ever stayed intact.

    3. C January 27, 2016 at 3:53 pm

      You can’t indulge in a philosophy and not expect the side effects, or perhaps even the foundational requirements, to effect you. You are similar to every other person that thought that they could participate at a party and not eventually be overwhelmed by the devil with which they choose to dance.
      Your assertions about isolationism are based on a flawed assumption that so called “deep links” are a foregone conclusion and not largely the result of globalist profit decisions that have absolutely nothing to do with national defense.
      Your flawed notion is that calling something “fundamentally flawed” without compelling proofs is an argument.
      Defensive perimeters are not the same thing as globalism. You draw a false analogy. Your 16th century proofs are simple assertions in regard to highly complex events that could be easily reframed for anyone’s agenda. At what point is your globalism not defensive? Is that its true reality? At what point does this strategy irrevocably cause the conditions that you claim to disown?

    4. Untergang07 January 27, 2016 at 10:00 pm

      Kaiser Wilhelm II invading old Blighty? Please let´s be real, you were the bane of Europe for centuries and responsible for one of the fooliest and most destructive wars that led to the destruction of Christendom and the very spirit of Europe (WWI).

      1. TheToryStorm January 27, 2016 at 10:18 pm

        Seeing as a loser Serbian student started it, and it was Wilhelm that escalated it by stupidly giving Austria a blank check to do whatever they wanted, how is it John Bull is to blame?

        Maybe if Germany hadn’t threatened Belgium, whose sovereignty Britain was treaty-bound to support, we wouldn’t have gotten involved.

        Nonetheless, WWI is mostly the fault of Wilhelm being a noob at foreign policy and telling Austria they could do whatever they wanted…and thinking no one (particularly Russia and France) would care.

      2. Untergang07 January 28, 2016 at 8:12 am

        Wilhelm II was a fool and a rookie in diplomacy but his blunders were used by his enemies (namely France and England). IN that time, Britain was being primed for war by its elites. Austria-Hungary may have wanted the war, but Germany didn’t.

        Even so, Germany offered peace by the 1916’s but England chose to enlist the help of the Americans in order to change the course of war since Britain’s collective ass was being kicked by Germany, even if it had to do a falseflag at the cost of hundreds of civilian lives at sea and millions of men afterwards.

      3. TheToryStorm January 28, 2016 at 9:03 am

        Great Britain’s performance in the war was abysmal, and the British Army was not the army of Wellington that had so professionally beaten the Imperial Guard at Waterloo. In fact, the German General Staff was superior the the Imperial General Staff (and Prussia possessed a superior staff system to any nation in the world).

        None the less, the majority of moral responsibility for initiating that terrible conflict lies squarely on Wilhelm’s shoulders:

        -He fired Bismarck, one of the greatest statesmen in history that accomplished one of the greatest acts of statesman ship in humanity’s collective history: German Unification.

        -British war preparations were in response to Wilhelm’s stated intent in multiple documents to challenge the Royal Navy at sea. While wealthy industrialists stood to profit from the buildup, there was a real threat being issued by Wilhelm.

        -Germany attacked first by invading France and Belgium.

  8. The Thraex January 27, 2016 at 2:31 pm

    In the political arena, left versus right is an artificial theater constructed to trick the public that opposing forces are battling it out or compromising for the good of the nation. In reality, both sides are controlled by the same group of elites.

    That’s right but why do you support Trump then?

    1. spicynujac January 27, 2016 at 4:39 pm

      He’s the best of all the retarded kids in the royal family that we can choose from to be our next monarch.

      1. The Thraex January 27, 2016 at 5:29 pm

        Hitler looked promising too and elected decratically.

  9. Corey January 27, 2016 at 3:08 pm

    There has been a proposal to replace Left and Right with Horizontal and Vertical. Horizontal being the camp that proposes universality and equality while the Vertical refers to the advocates of hierarchy and exclusivity. Refer to Jack Donovan’s ‘A Sky Without Eagles’.

    That said, as much as I oppose the Globalist plans, I can’t say I’m a Nationalist. Like you, Roosh, I don’t consider myself a nationalist to my ethnic background and I don’t want anything to do with the country that I am a citizen of. I may be siding with the Nationalists for the time being, but I will never be one of them. To me, modern society itself is an aberration to begin with.

    By the way, your list of nationalist platform describes the Islamic groups to the tee.

    1. C January 27, 2016 at 3:55 pm

      No it does not describe Islamic groups. Not even close. Lazy correlations don’t assist the conversation.

    2. Roosh January 27, 2016 at 4:08 pm

      “your list of nationalist platform describes the Islamic groups to the tee.”

      “To the tee” is a bit disingenuous. My nationalist ideal more describes what Poland, Hungary, and Czech are trying to achieve in the face of the migrant crisis.

      1. Corey January 27, 2016 at 6:51 pm

        I read the list again and I do admit I said that in haste, but I didn’t necessarily mean it in a bad way. I do think the European nationalists (West Europeans) need to do more for the sake of their survival; right now they aren’t doing much of substance.

  10. spicynujac January 27, 2016 at 4:22 pm

    This was a very helpful article. Nationalism has been a dirty word to me, but after seeing the platform points explained above, I think it’s more a problem with the negative connotation of the word nationalism, when in fact I agree with all the nationalist platform views (except I stand with the libertarians on immigration/borders). Assuming you are using the word correctly, I think nationalism has just gotten a bad rep the way the word “liberal” has (Jefferson was a proud liberal, and yet the word today has been twisted to mean its opposite.)

    However, there are still problems with nationalism:

    Nationalism is one of the primary causes of the Great War, which can be considered the War To End All Patriarchy. Western civilization and society has never been the same after WW1, and if nationalism caused that, even if it has some benefits to us in the short term, I cannot accept it.

    Then there is the question of what is the “nation”? If nationalism is simply loyalty versus to a nation whereas globalism is loyalty to the globe, then nationalism could be even more collectivist and centralized. Aren’t the people of North Korea some of the most proud, nationalistic people in the world? Isn’t nationalism the opposite of individualism or atomism? I feel more in common with my fellow man as I travel throughout the world, and in global international communities such as ROK than I do with, say, the Spanish speakers in Miami, banksters in NYC, pierced hipsters in Seattle or cowboys in Texas. Is that a globalist thought?

    Is it wrong to feel common unity and relatability to everyone throughout the world? Isn’t nationalism at some level based on race? The US is only about 60% white, so what race is it? Since whites are a minority of newborn births (meaning as soon as they grow up America will be majority nonwhite) will white nationalists have any place in America or must we find our own nation?

    And consider the nation of the US versus the globalist collective of the European Union.

    Is supporting the EU globalist or nationalist? Is supporting the USA globalist or nationalist?

    Think about your answer for a bit.

    The EU would be traditionally seen as a “globalist” group as it takes over and subverts the smaller nation-states that existed before. It has federal powers over many areas but leaves most governmental duties to its smaller member states.

    The USA is often seen of as “nationalist” especially by many of the puppet thinkers described in this article. When the UN does something, it’s evil, but if the USA does the same thing, its awesome.

    But the US federal government is most similar to the EU than anything else. Size of the EU: ~500 million. Size of the USA: ~325 million
    Physical size of Europe*: 10.2 sq km Size of USA: 9.8m sq km
    EU home to diverse languages / cultures / groups, predominately white
    US is the same.

    If supporting a nation is good, then when does it become bad and globalist? Consider the Third Reich? If it was nationalist to support Germany, if Germany had taken over and dominated all of Europe, would it then become a globalist empire? If the USA consolidates with Canada and Mexico into a North American union does it cease to become nationalistic and is now a globalist force? There are major problems with placing one’s faith and trust in “the nation” which is an amorphous and amoral thing, and why I am reluctant to support nationalism. And I’m not even touching the fact that so many things my nation is doing are evil and wrong.

    Also, what’s wrong with Paganism? Paganism is a part of many, many Christian rituals, symbols, holidays, architecture, calendars, etc. Modern Christianity is a mixture of Paganism and New Testament theology.

    1. Pilgrim_Shade January 27, 2016 at 4:48 pm

      “The USA is often seen of as “nationalist” especially by many of the puppet thinkers described in this article. When the UN does something, it’s evil, but if the USA does the same thing, its awesome…These are major problems with placing one’s faith and trust in “the nation” which is why I am reluctant to support nationalism.”

      I believe what you are describing is jingoism / State worship.

      Do I believe that at one point America had more freedoms than most countries? (yes, and it still does to one degree or another)

      Do I believe that our system is superior and EVERYBODY on Earth should have the American Political System, and we should be the ‘world’s policeman’ (no).

      I think the redline is imposing your political system on others by force, at which point you’ve gone full Trotsky. What is best for the USA is probably not the best system for every country / culture. Syria is not the USA. Nor is Russia, Japan, or E. Europe. All countries have a different culture than the US, and therefore the US system will not work in those countries.

      The USA used to believe this: it was even written into the National Anthem (last stanza):

      Then conquer we must,
      When our cause, it is just.

      Using that criteria, it is my opinion there has been no just war since The War of 1812 (you might be able to argue the Mexican War…).

      1. spicynujac January 27, 2016 at 4:56 pm

        I don’t even believe the USA has what’s best for the USA, much less what’s best for the world. If we weren’t so caught up in yelling at how we are #1 when we’re not, we might actually improve and change some things for the better.

    2. The Thraex January 27, 2016 at 5:50 pm

      The First World War was a battle between French Freemasonry (The Beast) and English (Scarlet) Freemasonry. It had nothing to do with nations.

  11. tudor January 27, 2016 at 4:31 pm

    “The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy” (Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966.)

    He is the former professor of Bill Clinton. You should also check out Carroll Quigley – Evolution of Civilization.

    1. The Thraex January 27, 2016 at 6:34 pm

      Web media is already centralized. There are a handful of websites which attract the majority of traffic.

  12. Vegard Johansen January 27, 2016 at 5:28 pm

    It`s so strange that most people have forgotten how nation states came to exist in the first place. They diden`t just fall out of the sky after all, but are just an expression of our species tribal nature. The natural evolution of the different states and their interrelations have led to a gradually more stable world. This stability of course have been won at a high cost paid in wars and other crisis. By simply moving people with a different genetic expression and a similarly different culture from one part of the world to another, this hard won stability is being threatened.
    It`s in my opinion foolish not to realize this!

    1. Batman3.0 January 27, 2016 at 5:40 pm

      Most nations and peoples can only absorb so many foreigners — economically, politically, culturally, and genetically — over a period of time. I’m particularly referring to culture because a nation or region can only have one dominant culture not two nor many. I can’t move to another country or region of the world and not assimilate, respect local mores, and learn the language — If I refuse to do that either I am stupid, a rude disrespectful ass, or came to conquer.

  13. CR7 January 27, 2016 at 6:29 pm

    I don’t think people can be firmly identified as X or Y. Or in this case, nationalist or globalist. Life isnt black and white, but mostly grey. Personally I always disliked groupthink, and blindly following ideologies. I like to think with my own head, and have my own opinion on most things.

    1. anon1 January 27, 2016 at 6:54 pm

      sometimes you need X and Y to differentiate. To quote Vox Day: “moderates are the only guys that stay on the fence and shoot their own side”

  14. anon1 January 27, 2016 at 6:44 pm

    The content of your article is most agreeable Roosh.

    Though few ethnically different but natively born or mixed race individuals who might agree with you, such is the fear and false msm perjoratives round the term “nationalism”.

    Closed borders



    Homogeneous population and closed borders


    Local solutions for local problems

    War as self-defense


    Individual rights

    Armed populace

    I think many men would agree with this, but the fear over the term nationalist is because people still think and discuss it like its code for white’s-only fascist.

    I dont think there’s any issue if a person can well integrate into a community as your parents have done, so long as they are productive members of society.

    Bare in mind this criteria is more stringent for entry than natives given we know most of people and society are leeches. But thats fine, i think it makes sense for a country to want hard working productive people to come to their society rather than scroungers. There also needs to be a soft quota system.

    A possible solution would be an equivalent #notyourshield GG type movement for nationalists, that included well integrated members of society who may be ethnically different but adapt themselves to the host nation within it.

    1. dilettante February 6, 2016 at 10:26 pm

      I agree with this. Without whites & white critical analysis education, I would not be educated to think for myself and continue to follow the herd of libtards within the skincolor lines of thinking.

      i have read the northwest front’s manifesto and what they argue is not unreasonable and is quite distinctive and acceptable. they want a white homeland just like jews, just like samoans, just like japanese, etc.

      the world is a big enough place for all to live in it, just not with each other all the time & every corner of the globe is mixed. i’m sure there could be cosmopolitan zones where all can mingle but there should be a homebase for each race.

      thats why i dont understand the anger about that guy who tried to buy houses in Leith, North Dakota.

  15. Brah January 27, 2016 at 9:56 pm

    I agree with Roosh’s assessment, however I think Roosh’s analysis is wrong. What I mean is that he portrays Globalists in a way that makes it seem that a bunch of conniving elites are sitting together in a room and rubbing their hands with sly grins on their faces.

    I think the reality is that we happen to be living at a time when the current chapter of human history is coming to an end and we must turn the page. And the next page is Globalism and One World Order (or whatever you want to call it). Nationalism is an impediment to that which is why all the forces such as feminism, homosexuality, multiculturalism, and every other “ism” is being released in full force to break down those fences. NOTHING can stop that because that is the next logical step in human evolution.

    Let’s look back in history a few hundred years ago when Europe was chock-full of small insignificant kingdoms and fiefdoms that constantly stabbed each other in the back for minor gains. At some point such a system became counterproductive and the elites of the time decided that it was necessary to unify places of geographic proximity into one whole. Hence we have the birth of nations that have a common culture and spirit, usually pretty homogenous in terms of physical appearance. The map of Europe as we know it today is relatively new, not even 200 years old.

    Then following the nationalist wars of the late 1800s, WW1 and WW2, nationalism became dangerous to stability. In recent examples we have the Yugoslav Wars. So nationalism had a time a place where it was the most natural state of human beings, but that time is now waning. Hence we are entering an era of Globalism.

    If society stopped advancing and everything stayed constant since the 1940s and 1950s then yeah we could argue that there is no need to stir the pot. However the digital revolution came about and now we are super connected like never before. I mean think about it, it is absolutely amazing how we can send a text to somebody 10,000 miles away and they receive it within a second. We take it for granted now, but in human history that has never ever been possible before. So in the context of politics and business it is no longer viable for homegenous groups of people to shelter themselves from the realities of the world. This is why Nationalism WILL eventually go away because it is counter-productive to where the digital revolution is taking us as a society.

    The elites are elite because they are educated, they can think a few steps ahead and adjust their strategy accordingly. So there is no conspiracy theory to screw people over and wipe out straight dudes, the elites are just going with the flow, albeit ahead of the general populace. Just like we now accept Nationalism as the norm, in a few years we will gladly accept Globalism as the norm. Anybody who doesn’t accept it will be woefully outdated.

    The reason that Anglo-Saxon straight white men seem to be the punching bags of today’s world is because they are the strongest proponents of Nationalism because in many ways it is their brainchild. So the elites are not necessarily against straight white men because they are straight white men, but because they represent an old way of thinking.

    I know these views are not popular on this website.

    1. Roosh January 28, 2016 at 1:24 pm

      “he portrays Globalists in a way that makes it seem that a bunch of conniving elites are sitting together in a room and rubbing their hands with sly grins on their faces”

      They’re meeting in front of your face in rooms (Davos, Bilderburg, etc), and you deny this?

    2. BlueBot22 January 28, 2016 at 9:11 pm

      I get what you are saying. It seems to me that those in power will always seek to consolidate their power, and with the weapons and technology we have now globalism does seem like the natural conclusion of this.

      Not that I’m saying that that’s the best system of governance, it’s absolutely terrifying…..I find it funny how they write the textbooks now to glorify both democracy and globalism, as if having the entire world run by a handful of people can be at all democratic. I think to maximize human freedom government should be as local as possible. But how is this possible?

    3. David February 5, 2016 at 3:36 am

      “The elites are elite because they are educated, they can think a few steps ahead and adjust their strategy accordingly.”

      This is so funny ! elites are elites because they are educated and can think a few steps ahead? don’t get it wrong my friend, elites are elites because they have enough resources to support their puppets to get into key power positions and make rules to secure them, their financial matters and they control over other people.

  16. Duuuude January 28, 2016 at 5:27 am

    Hyper-Masculine behavior among Iron Age Scandinavian men:

    Jews Continue Pressure for Internet Censorship:

    Israel Demands World Internet Censorship:

    ********************WE ALL SMELL THE RATS.. DON’T WE MEN!!*********************

    ‘We are all Jews,’ Obama declares as world marks Holocaust Remembrance Day:


  17. bucky January 28, 2016 at 9:55 am

    If Italians and Greeks are white, how are Persians and Armenians not white? Its all so confusing.

    1. Johnny Five January 28, 2016 at 4:30 pm

      Persians and Armenians are a borderline group that could be assimilated if their numbers are small, a cline between Arab and European.

      Italian and Greeks are European, i.e., White, although some people would say some Greeks and Southern Italians are not White.

      1. bucky January 28, 2016 at 10:06 pm

        is it being from a country that’s geographically in europe that makes you white then? other than that there’s little genetic difference between persians and armenians and italians and greeks. it can’t be religion, since the armenians are mostly christian, unless being orthodox makes you non-white, but then how do you explain all the blond russians who are as white as they get? or maybe some kinds of orthodox are white, others not.

      2. Johnny Five January 28, 2016 at 10:14 pm

        Ethnic Russians are White. Some might debate that and say Russians are Eurasian, however. European is White, though there’s some malleability, like someone having Amerindian, Areminian (Cher is half Armenian), or jewish ancestry could be White. I’m not a hardliner like some, who would say 100% European or you’re nonWhite. Religion has nothing to do with Whiteness. Bosnian Muslims are Slavic Whites.

  18. goldbullions January 28, 2016 at 11:27 am

    Make kids

  19. Hank Davis January 28, 2016 at 11:57 am

    Just by exposing this division and the hostility of the Repub establishment to nationalism, Trump has accomplished more than any politician in 30+ years. Buchanan said similar things but lacked Trump’s charisma, fame, money and willingness/ability to treat the establishment with open disdain.

  20. Rami Hiltunen January 28, 2016 at 1:18 pm

    Basically what you posted here is female interests versus male interests. Checkout how males and females vote and you get the big picture Roosh.

  21. Rami Hiltunen January 28, 2016 at 1:21 pm

    Aaand look which gender is dominating the media… Females manipulate their own agenda through it. Thats only natural. Megan Kelly for example…

  22. Puccalove69 January 28, 2016 at 1:24 pm

    Why is globalism bad for heterosexual men?

    1. Johnny Five January 28, 2016 at 4:37 pm

      Do you want to live in a shack? Globalism is designed to return to a feudal system where the diversity destroys all social cohesion and safety, and in return for safety you work for peanuts. That’s why erasing the middle class is essential.

  23. J.j. Cintia January 28, 2016 at 2:26 pm

    Both Capitalism and Marxism describe people as economic assets. Its no surprise since they came out of the same diseased gene pool. Little Alisa Rosenbaum also played this game by starting another red herring “third way” which was just Moar Capitalism and no collective interests for Whites or especially Aryans. This game is NOW OVER. EVERYBODY KNOWS HITLER WAS RIGHT. MEIN KAMPF IS AGAIN A WORLDWIDE BESTSELLER. Suck it…

  24. Blinko23 January 28, 2016 at 6:59 pm

    Bang on in every way.

    Great to see an awakening happening in the manosphere, breaking down all aspects of the control matrix. This system has been centuries in the making. And just before it is about to completely close in on us, there is at least a glimmer of hope.

  25. skillet January 28, 2016 at 11:26 pm

    It is amazing, but there is a connection between all these things in the deep psyche. Guns, nationalism, cultural libertarianism, monotheism etc

  26. Wrathchild January 29, 2016 at 3:49 pm

    They are socialists, let’s put the national back on the socialist.

    Jk not Jk

      1. jack jackson January 31, 2016 at 9:57 pm

        Not saying any of this is true. Who knows wtf to believe on the interwebz. It could be a red herring. It could be 100 percent accurate. It could be completely hogwash. But do you feel like everything is right in the neighborhood so to speak? TIFWIW

      2. jack jackson January 31, 2016 at 10:23 pm

        Believe most of their alleged control is overblown and exaggerated. Too many moving parts to have total control. I just can’t see how it’s attainable. People see what they want to see. It’s survival of the fittest out there, and us non-jewish men have let them attain positions of leadership in all of these industries? WTF? Have all males that are non-jewish, white,black,hispanic,asian,whatever been asleep at the wheel? Jerking off to internet porn? Get out there and lift, read, and build your own empire. Fight the good fight. Or just get anonymous hackers to hit them where it hurts the most? That federal reserve yo. I think it’s too late for them anymore. Too many people be woken up. With the Snowden leaks, wikileaks, all this info available on the web. It’s donezo for them. It’s cyclical. They had their fun in the sun, now it’s our turn. They reached their hand too far into the cookie jar and awoke a sleeping giant. But I digress. It was a fun ride for them I’m sure. But no one wins them all. I think this whole show has played out the same way an infinite number of times. It’s just a different ride with the same ending. Read into QM. MWI. String Theory. In the end, just focus on yourself and building the best you that you know how. “Be the change you wish to see in the world” Ghandi

  27. Aldous Huxley February 1, 2016 at 3:50 pm

    Armenians share the R1b haplotype of Western Europe and the Caucuses. So a good portion of your DNA is genetically white. You do belong here. Sorry it sucks.

  28. Vrtrahan February 1, 2016 at 4:36 pm

    What exactly is Roosh’s problem with Paganism? Not like Pagans were anti-nationalists or anti-family or anti-masculinity. Or anti anything else on that list.

    If anything Christianity and Islam all have globalist ambitions. They are also anti-free speech (blasphemy), just look at the treatment of galileo. Is this what roosh wants – for people to be jailed for making discoveries against the established power?

    I’m a supporter of roosh but sometimes he does get it wrong. Especially on topics he knows little about.

  29. Elton February 1, 2016 at 7:24 pm

    I agree with most points of this article but don’t forget that nationalism can be easily hijacked by dictators and turn into a toxic glue for the population it holds together. Hitler, Saddam, The Ayatollas of Iran, and many other countless examples derived their power from nationalism.

  30. CanadianSamurai February 2, 2016 at 12:11 pm

    Roosh has really come far since his pua days. He see’s the world as it is, and PUA is a side affect of the dysfunction.. I love reading His articles now. Very good man.

  31. TheCreoleKing February 3, 2016 at 12:05 am

    Uncle Roosh, thank you for dropping supreme wisdom on these “mofos”…the ROK readers are eating that “red cake” like there’s no tomorrow…and trust me…I am well aware that conservative values are best for the manosphere…but at the end of the day, both sides will be represented by puppets who will do what they are told by “the powers that be.”

  32. whiskeyhammer 90 February 5, 2016 at 12:43 pm

    Conservatism has never been the friend of the working man. American “conservatism” is simply the same liberal policies while lecturing the people who elected you why you can’t help them and why they should feel bad for expecting their elected representative to do so.

  33. IsrealisRooshV February 6, 2016 at 8:34 pm


  34. dilettante February 6, 2016 at 10:15 pm

    We need an Orania for virtious men (both alpha and beta, as we all are needed leaders and followers to create a patriarchial society that benefits all men – yes im a beta)

  35. LaineeThe♊︎Cat ✔Trump FOXH🐺LE February 21, 2016 at 10:30 pm

    I’m so glad I found you, Roosh. I went into a freaking panic when I saw all your articles were gone on the ROK site. It was the first time I had brought my husband to ROK.
    I showed him a video by a guy named Black Pigeon Speaks that was very well done, which got us talking on the subjects you write about. He didn’t like it at first (he’s a product of the sexual “revolution). However, after I explained it to him, he wanted to know more about it. So, I took him to your site, and all the articles were gone!

    I’m glad you are still publishing. May you, and men like you, reign forever!
    Do you have any articles about the (partial) separation of the sexes at young ages for the purpose of learning? Or, do you know of anyone who might be exploring that subject? I am thinking we need to get that back to that.

  36. LaineeThe♊︎Cat ✔Trump FOXH🐺LE February 21, 2016 at 10:44 pm

    The Only Nationalist Candidate

  37. Kratistos March 2, 2016 at 2:11 pm

    Enlightening article Roosh. I too believe in cultural integration for minority men. At the same time, living in SJW America today is antithetical to western values. Where any display of masculinity is severely punished.

  38. Tommy Hass July 9, 2016 at 2:53 am

    “. Neomasculinity, a model of patriarchy that is compatible with nationalism (if not outright essential for its success), is a vehicle that can serve men of various backgrounds, as long as minority men such as myself understand that they must follow the rules of any homogeneous population they find themselves in. I did that in Poland and can continue to do that in the future, because I know that if you believe in masculinity and the traditional ideas that are compatible with a life of meaning, nationalism is a better outcome for you that the globalist nightmare that many Western men find themselves trapped in today.”

    There are those that wish to kill people like you and me regardless of our civility, Roosh. They don’t care if you follow their rules.

  39. Critical Thinker September 21, 2016 at 10:25 pm

    Trying to shoehorn people into one camp or the other is just as silly as the left-right charade theory. I disagree with 100% of the so-called globalists platform, but also much of this nationalist platform, so where does that pit me in your world?

    This is me:

    -Secure borders
    -Free market
    -People can, should, and do choose the best person for the job regardless of gender or race. Feminism and affirmative action only cause problems and are obsolete, if they ever provided any utility at all… the same goes for a patriarchy in most aspects.
    -America is a melting pot. Patriotic Americans come in all shades. You can make an argument for many European nations, but not America.
    -As an evangelical Christian, I still believe in constitutional powers that uphold the freedom of religion. That said, western civilization was greatly influenced by Christ and thus should be defended as such.
    -Local solutions for local problems
    -War as self-defense
    -Individual rights
    -Armed populace

  40. Robert February 12, 2017 at 3:14 pm

    Racism is NOT what made America great. It was SCIENCE and the great American values that continue to make the world a greater place.
    Now, extreme nationalists are abusing science (even though they don’t believe in it).

  41. just a girl October 17, 2017 at 9:44 pm

    Fuck globalists, fuck em all, they lost. We won.

  42. Gary Carlyle Cook August 18, 2018 at 3:06 am

    Some truth is this but i’m not either. I’m an voluntarist. Maybe y’all allowing yourself to get caught up in false dichotomy.